UPPER OHIO-SHADE NONSTRUCTURAL STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS

Transcription

1 September 2016 UPPER OHIO-SHADE NONSTRUCTURAL STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT USACE Huntington District USACE Nonstructural Flood Proofing Committee Ohio Emergency Management Agency Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio Silver Jackets

2

3 UPPER OHIO-SHADE STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Pomeroy, Meigs County, Ohio; September 12, 2016 Marietta, Washington County, Ohio; September 13, 2016 Local Stakeholder Meetings; 2:00PM-3:30PM Public Workshops / Open House; 4:00PM-7:00PM Stakeholder meetings conducted by the Ohio Silver Jackets team including, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Huntington District, USACE National Flood Proofing Committee (NFPC), Ohio Emergency Management Agency, and Ohio Department of Natural Resources will provide an overview of various agency programs and authorities and individual risk reduction techniques. These techniques include elevation, wet flood proofing, dry flood proofing, acquisition, relocation, and individual berms and floodwalls. These meetings will also allow for the needs of the Upper Ohio-Shade Watershed to be expressed by local stakeholders in order to identify specific needs and potential opportunities within the watershed. Topic Time (Minutes) Presenter 1. Ohio Silver Jackets Program 15 USACE Huntington 2. USACE Programs and Authorities 15 USACE Huntington 3. Flood Risk and Nonstructural Measures 15 USACE NFPC 4. State Mitigation Branch Overview 15 Ohio EMA 5. State Floodplain Management Overview 15 Ohio DNR 6. Open Discussion with Q&A 15 All 7. Public Workshop / Open House 180 All

4

5 PRESENTER BIOGRAPHIES STEPHEN O LEARY, AIA, CFM US Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Mr. O Leary serves as an Architect/Planner and Project Manager with the Huntington District USACE. Mr. O'Leary's duties include USACE Nonstructural Flood Risk Management SME; USACE Nonstructural Flood Proofing Committee Member; West Virginia Silver Jackets Lead, project manager/team member on the Levee Safety Policy and Procedures Team (LSPPT), developing the new Levee Safety Program Engineering Circular (EC ); Course owner for the USACE Planning Associates FRM course; Served 15 years in the Planning Branch and 10 years in Engineering and Construction Division as the District's Senior Architect. The majority of his USACE Career has focused on flood risk management studies/reports, implementation of FRM projects and mitigation of flood prone structures. Certified Floodplain Manager; Licensed Architect. JOANN COMBS, CFM, MPM US Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Ms. Combs serves as an Economist and Project Manager with the Huntington District USACE. Ms. Combs duties include performing economic analysis on USACE studies; reviewing/ updating levee screening consequences; Ohio and West Virginia Silver Jackets team Co-Lead and LRH representative on the Kentucky Silver Jackets team; provide technical assistance on Floodplain Management Services requests; works with GIS and HAZUS programs; outreach for various USACE programs and authorities including Floodplain Management services, Planning Assistance to States, and Continuing Authorities Program; serves on the Special Emphasis Committee. Ms. Combs has served 8 years with the Huntington District USACE; 4 years in Project Management and 4 years in Planning Branch. Certified Floodplain Manager; Masters in Project Management. ASHLEY STEPHENS, CFM US Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Ms. Stephens serves as a Community Planner with the Huntington District USACE. Ms. Stephens duties include Ohio Silver Jackets Co-Lead, Lead Planner on Continuing Authorities Program projects, and preparing documentation for assessment of environmental impacts in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Ms. Stephens has served 7 years in the Planning Branch and is a Certified Floodplain Manager. Ms. Stephens obtained her Masters of Science in Geography.

6 STEVE FERRYMAN, CFM Ohio Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Branch Chief Mr. Ferryman joined the Ohio Emergency Management Agency in December 2008 and serves as the Mitigation Branch Chief for Ohio. The Mitigation Branch administers FEMA s Hazard Mitigation Assistance programs for the State. The Mitigation Branch is also responsible for maintaining the State of Ohio Hazard Mitigation Plan. Prior to joining the Ohio EMA, Mr. Ferryman worked at the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water, Floodplain Management Program for nine years. Major responsibilities included assisting communities in maintaining National Flood Insurance Program compliance and providing technical assistance and information about floodplain management to Ohio communities. Mr. Ferryman helped develop and implement the Floodplain Management Program s first grant to Ohio communities, which provided funding and technical assistance to create local natural hazard mitigation plans. Mr. Ferryman started at ODNR as an intern with the Water Resources Section in He provided groundwater information and technical assistance, conducted groundwater pump tests, and represented the division at public and educational events. Mr. Ferryman graduated from The Ohio State University in 2000 with a Bachelor of Science in Sustainable Resource Management with an emphasis in Water Resources. He is a Certified Floodplain Manager and member of the Association of State Floodplain Managers. CHRISTOPHER THOMS, CFM Program Manager Ohio s Floodplain Management Program Manager and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) State Coordinator, Christopher Thoms has the privilege of leading one of the top floodplain management staffs in the nation. In a range of capacities and with various job titles, Mr. Thoms has educated Ohioans of all ages since 1978 and specifically concerning floodplain management since He and his staff are responsible for assisting communities with understanding and implementing sound floodplain management programs, helping them become and/or remain compliant with NFIP-participation requirements and state flood damage reduction standards. Mr. Thoms and his staff seek to effectively provide technical assistance and education to Ohioans concerning land use and planning for flood hazard areas. In partnership with other agencies, working to develop policies and coordinate legislation to accomplish the twin state floodplain management objectives of reducing flood damages while promoting the natural

7 beneficial functions of floodplains, Mr. Thoms and his staff seek to be advocates for Ohio communities in their floodplain management efforts. Mr. Thoms has a wealth of experience as a public speaker and instructor for students, citizens, local, state, and federal officials, members of community organizations, and professionals. He is a certified teacher, who has taught in elementary, secondary, and college classrooms, authored, A Guide to Substantial Damage Determinations for local permit officials, coauthored curriculum, and conducted a variety of training workshops around the country. Mr. Thoms was the founding editor of Ohio's floodplain management newsletter, The Antediluvian, which provides articles and information in support of the local floodplain manager through two editions each year. A Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM), he is a member of the national Association of State Floodplain Managers, an Ohio Floodplain Management Association Board member, and serves on numerous other boards, committees, and partnerships to forward floodplain management. Mr. Thoms received a Bachelor of Science degree in Resource Development from the University of Rhode Island with graduate studies in education and specialized training in floodplain management from FEMA s Emergency Management Institute. Honored with OFMA s Distinguished Member Service Award, and with the other team members received the Association of State Floodplain Managers Award for Excellence, USACE s Silver Jacket Leadership Recognition (and Jacket), ODNR s Awards Celebrating Excellence (ACE), and a Governor s Recognition for Ohio s Structure Inventory Team. KATHERINE SKALAK GOEPPNER, EI, CFM Environmental Specialist Katherine Skalak Goeppner joined to ODNR s Floodplain Management Program as an Environmental Specialist in January She coordinates the state s involvement in FEMA s latest mapping initiative, Risk MAP (Mapping, Assessment, and Planning), which is aimed at bridging the gaps between flood hazard identification and flood risk assessment. This involves collecting and prioritizing flood hazard study needs, preliminary DFIRM reviews, non-regulatory product reviews, coordinating Risk MAP meetings, developing work statements, and managing mapping grant activities and budgets. Katherine is also involved in the Great Lakes Risk MAP project, website updates and providing technical assistance to communities concerning floodplain management and floodplain engineering related questions. She is Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) and has achieved Engineer Intern (EI) as recognized by the State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors of the State of Ohio. She received a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Engineering, concentrating in Soil and Water Engineering from The Ohio State University.

8

9 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Silver Jackets Program Presented By: JoAnn Combs, CFM, MPM Ashley Stephens, CFM US Army Corps of Engineers Silver Jackets Program Program Description Collaborative interagency approach to flood risk management and hazard mitigation throughout Ohio Program Objectives Integrate hazard planning and mitigation with emergency response and recovery Leverage resources and information among state and federal agencies Define interagency communication and roles Improve public outreach in risk management Example Activities in Ohio Flood of 1913 Campaign Installation of stream gages in Marietta vicinity HAZUS Level 2 analysis for 25 counties in Ohio Flood mapping update within Marion County, Ohio Mahoning County Flood Risk Management Informational Meeting 2 1

10 Program Overview State-led Interagency approach to sharing knowledge, leveraging resources, and collaboratively reducing flood risk Develop cohesive solutions for effectively managing the floodplain Focus hazard planning and mitigation on state priorities Enhance response and recovery efforts following natural disasters Follow life-cycle risk management Watershed perspectives Various Federal, State, and local Agency Involvement (Examples) Ohio EMA, ODNR, USGS, NWS/NOAA, FEMA, NRCS, Local Conservancy Districts, Many Others Combines available agency resources Funding Programs Technical expertise Huntington District is the Lead for Ohio Buffalo, Louisville, and Pittsburgh Districts provide support to Ohio Website: 3 Types of Efforts / Funding USACE participation funded through its National Flood Risk Management Program Nonstructural Flood Warning System Floodplain Mapping Flood Emergency Preparedness Plans Evacuation Plans Levee Safety Risk Communication Workshops with communities explaining risk with local USACE levees Meetings with local officials to discuss levee risk 4 2

11 Silver Jackets Ohio Program Ohio was the first state to establish a Silver Jackets team by signing a charter in 2005 Top Three Priorities Support the State Hazard Mitigation Plan objectives and updates Flood Risk Awareness Efforts Implementation of projects funded through the Silver Jackets initiative Program Status Program has supported seven interagency projects within Ohio since 2011 providing over $550K in Federal funds and leveraging over $700K in in-kind contributions Completed Ohio Silver Jackets Interagency Projects 6 3

12 Flood Inundation Warning System Ohio and Lower Muskingum Rivers, City of Marietta, and Washington and Morgan Counties Flood Inundation Warning System Reduces flood risk by providing flood inundation maps Allows for early flood warning Accurately predict where flooding will occur Partners U.S. Geological Survey (Project Lead) National Weather Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio Emergency Management Agency Housing and Urban Development City of Marietta Washington and Morgan County Commissioners Local flood mitigation committee RFG Associates, Inc. 7 Components of a Flood Warning System USGS Streamgage Modeling and Mapping NWS Stage Predictions Internet Application 8 4

13 Flood Inundation Warning System Ohio and Lower Muskingum Rivers Continued Objectives Improve public information and early earning systems Support efforts to enhance the early flood warning system along the Muskingum River Support efforts to implement an early flood warning system along Duck Creek Improve flooding emergency response systems Outcomes Predict the date and time for the crest of the flood and generate Flood Inundation Mapping Input data into new Washington County ALERT System 9 USGS Report Additional Information USGS Flood Inundation Mapping ndationmapper.html NWS Flood Inundation Mapping Water Alert ert/ 10 5

14 Flood of 1913 Ohio Silver Jackets Public Awareness Campaign Year-long flood awareness campaign 100 th anniversary of the Great Ohio Flood Campaign Focus Flood Safety Preparedness Mitigation 11 Flood of 1913 Team Activities Silver Jackets participation and press event at OSU Weather Symposium Presented at ASFPM Conference Articles in Silver Jackets Newsletter Twitter, Facebook, and business cards with QR codes Website Flood awareness brochure /Silver%20Jackets%201913%20Flood%20br ochure.pdf Press releases by multiple agencies 1913 Flood Miami Conservancy District (MCD) Facebook page U.S. Geologic Survey 1913 Flood video MCD Facebook Page 12 6

15 HAZUS Level 1 Analysis In 2008, Silver Jackets conducted the analysis in support of the Statewide Hazard Mitigation Plan Uses the Federal Emergency Management Agency s HAZUS program and methodology to calculate damages to structures in the Special Flood Hazard Area Analysis was conducted on 47 counties Level 3 Floodplain specific data Level 2 Combination of local and default flood hazard, building, and damage data Level 1 Default flood hazard, inventory, and damage information 13 BL4 Current Ohio Silver Jackets Interagency Projects 14 7

16 HAZUS Level 2 Analysis FEMA s HAZUS program and methodology to calculate damages to structures in the Special Flood Hazard Area Level 2 analysis for 25 counties Flood analysis for the 25- and 100-year frequency based on a four square mile drainage area Created depth grids User Defined Facilities (UDF) Ohio Emergency Management Agency worked with counties to gather tax parcel information required for UDF process Level 3 Floodplain specific data Level 2 Combination of local and default flood hazard, building, and damage data Level 1 Default flood hazard, inventory, and damage information 15 Loss Avoidance Study The study will assess the performance of implemented mitigation projects in Findlay and Ottawa Ohio Emergency Management Agency (Partner) has completed Phase 1 Initial Project Selection and has collected required data components U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Buffalo District is currently working on Phase 2 Physical Parameter Analysis Phase 3 Loss Estimation Analysis 16 8

17 Marion County Floodplain Mapping Conducting a flood study along the Scioto River through Marion County as current maps are unverified Completed Bridge/Culvert Information provided by Ohio Department of Transportation and Marion County Generated inundation limits and floodway profile Incorporated USGS model of La Rue into study Ohio Emergency Management Agency worked with Marion County Commissioners and the key Villages of La Rue, Prospect, and Green Camp to sign a resolution to adopt the results of this study as best available data until a physical map revision is completed by FEMA 17 Mahoning County Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Meeting The Mahoning River is a tributary to Beaver River which runs into the Upper Ohio River Background Chronic Flooding, siltation, and standing flood risks at multiple sites in Poland Township located in Mahoning County, Ohio Purpose Present Federal and state programs that may be of assistance to Mahoning County Create brochure and media product Meeting held August 16, 2016 in Lowellville, Ohio Led by Pittsburgh District Ohio EMA, ODNR, NWS, and other partners presented Product Create video from digitally recorded meeting to share with other Ohio municipalities that experience similar flood risks Mahoning County Meeting 18 9

18 BL2 Multimedia Outreach Project will develop videos for distribution to bring flood risk awareness to the general public, as well as, local officials regarding flood risk management, and the positive impacts of nonstructural mitigation Ohio Silver Jackets team is currently developing storyboards for videos Once completed videos will be distributed and placed on partner websites, YouTube, and social media 19 Upper Ohio-Shade Regional Nonstructural Workshop FEMA s Discovery process not deployed for this watershed Nonstructural workshops will be held in Ohio and West Virginia to achieve flood risk reduction and awareness Overview of flood risk Benefits of proper floodplain management Education about effective nonstructural measures Mitigation Upper Ohio-Shade Watershed Upcoming Ohio Workshops September 12, 2016 Meigs County Public Library, Pomeroy, Ohio Local Stakeholder Presentations: 2:00pm to 3:30pm Public Workshop Session: 4:00pm to 7:00pm September 13, 2016 Marietta Public Library, Marietta, Ohio Local Stakeholder Presentations: 2:00pm to 3:30pm Public Workshop Session: 4:00pm to 7:00pm 20 10

19 USACE Ohio Silver Jackets Contact Information Lead District for Ohio HUNTINGTON DISTRICT Ashley Stephens JoAnn Combs USACE Silver Jackets Website: Supporting Districts for Ohio BUFFALO DISTRICT Laura Ortiz LOUISVILLE DISTRICT Brandon Brummett PITTSBURGH DISTRICT Mike Debes Ohio Silver Jackets State Contact Information Steve Ferryman Ohio Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Branch Chief (614) Christopher Thoms Ohio Department of Natural Resources Floodplain Management Program (614)

20

21 USACE Programs and Authorities Presented by: JoAnn Combs, CFM, MPM Ashley Stephens, CFM September 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Flood Risk Management Ecosystem Restoration Regulatory Recreation Emergency Management International and Interagency Support Water Supply USACE Missions 2 1

22 Getting Started Authorization Permission to undertake a study or project Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) Study Resolution Special Authorizations Appropriation Funding to conduct an authorized study or project President s Annual Budget Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act Continuing Resolution Act (CRA) Work Plans 3 Civil Works Timeline Feasibility months Preconstruction, Engineering & Design months Construction Varies with Complexity Operation & Maintenance by Sponsor Life of Project 4 2

23 Feasibility Phase (24-36 months) What will be accomplished? Execute Feasibility Cost Share Agreement (FCSA) Develop Project Management Plan (PMP) Employ six step planning process Obtain public input for project formulation Formulate and evaluate alternative measures Perform preliminary design Conduct environmental analyses Identify and recommend tentatively selected plan (TSP) Determine necessary real estate acquisitions and utility relocations Develop baseline cost estimate and detailed schedule Conduct external peer review Produce a Feasibility Report Cost Varies with project complexity (Up to $3M without waiver) 50% Federal, 50% sponsor cost share Entire non-federal share can be in-kind services 5 SMART Feasibility Study Process Specific Measurable Attainable Risk-Informed Timely 6 3

24 Pre-Construction, Engineering, and Design (12-24 months) What will be accomplished? Execute Design Agreement Complete detailed studies and designs needed for plans and specifications Prepare plans and specifications for the first construction contract Produce Design Documentation Report (DDR) Develop Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) Cost Varies with project complexity Non-Federal cost share is determined by program and project purpose Entire non-federal share can be in-kind services 8 Construction (Varies) What will be accomplished? Execute Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) Acquire real estate and complete relocations (if applicable) Initiate and complete first construction contract Continue design and preparation of plans and specifications for subsequent contracts Complete all construction activities Develop Operations & Maintenance manual Cost Varies with project complexity Non-Federal cost share is determined by program and project purpose 9 4

25 Operation and Maintenance (Life of Project) What will be accomplished? Operate and maintain newly constructed project including any repair, rehabilitation, or replacement Cost Varies with project complexity 100% non-federal 10 Other Programs and Authorities 11 5

26 Continuing Authorities Program (CAP) Authorities Section 14, 1946 FCA, as amended Emergency streambank protection Section 107, 1960 Rivers & Harbors Act, as amended Small navigation projects Section 205, 1948 FCA, as amended Flood damage reduction Section 206, WRDA 1996, as amended Aquatic ecosystem restoration Section 208, 1954 FCA, as amended Snagging and clearing for flood control Section 1135, WRDA 1986, as amended Ecosystem restoration at Federal projects Section 14 Examples Cost Share Study Phase Initial $100K full Federal 50% / 50% after initial $100K Construction Phase 65% Federal, 35% Sponsor Section 206 Examples Section 205 Example 12 Planning Assistance to States (PAS) and Floodplain Management Services (FPMS) Planning Assistance to States (PAS Section 22) Technical assistance to support state comprehensive water and related land resource development plans Studies are planning level of detail and do not include detailed design for project construction Cost Share (50% Federal, 50% Sponsor) PAS Example Floodplain Management Services (FPMS) Information, technical planning assistance, and guidance in identifying the magnitude and extent of flood hazards and planning appropriate use of the floodplains Cost Share (100% Federal) FPMS Example 13 6

27 Section 729 Watershed Planning Watershed planning is a collaborative process of developing a holistic plan for addressing watershed needs Flood risk reduction Aquatic ecosystem restoration Stormwater management solutions Sedimentation and water quality improvements Clean water and sanitary sewer (environmental infrastructure) Recreation opportunities Emergency preparedness plans Example Section 729 Project Muskingum Basin and Nimishillen Creek 13 Section 729 Watershed Planning Nimishillen Creek Watershed Final Watershed Assessment Great success thanks to our engaged stakeholders Resulted in a Watershed Management Plan for sustainability of the watershed Some outcomes being implemented: Installation of additional rain/stream gages Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling update Consolidation of floodplain management duties Muskingum River Basin Final Watershed Assessment Initial stakeholder meetings in June 2016 Inventory problems, opportunities, and needs within the Basin Continued focused outreach to local stakeholders Form technical working and advisory groups Establish baseline condition Develop and prioritize strategies for addressing needs throughout the Basin 7

28 Ohio Environmental Infrastructure (Section 594) Design and/or construction assistance to non-federal interests for carrying out water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects Wastewater treatment and related facilities Combined sewer overflow Water supply, storage, treatment and related facilities Surface water resource protection and development 15 USACE District Contact Information BUFFALO DISTRICT Craig Forgette Chief, Planning Management Team (716) HUNTINGTON DISTRICT Rebecca Albert Acting Chief, Planning Branch (304) LOUSVILLE DISTRICT Sharon Bond Chief, Planning Branch (502) PITTSBURGH DISTRICT Ryan Fisher Chief, Plan Formulation and Economics Section (412)

29 Flood Risk, Nonstructural Measures, The National Flood Proofing Committee (NFPC) Presented by: Stephen O Leary, AIA, CFM USACE Huntington District / NFPC September 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers Flood Risk Risk = f [(Probability of Flooding) x (Consequences)] (Probability of Flooding) is the frequency of flooding or how often does flooding occur in a particular location. Reduce the frequency of flooding and risk is reduced. (Consequences) are the potential damages and life loss associated with flooding. The structures (critical, residential, commercial, public, and industrial), land use (agricultural, urban, public), and infrastructure (highways, roads, rail, utilities) make up the potentially damageable assets. Reduce the consequences of flooding and risk is reduced. Note: If critical facilities become inoperative during a flood event the area of impact extends beyond the area of flooding (i.e. electrical service, communications, water and wastewater, etc). 2 1

30 Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Definition Nonstructural flood risk management can be categorized as a set of physical or nonphysical measures utilized for mitigating loss of life as well as existing and future flood damages. The physical measures adapt to the natural characteristics of the floodplain without adversely affecting or changing those natural flood characteristics. These measures are generally compliant with the NFIP and cause no adverse affects to the floodplain, flood stages, velocities, or the environment. Because of their ability to adapt to flood risk, these measures may also be referred to as Flood Risk Adaptive Measures and can be incorporated into existing or new structures to mitigate for potential future flood damages and life loss. 3 Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures The most common physical FRAM measures implemented for flood damage and life loss reduction are: Acquisition Relocation Elevation Dry Flood Proofing Wet Flood Proofing Basement Removal Nonphysical measures can be considered separately or as a combination of floodplain management and planning functions. Representative nonphysical measures are: Floodplain Mapping Land Use Flood Insurance Evacuation Plans Flood Warning Zoning Operational Changes Floodplain Management Plans 4 2

31 Acquisition and Demolition Acquire the structure(s) as well as the land Demolish structure(s) or sell and remove 5 Elevation Elevation is one of the most common and effective methods used to prevent flooding of living space Recommend design and construction by reputable/qualified professionals and contractors Not permitted in regulatory floodway Acceptable in A Zones 6 3

32 Flood depths of 3 feet or less Structurally sound buildings New construction Retrofitting existing buildings No basement or crawl space Dry Floodproofing 7 Wet Floodproofing City of Sacramento Fire Station 43 (Natomas, CA) Church (Grundy, VA) Town Hall (Prestonsburg, KY) 8 4

33 Relocation Individual Relocations Redevelopment Site Relocation 9 Berms, Walls, and Barriers *Not FEMA Accredited 10 5

34 Assessing the Situation Flood Characteristics Flood depth, Flood velocity, Flood duration, Rate of rise, Debris/Ice flows, Wave action, Floodway, Other Site Characteristics Location, Soil type, Topography, Site size, Urban/Rural, Other Building/Structure Characteristics Type of construction, Foundation, Condition of the building, Lower levels (Basement), Historical Significance, Other Other Considerations Building Occupancy, Building Codes, Zoning Ordinances and Local Restrictions, Other Agencies (Local / State / Federal), Aesthetics, Public Heath/Safety/Welfare, Other 11 Flood Damage Reduction Matrix 12 6

35 USACE National Nonstructural Flood Proofing Committee (NFPC) The National Nonstructural Flood Proofing Committee (NFPC) functions under the general direction of the Chief, Planning Community of Practice, Directorate of Civil Works, HQUSACE. The objectives of the NFPC are to: Promote the development and use of all nonstructural flood risk reduction measures. Risk expertise on all aspects of nonstructural flood risk reduction and associated opportunities. Disseminate nonstructural flood reduction information. Partner with Planning Centers of Expertise in all aspects of nonstructural flood risk reduction and associated opportunities. Provide leadership in all aspects of floodplain management NFPC Activities Support for Field Assessments, Plan Formulation, and Project Review Nonstructural and Floodplain Management Training Publications of Nonstructural Mitigation Measures Collaboration with ASFPM and FM Approvals on National Flood Barrier Testing and Certification Program Collaboration with FEMA on Technical Bulletin Revisions NFPC Web Site Inventory of USACE Nonstructural Flood Risk Management Activities nservo Nonstructural mitigation costing tool 16 7

36 Questions? 15 8

37 OHIO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY MITIGATION BRANCH OVERVIEW Steve Ferryman, CFM Mitigation Branch Chief Ohio EMA Mitigation Branch The mission of the Mitigation Branch is to integrate hazard mitigation principles in a variety of ways to make Ohio communities more sustainable and citizens more resilient in the face of future disaster events. Develop and maintain the SHMP Assist Ohio communities in local mitigation planning efforts Administer FEMAs Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs Chair the State Hazard Mitigation Team 1

38 OHIO is Disaster Prone! There have been 48 Federal disaster declarations statewide since Countless local disasters Ohio ranks #10 in the nation in the number of disasters Flooding is the top ranking hazard, but also highly susceptible to: Windstorms (tornado and other wind events) Thunderstorms Landslides Severe winter/ice storms 36 of 48 Federal declarations due to flooding Moderately susceptible to coastal erosion, storm surge (Lake Erie), wildfire, dam failures, and urban fires. OHIO is Disaster Prone! 2

39 Disaster Response Damage Repair Cycle DAMAGE REPAIR A Solution: Hazard Mitigation Break the Cycle DAMAGE REPAIR 3

40 What is Hazard Mitigation? Any sustained action taken to reduce long term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. Acquisition/demolition Elevation Storm water infrastructure Flood insurance Tornado safe rooms Building, zoning and floodplain management codes Wetland and riparian area protection Local Hazard Mitigation Plans Public involvement Hazard identification and Risk Assessment Goals and actions to reduce risk Implement and update at least every 5 years 4

41 Unified Hazard Mitigation Assistance Pre disaster mitigation grant programs: Pre Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Post disaster mitigation grant: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Unified HMA Each program follows this basic process: Local governments apply for grants State governments assist locals, review grants, and submit applications to FEMA FEMA reviews grant applications and makes funding determinations; also provides technical assistance to states and locals 5

42 Estimated HMA Application Timeline March HMA application cycle opens Early April Letters of Intent to Ohio EMA Late April Applications due to Ohio EMA through egrants Early June Applications due to FEMA through egrants August FEMA notifies states of projects selected for further review October FEMA begins to award projects Pre Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) Authorized under Section 203 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act Cost share 75% Federal / 25% Non Federal Projects must be consistent with mitigation plans Must meet cost effectiveness requirements Available annually based on Congressional appropriation Provides project and/or planning grants to States and local governments Projects can be for any hazard affecting a community 6

43 Pre Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) Nationally competitive funds Ohio prioritizes and forwards all eligible projects to national competition Extensive project application required Community must participate in and be in good standing with the NFIP Ohio recipients: 2003: City of Fairfield (Butler Co.) 2006: City of Fairfield, Licking County 2007: Village of Fairfax (Hamilton Co.), Village of North Lewisburg (Champaign Co.), Ohio EMA Mitigation Branch 2008: Coshocton County, Holmes County, City of Whitehall 2009: Delhi Township (Hamilton Co.) 2010: Valley View (Cuyahoga Co.), MSDGC (Cincinnati) 2011: Village of Ottawa, Village of Fairfax (Hamilton Co.) 2012: Franklin Co. Risk Assessment, Safe Room Rebate Program 2013: 6 local plan updates, Safe Room Rebate Program, and Village of Fairfax (Hamilton Co.) 2014: 6 local plan updates, Safe Room Rebate Program, Bellville community safe room, Toledo Montessori community safe room 2015: 14 local mitigation plan updates, Springfield Twp. (Summit Co.), Valley View, Twinsburg (Summit Co.), Safe Room Rebate Program Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA) Authorized under Section 1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Must be consistent with adopted flood mitigation plan (local all hazard mitigation plan can be revised to meet requirements) Community must participate and be in good standing with the NFIP Provides project and planning grants for flood mitigation only. Structures must have flood insurance at time of application. 7

44 Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA) Provides project and planning grants for flood mitigation only. Structures must have flood insurance at time of application Available annually based on Congressional appropriations Ohio recipients: 2005: Village of New Richmond (Clermont Co.) 2006: City of Defiance, Defiance County, Licking County 2007: City of Findlay (Hancock Co.), Lorain County, City of Painesville (Lake Co.) supplemental 2008: City of Findlay (Hancock Co.), Colerain Township (Hamilton Co.) 2012: Village of Versailles (Darke Co.) 2013: City of Defiance, Medina Co, Hancock County, Valley View 2014: Ottawa (Putnam Co.), La Rue (Marion Co,), Hancock County 2015: Hancock County, Stark County FMA Cost Share Up to 100% for SRL properties Up to 90% for repetitive loss properties Up to 75% for properties insured under the NFIP 8

45 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Activated after a Presidential disaster declaration Funds allocated during the recovery period Intended for investment in long term mitigation measures to reduce vulnerability to natural hazards States manage the program and set the funding priorities. State Hazard Analysis Resource and Planning Portal (SHARPP) 9

46 OEMA Mitigation Branch Contacts Web: FAX Steve Ferryman, CFM State Hazard Mitigation Officer Tel. (614) Jacob Hoover, AICP, CFM Mitigation Supervisor Tel. (614) Dean Ervin Mitigation Planner Tel. (614) Sharon Rolf Mitigation Specialist Tel. (614) Daniel Clevidence Mitigation Specialist Tel. (614) Tim Clark Mitigation Specialist Tel. (614) QUESTIONS? 10

47 Upper Ohio Shade Workshop September 2016 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) A voluntary program A community adopts and enforces a floodplain ordinance and Federally-backed flood insurance is made available to property owners throughout the community 2 1

48 NFIP is a Partnership Local State Federal 3 Federal Roles Flood Insurance Rate Maps ID the hazard areas establish boundaries for floodway and fringe areas Flood Insurance Study (FIS) hydrology (flow & frequency) hydraulics (conveyance, velocity & elevations) insurance risk zones flood elevation profiles 4 4 2

49 Federal Roles Establish building protection standards Provide flood insurance coverage Ken Hinterlong Regional Engineer (312) State Role FMP Objectives: Reduce / eliminate flood related damage, Protect & preserve the natural function of floodplains. ODNR Floodplain Management Program Ensure the wise management 6 of Ohio s floodplains 6 3

50 FMP Elements: The 3 Ps 1. Professionalism, to ensure quality & effectiveness 2. Partnerships, to build local floodplain management capability 3. Presentation, to effectively communicate the message 7 State Role ODNR Division of Water Resources Preliminary map review ODNR conducts in-depth review of maps and study Communities need to review their maps These are your maps Greater accuracy with your input You know your community Stay informed of the proposed changes ODNR developed a preliminary map checklist for local officials 8 4

51 ODNR- Division of Water Resources Floodplain Management Program Assist with update and adoption of local flood damage reduction regulations ODNR must approve (prefer to review draft prior to adoption) Higher Standards Ask us about other higher standards to improve your flood damage reduction regulations The most common higher standard is adopting a freeboard standard. State coordinator for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) for FEMA s Risk MAP initiative 9 Local Role Adopt local floodplain management regulations Permitting and inspection of construction activities Maintain records of floodplain development and mapping Outreach to the public 10 5

52 WE ARE HERE TO TALK ABOUT FLOOD RISK! 11 Concept of Base Flood FIRMs depict risk of the base flood. Regulations & Insurance based on the base flood risk A flood that has a one-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year 1% annual chance flood 12 6

53 Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) SFHA s are the blue shaded areas on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) SFHA s represent the area of the 1% chance flood and are designated as Zone A or Zone AE on the FIRM 13 Determining Your Flood Risk Nearly everyone is at risk of flooding High Risk Identified Zone A, Special Flood Hazard Area on the flood maps Medium Risk Shaded Zone X areas on the maps Low Risk Unshaded Zone X areas on the maps RISK = PROBABILITY X CONSEQUENCE 14 7

54 Flood Risk Probabilities There is a 9% chance that a house will catch fire during the life of a 30-year mortgage For a house located within the Special Flood Hazard Area, there is a 26% chance that it will be inundated by a 1% annual change flood during the life of a 30-year mortgage Over a 50 year period, the probability increases to 39% 15 How Do We Manage Risk? NFIP is a good start! Flood Insurance Risk Identification (i.e. Mapping) Risk Reduction via Floodplain Management (i.e. floodplain regulations) 16 8

55 Flood Insurance Basics May be purchased from most insurance agents who write flood insurance under a special arrangement with the Federal government (WYOs) Flood insurance is available to anyone in a community that participates in the NFIP 17 NFIP: Program History and Rating Legislation National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Flood Insurance Disaster Protection Act of 1973 National Flood Insurance Reform of 1994 Historic Rate Structures: Subsidized rates for pre-firm structures Actuarial rates for post-firm structures Factors Used for Rating Flood Zone Building Type Lowest Floor Elevation vs. Base Flood Elevation Foundation Age (pre- or post-firm) Amount of insurance and deductible 18 9

56 Recent Reforms Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Biggert Waters 2012) Made the NFIP more financially stable by raising rates on certain classes of property to reflect true flood risk; and Triggered rate changes for certain properties within a revised or updated map area to accurately reflect the flood risk. Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 Repeals and modifies certain provisions of BW-12 Makes additional program changes Leaves some parts of BW-12 intact 19 QUESTIONS??? 10