Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Transcription

1 Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results Spring 2018

2 Survey Summary The survey was conducted in late May through mid-june of Residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 942 (338 paper) Participation rate = 19%

3 Respondent Information

4 What is your age? 30% 30% 25% 22% 20% 18% 15% 14% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1% and older

5 Do you live in the Lake Mills Area School District? 0.43% 6% 94% Yes No Not sure

6 In which municipality do you reside? 100% 80% 60% 61% 40% 20% 22% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 1% 0%

7 Are you an employee of the Lake Mills Area School District? 14% 86% Yes (n=133) No (n=809)

8 Do you have children attending school in the Lake Mills Area School District? 50% 50% Yes (n=469) No (n=473)

9 Please mark ALL other relationships you have with the Lake Mills Area School District: 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 40% 31% 28% 24% 19% 10% 0%

10 If you have school-aged children, what school(s) do they attend? Lake Mills Elementary School 45% Lake Mills Middle School 42% Lake Mills High School 39% Private school 4% Other 4% Public school outside of District 2% Home-school 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

11 How would you like to receive information from the District? District mailings School/District website Instant/Text messaging Facebook Lake Mills Leader Automated phone messenger Attend meetings Parent organizations Attend School Board meetings TV/Cable Watertown Daily Times Jefferson Daily Union Other 27% 25% 35% 5% 35% 16% 31% 28% 2% 17% 7% 14% 2% 7% 5% 6% 7% 3% 13% 3% 8% 2% 1% 1% 45% 54% 65% 90% Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Parents (Non-Staff) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

12 Overall Satisfaction with the Lake Mills Area School District

13 How well is the District doing in the following areas? Great (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Building pride in our community Delivering a high-quality educational experience Preparing students for life after high school Maintaining school facilities Keeping the public informed Spending tax dollars wisely

14 Overall, how satisfied are you with the Lake Mills Area School District? (All Respondents) 100% 80% 60% 53% 40% 28% 20% 0% 8% 9% 2% Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Very unsatisfied No opinion

15 Facility Planning Background Information

16 Updating and expanding the high school has been identified as the next phase of the District s Facility Master Plan. This phase would address the following needs: 1. Expand Capacity to Meet Enrollment Growth In 2016, the District hired an independent firm to develop student enrollment projections using only resident students. Resident enrollment projections indicate: The High School is projected to be over capacity in two years. The Middle School will be over capacity in four years. The Elementary School will be over capacity in six years. It is important to note that it will take two years after a referendum is approved before school construction is completed. 2. Expand and Update High School Classrooms and Labs The High School needs more general education (English, math, social studies) classrooms as well as updated space for tech ed (shop), agriculture, and family and consumer science. Academic support areas such as the library (LMC), cafeteria and gym also require updates and additional space. 3. Update Indoor and Outdoor Athletic Areas Currently, the High School baseball and football fields are at the Middle School. Due to the age and location of fields (built into a hill), there are significant updates needed as well as ongoing safety concerns. Additionally, the Middle School location creates challenges for scheduling, transportation and student supervision. There is also a growing demand for gym space to meet the needs of community and youth recreation programming. If the public chooses to address any of these projects, the primary way to obtain funding is through a capital referendum.

17 What advice would you give the School Board regarding updating District facilities? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 91% 80% 70% 78% 60% 56% 40% 20% 0% Explore a referendum to fund the next phase of the District's Facility Master Plan 25% 14% 16% 7% 2% Do nothing at this time 7% 15% Not sure/need more information 19% All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

18 High School Updates

19 The District explored building a new high school. However, the preliminary cost estimate of $86 million exceeds the District s borrowing capacity. Therefore, the School Board and Administration is recommending the following projects at the high school: Add six classrooms with flexible instructional areas. Renovate and update the agriculture areas to support class offerings in ag science, horticulture, veterinarian science as well as the technical education (shop) areas to support class offerings in building and construction, metals, woods, small power equipment, welding, engineering and architectural design. Renovate the library to create student collaboration and small group instruction areas. Relocate and expand the weight room with separate exterior access. The cost to address the projects identified above is approximately $6.9 million.

20 Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 30% 40% 70% Yes Undecided 11% Probably no Definitely no 8% 11% 19% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

21 Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 33% 54% 87% Yes Undecided 6% Probably no Definitely no 3% 4% 7% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

22 Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 30% 49% 79% Yes Undecided 8% Probably no Definitely no 6% 7% 13% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

23 Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 27% 29% 56% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 11% 17% 28% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

24 Additional Analysis for the $6.9 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(79%) +.75 (56%) = 61.75% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(81%) +.75 (61%) = 66.00%

25 Additional Projects for Consideration

26 1. Additional Gym and Indoor Athletic Support Areas There is a growing demand for gym space to meet the needs of community and youth recreation programming. Updates are also needed to the locker rooms to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) code requirements. The project would: Build a 3-court competition gym Provide additional space for practices, athletic events and large school or community events Provide space for community programs (i.e., senior walking, adult/youth evening basketball, volleyball, etc.) Renovate locker rooms Add parking spaces Add a dedicated entrance Relocate the bus barn Reconfigure the lower gym into the weight room Estimated cost: $8 million

27 Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 23% 23% 46% Yes Undecided 17% Probably no Definitely no 15% 22% 37% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

28 Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 27% 32% 59% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no Definitely no 8% 15% 23% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

29 Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 24% 33% 57% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 11% 16% 27% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

30 Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 11% 18% 29% Yes Undecided 19% Probably no Definitely no 20% 32% 52% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

31 Additional Analysis for the $8 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(59%) +.75 (29%) = 36.5% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(61%) +.75 (35%) = 41.5%

32 2. Outdoor Athletics After studying the various options, the District is recommending relocating the football field and building an outdoor athletic complex at the High School. The project could include: Installing a multi-use artificial turf field for football, soccer and physical education classes, as well as outdoor activities such as marching band practice Building a press box and installing a lighting and sound system Adding bleachers and parking Resurfacing and expanding the track, including field events Expansion of existing concession stand restrooms In addition, the project could include: Partnering with the City to relocate the baseball field to Wallace Park Converting the existing Middle School field to greenspace, playgrounds and recreation use Estimated cost: up to $3.275 million

33 When do you feel the District should relocate the football field to the High School campus? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 52% 43% 33% 18% 29% 26% 28% 30% 32% 21% 20% 14% 17% 13% 15% 9% 0% As soon as possible Within the next 10 years Never Undecided All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

34 Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes 29% Probably yes 24% 53% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 13% 19% 32% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

35 Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes 40% Probably yes 32% 72% Yes Undecided 14% Probably no Definitely no 4% 10% 14% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

36 Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 42% Probably yes 23% 65% Yes Undecided 12% Probably no Definitely no 10% 13% 23% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

37 Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 12% Probably yes 22% 34% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no Definitely no 17% 31% 48% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

38 Additional Analysis for the $3.275 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(65%) +.75 (34%) = 41.75% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(69%) +.75 (40%) = 47.25%

39 Athletic Field Repairs If the community does not support building a new outdoor athletic complex at the High School campus, an investment of $700,000 will be needed to: Repair retaining wall and walkway Replace press box Please note: This option would not increase parking or seating.

40 Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes 27% Probably yes 29% 56% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 15% 14% 29% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

41 Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes 23% Probably yes 30% 53% Yes Undecided 21% Probably no Definitely no 11% 15% 26% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

42 Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 34% Probably yes 26% 60% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 14% 11% 25% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

43 Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 20% Probably yes 31% 51% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 16% 17% 33% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

44 Additional Analysis for the $700,000 referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(60%) +.75 (51%) = 53.25% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(65%) +.75 (56%) = 58.25%

45 Project Prioritization

46 Which project do you believe is a higher priority? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 31% 49% 31% 40% 34% 35% 35% 26% 29% 27% 48% 20% 16% 0% Updating the outdoor athletic complex Building a gym and indoor athletic support areas Undecided/No opinion All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

47 Swimming Pool Lake Mills residents have talked about the need for a swimming pool for many years. Based on similar projects in neighboring districts, construction of an indoor pool would cost approximately $10 to $12 million. In addition, it would cost approximately $150,000 annually to heat, clean and supervise the pool, which would need to be funded outside of the current budget.

48 Would you support the District exploring a referendum that would cost $10-$12 million to build an indoor swimming pool? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 40% 35% 53% 28% 45% 42% 34% 57% 15% 23% 13% 15% 0% Yes No Undecided All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

49 Thank you!