FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University"

Transcription

1 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment Somewhat important 6 12% 2 8% 8 11% Important 19 39% 4 15% 23 31% Very important 23 47% 20 77% 43 57% % % % b. Community service or volunteer work FVOLUNTR Not important 1 2% 2 8% 3 4% Somewhat important 14 29% 6 23% 20 27% Important 20 41% 12 46% 32 43% Very important 14 29% 6 23% 20 27% % % % c. Participation in a learning community or some other formal FLERNCOM Not important 5 10% 3 12% 8 11% program where groups of students take two or more classes Somewhat important 11 22% 6 23% 17 23% together Important 17 35% 11 42% 28 37% Very important 16 33% 6 23% 22 29% % % % d. Work on a research project with a faculty FIMPR05 Not important 4 8% 5 19% 9 12% member outside of course or program requirements Somewhat important 11 22% 4 15% 15 20% Important 25 51% 8 31% 33 44% Very important 9 18% 9 35% 18 24% % % % e. Foreign language coursework FFORLANG Not important 1 2% 6 23% 7 9% Somewhat important 15 31% 7 27% 22 29% Important 18 37% 8 31% 26 35% Very important 15 31% 5 19% 20 27% % % % f. Study abroad FSTUDYAB Not important 5 10% 6 23% 11 15% Somewhat important 21 43% 11 42% 32 43% Important 16 33% 4 15% 20 27% Very important 7 14% 5 19% 12 16% % % %

2 2 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? (continued) g. Independent study or self-designed major FINDST06 Not important 11 22% 8 31% 19 25% Somewhat important 22 45% 9 35% 31 41% Important 13 27% 6 23% 19 25% Very important 3 6% 3 12% 6 8% % % % h. Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project FSENIOR Not important 3 6% 0 0% 3 4% or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Somewhat important 3 6% 0 0% 3 4% Important 19 39% 11 42% 30 40% Very important 24 49% 15 58% 39 52% % % % Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. Student relationships with other students FENVSTU Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of Alienation 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 3 6% 2 8% 5 7% 4 4 8% 1 4% 5 7% % 11 42% 34 45% % 8 31% 22 29% Friendly, Supportive, Sense of Belonging 5 10% 4 15% 9 12% % % %

3 3 Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. (continued) Student relationships with faculty members Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices FENVFAC FENVADM Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 2 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 3 6% 1 4% 4 5% % 1 4% 8 11% % 11 42% 22 29% % 9 35% 30 40% Available, Helpful, Sympathetic 6 12% 4 15% 10 13% Ttl % % % Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid 2 4% 1 4% 3 4% 2 4 9% 3 12% 7 10% % 6 23% 13 18% % 5 19% 22 30% % 5 19% 15 21% % 3 12% 9 12% Helpful, Considerate, Flexible 1 2% 3 12% 4 5% % % % To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? a. Requiring students to spend significant amounts FENVSCHO Very little 7 14% 2 8% 9 12% of time studying and on academic work Some 16 33% 8 31% 24 32% Quite a bit 16 33% 5 19% 21 28% Very much 10 20% 11 42% 21 28% % % %

4 4 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued) b. Providing students the support they need to help FENVSUPR Very little 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% them succeed academically Some 4 8% 8 31% 12 16% Quite a bit 21 43% 7 27% 28 37% Very much 22 45% 11 42% 33 44% % % % c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, FENVDIVR Very little 9 18% 0 0% 9 12% social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Some 11 22% 8 31% 19 25% Quite a bit 22 45% 8 31% 30 40% Very much 7 14% 10 38% 17 23% % % % d. Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities FENVNACA Very little 4 8% 1 4% 5 7% (work, family, etc.) Some 17 35% 13 50% 30 41% Quite a bit 23 48% 7 27% 30 41% Very much 4 8% 5 19% 9 12% % % % e. Providing students the support they need FENVSOCA Very little 3 6% 1 4% 4 5% to thrive socially Some 17 35% 12 46% 29 39% Quite a bit 21 44% 8 31% 29 39% Very much 7 15% 5 19% 12 16% % % % f. Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities FENVACT Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% (organizations, campus publications, student government, Some 9 19% 8 31% 17 23% fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Quite a bit 25 53% 9 35% 34 47% Very much 13 28% 9 35% 22 30% % % % g. Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities FENVEVEN Very little 2 4% 1 4% 3 4% (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Some 14 30% 8 31% 22 30% Quite a bit 22 47% 9 35% 31 42% Very much 9 19% 8 31% 17 23% % % %

5 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued) h. Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work FENVCOMP Very little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Some 11 23% 3 12% 14 19% Quite a bit 20 42% 11 42% 31 42% Very much 16 33% 12 46% 28 38% % % % About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? a. Teaching undergraduate students in class UGTEACH 0 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % 2 8% 6 8% % 4 15% 10 14% % 10 38% 25 34% % 8 31% 21 28% % 2 8% 8 11% % 0 0% 2 3% More than % 0 0% 1 1% % % % b. Grading papers and exams GRADEPAP 0 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % 5 19% 18 25% % 6 23% 26 36% % 7 27% 10 14% % 6 23% 13 18% % 1 4% 4 5% % 1 4% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % 5

6 6 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) c. Giving other forms of written and oral feedback GRADEBCK 0 1 2% 1 4% 2 3% to students % 9 35% 32 44% % 8 31% 21 29% % 1 4% 8 11% % 4 15% 6 8% % 3 12% 3 4% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 0 0% Ttl % % % d. Preparing for class CLASSPRP 0 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % 1 4% 10 14% % 5 19% 26 35% % 13 50% 21 28% % 5 19% 9 12% % 1 4% 4 5% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 1 4% 2 3% % % % e. Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching REFLECT 0 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % 10 38% 34 45% % 9 35% 24 32% % 3 12% 7 9% % 3 12% 4 5% % 1 4% 2 3% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 2 3% % % %

7 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) f. Research and scholarly activities SCHOLAR 0 4 8% 1 4% 5 7% % 11 42% 34 45% % 5 19% 18 24% % 2 8% 8 11% % 2 8% 3 4% % 3 12% 4 5% % 1 4% 2 3% More than % 1 4% 1 1% Ttl % % % g. Working with undergraduates on research FRESEARC % 14 54% 41 55% % 5 19% 21 28% % 3 12% 5 7% % 2 8% 3 4% % 1 4% 2 3% % 1 4% 1 1% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 1 1% % % % h. Advising undergraduate students ADVISE 0 4 8% 2 8% 6 8% % 11 42% 40 54% % 6 23% 16 22% % 4 15% 7 9% % 2 8% 2 3% % 1 4% 2 3% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % 7

8 8 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) i. Supervising internships or other field experiences FIELDEXP % 10 38% 43 58% % 10 38% 22 30% % 4 15% 6 8% % 0 0% 0 0% % 1 4% 1 1% % 1 4% 1 1% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 0 0% Ttl % % % j. Working with students on activities other than coursework FFACOTHR % 8 31% 28 38% (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) % 14 54% 36 49% % 3 12% 6 8% % 0 0% 2 3% % 1 4% 1 1% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 1 1% % % % k. Other interactions with students outside of the classroom FINTERAC % 2 8% 12 16% % 17 65% 39 53% % 3 12% 13 18% % 1 4% 4 5% % 1 4% 2 3% % 0 0% 0 0% % 1 4% 1 1% More than % 1 4% 2 3% % % %

9 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) l. Conducting service activities SERVICE % 4 15% 18 24% % 11 42% 31 42% % 4 15% 11 15% % 5 19% 10 14% % 1 4% 2 3% % 1 4% 2 3% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% Ttl % % % In what format do you most often teach? TTEACFOR Classroom, on-campus 47 98% 22 85% 69 93% Classroom, auxiliary location 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Distance education 1 2% 4 15% 5 7% % % % Please respond to the following two questions based on one particular undergraduate course section you are teaching or have taught during this academic year. What is the general area of your selected course? TCSDISCL Arts and Humanities 18 47% 3 13% 21 34% Biological science 2 5% 5 22% 7 11% Business 0 0% 3 13% 3 5% Education 2 5% 2 9% 4 7% Engineering 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Physical science 8 21% 2 9% 10 16% Professional 2 5% 2 9% 4 7% Social science 1 3% 2 9% 3 5% Other 5 13% 4 17% 9 15% % % % 9

10 10 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? a. Lecture LECTURE 0% 0 0% 2 8% 2 3% 1-9% 9 19% 3 12% 12 16% 10-19% 5 10% 3 12% 8 11% 20-29% 9 19% 2 8% 11 15% 30-39% 7 15% 4 15% 11 15% 40-49% 3 6% 2 8% 5 7% 50-74% 10 21% 10 38% 20 27% 75% or more 5 10% 0 0% 5 7% % % % b. Teacher-led discussion TEACHLED 0% 1 2% 2 8% 3 4% 1-9% 11 23% 6 23% 17 23% 10-19% 10 21% 6 23% 16 22% 20-29% 8 17% 6 23% 14 19% 30-39% 6 13% 2 8% 8 11% 40-49% 3 6% 2 8% 5 7% 50-74% 8 17% 2 8% 10 14% 75% or more 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % % % c. Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, TEACHSTU 0% 14 30% 3 12% 17 23% etc.) 1-9% 9 19% 6 23% 15 21% 10-19% 9 19% 8 31% 17 23% 20-29% 3 6% 3 12% 6 8% 30-39% 3 6% 0 0% 3 4% 40-49% 3 6% 3 12% 6 8% 50-74% 2 4% 2 8% 4 5% 75% or more 4 9% 1 4% 5 7% % % %

11 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) d. Student computer use COMPMED 0% 19 40% 6 23% 25 34% 1-9% 11 23% 10 38% 21 29% 10-19% 5 11% 4 15% 9 12% 20-29% 3 6% 0 0% 3 4% 30-39% 3 6% 1 4% 4 5% 40-49% 1 2% 2 8% 3 4% 50-74% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 75% or more 4 9% 3 12% 7 10% Ttl % % % e. Small group activities GROUPSML 0% 10 22% 5 19% 15 21% 1-9% 17 37% 9 35% 26 36% 10-19% 9 20% 5 19% 14 19% 20-29% 7 15% 2 8% 9 13% 30-39% 1 2% 3 12% 4 6% 40-49% 1 2% 1 4% 2 3% 50-74% 0 0% 1 4% 1 1% 75% or more 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % % % f. Student presentations STUPRES 0% 15 32% 5 19% 20 27% 1-9% 17 36% 6 23% 23 32% 10-19% 4 9% 6 23% 10 14% 20-29% 5 11% 3 12% 8 11% 30-39% 2 4% 2 8% 4 5% 40-49% 3 6% 1 4% 4 5% 50-74% 1 2% 3 12% 4 5% 75% or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % % % 11

12 12 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) g. In-class writing CLSWRITE 0% 13 28% 10 38% 23 32% 1-9% 20 43% 7 27% 27 37% 10-19% 5 11% 4 15% 9 12% 20-29% 3 6% 3 12% 6 8% 30-39% 2 4% 2 8% 4 5% 40-49% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 50-74% 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% 75% or more 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Ttl % % % h. Testing and evaluation TESTEVAL 0% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 1-9% 25 52% 8 31% 33 45% 10-19% 14 29% 10 38% 24 32% 20-29% 3 6% 2 8% 5 7% 30-39% 0 0% 2 8% 2 3% 40-49% 2 4% 3 12% 5 7% 50-74% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 75% or more 2 4% 1 4% 3 4% % % % i. Performances in applied and fine arts PERFORM 0% 38 86% 21 84% 59 86% (e.g., dance, drama, music) 1-9% 2 5% 2 8% 4 6% 10-19% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 20-29% 0 0% 1 4% 1 1% 30-39% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 40-49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 50-74% 2 5% 0 0% 2 3% 75% or more 2 5% 1 4% 3 4% % % %

13 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) j. Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.) EXPERIEN 0% 29 62% 12 46% 41 56% 1-9% 6 13% 2 8% 8 11% 10-19% 3 6% 5 19% 8 11% 20-29% 2 4% 4 15% 6 8% 30-39% 3 6% 1 4% 4 5% 40-49% 2 4% 2 8% 4 5% 50-74% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 75% or more 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Ttl % % % Estimate the total number of students you have taught during TTSTDCOL 9 or less 1 2% 5 20% 6 8% this current academic year % 6 24% 7 10% % 7 28% 13 18% % 6 24% 14 20% % 1 4% 18 25% 100 or more 13 28% 0 0% 13 18% % % % 13

14 14 Please respond to the following questions based on the typical students you have taught during this academic year. About how often has the typical student done each of the following? a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions TCLQUEST Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sometimes 30 65% 3 12% 33 46% Often 10 22% 12 46% 22 31% Very Often 6 13% 11 42% 17 24% % % % b. Made a class presentation TCLPRSNT Never 15 33% 4 15% 19 26% Sometimes 22 48% 8 31% 30 42% Often 6 13% 5 19% 11 15% Very Often 3 7% 9 35% 12 17% % % % c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before TREWROPA Never 16 36% 8 31% 24 34% turning it in Sometimes 19 43% 11 42% 30 43% Often 7 16% 5 19% 12 17% Very Often 2 5% 2 8% 4 6% % % % d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or TINTEGRA Never 9 20% 1 4% 10 14% information from various sources Sometimes 19 42% 9 35% 28 39% Often 13 29% 7 27% 20 28% Very Often 4 9% 9 35% 13 18% % % % e. Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, TDIVCLAS Never 14 32% 6 24% 20 29% genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing Sometimes 13 30% 9 36% 22 32% assignments Often 13 30% 7 28% 20 29% Very Often 4 9% 3 12% 7 10% % % %

15 15 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) f. Come to class without completing readings or assignments TCLUNPRE Never 0 0% 4 15% 4 6% Sometimes 8 18% 13 50% 21 30% Often 14 31% 8 31% 22 31% Very Often 23 51% 1 4% 24 34% % % % g. Worked with other students on projects during class TCLASSGR Never 6 13% 5 19% 11 15% Sometimes 29 63% 12 46% 41 57% Often 8 17% 5 19% 13 18% Very Often 3 7% 4 15% 7 10% % % % h. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class TOCCGRP Never 5 11% 0 0% 5 7% assignments Sometimes 25 54% 11 42% 36 50% Often 14 30% 13 50% 27 38% Very Often 2 4% 2 8% 4 6% % % % i. Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when TINTIDEA Never 9 20% 1 4% 10 14% completing assignments or during class discussions Sometimes 27 60% 10 40% 37 53% Often 9 20% 11 44% 20 29% Very Often 0 0% 3 12% 3 4% % % % j. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TTUTOR Never 18 40% 2 9% 20 29% Sometimes 23 51% 15 65% 38 56% Often 4 9% 4 17% 8 12% Very Often 0 0% 2 9% 2 3% % % % k. Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service TCOMMPRO Never 20 44% 10 43% 30 44% learning) as part of a regular course Sometimes 17 38% 10 43% 27 40% Often 6 13% 3 13% 9 13% Very Often 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% % % %

16 16 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) l. Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, TITICADE Never 10 22% 4 16% 14 20% instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Sometimes 15 33% 6 24% 21 30% Often 13 29% 10 40% 23 33% Very Often 7 16% 5 20% 12 17% % % % m. Used to communicate with an instructor T Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sometimes 13 28% 6 24% 19 27% Often 23 50% 7 28% 30 42% Very Often 10 22% 12 48% 22 31% % % % n. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor TGRADE Never 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Sometimes 18 40% 6 24% 24 34% Often 16 36% 12 48% 28 40% Very Often 10 22% 7 28% 17 24% % % % o. Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor TPLANS Never 3 7% 0 0% 3 4% Sometimes 32 71% 8 32% 40 57% Often 9 20% 9 36% 18 26% Very Often 1 2% 8 32% 9 13% % % % p. Discussed ideas from his or her readings or classes with TIDEAS Never 11 25% 4 17% 15 22% faculty members outside of class Sometimes 28 64% 11 46% 39 57% Often 5 11% 6 25% 11 16% Very Often 0 0% 3 13% 3 4% % % % q. Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on his TFEED Never 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% or her academic performance Sometimes 6 13% 3 13% 9 13% Often 22 47% 12 50% 34 48% Very Often 19 40% 9 38% 28 39% % % %

17 17 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) r. Worked harder than usual to meet an instructor's standards or TWORKHRD Never 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% expectations Sometimes 27 59% 10 42% 37 53% Often 15 33% 11 46% 26 37% Very Often 2 4% 3 13% 5 7% % % % s. Worked with faculty members on activities other than TFACOTHR Never 11 24% 7 29% 18 26% coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, Sometimes 27 60% 14 58% 41 59% etc.) Often 5 11% 3 13% 8 12% Very Often 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% % % % t. Discussed ideas from his or her readings or classes with others TOOCID05 Never 9 20% 0 0% 9 13% outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, Sometimes 28 62% 20 83% 48 70% etc.) Often 7 16% 3 13% 10 14% Very Often 1 2% 1 4% 2 3% % % % u. Had serious conversations with students of a different race or TDIVRSTU Never 8 18% 1 4% 9 13% ethnicity than his or her own Sometimes 26 59% 9 39% 35 52% Often 9 20% 8 35% 17 25% Very Often 1 2% 5 22% 6 9% % % % v. Had serious conversations with students who are very different TDIFFSTU Never 11 25% 1 4% 12 18% from him or her in terms of their religious beliefs, political Sometimes 24 55% 12 52% 36 54% opinions, or personal values Often 8 18% 8 35% 16 24% Very Often 1 2% 2 9% 3 4% % % % w. Examined the strengths and weaknesses of his or her views on TOWNVIEW Never 7 16% 1 4% 8 12% a topic or issue Sometimes 30 67% 15 65% 45 66% Often 7 16% 6 26% 13 19% Very Often 1 2% 1 4% 2 3% % % %

18 18 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) x. Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining TOTHRVW Never 6 13% 0 0% 6 9% how an issue looks from that person's perspective Sometimes 28 62% 12 55% 40 60% Often 9 20% 10 45% 19 28% Very Often 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% % % % y. Learned something that changed the way he or she understood TCHNGVW Never 3 7% 0 0% 3 4% an issue or concept Sometimes 24 55% 12 52% 36 54% Often 13 30% 7 30% 20 30% Very Often 4 9% 4 17% 8 12% % % % During the current school year, about how much reading and writing do you estimate the typical student has done? a. Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of TREADASG None 1 2% 0 0% 1 2% course readings Between 1 and % 5 24% 31 48% Between 5 and % 13 62% 27 42% Between 11 and % 3 14% 4 6% More than % 0 0% 1 2% % % % b. Number of books read on his or her own (not assigned) for TREADOWN None 16 37% 1 5% 17 27% personal enjoyment or academic enrichment Between 1 and % 18 86% 44 69% Between 5 and % 2 10% 3 5% Between 11 and % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % c. Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more TWRTMR05 None 35 80% 6 27% 41 62% Between 1 and % 12 55% 19 29% Between 5 and % 2 9% 4 6% Between 11 and % 2 9% 2 3% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % %

19 19 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing do you estimate the typical student has done? (continued) d. Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages TWRTMD05 None 13 30% 0 0% 13 20% Between 1 and % 12 55% 35 53% Between 5 and % 8 36% 16 24% Between 11 and % 1 5% 1 2% More than % 1 5% 1 2% % % % e. Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages TWRITSML None 3 7% 1 5% 4 6% Between 1 and % 9 41% 25 38% Between 5 and % 7 32% 24 36% Between 11 and % 4 18% 11 17% More than % 1 5% 2 3% % % % In a typical week, how many homework problem sets does the typical student complete? a. Number of problem sets that take the typical student more TPROBSTA None 10 22% 1 5% 11 17% than one hour to complete % 5 25% 22 34% % 11 55% 23 35% % 1 5% 4 6% More than 6 3 7% 2 10% 5 8% % % % b. Number of problem sets that take the typical student less than TPROBSTB None 7 16% 3 15% 10 15% one hour to complete % 7 35% 21 32% % 4 20% 19 29% % 3 15% 9 14% More than 6 3 7% 3 15% 6 9% % % %

20 20 About how many hours do you think the typical student should spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing TEXPREP 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other % 1 5% 7 10% academic activities) % 2 9% 12 17% % 8 36% 13 19% % 2 9% 9 13% % 6 27% 20 29% % 1 5% 3 4% More than % 2 9% 5 7% Ttl % % % b. Working for pay on campus TEXWRKON 0 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% % 6 26% 11 16% % 5 22% 29 42% % 5 22% 13 19% % 7 30% 15 22% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % c. Working for pay off campus TEXWRKOF % 2 9% 15 22% % 4 17% 12 17% % 2 9% 17 25% % 6 26% 9 13% % 7 30% 12 17% % 2 9% 2 3% % 0 0% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 1 1% % % %

21 21 About how many hours do you think the typical student should spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) d. Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus TEXCOCUR 0 1 2% 1 4% 2 3% publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, % 13 57% 40 57% intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) % 7 30% 23 33% % 0 0% 2 3% % 1 4% 2 3% % 0 0% 0 0% % 1 4% 1 1% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % e. Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) TEXSOCIA 0 0 0% 2 9% 2 3% % 9 39% 24 34% % 7 30% 22 31% % 2 9% 12 17% % 3 13% 9 13% % 0 0% 2 3% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % f. Providing care for dependents living with him or her (parents, TEXCARED % 1 5% 12 18% children, spouse, etc.) % 4 18% 17 26% % 9 41% 16 24% % 3 14% 5 8% % 5 23% 11 17% % 0 0% 2 3% % 0 0% 1 2% More than % 0 0% 2 3% % % %

22 22 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? g. Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) TEXCOMMU 0 3 6% 0 0% 3 4% % 19 83% 55 79% % 2 9% 9 13% % 2 9% 2 3% % 0 0% 1 1% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing TACTPREP 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other % 7 33% 33 50% academic activities) % 7 33% 21 32% % 5 24% 10 15% % 0 0% 0 0% % 1 5% 1 2% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 1 5% 1 2% % % % b. Working for pay on campus TACTWKON 0 2 4% 1 5% 3 4% % 3 14% 9 13% % 2 9% 18 26% % 8 36% 18 26% % 8 36% 18 26% % 0 0% 2 3% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % %

23 23 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) c. Working for pay off campus TACTWKOF 0 3 6% 2 9% 5 7% % 1 5% 5 7% % 0 0% 10 14% % 2 9% 7 10% % 6 27% 18 26% % 2 9% 9 13% % 5 23% 8 12% More than % 4 18% 7 10% % % % d. Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus TACTCOCU 0 1 2% 2 9% 3 4% publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, % 11 50% 21 31% intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) % 3 14% 21 31% % 2 9% 8 12% % 1 5% 8 12% % 1 5% 3 4% % 2 9% 4 6% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % e. Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) TACTSOCI 0 0 0% 1 5% 1 1% % 3 14% 4 6% % 3 14% 4 6% % 9 41% 21 31% % 0 0% 11 16% % 1 5% 16 24% % 2 9% 5 7% More than % 3 14% 6 9% % % %

24 24 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) f. Providing care for dependents living with him or her (parents, TACTCARE % 0 0% 5 8% children, spouse, etc.) % 7 33% 20 30% % 4 19% 11 17% % 5 24% 14 21% % 4 19% 8 12% % 1 5% 7 11% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 1 2% % % % g. Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) TACTCOMM 0 3 7% 0 0% 3 4% % 16 73% 47 69% % 6 27% 18 26% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % Select the response that represents the extent to which the TEXAMS Very Little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% typical student's examinations have challenged that 2 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% student to do his or her best work % 3 13% 5 7% % 3 13% 13 19% % 5 22% 21 30% % 8 35% 22 32% Very much 2 4% 4 17% 6 9% % % %

25 25 During the current school year, how much do you believe the typical student's coursework has emphasized the following mental activities? a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from his or her courses TMEMORIZ Very little 4 9% 3 14% 7 10% and readings so he or she can repeat them pretty much in the Some 11 24% 9 41% 20 29% same form Quite a bit 18 39% 7 32% 25 37% Very much 13 28% 3 14% 16 24% % % % b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, TANALYZE Very little 2 4% 0 0% 2 3% such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and Some 16 35% 4 18% 20 29% considering its components Quite a bit 20 43% 10 45% 30 44% Very much 8 17% 8 36% 16 24% % % % c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, TSYNTHES Very little 8 18% 0 0% 8 12% or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and Some 17 38% 6 27% 23 34% relationships Quite a bit 16 36% 10 45% 26 39% Very much 4 9% 6 27% 10 15% % % % d. Making judgments about the value of information, TEVALUAT Very little 6 13% 0 0% 6 9% arguments, or methods such as examining how others gathered Some 22 48% 7 32% 29 43% and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their Quite a bit 14 30% 7 32% 21 31% conclusions Very much 4 9% 8 36% 12 18% % % % e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new TAPPLYIN Very little 6 13% 1 5% 7 10% situations Some 21 47% 5 23% 26 39% Quite a bit 11 24% 8 36% 19 28% Very much 7 16% 8 36% 15 22% % % %

26 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? a. Writing clearly and effectively TGNWRITE Very little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Some 20 43% 6 27% 26 38% Quite a bit 16 35% 12 55% 28 41% Very much 9 20% 4 18% 13 19% % % % b. Speaking clearly and effectively TGNSPEAK Very little 3 7% 1 5% 4 6% Some 21 46% 3 14% 24 35% Quite a bit 16 35% 12 55% 28 41% Very much 6 13% 6 27% 12 18% % % % c. Thinking critically and analytically TGNANALY Very little 5 11% 0 0% 5 7% Some 22 48% 6 27% 28 41% Quite a bit 10 22% 9 41% 19 28% Very much 9 20% 7 32% 16 24% % % % d. Analyzing quantitative problems TGNQUANT Very little 7 16% 1 5% 8 12% Some 25 56% 6 27% 31 46% Quite a bit 8 18% 10 45% 18 27% Very much 5 11% 5 23% 10 15% % % % e. Using computing and information technology TGNCMPTS Very little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% Some 22 48% 3 14% 25 37% Quite a bit 19 41% 11 50% 30 44% Very much 4 9% 8 36% 12 18% % % % f. Working effectively with others TGNOTHER Very little 4 9% 1 5% 5 7% Some 22 48% 6 27% 28 41% Quite a bit 17 37% 10 45% 27 40% Very much 3 7% 5 23% 8 12% % % % 26

27 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (cont.) g. Learning effectively on his or her own TGNINQ Very little 11 24% 0 0% 11 16% Some 16 35% 8 36% 24 35% Quite a bit 15 33% 11 50% 26 38% Very much 4 9% 3 14% 7 10% % % % h. Understanding himself or herself TGNSELF Very little 8 17% 2 9% 10 15% Some 16 35% 5 23% 21 31% Quite a bit 15 33% 12 55% 27 40% Very much 7 15% 3 14% 10 15% % % % i. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds TGNDIVER Very little 4 9% 1 5% 5 7% Some 20 43% 5 23% 25 36% Quite a bit 17 36% 10 45% 27 39% Very much 6 13% 6 27% 12 17% % % % j. Solving complex real-world problems TGNPROBS Very little 16 34% 1 5% 17 25% Some 18 38% 6 27% 24 35% Quite a bit 11 23% 12 55% 23 33% Very much 2 4% 3 14% 5 7% % % % k. Developing a personal code of values and ethics TGNETHIC Very little 9 19% 1 5% 10 14% Some 25 53% 9 41% 34 49% Quite a bit 7 15% 9 41% 16 23% Very much 6 13% 3 14% 9 13% % % % l. Developing a deepened sense of spirituality TGNSPIRI Very little 14 30% 4 19% 18 26% Some 23 49% 10 48% 33 49% Quite a bit 8 17% 6 29% 14 21% Very much 2 4% 1 5% 3 4% % % % 27

28 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (cont.) m. Acquiring a broad general education TGNGENLE Very little 6 13% 1 5% 7 10% Some 12 26% 4 18% 16 24% Quite a bit 17 37% 11 50% 28 41% Very much 11 24% 6 27% 17 25% % % % n. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills TGNWORK Very little 5 11% 0 0% 5 7% Some 28 60% 5 23% 33 48% Quite a bit 10 21% 10 45% 20 29% Very much 4 9% 7 32% 11 16% % % % o. Voting in local, state, or national elections TGNCITZN Very little 13 28% 2 9% 15 22% Some 20 43% 11 50% 31 45% Quite a bit 9 19% 6 27% 15 22% Very much 5 11% 3 14% 8 12% % % % p. Contributing to the welfare of his or her community TGNCOMMU Very little 13 28% 3 14% 16 23% Some 24 51% 13 59% 37 54% Quite a bit 5 11% 3 14% 8 12% Very much 5 11% 3 14% 8 12% % % % 28

29 What is the general discipline of your academic appointment? (Please specify an academic discipline) APDISCOL Arts and humanities 18 43% 4 19% 22 35% Biological science 2 5% 5 24% 7 11% Business 2 5% 3 14% 5 8% Education 2 5% 3 14% 5 8% Engineering 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Physical science 9 21% 1 5% 10 16% Professional 2 5% 2 10% 4 6% Social science 2 5% 1 5% 3 5% Other 5 12% 2 10% 7 11% % % % 29

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school. Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 1 Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 2 Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics at Youngstown State University 150 undergraduate mathematics/mathematics

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSM Type of study Full Time

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16 Course Syllabus BUSI 1307 Personal Finace Revision Date: 10/17/16 Catalog Description: Personal and family accounts, budgets and budgetary control, bank accounts, charge accounts, borrowing, investing,

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications.

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Management Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACMA Type of study Full

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages: PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSC Type of study Full Time

More information

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 8 weeks.

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE SYLLABUS: AGEC 600 -- AGRICULTURAL FINANCE Professor: Timothy G. Baker, 590 Krannert -- Office: 494-4237 Cell: 714-0426 E-mail: baker@purdue.edu Secretary: Linda Klotz. Krannert 565. E-mail: lrklotz@purdue.edu

More information

University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Minor In Actuarial Science Prepared primarily by Kathy Zhong February, 2011 A. Summary Actuarial

More information

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am CONTENTS INSTRUCTOR... 1 COURSE DESCRIPTION... 1 COURSE OBJECTIVES... 1 COURSE MATERIALS... 2 COURSE FORMAT... Error! Bookmark

More information

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year Award BSc (Hons) School Cass Business School Department or equivalent UG Programme (Cass

More information

What to do With a Windfall EPISODE # 511

What to do With a Windfall EPISODE # 511 What to do With a Windfall EPISODE # 511 LESSON LEVEL Grades 9-12 KEY TOPICS Investing Financial planning Entrepreneurship LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. Learn how to make a financial plan. 2. Understand the concept

More information

Accounting 40S Course Outline Business and Technology Department

Accounting 40S Course Outline Business and Technology Department Accounting 40S Course Outline 2015-2016 Business and Technology Department General Learning Outcomes (GLOs) for ACC40S Students will build upon and expand accounting principles and concepts introduced

More information

Actuarial Control Cycle A1

Actuarial Control Cycle A1 ACST4031 Actuarial Control Cycle A1 The aim of the Actuarial Control Cycle is to provide students with an understanding of underlying actuarial principles that may be applied to a range of problems and

More information

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Course Template for the Learning Outcomes System

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Course Template for the Learning Outcomes System THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Course Template for the Learning Outcomes System BE103/512 School of Business Course Code and Title (BUSI0085/ACCT4110 Advanced Topics in Taxation)

More information

City University of Hong Kong. Course Syllabus. offered by Department of Accountancy with effect from Semester A 2017/18

City University of Hong Kong. Course Syllabus. offered by Department of Accountancy with effect from Semester A 2017/18 City University of Hong Kong offered by Department of Accountancy with effect from Semester A 2017/18 Part I Course Overview Course Title: Taxation and Tax Planning Course Code: AC4251 Course Duration:

More information

Senior Survey - Fall 2016

Senior Survey - Fall 2016 Senior Survey - Fall 2016 18 Responses Will you have permanent employment after graduation? Yes 17 No 1 Employer: Stellar Group Drake Construction Services Danis Construction, LLC WPC Industrial Contractors

More information

Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum

Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum Courses By Semester Foundations Course Work During August (assigned as needed; these are in addition to required credits) FIN 510 Introduction to Finance (2)

More information

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Senior Scheduling Today, we are going to discuss your senior course selections. Some reminders when you get your verification card. Not all classes in the course

More information