Item 10 Authority Board July 20, 2010

Transcription

1 Item 10 Authority Board July 20, 2010 July 2010 Allocation Request Forms Table of Contents No. Project Sponsor 1 EP 2 Line Description Project Name Phase 1 MTA-MUNI Transit Enhancements; Guideways 2 MTA-DPT Signals & Signs 3 MTA-DPT 4 MTA-DPT 5 MTA-DPT 6 MTA-DPT Pedestrian Circulation/ Safety Pedestrian Circulation/ Safety Pedestrian Circulation/ Safety Pedestrian Circulation/ Safety Automatic Fare Collection Program Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Design, Construction, Procurement Procurement, Construction Prop K Funds Requested Page No. $3,122,048 1 $98, Pedestrian Counting Planning $25, Converting Standard Crosswalks to Design, Continental Crosswalks Construction $130, Red Visibility Curbs Design, Construction $30, School Crosswalk Maintenance Planning, Construction $75, Total Requested $3,480,803 1 Acronyms for project sponsors include Municipal Transportation Agency - Department of Parking and Traffic (MTA-DPT) and Municipal Transportation Agency - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MTA-MUNI). 2 EP stands for Expenditure Plan. J:\2010\Memos\07 July \Prop K grouped Enclosure\TOC Grouped ARFs CAC xls

2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

3 1 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Automatic Fare Collection Program MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit ii. Transit Enhancements Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: g. Other transit enhancements EP Line Number (Primary): 16 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: 22 Supervisorial District(s): Citywide $3,122,048 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. SFMTA requests a Prop K allocation of $3,122,048 to fund the local match to Federal Section 5309 funds for the design, construction, and procurement phases of Phase 2 of the Automatic Fare Collection (AFC) program. The purpose of the AFC program is to roll out the Clipper fare collection system (formerly known as TransLink) by procuring and installing Clipperonly fare collection equipment and providing related support services. SFMTA is requesting a multi-phase allocation due to the complex nature of the project, and to allow SFMTA to utilize a design/build contract through the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Project background and scope description begin on the following page. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 1-Scope Page 1 of 19

4 2 Background TransLink, recently renamed Clipper SM, is a regional fare media program under the management of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). MTC's Transit Connectivity Plan called for implementation of TransLink as part of its regional fare coordination strategy. Through Resolution 3866 MTC set implementation schedules for individual transit agencies and adopted sanctions to encourage compliance. On June 15, 2010 the MTA Board adopted its Fare Media Transition Plan, which conforms to the implementation schedule in Resolution The plan is attached to this Allocation Request Form following the scope section. Full rollout of Clipper SM will improve regional accessibility to transit by simplifying fare payment and customer transfers across multiple operators. Fares collected through Clipper SM will be distributed to transit agencies according to the Clipper SM Program Memorandum of Understanding currently being reviewed and approved by the participating transit agencies. When fully implemented, Clipper SM will allow passengers to travel on public transit from one end of the Bay Area to the other using a single card to pay their fares. In the early 1990s, MTC and the region s major transit agencies agreed to embark on the development of a single magnetic stripe paper ticket to be used to ride on all transit agencies. To date, AC Transit, Dumbarton Express, Golden Gate Transit and Ferry, BART, Caltrain, and SFMTA have begun using Clipper SM. SamTrans and Valley Transportation Authority will be offering Clipper SM in When fully operational, MTC expects approximately 1 million Clipper SM transactions per day region-wide. As an MTC-funded pilot project, Clipper SM will also be utilized at five San Francisco parking garages: Japan Center, North Beach, Vallejo Street, Performing Arts and Mission/Bartlett. MTC entered into a contract with Motorola Inc. in 1999 to design, build, operate and maintain the regional smart card system. MTC recently approved the assignment of this contract to Cubic Corporation. SFMTA became revenue-ready with Clipper SM equipment installed and operating in September of 2008 and intends to fully transition to the Clipper SM system as its sole fare collection system for all pre-paid fares. As SFMTA progresses to comprehensive public launch and Clipper SM patronage grows, the need for adequate throughput in all aspects of the Muni system becomes increasingly important. In order to complete the rollout of the system at SFMTA, the agency has decided to replace its current fare gates and other fare collection equipment with new, Clipper SM - only equipment. This project is split into two phases totaling $45.7 million. Phase 1 focuses on the procurement and installation of ticket vending machines (TVMs) and fare gates in the SFMTA subway system and is not a part of this request. SFMTA received an infusion of funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA stimulus funds) in the amount $11,000,000 to fund Phase 1, allowing SFMTA to accelerate the delivery of this project by two years, with the Phase 1 improvements ready to use in 2010 rather than the original delivery schedule of SFMTA agreed upon a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with MTC to deliver Phase 1 at a total cost of $30,125,760. Phase 1 (not included in the current request) includes the procurement and installation of: 40 ticket vending machines with locations at all Muni stations, to eliminate cash handling at SFMTA subway fare gates 98 fare gates, including extra-width ADA compliant lanes 15 station agent control terminals (to control new fare gates) Page 2 of 19

5 3 Financial and ridership reporting, utilizing the Clipper SM system Also included as part of the agreement are provisions for procurement of support services (e.g. Consultant, BART and MTC coordination) A map of the Phase 1 locations is attached to this Allocation Request Form. Under the MOU between SFMTA and MTC, MTC procures and installs all proprietary Clipper SM equipment necessary for the new fare payment system. This includes all the devices, equipment, and other items necessary for a fare collection system. Among the devices which are a part of the fare payment system are Card Interface Devices (CIDs) that read and encode data on Clipper SM cards. This would include Muni fare gates and other fare collection equipment. MTC may also decide to order similar equipment for other agencies in the Bay Area when they convert to Clipper SM. SFMTA utilized a sole source contract with MTC for Phase 1 transaction because: A sole source contract (vs. a Request for Proposals solicitation) would minimize the risk of delays that could jeopardize the conditions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds allocated to this project A sole source contract would simplify system integration between the proprietary Clipper SM equipment and SFMTA s new automatic fare collection (AFC) system, and thereby reduce costs and delay risks. Scope The second phase of the project (Phase 2) is the subject of this request. Phase 2 focuses on the delivery of the automatic fare collection system at surface stops. The requested funds will allow SFMTA to: Procure additional ticket vending machines for surface stops/locations, number and locations yet to be determined. The prioritization scheme for selecting surface stops to be equipped with TVMs has not been finalized, but some of the key considerations will likely include: o Usage as a transfer point between transit providers or mode (i.e. to and from our cable cars); o Usage and whether boarding times will benefit from ticket presales; o o Cost analysis of sales revenue vs. operating and support costs for the location; Availability of alternate fare media sales options (e.g. Muni/Clipper retailer proximity). Because site costs can vary greatly depending on the locations ultimately selected, the number of Phase 2 TVMs will be determined when a prioritization scheme has been finalized and preliminary engineering completed. Provide construction site/infrastructure preparation work for the new equipment. Procure system support/enhancement services: System support is intended to complement the rollout out of the new equipment, providing staff training for maintenance and operation of the equipment, to create a positive experience for passengers using the new fare system. Additionally, SFMTA is considering several enhancements to the existing AFC system to improve operations and usability, such as additional fare products (e.g. passports, special Page 3 of 19

6 4 event tickets), TVM graphical user interface improvements, and equipment display enhancements. A task overview itemized by phase is as follows: Design: Construction: Procurement: Complete design/implementation packages associated with Vendor service enhancements/afc equipment procurements and site preparation (i.e. infrastructure installation) requirements. Complete construction activities to ensure usability of new AFC equipment (e.g. TVM) installations. Complete procurement of AFC equipment thru Clipper SM Contract Manager and Vendor. SFMTA plans to initiate the design of Phase 2 of the AFC system upon allocation of Prop K funds and deliver the project by Spring 2013 at a total cost of $15,610,240. SFMTA will extend and modify the Phase 1 MOU with MTC to include design, procurement, and construction services for the Phase 2 work. SFMTA will also perform design services and construction support utilizing city forces. SFMTA staff will perform/ direct design engineering, construction engineering support, construction administration/management, quality assurance reviews, contract solicitation and award, and procure stakeholder/regulatory approvals. Contractors will perform site and infrastructure preparation for equipment installations, provide as-needed AFC system support/enhancement services, and produce and install AFC equipment (e.g. TVMs). Project Benefits Project benefits include: 1. Consistent with the City s Transit First policy, the AFC program will encourage the use of auto-alternative modes by making fare collection easier. 2. The AFC program will improve public transit access across transit operators and help SFMTA cooperatively strive for improved regional transportation. 3. Customer Convenience Clipper has an extensive array of features designed to increase customer convenience (such as automatic loading of their fare account), security features (such as balance protection), and retail outlets throughout the Bay Area. 4. Cost-Effectiveness/Operating Efficiencies SFMTA will reduce our operating costs associated with the production and handling of our paper passes and transfers, reduce inefficiencies associated with cash handling, and reduce maintenance and support costs for outdated, legacy equipment. 5. Access to Data The Clipper system will improve access to financial revenue data, assist settlement reconciliation, provide ridership data (e.g. boarding dates, times, locations, product used), and facilitate sharing of data across agencies to improve transit planning. Prioritization The automatic fare collection project is included in two Prop K 5YPPs: the 5YPP for Other Transit Enhancements under the Wayside Fare Collection Equipment line item, and the 5YPP for Page 4 of 19

7 5 Guideways under the line item Wayside Fare Collection Equipment. This project has also been prioritized in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) on page 304. Capital projects are prioritized using a four-step process that groups and orders projects by program, project criteria, schedule, readiness, and fund availability. The CIP is managed by the Capital Projects Working Committee (CPWC), a group of Muni staff, from all levels of the organization. CPWC meets every month to review and update the Capital Program. This project is also a part of the SFMTA Short Range Transit Plan that is formally adopted every two years by the Municipal Transportation Agency board following a lengthy public participation process. The Draft SRTP is reviewed by the SFMTA Citizens Advisory Council and submitted to the SFMTA Board. The SFMTA Board then releases the Draft SRTP for a 30-day public comment period. At this time, the Draft SRTP is mailed to nearly 300 interested stakeholders and is posted on Muni s website ( After receiving and responding to public comments, and holding a public hearing, the SRTP is adopted by SFMTA Board. This project is included on page 202 of SFMTA's FY Short Range Transit Plan, adopted by the SFMTA Board on January 15, 2008 under the line item title, Fare Revenue Integration and Reporting System. Page 5 of 19

8 6 MTA Fare Media Transition Plan - Adopted by the MTA Board June 15, 2010 Fare Media Monthly Passes Adult BART/Muni Monthly Fast Pass Adult Muni Monthly Fast Pass Senior and Youth Muni Monthly Fast Pass Date for Ending Acceptance of Current Muni Fare Media RTC/Disabled Monthly Pass 9/30/2010 Lifeline Senior and Disabled Monthly Fast Pass + BART Visitor/Cable Car Comments Included in the Transition Plan Overview - Presented to the MTA Board (June 15, 2010) 8/1/2010 Available on Clipper SM only. Transition will be executed upon completion of 4/1/2011 replacing Metro faregates with Clipper SM - enabled faregates. SFMTA will validate qualifications and collect 2/1/2011 applications. MTC will enter data, process and mail Clipper SM card. TBD TBD 1 Day Passport 6/30/2011 RTC customers will be instructed on how to use the full features of their current Clipper SM card. RTC customers will be instructed on how to use the full features of their current Clipper SM card. Fare product currently under Pilot Program Agreement with BART. Proposal received from Contractor on budget, scope and timeline to implement new fare product. SFMTA will work with BART to evaluate proposal to make this product publicly available. Requires implementation of read/write Handheld Card Reader (HCR) to validate the availability of the product on the Limited Use Clipper SM Ticket. Comments Included in MTC Resolution 3866, Appendix B-3 (Adopted February 24, 2010) New product available for Jan sales period. Transition schedule dependent on completion of Metro faregates program. Date shown assumes availability on TransLink of the Senior/Disabled BART/Muni Monthly Pass. In no event shall the transition date for this product be later than February 1, SFMTA to submit to MTC an implementation strategy and proposed transition date by March 31, New product development and coordination with BART required for implementation. SFMTA to submit to MTC an implementation strategy and proposed transition date by March 31, Day Passport 6/30/2011 Same as above. Same as above. 7 Day Passport 6/30/2011 Same as above. Same as above. Ticket Books/Tokens Adult Single Ride Ticket The 10-Ride Ticket Book will be available on 4/30/2010 Book TransLink / Clipper SM only. This is the 10-ridebook in TransLink. School/Youth Ticket Book Requirement waived at this time Pending development of limited use card. Adult Single Token 4/1/2011 Pending availability of pre-encoded Limited Use TransLink / Clipper SM Tickets. Pending development of limited use card; this product is a one-time use ride distributed by nonprofits to clients. Inter-Agency Transfers Golden Gate Ferry and Transfer discount only available on TransLink / 3/30/2010 Transit Clipper SM. BART Downtown Transfer Transfer discount only available on TransLink / 8/1/2010 Discount Clipper SM. May require SFMTA Board action. Daly City Transfer 8/1/2010 Pending evaluation of transfer policy. May require SFMTA Board action. Institutional Pass Class Pass TBD Pending development of distribution plan. SFMTA to determine distribution strategy for fare product by June 30, Transfers Bus Transfers 9/30/2011 Requires SFMTA Board action. Metro/Subway Transfers 9/30/2011 Requires SFMTA Board action. ADA Transfers 9/30/2011 Requires SFMTA Board action. BART Plus Ticket Requirement waived at this time Transition requirement for this fare medium is suspended until all transit agencies which accept the BART Plus Ticket have begun to accept TransLink, and subject to MTC s evaluation of the operational and financial feasibility of a transition of this product to TransLink. * Per MTC Resolution 3866, an operator will be excused from compliance with a transition date requirement for particular fare media, if the TransLink contractor has not met at least 83% of the cardholder support service level standards set forth in Section B.1.12 of the TransLink contract for the two calendar months ending one month before the scheduled transition date. The operator s transition date requirement for the affected fare media will be reset to one month after the TransLink Contractor has met at least 83% of the TransLink contract s cardholder support service level standards for two consecutive calendar months. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F; Transition Plan Page 6 of 19

9 7 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Automatic Fare Collection Program MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /12 Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction / /12 Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) / /13 Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) / /12 Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) / /13 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /13 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Phase 1: Detailed design began in November 2008 and was completed in August Procurement began in September Pilot installation of automatic fare collection (AFC) equipment is scheduled for August 2010, with installations in the remaining subway stations scheduled to be complete by December Phase 2: Initiate detailed design in August 2010, initiate procurement in October 2010, advertise the construction contract for site preparation for surface TVMs in March 2012, begin installations/ construction in July 2012, and complete the project by March P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 2-Schedule Page 7 of 19

10 8 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Automatic Fare Collection Program MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Total Cost $1,528,811 Yes $5,471,189 Yes $8,610,240 Prop K - Current Request $305,762 $1,094,238 $1,722,048 $15,610,240 $3,122,048 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $700,098 $5,428,713 $7,921,189 $31,686,000 $45,736,000 Source of Cost Estimate Actual Cost Phase 1 costs + engineer's estimate for Phase 2 Phase 1 costs + engineer's estimate for Phase 2 Phase 1 costs + engineer's estimate for Phase 2 Expected Useful Life: 30 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 3-Cost Page 8 of 19

11 9 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET Phases 1 and 2 Combined Budget Task Breakdown Contract Deliverable Numbers * Cost Rounded Program Elements MTC MOU Deliverables (AFC Equipment, Vendor Support) 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 $26,196,905 $26,236,000 AFC Site Prep/Equipment Infrastructure 13, 14 $3,081,265 $3,000,000 Total Program Elements $29,278,170 $29,236,000 64% of program cost Program Support Costs SFMTA Staff Costs (PM, PE, CM) 16, 17 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 Soft costs external to SFMTA: MTC ($337,966) + consultant/subject matter expert ($2,082,830) + BART ($537,034) 2, 4, 8 $2,957,830 $3,000,000 Total Program Support Costs Surface TVMs & Infrastructure Surface TVMs and Infrastructure $8,957,830 $9,000,000 20% of program cost 10, 11 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 13% of program cost Marketing/Outreach Marketing (Direct) 15 $797,498 $800,000 Marketing (Indirect/subject matter expert): This work is being performed by Booz Allen Hamilton and Caribou Public Relations. 12 $702,502 $700,000 Total $1,500,000 $1,500,000 3% of program cost Total Program Costs $45,736,000 $45,736,000 * See contract details on following page. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 9 of 19

12 10 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency AFC Program Elements 1 Contract No. MR-1214 DELIVERABLE UNIT CONTRACT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE PHASE 1 PHASE 2 Current and Anticipated MTC Responsibilities Under MOU 1 Cubic AFC Equipment (CO 126) LS $ 19,992,549 $ 19,992,549 2 BAH Technical Advisor 2 LS $ 2,082,830 $ 2,082,830 3 LUCSC Initial Procurement 3 LS $ 651,826 $ 651,826 4 BART MOU/CM Support 4 LS $ 537,034 $ 537,034 5 Network Upgrades (CO 131) LS $ 162,607 $ 162,607 6 Additional Card Readers (CO 130) LS $ 243,267 $ 243,267 7 Additional TVM (CO 126 Am2) LS $ 86,656 $ 86,656 8 MTC MOU Support 5 LS $ 337,966 $ 337,966 9 System Enhancements/Vendor Support LS $ 5,060,000 $ 5,060, Surface TVM Procurement LS $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000, Marketing SME Support LS $ 702,502 $ 702, Subway Closeout/System Enhancements LS $ 550,240 $ 550,240 TOTAL $ 33,407,477 $ 24,797,237 $ 8,610,240 Current and Anticipated MTA Contracts Under MOU 11 Surface Site/Infrastructure Prep LS $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000, Subway Site/Infrastructure Prep LS $ 2,531,025 $ 2,531, Marketing Direct LS $ 797,498 $ 797,498 $ - TOTAL $ 6,328,523 $ 3,328,523 $ 3,000,000 Current and Anticipated work to be performed by MTA staff 16 SFMTA Staff (PM, PE, CM, QA, PCS) 6 LS $ 4,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,500, SME/Consultant/Agency Staff Support 7 LS $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL $ 6,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 TOTAL PROJECT: $ 45,736,000 $ 30,125,760 $ 15,610, All project costs to be included in the MOU between MTC and MTA. Subject matter expert (SME) consultant support for AFC system design and construction support. Initial limited use ticket stock order, used to test and certify the system. BART staff support and oversight required by the subway property owner (i.e. BART). Staff contract administration support costs required by the Cubic contract holder (i.e. MTC). Phase 1 cost for this line item is less than Phase 2 because $3.7 M in additional work is allocated to other agencies/consultants in Phase 1. Task abbreviations: PM - project management; PE - preliminary engineering; CM - contract management; QA - quality assurance; PCS - project control services. The SME/Consultant/Agency support and staff work may be performed by MTA staff or a consutant under contract with MTA or MTC. Tasks for this item include signage, media buys, informational handouts/videos, promotional items, and staff inreach/educational materials to be determined upon execution of the revised MOU, anticipated October P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F; Contract Detail Page 10 of 19

13 DESIGN PHASE Phase 2 Support Detail Number of Hours Hourly Unburdened Rate Hourly Burdened Overhead Rate 3.11 Total Project Management 5504 Project Manager II 2,012 $69 $214 $431,469 Subtotal 2,012 $69 $214 $431, Contract Administration 5212 Principal Engineer 200 $84 $263 $52, Assistant Engineer 200 $47 $145 $29,042 Subtotal 400 $131 $408 $81,587 Engineering Services 5211 Senior Engineer 150 $71 $220 $32, Full Engineer * 1,600 $63 $196 $313, Associate Engineer * 1,600 $54 $169 $270, Assistant Engineer 500 $47 $145 $72, Principal Engineer 24 $82 $255 $6, Executive Secretary I 150 $31 $98 $14, Civil Engineering Assistant 448 $34 $105 $47, Civil Engineering Associate I 448 $38 $117 $52,248 Subtotal 4,920 $419 $1,304 $809,121 Constructability Review 5211 Senior Engineer 160 $71 $220 $35, Full Engineer 160 $63 $196 $31,416 Subtotal 320 $134 $415 $66,582 Total Design Support Labor $1,388,758 See next page for construction phase support detail P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, Support Detail Page 11 of 19

14 12 CONSTRUCTION PHASE Project Management 5504 Project Manager 1,200 $69 $214 $257,337 Subtotal 1,200 $69 $214 $257,337 Contract Administration 5212 Principal Engineer 160 $84 $263 $42, Assistant Engineer 320 $47 $145 $46,467 Subtotal 480 $131 $408 $88,503 Engineering Services 5211 Senior Engineer 446 $71 $220 $98, Full Engineer * 620 $63 $196 $121, Associate Engineer * 620 $54 $169 $104, Assistant Engineer 620 $47 $145 $90, Principal Engineer 23 $82 $255 $5, Executive Secretary I 500 $31 $98 $48,911 Subtotal 2,829 $348 $1,083 $468,891 Contract Closeout 5211 Senior Engineer 23 $71 $220 $5, Full Engineer * 170 $63 $196 $33, Associate Engineer * 170 $54 $169 $28, Assistant Engineer 320 $47 $145 $46,467 Executive Secretary I 230 $31 $98 $22,499 Civil Engineer Associate $39 $120 $84,039 Subtotal 1,613 $305 $947 $220,044 Construction Management 5211 Senior Engineer 1,194 $71 $220 $262, Secretary 1,194 $31 $98 $116, Associate Engineer * 1,712 $54 $169 $289, Engineer * 1,712 $63 $196 $334, Construction Inspector 1,712 $39 $121 $206,622 Subtotal 7,524 $258 $803 $1,210,030 Total Construction Phase Support $2,244,806 Total Design and Construction Support Contingency 10% $3,633,564 $363,356 Total SFMTA Support 21,298 $1,864 $5,797 $3,996,920 Round up to: 4,000,000 SFMTA staff will perform/direct design engineering, construction engineering support, construction administration/management, quality assurance reviews, contract solicitation and award, and procure stakeholder/regulatory approvals. Contractors will perform site and infrastructure preparation for equipment installations, provide as-needed AFC system support/enhancement serv ices, and produce and install AFC equipment (e.g. TVMs). * Line item costs may be performed by a contractor instead of MTA staff. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, Support Detail Page 12 of 19

15 13 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Automatic Fare Collection Program MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $3,122,048 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $3,122,048 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $100,746,514 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds available for allocation in FY 2010/11 for Wayside Fare Collection Equipment in the 5YPP for Transit Enhancements ($3,060,000) and for Wayside Fare Collection Equipment in the 5YPP for Guideways ($62,048). The Strategic Plan amount is the total amount programmed for the Transit Enhancements and Guideways categories in FY 2010/11. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which h Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax $3,122,048 $3,122,048 Federal Section 5309 $7,500,000 $4,988,192 $12,488,192 Total: $10,622,048 $4,988,192 $15,610,240 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 80.00% 74.19% $15,610,240 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 5-Funding Page 13 of 19

16 14 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes Fund Source Federal Section 5309 $ Amount $12,488,192 Required Local Match % $ 20.00% $3,122, FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax Federal Section 5307 Planned Programmed $3,122,048 Allocated $3,893,964 Total $3,122,048 $3,893,964 FY07/08 I-Bond (PTMISEA) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Federal Section 5309 $7,500,000 $16,309,354 $23,809,354 AB664 Bridge Toll Funds $511,227 $511,227 SFMTA Operating Funds $47,590 $47,590 RM-2 $2,351,817 $2,351,817 Economic Stimulus/ARRA $11,000,000 $11,000,000 Total: $10,622,048 $35,113,952 $45,736,000 Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 93.17% 74.19% $45,736,000 Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $3,122,048 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 $1,561, % $1,561,024 FY 2011/12 $780, % $780,512 FY 2012/13 $780, % 0.00% 0.00% Total: $3,122,048 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 5-Funding Page 14 of 19

17 15 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Automatic Fare Collection Program Implementing Agency: MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) Prop K Recommended: Allocation Allocation Allocation Amount $305,762 $1,094,238 $1,722,048 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $3,122,048 We recommend a multi-phase allocation due to the complex nature of the project and to allow MTA, through MTC, to utilize a sole source design/build contract. Because Clipper is a proprietary system, a sole source contract eliminates the need for a programming interface with software from another vendor. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Maximum % Fiscal Year Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 16 FY 2010/11 $1,561,024 50% $1,561, FY 2011/12 $780,512 25% $780, FY 2012/13 $718,464 23% $62,048 22M FY 2012/13 $62,048 2% Total: $3,122, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 16 FY 2010/11 Design Engineering (PS&E) $305,762 10% $2,816, FY 2010/11 Construction $1,094,238 45% $1,722, FY 2010/11 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $161,024 50% $1,561, FY 2011/12 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $780,512 65% $780, FY 2012/13 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $718,464 98% $62,048 22M FY 2012/13 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Total: $62,048 $3,122, % Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2014 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 6-Authority Rec Page 15 of 19

18 16 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Automatic Fare Collection Program Implementing Agency: MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide a percent complete by phase (e.g. design, construction, procurement), percent complete of the overall project scope, a listing of completed deliverables, in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA). See SGA for definitions. 2. Upon revision of the MOU with MTC (anticipated by October 31, 2010), provide a copy of the revised MOU as well as updated scope, schedule, major line item budget, funding plan and MTA labor details to facilitate invoice review and oversight. 3. Upon commencement of the procurement phase (anticipated by October 31, 2010), MTA shall provide the number and locations of surface TVMs to be procured and installed, as well as the prioritization methodology MTA used to select locations where the surface TVMs will be installed. 4. Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital photos of installed equipment, including surface TVMs. 5. Upon project completion, provide electronic GIS shapefiles that are compatible with the Authority's GIS system showing the locations of the installed surface-stop stop TVMs. Special Conditions: 1. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. Notes: 1. Regarding the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution by Phase, cash flow can exceed what is listed above for a given phase as long as the total cash flow for the fiscal year does not exceed $1,561,024 in FY 2010/11, $780,512 in FY 2011/12, and $780,512 in FY 2012/ Consistent with Prop K policies, MTA shall expend non-prop K sources first to the extent possible. Quarterly billing shall not exceed Prop K's proportional share of the funding plan (20%). Supervisorial District(s): Citywide Prop K proportion of expenditures - this phase: 20.00% Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 6-Authority Rec Page 16 of 19

19 17 MAPS AND DRAWINGS New SFMTA Ticket Vending Machines - Production Prototype (Phase 1 and 2) P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 7-Maps.etc Page 17 of 19

20 18 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Planned Locations for Phase 1 Clipper SM TVM and Turnstile Installations P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 7-Maps.etc Page 18 of 19

21 19 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Current Request: $3,122,048 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Automatic Fare Collection Program MTA - San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Henry Kim Title: Project Manager Phone: (415) Fax: (415) Henry.Kim@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Margurite A. Fuller Manager, Grants Procurement and Administration (415) (415) Margurite.Fuller@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Ave, 3rd FL, San Francsico, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-MUNI AFC Program F, 8-Signatures Page 19 of 19

22 20 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

23 21 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iii. System Maintenance and Renovations (streets) Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: a. Signals and Signs EP Line Number (Primary): 33 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s): $98,755 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. See attached MS Word document. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 1-Scope Page 1 of 17

24 22 1 Background and Scope SFMTA was recently awarded a federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant in the amount of $888,795 to make improvements to traffic controls along light rail vehicle (LRV) corridors. While the existing signal infrastructure is in compliance with all traffic control device and roadway standards and complies with the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD), the document which establishes traffic control device standards, SFMTA is preparing to make improvements. The project scope of work is designed to address and mitigate a pattern of driver non-compliance and illegal left-turns in-front of an approaching T-Third light rail vehicle, which was not discovered until after the T-Third began service. The new hardware installed by this project will bring City infrastructure up to date with recent recommendations within the CA-MUTCD addressing rail safety. SFMTA will modify 114 intersections along all SFMTA LRV lines but focus primarily on the new T-Third corridor. The Authority's Bayview Hunters Point Neighborhood Transportation Plan, which the Board is anticipated to approve on June 29, 2010, confirmed the need for addressing these issues on the Third Street corridor and supports making these improvements in the Bayview. SFMTA requests a Prop K allocation of $98,755 to provide the 10% required local match to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant to fund the construction phase of the project which will benefit the citizens of San Francisco by: 1. Improving intersection safety for all roadway users. This project will enhance safety of drivers and passengers in vehicles traveling parallel to the rail tracks, as well as pedestrians crossing intersections, who may not expect a vehicle to be turning into the intersection. 2. Improving driver decision making about rights of way and turning 3. Improving service reliability focused primarily on the Muni T-Line. The greatest benefit to rail safety will be the reduction of collisions involving left turning vehicles. Diagrams of the proposed scope improvements are attached to the end of the scope. The project scope includes: 1. Installation of MUTCD recommended rail traffic signal indications (Lunar White Vertical and Horizontal Bards) 2. Removal of non-recommended rail traffic indications (White T and Red X indications) 3. Removal and/or modification of adjacent vehicular traffic signal indications. For example, the installation of a green through arrow in place of a green ball at locations where left turns are prohibited. Such a change will include pavement markings (item 4 below) and incidental sign changes. 4. Installation of pavement markings along the 3 rd Street/Bayshore corridor The HSIP grant for this project was approved as a single phase project with all activities classified under the construction phase. The scope of work within the construction phase includes minute amounts of planning, design and environmental clearance work. Substantial work within the construction phase includes procurement, preparation and sending of work-orders, installation, and project oversight. The schedule and budget

25 2 23 sections reflect all tasks and timelines for the project work that was approved within the HSIP approval for the construction phase. Prioritization: This project was prioritized by SFMTA, state and federal transportation agency staff based on accident history, transit passenger and traffic volumes, and transit operations. The installation of uniform transit signals and modification of vehicle signals is expected to improve intersection safety and operation. This project is not specifically identified in the current Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for Expenditure Plan Line 33 titled, Signals and Signs Maintenance and Renovation. However, the Joint Opportunity Funds line item of the plan was established primarily to provide local match funds for grant funded projects that had not been identified at the time the plan was written. This project also satisfies several of the prioritization criteria established in the plan, including: (2) Funding identified (8) Transit amenities (10) Geographic distribution (11) Leveraging Prop K funds (13) Safety (14) Mandates (15) System performance (20) Financial capacity, and (21) Maintenance capacity Implementation: SFMTA Division of Sustainable Streets (DSS, formerly DPT) Traffic Engineering will provide project coordination, complete the environmental clearance process and prepare work orders. SFMTA DSS Signal Shop will install the new rail signal heads and remove or modify existing vehicle signal heads as needed. The DSS Paint shop will install pavement markings. Task Force Account Work Performed By Project Coordination SFMTA Traffic Engineering Environmental Clearance SFMTA Traffic Engineering Design (Work Orders) SFMTA Traffic Engineering Prepare Purchase Order Documents SFMTA Traffic Engineering Installation SFMTA Paint and Signal Shops Force Account Labor and Purchase Order Costs The labor and equipment costs are based on estimates prepared by SFMTA engineering staff and maintenance shop managers based on recent similar work and purchases.

26 24 3 Discussion about the HSIP Grant and Local Match State and federal funds require environmental and historical site clearance and studies. Studies become more extensive when excavation (e.g. for conduits and pole foundations) disturb site conditions beyond a depth of 2 feet. This project has no excavation within the scope of work which means that study requirements should be modest and may consist of simply cataloging the locations and reporting no impact. There are a large number of locations, so SFMTA is budgeting $9,000 for the administrative aspect.

27 4 25 Examples of Project Work Scope Example 1. 3 rd and 23 rd Streets Replacement of rail signals to eliminate red signals and further differentiate rail signals from vehicular signals. Example 2. 3 rd and 23 rd Streets Deleting unnecessary median signals along the track-way to take the driver s eye away from rail signals.

28 26 5 Example 3. 3 rd and 22 nd Streets Before-and-after photos illustrating additional dynamic envelope lines and NO TURNS pavement legends to reinforce the existing No Left-Turn / No U- Turn restrictions. BEFORE AFTER

29 6 27 Example 4 3 rd and 22 nd Streets Replacement of green ball overhead signals with green up arrow signals to reinforce the existing No Left-Turn / No U-Turn restrictions.

30 28 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorical Exclusion Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Not Started 02/01/11 PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /11 Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /11 N/A N/A Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) / /12 Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /12 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) / /13 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. Once Prop K local match is secured, SFMTA will initiate procurement and install hardware and new striping using City force account. HSIP environmental and historical site clearance is not anticipated to be difficult because no excavation will be done as part of the project. However, there are over 100 intersections that must be approved, so the volume of work is the primary factor in the duration of the environmental study phase. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 2-Schedule Page 2 of 17

31 29 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Cost for Current Request/Phase Total Cost Prop K - Current Request $801,954 $80,195 $185,594 $18,560 $987,550 $98,755 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Total Cost Source of Cost Estimate Construction $801,954 MTA Paint & Signal Shop Estimate - Based on previous work Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: $185,594 $987,550 MTA Paint & Signal Shop Estimate - Based on previous work Expected Useful Life: 50 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F, 3-Cost Page 3 of 17

32 30 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. See next page. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 4 of 17

33 31 San Francisco Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements PROJECT DETAILED BUDGET 1 Coordination, Work Orders, Purchase Order Documents & Environmental Clearance $29,998 2 "T" Line Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements $640,981 3 King Street, Embarcadero and Citywide Rail Signal Improvements $226,791 4 Project Contingency (approximately 10%) $89,777 Total $987,547 Project Budget $987,550 HSIP FUNDS (90%) $888,795 Prop K 2010/11 Request (10%) $98,755 COORDINATION, WORK ORDERS, PURCHASE ORDER DOCUMENTS & ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Overhead Multiplier 2.37 Position Unburdened Salary * Fully Burdened Salary * Hours FTE Ratio Total Cost 5241 Engineer $124,774 $295, $29,998 Total Cost $29,998 * Base Salary is step 5 for each classification in effect today.

34 32 "T" LINE SIGNAL AND PAVEMENT MARKING IMPROVEMENTS AGENCY LABOR: Overhead Multiplier 2.37 Position Unburdened Salary * Fully Burdened Salary * Hours FTE Ratio Total Cost 7346 Painter $74,724 $177, $46, Painter Sup. $89,596 $212, $8, Electrician 7345** $143,857 $340, $454, Traffic Signal Electrican Supv I $175,512 $415, $17,198 Total Labor Cost $527,387 MATERIALS: Item Units Unit Cost Total Signal Hardware 12" Horizontal Bar Lunar White LED Indication 335 $150 $50,250 12" Vertical Bar Lunar White LED Indication 335 $150 $50,250 Misc Fittings and Connectors 70 $125 $8,750 Signal Hardware Sub-Total $109,250 Lane Striping 8" Solid White or Yellow (LF) 5, $3,074 Raised Pavement Markers 420 $2.50 $1,050 Messages ("NO TURN") 75 $2.92 $219 Lane Striping Sub-Total $4,343 Total Materials Cost $113,593 "T" LINE IMPROVEMENTS COST $640,981 * Base Salary is step 5 for each classification in effect today. ** Electricians receive a 5% premium when assigned as traffic signal electricians Note: Muni operations necessitates that working in LRV track right of way be done during late night/early morning hours. Consequently, electrican work is budgeted as over-time (1.5 x base rate)

35 33 KING STREET, EMBARCADERO AND CITYWIDE RAIL SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AGENCY LABOR: Overhead Multiplier 2.37 Position Unburdened Salary * Fully Burdened Salary * Hours FTE Ratio Total Cost 7345 Electrician 7345** $143,857 $340, $145, Traffic Signal Electrican Supv I $175,512 $415, $9,399 Total Labor Cost $154,791 MATERIALS: Item Units Unit Cost Total Signal Hardware 12" Horizontal Bar Lunar White LED Indication 80 $ $12,000 12" Vertical Bar Lunar White LED Indication 80 $ $12,000 2-Section 12" Vehicle Signal Head w/ Framework 80 $ $38,000 Misc Fittings and Connectors 80 $ $10,000 Signal Hardware Sub-Total $72,000 Total Materials Cost $72,000 KING STREET, EMBARCADERO AND CITYWIDE IMPROVEMENTS $226,791 * Base Salary is step 5 for each classification in effect today. ** Electricians receive a 5% premium when assigned as traffic signal electricians Note: Muni operations necessitates that working in LRV track right of way be done during late night/early morning hours. Consequently, electrican work is budgeted as over-time (1.5 x base rate)

36 34 PROJECT PHASE HSIP BUDGET (APPLICATION) Total HSIP Local PE (Design) Enviro PS&E Sub-total Percentage 0% 0% R/W (Right of Way) Eng Appraisal, etc Utilities Sub-total CONS (Construction) Constx Eng $30,000 $27,000 $3,000 Constx $867,777 $780,999 $86,778 Sub-total $897,777 $807,999 $89,778 Percentage 90% 10% Sub-Total $897,777 $807,999 $89,778 Contingency $89,778 $80,800 $8,978 Project Total $987,554 $888,799 $98,755 Project Budget $987,550 $888,795 $98,755 Percentage 90% 10%

37 35 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $98,755 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $100,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $553,000 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the Prop K funding programmed but unallocated in Fiscal Year 2009/10 ($50,000) and the amount programmed in Fiscal Year 2010/11 ($50,000) for Joint Opportunities in the Traffic Signal Upgrades sub-category. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Signals and Signs category in Fiscal Year 2010/11 ($370,000) plus $183,000 in prior year unallocated funds. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax HSIP Grant Total: Planned Programmed $98,755 $98,755 Allocated $888,795 $888,795 Total $98,755 $888,795 $987,550 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 90.00% 41.47% $987,550 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 5-Funding Page 9 of 17

38 36 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes Fund Source HSIP Grant $ Amount $888,795 Required Local Match % $ 10.00% $98, FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Total: Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan #DIV/0! Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $98,755 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 $75,000 $23, % 24.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $23,755 Total: $98,755 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 5-Funding Page 10 of 17

39 37 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $18,560 Allocation $80,195 Phase: Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $98,755 We are recommending a multi-phase allocation to match the scope, schedule and budget as funded through the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program grant program. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP % Fiscal Year Maximum Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 33 FY 2010/11 $39, % $59, FY 2011/12 $59, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $39,503 $98,755 $98,755 $98,755 Total: $98, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 33 FY 2010/11 Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) $18,560 19% $80, FY 2010/11 Construction $20,943 40% $59, FY 2011/12 Construction $59, % 100% 100% Total: $98,755 Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2012 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F, 6-Authority Rec Page 11 of 17

40 38 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide a percent complete for the overall project scope and a list of locations improved during the previous quarter, in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA). See SGA for definitions. 2. Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital photos of completed project. 3. Upon project completion, provide electronic GIS shapefiles that are compatible with the Authority's GIS system. 4. Special Conditions: 1. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. 2. Notes: 1. Regarding the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution by Phase, cash flow can exceed what is listed above for a given phase as long as the total cash flow for the fiscal year does not exceed $39,502 in FY 2010/11 and $59,252 in FY 2011/ Consistent with Prop K policies, the project sponsor shall expend non-prop K funds first to the extent possible. Unless a specific exception is pre-approved by the Authority, Prop K funds will not be reimbursed at a rate greater than their proportional share of the approved funding plan (i.e. 10%). Prop K proportion of Supervisorial District(s): 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 expenditures - this phase: 10.00% Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 6-Authority Rec Page 12 of 17

41 39 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 7-Map Page 13 of 17

42 40 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Current Request: $98,755 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Light Rail Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Brian B. Dusseault Title: Engineer Phone: (415) Fax: (415) brian.dusseault@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Margurite A. Fuller Mgr, Grants Procurement & Adm. (415) (415) Margurite.Fuller@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT LRV Signal HSIP Local Match F.xls, 8-Signatures Page 14 of 17

43 41 San Francisco T-Line Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Traffic Signals to be Upgraded Main Street Cross Street 1 03rd St. Le Conte Ave. 2 03rd St. Key Ave. 3 03rd St. Jamestown Ave. 4 03rd St. Ingerson Ave. 5 03rd St. Hollister Ave. 6 03rd St. Gilman Ave. / Paul Ave. 7 03rd St. Fitzgerald Ave. 8 03rd St. Egbert Ave. 9 03rd St. Donner Ave rd St. Carroll Ave rd St. Bancroft Ave rd St. Armstrong Ave rd St. Yosemite Ave rd St. Wallace Ave rd St. Van Dyke Ave. / Williams Ave rd St. Underwood Ave rd St. Thomas Ave. / Thornton Ave rd St. Shafter Ave rd St. Bayview St. / Revere Ave rd St. Quesada Ave rd St. Palou Ave rd St. Oakdale Ave rd St. Newcomb Ave rd St. McKinnon Ave rd St. La Salle Ave rd St. Kirkwood Ave rd St. Jerrold Ave rd St. Innes Ave rd St. Hudson Ave rd St. Galvez Ave rd St. Fairfax Ave rd St. Evans Ave rd St. Davidson Ave rd St. Burke Ave rd St. Arthur Ave. / Cargo Way 36 03rd St. Marin St rd St. Cesar Chavez St rd St. 26th St rd St. 25th St rd St. 24th St rd St. 23rd St rd St. 22nd St rd St. 20th St rd St. 19th St rd St. 18th St rd St. Mariposa St rd St. 16th St.

44 42 San Francisco T-Line Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Traffic Signals to be Upgraded Main Street Cross Street 48 03rd St. South St rd St. Mission Bay Blvd. (North) / Mission Bay Blvd. (South) 50 03rd St. Mission Rock St rd St. Channel St th St. Channel St. (including bridge signals) 53 04th St. Berry St. (including bridge signals) 54 09th Ave. Irving St th Ave. Judah St th St. Church St. / Market St th St. Church St th St. Castro St. / Market St th St. Church St th Avenue Rossmoor Dr th St. San Jose Ave. 62 Bay St. Hyde St. 63 Bayshore Blvd. Sunnydale Ave. 64 Bayshore Blvd. Visitacion Ave. 65 Bayshore Blvd. Leland Ave. 66 Bayshore Blvd. Arleta Ave. 67 Bayshore Blvd. Blanken Ave. 68 Bayshore Blvd. Tunnel Ave. 69 Bayshore Blvd. Hester Ave. 70 Beach St. Jones St. 71 Beach St. Taylor St. 72 Beach St. Mason St. 73 Beach St. Powell St. 74 Beach St. Stockton St. 75 Beach St. Hyde St. 76 California St. Drumm St. 77 Dolores St. Randall St. / San Jose Ave. 78 Eucalyptus Dr. Junipero Serra Blvd. / Ocean Ave. 79 Geneva Ave. San Jose Ave. 80 Hyde St. Washington St. 81 Jackson St. Mason St. 82 Jefferson St. Powell St. 83 Jefferson St. Taylor St. 84 Jefferson St. Jones St. 85 Junipero Serra Blvd. Portola Dr. / Sloat Blvd. / St. Francis Dr. / West Portal Ave. 86 King St. 5th St. 87 King St. Midblock bet. 4th St. and 5th St. 88 King St. 4th St. 89 King St. Midblock bet. 3rd St. and 4th St. 90 King St. 3rd St. 91 King St. Midblock bet. 2nd St. and 3rd St. 92 Ocean Ave. San Jose Ave. 93 Ocean Ave. NB I-280 On-Ramp 94 Powell St. Washington St.

45 43 San Francisco T-Line Corridor Signal and Pavement Marking Improvements Traffic Signals to be Upgraded Main Street Cross Street 95 San Jose Ave. Metro Center (Seneca Ave.) 96 The Embarcadero Townsend St. 97 The Embarcadero Midblock bet. Brannan St. and Townsend St. 98 The Embarcadero Brannan St. 99 The Embarcadero Bryant St. 100 The Embarcadero Harrison St. 101 The Embarcadero Folsom St. 102 The Embarcadero Howard St. 103 The Embarcadero Mission St. 104 The Embarcadero Midblock bet. Ferry Bldg. and Mission St. 105 The Embarcadero Ferry Bldg. 106 The Embarcadero Midblock bet. Ferry Bldg. and Washington St. 107 The Embarcadero Washington St. 108 The Embarcadero Broadway St. 109 The Embarcadero Green St. 110 The Embarcadero Battery St. / Lombard St. 111 The Embarcadero Chestnut St. / Sansome St. 112 The Embarcadero Bay St. 113 The Embarcadero Kearny St. / North Point St. 114 The Embarcadero Beach St. / Grant Ave.

46 44 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

47 45 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Pedestrian Counting MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: c. Pedestrian Circulation/Safety EP Line Number (Primary): 40 Current Request: $25,000 Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s): Citywide SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7- Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see the attached MS Word document. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 1-Scope Page 1 of 14

48 46 Scope and Project Benefits The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests a Prop K allocation of $25,000 to implement the Pedestrian Counting Project. SFMTA staff will count pedestrians at 25 locations Citywide and collect valuable data that will help SFMTA determine where pedestrians are most at risk based upon pedestrian volumes and collision history. SFMTA will begin work in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11 and complete the project scope in the 4 th quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11. This request represents the second year of funding for this project through Prop K. In September 2009, the Authority allocated $55,000 to SFMTA to fund this project through Resolution 10-17, Project number The first allocation of Prop K funds has funded purchase of six automatic pedestrian counters, leveraging $29,000 in Red Light Camera funds which funded manual counts. The count locations were chosen based on a number of factors, including locations with high pedestrian volumes, locations with high numbers of pedestrian collisions, locations where major improvements are planned, and locations where previous counts have been conducted. The first Prop K allocation is also supporting rotation of counters and data collection and validation to incorporate the counts into the pedestrian exposure model that is planned for development by the end of A summary of the accomplishments from the first year of the program, showing the 25 manual and automated count locations and results of the manual counts conducted in September 2009, is attached. As awareness and concern about the relationship between transportation choices, global warming and public health grows, transportation agencies are finding an increasing need for pedestrian mobility data. In San Francisco, data about the number of people walking could be used to measure the progress of City policies and sustainability goals, determine the effect of pedestrian infrastructure improvements, measure the mode split between the City s transportation options, forecast future pedestrian demand, and determine pedestrian collision exposure rates. The exposure rate is the number of vehicle-pedestrian collisions at a specific location over a given period of time, divided by the estimated total pedestrian volume over that same period. The exposure rate is a better indicator of pedestrian safety than simple collision history because it takes into account pedestrian volumes when comparing intersection safety. The SFMTA Pedestrian Counting Project will collect data on pedestrian volumes in order to calculate exposure rates, model pedestrian activity, and help prioritize future transportation improvements. Prop K funds will be used to fund counts at 25 locations throughout the city. These locations are in addition to the 25 locations where manual counts were taken in September 2009 and automatic counters are currently being rotated. Fehr & Peers, the consultant who is developing the model, is recommending counting at 25 new locations for the model to be more useful and robust. SFMTA staff will also work with the Authority staff to explore a possibility of using summer interns to rotate automatic counters at as many locations as possible to maximize the utility of the counters and improve the quality of the model. The data collected through these counts will be analyzed and summarized in a 2010 Pedestrian Counting Project Report and will feed into the pedestrian exposure model. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project Scope F.doc Page 2 of 14

49 47 Prioritization This project is included in the Year Prioritization Program for Expenditure Plan Line Item 40, Pedestrian Circulation and Safety. The project is listed and described under the subcategory titled, City-Wide Safety and Circulation Improvements. This project is consistent with the policy recommendations given in the Draft Better Streets Plan, which was developed as a joint effort between multiple city agencies with extensive public outreach. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project Scope F.doc Page 3 of 14

50 48 Attachment: Locations and results of 2009 Manual Counts The following table shows the 25 count locations and the results of the manual counts conducted in September automatic counters have been procured and have begun to be rotated among the 25 locations. Street Cross Street Date AM/PM 2 Hr Volume Peak Hour Peak Hr Volume 3rd Street Howard 9/8/ PM pm th Street Market 9/17/ PM pm th Street Market 9/16/ PM :30-5:30pm th Street Mission 9/16/ PM :15-5: th Street Folsom 9/17/ AM am 820 8th Street Market 9/17/ PM pm th Ave Irving 9/15/ AM am th Street Mission 9/15/ AM am th Street Castro 9/10/ PM pm th Ave Taraval 9/9/ PM pm th Street Castro 9/15/ PM :15-5:15pm th Ave Geary 9/9/ AM 765 7:45-8:45am th Ave Ulloa 9/9/ AM 44 7:15-8:15am 24 Bayshore Cortland 9/16/ AM 114 7:30-8:30am 70 Beach Hyde 9/16/ PM :15-5:15pm 2226 Chestnut Steiner 9/15/ PM pm 745 Divisadero Geary 9/10/ PM pm 993 Embarcadero Washington 9/10/ PM pm 570 Geary Laguna 9/16/ AM 487 7:30-8:30am 294 Geneva Ocean 9/10/ PM 808 4:15-5:15pm 414 Golden Gate Jones 9/17/ AM am 650 Ingalls Palou 9/17/ PM pm 33 JFK Stanyan 9/17/ PM pm 438 Mission Silver 9/17/ PM :15-5:15pm 730 Randall San Jose 9/16/ AM am 429 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, Update Page 4 of 14

51 49 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Pedestrian Counting MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /11 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /12 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /12 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 2-Schedule Page 5 of 14

52 50 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Pedestrian Counting MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K - Current Total Cost Request $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $25,000 $25,000 Source of Cost Estimate SFMTA Staff, based on 2009 effort Expected Useful Life: 7 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 3-Cost Page 6 of 14

53 51 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Project Breakdown Labor (manual counts) $ 22,753 Subtotal $ 22,753 Contingency 10% $ 2,275 Total $ 25,028 $25,000 Round down; 100% Prop K funded Summary by Phase Base Incl. Contingency Planning $ 22,753 $ 25,028 Total $ 22,753 $ 25,028 SFMTA Labor - Detail Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Assistant Engineer $ 92, $ 219, $ 16,903 Associate Engineer $ 107, $ 255, $ 2, Transit Planner IV $ 115, $ 274, $ 1,585 Engineer Principal $ 180, $ 427, $ 2,055 Total $ 22,753 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 7 of 14

54 52 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Pedestrian Counting MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $25,000 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $25,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $1,088,000 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds programmed in FY 2010/11 for the Pedestrian Counting project from the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category in FY 2010/11. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax $25,000 $25,000 Total: $25,000 $25,000 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 25.39% $25,000 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 5-Funding Page 8 of 14

55 53 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source $ Amount Required Local Match % $ FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Total: Planned Programmed Allocated Total Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 25.39% Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $25,000 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 $25, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: $25,000 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 5-Funding Page 9 of 14

56 54 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Pedestrian Counting Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $25,000 Phase: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $25,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Maximum % Fiscal Year Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 $25, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 00% $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Total: $25, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 Planning/Conceptual Engineering $25, % 100% 100% 100% 100% Total: $25,000 Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2011 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 6-Authority Rec Page 10 of 14

57 55 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Pedestrian Counting Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide percent complete of the scope of work in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA) With the first quarterly progress report (anticipated ), provide a list of final locations where counts will be taken. Upon project completion, provide a memorandum detailing the summary and analysis of the pedestrian counts and results of the pedestrian exposure model run incorporating the counts, including the analysis of the difference between 2009 and 2010 counts if applicable. 4. Upon project completion, provide a list as well as an electronic version of a GIS map and accompanying GIS shapefiles (compatible with the Authority's GIS software) that shows the geographic g locations where counts have taken place. Special Conditions: 1. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. Notes: 1. Once MTA establishes regular data collection and analysis procedures, MTA and Authority staff should discuss protocol for sharing this data with the Authority and with other agencies to support improved transportation planning in the City. 2. Citywide Prop K proportion of % Supervisorial District(s): expenditures - this phase: Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 6-Authority Rec Page 11 of 14

58 56 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Volumes from Sept 2009 Counts P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 7-Maps.etc Page 12 of 14

59 Pedestrian Volumes (sorted by Peak Hr Volume) Street Cross Street Date AM/PM 2 HR Volume Peak Hour Peak Hr Volume 4th Street Market 9/17/ PM pm th Street Market 9/17/ PM pm th Street Market 9/16/ PM :30-5:30pm 3118 Beach Hyde 9/16/ PM :15-5:15pm th Street Mission 9/15/ AM am rd Street Howard 9/8/ PM pm th Street Mission 9/16/ PM :15-5: Divisadero Geary 9/10/ AM am th Street Castro 9/10/ PM pm 844 7th Street Folsom 9/17/ AM am 820 Chestnut Steiner 9/15/ PM pm 745 Mission Silver 9/17/ PM :15-5:15pm th Street Castro 9/15/ PM :15-5:15pm 683 9th Ave Irving 9/15/ AM am 682 Golden Gate Jones 9/17/ AM am 650 Embarcadero Washington 9/10/ PM pm th Ave Geary 9/9/ AM 765 7:45-8:45am 473 JFK Stanyan 9/17/ PM pm 438 Randall San Jose 9/16/ AM am 429 Geneva Ocean 9/10/ PM 808 4:15-5:15pm th Ave Taraval 9/9/ PM pm 412 Geary Laguna 9/16/ AM 487 7:30-8:30am 294 Bayshore Cortland 9/16/ AM 114 7:30-8:30am 70 Ingalls Palou 9/17/ PM pm 33 34th Ave Ulloa 9/9/ AM 44 7:15-8:15am 24 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 7-Maps.etc Page 13 of 14

60 58 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Current Request: $25,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Pedestrian Counting MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Oliver Gajda Title: Pedestrian Program Manager Phone: (415) Fax: Oliver.Gajda@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Margurite A. Fuller Mgr., Grants Procurement and Adm. (415) (415) Margurite.Fuller@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Pedestrian Counting Project F, 8-Signatures Page 14 of 14

61 59 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: c. Pedestrian Circulation/Safety EP Line Number (Primary): 40 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s): Citywide $130,000 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7- Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see attached MS Word document. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 1-Scope Page 1 of 15

62 60 Scope and Project Benefits The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests a Prop K allocation of $130,000 to fund the design and construction of the conversion of standard crosswalks to continental crosswalks to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at 12 strategic locations Citywide. SFMTA will start the project in the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11 and complete it by the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2011/12. SFMTA Pedestrian Program staff will perform the work for all phases except for construction, which will be done by the SFMTA Paint and Sign Shop staff. This request represents the second year of funding for this project through Prop K. In September 2009, the Authority allocated $80,000 to SFMTA to fund this project through Resolution 10-17, project number The first year s allocation is being used to implement conversions of 14 crosswalks at 8 locations Citywide. SFMTA is planning to implement the conversions funded with the Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K allocation concurrently with those proposed for the Fiscal Year 2010/11 allocation to coordinate intersections with a comparable ranking and in a close proximity. In addition, SFMTA has completed 46 crosswalk conversions at 36 locations, accompanied by yield lines and signs, with non-prop K Fiscal Year 2009/10 funds. Through the combined efforts of the MTA and the Authority, approximately one third of the total 180 identified locations will be converted after SFMTA completes the proposed Fiscal Year 2010/11 Prop K project. A summary of the accomplishments from the first year of the program is attached. The standard treatment for marked crosswalks consists of two 12 -wide white retro-reflective thermoplastic stripes, usually installed roughly perpendicular to the street curb. Standard crosswalks are located throughout the City to alert drivers to expect crossing pedestrians and to direct pedestrians to desirable crossing locations. Through the planning process for the Better Streets Plan, SFMTA has drafted Crosswalk Guidelines that stipulate a policy of further enhancing pedestrian visibility at uncontrolled locations by installing continental crosswalks where marked crosswalks are warranted. Continental crosswalks consist of a series of wide stripes parallel to the curb for the length of the crossing. Because of the low approach angle at which pavement markings are viewed, the use of stripes longitudinal to the roadway in addition to or in place of the standard transverse markings can increase the visibility of a crosswalk to oncoming traffic. The SFMTA Crosswalk Guidelines further recommend that continental crosswalks at uncontrolled locations should be accompanied by additional measures such as advanced yield lines and yield here to ped signs. Advanced yield lines consist of a single row of white triangles placed across each approach to indicate the point at which vehicles must yield in advance of an uncontrolled marked crosswalk location. Additionally, at locations with high speed limits and high average daily traffic (ADT), in-street yield to pedestrian signs, medians or islands, and flashing beacons would be considered. During the first year of funding for this project, all uncontrolled locations on arterials with standard crosswalks were ranked for conversion to continental crosswalks. Locations were ranked based on: higher speeds, nearby pedestrian generators and a history of pedestrian collisions. Additionally, several locations due to their proximity to higher ranked intersections were selected for conversion. Moving forward, locations for conversion will be drawn from this ranked list. SFMTA will implement the recommendations from the Better Streets Plan with crosswalk conversions and accompanying yield lines and signs at approximately 12 locations, including: crosswalks (some locations only have one marked crosswalk) yield lines yield signs (1 sign per yield line, 2 signs where there is a raised median). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks Scope F.doc Page 2 of 15

63 61 The proposed project will be complemented by the installation of red curb zones at selected locations that will be funded by the Prop K allocation for the Red Visibility Curbs Project. The locations will be chosen from the ranked Continental Crosswalk list submitted under the previous Prop K allocation from Fiscal Year 2009/10. The attached table shows a preliminary list of locations being considered for implementation. This list is subject to change upon unforeseen factors, such as a change in the street paving schedule. Intersections on this preliminary list that require further special treatments, such as traffic control devices and street changes, will be set aside for a future Prop K allocation request for more extensive capital improvements and replaced with alternative intersections on the ranked list. Prioritization This project is included in the Year Prioritization Program for Expenditure Plan Line Item 40, Pedestrian Circulation and Safety. The project is listed and described under the subcategory titled, City-Wide Safety and Circulation Improvements. This project is consistent with the policy recommendations given in the Draft Better Streets Plan, which was developed as a joint effort between multiple city agencies with extensive public outreach. Furthermore, this project implements specific measures described in the Draft Better Streets Plan to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks Scope F.doc Page 3 of 15

64 62 Attachment: Locations for Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks Locations being converted with Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K funds Intersection Arterial Street Crosswalks Converted 1 Yield Lines Yield Signs 2 1 Geneva London Mission St Farragut Alemany Foote Alemany Niagara Columbus Francisco Geary Cook Mission St Ney Noriega 32nd Ave Locations converted with Fiscal Year 2009/10 non-prop K funds 3 Intersection Arterial Street 1 Lincoln 3rd Ave 2 Lincoln 11th Ave 3 Lincoln 15th Ave 4 Lincoln 17th Ave 5 Lincoln 21st Ave 6 Lincoln 23rd Ave 7 Lincoln 27th Ave 8 Lincoln 29th Ave 9 Lincoln 31st Ave 10 Lincoln 33rd Ave 11 Lincoln 34th Ave 12 Lincoln 35th Ave 13 Lincoln 47th Ave 14 Fulton 26th Ave 15 Fulton 32nd Ave 16 Fulton 33rd Ave 17 Fulton 34th Ave 18 Fulton 37th Ave 19 Fulton 38th Ave 20 Fulton 40th Ave 21 Fulton 42nd Ave 22 Fulton 44th Ave 23 Fulton 46th Ave 24 Fulton 48th Ave P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, Update Page 4 of 15

65 63 25 Alemany Lawrence 26 Alemany Orizaba/ Sagamore Sickles- crossing to 27 Alemany island 28 Geary 35th Ave 29 Geary 37th Ave 30 Geary 38th Ave 31 Geary 39th Ave 32 Geary Commonwealth/Beaumont 33 Mission Oliver/Lawrence 34 Silver Goettingen 35 Silver Holyoke/ Boylston 36 Silver Somerset Locations to be converted with Fiscal Year 2010/11 Prop K funds (preliminary) Intersection Arterial Street Crosswalks to be Converted 1 Yield Lines Yield Signs 2 1 Ocean Granada Silver Girard/ Barneveld Silver Brussels Stanyan Fell Alemany Rousseau Geneva Athens Sloat 26th Ave Alemany Naglee Alemany Tingley Fulton 24th Ave Fulton 20th Ave Fulton 17th Ave Some intersections have only one marked crosswalk. 2 The number of yield signs depends on the number of crosswalks and presence of a raised median. 3 With MTA's Fiscal Year 2009/10 non-prop K funds, MTA installed 46 staggered crosswalks with accompanying yield lines and signs at 36 locations. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, Update Page 5 of 15

66 64 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additional schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /11 Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /11 N/A N/A Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /12 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /13 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. The Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks project is being coordinated with the Red Visibility Curbs project. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 2-Schedule Page 6 of 15

67 65 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Total Cost $45,000 $85,000 Prop K - Current Request $45,000 $85,000 $130,000 $130,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $45,000 $85,000 $130,000 Source of Cost Estimate SFMTA Staff SFMTA Staff Expected Useful Life: 7 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 3-Cost Page 7 of 15

68 66 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks Allocation Request Project Breakdown Labor $ 100,869 Materials $ 17,376 Subtotal $ 118,245 Contingency 10% $ 11,824 Total $ 130,069 $130,000 Round down; 100% Prop K funded Summary by Phase Base Incl. Contingency Design $ 40,984 $ 45,082 Round down to $45,000 Construction $ 77,261 $ 84,988 Round up to $85,000 Total $ 118,245 $ 130,069 Labor - Design Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Assistant Engineer $ 92, $ 219, $ 29,580 Associate Engineer $ 107, $ 255, $ 7,368 Transit Planner IV $ 115, $ 274, $ 1,981 Engineer Principal $ 180, $ 427, $ 2,055 Total - Design $ 40,984 Labor - Construction Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Engineering Associate $ 77, $ 184, $ 888 Painter $ 74, $ 177, $ 48,531 Painter Sup $ 89, $ 212, $ 6,636 Traffic Survey Technician $ 68, $ 161, $ 1,165 Supervisor, Traffic & Street Signs $ 89, $ 212, $ 817 Sign Worker $ 62, $ 147, $ 1,849 Total - Construction $ 59,885 Total - Labor $ 100,869 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 8 of 15

69 67 Materials - Detail Item Cost per item Quantity Cost Continental Crosswalk $ $5,700 Yield Teeth $ $6,240 Yield Signs $ $5,436 Total- Materials $17,376 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 9 of 15

70 68 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $130,000 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $130,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $1,088,000 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds programmed in FY 2010/11 for Converting Crosswalks ($55,000) plus the amount programmed for Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements (an undesignated line item under the Citywide Safety and Circulation Improvements subcategory) ($75,000) in the 5YPP for the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category in FY 2010/11. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax Total: Planned Programmed $130,000 $130,000 Allocated Total $130,000 $130,000 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 25.39% $130,000 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 5-Funding Page 10 of 15

71 69 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source $ Amount Required Local Match % $ FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Total: Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 25.39% Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Authority staff is recommending 50%/50% cash flow to be consistent with the 5YPP and Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $130,000 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 $65,000 $65, % 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $65,000 Total: $130,000 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 5-Funding Page 11 of 15

72 70 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $45,000 Allocation $85,000 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $130,000 Multi-phase allocation is ok for straightforward scope and relatively short duration of design phase. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Maximum % Fiscal Year Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 $65, % $65, FY 2011/12 $65, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 00% $65,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130, Total: $130, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 Design Engineering (PS&E) $45,000 35% $85, FY 2010/11 Construction $20,000 50% $65, FY 2011/12 Construction $65, % 100% 100% Total: $130,000 Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 12/31/2012 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 6-Authority Rec Page 12 of 15

73 71 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide percent complete of the scope of work, a list of locations completed during the preceding quarter, and the total number of completed locations to date, in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA). 2. Upon completion of design (anticipated ), provide 2-3 digital photos of initial conditions. 3. Upon completion of design (anticipated ), provide evidence of completion of design. See Special Condition Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital photos of after conditions. 5. Upon project completion, provide a list as well as an electronic version of a GIS map and accompanying GIS shapefiles (compatible with the Authority's GIS software) that shows the geographic locations that have been completed. Special Conditions: 1. MTA may not incur expenses for the construction phase until Authority staff releases the funds ($85,000), pending receipt of Deliverable 3, evidence of completion of design. 2. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. 3. Notes: 1. Citywide Prop K proportion of % Supervisorial District(s): expenditures - this phase: Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 6-Authority Rec Page 13 of 15

74 72 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Crosswalk Samples P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 7-Maps.etc Page 14 of 15

75 73 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Current Request: $130,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Oliver Gajda Title: Pedestrian Program Manager Phone: (415) Fax: Oliver.Gajda@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Margurite A. Fuller Mgr., Grants Procurement and Adm. (415) (415) Margurite.Fuller@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Converting Crosswalks F, 8-Signatures Page 15 of 15

76 74 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

77 75 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Red Visibility Curbs MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: c. Pedestrian Circulation/Safety EP Line Number (Primary): 40 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s): Citywide $30,000 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7- Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was prioritized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see attached MS Word document. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 1-Scope Page 1 of 15

78 76 Scope and Project Benefits The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests a Prop K allocation of $30,000 to fund the evaluation, design, and construction phases of the Red Visibility Curb project. SFMTA will install 35 red zones Citywide to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at strategic locations. The proposed project will restrict parking near selected intersections to increase mutual visibility between cars and pedestrians. Red zones adjacent to crosswalks will also improve access to curb ramps. The proposed request represents the second year of the Prop K funding of the Red Visibility project. In September 2009, the Authority allocated $30,000 to SFMTA through the Citywide Pedestrian Safety and Circulation Improvements project in Resolution (Project Number ). SFMTA has attached a summary of the accomplishments of the first allocation for the Red Visibility Curb project. SFMTA plans to finish installing 50 red zones funded with the Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K allocation by third quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11. After reassessing project costs and complexity of the project design based on its experience in Fiscal Year 2009/10, SFMTA has reflected a higher cost per location in Fiscal Year 2010/11, partly because it plans to implement a greater number of locations with potential parking removal. SFMTA proposes to start the design phase of the subject project while it is completing the construction phase of the Fiscal Year 2009/10 project. Section 3B.18 of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) includes a recommendation of removing parking on both the near and far side of all intersections. In San Francisco, due to limited on-street parking supply and high demand, the long-standing historical practice has been to allow parking up to intersections unless there are location-specific grounds for parking removal. The SFMTA Crosswalk Guidelines, developed as part of the planning process for the Better Streets Plan, recommend that a 10-foot red zone be painted on all crosswalk approach legs. Furthermore, SFMTA will consider installing red zones longer than 10 feet, or red zones on the departure leg of intersections, if engineering judgment indicates they would be beneficial and feasible. SFMTA will select 35 locations for Red Visibility Curb enhancements to improve pedestrian safety and to restrict parking at intersections citywide. Locations will be coordinated with current Prop K funded projects including Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks, to further enhance pedestrian safety at selected locations. For the first year allocation for the Red Visibility Curb project, SFMTA Pedestrian Program staff began to identify candidate locations for conversion to continental crosswalks. All of these locations were also analyzed for red zones as the two treatments are complementary. Where red zones were not already present, staff noted the number of needed red zones, the appropriate length, and the amount of parking that would need to be removed. As these locations are converted from standard to continental crosswalks, the additional red zones will be implemented. Thus, the ranking of these red zones reflects the already approved ranking of continental crosswalks. The attachment shows proposed locations for red zones. SFMTA staff will also evaluate and implement red zones at locations requested by the public and other SFMTA staff. SFMTA estimates that up to 4-6 of the 35 locations will be identified through public requests, and the remainder will be chosen from continental crosswalk locations. Public requests will be accepted through the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11 and should be directed to the Pedestrian Program website at SFMTA will prioritize requests from the public based on engineering evaluations and geographic distribution. SFMTA will perform an engineering study at each chosen location to determine the appropriate length of the red zone and what actions must be taken to establish the red zone, such as parking meter removal. Where red zones will require the removal of parking, SFMTA will perform outreach by issuing public notice and P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs Scope F.doc Page 2 of 15

79 77 community members will be given the opportunity to comment at a public hearing. Red zones do not need to go through the Transportation Advisory Staff Committee (TASC) as long as they are 10 or shorter. SFMTA will start the project in the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11 with plans for completion by December The SFMTA Pedestrian Program staff will be doing the work for the evaluation and design phases of the project. The SFMTA Paint Shop will be performing the construction phase work. Prioritization The Red Visibility Curb project is included in the Year Prioritization Program for Expenditure Plan Line Item 40, Pedestrian Circulation and Safety. The project is listed and described under the subcategory titled, City-Wide Safety and Circulation Improvements. This project is consistent with the policy recommendations given in the Draft Better Streets Plan, which was developed as a joint effort between multiple city agencies with extensive public outreach. Furthermore, this project implements specific measures described in the Draft Better Streets Plan to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs Scope F.doc Page 3 of 15

80 78 Attachment: List of Locations for Red Visibility Curbs Pedestrian Program staff began the planning portion of this project in the 2nd quarter of 2009/10. After identifying candidate locations for conversion to continental crosswalks (through a separate Standard Grant Agreement), all locations were analyzed for red zones. Where red zones were not already present, staff noted the number of needed red zones, the appropriate length, and the amount of parking that would need to be removed. As these locations are converted from standard to continental crosswalks, the additional red zones will be implemented. Thus, the ranking of these red zones mirrors the already approved ranking of continental crosswalks but may be modified upon a closer inspection of the intersections. Staff will also implement red zones requested by the public and other SFMTA staff. An engineering evaluation is required before a red zone requested by the public will be implemented. Red Zones that will be implemented along with the first round (Fiscal Year 2009/10) of Continental Crosswalk conversions (without any parking removal) Intersection # Arterial Street # of Proposed Red Zones 1 Geneva London 3 2 Lincoln 34th Ave already has red zones 3 Mission St Farragut 3 4 Lincoln 27th Ave 2 5 Alemany Foote already has red zones 6 Alemany Niagara already has red zones 7 Columbus Francisco already has red zones 8 Geary Cook 1 9 Mission Farragut 2 10 Lincoln 27th Ave 2 11 Geary 37th Ave 1 12 Mission Ney 1 13 Alemany Orizaba/Sagamore 3 14 Fulton 14th Ave 1 15 Fulton 46th Ave 1 16 Fulton 16th Ave 1 17 Fulton 32nd Ave 1 18 Fulton 33rd Ave 1 19 Fulton 38th Ave 1 20 Fulton 48th Ave 1 21 Fulton 17th Ave 3 22 Fulton 26th Ave 1 23 Fulton 2nd Ave 3 24 Fulton 42nd Ave 1 25 Fulton 5th Ave 2 26 Fulton North Willard 1 27 Fulton 4th Ave 2 28 Fulton 12th Ave 2 29 Fulton 40th Ave 1 30 Fulton 24th Ave 1 31 Fulton 34th Ave 1 32 Fulton 44th Ave 1 33 Geary 38th Ave 1 34 Lincoln 23rd Ave 1 35 Lincoln 11th Ave 1 Total 47 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, Update Page 4 of 15

81 79 Red Zones that will be implemented along with the first round (Fiscal Year 2009/10) of Continental Crosswalk conversions (with potential parking removal) # of unmetered Intersection # Street 1 Street 2 # of Proposed Red Zones # of metered spaces removed spaces removed (nearby driveway) 36 Geneva London Geary Cook Mission Ney Noriega 32nd Ave Silver Girard/Barneveld Geneva Athens Alemany Tingley Geary 35th Ave Geary Commonwealth/ Beaumont 2 2 Total Requests for Red Zones from the public and SFMTA staff Intersection # Street 1 Street 2 # of Proposed Red Zones 45 25th Ave Ortega at least 1 46 Page Stanyan at least 1 Total 2 Red Zones that will be implemented along with the second round (Fiscal Year 2010/11) of Continental Crosswalk conversions (without parking removal) Intersection # Arterial Street # of Proposed Red Zones 47 Geary 37th Ave 1 48 Mission St Ney 2 49 Noriega 32nd Ave 1 50 Ocean Granada already has red zones 51 Silver Girard/ Barneveld 1 52 Silver Brussels 1 53 Stanyan Fell already has red zones 54 Alemany Rousseau already has red zones 55 Geneva Athens 1 56 Sloat 26th Ave already has red zones 57 Alemany Naglee already has red zones 58 Alemany Tingley 1 59 Alemany Lawrence already has red zones 60 Lincoln 29th Ave 1 61 Lincoln 47th Ave 1 62 Lincoln 33rd Ave 2 63 Lincoln 17th Ave 1 64 Lincoln 15th Ave 1 65 Lincoln 31st Ave 2 66 Silver Goettingen 1 67 Silver Lisbon 1 68 Sloat 21st Ave 1 69 Stanyan Page 1 70 Taraval 31st Ave 2 71 Taraval 33rd Ave 1 72 Taraval 38th Ave 2 73 Cortland Prentiss 1 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, Update Page 5 of 15

82 80 Total 26 Red Zones that will be implemented along with the second round (Fiscal Year 2010/11) of Continental Crosswalk conversions (with potential parking removal) # of unmetered Intersection # Street 1 Street 2 # of Proposed Red Zones # of metered spaces removed spaces removed (nearby driveway) 74 Lincoln 29th Ave Lincoln 47th Ave Noriega 37th Ave Oakdale Barneveld Silver Goettingen Mission Park Noriega 21st Ave Silver Lisbon Silver Naples Taraval 23rd Ave Taraval 20th Ave Taraval 16th Ave Taraval 29th Ave Total GRAND TOTAL P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, Update Page 6 of 15

83 81 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Red Visibility Curbs MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) / /11 Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /11 N/A N/A Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /12 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /12 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. The Red Visibility Curbs project is being coordinated with the Converting Standard Crosswalks to Continental Crosswalks project. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 2-Schedule Page 7 of 15

84 82 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Red Visibility Curbs MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K - Current Total Cost Request $23,000 $7,000 $23,000 $7,000 $30,000 $30,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $23,000 $7,000 $30,000 Source of Cost Estimate SFMTA Staff, based on prior work SFMTA Staff, based on prior work Expected Useful Life: 7 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 3-Cost Page 8 of 15

85 83 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Allocation Request Red Visibility Curbs Project Breakdown Labor $ 24,536 Materials $ 2,800 Subtotal $ 27,336 Contingency 10% $ 2,734 Total $ 30,070 $30,000 Round down; 100% Prop K funded Summary by Phase Base Incl. Contingency Design $ 20,687 $ 22,756 23,000 Round up Construction $ 6,649 $ 7,314 7,000 Round down Total $ 27,336 $ 30,070 30,000 Round down Labor - Design Engineering Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Assistant Engineer $ 92, $ 219, $ 13,628 Associate Engineer $ 107, $ 255, $ 3,684 Transit Planner IV $ 115, $ 274, $ 1,321 Engineer Principal $ 180, $ 427, $ 2,055 Total - Design Engineering $ 20,687 Labor- Construction Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Painter $ 74, $ 177, $ 2,554 Painter Sup $ 89, $ 212, $ 510 Parking Meter Repairer $ 68, $ 163, $ 784 Total - Construction $ 3,849 Total - Labor $24,536 Materials - Detail Item $/Linear ft. Quantity Total Red Curb Paint $ $ 2,800 Total $2,800 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 9 of 15

86 84 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Red Visibility Curbs MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $30,000 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $30,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $1,088,000 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds programmed in FY 2010/11 for Red Visibility Curbs from the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category in FY 2010/11. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax $30, $30, Total: $30,000 $30,000 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 25.39% $30,000 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 5-Funding Page 10 of 15

87 85 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source $ Amount Required Local Match % $ FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax Total: Planned Programmed $30,000 $30,000 Allocated Total $30,000 $30,000 Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 25.39% $30,000 Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $30,000 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 $15, % $15,000 FY 2011/12 $15, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: $30,000 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 5-Funding Page 11 of 15

88 86 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Red Visibility Curbs Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $23,000 Allocation $7,000 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $30,000 Multi-phase allocation is ok for straightforward scope and relatively short duration of design phase. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Maximum % Fiscal Year Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 $15, % $15, FY 2011/12 $15, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 00% $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30, Total: $30, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable 40 FY 2010/11 Design Engineering (PS&E) $15, FY 2011/12 Design Engineering (PS&E) $8, FY 2011/12 Construction $7,000 Total: $30,000 Balance 50% $15,000 77% $7, % 100% 100% Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 6/30/2012 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 6-Authority Rec Page 12 of 15

89 87 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: Red Visibility Curbs Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide percent complete of the scope of work, a list of locations for which a work order has been issued during the preceding quarter, and the total number of locations being implemented to date, in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA). 2. Upon completion of design (anticipated ), provide a list of changes to be implemented per location (e.g. number of parking meter removal). 3. Upon completion of design (anticipated ), provide 2-3 digital photos of initial conditions. 4. Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital photos of after conditions. 5. Upon project completion, provide a list as well as an electronic version of a GIS map and accompanying GIS shapefiles (compatible with the Authority's GIS software) that shows the geographic locations that have been completed. Special Conditions: 1. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. 2. Notes: 1. Citywide Prop K proportion of % Supervisorial District(s): expenditures - this phase: Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 6-Authority Rec Page 13 of 15

90 88 MAPS AND DRAWINGS Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process. This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics. Examples of Red Curbs P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 7-Maps.etc Page 14 of 15

91 89 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Current Request: $30,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: Red Visibility Curbs MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Oliver Gajda Title: Pedestrian Program Manager Phone: (415) Fax: Oliver.Gajda@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Margurite A. Fuller Mgr., Grants Procurement and Adm. (415) (415) Margurite.Fuller@sfmta.com Address: 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA South Van Ness Avenue, 8th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Red Visibility Curbs F, 8-Signatures Page 15 of 15

92 90 This Page Intentionally Left Blank

93 91 FY of Allocation Action: 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: School Crosswalk Maintenance MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION C. Street & Traffic Safety iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: c. Pedestrian Circulation/Safety EP Line Number (Primary): 40 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: Supervisorial District(s): Citywide $75,000 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7- Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs. Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account. Please see attached MS Word document. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 1-Scope Page 1 of 13

94 92 Scope and Project Benefits The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) requests a Prop K allocation of $75,000 to fund the planning and design phases of the re-striping of crosswalks at approximately 25 locations citywide. SFMTA will enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at strategic locations by restriping existing faded continental crosswalks located near schools Citywide. Intersections will be chosen by SFMTA Pedestrian Program staff based upon need and geographical distribution, ensuring re-striped crosswalks are not scheduled to be repaved in the near future. Marked crosswalks are an essential part of the pedestrian realm that enables safe, convenient pedestrian travel across roadways. Per California state law, all crosswalks in the vicinity of schools must be painted yellow. In San Francisco, SFMTA has elected to even further enhance the visibility of school crosswalks by adding horizontal stripes in a continental style. Continental crosswalks consist of a series of wide stripes parallel to the curb for the length of the crossing. There are continental school crosswalks at 989 intersections citywide. Each crosswalk has a life cycle of about 7 years, after which it must be repainted to maintain visibility. This request represents the third year of funding for this project through Prop K. In September 2009, the Authority allocated $75,000 to SFMTA to fund this project through Resolution 10-17, Project number A list of 30 crosswalk locations funded with the Fiscal Year 2009/10 allocation is attached. SFMTA anticipates that restriping at these locations will be completed by September SFMTA proposes to select the locations to be funded with the Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K allocation during the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2010/11 and to begin restriping at the selected locations as soon as the prior locations are completed. The selection of locations will be done by SFMTA Pedestrian Program staff, and the re-striping will be done by SFMTA Paint Shop staff. The unit cost per location has increased in Fiscal Year 2010/11 to reflect the MTA s recent reassessment of project costs and incorporation of planning work into the project budget. Prioritization This project is included in the Year Prioritization Program for Expenditure Plan Line Item 40, Pedestrian Circulation and Safety. The project is listed and described under the subcategory titled, Crosswalks. This project is consistent with the policy recommendations given in the Draft Better Streets Plan, which was developed as a joint effort between multiple city agencies with extensive public outreach. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance Scope F.doc Page 2 of 13

95 93 Attachment: Locations of crosswalks being implemented with the Fiscal Year 2009/10 Prop K funding Street 1 Street th Ave Geary 2 17th Ave Balboa 3 6th Ave Irving 4 Sunset Pacheco 5 Sunset Ortega 6 Sunset Rivera 7 Church 18th 8 Jules De Montfort 9 Ashton De Montfort 10 Ashton Head 11 Turk Masonic 12 Hayes Pierce 13 24th St San Jose 14 23rd St Guerrero 15 22nd St Bartlett 16 24th St Bartlett 17 24th St Potrero 18 Polk Elm 19 Van Ness Golden Gate 20 Van Ness Turk 21 Ellis Laguna 22 Sutter Laguna 23 Carolina Wisconsin 24 Oakdale Ingalls 25 Harbor Ingalls 26 Columbus Filbert 27 Clay Kearny 28 Washington Kearny 29 Fillmore Jackson 30 California Presidio P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, Update Page 3 of 13

96 94 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: School Crosswalk Maintenance MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Type : Status: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Categorically Exempt N/A Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2010/11). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year Planning/Conceptual Engineering / /11 Environmental Studies (PA&ED) R/W Activities/Acquisition Design Engineering (PS&E) Prepare Bid Documents Advertise Construction N/A N/A Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) /11 N/A N/A Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) N/A N/A /12 Project Closeout (i.e., final expenses incurred) /12 SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 2-Schedule Page 4 of 13

97 95 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: School Crosswalk Maintenance MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Enter the total cost for the phase or partial (but useful segment) phase (e.g. Islais Creek Phase 1 construction) covered by the CURRENT Prop K request. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K - Current Total Cost Request $14,000 $14,000 $61,000 $61,000 $75,000 $75,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate (e.g. 35% design, vendor quote) is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliability the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $14,000 $61,000 $75,000 Source of Cost Estimate SFMTA Staff SFMTA Staff Expected Useful Life: 7 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 3-Cost Page 5 of 13

98 96 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. 5. For construction costs, please include budget details. A sample format is provided below. Please note if work will be performed through a contract. 6. For any contract work, please provide the LBE/SBE/DBE goals as applicable to the contract. Crosswalk Maintenance Allocation Request Construction Breakdown Labor $ 53,223 Materials $ 15,000 Subtotal $ 68,223 Contingency 10% $ 6,822 Total $75,045 $75,000 Round down; 100% Prop K funded Summary by Phase Base Incl. Contingency Planning $13,209 $14,530 Round down to $14,000 Construction $55,014 $60,515 Round up to $61,000 Total $68,223 $75,045 Round down to $75,000 Labor - Evaluation & Selection Position Unburdened Overhead Burdened Salary Multiplier Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost Assistant Engineer $ 92, $ 219, $ 8,451 Associate Engineer $ 107, $ 255, $ 3,070 Transit Planner IV $ 115, $ 274, $ 660 Engineer Principal $ 180, $ 427, $ 1,027 Total - Eval & Selection $ 13,209 Labor - Construction Position Unburdened Salary Painter 74,724 Painter Sup 89,596 Materials - Detail Item Overhead Multiplier Burdened Salary FTE Ratio Hours Cost $ $ 36,441 $ $ 3,573 $ $ ,096 $ ,343 Total ,014 Intersection Cost (4 crossings) Quantity Total Ladder Crosswalk $ $15,000 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 4-Major Line Item Budget Page 6 of 13

99 97 FY 2010/11 Project Name: Implementing Agency: School Crosswalk Maintenance MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $75,000 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $75,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $1,088,000 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels. The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) amount is the amount of Prop K funds programmed in FY 2010/11 for Crosswalks Maintenance from the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category. The Strategic Plan amount is the amount programmed for the entire Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category in FY 2010/11. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Planned Programmed Allocated Total Prop K sales tax $75,000 $75,000 Total: $75,000 $75,000 Actual Leveraging - This Phase: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 0.00% 25.39% $75,000 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 5-Funding Page 7 of 13

100 98 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source $ Amount Required Local Match % $ FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Enter the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Total: Planned Programmed Allocated Total Actual Leveraging - Entire Project: Expected Leveraging per Expenditure Plan 25.39% Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the proposed cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) for the current request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan. Prop K Funds Requested: $75,000 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually Balance FY 2010/11 $75, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total: $75,000 P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 5-Funding Page 8 of 13

101 99 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: School Crosswalk Maintenance Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $14,000 Allocation $61,000 Phase: Planning/Conceptual Engineering Construction Total: Notes (e.g., justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or multi-sponsor recommendations): $75,000 Multi-phase allocation is ok for straightforward scope and relatively short duration of planning phase. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Maximum % Fiscal Year Line Reimbursement Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 $75, % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 00% $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Total: $75, % Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 40 FY 2010/11 Planning/Conceptual Engineering $14,000 19% $61, FY 2010/11 Construction $61, % 100% 100% 100% Total: $75,000 Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2012 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 6-Authority Rec Page 9 of 13

102 100 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: School Crosswalk Maintenance Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. Quarterly progress reports shall provide percent complete of the scope of work, a list of locations for which a work order has been issued during the preceding quarter, and the total number of locations being implemented to date, in addition to the requirements described in the Standard Grant Agreement (SGA). 2. Upon completion of planning (anticipated ), provide 2-3 digital photos of initial conditions. 3. Upon completion of planning (anticipated ), provide a ranked list of locations with a basis for the recommendation. See Special Condition Upon project completion, provide 2-3 digital photos of after conditions. 5. Upon project completion, provide a list as well as an electronic version of a GIS map and accompanying GIS shapefiles (compatible with the Authority's GIS software) that shows the geographic locations that have been completed. Special Conditions: 1. MTA may not incur expenses for the construction phase until Authority staff releases the Prop K construction funds ($61,000) pending receipt of Deliverable Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. 3. Notes: 1. Citywide Prop K proportion of % Supervisorial District(s): expenditures - this phase: Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail. P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 6-Authority Rec Page 10 of 13

103 101 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: School Crosswalk Maintenance Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY1011\ARF Final\MTA-DPT Crosswalk Maintenance F, 6-Authority Rec Page 11 of 13

104 102 Example of a school crosswalk