Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary

Transcription

1 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary 201 Stump Removal Project Scope of Work: This contact is for the removal of 513 stumps currently located along the city s right-ofway in the South West and North West Quadrants. Work includes removal of the stumps and restoration of the site. Funding Source: Budget Estimated Start: February 2018 Estimated Completion: July 2018 Board Approval: This contract is an extension of the stump removal contract awarded to Mudrack Tree Service in March of this year. We are asking the board to approve a contract with Mudrack Tree Service for the removal of 513 stumps (6514 total inches) and site restoration in the amount of $48, Please see the attached bid tab for a breakdown of the bids.

2 City of Fort Wayne 201 Stump Removal Contract RFQ#4164 Bid Opening March 13, 201 Asplundh Tree Total Stumps Total Units Unit Price Total Price No Bid Submitted Mudrack Tree Service Total Stumps Total Units Unit Price Total Price $.50 $48, Wright Tree Total Stumps Total Units Unit Price Total Price No Bid Submitted

3 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Foellinger Theatre Performer Area Improvements Project Project No: Project Approval Request Scope of Work: This project consists of improvements to the basement area of the Foellinger Theatre building. The improvements will include the creation of a new space for performer green rooms, changing areas, restrooms, and office areas. The space will also include a new elevator and improvements to ADA accessibility.. Funding Source: Parks Bond Fund Board Approval: On November 8 th, bids were accepted on Behalf of the Board of Park Commissioners for this project. Four companies submitted bids. The low bidder was Schenkel Construction. The parks department has a very good working history with this contractor and would like to recommend the acceptance of their bid. The bid was within the engineer s estimate for the project. At this time I would like to ask for the Board s approval of this project with Schenkel Construction, Inc. for the amount of $49, I ll be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Steve Schuhmacher

4 FWPARKS / FOELLINGER THEATRE - PERFORMER AREA IMPROVEMENTS [ LOWER LEVEL RENOVATION ] ITB # 4231 BID DATE : 11/08/201 Addendum No 1 CONTRACTOR BASE BID ( 5% CONTINGENCY ) VOLUNTARY ALTERNATE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATE VOLUNTARY ALTERNATE NOTES START DATE CALENDAR DAYS HAMILTON HUNTER BUILDERS x $ 533,000 Not Read ( ~ 25,380 ) NA SCHENKEL CONSTRUCTION x $ 49,000 $ 22,810 NA SHAWNEE CONSTRUCTION x $ 510,00 $ 24,300 NA STREBIG CONSTRUCTION x $ 50,104 Not Read ( ~ 24,148 ) NA

5 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Hamilton Park Playground Improvements Project Project No: 2105 Project Approval Request Scope of Work: This project consists of the installation of a new playground for children ages 2-5 in Hamilton Park. The existing 2-5 play equipment has reached its life expectancy and needs replaced. This old equipment will be removed and the new equipment will be placed in the same location, along with new wood fiber playground safety surfacing. Funding Source: Parks Budget Board Approval: On October 26th, s were accepted on Behalf of the Board of Park Commissioners for this project. Five companies submitted s. The budget for the project was specified at $95, and the vendors were instructed to design to that dollar amount. A review committee rated the s for value, quality and design. The committee felt that the submitted by Countryside Play Structures LLC Recreation most accurately met the requirements of this project. Countryside s quote in their was $93,15.50 At this time I would like to ask for the Board s approval of this project with Countryside Play Structures, LLC. for the amount of $93, Please see attached quote tab sheet for more information. I ll be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Steve Schuhmacher

6 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Hamilton 2-5 Playground Hamilton 2-5 Playground Hamilton 2-5 Playground Countryside Kompan Sinclair Budget: $95, Budget: $95, Budget: $95, Bid: $93,15.50 Bid: $94, Bid: $95, A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Creativity of of Creativity of of Creativity of of MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 600 9% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

7 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Hamilton 2-5 Playground Budget: $95, Hamilton 2-5 Playground Budget: $95, Hamilton 2-5 Playground Budget: Playworld Bid: $92, Miracle Bid: $80, Bid: A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS 6 Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design 8 Creativity of of Creativity of of 3 21 Creativity of of 5 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 56 5% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 555 3% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 0 0% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

8

9 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Lions Park Playground Improvements Project Project No: 2105 Project Approval Request Scope of Work: This project consists of the installation of new playground equipment for children ages 5-12 in Lions Park. The existing play equipment has reached its life expectancy and will be removed to allow for installation of the new equipment in its place. The project will include new equipment, installation, and wood fiber surfacing. Funding Source: Parks Bond Fund Board Approval: On October 26th, s were accepted on Behalf of the Board of Park Commissioners for this project. Five companies submitted s. The budget for the project was specified at $130, and the vendors were instructed to design to that dollar amount. A review committee rated the s for value, quality and design. The committee felt that the submitted by Kompan Inc. most accurately met the requirements of this project. Their quote submitted in their is $113, At this time I would like to ask for the Board s approval of this project with Kompan, Inc. for the amount of $113, Please see the attached project tab sheet for more information. I ll be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Steve Schuhmacher

10 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Lions 5-12 Playground Lions 5-12 Playground Lions 5-12 Playground Kompan Playworld Countryside Budget: $130, Budget: $130, Budget: $130, Bid: $113,064.0 Bid: $92, Bid: $119, A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Creativity of of Creativity of of Creativity of of MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 600 9% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

11 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Lions 5-12 Playground Budget: $130, Lions 5-12 Playground Budget: $130, Lions 5-12 Playground Budget: Sinclair Bid: $130, Miracle Bid: $125, Bid: A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS 6 Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design 8 Creativity of of Creativity of of 3 21 Creativity of of 5 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 56 5% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 555 3% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 0 0% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

12

13 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Kreager Park Playground Improvements Project Project No: 2105 Project Approval Request Scope of Work: This project consists of the installation of a new playground in Kreager Park that will provide exercise and fitness equipment for individuals age 13 and up. The fitness area will be located on the east side of the park adjacent to the existing playground in that area. Funding Source: Parks Bond Fund Board Approval: On October 26th, s were accepted on Behalf of the Board of Park Commissioners for this project. Five companies submitted s. The budget for the project was specified at $155, and the vendors were instructed to design to that dollar amount. A review committee rated the s for value, quality and design. The committee felt that the submitted by Snider Recreation most accurately met the requirements of this project. At this time I would like to ask for the Board s approval of this project with Snider Recreation, Inc. for the amount of $155, I ll be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Steve Schuhmacher

14 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Kreager Fitness Playground Kreager Fitness Playground Kreager Fitness Playground Snider Sinclair Countryside Budget: $155, Budget: $155, Budget: $155, Bid: $155, Bid: $155, Bid: $152, A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Creativity of of Creativity of of Creativity of of MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

15 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Kreager Fitness Playground Budget: $155, Kreager Fitness Playground Budget: $155, Kreager Fitness Playground Budget: Kompan Bid: $14,211. Playworld Bid: $154,5.00 Bid: A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS 6 Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design 8 Creativity of of Creativity of of 3 21 Creativity of of 5 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 59 8% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 555 3% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 0 0% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

16 IN - CITY OF FORT WAYNE - KRAEGER PARK - OPTION # 2 PROPOSED OUTDOOR FITNESS ZONE This presentation has been designed for printing on tabloid (11 x1 ) sized paper.

17 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Miracle SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Sinclair SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Kompan Budget: $20, Budget: $20, Budget: $20, Bid: $14, Bid: $20, Bid: $19, A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Creativity of of 1 Creativity of of 1 Creativity of of 1 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 53 5% MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 4 62% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

18 SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Countryside SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Playworld SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM Camp Allen Climber Budget: $20, Budget: $20, Budget: Bid: $1,21.00 Bid: $, Bid: A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE , 1, 3, 6, 9 SCORE COMMENTS 6 Installer s and Installer s and Installer s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Sales Team s and Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Warranty of all equipment Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design Accessibility/Universal Design 8 Creativity of of 1 Creativity of of 1 Creativity of of MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: % MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE: 64 TOTAL: 0 0% WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. WEIGHT = How important we feel this Selection Criteria is to the position. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. Values range from 1 through = Low, 10 = High. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. SCORE = How well this meets the Selection Criteria. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. Zero: Does not meet criteria, 1 = Low, 3 = Fair, 6 = Good, 9 = Excellent. EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C EXT. SCORE = Column B times Column C Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended. Source: Six Sigma/Cause and Effect Matrix; as amended.

19

20 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Buckner Park Playground Safety Surfacing Improvements Project Project No: Project Approval Request Scope of Work: This project consists of improvements to the playground safety surfacing at Buckner Park playground. The existing playground has poured-in-place rubber safety surfacing that has reached its life expectancy and needs to be replaced. The new proposed safety surfacing is an engineered turf system that will work much better and last longer providing a superior playground surface. Funding Source: Parks Bond Fund Board Approval: On October 30th, quotes were accepted on Behalf of the Board of Park Commissioners for this project. Five companies submitted s. The low quote was submitted by Rubberecycle LLC which will provide and install a product called Genesis Turf under all of the play equipment at Buckner Park. At this time I would like to ask for the Board s approval of this project with Schenkel Construction, Inc. for the amount of $211, Please see attached quote tab sheet for quote results. I ll be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Steve Schuhmacher

21 Tabulation Project Name: 201 Park Playground Surfacing Improvments Project No.: Bids Due: 10/30/201 CONTRACTOR: Rubberrecycle Playworld Recreation Insites Countryside Play Structures Sinclair Recreation 8' CFH 5-12 area w/ 10' CFH $8, $13, $8,83.2 $144, $9, area w/10' CFH $132, $109,55.00 $13,390. $68, $168, Total Price: $211, $282,13.00 $216,14.04 $213, $265,34.00 Addendum Receipt Verification: YES YES YES YES YES

22 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Various Parks December 201 Change Orders Project Numbers , 21012, 21003, 21045, 2102 Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This month we have four change orders from various projects in various parks. These projects include: Project , Conservatory Drainage Gutter Improvement Project Change Order #1 Deduct $44, Project 21012, Franklin Park Phase II Project Change Order #1... Add $34, Project 21003, Foellinger Theatre Ladder Improvements Project Change Order #1.Add $1, Project 21045, Harris Road Barn Improvements Project Change Order #1 Deduct $1, Project 2102, Foellinger Theatre Flooring Improvements Project Change Order #1 Deduct $13, Total: Deduct $24,63.00 The summation of all four of these changes results in a request for a credit back to the parks department in the amount of $24, Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a credit of $24,63.00 for these projects. Please see the attached change orders for details of these project changes. Thank you.

23 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Follinger-Freimann Botanical Conservatory Drainage Gutter Improvement Project Project Number Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This project consists of improvements to the concrete gutter system on the glass houses of the Botanical Conservatory s glass roofed buildings. New Scope of Work: This project had a $3,000 contingency allowance. Although some changes were required, not all of the allowance was needed; therefore some funds are left in the project. Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a change deduction of $1, to this contract. Please see the attached change order #1 for details. Thank you.

24

25 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Franklin School Park Phase II Improvement Project Project Number Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This project is phase II of the Franklin School Park Development project, which included the construction of new concrete walks, paths, parking areas, and the renovation of a storage building into a rentable pavilion. New Scope of Work: This was a very detailed project which included many unexpected changes. These changes have been compiled in the attached change order list. This project was below our original budget of $1,200, and therefore funds for this change order are available through the Park Bond. Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a change addition of $34, to this contract. The original contract was $1,032, This change will bring the new contract amount to $1,06, Please see the attached change order #1 for details. Thank you.

26

27 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Franke Park Harris Road Barn Improvement Project Project Number Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This project consists of the installation of new steel siding, roofing, and windows in the Harris Road storage barn. New Scope of Work: This project had a $3,000 contingency allowance. Although some changes were required, not all of the allowance was needed; therefore some funds are left in the project. Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a change deduction of $1, to this contract. Please see the attached change order #1 for details. Thank you.

28

29 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Franke Park Foellinger Theatre Ladder Improvement Project Project Number Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This project consists of the installation of a new metal ship ladder back stage of the Foellinger Theatre. The new ladder will make a safer passage for staff to access the upper tower areas. New Scope of Work: During installation it was found that one of the original steel support beams was not adequate for support of the new structure and therefore had to be replaced. This resulted in an additional cost to the project. Funding Source: Park Cumulative Capital Fund Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a change addition of $1, to this contract. Please see the attached change order #1 for details. Thank you.

30 FORT WAYNE PARKS AND RECREATION 05 East State Boulevard Fort Wayne, IN (260) CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - Project# RFQ# 4128 Issuant Date: Nov. 16,201 Owner's File No. (P.O.): Contractor: Contract For: Hamilton Hunter Builders Foellinger Theatre Ladder Improvements TYPE OF CHANGE: I Alteration I X Addition Deduction I Other: You are authorized to make the following changes to this contract: Allowance: Initial Contingency Allowance as part of Quote. ($ 4,000.00) Add: Cost to provide and install an additional steel beam. $ 4, Add: Cost to provide and install PVC beam protection at opening. $ 5.00 Total Additional Cost: ($ 1,059.00) $28, Contract amount prior to this Change Order (includes Contingency Allowance) $ 1, Net increase resulting from this Change Order $29, Current Contract price INCLUDING this Change Order Chan By: ) )._j 1-- l/ David Grim Date: If Date:

31 Board of Park Commissioners Project Summary Franke Park Foellinger Theatre Flooring Improvement Project Project Number 2102 Change Order No. 1 Original Scope of Work: This project consists of the resurfacing of the surface of the stage wood floor. New Scope of Work: A high contingency allowance was included with this project because the floor resurfacing was dependent upon temperature conditions. If the temperatures were not warm enough to apply the floor sealant, measures would have been needed to control the temperature. However, temperatures were adequate and the job was completed without needing the additional funds. Board Approval: At this time I would like to ask the Board of Park Commissioners for approval of a change credit of $13, to this contract. Please see the attached change order #1 for details. Thank you.

32