EU Cohesion Monitor 2018
|
|
|
- Patricia Blair
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EU Cohesion Monitor 2018 An assessment of cohesion in the 28 member states of the European Union an initiative of Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
2 ECFR/238 Copyright of this publication is held by the European Council on Foreign Relations. You may not copy, reproduce, republish or circulate in any way the content from this publication except for your own personal and non-commercial use. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the European Council on Foreign Relations. ECFR December 2017 ISBN: Published by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), Tennyson House , Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5PA, United Kingdom Data visualization and interactive PDF by Dieter Dollacker and Dirk Waldik, Denkbuilder Berlin Document Version 1.1 Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
3 duction Rationale duction Rationale FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The EU Cohesion Monitor is an index of the 28 member states of the European Union and their readiness for joint action and cooperation. The monitor uses ten indicators to conceptualize and illustrate the foundations, national trajectories and future potentials of cohesion in Europe. The EU Cohesion Monitor is part of the Rethink: Europe project by the European Council on Foreign Relations and Stiftung Mercator. To learn more about the project please visit ecfr.eu/rethinkeurope and. To contact the project team please Team Josef Janning heads the Berlin office of ECFR and leads the project as Senior Policy Fellow. Christoph Klavehn manages the project as Project Coordinator at the Berlin office of ECFR. This updated edition includes the cohesion ranking and trends of the EU28 from 2007 to Christel Zunneberg is Project Assistant and supports Rethink: Europe s research. Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
4 FAQ Cohesion concept duction Rationale What is the EU Cohesion Monitor? Are cooperation and cohesion different What is the difference between indi- What recommendations emerge from FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The EU Cohesion Monitor is an index of the 28 member states of the European Union and their readiness for joint action and cooperation. It measures how strong cohesion is, how it is changing, and how much it differs between the member states of the European Union. The concept s central assumption is that European cohesion is a precondition for Europe s capacity to act, and that acting together successfully will in turn strengthen cohesion. concepts? Overall, we assume that successful cooperation between individuals as well as societies and countries will strengthen mutual bonds, shared incentives, and common experiences. Cohesion is broader in that it focuses on the disposition of collective actors to work together. The EU Cohesion Monitor looks not only at actual cooperation but includes a measurement of the awareness, readiness, and cooperation-mindedness of societies. vidual and structural cohesion? Individual cohesion describes people s experiences, attitudes, beliefs, and well-being. Structural cohesion is shaped by connections and practices between countries on the macro-level, including the actions of economic, political, and cultural elites. The two dimensions often complement each other, but this is not necessarily so. The EU Cohesion Monitor displays both dimensions separately to make this differentiation visible. the EU Cohesion Monitor? Cohesion is a central resource needed for European cooperation. Strategies to strengthen cohesion need to address both its individual as well as its structural dimension. They should also address each country s distinct cohesion profile. Cohesion is not subject to swift changes. Measures that can boost cohesion should be pursued with stamina for the long term. The variety in cohesion also means that not only policymakers and governments are encouraged to address it. Cohesion is as much a field of engagement for civil-society organisations as well as EU citizens. Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
5 FAQ Data and design duction Rationale How is the EU Cohesion Monitor com- What is the reason for choosing these What are your data sources? How do you Do you weigh your data? FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four piled? The EU Cohesion Monitor combines a total of 32 factors to a set of ten cohesion indicators for each of the 28 EU member states. Data was gathered for 2007, 2014, and 2016/17. The monitor presents the cohesion indicators on a scale of 1 to 10 points for ease of analysis and comparability. A description of how the data is converted is available at. particular indicators and variables? Each of the EU Cohesion Monitor s ten indicators rests on a cohesion assumption, or hypothesis. Regarding the indicator Funding, for example, we argue that the inflow of resources through EU funds will strengthen awareness of EU benefits, such as through the presence of EU-funded projects to improve local infrastructure. At the same time, being a net contributor to the EU budget will increase that country s stake in shaping the EU and thus will generally strengthen its engagement with it. deal with data gaps? The EU Cohesion Monitor relies on datasets that are publicly available. The most prominent sources include Eurostat and Eurobarometer surveys. Where there are gaps in the primary data we use proxy data to cover them. For example, if a statistic is not available for 2017, we use the closest data available, say Similarly, when no data is available from other years at all, we use data from proxy countries, e.g. using data for. The EU Cohesion Monitor was compiled with the goal to minimise these approximations. We only weigh data where we see a compelling reason. For example, the maximum score in the Security indicator is 7 points rather than 10. The scale ends at seven because stronger cooperation and deeper integration in the area of security and defence is part of ongoing policy debates. The scaling has to give room for such steps and may need to be adjusted in future editions of the EU Cohesion Monitor. Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
6 FAQ The 2017 update duction Rationale What are the results since the previous Why do countries still differ so much in their What are the methodological Can I use EU Cohesion Monitor scores FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four edition of the EU Cohesion Monitor? In the past three years the continued recovery from the financial crisis and long-term EU funding patterns have shaped structural cohesion more than the arrival of migrants in Europe. Trends in individual cohesion are marked by the substantial turnout for anti-eu and populist parties in several member states that held national elections in the period from 2015 to While this led to a further plummeting of the Engagement indicator, positive results for the Attitudes, Approval and Experience indicators explain why individual cohesion has grown steadily. levels of cohesion? The differences stem from the monitor s combination of cohesion indicators and factors that represent different sources of cohesion and give each country its distinct cohesion profile based on its geography, population, socio-economic resilience, and more. The EU Cohesion Monitor captures a variety of data points to give a balanced assessment of cohesion. Therefore, the trends it describes tend to change gradually rather than abruptly from one year to the next. changes? The updated edition includes new data for the period from 2007 to 2017 as well as methodological improvements to make comparisons in a threeyear timeline more consistent. Some of the primary data had not received an update since the EU Cohesion Monitor s first edition. This includes cases where Eurobarometer questions or Eurostat tables have been discontinued or, in the case of the Engagement indicator, no new elections have taken place. In these cases we used the 2014 data point for Details at. for my work? Are the data sets available? Yes. The data underlying and generated by the EU Cohesion Monitor can be accessed in its entirety and free of charge at. Please cite as follows: EU Cohesion Monitor, European Council on Foreign Relations, December 2017, available at Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
7 Country Groups Overview duction Rationale Founding Six Big Six Five Country Groups FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Affluent Seven United Kingdom Visegrád Four Results are not only presented for individual EU member states, but also for five country groups. The illustration shows each group s composition, the overlap between them, and the countries that do not fall into any of the five groups. The impact of country groups on the politics of the EU and European integration at large has been changing over time and has often depended on the policy issue at stake. Some groups are more formalized or institutionalized than others. Group data is provided by combining the scores of their respective member countries. Southern Seven Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
8 Country Groups Big Six duction Rationale The EU Powerhouse Share of Population Share of GDP FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The term Big Six refers to,,,, and the. These countries are considered major European powers. After Brexit, the group will eventually turn into the Big Five. Even without the, it will continue to be the EU powerhouse. 70% 7% 9% 12% 16% 13% 13% Share of Military Spending 75% 3% 7% 11% 21% 18% 15% Employed to Unemployed 80% 10:1 4% 23% Big Six 10:1 21:1 Sources: Eurostat (Population 2015), World Bank (GDP 2015), SIPRI Milex Data (Military Spending 2015), Eurostat (Ratio of employed to unemployed 2015). 6% 10% 16% 21% 18:1 13:1 9:1 8:1 5:1 Big Six Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
9 Country Groups Founding Six duction Rationale The EU Pioneers Share of Population Share of GDP Total FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The term Founding Six refers to,,,, and the. As signatories to the 1957 Rome Treaty they created what has become the European Union. With the Franco-German partnership at its centre the Founding Six is the oldest group within the EU. It continues to have significant leverage and makes up about half the EU s population, GDP, and defence spending. 47% 16% 12% 13% Share of Military Spending 55% 5% 21% 11% 15% Employed to Unemployed 53% 12:1 21% Founding Six 12:1 12:1 Sources: Eurostat (Population 2015), World Bank (GDP 2015), SIPRI Milex Data (Military Spending 2015), Eurostat (Ratio of employed to unemployed 2015). 4% 10% 16% 9:1 21:1 8:1 15:1 14:1 Founding Six Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
10 Country Groups Affluent Seven duction Rationale Strength in Numbers Share of Population Share of GDP Total FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The term Affluent Seven refers to the group of seven countries consisting of, the three Nordic EU members of,, and, and the Benelux countries. This group has special economic clout among the EU28. Each one of the seven maintains an employment ratio of at least 10 to 1. In addition, the group's disposable income per capita is significantly above the averages of both the EU and the Big Six. 11% Share of Military Spending 16% 5% Employed to Unemployed 11% 4% 14:1 Affluent Seven 14:1 Sources: Eurostat (Population 2015), World Bank (GDP 2015), SIPRI Milex Data (Military Spending 2015), Eurostat (Ratio of employed to unemployed 2015). 17:1 12:1 16:1 10:1 15:1 14:1 13:1 Affluent Seven Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
11 Country Groups Southern Seven duction Rationale FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Mediterranean Shores The term Southern Seven refers to the group of seven countries consisting of,,,,, and. Despite being disparate in size, the countries in this group share socio-economic similarities. In recent years political initiatives have attempted to institutionalize this group. The Southern Seven have been particularly affected by the Eurozone debt crisis and increasing migration to Europe. Share of Population 38% Share of Military Spending 41% 13% 12% 9% Share of GDP Total 36% Employed to Unemployed 7:1 15% 11% 7% (2013) 21% Southern Seven 7:1 10% 7:1 9:1 Sources: Eurostat (Population 2015), World Bank (GDP 2015), SIPRI Milex Data (Military Spending 2015), Eurostat (Ratio of employed to unemployed 2015). 6% 4:1 8:1 18:1 8:1 5:1 Southern Seven Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
12 Country Groups Visegrád Four duction Rationale The New East Share of Population Share of GDP Total FAQ Cohesion concept Data and design The 2017 update Country Groups Overview Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four The term Visegrád Four refers to the group of countries consisting of the Czech Republic,, and. All four joined the European Union together in More frequently than other groups the Visegrád Four act as a political coalition within the European Union. Their cooperation is based on common cultural values, history and a similar outlook on economic and security policy. 13% 7% Share of Military Spending 5% Employed to Unemployed 6% 4% 13:1 Visegrád Four 13:1 Sources: Eurostat (Population 2015), World Bank (GDP 2015), SIPRI Milex Data (Military Spending 2015), Eurostat (Ratio of employed to unemployed 2015). 19:1 15:1 13:1 9:1 Visegrád Four Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
13 EU Cohesion Monitor Design Individual Structural Individual Cohesion Structural Cohesion Citizens of other EU countries % of population Visited another EU country Socialised with people from other EU country Foreign language skills Disposable income per capita Debt to GDP Social Justice Index Turnout in EP elections Anti-EU/populist share in EP elections Anti-EU/populist share in national elections EU trade to total trade EU trade to GDP ratio EU investments to total investments EU investments to GDP ratio Trust in EU Positive image of EU National interest well taken into account Perception as European Support for economic and monetary union Support for common foreign policy Support for common defence and security policy Euro among most positive results of EU Free movement among most positive results of EU Peace in Europe among most positive results of EU Inflow of EU funds as % of GDP Balance of payments to EU budget Population (share) living near borders Non-EU neighbours Number of opt outs Joint commands and cooperation Joint development and procurement Multinational deployments Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
14 EU Cohesion Monitor Design Individual Structural Individual Cohesion is strengthened by: Citizens of other EU countries % of population Visited another EU country Socialised with people from other EU country Foreign language skills + Citizens first-hand EU experience, proximity of other EU countries, and foreign language skills Turnout in EP elections Anti-EU/populist share in EP elections Anti-EU/populist share in national elections + A high turnout in elections to the European Parliament and low voting preferences for anti-eu/populist parties in the EP and national parliaments 4 Indicators Trust in EU Positive image of EU National interest well taken into account Perception as European 17 Factors + Positive views on the benefits of integration and on the EU at large Support for economic and monetary union Support for common foreign policy Support for common defence and security policy Euro among most positive results of EU Free movement among most positive results of EU Peace in Europe among most positive results of EU + Support for and positive views on areas of deeper integration Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
15 EU Cohesion Monitor Design Individual Structural Structural Cohesion is strengthened by: + A society s resilience in terms of its affluence and equality fostering EU engagement and solidarity Disposable income per capita Debt to GDP Social Justice Index + High connectedness and integration of a country s economy with other EU economies through trade and investment flows EU trade to total trade EU trade to GDP ratio EU investments to total investments EU investments to GDP ratio + Inflow of resources through EU funds as well as being a net contributor to the EU s budget 6 Indicators 15 Factors Inflow of EU funds as % of GDP Balance of payments to EU budget + A high number of regions sharing a border with other EU member states as well as with non-eu countries Population (share) living near borders Non-EU neighbours + No or a low number of opt-outs from the generally accepted state of integration Number of opt outs + Deep multinational cooperation in the area of defence and security Joint commands and cooperation Joint development and procurement Multinational deployments Design Overall Results Rankings Countries
16 Overall Results Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion LU Strong cohesion IE BE MT CY DE ES NL Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Structural Cohesion Fairly weak cohesion DK SE HR RO PL IT EL FI BG EE EU PT HU SI FR CZ LT AT LV SK Experience and attitude gap
17 Overall Results Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion LU Strong cohesion BE IE MT DE EE NL CY SE FI AT SI SK LT Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Structural Cohesion HR IT DK ES PT FR EU RO BG PL LV Founding Six Affluent Seven EL CZ Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion HU Experience and attitude gap
18 Overall Results Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion LU Strong cohesion IE MT DE BE Overall Results Country Groups Big Six CY Structural Cohesion IT DK HR SE PT ES FR FI NL EU AT RO EE SI BG LT LV SK Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion EL PL CZ HU Experience and attitude gap
19 Country Groups Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Southern Seven Affluent Seven Founding Six Structural Cohesion Big Six EU Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Visegrád Four Experience and attitude gap
20 Country Groups Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Affluent Seven Founding Six Structural Cohesion Southern Seven Big Six EU Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Visegrád Four Experience and attitude gap
21 Big Six Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
22 Big Six Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Structural Cohesion Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
23 Founding Six Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
24 Founding Six Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
25 Affluent Seven Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
26 Affluent Seven Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
27 Southern Seven Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
28 Southern Seven Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
29 Visegrád Four Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
30 Visegrád Four Attitudes outperform structural ties Individual Cohesion Strong cohesion Structural Cohesion Overall Results Country Groups Big Six Founding Six Affluent Seven Southern Seven Visegrád Four Fairly weak cohesion Experience and attitude gap
31 Individual Cohesion Trend 8.4 # or more 5.85 to to 5.84 less than INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security
32 Individual Cohesion Trend 9,1 # or more 5.85 to to 5.84 less than ,0 7,9 7,7 7,5 6, ,8 7 6,7 8 6,5 10 6,3 12 6,2 14 6,1 15 5,9 16 5,8 17 5,7 18 INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5,5 5, Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security 5,3 5,1 4,9 4,6 4,5 4,2 4,
33 Individual Cohesion Trend Gains No Change Losses INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security
34 Structural Cohesion Trend 8.1 # or more 5.11 to to 5.10 less than INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security
35 Structural Cohesion Trend 7.6 # or more 5.11 to to 5.10 less than INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security
36 Structural Cohesion Trend 1.2 Gains No Change Losses INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION -0.5 Experience Engagement Attitudes Approval Resilience Economic Ties Funding Neighbourhood Policy Integration Security
37 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.4
38 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
39 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.4
40 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.9
41 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
42 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.9
43 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
44 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
45 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
46 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.4
47 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
48 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.4
49 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.6
50 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
51 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.6
52 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.4
53 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
54 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.4
55 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.1
56 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
57 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.1
58 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
59 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
60 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
61 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.9
62 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
63 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.9
64 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.8
65 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
66 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.8
67 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.4
68 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
69 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.4
70 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.9
71 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
72 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.9
73 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.5
74 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
75 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.5
76 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.7
77 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
78 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.7
79 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.0
80 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
81 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.0
82 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.5
83 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
84 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.5
85 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.4
86 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
87 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.4
88 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 7.6
89 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
90 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 7.6
91 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.6
92 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
93 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.6
94 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.2
95 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
96 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.2
97 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.6
98 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
99 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.6
100 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.5
101 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
102 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.5
103 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.7
104 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
105 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.7
106 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.8
107 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
108 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 6.8
109 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
110 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
111 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 5.8
112 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.7
113 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
114 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.7
115 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.5
116 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
117 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 4.5
118 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.7
119 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION
120 2017 vs EU INDIVIDUAL COHESION STRUCTURAL COHESION 3.7
Two years to go to the 2014 European elections European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 77.4)
Directorate-General for Communication PUBLIC OPINION MONITORING UNIT Brussels, 23 October 2012. Two years to go to the 2014 European elections European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 77.4) FOCUS ON THE
European contract law in business-to-business transactions
Flash Eurobarometer European Commission European contract law in business-to-business transactions Report: 2011 Flash Eurobarometer 320 The Gallup Organization This survey was requested by DG JUSTICE:
A new approach to education PPPs in the Eurostat/OECD exercise
A new approach to education PPPs in the Eurostat/OECD exercise OECD Meeting on PPPs for Non-European Countries, 27 29 April 2009 Eurostat losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure
EU Budget 2009: billion. implemented. 4. The European Union as a global player; ; 6.95% 5. Administration ; 6.
20.09.2010 EU Budget 2009: 112.107 billion 4. The European Union as a global player; 7 788 ; 6.95% 3. Citizenship, freedom, security and justice; 1 930 ; 1.72% 2. Preservation and management of natural
European contract law in consumer transactions
Flash Eurobarometer European Commission European contract law in consumer transactions Report: 2011 Flash Eurobarometer 321 The Gallup Organization This survey was requested by DGJUSTICE: and coordinated
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2017 SWD(2017) 330 final PART 13/13 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE
Trust, Statistics & Knowledge Evidence from the EC Special Eurobarometer survey 2009
Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life Busan, Korea - 27 October 2009 Trust, Statistics & Knowledge Evidence from the EC Special Eurobarometer survey 2009 Marco Mira d Ercole (OECD), A. Papacostas(Eurobarometer)
Themes Income and wages in Europe Wages, productivity and the wage share Working poverty and minimum wage The gender pay gap
5. W A G E D E V E L O P M E N T S At the ETUC Congress in Seville in 27, wage developments in Europe were among the most debated issues. One of the key problems highlighted in this respect was the need
Investment and Investment Finance open questions?
Investment and Investment Finance open questions? COMPNET 13 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE CHIEF ECONOMISTS PANEL 29 June 2017 Debora Revoltella Economics Department European Investment Bank Key issues Questions
Special Eurobarometer 418 SOCIAL CLIMATE REPORT
Special Eurobarometer 418 SOCIAL CLIMATE REPORT Fieldwork: June 2014 Publication: November 2014 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs
Parlemeter - November 2012 European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 78.2)
Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit Parlemeter - November European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/EP 78.2) ANALYTICAL SYNTHESIS Brussels, 14 February 2013. Coverage: Population:
Improving the quality of public finance an analytical framework 2018 Ludwig Erhard Lecture
Improving the quality of public finance an analytical framework 2018 Ludwig Erhard Lecture Marco Buti Director-General Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission Lisbon Council The 2018 Euro Summit:
THE 2016 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD
THE 2016 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD Quantitative data April 2016 This document contains a selection of graphs with quantitative data from the 2016 EU Justice Scoreboard. (The figure numbers correspond to those
PROVISIONAL DRAFT. Information Note from the Commission. on progress in implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
PROVISIONAL DRAFT Information Note from the Commission on progress in implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Introduction This note, which is based on the third report
Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 2013 Presentation of J.M. Barroso,
Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 213 Presentation of J.M. Barroso, President of the European Commission, to the European Council of 14-1 March 213 Economic recovery
Macroeconomic policies in an open economy
Macroeconomic policies in an open economy We have seen that monetary and fiscal policies affect the interest rate (i) in the short run: expansionary MP reduce i and viceversa, while expansionary fiscal
EUROPE 2020 Towards the 2013 Annual Growth Survey
EUROPE 2020 Towards the 2013 Annual Growth Survey Marcel Haag Head of Unit Secretariat General, European Commission 1 Restoring growth: a pressing priority EU GDP level in recent years (first quarter 2005
What budget for the EU? Principles, spending priorities and the impact of Brexit
What budget for the EU? Principles, spending priorities and the impact of Brexit Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff, Bruegel Thanks to Yana Myachenkova, Nicolas Moës and David Pichler for excellent research
A European Energy Dialogue. Exploring the needs and methods of public involvement and engagement in the energy policy field
A European Energy Dialogue Exploring the needs and methods of public involvement and engagement in the energy policy field Why we need a European Energy Dialogue (1) Performance of EU energy utilities
Active Ageing and Intergenerational Solidarity: What differences across the EU countries?
Active Ageing and Intergenerational Solidarity: What differences across the EU countries? Drawn from the SSO Research Note prepared by Asghar Zaidi and Eszter Zólyomi Drawn from the article by Asghar Zaidi,
Investing in Europe s Future: A regional development strategy for 2020
Investing in Europe s Future: A regional development strategy for 2020 The 5 th Report on Economic, social and territorial cohesion Statistical analysis and research methods Presented by Zuzana Gáková
Benchmarking options for the effective achievement of the renewable energy target of the EU energy strategy by 2030
Benchmarking options for the effective achievement of the renewable energy target of the EU energy strategy by 2030 IAEE 2017 Authors: Lukas Liebmann, Christoph Zehetner, Gustav Resch Energy Economics
Flash Eurobarometer 470. Report. Work-life balance
Work-life balance Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers and co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication This document does not represent
DEFENCE DATA KEY FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
DEFENCE DATA 2016-2017 KEY FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TOTAL DEFENCE EXPENDITURE 4 2. REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE 8 3. DEFENCE EXPENDITURE BREAKDOWN 10 4. COLLABORATIVE DEFENCE EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
Economic Integration and Social Cohesion: the European Union s experience. Vasco Cal Mexico November 2004
Economic Integration and Social Cohesion: the European Union s experience Vasco Cal Mexico November 2004 Structure of this presentation Origins of EU cohesion policy Cohesion policy: value added Main challenges
RETIREMENT Differences in State of Affairs and legacies across the EU28
RETIREMENT Differences in State of Affairs and legacies across the EU28 EC/OECD Workshop on delivering longer working lives and higher retirement ages Brussels, 12-13 November 2014 Fritz von Nordheim European
Securing sustainable and adequate social protection in the EU
Securing sustainable and adequate social protection in the EU Session on Social Protection & Security IFA 12th Global Conference on Ageing 11 June 2014, HICC Hyderabad India Dr Lieve Fransen European Commission
"Overcoming Europe s Policy Trilemmas: Economics, Politics and Governance in a Union Under Stress"
"Overcoming Europe s Policy Trilemmas: Economics, Politics and Governance in a Union Under Stress" Marco Buti DG Economic and Financial Affairs European Commission Brown University, 31 October 2016 Outline
Albane DEMBLANS Secretariat-General of the European Commission
Albane DEMBLANS Secretariat-General of the European Commission European Economic and Social Committee 1 June 2016 Economic and social context European Semester 2016 Economic and social context A moderate
The Mystery of Low Productivity Growth: Some Insights from Belgium
The Mystery of Low Productivity Growth: Some Insights from Belgium Bank of Poland - 26 October 218 Luc Dresse (luc.dresse@nbb.be) Chief Advisor Economics and Research Dept. LU BE US NL DK DE FR SE EU15
EUROPE S SOURCES OF GROWTH
EUROPE S SOURCES OF GROWTH Presentation of J.M. Barroso, President of the European Commission, to the European Council of 23 October 2011 A roadmap to stability and growth 1. Give a decisive response to
AN INITIATIVE TO SUPPORT WORK-LIFE BALANCE FOR WORKING PARENTS AND CARERS
AN INITIATIVE TO SUPPORT WORK-LIFE BALANCE FOR WORKING PARENTS AND CARERS Work-life balance: the Lombardy Region reflects on Europe, Milano 5 December 2017 Fabian LUETZ, Legal Officer DG JUST, D.2 (Gender
Social Protection and Social Inclusion in Europe Key facts and figures
MEMO/08/625 Brussels, 16 October 2008 Social Protection and Social Inclusion in Europe Key facts and figures What is the report and what are the main highlights? The European Commission today published
Using Register information to estimate (early) monthly unemployment rates for EU aggregates
Slide 1 of 22 Session 2: Register-based Social Statistics Using Register information to estimate (early) monthly unemployment rates for EU aggregates Carsten Olsson Eurostat F2 "Labour Market Statistics
Recent trends in the PPP market in Europe: slow recovery and increasing EIB involvement
ECON Note EIB PRIORITIES STUDIES Recent trends in the PPP market in Europe: slow recovery and increasing EIB involvement Economics Department Andreas Kappeler Disclaimer: The views expressed in this document
Fiscal sustainability challenges in Romania
Preliminary Draft For discussion only Fiscal sustainability challenges in Romania Bucharest, May 10, 2011 Ionut Dumitru Anca Paliu Agenda 1. Main fiscal sustainability challenges 2. Tax collection issues
Equality between women and men in the European Union. Fátima Ribeiro Gender Equality Unit, DG Justice and Consumers
Equality between women and men in the European Union Fátima Ribeiro Gender Equality Unit, DG Justice and Consumers EU Commitments on Gender Equality EU Treaty EU legislation Commission's Strategy for equality
Standard Eurobarometer
Standard Eurobarometer 67 / Spring 2007 Standard Eurobarometer European Commission SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER EUROPEANS KNOWELEDGE ON ECONOMICAL INDICATORS 1 1 This preliminary analysis is done by Antonis PAPACOSTAS
Part C. Impact on sample design
Part C. Impact on sample design Ing. Marie Hörmannová, CSc. Business Cycle Surveys Department Introduction In December 2006, the European Council adopted the regulation establishing the revised EU statistical
Economic, employment and social policies in the new EU 2020 strategy
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Social protection and inclusion policies Walter WOLF Economic, employment and social policies in the new EU 2020 strategy Skopje,
Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio at 39.8% of GDP in 2007 Steady decline in top personal and corporate income tax rates since 2000
DG TAXUD STAT/09/92 22 June 2009 Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio at 39.8% of GDP in 2007 Steady decline in top personal and corporate income tax rates since 2000 The overall tax-to-gdp
Completing EMU: Arguments and proposals for the next term of office of the European Parliament and the European Commission
Completing EMU: Arguments and proposals for the next term of office of the European Parliament and the European Commission Public Hearing, European Economic and Social Committee, 5 December 2013 Taneli
GROWTH AND JOBS: NEXT STEPS
GROWTH AND JOBS: NEXT STEPS Presentation of J.M. Barroso, President of the European Commission, to the informal European Council of 30 January 2012 Tackling the «vicious circles» affecting Europe Europe
Responding to economic and social challenges: Active inclusion of the people furthest from the labour market
Responding to economic and social challenges: Active inclusion of the people furthest from the labour market István VÁNYOLÓS DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission Brussels, July
Two years to go to the 2014 European elections European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/PE 77.4)
Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit Two years to go to the 2014 European elections European Parliament Eurobarometer (EB/PE 77.4) Brussels, 6 February 2013 FOCUS REPORT
Heterogeneity and the ECB s monetary policy
Benoît Cœuré Member of the Executive Board Heterogeneity and the ECB s monetary policy Paris, 29 March 2019 Persistence of inflation differentials main pre-crisis concern Inflation dispersion in the euro
THE 2015 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD
THE 215 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
Investment and Investment Finance in Slovenia
Investment and Investment Finance in Slovenia Debora Revoltella Chief Economist European Investment Bank Bank of Slovenia, European Investment Bank, European Commission Conference Ljubljana November 16,
DEMOCARE Demographic change and policies for the reconciliation of work and family life
DEMOCARE Demographic change and policies for the reconciliation of work and family life Jean-Marie Jungblut, research officer living conditions and quality of life unit "Work-life balance conference" in
ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008
www.efesonline.org 25.2.29 ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 28 INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY FILES Employee ownership is progressing faster and stronger across Europe than
Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy
Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy INFORSE-Europe and EREF European Sustainable Energy Seminar 28 April, 2009 Beth Masterson Policy Analyst DG Regio Thematic Coordination and Innovation Proceedings
January 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.5%
STAT//29 1 March 20 January 20 Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.5% The euro area 1 (EA16) seasonally-adjusted 2 unemployment rate 3 was 9.9% in January 20, the same as in December 2009 4.
Can Active Labour Market Programmes reduce Long-Term Unemployment?
Mutual Learning Programme: Autumn 2012 Seminar Can Active Labour Market Programmes reduce Long-Term Unemployment? Thematic Review Seminar on Tackling long-term unemployment effective strategies and tools
European Semester and monitoring policy for investment in health and well-being
European Semester and monitoring policy for investment in health and well-being Presentation by dr Stefan ISZKOWSKI, Policy Officer for Employment and Social Aspects of European Semester, DG EMPL at EuroHealthNet
EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING IN SUPPORT OF R&D ACTIVITIES
EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING IN SUPPORT OF R&D ACTIVITIES Michele Cincera (ULB & CEPR), Dirk Czarnitzki (KUL & ZEW) & Susanne Thorwarth (ZEW & KUL) 1 Workshop on assessing the socio-economic impacts of
NOTE ON EU27 CHILD POVERTY RATES
NOTE ON EU7 CHILD POVERTY RATES Research note prepared for Child Poverty Action Group Authors: H. Xavier Jara and Chrysa Leventi Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) University of Essex The
AREA 1: CHALLENGES FOR THE
WELFARE, WEALTH AND WORK A NEW GROWTH PATH FOR EUROPE A European research consortium is working on empirical foundations for a new socio-ecological growth model AREA 1: CHALLENGES FOR THE WELFARE STATES
Flash Eurobarometer N o 189a EU communication and the citizens. Analytical Report. Fieldwork: April 2008 Report: May 2008
Gallup Flash Eurobarometer N o 189a EU communication and the citizens Flash Eurobarometer European Commission Expectations of European citizens regarding the social reality in 20 years time Analytical
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.9.2018 COM(2018) 629 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL 11th FINANCIAL REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND
ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 2008
www.efesonline.org 25.2.29 ANNUAL ECONOMIC SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 28 INTRODUCTION TO COUNTRY FILES Employee ownership is progressing faster and stronger across Europe than
2015 Ageing Report Per Eckefeldt European Commission Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs
2015 Ageing Report Per Eckefeldt European Commission Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs Workhop on Pensions Luxembourg, 14 November 2014 1 Outline What's next? Preparation of the 2015
PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES 2010 IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING
PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING In 7, reaching the benchmarks for continues to pose a serious challenge for education and training systems in Europe, except for the goal
Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview
Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview Warsaw, Poland May 17, 2010 From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Poland spends fairly well Recent reforms
LEADER implementation update Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015
LEADER 2007-2013 implementation update Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015 #LeaderCLLD 2,416 2,416 8.9 Progress on LAG selection in the EU (2007-2013) 3.000 2.500 2.000 2.182 2.239 2.287
INTERGENERATIONAL FAIRNESS ESDE 2017 CONFERENCE 10 OCTOBER 2017 #ESDE2017. Barbara Kauffmann Director of Employment and Social Governance Directorate
ESDE 2017 CONFERENCE 10 OCTOBER 2017 #ESDE2017 INTERGENERATIONAL FAIRNESS Barbara Kauffmann Director of Employment and Social Governance Directorate European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and
Andor Urmos European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy
Andor Urmos European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban EU 2014-2020: 1/3 of the EU budget 2 2014-2022 (eligibility simulation) GDP/capita* < 75% of EU average 75-90% > 90% *index EU27=100
PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES 2010 IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING
PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING In, reaching the benchmarks for continues to pose a serious challenge for education and training systems in Europe, except for the goal
Investment and competitivenss" Boris Vujčić, guverner
Investment and competitivenss" Boris Vujčić, guverner e-mail: boris.vujcic@hnb.hr Outline Capital investment and FDI developments in Croatia and peer countries Structural position of Croatia Why are some
Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy
Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 Presentation by David Müller, Member of cabinet For Alpeuregio summer school Cohesion policy Basics on EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy
Reform strategies: the experience of emerging European economies and their effects on sustainability and equity
Cross-country experiences Session 3 Reform strategies: the experience of emerging European economies and their effects on sustainability and equity Per Eckefeldt European Commission Directorate General
October 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 10.1% EU27 at 9.6%
STAT//180 30 November 20 October 20 Euro area unemployment rate at.1% EU27 at 9.6% The euro area 1 (EA16) seasonally-adjusted 2 unemployment rate 3 was.1% in October 20, compared with.0% in September 4.
Gender equality in the Member States
Women on -- Factsheet 2 Gender equality in the Member States The arguments: On average, a mere 13.7 of board members and 15 of non-executive board members of the largest companies listed on stock exchanges
Standard Eurobarometer 83 Spring 2015 THE EU BUDGET REPORT
Standard Eurobarometer 83 Spring 2015 THE EU BUDGET REPORT Fieldwork: May 2015 This survey has been requested and co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm
EBA Call for Evidence and Discussion Paper on SMEs
EBA Call for Evidence and Discussion Paper on SMEs Preliminary analysis for the SME report in accordance with the EBA mandate in Article 501 CRR Public Hearing - 4 September 2015 Contents 1. Background
Member States Meeting jointly with. Vegetables" and. Group
Member States Meeting jointly with the Advisory Group on "Fruit Fruit and Vegetables" and the School Fruit Scheme Experts Group Wednesday 28 March 2012 DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission
STAT/14/ October 2014
STAT/14/158-21 October 2014 Provision of deficit and debt data for 2013 - second notification Euro area and EU28 government deficit at 2.9% and 3.2% of GDP respectively Government debt at 90.9% and 85.4%
The entitlement to and use of sickness benefits by persons residing in a Member State other than the competent Member State
The entitlement to and use of sickness benefits by persons residing in a Member State other than the competent Member State Report on S1 portable documents Reference year 2015 Jozef Pacolet & Frederic
Issues Paper. 29 February 2012
29 February 212 Issues Paper In the context of the European semester, the March European Council gives, on the basis of the Commission's Annual Growth Survey, guidance to Member States for the Stability
European Innovation Policy. an Economic perspective
European Policy an Economic perspective Pierre VIGIER Economic Analysis Directorate DG Research & Europe is facing major challenges Knowledge and innovation are crucial Today: Major economic and financial
In 2010, Europe faced a choice
Europe 2020 Ruth Paserman DG Enterprise and Industry Head of Unit Europe 2020 and National Competitiveness Policies Alpeuregio summer school 2014 2 July 2014 In 2010, Europe faced a choice 2010-2020: a
New Europeans. Fieldwork : March 2010 April 2010 Publication: April 2011
Special Eurobarometer European Commission New Europeans Report Fieldwork : March 2010 April 2010 Publication: April 2011 Special Eurobarometer 346 / Wave TNS Opinion & Social This survey was requested
SYSTEMIC RISK BUFFER. Background analysis for the implementation of the Systemic Risk Buffer as a macro-prudential measure in Estonia
SYSTEMIC RISK BUFFER Background analysis for the implementation of the as a macro-prudential measure in Estonia May 214 SUMMARY Starting from 1 January 214 the revised prudential requirements for credit
The efficiency and effectiveness of public spending. - Issues for discussion -
ECONOMIC POLICY COMMITTEE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs Brussels, 4 April 2007 ECFIN/EPC (2007)REP/51792-final The efficiency and effectiveness of public spending
AUTOMATIC STABILIZERS VS. DISCRETIONARY MEASURES: EVIDENCE FROM CROATIA ANA GRDOVIĆ GNIP
AUTOMATIC STABILIZERS VS. DISCRETIONARY MEASURES: EVIDENCE FROM CROATIA ANA GRDOVIĆ GNIP Content Short introductory theoretical background e case of Croatia o Empirical framework Data and limitations Output
IMPACT INDICATORS. Research, Innovation, ICT and broadband, SMEs Competitiveness
IMPACT INDICATORS Research, Innovation, ICT and broadband, SMEs Competitiveness Athanasios Lapatinas DG-JRC, Unit.I.1 Modelling, Indicators and Impact Evaluation REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting, 5-6 March
Financial stability is seen in the narrow sense of households being able to repay loans, and banks being exposed to the risk of non-performing loans,
FINANCE AND HOUSING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: A DEMAND-SIDE APPROACH Liviu Voinea, Deputy Governor, National Bank of Romania Finance and Housing Panel, Bruegel Annual Meetings 217 In 215, ESRB published
Gender pension gap economic perspective
Gender pension gap economic perspective Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak Institute of Statistics and Demography SGH Part of this research was supported by European Commission 7th Framework Programme project "Employment
FIRST REPORT COSTS AND PAST PERFORMANCE
FIRST REPORT COSTS AND PAST PERFORMANCE DECEMBER 2018 https://eiopa.europa.eu/ PDF ISBN 978-92-9473-131-9 ISSN 2599-8862 doi: 10.2854/480813 EI-AM-18-001-EN-N EIOPA, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided
Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy
Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 Cohesion policy The European Union is diverse GDP/capita 2 The European Union is diverse Unemployment 3 The European Union is diverse Third-level
EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion
EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy 2021-2027 #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion ALIGNED TO POLITICAL PRIORITIES Simplification, transparency and flexibility Source: European
Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society
Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society Dr Krzysztof Iszkowski DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Social and demographic analysis 2 European population is growing, but: for how
Past and current reform strategies in Poland
Paweł Szałamacha Past and current reform strategies in Poland Vienna / November 20-21, 2017 2 In the last decade, Poland s growth has been strongly fueled by real convergence mechanisms Capital accumulation
REGIONAL PROGRESS OF THE LISBON STRATEGY OBJECTIVES IN THE EUROPEAN REGION EGRI, ZOLTÁN TÁNCZOS, TAMÁS
REGIONAL PROGRESS OF THE LISBON STRATEGY OBJECTIVES IN THE EUROPEAN REGION EGRI, ZOLTÁN TÁNCZOS, TAMÁS Key words: Lisbon strategy, mobility factor, education-employment factor, human resourches. CONCLUSIONS
How EU Cohesion Policy is helping to tackle the challenges of CLIMATE CHANGE and ENERGY SECURITY
September 2014 How EU Cohesion Policy is helping to tackle the challenges of CLIMATE CHANGE and ENERGY SECURITY A paper by the European Commission s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy Regional
The challenges of an ageing population. Budgetary and labour force projections for Belgium and the EU Member States
The challenges of an ageing population Budgetary and labour force projections for Belgium and the EU Member States Alexander Schwan, European Commission WSE Arbeidsmarktcongres 2013 07.02.2013 Provinciehuis
Denmark s Tourism Performance in Europe
s Tourism Performance in Europe 2000-2009 Visit Tourism Research Islands Brygge 43, 3 DK-2300 Copenhagen S +45 3288 9900 www.visitdenmark.com/analyser ISBN: 87 87393 71-9 December, 2010 (revised edition)
Macro-financial outlook with a view on NPL s and debt restructuring. Vedran Šošić, Vicegovernor
Macro-financial outlook with a view on NPL s and debt restructuring Vedran Šošić, Vicegovernor February 215 Outline of the presentation Banking system performing well. Elevated NPL level appears to be
I. EUROPEANS AND THE TAX ON FINANCIAL TRANSACTION (TFT)...10 IV. THE REACTIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES TO THE CRISIS...19
Directorate General for Communication Directorate C - Relations with Citizens PUBLIC OPINION MONITORING UNIT Brussels, 22 June 2011 EUROPEANS AND THE CRISIS European Parliament Eurobarometer ( Parlemeter
Working conditions in Europe. Findings from the 5 th European Working Conditions Survey
Working conditions in Europe. Findings from the 5 th European Working Conditions Survey Gijs van Houten - Eurofound Studies seminar Work, participation, democracy: People, rights, civil economy London,
Bulgarian Banking Association
Peter Praet Member of the Executive Board of the ECB Presentation to the Bulgarian Banking Association Sofia, 24 May 2017 Euro area real GDP, composite PMI and ESI (annual % change) Distribution of growth