M:\Meetings\Memo to CAC\2008\01 - Jan 2008\Prop K MTA LRV Vetag Detection.doc Page 2 of 3

Transcription

1

2 time basis. In order to better monitor system performance and optimize TSP for the T-Third and N- Judah lines that utilize 3rd Street and South Embarcadero, the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) is proposing an upgrade to its MIST software so that Vetag loops can be accurately monitored. The purpose of this memorandum is to present the MTA s request for $85,000 in Prop K to implement the LRV Vetag Detection System and to seek a motion of support to allocate the requested funds, with conditions. DISCUSSION Vetag loop failure results in adverse impacts to Muni's light rail on-time performance and safety. When a Vetag detector fails as a vehicle approaches an intersection, traffic signals cannot respond appropriately to oncoming LRVs, forcing them to wait for the next available green signal that would come up in a regular sequence. When a Vetag detector fails as the vehicle leaves the intersection, priority mode will hold the green signal until it times out, preventing the system from responding to subsequent LRV arrivals, and increasing delays for other traffic movements within the intersection. Vetag failure also creates a less safe condition for pedestrians and left turning vehicles because the "Train Coming" Signals are not triggered to warn pedestrians. The MTA s current request for $85,000 will fund a software enhancement to the existing MIST software operated by SFgo to report the status of 243 Vetag loops along the Embarcadero and 3rd Street. Since MIST already communicates with the traffic signal controller software (D4), and D4 communicates with the Vetag detectors, additional MIST features will be developed to monitor and report on the status of Vetag detectors on a real-time basis. The enhanced MIST features will fill the gap that currently exists in regard to pro-actively monitoring and reporting Vetag detector failures. Upon completion of the proposed MIST enhancements, SFgo TMC operators will have the capacity to quickly report any malfunctioning detectors to MTA's Operations Division for the appropriate follow-up. The project will include elements such as an LRV Vetag detector display, LRV detector failure checking and logging displays, and it will allow SFgo to provide LRV headway reporting and LRV status reporting. MTA expects these proposed enhancements to significantly improve LRV service and operations by: 1. Optimizing transit priority along these heavily-used transit corridors 2. Improving Muni's on-time performance by improving system maintenance 3. Reducing operating costs by facilitating maintenance work and reducing down-time 4. Improve pedestrian, traffic, and train safety Once developed, the software can be utilized for additional Muni light rail lines that are upgraded with fiber interconnect and integrated into the SFgo system. The project is scheduled to be completed in early Per Prop K performance monitoring requirements, we have included deliverables requiring on-time status reports for the T-Third and N- Judah lines for existing conditions and after the project in the staff recommendation. Further details on scope, schedule, and budget for the subject project are included in the attached allocation request form. We are seeking a motion of support for the allocation of $85,000 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for the LRV Vetag Detection System, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule. M:\Meetings\Memo to CAC\2008\01 - Jan 2008\Prop K MTA LRV Vetag Detection.doc Page 2 of 3

3 ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $85,000 in Prop K Funds, with conditions, to the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) for the LRV Vetag Detection System, subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule. 2. Adopt a Motion of Support for the Allocation of $85,000 in Prop K Funds, with conditions, to the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) for the LRV Vetag Detection System, subject to the Attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule, with modifications. 3. Defer action, pending additional information or further staff analysis. FINANCIAL IMPACTS This action would allocate $85,000 in Prop K funds to the MTA for the implementation of the LRV Vetag Detection System. A total of $6,325,777 is available for allocation in the BRT/TPS/MUNI Metro Network category for Fiscal Year 2007/08, leaving sufficient funds to accommodate the current request. The allocation would be subject to the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule contained in the attached Allocation Request Form. The recommended cash flow is consistent with the Prop K Strategic Plan, and as such, will not trigger the need for additional financing beyond that already assumed in the Strategic Plan. The Prop K Capital Budget (Attachment 2) shows cash flow distribution schedules for all previously approved allocations and appropriations with cash flow distributions schedules, plus the current staff recommendation, which is the subject of this memorandum. Attachment 3 contains a summary table showing previously approved Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedules and the net change resulting from approval of the proposed recommendation. Sufficient funds are included in the Fiscal Year 2007/08 budget to accommodate the proposed recommendation. Furthermore, sufficient funds will be included in the Fiscal Year 2007/08 budget to cover the recommended cash flow distribution for that fiscal year. Furthermore, sufficient funds will be included in the Fiscal Year 2008/09 budget to cover the recommended cash flow distribution for that fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a motion of support for the allocation of $85,000 in Prop K funds, with conditions, to the MTA for the LRV Vetag Detection System, subject to the attached Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution Schedule. Attachments 1. Allocation Request Form 2. Prop K Capital Budget 3. Prop K Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution - Summary Table M:\Meetings\Memo to CAC\2008\01 - Jan 2008\Prop K MTA LRV Vetag Detection.doc Page 3 of 3

4 FY of Allocation Action: 2007/08 Project Name: Implementing Agency: LRV Vetag Detection System MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Category: Subcategory: EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION A. Transit i. Major Capital Projects (transit) Gray cells will automatically be filled in. EP Project/Program: a.1 Bus Rapid Transit/MUNI Metro Network EP Line Number (Primary): 1 Current Request: Other EP Line Numbers: $85,000 SCOPE Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets. Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Programs. Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan or 5- Year Prioritization Program(s). Indicate work to be performed by outside consultants or force account. Very long scopes may be typed into a separate Word file. This request for $85,000 is to fund a software enhancement to the existing Management Information System for Transportation (MIST) software operated by SFgo to report the status of the Transit Signal Priority (TSP) detection system (Vetag loops) along the Embarcadero and 3rd Street. The scope of the software upgrades will positively impact a 5.4 mile stretch on 3rd Street from 4th & King to Sunnydale (affecting 64 intersections and 195 Vetag loops) and a 2 mile stretch along the Embarcadero from Mission Street to King & 4th Streets (affecting 8 intersections and 48 Vetag loops). The proposed project will immediately benefit passengers on the T and N-lines and benefit F-Line passengers in the future with improved on-time LRV performance. Background The existing Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system implemented along 3rd Street and the Embarcadero is one of the most advanced TSP systems in the nation. This TSP system for light rail vehicles (LRVs) along 3rd Street and South Embarcadero has effectively reduced LRV travel times by 15%-25%, resulting in substantial savings in operating costs, improving transit service for Muni patrons, and minimizing conflicts with other modes of transportation. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 1-Scope Form v Page 1 of 13

5 The key elements of the TSP system are the Vetag loops and Fourth Dimensions' (D4) software running on standard 2070 traffic signal controllers. The Vetag loops are vital to the detection system and are installed under the LRV tracks before (check-in) and after (check-out) each signalized intersection. The loops are wired to the traffic signal controller at each intersection. When a LRV triggers a check-in V-tag detector, an electrical signal is transmitted to the traffic signal controller to modify the signal timing to either hold or call for an early green interval for the LRV to pass through the intersection with no delay. Upon triggering the check-out Vetag detector, the traffic signal terminates the signal priority mode and resumes normal operation. In addition to providing a green signal for the LRV at the next intersection, the traffic signal controller also communicates with traffic signal controllers further downstream via the fiber optic cables, prompting them to prepare for the LRV's arrival and getting them ready to provide a green signal for the LRV as it approaches. All traffic signals along 3rd Street and South Embarcadero are also networked via fiber optic cables to SFgo's Transportation Management Center (TMC), presently located at 25 Van Ness Avenue and operated by MTA- DPT Traffic Engineering staff. SFgo's central system MIST software continually monitors traffic signal operations, and is capable of displaying and reporting system status on a real-time basis. MIST was developed by Telvent-Farradyne, Inc., and was procured and installed as part of SFgo's Initial Phase implementation in The Problem Despite the vital role that the Vetag loops (detectors) play in TSP, MTA's Operations Division currently does not have the resources to pro-actively check and verify the working status of the Vetag detectors on a regular basis. The Vetag loops fail often, at least several times per year, and the failures typically remain undetected for extended periods, resulting in adverse impacts to Muni's light rail on-time performance and safety. When a check in Vetag detector fails, traffic signals cannot respond appropriately to oncoming LRVs, forcing them to wait for the next available green signal that would come up in a regular sequence. When a check-out Vetag detector fails, priority mode will hold the green signal until it times out (maximum threshold is presently set to 255 seconds), preventing the system from responding to subsequent LRV arrivals, and increasing delays for other traffic movements within the intersection. Furthermore, the Vetag detector failures create a less safe condition for pedestrians and left turning vehicles because the "Train Coming" Signals are not triggered to warn pedestrians. The Solution and Scope Since MIST already communicates with the traffic signal controller software (D4), and D4 communicates with the Vetag detectors, additional MIST features will be developed to monitor and report on the status of V-tag detectors on a real-time basis. The enhanced MIST features would fill the gap that currently exists in regard to pro-actively monitoring and reporting Vetag detector failures. Upon completion of the proposed MIST enhancements, SFgo TMC operators will have the capacity to quickly report any malfunctioning detectors to MTA's Operations Division for the appropriate follow-up. MTA-DPT is planning to include the following MIST software enhancements in the 2nd Contract Amendment (Change Order) to the existing MIST Contract with Telvent-Farradyne: 1. LRV Vetag detector display: Display the status of LRV check-in and check-out detectors on site maps on a real-time basis. 2. LRV detector failure checking and logging display: Monitor LRV detector for failure conditions. Failed checkin/check-out detectors will be logged and presented as part of the standard failure report. 3. Priority mode logging: Capture and log each time a traffic signal controller goes through a priority mode change. The beginning and ending of each occurrence will be date-and time-stamped. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 1-Scope Form v Page 2 of 13

6 4. LRV headway reporting: By monitoring the time between LRV check-in requests, compare observed headways against expected headways (plus or minus a tolerance threshold). Expected headways will vary by time and day of week according to the LRV schedule and would be stored in a database table. If headway deviation exceeds the threshold, it will issue an alarm to the SFgo Transportation Management Center operator and show the alarm in the failure report as LRV detector alarm headway out of expected range. 5. LRV status reporting: Provide the ability to create reports combining data from the LRV detector logging, priority mode logging and the headway monitoring. User can select reports by intersection and by time/date to start and end. User can also select reports to highlight only problem areas; e.g., show all occurrences of LRV detector failure for selected intersections between selected time/date points. Benefits MTA expects these proposed enhancements to significantly improve LRV service and operations by: 1. Optimizing transit priority along these heavily-used transit corridors 2. Improving Muni's on-time performance by improving system maintenance 3. Reducing operating costs by facilitating maintenance work and reducing down-time 4. Improve pedestrian, traffic, and train safety Once developed, the software can be utlized for additional Muni light rail lines that are upgraded with fiber interconnect and integrated into the SFgo system. Prioritization Although this project is not specifically identified in the 5YPP for EP1- BRT/TPS Muni Metro Network, it is a component of the "TPS Implementation - Undesignated" line item. The project was prioritized within the MTA by the Muni Operations and Safety Committee and was presented at the MTA-DPT Planning Section Managers' meeting with the concurrence of the MTA-DPT managers from the bicycle and pedestrian programs. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 1-Scope Form v Page 3 of 13

7 FY 2007/08 Project Name: Implementing Agency: LRV Vetag Detection System MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Type : Status: Categorically Exempt Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2007/08). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Advertise Construction Start Construction (e.g., Award Contract) Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use) Start Date End Date Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year / /09 N/A N/A N/A N/A / /09 N/A N/A SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 2-Schedule Form v Page 4 of 13

8 FY 2007/08 Project Name: Implementing Agency: LRV Vetag Detection System MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. In the table below provide information for the CURRENT Prop K request only rather than the total project cost for all phases. For instance, if the request is for Phase 1 of a planning study, just show the total cost for Phase 1 and the amount of Prop K funds requested for Phase 1. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Yes/No Yes Yes Cost for Current Request/Phase Prop K - Current Total Cost Request $8,000 $89,000 $8,000 $77,000 $97,000 $85,000 COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information. Source of cost estimate is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliablity the farther along a project is in its development. Planning/Conceptual Engineering Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Design Engineering (PS&E) R/W Activities/Acquisition Construction Procurement (e.g. rolling stock) Operations Total: Total Cost $8,000 $89,000 $97,000 Source of Cost Estimate MTA estimate based on prior work MTA/Consultant Quote Expected Useful Life: 20 Years Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number). P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 3-Cost Form v Page 5 of 13

9 MAJOR LINE ITEM BUDGET 1. Provide a major line item budget, with subtotals by phase. More detail is required the farther along the project is in the development phase. Planning studies should provide task-level budget information. 2. Requests for project development should include preliminary estimates for later phases such as construction. 3. Support costs and contingencies should be called out in each phase, as appropriate. Provide both dollar amounts and % (e.g. % of construction) for support costs and contingencies. 4. For work to be performed by agency staff rather than consultants, provide base rate, overhead multiplier, and fully burdened rates by position with FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio. A sample format is provided below. Detail Planning and Design Phase Position Unburdened Salary/Hr Overhead Multiplier Fully Burdened hourly rate Hours Total Cost Planner IV $ $ $3, Assistant Eng5203 $ $ $4, Sub total for Planning and Design Phase 70 $7, *Round up to $8,000 Construction Phase Consultant Contract - See detail on following page $ 77,000 Subtotal for consultant $77,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $84, *Round up to $85,000 Authority Note: See Authority Recommendation Section for special condition related to the overhead multiplier. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 4-Major Line Form Item Budget v Page 6 of 13

10 SFgo - MIST Enhancement Telvent - Farrandyn's propsal Total hours: $ per hour Total cost: $80, Contingency (10%) $8, TOTAL: $88, Tasks LRV tasks (hrs.) Non-LRV tasks (hrs.) Shared tasks (hrs.) Total (hrs.) 0 Project managemnet Archive timing sheets* Report Autoscope failure LRV detector display LRV detector Failure checking & loggingdisplay Priority mode logging LRV headway monitoring LRV status reporting Placement & display of overlap and green split timers Documentation & training Installation & testing Total: Funding Needs TASKS Percentage Cost Contingency (10%) Total cost Round-up Funding Sources LRV tasks 86.44% $69, $6, $76, ,000 Prop K Non - LRV taks 13.56% $10, $1, $12, ,000 SFgo Total: % $80, $8, $88, ,000 * Cost not included in Prop K request P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls Page 7 of 13

11 FY 2007/08 Project Name: Implementing Agency: LRV Vetag Detection System MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Prop K Funds Requested: $85,000 5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: $850,000 (enter if appropriate) Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY: $6,555,777 If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greather than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan. This project is a part of the TPS Implementation - Undesignated line item in 5YPP for EP#1 titled, "BRT/TPS/Muni Network" Authority Note: The 5YPP amount is the FY 2007/08 amount programmed for TPS Implementation - Undesignated. The Strategic Plan amount is for the entire BRT/TPS/Muni Metro Network category including $1,805,777 in unallocated prior year funds and $4,750,000 in FY 2007/08 funds. Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax Planned Programmed Allocated Total $85,000 $85,000 Total: $85,000 $85,000 Prop K Match % - Current Request: % $97,000 Total from Cost worksheet P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 5-Funding Form v Page 8 of 13

12 Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? No Fund Source Amount Required Local Match % $ FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES) Entire the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet. Fund Source Prop K sales tax Sfgo Initial Phase funding (incl. Federal Earmark, CMAQ, Prop B local match) Total: Planned Programmed $85,000 $12,000 $97,000 Allocated Total $85,000 $12,000 $97,000 Prop K Match % - Entire Project: 87.63% $97,000 Total from Cost worksheet FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST Use the table below to enter the cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available annually for eligible reimbursements) that you would like for the current allocation request. If the schedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below. Prop K Funds Requested: $85,000 Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution Schedule Fiscal Year % Reimbursed Cash Flow Annually FY 2007/08 $85, % 0% 0% 0% 0% Total: $85,000 Balance P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 5-Funding Form v Page 9 of 13

13 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: LRV Vetag Detection System Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Amount Prop K Recommended: Allocation $8,000 Allocation $77,000 Phase: Design Engineering (PS&E) Construction Total: Notes (e.g.,justificationl for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-ep line item or mult-sponsor recommendations): $85,000 Project primarily involves software development and testing and therefore, is appropriate for a multi-phase allocation. Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP % Fiscal Year Maximum Line Reimbursement Reimbursable 1 FY 2007/08 $40,000 47% 1 FY 2008/09 $45,000 53% 0% 0% 0% Total: $85, % If adjusting from Strategic Plan assumptions, provide detail: Balance $45,000 Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation) EP Line Fiscal Year Phase Maximum Reimbursement Cumulative % Reimbursable Balance 1 FY 2007/08 Design Engineering (PS&E) $3,500 4% $81,500 1 FY 2007/08 Construction See Note $36,500 47% $45,000 1 FY 2008/09 Design Engineering Section (PS&E) Below $3,500 51% $41,500 1 FY 2008/09 Construction $41, % 100% Total: $85,000 Prop K Fund Expiration Date: 3/31/2010 Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date. P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 6-Authority Rec Form v Page 10 of 13

14 AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION This section is to be completed by Authority Staff. Last Updated: Resolution. No. Res. Date: Project Name: LRV Vetag Detection System Implementing Agency: MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Future Commitment to: Action Amount Fiscal Year Phase Trigger: Deliverables: 1. By July 15, 2008 (along with the FY 2007/08 4th Quarter Progress Report), provide an on-time status report for existing conditions on the T-Third and N-Judah lines. 2. Upon project completion, provide evidence of completed, functional project (e.g., 2-3 digital photos or screen print out showing LRV detector failure display). 3. By September 30, 2009 (approximately 6 months after estimated project completion), provide an on-time status report for the T-Third and N-Judah lines Special Conditions: 1. Pending Authority approval of MTA's proposed new overhead multiplier rates, the Authority will only reimburse MTA overhead on labor at the approved rates of 2.22 for DPT and 2.92 for MUNI. 2. Reminder: The MTA would need to request an amendment to the Standard Grant Agreement to expend MTA's ~$8,000 budget on non-labor items. 3. Notes: 1. Regarding the Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution by Phase; cash flow can exceed what is listed above for a given phase as long as the total cash flow for the fiscal year does not exceed $40,000 in FY 2007/08 and $45,000 in FY 2008/ No sub-project detail required. TA Project Reviewer: Project # from SGA: P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 6-Authority Rec Form v Page 11 of 13

15 MAPS AND DRAWINGS P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 7-Maps.etc Form v Page 12 of 13

16 FY of Allocation Action: 2007/08 Current Request: $85,000 Project Name: Implementing Agency: LRV Vetag Detection System MTA - Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT) Signatures By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation. Project Manager Name (typed): Javad Mirabdal Title: Manager, Transit Priority Group Phone: (415) Fax: (415) Javad.Mirabdal@sfmta.com Grants Section Contact Monique Webster Manager, Grants Procurement (415) (415) Monique.Webster@sfmta.com Address: 1 S. Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA 1 S. Van Ness Avenue, 7th FL, San Francisco, CA Please sign in blue ink. Signature: Date: P:\Prop K\FY0708\ARF Final\MTA DPT SFgo LRV Vetag detection system.xls, 8-Signatures Form v Page 13 of 13

17 Attachment 2. Prop K FY 2007/08 Capital Budget Cash Flow Distribution EP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 TRANSIT 1 MTA (DPT) Improving Transit Operation on Van Ness North of North Point $69,400 $34,700 $34,700 1 MTA (DPT) Improving LRV and Pedestrian Safety at 9th Avenue and Irving/Judah - PS&E $60,000 $50,000 $10,000 1 MTA (DPT) Harrison Street Transit Lane between the Embarcadero and First Street $59,000 $59,000 1 MTA (DPT) Carl/Cole Transit Center Feasibility Study $20,000 $20,000 1 MTA (DPT) Market Street - Improve Signal Timing to Improve Transit Operation $45,000 $30,000 $15,000 1 MTA (DPT) 19th Avenue, Lincoln Way and Cross-Over Drive Transit Stop Improvement $45,300 $45,300 1 MTA (DPT) Improving F-Line Safety and Operation at Powell and Jefferson $73,314 $73,314 1 MTA (DPT) Geneva Transit Preferential Street (TPS) $150,000 $45,000 $75,000 $30,000 1 MTA (DPT) McAllister Street Two-Way Study Between Hyde and Market $20,000 $20,000 1 MTA (DPT) LRV Vetag Detection System by Sfgo $85,000 $40,000 $45,000 5 TJPA 200 Main Right of Way Acquisition $3,209,000 $3,209,000 5 TJPA Right of Way Relocation Costs $3,407,000 $691,000 $2,716,000 5 TJPA Right of Way Acquisition - Temporary Terminal, Transit Center, Ramps $17,155,000 $17,155,000 5 TJPA PMPC Task Order 6, Survey & Environmental Consulting Services $3,854,000 $980,000 $2,874,000 5 TJPA Downtown Extension (DTX), Preliminary Engineering, Part 2 $18,350,000 $1,726,000 $13,040,000 $3,584, MTA (MUNI) Mission Bay Loop - Additional PS&E $192,000 $163,200 $28, MTA (MUNI) Paratransit Vehicle Procurement $530,297 $530, MTA (MUNI) Trolleybus wheelchair lift O&M $481,000 $481, MTA (MUNI) F-line historic streetcar O&M $977,000 $977,000 20M MTA (MUNI) Escalator Rehabilitation and Upgrade PS&E $227,785 $113,893 $113, MTA (MUNI) MUNI MMX O&M $3,151,000 $3,151,000 22M MTA (MUNI) Capital Planning and Grants Staffing $410,000 $410,000 22M MTA (MUNI) Overhead Rehab : Traction Power Substations - Construction $1,850,000 $555,000 $925,000 $370,000 22M MTA (MUNI) Church and Duboce Track Work Replacement $270,000 $135,000 $135,000 22M MTA (MUNI) Radio Communications System and CAD Replacement $2,692,559 $920,818 $1,559,010 $212,731 Transit Subtotal: $57,383,655 $31,615,522 $21,571,402 $4,196,731 PARATRANSIT 23 MTA (MUNI) Paratransit $9,670,000 $9,670,000 Paratransit Subtotal: $9,670,000 $9,670,000 STREETS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY South Access to Golden Gate - Doyle Drive - 24 SFCTA PS&E $2,967,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $967, MTA (DPT) New Truck for Sign Shop $65,000 $65, MTA (DPT) Construction of New Signal Contract 58 $1,577,170 $584,000 $550,500 $442, MTA (DPT) Traffic Signal Controller and Cabinet Replacement $195,000 $195,000 Capital Budget FY 0708 Feb Capital Budget - 7 Page 1 of 3

18 Attachment 2. Prop K FY 2007/08 Capital Budget Cash Flow Distribution EP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 33 MTA (DPT) Traffic Sign Graffiti Program $160,000 $160,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades - Mission Street - 33 MTA (DPT) Additional Construction Funds $285,000 $247,500 $37, MTA (DPT) Traffic Signal Controller and Cabinet Replacement $150,000 $150, MTA (DPT) Construction of Signal Modification Contract 32 $1,981,197 $1,200,000 $781, MTA (DPT) Traffic Sign Graffiti Program $160,000 $80,000 $80, DPW Street Resurfacing Program $13,920,000 $6,960,000 $6,960, DPW Street Repair and Cleaning Equipment $642,000 $321,000 $321, DPW Embarcadero Roadway O&M $394,000 $394, DPW Public Sidewalk Repair $524,400 $524, MTA (DPT) Local Match-Tenderloin Pedestrian Improvements $81,100 $81, MTA (DPT) Traffic Calming - School Area Safety - Grant Matches $143,000 $74,400 $68, MTA (DPT) Traffic Calming - Planning $503,000 $251,500 $251, MTA (DPT) Traffic Calming - Implementation - Local Streets $941,070 $252,768 $353,975 $334, MTA (DPT) Traffic Calming - Evaluation and Outreach $70,000 $35,000 $35, MTA (DPT) Cesar Chavez Bicycle Improvements, Sanchez to US-101 $65,100 $19,530 $32,550 $13, MTA (DPT) Division Street Bicycle Improvements, 9th to 11th $11,400 $3,420 $5,700 $2, MTA (DPT) Holloway Avenue Bike Boulevard, Lee Ave to Varela Ave $15,100 $4,530 $7,550 $3, MTA (DPT) Lee Avenue Bike Lanes, Holloway Ave to Ocean Ave $16,700 $5,010 $8,350 $3, MTA (DPT) Masonic Avenue Bike Lane, Fell St to Geary Blvd $35,600 $10,680 $17,800 $7, MTA (DPT) Portola Drive Bike Lanes, O'Shaughessy Blvd to Sloat Blvd $18,000 $5,400 $9,000 $3, MTA (DPT) Potrero Avenue Bicycle Improvements, 17th to Division $17,900 $5,370 $8,950 $3, MTA (DPT) Sagamore and Sickles Strees Bike Lanes, Alemany to Brotherhood Way $6,300 $1,890 $3,150 $1, MTA (DPT) Bicycle Safety Program FY 2007/08 $457,000 $182,800 $274, MTA (DPT) Bicycle Network Improvements - Local Match $15,000 $4,500 $7,500 $3, MTA (DPT) Local Match - Golden Gate Park Pedestrian Access Improvements $20,886 $20, MTA (DPT) Ladder Crosswalks Maintenance $42,750 $21,375 $21, MTA (DPT) Accessible Pedestrian Signals Selection & Design $161,500 $104,970 $56, DPW Curb Ramps $672,000 $20,000 $652, DPW Tree Planting and Maintenance $933,000 $933,000 Streets and Traffic Safety Subtotal: $27,247,173 $12,919,029 $10,543,927 $817,217 TSM/STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 43 DOE Clean Air Program $131,000 $131, DPW Leland Avenue Streetscape Improvements Project $53,120 $26,560 $26,560 Broadway Streetscape Improvements Project - 44 DPW Phase 2 - Additional Construciton $385,520 $385,520 Capital Budget FY 0708 Feb Capital Budget - 7 Page 2 of 3

19 Attachment 2. Prop K FY 2007/08 Capital Budget Cash Flow Distribution EP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 TSM/Strategic Initiatives Subtotal: $569,640 $157,560 $412,080 NEW PROJECTS & PROGRAMS TBD SFCTA CityBuild Program FY 2007/08 * $473,000 $473,000 TOTAL $95,343,468 $54,835,111 $32,527,409 $5,013,948 Shaded lines indicate current allocations * CityBuild Program FY 2007/08 will be funded initially from cost savings associated with actual allocation and reimbursement requests that have been much slower than assumed in the Strategic Plan. Costs will be distributed among appropriate capital project line items as part of the Strategic Plan update in early Capital Budget FY 0708 Feb Capital Budget - 7 Page 3 of 3

20 Attachment 3. Prop K FY 2007/08 Capital Budget Summary Cash Flow Distribution Total FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 Prior Allocations 95,258,468 55,795,111 33,482,409 5,980,948 0 Current Request(s) 85,000 40,000 45, New Total Allocations 95,343,468 55,835,111 33,527,409 5,980,948 0 Notes This table shows Cash Flow Distribution Schedules for all FY 2007/08 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended allocation(s). Capital Budget FY 0708 Feb CF Summary - 7 Page 1 of 1