Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 Manhattan, Kansas

Transcription

1 Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 Manhattan, Kansas The mission of the Manhattan-Ogden School District is to educate each student to be a contributing citizen in a changing, diverse society. Board of Education Meeting Agenda April 20, 2016 Robinson Education Center Kirmser Conference Room 2031 Poyntz Avenue ADDTONAL MEETNG NFORMATON NDEX TEM PAGE 7.0 New Business 7.3 Human Resources Report Addendum Old Business 10.1 Budget Planning

2 TEM 7.3 HUMAN RESOURCES AGENDA BACKGROUND April 20, 2016 LEAVE OF ABSENCE Melissa Scuilla, Teacher, has submitted a letter requesting Leave of Absence for school year. Ms. Scuilla has been with the district since December t is the recommendation of the Administration to approve this request for a Leave of Absence. RESGNATON Syndia Guerrero, was approved by the Board of Education at the April 6, 2016 meeting as the Spanish Teacher at Anthony and Eisenhower Middle Schools for t is the recommendation of the Administration to approve this resignation. 2

3 TEM 10.1 Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 School Finance Update and Budget Planning Report Board of Education Meeting April 20, 2016 Lew Faust Director of Business Services 3

4 Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 HB 2741 Excluded Expenditures Projections Description FY 2015 Actual ( ) Student Activities: Officials, Rental, Transptn, Supp/Equip S 379,412 General Fund Total, FY 2015 Actual $ 379, ( ) Coaches/Sponsors: Salary/Benefits $ 469, ( ) Activity Trips/Supplemental nsurance $ 82,415 Supplemental General Fund Total, FY 2015 Actual $ 552,140 Total $ 931,552 Projected Mill Levy mpact, FY 2018 Value 1.46 Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 Actual Mill Levy-FY 2016!General Fund Supplemental General Fund Adult Education 0.42 Capital Outlay 8.00 Bond & nterest#! Special Assessment 0.10 Total-FY 2016 Actual Manhattan-Ogden Projected Mill Levy-FY 2018 (HB 2741) General Fund Supplemental General Fund 0.00 Adult Education 0.42 Capital Outlay 8.00 Bond & nterest # Local Mill Levy 1.46 Special Assessment 0.10 Total-Projected FY 2018 (HB 2741) *Difference *This is a comparison to FY 2016 mill levy figures and does not account for inflation, additional operational costs and/or increases in employer paid salary and benefits. 4

5 HB 2741 KASB Projected Data Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 KASB Projected Values for HB 2741 Description Section 1: Enrollment Aid Section 2: Transportation Aid Section 3: Poverty Aid Section 4: Bilingual Aid Vocational/CTE Aid Value Multiplier Estimated Total-FY $ 5,775 $ 34,938, $ 211 $ 1,274, $ 3,099 $ 4,094, $ 425 $ 148,750 0 $ - $ - Prior Formula Values $ 23,715,608 $ 1,495,732 $ 3,337,373 $ 249,224 $ 267,329 LOB Aid/ Authority 0 $ 12,001,652 l *Net Total Difference $ 11,223,142 $ (220,911) $ 756,905 $ (100,474) $ (267,329) $ (12,001,652) $ (610,319) *Prior to adjustments for Balance Savings, Hold Harmless and Cash Balances With Projected Adjustments value for Manhattan-Ogden = $ (2,179,707) Projected Mill Levy mpact 1 mill =$637, Manhattan-Ogden Projected Mill Levy-FY 2018 (HB 2741) ' l General Fund Supplemental General Fund 0.00 Adult Education 0.42 Capital Outlay 8.00 Bond & nterest # Local Mill Levy 3.42 Special Assessment Total-Projected FY 2018 (HB 2741) FY 2016 Actual Mill Levy **Projected Mill Levy Difference 0.99 **This represent s a break-even value compared to FY 2015 actual expenditures. 5

6 School Funding Sub Committee Recon1mendations The State Board of Education has developed the following outcomes for measuring progress over time: Kindergarten readiness ndividual Plan of Study focused on career interest High school graduation rates Post-secondary completion/attendance Social/emotion growth measured locally As we have worked over the course of a number of meetings to re-envision school finance, we kept the State Board of Education's vision and outcomes for measuring progress in mind. Their work will create the accreditation process that will measure school district success. The funding formula will need to reflect the programs ;;ind structures required to meet the State Board's work. USA, KSSA, KASBO School Finance Subcommittee Collectively we developed a school finance framework, which states that a school funding formula needs to adhere to the following principles: Every student in Kansas' public schools will have an equal opportunity to be college and career ready, as defined by the Rose Standards; Some students will require greater supports to meet standards; Funding to districts must be directly related to what it costs to educate each individual student; Any formula must meet constitutional requirements for equity and adequacy; The formula should recognize local control and provide funding of educational services; and, The legislature and school districts need budgetingpredictability. Using the direction of the State Board of Education and principles above our work group has develop the following framework for funding schools based on needs of individual students. 1. Foundation aid based on enrollment Using prior year audited enrollment provides the legislature greater predictability No adjustments for changes in the fall 2. All day Kindergarten Meet the State Board of Education's outcome on Kindergarten readiness 3. Pre-Kinde~garten Continue current grant program Examine expanding for high needs student 6

7 4. High academic needs Focus on needs of individual students Consider census based poverty as the basis with other indicators of academic needs to develop a tiered system Absenteeism ii. Retention iii. Expulsion/suspension iv. Homeless or migrant v. English language learners vi. Scoring at level 1 on state assessments vii. Poverty based on census or direct certification This new a concept needs further analysis 5. Career technical education Move to a categorical, teacher based funding model nclude career counselors Support for ndividual Plans of Study beginning in middle school Move $1000 incentive to student for tuition at a post-secondary Consider regional funding based on workforce needs 6. Virtual School Examine the efficiency of the delivery model and success of students 7. Special education Continue current formula 8. Transportation Continue current formula Consider funding for students living less than 2.5 miles away from school for qualified reasons 9. Teacher quality mproving instruction for students Consider funding based on number of certified teachers Continue to fund stipend for National Board Certification 10. Local option budget Roll average LOB mill levy into statewide 20 mill Allow a local control of additional millage Part equalized ii. Concept is high wealth districts would pay part of the equalization for the low wealth districts iii. Limited for non-instructional 11. Capital outlay All districts should have access to locally generated and equalized funds for capital improvement Support local control and flexibility of funds 12. New facilities weighting New schools have additional costs 7

8 13. Low enrollment aid Keep current structure Review and analyze data Careful consideration of geographical size compared to enrollment 14. Bond equalization Consider a tiered plan: full equalization for schools; a lower tier for gyms, auditoriums, bus barns; and the lowest tier for athletic facilities, support and administration. 8

9 Summary of State of Kansas Oral Argument Brief Submitted to Supreme Court of Kansas on April 15, 2016 Section - Capital Outlay Equalization Aid HB 2655-Addresses the Capital Outlay equity issue by adopting the Capital Outlay formula originally in place for FY 2015, prior to SB 7, which the Court has previously found to be Constitutional. This remedy was also identified in the Gannon decision as one that would be acceptable to the Court. Section -Local Option Budget (LOB) Equalization Aid HB 2655-State asserts that the inequities in the LOB formula are resolved by adopting the previously approved Capital Outlay formula as the formula for distribution of LOB aid. Further, the state notes that this new formula for LOB aid is fully funded for equalization. Finally the state asserts that there was no rational educational basis for the structure of the previous LOB equalization aid formula. Section - Hold Harmless Aid HB 2655-State presents evidence that the Hold Harmless Provision was supported by all who testified, both as proponents and opponents, as necessary and appropriate. Section V - Severability HB 2655-State asserts that the legislation substantially complies with the directives of the Court in Gannon &. State requests that if remedy is required that the unconstitutional provisions be severed, rather than shutting down or enjoining all school funding. This is a change in technical language from SB 7, which had a nonseverability clause that meant that the entire bill had to either be approved or disapproved. Section V - Conclusion The State of Kansas argues that the Article 6 equity violations have been cured by HB 2655 and that the record submitted substantiates that the legislature acted in good faith to address and document their deliberations. The State attempts to shift the burden for keeping schools open onto the Court. "Zero funding for Kansas public schools cannot comply with Article 6, and the only reason zero funding would exist would be as a result of this Court's orders and decisions." 9

10 Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 FY 2016 Projected Budget Savings Category Description Projected Savings Source/Department Utilities Electricity & Gas $ 250,000 Maintenance/Facilities Overtime Salary/Benefits $ 30,000 Personnel-all departments nsurance Health Benefits-ACA S 700,000 Classified Additions Total l $ 980,000-10

11 Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 FY 2017 Projected Budget Additions/Reductions/Savings category Description Projected Cost Source/Department Salary/Benefits Superintendent Salary ncrease $ 28,500 BOE Certified Personnel Additional Teaching Staff (1 or 2) $ 94,000 Tentative-Enrollment ncreases Addtl. Duty Salary/Benefits MTSS Leadership Team (District) $ 3,000 MTSS lmplementation--tasn Online Registration Software Annual License Fee $ 12,000 District Adm in/boe Contract Services Copier Equipment Contract $ 11,500 Procurement Committee Contract Services Loss of E-Rate Funding $ 65,000 T /Business Services Technology ncrease Bandwidth Capacity $ 35,000 Director of Technology Facilities Planning Long Range Facility Plan $ 100,000 Facilities & Growth Committee Pre-K Funding PAT Funding--RRR $ 42,500 KS Legislature/Governor nflation Calculated Value of 1% $ 275,000 Projected Rate of nflation nsurance Health nsurance ncrease (1%=45k) $ 45,000 Human Resources Affordable Care Act July 1-September 30 $ 200,000 Human Resources -- State SPED Aid Categorical Funding Decrease $ 57,500 KSDE Update-D. Howser Community Activity Chamber Membership (NP) $ 1,000 DAT Phone Bill AT&T Rate ncrease + Addtl Lines $ 25,000 Accounts Payable Utilities 1 Westar (29% ncrease Transmission Rate) $ 20,000 Westar Energy Business Manager nsurance 1 Short-term Disability Coverage (12% decrease) $ (15,000) Human Resources Sub-Total #1 $ 1,000,000 - Category Description Projected Cost Source/Department Salary/Benefits Classified Employees Wages (1%) $ 100,000 Classified Wage Committee Salary/Benefits Certified/ Administrative Wages (1%) $ 375,000 District Admin/BOE/Negotiations Sub-Total #2 1 $ 475,000 Grand Total $ 1,475,000 11

12 Budget Review Variables for FY 2015-FV 2017: Manhattan-Ogden USO 383 General Fund Total Weighted FTE FTE*BBPP Transfers n Calculated Legal Max Block Grant Actual Audited Budget Authority, FY 2015 Legal Max 9398 $ 36,201,096 $ 250,000 $ 36, $ 36,576,282 Addtl Adjustments-Balance, MA $ (35,841) September 20, 2015 Audited FTE $ 36,726,509 $ 400,000 $ 37,126,506 $ 400,000 Additional Flow Th rough Transfers $ 6,112,375 February 20, 2016 Additional Military Count 0 $ - $ - Extraordinarv Needs Fund Deduction $ (115,494) $ (115,494) $ (115,494) State Aid Over-Proration $ 151,335 $ 151,335 $ 151,335 Total $ 36,762,350 $ 400,000 $ 37,162,350 $ 36,976,282 Net Difference $ 561,254 $ 150,000 $ 711,254 $ (186,068 Supplemental General (LOB) Adopted Budget Authority (31%) $ 12,554, 291 $ 700,000 $ 13,254,291 $ 13,254,291 Total Projected Budget Authority (prior to any allotments/reductions) Year 1-Block Grant (FY 2016) $ 50,416,641 $ 50,230,573 Adjusted FY 2016Total w/out SG Equalization Aid Plug $ 49,716,641 $ 49,530,573 Difference: Legal Max to Actual FY16 $ (186,068) *Budget Adjustments Resulting from Modifications to SB 7--Block Grant Year 3 FY 2017 *tems in this section are subject to ongoing change by the Kansas Legislature General Fund Reduction of 0.4% for Extraordinary Needs Fund (Accounted for in FY 2016 Calculation) $ - Hold Harmless (SS HB 2655) One time money $ 1,536,205 Supplemental General Fund (LOB) State Aid (SS HB 2655) $ (1,536,205) Total Adjustments to FY 2017 $ - Projected Budget Variables-FY 2017 Block Grant State Aide Adjustments $ - Projected Savings List-FY 2016 (Attachment ) $ 980,000 Projected Budget Additions List (Attachment ) $ (1,475,000} FY 2016 Contingency Reserve Budget Transfer $ (400,000) FY 2016 over Prorauon Budget A djustmen~ $ (155,335) Tota l s (l,050,335) Possible Revenue Enhancements Fiscal Value Combined Total Mill Levy-Combined Mill Levy-ndividual F-\..±.7-P4Gjei;i-ea~-1ide1*-if'lEFea~tttdeRt-s-) Negated by Block Grant ~~00 ~ '" Replenish SG Aid reduction $ 1,536,205 $ 1,536, % LOB (32%) $ 406,000 $ 1,942, % LOB (33%) $ 812,000 s 2,348, Cost of Living Mill Levy Requires BOE Resolution $ 865,371 $ 865, Revenue Enhancement Maximum Total SG Aid+ 33%LOB +Cost of Living ncrease $ 3,213, M:\Lew-DBS\Budget 2017\Budget Planning_Additions, FY 2017