National Survey of Student Engagement

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "National Survey of Student Engagement"

Transcription

1 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing assignments Come to class without completing readings or assignments Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community-based project as part of a regular course Variable CLQUEST CLPRESEN REWROPAP INTEGRAT DIVCLASS CLUNPREP CLASSGRP OCCGRP INTIDEAS TUTOR COMMPROJ compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b ACL ACL ACL ACL ACL ACL Means Comparison Report In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often FY *** *** -.33 SR *** *** -.17 FY SR *.08 FY *** *** -.16 SR * FY SR FY SR FY ** **.12 SR * FY *** ***.20 SR **.14 FY SR *** ***.20 FY SR * FY *** *** -.21 SR FY * ** -.11 SR a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 1

2 Variable Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b l. Used an electronic medium (list-serv, chat group, Internet, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment ITACADEM EEE FY *** *** -.26 SR * *.09 m. Used to communicate with an instructor FY *** *** -.35 SR n. o. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor FACGRADE FACPLANS SFI SFI FY *** *** -.25 SR FY *** *** -.33 SR * ** -.11 p. q. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class Received prompt feedback from faculty on your academic performance (written or oral) FACIDEAS FACFEED SFI SFI FY *** *** -.20 SR * -.09 FY *** *** -.24 SR *** *** -.16 r. s. t. u. Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own WORKHARD FACOTHER OOCIDEAS DIVRSTUD LAC SFI ACL EEE FY * ** -.12 SR FY *** *** -.19 SR * -.10 FY SR FY * -.09 SR v. Had serious conversations with students who are very different from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values DIFFSTU2 EEE FY * -.11 SR a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 2

3 2. Mental Activities Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your a. courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a b. particular case or situation in depth and considering its components Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or c. experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods, such as d. examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their Applying theories or concepts to practical e. problems or in new situations 3. Examinations To what extent have your examinations during the current school year challenged you to do your best work? 4. Reading and Writing a. Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings b. Number of books read on your own (not assigned) for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment c. Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more d. Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages e. Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages Variable MEMORIZE ANALYZE SYNTHESZ EVALUATE APPLYING EXAMS READASGN READOWN WRITEMOR WRITEMID WRITESML Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC During the current school year, how much has your coursework emphasized the following mental activities? FY * **.12 SR * ***.14 FY SR FY ** *** -.18 SR * -.09 FY * * -.11 SR ** ** -.14 FY * ** -.14 SR =very little to 7=very much FY SR During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done? 1=none, 2=between 1 and 4, 3=between 5 and 10, 4=between 11 and 20, 5=more than 20 FY SR FY SR * * -.10 FY SR FY SR FY SR *** ***.19 a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 3

4 5. Problem Sets a. Number of problem sets that take you more than an hour to complete b. Number of problem sets that take you less than an hour to complete 6. Additional Collegiate Experiences a. Attended an art exhibit, gallery, play, dance, or other theatre performance b. Exercised or participated in physical fitness activities c. Participated in activities to enhance your spirituality (worship, meditation, prayer, etc.) 7. Enriching Educational Experiences Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op a. experience, or clinical assignment b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Community service or volunteer work Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements Foreign language coursework Study abroad Independent study or self-designed major Culminating senior experience (comprehensive exam, capstone course, thesis, project, etc.) Variable PROBSETA PROBSETB ATTDARTS EXERCISE WORSHIP INTERN VOLUNTER LEARNCOM RESEARCH FORLANG STUDYABR INDSTUDY SENIORX Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b EEE EEE SFI EEE EEE EEE EEE In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you complete? 1=none, 2=1-2, 3=3-4, 4=5-6, 5=more than 6 FY * SR *** ***.17 FY ** ***.18 SR * ***.15 In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often FY SR *** *.10 FY SR ** FY *** *** -.41 SR *** *** -.29 Which of the following have you done or do you plan to do before you graduate from your institution? (Recoded: 0=have not decided, do not plan to do, plan to do; 1=done. Thus, the mean is the proportion responding "done" among all valid respondents.) FY SR * FY ** *** -.16 SR FY *** ***.32 SR FY ** ** -.09 SR * FY *** *** -.29 SR *** -.16 FY ** * -.07 SR FY * * -.07 SR *** *** -.29 FY ** * -.06 SR a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 4

5 8. Quality of Relationships a. b. c. National Survey of 9. Time Usage Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyzing data, a. rehearsing, and other activities related to your academic program) b. c. d. e. f. g. Relationships with other students Relationships with faculty members Relationships with administrative personnel and offices Working for pay on campus Working for pay off campus Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, social fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, exercising, etc.) Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) Variable ENVSTU ENVFAC ENVADM ACADPR01 WORKON01 WORKOF01 COCURR01 SOCIAL01 CAREDE01 COMMUTE Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b SCE SCE SCE LAC EEE Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at your institution. 1=unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=friendly, supportive, sense of belonging FY SR * *.09 1=unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=available, helpful, sympathetic FY ** *** -.16 SR =unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=helpful, considerate, flexible FY SR *** ***.24 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? 1=0 hrs/wk, 2=1-5 hrs/wk, 3=6-10 hrs/wk, 4=11-15 hrs/wk, 5=16-20 hrs/wk, 6=21-25 hrs/wk, 7=26-30 hrs/wk, 8=more than 30 hrs/wk FY * -.11 SR *** **.14 FY *** *** -.27 SR * -.09 FY *** *** -.22 SR *** FY * *** -.16 SR ** -.11 FY *** ***.18 SR *** ***.14 FY *** *** -.18 SR *** * -.08 FY SR * a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 5

6 10. Institutional Environment a. Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work b. Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds d. Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) e. f. g. 11. Educational and Personal Growth a. b. c. d. e. f. Providing the support you need to thrive socially Attending campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Using computers in academic work Acquiring a broad general education Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills Writing clearly and effectively Speaking clearly and effectively Thinking critically and analytically Analyzing quantitative problems Variable ENVSCHOL ENVSUPRT ENVDIVRS ENVNACAD ENVSOCAL ENVEVENT ENVCOMPT GNGENLED GNWORK GNWRITE GNSPEAK GNANALY GNQUANT Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b LAC SCE EEE SCE SCE To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? 1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much FY *** *** -.20 SR FY * ** -.15 SR *** *** -.16 FY *** *** -.29 SR *** *** -.17 FY *** *** -.16 SR *** *** -.20 FY * ** -.13 SR FY * -.10 SR ** -.11 FY SR *** *.09 To what extent has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? 1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much FY SR * -.11 FY ** *** -.15 SR FY *** *** -.20 SR FY * SR FY ** *** -.19 SR ** -.11 FY SR * a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 6

7 12. Academic Advising Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your institution? 13. Satisfaction How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? 14. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Using computing and information technology Working effectively with others Voting in local, state, or national elections Learning effectively on your own Understanding yourself Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds Solving complex real-world problems Developing a personal code of values and ethics Contributing to the welfare of your community If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending? Variable GNCMPTS GNOTHERS GNCITIZN GNINQ GNSELF GNDIVERS GNPROBSV GNETHICS GNCOMMUN p. Developing a deepened sense of spirituality GNSPIRIT ADVISE ENTIREXP SAMECOLL Means Comparison Report compared with: Benchmark Effect Effect Class Mean Mean Sig a Size b Mean Sig a Size b FY SR *** ***.15 FY SR *.09 FY *** ***.34 SR * *.09 FY SR FY * -.11 SR * *** -.15 FY SR FY SR FY ** *** -.18 SR *** *** -.19 FY ** -.13 SR * -.09 FY *** *** -.38 SR *** *** =poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent FY SR =poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent FY SR =definitely no, 2=probably no, 3=probably yes, 4=definitely yes FY * SR *** ***.15 a * p<.05 ** p<.01 ***p<.001 (2-tailed). b Effect size = mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation. 7

8 Detailed Statistics First Year Students Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: CLQUEST ,491 42, CLPRESEN ,479 42, REWROPAP ,468 42, INTEGRAT ,476 42, DIVCLASS ,457 42, CLUNPREP ,456 42, CLASSGRP ,467 42, OCCGRP ,471 42, INTIDEAS ,449 42, TUTOR ,451 42, COMMPROJ ,440 42, ITACADEM ,449 42, ,447 42, FACGRADE ,441 42, FACPLANS ,444 42, FACIDEAS ,442 42, FACFEED ,436 42, WORKHARD ,441 42, FACOTHER ,444 42, OOCIDEAS ,433 42, DIVRSTUD ,429 42, DIFFSTU ,426 42, MEMORIZE ,445 42, ANALYZE ,431 42, SYNTHESZ ,422 42, EVALUATE ,422 42, APPLYING ,431 42, EXAMS ,699 40, READASGN ,011 41, READOWN ,017 41, WRITEMOR ,007 41, WRITEMID ,017 41, WRITESML ,019 41, a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 8

9 Detailed Statistics First Year Students Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: PROBSETA PROBSETB ATTDARTS EXERCISE WORSHIP INTERN VOLUNTER LEARNCOM RESEARCH FORLANG STUDYABR INDSTUDY SENIORX ENVSTU ENVFAC ENVADM ACADPR01 WORKON01 WORKOF01 COCURR01 SOCIAL01 CAREDE01 COMMUTE ENVSCHOL ENVSUPRT ENVDIVRS ENVNACAD ENVSOCAL ENVEVENT ENVCOMPT GNGENLED GNWORK ,994 41, ,976 41, ,030 41, ,031 41, ,027 41, ,000 41, ,987 41, ,999 41, ,998 41, ,997 41, ,989 41, ,990 41, ,000 41, ,021 41, ,012 41, ,002 41, ,594 40, ,595 40, ,595 40, ,597 40, ,595 40, ,587 40, ,606 40, ,601 40, ,595 40, ,577 40, ,564 40, ,555 40, ,574 40, ,579 40, ,582 40, ,572 40, a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 9

10 Detailed Statistics First Year Students Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: GNWRITE GNSPEAK GNANALY GNQUANT GNCMPTS GNOTHERS GNCITIZN GNINQ GNSELF GNDIVERS GNPROBSV GNETHICS GNCOMMUN GNSPIRIT ADVISE ENTIREXP SAMECOLL ,583 40, ,576 40, ,573 40, ,552 40, ,567 40, ,571 40, ,545 40, ,565 40, ,560 40, ,563 40, ,575 40, ,563 40, ,566 40, ,560 40, ,596 40, ,616 40, ,608 40, a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 10

11 Detailed Statistics Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: CLQUEST ,353 43, CLPRESEN ,345 43, REWROPAP ,332 43, INTEGRAT ,344 43, DIVCLASS ,345 43, CLUNPREP ,327 43, CLASSGRP ,332 43, OCCGRP ,335 43, INTIDEAS ,322 43, TUTOR ,323 43, COMMPROJ ,315 43, ITACADEM ,325 43, ,321 43, FACGRADE ,319 43, FACPLANS ,316 43, FACIDEAS ,320 43, FACFEED ,319 43, WORKHARD ,315 43, FACOTHER ,316 43, OOCIDEAS ,310 43, DIVRSTUD ,293 43, DIFFSTU ,298 43, MEMORIZE ,304 43, ANALYZE ,302 43, SYNTHESZ ,292 43, EVALUATE ,294 43, APPLYING ,301 43, EXAMS ,581 41, READASGN ,997 42, READOWN ,023 42, WRITEMOR ,011 42, WRITEMID ,009 42, WRITESML ,012 42, a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 11

12 Detailed Statistics Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: PROBSETA ,910 42, PROBSETB ,866 42, ATTDARTS ,034 42, EXERCISE ,028 42, WORSHIP ,023 42, INTERN ,994 42, VOLUNTER ,005 42, LEARNCOM ,988 42, RESEARCH ,980 42, FORLANG ,998 42, STUDYABR ,980 42, INDSTUDY ,989 42, SENIORX ,990 42, ENVSTU ,023 42, ENVFAC ,021 42, ENVADM ,011 42, ACADPR ,819 42, WORKON ,830 42, WORKOF ,829 42, COCURR ,826 42, SOCIAL ,826 42, CAREDE ,839 42, COMMUTE ,841 42, ENVSCHOL ,814 42, ENVSUPRT ,821 42, ENVDIVRS ,796 41, ENVNACAD ,782 41, ENVSOCAL ,737 41, ENVEVENT ,769 41, ENVCOMPT ,816 42, GNGENLED ,822 42, GNWORK ,826 42, a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 12

13 Detailed Statistics Mean Margin of error (95% level) a Standard deviation b Number of respondents Significance c compared with: Effect size d compared with: GNWRITE GNSPEAK GNANALY GNQUANT GNCMPTS GNOTHERS GNCITIZN GNINQ GNSELF GNDIVERS GNPROBSV GNETHICS GNCOMMUN GNSPIRIT ADVISE ENTIREXP SAMECOLL ,833 42, ,826 42, ,824 42, ,804 41, ,824 42, ,825 42, ,805 41, ,807 41, ,814 41, ,820 42, ,819 42, ,811 41, ,813 41, ,800 41, ,832 42, ,844 42, ,831 42, ipeds: a The margin of error surrounding the reported mean forms a 95% confidence interval, a range of values with a 95% likelihood to contain the true population mean. b Standard deviation is a measure of the average amount the individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution. c This statistic represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance. d Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group. 13

14 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 28 5% 496 3% 1,245 3% 18 3% 275 1% 709 2% contributed to class discussions Sometimes % 6,375 36% 15,467 37% % 4,187 23% 10,312 24% Often % 6,187 35% 14,498 34% % 5,914 32% 13,569 31% Very often 71 14% 4,433 25% 11,094 26% % 7,977 43% 18,719 43% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Never 61 12% 2,613 15% 6,111 14% 10 2% 646 4% 1,702 4% Sometimes % 9,289 53% 22,996 54% % 5,624 31% 13,943 32% Often % 4,264 24% 10,240 24% % 7,036 38% 16,506 38% Very often 32 6% 1,313 8% 2,938 7% % 5,039 27% 11,136 26% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % c. Prepared two or more drafts of a REWROPAP Never 69 13% 2,011 12% 5,338 13% 87 15% 2,681 15% 6,972 16% paper or assignment before turning it Sometimes % 5,189 30% 12,703 30% % 6,667 36% 16,072 37% in Often % 5,703 33% 13,602 32% % 5,107 28% 11,594 27% Very often % 4,565 26% 10,615 25% 94 16% 3,877 21% 8,635 20% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % d. Worked on a paper or project that INTEGRAT Never 4 1% 403 2% 940 2% 1 0% 168 1% 414 1% required integrating ideas or Sometimes 95 19% 3,984 23% 9,483 22% 55 10% 2,240 12% 5,261 12% information from various sources Often % 7,670 44% 18,491 44% % 6,905 38% 16,268 38% Very often % 5,419 31% 13,358 32% % 9,031 49% 21,344 49% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % e. DIVCLASS Never 35 7% 1,151 7% 2,897 7% 31 5% 1,164 6% 3,034 7% Included diverse perspectives (by race, religion, gender, political) in class discussions or assignments Sometimes % 6,106 35% 14,723 35% % 5,968 33% 14,039 32% Often % 6,425 37% 15,364 36% % 6,317 34% 14,513 34% Very often 94 18% 3,775 22% 9,253 22% % 4,896 27% 11,685 27% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % f. CLUNPREP Never 82 16% 4,025 23% 9,170 22% 85 15% 3,847 21% 8,518 20% Came to class without completing readings or assignments Sometimes % 10,395 60% 25,540 60% % 11,029 60% 25,911 60% Often 88 17% 2,268 13% 5,554 13% 85 15% 2,424 13% 6,250 14% Very often 21 4% 768 4% 1,955 5% 29 5% 1,027 6% 2,557 6% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % g. Worked with other students on CLASSGRP Never 38 7% 2,029 12% 5,564 13% 49 9% 1,850 10% 5,240 12% projects during class Sometimes % 8,414 48% 20,427 48% % 7,942 43% 19,325 45% Often % 5,596 32% 12,925 31% % 5,932 32% 13,124 30% Very often 55 11% 1,428 8% 3,316 8% 97 17% 2,608 14% 5,560 13% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % 14

15 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions h. Worked with classmates outside of OCCGRP Never 59 12% 2,577 15% 5,378 13% 15 3% 1,352 7% 2,951 7% class to prepare class assignments Sometimes % 8,333 48% 19,546 46% % 6,671 36% 15,494 36% Often % 4,977 28% 12,863 30% % 6,371 35% 15,232 35% Very often 46 9% 1,584 9% 4,462 11% % 3,941 21% 9,578 22% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % i. Put together ideas or concepts from INTIDEAS Never 48 9% 1,684 10% 3,836 9% 16 3% 728 4% 1,638 4% different courses when completing Sometimes % 8,153 47% 19,377 46% % 5,618 31% 13,085 30% assignments or class discussions Often % 5,859 34% 14,281 34% % 7,781 42% 18,297 42% Very often 42 8% 1,753 10% 4,705 11% % 4,195 23% 10,213 24% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % j. Tutored or taught other students TUTOR Never % 9,573 55% 22,026 52% % 8,125 44% 18,241 42% (paid or voluntary) Sometimes % 5,586 32% 14,176 34% % 6,254 34% 15,113 35% Often 34 7% 1,550 9% 4,104 10% 76 13% 2,238 12% 5,495 13% Very often 14 3% 742 4% 1,902 5% 54 9% 1,706 9% 4,386 10% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % k. Participated in a community-based COMMPROJ Never % 10,832 62% 25,935 61% % 9,434 52% 22,446 52% project as part of a regular course Sometimes % 4,440 25% 10,779 26% % 5,353 29% 12,721 29% Often 39 8% 1,456 8% 3,640 9% 80 14% 2,138 12% 4,941 11% Very often 19 4% 712 4% 1,821 4% 40 7% 1,390 8% 3,102 7% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % l. ITACADEM Never % 3,241 19% 7,355 17% 68 12% 2,560 14% 6,067 14% Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Sometimes % 5,110 29% 12,265 29% % 5,008 27% 11,735 27% Often % 4,618 26% 11,063 26% % 4,740 26% 11,260 26% Very often % 4,480 26% 11,503 27% % 6,017 33% 14,174 33% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % m. Never 38 7% 859 5% 1,688 4% 8 1% 424 2% 819 2% Used to communicate with an instructor Sometimes % 5,115 29% 11,443 27% % 3,937 21% 8,228 19% Often % 6,153 35% 14,993 36% % 5,852 32% 13,805 32% Very often % 5,320 30% 14,070 33% % 8,108 44% 20,376 47% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % n. Discussed grades or assignments FACGRADE Never 46 9% 1,392 8% 3,238 8% 19 3% 736 4% 1,747 4% with an instructor Sometimes % 7,606 44% 18,075 43% % 6,346 35% 14,843 34% Often % 5,586 32% 13,739 33% % 6,496 35% 15,125 35% Very often 46 9% 2,857 16% 7,129 17% % 4,741 26% 11,512 27% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % 15

16 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions o. Talked about career plans with a FACPLANS Never % 4,087 23% 9,679 23% 83 14% 2,841 16% 6,545 15% faculty member or advisor Sometimes % 8,394 48% 20,295 48% % 7,362 40% 17,032 39% Often 72 14% 3,498 20% 8,600 20% % 4,797 26% 11,314 26% Very often 24 5% 1,465 8% 3,612 9% 79 14% 3,316 18% 8,325 19% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % p. Discussed ideas from your readings FACIDEAS Never % 7,446 43% 16,937 40% % 4,848 26% 10,870 25% or classes with faculty members Sometimes % 7,257 42% 18,161 43% % 8,627 47% 20,476 47% outside of class Often 57 11% 2,081 12% 5,355 13% % 3,418 19% 8,241 19% Very often 8 2% 658 4% 1,723 4% 25 4% 1,427 8% 3,639 8% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % q. Received prompt feedback from FACFEED Never 53 10% 1,301 7% 2,980 7% 22 4% 742 4% 1,758 4% faculty on your academic Sometimes % 6,853 39% 15,758 37% % 5,234 29% 12,383 29% performance (written or oral) Often % 6,904 40% 17,072 40% % 8,438 46% 19,899 46% Very often 44 9% 2,378 14% 6,350 15% 86 15% 3,905 21% 9,181 21% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % r. Worked harder than you thought you WORKHARD Never 44 9% 1,386 8% 3,514 8% 36 6% 1,082 6% 2,758 6% could to meet an instructor's Sometimes % 7,039 40% 16,625 39% % 6,308 34% 15,152 35% standards or expectations Often % 6,363 36% 15,341 36% % 7,219 39% 16,571 38% Very often 56 11% 2,653 15% 6,679 16% 90 16% 3,706 20% 8,730 20% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % s. FACOTHER Never % 10,762 62% 25,162 60% % 8,562 47% 19,025 44% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) Sometimes 91 18% 4,580 26% 11,479 27% % 5,588 31% 13,702 32% Often 29 6% 1,505 9% 3,944 9% 74 13% 2,591 14% 6,404 15% Very often 21 4% 597 3% 1,581 4% 45 8% 1,575 9% 4,084 9% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % t. OOCIDEAS Never 29 6% 1,185 7% 2,665 6% 24 4% 675 4% 1,527 4% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, coworkers, etc.) Sometimes % 6,611 38% 15,100 36% % 5,831 32% 13,285 31% Often % 6,170 35% 15,158 36% % 6,970 38% 16,347 38% Very often % 3,467 20% 9,228 22% % 4,834 26% 12,048 28% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % u. Had serious conversations with DIVRSTUD Never 91 18% 3,115 18% 7,042 17% 55 10% 2,668 15% 5,863 14% students of a different race or Sometimes % 6,193 36% 14,430 34% % 6,600 36% 15,337 36% ethnicity than your own Often % 4,341 25% 10,602 25% % 4,806 26% 11,345 26% Very often % 3,780 22% 10,067 24% % 4,219 23% 10,623 25% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % 16

17 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions v. Had serious conversations with DIFFSTU2 Never 52 10% 2,051 12% 4,622 11% 48 8% 1,941 11% 4,296 10% students who are very different from Sometimes % 5,892 34% 13,435 32% % 6,486 35% 14,888 34% you in terms of their religious Often % 5,028 29% 12,425 29% % 5,298 29% 12,629 29% beliefs, political opinions, or Very often % 4,455 26% 11,649 28% % 4,573 25% 11,361 26% personal values Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % 2a. Coursework emphasizes: MEMORIZE Often 23 4% 803 5% 2,241 5% 29 5% 1,520 8% 4,101 9% Memorizing facts, ideas or methods Some % 4,495 26% 11,138 26% % 5,429 30% 13,267 31% from your courses and readings Quite a bit % 7,218 41% 17,028 40% % 6,772 37% 15,523 36% Very much % 4,929 28% 11,764 28% % 4,583 25% 10,314 24% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % b. Coursework emphasizes: Analyzing ANALYZE Often 7 1% 390 2% 829 2% 12 2% 263 1% 576 1% the basic elements of an idea, Some % 3,419 20% 7,580 18% 70 12% 2,361 13% 5,388 12% experience or theory Quite a bit % 7,927 45% 18,810 45% % 7,652 42% 17,694 41% Very much % 5,695 33% 14,931 35% % 8,026 44% 19,540 45% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % c. Coursework emphasizes: SYNTHESZ Very little 28 5% 848 5% 1,922 5% 25 4% 611 3% 1,420 3% Synthesizing and organizing ideas, Some % 5,159 30% 11,911 28% % 3,863 21% 8,919 21% information, or experiences Quite a bit % 7,335 42% 17,573 42% % 7,524 41% 17,360 40% Very much % 4,080 23% 10,719 25% % 6,294 34% 15,479 36% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % d. EVALUATE Very little 29 6% 1,092 6% 2,496 6% 35 6% 975 5% 2,258 5% Coursework emphasizes: Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods Some % 5,027 29% 12,059 29% % 4,193 23% 9,974 23% Quite a bit % 7,216 41% 17,312 41% % 7,161 39% 16,784 39% Very much % 4,087 23% 10,262 24% % 5,965 33% 14,170 33% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % e. APPLYING Very little 21 4% 723 4% 1,629 4% 15 3% 506 3% 1,186 3% Coursework emphasizes: Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Some % 4,084 23% 9,604 23% 92 16% 3,025 17% 7,127 17% Quite a bit % 7,104 41% 16,770 40% % 6,604 36% 15,289 35% Very much % 5,520 32% 14,148 34% % 8,166 45% 19,588 45% Total % 17, % 42, % % 18, % 43, % 3. Mark the box that best represents the EXAMS Very little 1 0% 87 1% 213 1% 2 0% 136 1% 358 1% extent to which your examinations 2 3 1% 143 1% 338 1% 6 1% 243 1% 592 1% during the current school year have % 447 3% 1,060 3% 15 3% 569 3% 1,369 3% challenged you to do your best work % 1,704 10% 4,031 10% 50 9% 1,760 10% 4,221 10% % 5,486 33% 12,389 31% % 5,346 30% 12,623 30% % 5,992 36% 15,086 37% % 6,117 35% 14,705 35% Very much 64 13% 2,840 17% 7,353 18% % 3,410 19% 7,758 19% Total % 16, % 40, % % 17, % 41, % 17

18 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions 4a. Number of assigned textbooks, READASGN None 1 0% 196 1% 390 1% 5 1% 258 1% 580 1% books, or book-length packs of Between % 3,247 19% 7,198 17% % 4,428 25% 9,647 23% course readings Between % 6,290 37% 14,774 36% % 6,361 35% 14,664 34% Between % 4,842 28% 12,347 30% % 4,272 24% 10,634 25% More than % 2,436 14% 6,435 16% 79 14% 2,678 15% 6,980 16% Total % 17, % 41, % % 17, % 42, % b. Number of books read on your own READOWN None % 4,570 27% 10,542 26% % 3,772 21% 8,576 20% (not assigned) for personal Between % 9,211 54% 22,563 55% % 9,560 53% 22,771 54% enjoyment or academic enrichment Between % 2,098 12% 5,272 13% 77 14% 2,774 15% 6,790 16% Between % 668 4% 1,680 4% 29 5% 1,104 6% 2,514 6% More than % 470 3% 1,104 3% 20 4% 813 5% 1,904 4% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % c. Number of written papers or reports WRITEMOR None % 14,137 83% 34,029 83% % 8,841 49% 20,034 47% of 20 pages or more Between % 2,061 12% 5,230 13% % 7,532 42% 18,630 44% Between % 444 3% 1,058 3% 36 6% 1,127 6% 2,656 6% Between % 207 1% 474 1% 12 2% 307 2% 708 2% More than % 158 1% 341 1% 4 1% 204 1% 495 1% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % d. Number of written papers or reports WRITEMID None 42 8% 2,391 14% 5,175 13% 42 7% 1,545 9% 3,428 8% between 5 and 19 pages Between % 8,438 50% 19,925 48% % 7,545 42% 17,225 41% Between % 4,424 26% 11,493 28% % 5,783 32% 14,091 33% Between % 1,442 8% 3,720 9% 73 13% 2,343 13% 5,911 14% More than % 322 2% 836 2% 29 5% 793 4% 1,869 4% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % e. Number of written papers or reports WRITESML None 6 1% 507 3% 1,114 3% 21 4% 1,255 7% 2,847 7% of fewer than 5 pages Between % 4,238 25% 10,114 25% % 5,383 30% 12,450 29% Between % 5,607 33% 13,465 33% % 4,740 26% 11,442 27% Between % 4,314 25% 10,473 25% % 3,635 20% 8,771 21% More than % 2,353 14% 5,990 15% % 2,999 17% 7,007 16% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % 5a. Number of problem sets that take PROBSETA None 51 10% 2,520 15% 6,048 15% 84 15% 3,704 21% 9,395 22% you more than an hour to complete % 6,418 38% 15,037 37% % 5,930 33% 13,674 32% % 5,331 31% 12,809 31% % 5,091 28% 11,798 28% % 1,544 9% 4,074 10% 68 12% 1,710 10% 3,926 9% More than % 1,181 7% 3,125 8% 48 9% 1,475 8% 3,500 8% Total % 16, % 41, % % 17, % 42, % 18

19 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions b. Number of problem sets that take PROBSETB None 41 8% 2,237 13% 6,071 15% % 4,778 27% 12,465 30% you less than an hour to complete % 5,871 35% 14,391 35% % 6,319 35% 14,672 35% % 4,864 29% 11,313 28% % 3,901 22% 8,651 20% % 2,172 13% 5,075 12% 58 10% 1,527 9% 3,392 8% More than % 1,832 11% 4,197 10% 50 9% 1,341 8% 3,026 7% Total % 16, % 41, % % 17, % 42, % 6a. Attended an art exhibit, gallery, play, ATTDARTS Never % 4,672 27% 10,507 26% % 6,147 34% 13,204 31% Sometimes % 7,962 47% 19,284 47% % 8,052 45% 19,025 45% Often 88 17% 2,846 17% 7,353 18% 91 16% 2,328 13% 6,261 15% Very often 38 8% 1,550 9% 4,022 10% 66 12% 1,507 8% 4,077 10% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % 6b. Exercised or participated in physical EXERCISE Never 92 18% 3,420 20% 6,918 17% % 4,547 25% 9,151 22% Sometimes % 4,669 27% 11,169 27% % 5,272 29% 12,309 29% Often % 3,806 22% 9,552 23% % 3,591 20% 8,867 21% Very often % 5,136 30% 13,527 33% % 4,618 26% 12,235 29% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % 6c. Participated in activities to enhance WORSHIP Never % 7,477 44% 17,082 42% % 7,863 44% 17,791 42% Sometimes % 4,547 27% 10,990 27% % 4,917 27% 11,513 27% Often 48 9% 2,275 13% 5,680 14% 55 10% 2,279 13% 5,501 13% Very often 31 6% 2,728 16% 7,403 18% 60 11% 2,964 16% 7,738 18% Total % 17, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % 7a. Practicum, internship, field INTERN Have not decided 91 18% 2,454 14% 5,723 14% 37 7% 1,399 8% 2,981 7% experience, co-op experience, or Do not plan to do 23 5% 860 5% 1,666 4% 80 14% 3,322 18% 7,587 18% clinical assignment Plan to do % 12,584 74% 31,124 76% % 3,767 21% 8,113 19% Done 24 5% 1,102 6% 2,601 6% % 9,506 53% 23,813 56% Total % 17, % 41, % % 17, % 42, % b. Community service or volunteer VOLUNTER Have not decided 79 16% 2,777 16% 6,544 16% 66 12% 1,861 10% 4,055 10% work Do not plan to do 40 8% 1,303 8% 2,856 7% % 3,558 20% 8,033 19% Plan to do % 6,756 40% 16,296 40% 63 11% 2,301 13% 4,844 11% Done % 6,151 36% 15,390 37% % 10,285 57% 25,566 60% Total % 16, % 41, % % 18, % 42, % c. Participate in a learning community LEARNCOM Have not decided % 6,733 40% 16,172 39% 85 15% 2,819 16% 6,168 15% or formal program where groups take 2+ classes together Do not plan to do % 4,780 28% 11,841 29% % 9,850 55% 24,073 57% Plan to do 65 13% 3,501 21% 8,221 20% 32 6% 1,246 7% 2,633 6% Done % 1,985 12% 4,866 12% % 4,073 23% 9,597 23% Total % 16, % 41, % % 17, % 42, % 19

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

Southern Utah University

Southern Utah University Selected Comparison Groups August 2009 Reviewing Your Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report Ntionl Survey of Student Enggement Mens Summry Report Vrile Vr. Nme Clss Men Men Sig Effect Size Men Sig Effect Size COLLEGE ACTIVITIES Acdemic, Intellectul, nd Socil Experiences Asked questions in clss

More information

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District FCLQUEST FCLPRESEN FREWROPAP FINTEGRAT FCLUNPREP FCLASSGRP FOCCGRP selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions selected course section make a class presentation selected

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

Level of Academic Challenge

Level of Academic Challenge N S S E S n a p s h o t November 2009 Inside this issue: Active and Collaborative Learning Student and faculty Interaction Enriching Education Experiences Multi year benchmarks Supporting Campus Environment

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

Faculty Campus Climate Survey

Faculty Campus Climate Survey Faculty Campus Climate Survey Summary Report June 20, 2017 Dr. Ann McCann Director of Planning & Assessment Faculty Campus Climate Survey The Faculty Campus Climate Survey was conducted in March 2017 to

More information

Commissioned by: A National Survey

Commissioned by: A National Survey Commissioned by: Conducted by: Precision Research Services A National Survey Random (non biased) sample N = 1500 respondents The make up of sample closely resembles the population Multi-stage, stratified

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSM Type of study Full Time

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

YouGov March 14-16, 2017

YouGov March 14-16, 2017 1. Watch College Sports How often do you watch college sports of any kind? Often 16% 21% 10% 13% 18% 16% 16% 16% 14% 15% 21% Sometimes 22% 27% 16% 20% 19% 26% 20% 22% 27% 12% 20% Rarely 20% 20% 21% 19%

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 8 weeks.

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16 Course Syllabus BUSI 1307 Personal Finace Revision Date: 10/17/16 Catalog Description: Personal and family accounts, budgets and budgetary control, bank accounts, charge accounts, borrowing, investing,

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages: PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSC Type of study Full Time

More information

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year?

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Q What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Answered: 2 Skipped: / 35 Q2 How many years of experience do you have working in education? Answered: 2 Skipped: - years

More information

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 9 criteria evaluated: Students Program educational objectives Program

More information

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am CONTENTS INSTRUCTOR... 1 COURSE DESCRIPTION... 1 COURSE OBJECTIVES... 1 COURSE MATERIALS... 2 COURSE FORMAT... Error! Bookmark

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report B-CU Graduate Exit urvey pring 2008- pring Report Table of Contents I. Executive ummary... 2 II. Methodology... 2 III. Objectives... 2 IV. ummary of the urvey... 3 V. Gender of Participants... 5 VI. Response

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report 2. Do you live in a: Response Rate: 99% (N=190) Question Type: Choose one Tag: Q1 Residence Hall (1) 173 9 House / apartment near campus (2) 6 3% House / apartment far from campus (driving required) (3)

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus: O

More information

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications.

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Management Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACMA Type of study Full

More information

Alabama A & M University Student Academic Program Assessment Environmental Science

Alabama A & M University Student Academic Program Assessment Environmental Science Section I Degree program type: 1 Undergraduate 2 100% 2 Graduate 0 0% Gender: 1 Male 0 0% 2 Female 2 100% Age group: 1 18-20 0 0% 2 21-23 2 100% 3 24-25 0 0% 4 26-30 0 0% 5 31-40 0 0% 6 41-60 0 0% 7 61

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information