To: From: By: Subject:

Transcription

1 To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA Honorable City Council Date: 11/17/2015 R. A. Zais, Interim City Man~y~~~~ Blaine Fritts, Finance Direct~ana Masorl, Financial Accountant~ 2015/2016 Biennial Budget Amendments FINANCIAL ACTION SUMMARY Ord. 600 Approved Budget Revised lncrease/(decrease) Begin Balance $25,649,224 Begin Balance $29,096,236 Begin Balance $3,447,012 Revenue $39,065,273 Revenue $40,749,837 Revenue $1,684,564 Transfers ln/(out) $0 Transfers ln/(out) $0 Transfers ln/(out) $0 Total Sources $64,714,497 Total Sources $69,846,073 Total Sources $5,131,576 Operations $21,905,188 Operations $22,341,971 Operations $436,783 GIP $23,200,000 CIP $24,826,000 CIP $1,626,000 Debt Repay $1,056,584 Debt Repay $1,056,584 Debt Repay $0 Other $0 Other $0 Other $0 Total Uses $46, 161,772 Total Uses $48,224,555 Total Uses $2,062,783 End Balance $18,552,725 End Balance $21,621,518 End Balance $3,068,793 ISSUE: Shall the Council hold a public hearing and take actions to implement the 2015/2016 Mid-Biennial Review and Modifications? RECOMMENDATION: To open the continued public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, pass first reading of Ordinance No. 609 Adopting 2015/2016 Budget Amendments and Ordinance No. 618 Adopting the 2016 Authorized Position Listing, Salaries, Wages, and Benefits, and pass second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 617 Property Tax Levy for POLICY DECISION: Woodinville uses a biennial budget (two-year budget). RCW 35A requires cities that use biennial budgets to hold a hearing to modify the budget no sooner than eight months after the beginning of the budget period and not later than the conclusion of the first year of the two-year period. These hearings, reviews, and modifications comply with this requirement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On November 3, 2015 Council received the Mid-Biennium Budget report from staff with recommended budget revisions and the related ordinances and resolution. Council pass first reading of Ordinance No. 617 Property Tax Levy for 2016 unanimously. The following information summarizes the major changes that have occurred since the 2015/2016 Biennial Budget was adopted in December These items include: No new taxes. Restoring two staffing positions. One in Development Services and one in Public Works. Adding two new staffing positions. One in Development Services and one in Public Works. Adding a new patrol police officer six months earlier than planned. Reducing Development Services revenues to match current forecast. To approve the recommended changes proposed in the attached 2015/2016 Biennium Review and Modification Report, the Council will need to amend the budget, approve the 2016 position listing, salaries, wages, and benefits, adopt the 2016 fee resolution, and levy property taxes for 2016 at the same levy amount as 2015 (except for new construction). While each of these items require separate City Council action, they are all inter-related.

2 RECOMMENDED MOTION: 1. OPEN CONCURRENT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON: a) ORDINANCE NO. 609 ADOPTING 2015/2016 BUDGET AMENDMENTS; b) ORDINANCE NO. 617 ADOPTING THE 2016 PROPER.TY TAX LEVY; c) RESOLUTION NO. 471 ADOPTING 2016 FEES AND CHARGES; d} ORDINANCE NO. 618 ADOPTING THE 2016 AUTHORIZED POSITION LISTING, SALARIES, WAGES, AND BENEFITS. 2. OPEN THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PORTION ON THIESE ITEMS. [Receive report from Staff] [Receive public comments] 3. I MOVE TO CLOSE THE CONCURRENT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON: a) ORDINANCE NO. 609 ADOPTING 2015/2016 BUDGET AMENDMENTS; b} ORDINANCE NO. 617 ADOPTING THIE 2016 PROPERTY TAX LIEVY; c) RESOLUTION NO. 411 ADOPTING 2016 FEES AND CHARGES; d) ORDINANCE NO. 618 ADOPTING THE 2016 AUTHORIZED POSITION LISTING, SALARIES, WAGES, AND BENEFITS. 4. I MOVE TO PASS FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 609, AN ORDINANCE OF THIE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 600, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR 2015/2016, ADOPTING A REVISED BIENNIAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, FOR THE YEARS 2015 AND 2016, SETTING FORTH THIE REVISED ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES TO FACILITATE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND OPERATIONAL NEEDS. 5. I MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 617, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, LEVYING THE GENERAL TAXES FOR THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2016, ON All PROPERTY, BOTH REAL AND PERSONAL, IN SAID CITY WHICH IS SUBJECT TO TAXATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO CAR.RY ON THE SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS OF SAID CITY FOR THE ENSUING YEAR AS REQUIRED BY LAW. 6. I MOVE TO PASS FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 618, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 599, ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEE POSITIONS, PAY RANGES, AND BENEFITS FOR Attachment 1: Mid-Biennial Review and Requested Budget Revisions Attachment 2: Staffing Need Summaries Attachment 3: Budget Modification Ordinance No. 609 Attachment 4: 2016 Property Tax Levy Ordinance No. 617 Attachment 5: Resolution No. 471: 2016 Fees and Charges Attachment 6: Ordinance No. 618: 2014 Authorized Position Listing, Salaries, Wages, and Benefits 2

3 Attachment /2016 Budget - Mid-Biennial Review and Modification Report 1. Revenues and Expenditures There have been changes to operating assumptions since the 2015/2016 budget was adopted in December The following section will address the impact on revenues and expenditures and detail the recommended changes. Operating Revenues Sales Tax is the largest source of revenue to the City's General Fund. Revenues are in line with budget projections. Sales Tax since incorporation and the current biennial forecast is shown graphically: $8,000, Sales Tax Revenue (2015 & 2016 forecasted revenue) $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0... ~~-... ~~ ~ ~~v r.. Property Tax revenue, the General Fund's second largest source of revenue, represents about $3 million annually. The first increase in eight years was authorized in Currently, the General Fund is budgeted to receive $30,000 of additional property tax revenue from a potential 1 % property tax increase in However, property tax increases are limited by the 1 % rule or the change in the Implicit Price Deflator for Personal Consumption Expenditures (IPD}, whichever is lower. The 2015 IPD is %, which means an increase in property tax would only generate an additional $7,700 without an authorizing vote of the people or the City Council declaring substantial need and using banked capacity. Staff recommends no increase to property taxes, and as a result, this budget amendment proposes to reduce property tax revenue by $30,000. $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 Property Tax Revenues 3

4 Attachment 1 Other changes in revenue to the General Fund include an increase of revenues for: Liquor excise tax in the amount of $20,000. Rental income for the leased out portion of the City Shop in the amount of $48,000. Tourism promotion services related to the way-finding sign program in the amount of $20,000. Animal licensing in the amount of $60,000. This increase is due to a change in our accounting practices. In prior budget cycles, the City would only budget for the net difference between the cost of providing animal services and the revenue generated form licensing. Now the City is budgeting for the full cost and revenues associated with this activity. The net change is $0.00. Development Services revenue is derived from permitting and other services fees and that are expected to generate $2.7 million for the biennium, a $1.14 million reduction in the budgeted amount. There are two factors that drive the revision. First, construction activities, while showing anticipated growth, are occurring at a slower pace than expected. Examples are the delayed occupancy and application for permits of Phase II of the Woodin Creek Village project, and the delayed development of the Vinterra project. Second, an effort to refine the prior method of forecasting permitting revenue yielded an overly optimistic forecast. This method has been reevaluated and the optimistic assumptions have been adjusted appropriately. Street Fund revenues have a couple of minor changes. Gas Tax revenue for the Street Fund is distributed on a per capita basis. The City will receive close to $491,000 for the biennium. The forecast for Gas Tax revenue increased by $15,000 and insurance recoveries are increased by $30,000 due to the damage of a street light pole. Park fees, Utility Taxes, Surface Water Management fees and Admission Taxes are in line with expectations. The final proposed revision to operating revenues is an increase of $50,000 in grant revenue in the Surface Water Management Fund for a Department of Ecology grant that was anticipated in 2014 but actual was received in CIP Revenues A number of factors have led to an anticipated increase in CIP revenue of $2.6 million. Due to the timing of development, Traffic Impact Fees revenues are lower than expected, resulting in a recommended $330,000 decrease in budgeted revenue. Additionally, the original budget projected $224,000 in developer contributions for frontage improvements along SR 522 for the Hampton Inn development. A developer agreement was not reached, and as a result, developer contributions are decreasing by $224,000. The final decrease to CIP revenue is $10,000 in flood levy grant revenue. Revenue received from Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) in the first nine months of the biennium has far exceeded expectations for the two year period. REET revenue for the biennium is adjusted to $2.15 million, an increase of $1.23 million over the original budget. In addition, the City received an unbudgeted $110,000 grant from the King County Flood Control District as well as an additional $1.8 million in grant revenues that were expected in 2014, but were receipted in

5 Attachment 1 City of Woodinville, Washington Table No. 1: 2015/2016 Mid-Biennium Revenue Summary 2015/ /2016 Budget Revised $ Increase/ % Increase/ Source of Funds (Ord. No. 600) Estimate (Decrease) (Decrease) General Fund $19,883,121 $20,001,121 $118, % Restricted Operating Funds $5,229,490 $4,133,655 ($1,095,835) % Restricted Internal Services Funds $176,562 $176,562 $0 0.00% Restricted Capital Funds $11,046,100 $13,429,469 $2,383, % Surface Water $2,730,000 $3,009,030 $279, % Debt Service $0 $0 $0 0.00% Total All Funds $39,065,273 $40, 749,837 $1,684, % Operating Expenditures Operating expenditures are proposed to increase by $436,784 for the biennium. There are a number of factors that contribute to this recommendation. First, the City is working to meet the statutory mandate of complying with the Comprehensive Plan update. This has required an increase in consultant services. Second, the change in the City Manager position requires funding for interim services, recruitment services, and severance commitments to the prior City Manager. Third, with the increase in development activity, the increase in street scape, and the demand for park maintenance, this proposal includes the reinstatement of two positions and the addition of two new positions (see details on these positon in Attachment 2). Fourth, in an effort to provide better police coverage, the original budget included adding an officer on July 1, This budget amendment proposes to add the officer sooner, by January 1, It is important to note that once the City adds an officer, it takes eight to nine months to get them trained and actively patrolling. Finally, there are a number of minor revisions which includes modifying the budget for the Council authorized purchase of a new truck and the unplanned purchase of a new plotter to replace the one that recently broke down. The effect of these revisions are summarize below: Net Change of Expenditures by Category Salaries Benefits Category Intergovernmental Services Professional Services Small Tools & Equip Supplies Machinery & Equipment Capital Outlay Amount $109,100 ($106,666) $24,900 $299,300 $13,000 $3,000 $108,150 ($14,000) Total Change in Operating Expenditures $436,784 ====== 5

6 Attachment 1 Capital Improvement Project Expenditures Capital improvement project expenditures are expected to be $1.63 million more than budgeted. Significant additions/reductions to projects include: Project Apple Farm Village Driveway (unbudgeted project) Woodinville-Duvall Road Widening SR 522 Frontage Landscaping Arterial Street Overlay Program Wood-Sno Widening/Sidewalk - 190th to 195th St PW Shop Repainting Old Woodinville Schoolhouse NPDES Phase 1 Basin Planning Participation - Sno Co Eastside Rail Corridor Acquisition Increase/ (Decrease) $20,000 $190,000 ($486,000) $84,000 ($218,000) ($45,000) $22,000 ($40,000) $65,000 ($408,000) In addition there were $2.03 million in 2013/2014 CIP expenditures that were anticipated to occur in 2014, but actually occurred in /2016 Budget Ordinance No. 609 The budget ordinance amends the 2015/2016 biennial budget to acknowledge the changes in appropriations described above. Ordinance 609 restates all funds, whether amended or not. The Ordinance and amended amounts are shown in Attachment Property Tax Levy Ordinance No. 617 This budget amendment calls for no increase in the City's property tax levy except for additional revenue from new construction. The value of new construction for the 2016 levy is expected to be $23.1 million, but changes to state assessed utilities are not yet known. The amount of new construction is three times greater than last year's new construction. $23.1 million in new construction will generate about $24,000 in new revenue. $4,000,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $0 Assessed Valuation I New Construction m <:!" Lil ld r-. oo a, o..-1 N m <:!" Lil ld r-. oo a, o..-1 N m <:!" Lil " a, a, a, a, a, a, a, I.-I.-I.-I.-I.-I.-I a, a, a, a, a, a, a, t.-<.-< INNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 ~Assessed Valuation "''"'m""",new Construction 6

7 Attachment 1 --~l I: I Because the City of Woodinville has increased property taxes only once since 2006, the City has "banked capacity". Banked capacity refers to the amount of revenue the Council could levy through property taxes, without voter approval; but did not. Woodinville's banked capacity is approximately $500,000. The Council could increase property taxes by this amount without voter approval; however, there is no proposal to do this. The ordinance, shown in Attachment 4, assumes no increase in property taxes other than from new construction and changes in state assessed utilities Fee Resolution No. 471 Annually, the City Council reviews fees that have been established by resolution and considers any recommended changes, including new fees. Staff has completed a review of the 2015 fees and proposes several changes to Development Services fees and a few changes to other City fees for The resolution (see attachment 5) is scheduled to take effect on January 1, Development Services Hourly rates were adjusted based on actual costs. The time required for each permit was analyzed and fees were adjusted to meet typical review hours. New fees: o A new permit for commercial re-roofs was added. o Demolition permit fees were split between residential and commercial and adjusted to reflect actual review time. o A modest fee was added for tree removal permits to recoup some of the time needed to process the permit. o Grading permits associated with improvements to existing developments were split into non-residential and single family. o A fee for right-of-way use permits was established. o An hourly rate for inspections more than two hours was established. o Costs associated with preparing a zoning verification letter were added. o Fees for inspections greater than two hours were added. Fees removed: o Structural review deposits were removed as applicants pay the charge for structural review at permit issuance. o The replacement of recalled heads for fire permits was removed. Other City Fees Fees for GIS services were lowered to reflect actual cost and pricing at other cities. Concealed pistol licenses removed. Clearance letter fees removed. Fees added for DVD or CD for public records requests. There was no change to the fees for surface water management or sports field rentals. 7

8 Attachment Authorized Position Listing and Salary and Benefit Ordinance No. 618 Ordinance No. 618 implements the following actions: Establishes the authorized number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTEs) at in For Non-Represented Employees, grants 1.1% cost of living adjustment (COLA) in 2016; and contributes up to a 3.1 % increase in medical coverage and up to a 4.5% increase in dental coverage. All other health coverages remain the same. For the Teamsters represented employee group, maintains all wages and benefits as current levels pending completion of a labor agreement. For non-regular, seasonal, and part-time employees, grants a cost of living adjustment, as determined by the State of Washington minimum wage increase Fuil-Time Equivalent Employees I... I<. I ,_ "",. ~ ' - _, - "" The increases in expenditures resulting from this ordinance (see attachment 6) are reflected in the City's Budget Ordinance No SUMMARY Overall the City operating finances are well positioned. Revenues are near, or a little up, from original budget estimates. Although operating expenditures are increased, the City is operating within its revenue means. There is no increase to taxes. The City's staffing positions are increased by 3.8 FTE to meet the demand for services. The City's operating margin is sufficient to respond to moderate economic corrections. 8

9 Attachment 2 Staffing Needs Summary for 2015/2016 Mid-Biennial Review The proposals below detail the request for additional staff in the following departments: Development Services 1. Building Official (restored position) 2. Records Clerk (new position) Public Works 3. Maintenance Worker I (new position) 4. Engineer I/Field Engineer (restored position) Police 5. Patrol Police Officer (new position) Development Service The Development Services Department is requesting that two additional positions be authorized in order to effectively carry out its assigned responsibilities, meet growing service demands, increase productivity, and responsiveness, and keep pace with the growth and development of the City. The requested positions are a Building Official (Pay Range 71) and a Records Clerk (Pay Range 4). Develoement Services FTIE Proposed FTE Biennium Biennium!Biennium Biennium Biennium Revision Long-Range Planning Permitting and Land Use Total Development Services Building Official (restored position) The proposal is to recruit and hire a replacement for the Plans Examiner position that was reduced in The estimated cost for the Building Official position includes $87, 720 in salary and $40,368 in benefits for a total of $128,088 in In 2017, the salary and benefits would increase to $94, 738 and $43,597 respectively, for a total of $138,335. In 2008, the Development Services Department had 16.4 staff members. Currently, the department has eight staff members. In 2011, cutbacks were made due to reduced workload as a result of the recession. Duties were consolidated and staff performed multiple jobs. The situation has clearly changed over the years, requiring the addition of staff. The economy has improved with the unemployment rate decreasing from 10.4% in 2010 to 5.2% in Development is on the rise. In the City issued 1101 permits for a total valuation of $15,917,259. So far in , the City has issued 542 permits for a total valuation of $47, 167, 185. Developments such as: Woodin Creek Village, Hampton Inn, and the subdivisions Vinterra, Slocum and Church, have all contributed to a higher workload. 9

10 Attachment 2 At current staffing levels, there have been delays in permitting and customer service is suffering. Customers can no longer walk-in with plans and receive over-the-counter help. Staff is unable to provide customers with complete and timely answers to building code questions. In addition, the heavy workload increases the risk of errors by staff. Without a full-time qualified official to review plans, it is difficult to ensure valuations given by contractors are accurate. The inability to review this information results in potential loss in revenue. The staff shortages of the past two years have been filled using contractors that are not at the City enough to ensure there is coordination between departments. Currently, fire reviews are done by a firm in Utah, which makes it difficult to answer questions for customers in person, at the front counter. The cost to perform plan review and inspections annually is approximately $168,000 per year. The same work could be performed by a full-time permanent employee for $128,088 per year. Records Clerk (new position) The proposal is to recruit and hire a two-year term limited position to continue the inprogress development of a records management system that is retrievable, accurate, and timely. After two years the project will be re-evaluated to see if it needs to be extended. The position would consist of a clerk to organize, scan and retrieve records as needed. The position would be budgeted at a salary of $38,904 with benefits of $25,764 for a total of $64,668 in In 2017, the salary would be $42,016 with benefits of $27,825 for a total of $69,841. The Development Services Department performed file reduction through microfiche for a limited period of time 10 years ago, and has a history of storing documents in spare buildings. Some documents have been scanned, but currently an estimated 330 banker boxes are in storage with approximately 3,200 to 3,400 files that are not easily accessible or identifiable. With so many records inaccessible, it's difficult to avoid or delay customer service for residents and businesses looking for property files to be researched and pulled. If staff is unable to locate files in a timely manner, it places the City at risk of violating the Public Records Act. In the past, staff has made significant effort to improve records management. However results were not seen until 2015, when the City hired temporary summer help. With the summer help, staff was able to go through and organize boxes in the span of two and half months. Misplaced, lost or unknown files have been a problem in the past. With the temporary help, staff identified numerous boxes that were not previously searchable in the City's permitting system. These records were unknown to staff. With a records clerk working full-time, a more complete records management system may be realized. Staff has worked to store and archive records correctly. Each file must be verified with digital records, permitting system, inspection reports and purged of superseded documents. Verification takes anywhere from ten minutes to an hour for 10

11 Attachment 2 complex permits. Without continued support, the records management system that the department is transitioning to will be stalled, slowed down and potentially not completed. Public Works The Public Works Department is requesting authorization for two additional positions in order to effectively carry out its assigned responsibilities. The requested positions are an Engineer I/Field Engineer (Pay Range 50) in the Engineering Division and a Maintenance Worker I (Pay Range B) with the Parks Division in the Maintenance Group. Public Works FTE Proposed FTE Biennium Biennium Biennium Biennium Biennium Revision Maintenance Streets Storm Parks Facilities 2 2 Contract Contract Contract Contract Total Maintenaunce Engineering Total for Public Works Public Works Workload Indicators Biennium Biennium Biennium Biennium Biennium* No. of Acres Developed park Land No. of landscaped Places within ROW No. of Permits Issued (est) Miles of Storm sewer system * The 2015/2016 Biennium workload indicators are forecasted totals. The charts above show the number of authorized positions for the Public Works Department, along with some major workload indicators, for the years 2007 through 2015/2016. This information was gathered from the City's adopted budget documents covering these years. During the 2007/2008 biennium, the Department was authorized a total of 20 FTE's. This amount was reduced over the years to a low of 13 FTE's in 2011/2012. One Maintenance Worker Ill was added in 2013, to concentrate on the City's Surface Water Management System in response to requirements dictated by the City's NP DES permit, bringing the current authorization to 14 FTE's. As evidenced by the charts above, the main workload indicators have either matched or increased the 2007/2008 levels. Below is a detailed explanation of the need for each position. 11

12 Attachment 2 Engineer I/Field Engineer (restored position) This position is needed to review development proposals, detailed constructions plans for developments and the required infrastructure improvements, and right of way permits. The reviews need to be conducted within the timeframes specified by law and cannot be delayed or rescheduled. This position also conducts inspections of construction activities to insure that improvements are constructed correctly, are conducted in compliance with applicable codes, laws, and regulations, and that the public interest is protected. An equivalent position was eliminated in 2009/2010 when development activity was reduced, but as indicated by the number of permits being issued by the City, development activity has increased and the position is now needed. By restoring this position, the City will eliminate the cost of having development reviews conducted by contracted engineering consultants, resulting in savings of over $40,000 per year. Staff anticipates that this development workload will continue for at least the next three to five years. As an entry level engineering position, it is expected that the Engineer I position will turnover every three to five years. City staff commits to review the need for the Engineer I position with the City Manager, and if appropriate, with Council, every time the position becomes vacant. Maintenance Worker I (new position) The three largest developed parks within the City; Wilmot, Rotary, and the Sport Fields, are most heavily used on weekends when City Staff are not scheduled to work. In addition, the City's responsibility for maintaining parks and streetscapes has grown significantly in the last seven years from a substantial increase in developed park areas and landscaped streetscapes (from one to twelve). The requested position is needed to fulfill the increase in responsibilities and to provide a necessary weekend presence. Currently, the City either brings staff in on overtime (a minimum of three hours at an average cost of $141 per day) or contracts for services ($150 each time for the three parks) to clean parks and their facilities on the weekends. To maintain landscaped streetscapes, the City must utilize City personnel designated for storm or street maintenance, taking time away from the upkeep of City streets and drainage systems. By adding a new maintenance position, a City employee would be present in the park system during periods of the heaviest use, would provide on-going maintenance and repairs as needed, and be the extra labor resource needed to maintain landscaped streetscapes. In addition, the position would enhance the City's ability to respond promptly to emergency situations, such as stops signs down or fallen trees blocking the roads, on the weekends. Instead of waiting an hour for a standby employee to travel to the City, the added employee would be already be within City limits, able to respond within minutes. Cost savings that offset the cost of the new position are estimated to be $42,400 annually from reducing standby time, decreasing emergency call out response time, reducing the number of temporary employees, eliminating contracted park maintenance services, and reducing overtime. 12

13 ~~- -~~- --~ Attachment 2 Police Department In order to effectively carry out its assigned responsibilities, the Police Department is requesting authorization for one additional patrol police officer position six months earlier than planned. On December 2, 2014, the City Council approved a budget for an additional FTE to the Woodinville Police Department, effective July of The request for an additional FTE was based in part on anticipated calls for service associated with two building projects; Woodin Creek and the Vinterra housing development. Currently, the Woodinville Police Department has 12 FTE's assigned to the City; a police chief, an administrative sergeant, a detective, a school resource officer, and eight reactive patrol officers. The Police has a minimum staffing level of one officer per shift and staggers shifts to provide the best coverage during those times that have the highest calls for service. However, there are often times that, due to prisoner transports, vacation, training, etc., officers are working alone in the City, relying 100% on the King County Sheriff's Office for backup. This arrangement often works well for high priority calls, but does not address calls that fall into other categories such as; traffic accidents, property crimes, and crime prevention. During these situations, officer safety is compromised and police responsiveness to the community suffers. In addition, there were 157 more calls for service in the City compared to the same time last year, and given the amount of development occurring within the City, the number is likely to increase even more. While the King County Sheriff's is making significant improvement to its hiring process, it is likely that it will take up to nine months before the requested FTE is trained and available for service. To match the City's continued growth, the increasing demand for police services, the time needed to train an officer, and the City's commitment to reducing crime, an additional officer six months earlier than planned is needed. 13

14 Attachment 2 Financial Analysis for all Staffing Requests and Funding Plan The anticipated net cost to funding the two restored and two new staff positions averages out to $122,000 for the next two years. The police position was authorized as part of Ordinance No. 600 adopting the 2015/2016 biennial budget. The additional funding need to bring an officer on six month sooner is $94, Additional Position Cost Analysis Total Less: Position Contract Del)~rtment Position Salai:Y Benefits Costs Saving~ Development Services '""' Building Official (restored) 87,720 40, , ,000 Development Services Records Clerk (new) 38,904 25,764 64,668 30,000 Public Works Maintenance Worker I (new) 46,920 30,432 77,352 42,400 Public Works Engineer I (restored) 71,256 34, ,444 48,000 Tota! $375,552 $268,400 Position Cost (~!Yin9. 5 ).. (19,912) 34,668 34,952 57,444 $107, Additional Position Cost Analysis Total Position Less: Contract _ Departrrient Position... ~~i~i)'., Benefits Costs,,,,, //'.. ~yi~$~. Development Services Building Official (restored) 94,738 43, , ,000 Development Services Records Clerk (new) 42,016 27,825 69,841 30,000 Public Works Maintenance Worker I (new) 50,674 32,867 83,540 42,400 Public Works Engineer I (restored) 76,956 36, ,880 48,000 Tota! $405,596 $268,400 Assumes: COLA of 3% Average annual funding needed: Increase of Health Benefits of 8% All received a step increase 5% Position Cost J ~vi~9!l (9,665) 39,841 41, ,880 $137, 196 $122, Position Cost Analysis - add a Police Officer 6 months earlier than budgeted Total D~partment Police Position Add 0.5 FTE Officer 94,000 Less: Contract S~ving~ 94,000 Position Cost. {!V,1~9~).. To fund these staffing needs alternatives such as cost savings and efficiencies, an increase in utility and property taxes, and other funding sources were considered. Although some cost savings will be realized to fund these positions, the amount is insufficient to cover to whole expense. Staff does not recommend increasing taxes to meet this need. However, one alternative is to reallocate funding. Currently, the City dedicates all Sales Tax from Construction and all SST Mitigation funds to GIP, $1.3 million a year. In exchange for this shift of General Fund revenue to GIP funds, the City dedicates 60%, or $528,000, of the Utility Tax revenue to operating activity. Staff recommends that the dedication of Utility Tax revenue to operating activity be increased to 75%. This will yield approximately $132,000 in additional revenue to the General Fund annually, which is sufficient to fund the staffing requests. The impact to GIP will be minimal as it is 14

15 Attachment 2 anticipated that revenue sources restricted for CIP use will remain healthy for the next few years (see data below). The onetime funding needed for the addition of a patrol police officer effective January 2016 is $94,000. It can be funded by a credit received form King County Sherriff's Office with our 2014 contract for police services, which was approximately $144, CIP Revenue Sources Actual Actual Actual Actual Forecast Forecast F,orecast REET I &II $463,837 $925,434 $867,091 $416,909 $1,745,209 $401,791 $500,000 SST Mitigation $0 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $530,000 $530,000 Sales Tax from Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 Utility Tax $978,329 $998,105 $873,203 $939,872 $351,881 $219,319 $220,000 Park Impact Fees $3,175 $6,300 $6,400 $73,025 $347,087 $688,013 $300,000 Traffic Impact Fees $31,288 $15,529 $78,184 $92,304 $704,130 $942,870 $500,000 TOTAL CIP REVENUES $1,476,629 $1,945,369 $1,824,878 $1,522,109 $4,478,308 $3,581,992 $2,850, The forecast for 2016 and 2017 assumes that an additional 15% of utility tax is allocated to the General Fund. 2 - Starting in % of utility tax was shifted to the General Fund from CIP and 100% of sales tax from construction and SST mitigation was shifted from the General fund to CIP. The net effect was to decrease the General Fund revenue by$1.6 million. TOTALCIP REVENUES $5,000,000 $4,500, $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500, , $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000, $500,000 $ Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Actual ~TOTAL CIP REVENUES Forecast Forecast Forecast 15

16 Attachment 3 ORDINANCE NO. 609 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 600, WHICH ADOPTED A BUDGET FOR 2015/2016, ADOPTING A REVISED BIENNIAL BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, FOR THE YEARS 2015 AND 2016, SETTING FORTH THE REVISED ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES TO FACILITATE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND OPERATIONAL NEEDS. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 600 adopted the Budget; and WHEREAS, certain adjustments to expenditures are in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, it is good financial management practice to update and revise revenue and expenditure estimates to ensure accurate financial reporting and decision making occur; and WHEREAS, the changes set forth herein properly reflect actual activity levels and events that have occurred or are expected to occur during the 24-month budget period; and have been recalculated to more accurately reflect events to form the basis for moving forward with the Biennial Budget; and WHEREAS, this ordinance more accurately reflects the legal limit of expenditure authorized by the City Council for the Budget period; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been on file with the City Clerk more than five (5) days prior to its passage; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The biennial budget of the City of Woodinville, Washington for the years 2015 and 2016, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, is hereby adopted by this reference, in the aggregate total of estimated expenditures for all funds combined of $65,629,940. Page 1 of3 Ordinance No

17 Attachment 3 are: Section 2. The totals of estimated expenditures for each separate fund, ~s set forth herein, Fund Original Revision 1 Ord. 600 Ord General Fund $23,314,809 $24,020, Street Fund $1,365,727 $1,801, Development Services $3,530,025 $3,263, Admission Tax $260,000 $260, Parks & Recreation Special Revenue $766,510 $899, System Replacement $100,000 $100, Strategic Budget Reserve $0 $0 114 Park Impact Fee $1,389,000 $454, Hotel/Motel Tax $192,010 $250, Traffic Impact Fees $1,706,000 $1,454, Utility Tax $3,875,800 $3,903, Debt Service $1,056,584 $1,056, Capital Project $1,481,000 $2,608, Special Capital Project $2,045,000 $2,812, Capital Street Reserve $9,686,000 $11,426, Parks and Recreation Capital Projects $415,000 $417, Facilities Capital Project $4,250,000 $239, Sammamish Bridge Replacement $7,097,000 $7,097, O Surface Water Management $2,216,691 $2,382, Surface Water Capital Projects $633,000 $773, Equipment Rental $132,000 $181, Equipment Replacement $174,000 $199, Unemployment Reserve $30,000 $30,000 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $65,716, 156 $65,629,940 Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the Office of the Auditor of the State of Washington, Division of Municipal Corporations and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 4. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after publication of an approved summary consisting of the title to this ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Page 2 of3 Ordinance No

18 Attachment 3 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Bernard W. Talmas, Mayor By: Jennifer Kuhn, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: Greg Rubstello, City Attorney PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 609 Page 3 of3 Ordinance No

19 Attachment 4 ORDINANCE NO. 617 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, LEVYING THE GENERAL TAXES FOR THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2016, ON ALL PROPERTY, BOTH REAL AND PERSONAL, IN SAID CITY WHICH IS SUBJECT TO TAXATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO CARRY ON THE SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS OF SAID CITY FOR THE ENSUING YEAR AS REQUIRED BY LAW. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodinville has met and considered its mid biennial budget review for the calendar year 2016; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW , the City Council of the City of Woodinville held a public hearing on November 3, 2015, and November 17, 2015 to consider possible increases in property tax revenue and General Fund revenue for the calendar year 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodinville after hearing and after duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, determined that the City of Woodinville requires a regular levy in the amount of $3, 110,000 which includes no increase in property tax revenue from the previous year, exclusive of amounts resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state-assessed property, and amounts authorized by law as a result of annexations that have occurred and refunds made, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLIE, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Woodinville that the regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for the 2016 levy, which is a 0% percentage increase from the property tax revenue from the previous year, but includes $7,450 in refunds made, and includes additional revenue resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state-assessed property, and any additional amounts resulting from any annexations that have occurred, for a total levy of $3, 110,000. Section 2. This ordinance shall be certified to the proper County officials, as provided by law, and taxes here levied shall be collected to pay to the City of Woodinville at the time and in the manner provided by the laws of the State of Washington for the collection of taxes for noncharter code cities. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, or a summary thereof consisting of the title, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after publication. Page 1 of2 Ordinance No

20 Attachment 4 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGNED IN AUTHENTICATION OF ITS PASSAGE THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Bernard W. Talmas, Mayor Jennifer L. Kuhn, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Greg A Rubstello City Attorney PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 617 Page 2 of2 Ordinance No

21 Attachment 5 RESOLUTION NO. 471 A RESOLUTION OF THE WOODINVILLE CITY COUNCIL, REPEALING FEES ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 456, AND ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish fees and charges for services by resolution; WHEREAS, the City Council has supported as review of fees and charges to ensure that the fees and charges are appropriate for the service provided; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Effective January 1, 2016, the Woodinville City Council hereby adopts the fees established by Resolution No. 471 as set forth in Attachment 1 of this resolution. Section 2. Severability/Savings. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution or any resolution adopted or amended hereby, should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phase of this Resolution. RESOLVED this 3rd dlay of November, ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Bernard W. Talmas, Mayor Jennifer Kuhn, City Clerk 21

22 CITY OF WOODINVILLE 2016 FEE SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEES Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Development Agreement Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Actual cost $10,000 de osit $8,229 Conditional Use Permit 1. New construction $6,880, plus $6,304, plus ($ ) Hearing Examiner d~osit... Hearing Examiner deposit.. _..,,.. $3,713, plus $2,735, plus 2. Existing Building or HIP ($978) Hearing Examiner de osit Hearin Examiner de osit $2,618 Actual cost $10,000 deposit $8,229 $2,398 $0 $0 ($220) - Critical... Area Review,.....,..,..,...,......,-..._....,_...,,..,...,,,,,,_....._,_...,,,_..,......,..,..._....._.,_..._ ~:,~!~!_cl_t_~~ "--""'--'"""" _...,_,,,,,_,,_ ,..._..,_,,,,,,,J~:.~?..~ ,,,, "-""""" $2,462...,,..--.~g 2. Determination $535 $535 $ _ Exception _ Hearing Exam~;~~ d~:~~~...--hearing.. Exam~;:r d~]~~~ $ Reasonable Use Permit $5,643, plus $7,067, plus $ 1424 Hearin Examiner de osit Hearing Examiner deposit ' Design Review (standalone - no other permit is... submittedl _._......_ _ _..... _ 1. Deslgn Review -- _minor construction. or _alteration $ $ $0 2. Design Review- ma or construction or alteration $3,810 $3,810 $0 Home Industry Permit $104 $108 $4 Land Use Project Approval (Commercial, Industrial, Multi-Fami!YLPublicl..._ _.._ ,, _ ~e!_!:~(~.~~~ _ _ I~.1.I~ $9, _.. J21 ~-- 2. Existing building/development $5,145 $4,828 ($317)... Master Si.9 nage Plan _._ _ _......_..._..._._ _ _1_: ~~-~!~i-~rati~_e:_ _..._ ~l>~.l _... $3, !?.. 2. Planning Commission $4,660 $4,660 $0 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).Review _ _._ J.:._~~~~~1?~-~.E.~~':fmi~~!.i~~ _ Jj~-~~~ $3,01 o..... ($1,303)_ Determination as part of another permit $\69~ J~!..?95 _,,..._.._J~.. _.. 3. Addendum $1,161 $1,161 $0,,......,.,..,_......,..,,_..., ,...,,...,....,.., _...., 4. Determination for restoration or non-construction $543 $543 $ ,..._...., 5. SEPA E_xemption (may be combined with Shoreline $ 411 $387 ($24) Exemption)_ ,, Environmental Impact Statement $4,313, plus actual cost $4,490, plus actual cost $177 Shoreline Permits "" , ,..., Substantial Develo~ment _,,,._,,..... _ _. $8, _....._. $6, ($2,266) Ex~pron....._.,,..._......_...._... $ $ ($24) 9. 3._ Conditional Use _ Hearin~~~;~~ d~j~~~- Hearing~xa~~~~~~~~..._... ($ 2, 796 )... $16, 173, plus $13,335, plus ($2,838) 4. Variance Hearing Examiner de osit Hearing Examiner deposit S ecial Use Permit $8,361 $8,446 $85 22

23 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Fee Type 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Subdivisions , Short_Subdivision (4 lots or less] $9, $9,_135 _ ($570) -~:... ~.~: !~.i-~:~~--~ub~i~i-='.~~---~~ -~~-r~~~} Hearing Exa~ i~~~od~:~ _... Hearing~xa~ i~~~ d~~~~ ($ )....,, , _ ,, _3. Major Modification ~i.~ J~'.~i~ J!~i~L 4. Final Plat $5,993 $5,993 $0 Temporary Use Permit $1,777 $1,667 ($110)... Wireless_Service Facility _. New.Facility_ _ $4, 710; $4,977 J?_ Substantial Modification to Existing Facility $2.,t$7z:t $2,905 $138 Variance }~$!~?0 $9,323 ($557) Annexation Actual cost $6,500 de osit $1,500 Zoning Map Amendment $7,640 $364 NOTE: Applications that require a hearing by the City's Hearing Examiner are required to pay the Hearing Examiner deposit at the time of submittal. This deposit is required as art of the submittal fees for a com lete a lication. $1,650 $20 $89 plus, hourly fee $3 Actual Cost $2,550 Deposit Actual Cost $2,550 Deposit $0 23

24 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Valuation Building permit fees are based on the valuation of the project. The Building Official determines the valuation of all work, and will consider alternatives calculation to the Building Valuation Data (BVD) method of valuation, such as actual contracts or bids for the work. The valuation listed on the application is an estimate of the fair market value of construction including all labor and materials and may not be the same valuation determined by the Building Official during review. Where the valuation provided by the applicant is higher than the BVD, the Building Official has the option to acgept the provided valuation. Use of the BVD is only an estimate. The City estimates valuation using the February 2015 edition of the BVD Square Foot Construction Costs Table published by the "Building Safety Journal" and gross square footage. The following percentages apply to the valuation of different work types: - New construction, shell buildings, additions, etc.: 100% of BVD - Alterations, repairs & equipment, change of use with minimal work: The val!jatipn listed on the application shall be used concurrent with the approval by the Building Official - Tenant Improvement, Interior Remodel: 20% of the BVD - Garages, decks, porches, 100% of the "Utility, miscellaneous" Building Permit Fee These fees are due at issuance of the ermit. Value of the Project $0-$10,000 $10, $25,000 $25, $50,000 $50, $100,000 $100, Fee.;<''!ll:6$Bfor thjfi~tl50,000 plus 2 $~\{0(1e,ilJ&{if: \'J$:t~clditional $1;00'b; or fraction 'tb&r~bf;lo ''i\lc,;,_ \:tibd including $'1'[~tQOO $185 ''tij'pihe first $10,000 p1ff/itw for each,. I $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $48!.f~r:;{ge first $25,000 plus $15 for each additioriaf$},qoo, or fraction thereof, to and 'Abfii'h including $50,000 '''ise'6lor,n,e first $50,000 plus $9 for each addition'a'ii$1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $1,360 for the first $100,000 plus $8 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 Fee b. $12 ($10)/$2 ($12)/$1 $27/$0 $58/$0 Re-roof (single-family residential only) Re-roof ( commercial only) Change of occupancy with no work Building Permit Pian Review $4;0~t:Jgr the fifsfi@0,000 plus $7 for eacfu:flclditionai '$~;:pgo, or a fraction therjqf$te and indoa,1,119 $1,000,000 $7,226 for $1,000,000 plus $6 for additi.,000, or fraction thereof $4,560 for the first $500,000 plus $7 for each additional $1,000, or a fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 $8,060 for the first $1,000,000 plus $6 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Exceptions - fees shall be as noted and not based on valuation $153 $285 $160 Building Permit Fee based on project valuation. For building and combination building permits, these fees are due at submittal of the permit. 1. Building Plan Review I 65% of the building permit fee I 65% of the building permit fee 2. Fire Plan Review I 15% of the building plan review fee I 15% of the building plan review fee $299 $463/$0 $834/$0 $7 NEW $14 I $0 I $0 NOTE:. Plan review fees cover the cost of the initial review and two (2) resubmittal.reviews. If the application is not approved after the second resubmittal review or if there are significant changes to the scope of work, additional plan review fees may apply. Plan review fees do not cover the cost of structural review or outside consultant review. 24

25 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471.-ii;N1Qi~i~'i!iF~~:finnl'11is -- ~-.- -';-~-- ~-~-- ~ ~-, -_ ~-, ~m~s~-fe;s- a~;-i;;:~i-i~~~-;;m; o~tm@.wegmnitt -: -,C < ~-~---~J:,.-»n>,Cn,-. '-'~n - n ~ - nn ~---=Cw..<,>~ n ""- ~ nn - - nn <. ~-~ >. n nn n n -- ~-"'-- n n -"'- n - _.,t Fee Type Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Residential Demolition (per structure) $75 $143 $68 Commercial Demolition (per structure) $75 $476 $401 Plan Review, if required $58 $61 $3, ' -.,,, f131:b,r!inttl~11l.2".i, 1E;, ); n n _ -~ -- :. _ -: ' t - n <.a _ ~ -, - ' - - -, --_, -C.., ~"- n ~ :f!lli@~1}te~s~'?lre- rull1e, ~lr'ts i~jil'~e _offi thr~ m!frlil)l:ff, Jc, ~, ~ l i'" ] n,,., 1 t n ~ n f _.. - n 4 ><, c "-' - r. n ~ n n > nnnt': "~ -'<-n --~~ nn, "" nn '.a - '-'= n n n n -- n ~ - ---!-n'.. nn"~ - ; --~- = - - n n n - =- n -;::,. n n "" "-n-m ' Fee Type Base Mechanical Permit Fee Fee per fixture or piping only (all fixtures include associated piping, duct work or piping only is charged as a single fixture Plan Review, if required 2015 Fee 2016 Fee $90 $20 <10 fixtures: $31 >11 fixtures: $61 Fee~ $4 $1 $1 $3 Base Plumbing Permit Fee Fee per fixture or piping only (all fixtures include.. associated piping, duct work or piping only is charge' as a single fixture Plan Review, if required $90 $20 <10 fixtures: $31 >11 fixtures: $61 $7 $1 $3 Permanent Sig~),.J~der Master Sign"'""."i;,1,,n 1. Permit fee <'zg;;,, 2. Plan review fee Temporary Sign ::~}';\,,,,,,,, 1. Portable and Limited Duratioh{,ign Permit '!f?j.f;';; 2. Annual Renewal Fee (appli6~~j~\jtfhe sgrr{ii lgn is used after initial permit and codeh:~} 2.ry9JJ]RQ,~riged) $120 None $110 $27 $195 $116persign $127 None $75 $17 $4 $2 $7 $0 ($35) ($10) Tree Removal Under Tree Plan IV $0 $20 25

26 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 New construction Improvements to existing non-residential development, modification and maintenance Improvements to existing single-family development, modification and maintenance $1,655 plus $1 per cubic yard over 100 cubic yards, and $0.10 per cubic yard after 1,000 cubic ard $616 $616i, $900 plus $1 per cubic yard over 100 cubic yards, and $0.50 per cubic yard after 1,000 cubic ard $543 plus $1 per cubic yard over 100 cubic yards, and $0.50 per cubic yard after 1,000 cubic ards $291, plus $1 per cubic yard over 100 cubic yards, and $0.50 per cubic yard after 1,000 cubic ards ($755)/ $0/ $0.40 ($73)/ $1/ $0.50 ($325)/ $1/$0.50 Fee Type 2015 Fee 2016 Fee. Fee A. Improvement to public right-of-way that is not a requirement of development, such as replacing a drivewa or installing a small rocker Improvement to, or installation of utilities in, public right-of-way as part of development $88 $0 $874 pl~i'f[t~r foot after '"first 100 feet $4 $0 $70/$0 Installation of utilities in right-of-way that includes only: 1) directional boring, 2) installing wires in existing conduits, overlash to existing aeria)~ 1 1or(~Jl!f\lif;1dow cuts less than 16 square feet each #Permiff~~t.$1~6 plus $fi5?tjpc>t \;,)ifopfter fitsfitqq,j~~t up to f;ooq.:, 'j~~tand $0.1 QJp~fQqt, after tffejf 'Ji!tflif f f;~~:::~!ij;$e1t per foot1ft~r first 100 feet up to 1,000leif,pnd $0.10 per foot affgflfhe first 1,000 feet $804 plus $2 per foot after first 100 feet up to 1,000 feet, and $0.20 per foot after first 1,000 feet $0/$0/$0 $321 $15 Permit fee: $147 Plan review fee: $159 $321 $15 Annual renewal fee: $70 Annual renewal fee: $70 $0 Short Term Profit (72 or less cohij~p()µs hq1,1f J&ffairs, house moves, temporary sales, aniff :''ii(fres) Short Term Nonprofit (72 or less continuous hours to a non-profit organization for assemblies, bike races, block parties, parades, parking, processions, nonmotorized vehicle races, street dances, which do not involve an ph sical disturbance of the right-of-wa Installation of locking residential mailboxes Ri ht-of-wa Vacation Right-of-Wa Use Permit Permit fee: $147 Plan review fee: $159 $2 million liability insurance policy also required $0 $5,754 $0 $306 $2 million liability insurance olic also required $162 $2 million liability insurance policy also required $0 $5,828 $1,337 $0 $8 $0 $74 $1,337 26

27 - Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Pre-Application 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A First Pre-Application. Meeting_ $0 $0 $0 Subsequent Meetings $496 $150 $346 Special Events Permit 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A 1. For-Profit Event $395 $ ~ 5) 2. Non-Profit Event $197 $182 $15 Note: Other fees may be required to cover the cost of City services necessary for the event, such as police and fire services, and other permits/fees ma be required, such as fire operational, right-of-wa, and/or sign permits. Other Types 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Zoning Verification Letter Individual Roadside Memorial Signs $0 $218 $170 $228 $170 $10 Post-Issuance Permit Revision: These fees are due at issuance of the revision. Field Change Additional Plan Reviews (more than 2 revisions): These fees are due at issuance of the ermit. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy: These fees are due at issuance of the TCO. Extension of Permit, Project Approval: These fees at renewal of the ermit. Special Investigative Fee for Work Initiated or Complef~q; without a Permit: These fees are due at issuance of the\:{ 1 2 permit, and are paid in addition to the required permit fees. Washington State Building NOTE: Except as noted otherwise, fees and charges are nonrefundable. {iltqli~iti~t~t~~~l~it "<;1;qfmulti-family units additi:ooal $2.00 er unit. Hourly fee 20%;6fpermit fee, miffirnwn $250 Equal to permit fee (plan!eview fees not included) $4.50 per building, demolition, or sign permit. For multi-family units additional $2.00 er unit. Included in permit fee $24 $0 10% $0 $0 $0/$0 $0 Inspection Type Ins ections greater than twt;ijpurs Re-inspection (including work''rlgth~ady for i.. when ins ector arrives on-site,;, \cc~;. tion Voluntary Inspection - Inspections re'cfu:~it{ Ji'y the owner's or representative not associateh,wrth a permit or land use ap lication i.e., Grou Homes, etc. Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum char e two-hours Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated : IMP~ ~lr!~l,s " -. ',. Fee Type Park Impact Fee Traffic Impact Fee '"" -,,.,. -~ ".. ~ ~--- ~-'- ~ ~~ cj - '~ -\' '_-. ~- -~ Fee 2016 Fee FeeA $0 Hourly fee $119 Hourly fee Hourly fee $0 $113 $119 $6 Hourly fee Hourly fee $0 Hourly fee Hourly fee $ : _- -- _ --,-- ~=.. ~ ime.$e~~~i~~ Gl_;; a!~~irn~ri;;~ f~t~:~.~~itti~i":~.j; ( n ---.,. -~- "!,...,.., ~-::.-~ ,t,,..,,. _,., s::;:...l.-,._,., Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Per Municipal Code Per Municipal Code $0 Per Municipal Code Per Municipal Code $0 27

28 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Hearing Examiner 2. City Attorney 4. Other Consultant Reviews $2,500 $1,500.$2,500 $1,500 $0 NOTE: Deposits shau be used to reimburse for costs involved 1JYith processing an application. Deposits shal.1 be held for a period not to exceed three months. from the date of completion pfthe project to allow for all billings related to the event to be.received by the City and billed against cost When costs exceed the original deposit, an. additio.nal deposit wih be required before any additional work wih be performed, as determined b the Cit ; No int~rest shall accrue to ao deposit. Per Municipal Code $0 Security/monitoring administration H~~fl, Hourly fee $0 Security/monitoring inspection,;,~p'ti;tlilf~~,, Hourly fee $0 NOTE: If the City finds it necessary to utilize funds provided for a guarantee, and incurs expenses in obtaining and administering such funds, a portion of these monies. shall also be used to reimbur~e the City for such recovery costs. If the guarantee is not adequate to cover all necessary costs, the developer/owner is required to make up the deficit in cash within 30 days ofreceipt of written notice from the Cit. Fire Alarm System 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Modification (Monitoring, Device Swap, Tenant $282 $293 $11 New Systems $502 $415 ($87) 2016 Fee Fee A Tenant Improvement heads $295 $ heads $331 $377 $ heads $374 $437 $63 New Systems an zone) $452 $437 ($15) 2. $461 $476 $15 3. $550 $556 $6 4. $598 $599 $1 Fire Extinguishing/Suppression System 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Modifications to Existing $266 $266 $0 New Systems $350 $350 $0 Underground Supply Permits 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Commercial Buildings $447 $465 $18 Residential Buildings $319 $345 $26 Standpipe Installation 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Class I or II $393 $346 ($47) Class Ill $561 $526 ($35) Other Types of Permits/Inspections 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee~ Fire Pump Installation $338 $346 $8 Power Generators $393 $315 ($78) Permitted Hazardous $502 $506 $4 28

29 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Fire Alarm System Flammable/Combustible Liquids/Construction 1. Flam/Comb Pipeline Repair or Modify 2. Tank Install/Construction first tank 3. Tank Install/Construction each additional tank 4. Modify or Alter Equipment 5. Tank Removal/Abandon (>500 gals only) first tank 6. Tank Removal/Abandon (>500 gals only) second and each additional tank 7. Tank Removal/Abandon (<500 gals only) per tank LPG Construction 1. Install or Modify LP-gas system/const. 2. Tank Install - Residential (R-3) >500 gals only Compressed Gas System, Install, Modify, or Remove Inspection/Testing, if over 2 hours total per permit 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee /1. $376 $387 $11 $505 $505 $0 $376 $315 ($61) $408 $418 $10 $426 $315 ($111) $306 $220 ($86) $137 $243 $106 $376 $387 $11 $214 $84 $556 ($32) Hourly fee $119 $256 $222 ($34) '.%J208 $222 $14,$220 $222 $2 $228 $222 ($6) $214 $222 $8 $213 $222 $9 $208 $222 $ Class ltif@g~ Class 11-II IA'li'igylci,s 6.20 Hazardous Materfal's[t, 6.22 High Piled Storage > so~ ; q FT 6.24 Industrial Ovens Operations 6.25 Lumberyard and Woodworking Pla~tf LPG, Storage, Use or Transport: Aggregate Water Capacity/Ops= 125 to <500 gal 6.32 Open Flames and Candles, Assembly Areas, Dining Areas & Drinking Establishments 6.38 Refrigeration Equipment 6.39 Repair Garage/Fuel Dispensing Facilities* *Exce t see Flammable and Combustible Li uids/0 s 6.41 Spraying or Dipping Operations 6.42 Scrap tires and Tire Byproducts Storage $227 $222 ($5) $235 $222 ($13) $205 $222 $17 $270 $222 ($48) $235 $222 ($13) $212 $222 $10 $187 $222 $35 $205 $222 $17 $197 $222 $25 $209 $222 $13 $201 $222 $21 $183 $222 $39 $200 $222 $22 NOTE: Fees listed above are limited to a maximum of $1,090 per business per structure, regardless of number of hazards. 29

30 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 Places of Assembly - Operational Permits 1. Listed Occupancy $235 $245 $10 2. Listed Occupancy $258 $268 $10 3. Listed Occupancy $284 $294 $10 4. Listed Occupancy 1000 or more $310 $320 $10 5. Non-profit Status $201 $211 $10 Places of Assembly - Special Events (Outdoors >500 people; Indoors over listed occupancy) 1. For-Profit Event $297 $246 ($51) 2. Not-For-Profit Event $198 $198 $0 Tents and Canopies, Temporary Membrane Structures $246 $222 ($24) Reviews/Inspections/Renewals 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Special Inspections or Re-inspections Ho~"rfyJ'f~~''' Hourly fee $10 Annual Inspections 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Annual Inspection Fee $10 Position Public Works Director, Developm $7 Assistant Public Works Direct9t $133 $138 $5 Senior Engineer, Senior Planne $125 $130 $5 $117 $122 $5 $109 $119 $10 $104 $110 $6 $102 $108 $6 $117 $123 $5 30

31 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 SURFACE WATER MANGEMENT FEES Rate Category Percent Impervious Surface Annual Service Charge Annual Service Charge 1) Residential: single-family home NA $87.15/parcel $87.15/parcel $0 2) Very Light S10% $87.15/parcel $87.15/parcel $0 3) Lighr More than 10%, :;;; 20% $203.36/acre $203.36/acre $0 4) Moderate More than 20%, :;;; 45% $421.25/acre $421.25/acre $0 5) Moderate Heavy More than 45%, :;;; 65% $813.44/acre $813.44/acre $0 6) Heavy* More than 65%, :;;; 85% $1,031.31/acre.:(.\.':-. :,..-.. $1,031.31/acre $0 7) Very Heavy More than 85%, :;;; 100% $1.~?~}a~l~tre $1,350.89/acre $0 * With commercial properties that have flow control, the rate will be reduced by Fee 8. 31

32 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 PARK FEES $75.00/hr Per Field $75.00/hr Per Field $0 Youth Resident* $40.00/hr Per Field $40.00/hr Per Field $0 Northshore Youth Soccer Association (contractual dates only) $32.00/hr Per Field $32.00/hr Per Field $0 Adult - Resident and Non-Resident $75.00/hr Per Field $75.00/hr Per Field $0 *Criteria to Qualify for Woodinville Youth Resident Discount: INDIVIDUAUNON-BLOCK BOOKING APPLICANTS: 1. Applicant or Business must have Woodinville City address. 2. Rental event must be non-commercial in nature. All commercial rental harged the non-resident rate. * A Block Booking Permit must be completed for customers requesting more th within a 6 month period. Block Booking is only available to non-profit organizations, such as sport leagues. ORGANIZATION BLOCK BOOKING: Must have at least 50 members or 10% of the organization roster least three of the following criteria: 1. Official mailing address or place of busin~ 2. "Woodinville" is included in the Official N~ 3. Legally formed and existing Non-Profit st1 4. Rental event must be non-commercial in n $23 $23 $0 32

33 Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 OTHER CITY FEES Description 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee 6. Customized GIS Request $60/hour $60/hour $0 CD/DVD 1: Standard GIS Layers $30 $10 ($20) Maps by Media Size: Download Free Free $0 8.5x11 $5 $4 $1 11x17 $8 $7 $1 22x34 $12 $11 $1 24x36 $15 $14 $1 36x48 $20 $19 $1 Description Letter and Legal size black and white copies $0 Letter Size (8 W' x 11 ") color copies $0 Legal Size (8 %" x 14") color copies $Cf5~fper page $0 11x17 color copies $1.19 per page $0 CD/DVD $2 $2 Customized CD-ROM $0 Audio Tape Charged by outside vendor $0 DVD from Meetings Charged by outside vendor $0 Charged by outside vendor $0 Fee for performi~'9:qpz~ry services $10 per notary block $10 per notary block $0 Description 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee 6. Fee for engraving onto brick or tile.~it'. 1'ltJR~f;~~teway Park Charged by outside vendor Charged by outside vendor $0 '"SEP Description 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee 6. Fee for each participant's sign location $200 $200 $0 33

34 '.~ ' ~ l~iis~.i~:rl{~~;jii~~.-:, ~~:-.-, :, ~-. ~ ~~:.. -- ~ ~ -~- : --~~-. ' Attachment 1 of Resolution 471 ::...~,_,,._,:-_,.:: ~_:,.,,,_y~--_,t-:----~~-.;-~-----~-----=-,- -- ' - ",,-- ' '' - - ' ~ - -~ -c ~ - ::-- ~---- ""';:'.,-, =- -~'-~--~ ~ ~-~-:::-~=-~- -- ~ -=-,-~ - -- ~~)PfJ~l!!J: i~e~irf~ ~f RJjlTqu~ilf~J ~,tatrf ~m angfsl _ D escnp t ion ' -, _- ~ :-- - ~ ; -- -':_-~ ~- ~- ""-~ ~ - - ' ' ' ' -. _, ' '' ' ' ' ""- :_10 - k -- ' ' - ~ ~' _"..._ = 2015 F ee 2016 F ee ee City Processing Fee $25 $25 $0 City Photo fee $12 $12 $0 *Fees established by US Dept. Of State Description 2015 Fee 2016 Fee Fee A Commercial Alarms: Third, fourth and fifth false alarms $50 each $0 Sixth and additional false alarms $100 each $0 Residential Alarms: Fourth and fifth false alarms $50 each $0 Sixth and additional false alarms :.,,,..-,:.' $100 eacn ;?ta. $100 each $0 Description 2016 Fee Fee A First card $15 $0 Additional cards $5 $ Fee 2016 Fee Fee A $30 $30 $0 $60 $60 $0 $15 $15 $0 $15 $15 $0 Reissue $5 $5 $0 Transfer $3 $3 $0 Disabled[4] $15 $15 $0 [1] Proof is required [2] Pet is 8 weeks to 6 months old. good for 6 months [3] Owner proves they are 65 or older with proof of pet spayed or neutered [4] Owner meets eligibility requirements for a Metro Regional Reduced Fare Permit 34