PROJECT DATA Project Title: Modena Union Street Bridge Project File : unionst.prj Run Date and Time: 9/6/03 7:47:22 AM. Project in English units
|
|
- Daniella Hamilton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HEC-RAS Version 3.1 November 2002 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street, Suite D Davis, California (916) X X XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXX XXXX X X X X XXXXX PROJECT DATA Project Title: Modena Union Street Bridge Project File : unionst.prj Run Date and Time: 9/6/03 7:47:22 AM Project in English units Project Union Street Bridge Analysis PLAN DATA Plan Title: mixed flows Plan File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.p02 Geometry Title: West Branch of Brandywine Creek Geometry File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.g01 Flow Title Flow File : Union Street Flow : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.f01
2 Plan Summary Information: Number of: Cross Sections = 10 Mulitple Openings = 0 Culverts = 0 Inline Structures = 0 Bridges = 1 Lateral Structures = 0 Computational Information Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.01 Critical depth calculaton tolerance = 0.01 Maximum number of interations = 20 Maximum difference tolerance = 0.3 Flow tolerance factor = Computation Options Critical depth computed only where necessary Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only Friction Slope Method: Average Conveyance Computational Flow Regime: Mixed Flow FLOW DATA Flow Title: Union Street Flow Flow File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.f01 Flow Data (cfs) River Reach RS 100 Yr 500 Yr West Branch Bran Boundary Conditions River Reach Profile Upstream Downstream West Branch Bran1 100 Yr Known WS = 98.4 Known WS = 0 West Branch Bran1 500 Yr Known WS = 0 Known WS = 0
3 GEOMETRY DATA Geometry Title: West Branch of Brandywine Creek Geometry File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.g01 REACH: 1 RS: 70 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.67 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.07 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.69 Stream Power (lb/ft s)
4 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.22 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.01 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 60 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.76 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.43 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.66 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.12 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.02 Cum SA (acres)
5 Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 50 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.97 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 6.85 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.34 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.24 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.03 Cum SA (acres)
6 Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 40 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.30 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.03 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.30 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.19 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.04 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface.
7 REACH: 1 RS: 36 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.15 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 7.96 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.17 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.00 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.16 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. BRIDGE
8 REACH: 1 RS: 35 Existing Bridge Structure Distance from Upstream XS = 1 Deck/Roadway Width = 33 Weir Coefficient = 2.6 Upstream Deck/Roadway Coordinates num= 7 Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Upstream Bridge Cross Section Data Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan Downstream Deck/Roadway Coordinates num= 7 Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Downstream Bridge Cross Section Data Station Elevation Data num=
9 Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan Upstream Embankment side slope = 0 horiz. to 1.0 vertical Downstream Embankment side slope = 0 horiz. to 1.0 vertical Maximum allowable submergence for weir flow =.95 Elevation at which weir flow begins = Energy head used in spillway design = Spillway height used in design = Weir crest shape = Broad Crested Number of Piers = 1 Pier Data Pier Station Upstream= 0 Downstream= 0 Upstream num= 2 Width Elev Width Elev Downstream num= 2 Width Elev Width Elev Number of Bridge Coefficient Sets = 1 Low Flow Methods and Data Energy Momentum Cd = 1.33 Yarnell KVal =.9 Selected Low Flow Methods = Highest Energy Answer High Flow Method Energy Only Additional Bridge Parameters Add Friction component to Momentum Do not add Weight component to Momentum Class B flow critical depth computations use critical depth inside the bridge at the upstream end Criteria to check for pressure flow = Upstream energy grade line
10 BRIDGE OUTPUT Profile #100 Yr E.G. US. (ft) Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) E.G. Elev (ft) Q Total (cfs) W.S. Elev (ft) Q Bridge (cfs) Crit W.S. (ft) Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) Weir Submerg Froude # Chl Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) Min El Weir Flow (ft) Hydr Depth (ft) Min El Prs (ft) W.P. Total (ft) Delta EG (ft) 1.18 Conv. Total (cfs) Delta WS (ft) 1.47 Top Width (ft) BR Open Area (sq ft) Frctn Loss (ft) BR Open Vel (ft/s) C & E Loss (ft) Coef of Q Shear Total (lb/sq ft) Br Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) Note: Yarnell answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is weir flow. The Yarnell answer has been disregarded. Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is weir flow. The momentum answer has been disregarded. REACH: 1 RS: 34 Station Elevation Data num=
11 Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.45 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 9.31 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.08 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.32 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.05 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 30 Station Elevation Data num=
12 Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.30 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.37 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.20 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.38 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.16 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 20 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan
13 E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.75 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.24 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.77 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.28 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.12 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 10 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan
14 E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.93 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.86 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.59 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.59 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.05 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 0 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB
15 Vel Head (ft) 2.43 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 9.79 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.63 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) Cum SA (acres) SUMMARY OF MANNING'S N VALUES River:West Branch Bran Reach River Sta. n1 n2 n Bridge SUMMARY OF REACH LENGTHS River: West Branch Bran
16 Reach River Sta. Left Channel Right Bridge SUMMARY OF CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS River: West Branch Bran Reach River Sta. Contr. Expan Bridge
Plan Title: Proposed(24x48 beam) Plan File : h:\padot 8-0\SR York\Str\Design\H&H\2002\SR4017.p05
HEC-RAS September 1998 Version 2.2 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street, Suite D Davis, California 95616-4687 (916) 756-1104 X X XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X
More informationIf you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.
July 12, 2018 Attn: Matt Siekielski NexBank SSB 2515 McKinney Ave, Ste 1100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Re: Flood Reclamation Feasibility Study - Limited Mr. Siekielski, We have completed a limited flood reclamation
More informationAPPENDIX F SCOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX F SCOUR ANALYSIS Lichtenstein CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOB Otter St. over Otter Creek SHEET NO. 1 OF 3 CALC. BY CAF DATE 4/24/2007 CHECKED BY GM DATE 4/25/2007 SCALE Variables for Scour Equations
More informationSR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012.
S A N T A A N A R I V E R L O C A T I O N H Y D R A U L I C S T U D Y SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE EA NO. 0C7000 Prepared for San Bernardino Associated
More informationSR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012.
C I T Y C R E E K L O C A T I O N H Y D R A U L I C S T U D Y SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE EA NO. 0C7000 Prepared for San Bernardino Associated
More informationCRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number ARABI, CITY OF 130514 CORDELE, CITY OF 130214 CRISP COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 130504 Crisp County EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 25,
More informationTrinity River Restoration Program
Trinity River Restoration Program Trinity River Bridges: Hydraulic, Scour, and Riprap Sizing Analysis US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION TECHNICAL SERVICE CENTER Prepared by Kent L. Collins
More informationAPPENDIX K Drainage Study
APPENDIX K Drainage Study Storm Drainage Study For Project 65 Sacramento, California Prepared for: Capital Station 65, LLC Prepared by: Nolte Associates, Inc. 2495 Natomas Park Drive, Fourth Floor Sacramento,
More informationSPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT
SPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS OF ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT RICHARD PRUITT (502) 315-6380 Louisville District COE richard.l.pruitt@lrl02.usace.army.mil Spillway ROUGH RIVER LAKE PERTINENT DATA Construction
More informationThe maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively.
2.1.1.2 HYDRAULIC IMPACTS VALLEY The maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively. General. The computation of valley storage
More informationChapter 5 Floodplain Management
Chapter 5 Floodplain Management Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Floodplain Management and Regulation... 1 2.1 City Code... 1 2.2 Floodplain Management... 1 2.3 Level of Flood Protection... 2 2.3.1 Standard
More informationBUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Butts County Community Name Community Number BUTTS COUNTY (UNICORPORATED AREAS) 130518 FLOVILLA, CITY OF 130283 JACKSON, CITY OF 130222 JENKINSBURG, TOWN OF
More informationDECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number ATTAPULGUS, CITY OF 130541 BAINBRIDGE, CITY OF 130204 BRINSON, TOWN OF 130670 CLIMAX, CITY OF 130542 DECATUR COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED
More informationHOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number BONIFAY, CITY OF 120116 ESTO, TOWN OF 120630 HOLMES COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 120420 NOMA, TOWN OF 120631 PONCE DE LEON,
More informationBurlington, Massachusetts
Stormwater Management Summary Proposed Restaurant Burlington, Massachusetts Prepared for ND Burlington South Avenue LLC C/O National Development 2310 Washington Street Newton, MA 02462 Prepared by /Vanasse
More informationUPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY
UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT [ EIS ] Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee Rob Newman Director, Trinity River Corridor Project, Fort Worth District 28 April 2014
More informationModel Development to Support Assessment of Flood Risk for the Columbia River Treaty Review
Model Development to Support Assessment of Flood Risk for the Columbia River Treaty Review 2012 AWRA Washington State Conference Sara Marxen, P.E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District September,
More informationRequirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations
FACT SHEET Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section 65.10 of the NFIP Regulations As part of a mapping project, it is the levee owner s or community s responsibility to provide data and documentation
More informationSENECA COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS
SENECA COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ATTICA, VILLAGE OF* 390991 BETTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF 390500 BLOOMFIELD, VILLAGE OF* 390989 NEW RIEGEL, VILLAGE OF* 390990 REPUBLIC,
More informationKentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations
Kentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations Presentation to: 2014 KAMM Conference Lake Barkley State Resort Park by Solitha Dharman Department for Environmental Protection
More informationJuly 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,
July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope, Alabama Flood Maps Fairhope Permitting Jurisdiction Coastal
More informationFINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012
FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD-00002 FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 1 Executive Summary... 2 1 Objective... 4 2 Study Approach...
More informationSkagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10
Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10 Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Process Overview Process, Schedule, & Deliverables Base Flood Elevations, Modeling, & Levees
More informationDealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management
Dealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management The following is a list of acceptable methods that the State Floodplain Management Coordinator and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
More informationSUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT
ITEM 2 Agenda of January 19, 2017 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Richard M. Johnson, Executive Director (916) 874-7606 SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY
More informationFlood Risk Assessment for Planning
Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Report on: Sample Property, Sample Town, Sample Postcode Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report Date: Sample AEL-XXXX-FRA-XXXX 28 th October 2016 Client Reference:
More informationAPPENDIX A-3: Cost Engineering
APPENDIX A-3: Cost Engineering ALISO CREEK MAINSTEM ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION STUDY Orange County, California September 217 Orange County Public Works Environmental Resources Department This page intentionally
More informationSubject: Upper Merrimack and Pemigewasset River Study Task 9 - Water Supply Evaluation
Memorandum To: From: Barbara Blumeris, USACE Ginger Croom and Kirk Westphal, CDM Date: April 14, 2008 Subject: Upper Merrimack and Pemigewasset River Study Task 9 - Water Supply Evaluation Executive Summary
More informationDevelopment Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis
Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis January 2008 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2015 J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95811 Ph. 916.447.8779
More informationThe SAS System 11:03 Monday, November 11,
The SAS System 11:3 Monday, November 11, 213 1 The CONTENTS Procedure Data Set Name BIO.AUTO_PREMIUMS Observations 5 Member Type DATA Variables 3 Engine V9 Indexes Created Monday, November 11, 213 11:4:19
More informationRegion N 1371 Pcachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309
Region N 1371 Pcachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 Section 60.3 (d) (3) of the National Flood nsurance. Program (NFP) regulations states that a community-shall "prohibit encroachments, including
More informationBucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014
Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting November 2014 Agenda for Today Risk MAP Program overview Overview of non-regulatory Flood Risk Products and datasets Discuss mitigation action Technical overview
More informationLinear Programming: Simplex Method
Mathematical Modeling (STAT 420/620) Spring 2015 Lecture 10 February 19, 2015 Linear Programming: Simplex Method Lecture Plan 1. Linear Programming and Simplex Method a. Family Farm Problem b. Simplex
More informationFLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT
Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes, Greece, 3-5 September 2015 FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES
More informationUpper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction
Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction This survey is intended to help the interagency planning committee to receive public feedback on specific flood risk reduction techniques,
More informationJANUARY 13, ILL. ADM. CODE CH. I, SEC TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES
TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES PART 3702 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DAMS Section Page No. 3702.10 Purpose 2 3702.20 Definitions 3 3702.30
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION GENERAL In 1968, the U.S. Congress passed the National Flood Insurance Act, which created
More informationJONES COUNTY GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS. Effective: May 4, 2009 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13169CV000A
JONES COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS JONES COUNTY COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER GRAY, CITY OF 130237 JONES COUNTY 130434 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) Effective: May 4, 2009 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER
More informationThe AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian
The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian The year 212 was the UK s second wettest since recordkeeping began only 6.6 mm shy of the record set in 2. In 27, the UK experienced its wettest summer, which
More informationPUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA
PUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Eatonton, City of 130218 Putnam County 130540 (Unincorporated Areas) Putnam County Effective: September 26, 2008 FLOOD INSURANCE
More informationBRIDGE ALTERNATE STUDY No. 1
BRIDGE ALTERNATE STUDY No. 1 RURAL STREAM CROSSING Prepared for U. S. Bridge Cambridge, Ohio Prepared by RICHLAND ENGINEERING LIMITED 29 North Park Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44902-1769 419/524-0074 FAX 419/524-1812
More informationDuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis
DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project Benefit Cost Analysis 1.0 Benefit Cost Analysis Preparation The BCA for this proposal was a collaborative effort between DuPage County, V3 engineering
More information7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3%
I. FLOOD HAZARD A. Definition 1. Hazard: probability of water height 2. At a Specific XY floodplain location; 3. Z can be expressed as elevation (NAVD88); gauge height; height above ground (depth). 4.
More informationCorps Water Management System (CWMS)
Corps Water Management System (CWMS) Real-Time Decision Support Modeling & Mapping Inter-Agency Flood Risk Characterization Workshop Christopher N. Dunn, P.E., D. WRE, Director Hydrologic Engineering Center
More informationAction Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps
Presentation to USACE 2012 Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Joint Workshop, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain
More informationUnderstanding and Using NFIP Data
Understanding and Using NFIP Data The understanding of those who provide information and of those who have to act responsibly in using that information is often very much misunderstood. Old Proverb Overview
More informationAPPENDIX E ECONOMICS
APPENDIX E ECONOMICS American River Watershed Common Features General Reevaluation Report Draft Economics Appendix E February 2015 Cover Photos courtesy of the Sacramento District: Sacramento Weir during
More informationOpinion of Probable Cost
Appendix E Opinion of Probable Cost 01054/8410233/14/Rohner_Alt_Analysis_Report Rohner Creek Flood Control, Habitat and Seismic Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Cost Alternative 1: Improved Channel
More informationJENKINS COUNTY, GEORGIA
JENKINS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Jenkins County JENKINS COUNTY 130118 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) MILLEN, CITY OF 130119 Revised: August 5, 2010 FLOOD INSURANCE
More informationMONTGOMERY COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS)
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NEW YORK Montgomery County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AMES, VILLAGE OF 360439 GLEN, TOWN OF 361295 AMSTERDAM, CITY OF 360440 HAGAMAN, VILLAGE OF
More informationNon Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids
Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids Virginia Floodplain Management Association 2015 Floodplain Management Workshop October 29th, 2015 Nabil Ghalayini, P.E., PMP, D.WRE, CFM
More informationENGINEERING REPORT FREEBOARD ANALYSIS. HOUSATONIC RIVER and NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS SECTION 1. ANSONIA and DERBY, CONNECTICUT
ENGINEERING REPORT FREEBOARD ANALYSIS HOUSATONIC RIVER and NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS SECTION 1 ANSONIA and DERBY, CONNECTICUT December 2010 MMI #1560-119 and #3118-03 Prepared for: City
More informationMaricopa County DOT. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning. March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Maricopa County DOT Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) A strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining,
More informationChicopee River CSO Project Springfield Water & Sewer Commission. APWA Congress September 9, CSO Control Plan. CSO Control
Chicopee River CSO Project Springfield Water & Sewer Commission APWA Congress September 9, 2007 CSO Control Plan Typical Approach Different Thinking on Controlling Costs Case Example Springfield MA CSO
More informationDynamic Response of Jackup Units Re-evaluation of SNAME 5-5A Four Methods
ISOPE 2010 Conference Beijing, China 24 June 2010 Dynamic Response of Jackup Units Re-evaluation of SNAME 5-5A Four Methods Xi Ying Zhang, Zhi Ping Cheng, Jer-Fang Wu and Chee Chow Kei ABS 1 Main Contents
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality WHAT IS A FLOOD? The National Flood Insurance Program defines a flood as a general and temporary condition of partial
More informationPaschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula Kokovinos Konstantinos Koujianos Ioannis Vatistas Panagiotis
Evros River Flood Lavara Case Study Chouvardas Konstantinos (Coordinator) Papapostolou Christos Chamitidou Maria Partsias Christos Doulgeraki Chrisoula Paschali Stauroula Paschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula
More informationLUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA
LUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Lumpkin County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER DAHLONEGA, CITY OF 130129 LUMPKIN COUNTY 130354 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY
More informationScottish Planning Policy (SPP) Compensatory Flood Storage / Flood Mitigation
Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) Compensatory Flood Storage / Flood Mitigation Marc Becker SEPA Flood Unit Manager Joint SHG / SHGS meeting 8 th September 2010 Smith Art Gallery and Museum, Dumbarton Road,
More informationVOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
VOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ARCADIA, CITY OF 190694 BREDA, CITY OF* 190926 CARROLL, CITY OF 190041 CARROLL COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 190039 COON RAPIDS,
More informationMONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA
MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Monroe County Community Name Community Number *CULLODEN, CITY OF 130543 FORSYTH, CITY OF 130359 MONROE COUNTY 130138 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) *No Flood Hazard
More informationPublic Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study
Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 11 &
More informationIN THE LITTLE APPLE A PRESENTATION FOR THE 2017 ASFPM ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, MO, MANAGING FLOOD RISK IN THE HEARTLAND
A PRESENTATION FOR THE 2017 ASFPM ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, MO, MANAGING FLOOD RISK IN THE HEARTLAND NONSTRUCTURAL 237 217 200 ASSESSMENT 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27.59 IN THE LITTLE
More informationPeter Brett Associates. Assessing Flood Risk and River Modelling Doulton Brook Development, West Midlands
Peter Brett Associates Assessing Flood Risk and River Modelling Doulton Brook Development, West Midlands PLANNING POLICY INTRODUCTION For any proposed residential development close to a river or watercourse
More informationREVISED: MARCH 7, 2019 VOLUME 1 OF 3 MISSOULA COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME
VOLUME 1 OF 3 MISSOULA COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME MISSOULA COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER 300048 MISSOULA, CITY OF 300049 REVISED: MARCH 7, 2019 FLOOD INSURANCE
More informationFlood Insurance and Levees
Flood Insurance and Levees NFIP Requirements are found in 44 (CFR) Section 65.10 General Requirements 65.10(a) Design Criteria 65.10(b) Operation Plans and Criteria 65.10(c) Maintenance Plans and Criteria
More information1 Interest: Investing Money
1 Interest: Investing Money Relating Units of Time 1. Becky has been working at a flower shop for 2.1 yr. a) How long is this in weeks? Round up. 2.1 yr 3 wk/yr is about wk b) How long is this in days?
More informationWASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS
WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER *MACKVILLE, CITY OF 210475 SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF 210220 WASHINGTON COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 210365 *WILLISBURG, CITY
More informationMexican Gold Corp. (TSX-V: MEX) Recommendation - BUY Target Price - C$ QUARTERLY UPDATE (November 26, 2018) comprehensiveresearch.
Mexican Gold Corp. (TSX-V: MEX) Recommendation - BUY Target Price - C$ 0.75 QUARTERLY UPDATE (November 26, 2018) comprehensiveresearch.ca Maintaining Our Buy Rating and Adjusting Target Price to C$ 0.75
More informationChapter 6 - Floodplains
Chapter 6 - Floodplains 6.1 Overview The goal of floodplain management is to reduce the potential risks to both existing and future developments, and infrastructure, in the 100-year floodplain. Over the
More informationFlood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management COUNTY SUMMARY COUNTY: MONAGHAN (Information correct as of 31/12/2017) CONTENTS: 1. OPW Capital Investment to 31 December 2017 a. Major Flood Relief Schemes 1995 2017 b. Minor Flood
More informationSECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA
SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA Contents 9.1. NFIP Maps and Data... 9-2 9.1.1. Adopting and enforcing NFIP floodplain maps and data... 9-2 9.1.2. Adopting and enforcing more restrictive data... 9-2 9.1.3. Annexations...
More informationDES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development
DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS Flooding Risk & Impact to Development River System Des Moines Flood Protection Des Moines Flood Protection cont. Infrastructure Over 24 miles of levees 21stormwater pump stations
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000
PDF Version [Printer friendly ideal for printing entire document] BRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000 Published by Important: Quickscribe offers a convenient and economical updating service
More informationEXST7015: Multiple Regression from Snedecor & Cochran (1967) RAW DATA LISTING
Multiple (Linear) Regression Introductory example Page 1 1 options ps=256 ls=132 nocenter nodate nonumber; 3 DATA ONE; 4 TITLE1 ''; 5 INPUT X1 X2 X3 Y; 6 **** LABEL Y ='Plant available phosphorus' 7 X1='Inorganic
More informationEmpirical Rule (P148)
Interpreting the Standard Deviation Numerical Descriptive Measures for Quantitative data III Dr. Tom Ilvento FREC 408 We can use the standard deviation to express the proportion of cases that might fall
More informationDEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS. No. R February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998
STAATSKOERANT, 24 FEBRUARIE 2012 No. 35062 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS No. R. 139 24 February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998 REGULATIONS REGARDING THE SAFETY OF DAMS IN TERMS OF SECTION
More informationRequest for Removal of Lands from Floodplain & City Floodplain Map Amendment Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Pump Station 18, Monona, WI
999 Fourier Drive, Suite 201 Madison, Wisconsin 53517 (608) 826-0532 phone (608) 826-0530 FAX www.vierbicher.com September 6, 2016 Ms. Sonja Reichertz Planning & Community Development Coordinator Plan
More informationSubsoil Exploration. Foundation Engineering. Solution Givens:
Problems: 1. Site investigation is to be made for a structure of 100m length and 70m width. The soil profile is shown below, if the structure is subjected to 200 KN/m 2 what is the approximate depth of
More information(24 February to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF (Gazette No , Notice No See Act for commencement dates)
(24 February 2012 - to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF 1998 (Gazette No. 19182, Notice No. 1091. See Act for commencement dates) REGULATIONS REGARDING THE SAFETY OF DAMS IN TERMS OF SECTION 123(1) OF THE
More informationDES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS
VOLUME 1 OF 1 DES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME CID CITY OF BURLINGTON 190114 CITY OF DANVILLE 190115 DES MOINES COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 190113 CITY OF MEDIAPOLIS 190615
More informationWOOD COUNTY, WV FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS
WOOD COUNTY, WV FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 Section 1.1 Intent 3 Section 1.2 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions 3 Section 1.3 Applicability 3 Section 1.4 Matters
More informationSMALL RENEWABLE ENERGY (HYDRO) INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM
SMALL RENEWABLE ENERGY (HYDRO) INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM Contact Name: Company / Organisation: Address: Telephone: email: Insured Parties (Parties to be named in the policy as insured) PLEASE NOTE: Contract
More informationTable 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal
MnDNR LOMC Guide This document has been prepared by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources floodplain staff and is intended to provide assistance with LOMR/CLOMR submittals. This information is
More informationMEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS
VOLUME 1 MEIGS COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER MEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 390387 MIDDLEPORT, VILLAGE OF 390388 POMEROY, VILLAGE OF 390389 RACINE, VILLAGE OF 390390
More informationFederal Emergency Management Agency
Page 1 of 6 Issue Date: September 27, 2010 Effective Date: February 14, 2011 Follows Conditional Case No.: 08-08-0873R DETERMINATION DOCUMENT COMMUNITY AND REVISION INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option
Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option October 16, 2012 Q1. Why has the position on a ring-levee changed? The feasibility study recommended buy-outs for areas with staging
More informationHerkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners
Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners FLOOD INSURANCE Who Should Purchase Flood
More informationVOLUME 1 OF 1 GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS GONZALES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS
VOLUME 1 OF 1 GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME GONZALES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER 480253 GONZALES, CITY OF 480254 NIXON, CITY OF 481114 SMILEY, CITY OF*
More informationAbstract. An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley
An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley At left: Crew members place sandbags during flood fighting effors (DWR). By David Ford, PhD, PE, D.WRE; Joanna
More informationPublic Notice. Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks. Date: January 24, 2019
Public Notice Number: CESWF-18-MITB Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks Date: January 24, 2019 Purpose The purpose of this Public Notice is to inform you of mitigation banking guidelines being
More informationLAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA
LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Laurens County ALLENTOWN, TOWN OF 130605 CADWELL, TOWN OF 130606 DEXTER, TOWN OF 130607 DUBLIN, CITY OF 130217 DUDLEY, CITY
More informationModeling Surfzone Tracer Plumes AGU Meeting of the Americas Falk Feddersen, David B. Clark, & R.T. Guza Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Modeling Surfzone Tracer Plumes 21 AGU Meeting of the Americas Falk Feddersen, David B. Clark, & R.T. Guza Scripps Institution of Oceanography HB6 Experiment HB6 Experiment Y (m) ï 1K m h (m) ï ï ï ï ï
More informationUSACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification
USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification Richard J. Varuso, Ph.D., P.E. Deputy Chief, Geotechnical Branch Levee Safety Program Manager USACE - New Orleans District 17 Nov 2011 US Army
More informationMarin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting
Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting May 26, 2010 6:30 8:30 pm Mill Valley City Hall Council s Chambers PG&E Utilities at Bothin Marsh PG&E Utilities
More informationKing County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016
King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process Webinar June 14, 2016 Agenda King County DFIRM Study History What is/has been done Process for moving forward Seclusion Seclusion mapping process Seclusion
More informationEFFINGHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA
EFFINGHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Effingham County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER EFFINGHAM COUNTY 130076 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) GUYTON, CITY OF 130456 RINCON, CITY OF 130426 SPRINGFIELD,
More information1 Adda247 No. 1 APP for Banking & SSC Preparation Website: bankersadda.com sscadda.com store.adda247.com
1 Adda247 No. 1 APP for Banking & SSC Preparation Q41. The upstream speed of a boat is 18 km/hr which is 500% more than the speed of stream. Find how much distance boat will cover in 3 hours while travelling
More informationTechnical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo
Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo September 8, 2017 City of Cedar Rapids E Avenue Watershed Drainage Study Memo Date: Tuesday,
More informationCHAPTER TOPICS STATISTIK & PROBABILITAS. Copyright 2017 By. Ir. Arthur Daniel Limantara, MM, MT.
Distribusi Normal CHAPTER TOPICS The Normal Distribution The Standardized Normal Distribution Evaluating the Normality Assumption The Uniform Distribution The Exponential Distribution 2 CONTINUOUS PROBABILITY
More information