Maricopa County DOT. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning. March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

Transcription

1 Maricopa County DOT Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

2 Transportation Asset Management (TAM) A strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, upgrading, and expanding physical assets effectively throughout their lifecycle. It focuses on business and engineering practices for resource allocation and utilization, with the objective of better decision making based upon quality information and well defined objectives. - AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways, Planning Subcommittee on Asset Management 2

3 MCDOT Mission Promote quality of life and economic vitality Provide a system that is safe and efficient for all modes of travel Encourage a seamless regional transportation network Protect past and future transportation investments through strategic system preservation 3

4 MCDOT TAM Goals and Objectives Goal 1 Instill TAM as an integral part of the Department business model to foster adoption. 2 Utilize a risk management framework to identify threats and opportunities for projects and programs. 3 Preserve transportation assets, such as pavement and bridges. 4 Make sure the TAMP influences and is influenced by other plans. 5 Enlist the TAMP to cross Division and Branch processes and unify activities in order to advance Department collaboration. 6 Identify sustainable funding patterns for roads and bridges in order to address needs. 7 Stabilize the "peaks and valleys" of project schedules (design and lettings) to improve project delivery. 8 Improve data quality and knowledge in an effort to progress toward structured, data-driven decision-making processes. 4

5 TAM Building Blocks TAM Investment Strategies Financial Plan Inventory Condition Performance Targets Lifecycle Costs Risk 5

6 Asset Management Lifecycle Planning Evaluating Budgeting Reporting Scheduling Performing 6

7 Asset Inventory and Condition Collect inventory and condition data for a representative sample of MCDOT roadway using strictly controlled data collection methods (210) 0.1-mile survey samples Sample width is generally ROW fence to ROW fence Review of samples to ensure representation of assets Road Strata Centerline Miles 0.1-mile Sections Required for 90/10% Pass/Fail Rate +/-7% Local (minus unpaved) Collector Arterial Total 2, Aggregated MOE for All Roads: +/- 4.04% 7

8 Data Collection Approach Collect data for 36 roadway assets/features Spreadsheet-based form; tablet-based data collection enabled 8

9 Defining Asset Condition Data collection process focuses on counting inventory and deficiency Performance-based budget model determines LOS based on range established for each asset 9

10 LOS Scorecards Model creates scorecards for graphic representation of LOS 10

11 Performance-Based Budgeting A systematic way to allocate funds Addresses gap between available resources and maintenance needs Quantifies and prioritizes work backlog Provides compelling budget information Effectively communicates impact of doing nothing (delayed maintenance) An approach for achieving near- and longterm asset performance goals 11

12 Performance-Based Budgeting Compare current condition assessment grades to LOS targets Calculate Level of Effort required to achieve target; aggregated to become annual budget Managers develop annual work plans to achieve targets 12

13 Performance-Based Budget Output 2015 Statewide LOS-BASED WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET - MAINTENANCE Annual Budget (For LOS-Rated Assets Only) Group Drainage Roadside Feature Fence Guardrail Impact Attenuators Sweeping Litter Shoulders Unpaved Ditches Channels Pipes & Culverts Current LOS Target LOS B- A A+ C+ C+ C+ Target FY Yrs to Target 1 A B- A B B- A B Activity Description LOE Qty Units % Distrib. Factor Annual Work Quantity Units Labor Equipment Materials Expenditure Total 1505 ROUTINE FENCE MAINTENANCE 1,697,986 LIN FT ,375,084 LIN FT 1,652, , ,821 2,688 2,420, ACCIDENT-CHAIN LINK FENCE REPAIR 1,697,986 LIN FT ,610 LIN FT 118,999 48,185 57, , ACCIDENT BARBED WIRE FENCE REPAIR 1,697,986 LIN FT ,557 LIN FT 90,520 26,482 14, , CONTRACT FENCE INSPECTION & MINOR REPA 1,697,986 LIN FT ,324 LIN FT ,237 23, CONTRACT NEW FENCE INSTALLATION 1,697,986 LIN FT ,412 LIN FT 2, , , ,864, , ,969 1,001,774 3,779, ACCIDENT GUARDRAIL REPAIR 1,130,026 LIN FT ,504 LIN FT 701, , ,172 1,532 1,773, ROUTINE GUARDRAIL REPAIR 1,130,026 LIN FT ,026,129 LIN FT 354, , , , CONTR GR INSTAL & REPAIR-ADOT FURN MATL 1,130,026 LIN FT ,172 LIN FT , ,493 1,018, CONTR GR INSTAL/RPR-CONTRACT FURN MATL 1,130,026 LIN FT ,221 LIN FT ,273,714 1,274, ,056, ,797 1,194,273 1,957,900 4,650, CRASH ATTENR. (GUARDR.) REPAIR-ACCIDENT 8,842 LIN FT ,719 LIN FT 64,475 23, ,972 7, , OTHER ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE 8,842 LIN FT LBR HRS 4,124 2, ,621 8, ,599 25, ,289 9, , MECHANICAL SWEEPING 11, FT LM , FT LM 325, ,458 1, , CONTRACT MECHANICAL SWEEPING 11, FT LM , FT LM , , , ,458 1, , , FULL-WIDTH LITTER PICK-UP 40,895 ACRES ,548 ACRES 86,295 22,335 10, , SPOT LITTER & DEBRIS PICK-UP 40,895 ACRES ,045 LBR HRS 2,073, ,001 9,754 51,166 2,803, REMOVAL OF DEAD ANIMALS FROM RDWY{NE 40,895 ACRES ,998 LBR HRS 137,766 35,716 1,284 11, , ,297, ,052 21,874 63,332 3,110, BLADE UNPAVED SHOULDERS 17, FT LM ,299-77,356 92,029 7, , REPAIR / REMOVE SHOULDERS 17, FT LM , , , ,317-1,187, , , ,749-1,363, CLEAN CUTS/CHANNELS/DIKES/EMBANK CURB 2,473,952 LIN FT ,085,997 LIN FT 837, , , ,885, MINOR SLIDE REMOVAL 2,473,952 LIN FT ,876,362 SQ FT 2,839,478 2,412, ,252, OTHER DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 2,473,952 LIN FT ,883 LBR HRS 147, ,346 31, , ,824,303 3,504, , ,481, CLEAN CUTS/CHANNELS/DIKES/EMBANK CURB 1,972,667 LIN FT ,972,667 LIN FT 791, , , ,783, , , , ,783, ROUTINE DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE 96,181 EACH ,522 EACH 556, ,233 55,496 2,609 1,046, EMERGENCY DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE 96,181 EACH ,368 EACH 105, ,332 9, , OTHER DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 96,181 EACH LBR HRS 13,433 14,849 2, , CONTRACT HYDRO VACUUM-ST PROV TRF CNT 96,181 EACH ,024 EACH 14,551 21, , , , ,148 67, ,417 1,459,908 13

14 Multi-Year Planning Scenarios Group Current Data 1-Yr Goal 3-Yr Goal 5-Yr Goal Feature Current LOS Current Budget Target LOS Target Budget Target LOS Target Budget Target LOS Target Budget Total Budget 143,649, ,631, ,756, ,181,892 Unallocated Funds 17,000,000 19,500,000 19,500,000 19,500,000 Non-LOS Spending 72,465,373 72,465,373 72,465,373 72,465,373 LOS Spending 54,183,627 74,666,249 59,790,653 57,216,519 Fence 2,774,508 3,779,191 3,109,402 2,975,445 Guardrail B- 3,058,079 A 4,650,452 A 3,588,870 A 3,376,554 Roadside Impact Attenuators Length Requiring Sweeping A+ 663,467 A 652,457 C+ 689,602 A 900,206 A 659,797 A 759,803 A 661,265 A 731,723 Length Requiring Litter Patrol (Phx) B- 312,928 A 449,614 A 358,489 A 340,264 Length Requiring Litter Patrol (non-phx) A+ 1,377,521 C- - C- 290,180 C- 725,117 Shoulders A 1,351,232 1,308,816 1,337,093 1,342,749 Ditch C+ 338,893 B 5,187,493 B 1,955,093 B 1,308,613 Drainage Lined Channels C+ 1,623,039 1,783,358 1,676,479 1,655,103 Pipes & Culverts B- 1,455,676 B- 1,459,908 B- 1,457,087 B- 1,456,522 Alligator Cracks B- 702,743 B- 1,478,879 B- 961,455 B- 857,970 Bleeding 463,416 15,854,291 5,593,708 3,541,591 Paved Surfaces Cracks > 1/4" Cracks < 1/4" C D+ 6,603,889 2,177,664 C C- 3,814,785 3,400,808 C 5,674,188 C- 2,585,379 C 6,046,068 C- 2,422,293 Potholes 1,335,915 A+ 1,631,882 A+ 1,434,571 A+ 1,395,109 Raveling B 5,812,465 B 4,126,374 B 4,706,340 B 4,822,333 14

15 Work the Plan Evaluate the Work Work is performed and accomplishment data is tracked within the OMS Labor, equipment, material, and accomplishment (e.g., linear feet of guardrail repaired/replaced) reported for each work order Cycle starts over to evaluate LOS and tracking towards LOS targets Ability to display LOS trends over time progress toward goal 15

16 TAM at MCDOT Phase 1: Establish a Baseline Phase 2: Develop a TAM Roadmap Phase 3: Document TAM Program Details improved processes; updated annually Phase 4: Implementation Cartegraph Operations Management System (OMS) implementation underway 16

17 Summary Proven TAM processes are the foundation for optimizing asset investment Involves all levels of the organization Having good asset inventory and condition data is critical for success Technology enables TAM to be sustainable Supports improvement Provides data for making more-informed decisions Demonstrates impact of those decisions 17

18 QUESTIONS DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.