CITY OF WOODINVILLE rd Avenue NE WOODINVILLE, WA (425) FAX (425) NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING

Transcription

1 CITY OF WOODINVILLE rd Avenue NE WOODINVILLE, WA (425) FAX (425) EXHIBIT C11 -- PAGE l OF ~ NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING PURPOSE: The Woodinville City Council will continued the public hearing to receive testimony regarding adoption of the 2015 Woodinville Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 591), Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (Ordinance 591), Code Amendments associated with a Best Available Science Review for critical area regulations (Ordinance 6os), and Planned Action Ordinance for the Central Business District (Ordinance 6o6). Copies of the following documents are available at: -Draft Comprehensive Plan Update Draft Municipal Code Update & Best Available Science Review - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Revised Draft Existing Conditions Report - Transportation Element with Amendments (Replaces Chapter 6 of Draft Comprehensive Plan) - Municipal Code Edits (Replaces Pages "Code UpdatejBAS3" through "Code Update/BAS 48" of the Municipal Code Update & Best Available Science Review Document) -Woodinville Comprehensive Plan Update Fiscal Analysis Copies of the staff report will be available seven (7) days prior to the public hearing on our website at http: // woodinville. wa. us/cit;yhall/councilvideos.asp, (on this page select the agenda for the corresponding meeting) or at Woodinville City Hall located at rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, Washington. All interested parties may appear and provide testimony to the City Council on the above proposals during the hearing. Written comments will be accepted up to and at the hearing. Comments should be addressed to the City Council at the mailing address shown above or cit;ycouncil@ci.woodinville.wa.us. For additional information on the public hearing, please contact Jennifer Kuhn, City Clerk at or jenniferk@ci.woodinville.wa.us or the Responsible Official, David Kuhl, Development Services Director at , x 2271 or davek@ci.woodinville.wa.us. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, May 5 and May 12, :00p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard. LOCATION: Woodinville City Hall rd Avenue NE Council Chambers Woodinville, WA DATED this 22nd day of April Jennifer Kuhn City Clerk/CMC Faxed to: ed to: Post: Published: Mailed to: News Media 1) City Staff, 2) Council & 3) City Attorney 1) In-house, 2) Post Office & 3) Website Woodinville Weekly April 27 Party of Record, EIS Mailing List C: \Users\jenniferk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windaws\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\AE6QCSRE\Comp Plan Ord Contd docx

2 Craig MacKay h Avenue NE Woodinville, WA EXHIBIT _3 f Curtis Takahashi '7 -z.. <ay Talbot P.o. Box 2606 PAGe ::ofz B h Avenue NE Woodinville, WA 98072,\/oodinville, WA Denny Fitzpatrick Willows Lodge N. E h Street Woodinville, WA Sandra White NE h Street Woodinville, WA Keith Wells NE h Street, Suite G Woodinville, WA Jim Hansink h Place NE Woodinville, WA Laurie Cook NE 182nd Street Woodinville, WA Jean Yabroff nd Avenue NE Woodinville, WA Michelle Morris NE Woodinville Duvall Woodinville, WA Dave Witt h Place NE Woodinville, WA Dirty Bucket Brew Attn: Steve Accord h Ave NE, #101 Woodinville, WA Joan Yim NE Street #G101 Woodinville, WA Paula Waters NE h Place Woodinville, WA Susan Boundy-Sanders h Avenue NE Woodinville, WA Collins Woerman Attn: Harold Moniz 710 Second Ave., Suite 1400 Seattle, WA Housing Dev. Consortium Attn: Kayla Schott-Bresler 1402 Third Ave., Suite 1230 Seattle, WA Housing Dev. Consortium Attn: Marty Kooistra, Ex. Dir Third Ave., Suite 1230 Seattle, WA Eastside Ski & Sport Attn: Greg Moore NE Woodinville Duvall Rd \A/nnrlin\liiiP \A/A QR07? jhansink@gmail.com Schnapslekhe Spirits Attn: David Groom h NE Space H Woodinville, WA director@woodinvillechamber.org Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division Attn: Karen Walter nd Ave SE Auburn, WA KWalter@muckleshoot. nsn. us nccassell@yahoo. com steve@snoqualmietribe.us

3 Mailed CC 5/5 & 5/12 Public Hearing Notice April 23, 2015 EXHIBIT q / PAGE 3 OF~ erikandgo@gmail.com Rick@chatterton1.com Triplehorn Brewing Co Attn: Rich Nesheim h Ave NE #6 Woodinville, WA Patpark123@gmail.com Woodinville Farmers Market Attn: Valerie Schick P.O. Box 1927 Woodinville, WA Molbak's Attn: Mark Carlson NE h Street Woodinville, WA EPN Company Attn: John Evans 12 Bloomdale Irvine, CA AHBL Attn: Lisa Klein 2215 N h Street Tacoma, WA Joe Zante NE 162nd Street Bothell, WA C:\Users\jenniferk\AppData\Local\Microsoft\~indows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\AE6QCSRE\May 5 and 12 Parties o@.ecord Labels page 2.doc

4 Exhibit 92 Page 1 of 7 To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Jrd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA Honorable City Council p ~ 1 Richard A. Leahy, City Manager V v David Kuhl, Development Services Director a.. Public Hearing for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Date: 5/05/2015 ISSUE: Shall the City Council open the continued public hearing and receive testimony regarding the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Update? RECOMMENDATION: To open the continued public hearing and receive testimony. POLICY DECISION: The Comprehensive Plan is being updated as required by state law. Approval of the Plan is required no later than June 30, As part of Comprehensive Plan Update, the Zoning Code is being simplified and updated. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The public hearing includes the 2015 Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 591), the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (Ordinance 591), Code Amendments associated with a Best Available Science Review for critical area regulations (Ordinance 605), and a Planned Action Ordinance for the Central Business District (Ordinance 606). Council opened the public hearing on April 14, 2015 and continued it to May 5, The discussion tonight will focus on Land Use, Transportation and Growth Targets. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Open the Public Hearing for Ordinance No. 591, 605, 606, take testimony, and continue the hearing to May 12, RECOMMENDED MOTION: 1. OPEN THE CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 591, 605 and 606 REGARDING THE 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN, CODE AMENDMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH A BEST AVAILABLE SCIENCE REVIEW FOR CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS AND A PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE FOR THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. 2. OPEN THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PORTION OF THE HEARING. [Receive the staff report and public comment] 3. I MOVE TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARINGO MAY 12, 20151N THE WOODINVILLE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 7:00PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS MAY BE HEARD. Attachment 1: Exhibit List Updated April28, 2015 Attachment 2: Exhibit 93: Memorandum dated April27, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting, RE: Updated Geologic Hazard Maps Attachment 3: : Memorandum dated April 27, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting, RE: City Council Questions Regarding Growth Targets

5 Exhibit 92 Page 2 of 7 Attachment 1 CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT LIST 2015 Comprehensive Plan and Code Amendments Update Exhibit Description No. of No. pages 1 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated January 7, Draft Comprehensive Plan Update Draft Municipal Code Update Title 21 and Best Available Science 267 Review 4 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Revised Draft Existing Conditions Report Outline of Supplemental Revisions and Information- Planning 6 Commission Hearing, January 7, 2015, with Supplements A, B, and C A- Transportation Element with Amendments: Replaces Chapter 6 of Draft Comprehensive Plan 17 B - Municipal Code Edits: Replaces Pages "Code Update/BAS 3" through "Code Update/BAS 48" of the Municipal Code Update & Best Available Science Review Document. C - Fiscal Analysis: Additional Information under Separate Cover "Woodinville Comprehensive Plan Update Fiscal Analysis" 28 7 Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice and Declaration of Posting 3 8 Notice of Availability 2015 Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code 4 Update and Draft Planned Action EIS and Affidavit of Publication 9 Acknowledgement Letter from Washington State Department of 1 Commerce dated November 18, Citizens Comments ( sent 12/16/2014@ 9:58AM from Steven 7 Mullen-Moses, Director of Archaeology & Historic Preservation, Snoqualmie Tribe to Dave Kuhl; sent 11/06/2014@ 4:47PM from Nancy Cassell to Woodinville City Council; Open House Comment Cards) 11 Citizen Comments (Letter from Collins Woerman dated January 7, 2015) 2 12 Public Hearing Sign-Up Sheet for January 7, PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission January 7, Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code Update 47 2

6 Exhibit 92 Page 3 of 7 14 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated January 21, Citizens Comments (Letter from Housing Development Consortium to 2 the Planning Commission dated June 4, 2014) 16 Memo from Bob Bengford of Makers to the Planning Commission dated 2 January 20, Staff Handout to Planning Commission of PowerPoint Presentation for 8 January 21, 2015 (Transportation Element) 18 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission January 21, Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code Update 19 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission January 21, Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element 20 Citizen Hand Out from Susan Boundy-Sanders- Types of Shopping 1 Centers 21 January 21, 2015, Continued Public Hearing Sign-Up Sheet for Draft Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code Update 22 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated February 4, sent January 9, 2015,@ 2:47PM, from Karen Walter, 21 Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director. 24 Memorandum dated January 27, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, 6 BERK Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director, City of Woodinville, RE: Responses to Comments from Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, January 9, Citizen Comments: sent January 17, 2015@ 2:40PM from Jim 3 Hansink to Thomas Hansen with from Thomas Hansen to Jim Hansink sent January 20, 2015@ 7:56AM. 26 Memorandum dated January 28, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, 16 BERK Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director; Members of the Woodinville Planning Commission, RE: Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code Update and EIS -Status of Documents and Responses to Comments, with Zipper Geo Associates, LLC, attachment (Zipper Geo Associates, LLC, letter dated January 15, 2015, Project No , addressed to City of Woodinville, Attn: Mr. Thomas E. Hansen, PE, Public Works Director). Note: The Zipper Geo Associates attachment is a peer review of documents and information sources, including Golder Associates review found in Exhibit 3 -The Municipal Code Update & Best Available Science Review November 2014, pages Code Update/BAS

7 Exhibit 92 Page 4 of 7 27 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission February 4, Economic Development 28 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission February 4, Comprehensive Plan Update- Parks, Recreation, & Open Space; Capital Facilities; Utilities 29 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission February 4, Comprehensive Plan-Geologic Hazard and Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Update 30 February 4, 2015, Continued Public Hearing Sign-Up Sheet for Draft Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code Update 31 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated February 18, Citizen Comments: Documents received from Susan Boundy-Sanders 5 February 10, Memo dated February 18, 2015, from Jenny Ngo, Sr. Planner, to 3 Planning Commission 34 sent February 17, 2015@ 8:32PM from Susan Boundy-Sanders a ~ to Planning Commissioners, Dave Kuhl, Paula Waters, and Sandy Guinn (with attachments) 35 PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission February 18, Staff Hand Out to Planning Commission February 18, sent Sunday, February 08, 2015, 5:43 PM, from 2 director@woodinvillechamber.org to Dave Kuhl 38 Sign Up Sheet for Planning Commission February 15, 2015, Public 6 Hearing 39 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated March 4, Memorandum from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting, dated 122 February 26, 2015, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Department Director, RE: Responses to Comments on Comprehensive Plan and Related Components 41 Planning Commission Comments from Thomas Hansen sent Tuesday, March 03, 2015, 12:11 PM, 1 to Lisa Grueter,cc to Dave Kuhl; Michael Read, PE, Subject: questions on capacity for 171 st 43 Memorandum dated March 3, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK 12 Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Department Director, RE: Supplemental Memo: Responses to Comments on Comprehensive Plan and Related Components 4

8 Exhibit 92 Page 5 of 7 44 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission March 4, March 4th Planning Commission Continued Public Hearing Sign-Up 3 Sheet 46 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated 03/18/15 regarding 2 Ordinance No. 591, 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update 47 Draft Ordinance Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice and Declaration of Public 6 Notice 49 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated 03/18/15 regarding 1 Ordinance No. 606 Planned Action for the Central Business District 50 Draft Ordinance City of Woodinville Community Meeting: Discussion Guide regarding 4 Draft Planned Action for the Central Business District 52 Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated March 18, 2015, 2 regarding Ordinance No. 605 Critical Areas Ordinance Draft Critical Areas Regulations with mark ups Draft Critical Areas Regulations with mark ups and comments 25 Revised Draft Critical Areas Regulations without mark ups ReseFved fef Draft Ordinance No sent March 18, :34 PM from Sharon Peterson to Jenny 1 Ngo 57 Memorandum dated March 12, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, 15 BERK Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director; Members of the Woodinville Planning Commission, RE: Responses to Comments from Puget Sound Regional Council 58 Letter dated March 18, 2015, from Karen Mooseker, Director, Capital 1 Projects, Northshore School District, to Dave Kuhl, Director Development Services 59 sent March 18, 2015@ 12:56 PM from Kathy Heywood to Sandy 1 Guinn; Dave Kuhl 60 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission March 18, , regarding Comprehensive Plan & Municipal Code Update 61 March 18, 2015, Continued Public Hearing Sign-Up Sheet for Ordinance

9 Exhibit 92 Page 6 of 7 62 Letter dated March 18, 2015, from Joan B. Yim, AICP, Woodinville 2 Resident, to City of Woodinville, Planning Commission, regarding Ordinance's 591 and Planning Commission March 18, 2015, Continued Public Hearing Sign- 2 Up List for Ordinance No Planned Action for the Central Business District 64 Planning Commission March 18, 2015, Continued Public Hearing Sign- 2 Up List for Ordinance No Critical Areas Ordinance 65 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated 03/25/15 regarding 2 Ordinance No. 606 Planned Action for the Central Business District 66 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated 03/25/15 regarding 2 Ordinance 605 Critical Areas Ordinance 67 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission March 25, regarding Ordinance 605- Critical Areas Ordinance 68 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission March 25, regarding Ordinance 606- Planned Action for the Central Business District 69 Sign-Up Sheet for Planning Commission March 25, 2015, Public 2 Hearing regarding Ordinance 605- Critical Areas Ordinance 70 Sign-Up Sheet for Planning Commission March 25, 2015, Public 2 Hearing regarding Ordinance 606- Planned Action for the Central Business District 71 Staff Report to Planning Commission dated April 1, 2015, regarding 2 Ordinance 605 Critical Areas Ordinance 72 Critical Areas Ordinance without mark ups (March 26, 2015) Critical Areas Ordinance with mark ups (March 26, 2015) Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Planning Commission April 1, regarding Ordinance Critical Areas 75 Continued Public Hearing April1, 2015, Sign-Up Sheet for Ordinance Letter dated March 18, 2015 addressed to Woodinville City Hall, Attn: 23 Planning Commission from John Evans, EPN Companies, with maps and PowerPoint Presentation presented by AHBL to Planning Commission on March 18, Summary of Planning Commission Recommendations of Ord No. 591: 42 1) Comprehensive Plan Recommendations, and 2) Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Recommendations. Includes comparison of 2009 Comp Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendations. 78 Proposed Ord No Includes Exhibit A: Public Participation Process; 274 Exhibit B: Findings and Recommendations of the Planning Commission; Exhibit C: Proposed 2015 Comp Plan as recommended by the Plannin_g_ 6

10 Exhibit 92 Page 7 of 7 Commission March 18, 2015 and Exhibit D: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan as recommended by the P & R Commission Feb. 5, Proposed Ord No. 605 Critical Areas as recommended by the Planning 59 Commission on April 1, Proposed Ord No. 606 Planned Action for Central Business District as 37 recommended by the Planning Commission on March 25, Written Public Comments: Dated , From: John Evans, Subject: 14 Request to Include Zante Property in City's UGA, Includes letter and Presentation 82 April14, 2015 Public Hearing Notice (DSD sent to Party of Record, EIS 1 Mailing List) 83 City of Woodinville staff report From City Manager Rich Leahy; By Dave 44 Kuhl, Development Services Director; To Council- Dated: 04/14/ Berk's and Maker's PowerPoint Presentation to Council April14, regarding Ordinance 591 Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan 85 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Council April 14, 2015 regarding 4 Ordinance 591 Parks, Recreation, & Open Space 86 Staff's PowerPoint Presentation to Council April 14, 2015 regarding 18 Ordinance 605- Critical Areas Ordinance 87 Dave Findley's, Golder Associates, PowerPoint Presentation to Council 15 April14, 2015 regarding Critical Areas and Geological Resources 88 Golder Associates Draft Technical Memorandum Handout to Council 21 April14, 2015 Re: Landslide Hazard Mapping-Additional Evaluation 89 Berk's PowerPoint Presentation to Council April14, 2015 regarding 11 Ordinance Planned Action for the Central Business District 90 April14, 2015, Public Hearing Sign-Up Sheet for Ordinance 591, and May 5 and May 12, 2015 Public Hearing Notice (DSD sent to Party of 3 Record, EIS Mailing List) 92 Staff Report to Council dated May 5, 2015, regarding Public Hearing for 7 the 2015 Comprehensive Plan (includes Exhibit List date ) 93 Memorandum dated April 27, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK 4 Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director; RE: Updated Geologic Hazard Maps 94 Memorandum dated April27, 2015, from Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK 23 Consulting, to Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director; RE: City Council Questions Regarding Growth Targets Updated April28,

11 Exhibit 93 Page 1 of 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 27, 2015 TO: FROM: RE: Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting Updated Geologic Hazard Maps Following the April 14, 2015 City Council meeting, Golder Associates made minor amendments to several of the Geologic Hazard maps distributed that evening, addressing the area between NE 174th Street and NE 178th Street as a liquefaction and problem soil area, not just a landslide hazard area. Also, the critical aquifer recharge area (CARA) map has no substantive edits but Golder Associates suggests clipping the information to the city limits as with other maps. In summary, the following edits have been made to the April 14, 2015 maps: Potential Liquefaction Hazard Area map (Figure 3): This was revised to show the wetland area that is located on the east slope between NE 174th Street and NE 178th Street that was added to the Potential Landslide Hazard area. Potential Problem Soil Area map (Figure 5): This was revised to show the wetland area that was added to the Potential Landslide Hazard area map area that is located on the east slope between NE 174th Street and NE 178th Street that was added to the Potential Landslide Hazard Areas map. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas map (Figure 7): The previous version had the shaded CARA area extending across the City limits into Snohomish County. While aquifer locations are independent of political boundaries Golder clipped it to be consistent with the other GeoHazard maps. The revised maps are attached to this memo. Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 1

12 140TH AV E NE 144TH AV E NE AV E City of Woodinville Geohazards - Potential Liquefaction Hazard Areas Exhibit 93 Page 2 of 4 Figure 3 Document Path: G:\CityOfWoodinville\CityOfWoodinville\99_PROJECTS\ _Woodinville_Geohazards\02_PRODUCTION\MXD\FIGURES\Rev2\ _006_F3_Rev2_LiquefactionHazards.mxd 120TH AV E NE AV E S R T H 124TH AV E NE T H S R D R H O L LY H I L L S TH AV E NE Sammamish River T H Miles AV E T H T H T H 132ND AV E NE S R W O O D I N V I L L E - R E D M O N D N D AV E S R L I T T L E TH AV E NE Little Bear Creek T H R D SR B E A R T H P L S R P K W Y C R E E K W O O D I N V I L L E - S N O H O M I S H R D Woodin Creek ST CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA Date: April, 2015 Source: City of Woodinville, King County, Golder Associates Inc T H AV E Woodin Creek T H P L T H T H T H T H Sammamish River KING COUNTY PLANNED ANNEXATION AREA AV E CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA NE 150 TH ST T H Derby Creek CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA N D T H Cold Creek 152ND AV E NE 152ND AV E NE T H T H 154TH AV E NE T H R D ST URBAN GROWTH AREA T H T H D R R D P L N D P L T H NE 203 RD T H P L T H 158TH AV E NE P L T H P L P L T H Lake Leota 164TH AV E NE 164TH AV E NE T H 162ND AV E NE 162ND AV E NE T H T H 166TH AV E NE N D P L R D ST Liquefaction Hazard Area 168TH AV E NE City of Woodinville Boundary Urban Growth Area 170TH AV E NE T H ST P L NE 152 ND City-King County Joint Study Area N D King County Planned Annexation Area Parcel Boundary AV E

13 140TH AV E NE 144TH AV E NE AV E City of Woodinville Geohazards - Potential Problem Soil Areas Exhibit 93 Page 3 of 4 Figure 5 Document Path: G:\CityOfWoodinville\CityOfWoodinville\99_PROJECTS\ _Woodinville_Geohazards\02_PRODUCTION\MXD\FIGURES\Rev2\ _005_F5_Rev2_SoilHazards.mxd 120TH AV E NE AV E S R T H 124TH AV E NE T H S R D R H O L LY H I L L S TH AV E NE Sammamish River T H Miles AV E T H T H T H 132ND AV E NE S R W O O D I N V I L L E - R E D M O N D N D AV E S R L I T T L E TH AV E NE Little Bear Creek T H R D SR B E A R T H P L S R P K W Y C R E E K W O O D I N V I L L E - S N O H O M I S H R D Woodin Creek ST CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA Date: April, 2015 Source: City of Woodinville, King County, Golder Associates Inc T H AV E Woodin Creek T H P L T H T H T H T H Sammamish River KING COUNTY PLANNED ANNEXATION AREA AV E CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA NE 150 TH ST T H Derby Creek CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA N D T H Cold Creek 152ND AV E NE 152ND AV E NE T H T H 154TH AV E NE T H R D ST URBAN GROWTH AREA T H T H D R R D P L N D P L T H NE 203 RD T H P L T H 158TH AV E NE P L T H P L P L T H Lake Leota 164TH AV E NE 164TH AV E NE T H 162ND AV E NE 162ND AV E NE T H T H 166TH AV E NE N D P L R D ST 168TH AV E NE Potential Problem Soil Area City of Woodinville Boundary Urban Growth Area 170TH AV E NE T H ST P L NE 152 ND City-King County Joint Study Area N D King County Planned Annexation Area Parcel Boundary AV E

14 140TH AV E NE 144TH AV E NE AV E City of Woodinville Geohazards - Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Exhibit 93 Page 4 of 4 Figure 7 Document Path: G:\CityOfWoodinville\CityOfWoodinville\99_PROJECTS\ _Woodinville_Geohazards\02_PRODUCTION\MXD\FIGURES\Rev2\ _008_F7_Rev2_CARA.mxd 120TH AV E NE AV E S R T H 124TH AV E NE T H S R D R H O L LY H I L L S TH AV E NE Sammamish River T H Miles AV E T H T H T H 132ND AV E NE S R W O O D I N V I L L E - R E D M O N D N D AV E S R L I T T L E TH AV E NE Little Bear Creek T H R D SR B E A R T H P L S R P K W Y C R E E K W O O D I N V I L L E - S N O H O M I S H R D Woodin Creek ST CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA Date: April, 2015 Source: City of Woodinville, King County, The Watershed Company T H AV E Woodin Creek T H P L T H T H T H T H Sammamish River KING COUNTY PLANNED ANNEXATION AREA AV E CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA NE 150 TH ST T H Derby Creek CITY-KING COUNTY JOINT STUDY AREA N D T H Cold Creek 152ND AV E NE 152ND AV E NE T H T H 154TH AV E NE T H R D ST URBAN GROWTH AREA T H T H D R R D P L N D P L T H NE 203 RD T H P L T H 158TH AV E NE P L T H P L P L T H Lake Leota 164TH AV E NE 164TH AV E NE T H 162ND AV E NE 162ND AV E NE T H T H 166TH AV E NE N D P L R D ST 168TH AV E NE Critical Aquifer Recharge Area City of Woodinville Boundary Urban Growth Area 170TH AV E NE T H ST P L NE 152 ND City-King County Joint Study Area N D King County Planned Annexation Area Parcel Boundary AV E

15 Page 1 of 23 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 28, 2015 TO: FROM: RE: Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director Lisa Grueter, Manager, BERK Consulting City Council Questions Regarding Growth Targets Introduction This memo provides responses to City Council April 14, 2015 questions regarding growth targets. How many dwellings does the City contain currently? The City contains about 5,000 dwelling units: 2010: 4, : 5, : 5,006 The Existing Conditions Report dated November 2014 describes the City s existing number and type of dwellings: Most of the City s land is zoned and used for single family residential uses, and the City s housing stock is predominantly single family. However, the share of multifamily dwellings is increasing. See Exhibit Most of the City s housing stock was developed between 1980 and 1999 (60%). About 22% was developed in 1979 or earlier, and about 18% has been developed since the year (ARCH 2013) Exhibit Housing Stock: Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management; BERK 2013 Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 1

16 Page 2 of 23 MEMORANDUM How does the City s growth target relate to other community growth targets? The City s original growth target for the year was 3,000 dwelling units. See Attachment A. Out of a group of eight communities, four had greater targets, one had the same target as Woodinville, and two had lower targets. All larger city targets are less than the targets for core cities and metro cities except for Bothell which only shows the King County portion of their target. After removing building permits completed between 2006 and 2012 (but not development agreements like in the Tourist Business District) King County reports a remaining target of 2,427 dwellings for the period The remaining housing targets for all King County jurisdictions is shown below. Within the larger city category, the cities of Des Moines, Issaquah, Kenmore, Sammamish, and Shoreline have greater targets remaining than Woodinville. As a share of base housing, however, the City s growth target is a significant addition. Kenmore likewise has a significant addition among other larger cities. Core cities also have taken on higher shares as well as a few small cities. See Attachment B. Exhibit Remaining Housing Growth Targets by Countywide Planning Policy Categories Source: King County Buildable Lands Report July 2014 Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 2

17 Page 3 of 23 MEMORANDUM The City s employment allocations are among the higher of the larger cities but reflect the City s role as a retail center for northeast King County and as a manufacturing center including wineries and distilleries. (See the November 2014 Existing Conditions Report for market study findings.) The City s job target of 5,000 between 2006 and 2031 was the same as for Shoreline and Des Moines. Since the City of Woodinville lost more jobs during the recession than those communities, it has a greater remaining target than Shoreline and Des Moines. However, lost jobs would presumably occupy existing space where they once resided rather than require new capacity. Therefore the City s target for which it needs to demonstrate capacity is 5,000 (plus we may subtract jobs fitting into new construction based on permits between 2006 and 2012). Woodinville and most other communities have a significant allocation of jobs compared to their base jobs as seen in Attachment B. Exhibit Remaining Job Growth Targets by Countywide Planning Policy Categories Is the City required to meet a 20 year growth allocation? The Growth Management Act requires that the City plan for 20 years of growth by the deadline of June 30, 2015: RCW 36.70A.110(2) Based upon the growth management population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the county and each city within the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county or city for the succeeding twenty year period Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 3

18 Page 4 of 23 MEMORANDUM RCW 36.70A.130 (1)(a) Each comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the county or city that adopted them. Except as otherwise provided, a county or city shall take legislative action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive land use plan and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section. RCW 36.70A.130 (1) (c) The review and evaluation required by this subsection shall include, but is not limited to, consideration of critical area ordinances and, if planning under RCW 36.70A.040, an analysis of the population allocated to a city or county from the most recent ten year population forecast by the office of financial management. RCW 36.70A.130 (5) counties and cities shall take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows: (a) On or before June 30, 2015, and every eight years thereafter, for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties; While King County declined to formally extend the 2031 growth targets an Interjurisdictional Team (IJT) that makes recommendations to the King County Growth Management Planning Council developed a recommended method to extend targets by four years from 2031 to 2035 a straight line method. See Attachment C. BERK Consulting prepared an analysis of the straight line method plus other methods to extend the housing and employment targets in an appendix to the November 2014 Existing Conditions Report (Appendix A) and the Draft EIS (Appendix B). Se Attachment D for the memo included in these other reports. We recommend use of the straight line method of growth target extension as it is the primary method used by other King County jurisdictions. The City must plan for 20 years of growth to the year The City has several methods to consider. The method that is most likely to be used by other local governments for its simplicity and progress towards local plans is the straight line method. That method produces a small deficit of housing ( 67 dwelling units) and deficit small surplus of job capacity ( (+237) at the year 2035 with the FAR capacity method. Other methods relating to Woodinville specific trends or countywide trends bracket the straight line approach with some results higher or lower. [Includes edits to original text to correct spelling and text errors.] Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 4

19 Page 5 of King County Countywide Planning Policies November 2012 Amended December 3, 2012 Core Cities Larger Cities Small Cities Urban Unincorp Table DP 1: King County Jurisdiction Growth Targets Net New Units Net New Jobs Housing Target Potential Annexation Area Housing Target Employment Target Potential Annexation Area Emp Target Metropolitan Cities Bellevue 17, ,000 Seattle 86, ,700 Metropolitan Cities Subtotal 103, ,700 Auburn 9,620 19,350 Bothell 3, , Burien 4,440 4,960 Federal Way 8,100 2,390 12, Kent 9, , Kirkland 8,570 20,850 Redmond 10, ,000 Renton 14,835 3,895 29, SeaTac 5,800 25,300 Tukwila 4, ,500 2,050 Core Cities Subtotal 78, ,340 Des Moines 3,000 5,000 Issaquah 5, ,000 Kenmore 3,500 3,000 Maple Valley 1,800 1,060 2,000 Mercer Island 2,000 1,000 Sammamish 4, ,800 Shoreline 5,000 5,000 Woodinville 3,000 5,000 Larger Cities Subtotal 28,050 42,800 Algona Beaux Arts 3 3 Black Diamond 1,900 1,050 Carnation Clyde Hill 10 0 Covington 1,470 1,320 Duvall 1, Enumclaw 1, Hunts Point 1 0 Lake Forest Park Medina 19 0 Milton Newcastle 1, Normandy Park North Bend 665 1,050 Pacific Skykomish 10 0 Snoqualmie 1,615 1,050 Yarrow Point 14 0 Small Cities Subtotal 10,922 8,168 Potential Annexation Areas 10,090 3,220 North Highline 820 2,170 Bear Creek UPD 910 3,580 Unclaimed Urban Uninc Urban Incorporated Subtotal 12,470 9,060 Urban Growth Area Total 233, ,068 Chapter: DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS 2 0

20 Page 6 of 23 Housing Targets and Percentage of Base Units Net Housing Target Added Growth Target and Added Growth as Percentage of 2011 Units Reg. Geog. Juris 2011 Housing Units Metro Bellevue 56,095 12,778 2,720 28% Metro Seattle 310,735 59,014 13,760 23% Core Auburn (in King County) 24,801 9,004 1,539 43% Core Bothell (in King County) 7,595 2, % Core Burien 19,862 4, % Core Federal Way 35,468 7,457 1,296 25% Core Kent 45,644 7,236 1,248 19% Core Kirkland 24,474 7,208 1,152 34% Core Redmond 24,671 8,004 1,632 39% Core Renton 40,006 11,706 2,374 35% Core SeaTac 10,404 5, % Core Tukwila 7,726 4, % Larger Des Moines 12,590 2, % Larger Issaquah 14,018 3, % Larger Kenmore 8,689 2, % Larger Maple Valley 8, % Larger Mercer Island 9,933 1, % Larger Sammamish 16,148 3, % Larger Shoreline 22,920 3, % Larger Woodinville 4,997 2, % Small Algona 1, % Small Beaux Arts % Small Black Diamond 1,689 1, % Small Carnation % Small Clyde Hill 1, % Small Covington 6,107 1, % Small Duvall 2, % Small Enumclaw 4,788 1, % Small Hunts Point % Small Lake Forest Park 5, % Small Medina 1, % Small Milton (in King County) % Small Newcastle 4, % Small Normandy Park 2, % Small North Bend 2, % Small Pacific (in King County) 2, % Small Skykomish % Small Snoqualmie 3, % Small Yarrow Point % UU Urban Unincorporated Unavailable 7,969 2,536 Unavailable Shaded Communities with Targets at 35% or more of Base

21 Page 7 of 23 Job Targets and Percentage of Base Units 2011 Jobs (Covered Emp by ESD) Net Job Target Added Growth Target and Added Growth as Percentage of 2011 Jobs Reg. Geog. Jurisdiction Metro Bellevue 122,635 48,288 8,480 46% Metro Seattle 473, ,063 23,472 33% Core Auburn (in King County) 37,400 18,600 3,096 58% Core Bothell (in King County) 12,590 3, % Core Burien 11,572 7, % Core Federal Way 28,811 12,929 1,968 52% Core Kent 61,858 14,939 2,112 28% Core Kirkland 31,745 18,804 3,232 69% Core Redmond 78,893 27,315 3,680 39% Core Renton 54,997 23,203 4,640 51% Core SeaTac 24,828 27,084 4, % Core Tukwila 42,759 17,133 2,480 46% Larger Des Moines 5,703 5, % Larger Issaquah 19,912 17,517 3, % Larger Kenmore 3,637 3, % Larger Maple Valley 3,192 2, % Larger Mercer Island 6,344 1, % Larger Sammamish 4,589 1, % Larger Shoreline 16,039 5, % Larger Woodinville 11,387 7, % Small Algona 1, % Small Beaux Arts % Small Black Diamond 436 1, % Small Carnation % Small Clyde Hill % Small Covington 4, % Small Duvall 1, % Small Enumclaw 4, % Small Hunts Point % Small Lake Forest Park 1, % Small Medina % Small Milton (in King County) % Small Newcastle 1, % Small Normandy Park % Small North Bend 2, % Small Pacific (in King County) 772 1, % Small Skykomish % Small Snoqualmie 3, % Small Yarrow Point % UU Urban Unincorporated Unavailable 7,720 1,624 Unavailable Shaded Communities with Targets at 35% or more of Base

22 Page 8 of 23 ~Attachm e nt C RE Growth Target Horizon Year From : Felt, chandler <Chandler. Felt@kingcounty.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, :16 PM To: Lisa Grueter cc: wolf, Karen Subject: RE: Growth Target Horizon Year Lisa - thanks for following up with a phone call on this. The gap between 2031 and 2035 is one of my current big issues, and it's not resolved yet. Here's a quick summary so far: The new Growth Targets were recently adopted and ratified. They cover the 25-year period between 2006 and We're beginning to work on the 2014 Buildable Lands Report, which will cover the same period, to Many cities expect to adopt a new comp Plan in 2015, with a 20-year horizon to cities are responsible for dealing wi th the gap within their own ~urisdiction. The county s GMA staff group will come up with guidance for jurisdictions planning to 2035, probably including two options: Extrapolate at targeted growth rate to add a little growth by 2035, or Adjust the growth rate to bend the trend toward vision2040 shares of population and jobs. I hope that helps. I'll try to keep you posted as we work on the issue. Thanks! Chandler Felt, Demographer King county Performance, Strategy and Budget (206) From: Lisa Grueter [mailto:lisa@berkconsulting. com] sent: Thursday, March 14, : 36AM To: Felt, Chandler subject: Growth Target Horizon Year Hi chandler, we're doing some work for covington and woodinville. With the 2015 comp Plan Update deadline do Page 1

23 Page 9 of 23 RE Growth Target Horizon Year you anticipate the 2031 Growth Targets will 1n fact be considered 2035 Growth Targets? we need to select a horizon year for modeling and wanted to get your input. If you'd like to discuss, I'm available by cell phone at Thank you, Lisa Grueter I DIRECT STRATEGY I ANALYSIS I COMMUNICATIONS Helping communities and organizations create Their Best Futures Page 2

24 Page 10 of 23 DRAFT Technical Memo on Growth Targets June 13, 2013 This technical memo by the Interjurisdictional Team (IJT) provides guidance to King County jurisdictions working toward the 2015 comprehensive plan update required by the Growth Management Act. The memo addresses a key question that has been raised about including the adopted growth targets in comprehensive plan updates: Extending the time horizon beyond the 2031 adopted targets horizon year Updating the base year from 2006 to 2012 was addressed in a separate memo released in April BACKGROUND The Growth Management Act requires cities to plan for sufficient areas and densities for growth anticipated to occur in a twenty year period. To meet this state requirement, as cities update their comprehensive plans by the required 2015 deadline it is anticipated that many cities will extend their planning horizon to The Growth Management Planning Council sets household and employment growth targets for cities in King County in the Countywide Planning Policies. The current targets established by the GMPC are for the period This memo considers how cities may incorporate the 2031 targets into their comprehensive plans and extend the target values to a 2035 planning horizon. Straight Line Extension Cities may choose to extend their 2031 targets by adding the annual increment of the target period to extend the target to In other words, a straight line extension of the targets. Steps for Adjusting Targets by Extrapolating Incremental Annual Growth 1. Divide adopted target by 25 to show annual increment of growth 2. Multiply increment by four to calculate additional growth between 2031 and Add additional growth to original target to show new target 4. Calculate housing unit and job growth from 2006 to Subtract 4 from 3 to calculate new 2012 to 2035 target 6. Add new growth targets to 2012 housing units and jobs to show total housing units and jobs in 2035 A draft table of extended targets for individual cities is attached. The values in this table follow the above steps, but should be verified by individual cities. Target extensions may need to be adjusted to account for local changes, such as annexations.

25 Page 11 of 23 Adjustment for Regional Vision A key aspect of the regional plan, VISION 2040, is to gradually guide new development increasingly toward centers as the region continues to grow and change. VISION 2040 recognizes that this change in development patterns is more oriented toward centers and larger cities than current targets and that the change toward the regional plan will occur over time. VISION 2040 seeks a higher proportion of growth occurring in Metropolitan, Core, and Large cities than planned for with the 2031 targets and a lower proportion of growth in rural areas. With a nine year span between the 2031 targets and VISION 2040, cities have a time period available to adjust planning to become more consistent with the regional plan. As cities extend their planning horizon to 2035 they may seek to acknowledge the need to align toward VISION 2040 so as to avoid a larger adjustment that might be needed otherwise as cities approach the year For example, 2031 targets assign 28.3% of growth to Core cities while VISION 2040 assigns about 32.2%. To adjust growth planning toward VISION, Core cities may choose to recognize a planning horizon based on a mid point between the target and the VISION, about 30.0% Regional Geography Target Shares RGS Shares New 2035 Shares Metropolitan cities 39.8% 40.6% 40.2% Core cities 28.3% 32.2% 30.0% Large cities 13.9% 14.9% 14.4% Small cities 8.4% 4.8% 6.8% Uninc. Urban Areas 6.2% 4.8% 5.6% Rural 3.3% 2.8% 3.1% For additional information about VISION 2040 allocations or the King County 2031 growth targets, please contact Chandler Felt, King County or Carol Naito, PSRC

26 Page 12 of 23 King County Jurisdiction Growth Target Extensions to Targets Extended Targets Extensions New Units Net New Jobs New Units Net New Jobs Housing Target (2008 Boundary) Employment Target (2008 Boundary) Housing Target (2008 Boundary) Employment Target (2008 Boundary) New Units Net New Jobs Metropolitan Cities 103, , , ,652 16,480 31,952 Bellevue 17,000 53,000 19,720 61,480 2,720 8,480 Seattle 86, ,700 99, ,172 13,760 23,472 Core Cities 75, ,250 87, ,010 12,041 26,760 Auburn 9,620 19,350 11,159 22,446 1,539 3,096 Bothell 3,000 4,800 3,480 5, Burien 3,900 4,600 4,524 5, Federal Way 8,100 12,300 9,396 14,268 1,296 1,968 Kent 7,800 13,200 9,048 15,312 1,248 2,112 Kirkland 7,200 20,200 8,352 23,432 1,152 3,232 Redmond 10,200 23,000 11,832 26,680 1,632 3,680 Renton 14,835 29,000 17,209 33,640 2,374 4,640 SeaTac 5,800 25,300 6,728 29, ,048 Tukwila 4,800 15,500 5,568 17, ,480 Larger Cities 28,050 42,800 32,538 49,648 4,488 6,848 Des Moines 3,000 5,000 3,480 5, Issaquah 5,750 20,000 6,670 23, ,200 Kenmore 3,500 3,000 4,060 3, Maple Valley** 1,800 2,000 2,088 2, Mercer Island 2,000 1,000 2,320 1, Sammamish 4,000 1,800 4,640 2, Shoreline 5,000 5,000 5,800 5, Woodinville 3,000 5,000 3,480 5, Small Cities 10,922 8,168 12,670 9,475 1,748 1,307 Algona Beaux Arts Black Diamond 1,900 1,050 2,204 1, Carnation Clyde Hill Covington 1,470 1,320 1,705 1, Duvall 1, , Enumclaw 1, , Hunts Point Lake Forest Park Medina

27 Page 13 of Targets Extended Targets Extensions Net New New Units Net New Jobs New Units Net New Jobs New Units Jobs Milton Newcastle 1, , Normandy Park North Bend 665 1, , Pacific Skykomish Snoqualmie 1,615 1,050 1,873 1, Yarrow Point Urban Unincorporated 15,850 10,150 18,386 11,774 2,536 1,624 Potential Annex Areas 12,930 3,950 14,999 4,582 2, Bellevue PAA Bothell PAA Federal Way PAA 2, , Kent PAA 1, , Kirkland PAA 1, , Redmond PAA Renton PAA 3, , Tukwila PAA 50 2, , Issaquah PAA Maple Valley PAA** 1, , Sammamish PAA Milton PAA Pacific PAA North Highline 1,360 2,530 1,578 2, Bear Creek Urban Planned Dev 910 3,580 1,056 4, Unclaimed Urban Unincorp Rural 5, , Rural 5, , King County Total 238, , , ,559 38,152 68,491

28 Page 14 of 23 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 30, 2014 TO: FROM: RE: Dave Kuhl, Development Services Director, City of Woodinville Erik Rundell, Kapena Pflum, and Lisa Grueter, BERK Woodinville Comprehensive Plan Update, 2031 Growth Targets, 2035 Planning Estimates, and Land Capacity OVERVIEW The City of Woodinville has been allocated housing and employment growth targets in the King County Countywide Planning Policies. The City s Comprehensive Plan needs to reflect the growth targets and provide land use capacity sufficient to meet the targets. Currently, the growth targets extend to the year See Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 Current Growth Targets Housing Target Source: King County Countywide Planning Policies 2012 Employment Target Net New Units Net New Jobs Growth Target ,000 5,000 While the growth targets extend to the year 2031, the new 20-year planning horizon for local governments with a Comprehensive Plan Update deadline of June 30, 2015, such as Woodinville, is actually However, King County has no plans to formally update growth targets to the year Given the Growth Management Act (GMA) requirement to plan for 20 years (RCW 36.70A.115), King County and in interjurisdictional team of planning directors recommends that local governments start with the 2031 growth target and use either a straight-line projection or consider bending the trend towards Vision 2040 in order to derive a 20 year growth number. 12 The following sections of the memorandum describe the process for determining the City s updated residential and employment capacity and how these figures relate to the City s 2031 growth targets. Next the memo describes the process to develop 2035 planning estimates for housing and employment. The 1 VISION 2040 is the regional land use plan that has been adopted by its 80+ member agencies in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and cities. It also serves as the adopted multi-county planning policies required under GMA for Snohomish, King, and Pierce counties. 2 Technical Memo on Growth Targets Extension, revised October 31, 2013, Michael Kattermann, AICP, Senior Planner, Bellevue. to Doreen Booth, Policy Analyst, Sound Cities Association. Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 1

29 REVISED DRAFT Page 15 of 23 MEMORANDUM memo then compares the updated land capacity figures with the 2035 planning estimates to assess the City s future land use needs. Last, a section on conclusions and next steps is provided. RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY AND 2031 GROWTH TARGETS This memo updates the residential land capacity figures prepared by BERK calculated on behalf of the City in summer and fall The 2012 analysis used a parcel based method that applied proposed zoning rules to each parcel; the method incorporated and expanded the number of properties in the CBD zone considered redevelopable based on City staff knowledge of potential developments through preapplications or informal discussions with property owners. In addition, the 2012 analysis factored in building permit activity and residential development in the development pipeline as part of the City s residential capacity. The results of the 2012 analysis found that using the proposed zoning rule changes, the City would have slightly excess capacity to meet its 2031 housing growth target. Exhibit 2 summarizes the results of the 2012 analysis. Exhibit Residential Capacity with Adopted Zoning Rules (Now Superseded) Housing Capacity Target 3,000 Permits 573 Pending Development 225 Growth Target Remaining 2,202 Buildable Land Capacity 2,675 Net Surplus/Deficit 473 Source: BERK, 2012 A 2014 analysis the same methodology as was used in 2012, but incorporates additions and changes. First, this analysis incorporates the most recent pending development figures, notably the addition of the 800- unit Canterbury Square development (a net addition of 672 units above the existing 128 units), which increased the overall capacity within the City. The 2012 analysis assumed a net addition of 532 units on the Canterbury Square site. The second noteworthy change is the correction of an error in the 2012 analysis that counted properties in the Tourist Business zone with a development agreement as part of the buildable lands supply as well as in pending development essentially a double count, which reduces overall residential capacity within the CBD. However, buildable land properties were reviewed in the process of developing transportation model land use inputs. As a result, some R-1 land purchased for public use was removed. Some R-6 land in the western portion of the City was added as likely to be redeveloped with additional lots and less R-6 land in central Woodinville was thought to redevelop. The buildable land capacity estimated in 2014 is similar to the original 2012 results,but 60 units less. However, the City can still meet its 2031 targets. Exhibit 3 shows the updated 2013 land capacity figures. The overall conclusion is that the City has sufficient capacity to meet its 2031 Housing Target with a surplus of 413 dwellings approximately. Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures 2