Enclosure Table of Contents

Transcription

1 Item 8 Enclosure Citizens Advisory Committee September 25, 2013 Prop K/AA Grouped Allocation Requests October 2013 Board Action Enclosure Table of Contents No. Fund Source Project Sponsor 1 1 Prop K TJPA EP 2 Line Item/ Category Description Project Name Phase DTX to Rebuilt Transbay Terminal Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Design, RightofWay Funds Requested Page No. 4,500, Prop K PCJPB Caltrain Electrification Caltrain Early Investment Program Environmental, Procurement, Construction 6,390, Prop K PCJPB Caltrain CIP RightofWay Safety Fencing Construction 429, Prop K PCJPB Caltrain CIP Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Design, Construction 585, Prop K PCJPB Transit Vehicles MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Construction 1,000, Prop K PCJPB Guideways Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Planning, Design, Construction 86, Prop K PCJPB Guideways CTAMS Data Population Design 350, Prop K PCJPB Guideways 9 Prop K PCJPB Guideways Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Construction 118, Planning 120, Prop K PCJPB Guideways Rail Grinding Construction 154, Prop K PCJPB Guideways Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Design, Construction 118, Prop K PCJPB Guideways South Terminal Wayside Power Construction 28, Prop K PCJPB Guideways 14 Prop K DPW Great Highway Erosion Repair Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Construction 838, Planning 49, Prop K SFMTA Traffic Calming Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Design, Construction 46, Prop K SFMTA Bicycle Circulation/Safety, Pedestrian Circulation/Safety Mansell Corridor Improvement Project Environmental 88, Prop K DPW Transportation/ Land Use Coordination Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Environmental, Design 24, Prop K DPW Transportation/ Land Use Coordination ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Environmental, Design 20, Prop AA DPW Street Repair and Reconstruction McAllister St Pavement Renovation Construction 2,210, EP stands for Expenditure Plan. Total Requested 17,157,382 Acronym include TJPA (Transbay Joint Powers Authority), PCJPB (Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain)), DPW (San Francisco Department of Public Works), and SFMTA (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency). M:\CAC\Meetings\Memo to CAC\2013\09 Sep 25\Prop K_AA Grouped enclosure\toc Prop K Grouped.xlsx

2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

3 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E81 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Transbay Joint Powers Authority EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit i. Major Capital Projects (transit) b.1 Caltrain Downtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Terminal Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 5 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 4,500,000 6 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) is requesting 4,200,000 in Prop K funds for the RightofWay phase of the Transbay Transit Center project and 300,000 for the Design phase of the Downtown Extension project. Please see next page for scope. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 1Scope Page 1 of 17

4 E82 Background and Project Benefits Headed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), the Downtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Terminal (Project) has three major components: the extension of Caltrain commuter rail service from its current San Francisco terminus at Fourth and Townsend Streets to a new underground terminus underneath a new Transbay Transit Center; a new, multimodal Transbay Transit Center on the site of the former Transbay Terminal; and the establishment of a Redevelopment Area Plan with related development projects, including transitoriented development on publicly owned land in the vicinity of the new multimodal Transbay Transit Center. The Prop K Expenditures Plan specifies that the downtown rail extension and the terminal are to be built as a single integrated project. Bus operations are scheduled to start at the new terminal in October The Project provides the following public benefits: improved access to rail and bus services; improved Caltrain service by providing direct access to downtown San Francisco; enhanced connectivity between Caltrain and other major transit providers; modernization of the former Transbay Terminal to meet future transit needs; reduced nontransit vehicle use; accommodating projected growth in travel demand in the San Jose San Francisco corridor; reduced traffic congestion on US Highway 101 and I280 and other routes between San Jose and San Francisco; reduced vehicle hours of delay on major freeways in the Peninsula corridor; improved regional air quality by reducing auto emissions; direct access to downtown San Francisco for future intercity and/or highspeed rail service; alleviation of blight and revitalization of the Transbay Terminal Area; construction of more than 4,400 new housing units, thirtyfive percent of which will be affordable; facilitate transit use by developing housing next to a major transit hub; enhanced access to employment, retail, and entertainment opportunities; and support of local economic development goals. Current Request The current request would fund the continuation of preliminary engineering (PE) for the Downtown Extension (DTX) and potential costs for closeout of the final two rightofway (ROW) acquisitions for the Project. A detailed scope and budget of 300,000 for DTX PE is included as an attachment to this application package. During the course of work, adjustments may be made to individual lineitems within the scope; however, the overall budget will not be exceeded. The scope of work includes: 1) project management; 2) ongoing coordination between TJPA and stakeholders, including but not limited to, Caltrain, the California High Speed Rail Authority, the City and County of San Francisco, the Federal Transit Administration, and the Federal Railroad Administration; and 3) provide support for the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report/Statement being prepared to address changes to the approved project required by the California High Speed Rail Authority. The changes consist of an extension of the train box by 150 feet and providing a larger turning radius in the throat structure resulting in a larger footprint and additional ROW takes. This funding request would also cover 4.2 million in worst case compensation, attorneys' and experts' fees, and court costs associated with the acquisition of 564 and 568 Howard, properties TJPA is acquiring through eminent domain litigation. Phase 1 of the Transbay Project has required acquisition of fee interests and easements. To date, the TJPA has acquired 19 fee interests in formerly stateowned parcels under a 2003 Cooperative Agreement between the State of California, P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX Scope.docx Page 2 of 17

5 E83 TJPA, and the City and County of San Francisco; 21 fee interests in parcels through voluntary purchasesale agreements with private property owners (9 of which were settlements of eminent domain actions); and 15 easement interests in parcels through voluntary purchasesale agreements with private property owners (13 of these easement interests are currently pending but an agreement has been reached with the easement holders and closing is scheduled to occur in fall TJPA currently has possession of the two remaining Howard Street parcels pursuant to court order, and trials are scheduled for spring of Eminent domain litigation was filed in December 2010 by the City and County of San Francisco, acting on behalf of the TJPA for several properties. In early 2011, the Authority deposited the amount of probable compensation based on TJPA's appraisals for several of the properties, including 564 and 568 Howard, with the State Treasurer, using 6,236,359 in Prop K funds allocated by the Authority Board on February 12, 2008 through Resolution In May 2013, as required by eminent domain law, the Authority increased the deposits with Prop K funds from Resolution 0847 for these two properties by 1,725,000 to match the estimated probable compensation based on TJPA s updated appraisals. TJPA has sufficient funds remaining in Resolution 0847 (Project No ), to cover any settlement amounts for 564 and 568 Howard that are based on TJPA s updated appraisals. However, the former property owners have prepared their own appraisals, which are more than 7 million higher than TJPA s appraisals, in the aggregate. Although TJPA strongly believes that its updated appraisals of the properties are more credible than the property owners' appraisals and that a jury will determine just compensation at a value much closer to TJPA's appraisal, the conservative approach is to be prepared to respond to a "worst case" scenario. Funds will be due within thirty (30) days after the end of the trials for these properties. Should a jury find that the former property owners valuations are correct, TJPA would not have sufficient funds remaining to fund this worst case. This funding request is for 4.2 million to cover any difference. Any funds not required when the final settlement amounts are known may be rescinded and deobligated for future allocation to the project. As with all Authorityfunded right of way purchases, the Authority may hold a quitclaim deed on the property should the Transbay Project be cancelled. Prop K Strategic Plan Amendment See Funding Section for required Strategic Plan amendment. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX Scope.docx Page 3 of 17

6 E84 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Transbay Joint Powers Authority ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: EIR/EIS Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Completed 02/08/05 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES PHASE 1 ONLY Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Phase 1 (Transbay Transit Center) Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /01 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /09 R/W Activities/Acquisition / /14 Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents / /17 Advertise Construction /08 N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /08 N/A Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) N/A N/A Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A /18 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) N/A /18 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. The schedule presented above is based on the Refined Locally Preferred Alternative commitment schedule for the Full Program with dates shown for the Transbay Transit Center. The TJPA Board of Directors has approved the Recommended Implementation Strategy. Under this Strategy, the TJPA will proceed with the engineering, design and construction of the Transit Center Building and Train Box as Phase 1, while continuing to seek full funding for Phase 2 DTX. The schedule for Phase 2 will be developed once TJPA has identified funding and a delivery method. The funding requested for Phase 2 will cover preliminary engineering activities through June There is an obligation to complete the project for bus operations in the timeframe stipulated in the Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans. Bus operations are scheduled to start in October P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 2Schedule Page 4 of 17

7 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E85 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Transbay Joint Powers Authority COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Total Cost 300,000 7,700,000 8,000,000 Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Current Request 300,000 For Phase 2 4,200,000 For Phase 1 4,500,000 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 131,686, ,427, ,047,277 3,828,238,625 4,495,400,000 Source of Cost Estimate Completed by Caltrain Current Budget (adopted by TJPA on July 11, 2013) Current Budget (adopted by TJPA on July 11, 2013) Current Budget (adopted by TJPA on July 11, 2013) Current Budget (adopted by TJPA on July 11, 2013) % Complete of Design: 42 as of Expected Useful Life: 70 Years 6/30/13 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 3Cost Page 5 of 17

8 E86 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. PROJECT BUDGET ROW ACQUISITION PHASE 1 TASK Totals ROW Acquisition (Eminent Domain Contingency) 4,200,000 PROJECT BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DTX PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING CONTRACT TASK Total 1. Project Management 50, Coordination 163, Supplemental EIS/EIR Support 87,000 Contract Total 300,000 TOTAL FUNDING REQUEST ROW Acquisition Phase 1 4,200,000 DTX Continued Preliminary Engineering Phase 2 300,000 Covers activities through June 2014 Total 4,500,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 6 of 17

9 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E87 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 4,500,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 31,332,624 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Downtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Terminal category in Fiscal Year 2013/14. This request requires a Strategic Plan amendment to change the phase for funds already programmed in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Transbay Transit Center (Phase 1) from Design to RightofWay and to advance 300,000 in Prop K funds programmed to DTX (Phase 2) in Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14. See attached Strategic Plan amendment for details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax 300,000 4,200,000 3,500,000 8,000, Total: 300,000 4,200,000 3,500,000 8,000,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 0.00% 8,000,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 85.68% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 5Funding Page 7 of 17

10 E88 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source No Required Local Match Amount % FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total See attached. Total: Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 94.95% 4,495,400,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 85.68% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 4,500,000 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year Cash Flow % Reimbursed Annually Balance FY 2013/14 4,500, % % % % % 0 Total: 4,500,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: Fiscal Year Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance 0 Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 5Funding Page 8 of 17

11 E89 Dowtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Transit Center Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 Phase 1: Transbay Transit Center Project Phases 1 Source 2 Type Status PE/ENV PS&E ROW CON Total by Status TOTAL 3 Allocated 0 70,000, ,000, ,000,000 ARRA Federal Programmed ,000,000 Planned Allocated ,650,000 2,650,000 FRA Rail Relocation Federal Programmed ,650,000 Planned Allocated 19,626,000 2,500, ,264,000 62,390,000 FTA Grants Federal Programmed ,390,000 Planned Allocated 0 100, ,000 FEMA Grants Federal Programmed ,000 Planned Allocated OneBayArea Grant Federal Programmed ,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Planned Allocated ,000, ,000,000 TIFIA Loan 4 Federal Programmed ,000,000 Planned ,000,000 97,000,000 Allocated 0 67,400, ,276, ,676,000 AB 1171 State Programmed 0 2,324, ,324, ,000,000 Planned Allocated 6,600, ,800,000 54,400,000 Regional Measure 1 State Programmed ,400,000 Planned Allocated 42,331,000 17,719,000 52,745,000 30,222, ,017,000 Regional Measure 2 State Programmed ,017,000 Planned Allocated 0 6,762,000 3,391, ,153,000 RIPSF State Programmed ,153,000 Planned Allocated 0 3,398, ,445,000 9,843,000 AC Transit Local Programmed ,709,000 29,709,000 39,552,000 Planned P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF Page 9 of 17

12 E810 Phase 1: Transbay Transit Center Dowtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Transit Center Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 Project Phases 1 Source 2 Type Status PE/ENV PS&E ROW CON Total by Status TOTAL 3 Allocated ,885, ,885,476 Land Sales 5 Local Programmed ,605,476 Planned ,720, ,720,000 Allocated 26,693,901 18,200,000 23,665,283 8,152,666 76,711,850 Prop K 6 Local Programmed 0 6,676, ,756,624 58,432, ,344,474 Planned 0 0 4,200, ,200,000 Allocated 2,306, ,000 37,000 4,274,423 7,260,423 Other Local 7 Local Programmed ,260,423 Planned Allocated 4,497, ,497,000 SMCTA Local Programmed ,497,000 Planned Allocated TBD 8 Local Programmed ,530,627 Planned ,530,627 84,530,627 Allocated 102,053, ,622,000 79,838, ,969,565 1,281,483,749 Totals Programmed 0 9,000, ,465,624 96,465,624 1,899,400,000 Planned 0 0 4,200, ,250, ,450, ,053, ,622,000 84,038,283 1,517,685,816 1,899,400,000 1 Acronyms used for project phases include: PE/ENV Preliminary Engineering/Environmental Documentation, PS&E Plans, Specifications & Estimates or Final Design, ROW Right of Way, CON Construction. 2 Acronyms used in this column include: AB Assembly Bill, ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, FRA Federal Railroad Administration, FTA Federal Transit Administration, RIP Regional Improvement Program, TJPA Transbay Joint Powers Authority, SMCTA San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and TIFIA Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act 3 On July 11, 2013, the TJPA approved a revised budget of billion, an increase of million over the May 2010 baseline. 4 The majority source of repayment for the TIFIA loan is tax increment. Passenger facility charges from AC Transit also represent a portion of the pledged revenues. TJPA is planning to renegotiate its current TIFIA loan to increase the amount. The million range of planned TIFIA amount reflects TJPA's estimate of the additional borrowing capacity stemming from a renegotiated financing agreement. 5 Land Sales based on 2013 update of land values. Revenues previously assumed for Phase 2 accelerated to fund outyear Phase 1 construction costs. 6 Prop K amount includes 41 million in new programming capacity available in the 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline. 7 Other Local includes proceeds from the sale of Transferrable Development Rights (TDRs) associated with 80 Natoma, as well as income from leasing out the various properties TJPA acquired before they were needed for construction. This also includes a small amount of interest earnings. 8 Potential sources include other federal funds, District Plan Impact Fees, philanthropic opportunities to fund public artwork and park costs, etc. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF Page 10 of 17

13 E811 Phase 2: Downtown Extension Dowtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Transit Center Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 Project Phases 1 Source 2 Type Status PE/ENV PS&E ROW CON Total by Status TOTAL 3 Allocated TIFIA Loan Federal Programmed ,241,101 Planned ,241, ,241,101 Allocated 1,240, ,240,000 Alternatives Analysis Federal Programmed Grant Planned ,240,000 Allocated 6,983, ,983,557 Regional Measure 2 State Programmed ,983,557 Planned Allocated Land Sales Local Programmed ,000,000 Planned ,000,000 80,000,000 Allocated ,862, ,862,415 SMCTA State Programmed ,862,415 Planned Allocated 20,028, ,000, ,028,809 Prop K Local Programmed ,161,173 30,161,173 79,489,982 Planned 0 300, ,000 Allocated RIPSF 4 State Programmed ,800,000 Planned ,800,000 17,800,000 Allocated New Starts Federal Programmed ,000,000 Planned ,000, ,000,000 Allocated New Bridge Tolls Local Programmed ,000,000 Planned ,000, ,000,000 High Speed Rail Allocated Federal or Programmed State Planned ,000, ,000, ,000,000 Allocated Sales Tax Extension Local Programmed / Other Local Planned ,000, ,000, ,000,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF Page 11 of 17

14 E812 Phase 2: Downtown Extension Dowtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Transit Center Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 Project Phases 1 Source 2 Type Status PE/ENV PS&E ROW CON Total by Status TOTAL 3 Allocated Joint Development 5 Local Programmed 0 59,081, ,126, ,792, ,000, ,000,000 Planned Allocated 28,252, ,862, ,114,781 Totals Programmed 0 59,081, ,126, ,953, ,161,173 2,595,617,055 Planned 0 300, ,089,041,101 2,089,341,101 28,252,366 59,381, ,989,055 2,305,994,634 2,595,617,055 1 Acronyms used for project phases include: PE/ENV Preliminary Engineering/Environmental Documentation, PS&E Plans, Specifications & Estimates or Final Design, ROW Right of Way, CON Construction. 2 Acronyms used in this column include: RIP Regional Improvement Program, SMCTA San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and TIFIA Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act 3 Phase 2 budget based on Plan Bay Area Transportation Investment Strategy. Planned revenues subject to change. 4 In November 2005, through Resolution 0630, the Authority committed to prioritizing its RIP funds to four major capital projects, including the Downtown Extension to a Rebuilt Transbay Terminal. This commitment stems from the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan. In March 2012, through Resolution 1244, the Authority Board made the Central Subway the second priority for future RIP funds and repayment of the MTC STP/CMAQ advance (i.e. by programming 34 million in RIP funds to a project or projects of MTC's choice) the third priority. No priority order had been assigned to the remaining two projects, which includes the subject project and Caltrain Electrification. 5 The amount of Joint Development in the Plan Bay Area Transportation Investment Strategy is 100 million. As the formation of a MelloRoos Community Facilities District moves forward, updated projections show that DTX can expect closer to 400 million. Funding plan includes corresponding reduction in TIFIA and Land Sales which have been accelerated to fund Phase 1. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF Page 12 of 17

15 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E813 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Implementing Agency: Transbay Joint Powers Authority Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 4,200,000 Prop K Allocation 300,000 Phase: R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 4,500,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 5 FY 2013/14 4,500, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 4,500, % Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 5 FY 2013/14 R/W Activities/Acquisition 4,200,000 93% Prop K EP 5 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 300, % 100% 100% 100% Total: 4,500,000 Balance 300, Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2014 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 6Authority Rec Page 13 of 17

16 E814 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Implementing Agency: Transbay Joint Powers Authority Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: Monthly progress reports shall, in addition to standard Prop K requirements, report on the use of any preconstruction income generated from the properties acquired with Prop K funds. (Phase 1) Upon close of escrow for each property, provide the Authority with a copy of the final agreement with property owners. (Phase 1) Upon close of escrow for each property, provide the Authority with a memorandum detailing closing costs. (Phase 1) For DTX design, provide monthly report detailing cost and progress by task. The monthly report shall include a summary of all contracts and agreements, including agency work, showing the budgeted versus actual amounts. (Phase 2) Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment to change the phase for funds already programmed in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Transbay Transit Center (Phase 1) from Design to RightofWay and to advance 300,000 in Prop K funds programmed to DTX (Phase 2) in Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14. See attached Strategic Plan amendment for details. Notes: TJPA will provide the Authority with draft and final versions of all deliverables resulting from the scope of work resulting from this allocation. The TJPA will execute a quitclaim deed in favor of the Authority for the properties acquired with Prop K funds. Should the Transbay Program be cancelled, ownership of the properties will be conveyed to the Authority. If the actual final cost of the properties, including closing costs, are less than the amount allocated, any unused Prop K funds will be deobligated and returned to the Authority for reprogramming to the Transbay Transit Center/Downtown Extension project. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: 0.00% Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: CP Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 6Authority Rec Page 14 of 17

17 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E815 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Implementing Agency: Transbay Joint Powers Authority SUBPROJECT DETAIL SubProject # from SGA: Name: Transbay Transit Center ROW Supervisorial District(s): 6 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 5 FY 2013/14 R/W Activities/Acquisition 4,200,000 Total: 4,200,000 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 0 100% 0 100% 0 100% 0 100% 0 SubProject # from SGA: Name: Downtown Extension PS&E Supervisorial District(s): 6 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 5 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 300,000 Total: 300,000 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 6Authority Rec Page 15 of 17

18 E816 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Map identifying 564 & 568 Howard Street P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 7Maps.etc Page 16 of 17

19 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E817 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 4,500,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Transbay Transit Center and Downtown Extension Transbay Joint Powers Authority Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Maria AyerdiKaplan Title: Executive Director Phone: (415) Fax: (415) mayerdikaplan@transbaycenter.org Grants Section Contact Sara Gigliotti Chief Financial Officer (415) (415) sgigliotti@transbaycenter.org Address: 201 Mission Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA Mission Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\TJPA Transbay Transit Center and DTX ARF, 8Signatures Page 17 of 17

20 E818 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

21 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E819 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Investment Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit i. Major Capital Projects (transit) b.2 Caltrain Electrification Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 6 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 6,390,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. See next pages. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 1Scope Page 1 of 25

22 E820 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form Background On April 24, 2012, through Resolution 1262, the Authority Board authorized the Executive Director to execute, with conditions, a Memorandum of Understanding with the California High Speed Rail Authority, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and six other local and regional entities to establish a funding framework for a HighSpeed Rail Early Investment Strategy for a blended system in the Peninsula Corridor. The Early Investment Strategy, also known as the Early Investment Program (EIP), consists of two components including: the Communications Based Overlay Signal System (CBOSS) (also known as Positive Train Control (PTC)) project; and the electrification of the Caltrain line between San Jose and San Francisco and the purchase of electricmultiple unit (EMU) vehicles to operate on the electrified railroad. Combined, CBOSS/PTC, the electrification of the Caltrain line between San Jose and San Francisco, and the purchase of EMU vehicles will modernize the corridor, reduce train related emissions by up to 90 percent, provide faster and increased service to more stations, and will prepare the Caltrain system for shared use with High Speed Rail. Overview of Request On November 20, 2012, through Resolution 1317, the Authority Board allocated 3 million in Prop K funds as the first installment of funding toward San Francisco's 60 million commitment to the EIP. The current allocation request will provide the second installment of funding (Fiscal Year 2013/14 member share). The requested funds will be directed toward the following scope elements of these projects: CBOSS/PTC: subsystem installation, subsystem and system testing, training, safety certification, completion of the backup control center facility (BCCF), commissioning and system acceptance. Details of the CBOSS project are included below. Electrification: 35% design refresh, environmental clearance, development of the system safety program, development of the project delivery method, and preparation of the project delivery request for proposals (RFP). The environmental Notice of Preparation, with a more detailed scope is attached to this allocation request. EMU Procurement: Development of EMU specifications, service/operations planning and analysis. CBOSS Scope CBOSS is a system that tracks train locations and prevents unsafe movement through the use of equipment onboard the locomotives and in the field. CBOSS functions will remain unchanged prior to, during, and post electrification. The fiber optic backbone installed through CBOSS project will be connected with traction power substations as part of the electrification project. This will allow electrified systems to be monitored in the Central Control Facility through this component of the CBOSS system. Additionally, all electrification components that interface with wayside CBOSS P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB EIP Scope.docx Page 2 of 25

23 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form E821 equipment will be tested to ensure compatibility with the entire CBOSS system. That testing will be a part of the electrification project scope of work. New EMU vehicles will be procured with CBOSS equipment that is designed to work seamlessly with the CBOSS system and will operate in the same way as on the diesel vehicles. This allocation request is for the second installment of funding for the implementation of CBOSS along the Caltrain corridor to meet Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) requirements for the installation of an operational positive train control system by December The CBOSS project is being implemented through a multiphase designbuild contract that was awarded by the PCJPB in October The project includes a provision for the construction of a Backup Central Control Facility (BCCF) that is integrated with existing communications and control facilities to be used in the event of the failure of the main CBOSS system, as well as the installation of a fiber optics communications backbone to provide improved CBOSS communications. Caltrain, assisted by the contractor, will work with the Association of American Railroads (AAR) and tenant railroad operators to ensure that the CBOSS is supported by and compliant with interoperability standards of the Federal Railroad Administration. Implementation of Caltrain CBOSS project will also enable Caltrain to support existing rail service levels during construction of the electrification system while maintaining a safe work environment for crews installing the electrification equipment. Please see the attached Contract Document for a detailed scope description of the CBOSS project. Briefly, scope elements may include, but are not limited to: Final Design, procurement, manufacture, installation, and testing, inclusive of any necessary modifications to Caltrain s systems, subsystems, vehicles and facilities. CBOSS system elements include digital data link communication systems; GPS equipment onboard trains; computers with digitized maps on locomotives and maintenanceofway equipment to display train locations; throttlebrake interfaces on locomotives to allow CBOSS override of locomotive systems if needed; wayside interface units at switches and wayside detectors; and central control facility (CCF) computers and displays. Ensure that Caltrain CBOSS system fixed infrastructure is interoperable with other operator s positive train control equipped trains (such as Union Pacific) that operate in the Caltrain corridor. Installation of fiber optic backbone cables to provide enhanced CBOSS communications between wayside equipment and the CCF. Coordination and support of FRA requirements. Training of JPB and contract operator staff on the use of the CBOSS system. Update Caltrain operating rules, maintenance and inspection procedures and other documents required to support the operation and maintenance of the Caltrain CBOSS system. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB EIP Scope.docx Page 3 of 25

24 E822 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form Work completed to date includes: Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued to the prime contractor on January 27, Completed wayside survey of rail signals and crossings to verify the existing infrastructure. Held interoperability meetings with tenant and host railroads including Union Pacific Railroad, California High Speed Rail Authority, Amtrak, Capital Corridor and Altamont Commuter Express to discuss both technical and business issues related to the implementation of CBOSS. Completed the GPS data collection, a required input for the CBOSS software. This information also aids the engineering design effort. Completed the vehicle inspection survey to verify existing rolling stock condition and equipment. This will allow the contractor to design the onboard CBOSS equipment. Commenced system and subsystem preliminary design. Began developing requirements for backup control center facility. Submitted Positive Train Control Implementation Plan (PTCIP) annual update and the PTC Development plan to FRA for review and approval. Funding The requested amount is consistent with the 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline. See chart in the Funding Section for a description of the Fiscal Year 2014 funding needs for the EIP. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB EIP Scope.docx Page 4 of 25

25 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E823 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Investment Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorical Exemption Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Completed 07/02/09 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. CBOSS Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering N/A N/A N/A N/A Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /10 R/W Activities/Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents N/A N/A N/A N/A Advertise Construction N/A N/A /12 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /13 N/A N/A Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Please note this is a design/build contract. See the next page for a project summary schedule. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 2Schedule CBOSS Page 5 of 25

26 E824 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Caltrain Advanced Signal System CBOSS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Activities J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J 1. Preliminary Design 2. Critical Design 3. Final Design 4. System Procurement 5. System Installation 6. Testing/Commissioning 7. System Acceptance P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, CBOSS Summary Schedule Page 6 of 25

27 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E825 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Implementation Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Environmental Impact Report/Statement (EIR/S) Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 11/07/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. ELECTRIFICATION Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /15 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /15 R/W Activities/Acquisition / /15 Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction / /16 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) / /20 Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /20 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /20 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Environmental clearance type and schedule above is provided for reference purposes only and will be subject to change as the PCJPB refines the schedule for the electrification project based on the PCJPB Board action on September 5, 2013 approving a design/build project delivery method. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 2Schedule Electrification Page 7 of 25

28 E826 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Investment Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. CBOSS Planning/Conceptual Engineering** Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E)** R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Current Request 188,060,000 2,460, ,060,000 2,460,000 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering** Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E)** R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 34,720,000 8,200, ,060, ,980,000 Source of Cost Estimate JBP cost estimates/actual contract costs JBP cost estimates/actual contract costs JBP cost estimates/actual contract costs % Complete of Design: 65 as of Expected Useful Life: 30 Years 8/31/2013 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 3Cost CBOSS Page 8 of 25

29 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E827 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Investment Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. ELECTRIFICATION Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Prop AA Yes/No Total Cost Current Request Current Request Planning/Conceptual Engineering** Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E)** Yes TBD 3,570,000 R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes TBD 360,000 3,930,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering** Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E)** R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost TBD 785,000, ,000,000 1,225,000,000 % Complete of Design: 35 as of 8/31/2013 Expected Useful Life: 30 Years TBD Source of Cost Estimate Early Investment Program Funding Plan Early Investment Program Funding Plan Phaselevel budget projections are anticipated to be available by December 2013, following PCJPB Board action to select the project delivery method. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 3Cost Electrification Page 9 of 25

30 E828 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Please see the overall budgets and funding plans for Electrification and CBOSS on subsequent pages. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 10 of 25

31 E829 San Francisco County Transportation Authority CBOSS Major Line Item Budget <=FY12 FY13 FY 14 FY 15 FY16 FY 17 TOTAL % of CON Contract Design 14,626,902 8,307,335 22,934,237 21% Contract Procurement/equipment 35,146,549 4,743,729 39,890,278 Contract Installation/Testing 5,435,248 41,182,565 23,452,723 70,070,536 Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) 1,715,500 3,525,122 5,240,622 5% Agency Staff 807,000 1,351,056 2,518,680 2,445,010 2,072,521 9,194,266 8% Program/Project Management 6,219,202 5,404,223 10,074,718 9,780,040 8,290,083 39,768,266 36% Other Project Direct Cost 360,000 2,467,761 19,380,000 1,900,000 24,107,761 22% Project contingency 2,003,113 6,395,029 7,753,134 3,642,759 19,794,034 18% TOTAL 8,741,702 23,745,294 70,345,319 85,284,478 39,358,086 3,525, ,000,000 <=FY12 FY Q3 2012Q4 2013Q1 2013Q2 Contract Design 2,134,292 4,100,627 8,391,984 14,626,902 Contract Procurement/equipment Contract Installation/Testing Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) 1,715,500 1,715,500 Agency Staff 807, , , , ,377 2,158,056 Program/Project Management 6,219,202 1,128,136 1,169,659 1,468,921 1,637,507 11,623,425 Other Project Direct Cost 15,000 15, ,000 15, ,000 Project contingency 326, , , ,751 2,003,113 Subtotal 8,741,702 3,885,705 6,104,729 11,529,225 2,225,635 32,486,996 Total FY Q3 2013Q4 2014Q1 2014Q2 Contract Design 8,307,335 8,307,335 Contract Procurement/equipment 10,844,513 8,245,700 14,056,336 2,000,000 35,146,549 Contract Installation/Testing 5,435,248 5,435,248 Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) Agency Staff 553, , , ,619 2,518,680 Program/Project Management 2,212,922 2,507,174 3,116,147 2,238,475 10,074,718 Other Project Direct Cost 300,000 90,000 90,000 1,987,761 2,467,761 Project contingency 2,221,800 1,146,967 1,804,152 1,222,110 6,395,029 Subtotal 24,439,801 12,616,635 19,845,671 13,443,212 70,345,319 Total Contract Design FY Q3 2014Q4 2015Q1 2015Q2 Contract Procurement/equipment 4,743,729 4,743,729 Contract Installation/Testing 17,350,970 14,739,303 9,092,292 41,182,565 Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) Agency Staff 614, , , ,001 2,445,010 Program/Project Management 2,458,415 2,382,201 2,463,417 2,476,006 9,780,040 Other Project Direct Cost 9,590,000 9,590, , ,000 19,380,000 Project contingency 3,475,772 1,256,775 1,791,857 1,228,730 7,753,134 Subtotal 38,233,490 13,824,527 19,710,432 13,516,029 85,284,478 Total P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, CBOSS Major Line Item Budget Page 11 of 25

32 E830 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Contract Design Contract Procurement/equipment CBOSS Major Line Item Budget FY Q3 2015Q4 2016Q1 2016Q2 Contract Installation/Testing 5,829,837 9,139,214 8,483,672 23,452,723 Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) Agency Staff 576, , , ,921 2,072,521 Program/Project Management 2,306,286 2,144,195 1,991,916 1,847,685 8,290,083 Other Project Direct Cost 100, ,000 1,600, ,000 1,900,000 Project contingency 969,396 1,191, ,888 1,031,528 3,642,759 Subtotal 9,782,091 13,111,404 4,539,784 11,924,807 39,358,086 Total Contract Design Contract Procurement/equipment Contract Installation/Testing FY Q3 2016Q4 2017Q1 2017Q2 Contract Commercial (Bond and Warranty) 3,525,122 3,525,122 Agency Staff Program/Project Management Other Project Direct Cost Project contingency Subtotal 3,525,122 3,525,122 Total P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, CBOSS Major Line Item Budget Page 12 of 25

33 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E831 PROJECT: CBOSS/PTC Description/Justification: This project implements the Caltrain Advanced Signal System (CBOSS/PTC) along the Caltrain corridor to meet Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) requirements for the installation of an operational positive train control system by December The CBOSS/PTC is a system that tracks train locations and prevents unsafe movement through the use of equipment onboard the locomotives and in the field. The project includes provision for a Backup Central Control Facility (BCCF) that is integrated with existing communications and control facilities to be used in the event of the failure of the main PTC/CBOSS system, as well as the installation of a fiber optics communications backbone to provide improved PTC/CBOSS communications. The project includes provision for Caltrain, assisted by the contractor, to work with the Association of American Railroads (AAR) and tenant railroad operators to ensure that the PTC/CBOSS is supported by and compliant with interoperability standards. This project is being implemented through a multiphase design/build contract that was awarded in November Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 13 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 3,000,000 21,300,000 24,300,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Environmental July09 July09 Design April10 August13 Construction June13 June15 Testing September14 October15 System Acceptance October15 May16 Funding Plan: Funding Source Prior Budget Proposed FY13 Budget Future Budget Comments FRA and FHWA 17,250,000 2,800,000 FTA 4,000,000 23,000,000 State Prop 1A and SLPP 1,050,000 40,000,000 68,500,000 The PCJPB has updated the funding Local Match JPB Member 4,200,000 plan for the CBOSS/PTC project to reflect the 2.8 million in Federal San Francisco 3,000,000 20,400,000 grant funds secured for the project. San Mateo 3,000,000 20,400,000 A proportionate reduction in JPB Santa Clara 3,000,000 20,400,000 member agency contributions to Local Match County SF PTC/CBOSS is shown. Regional/Other TOTAL 22,500,000 53,000, ,500,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, CBOSS Project Summary Page 13 of 25

34 E832 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Caltrain Early Investment Program FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 6,390,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 6,390,000 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. On November 20, 2012, through Resolution 1317, the Authority Board allocated 3 million in Prop K funds to the CBOSS project and committed to allocate 6,390,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 to the project. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. CBOSS Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total See attached funding plan for the CBOSS. Electrification Fund Source Total: Planned Programmed Allocated Total See attached funding plan for Electrification. Total: Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 88.77% 188,060,000 Total from CBOSS Cost worksheet TBD Total from Electrification Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 5Funding Page 14 of 25

35 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E833 Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes Prop K Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % See attached funding plan for the Early Investment Program (CBOSS and Electrification FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total See attached funding plan for the Early Investment Program Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: TBD Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 88.77% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 6,390,000 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year Cash Flow % Reimbursed Annually Balance FY 2013/14 6,390, % % % % % 0 Total: 6,390,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 5Funding Page 15 of 25

36 E834 San Francisco County Transportation Authority The tables below identify the programming needed to advance the Early Investment Program, which includes implementation of CBOSS by 2015 and corridor electrification to achieve electrified Caltrain service by Electrified Caltrain service includes increased level of peak hour service and acquisition of 96 EMUs. The current funding plan for Electrification (Table 1a) shows that a total of 10.1 million in State Prop 1A and NonProp 1A State/Regional funds was anticipated to be used in FY14. Because Prop 1A funding will not be available until early 2014 and PCJPB needs funding for work now, it is proposing to use 12.1 million in JPB Local funds (out of a total of million) from the CBOSS project (Table 1b) for electrification in place of the Prop 1A funds. PCJPB is proposing to use 2 million more in FY14 for electrification than what was originally budgeted to advance the specifications for the EMUs and environmental and early design work. The total JPB Local funds (i.e. member contribution) for FY14 would not change due to this swap. These changes to the funding plans are reflected in Tables 2a and 2b below. To ensure that the CBOSS project funding plan remains whole (i.e. to make up for the 12.1 million in JPB funds which were transferred to Electrification), PCJPB is proposing to move an equivalent amount of currently available NonProp 1A State/Regional funds (i.e million in State Prop 1B funds) to the CBOSS project from the Electrification project. Prop 1B funds, which are currently available, are not eligible to be used on the environmental phase. To view this proposed change, compare Tables 1b and 2b FY14 NonProp 1A State/Regional funds to see an increase in funds from 2.4 million to 14.5 million. Table 1a Electrification Infrastructure Annual Cash Flow Needs State Prop 1A NonProp 1A State/Regional JPB Local 11,000,000 Federal 13,000,000 Table 1b Advanced Signal System (CBOSS) Annual Cash Flow Needs State Prop 1A connectivity NonProp 1A State/Regional 1,050,000 JPB Local 9,900,000 Federal 17,250,000 Table 2a Electrification Infrastructure Annual Cash Flow Needs State Prop 1A NonProp 1A State/Regional JPB Local** 11,000,000 Federal 13,000,000 Table 2b Advanced Signal System (CBOSS) Annual Cash Flow Needs State Prop 1A connectivity NonProp 1A State/Regional 4,220,000 JPB Local 4,240,000 Federal 17,250,000 Current Funding Plan (March 2013) FY12 and Before FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16FY20+ Total 5,050,000 18,625, ,325, ,000,000 5,050,000 14,950,000 31,000,000 51,000, , ,650, ,900,000 3,000,000 3,675, ,925, ,600,000 Totals 24,000,000 3,250,000 10,100,000 37,250,000 1,150,900,000 1,225,500,000 FY12 and Before FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16FY20 Total 39,900,000 66,100, ,000, ,000 2,400,000 3,550,000 3,300,000 19,173,200 30,712,000 11,241,000 74,326,200 4,000,000 25,827,800 47,077,800 Totals 28,200,000 47,300, ,501,000 30,712,000 11,241, ,954,000 Proposed Funding Plan (June 2013) FY12 and Before FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16FY20+ Total 23,675, ,325, ,000,000 4,230,000 31,500,000 35,730, ,000 12,100,000 3,170, ,650, ,170,000 3,000,000 3,675, ,925, ,600,000 Totals 24,000,000 3,250,000 12,100,000 34,750,000 1,151,400,000 1,225,500,000 FY12 and Before FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16FY20 Total 39,840,000 65,610, ,450, ,000 14,500,000 18,820,000 9,000,000 7,070,200 27,540,000 11,360,000 59,210,200 4,430,000 25,830,800 47,510,800 Totals 25,710,000 53,370, ,011,000 27,540,000 11,360, ,991,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, Cash Flow Table Page 16 of 25

37 E835 CommunicationsBased Overlay Signal System Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 Project Phases 1 Source 2 Type Status PE/ENV PS&E ROW CON Total by Status TOTAL Allocated 17,250, ,250,000 FRA Federal Programmed ,250,000 Planned Allocated ,830,000 2,830,000 FTA/FHWA Funds Federal Programmed ,430,000 27,430,000 (Caltrain) Planned ,260,000 Allocated 0 8,200, ,250, ,450,000 Prop 1A High Speed State Programmed Rail Connectivity Planned ,450,000 Allocated 4,230, ,500,000 6,730,000 Prop 1BCaltrain State Programmed ,100,000 12,100,000 18,830,000 Planned Previous Local Commitment 5 Allocated 4,240, ,240,000 Programmed Local 4,240,000 Planned Allocated 3,000, ,000,000 Prop K 3,4 Local Programmed ,930,000 9,930,000 12,930,000 Planned Allocated San Francisco Local Programmed Member Share/RIP 4 Local 5,390,000 Planned ,390,000 5,390,000 Allocated 3,000, ,460,000 5,460,000 SMCTA 6 Local Programmed ,860,000 12,860,000 18,320,000 Planned Allocated 3,000, ,460,000 5,460,000 VTA Local Programmed ,860,000 12,860,000 18,320,000 Planned Allocated 34,720,000 8,200, ,500, ,420,000 Totals Programmed ,180,000 75,180, ,990,000 Planned ,390,000 5,390,000 34,720,000 8,200, ,070, ,990,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final Page 17 of 25

38 E836 CommunicationsBased Overlay Signal System Funding Plan Updated: September Acronyms used for project phases include: PE/ENV Preliminary Engineering/Environmental Documentation, PS&E Plans, Specifications & Estimates or Final Design, ROW Right of Way, CON Construction. For the purposes of this table, construction includes procurement (e.g. vehicles). 2 Acronyms used in this column include: FHWA Federal Highway Administration, FRA Federal Railroad Administration, FTA Federal Transit Administration, PCJPB Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, SMCTA San Mateo County Transportation Authority, VTA Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 3 Programmed Prop K amount includes 1,000,000 in new programming capacity which is available through the 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline. 4 In April 2012, the Authority entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the California HighSpeed Rail Authority (CHSRA), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the City and County of San Francisco, and five other parties to establish a funding framework for a highspeed rail (HSR) early investment strategy for a blended system in the Peninsula Corridor. The MOU commits each of the three PCJPB members (San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties) to a local contribution of 60 million for the Early Investment Strategy for the Peninsula Corridor, comprised of the Caltrain Electrification and Advance Signal System/CBOSS projects, which has a total cost of billion. We are working with the Mayor's Office to identify transportation revenue to meet San Francisco's total remaining commitment of million for the project (33.75 million for Electrification and 5.39 million for CBOSS). The Authority has a remaining commitment of 20 million in RIP funds to Electrification/CBOSS, but funds are unlikely to be available to program when needed for the project. 5 Previous local commitments from PBJPB members split onethird each. 6 The SMCTA local contribution includes 3.8 million of State Local Partnership Program (SLPP) funds. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final Page 18 of 25

39 Caltrain Electrification Funding Plan Updated: September 2013 E837 Source 2 Project Phases Type Status TBD 1 Total by Status TOTAL Allocated 4,000,000 4,000,000 CMAQ 3 Federal Programmed 0 0 4,000,000 Planned 0 0 Allocated 12,000,000 12,000,000 FTA Formula Funds Federal Programmed 0 0 (Caltrain) Planned 441,500, ,500, ,500,000 Allocated 0 0 Prop 1A High Speed State Programmed ,000,000 Planned 600,000, ,000,000 Allocated 0 0 Prop 1BCaltrain State Programmed 4,700,000 4,700,000 4,700,000 Planned 0 0 Allocated 0 0 BATA Bridge Tolls Regional Programmed ,000,000 Planned 11,000,000 11,000,000 Allocated 0 0 Carl Moyer Program Regional Programmed ,000,000 Planned 20,000,000 20,000,000 Allocated 11,000,000 11,000,000 Previous Local Programmed 0 0 Commitment 6 Local Planned ,000,000 Allocated 0 0 Prop K Local Programmed 3,930,000 3,930,000 3,930,000 Planned 0 0 San Francisco Local Allocated 0 0 Member Share/RIP 4, Local Programmed ,753,333 5 Planned 33,753,333 33,753,333 Allocated 0 0 SMCTA Local Programmed 41,683,333 41,683,333 41,683,333 Planned 0 0 Allocated 0 0 VTA Local Programmed 41,683,333 41,683,333 41,683,333 Planned 0 0 Allocated 27,000,000 27,000,000 Totals Programmed 91,996,666 91,996,666 3,930,000 Planned 1,106,253,333 1,106,253,333 1,225,249,999 1,225,249,999 1 Phaselevel budget projections are not yet available since PCJBP is evaluating the project delivery method and most of the funding for the project is planned rather than programmed or allocated. 2 Acronyms used in this column include: CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, RIP Regional Improvement Program, SMCTA San Mateo County Transportation Authority, VTA Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 3 4 million in San Francisco share RIP funds were programmed to the Electrification project and then, with Caltrain s consent, were swapped with federal CMAQ funds in Funding is part of San Francisco's 60 million member contribution to the highspeed rail (HSR) early investment strategy. See note #5 below. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final Page 19 of 25

40 E838 Caltrain Electrification Funding Plan Updated: September Includes 20 million in remaining RIP commitment to the Electrification project (Resolution 1244, approved ). 5 In April 2012, the Authority entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the City and County of San Francisco, and five other parties to establish a funding framework for a highspeed rail (HSR) early investment strategy for a blended system in the Peninsula Corridor. The MOU commits each of the three PCJPB members (San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties) to a local contribution of 60 million for the Early Investment Strategy for the Peninsula Corridor, comprised of the Caltrain Electrification and Advance Signal System/CBOSS projects, which has a total cost of billion. We are working with the Mayor's Office to identify transportation revenue to meet San Francisco's total remaining commitment of million for the project (33.75 million for Electrification and 5.39 million for CBOSS). The Authority has a remaining commitment of 20 M in RIP funds to Electrification/CBOSS, but funds are unlikely to be available to program when needed for the project. 6 Previous local commitment provided by the three PCJPB members split onethird each. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final Page 20 of 25

41 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E839 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Caltrain Early Investment Program Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Phase: Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation Prop K Allocation Prop K Allocation 3,570, ,000 2,460,000 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Construction Total: 6,390,000 Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, This allocation fulfills a commitment to allocate 6,390,000 notes for multiep line item or multisponsor approved through Resolution recommendations): Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum % Source Fiscal Year Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 6,390, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 6,390, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 3,570,000 56% 2,820,000 Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) 360,000 62% 2,460,000 Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Construction 2,460, % 100% % 0 100% 0 100% 0 Total: 6,390,000 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 6Authority Rec Page 21 of 25

42 E840 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Caltrain Early Investment Program Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: The funding partners who are signatories to the MOU, including the Authority, have jointly established a project oversight protocol that allows the funding partners sufficient oversight of the program to ensure that funds allocated by funding partners are employed effectively and efficiently. MTC is chairing the group that exercises oversight. This group meets monthly. The next meeting is anticipated to be held on October 9, Special Conditions: 1. Notes: 1. On April 24, 2012, through Resolution 1262, the Authority Board authorized the Executive Director to execute, with conditions, a Memorandum of Understanding with the California High Speed Rail Authority, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and six other local and regional entities to establish a funding framework for a HighSpeed Rail Early Investment Strategy for a blended system in the Peninsula Corridor. 2. On November 20, 2012, through Resolution 1317, the Authority Board approved a Strategic Plan amendment to advance all 30years of remaining Prop K funds in the Caltrain Electrification line item so that a total of 15,860,000 (3,000,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13, 6,390,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14, and 6,470,000 in Fiscal Year 2014/15) was available for allocation after accounting for financing costs to be covered by the electrification line item. At that time, the Authority Board approved a commitment to allocate 6,390,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 to the CBOSS project, which is fulfilled with this allocation. 3. On July 23, 2013, through Resolution 1413, the Authority Board approved the 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline including 1,000,000 in new programming capacity in Fiscal Year 2014/15. This brings the total Prop K funds available for the electrification line item to 16,860,000. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 TBD expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 6Authority Rec Page 22 of 25

43 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E841 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Caltrain Early Investment Program Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) SUBPROJECT DETAIL Caltrain Early Investment Program Environmental SubProject # from SGA: Name: Studies (Electrification) Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 3,570,000 56% 0% 2,460,000 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 Total: 3,570,000 Caltrain Early Investment Program Procurement SubProject # from SGA: Name: (Electrification) Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) 360,000 6% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 0% 2,460,000 Total: 360,000 Caltrain Early Investment Program Construction SubProject # from SGA: Name: (CBOSS) Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 6 FY 2013/14 Construction 2,460,000 38% 3,930,000 0% 3,930,000 0% 3,930,000 0% 3,930,000 0% 3,930,000 Total: 2,460,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 6Authority Rec Page 23 of 25

44 E842 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 7Maps.etc Page 24 of 25

45 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E843 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 6,390,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Caltrain Early Investment Program Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): April Chan Title: Executive Officer, Planning and Development Phone: Grants Section Contact Peter Skinner Senior Grants Analyst Fax: chana@samtrans.com skinnerp@samtrans.com Address: 1250 San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, CA San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\Caltrain Early Investment Program Final, 8Signatures Page 25 of 25

46 E844 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2013 Ken Yeager, Chair Tom Nolan, Vice Chair José Cisneros Malia Cohen Jerry Deal Ash Kalra Arthur L. Lloyd Adrienne Tissier Perry Woodward Michael J. Scanlon Executive Director NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) DATE TO SUBJECT PROJECT TITLE January 31, 2013 Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Page 1 The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), consistent with requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the EIR is to evaluate the environmental issues associated with the proposed improvements included in the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project. The JPB will serve as the lead agency under CEQA for the EIR. The purpose of this Notice of Preparation (NOP) is to notify agencies, organizations, and individuals that JPB plans to prepare the EIR and to request input on the scope of the environmental analysis to be performed. From public agencies, we are inviting comments on the scope and content of the environmental information that is germane to each agency s statutory responsibilities with regard to the proposed project. We are also requesting interested individuals or organizations views on the scope of the environmental document. DATES Written responses and comments on the scope of the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project EIR will be accepted until 5 pm on March 18, Please send written comments to: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Attn: Stacy Cocke, Senior Planner 1250 San Carlos Ave. P.O. Box 3006 San Carlos, CA Your comments may also be sent by to electrification@caltrain.com. Please include the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project in the subject heading. Public scoping meetings are scheduled in late February, at the times and dates listed below. SCOPING MEETINGS Four public scoping meetings will be held for the project at the following locations: Caltrain Office, 2nd Floor Auditorium, 1250 San Carlos Ave., San Carlos Open House 3pm6 pm, Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013 Public Scoping Meeting 6pm8 pm, Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013 Palo Alto City Hall, City Council Chambers, 250 Hamilton Ave., Palo Alto, 6pm8pm, Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Headquarters, Auditorium, 3331 N. First St., San Jose, 6pm8pm, Tuesday, Mar. 5, 2013 San Francisco City Hall, Board of Supervisors Chambers, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, 6pm8pm, Thursday, Mar. 7, 2013 The scoping meetings will provide opportunities for the lead agency to explain the project and to give interested agencies, organizations and individuals additional opportunities to comment on the scope and content of the EIR. PROJECT HISTORY The proposed project is part of a program to modernize operation of the Caltrain rail corridor between San Jose and San Francisco. There is a lengthy history of planning for modernization of the Peninsula rail corridor. Modernization projects include the installation of an advanced signal system and the electrification of the rail line. The signal upgrade project (commonly referred to as CBOSS PTC or CBOSS), and corridor electrification are discussed below. Caltrain previously evaluated corridor electrification in a prior EIR, for which a draft was completed in 2004 and a final was completed in Caltrain did not certify the Final EIR due to the need for resolution of issues regarding joint planning for shared use of the Caltrain corridor for Caltrain service and for future highspeed rail (HSR) service.

47 Page 2 E845 Since 2009, Caltrain, the California HighSpeed Rail Authority (CHSRA), the California Legislature, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and other parties have worked together to develop a vision of a blended system whereby both Caltrain and HSR would utilize the existing Caltrain Corridor on the San Francisco Peninsula. This vision for implementing blended service on the San Francisco Peninsula was included in the Revised 2012 Business Plan 1 that the CHSRA Board adopted in April 2012 for the California HighSpeed Rail System. Caltrain and the CHSRA are committed to advancing a blended system concept. This local vision was developed with stakeholders interested in the corridor. The blended system will remain substantially within the existing Caltrain rightofway and accommodate future highspeed rail and modernized Caltrain service along the Peninsula corridor by primarily utilizing the existing track configuration on the Peninsula. The blended system will be primarily a twotrack system shared by Caltrain, highspeed rail and existing tenant passenger and freight rail operators; however, as discussed below concerning cumulative analysis, a blended system may require passing tracks at certain locations in the Peninsula corridor. Based on the blended system vision, the Caltrain Peninsula Corridor has been designated to receive an initial investment of Proposition 1A bond funds that would benefit Caltrain and its modernization program in the short term and HSR in the long run. Caltrain, CHSRA and seven other San Francisco Bay Area agencies (City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Transbay Joint Powers Authority, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, City of San Jose, and the MTC) have approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 2 to pursue shared use of the corridor between San Jose and San Francisco to provide blended service of both Caltrain commuter rail service and HSR intercity service. The MOU includes agency and funding commitments toward making an initial investment of 1.5 billion in the corridor for purchasing and installing an advanced signal system, electrifying the rail line from San Francisco to San Jose, and purchasing electrified rolling stock. The MOU also conceptually outlines potential additional improvements needed beyond the first incremental investment of 1.5 billion to accommodate future high speed rail service in the corridor. Corridor improvements identified in the MOU include the following: Advanced Signal System (commonly referred to as CBOSS PTC or CBOSS): Caltrain is presently in the design phase of this project. CBOSS stands for Communications Based Overlay Signal System and PTC stands for Positive Train Control. This project will increase the operating performance of the current signal system, improve the efficiency of grade crossing warning functions and automatically stop a train when there is violation of speed or route. This project, which includes implementation of safety improvements mandated by federal law, has already been cleared environmentally by Caltrain and is scheduled to be operational by 2015 as mandated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Corridor Electrification: Caltrain decided to prepare this new EIR for the corridor electrification due to the changes in existing conditions 3 that have occurred along the corridor since the prior EIR analyses was conducted, to update the environmental analysis, and to update the cumulative analysis of blended service and other cumulative developments along the corridor. Completion of a new EIR will also allow public agencies, stakeholders, the public and decisionmaker s the opportunity to review and comment on the project s environmental effects in light of current information and analyses. This project will provide environmental approval for operation of up to 6 Caltrain trains per peak hour per direction (an increase from 5 trains per peak hour per direction at present). Electrification can be analyzed as a separate project under CEQA because it has independent utility (providing Caltrain electrified service) and logical termini (station end points). Electrification of the rail line is scheduled to be operational by Blended Service: Caltrain, CHSRA, and the MOU partners have agreed on shared use of the Caltrain corridor for use of up to 6 Caltrain trains per peak hour per direction and up to 4 HSR trains per peak hour per direction. The operational feasibility of blended service has been studied, but this project is presently only at the conceptual planning phase. The potential addition of HSR service to this corridor will be subject of a separate environmental review process that will be undertaken subsequent to the environmental process for the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project. Based on the current CHSRA 2012 Business Plan, blended service along the Corridor is scheduled to commence sometime between 2026 and PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is the electrification of the Caltrain Peninsula Corridor from its current northern terminus at the San Francisco Caltrain Station at Fourth and King Streets in the City of San Francisco to approximately 2 miles south of the Tamien Station in San Jose, a total distance of approximately 51 miles. The project location is shown in Figure 1. The project 1 See: 2 See: 3 For example, there have been changed physical conditions in terms of existing development adjacent to the Caltrain ROW and stations, levels of traffic as well as changes in terms of adopted land use planning around stations.

48 E846 location includes the entire JPBowned rightofway (ROW) along this 51mile segment, additional ROW for new facilities and operational requirements and for any construction or access areas located outside the ROW. This project does not include electrifying the corridor south of Tamien, which is owned by the Union Pacific Railroad. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT The primary purposes of the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project are to provide electrical infrastructure that will be compatible with separate later use for blended service, improve train performance, and reduce longterm environmental impact by reducing noise, improving regional air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. An electrified Caltrain system would better address Peninsula commuters vision of an environmentally friendly, fast, reliable service. This also is expected to help accommodate increase system ridership through improved system operations. Page 3 The population of the Bay Area is increasing and, with it, traffic congestion. Commute traffic between major employment centers in San Francisco and along the San Francisco Peninsula is growing, and there has been a substantial increase in reverse commute trips from San Francisco to Peninsula and South Bay locations over the past decade. Offpeak travel between San Francisco and Peninsula and South Bay locations is also on the rise. Caltrain has experienced substantial increases in ridership as people seek alternate ways to meet these travel needs. Electrification would modernize Caltrain and make it possible to increase service levels and it offers several advantages in comparison with existing diesel power use, and these benefits serve the primary purposes of the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project, as follows: Provide HighSpeed Rail Compatible Electrical Infrastructure: An electrified Caltrain system would set the stage for an expanded modern regional electric express service and for future blended HSR service. While this project will not include all infrastructure necessary to implement highspeed rail service in the corridor (such as HSR maintenance facilities, station platform improvements, or passing tracks), the electrical infrastructure (such as overhead wire systems) will be compatible for later blended service. Improve Train Performance, Increase Ridership and Increase Service: The project envisions the use of Electric Multiple Units (EMUs), which are selfpropelled electric rail vehicles, can accelerate and decelerate at faster rates than dieselpowered trains, even with longer trains. 4 With EMUs, Caltrain can run longer consists without degrading speeds, thus increasing peakperiod capacity. Electrification performance allows increased peak service levels from the current 5 trains to 6 trains per peak hour per direction with existing trackage. A substantial portion of a Caltrain trip is spent accelerating and decelerating between stations, given Caltrain s closeset station stops. For the same service profile of stops, electric trains can provide travel time reductions. Alternatively, due to the time savings, additional stops could be added without delaying existing total transit time from San Jose to San Francisco. Local service travel time savings and/or additional stops, in addition to the reduced trip times of the express trains, are expected to stimulate additional Caltrain ridership. Increase Revenue and Reduce Cost: Anticipated increased ridership will increase fare revenues and conversion from diesel to electricity will reduce fuel costs. These efforts will substantially reduce but not eliminate the need for financial subsidy. Reduce Environmental Impact by reducing noise emanating from Trains: Noise emanating from the passage of electrified train sets is measurably less when compared with diesel operations.with the increases in peak and offpeak Caltrain service that are either underway or planned for implementation during the next decades, electrification becomes an important consideration for reducing noise of train passbys and maintaining Peninsula quality of life. Train horns will continue to be sounded at grade crossings, consistent with FRA and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) safety regulations, whether or not electrification is pursued. Reduce Environmental Impact by improving regional air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Electric operations would produce substantial reductions in corridor air pollution emissions when compared with diesel locomotives, even when the indirect emissions from electrical power generation are included in the analysis. In addition, the increased ridership allowed by the project would reduce automobile usage, thereby resulting in additional air quality benefits. Electrically powered trains are also more energy efficient than dieselelectric trains. Reduced energy use also translates into reduced air emissions. Reductions in air pollutant emissions represent longterm health benefits for Caltrain riders, and residents and employees along the Caltrain corridor. In addition, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions with electrification versus diesel operations will help California to meet its goals under AB 32, the 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act as well as post2020 state greenhouse gas emission reductions goals. 4 The number of vehicles assembled together into a train is referred to as a train consist.

49 Page 4 E847 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project consists of converting Caltrain from dieselhauled to EMU trains for service between the Fourth and King Street Station in San Francisco and the Tamien Station in San Jose. Operating speed will be up to 79mph, which is what it is today. In 2019 service between San Jose and San Francisco would utilize a mixed fleet of EMU s and diesel locomotives. After 2019, diesel locomotives will be replaced with EMUs over time as they reach the end of their service life. 5 Caltrain s dieselpowered locomotive service would continue to be used to provide service between the San Jose Diridon Station and Gilroy. 6 Fleet requirements under the proposed Project are presented in Table 1 (this data may be updated during further development of the project description as necessary). TABLE 1: PRELIMINARY FLEET REQUIREMENTS PENINSULA CORRIDOR ELECTRIFICATION PROJECT Year Diesel Locomotives EMUs Trailer Cars Total Passenger Vehicles Year (Six trains per peak hour / direction) The majority of vehicles will be replaced in 2019 as they reach their design life. Additional vehicles would be replaced after 2019 as they reach their design life. Source: PCJPB, The level of Caltrain operations and therefore fleet requirements under the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project would be six trains per peak hour per direction from Tamien Station in San Jose to San Francisco, with a mixed EMU and diesel locomotive fleet. Caltrain service will also include six dieselpowered trains per day in the San Jose to Gilroy segment, by The project would require the installation of 130 to 140 singletrack miles of overhead contact system (OCS) for the distribution of electrical power to the new electric rolling stock.the OCS would be powered from a 25 kilovolt (kv), 60 Hertz (Hz), singlephase, alternating current (AC) supply system consisting of traction power supply (TPS) substations, one switching station and paralleling stations. These facilities are described in more detail in the following pages. Figure 2 shows the general location of potential TPS substation, switching station and paralleling stations. Overhead Contact System. An alternating current (AC) overhead catenary system (OCS) would be employed. For heavyhaul commuter rail systems, such as that operated by Caltrain, the voltage of choice today throughout Europe and the rest of the world is 25 kv at commercial frequencies (50 to 60 Hz), and this is the voltage proposed for the Project. This power supply and distribution system and voltage are compatible with the requirements of HSR and will accommodate future development of HSR in the Caltrain corridor. Furthermore, the OCS conductors and traction power equipment will be sized and located based on a computerized analysis of traction power load flow requirements using the probable maximum capacity of the Peninsula Corridor alignment including Caltrain and HSR. Clearances for maintenance and operation of the OCS will be designed to allow for existing freight railroad and tenant passenger rail clearances and operations. Normal design clearances would be provided in all open areas. Special designs may be employed in close clearance tunnels or under bridges in order to provide sufficient clearances to freights and diesel passenger trains. The particular type of OCS support on a given segment is dependent upon the track segment s exact configuration (e.g., number of tracks) and other sitespecific requirements and constraints. Power would be supplied to the OCS at each of the traction power facilities, either by means of noninsulated aerial connections or by insulated underground connections. Power would be delivered to the OCS usually through a polemounted 5 This project only includes funding for EMUs representing approximately 75% of the operational fleet between San Jose and San Francisco. Funding for replacement of the remainder of the diesel fleet between San Jose and San Francisco would have to come from future funding sources. It is expected that 100% of the San Jose to San Francisco fleet would be EMUs between 2026 and 2029, as the fleet would need to be fully electrified to operate in a blended service environment with HSR. 6 This project only includes electrification to a point approximately 2 miles south of Tamien Station. The Union Pacific Corridor south of this point will not be electrified by this project.

50 E848 Page 5 disconnect switch, which permits energization or deenergization of a particular section of the OCS conductors. The overhead electrical system would include an integrated bonding and grounding system to protect the public during all system operations. The OCS poles nominally need to be approximately 10 feet from the centerline of the railway tracks. In addition, there needs to be clearance of vegetation within approximately 10 feet of the OCS poles and catenary system for electrical safety. In most cases, the OCS poles will be placed within the Caltrain ROW. In certain locations, there may be insufficient clearance from the railway track centerlines and Caltrain may need to acquire ROW for placement of poles and wires. Trimming or removal of trees will be required along the tracks and electrical facilities where they would otherwise pose a maintenance or safety concern including areas within 10 feet of OCS poles (areas within 20 feet of the railway track centerlines). Where electrical clearance is necessary outside the Caltrain ROW, Caltrain will need to obtain an electrical safety easement from property owners. AutoTransformer Power Feed Arrangement. The autotransformer power feed system arrangement reduces the need for substations and would require the installation of only two supply substations spaced 36 miles apart. In addition, there would be one switching station and seven paralleling stations at a spacing of approximately 5 miles. The paralleling stations provide additional power support to the power distribution system and permit increased spacing of the primary substations. In addition to reducing the number of substations and thereby minimizing the introduction of new, large equipment installations into the corridor another advantage of the autotransformer feed arrangement for implementation along the Caltrain corridor is its potential to reduce electromagnetic fields (EMF) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) because it includes two parallel aerial feeders, one on each side of the alignment. The currents in the parallel feeders flow in the opposite direction to that in the main catenary conductors, and this reduces the EMF/EMI effects created by current flow in the OCS. Traction power facilities are likely to require new rightofway (in some locations) and connections to the utility highvoltage transmission network. Alternate sites will be considered for the two substation facilities. Sites for intermediate paralleling and switching station facilities have been identified. These facilities do not require connection to the utility highvoltage system, or such large tracts. Final site selection will be coordinated with local authorities. Figure 2 shows the proposed general locations for potential traction power facilities. Substations, Switching Station, and Paralleling Stations. The two substations would each include two 60MVA (million Voltamperes) oilfilled transformers that will step down the power utility supplied voltage of 115kV to the 2 x 25 kv distribution voltage for the OCS. The source power utility would be requested to provide two incoming feeds, which would tap two phases of each threephase transmission line. The substation compound would include circuit breakers and switching equipment that would feed power from the highvoltage lines to each line section of track. The lineside equipment would be designed to provide alternate switching arrangements in the event of a substation equipment outage. A substation compound would typically be approximately 150 feet by 200 feet in size. At approximately the midpoint between substations, a switching station would be installed. At the switching station a phase break would be required to ensure the power supplies from each substation is isolated from each other in order to avoid a fault condition. In addition, switching would be installed to provide operating flexibility during equipment outages. In between the substations and the switching station, paralleling stations would be installed to maintain the autotransformer system and system operating voltages. The switching station would be equipped with two 10MVA oilfilled autotransformer units and the paralleling stations with either one or two 10MVA oilfilled autotransformer units. These facilities would contain a variety of circuit breakers and switching equipment but would be typically as shown in the proposed location drawings above. Switching station compound dimensions are typically 80 feet wide by 160 feet long; paralleling station compound dimensions are typically 40 feet wide by 80 feet long. Overbridge Protection Structures. In addition to the electrical facilities themselves, electrification of the corridor would require the construction or enhancement of overbridge protection barriers on 47 roadway bridges across the Caltrain alignment. These barriers are necessary to prohibit access to the rail corridor and prevent objects from being thrown off the bridges in a manner that would damage or interfere with the electrical facilities. Fifteen of the existing bridges already have such barriers on both the north and south bridge face, six bridges have a barrier on only one bridge face, and 26 have no overbridge protection barriers. Overbridge protection barriers would be 6.5 feet high above sidewalk or pavement level, and placed along the parapet of the bridge at least 10 feet from the closest energized conductors crossing underneath. The existing barriers will be enhanced to meet these requirements.

51 Page 6 E849 For twotrack segments, the length of the overbridge protection barrier would be about 35 to 40 feet long. For three and fourtrack segments, the overbridge protection barrier would be from 65 to 80 feet long. Overbridge protection barriers may be constructed from a variety of materials, including timber, sheet metal, small mesh wire fabric, and concrete or other solid material. Right of Way Needs. Based on the current system design, there would be a need for acquisition of approximately 1 acre of new right of way for traction power facilities. Caltrain is presently examining the design for project facilities and the amount of right of way may be more or less than 1 acre. As noted above, additional right of way may be needed for location of some OCS poles and wires and electrical safety clearance easements will need to be acquired where clearance of vegetation needs to occur outside the current Caltrain ROW. PROJECT FINANCING AND FUNDING The project is estimated to cost approximately billion of which approximately 785 million is for infrastructure costs and the remaining 440 million is for rolling stock. The project will be financed through a combination of local, state, and federal sources. Based on the 9party MOU, the breakdown of funding is as follows: FUNDING SOURCES MILLIONS (, YEAR OF EXPENDITURE) State Prop 1A 7, Prop 1B JPB 121 Regional (Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Tolls) 31 Federal (Federal Transit Administration FTA) Total 1,225 Other funding sources may be substituted for these sources if available. The project cost estimate and funding plan are being updated to reflect current designs and assumptions. The updated cost estimate and funding plan will be included in the Draft EIR. PROJECT SCHEDULE Although no decision has been made on contract procurement type, the preliminary schedule presented below assumes a Design Bid Build procurement process. Please note that this schedule is preliminary and subject to change. The preliminary project schedule (subject to change) is as follows: Environmental/Design/Permitting: 12 years Construction: 34 years Testing: 12 years The goal for electric revenue service is Project Delivery schedule has not been finalized yet. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The lead agency has initially determined that the following topics will be included for evaluation in the EIR: Aesthetic/ Visual, Air Quality, Biological Resources, ArchaeologicalHistoric Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change, Electromagnetic Interference/ Electromagnetic Fields (EMI/EMF), Hazardous Waste and Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning (including parks and recreation), Noise and Vibration, Population and Housing, Public Services and Utilities, Safety, Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice, and Traffic and Circulation. The EIR will consider both temporary constructionperiod and permanent impacts. 7 Safe, Reliable HighSpeed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century of The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of FTA has already completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) under the National Environmental Policy Act in 2009 for electrification of the Peninsula Corridor and issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

52 E850 Page 7 The EIR will also include a cumulative Impact analysis of the impacts of the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project in combination with other planned railway projects in the corridor including blended service (up to 4 HSR trains per peak hour per direction). The cumulative analysis of blended service will include two scenarios: 1) up to 2 HSR trains per peak hour per direction in addition to 6 Caltrain trains per peak hour per direction (socalled 62 scenario); and 2) up to 4 HSR trains per peak hour per direction in addition to 6 Caltrain trains per peak hour per direction (socalled 64 scenario). Both blended service scenarios may require station improvements at HSR stops (such as the Millbrae Station), grade crossing improvements and maintenance facilities; only the 64 scenario would require additional passing tracks at certain locations. The HSR improvements will be reviewed at a conceptual level only as the project design of blended service will not be completed until after this environmental process is complete. Operational speeds up to 110 mph may be considered in the cumulative analysis. The cumulative analysis will also take into consideration of the cumulative effects of this project in combination with the Downtown Extension of rail service from the Fourth and King Station to the new Transbay Transit Center in San Francisco, the Dumbarton Rail Corridor Project, improvements to the Altamont Corridor Express service and improvements to the Capitol Corridor service, as well as other transportation improvements included in MTC s Regional Transportation Plan and land use plans and projects in the various cities along the Caltrain corridor including transitoriented development around Caltrain stations. As noted above, the cumulative analysis of blended service will be at a conceptual level using a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis corresponding to the level of information available about blended service at this time. Caltrain is seeking comments from agencies, stakeholders and the public regarding the environmental effects to be analyzed in the EIR. ALTERNATIVES As required by CEQA, the EIR will consider a reasonable range of alternatives in addition to the proposed project. At a minimum, the following two alternatives will be evaluated in detail the EIR: the NoElectrification (NoProject) Alternative and the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Alternative (Proposed Project). Caltrain is seeking comments from agencies, stakeholders and the public regarding feasible alternatives for evaluation in the EIR. After consideration of input from project scoping and development of environmental analysis of the proposed project, Caltrain will consider the need for analysis of additional alternatives. Only alternatives that are feasible, meet the project purpose and need, and reduce one or more significant environmental impacts of the proposed project will be analyzed in detail. Alternatives that are infeasible, that do not meet the project purpose and need, or that do not reduce one or more significant environmental impacts of the proposed project will be discussed in the EIR but will not be analyzed in detail as allowed by the requirements of CEQA. MARIN Berkeley 24 Walnut Creek Berkeley 24 Walnut Creek 1 1 San Francisco SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY Daly City 280 San Francisco 101 Bayshore South San Francisco 80 Milbrae Transit Center Broadway Burlingame San Mateo San Mateo Hayward Park Hillsdale Redwood City Oakland Belmont San Carlos Alameda Redwood City Atherton Menlo Park Palo Alto SAN Stanford MATEO Palo Alto California Ave. COUNTY 101 San Antonio Mountain View Mountain View Sunnyvale Lawrence Sunnyvale Sacramento Project Location Santa Clara Monterey San Bruno San Francisco 22nd St. 92 San Leandro 84 Hayward 280 SANTA CLARA COUNTY Legend CONTRA COSTA Corridor Electrification Project COUNTY Caltrain South of Project Area Existing Caltrain Station Miles Fremont 680 ALAMEDA COUNTY Santa Clara College Park San Jose Diridon Tamien 101 San Jose Capitol 80 Legend CONTRA San Francisco San Francisco COSTA Corridor Electrification Project Oakland COUNTY SAN PS1 Caltrain South of Project Area FRANCISCO 22nd St. Alameda COUNTY Existing Caltrain Station PS2 Proposed Paralleling Stations (PS) Bayshore Daly City Proposed Switching Station (SWS) Proposed Traction Power Supply 101 San 280 Substations (TPS) South San Francisco Leandro 680 Note: Locations of all facilities are approximate. TPS San Bruno Miles 580 Milbrae Transit Center Hayward PS3 Broadway 92 Burlingame San Mateo ALAMEDA San Mateo COUNTY Hayward Park PS4 Hillsdale Belmont San Carlos Fremont 84 Redwood City Redwood City SWS1 Atherton Menlo Park Palo Alto Stanford Palo Alto California Ave. 101 PS5 San Antonio Mountain View Mountain View SAN MATEO Sunnyvale PS6 COUNTY Lawrence Sunnyvale 1 Santa Clara Santa Clara TPS2 College Park San Jose Diridon 280 Tamien SANTA 101 San Jose CLARA PS7 Capitol COUNTY Graphics (1813) tm Los Angeles SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CALIFORNIA Blossom Hill to Morgan Hill, San Martin, and Gilroy Figure 1 Project Location Corridor Electrification Project Graphics (1813) tm SANTA CRUZ COUNTY Blossom Hill to Morgan Hill, San Martin, and Gilroy Figure 2 Traction Power Supply Facility Locations Corridor Electrification Project

53 E851

54 E852

55 E853

56 E854

57 E855

58 E856

59 E857

60 E858

61 E859

62 E860

63 E861

64 E862

65 E863

66 E864 Date: March 28, 2012 W.I.: 1512 Referred by: Commission FUNDING PLAN Attachment B Resolution No Page 1 of 2 Program Costs and Proposed Funding for Peninsula Corridor Projects: Electrification and Advance Signal System Program Costs (in millions, year of expenditure) Advance Signal System / Positive Train Control (PTC) 231 Electrification and Electric Multiple Units (EMUs) 1,225 Total 1,456 Program Funding (in millions) Source Amount JPB Contributions 180 JPB Local Currently Available 11 Caltrain PTC 4 Subtotal Local 195 Prop 1A Connectivity 106 Prop 1A High Speed Rail Authority 600 Prop 1B Caltrain 24 Subtotal State 730 Federal RR Admin. for PTC 17 Federal Transit Admin prior/current obligations 43 Federal Transit Admin future obligations 440 Subtotal Federal 500 MTC Bridge Tolls 11 BAAQMD Carl Moyer 20 Subtotal Regional 31 Total 1,456 See Next Page for Notes.

67 Attachment B Resolution No Page 2 of 2 E865 Funding Plan Notes: 1. Caltrain Joint Powers Board (JPB) Local Contribution is 60 million from San Mateo sales tax, 60 million from VTA sales tax, and 60 million from San Francisco (23 million from sales tax, 37 million from Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP)/local/other). Each agency s contribution, including Proposition 1A Connectivity funds as outlined in Note 2, is contingent upon the 60 million each from the other two JPB partners. 2. Prop 1A Connectivity is 42 million from Caltrain, 26 million from VTA, and 38 million from BART (2 nd priority for BART after receipt of 150 million for railcars). 3. Prop 1B Caltrain is 20 million Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA), 4 million StateLocal Partnership Program (SLPP). 4. FTA Prior/Current Obligations is 16 million for electrification in prior years, 27 million for EMUs in FY FTA Future Obligations is 315 million for electric multiple units (EMUs), 125 million from fixed guideway caps. Funds will be programmed in accordance with MTC Transit Capital Priorities process between approximately FY and FY Bridge Tolls is from Regional Measure 1 (RM1) West Bay Rail Reserve. 7. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) funds to be confirmed. 8. Assumes that all local sources, Prop 1B PTMISEA, all federal sources, and bridge tolls can be used as match to Prop 1A funds, totaling 726 million in matching funds for 706 million in Prop 1A funds. 9. Other potential future funding sources could be substituted if secured, including federal Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) funds (such as current Caltrain application for 44 million), State Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) funds, and private financing. J:\SECTION\ALLSTAFF\Resolution\RESOLUTIONS\MTC Resolutions\RES4056.doc

68 E866 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

69 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E867 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: RightofWay Safety Fencing Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit i. Major Capital Projects (transit) b.3 Caltrain Capital Improvement Program Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 7 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 429,869 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will help fund the continuation of an ongoing annual project to install vandalresistant fencing along the Caltrain corridor to deter trespassing, vandalism, and illegal dumping. The Fiscal Year 2014 program will install an estimated 16,500 lineal feet of fencing between San Francisco and San Jose. Fencing locations are selected and scheduled for work based on conditions identified in the field by PCJPB staff. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

70 E868 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: RightofWay Safety Fencing Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /15 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

71 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E869 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: RightofWay Safety Fencing Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Cost for Current Request/Phase Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost 1,225, ,869 1,225,950 Prop K Current Request 429,869 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 1,225,950 1,225,950 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget % Complete of Design: NA as of NA Expected Useful Life: 25 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

72 E870 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

73 E OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS/ENHANCEMENTS 4.2 PROJECT: ROW Safety Fencing FY14 Description/Justification: This allocation request will help fund the continuation of an ongoing annual project to install vandalresistant fencing along the Caltrain corridor to deter trespassing, vandalism and illegal dumping. The FY14 program will install an estimated 16,500 lineal feet of fencing between San Francisco and San Jose. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE N/A Procurement/Construction 753,450 Construction Management 115,000 Staff/Administration 272,500 Project Contingency 85,000 TOTAL 1,225,950 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 1,225,950 1,225,950 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction July13 September14 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal State 570,000 Local Match JPB Member 655,950 San Francisco 429,869 San Mateo 113,041 Santa Clara 113,041 Local Match County SC Regional/Other TOTAL 1,225,950

74 E872 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: RightofWay Safety Fencing FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 429,869 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 150,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 150,000 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Caltrain CIP ProjectsUndesignated project in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program 5YPP. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Capital Improvement Program category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (150,000) in the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 864,869 in Fiscal Year 2033/34 funds to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 279, , ,869 Prop 1B Transit Security 570, ,000 Other PCJPB Members 226, ,081 Total: 429, , ,081 1,225,950 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 64.94% 1,225,950 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 69.25% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

75 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source No Required Local Match Amount % E873 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 64.94% 1,225,950 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 69.25% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 429,869 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year Cash Flow % Reimbursed Annually Balance FY 2013/14 429, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 429,869 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

76 E874 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: RightofWay Safety Fencing Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 429,869 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 429,869 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 429, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 429,869 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 Construction 429, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: 429,869 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 9/30/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

77 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E875 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: RightofWay Safety Fencing Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Capital Improvement Program amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

78 E876 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 429,869 Project Name: Implementing Agency: RightofWay Safety Fencing Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Robert Scarpino Title: Program Manager Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g scarpinor@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Right of Way Safety Fencing , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

79 2009 Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (EP 7) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 22, 2013 Board Approval Last Update: September 16, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 33,333 33,333 PCJPB Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) for Caltrain PROC, CON Allocated 166, ,667 PCJPB Caltrain System Wide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program MULTI Allocated (0) (0) PCJPB Caltrain System Wide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program MULTI Deobligated 416, ,667 PCJPB Capital Program Management and Capital Project Development O&M Allocated 1,113,333 1,113,333 O&M Allocated Peninsula Rail Program (formerly Caltrain 2025) Program Management & Implementation PCJPB PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated 1 TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Capital Program Management 1 Planning Allocated 144, , , ,650 Capital Project Development 1 Planning Allocated PCJPB 6,667 6,667 Caltrain Systemwide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program 1 Planning Allocated PCJPB 150, ,000 Planning Allocated Peninsula Rail Program (formerly Caltrain 2025) Program Management & Implementation PCJPB 150, ,000 PCJPB Railism Modeling Software Update PROC Allocated PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB RightofWay Safety Fencing 2 CON Pending 429, ,869 PCJPB Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations 2 PS&E, CON Pending 585, ,000 PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated 2 TBD Programmed 0 0 1,730, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,384,869 Total Programmed in 5YPP 1,730, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,384,869 (0) (0) (0) (0) Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 1,699, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,353,979 30,890 30, Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 23, 2010 through Res E877 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 7 Tab: EP 7 5YPP Page 1 of 2

80 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (EP 7) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 22, 2013 Board Approval Last Update: September 16, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ) Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 864,869 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Caltrain CIP category. This increases Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 1,014,869. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 7 Tab: EP 7 5YPP Page 2 of 2

81 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E879 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit i. Major Capital Projects (transit) b.3 Caltrain Capital Improvement Program Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 7 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 585,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will help fund the installation of train departure monitors at the San Francisco 4th & King and San Jose Diridon stations to provide better Caltrain arrival information to passengers. The train departure monitors will be a series of large electronic display boards that will display train identification, destination, track number, and departure times. Changes to the train information such as departure time will automatically come from the Predictive Arrival/Departure System (PADS) and be displayed on the monitors. The scope of this project includes but, is not limited to, train display monitor layout, installation of the monitors at the San Francisco and San Jose stations, installation of cables, testing of the system and any other components necessary to make the system function correctly. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 1Scope Page 1 of 12

82 E880 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction / /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /15 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 2Schedule Page 2 of 12

83 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E881 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Cost for Current p Request/Phase Current Prop AA Total Cost Request Current Request 200, , , , , ,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 200,000 1,180,000 1,380,000 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 0 as of 8/13/2013 Expected Useful Life: 30 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 3Cost Page 3 of 12

84 E882 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 12

85 E OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS/ENHANCEMENTS 4.7 PROJECT: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Description/Justification: This project will install train departure monitors at the San Francisco 4th & King and San Jose Diridon stations to provide better Caltrain arrival information to passengers. The train departure monitors will be a series of large electronic display boards that will display train ID, destination, track number and departure times. Changes to the train information such as departure time will automatically come from the Predictive Arrival/Departure System (PADS) and be displayed on the monitors. The scope of this project includes but, is not limited to, train display monitor layout, installation of the monitors at the San Francisco and San Jose stations, installation of cables, testing of the system and any other components necessary to make the system function correctly. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 165,000 Procurement/Construction Construction Management Staff/Administration 300,000 Project Contingency 120,000 TOTAL 585,000 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 585, ,000 1,380,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E January14 June14 Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction December14 October15 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal State Local Match JPB Member 585, ,000 San Francisco 585,000 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SC Regional/Other TOTAL 585,000

86 E884 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 585,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 150,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 150,000 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Caltrain CIP ProjectsUndesignated project in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program 5YPP. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Capital Improvement Program category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (150,000) in the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 864,869 in Fiscal Year 2033/34 funds to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 435, , ,000 Total: 585, ,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 0.00% 585,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 69.25% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 5Funding Page 6 of 12

87 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % E885 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 435, , , , ,000 Total: 150,000 1,380,000 1,380,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 57.61% 1,380,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 69.25% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 585, , % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 585,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually 0 Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 5Funding Page 7 of 12

88 E886 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 200,000 Prop K Allocation 385,000 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 585,000 A multiphase allocation is appropriate given the need to provide San Francisco's full local share for Caltrain's Fiscal Year 2013/14 Capital Budget, which includes planning/conceptual engineering, design engineering, and construction funds. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 292, % Prop K EP 7 FY 2014/15 292, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 585,000 Balance 292,500 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 200,000 34% Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 Construction 92,500 50% Prop K EP 7 FY 2014/15 Construction 292, % 100% 100% Total: 585,000 Balance 385, ,500 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2016 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 12

89 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E887 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of design (anticipated June 2014), provide evidence of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page). See Special Condition Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions. 3. Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Capital Improvement Program amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. PCJPB may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (385,000) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page). Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 12

90 E888 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) SUBPROJECT DETAIL Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations SubProject # from SGA: Name: Design Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 200,000 Total: 200,000 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 0 100% 0 100% 0 Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations SubProject # from SGA: Name: Construction Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 7 FY 2013/14 Construction 92,500 Prop K EP 7 FY 2014/15 Construction 292,500 Total: 385,000 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 24% 292, % 0 76% 0 100% 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 10 of 12

91 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E889 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Example of sign that will be installed. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 11 of 12

92 E890 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 585,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Robert Tam Title: Manager Technology and Research Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g tamr@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations xlsx, 8Signatures Page 12 of 12

93 2009 Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (EP 7) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 22, 2013 Board Approval Last Update: September 16, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 33,333 33,333 PCJPB Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS) for Caltrain PROC, CON Allocated 166, ,667 PCJPB Caltrain System Wide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program MULTI Allocated (0) (0) PCJPB Caltrain System Wide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program MULTI Deobligated 416, ,667 PCJPB Capital Program Management and Capital Project Development O&M Allocated 1,113,333 1,113,333 O&M Allocated Peninsula Rail Program (formerly Caltrain 2025) Program Management & Implementation PCJPB PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated 1 TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Capital Program Management 1 Planning Allocated 144, , , ,650 Capital Project Development 1 Planning Allocated PCJPB 6,667 6,667 Caltrain Systemwide Station Improvements: State of Good Repair Program 1 Planning Allocated PCJPB 150, ,000 Planning Allocated Peninsula Rail Program (formerly Caltrain 2025) Program Management & Implementation PCJPB 150, ,000 PCJPB Railism Modeling Software Update PROC Allocated PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB RightofWay Safety Fencing 2 CON Pending 429, ,869 PCJPB Train Departure Monitors at Terminal Stations 2 PS&E, CON Pending 585, ,000 PCJPB Caltrain CIP Projects Undesignated 2 TBD Programmed 0 0 1,730, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,384,869 Total Programmed in 5YPP 1,730, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,384,869 (0) (0) (0) (0) Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 1,699, , , ,000 1,014,869 3,353,979 30,890 30, Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 23, 2010 through Res E891 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 7 Tab: EP 7 5YPP Page 1 of 2

94 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (EP 7) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 22, 2013 Board Approval Last Update: September 16, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ) Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 864,869 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Caltrain CIP category. This increases Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 1,014,869. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 7 Tab: EP 7 5YPP Page 2 of 2

95 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E893 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) a.1 VehiclesTransit vehicle replacement and renovation Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 17 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 1,000,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request is a continuation of the multiyear State of Good Repair (SOGR) project, to replace the Model C18 Caterpillar separate headend power (SEPHEP) units on six (6) Motive Power Model (MP) 36 locomotives and deliver spare materials to support future maintenance of the new units. A separate headend power unit is a diesel generator, separate from the main engine, in the locomotive that provides electrical power to the passenger cars. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 1Scope Page 1 of 10

96 E894 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

97 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E895 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Cost for Current p Request/Phase Current Prop AA Total Cost Request Current Request 1,073,700 1,000,000 1,073,700 1,000,000 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 1,360,600 1,360,600 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget % Complete of Design: NA as of NA Expected Useful Life: 15 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 3Cost Page 3 of 10

98 E896 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

99 1. SOGR ROLLING STOCK 1.17 PROJECT: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Description/Justification: This project will replace the C18 Caterpillar SEPHEP units on six (6) each MP 36 locomotives. In addition, spare materials will be delivered to support the C18 SEPHEP units. Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments Project Cost Estimates: PE/Env/PSE Procurement/Construction 994,000 Construction Management Staff/Administration 225,000 Project Contingency 141,600 TOTAL 1,360,600 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 1,073, ,900 1,360,600 Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction January14 Jun16 Project Milestones: Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal State Local Match JPB Member 1,073, ,900 San Francisco 1,000,000 San Mateo 36,850 Santa Clara 36,850 Local Match County SC E897 Regional/Other TOTAL 1,073,700

100 E898 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 1,000,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,000,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,000,334 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Caltrain Vehicle Projects Undesignated project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Vehicles. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Vehicles category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,000,334), in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K Other Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 73,700 73,700 Total: 1,000,000 73,700 73,700 1,073,700 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 6.86% 1,073,700 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 83.73% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 5Funding Page 6 of 10

101 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % E899 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 1,000,000 1,000, ,900 73, ,600 Total: 1,000,000 1,434,300 1,360,600 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 26.50% 1,360,600 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 83.73% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 1,000,000 1,000, % % % % % 0 1,000,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 5Funding Page 7 of 10

102 E8100 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 1,000,000 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 1,000,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 17 FY 2013/14 200, % Prop K EP 17 FY 2014/15 400, % Prop K EP 17 FY 2015/16 400, % 0.00% 0.00% Total: 1,000,000 Balance 800, ,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 17 FY 2013/14 Construction 200,000 20% Prop K EP 17 FY 2014/15 Construction 400,000 60% Prop K EP 17 FY 2015/16 Construction 400, % 100% 100% Total: 1,000,000 Balance 800, ,000 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2017 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

103 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8101 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of construction, provide 23 digital photos of completed project Special Conditions: Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

104 E8102 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 1,000,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Stephen P. Coleman Title: Manager, Rail Maintenance Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g colemans@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_MP 36 SEP HEP Replacement xlsx, 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

105 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8103 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 86,400 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will provide funding for the preliminary engineering, design and a portion of the construction costs of the Brisbane tunnel and track rehab project, which will rehabilitate the track structure and drainage system in Tunnel #4 in Brisbane. Previous projects have replaced ties and improved drainage in Tunnels 1, 2 & 3. However, the track structure in Tunnel #4 is now at the end of its useful life (poor tie conditions and fouled ballast) and the drainage system is ineffective. The track requires frequent surfacing to maintain the alignment. This project will install an effective drainage system, replace the fouled ballast, and rebuild the track. This will mitigate the need for a potential speed restriction through this area. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 1Scope Page 1 of 11

106 E8104 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) To Begin 05/31/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction / /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /17 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 2Schedule Page 2 of 11

107 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8105 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Prop AA Total Cost Current Request Current Request 111,000 22, , , ,000 54,200 10,000 86,400 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 111, ,000 7,625,000 8,007,000 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget Capital Budet Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 0 as of 8/13/2013 Expected Useful Life: 70 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 3Cost Page 3 of 11

108 E8106 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 11

109 E SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.14 PROJECT: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Description/Justification: This project will rehabilitate the track structure and drainage system in Tunnel #4 in Brisbane. Earlier projects have replaced ties and improved drainage in Tunnels 1, 2 & 3. The track structure in Tunnel #4 is now at the end of its useful life (poor tie conditions and fouled ballast) and the drainage system is ineffective. The track requires frequent surfacing to maintain the alignment. The track structure condition will eventually have an effect on the track geometry. This project will install a effective drainage system, replace the fouled ballast, and rebuild the track. This will mitigate the need for a potential speed restriction through this area. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 432,000 Procurement/Construction 5,508,000 Construction Management 520,000 Staff/Administration 1,079,000 Project Contingency 468,000 TOTAL 8,007,000 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 432,000 7,575,000 8,007,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design December13 June14 PS&E July14 December14 Environmental May14 May14 Right of Way Procurement Construction July15 July16 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal 345,600 6,060,000 State Local Match JPB Member 86,400 1,515,000 San Francisco 86,400 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SF Regional/Other TOTAL 432,000

110 E8108 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 86,400 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 in Fiscal Year 2033/34 funds to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Planned Programmed Allocated Total 86,400 86, , ,600 Total: 86, , , ,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 80.00% 432,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 5Funding Page 6 of 11

111 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 345, % 86,400 E8109 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 86,400 86,400 FTA ,060, ,600 6,405,600 Member Agencies 1,515,000 1,515,000 Total: 86,400 8,352,600 8,007,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 98.92% 8,007,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 86,400 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 86, % % % % % 0 86,400 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 5Funding Page 7 of 11

112 E8110 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 22,200 Prop K Allocation 54,200 Prop K Allocation 10,000 Phase: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 86,400 A multiphase allocation is appropriate given the need to provide San Francisco's full local share for Caltrain's Fiscal Year 2013/14 Capital Budget, which includes planning/conceptual engineering, design engineering, and construction funds. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum % Fiscal Year Source Reimbursement Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 86, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 86,400 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Planning/Conceptual Engineering 22, % Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 54, % Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 10, % % % Total: 86,400 Balance 64,200 10, Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 9/30/2017 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 11

113 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8111 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of design (anticipated December 2014), provide evidence of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page). 2. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions. 3. Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. Notes: In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400,001. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 11

114 E8112 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) SUBPROJECT DETAIL Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation SubProject # from SGA: Name: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Planning/Conceptual Engineering 22,200 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 0 Total: 22,200 Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation SubProject # from SGA: Name: Design Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 54, % 0 Total: 54,200 Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehab SubProject # from SGA: Name: Construction Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 10,000 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 0 Total: 10,000 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 6Authority Rec Page 10 of 11

115 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8113 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 86,400 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Pedro Gutierrez Title: Manager of Engineering Maintenan Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g gutierrezp@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Brisbane Tunnel Track Drainage Rehab , 8Signatures Page 11 of 11

116 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

117 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

118 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

119 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8117 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: CTAMS Data Population Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 350,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. In 2011, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB) was awarded a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) discretionary grant to develop a new relational State of Good Repair (SOGR) database referred to as the Caltrain Transit Asset Management System (CTAMS), to track the conditions of Caltrain assets including but not limited to: tracks, crossings, structures, stations and signals. CTAMS retained the functions and improved the efficiency of the existing Excelbased SOGR database. However, due to funding constraints, after the framework of the database was built, only limited amounts of the existing data from the SOGR database had been transferred to the new CTAMS database. The CTAMS project will transfer the remaining data from the SOGR database to the new CTAMS database, bringing the new database up to date with the most accurate and complete set of data and conditions. Data population will include existing ratings, inspection records and photos. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

120 E8118 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: CTAMS Data Population Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /15 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

121 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8119 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: CTAMS Data Population Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 1,100,000 1,100,000 Prop K Current Request 350, ,000 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 1,100,000 1,100,000 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 75 as of 7/31/2013 Expected Useful Life: 15 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

122 E8120 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

123 E SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.16 PROJECT: CTAMS Data Population Description/Justification: In 2011, the PCJPB was awarded a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) discretionary grant to develop a new relational State of Good Repair (SOGR) database referred to as CTAMS, to track the conditions of Caltrain assets including but not limited to: tracks, crossings, structures, stations and signals. CTAMS retained the functions and improved the efficiency of the existing Excelbased SOGR database. However, due to funding constraints, the framework of the database was built, but only limited amounts of existing data from the current SOGR database were transferred to the new CTAMS database. The CTAMS project will transfer data from the SOGR database to the new CTAMS database, bringing the new database up to date with the most accurate and complete set of data and conditions. That data population will include existing ratings, inspection records and photos. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 300,000 Procurement/Construction Construction Management Staff/Administration Project Contingency 50,000 TOTAL 350,000 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 750, , ,100,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E July11 July14 Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal State Local Match JPB Member 350,000 San Francisco 350,000 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SF Regional/Other TOTAL 350,000

124 E8122 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: CTAMS Data Population FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 350,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 in Fiscal Year 2033/34 funds to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 350, ,000 Federal Transit Administration 5307 Funds 750, ,000 Total: 350, , ,000 1,100,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 68.18% 1,100,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

125 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % E8123 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Total: 0 0 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 350, , % % % % % 0 350,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

126 E8124 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: CTAMS Data Population Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 350,000 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 350,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 350, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 350,000 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 350, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: 350,000 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

127 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8125 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: CTAMS Data Population Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

128 E8126 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 350,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: CTAMS Data Population Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Zhenlin Guan Title: Project Engineer Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g guanz@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJBP_CTAMS Data Population , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

129 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

130 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

131 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

132 E8130 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

133 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8131 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: 118,160 Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will help fund the replacement of the Jerrold Avenue bridge north span. Design of this project was previously completed in June 2013 and was funded through the original Jerrold Avenue Bridge Replacement project, which was funded in part by Prop K (Res. 1032, Project ). While the Jerrold Avenue bridge was reconstructed in 2011 with a new steel main span, the concrete north approach span, constructed in 2000, was not replaced. However, it had 12 inches of ballast added to raise the track level with the new bridge. This increased the weight on the north span and put additional stress on the concrete beams, restricting the maximum weight of a train crossing the span. This weight limit does not affect commuter rail operations, but freight rail could be impacted by the weight restriction. Additionally, a temporary construction measure was employed to retain the added ballast along the north span, obstructing a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) required walkway, leaving an unsafe footing condition for rail workers and train crews. This project will correct these issues by replacing the northern approach span and installing a new worker walkway. Scope elements include, but are not limited to: replacing the four precast concrete north span segments with an earthen berm; supporting the existing vertical concrete support structures with micropiles; installing a new walkway at tracklevel to meet FRA requirements; and any other necessary work to allow for the successful construction of the project. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

134 E8132 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorical Exemption Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Complete 08/21/09 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /10 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /13 Prepare Bid Documents / /14 Advertise Construction / /14 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /15 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /15 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Please note the design of the Jerrold Avenue north span replacement project was previously completed in June 2013 as part of the Jerrold Avenue Bridge Replacement project. Construction of the North Span replacement is anticipated to begin in July 2014 and be complete by December P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

135 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8133 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Current Request 590, , , ,160 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 56, , ,801 Actuals Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 100 as of 6/30/2013 Expected Useful Life: 70 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

136 E8134 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

137 1. SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.15 PROJECT: Jerrold Ave North Span Removal Description/Justification: The Jerrold Avenue bridge was reconstructed in 2011 with a new steel main span. However, the north approach span, constructed in 2000, was not replaced, but had 12 inches of ballast added to raise the track level with the new bridge. This increased the weight on the north span is putting additional stress on the concrete beams, restricting the maximum weight of a train crossing the span. While this does not affect commuter rail operations, freight rail could be impacted by the weight restriction. Additionally a temporary construction measure was employed to retain the added ballast along the north span which obstructs the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) required walkway and leaves an unsafe footing condition for roadway workers and train crews. This project will correct these issues by replacing the northern approach span and installing a new required worker walkway. Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments Project Cost Estimates: PE/Env/PSE 56,001 Procurement/Construction 303,000 Construction Management 25,000 Staff/Administration 210,000 Project Contingency 52,800 TOTAL 646,801 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 56, , ,801 Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E March13 June13 Environmental August09 August09 Right of Way Procurement Construction July14 December14 Project Milestones: Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments E8135 Federal 472,640 State Local Match JPB Member 118,160 San Francisco 118,160 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SF Regional/Other TOTAL 590,800

138 E8136 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 118,160 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 in Fiscal Year 2033/34 funds to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Planned Programmed Allocated Total 118, , , ,640 Total: 118, , , ,800 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 80.00% 590,800 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

139 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 472, % 118,160 E8137 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 FTA 5309 Other Local Funds (NonProp K) Planned Programmed Allocated Total 118, , , ,640 7,002 7,002 48,999 48,999 Total: 118,160 1,175, ,801 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 81.73% 646,801 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 118, , % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 118,160 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

140 E8138 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 118,160 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 118,160 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 118, % 12.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 118,160 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 118, % 12.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 118,160 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

141 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8139 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. PCJPB may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (118,160) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page) as already required for Project Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

142 E8140 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 118,160 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Patrick Kitto Title: Project Engineer Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g kittop@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

143 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

144 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

145 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

146 E8144 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

147 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8145 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 120,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will help fund the preliminary engineering of the removal and replacement of the Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue bridges in the City and County of San Francisco. The bridges will be replaced with an elevated soil berm to match the existing slopes and profiles of existing track. Both of these streets were closed to through traffic under the Caltrain rightofway when Interstate 280 was constructed. Since that time, the former roadways below the bridge structures have become security and safety concerns for both the JPB and the San Francisco Police Department. Additionally, annual bridge inspections have determined these structures have reached the end of their useful life. The PCJPB will assign a public outreach officer to the project and create a project specific webpage with weekly updates. The PCJPB will also use social media to contact the community and schedule outreach meetings as needed. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

148 E8146 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Marin Street and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorical Exemption Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 05/01/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition / /14 Engineering Final Design/(PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction / /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

149 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8147 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Prop AA Total Cost Current Request Current Request 600, , , ,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 600, ,000 3,594,000 4,656,000 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget Capital Budget Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 0 as of Expected Useful Life: 70 Years 8/13/2013 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

150 E8148 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

151 E SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.9 PROJECT: Marin Street and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement Description/Justification: This project will remove the bridge structures at Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue, located in the City and County of San Francisco, and replace them with an elevated soil berm structure to match the existing slopes and profiles of the adjacent berm structure. Both streets were closed to through traffic below the Caltrain rightofway when the Interstate 280 overhead viaduct was constructed. Since that time, the former roadway below the bridge structures has become a security and safety concern. Additionally, annual bridge inspections have determined these structures have reached the end of their useful life. This allocation request will help fund the preliminary design engineering of the bridge removal and replacement. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 375,000 Procurement/Construction 2,125,000 Construction Management 510,000 Staff/Administration 870,000 Project Contingency 776,000 TOTAL 4,656,000 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 600,000 4,056,000 4,656,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design Dec13 June14 PS&E Jun14 Dec15 Environmental Jan14 June14 Right of Way December13 March14 Procurement Construction July15 March16 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal 480,000 3,244,800 State Local Match JPB Member 120, ,200 San Francisco 120,000 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County Specific Regional/Other TOTAL 600,000

152 E8150 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 120,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 from Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Planned Programmed Allocated Total 120, , , ,000 Total: 120, , , ,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 80.00% 600,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

153 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 480, % 120,000 E8151 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 120, ,000 FTA ,244, ,000 3,724,800 Member Agencies 811, ,200 Total: 120,000 5,136,000 4,656,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 97.42% 4,656,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 120,000 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 120, % % % % % 0 120,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

154 E8152 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 120,000 Phase: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 120,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 120, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 120,000 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Planning/Conceptual Engineering 120, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: 120,000 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2014 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

155 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8153 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: Upon completion of prelimary design engineering (anticipated June 2014), provide copies of preliminary design engineering drawings. 3. Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

156 E8154 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 120,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Patrick Kitto Title: Project Engineer Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g kittop@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Marin St and Napoleon Ave Bridge Replacement , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

157 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

158 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

159 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

160 E8158 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

161 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8159 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Rail Grinding Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 154,143 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This project will implement a multiyear rail grinding program based on the recommendations of the 2011 rail grinding study. The project will include both maintenance analysis and rail grinding of the mainline track throughout the entire Caltrain system. Rail grinding helps to extend and maintain the useful life of the rail, improves ride quality, and helps to minimize and mitigate rail noise issues. Rail grinding can correct typical rail flaws that develop from the wheel/rail interface. These improvements will utlimately result in a smoother ride, reduce shaking and provide an overall benefit to passengers. The rail grinding work will be priortized at the curve locations of the track, where a majority of the deterioration has occurred according to the 2011 study. Each fiscal year, the PCJPB will plan and program the application of rail grinding so that any impact on the current PCJPB operations is minimized and the use of its infrastructure and resources are optimized. This allocation request will provide funding for the first year of this this new multiyear program. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

162 E8160 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Rail Grinding Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction / /14 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /15 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

163 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8161 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Rail Grinding Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Current Request 770, , , ,143 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 2,207,241 2,207,241 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget % Complete of Design: N/A as of Expected Useful Life: N/A Years N/A P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

164 E8162 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

165 1. SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.6 PROJECT: Rail Grinding This project will implement a multiyear rail grinding program based on the recommendations of the 2011 rail grinding study. The project will include both maintenance analysis and rail grinding of the mainline track throughout the entire Caltrain system. Each fiscal year, the PCJPB will plan and program the application of rail grinding so that any impact on the current PCJPB operations is minimized and the use of its infrastructure and resources are optimized. Description/Justification: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments Project Cost Estimates: PE/Env/PSE Procurement/Construction 1,800,000 Construction Management Staff/Administration 270,000 Project Contingency 137,241 TOTAL 2,207,241 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 770,714 1,436,527 2,207,241 Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction July14 June15 Project Milestones: Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal 616,571 1,149,222 E8163 State Local Match JPB Member 154, ,305 San Francisco 154,143 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County Specific Other Homeland Security TOTAL 770,714

166 E8164 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Rail Grinding FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 154,143 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 from Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Planned Programmed Allocated Total 154, , , ,571 Total: 154, , , ,714 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 80.00% 770,714 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

167 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 616, % 154,143 E8165 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 154, ,143 1,149, ,571 1,765, , ,305 Total: 154,143 2,823,812 2,207,241 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 93.02% 2,207,241 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 154, , % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 154,143 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

168 E8166 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Rail Grinding Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 154,143 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 154,143 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 61, % Prop K EP 22 FY 2014/15 92, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 154,143 Balance 92,486 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 61,657 40% Prop K EP 22 FY 2014/15 Construction 92, % 100% 100% 100% Total: 154,143 Balance 92,486 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2016 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

169 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8167 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Rail Grinding Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

170 E8168 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 154,143 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Rail Grinding Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Pedro Gutierrez Title: Manager of Engineering Maintenan Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g gutierrezp@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Rail Grinding , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

171 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

172 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

173 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

174 E8172 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

175 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8173 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: 118,428 Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. This allocation request will help fund the Fiscal Year 2013/14 communication system State of Good Repair (SOGR) program. Program elements include, but are not limited to the following tasks: Installing new radio base stations for improvement of voice radio coverage in the Mountain View and Brisbane areas; Updating the communications system asbuilt plan; Updating all radio base stations sites including San Francisco, Sign Hill, San Carlos, Central Control Facility (CCF), the Centralized Maintenance and Operations Facility (CEMOF), Monument Peak, and San Bruno Mountains; and Completing necessary rehabilitation and upgrade of the voice radio system within the San Francisco tunnels based on a study currently underway. An initial study of the voice radio system within the San Francisco tunnels identified radio coverage issues that were caused by interference from tunnel radios which were out of synch. Subsequently, a study currently underway is being performed to identify solutions that will rectify the coverage issues. Thereafter, the PCJPB will review the study and approve a viable solution that will be issued for design. The overall project will also update asbuilt plans to show the orientation of the equipment at each location. This documentation will help maintain communication systems and facilitate future communication system projects. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 1Scope Page 1 of 11

176 E8174 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents / /14 Advertise Construction / /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /15 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 2Schedule Page 2 of 11

177 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8175 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 297, , ,140 Prop K Current Request 59,506 58, ,428 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 297, , ,140 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 0 as of 8/20/2013 Expected Useful Life: 50 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 3Cost Page 3 of 11

178 E8176 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on the next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 11

179 1. SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.11 PROJECT: Railroad Communication System SOGR Description/Justification: Program elements include, but are not limited to the following tasks: installing new radio base stations for improvement of voice radio coverage in the Mountain View and Brisbane areas; updating communications system asbuilt plan: updating all radio base stations sites including San Francisco, Sign Hill, San Carlos, Central Control Facility (CCF), the Centralized Maintenance and Operations Facility (CEMOF), Monument Peak, and San Bruno Mountains and completing necessary rehabilitation and upgrade of the voice radio system within the San Francisco tunnels based on a study currently underway. The project will also update asbuilt plans to show the orientation of the equipment at each location. This documentation will help maintain communication systems and facilitate future communication system projects. Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments Project Cost Estimates: PE/Env/PSE 297,530 Procurement/Construction 200,000 Construction Management 4,920 Staff/Administration 29,800 Project Contingency 59,890 TOTAL 592,140 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 0 592, ,140 Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E November13 February14 Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction July14 June15 Project Milestones: Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments E8177 Federal 473,712 State Local Match JPB Member 118,428 San Francisco 118,428 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SF Regional/Other TOTAL 592,140

180 E8178 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 118,428 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 from Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Planned Programmed Allocated Total 118, , , ,712 Total: 118, , , ,140 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 80.00% 592,140 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 5Funding Page 6 of 11

181 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 473, % 118,428 E8179 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Total: Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 80.00% 592,140 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 118,428 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 118, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 118,428 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 5Funding Page 7 of 11

182 E8180 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 59,506 Prop K Allocation 58,922 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 118,428 A multiphase allocation is appropriate given the need to provide San Francisco's full local share for Caltrain's Fiscal Year 2013/14 Capital Budget, which includes design engineering and construction funds. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 118, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 118,428 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 59,506 50% Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 58, % 100% 100% 100% Total: 118,428 Balance 58,922 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2016 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 11

183 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8181 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of design (anticipated February 2014), provide evidence of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page). 2. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions. 3. Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. PCJPB may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (58,922) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page). Notes: In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400,001. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 11

184 E8182 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) SUBPROJECT DETAIL Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair SubProject # from SGA: Name: Design Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 59,506 Total: 59,506 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 58,922 0% 0% 0% 0% Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair SubProject # from SGA: Name: Construction Supervisorial District(s): 6,10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 58, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 6Authority Rec Page 10 of 11

185 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8183 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 118,428 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Uhila Makoni Title: Project Engineer Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g makoniu@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair , 8Signatures Page 11 of 11

186 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

187 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

188 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

189 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8187 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: South Terminal Wayside Power Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 28,197 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Prop K will help fund the installation of new wayside power cabinets at the San Jose Diridon station to provide electricity to trains that are laying over at the station. This will reduce the need for locomotive engines to be running thereby saving fuel, reducing noise, and diesel emissions. Project design was completed in September 2012 as part of a separate project, South Terminal Phase 1*. Project schedule and costs are only for the installation of the power cabinets, a new power substation, as well as construction engineering/project administration. The scope of the project includes, but is not limited to: the replacement of a nonfunctional electric power substation on the Diridon Station main platform; replacement of existing nonfunctional wayside power cabinets; installation of new wayside power cabinets on the new platforms constructed as part of the South Terminal Phase 1 project; installation of conduits and power cables; and any other work necessary to facilitate the replacement/installation of the wayside power cabinets and associated substation. *The Authority Board allocated 160,000 in Prop K funds to the South Terminal Phase I project in November 2008 (Resolution 0921, Project ) for the construction of two new platforms at the San Jose Diridon Station, along with stairs and ADAcompliant ramps to access the existing pedestrian underpass. Due to cost savings as a result of a favorable bidding environment, the contract award was substantially below the engineer's estimate and Prop K funds were not needed and were subsequently deobligated. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

190 E8188 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: South Terminal Wayside Power Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Completed 05/05/08 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /13 Prepare Bid Documents / /13 Advertise Construction / /13 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Project design was completed in September 2012 as part of a separate project, South Terminal Phase 1. The South Terminal Wayside Power project only includes the installation of the new wayside power equipment. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

191 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8189 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: South Terminal Wayside Power Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 2,600,000 28,197 2,600,000 Prop K Current Request 28,197 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 1,000,000 2,600,000 3,600,000 Actuals Source of Cost Estimate PCJPB Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 100 as of 9/30/2012 Expected Useful Life: 30 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

192 E8190 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

193 E OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS/ENHANCEMENTS 3.3 PROJECT: South Terminal Wayside Power Description/Justification: Wayside power will provide electricity to the train for lights and heat to allow cleaning and other servicing. Without wayside power, there is the need to keep the locomotives running using fuel and increasing the noise level. Scope is to include a new unit substation and wayside cabinets at eight locations. The existing substation at Diridon Station on Platform A will be removed and replaced. The existing wayside cabinets on existing Platforms B and C will be removed and replaced. New wayside cabinets on the new platforms D and E will be provided. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 1,000,000 Procurement/Construction 1,906,000 Construction Management 247,732 Staff/Administration 210,948 Project Contingency 235,320 TOTAL 3,600,000 Project Budget: Existing Project Budget FY14 Prop K Request Future Budget Total 3,571,803 28, ,600,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E April11 September12 Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction August13 April15 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed Budget Future Budget Comments Federal 245,563 FTA 5307 Funding State Local Match JPB Member San Francisco 28,197 Funds deobligated from Narrow Banding San Mateo 713,402 Surplus funds from South Terminal Phase 1 and CCF Santa Clara 1,297,838 Surplus funds from South Terminal Phase 1 and CCF Local Match County SC Regional/Other 315,000 Carl Moyer Funding TOTAL 2,600,000

194 E8192 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: South Terminal Wayside Power FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 28,197 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 from Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Carl Moyer Program Other Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 28,197 28, , , , ,000 2,011,240 2,011,240 Total: 28,197 2,571,803 2,571,803 2,600,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 98.92% 2,600,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

195 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source FTA 5307 Yes Prop K Required Local Match Amount % 245, % 61,390 E8193 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K FTA 5307 Carl Moyer Program Other Member Agencies Planned Programmed Allocated Total 28,197 28, , , , ,000 3,011,240 3,011,240 Total: 28,197 7,171,803 3,600,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 99.22% 3,600,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 28,197 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 28, % % % % % 0 28,197 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

196 E8194 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: South Terminal Wayside Power Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 28,197 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 28,197 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 28, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 28,197 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 28, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: 28,197 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2016 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

197 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8195 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: South Terminal Wayside Power Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. PCJPB may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (28,197) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page). Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

198 E8196 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 28,197 Project Name: Implementing Agency: South Terminal Wayside Power Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Name (typed): Al Fung Project Manager Grants Section Contact April Chan Title: Project Manager Phone: Fax: funga@samtrans.com Executive Officer, Planning and Development chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Wayside Power , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

199 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

200 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

201 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

202 E8200 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

203 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8201 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit iii. System Maintenance and Renovation (transit) c.1 Guideways Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 22 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 838,000 6,10 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. The project will upgrade unreliable Public Address (PA) systems and inadequate PA coverage at the 22nd St, South San Francisco, Sunnyvale, and San Jose Diridon stations. Additionally, the project will install a Visual Message Sign (VMS) at the 22nd Street station. The project includes design, procurement, installation, and testing of the new PA and VMS equipment. PA upgrades include replacing amplifiers, mixers, and all speakers. VMS installation will include new signs and poles and networking equipment. The upgrades will be compatible with the Predictive Arrival/Departure System (PADS). The project will look to correct the following deficiencies: unreliable PA system and inadequate coverage at the South San Francisco Station; unreliable PA system and inadequate coverage at the 22nd Street Station; no VMS signs at the 22nd Street Station; inadequate PA coverage at the Sunnyvale Station; and unreliable PA system at the San Jose Diridon Station. The project will enhance customer service providing patrons realtime information and bring station communications up to Caltrain standards. In September 2012 through Resolution 1312 (Projects ), the Authority Board approved the allocation of 800,000 in Prop K funds for the design phase (604,000) and a portion of the construction phase costs (196,000) for this project. The project is currently in design, which is approximately 80% complete at this time. Design is anticipated to be completed September This allocation request will fully fund the construction phase of the project. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 1Scope Page 1 of 10

204 E8202 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE N/A N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents / /14 Advertise Construction / /14 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /14 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /15 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 2Schedule Page 2 of 10

205 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8203 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K Current Request 1,034, ,000 1,034, ,000 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 604,000 1,034,000 1,638,000 Source of Cost Estimate Capital Budget Capital Budget % Complete of Design: 80 as of Expected Useful Life: 30 Years 6/30/13 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 3Cost Page 3 of 10

206 E8204 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See Project Summary on the next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 4Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 10

207 E SOGR RIGHT OF WAY / SIGNAL & COMMUNICATION 1.13 PROJECT: Upgrade Public Address System at 22nd St, South San Francisco, Sunnyvale, and San Jose Diridon stations Description/Justification: The project will upgrade unreliable Public Address (PA) systems and inadequate PA coverage at the 22nd St, South San Francisco, Sunnyvale, and San Jose Diridon stations. Additionally, the project will install a Visual Message Sign (VMS) at the 22nd Street station. The project includes design, procurement, installation, and testing of the new PA and VMS equipment. PA upgrades include replacing amplifiers, mixers and all speakers. VMS installation will include new signs and poles and networking equipment. The upgrades will be compatible with the Predictive Arrival/Departure System (PADS). The project will look to correct the following deficiencies: unreliable PA system and inadequate coverage at the South San Francisco Station; unreliable PA system and inadequate coverage at the 22nd Street Station; no VMS signs at the 22nd Street Station; inadequate PA coverage at the Sunnyvale Station; and unreliable PA system at the San Jose Diridon Station. The project will enhance customer service providing patrons real time information and bring station communications up to Caltrain standards. The PCJPB received a Prop K allocation in 2013, which funded design of the project and a portion of the construction. This allocation request will fully fund the construction phase of the project. Project Cost Estimates: Cost By Element Original Est. Revised Est. Variance Comments PE/Env/PSE 400,000 Procurement/Construction 810,000 Construction Management 50,000 Staff/Administration 258,000 Project Contingency 120,000 TOTAL 1,638,000 Project Budget: Prior Year Budgeted FY 14 Budget Request Future Budget Total 800, , ,638,000 Project Milestones: Milestones Estimated Start Estimated End Comments Study Preliminary Design PS&E February13 September13 Environmental Right of Way Procurement Construction April14 November14 Funding Plan: Funding Source Proposed FY14 Budget Future Budget Comments Federal State Local Match JPB Member 838,000 San Francisco 838,000 San Mateo Santa Clara Local Match County SF Regional/Other TOTAL 838,000

208 E8206 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 838,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 1,300,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,306,541 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Undesignated Guideways project in the 5YPP for Caltrain Guideways. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Caltrain Guideways category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,306,541) in the adopted 2013 Prop K Strategic Plan Baseline. Funding the Caltrain FY 2013/14 annual request (totaling 3.8 million) requires a Strategic Plan amendment to advance a total of 485,131 from Fiscal Year 2033/34 to Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This requires a corresponding amendment of the 5YPP. See memo and attached draft Strategic Plan and 5YPP amendments for additional details. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 838, ,000 1,034,000 Total: 838, , ,000 1,034,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 0.00% 1,034,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 77.72% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 5Funding Page 6 of 10

209 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % E8207 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K Planned Programmed Allocated Total 838, ,000 1,638,000 Total: 838,000 2,438,000 1,638,000 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 0.00% 1,638,000 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 77.72% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 838, , % % % % % 0 838,000 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 5Funding Page 7 of 10

210 E8208 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 838,000 Phase: Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 838,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 838, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 838,000 Balance Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 22 FY 2013/14 Construction 838, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: 838,000 Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 6Authority Rec Page 8 of 10

211 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8209 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Implementing Agency: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of completed project, including VMS sign at the 22nd Street station. 3. Special Conditions: 1. Approval of this request is contingent upon Authority Board approval of a Strategic Plan amendment and a corresponding 5YPP Caltrain Guideways amendment. See attached draft 5YPP amendment, funding section, and staff memo for additional details. 2. PCJPB may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (838,000) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page) as required by previous Prop K design allocation (Res. 1312, Project ). Notes: 1. In order to comply with Prop K Expenditure Plan category eligibility and maintain consistency with available funds, PCJPB has allowed San Francisco's 1/3 share to be distributed unevenly across individual projects as long as the total contribution is held constant. The FY 13/14 Caltrain capital match contribution is 3.8 million for each of the PCJPB entities or 1/3 of a total 11,400, Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 6, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 10

212 E8210 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 838,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Robert Tam Title: Manager Technology and Research Phone: Fax: Grants Section Contact April Chan Development g tamr@samtrans.com chana@samtrans.com Address: Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Caltrain 1250 San Carlos Ave San Carlos, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\PCJPB 2013 Annual Request\PCJPB_Upgrade PAVMS System , 8Signatures Page 10 of 10

213 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge and Guadalupe Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 133, ,333 PCJPB Narrow Banding Project CON Allocated 233, ,333 PCJPB Operational Control Center Replacement CON Allocated 86,667 86,667 PCJPB Quint and Jerrold St. Bridge Replacement PS&E Allocated 200, ,000 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Allocated 1,408,333 1,408,333 PCJPB South Terminal Station Improvement Project CON Deobligated (1,408,333) (1,408,333) PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB PRP Program Implementation and Management 1 PLAN Allocated 935, ,000 PCJPB Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards Update 1 PROC Allocated 97,000 97,000 PCJPB Update of Suicide Prevention Signs 1 CON Allocated 36,667 36,667 PCJPB Narrow Banding 1 CON Allocated 202, ,047 PCJPB Narrow Banding 3 CON Deobligated (28,197) (28,197) PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement 1 PS&E Allocated 93,333 93,333 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab 1 CON Allocated 217, ,445 PCJPB Signal System Rehab 1 CON Allocated 300, ,000 PCJPB Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement PS&E, ENV Allocated 1,000,000 1,000,000 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehab CON Allocated 1,050,000 1,050,000 PCJPB North South Road Channel PS&E, CON Allocated 70,300 70,300 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PLAN Allocated 69,000 69,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 PS&E, Allocated 75,300 75,300 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 2 CON Allocated 60,000 60,000 PCJPB San Mateo Bridge Replacement Design 2 PS&E Allocated 240, ,000 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 R/W Allocated 48,174 48,174 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 1 of 3

214 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 PCJPB San Francisco Roadway Bridges Replacement 2 CON Allocated 446, ,533 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 PS&E Allocated 98,800 98,800 PCJPB Signal System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 441, ,200 PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program 2 CON Allocated 588, ,000 PCJPB Train Dispatcher Voice Communication System 2 CON Allocated 245, ,756 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 PS&E Allocated 604, ,000 PCJPB Upgrade Public Address Systems 2 CON Allocated 196, ,000 PCJPB Voice Radio System Rehabilitation 2 CON Allocated 110, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways TBD Programmed 0 0 PLAN, PS&E, PCJPB Brisbane Tunnel Track and Drainage Rehabilitation 3 CON Pending 86,400 86,400 PCJPB CTAMS Data Population 3 PS&E Pending 350, ,000 PCJPB Jerrold Bridge North Span Replacement 3 CON Pending 118, ,160 PCJPB Marin Street and Napoleon Avenue Bridge Replacement 3 PLAN Pending 120, ,000 PCJPB Railroad Communication System State of Good Repair 3 PS&E, CON Pending 118, ,428 PCJPB Rail Grinding 3 CON Pending 154, ,143 PCJPB South Terminal Wayside Power 3 CON Pending 28,197 28,197 PCJPB Upgrade of Public Address & Visual Message Signs 3 CON Pending 838, ,000 PCJPB Undesignated Guideways 3 TBD Programmed 0 0 Total Programmed in 5YPP 653,333 1,853,295 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663,019 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,061,666 1,881,492 2,120,300 3,222,763 1,813,328 11,099,549 (1,408,333) (28,197) (1,436,530) * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on November 25, 2012 through Res Total Programmed in 2013 Strategic Plan Baseline* Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 653,333 1,881,492 2,092,103 3,222,763 1,813,328 9,663, , P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 2 of 3

215 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Guideways PCJPB (EP 22P) Programming and Allocations Todate Pending October 8, 2013 Board Approval Last update: September 16, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 Finance Neutral Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2010/11 Annual Request (Res. 1123, ): Advance 160,389 in FY 2022/23 funds to FY 2010/11 in the Caltrain Capital Improvement Program (CIP) category and delay 826,841 in FY 2010/11 funds to FY 2011/12 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2010/11 Caltrain CIP funds from 150,000 to 310,389, decreases FY 2010/11 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 473,159 and increases FY 2011/12 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 2,126, Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2012/13 Annual Request (Res , ): Advance 1,922,763 in FY 2024/25, FY 2025/26, and FY 2026/27 funds to FY 2012/13 in the Caltrain Guideways category. This increases FY 2012/13 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 3,222,763. Strategic Plan and 5YPP Amendment to accommodate Caltrain's FY 2013/14 Annual Request (Res. XX.XX, XX.XX.XX): Advance 485,131 in FY 2033/34 funds to FY 2013/14 in the Guideways category. This increases FY 2013/14 Caltrain Guideways funds from 1,300,000 to 1,785,131. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 22P Tab: EP 22P 5YPP Page 3 of 3

216 E8214 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

217 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8215 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Department of Public Works Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety i. Major Capital Projects (Streets) Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Project/Program: b.2 Great Highway Erosion Repair Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 26 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 49,596 4,7 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. In the winter of 2009/2010, a section of the Great Highway was subjected to intense slipout of the supporting bluffs south of Sloat Boulevard. In the area with the most severe bluff slipout, the Great Highway southbound lane was undermined and the pavement collapsed. The Lake Merced Wastewater Tunnel, which is located underneath the southbound lanes of the Great Highway, was left vulnerable, should further bluff retreat continue. The Southwest Ocean Outfall (SWOO) pipe, which discharges treated wastewater four miles off shore in the Pacific Ocean, was also threatened. Local forces, which included DPW and other city department staff, were deployed to begin storm damage assessment. Following the 2010 storm event, federally, state, and locally funded emergency work took place allowing the southbound lanes south of Sloat Boulevard to reopen. An emergency response was crucial in protecting the Lake Merced Wastewater Tunnel, beach and ocean infrastructure, and bluffs. The primary objective of Great Highway Emergency Stabilization project was to stabilize bluff top, protect bluff toe, and reopen the roadway. Emergency repair work included the installation of a revetment (including 2ton boulder layer ) of approximately 425 linear feet from south of the SWOO to the southern limit of the bluff slipout. Emergency opening work included roadway realignment and associated utility work. The number of southbound lanes was also reduced from two to one, and the remaining lane was moved east into the existing median to increase the setback between the edge of roadway and the edge of the bluff. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 1Scope Page 1 of 13

218 E8216 San Francisco County Transportation Authority The funding from this Prop K request will be used for planning and conceptual engineering work to evaluate design options and submit several forms to Caltrans, seeking Permanent Restoration funding. Caltrans input on design options as included in the forms to be submitted to is the key first step to enabling DPW to fully develop the scope, budget, and timeline for a permanent restoration project for the Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard. DPW will present Caltrans with two options for permanent restoration (See diagram on page 10.): Option 1 Reconfigure the existing northbound lanes into a northbound/southbound configuration; Option 2 Divert southbound Great Highway traffic south of Sloat to Skyline via Sloat Boulevard, as we require Caltrans input on what is considered inkind replacement of the damaged road. Both options would require some intersection improvements at Sloat Boulevard/Skyline Boulevard. There are no plans to alter northbound traffic, alter the Zoo entrance, or alter traffic flow into the Oceanside facility under either option. While this work is not explicitly in the SPUR Ocean Beach Master Plan, both options are compatible with that vision and recommendations included in the plan. After Caltrans indicates which option it prefers, DPW will then anticipate a revised Damage Assessment Form, which would enable Caltrans to authorize funds for the permanent restoration project. DPW anticipates a future Prop K request to fund additional planning work, which will include public outreach. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 1Scope Page 2 of 13

219 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8217 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Department of Public Works Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Unknown PrePlanning Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents /15 Advertise Construction /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. The anticipated date of forms submission is January Caltrans will review the packet and set up a field review site visit. Caltrans will then indicate which reroute option it believes restores the damage from the storm impact and request additional information to determine the level of environmental review for the project. Prop K funds will fund the initial effort for conceptual engineering, which provides the scope of work necessary for environmental review. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 2Schedule :FY 10/11 Page 3 of 13

220 E8218 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Prop K/Prop AA Sales Allocation Request Form FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Department of Public Works COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes No No No No No Total Cost 49,596 Cost for Current Request/Phase 49,596 Prop K Current Request 49,596 49,596 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 49,596 49,596 Source of Cost Estimate DPW Manager and DPW Engineers' estimate % Complete of Design: 0 as of 8/23/2013 Expected Useful Life: 20 Years P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 3Cost :FY 10/11 Page 4 of 13

221 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8219 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY SUMMARY BY TASK TASK Totals AGENCY LABOR 1.Planning/Conceptual Engineering 49,596 TOTAL 49,596 PROJECT BUDGET DETAIL PLANNING/CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING SFDPW Labor Cost Detail Position Hours Base Rate Fully Burdened Cost FTE Total 0931 Project Manager , Administrative Engineer , Assistant Engineer , Environmental Assistant ,038 Total ,596 FTE stands for full time equivalent. Overhead multiplier is P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget :FY 10/11 Page 5 of 13

222 E8220 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 49,596 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 0 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 1,225,509 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the entire amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 in the Great Highway Erosion Repair 5YPP. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Great Highway Erosion Repair category in Fiscal Year 2013/14. The proposed 5YPP amendment would add the subject project and program 49,596 in deobligated funds from the Great Highway Emergency Stabilization project to the Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) in Fiscal Year 13/14. See attached 5YPP amendment for details. DPW received Federal reimbursement for the emergency repair work on Great Highway. The deobligation of 1,225,509 in Prop K funds from the Great Highway Emergency Stabilization project creates programming capacity for the subject request. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 49,596 49,596 49,596 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 86.47% 49,596 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 5Funding :FY 10/11 Page 6 of 13

223 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8221 Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source Amount Required Local Match % FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Total: Planned Programmed 0 Allocated Total Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: #DIV/0! 86.47% 49,596 Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project: % FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 49,596 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually FY 2013/14 49, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 49,596 Balance P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 5Funding :FY 10/11 Page 7 of 13

224 E8222 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 9/6/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 49,596 Phase: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 49,596 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 26 FY 2013/14 49, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 49, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum Source Fiscal Year Phase Reimbursement Prop K EP 26 FY 2013/14 Planning/Conceptual Engineering 49,596 Total: 49,596 Balance Cumulative % Reimbursable 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Balance Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2014 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 6Authority Rec :FY 10/11 Page 8 of 13

225 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8223 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 9/6/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon submittal to Caltrans of a request for Authoritization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering (anticipated January 2013), provide memorandum summarizing the materials provided to Caltrans (Authoritization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering, Preliminary Environmental Studies, and Field Review forms), input received from Caltrans, and a scope, schedule, budget, and funding plan for the project. 2. Special Conditions: 1. The recommended appropriation is contingent upon a 5YPP amendment to add the subject project and program 49,596 in funds deobligated from the Great Highway Emergency Stabilization project to the subject project. See attached 5YPP amendment for details. 2. Notes: 1. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 4, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: 0.00% Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 6Authority Rec :FY 10/11 Page 9 of 13

226 E8224 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form MAPS AND DRAWINGS Great Highway/Sloat Boulevard Intersection Looking South P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 7Maps.etc :FY 10/11 Page 10 of 13

227 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8225 Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard Looking South Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard Looking South P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 7Maps.etc :FY 10/11 Page 11 of 13

228 E8226 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form Great Highway and Skyline Boulevard Intersection (Southbound) Great Highway and Skyline Boulevard Intersection (Northbound) Great Highway north of Skyline Boulevard Looking North P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 7Maps.etc :FY 10/11 Page 12 of 13

229 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8227 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 49,596 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) Department of Public Works Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Frank Filice Title: Project Manager Phone: (415) Fax: (415) Frank.Filice@sfdpw.org Grants Section Contact Ananda Hirsch Transportation Finance Analyst (415) (415) Ananda.Hirsch@sfdpw.org Address: 30 Van Ness, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA Van Ness, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Great Highway Reroute.xlsx, 8Signatures :FY 10/11 Page 13 of 13

230 2009 Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects E8228 New and Upgraded Streets (EP 2630) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: September 4, 2013 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 Great Highway Erosion Repair (EP 26) DPW Great Highway Erosion Repair CON Allocated 1,330,000 1,330,000 DPW Great Highway Erosion Repair 4 CON Deobligated (1,225,509) (1,225,509) DPW Great Highway Reroute 4 PLAN Pending 49,596 49,596 Visitacion Valley Watershed (EP 27) SFCTA BiCounty & Visitacion Valley Watershed Improvements 3 TBD Programmed 745, ,000 SFCTA HarneyGeneva Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study 3 PLAN Appropriated 200, ,000 SFCTA BiCounty & Visitacion Valley Watershed Improvements TBD Programmed 1,000,000 1,000,000 SFCTA US 101 Candlestick Interchange PSR PLAN Allocated 55,000 55,000 SFCTA BiCounty & Visitacion Valley Watershed Improvements TBD Programmed 1,000,000 1,000,000 SFCTA BiCounty & Visitacion Valley Watershed Improvements TBD Programmed 2,000,000 2,000,000 Other Upgrades to Major Arterials (EP 30) SFCTA/ DPW 19th Avenue Bulbouts (Lincoln Junipero Serra) 1,2 PS&E Programmed 84,644 84,644 SFCTA/ DPW 19th Avenue Bulbouts (Lincoln Junipero Serra) CON Programmed 1,000,000 1,000,000 DPW 19th Avenue Median Improvements 1 PS&E Allocated 123, ,250 DPW 19th Avenue Median Improvements PS&E Deobligated (22,489) (22,489) DPW 19th Avenue Median Improvements 2 CON Allocated 292, ,106 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 2630.xlsx Tab: EP2630 5YPP 010.XX.13 Page 1 of 2

231 2009 Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects New and Upgraded Streets (EP 2630) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: September 4, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 49,596 6,631, ,491 1,055,000 1,477,511 3,200,000 Total Programmed in 5YPP 49,596 2,049,952 1,330,000 55, , ,000 (1,225,509) 0 (22,489) 0 0 (1,247,998) 745,000 1,000,000 1,084,644 3,000, ,829,644 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,330,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 3,000, ,830,000 3,732 3,732 1,484,241 1,429,241 1,451,730 1,251,730 1,202,134 1,202,134 Total Programmed in Amended 2009 Strategic Plan Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on March 30, 2010 through Res ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 5YPP amendment to fund design of the new 19th Avenue Median Improvements project (Resolution 1163, ). 19th Avenue Bulbouts (Lincoln Junipero Serra): reduced from 500,000 to 376, YPP amendment to fund construction of the 19th Avenue Median Improvements project (Resolution 1224, ). 19th Avenue Bulbouts (Lincoln Junipero Serra): reduced from 376,750 to 84, BiCounty & Visitacion Valley Watershed Improvements (TBD) was reduced from 945,000 to 745,000 to fund SFCTA's HarneyGeneva Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study (Res. XXXX, pending) YPP amendment to add Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration) (Resolution XXXX, XX.XX.XXXX) Great Highway Emergency Stabilization: Deobligation of 1,225,509 in Fiscal Year 2009/10. Great Highway Reroute Project (Permanent Restoration): Added project with 49,596 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 fundsfor planning/conceptual engineering. E8229 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 2630.xlsx Tab: EP2630 5YPP 010.XX.13 Page 2 of 2

232 E8230 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

233 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8231 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements a. Traffic Calming Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 38 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 46,165 3 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see the following page for the start of the scope. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 1Scope Page 1 of 16

234 E8232 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form Background The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests Prop K funding in the amount of 46,165 to support design and construction work for the Jean Parker Safe Routes to School project. The Jean Parker Safe Routes to School project will be located at the intersection of Broadway and Powell Streets and includes three sidewalk extensions (curb bulbouts) and curb ramp updates on all corners of the intersection. This funding request serves as the 10 percent local match required for the 414,900 Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Grant. In October 2012, the SFMTA received the state SR2S grant to fund portions of the improvements identified in the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project, which were developed from an outreach process led by the Planning Department in partnership with SFMTA and the San Francisco Department of Public Works (DPW). The Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project limits are Broadway from Powell Street to Columbus Avenue, and the improvements include bulbouts, special paving of intersections, new medians and curb work, street trees, lighting, seating, bus stop improvements, repaving, and bus bulbs. Because the SR2S grant only partially funded the full Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project, the SFMTA applied to the Authority for One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG) funding for the remaining improvements and upgrades near Jean Parker Elementary School. On June 25, 2013, the Authority Board programmed 5.3 million in OBAG funding to the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) will consider the Authority s OBAG funding recommendations, including those for the Broadway Chinatown project, at its September 25, 2013 meeting. With SR2S and OBAG funds, the Broadway and Powell Streets intersection will benefit from all of the improvements developed from the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project, including bulbouts, special paving of intersections, new medians and curb work, street trees, lighting, seating, bus stop improvements, repaving, and bus bulbs. Scope and Benefits The Jean Parker SR2S project will improve pedestrian safety at the intersection of Broadway and Powell Streets. The project has received letters of support from Supervisor Chiu, the San Francisco Unified School District, Walk San Francisco, and the Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee. In addition, Jean Parker Elementary School was ranked first for improvements under the Institute of Transportation Engineers methodology for selecting locations for Safe Routes to School improvements. Using the SR2S grant and Prop K funds, three sidewalk extensions (or corner bulbouts) will be installed to reduce the crossing distance at intersection of Broadway and Powell Streets. In addition, curb ramp upgrades at all corners will improve access to all people who walk in the neighborhood. The improvements will make it more appealing for students and residents in the area to walk from P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary ARF scope MTA.docx Page 2 of 16

235 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form E8233 the school or nearby apartments to the library, parks, bus stops and the commercial corridor along Powell and Stockton Streets. Aligning the SR2S and Broadway Chinatown Streetscape projects together is more efficient than designing and constructing each project separately. It is being proposed to MTC that the remaining four bulbouts, the bulbout design engineering and construction be funded with OBAG. The Jean Parker SR2S project construction would occur when OBAG funding is obtained for all bulbouts at the Broadway and Powell Streets intersection. OBAG would also provide funding for longer length bulbouts developed as a result of input from the public outreach meetings. The longer length bulbouts would supplement the corner bulbouts covered by the SR2S grant. Aligning construction for the projects together would also minimize disruption to the neighborhood and reduce the project costs due to economies of scale with the larger Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project. In addition, the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project proposes decorative sidewalk pavers and additional lighting at Broadway and Powell Streets, which triggers the need for construction coordination to avoid disrupting newly installed improvements. As part of the SR2S grant requirements, this project will include noninfrastructure work. The work includes the following: 1. Prepare training materials for a San Francisco Bicycle Coalition led Bicycle Riding Training class geared toward elementary school children 2. Prepare flyers and posters promoting Walk and Bike to School events at the school 3. Provide funding for SFMTA/SF Police Department s s Traffic Company police officers to provide enforcement of turning vehicles yielding to pedestrians and adhering to the speed limit on Broadway outside the school (not Prop Keligible). The SFMTA is combining the education and enforcement activities for all SR2S grants and developing a plan to implement them. At this time, a schedule has not been identified. SFMTA anticipates finalizing a schedule for the implementation of the noninfrastructure improvements in early 2014 in time for Bike to School Day on May 7, 2014 and Walk to School Day in October Implementation The bulbouts and curb ramps will be designed by DPW as part of the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project. It is anticipated that design will start in January The Jean Parker SR2S project will be built by contractor as part of the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape Project. Construction is anticipated to start in April 2015 and be completed by January Prioritization The high frequency of pedestrian trips and pedestrianinvolved collisions contributed to Jean Parker Elementary School ranking in the top tier of the SFMTA s prioritized list of schools needing safety enhancements. This prioritization was created to better select project schools for SR2S funding and P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary ARF scope MTA.docx Page 3 of 16

236 E8234 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form includes other criteria such as the number of students enrolled living within one mile of the school, rates of free or reduced lunch, the number of collisions with fatalities and severe injuries, and the number of collisions during school hours. The requested allocation requires a 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amendment to the Traffic Calming category to program the subject project and use 45,500 in Prop K funds from the Fiscal Year 2010/11 West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) project and 665 in Prop K funds from the Fiscal Year 2013/14 TBD (Safe Routes to School Match) line item (15,990). The West Portal Elementary School project is fully funded. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary ARF scope MTA.docx Page 4 of 16

237 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8235 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 12/31/13 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction /15 N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /15 N/A N/A Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. The Jean Parker SR2S project will be constructed as part of the Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project. The Jean Parker SR2S project grant must meet a timely use of funds requirement to close out the grant by December 28, The Broadway Chinatown Streetscape project construction will be able to meet the SR2S project close out milestone date. The SFMTA anticipates the project will be advertised in October 2014 and a construction contract will be awarded in April The SFMTA anticipates construction will then begin in April 2015 and be completed by January For the noninfrastructure improvements, the SFMTA is combining the education and enforcement activities for all Safe Routes to School grants and developing a plan to implement them. At this time, a schedule has not been identified. SFMTA anticipates finalizing a schedule for the implementation of the noninfrastructure improvements in early 2014 in time for Bike to School Day on May 7, 2014 and Walk to School Day in October 2014 (date TBD). P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 2Schedule Page 5 of 16

238 E8236 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 64, , ,920 Prop K Current Request 6,965 39,200 46,165 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 5,145 64, , ,065 Source of Cost Estimate Based on engineer's estimate on prior projects Based on engineer's estimate on prior projects Based on engineer's estimate on prior projects and includes public outreach and education % Complete of Design: 30 as of Expected Useful Life: 25 Years 5/21/13 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 3Cost Page 6 of 16

239 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8237 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. FTE = Full Time Equivalent; MFB = Mandatory Fringe Benefits Budget Summary by Task Overhead rate = (SFMTA) and 2.59 (DPW) I. COST BREAKDOWN BY PHASE A. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Position Salary Per FTE MFB for FTE Salary + MFB Overhead = (Salary+MFB) x (Fully Burdened) Approved Rate Salary + MFB + (0.803) Overhead Hours FTE Cost SFMTA Staff Planning Department General Plan Referral 1,375 Principal Engineer (5212) 170,560 85, , , , Sr. Engineer (5211) 146,952 75, , , , Engineer (5241) 126,932 67, , , , ,010 Associate Engineer (5207) 109,668 59, , , , ,690 Transit Planner III (5289) 99,476 55, , , , SFMTA Labor Subtotal ,145 B. DESIGN ENGINEERING 1. Engineering Work Staff Time Position Salary Per FTE MFB for FTE Salary + MFB Overhead = (Salary+MFB) x (Fully Burdened) Approved Rate Salary + MFB + (0.803) Overhead Hours FTE Cost SFMTA Staff Principal Engineer (5212) 170,560 85, , , , Sr. Engineer (5211) 146,952 75, , , , ,737 Engineer (5241) 126,932 67, , , , ,683 Associate Engineer (5207) 109,668 59, , , , ,910 Transit Planner III (5289) 99,476 55, , , , Eng Associate 1 (5364) 77,922 46, , ,063 2,241, ,466 SFMTA Staff Labor Subtotal ,002 Position Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Full Burdened FTE Cost DPW Staff Engineer (5241) ,794 Landscape Architect (5274) ,903 Junior Engineer (5201) ,198 DPW Staff Labor Subtotal , Engineering Site Survey Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Cost Topographic Survey Square Feet ,497 Set Horizontal Control 4 Each Set Vertical Control 2 Each Auto CAD Drafting Square Feet ,405 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Square Feet Engineering Site Survey Total 20,000 Total Design Engineering 64,897 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 7 of 16

240 E8238 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form C. CONSTRUCTION Position Salary Per FTE MFB for FTE MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET Salary + MFB Overhead = (Salary+MFB) x (Fully Burdened) Approved Rate Salary + MFB + (0.803) Overhead Hours FTE Cost SFMTA Staff Principal Engineer (5212) 170,560 85, , , , Sr. Engineer (5211) 146,952 75, , , , Engineer (5241) 126,932 67, , , , ,683 Associate Engineer (5207) 109,668 59, , , , ,910 Eng Associate 1 (5364) 77,922 46, , ,063 2,241, ,311 SFMTA Staff Labor Subtotal ,120 DPW Streets and Highways Construction Support, Contract Preparation and Sidewalk Legislation Support Position Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Full Burdened FTE Cost DPW Staff Senior Engineer (5211) Engineer (5241) Associate Engineer (5207) ,229 Junior Engineer (5201) ,248 DPW Staff Labor Subtotal ,841 DPW Construction Management Position Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Full Burdened FTE Cost DPW Staff Senior Engineer (5211) ,320 Construction Inspector (6318) ,741 DPW Staff Labor Subtotal ,061 DPW Construction Support Subtotal 31,902 Construction Costs Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost Sidewalk Extension (Bulbouts) Each 60, ,000 Concrete Curb Ramp Each 2, ,000 6 inch concrete curb and 2 foot wide concrete gutter Feet ,500 Catchbasin Removal Each 5, ,000 Catchbasin Installation Each 15, ,000 Culvert Feet ,500 Traffic Routing Lump Sum 36, ,000 Subtotal 290,000 Contingency (10%) 29,000 Construction Contract Subtotal 319,000 Total Construction (excluding Public Outreach and Education) 360,023 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 8 of 16

241 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8239 D. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION Position Salary Per FTE MFB for FTE MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET Salary + MFB Overhead = (Salary+MFB) x (Fully Burdened) Approved Rate Salary + MFB + (0.803) Overhead Hours FTE Cost SFMTA Staff Engineer (5241) 126,932 67, , , , Associate Engineer (5207) 109,668 59, , , , ,322 Transit Planner III (5289) 99,476 55, , , , ,312 Eng Associate 1 (5364) 77,922 46, , ,063 2,241, ,399 Position Hourly Salary Hours Cost Police Officer (SFPD/SFMTA Traffic Company) ,440 Public Outreach and Education (10% of Construction as per Safe Routes to School Grant Requirements) TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 31, ,065 II. COST BREAKDOWN BY FUNDING SOURCE A. PROP K REQUEST PORTION Task Cost Design Engineering 6,965 Construction 39,200 Total 46,165 B. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT PORTION Task Cost Environmental 5,145 Design Engineering 57,932 Construction 351,823 Total 414,900 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 9 of 16

242 E8240 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 46,165 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 6,256,291 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The requested allocation requires a 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amendment to the Traffic Calming category to program the subject project and use 45,500 in Prop K funds from the Fiscal Year 2010/11 West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) project and 665 in Prop K funds from the Fiscal Year 2013/14 TBD (Safe Routes to School Match) line item (15,990). See attached 5YPP amendment for details. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Traffic Calming category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (2,429,880), programmed but unallocated funds from prior fiscal years (3,227,366), and cumulative remaining programming capacity (559,045). Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K State Safe Routes to School Planned Programmed Allocated Total 46,165 46, , ,755 Total: 46, , , ,920 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 89.87% 455,920 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 50.70% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 5Funding Page 10 of 16

243 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes Prop K Required Local Match Fund Source Amount % State Safe Routes to School 414, % 46,100 E8241 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K State Safe Routes to School Planned Programmed Allocated Total 46,165 46, , ,900 Total: 875, ,065 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 89.99% 461,065 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 50.70% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Fiscal Year FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 46,165 6, % 39,200 39, % 0.00% 0.00% % 0 46,165 Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 5Funding Page 11 of 16

244 E8242 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 6,965 Prop K Allocation 39,200 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: 46,165 Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, Multiphase allocation is recommended given the need to notes for multiep line item or multisponsor coordinate the subject project with the larger Broadway Chinatown recommendations): Streetscape project. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 38 FY 2013/14 6, % Prop K EP 38 FY 2014/15 39, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 46,165 Balance 39,200 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 38 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 6,965 15% Prop K EP 38 FY 2014/15 Construction 39, % 100% 100% 100% Total: 46,165 Balance 39,200 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2017 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 6Authority Rec Page 12 of 16

245 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8243 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of design (anticipated October 2014), provide evidence of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page). See Special Condition #2. 2. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of before and after conditions Special Conditions: 1. The recommended allocation is contingent upon a 5YPP amendment to the Traffic Calming category. See attached 5YPP amendment for details. 2. SFMTA may not incur expenses for this construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds (39,200) pending receipt of evidence of completion of design (e.g. copy of certifications page). 3. The Authority will only reimburse SFMTA up to the approved overhead multiplier rate for the fiscal year that SFMTA incurs charges. Notes: 1. Consistent with Prop K policies, the project sponsor shall expend nonprop K funds first to the extent possible. Unless a specific exception is preapproved by the Authority, Prop K funds will not be reimbursed at a rate greater than their proportional share of the approved funding plan (i.e % of the construction budget). 2. Noninfrastructurerelated enforcement activities are not eligible for Prop K reimbursement. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 6Authority Rec Page 13 of 16

246 E8244 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: SUBPROJECT DETAIL Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Match) Design Supervisorial District(s): 6 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 38 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 6,965 Total: 6,965 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 39, % 39, % 39, % 39, % 39,200 Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Match) Construction Supervisorial District(s): 6 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 38 FY 2014/15 Construction 39, % 0% 0% 0% 0% Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 6Authority Rec Page 14 of 16

247 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8245 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 7Maps.etc :FY 10/11 Page 15 of 16

248 E8246 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 46,165 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Ken Kwong Title: Associate Engineer Phone: Fax: kenneth.kwong@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Joel Goldberg Manager, Capital Procurement & Management joel.goldberg@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th Floor, San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Jean Parker Elementary Prop K ARF MTA, 8Signatures Page 16 of 16

249 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Traffic Calming (EP 38) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Pending Last Update: September 16, 2013 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 Implementation SFMTA 18th Avenue Bypass Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 21,750 21,750 SFMTA Bayview Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 38,400 38,400 SFMTA Central Richmond Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 157, ,800 SFMTA CerritosCedro Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 12,800 12,800 SFMTA Circular Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 145, ,000 PLAN, SFMTA Crestlake Traffic Calming Implementation PS&E, CON Allocated 165, ,500 SFMTA Excelsior Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 217, ,500 SFMTA Fillmore Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 45,000 45,000 SFMTA Holloway Garfield Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 170, ,000 SFMTA Inner Sunset Traffic Calming Implementation 2 CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA North Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 72,500 72,500 SFMTA O Shaughnessy Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 87,000 87,000 SFMTA Potrero Hill Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 165, ,900 SFMTA Randolph/Broad Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 20,000 20,000 SFMTA Roosevelt Buena Vista 17th St. Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 161, ,000 SFMTA South Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 145, ,000 SFMTA St. Francis Wood Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 73,800 73,800 SFMTA Sunnyside Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 114, ,700 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 1 of 8

250 E8248 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Bayview, 18th Ave. Bypass, West Portal, Teresita Blvd., Bernal Heights, Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, HollowayGarfield, Cedro Cerritos, RooseveltBuena Vista17th St, Sunnyside, Crest Lake, St. Francis Wood, Fillmore, Mission South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St.., MinnaNatoma, South SFMTA Silver Terrace) CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA MinnaNatoma Home Zone 4 CON Allocated 380, ,300 SFMTA Bayview Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 147, ,400 SFMTA Central Richmond Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 461, ,500 SFMTA Circular Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 112, ,100 SFMTA Clipper Street Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 48,000 48,000 SFMTA Holloway Garfield CerritosCedro Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 187, ,900 SFMTA North Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 48,000 48,000 SFMTA Potrero Hill Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 250, ,500 SFMTA RandolphBroad Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 30,000 30,000 SFMTA RooseveltBuena Vista 17th Street Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 188, ,100 SFMTA South Bernal Heights Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 112, ,100 SFMTA Saint Francis Wood Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 69,500 69,500 SFMTA Sunnyside Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 80,000 80,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 2 of 8

251 E8249 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA Silver Terrace Traffic Calming Implementation PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 107, ,500 PLAN, SFMTA Site Specific Traffic Calming Implementation 5 PS&E, CON Allocated 300, ,000 SFMTA TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Bayview, Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, HollowayGarfield, CedroCerritos, RooseveltBuena Vista17th St, Sunnyside, Crest Lake, St. Francis Wood, Fillmore, Mission St. South of Cesar Chaves St., Folsom St., West Portal, MinnaNatoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley) CON Programmed 907, ,100 SFMTA TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, HollowayGarfield, RooseveltBuena Vista17th St, Sunnyside, Crest Lake, Mission South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St. West Portal, MinnaNatoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley, CayugaSan Jose Ave., Jerrold) CON Programmed 1,075,000 1,075,000 SFMTA TBD (Implementation of projects from the following traffic calming plans: Central Richmond, Potrero Hill, Mission St. South of Cesar Chavez St., Folsom St. West Portal, MinnaNatoma, South Silver Terrace, Clayton, Dewey, Jordan Park Laurel Heights, Visitation Valley, CayugaSan Jose Ave., Jerrold) CON Programmed 1,499,880 1,499,880 SFMTA TBD (Mission St. South of Cesar Chavez St.) PS&E, CON Programmed 58,000 58,000 SFMTA Teresita Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 116, ,000 SFMTA West Portal Traffic Calming Implementation CON Allocated 14,500 14,500 Implementation (Early Implementation / Action) SFMTA Early Implementation FY 2009/10 CON Allocated 56,100 56,100 SFMTA Spot Improvements CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Spot Improvements CON Allocated 200, ,000 SFMTA Spot Improvements CON Programmed 100, ,000 SFMTA Spot Improvements CON Programmed 100, ,000 SFMTA Sunset Traffic Circle SFMTA PLAN, PS&E, CON Allocated 85,200 85,200 TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with DPW repaving) 3,8 TBD Programmed 0 0 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 3 of 8

252 E8250 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA Geary Blvd. and Steiner St. Crosswalk Reopening 3 CON Allocated 67,000 67,000 TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with SFMTA DPW repaving) 8, 13 TBD Programmed 4,800 4,800 SFMTA Bryant Street Traffic Calming and Greening 8 CON Allocated 115, ,200 TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with SFMTA DPW repaving) TBD Programmed 100, ,000 TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with SFMTA DPW repaving) TBD Programmed 100, ,000 TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with SFMTA DPW repaving) TBD Programmed 100, ,000 SFMTA YPP Development 13 Plan Allocated 13,000 13,000 Implementation (Local School Area) Balboa Denman Middle School (Safe Routes to School SFMTA Match) 2, 10 CON Programmed 0 0 Balboa Denman Middle School (Safe Routes to School SFMTA Match) 2, 10 DES Allocated 77,733 77,733 Sunset Elementary and AP Giannini Middle School (SF SFMTA Safe Routes to School Match) 2 DES Allocated 100, ,000 Clarendon Alternative Elementary School (Safe Routes SFMTA to School Match) CON Allocated 86,120 86,120 Clarendon Alternative Elementary School (Safe Routes SFMTA to School Match) CON Deobligated (2,019) (2,019) Guadalupe Elementary School (Safe Routes to School SFMTA Match) 9, 12 CON Programmed 0 0 Tenderloin Community Elementary School (Safe Routes SFMTA to School Match) 9 DES Allocated 48,939 48,939 SFMTA TBD (Safe Routes to School Match) 15, 16, 17 PLAN Programmed 15,325 15,325 Jefferson Elementary School (Safe Routes to School SFMTA Match) 16 CON Pending 45,200 45,200 SFMTA Chinatown (Safe Routes to School Match) 15 CON Allocated 88,810 88,810 SFMTA Redding Elementary School 11 PLAN Allocated 22,000 22,000 Sunset Elementary and AP Giannini Middle School (SF SFMTA Safe Routes to School Match) 12 CON Allocated 81,350 81,350 SFMTA Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match) 10, 12 CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA SFMTA SFMTA SFMTA SFMTA West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) 17 TBD Programmed 0 0 Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) 17 DES Pending 6,965 6,965 Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) 17 CON Pending 39,200 39,200 West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) CON Allocated 49,500 49,500 West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) PLAN/ DES Allocated 15,000 15,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 4 of 8

253 E8251 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 New Project Studies / Plan Development (Arterial) Folsom St. Traffic Calming Plan (Support Planning SFMTA Dept and DPW Paving) PLAN Allocated 58,000 58,000 Folsom St. Traffic Calming Plan (Support Planning SFMTA Dept and DPW Paving) PLAN Deobligated (2,957) (2,957) SFMTA 2nd Street Streetscape 7 PA&ED Allocated 30,000 30,000 SFMTA TBD (2 plans at 61,000 each) PLAN/ CER Programmed 22,000 22,000 SFMTA Corridor Speed Reduction PLAN/ CER Allocated 100, ,000 SFMTA TBD (2 plans at 65,000 each) PLAN/ CER Programmed 130, ,000 SFMTA TBD (3 plans at 59,500 each) 1 PLAN/ CER Programmed 136, ,500 SFMTA TBD (3 plans at 63,000 each) PLAN/ CER Programmed 189, ,000 New Project Studies / Plan Development (Local Areawide Large) MTA TBD 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 17,980 17,980 MTA Visitacion Valley Area Traffic Calming Plan 1 PLAN Allocated 160, ,000 New Project Studies / Plan Development (Local Site Specific SFMTA CayugaSan Jose AvenueTraffic Calming Plan PLAN/ CER/ PS&E Programmed 90,000 90,000 SFMTA Clayton Area Traffic Calming Plan 1 PLAN/ CER Allocated 95,000 95,000 SFMTA Dewey Blvd. Area Traffic Calming Plan 1 PLAN/ CER Allocated 95,000 95,000 SFMTA Jerrold Ave. Traffic Calming Plan PLAN/ CER Programmed 90,000 90,000 SFMTA Jordan ParkLaurel Heights Area Traffic Calming Plan 1 PLAN/ CER Allocated 95,000 95,000 SFMTA Minna Natoma 15th St. Area Traffic Calming Plan PLAN/ CER Allocated 85,000 85,000 SFMTA Minna Natoma 15th St. Area Traffic Calming Plan PLAN/ CER Deobligated (346) (346) SFMTA South Silver Terrace Area Traffic Calming Plan PLAN/ CER Allocated 85,000 85,000 SFMTA TBD (2 plans at 90,000 each) 6 PLAN/ CER Programmed 15,486 15,486 SFMTA TBD (3 projects at 92,000 each) CON Programmed 276, ,000 SFMTA TBD (4 projects at 95,000 each) CON Programmed 380, ,000 Project Evaluation And Outreach SFMTA Evaluation of New Requests 1 PLAN/ CER Allocated 51,000 51,000 SFMTA Evaluation of New Requests 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 5 of 8

254 E8252 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA Evaluation of New Requests 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Evaluation of New Requests 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Traffic Calming Evaluation of New Requests PLAN Allocated 50,000 50,000 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Revision 6 PLAN/ CER Allocated 164, ,514 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach PLAN/ CER Allocated 20,000 20,000 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach PLAN/ CER Deobligated (2,076) (2,076) SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach 1 PLAN/ CER Allocated 12,000 12,000 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach 1 PLAN/ CER Deobligated (700) (700) SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Traffic Calming Program Outreach 14 PLAN/ CER Programmed 0 0 PLAN/ SFMTA LocalTrack ApplicationBased Program 14 CER/DES Allocated 334, ,020 Total Programmed in 5YPP 2,520, ,600 4,424,000 2,116,202 2,788,900 12,497,874 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 2,469, ,000 3,199, , ,695 7,098,901 (7,398) (700) (8,098) 58, ,300 1,224,586 1,757,980 2,225,205 5,407,071 Total Programmed in Amended 2009 Strategic Plan * Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on March 30, 2010 through Res ,631,450 3,004,500 2,302,000 2,067,000 2,429,880 12,434, , , ,367 3,089, , , , ,045 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 6 of 8

255 E8253 Agency Project Name Phase Status FOOTNOTES: 1 5YPP Amendment to fully fund Traffic Calming Planning, Outreach and Evaluation projects for FY 2010/11 (Res. 1119, ) FY 10/11 New Project Studies/Plan Development (Arterial) decreased from 178,500 to 136,500. Funds redirected to six projects below. Visitacion Valley Area Traffic Calming Plan increased from 145,000 to 160,000. Clayton Area Traffic Calming Plan increased from 87,000 to 95,000. Dewey Blvd. Area Traffic Calming Plan increased from 87,000 to 95,000. Jordan ParkLaurel Heights Area Traffic Calming Plan increased from 87,000 to 95,000. Evaluation of New Requests increased from 50,000 to 51,000. Traffic Calming Program Outreach increased from 10,000 to 12, YPP Amendment to fully fund design of Sunset Elementary and AP Giannini Safe Routes to School (100,000) (Res 1162, ) Fiscal Year 2010/11 Inner Sunset Traffic Calming Implementation reduced from 70,000 to 0. Fiscal Year 2011/12 Balboa Denman Middle School (Safe Routes to School Match) reduced from 105,000 to 75,000. Fiscal Year 2009/ / / / /14 3 FY 09/10 Joint Opportunities funds decreased from 100,000 to 33,000, and 67,000 was redirected to FY 11/12 for the Geary Blvd and Steiner St Crosswalk Reopening project. 4 Minna/Natoma Home Zone funding from the Fiscal Year 2010/11 Traffic Calming Implementation program. 5 5YPP Amendment to add 300,000 for the Site Specific Traffic Calming Implementation project (Res. 1228, ). Site Specific Traffic Calming project: Added new project. Fiscal Year 2011/12 Traffic Calming Implementation project: Reduced programming from 1,207,000 to 907, YPP Amendment to add 154,514 for the Traffic Calming Program Revision project (Res. 1252, ). Revised Project Selection Process project: Added new project. Total 9 Fiscal Year 2011/12 Traffic Calming New Project Studies/Plan Development (Local Site Specific Small Area Wide Linear) TBD project: Reduced programming from 180,000 to 15, YPP amendment to add 30,000 for the 2nd Street Streetscape Project (Resolution 1252, ). Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Programmed 30,000 to Fiscal Year 2011/12. 2nd Street Streetscape Project: Added Project. 8 FY 09/10 Joint Opportunities funds decreased from 33,000 to 0 and FY 10/11 Joint Opportunities funds decreased from 100,000 to 17,800, and 120,000 was redirected to FY 12/13 for the Bryant Street Traffic Calming and Greening project. 10 5YPP Amendment to accomodate new project: Tenderloin Community Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) (Res. 1326, ) Guadalupe Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming in FY 2012/13 from 110,000 to 61,061 to fund higher priority project. Tenderloin Community Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Added new project with 48,939 in FY 2012/13 for design. 5YPP Amendment to add 77,733 for the construction phae of BalboaDenman Middle School (Safe Routes to School Match) (Res. 1326, ) Reduced programming in FY 2011/12 from 75,000 to 0 to fund project in FY 2012/13. 5YPP Amendment to allow project funds to be used for the project design phase instead of the construction phase as originally programmed. Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming in FY 2009/10 from 3,880 to 1,147 to fund project. 5YPP Amendment to allow Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match) funds to be used for the project design phase instead of the construction phase as originally programmed. 11 5YPP Amendment to add 22,000 for Redding Elementary School (Res. 1347, ) Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 22,000 in FY 2012/13. Redding Elementary School: Added project with 22,000 in FY 2012/13 for planning/conceptual engineering. 12 5YPP Amendment to add 81,350 for the construction phase of Sunset Elementary and AP Giannini Middle School (SF Safe Routes to School Match) (Resolution 1347, ) Guadalupe Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming in FY 2012/13 from 61,061 to 0 to fund higher priority project. Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming in FY 2009/10 from 1,147 to 0 to fund project. Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 19,142 in FY 2012/ YPP amendment to add YPP Development (Resolution 1349, ). TBD Joint opportunity project (e.g. coordination with DPW repaving): Reduced programming by 13,000 in Fiscal Year 2010/11. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 7 of 8

256 E8254 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year 2009/ / / / / YPP Development: Added project with 13,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 planning funds. 14 5YPP amendment to add LocalTrack ApplicationBased Program (Resolution 1364, ). TBD New Project Studies / Plan Development (Local Areawide Large): Reduced programming by 134,020 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Evaluation of New Requests: Reduced programming by 55,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12, 55,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13, and 60,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 Traffic Calming Program Outreach: Reduced programming by 10,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12, 10,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13, and 10,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 LocalTrack ApplicationBased Program: Added project with 334,020 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 planning, conceptual engineering, and design funds. 15 5YPP amendment to add Chinatown (Safe Routes to School Match) (Resolution 1405, ). Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming by 88,810 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Chinatown (Safe Routes to School Match): Added project with 88,810 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 planning funds for construction. Cash flow exceeds programming by 13, YPP amendment to add Jefferson Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) (Resolution XXXX, MO.DA.YR). Undesignated (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming by 45,200 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Jefferson Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Added project with 45,200 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for construction. 17 5YPP amendment to add Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match) (Resolution XXXX, MO.DA.YR). West Portal Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming by 45,500 in Fiscal Year 2010/11. TBD (Safe Routes to School Match): Reduced programming by 665 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Jean Parker Elementary School (Safe Routes to School Match): Added project with 6,965 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for design and 39,200 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for construction. Total P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 38 Tab: EP 38 5YPP Page 8 of 8

257 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8255 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: Prop K EP Project/Program: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements b. Bicycle Circulation/Safety Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 39 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: 40 Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 88,259 9, 10, 11 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see next page. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 1Scope Page 1 of 19

258 E8256 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form Introduction The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests a Prop K allocation of 88,259 to fund the environmental phase of the Mansell Corridor Improvement Project. On June 30, 2013, through Resolution 1363, the Authority Board programmed 1,762,239 in One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG) funding to the SFMTA for the design and construction of the project. In January 2013, the Authority Board, through Resolution 1330, allocated 172,724 in Prop K funds to the SFMTA to partially fund the planning phase and further advance project development. The current request is for funding for the environmental phase, which will ensure project readiness for when the federal OBAG funds are available to the project. Project Background Mansell Street is a divided highway running through the middle of McLaren Park, which is the largest park in southeastern San Francisco. The park serves as both a regional and neighborhood recreation facility for this area of San Francisco. Although the project is not located directly in a San Francisco Priority Development Area (PDA), Mansell Street serves as a major connecting route linking two PDAs, the Bayview /Hunters Point Shipyard/Candlestick Point and the Mission San Jose Corridor. The location of the park also serves the Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) community of Eastern San Francisco and the Outer Mission/Crocker Amazon/Oceanview Community of Concern. The park serves many low income communities adjacent to the park including areas of Visitacion Valley and along Sunnydale Avenue. The Planned Affordable Housing Development, as described in the Visitacion Valley/ Schlage Lock Plan, will increase the number of residents served by Mansell Street and McLaren Park. Mansell Street was conceived in the 1950 s as part of a nevercompleted crosstown freeway. By design, Mansell Street primarily serves motorized vehicles. The width of the traffic lanes and three different speed limits posted encourage speeding. Although there are several trail systems and a large recreational facility adjacent to Mansell Street, there are no pedestrian, bicycle, or bus stop facilities included within the existing configuration. Pedestrians have to walk on the street or climb over a guard rail and walk along an overgrown informal path to access different park facilities or to commute between neighborhoods. Bicyclists share the road with vehicles travelling at speeds up to 45 MPH, and public transit users have to wait on the street for a bus. These nonideal conditions P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell Environmental ARF MTA scope.docx Page 2 of 19

259 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8257 encourage residents to drive into the park and between park facilities and adjacent neighborhoods rather than walk. Existing facilities do not support multimodal travel or foster community vitality. Many of these concerns were brought to the attention of the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department (SFRPD) during its 2010 McLaren Park Needs Assessment workshops. In 2010, SFRPD completed three community workshops to gather information on the greater needs in McLaren Park. More than 300 residents attended those workshops and overwhelmingly voiced their concern for pedestrian and bicycle safety in the park. During this public process, the community expressed a need for traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures along all park roads, and Mansell Street was identified as the most problematic street. The community later described the specific need for sidewalks or paths adjacent to the road, bicycle facilities, bulbouts and crosswalks, and other traffic calming measures. The community also mentioned the desire to reduce the number of lanes on Mansell from four to two with a reduction of the speed limits. Currently, the highest speed limit is 45 mph. Project Scope and Benefits This streetscape improvement project will address pedestrian safety and bicycle access issues by reducing the number of vehicular lanes from four to two (one lane each way), separating vehicular traffic and moving it to the south side of the median between Visitacion Avenue and Brazil Street, and creating a multiuse path on the north side of the median. The proposed project includes the construction of sidewalks along the south side of Mansell from the intersection of Visitacion and Mansell to the Persia and Sunnydale intersection, and class II and III bicycle facilities between Brazil and Dublin. Safety improvements include raised crosswalks and flashing beacons at all unimproved intersections and a corner bulbout at the intersection of Mansell Street and Sunnydale Avenue. Streetlevel lighting, trees and landscape, and site furnishings are also included to make this a complete streets project. Due to funding limitations, however, the project will be implemented in Phases I and II with a majority of work being done in Phase I. Phase I will deliver everything in the project related to multimodal transportation improvements, including lighting, traffic signals, raised crosswalks, flashing beacons, and a corner bulbout. Phase II will deliver landscape improvements, low impact P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell Environmental ARF MTA scope.docx Page 3 of 19

260 E8258 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form development features, and improvements along Brazil Street. Phase II elements will be included in the construction contract bid documents as alternates. If funding for specific Phase II elements is secured prior to or during the construction phase, these elements will be implemented concurrently with Phase I. In addition to park users, these improvements will benefit residents of the adjacent communities and the region at large. Commuters who currently use Mansell Street to get to work or school will have more safe and efficient mode choices. The project will improve the quality of life for residents within the two PDAs, the Eastern San Francisco CARE, and Southern San Francisco Community of Concern by providing multimodal options that are safe and convenient. The Mansell Corridor Improvement Project will provide improved connections between adjacent neighborhoods, park trail systems, recreational facilities and the three public schools located immediately adjacent to the Park. The addition of sidewalks and bicycle facilities will activate this portion of the park, which historically has become underutilized due to access and isolation issues. Additional planned trail improvements adjacent to Mansell (that will be funded by the Land and Water Conservation Fund and inkind volunteer labor) are expected to increase pedestrian volumes in the park once the pedestrian path and crosswalks are in place. The SFRPD strongly believes in induced demand, if you build it, they will come. Similar capital improvement project and bicycle facility projects in the other San Francisco parks have shown that renovation to park facilities results in higher usage and can instill a sense of pride and stewardship in the community. The proposed facilities on Mansell Street will provide opportunities for increased physical activity by encouraging residents and park users to walk, stroll, skate, or bike. These activities have proven health benefits. Moreover, greater use of lower carbonemission transportation modes will have a positive impact on the environment. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell Environmental ARF MTA scope.docx Page 4 of 19

261 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form E8259 Mansell Environmental Tasks and Deliverables Task/Milestone Deliverable End Date CEQA Certification A copy of the CEQA certification September 2013 Submit a complete CEQA application to the Planning Dept. NEPA Approval A copy of the NEPA approval January 2014 Schedule and conduct a field review with Caltrans Submit the Preliminary Environmental Study and Request for Preliminary Engineering Authorization to Caltrans Conduct and submit any required technical studies to Caltrans Implementation This project is a SFMTA partnership with the SFRPD and the Department of Public Works. The environmental work will be prepared primarily by SFMTA staff, including the CEQA application submittal to the Planning Department and the NEPA application submittal to Caltrans. Prioritization The Mansell project is not included in a 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) and would require 5YPP amendments to two categories to support SFMTA's funding request. The requested allocation requires amendments to the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety 5YPP to add the subject project and use 44,130 in Prop K funds from cumulative remaining programming capacity (174,195) and to the Bicycle Circulation and 5YPP to add the subject project and use 44,129 in Prop K funds from the cumulative remaining programming capacity (73,081). See attached 5YPP amendments for details. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell Environmental ARF MTA scope.docx Page 5 of 19

262 E8260 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 01/30/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /13 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents / /15 Advertise Construction /15 N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /16 N/A N/A Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /17 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /18 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Project Phase Start Date (Month, Year) End Date (Month, Year) Planning/Conceptual Engineering January 2013 April 2013 Environmental Studies April 2013 January 2014 Design Engineering December 2013 March 2015 Prepare Construction Obligation package October 2014 December 2014 Receive OBAG Construction Funds March 2015 March 2015 Advertise Construction April 2015 April 2015 Award Construction Contract August 2015 Construction August 2015 August 2016 Federal Obligation Deadline for Fiscal Year 2013/14 March 31, 2014 (Design Phase) Federal Obligation Deadline for Fiscal Year 2014/15 March 31, 2015 (Construction Phase) P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 2Schedule Page 6 of 19

263 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8261 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 88,824 88,824 Prop K Current Request 88,259 88,259 Prop AA Current Request 0 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 311,471 88, ,693 5,701,653 6,845,641 Source of Cost Estimate Actual Costs SFMTA, DPW, RPD estimates. SFMTA, DPW, RPD estimates. SFMTA, DPW, RPD estimates. % Complete of Design: 0 as of Expected Useful Life: 20 Years 8/9/2013 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 3Cost Page 7 of 19

264 E8262 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. FTE = Full Time Equivalent PLANNING/CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PHASE (Complete) Agency: SFMTA Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fringe Benefits Rate Overhead = * (Salary + Fringe) Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Engineering Associate/ ,642 Junior Engineer/ ,534 Associate Engineer/ ,679 Engineer/ ,314 Senior Engineer/ ,335 Principal Engineer/ ,000 SFMTA Subtotal ,504 Agency: SFDPW Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Project Manager I/ ,819 Assistant Project Manager/ ,326 Senior Landscape Architect/ ,008 Full Landscape Architect/ ,034 Landscape Architectural Associate II/ ,073 Landscape Architectural Associate I/ ,326 Engineer/ ,461 Associate Engineer/ ,174 DPW Subtotal ,220 Agency: SFRPD Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Planner III/5291 (inkind) ,210 Planner II/5277 (inkind) ,498 Project Manager I/5502 (inkind) ,040 SFRPD Subtotal (inkind) ,748 Planning & Conceptual Engineering Total 311,471 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 4aDetailed Project Budget Page 8 of 19

265 E8263 San Francisco County Transportation Authority ENVIRONMENTAL PHASE (Subject of this request) Agency: SFMTA Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fringe Benefits Rate Overhead = * (Salary + Fringe) Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost 9180 Manager IV , Engineering Associate , Associate Engineer , Transit Planner III , Junior Engineer , Engineer , Senior Engineer ,088 Contingency 20% 10,115 SFMTA Subtotal ,679 Agency: SFDPW Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Project Manager II/ ,283 Assistant Project Manager/ ,438 Engineering Trainee III/ ,931 Contingency 20% 2,930 SFDPW Subtotal ,581 Agency: SFRPD Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Planner III/5291 (inkind) SFRPD Subtotal (inkind) Other: Planning Department CEQA Fee LS 10,000 Total Environmental Phase 88,824 Prop K: Environmental Total Less InKind 88,259 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 4aDetailed Project Budget Page 9 of 19

266 E8264 San Francisco County Transportation Authority DESIGN PHASE (Not part of this request) Agency: SFDPW Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Project Manager I/ ,380 Assistant Project Manager/ ,200 Senior Engineer/ ,423 Engineer/ ,304 Associate Engineer/ ,741 Assistant Engineer/ ,181 Junior Engineer/ ,383 Senior Clerk Typist/ ,940 Full Landscape Architect/ ,134 Landscape Architectural Associate II/ ,838 Landscape Architectural Associate I/ ,874 SFDPW Labor Subtotal ,398 Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fringe Benefits Rate Overhead = * (Salary + Fringe) Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Agency: SFMTA 5364 Engineering Associate , Associate Engineer , Engineering Intern , Engineer , Senior Engineer , Principal Engineer ,778 Design Total ,702 Agency: SFRPD Overhead Rate: Hourly Fully Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Burdened FTE Cost Project Manager I/ ,594 Design Total 743,693 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 4aDetailed Project Budget Page 10 of 19

267 E8265 CONSTRUCTION PHASE (Not part of this request) San Francisco County Transportation Authority Construction Phase Hard Costs (by scope item) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Phase 1 Alt Demolition LS 1 323, , ,525 20,344 Asphaltic Concrete 2" Overlay SF 265, ,060,000 1,060,000 Asphalt Paving (sidewalk and bus stops) SF 37, , ,400 Speed Tables at Crosswalks SF 4, , ,500 Roadway ReStriping/Rumble Strips LS 1 70,000 70,000 70,000 6" Asphalt Curb LF 4, ,000 86,000 6" Concrete Curb (at adjusted medians) LF 1, ,250 44,250 Concrete Curb Ramps EA 10 3,500 35,000 35,000 Rumble Strips LF 4, ,856 2,856 Stabilized Decomposed Granite SF 10, ,000 50,000 2'4' High Concrete Wall at Brazil Bus Stop LF ,625 20,625 ReGrade Roadway/Misc. Hardscape SF 15, ,000 30,000 Drop Inlet EA 10 10, , ,000 Grading SF 41, ,063 62,063 Bioswale/Retention Areas SF 41, , ,125 Bioswale Native Grass Planting SF 41, ,375 41,375 Native Low Water Use Shrub Planting SF 32, ,875 97, Gallon Tree Planting EA ,500 22,500 24" Box Tree Planting EA 75 1,200 90,000 90,000 Irrigation System SF 50, , ,000 Benches EA 12 2,500 30,000 30,000 Bike Racks EA ,600 1,400 11,200 Vehicular Bollards EA ,000 21,000 Vehicular Gates EA 4 10,000 40,000 40,000 Jersey Barrier LF ,500 77,500 Kiosk/Signage EA 2 15,000 30,000 30,000 Safe Hit Posts EA Flashing Beacon at Crosswalks EA 8 15, , ,000 Public Art LS 1 35,000 35,000 35,000 Misc Utility Work LS 1 75,000 75,000 75,000 Solar Street Lighting EA 15 12, , ,000 Persia/Sunnydale Intersection Improv. LS 1 16,360 16,360 16,360 Subtotal 3,647,298 2,865, ,982 Triffic Control (5%) LS 1 143, , ,266 39,099 Design Contingency LS 1 286, , ,532 26,309 Escalation Factor (5%) LS 1 143, , ,266 39,099 Mobilization (5%) LS 1 143, , ,266 39,099 Subtotal 4,507,233 3,581, ,588 Construction Contingency (10%) 450, ,165 92,559 Construction Hard Costs Total 4,957,956 3,939,810 1,018,146 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 4aDetailed Project Budget Page 11 of 19

268 E8266 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Construction Phase Labor Costs (Construction Management and Support) Agency: SFDPW Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burd. FTE Cost Phase 1 Alt. Project Manager I/ ,456 76,682 19,774 Assistant Project Manager/ ,580 46,571 12,009 Public Relations Officer/ ,664 18,018 4,646 Disability Access Coordinator/ ,448 14,666 3,782 Administrative Engineer/ ,394 13,828 3,566 Landscape Architect/ ,532 89,463 23,069 Engineer/ ,076 12,780 3,296 Survey Associate/ ,596 9,219 2,377 Office Admin: Constr. Inspector/ ,369 28,913 7,456 Resident Engineer: Assoc Engineer/ ,709 99,939 25,770 Constr. Manager: Admin. Engineer/ , ,452 32,091 Division Manager: Senior Engineer/ ,421 29,750 7,671 SFDPW Labor Subtotal , , ,507 Agency: SF Rec and Park Overhead Rate: Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fully Burd. FTE Cost Phase 1 Alt. Project Manager I/ ,297 9,776 2,521 Agency: SFMTA Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Hourly Fringe Benefits Rate Overhead = * (Salary + Fringe) Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Phase 1 Alt Engineer ,732 5,352 1, Associate Engineer ,756 9,346 2, Painter ,682 1, Sign Worker ,442 1, SFMTA Labor Subtotal ,611 17,181 4,431 Construction Labor Costs Total 743, , ,459 Construction Total 5,701,649 4,531,048 1,170,605 TOTAL PHASE I ONLY TOTAL ALTERNATE ITEMS ONLY TOTAL PHASE I AND ALTERNATE ITEMS 5,675,036 1,170,605 6,845,640 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA, 4aDetailed Project Budget Page 12 of 19

269 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8267 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 88,259 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 0 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 3,212,428 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5 Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The Mansell project is not included in a 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) and would require 5YPP amendments to two categories to support SFMTA's funding request. The requested allocation requires amendments to the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety 5YPP to add the subject project and use 44,130 in Prop K funds from cumulative remaining programming capacity (174,195) and to the Bicycle Circulation and 5YPP to add the subject project and use 44,129 in Prop K funds from the cumulative remaining programming capacity (73,081). See attached 5YPP amendments for details. The Strategic Plan amount includes 1,105,000 for the entire Pedestrian Circulation and Safety 5YPP in Fiscal Year 2013/14, 810,428 in unallocated funds from previous years, and 174,195 in unprogrammed funds; and 850,000 for the entire Bicycle Circulation and Safety 5YPP in Fiscal Year 2013/14, 199,724 in unallocated funds from previous years, and 73,081 in unprogrammed funds. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax SFRPD InKind Labor Total: Planned Programmed Allocated Total 88,259 88, , ,824 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: 0.64% 88,824 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Total from Cost worksheet Plan 37.00% P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 5Funding Page 13 of 19

270 E8268 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source No Required Local Match Amount % FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax 977, ,724 1,149,886 Prop AA 2,527,852 2,527,852 OBAG 1,762,239 1,762,239 SFRPD In Kind 39,312 39,312 SFRPD Operating Funds 100, ,000 Park Bond 417, ,641 Urban Greening Grant (pending) 848, ,711 Funding plan for Total: 2,243,514 4,290, ,036 6,845,641 Phases I and II Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: 83.20% 6,845,641 Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 37.00% Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 88,259 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year Cash Flow % Reimbursed Annually Balance FY 2013/14 88, % % % % % 0 Total: 88,259 Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: 0 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 5Funding Page 14 of 19

271 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8269 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 88,259 Phase: Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 88,259 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 40 FY 2013/14 44, % 44,129 Prop K EP 39 FY 2013/14 44, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 88, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 40 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 44,130 50% Prop K EP 39 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 44, % 100% 100% 100% Total: 88,259 Balance 44, Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 9/30/2014 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 15 of 19

272 E8270 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: With the quarterly progress report following receipt of CEQA approval, provide a copy of the CEQA certification. With the quarterly progress report following receipt of NEPA approval, provide a copy of the signed approval. Special Conditions: 1. The recommended allocation is contingent upon 5YPP amendments to the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety and Bicycle Circulation and Safety categories. See attached 5YPP amendments for details. 2. The Authority will only reimburse SFMTA up to the approved overhead multiplier rate for the fiscal year that SFMTA incurs charges. Notes: Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 9, 10, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 16 of 19

273 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. E8271 Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project Implementing Agency: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency SUBPROJECT DETAIL Mansell Corridor Improvement Project SubProject # from SGA: Name: Environmental Studies Ped Safety Supervisorial District(s): 9, 10, 11 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 40 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 44,130 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 50% 0 Total: 44,130 Mansell Corridor Improvement Project SubProject # from SGA: Name: Environmental Studies Bike Safety Supervisorial District(s): 9, 10, 11 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Prop K EP 39 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 44,129 50% Balance 0 Total: 44,129 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 17 of 19

274 E8272 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Please see separate attachment for project diagrams and maps. Area Map Rendering of design P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 18 of 19

275 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8273 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 88,259 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Mansell Corridor Improvement Project San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Laura Stonehill Title: Project Manager Phone: (415) Grants Section Contact Joel C. Goldberg Manager, Capital Procurement & Management (415) Fax: Laura.Stonehill@sfmta.com Joel.Goldberg@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\SFMTA Mansell ENV Prop K ARF MTA.xlsx, 8Signatures Page 19 of 19

276 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Pedestrian Circulation/Safety (EP 40) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: September 20, 2013 Fiscal Year Total Status Agency Project Name Phase 2009/ / / / /14 Citywide Pedestrian Safety & Circulation Improvements Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements 1 TBD Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements 5, 6, 10 TBD Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements 10, 11 TBD Programmed 101, ,273 SFMTA Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements TBD Programmed 200, ,000 SFMTA PLAN/CER, PS&E, CON Allocated 80,000 80,000 PLAN/CER, PS&E, CON Deobligated (11) (11) Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks SFMTA SFMTA Converting Standard Crosswalks to SFMTA Continental Crosswalks 1 CON Allocated 130, ,000 Continental Crosswalks and Red Visibility SFMTA Curbs 5 CON Allocated 35,727 35,727 SFMTA Continental Crosswalks 10 PS&E Allocated 115, ,000 SFMTA YPP Development 11 Plan /, Allocated 19,000 19,000 SFMTA Pedestrian Counting PROC Allocated 55,000 55,000 SFMTA Pedestrian Counting PROC Deobligated (147) (147) SFMTA Pedestrian Counting PROC Allocated 25,000 25,000 SFMTA Red Visibility Curbs PS&E, CON Allocated 30,000 30,000 PLAN/CER, PS&E, CON Deobligated (865) (865) SFMTA Red Visibility Curbs CER, PS&E, CON Allocated 30,000 30,000 SFMTA Red Visibility Curbs PLAN/CER, PS&E, CON Allocated 230, ,000 SFMTA ReOpen Closed Crosswalks Reopening Closed Crosswalks at Marina / Buchannan CON Allocated 97,000 97,000 SFMTA Reopening Closed Crosswalks at Marina / Buchannan CON Deobligated (97,000) (97,000) SFMTA SFMTA O'Shaughnessy / Del Vale New Crosswalk 6 PS&E, CON Allocated 136, ,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 40 Tab: EP 40 5YPP Page 1 of 12

277 Fiscal Year Total Agency Project Name Phase Status 2009/ / / / /14 CER, PS&E, CON Programmed 3,000 3,000 SFMTA Reopening Closed Crosswalks Corridor and AreaSpecific Projects BART Transit Connectivity at Regional Hubs (Embarcadero BART Station) CON Programmed 50,000 50,000 BART SFMTA Better Streets Projects 4 CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Better Streets Projects 4,14 CON Programmed 0 0 Union Square Public RightofWay Accessibility Improvements Phase I 4 CON Allocated 339, ,900 DPW Union Square Public RightofWay Accessibility Improvements Phase I CON Deobligated (293) (293) DPW SFMTA Better Streets Projects 14 CON Programmed 79,271 79,271 SFMTA Better Streets Projects CON Programmed 200, ,000 SFMTA 6th Street Improvements 14 PLAN, PA&ED Allocated 180, ,829 Golden Gate Park and Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements: Golden Gate Park Pedestrian Improvements CON Allocated 93,000 93,000 SFMTA SFMTA Plan Implementation 3 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Plan Implementation 3 PS&E, CON Programmed 61,183 61,183 MissionGeneva Transit and Pedestrian SFMTA Improvements 3 CON Allocated 168, ,000 SFMTA Plan Implementation PS&E, CON Programmed 100, ,000 SFMTA Plan Implementation PS&E, CON Programmed 100, ,000 PLAN/CER, PA&ED, PS&E Programmed 80,000 80,000 SFMTA Stockton Street Pedestrian Enhancements Crosswalks SFMTA School Crosswalk Maintenance CON Allocated 75,000 75,000 SFMTA School Crosswalk Maintenance CON Deobligated (440) (440) SFMTA School Crosswalk Maintenance CON Allocated 75,000 75,000 SFMTA School Crosswalk Maintenance CON Deobligated (5,758) (5,758) SFMTA Crosswalk Maintenance CON Allocated 75,000 75,000 SFMTA Crosswalk Maintenance CON Programmed 75,000 75,000 SFMTA Crosswalk Maintenance CON Programmed 75,000 75,000 Medians, BulbOuts & Sidewalk Widening SFMTA Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements CON Allocated 173, ,000 E8275 Golden Gate Park and Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements: Duboce Avenue Curb Extensions PS&E Allocated 47,000 47,000 SFMTA Golden Gate Park and Duboce Avenue Pedestrian Improvements: Duboce Avenue Curb Extensions PS&E Deobligated (2,667) (2,667) SFMTA P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 40 Tab: EP 40 5YPP Page 2 of 12

278 E8276 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA 14th/Market Curb Bulb CON Programmed 53,000 53,000 SFMTA Medians, BulbOuts & Sidewalk Widening 9, 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 DPW Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements 9 PS&E Allocated 33,552 33,552 SFMTA Pedestrian Refuge Islands 2 PS&E Allocated 25,000 25,000 SFMTA Medians, BulbOuts & Sidewalk Widening 2, 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 87,701 87,701 SFMTA Silver and Augusta Island and Bulbout 12 CON Allocated 153, ,747 SFMTA Medians, BulbOuts & Sidewalk Widening PS&E, CON Programmed 200, ,000 SFMTA Medians, BulbOuts & Sidewalk Widening PS&E, CON Programmed 200, ,000 Pedestrian Signals (Countdown & APS) Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and APS) PS&E, CON Allocated 214, ,000 SFMTA Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and APS) PS&E, CON Deobligated (342) (342) Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and SFMTA PS&E, CON, APS) 7 PROC Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and PS&E, CON, APS) 7, 12 PROC Programmed 0 0 SFMTA SFMTA New Pedestrian Signals 13 CON Allocated 923, ,905 SFMTA Franklin Street Signal Upgrades Conduit 7 PS&E Allocated 112, ,095 PS&E, CON, PROC Programmed 250, ,000 Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and APS) SFMTA SFMTA Mansell Corridor Improvements 8 PLAN Allocated 119, ,112 SFMTA Mansell Corridor Improvements 15 ENV Pending 44,130 44, , , ,491 2,203,682 1,329,959 5,642,902 Total Programmed in 5YPP 783, , ,900 1,648, ,959 3,834,997 (4,130) (103,100) (293) 0 0 (107,523) 50,000 56, , ,544 1,105,000 1,915,428 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 833,000 1,088,000 1,716, ,000 1,105,000 5,551, , , , ,197 1,749, , , ,065 Total Programmed in Amended 2009 Strategic Plan * Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on March 30, 2010 through Res P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 40 Tab: EP 40 5YPP Page 3 of 12

279 Fiscal Year Agency Project Name Phase Status Total 2009/ / / / /14 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 75,000 in undesignated FY 2010/11 Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements funds were added to 55,000 in FY 2010/11 funds for the Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks project for the total FY 2010/11 allocation of 130,000 to the project. 2 25,000 from 175,000 programmed in FY 2011/12 Medians, Bulbouts & Sidewalk Widening funds were allocated in FY 2011/12 for Pedestrian Refuge Islands. 3 5YPP amendment to add the MissionGeneva Transit and Pedestrian Improvements project and reprogram 29,183 in FY 2005/06 Prop K funds deobligated from the Pedestrian Signals: 16th Street and Folsom Street project (Res. 0634, ) (Res. 1163, ). The deobligation is included in the "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles." MissionGeneva funding also includes 100,000 and 38,813 in FYs 2010/11 and 2011/12 Prop K funds, respectively from the Plan Implementation placeholder. 4 5YPP amendment to add DPW's Union Square Public RightofWay Accessibility Improvements project using Prop K funds reprogrammed from Fiscal Years 2010/11 and 2011/12 SFMTA Better Streets Projects placeholders (Resolution 1206, ). 5 35,747 in undesignated FY 2011/12 Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements funds were allocated in FY 2012/13 for Continental Crosswalks and Red Visibility Curbs ,000 in undesignated FY 2011/12 Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements funds were allocated in FY 2012/13 for O'Shaughnessy / Del Vale New Crosswalk. FY 2010/11 Pedestrian Signals funds decreased from 36,000 to 0, and FY 2011/12 Pedestrian Signals funds decreased from 1,000,000 to 923,905, and 112,095 was redirected to FY 12/13 for the Franklin Street Signal Upgrades Conduit project. 8 5YPP amendment to add Mansell Corridor Improvements (Resolution 1330, ). 7 Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 119,112 in Fiscal Year 2012/13. Mansell Corridor Improvements: Added project with 119,112 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 funds for planning/conceptual engineering. 9 5YPP amendment to add Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements (Resolution 1343, ) Medians, Bulbouts & Sidewalk Widening: Reduced by 33,552 in Fiscal Year 2010/11. Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements: Added project with 33,552 in Fiscal Year 2012/ Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements funds from Fiscal Year 2011/12 (28,273) and Fiscal Year 2012/13 (86,727) were allocated to Continental Crosswalks. 11 5YPP amendment to add YPP Development (Resolution 1349, ). Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements: Reduced programming by 12,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/ YPP Development: Added project with 12,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 planning funds. 12 Medians, Bulbouts & Sidewalk Widening funds from Fiscal Year 2010/11 (91,448) and Fiscal Year 2011/12 (62,299) were allocated to Silver and Augusta Island and Bulbout. 13 Pedestrian Signals (including countdowns and APS) funds from Fiscal Year 2011/12 (923,905) were allocated to New Pedestrian Signals. 14 5YPP amendment to add 6th Street Improvements (Resolution 1405, ). Better Streets Projects: Reduced by 26,100 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Better Streets Projects: Reduced by 154,729 in Fiscal Year 2012/13. 6th Street Improvements: Added project with 180,829 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for planning/conceptual engineering and environmental review. E YPP amendment to add Mansell Corridor Improvements (Resolution XXXX, XX.XX.XXXX) Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 44,130 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Mansell Corridor Improvements: Added project with 44,130 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for the environmental phase. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 40 Tab: EP 40 5YPP Page 4 of 12

280 E Prop K 5YPP Program of Projects Bicycle Circulation/Safety (EP 39) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: August 22, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 SubCategory 1 (Safety, Education and Outreach) SFMTA Bicycle Safety Education Classes 5 CON Allocated 165, ,000 SFMTA Bicycle Safety Education Classes 5 CON Deobligated (130,000) (130,000) SFMTA Bicycle Safety Education Classes 5 CON Allocated 130, ,000 SFMTA Bicycle Safety Education Classes CON Allocated 175, ,000 SFMTA Bike To Work Day Promotion CON Allocated 0 100, ,000 SFMTA Bike To Work Day Promotion CON Allocated 80,000 80,000 SFMTA Bike To Work Day Promotion CON Deobligated (88) (88) SFMTA Bike To Work Day Promotion CON Allocated 162, ,000 SFMTA Safety, Education, and Outreach CON Allocated 75,000 75,000 SFMTA Safety, Education, and Outreach CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Safety, Education, and Outreach CON Allocated 136, ,000 SubCategory 2 (System Performance and Innovation) SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments 4 Plan, PS&E Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments 4 Plan, PS&E Programmed 0 0 SFMTA SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments Green Wave and BackIn Angled Parking CON Allocated 14,000 14,000 Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments Toolbox Plan, PA&ED, PS&E Allocated 86,000 86,000 SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments 10 Plan, PS&E Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments Bicycle Green Wave Plan, PS&E Allocated 71,100 71,100 SFMTA Bicycle Green Wave 10 CON Allocated 117, ,176 SFMTA Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments Plan, PS&E Programmed 265, ,000 SFMTA Colored Pavement Treatments Plan, PS&E Programmed 0 0 SFMTA State of Cycling Report PLAN Allocated 131, ,325 SFMTA State of Cycling Report PLAN Programmed 0 0 SFMTA State of Cycling Report 11, 13, 15, 16 PLAN Programmed 35,724 35,724 SFMTA State of Cycling Report 16 PLAN Programmed 180, ,000 SubCategory 3 (Bicycle Network and Facilities Improvement) SFMTA 12 North Point Street bicycle lanes, The Embarcadero to Van Ness Avenue 1 CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA 26 Division Street bicycle lanes, 9th11th Streets 1 CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA SFMTA Bicycle Network Planning and Design 2nd Street Bike Lanes Bicycle Network Planning and Design Coordination Plan, PA&ED, PS&E Allocated 15,000 15,000 Plan, PA&ED, PS&E Allocated 15,000 15,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 39 Page 1 of 5

281 E8279 Bicycle Circulation/Safety (EP 39) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: August 22, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA Bicycle Network Planning and Design Coordination Bicycle Network Planning and Design Phelan Avenue Bike Lanes Plan, PA&ED, PS&E Deobligated (663) (663) Plan, PA&ED, PS&E Allocated 30,000 30,000 SFMTA SFMTA Shared Roadway Bicycle Markings CON Allocated 240, ,000 SFMTA John Muir Bike Lanes 1 CON Allocated 139, ,000 SFMTA McCoppin Bikeway 1 CON Allocated 28,000 28,000 SFMTA Potrero Bike Lanes 1 CON Allocated 30,000 30,000 SFMTA Potrero Bike Lanes CON Deobligated (97) (97) SFMTA Alemany Bike Lanes CON Allocated 90,000 90,000 SFMTA Alemany Bike Lanes CON Deobligated (42,777) (42,777) SFMTA Portola Bike Lanes CON Allocated 70,000 70,000 SFMTA FY 2010/11 BTA Local Match 23rd CON Allocated 2,000 2,000 SFMTA FY 2010/11 BTA Local Match Bayshore CON Allocated 2,000 2,000 SFMTA FY 2010/11 BTA Local Match Holloway CON Allocated 3,000 3,000 SFMTA FY 2010/11 BTA Local Match Portola CON Allocated 10,000 10,000 SFMTA FY 2010/11 BTA Local Match San Bruno CON Allocated 30,000 30,000 DPW Marina Green Bicycle Trail 2 PS&E Allocated 14,400 14,400 SFMTA 14th and Market Streets Curb Bulb 3 PS&E Allocated 35,000 35,000 SFMTA 14th and Market Streets Curb Bulb PS&E Deobligated (9,473) (9,473) SFMTA 2nd Street Streetscape 7 PA&ED Allocated 50,000 50,000 Any Eligible Bicycle Parking Plan, PS&E Allocated 125, ,000 SFMTA JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway 8 Plan, PS&E Allocated 112, ,000 SFMTA JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway 8 Plan, PS&E Deobligated (50,900) (50,900) SFMTA JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway 8 CON Allocated 412, ,000 SFMTA JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway CON Deobligated (934) (934) SFMTA Fell/Oak Bikeway Improvements 4 Plan, PS&E Allocated 165, ,000 SFMTA Fell/Oak Bikeway Improvements 10, 11 CON Programmed 0 0 Cargo Way bike lanes, from Illinois to Jennings SFMTA streets PS&E, CON Allocated 94,000 94,000 Masonic Avenue Corridor Multimodal Streetscape SFMTA Improvements EIR PA&ED Allocated 41,000 41,000 Masonic Avenue Corridor Multimodal Streetscape SFMTA Improvements 17 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 Masonic Avenue Corridor Multimodal Streetscape SFMTA Improvements 17 CON Programmed 49,175 49,175 SFMTA Automated Bicycle Counters Upgrade 16 CON Pending 331,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 39 Page 2 of 5

282 E8280 Bicycle Circulation/Safety (EP 39) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: August 22, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 SFMTA Citywide Bicycle Wayfinding Plan 15 PLAN Pending 32,000 SFMTA Sloat Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Polk Street Bicycle Lanes 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Bicycle Parking Near Transit 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Electronic Bicycle Lockers 11 PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 SFMTA Cesar Chavez, I280 to US 101 CON Allocated 201, ,000 Folsom Street Bicycle Lanes, 13th Street to 19th SFMTA Street CON Allocated 27,000 27,000 SFMTA Mansell Corridor Improvements 9 Plan Allocated 53,612 53,612 SFMTA Mansell Corridor Improvements 18 ENV Pending 44,129 44,129 SFMTA Bicycle Sharing CON Allocated 200, ,000 SFMTA Polk Street Demonstration Project 13 CON Allocated 65,000 65,000 SFMTA Citywide LongTerm Bicycle Parking Strategy Plan Allocated 45,000 45,000 Any Eligible Bicycle Parking 11, 14 TBD Programmed 0 0 BART Civic Center BART/Muni Bike Station 14 CON Allocated 102, ,000 Any Eligible Bicycle Parking 14 TBD Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Caltrain Bicycle Parking Plan, PS&E Programmed 0 0 PCJPB Caltrain Bicycle Parking PS&E, CON Programmed 0 0 PCJPB 4th and King Caltrain Bike Study PLAN Allocated 45,000 45,000 PCJPB SF Bicycle Parking Facility Capital Improvements CON Allocated 165, ,000 PS&E, CON, SFMTA ShortTerm Bicycle Parking 11 Proc Allocated 175, ,000 BART Civic Center Bicycle Station PS&E Allocated 85,000 85,000 Plan, PS&E, SFMTA Match for Discretionary Grants 12, 16 CON Programmed 164, ,000 Plan, PS&E, SFMTA Match for Discretionary Grants CON Programmed 220, ,000 SFMTA YPP Development 12 Plan Allocated 16,000 16,000 P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 39 Page 3 of 5

283 E8281 Bicycle Circulation/Safety (EP 39) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: August 22, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 Total Programmed in 5YPP 290, ,065 1,509,790 1,544,888 1,223,304 5,460,709 Total Allocated and Pending in 5YPP Total Deobligated in 5YPP Total Unallocated in 5YPP 291,325 1,125,400 1,475,000 1,380, ,129 4,781,742 (663) (233,335) (934) 0 0 (234,932) , , , ,899 Total Programmed in Amended 2009 Strategic Plan * * The 2009 Strategic Plan was amended on March 30, 2010 through Res Deobligated from Prior 5YPP Cycles ** Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 765,000 1,440,000 1,286,000 1,086, ,000 5,427,000 62,661 62, ,999 1,084, , ,256 28,952 28,952 ** "Deobligated from prior 5YPP cycles" includes deobligations from allocations approved prior to the current 5YPP period, excluding deobligations incorporated in the first 2009 Strategic Plan amendment, as of December 31, Programmed Pending Allocation/Appropriation Board Approved Allocation/Appropriation FOOTNOTES: 1 5YPP to add three new projects: John Muir Drive Bike Lanes; McCoppin Bikeway; and Potrero Avenue Bike Lanes, which together comprise the Bicycle Facility Implementation Project (Resolution 1113, 138,000 in Fiscal Year 2009/10 funds for the 43 Illinois Street Bicycle Lanes project and 59,000 of 77,000 in Fiscal Year 2009/10 funds programmed to the 63 Laguna Honda Boulevard Bicycle 18,000 programmed to the Laguna Honda Project. 125,000 in unallocated Fiscal Year 2009/10 funds for the Bicycle Capital Projects placeholder. 55,000 in Fiscal Year 2010/11 funds for the 26 Division Street Bicycle Lanes Project (funded by another source) were reprogrammed to the Fiscal Year 2010/11 Bicycle Capital Projects placeholder as 2 5YPP to add DPW's Marina Green Bicycle Trail using Prop K funds reprogrammed from the Fiscal Year 2010/11 MTA Bicycle Network Planning and Design placeholder (Resolution 1133, ). 3 5YPP amendment to add 35,000 for the 14th and Market Streets Curb Bulb project (Resolution 1143, ). 14th and Market Streets Curb Bulb: Added new project. Shared Roadway Bicycle Markings: Reduced programming from 35,000 to YPP amendment to add 165,000 for the Fell and Oak Bikeway Improvements Project (Resolution 1163, ). Fell and Oak Bikeway Improvements Project: Added new project. Fiscal Year 2010/11 Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments: Reduced programming from 88,000 to 0. Fiscal Year 2011/12 Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments: Reduced programming from 200,000 to 123, YPP amendment to reprogram 130,000 for the Fiscal Year 2011/12 Bicycle Safety Education Classes Project (Resolution 1162, ). Fiscal Year 2011/12 Bicycle Safety Education Classes Project: Added new project. Fiscal Year 2010/11 Bicycle Safety Education Classes Project: Deobligation of 130, This Fiscal Year 2011/12 allocation for the Bike to Work Day Promotion project utilized the 100,000 originally programmed in Fiscal Year 2010/11 to the same project. 7 5YPP amendment to add 50,000 for the 2nd Street Streetscape Project (Resolution 1252, ). Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Programmed 50,000 to Fiscal Year 2011/12. 2nd Street Streetscape Project: Added Project. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 39 Page 4 of 5

284 E8282 Bicycle Circulation/Safety (EP 39) Programming and Allocations Todate Amendment for Board Approval Last Update: August 22, 2013 Agency Project Name Phase Status Fiscal Year Total 2009/ / / / /14 8 JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway (construction; Resolution 1214, ) included 50,900 deobligated from JFK Drive ParkingBuffered Bikeway (planning/design; Resolution 1151, ). 9 5YPP amendment to add Mansell Corridor Improvements (Resolution 1330, ) Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 53,612 in Fiscal Year 2012/13. Mansell Corridor Improvements: Added project with 53,612 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 funds for planning/conceptual engineering. 10 5YPP amendment to fully fund project: Bicycle Green Wave (Resolution 1347, ). Bicycle Green Wave project: Added project with 91,900 from Pilot Installations of Innovative Treatments. Fell/Oak Bikeway Improvements project: Reduced from 30,000 to 4,724 in Fiscal Year 2012/ YPP amendment to fully fund project: ShortTerm Bicycle Parking (Resolution 1347, ). Short Term Bicycle Parking: Added new project in Fiscal Year 2012/13. State of Cycling Report: Reduced programming from 160,000 to 132,724 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Bicycle Parking: Reduced from 102,000 to 77,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12 (to be made whole in Fiscal Year 2013/14 with 25,000 programmed for Bicycle Parking in Fiscal Year 2013/14). Bicycle Parking Near Transit: Reduced from 73,000 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Electronic Bicycle Lockers: Reduced from 28,000 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Sloat Boulevard: Reduced from 14,000 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Polk Street: Reduced from 3,000 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Fell/Oak Bikeway Improvements: Reduced from 4,724 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2012/ YPP amendment to add YPP Development (Resolution 1349, ). Match for Discretionary Grants: Reduced programming by 16,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/ YPP Development: Added project with 16,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 planning funds. 13 5YPP amendment to add Polk Street Demonstration Project (Resolution 1355, ). State of Cycling Report: Reduced programming by 65,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Polk Street Demonstration Project: Added project with 65,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 funds. 14 Bicycle Parking: Reduced programming from 77,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 and from 25,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 to 0 in Fiscal Year 2013/ YPP amendment to add Citywide Bicycle Wayfinding Plan (Resolution XXXX, ). State of Cycling Report: Reduced programming by 32,000 in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Citywide Bicycle Wayfinding Plan: Add 32,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 planning funds. 16 5YPP amendment to add Automated Bicycle Counters Upgrade (Resolution XXXX, ). Masonic Avenue Corridor Multimodal Streetscape Improvements: Reduced programming by 240,175 in Fiscal Year 2011/12 and 90,825 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Automated Bicycle Counters Upgrade: Added 331,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for construction funds. 17 Masonic Avenue Corridor Multimodal Streetscape Improvements is funded with OneBayArea Grant funds and SFMTA revenue bonds. 18 5YPP amendment to add Mansell Corridor Improvements (Resolution XXXX, XX.XX.XXXX) Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity: Reduced by 44,129 in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Mansell Corridor Improvements: Added project with 44,129 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds for the environmental phase. P:\Prop K\SP5YPP\2009 Living\5YPP Amended\EP 39 Page 5 of 5

285 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8283 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION D. TSM/Strategic Initiatives ii. Transportation/Land Use Coordination Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Project/Program: b. Transportation/Land Use Coordination Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 44 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 24, SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Scope Prop K and funds Benefits will be used for the environmental review and detailed design phases of the Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School project. Prop K will provide the 11.47% local match required for the project's OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) funding, which was programmed by the Authority Board at its June 25, 2013 meeting. Longfellow Elementary School is located at 755 Morse Street in the Crocker Amazon neighborhood of San Francisco. Of the school s 600 students, roughly 35 percent walk to school. Situated just south of Mission Street, Longfellow Elementary is in a Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Community of Concern and is located in close proximity to affordable housing. The school and surrounding area are accessible by several Muni routes, which are all part of the Mission Street MUNI Rapid Network and connect to BART. Many students and adults using transit to enter and exit the area access that transit on foot and will benefit from pedestrian safety improvements. Scope and Benefits The proposed project will construct pedestrian bulbouts and upgrade curb ramps at the intersections of Mission and Whittier Streets, Mission Street and Whipple Avenue, and Mission and Lowell Streets; install rectangular rapid flashing beacons at the intersection of Mission Street and Whipple Avenue; and provide landscaping, if feasible, near Longfellow Elementary School. Two bulbouts will be constructed at each of the intersections for a total of six bulbouts for the project. Mission Street is a 58 6 wide street, with four travel lanes, two in each direction, and traffic volumes of 14,000 vehicles per day. The The intersections proposed of project Mission will and construct Whittier Streets and Mission Street and Lowell Street/Naglee Avenue are signalized, while the pedestrian bulbouts and upgrade curb h i i f Mi i d P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 1Scope Page 1 of 15

286 E8284 San Francisco County Transportation Authority As a result of a Longfellow Elementary School Walking Audit that took place in May 2010, the following measures have already been implemented to improve the safety around the school: Installed red zones on Mission Street and Whipple Avenue to improve visibility at the uncontrolled crossing. Installed advance yield and limit lines at the school crossing on Mission Street and Whipple Avenue. Adjusted pedestrian signal times at Mission and Whittier Streets and Mission Street and Lowell Street/Naglee Avenue to ensure sufficient pedestrian crossing times. Installed 15 mph speed limit signs on streets adjacent to Longfellow Elementary School. Additionally, a recommendation was made in the Longfellow Elementary Walking Audit to construct pedestrian bulbouts. Bulbouts extend the curbs toward the center of the roadway and are used to narrow the roadway and create shorter pedestrian crossings. Bulbouts improve sight distance by making pedestrians waiting to cross the street more visible. They also influence driver behavior by changing the appearance of the street. For instance, they prevent speeding turns by sharpening the corner curves. Because of the high number of students who walk to Longfellow Elementary School, the community strongly supports the installation of the bulbouts at the intersections of Mission and Whittier Streets, Mission Street and Whipple Avenue, and Mission and Lowell Streets. Project staff will periodically update the school staff and immediate neghborhood residents and businesses on the project schedule. Prioritization The high frequency of pedestrian trips and pedestrianinvolved collisions contributed to Longfellow Elementary School ranking in the third tier (of five) of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency's (SFMTA s) prioritized list of schools needing safety enhancements. This prioritization was created to better select project schools for Safe Routes to School funding and includes other criteria such as the number of students enrolled living within one mile of the school, rates of free or reduced lunch, the number of collisions with fatalities and severe injuries, and the number of collisions during school hours. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 1Scope Page 2 of 15

287 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8285 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 06/30/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /13 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents /15 Advertise Construction /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) / /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Phase Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies ROW Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering Advertise Construction Award Construction Contract Construction Project Closeout Start Date December 2012 January 2014 March 2014 October 2014 April 2015 End Date March 2013 June 2014 September 2014 January 2015 March 2015 August 2015 August 2016 Federal Obligation Deadline for for Fiscal Year 2013/14 March 31, 31, 2014 (Design Phase) Federal Obligation Deadline for for Fiscal Year 2014/15 March 31, 2015 (Construction Phase) No DPW coordination expects to issues submit or its external request deadlines for Preliminary are likely Engineering to affect installation Authorization of these from bulbs Caltrans outs by and 10/1/13. curb ramps. DPW No coordination and PUC will issues coordinate or external the relocation deadlines are and likely installation to affect of installation catch basins of and these sewer bulbs manholes outs and for curb the ramps. bulb outs. DPW DPW and PUC and SFMTA will coordinate will work the together relocation on and the installation design of the of bulb catch outs. basins and sewer manholes for the bulb outs. DPW and SFMTA will work together on the design of the bulb outs. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 2Schedule Page 3 of 15

288 E8286 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 7, , ,793 Prop K Current Request ,066 24,981 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 17,483 7, , , ,636 Source of Cost Estimate Actual Cost Engineer's Estimate at 20% design Engineer's Estimate at 20% design Engineer's Estimate at 20% design % Complete of Design: 20 as of Expected Useful Life: 20 Years 8/12/2013 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 3Cost Page 4 of 15

289 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8287 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. FTE = Full Time Equivalent Planning / Conceptual Engineering (project dev. phase, December 2012 April 2013) Agency: SFMTA Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Burdened FTE Cost 5364 Engineering Associate , Junior Engineer , Associate Engineer , Engineer , Senior Engineer Agency: DPW 5203 Assistant Engineer ,959 Planning / Conceptual Engineering Total ,483 Environmental Agency: SFMTA Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Burdened FTE Cost 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,175 Environmental Total ,976 Design Phase Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Burdened FTE Cost Agency: SFMTA 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,897 Agency: DPW 5241 Full Engineer , Assistant Engineer , Senior Engineer ,862 Design Total ,817 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 5 of 15

290 E8288 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Construction Phase Hard Costs (by scope item) Item Traffic Routing Work Asphalt Concrete (Type A, ½Inch Maximum With Medium Grading) Full Depth Planing Per 2Inch Depth of Cut 8Inch Thick Concrete Base 8Inch Thick Concrete Parking Strip or Gutter 6Inch Wide Concrete Curb 3 ½Inch Thick Concrete Sidewalk Concrete Curb Ramp With Concrete Detectable Surface Tiles Flashing Beacon Landscaping Mobilization for bulbouts Traffic Routing for Sewer Work Trench and Excavation Support Work Catch Basin Manhole Abandoning Existing Catchbasin Standard Side Sewer Air Vent and Trap Assembly Exploratory Holes Mobilization and Demobilization for sewer work Allowance for Excavation Permit Fee Field Office Project Sign Subtotal Contingency (20%) MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET Quantity Unit Unit Price Cost LS 40, TON 130 7, SF SF 10 35, SF 16 27, LF 35 20, SF 10 69, EA 2,500 42,500 1 EA 15,000 15,000 LS 10,000 LS 12,200 LS 8,454 LS 4,000 4 EA 8,240 32,960 4 EA 5,150 20,600 2 EA EA 1,000 1,000 1 EA 1,000 1,000 LS 2,818 AL 10,000 10,000 LS 1,000 1,000 LS 2,000 2, ,480 72,896 Construction Hard Costs Total 437,376 Construction Phase Labor Costs (Construction Management and Support) Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Burdened FTE Cost Agency: DPW 5211 Senior Engineer , Construction Inspector , Principal Clerk , Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer , Agency: SFMTA 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer , Painter , Sign Worker Construction Labor Costs Total ,984 Construction Total 539,360 TOTAL 774,636 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 6 of 15

291 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8289 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 24,981 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 2,029,240 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 2,616,390 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Local Capital Match in the Transportation/Land Use Coordination 5YPP (29,240 in Fiscal Year 2011/12 funds, 400,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 funds, and 1,600,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds). The Strategic Plan amount is the entire amount programmed in the Transportation/Land Use Coordination category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,726,276 ), programmed but unallocated funds from prior fiscal years (862,861) and cumulative remaining programming capacity (27,253). Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 24,981 24,981 OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) 192, ,812 Total: 217, ,793 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 88.53% 40.48% 217,793 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 5Funding Page 7 of 15

292 E8290 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Fund Source OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) Amount 192,812 Required Local Match % 11.47% 24,981 Yes Prop K FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) SFMTA Operating Total: Planned Programmed 86, , ,307 Allocated Total 86, ,307 17,483 17,483 17, ,636 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 88.79% 40.48% 774,636 Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually FY 2013/14 Total: 24,981 24,981 24, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Balance Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 5Funding Page 8 of 15

293 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8291 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 915 Prop K Allocation 24,066 Phase: Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): Total: 24,981 A multiphase allocation for environmental studies and design is appropriate given the short duration and concurrent nature of the work. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 14, % Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 10, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 24, % Balance 10,314 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum Source Fiscal Year Phase Reimbursement Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 915 Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 13,752 Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 Design Engineering (PS&E) 10,314 Total: 24,981 Cumulative % Reimbursable 4% 59% 100% 100% 100% Balance 24,066 10,314 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 15

294 E8292 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of the design (anticipated September 2014), provide evidence of completion of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page Special Conditions: 1. The Authority will only reimburse SFMTA up to the approved overhead multiplier rate for the fiscal year that SFMTA incurs charges. 2. Notes: 1. Consistent with Prop K policies, the project sponsor shall expend nonprop K funds first to the extent possible. Unless a specific exception is preapproved by the Authority, Prop K funds will not be reimbursed at a rate greater than their proportional share of the approved funding plan (i.e % of the environmental studies and design budget). Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 10 of 15

295 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8293 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works SUBPROJECT DETAIL Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Environmental Studies Supervisorial District(s): 11 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 915 Total: 915 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Design Supervisorial District(s): 11 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 13,752 57% 10,314 Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 Design Engineering (PS&E) 10, % Total: 24,066 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 11 of 15

296 E8294 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAPS AND DRAWINGS P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 12 of 15

297 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8295 Eastbound Mission Street at Whittier Street Westbound Mission Street at Whittier Street Eastbound Mission Street at Whipple Avenue P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 13 of 15

298 E8296 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Westbound Mission Street at Whipple Avenue P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 14 of 15

299 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8297 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 24,981 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Ken Spielman Title: Project Manager Phone: (415) Grants Section Contact Rachel Alonso Administrative Analyst Fax: kenneth.spielman@sfdpw.org Address: 1680 Mission Street, 4th floor, San Francisco, CA, rachel.alonso@sfdpw.org 1 Carlton B Goodlett Place, Room 340 San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF Longfellow xlsx, 8Signatures Page 15 of 15

300 E8298 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

301 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8299 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION D. TSM/Strategic Initiatives ii. Transportation/Land Use Coordination Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Project/Program: b. Transportation/Land Use Coordination Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 44 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 20, SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Scope and Benefits Prop K funds will be used for the environmental review and detailed design phases of the ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School project. Prop K will provide the 11.47% local match required for the project's OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) funding, which was programmed by the Authority Board at its June 25, 2013 meeting. The project will include the construction of eight (8) pedestrian bulb outs at the intersection of Bacon and Goettingen Streets. The Portola branch of the San Francisco Public Library is also located at this corner. The proposed bulb outs would improve the safety of students and other pedestrians within the area. The intersection of Bacon and Goettingen Streets is a busy vehicular intersection with a high number of studentage pedestrians. Bacon and Goettingen Streets are both approximately 40feet wide with two lanes of traffic, one in each direction, and parking on each side. The intersection has fourway STOP control. ER Taylor Elementary School has over 600 students and roughly 30 percent of these students walk to school. The community supports the installation of bulb outs at this location. Project staff conducted a walking audit in January 2011 and has spoken to the residents immediately adjacent to the intersection on the phone, and met with school principal and staff as well as the manager of the adjacent library. Project staff will periodically update the school staff and immediate neighborhood residents and businesses on the project schedule. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 1Scope Page 1 of 14

302 E8300 San Francisco County Transportation Authority The bulb outs will increase safety by sharpening street corner curves to prevent speeding turns, shortening pedestrian crossing distances, and increasing pedestrians visibility to vehicles, transit and bicyclists. Similarly, the bulb outs increase vehicle visibility for pedestrians. As a result, adding this traffic calming measure at the intersection could encourage more parents to allow their children to walk, bike, or take transit to school. Additionally, the increase in pedestrian, bicycle, or transit trips to school could lead to improved air quality in the neighborhood due to fewer motorized student drop offs. The Bacon/Goettingen Streets crosswalk is located 3 blocks east of Bayshore Boulevard, where the Bayview/Hunter s Point Priority Development Area (PDA) begins. According to data from the Mayor s Office of Housing, and as part of the Sustainable Communities Strategy, affordable housing is planned in Bayview/Hunter s Point within close proximity to ER Taylor Elementary School. There are few elementary schools within close distance, and it is likely that many of the children who would be living in this affordable housing would be commuting as pedestrians to ER Taylor Elementary School. The Bacon/Goettingen Streets intersection is also within a High Impact Area. It is within 1/4 mile of mass transit, provides direct access to regional transit hubs, and connects to multiple PDAs. Muni 54 Felton, Muni 9 San Bruno, Muni 44 O'Shaughnessy, and SamTrans transit stops are within 3 blocks of this intersection. Users of these nearby transit lines often walk or bike to these transit stops, and the Bacon/Goettingen bulbs outs would create a more pedestrianfriendly environment and encourage utilizing multiple modes of transit. Additionally, based on the JobsHousing Connection Scenario of the Sustainable Communities Strategy, the Bacon/Goettingen Streets intersection lies within an area expected to take on the top 1/3 of job growth density over the next 30 years. Investing in the Portola neighborhood and ER Taylor Elementary School area to improve the pedestrian realm at the Bacon/Goettingen intersection will help accommodate the anticipated growth in the area and continue to enhance its connectivity to other PDAs within San Francisco. Prioritization The high frequency of pedestrian trips and pedestrianinvolved collisions contributed to ER Taylor Elementary School ranking in the second tier (of five) of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency's (SFMTA s) prioritized list of schools needing safety enhancements. This prioritization was created to better select project schools for Safe Routes to School funding and includes other criteria such as the number of students enrolled living within one mile of the school, rates of free or reduced lunch, the number of collisions with fatalities and severe injuries, and the number of collisions during school hours. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 1Scope Page 2 of 14

303 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8301 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Underway 06/30/14 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /13 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) / /14 R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /15 Prepare Bid Documents /15 Advertise Construction /15 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) / /16 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) /16 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /17 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Phase Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies ROW Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering Advertise Construction Award Construction Contract Construction Project Closeout Start Date December 2012 January 2014 March 2014 October 2014 April 2015 End Date March 2013 June 2014 September 2014 January 2015 March 2015 August 2015 August 2016 Federal Obligation Deadline for for Fiscal Year 2013/14 March 31, 31, 2014 (Design Phase) Federal Obligation Deadline for for Fiscal Year 2014/15 March 31, 2015 (Construction Phase) No DPW coordination expects to issues submit or its external request deadlines for Preliminary are likely Engineering to affect installation Authorization of these from bulbs Caltrans outs by and 10/1/13. curb ramps. DPW No coordination and PUC will issues coordinate or external the relocation deadlines are and likely installation to affect of installation catch basins of and these sewer bulbs manholes outs and for curb the ramps. bulb outs. DPW DPW and PUC and SFMTA will coordinate will work the together relocation on and the installation design of the of bulb catch outs. basins and sewer manholes for the bulb outs. DPW and SFMTA will work together on the design of the bulb outs. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 2Schedule Page 3 of 14

304 E8302 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Department of Public Works COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No Yes Yes Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 7, , ,970 Prop K Current Request ,269 20,184 Prop AA Current Request COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 17,618 7, , , ,573 Source of Cost Estimate Actual Cost Engineer's Estimate at 20% design Engineer's Estimate at 20% design Engineer's Estimate at 20% design % Complete of Design: 20 as of Expected Useful Life: 20 Years 8/12/2013 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 3Cost Page 4 of 14

305 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8303 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. FTE = Full Time Equivalent Planning / Conceptual Engineering (project dev. phase, December 2012 April 2013) Agency: SFMTA Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,408 Agency: DPW 5203 Assistant Engineer ,959 Planning / Conceptual Engineering Total ,618 Environmental Agency: SFMTA Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,175 Environmental Total ,976 Design Phase Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Agency: SFMTA 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,478 Agency: DPW 5211 Senior Engineer , Full Engineer , Assistant Engineer ,129 Design Total ,994 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 5 of 14

306 E8304 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET Construction Phase Hard Costs (by scope item) Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Cost Traffic Routing Work LS 28,055 Temporary Striping Asphalt Concrete (Type A, ½Inch Maximum With Medium Grading) 100 TON ,000 Full Depth Planing Per 2Inch Depth of Cut 4,000 SF 1 2,640 8Inch Thick Concrete Base 3,500 SF 10 35,000 Combined 6Inch Wide Concrete Curb and 2Foot Wide Concrete Gutter 350 LF 45 15,750 3 ½Inch Thick Concrete Sidewalk 3,880 SF 10 38,800 Concrete Curb Ramp With Concrete Detectable Surface Tiles 8 EA 2,500 20,000 Mobilization LS 9,985 Trench and Excavation Support Work LS 4,000 Catch Basin 5 EA 8,240 41,200 Manhole 2 EA 5,150 10,300 Abandoning Existing Catchbasin 3 EA 400 1,200 Exploratory Holes 1 EA 1,000 1,000 Valve Relocation LS 45,000 45,000 Excavation Permit Fee LS 10,000 10,000 Office LS 1,000 1,000 Project Signs LS 2,000 2,000 Subtotal 279,030 Contingency (20%) 55,806 Construction Hard Costs Total 334,836 Construction Phase Labor Costs (Construction Management and Support) Position (Title and Classification) Hours Hourly Base Salary Overhead Rate Hourly Fully Burdened FTE Cost Agency: DPW 5211 Senior Engineer , Construction Inspector , Principal Clerk , Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer ,390 Agency: SFMTA 5203 Assistant Engineer , Associate Engineer , Painter , Sign Worker ,712 Construction Labor Costs Total ,149 Construction Total 410,985 TOTAL 604,573 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget Page 6 of 14

307 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8305 FY 2013/14 Project Name: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 20,184 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 2,029,240 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 2,616,390 FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in Fiscal Year 2013/14 for the Local Capital Match in the Transportation/Land Use Coordination 5YPP (29,240 in Fiscal Year 2011/12 funds, 400,000 in Fiscal Year 2012/13 funds, and 1,600,000 in Fiscal Year 2013/14 funds). The Strategic Plan amount is the entire amount programmed in the Transportation/Land Use Coordination category in Fiscal Year 2013/14 (1,726,276 ), programmed but unallocated funds from prior fiscal years (862,861) and cumulative remaining programming capacity (27,253). Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K 20,184 20,184 OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) 155, ,786 Total: 175, ,970 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 88.53% 40.48% 175,970 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 5Funding Page 7 of 14

308 E8306 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes Prop K Fund Source OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) Amount 155,786 Required Local Match % 11.47% 20,184 FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K OneBayArea Grant Program (OBAG) SFMTA Operating Total: Planned Programmed 67, , ,631 Allocated 17,618 17,618 Total 67, ,631 17, ,573 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 88.86% 40.48% 604,573 Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project:. FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: 20,184 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually FY 2013/14 20,184 Total: 20, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Balance Prop AA Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually Balance Total: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 5Funding Page 8 of 14

309 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8307 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Amount Funding Recommended: Prop K Allocation 915 Prop K Allocation 19,269 Phase: Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): Total: 20,184 A multiphase allocation for environmental studies and design is appropriate given the short duration and concurrent nature of the work. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement % Reimbursable Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 11, % Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 8, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 20, % Balance 8,258 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum Source Fiscal Year Phase Reimbursement Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 915 Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 11,011 Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 Design Engineering (PS&E) 8,258 Total: 20,184 Cumulative % Reimbursable 5% 59% 100% 100% 100% Balance 19,269 8,258 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2015 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 9 of 14

310 E8308 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of the design (anticipated September 2014), provide evidence of completion of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page) Special Conditions: 1. The Authority will only reimburse SFMTA up to the approved overhead multiplier rate for the fiscal year that SFMTA incurs charges. 2. Notes: 1. Consistent with Prop K policies, the project sponsor shall expend nonprop K funds first to the extent possible. Unless a specific exception is preapproved by the Authority, Prop K funds will not be reimbursed at a rate greater than their proportional share of the approved funding plan (i.e % of the environmental studies and design budget). Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: Subproject detail? Yes If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 10 of 14

311 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8309 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 8/28/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works SUBPROJECT DETAIL ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Environmental Studies Supervisorial District(s): 10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 915 Total: 915 Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 100% 100% ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School SubProject # from SGA: Name: Design Supervisorial District(s): 10 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop K EP 44 FY 2013/14 Design Engineering (PS&E) 11,011 57% 8,258 Prop K EP 44 FY 2014/15 Design Engineering (PS&E) 8, % Total: 19,269 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 6Authority Rec Page 11 of 14

312 E8310 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 12 of 14

313 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8311 P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 7Maps.etc Page 13 of 14

314 E8312 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Current Prop K Request: Current Prop AA Request: 20,184 Project Name: ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax and/or vehicle registration fee funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Ken Spielman Grants Section Contact Rachel Alonso Title: Project Manager Administrative Analyst Phone: (415) Fax: kenneth.spielman@sfdpw.org rachel.alonso@sfdpw.org Address: 1680 Mission Street, 4th floor, San Francisco, CA, Carlton B Goodlett Place, Room 340 San Francisco, CA Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1314\ARF Final\DPW Prop K ARF ER Taylor xlsx, 8Signatures Page 14 of 14

315 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8313 FY of Allocation Action: 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: McAllister St Pavement Renovation Department of Public Works Prop K Category: Prop K Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iii. System Maintenance and Renovations (streets) Gray cells will automatically be filled in. Prop K EP Project/Program: b.1 Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction Prop K EP Line Number (Primary): 34 Current Prop K Request: Prop K Other EP Line Numbers: Prop AA Category: Street Repair and Reconstruction Current Prop AA Request: Supervisorial District(s): 2,210,000 5, 6 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Describe any outreach activities included in the scope. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K/Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plans and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. The Department of Public Works requests FY 2013/14 Prop AA funds for the construction of the McAllister Street Pavement Renovation Project. The proposed limits of the project include a total of 11 blocks of McAllister Street from Polk Street to Franklin Street and from Gough Street to Divisadero Street, a total distance of 1 mile. The average PCI score along these limits is 60. This project will consist of paving work, base repairs, curb ramp construction, and sidewalk and curb repairs at various locations. Approximately 4244 curb ramps will be constructed at the intersections of McAllister Street and: Scott Street, Pierce Street, Steiner Street, Fillmore Street, and Laguna Street, as well as at a possible new midblock crosswalk curb ramps on McAllister Street between Webster and Laguna Streets. Sidewalk repair will occur at every curb ramp; beyond the curb returns, where the ramps will be installed, the number of locations isolated strictly for repairs is unknown. Therefore, at least 4244 areas will contain sidewalk work. P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 1Scope :FY 10/11 Page 1 of 12

316 E8314 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Prioritization DPW inspects each of the City's blocks and assigns a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score every two years. The PCI score ranges from a low of 0 to a high of 100. These scores assist DPW with implementing the pavement management strategy of aiming to preserve streets by applying the right treatment to the right roadway at the right time. Streets are selected based on PCI scores as well as the presence of transit and bicycle routes, street clearance (ie, coordinatiion with utilities); and geographic equity. To extend the life of the pavement and to minimize disruption to neighbohoods and traveling public, each street is either "cleared" by utilities of future utility street excavation to avoid excavation of newly paved streets or utility excavation projects are coordinated with paving projects and, where possible, jointly contracted. The ability of the City to expedite paving projects is limited by its ability to clear streets of utility work prior to paving the streets. For example, the City's Public Utilities Commission needs to televise sewers under the streets to determine whether the sewers also need replacement or repairs. Delays in televising, evaluating, repairing and/or replacement of sewers delay pavement work. See page 3 for a list of all paving projects planned for FY 2013/14. This project is programmed in the Prop AA Strategic Plan and 5Year Prioritization Program approved by the Authority Board on December 11, P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 1Scope :FY 10/11 Page 2 of 12

317 E8315 FY DPW Paving Projects Job Order Project Phase 1975J As Needed Paving Contract No. 8 (Market St Pavement Improvements Phase 3) Construction Joint Sewer Lead Bryant St Paving Construction 2239J Joint Sewer Lead Schwerin Street Paving (Sewer JO 1274J) Construction 2204J Joint Transit and Pedestrian Market St and Haight St Paving Transit and Pedestrian Improvemen Construction 1951J Various Locations #16 (Market St Pavement Improvements Phase 2) Construction 2270J Masonic Ave Pavement Renovation and Streetscape (MTA to request OBAG) Construction 2182J McAllister St Pavement Renovation Construction 2306J Various Locations Multilayer Micro surfacing FY Construction 2233J Point Lobos Ave and Washington St Pavement Renovation Construction 2184J Potrero Ave Streetscape Improvements (Streetscape JO 2127J) Construction 2276J Roadway Inquiries FY Construction 2275J Various Locations BSSR FY Construction 2158J Various Locations Pavement Preservation FY Construction 1748J 2nd St Pavement Renovation Design 2267J Columbus Ave and Kearny St Pavement Renovation Design 2262J Guerrero St, San Jose Ave and Corbett Ave Pavement Renovation Design 2183J Pavement Renovation Ocean Ave and Persia Ave Design 2261J Various Locations Pavement Preservation FY Design 2265J Visitacion Ave, Teresita Blvd, Chaves Ave Pavement Renovation Design 2272J West Portal Ave and Quintara St Pavement Renovation Design 2091J 15th/16th/18th/19th/20th Ave and California/Clement St Sewer and Paving Joint Construction 2090J 16th/21st/24th/25th Ave and Cabrillo/California St Sewer and Paving Joint Construction 2092J 20th/Arkansas/Connecticut/Mississippi/Missouri/Wisconsin St Sewer Replacement Construction 2159J As Needed Paving Contract No. 9 Construction 2273J Joint Pavement Renovation & Streetscape Castro Street Project (Streetscape JO 2124J) Construction 2061J Pavement Renovation 20th Ave and Lincoln Way Construction 2063J Pavement Renovation Alemany Blvd Phase II Construction 2049J Pavement Renovation Divisadero St and Franklin St Construction 2051J Pavement Renovation Guerrero St Construction 2062J Pavement Renovation Pine St, Sacramento St and Stockton St Construction 2210J Pavement Renovation Polk St resurfacing from Market to McAllister (2212J MTA work) Construction 2067J Pavement Renovation Silver Ave Construction 2202J Pavement Renovation Upper Market St Construction 2050J Pavement Renovation & Sewer Replacement Clay St Construction 2066J Pavement Renovation, Sewer Replacement, and Water Main Installation Gough Street Construction 2274J Various Locations BSSR (GO Portion YR 2) Construction 2159J As Needed Paving Contract No. 9 Design 2260J Dolores St Pavement Renovation Design 2269J Pavement Renovation Crescent Ave and Hudson Ave Design 2268J Pavement Renovation Folsom St Phase 4 Design 2065J Pavement Renovation Fulton St 24th to Great Highway Phase 2 Design 2264J Pavement Renovation Haight St and Hayes St Design 2064J Pavement Renovation Polk St Design 2266J Pavement Renovation Vicente St and Ocean Ave Design P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx Page 3 of 12

318 E8316 San Francisco County Transportation Authority FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: McAllister St Pavement Renovation Department of Public Works Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /14 Prepare Bid Documents / /14 Advertise Construction /14 N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /14 N/A N/A Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /15 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /16 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each subproject in the current request and a schedule for public involvement, if appropriate. For planning efforts, provide start/end dates by task here or in the scope (Tab 1). Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Design is anticipated to be completed by September DPW anticipates advertising the construction contract in October 2013 and starting construction in February The UC Hastings Streetscape project on McAllister between Hyde and Leavenworth Streets (scheduled to begin construction by March 2014) is outside the limits of this project. Authority Note: We are working with SFMTA to understand the relationship between potential TEP improvements on McAllister and the DPW paving project. We will bring an update to the September 25, 2013 CAC meeting. P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 2Schedule :FY 10/11 Page 4 of 12

319 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Prop K/Prop AA Sales Allocation Request Form E8317 FY 2013/14 Project Name: Implementing Agency: McAllister St Pavement Renovation Department of Public Works COST SUMMARY BY PHASE CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multiphase allocations will be considered on a casebycase basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT funding request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Yes/No No No No No Yes No Total Cost Cost for Current Request/Phase 2,482,463 2,482,463 Prop K Current Request 0 Prop AA Current Request 2,210,000 2,210,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Total Cost 281,200 2,482,463 2,763,663 Source of Cost Estimate Actual Cost at 40% Design Engineer's Cost Estimate at 40% Design & SFMTA % Complete of Design: 40 as of Expected Useful Life: 20 Years 8/17/2013 P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 3Cost :FY 10/11 Page 5 of 12

320 E8318 San Francisco County Transportation Authority MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by task and phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide tasklevel budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (fulltime equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Preliminary Construction Estimate: 2,482,463 Construction Item Cost Traffic Related Items 87,500 Planing 203,500 Asphalt Concrete 369,600 Concrete Sidewalk 73,770 * 44 Curb 2, ,000 Concrete Curbs 35,000 Concrete Base 387,000 Concrete Pavement and Parking Strip 369,600 Miscellaneous Items 350,000 ** Subtotal 1,985,970 Contingencies 10% 198,597 Construction Management 15% 297,896 Total Cost 2,482,463 * Concrete reconstruction triggers the need for a new sidewalk. ** Miscellaneous items include catchbasins, manhole adjustment, excavation permit fee, field offices, project signage, DPT striping and construction support and deenergization of MUNI overhead contacts services. Construction Management Title (class) Base Rate Overhead Multiplier Burdened Rate/Hr. Number of Hours Construction Inspector (6318) ,468 Materials Testing Technician (5305) ,516 Associate Engineer (5207) ,255 Administrative Engineer (5174) ,991 Public Relations Officer (1314) ,601 Junior Engineer (5201) ,390 Total 2, ,221 SFMTADPT Construction Support (included in Miscellaneous above) Overhead Title (class) Base Rate Multiplier Burdened Rate/Hr. Number of Hours Senior Traffic Engineer (5211) ,380 Traffic Engineer (5241) ,060 Associate Traffic Engineer (5207) ,900 Draftsman (5364) ,280 Total ,620 Contingency (15%) 2,193 Total with Contingency 16,813 FTE FTE Cost Cost P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 4Major Line Item Budget :FY 10/11 Page 6 of 12

321 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8319 FY 2013/14 Project Name: McAllister St Pavement Renovation FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: 0 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: FUNDING PLAN FOR CURRENT PROP AA REQUEST Prop AA Funds Requested: 2,210,000 5Year Prioritization Program Amount: 2,210,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: 2,412,228 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The Prop AA 5Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop AA funds available for allocation to the subject project for construction in Fiscal Year 2013/14. The Prop AA Strategic Plan amount is the total amount of programming for the Street Repair and Reconstruction category in Fiscal Year 2013/14. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K/Prop AA funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop AA Vehicle Registration Fee HUTA Fund (gas tax) Total: Planned 0 Programmed 2,210, ,463 2,482,463 Allocated 0 Total 2,210, , ,482,463 Actual Prop K Leveraging This Phase: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 10.98% 79.06% 2,482,463 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 5Funding :FY 13/14 Page 7 of 12

322 E8320 San Francisco County Transportation Authority Is Prop K/Prop AA providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source Amount Required Local Match % FUNDING PLAN FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop AA Vehicle Registration Fee 2,210,000 2,210,000 HUTA Fund (gas tax) 303, , , Total: 2,210, , ,000 2,763,663 Actual Prop K Leveraging Entire Project: Expected Prop K Leveraging per Expenditure Plan: 20.03% 79.06% 2,763,663 Total from Cost worksheet Actual Prop AA Leveraging Entire Project: % FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K/Prop AA funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Prop K/Prop AA Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: Sponsor Request Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule % Reimbursed Fiscal Year Cash Flow Annually 0 Balance Total: 0 Prop AA Funds Requested: 2,210,000 Sponsor Request Proposed Prop AA Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2013/14 1,768, % 442,000 FY 2014/15 442, % 0.00% 0 0 Total: 2,210,000 P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 5Funding :FY 13/14 Page 8 of 12

323 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8321 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 9/17/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: McAllister Street Pavement Renovation Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Amount Phase: Funding Recommended: Prop AA Allocation 2,210,000 Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multiphase recommendations, notes for multiep line item or multisponsor recommendations): 2,210,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) Maximum % Fiscal Year Source Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance Prop AA Street FY 2013/14 1,768, % 442,000 Prop AA Street FY 2014/15 442, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: 2,210, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) Source Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance Prop AA Street FY 2013/14 Construction 1,768,000 80% 442,000 Prop AA Street FY 2014/15 Construction 442, % 0 100% 0 100% 0 100% 0 Total: 2,210,000 Prop K/Prop AA Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2016 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 6Authority Rec :FY 10/11 Page 9 of 12

324 E8322 San Francisco County Transportation Authority AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: 9/17/2013 Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: McAllister Street Pavement Renovation Implementing Agency: Department of Public Works Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Upon completion of design (anticipated by September 2013), provide evidence of completion of 100% design (e.g. copy of certifications page), and 23 digital photos of existing conditions. See Special Condition #1. 2. Upon project completion, provide 23 digital photos of completed project and/or construction work in progress. 3. Special Conditions: 1. DPW may not incur expenses for the construction phase until Authority staff releases the Prop AA construction funds (2,210,000) following receipt of evidence of completion of design. See Deliverable #1. 2. The Authority will only reimburse SFMTA up to the approved overhead multiplier rate for the fiscal year that SFMTA incurs charges. Notes: 1. Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 5, % expenditures this phase: Prop AA proportion of expenditures this phase: 90.14% Subproject detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for subproject detail. SFCTA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 6Authority Rec :FY 10/11 Page 10 of 12

325 San Francisco County Transportation Authority E8323 MAPS AND DRAWINGS McAllister Street Pavement and Renovation Project extends 1.0 miles P:\Prop AA\Allocation Requests\FY1314\ARF Final\Prop AA ARF McAllister ( ).xlsx, 7Maps.etc :FY 10/11 Page 11 of 12