Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Mean Comparisons August Purdue University"

Transcription

1 Mean Comparisons August 2010 University

2 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted and locally administered oversamples and other non-randomly selected students are not included in this report. Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. The name of each variable appears in the second column for easy reference to your data file and the summary statistics at the end of this section. Response options are also provided to help you interpret the statistics. Benchmark Items that make up the five Benchmarks of ive Educational Practice are indicated by the following: LAC=Level of Academic Challenge ACL=Active and Collaborative Learning SFI=Student-Faculty Interaction EEE=Enriching Educational Experiences SCE=Supportive Campus Environment Mean The mean is the weighted arithmetic average of student responses on a particular item. Means are provided for your institution and all comparison groups. Additional details regarding weighting can be found on the NSSE Web site. nsse.iub.edu/links/institutional_reporting Class Results are reported separately for first-year students (FY) and seniors (SR). Institution-reported class ranks are used. Statistical Significance Items with mean differences that are larger than would be expected by chance alone are noted with one, two, or three asterisks, referring to three significance levels (p<.05, p<.01, and p<.001). The smaller the significance level, the smaller the likelihood that the difference is due to chance. Statistical significance does not guarantee the result is substantive or important. Large sample sizes (like those produced by NSSE) tend to generate more statistically significant results even though the magnitude of mean differences may be inconsequential. Consult effect sizes (see below) to judge the practical meaning of the results. Size size indicates the practical significance of the mean difference. It is calculated by dividing the mean difference by the pooled standard deviation. In practice, an effect size of.2 is often considered small,.5 moderate, and.8 large. A positive sign indicates that your institution's mean was greater, thus showing an affirmative result for your institution. A negative sign indicates the institution lags behind the comparison group, suggesting that the student behavior or institutional practice represented by the item may warrant attention. An exception to this interpretation is the coming to class unprepared item (item 1f.) where a negative sign is preferred (i.e., meaning fewer students reporting coming to class unprepared)

3 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing assignments Come to class without completing readings or assignments Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community-based project (e.g. service learning) as part of a regular course Variable CLQUEST CLPRESEN REWROPAP INTEGRAT DIVCLASS CLUNPREP CLASSGRP OCCGRP INTIDEAS TUTOR COMMPROJ Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c ACL ACL ACL ACL ACL ACL compared with: In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often FY *** *** *** -.09 SR ** *** *** -.11 FY *** *** ***.38 SR *** *** ***.17 FY *** *** SR FY ** * SR * *** *** -.08 FY * *** -.09 SR *** *** *** -.14 FY ** * SR ** *** ***.16 FY *** *** ***.25 SR *** *** ***.13 FY *** *** ***.30 SR *** *** ***.34 FY SR FY SR *** *** ***.10 FY * SR *** *** ***.11 a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 1 -

4 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University l. Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Variable ITACADEM compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c EEE FY *.05 SR ** *** ** -.07 m. Used to communicate with an instructor FY *** *** *** -.16 SR *** *** *** -.11 n. o. p. q. r. s. t. u. v. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own Had serious conversations with students who are very different from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values FACGRADE FACPLANS FACIDEAS FACFEED WORKHARD FACOTHER OOCIDEAS DIVRSTUD DIFFSTU2 SFI SFI SFI SFI LAC SFI ACL EEE EEE FY *** *** *** -.13 SR FY SR FY SR FY *** *** *** -.12 SR ** *** *** -.09 FY SR ** ** FY * * **.07 SR *** *** ***.15 FY *** *** *** -.16 SR *** *** *** -.14 FY *** *** *** -.10 SR ** *** * -.05 FY * *** ** -.08 SR * a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 2 -

5 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University 2. Mental Activities Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your a. courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a b. particular case or situation in depth and considering its components Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or c. experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Making judgments about the value of info., arguments, or methods, such as examining how d. others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions Applying theories or concepts to practical e. problems or in new situations 3. Reading and Writing a. b. c. d. e. Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). Variable MEMORIZE ANALYZE SYNTHESZ EVALUATE APPLYING READASGN READOWN WRITEMOR WRITEMID WRITESML compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC During the current school year, how much has your coursework emphasized the following mental activities? 1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much FY SR FY ** SR * FY ** SR *** *** *** -.09 FY SR FY SR * **.07 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done? 1=None, 2=1-4, 3=5-10, 4=11-20, 5=More than 20 FY *** *** *** -.19 SR *** *** *** -.19 FY SR * -.05 FY * ** **.09 SR *** *** ***.10 FY *** *** *** -.11 SR *** *** * -.06 FY *** *** *** -.12 SR b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 3 -

6 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University 4. Problem Sets Number of problem sets that take you more than an a. hour to complete b. Variable compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD FY *** *** ***.29 SR *** *** ***.15 FY *** *** ***.20 SR *** *** *** Examinations 1=Very little to 7=Very much Select the circle that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school EXAMS FY * **.07 year have challenged you to do your best work. SR During the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 6. Additional Collegiate Experiences 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Very often a. b. Attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theater FY *** *** *** -.13 ATDART07 or other performance SR *** *** *** -.08 Exercised or participated in physical fitness FY ** ** * -.07 EXRCSE05 activities SR c. d. e. f. Number of problem sets that take you less than an hour to complete Participated in activities to enhance your spirituality (worship, meditation, prayer, etc.) Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views on a topic or issue Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective Learned something that changed the way you understand an issue or concept 7. Enriching Educational Experiences Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op a. experience, or clinical assignment PROBSETA PROBSETB WORSHP05 OWNVIEW OTHRVIEW CHNGVIEW INTERN04 EEE In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you complete? 1=None, 2=1-2, 3=3-4, 4=5-6, 5=More than 6 FY *** *** **.08 SR *** *** *.05 FY ** *** *** -.10 SR * ** ** -.07 FY ** *** ** -.08 SR *** *** *** -.10 FY *** *** *** -.11 SR *** *** ** -.08 Which of the following have you done or do you plan to do before you graduate from your institution? (Recoded: 0=Have not decided, Do not plan to do, Plan to do; 1=Done. Thus, the mean is the proportion responding "Done" among all valid respondents.) FY SR *** *** ***.26

7 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University Variable compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c b. c. Community service or volunteer work Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together VOLNTR04 LRNCOM04 EEE EEE FY *** *** *** -.11 SR *** ** ***.14 FY *** ***.14 SR * ** ***.11 d. Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements RESRCH04 SFI FY SR **.07 e. Foreign language coursework FORLNG04 EEE FY *** *** *** -.10 SR *** f. Study abroad STDABR04 EEE FY SR * *** g. h. Independent study or self-designed major Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) 8. Quality of Relationships INDSTD04 SNRX04 EEE EEE FY ** *** ***.13 SR * FY * * **.09 SR *** *** ***.29 Select the circle that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at your institution. 1=Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of alienation to 7=Friendly, Supportive, Sense of belonging a. Relationships with other students ENVSTU SCE FY SR *** *** ***.12 1=Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic to 7=Available, Helpful, Sympathetic b. Relationships with faculty members ENVFAC SCE FY *** *** *** -.12 SR * * =Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid to 7=Helpful, Considerate, Flexible c. Relationships with administrative personnel and offices ENVADM SCE FY SR a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 5 -

8 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University 9. Time Usage Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, a. doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities) b. c. d. e. f. g. 10. Institutional Environment Spending significant amounts of time studying and a. on academic work b. c. Working for pay on campus Working for pay off campus Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Variable ACADPR01 WORKON01 WORKOF01 compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c FY *** *** ***.20 SR *** ** **.08 FY SR ** * FY SR *** *** *** -.32 COCURR01 EEE FY *** * ***.11 SOCIAL05 CAREDE01 COMMUTE ENVSCHOL ENVSUPRT ENVDIVRS LAC LAC SCE EEE About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? 1=0 hrs/wk, 2=1-5 hrs/wk, 3=6-10 hrs/wk, 4=11-15 hrs/wk, 5=16-20 hrs/wk, 6=21-25 hrs/wk, 7=26-30 hrs/wk, 8=More than 30 hrs/wk SR *** *** ***.24 FY *** *** *** -.09 SR ***.12 FY ** *** SR *** -.17 FY ** **.07 SR *** * *** -.08 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? 1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much FY *** ** ***.13 SR *** *** ***.13 FY *** *** *** -.11 SR * ** FY ** * ***.11 SR ** a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 6 -

9 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University d. e. f. g. 11. Educational and Personal Growth a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Providing the support you need to thrive socially Attending campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Using computers in academic work Acquiring a broad general education Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills Writing clearly and effectively Speaking clearly and effectively Thinking critically and analytically Analyzing quantitative problems Using computing and information technology Working effectively with others a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). Variable ENVNACAD ENVSOCAL ENVEVENT ENVCOMPT GNGENLED GNWORK GNWRITE GNSPEAK GNANALY GNQUANT GNCMPTS GNOTHERS compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c SCE SCE FY *** *** ** -.08 SR FY *** *** *** -.09 SR *** ** FY *** *** *** -.23 SR *** *** *** -.13 FY *** *** ***.15 SR *** *** ***.16 To what extent has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? 1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much FY *** *** *** -.16 SR * FY ***.10 SR *** *** ***.20 FY *** *** *** -.12 SR *** *** *** -.12 FY ** ** **.08 SR ** * ***.09 FY *** *** * -.07 SR **.08 FY **.08 SR *** *** ***.20 FY *** *** ***.18 SR *** *** ***.19 FY *** *** ***.20 SR *** *** ***.20 b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 7 -

10 NSSE 2010 Mean Comparisons University i. j. k. l. n. o. Voting in local, state, or national elections Learning effectively on your own Understanding yourself Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds m. Solving complex real-world problems Developing a personal code of values and ethics Contributing to the welfare of your community Variable GNCITIZN GNINQ GNSELF GNDIVERS GNPROBSV GNETHICS GNCOMMUN p. Developing a deepened sense of spirituality GNSPIRIT compared with: Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c FY *** *** *** -.20 SR *** *** *** -.13 FY * ** SR ***.09 FY *** *** * -.07 SR FY SR FY ***.10 SR *** *** ***.17 FY ** ** SR FY *** *** *** -.10 SR *** *** ** -.08 FY SR Academic Advising 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your ADVISE FY institution? SR * *** *** Satisfaction 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent How would you evaluate your entire educational FY * ** ENTIREXP experience at this institution? SR * ** =Definitely no, 2=Probably no, 3=Probably yes, 4=Definitely yes If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending? SAMECOLL FY SR **.07 IPEDS: a Weighted by gender and enrollment status (and size for comparisons). b * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed). c Mean difference divided by pooled SD - 8 -

11 N Mean Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d CLQUEST 1, ,514 2,372 2, CLPRESEN 1, ,415 2,272 2, REWROPAP 1, ,529 2,377 2, INTEGRAT 1, ,497 2,344 19, DIVCLASS 1, ,426 2,291 2, CLUNPREP 1, ,758 14,187 19, CLASSGRP 1, ,400 2,272 2, OCCGRP 1, ,786 14,223 19, INTIDEAS 1, ,983 13,285 18, TUTOR 1, ,010 13,320 18, COMMPROJ 1, ,935 13,229 18, ITACADEM 1, ,255 2,130 18, , ,270 13,326 18, FACGRADE 1, ,992 13,300 18, FACPLANS 1, ,002 13,304 18, FACIDEAS 1, ,026 13,334 18, FACFEED 1, ,769 13,032 17, WORKHARD 1, ,760 13,021 17, FACOTHER 1, ,736 12,989 17, OOCIDEAS 1, ,201 2,084 1, DIVRSTUD 1, ,204 2,086 17, DIFFSTU2 1, ,192 2,074 1, MEMORIZE 1, ,703 12,956 17, ANALYZE 1, ,657 12,908 17, SYNTHESZ 1, ,638 2,072 17, EVALUATE 1, ,662 12,915 17, APPLYING 1, ,692 12,949 17, READASGN 1, ,240 2,108 1, a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation. NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University Peers and Big 10 Significance e compared with: Peers and Big 10 Size f compared with: - 1 -

12 N Mean Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University Peers and Big 10 Significance e compared with: Peers and Big 10 Size f compared with: READOWN 1, ,639 12,888 17, WRITEMOR 1, ,124 1,998 1, WRITEMID 1, ,230 2,094 1, WRITESML 1, ,652 12,904 17, PROBSETA 1, ,166 2,047 1, PROBSETB 1, ,630 12,868 17, EXAMS 1, ,667 2,049 17, ATDART07 1, ,297 2,154 1, EXRCSE05 1, ,533 12,763 17, WORSHP05 1, ,141 2,035 1, OWNVIEW 1, ,511 12,735 17, OTHRVIEW 1, ,520 12,744 17, CHNGVIEW 1, ,166 2,048 1, INTERN04 1, ,386 12,586 17, VOLNTR04 1, ,197 2,071 1, LRNCOM04 1, ,147 1,989 1, RESRCH04 1, ,356 12,551 17, FORLNG04 1, ,273 2,148 1, STDABR04 1, ,342 12,525 17, INDSTD04 1, ,952 1,855 1, SNRX04 1, ,968 1,872 1, ENVSTU 1, ,360 12,560 17, ENVFAC 1, ,079 1,974 1, ENVADM 1, ,347 12,542 17, ACADPR01 1, ,098 1,993 1, WORKON01 1, ,212 12,463 17, WORKOF01 1, ,257 1,937 1, COCURR01 1, ,107 2,000 1, a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation

13 N Mean Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University Peers and Big 10 Significance e compared with: Peers and Big 10 Size f compared with: SOCIAL05 1, ,243 12,419 1, CAREDE01 1, ,982 1,870 1, COMMUTE 1, ,156 2,010 1, ENVSCHOL 1, ,162 12,332 16, ENVSUPRT 1, ,128 2,006 1, ENVDIVRS 1, ,120 12,278 16, ENVNACAD 1, ,180 2,050 1, ENVSOCAL 1, ,094 12,243 16, ENVEVENT 1, ,119 1,995 1, ENVCOMPT 1, ,198 2,059 1, GNGENLED 1, ,001 1,936 16, GNWORK 1, ,987 12,128 1, GNWRITE 1, ,996 1,967 1, GNSPEAK 1, ,145 2,019 1, GNANALY 1, ,021 12,108 1, GNQUANT 1, ,955 12,084 16, GNCMPTS 1, ,994 12,132 16, GNOTHERS 1, ,007 12,145 16, GNCITIZN 1, ,821 11,937 16, GNINQ 1, ,981 1,881 1, GNSELF 1, ,003 1,895 1, GNDIVERS 1, ,814 11,924 16, GNPROBSV 1, ,817 11,923 16, GNETHICS 1, ,024 11,912 16, GNCOMMUN 1, ,814 11,927 16, GNSPIRIT 1, ,819 11,937 16, ADVISE 1, ,943 12,082 16, ENTIREXP 1, ,089 1,970 16, SAMECOLL 1, ,955 12,092 16, a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. IPEDS: d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation

14 NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University CLQUEST CLPRESEN REWROPAP INTEGRAT DIVCLASS CLUNPREP CLASSGRP OCCGRP INTIDEAS TUTOR COMMPROJ ITACADEM FACGRADE FACPLANS FACIDEAS FACFEED WORKHARD FACOTHER OOCIDEAS DIVRSTUD DIFFSTU2 MEMORIZE ANALYZE SYNTHESZ EVALUATE APPLYING READASGN N Mean Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d Significance e Size f 1, ,486 16,174 24, , ,698 2,550 2, , ,456 16,137 2, , ,503 16,181 24, , ,497 16,179 24, , ,647 2,507 2, , ,666 2,532 24, , ,787 2,627 2, , ,577 2,437 2, , ,542 2,419 2, , ,488 15,401 23, , ,888 15,483 23, , ,474 2,340 2, , ,606 2,458 2, , ,875 15,466 23, , ,894 15,486 23, , ,693 2,356 23, , ,672 15,235 23, , ,655 15,206 23, , ,665 15,213 23, , ,697 15,258 2, , ,700 15,256 2, , ,588 15,141 23, , ,543 15,087 23, , ,484 2,344 2, , ,528 15,094 2, , ,582 15,138 23, , ,501 2,371 2, Peers and Big 10 compared with: Peers and Big 10 compared with: a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation

15 NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University READOWN WRITEMOR WRITEMID WRITESML PROBSETA PROBSETB EXAMS ATDART07 EXRCSE05 WORSHP05 OWNVIEW OTHRVIEW CHNGVIEW INTERN04 VOLNTR04 LRNCOM04 RESRCH04 FORLNG04 STDABR04 INDSTD04 SNRX04 ENVSTU ENVFAC ENVADM ACADPR01 WORKON01 WORKOF01 COCURR01 N Mean Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d Significance e Size f Peers and Big 10 compared with: Peers and Big 10 compared with: 1, ,530 15,073 23, , ,381 2,267 23, , ,516 15,060 23, , ,534 15,077 23, , ,478 15,015 2, , ,473 2,314 22, , ,537 15,073 23, , ,504 2,366 2, , ,361 14,884 22, , ,352 14,876 22, , ,338 14,863 22, , ,414 2,287 22, , ,391 14,919 22, , ,450 2,307 2, , ,435 2,283 2, , ,336 2,206 2, , ,225 14,730 2, , ,384 2,252 22, , ,424 2,312 22, , ,408 2,305 22, , ,279 2,187 2, , ,474 2,332 2, , ,225 14,726 22, , ,220 14,719 22, , ,324 2,212 2, , ,392 2,249 22, , ,579 2,392 2, , ,256 2,173 1, a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation

16 N Mean NSSE 2010 Detailed Statistics a University Standard Error of the Mean b Standard Deviation c Degrees of Freedom d Significance e Size f Peers and Big 10 compared with: Peers and Big 10 compared with: SOCIAL05 1, ,107 14,593 22, CAREDE01 1, ,092 14,579 2, COMMUTE 1, ,429 2,269 2, ENVSCHOL 1, ,002 14,475 22, ENVSUPRT 1, ,958 14,427 22, ENVDIVRS 1, ,967 14,432 22, ENVNACAD 1, ,982 14,444 22, ENVSOCAL 1, ,384 2,243 22, ENVEVENT 1, ,370 2,237 22, ENVCOMPT 1, ,455 2,291 2, GNGENLED 1, ,881 14,329 21, GNWORK 1, ,861 14,306 21, GNWRITE 1, ,873 14,323 21, GNSPEAK 1, ,390 2,242 2, GNANALY 1, ,859 14,306 2, GNQUANT 1, ,841 14,281 21, GNCMPTS 1, ,419 2,272 2, GNOTHERS 1, ,433 2,278 2, GNCITIZN 1, ,306 2,186 1, GNINQ 1, ,727 14,146 21, GNSELF 1, ,680 14,100 1, GNDIVERS 1, ,717 14,144 1, GNPROBSV 1, ,323 2,195 2, GNETHICS 1, ,723 14,141 1, GNCOMMUN 1, ,724 14,147 21, GNSPIRIT 1, ,222 2,111 1, ADVISE 1, ,856 2,193 2, ENTIREXP 1, ,847 14,292 21, SAMECOLL 1, ,862 14,311 21, a All statistics are weighted by gender and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. b The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean. c A measure of the amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. IPEDS: d Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption. e Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. f size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, then dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation

17 Frequency Distributions August 2010 University

18 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that comprise the five Benchmarks of ive Educational Practice are indicated by the following: LAC=Level of Academic Challenge ACL=Active and Collaborative Learning SFI=Student-Faculty Interaction EEE=Enriching Educational Experiences SCE=Supportive Campus Environment Variable Names The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your raw data file and the Mean Comparisons report. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students (including those from census administrations) for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted and locally administered oversamples and other nonrandomly selected students are not included in this report. NSSEville NSSEville State Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2010 State Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 15 2% 211 2% 1,248 3% 4,922 3% 9 1% 124 1% 901 2% 3,538 2% contributed to class (ACL) Sometimes % 2,905 34% 14,781 35% 57,335 35% % 2,088 22% 12,633 23% 46,587 25% discussions Often % 2,967 35% 15,134 36% 57,083 35% % 3,048 33% 17,608 33% 60,869 32% Very often % 2,079 29% 11,163 26% 44,027 27% % 4,058 44% 23,086 42% 81,914 41% Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 192, % 1b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Never 80 9% 775 9% 5,215 13% 21,742 14% 24 2% 277 3% 2,779 5% 10,865 6% (ACL) Sometimes % 4,202 50% 21,727 50% 85,258 51% % 2,761 30% 16,041 30% 62,084 33% Often % 2,406 30% 11,642 28% 42,552 26% % 3,688 39% 20,570 37% 71,247 36% Very often 47 5% % 3,780 9% 13,872 9% % 2,638 28% 15,083 27% 49,267 25% Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1c. Prepared two or more REWROPAP Never % % 4,445 11% 20,566 13% % 1,624 16% 7,821 14% 30,644 16% drafts of Sometimes % 2,658 32% 12,162 29% 49,181 30% % 3,644 38% 19,675 36% 72,374 37% a paper or assignment Often % 2,709 33% 14,262 34% 52,973 33% % 2,451 27% 15,467 29% 52,575 28% before turning it in Very often % 1,803 25% 11,341 27% 40,180 25% % 1,628 18% 11,403 21% 37,522 20% Total % 8, % 42, % 162, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1d. Worked on a paper or INTEGRAT Never 12 1% 133 2% 805 2% 3,275 2% 4 0% 88 1% 584 1% 2,004 1% project that required Sometimes % 1,558 19% 7,790 19% 30,757 19% 79 8% 1,045 12% 5,944 11% 22,154 12% integrating ideas or Often % 3,796 46% 18,693 44% 71,661 43% % 3,565 38% 20,389 38% 71,169 37% information from various Very often % 2,696 33% 15,110 35% 57,856 35% % 4,669 49% 27,625 50% 98,358 50% sources Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1e. Included diverse DIVCLASS Never 66 7% 516 6% 2,614 7% 10,590 7% 52 5% 542 6% 3,288 7% 12,973 7% perspectives (different Sometimes % 2,548 30% 12,747 30% 50,123 31% % 2,780 29% 15,326 28% 56,316 29% races, religions, genders, Often % 3,248 39% 16,448 38% 62,783 38% % 3,253 35% 18,995 35% 66,376 34% political beliefs, etc.) in Very often % 1,865 25% 10,544 25% 39,804 24% % 2,780 30% 16,844 30% 57,710 29% class discussions or writing Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % i t Response Options Response options are listed as they appear on the instrument. NSSE 2010 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a NSSEville State University Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institutionreported class ranks are used. Count The Count column represents the actual number of students who responded to the particular option in each question. Counts are unweighted. Column Percentage (%) This column presents the weighted percentage of students responding to the particular option in each question. Weighting Weights adjusting for gender and enrollment status (and by institutional size for comparison groups) are applied to the percentage column (%) of this report. Weights are computed separately for first-year students and seniors. Weighted results present a more accurate representation of your institution and comparison group students. Only the column percents are weighted. The counts are the actual number of respondents. Because the counts are unweighted and the column percentages are weighted, you will not be able to calculate the column percent directly from the count numbers. Additional details about weighting can be found on the NSSE Web site. nsse.iub.edu/links/institutional_reporting - 1 -

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Southern Utah University

Southern Utah University Selected Comparison Groups August 2009 Reviewing Your Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report Ntionl Survey of Student Enggement Mens Summry Report Vrile Vr. Nme Clss Men Men Sig Effect Size Men Sig Effect Size COLLEGE ACTIVITIES Acdemic, Intellectul, nd Socil Experiences Asked questions in clss

More information

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District FCLQUEST FCLPRESEN FREWROPAP FINTEGRAT FCLUNPREP FCLASSGRP FOCCGRP selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions selected course section make a class presentation selected

More information

Level of Academic Challenge

Level of Academic Challenge N S S E S n a p s h o t November 2009 Inside this issue: Active and Collaborative Learning Student and faculty Interaction Enriching Education Experiences Multi year benchmarks Supporting Campus Environment

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Analysis of Multiple Years of NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Fall 2008 Regional NSSE Users Workshop October 2008 Allison BrckaLorenz Overview Introduction Five Multi Year Analysis Tasks 1. Identifying

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report 2. Do you live in a: Response Rate: 99% (N=190) Question Type: Choose one Tag: Q1 Residence Hall (1) 173 9 House / apartment near campus (2) 6 3% House / apartment far from campus (driving required) (3)

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus: O

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

YouGov March 14-16, 2017

YouGov March 14-16, 2017 1. Watch College Sports How often do you watch college sports of any kind? Often 16% 21% 10% 13% 18% 16% 16% 16% 14% 15% 21% Sometimes 22% 27% 16% 20% 19% 26% 20% 22% 27% 12% 20% Rarely 20% 20% 21% 19%

More information

UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result

UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result 1. What is your gender? Male 44% 15 Female 56% 19 2. What is your age? 25-29 18% 6 30-34 47% 16 35-39 18% 6 40 or older 18%

More information

~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002

~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002 ~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002 The Credit Card Survey of USC Students was administered during the Spring 2002 semester to collect information about 1) students use of credit

More information

Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods

Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods I. Detailed Methodology Research Design AARP s 2003 multicultural project focuses on volunteerism and charitable giving. One broad goal of the project

More information

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year?

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Q What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Answered: 2 Skipped: / 35 Q2 How many years of experience do you have working in education? Answered: 2 Skipped: - years

More information

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 8 weeks.

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Summer 2018 COURSE: FIN 670, Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 500 and graduate standing

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Commissioned by: A National Survey

Commissioned by: A National Survey Commissioned by: Conducted by: Precision Research Services A National Survey Random (non biased) sample N = 1500 respondents The make up of sample closely resembles the population Multi-stage, stratified

More information

NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY

NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Data weighted to states Figure 1: Positive Feelings about Community: Summary i Frequency of Positive Feelings, by State OREGON

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report B-CU Graduate Exit urvey pring 2008- pring Report Table of Contents I. Executive ummary... 2 II. Methodology... 2 III. Objectives... 2 IV. ummary of the urvey... 3 V. Gender of Participants... 5 VI. Response

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Fall 2016 COURSE: FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 383 Investment

More information

CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 208 CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Sr. No. Content Page No. 6.1 Introduction 212 6.2 Reliability and Normality of Data 212 6.3 Descriptive Analysis 213 6.4 Cross Tabulation 218 6.5 Chi Square

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SIA Civic Engagement Questionnaire

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SIA Civic Engagement Questionnaire CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SIA Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus:

More information