SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences"

Transcription

1 NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison groups The major field report category 'Social Sciences' includes the following majors: Anthropology; Economics; Ethnic studies; Geography; Political science (includes govt, int. relations); Psychology; Social work; Sociology; Gender studies; Other social science.

2 NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Frequency Distributions

3 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Sample This report is based on information from all randomly selected or census-administered Social Sciences students for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted and locally administered oversamples and other non-randomly selected students are not included. Variable Names Class Major Categories The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your raw data file. Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make up the five "Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice" are indicated by the following: LAC: Level of Academic Challenge ACL: Active and Collaborative Learning SFI: Student-Faculty Interaction EEE: Enriching Educational Experiences SCE: Supportive Campus Environment Response Options Response options listed just as they appear on the instrument. Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class levels are used. Of course, first-year student reports of major are likely to be unstable, and interpretations of first-year results should be made with caution. BETWEEN Institution Comparisons on Major Categories NSSE data serve to identify institutional strengths and weaknesses in reference to selected comparison institutions, yet institution-level comparisons may not capture important variation in student engagement that can be found within key sub-populations such as major. This report displays the frequency distributions for the Social Sciences major category at your institution and at your selected comparison institutions. Students self-reported majors (primary major if two were reported) were assigned to one of 85 majors. Institutions had the option to customize how these were grouped into as many as eight major field categories. Institutions choosing not to customize receive NSSE s standard 8-category grouping. Major categories with fewer than five respondents in a given class are not reported. Comparison groups must contain at least three institutions with five or more respondents in the major category, or they are left blank. NSSEville NSSEville State Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 State Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 0 0% 16 2% 65 2% 271 2% 1 1% 11 1% 54 1% 203 1% contributed to class (ACL) discussions Sometimes 27 26% % 1,215 30% 4,837 28% 24 16% % 1,143 19% 4,188 18% Often 40 38% % 1,437 35% 6,240 36% 50 33% % 1,831 31% 6,909 29% Very often 38 36% % 1,371 34% 6,208 35% 75 50% % 2,956 49% 12,139 52% Total % % 4, % 17, % % 1, % 5, % 23, % 1b. Made a class presentation Never 12 11% 57 7% % 1,735 10% 5 3% 37 3% 234 4% 918 4% Sometimes 67 64% % 2,092 51% 9,171 52% 52 34% % 2,087 35% 8,513 36% Often 19 18% % 1,167 29% 4,931 28% 71 47% % 2,319 39% 9,016 38% Very often 7 7% 96 12% 387 9% 1,726 10% 24 16% % 1,367 23% 5,015 21% Total % % 4, % 17, % % 1, % 6, % 23, % 1c. REWROPAP Never 18 17% % % 2,415 14% 26 17% % % 3,887 17% Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in CLPRESEN (ACL) Sometimes 44 42% % 1,262 31% 5,630 32% 62 41% % 2,148 36% 8,966 38% Often 27 26% % 1,277 31% 5,372 31% 37 24% % 1,540 26% 5,985 26% Very often 16 15% % 1,011 25% 4,070 23% 27 18% % 1,345 22% 4,594 20% Total % % 4, % 17, % % 1, % 5, % 23, % Count Column Percentage (%) Weighting The Count column represents the actual number of students who selected the particular option in each question. The '%' column represents the percentage of students who selected the particular option in each question. All results displayed in this report are unweighted.

4 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 1 6% 61 4% 122 3% 491 3% 1 2% 72 3% 154 2% 549 2% contributed to class (ACL) Sometimes 5 29% % 1,624 34% 6,154 32% 13 21% % 2,025 24% 7,000 23% discussions Often 6 35% % 1,625 34% 6,448 34% 23 37% % 2,580 30% 9,052 30% Very often 5 29% % 1,398 29% 6,008 31% 26 41% % 3,829 45% 14,052 46% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Never 1 6% % % 2,640 14% 1 2% 121 5% 401 5% 1,687 6% (ACL) Sometimes 10 59% % 2,443 51% 10,280 54% 19 30% % 2,969 35% 11,351 37% Often 5 29% % 1,296 27% 4,776 25% 29 45% % 3,287 38% 11,391 37% Very often 1 6% 100 6% 400 8% 1,347 7% 15 23% % 1,937 23% 6,216 20% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1c. Prepared two or more drafts of REWROPAP Never 3 19% % % 2,504 13% 4 6% % 1,270 15% 4,994 16% a paper or assignment before Sometimes 5 31% % 1,358 29% 5,750 30% 30 47% % 3,061 36% 11,436 37% turning it in Often 6 38% % 1,537 32% 5,976 31% 16 25% % 2,291 27% 7,983 26% Very often 2 13% % 1,288 27% 4,756 25% 14 22% % 1,946 23% 6,143 20% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1d. Worked on a paper or project INTEGRAT Never 0 0% 37 2% 93 2% 322 2% 0 0% 26 1% 44 1% 209 1% that required integrating ideas Sometimes 2 12% % % 3,128 16% 4 6% % 602 7% 2,383 8% or information from various Often 8 47% % 1,997 42% 7,882 41% 22 34% % 2,799 33% 9,817 32% sources Very often 7 41% % 1,887 40% 7,720 41% 38 59% 1,252 53% 5,148 60% 18,242 60% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1e. DIVCLASS Never 0 0% 66 4% 208 4% 751 4% 1 2% 102 4% 211 2% 793 3% Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing assignments NSSE 2011 Major Field Report: Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Sometimes 4 24% % 1,208 25% 4,749 25% 14 22% % 1,599 19% 6,064 20% Often 7 41% % 1,871 39% 7,557 40% 22 34% % 2,943 34% 10,716 35% Very often 6 35% % 1,462 31% 5,978 31% 27 42% % 3,817 45% 13,028 43% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1f. Come to class without CLUNPREP Never 1 6% % 1,282 27% 4,743 25% 14 22% % 1,802 21% 5,882 19% completing readings or Sometimes 14 82% % 2,738 57% 11,040 58% 39 61% 1,354 57% 5,077 59% 18,069 59% assignments Often 2 12% % % 2,309 12% 7 11% % 1,205 14% 4,582 15% Very often 0 0% 90 5% 226 5% 986 5% 4 6% % 519 6% 2,147 7% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1g. Worked with other students CLASSGRP Never 2 12% % % 2,825 15% 7 11% % 750 9% 3,546 12% on projects during class (ACL) Sometimes 10 59% % 2,091 44% 8,541 45% 31 48% 1,169 49% 3,764 44% 14,145 46% Often 4 24% % 1,541 32% 5,754 30% 20 31% % 2,784 32% 9,011 29% Very often 1 6% % % 1,965 10% 6 9% % 1,294 15% 3,941 13% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE

5 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE h. Worked with classmates OCCGRP Never 2 12% % % 2,506 13% 3 5% 212 9% 732 8% 2,660 9% outside of class to prepare (ACL) Sometimes 10 59% % 2,088 44% 8,365 44% 31 48% 1,041 44% 3,504 41% 12,361 40% class assignments Often 2 12% % 1,413 30% 5,971 31% 21 33% % 2,945 34% 10,491 34% Very often 3 18% % % 2,293 12% 9 14% % 1,431 17% 5,230 17% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1i. Put together ideas or concepts INTIDEAS Never 0 0% 69 4% 267 6% 938 5% 0 0% 64 3% 227 3% 807 3% from different courses when Sometimes 3 18% % 1,646 35% 6,443 34% 14 22% % 2,066 24% 7,123 23% completing assignments or Often 8 47% % 1,907 40% 7,637 40% 31 48% % 3,621 42% 12,968 42% during class discussions Very often 6 35% % % 4,037 21% 19 30% % 2,667 31% 9,720 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1j. Tutored or taught other TUTOR Never 7 41% % 2,798 59% 10,350 54% 34 53% 1,186 50% 4,366 51% 14,868 49% students (paid or voluntary) (ACL) Sometimes 7 41% % 1,381 29% 6,037 32% 13 20% % 2,678 31% 9,885 32% Often 3 18% % 404 8% 1,897 10% 11 17% % % 3,321 11% Very often 0 0% 70 4% 185 4% 805 4% 6 9% 169 7% 635 7% 2,571 8% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1k. Participated in a communitybased COMMPROJ Never 13 76% 1,112 68% 2,768 58% 11,270 59% 30 48% 1,354 58% 3,843 45% 14,447 47% project (e.g. service (ACL) Sometimes 2 12% % 1,293 27% 4,830 25% 19 30% % 2,706 32% 9,350 31% learning) as part of a regular Often 1 6% 122 7% % 1,907 10% 12 19% 208 9% 1,191 14% 4,014 13% course Very often 1 6% 52 3% 226 5% 977 5% 2 3% 161 7% % 2,682 9% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1l. ITACADEM Never 6 35% % % 2,885 15% 10 16% % 1,022 12% 3,463 11% Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment (EEE) Sometimes 4 24% % 1,440 30% 5,630 29% 22 34% % 2,469 29% 8,957 29% Often 3 18% % 1,349 28% 5,384 28% 18 28% % 2,329 27% 8,400 27% Very often 4 24% % 1,198 25% 5,193 27% 14 22% % 2,773 32% 9,854 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1m. Used to communicate Never 0 0% 11 1% 48 1% 142 1% 0 0% 11 0% 26 0% 100 0% with an instructor Sometimes 2 13% % % 2,937 15% 4 6% % % 2,934 10% Often 9 56% % 1,644 35% 6,474 34% 20 31% % 2,451 29% 8,567 28% Very often 5 31% % 2,271 48% 9,531 50% 40 63% 1,396 59% 5,256 61% 19,028 62% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1n. Discussed grades or FACGRADE Never 0 0% 131 8% 402 8% 1,431 8% 4 6% 140 6% 389 5% 1,449 5% assignments with an instructor (SFI) Sometimes 11 65% % 1,782 37% 7,480 39% 17 27% % 2,830 33% 10,499 34% Often 4 24% % 1,525 32% 6,054 32% 22 34% % 2,885 34% 10,099 33% Very often 2 12% % 1,054 22% 4,112 22% 21 33% % 2,486 29% 8,578 28% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 5

6 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE o. Talked about career plans FACPLANS Never 4 24% % 1,125 24% 4,413 23% 4 6% % 1,331 15% 4,641 15% with a faculty member or (SFI) Sometimes 6 35% % 2,083 44% 8,335 44% 22 34% % 3,317 39% 12,051 39% advisor Often 3 18% % 1,023 22% 4,199 22% 20 31% % 2,271 26% 7,960 26% Very often 4 24% % % 2,110 11% 18 28% % 1,670 19% 5,994 20% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1p. Discussed ideas from your FACIDEAS Never 7 41% % 2,030 43% 7,322 38% 16 25% % 2,310 27% 8,010 26% readings or classes with (SFI) Sometimes 5 29% % 1,710 36% 7,368 39% 22 34% % 3,608 42% 13,192 43% faculty members outside of Often 3 18% % % 2,921 15% 16 25% % 1,677 19% 5,856 19% class Very often 2 12% 135 8% 333 7% 1,503 8% 10 16% % 1,013 12% 3,634 12% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1q. Received prompt written or FACFEED Never 1 6% 106 6% 288 6% 1,046 5% 0 0% 114 5% 334 4% 1,137 4% oral feedback from faculty on (SFI) Sometimes 6 35% % 1,591 33% 6,221 33% 20 31% % 2,325 27% 8,401 27% your academic performance Often 7 41% % 1,866 39% 7,708 40% 30 47% 1,021 43% 3,895 45% 13,909 45% Very often 3 18% % 1,017 21% 4,124 22% 14 22% % 2,056 24% 7,209 24% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1r. Worked harder than you WORKHARD Never 1 6% 117 7% 330 7% 1,250 7% 5 8% 149 6% 398 5% 1,749 6% thought you could to meet an (LAC) Sometimes 6 35% % 1,547 33% 6,376 33% 17 27% % 2,677 31% 10,090 33% instructor's standards or Often 5 29% % 1,913 40% 7,504 39% 23 37% % 3,534 41% 12,075 39% expectations Very often 5 29% % % 3,934 21% 18 29% % 1,974 23% 6,707 22% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1s. FACOTHER Never 11 65% % 2,737 58% 10,532 55% 31 48% 1,064 45% 3,940 46% 13,396 44% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) (SFI) Sometimes 2 12% % 1,225 26% 5,279 28% 12 19% % 2,496 29% 9,393 31% Often 3 18% % % 2,148 11% 11 17% % 1,248 15% 4,602 15% Very often 1 6% 97 6% 245 5% 1,050 6% 10 16% % % 3,146 10% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1t. Discussed ideas from your OOCIDEAS Never 0 0% 93 6% 237 5% 766 4% 2 3% 80 3% 239 3% 749 2% readings or classes with others (ACL) Sometimes 4 24% % 1,415 30% 5,368 28% 20 32% % 2,075 24% 7,330 24% outside of class (students, Often 9 53% % 1,719 36% 7,012 37% 25 40% % 3,167 37% 11,404 37% family members, co-workers, Very often 4 24% % 1,382 29% 5,891 31% 16 25% % 3,126 36% 11,172 36% etc.) Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1u. Had serious conversations DIVRSTUD Never 6 35% % % 2,312 12% 5 8% % % 2,958 10% with students of a different (EEE) Sometimes 2 12% % 1,394 29% 5,583 29% 21 33% % 2,600 30% 9,395 31% race or ethnicity than your Often 7 41% % 1,344 28% 5,231 27% 24 38% % 2,436 28% 8,625 28% own Very often 2 12% % 1,346 28% 5,972 31% 14 22% % 2,703 31% 9,721 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6

7 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE v. Had serious conversations DIFFSTU2 Never 4 24% 143 9% % 1,730 9% 9 14% 209 9% 700 8% 2,338 8% with students who are very (EEE) Sometimes 5 29% % 1,393 29% 5,392 28% 21 33% % 2,668 31% 9,288 30% different from you in terms of Often 4 24% % 1,472 31% 5,677 30% 17 27% % 2,624 30% 9,303 30% their religious beliefs, political Very often 4 24% % 1,391 29% 6,313 33% 17 27% % 2,617 30% 9,758 32% opinions, or personal values Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 2a. Coursework emphasizes: MEMORIZE Very little 0 0% 62 4% 222 5% 1,025 5% 5 8% 140 6% 679 8% 2,653 9% Memorizing facts, ideas, or Some 4 24% % 1,140 24% 4,839 25% 19 30% % 2,517 29% 9,146 30% methods from your courses Quite a bit 8 47% % 1,998 42% 7,739 40% 24 38% % 3,236 38% 11,264 37% and readings Very much 5 29% % 1,404 29% 5,513 29% 16 25% % 2,177 25% 7,638 25% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 2b. Coursework emphasizes: ANALYZE Very little 0 0% 28 2% 66 1% 263 1% 0 0% 34 1% 92 1% 314 1% Analyzing the basic elements (LAC) Some 3 18% % % 2,443 13% 4 6% % % 3,009 10% of an idea, experience, or Quite a bit 10 59% % 2,026 43% 7,902 42% 24 38% % 3,334 39% 11,829 39% theory Very much 4 24% % 1,946 41% 8,431 44% 36 56% 1,136 48% 4,254 50% 15,464 51% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 2c. Coursework emphasizes: SYNTHESZ Very little 1 6% 46 3% 188 4% 627 3% 1 2% 84 4% 241 3% 873 3% Synthesizing and organizing (LAC) Some 4 24% % 1,111 23% 4,219 22% 12 19% % 1,583 18% 5,344 17% ideas, information, or Quite a bit 7 41% % 1,975 42% 7,767 41% 25 39% % 3,399 40% 11,913 39% experiences Very much 5 29% % 1,471 31% 6,398 34% 26 41% % 3,351 39% 12,441 41% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 2d. EVALUATE Very little 0 0% 72 4% 185 4% 711 4% 1 2% 79 3% 294 3% 1,056 3% Coursework emphasizes: Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods (LAC) Some 5 29% % 1,018 21% 4,126 22% 14 22% % 1,517 18% 5,581 18% Quite a bit 8 47% % 1,947 41% 7,767 41% 24 38% % 3,442 40% 12,041 39% Very much 4 24% % 1,604 34% 6,456 34% 25 39% % 3,339 39% 11,977 39% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 2e. Coursework emphasizes: APPLYING Very little 0 0% 62 4% 175 4% 652 3% 0 0% 82 3% 182 2% 810 3% Applying theories or concepts (LAC) Some 2 12% % % 3,793 20% 3 5% % 1,274 15% 4,711 15% to practical problems or in Quite a bit 10 59% % 1,855 39% 7,356 39% 27 42% % 2,979 35% 10,889 35% new situations Very much 5 29% % 1,741 37% 7,277 38% 34 53% 1,075 45% 4,170 48% 14,281 47% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 3a. Number of assigned READASGN None 0 0% 4 0% 16 0% 61 0% 1 2% 12 1% 44 1% 166 1% textbooks, books, or booklength (LAC) % % % 2,769 14% 8 13% % 1,864 22% 5,733 19% packs of course % % 2,116 44% 7,624 40% 28 44% % 3,368 39% 11,243 37% readings % % 1,254 26% 5,667 30% 12 19% % 2,031 24% 8,140 27% More than % % % 2,981 16% 14 22% % 1,295 15% 5,393 18% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7

8 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE b. Number of books read on READOWN None 1 6% % 1,174 25% 4,239 22% 15 23% % 1,734 20% 6,042 20% your own (not assigned) for % % 2,593 54% 10,723 56% 28 44% 1,261 53% 4,647 54% 16,717 54% personal enjoyment or % % % 2,685 14% 12 19% % 1,361 16% 4,926 16% academic enrichment % 63 4% 184 4% 737 4% 5 8% 108 5% 452 5% 1,605 5% More than % 57 3% 199 4% 725 4% 4 6% 106 4% 413 5% 1,419 5% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 3c. Number of written papers or WRITEMOR None 15 94% 1,373 84% 3,988 84% 15,892 83% 21 33% 1,091 46% 3,875 45% 13,272 43% reports of 20 pages or more (LAC) % % % 2,368 12% 35 55% 1,109 47% 3,925 46% 14,625 48% % 47 3% 119 3% 447 2% 3 5% 115 5% 539 6% 1,896 6% % 18 1% 60 1% 195 1% 5 8% 33 1% 153 2% 465 2% More than % 9 1% 37 1% 167 1% 0 0% 32 1% 114 1% 440 1% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 3d. Number of written papers or WRITEMID None 4 25% % % 2,076 11% 2 3% 125 5% 369 4% 1,411 5% reports between 5 and 19 (LAC) % % 2,634 55% 10,110 53% 22 34% % 3,310 38% 11,102 36% pages % % 1,237 26% 5,430 28% 28 44% % 3,276 38% 12,060 39% % 87 5% 259 5% 1,269 7% 7 11% % 1,235 14% 4,583 15% More than % 21 1% 44 1% 238 1% 5 8% 120 5% 429 5% 1,575 5% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 3e. Number of written papers or WRITESML None 0 0% 38 2% 126 3% 433 2% 5 8% 117 5% 513 6% 1,631 5% reports of fewer than 5 pages (LAC) % % 1,513 32% 5,573 29% 16 25% % 2,976 35% 9,621 31% % % 1,635 34% 6,623 35% 19 30% % 2,407 28% 8,793 29% % % 1,030 22% 4,311 23% 12 19% % 1,530 18% 5,964 19% More than % % % 2,202 12% 12 19% % 1,196 14% 4,732 15% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 4a. Number of problem sets that PROBSETA None 1 6% % % 2,968 16% 14 22% % 1,903 22% 8,075 26% take you more than an hour to % % 1,679 35% 6,634 35% 23 36% % 2,761 32% 9,493 31% complete % % 1,522 32% 5,832 31% 16 25% % 2,397 28% 7,798 25% % % % 1,922 10% 7 11% 199 8% 810 9% 2,625 9% More than 6 1 6% 150 9% 426 9% 1,730 9% 4 6% 188 8% 695 8% 2,590 8% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 4b. Number of problem sets that PROBSETB None 2 12% % % 2,986 16% 17 27% % 2,473 29% 10,110 33% take you less than an hour to % % 1,680 35% 6,540 34% 21 33% % 3,052 36% 10,389 34% complete % % 1,279 27% 4,900 26% 15 23% % 1,785 21% 5,754 19% % % % 2,154 11% 8 13% 165 7% 625 7% 2,068 7% More than 6 1 6% % % 2,499 13% 3 5% 171 7% 639 7% 2,244 7% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 8

9 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE Select the circle that best EXAMS 1 Very little 0 0% 6 0% 28 1% 92 0% 0 0% 16 1% 87 1% 297 1% represents the extent to which 2 0 0% 24 1% 58 1% 192 1% 1 2% 44 2% 131 2% 482 2% your examinations during the 3 1 6% 53 3% 179 4% 615 3% 1 2% 104 4% 340 4% 1,215 4% current school year challenged % % % 2,148 11% 7 11% % % 3,437 11% you to do your best work % % 1,568 33% 5,965 31% 31 48% % 2,551 30% 9,273 30% % % 1,512 32% 6,508 34% 12 19% % 2,791 32% 10,106 33% 7 Very much 3 18% % % 3,639 19% 12 19% % 1,786 21% 5,952 19% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6a. Attended an art exhibit, play, ATDART07 Never 3 18% % 1,051 22% 3,819 20% 17 27% % 2,641 31% 8,140 27% dance, music, theater, or other Sometimes 5 29% % 2,345 49% 9,154 48% 30 47% 1,140 48% 4,061 47% 14,747 48% performance Often 8 47% % % 4,051 21% 10 16% % 1,275 15% 5,154 17% Very often 1 6% 152 9% % 2,108 11% 7 11% 176 7% 625 7% 2,641 9% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6b. Exercised or participated in EXRCSE05 Never 3 18% 155 9% % 1,913 10% 4 6% % 1,401 16% 3,960 13% physical fitness activities Sometimes 6 35% % 1,417 30% 5,312 28% 22 34% % 2,876 33% 9,612 31% Often 4 24% % 1,245 26% 4,938 26% 18 28% % 2,101 24% 7,371 24% Very often 4 24% % 1,516 32% 6,907 36% 20 31% % 2,215 26% 9,692 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6c. Participated in activities to WORSHP05 Never 8 50% % 2,263 48% 8,402 44% 41 64% 1,231 52% 3,636 42% 12,760 42% enhance your spirituality Sometimes 7 44% % 1,166 25% 4,916 26% 9 14% % 2,288 27% 8,157 27% (worship, meditation, prayer, Often 0 0% % % 2,571 14% 7 11% % 1,174 14% 4,106 13% etc.) Very often 1 6% % % 3,153 17% 7 11% % 1,495 17% 5,594 18% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6d. Examined the strengths and OWNVIEW Never 1 6% % 430 9% 1,379 7% 8 13% 188 8% 492 6% 1,579 5% weaknesses of your own views Sometimes 4 24% % 1,583 33% 6,082 32% 21 33% % 2,391 28% 8,577 28% on a topic or issue Often 6 35% % 1,680 35% 6,951 36% 23 36% % 3,362 39% 11,759 38% Very often 6 35% % 1,063 22% 4,649 24% 12 19% % 2,327 27% 8,684 28% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6e. Tried to better understand OTHRVIEW Never 0 0% 69 4% 197 4% 683 4% 4 6% 113 5% 230 3% 786 3% someone else's views by Sometimes 5 29% % 1,230 26% 4,805 25% 20 31% % 1,793 21% 6,531 21% imagining how an issue looks Often 8 47% % 1,829 38% 7,484 39% 25 39% % 3,456 40% 12,433 41% from his or her perspective Very often 4 24% % 1,503 32% 6,103 32% 15 23% % 3,126 36% 10,918 36% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 6f. Learned something that CHNGVIEW Never 0 0% 55 3% 160 3% 499 3% 5 8% 66 3% 149 2% 521 2% changed the way you Sometimes 3 18% % 1,190 25% 4,548 24% 16 25% % 1,916 22% 6,861 22% understand an issue or Often 9 53% % 1,880 39% 7,533 39% 21 33% % 3,440 40% 12,338 40% concept Very often 5 29% % 1,542 32% 6,537 34% 21 33% % 3,109 36% 11,002 36% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9

10 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE a. Practicum, internship, field INTERN04 Have not decided 3 18% 150 9% % 2,101 11% 4 6% 175 7% 786 9% 2,552 8% experience, co-op experience, (EEE) Do not plan to do 1 6% 48 3% 156 3% 516 3% 12 19% % 1,287 15% 4,885 16% or clinical assignment Plan to do 13 76% 1,353 83% 3,802 80% 15,425 81% 14 22% % 2,380 28% 7,221 24% Done 0 0% 86 5% 213 4% 1,050 5% 34 53% 1,314 55% 4,159 48% 16,050 52% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7b. Community service or VOLNTR04 Have not decided 2 12% % 443 9% 1,562 8% 2 3% 201 8% 700 8% 2,047 7% volunteer work (EEE) Do not plan to do 0 0% 86 5% 195 4% 660 3% 13 20% % % 3,138 10% Plan to do 10 59% % 2,152 45% 8,346 44% 9 14% % 1,458 17% 4,554 15% Done 5 29% % 1,965 41% 8,448 44% 40 63% 1,478 62% 5,461 64% 20,830 68% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7c. Participate in a learning LRNCOM04 Have not decided 4 24% % 1,606 34% 6,180 33% 11 18% % 1,344 16% 4,119 13% community or some other (EEE) Do not plan to do 4 24% % 1,053 22% 4,622 24% 36 58% 1,302 55% 4,101 48% 15,821 52% formal program where groups Plan to do 5 29% % 1,298 27% 4,980 26% 1 2% 176 7% % 2,580 8% of students take two or more Done 4 24% % % 3,197 17% 14 23% % 2,224 26% 8,020 26% classes together Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7d. Work on a research project RESRCH04 Have not decided 6 35% % 1,872 39% 7,094 37% 6 9% % 1,680 20% 4,855 16% with a faculty member outside (SFI) Do not plan to do 2 12% % % 3,092 16% 36 56% 1,087 46% 3,651 42% 13,635 45% of course or program Plan to do 9 53% % 1,833 39% 8,037 42% 6 9% % 1,394 16% 4,468 15% requirements Done 0 0% 69 4% 198 4% 811 4% 16 25% % 1,869 22% 7,676 25% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7e. Foreign language coursework FORLNG04 Have not decided 1 6% % % 2,557 13% 3 5% 121 5% 793 9% 2,071 7% (EEE) Do not plan to do 4 24% % 1,047 22% 3,278 17% 20 31% % 3,407 40% 9,567 31% Plan to do 9 53% % 1,759 37% 7,058 37% 6 9% 140 6% 816 9% 2,261 7% Done 3 18% % 1,116 23% 6,186 32% 35 55% 1,358 57% 3,594 42% 16,801 55% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7f. Study abroad STDABR04 Have not decided 4 24% % 1,249 26% 4,424 23% 8 13% % 1,323 15% 3,607 12% (EEE) Do not plan to do 5 29% % % 3,239 17% 45 70% 1,445 61% 5,216 61% 17,434 57% Plan to do 8 47% % 2,411 51% 10,911 57% 8 13% 217 9% % 2,784 9% Done 0 0% 43 3% 84 2% 435 2% 3 5% % 1,169 14% 6,771 22% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 7g. Independent study or selfdesigned INDSTD04 Have not decided 4 24% % 1,653 35% 6,564 35% 7 11% % 1,274 15% 3,481 11% major (EEE) Do not plan to do 9 53% % 2,152 45% 8,506 45% 44 69% 1,458 62% 4,979 58% 18,098 59% Plan to do 4 24% % % 3,321 17% 6 9% 185 8% 754 9% 2,457 8% Done 0 0% 46 3% 144 3% 595 3% 7 11% % 1,542 18% 6,465 21% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10

11 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE h. Culminating senior SNRX04 Have not decided 7 41% % 1,698 36% 6,214 33% 7 11% % 1,084 13% 3,058 10% experience (capstone course, (EEE) Do not plan to do 1 6% 122 7% 368 8% 1,334 7% 22 34% % 1,995 23% 7,524 25% senior project or thesis, Plan to do 9 53% % 2,624 55% 11,213 59% 16 25% % 2,576 30% 8,460 28% comprehensive exam, etc.) Done 0 0% 48 3% 71 1% 313 2% 19 30% % 2,956 34% 11,666 38% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 8a. Quality of relationships with ENVSTU other students (SCE) 8b. Quality of relationships with ENVFAC faculty members (SCE) 8c. Quality of relationships with ENVADM administrative personnel (SCE) and offices 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of alienation 0 0% 30 2% 59 1% 207 1% 0 0% 39 2% 98 1% 323 1% % 46 3% 160 3% 541 3% 0 0% 76 3% 193 2% 780 3% 3 1 6% 92 6% 291 6% 1,025 5% 2 3% 134 6% 413 5% 1,429 5% % % % 2,273 12% 12 19% % 1,044 12% 3,499 11% % % 1,032 22% 3,998 21% 13 20% % 1,832 21% 6,514 21% % % 1,380 29% 5,837 31% 18 28% % 2,615 30% 9,542 31% 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of belonging 4 24% % 1,204 25% 5,246 27% 19 30% % 2,416 28% 8,637 28% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1 Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic 1 6% 13 1% 30 1% 115 1% 0 0% 30 1% 74 1% 263 1% 2 0 0% 35 2% 102 2% 340 2% 0 0% 76 3% 138 2% 618 2% 3 0 0% 107 7% 263 6% 956 5% 3 5% 121 5% 333 4% 1,310 4% % % % 2,767 14% 8 13% % % 3,417 11% % % 1,257 26% 4,893 26% 16 25% % 1,886 22% 6,758 22% % % 1,491 31% 6,027 32% 19 30% % 2,814 33% 10,057 33% 7 Available, Helpful, Sympathetic 4 24% % % 4,021 21% 18 28% % 2,457 29% 8,298 27% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 1 Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid 0 0% 49 3% 144 3% 482 3% 3 5% 162 7% 424 5% 1,607 5% 2 1 6% 112 7% 275 6% 973 5% 6 9% 202 8% 627 7% 2,456 8% 3 1 6% % % 1,840 10% 9 14% % % 3,376 11% % % 1,103 23% 4,128 22% 14 22% % 1,802 21% 6,318 21% % % 1,084 23% 4,498 24% 16 25% % 1,908 22% 6,730 22% % % % 4,108 21% 12 19% % 1,579 18% 5,841 19% 7 Helpful, Considerate, 4 24% % % 3,092 16% 4 6% % 1,326 15% 4,420 14% Flexible Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11

12 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE a. Preparing for class (studying, ACADPR01 0 hr/wk 0 0% 3 0% 11 0% 44 0% 0 0% 7 0% 18 0% 71 0% reading, writing, doing (LAC) 1-5 hr/wk 2 12% % % 2,388 12% 13 20% % 1,493 17% 4,505 15% homework or lab work, 6-10 hr/wk 7 41% % 1,256 26% 4,411 23% 11 17% % 2,330 27% 7,555 25% analyzing data, rehearsing, hr/wk 1 6% % 1,093 23% 4,262 22% 13 20% % 1,788 21% 6,514 21% and other academic activities) hr/wk 3 18% % % 3,609 19% 17 27% % 1,338 16% 5,288 17% hr/wk 3 18% % 436 9% 2,309 12% 5 8% % 750 9% 3,206 10% hr/wk 1 6% 101 6% 214 4% 1,165 6% 2 3% 121 5% 457 5% 1,775 6% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 62 4% 185 4% 924 5% 3 5% 105 4% 433 5% 1,787 6% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9b. Working for pay on campus WORKON01 0 hr/wk 10 59% 1,346 82% 3,813 80% 14,592 76% 43 67% 1,680 71% 6,561 76% 21,056 69% 1-5 hr/wk 2 12% 51 3% 187 4% 998 5% 6 9% 106 4% 298 3% 1,560 5% 6-10 hr/wk 4 24% 94 6% 365 8% 1,829 10% 5 8% 204 9% 558 6% 2,960 10% hr/wk 1 6% 50 3% 215 5% 871 5% 4 6% 165 7% 466 5% 2,095 7% hr/wk 0 0% 34 2% 137 3% 510 3% 4 6% 120 5% 447 5% 1,821 6% hr/wk 0 0% 7 0% 16 0% 89 0% 2 3% 30 1% 96 1% 466 2% hr/wk 0 0% 6 0% 10 0% 47 0% 0 0% 16 1% 40 0% 188 1% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 48 3% 18 0% 163 1% 0 0% 56 2% 119 1% 486 2% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9c. Working for pay off campus WORKOF01 0 hr/wk 14 82% 1,312 80% 3,304 69% 14,474 76% 44 69% 1,356 57% 3,502 41% 15,435 50% 1-5 hr/wk 0 0% 47 3% 232 5% 797 4% 0 0% 83 4% 373 4% 1,435 5% 6-10 hr/wk 1 6% 60 4% 243 5% 764 4% 4 6% 125 5% 535 6% 1,813 6% hr/wk 2 12% 62 4% 253 5% 782 4% 2 3% 157 7% 600 7% 1,848 6% hr/wk 0 0% 55 3% 252 5% 778 4% 5 8% 197 8% % 2,493 8% hr/wk 0 0% 41 3% 172 4% 514 3% 3 5% 150 6% 701 8% 2,015 7% hr/wk 0 0% 24 1% 111 2% 331 2% 4 6% 102 4% 555 6% 1,435 5% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 35 2% 193 4% 647 3% 2 3% 198 8% 1,497 17% 4,152 14% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9d. Participating in co-curricular COCURR01 0 hr/wk 4 24% % 2,082 44% 6,600 35% 30 47% % 4,328 50% 12,925 42% activities (organizations, (EEE) 1-5 hr/wk 8 47% % 1,488 31% 6,290 33% 16 25% % 2,265 26% 8,750 28% campus publications, student 6-10 hr/wk 2 12% % % 2,822 15% 5 8% % % 3,864 13% government, fraternity or hr/wk 1 6% % 308 6% 1,555 8% 4 6% 205 9% 501 6% 2,183 7% sorority, intercollegiate or hr/wk 0 0% 84 5% 144 3% 863 5% 4 6% 117 5% 293 3% 1,317 4% intramural sports, etc.) hr/wk 2 12% 43 3% 80 2% 482 3% 2 3% 51 2% 135 2% 661 2% hr/wk 0 0% 26 2% 37 1% 205 1% 1 2% 32 1% 82 1% 339 1% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 36 2% 52 1% 304 2% 2 3% 68 3% 140 2% 669 2% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 12

13 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE e. Relaxing and socializing SOCIAL05 0 hr/wk 1 6% 21 1% 43 1% 185 1% 1 2% 24 1% 111 1% 339 1% (watching TV, partying, etc.) 1-5 hr/wk 2 12% % 1,120 23% 4,290 22% 12 19% % 2,588 30% 8,153 27% 6-10 hr/wk 7 41% % 1,370 29% 5,537 29% 15 23% % 2,591 30% 9,275 30% hr/wk 3 18% % % 4,080 21% 23 36% % 1,568 18% 6,088 20% hr/wk 3 18% % % 2,379 12% 5 8% % % 3,527 11% hr/wk 1 6% 106 6% 298 6% 1,181 6% 4 6% 132 6% 398 5% 1,510 5% hr/wk 0 0% 51 3% 145 3% 521 3% 2 3% 61 3% 167 2% 678 2% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 98 6% 263 6% 938 5% 2 3% 122 5% 285 3% 1,134 4% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9f. Providing care for dependents CAREDE01 0 hr/wk 11 65% 1,301 80% 3,270 69% 14,689 77% 42 66% 1,711 72% 4,610 54% 19,442 63% living with you (parents, 1-5 hr/wk 5 29% % % 1,912 10% 4 6% % 1,195 14% 3,450 11% children, spouse, etc.) 6-10 hr/wk 1 6% 70 4% 300 6% 831 4% 3 5% 114 5% 630 7% 1,787 6% hr/wk 0 0% 30 2% 141 3% 438 2% 2 3% 66 3% 368 4% 982 3% hr/wk 0 0% 11 1% 94 2% 271 1% 2 3% 43 2% 304 4% 822 3% hr/wk 0 0% 15 1% 52 1% 136 1% 0 0% 22 1% 172 2% 481 2% hr/wk 0 0% 4 0% 20 0% 83 0% 1 2% 10 0% 122 1% 359 1% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 29 2% 234 5% 711 4% 10 16% 145 6% 1,192 14% 3,333 11% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 9g. Commuting to class (driving, COMMUTE 0 hr/wk 5 29% % % 3,669 19% 10 16% % 695 8% 3,489 11% walking, etc.) 1-5 hr/wk 10 59% 1,026 62% 2,843 59% 11,844 62% 35 55% 1,500 63% 5,212 61% 19,097 62% 6-10 hr/wk 1 6% % % 2,261 12% 14 22% % 1,735 20% 5,308 17% hr/wk 1 6% 59 4% 200 4% 694 4% 2 3% 130 5% 554 6% 1,606 5% hr/wk 0 0% 30 2% 93 2% 296 2% 2 3% 38 2% 197 2% 565 2% hr/wk 0 0% 12 1% 45 1% 126 1% 1 2% 18 1% 70 1% 207 1% hr/wk 0 0% 9 1% 24 1% 74 0% 0 0% 10 0% 39 0% 136 0% 30+ hr/wk 0 0% 18 1% 50 1% 163 1% 0 0% 28 1% 111 1% 325 1% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10a. ENVSCHOL Very little 0 0% 35 2% 89 2% 284 1% 1 2% 70 3% 183 2% 661 2% Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work (LAC) Some 3 18% % % 2,785 15% 13 20% % 1,483 17% 5,130 17% Quite a bit 9 53% % 2,243 47% 8,588 45% 33 52% 1,072 45% 4,019 47% 13,711 45% Very much 5 29% % 1,646 35% 7,447 39% 17 27% % 2,910 34% 11,197 36% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10b. ENVSUPRT Very little 1 6% 44 3% 135 3% 428 2% 1 2% 143 6% 382 4% 1,380 5% Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically (SCE) Some 3 18% % % 3,056 16% 14 22% % 1,901 22% 6,682 22% Quite a bit 8 47% % 2,020 43% 7,830 41% 26 41% % 3,624 42% 12,731 42% Very much 5 29% % 1,729 37% 7,691 40% 22 35% % 2,655 31% 9,780 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 13

14 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE c. Encouraging contact among ENVDIVRS Very little 2 12% % % 1,887 10% 6 10% % 1,188 14% 4,579 15% students from different (EEE) Some 4 24% % 1,282 27% 5,090 27% 27 44% % 2,581 30% 9,623 31% economic, social, and racial or Quite a bit 8 47% % 1,532 32% 6,140 32% 15 25% % 2,648 31% 9,166 30% ethnic backgrounds Very much 3 18% % 1,427 30% 5,929 31% 13 21% % 2,137 25% 7,200 24% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10d. Helping you cope with your ENVNACAD Very little 4 24% % 1,084 23% 4,082 21% 27 42% % 2,850 33% 10,283 34% non-academic responsibilities (SCE) Some 3 18% % 1,745 37% 7,070 37% 17 27% % 3,000 35% 11,160 36% (work, family, etc.) Quite a bit 5 29% % 1,191 25% 4,995 26% 13 20% % 1,751 20% 5,985 20% Very much 5 29% % % 2,898 15% 7 11% 226 9% % 3,230 11% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10e. Providing the support you ENVSOCAL Very little 5 29% % % 2,679 14% 15 23% % 1,879 22% 6,632 22% need to thrive socially (SCE) Some 2 12% % 1,559 33% 6,146 32% 28 44% % 3,171 37% 11,481 38% Quite a bit 6 35% % 1,549 33% 6,348 33% 16 25% % 2,317 27% 8,281 27% Very much 4 24% % % 3,792 20% 5 8% % 1,178 14% 4,101 13% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10f. Attending campus events and ENVEVENT Very little 3 18% 87 5% 404 9% 1,264 7% 5 8% % 1,198 14% 3,305 11% activities (special speakers, Some 1 6% % 1,118 24% 3,950 21% 23 36% % 2,440 29% 8,061 26% cultural performances, athletic Quite a bit 9 53% % 1,736 37% 7,050 37% 21 33% % 2,925 34% 11,325 37% events, etc.) Very much 4 24% % 1,487 31% 6,782 36% 15 23% % 1,994 23% 7,891 26% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 10g. ENVCOMPT Very little 0 0% 24 1% 131 3% 453 2% 2 3% 45 2% 188 2% 624 2% Using computers in academic work Some 1 6% % % 2,529 13% 7 11% % % 3,342 11% Quite a bit 10 59% % 1,623 34% 6,361 33% 18 29% % 2,499 29% 9,052 30% Very much 6 35% % 2,337 49% 9,723 51% 36 57% 1,358 57% 4,930 58% 17,608 57% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11a. Acquiring a broad general GNGENLED Very little 0 0% 21 1% 110 2% 350 2% 1 2% 60 3% 196 2% 595 2% education Some 2 13% % % 2,254 12% 8 13% % 1,003 12% 3,258 11% Quite a bit 8 50% % 1,939 41% 7,439 39% 24 38% % 3,056 36% 10,449 34% Very much 6 38% % 2,061 43% 9,007 47% 31 48% 1,164 49% 4,304 50% 16,277 53% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11b. Acquiring job or work-related GNWORK Very little 3 19% 139 9% % 1,790 9% 2 3% % 639 7% 2,597 9% knowledge and skills Some 3 19% % 1,402 30% 5,510 29% 17 27% % 1,998 23% 7,821 26% Quite a bit 6 38% % 1,648 35% 6,634 35% 22 34% % 3,032 35% 10,498 34% Very much 4 25% % 1,175 25% 5,088 27% 23 36% % 2,882 34% 9,636 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 14

15 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE c. Writing clearly and GNWRITE Very little 2 13% 64 4% 178 4% 701 4% 0 0% 92 4% 215 3% 834 3% effectively Some 2 13% % % 3,412 18% 9 14% % 1,229 14% 4,443 15% Quite a bit 7 44% % 1,893 40% 7,276 38% 32 50% % 3,232 38% 11,098 36% Very much 5 31% % 1,791 38% 7,661 40% 23 36% % 3,881 45% 14,194 46% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11d. Speaking clearly and GNSPEAK Very little 0 0% 122 7% 293 6% 1,344 7% 0 0% 160 7% 381 4% 1,504 5% effectively Some 3 19% % 1,173 25% 4,727 25% 14 22% % 1,650 19% 6,320 21% Quite a bit 7 44% % 1,764 37% 6,836 36% 26 41% % 3,253 38% 11,114 36% Very much 6 38% % 1,509 32% 6,084 32% 24 38% % 3,259 38% 11,557 38% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11e. Thinking critically and GNANALY Very little 0 0% 41 3% 86 2% 337 2% 2 3% 58 2% 125 1% 466 2% analytically Some 3 19% % % 2,223 12% 8 13% % 748 9% 2,655 9% Quite a bit 6 38% % 1,812 38% 6,993 37% 21 33% % 2,945 34% 9,957 33% Very much 7 44% % 2,192 46% 9,450 50% 33 52% 1,203 51% 4,724 55% 17,410 57% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11f. Analyzing quantitative GNQUANT Very little 1 7% 89 5% 263 6% 1,092 6% 1 2% 129 5% 351 4% 1,517 5% problems Some 3 20% % 1,129 24% 4,529 24% 16 25% % 1,803 21% 6,956 23% Quite a bit 7 47% % 1,919 41% 7,325 39% 28 44% % 3,203 37% 10,935 36% Very much 4 27% % 1,424 30% 6,015 32% 19 30% % 3,192 37% 11,071 36% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11g. GNCMPTS Very little 1 6% 106 6% 352 7% 1,394 7% 4 6% 116 5% 398 5% 1,552 5% Using computing and information technology Some 2 13% % 1,139 24% 4,646 24% 14 22% % 1,691 20% 6,698 22% Quite a bit 9 56% % 1,696 36% 6,707 35% 22 34% % 3,030 35% 10,740 35% Very much 4 25% % 1,560 33% 6,288 33% 24 38% % 3,443 40% 11,568 38% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11h. Working effectively with GNOTHERS Very little 2 13% 84 5% 240 5% 897 5% 1 2% 131 6% 288 3% 1,087 4% others Some 3 19% % 1,051 22% 4,231 22% 17 27% % 1,538 18% 5,898 19% Quite a bit 8 50% % 1,796 38% 7,067 37% 25 39% % 3,180 37% 11,223 37% Very much 3 19% % 1,656 35% 6,822 36% 21 33% % 3,556 42% 12,364 40% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11i. Voting in local, state, or GNCITIZN Very little 7 41% % 1,851 39% 6,958 37% 24 38% % 2,574 30% 8,853 29% national elections Some 3 18% % 1,351 29% 5,642 30% 21 33% % 2,498 29% 9,134 30% Quite a bit 4 24% % % 3,692 19% 10 16% % 1,838 22% 6,597 22% Very much 3 18% % % 2,675 14% 8 13% % 1,633 19% 5,942 19% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 15

16 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE j. Learning effectively on your GNINQ Very little 0 0% 85 5% 255 5% 838 4% 3 5% 118 5% 449 5% 1,409 5% own Some 4 24% % 1,002 21% 3,891 21% 17 27% % 1,515 18% 5,399 18% Quite a bit 9 53% % 2,040 43% 8,070 43% 23 37% % 3,424 40% 12,039 40% Very much 4 24% % 1,412 30% 6,110 32% 20 32% % 3,138 37% 11,586 38% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11k. Understanding yourself GNSELF Very little 2 12% 145 9% % 1,616 9% 5 8% 218 9% 686 8% 2,378 8% Some 3 18% % 1,051 22% 4,246 23% 19 30% % 1,790 21% 6,242 21% Quite a bit 8 47% % 1,668 35% 6,789 36% 18 29% % 2,806 33% 10,171 33% Very much 4 24% % 1,533 33% 6,214 33% 21 33% % 3,229 38% 11,586 38% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11l. Understanding people of GNDIVERS Very little 3 18% 143 9% % 1,785 9% 8 13% % 701 8% 2,702 9% other racial and ethnic Some 2 12% % 1,230 26% 5,124 27% 24 38% % 1,961 23% 7,795 26% backgrounds Quite a bit 7 41% % 1,613 34% 6,467 34% 18 29% % 2,865 34% 10,142 33% Very much 5 29% % 1,415 30% 5,552 29% 13 21% % 3,008 35% 9,835 32% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11m. Solving complex real-world GNPROBSV Very little 3 18% % % 1,626 9% 4 6% % 731 9% 2,545 8% problems Some 3 18% % 1,358 29% 5,485 29% 18 29% % 2,169 25% 7,939 26% Quite a bit 9 53% % 1,744 37% 6,958 37% 23 37% % 3,074 36% 11,077 36% Very much 2 12% % 1,156 24% 4,857 26% 18 29% % 2,552 30% 8,925 29% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11n. GNETHICS Very little 4 24% % % 1,967 10% 8 13% % % 3,443 11% Developing a personal code of values and ethics Some 1 6% % 1,169 25% 4,503 24% 18 29% % 1,913 22% 7,012 23% Quite a bit 6 35% % 1,620 34% 6,434 34% 19 30% % 2,646 31% 9,391 31% Very much 6 35% % 1,390 29% 6,014 32% 18 29% % 3,003 35% 10,662 35% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11o. Contributing to the welfare GNCOMMUN Very little 3 18% % % 2,657 14% 10 16% % 1,216 14% 4,056 13% of your community Some 5 29% % 1,469 31% 5,629 30% 25 40% % 2,371 28% 8,489 28% Quite a bit 5 29% % 1,462 31% 6,006 32% 16 25% % 2,527 30% 9,230 30% Very much 4 24% % 1,037 22% 4,653 25% 12 19% % 2,422 28% 8,707 29% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 11p. Developing a deepened sense GNSPIRIT Very little 9 53% % 1,743 37% 7,134 38% 33 53% 1,223 52% 3,653 43% 13,606 45% of spirituality Some 3 18% % 1,211 26% 4,789 25% 16 26% % 1,991 23% 7,079 23% Quite a bit 2 12% % % 3,535 19% 8 13% % 1,435 17% 4,558 15% Very much 3 18% % % 3,496 18% 5 8% % 1,466 17% 5,281 17% Total % 1, % 4, % 18, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 16

17 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE Overall, how would you ADVISE Poor 0 0% 85 5% 212 4% 790 4% 3 5% % 702 8% 2,729 9% evaluate the quality of Fair 3 18% % % 2,865 15% 11 17% % 1,641 19% 5,838 19% academic advising you have Good 8 47% % 2,176 46% 8,456 44% 24 38% % 3,433 40% 11,931 39% received at your institution? Excellent 6 35% % 1,605 34% 7,026 37% 26 41% % 2,840 33% 10,248 33% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 13. How would you evaluate your ENTIREXP Poor 2 12% 28 2% 72 2% 251 1% 0 0% 66 3% 146 2% 575 2% entire educational experience Fair 0 0% % % 1,814 9% 11 17% % % 3,173 10% at this institution? Good 11 65% % 2,347 49% 8,783 46% 29 45% 1,149 48% 4,116 48% 13,666 44% Excellent 4 24% % 1,797 38% 8,265 43% 24 38% % 3,429 40% 13,307 43% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 14. If you could start over again, SAMECOLL Definitely no 2 12% 78 5% 221 5% 773 4% 2 3% 131 5% 411 5% 1,499 5% would you go to the same Probably no 1 6% % % 2,176 11% 7 11% % 1,144 13% 3,839 12% institution you are now Probably yes 8 47% % 1,895 40% 7,123 37% 25 39% % 3,276 38% 11,193 36% attending? Definitely yes 6 35% % 2,028 42% 9,069 47% 30 47% % 3,785 44% 14,216 46% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 17

18 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE 2011 Mid East Public Carnegie Class NSSE Age AGE 19 or younger 16 94% 1,474 90% 4,126 86% 16,685 87% 0 0% 5 0% 20 0% 97 0% % 122 7% 310 6% 1,288 7% 47 73% 1,915 80% 5,019 58% 20,499 67% % 19 1% 126 3% 392 2% 6 9% % 1,680 19% 4,593 15% % 20 1% 125 3% 409 2% 5 8% 113 5% % 2,681 9% % 9 1% 89 2% 354 2% 6 9% 97 4% % 2,504 8% Over % 2 0% 12 0% 48 0% 0 0% 9 0% 120 1% 369 1% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 16. Your sex: SEX Male 4 24% % 1,077 23% 5,145 27% 19 30% % 2,102 24% 8,646 28% Female 13 76% 1,125 68% 3,706 77% 14,028 73% 45 70% 1,646 69% 6,510 76% 22,085 72% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 17. Are you an international INTERNAT No % 1,533 94% 4,569 96% 17,952 94% 58 91% 2,282 96% 8,286 96% 29,341 96% student or foreign national? Yes 0 0% 104 6% 192 4% 1,147 6% 6 9% 96 4% 319 4% 1,330 4% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 18. What is your racial or ethnic RACE05 American Indian or other identification? (Select only Native American 0 0% 9 1% 31 1% 150 1% 1 2% 7 0% 93 1% 278 1% one.) Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 0 0% 128 8% 227 5% 1,168 6% 1 2% 134 6% 409 5% 1,615 5% Black or African American 1 6% % % 1,944 10% 3 5% % 809 9% 3,052 10% White (non-hispanic) 16 94% 1,007 61% 2,753 58% 11,956 62% 52 81% 1,577 66% 5,055 59% 19,626 64% Mexican or Mexican American 0 0% 14 1% 375 8% 845 4% 1 2% 10 0% 676 8% 1,240 4% Puerto Rican 0 0% 30 2% 52 1% 179 1% 0 0% 35 1% 81 1% 246 1% Other Hispanic or Latino 0 0% 54 3% 234 5% 731 4% 0 0% 70 3% 361 4% 991 3% Multiracial 0 0% 58 4% 194 4% 790 4% 1 2% 84 4% 367 4% 1,204 4% Other 0 0% 32 2% 91 2% 315 2% 0 0% 54 2% 166 2% 509 2% I prefer not to respond 0 0% 99 6% 292 6% 1,083 6% 5 8% 151 6% 604 7% 1,991 6% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 19. What is your current CLASS Freshman/first year 15 94% 1,451 88% 4,006 84% 16,435 86% 0 0% 1 0% 3 0% 16 0% classification in college? Sophomore 1 6% % % 2,356 12% 0 0% 6 0% 25 0% 72 0% Junior 0 0% 16 1% 65 1% 229 1% 4 6% 105 4% 388 4% 1,365 4% Senior 0 0% 3 0% 12 0% 50 0% 59 92% 2,241 94% 8,053 93% 28,826 94% Unclassified 0 0% 3 0% 34 1% 93 0% 1 2% 31 1% 158 2% 495 2% Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 20. Did you begin college at your ENTER Started here % 1,520 93% 4,321 90% 17,508 91% 31 48% 1,495 63% 4,150 48% 18,175 59% current institution or Started elsewhere 0 0% 123 7% % 1,655 9% 33 52% % 4,481 52% 12,616 41% elsewhere? Total % 1, % 4, % 19, % % 2, % 8, % 30, % 18

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

Southern Utah University

Southern Utah University Selected Comparison Groups August 2009 Reviewing Your Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report Ntionl Survey of Student Enggement Mens Summry Report Vrile Vr. Nme Clss Men Men Sig Effect Size Men Sig Effect Size COLLEGE ACTIVITIES Acdemic, Intellectul, nd Socil Experiences Asked questions in clss

More information

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District FCLQUEST FCLPRESEN FREWROPAP FINTEGRAT FCLUNPREP FCLASSGRP FOCCGRP selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions selected course section make a class presentation selected

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

Level of Academic Challenge

Level of Academic Challenge N S S E S n a p s h o t November 2009 Inside this issue: Active and Collaborative Learning Student and faculty Interaction Enriching Education Experiences Multi year benchmarks Supporting Campus Environment

More information

ASF Committer Diversity Survey

ASF Committer Diversity Survey ASF Committer Diversity Survey - 2016 Introduction Many organisations are wanting to find out how effective they are at attracting a diverse range of people. The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) promotes

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics In spring 2015, nine community colleges from across the state were provided a small stipend to participate in the Civic Engagement Survey

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

Alabama A & M University Student Academic Program Assessment Environmental Science

Alabama A & M University Student Academic Program Assessment Environmental Science Section I Degree program type: 1 Undergraduate 2 100% 2 Graduate 0 0% Gender: 1 Male 0 0% 2 Female 2 100% Age group: 1 18-20 0 0% 2 21-23 2 100% 3 24-25 0 0% 4 26-30 0 0% 5 31-40 0 0% 6 41-60 0 0% 7 61

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

United Way Worldwide: MyFreeTaxes Survey November 18-23, Report Date: January 28, 2016

United Way Worldwide: MyFreeTaxes Survey November 18-23, Report Date: January 28, 2016 United Way Worldwide: MyFreeTaxes Survey November 18-23, 2015 Report Date: January 28, 2016 Methodology Survey Type: The national public opinion survey was conducted using Lightspeed GMI online survey.

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation

Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page

More information

Northwest Census Data Aggregation

Northwest Census Data Aggregation Northwest Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table

More information

Riverview Census Data Aggregation

Riverview Census Data Aggregation Riverview Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table

More information

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation Zipe Code 66101 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)

More information

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation Zipe Code 66103 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)

More information

Mobiloil Federal Credit Union Employment Application

Mobiloil Federal Credit Union Employment Application Mobiloil Federal Credit Union Employment Application It is our policy to provide equal employment opportunity to all qualified persons without regard to race, creed, color, religious belief, sex, age,

More information

Click here to unlock TallPDF.NET. Q1. During the academic year, on average how often do you visit the Price Center? % Less than once a week

Click here to unlock TallPDF.NET. Q1. During the academic year, on average how often do you visit the Price Center? % Less than once a week University Centers Student Usage and Priority Survey Description: Date Created: 10/25/2012 9:11:38 PM Date Range: 10/29/2012 6:00:00 AM - 11/23/2012 11:59:00 PM Total Respondents: 1808 Q1. During the academic

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

Findings from Focus Groups: Select Populations in Dane County

Findings from Focus Groups: Select Populations in Dane County W ISCONSIN STATE PLANNING GRANT Briefing Paper 3, September 2001 Findings from Focus Groups: Select Populations in Dane County Wisconsin is one of 20 states that received a grant in 2000-01 from the Health

More information

NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY

NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Data weighted to states Figure 1: Positive Feelings about Community: Summary i Frequency of Positive Feelings, by State OREGON

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey C I T Y O F E L K G R O V E, C A 2011 Supplemental Web Survey Results 3005 30th Street 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 ww.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org

More information

CITY OF CALISTOGA DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION

CITY OF CALISTOGA DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION Date Applicant s Name Phone Residence Address Home City, State, Zip Code Phone Mailing Address (If different) FAMILY INFORMATION Applicant or Co-Applicant

More information

Employment Application

Employment Application Employment Application To Applicant Instructions We appreciate your interest in our company and we are interested in reviewing your qualifications for our current open positions. To make this the best

More information

2016 Labor Market Profile

2016 Labor Market Profile 2016 Labor Market Profile Prepared by The Tyler Economic Development Council Tyler Area Sponsor June 2016 The ability to demonstrate a regions availability of talented workers has become a vital tool

More information

Please complete all forms in their entirety. All documents submitted become the property of Drew and cannot be returned.

Please complete all forms in their entirety. All documents submitted become the property of Drew and cannot be returned. I N S T R U C T I O N S F O R C O M P L E T I N G T H E M. A.T. A P P L I C AT I O N Office of Graduate Admission The Caspersen School Drew University Madison, New Jersey 07940 973.408.3110 fax: 973.408.3040

More information

Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods

Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods Appendix A: Detailed Methodology and Statistical Methods I. Detailed Methodology Research Design AARP s 2003 multicultural project focuses on volunteerism and charitable giving. One broad goal of the project

More information

~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002

~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002 ~ Credit Card Survey of USC Students ~ Results from Spring 2002 The Credit Card Survey of USC Students was administered during the Spring 2002 semester to collect information about 1) students use of credit

More information

July Sub-group Audiences Report

July Sub-group Audiences Report July 2013 Sub-group Audiences Report SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland completed 4,000 telephone interviews among the following groups between April 4, 2013 and May 3, 2013: Audience General

More information

MedStart-5. Application for Assistance

MedStart-5. Application for Assistance MedStart-5 Application for Assistance Transportation Meals Assistance Utilities Co-Payments Adult Home Care Lab Testing For application help, contact us at 1-888-842-2654 To apply for benefits, follow

More information

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017 New Braunfels, TX Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780

More information

February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904)

February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904) February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904) 620-2102 University of North Florida Poll Reveals that a Vast Majority of Duval County Residents

More information

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Analysis of Multiple Years of NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Fall 2008 Regional NSSE Users Workshop October 2008 Allison BrckaLorenz Overview Introduction Five Multi Year Analysis Tasks 1. Identifying

More information

Total Enrollment by Division, Department, Degree Track and Year of Study as of 10/15/17

Total Enrollment by Division, Department, Degree Track and Year of Study as of 10/15/17 Enrollment by Division, Department, Degree Track and Year of Study as of 1/1/1 G1 G G G G DCE G1 G G G + Architecture 1 1 Art and Archaeology 1 1 1 Classics Comparative Literature 1 1 East Asian Studies

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Patient Identification Form

Patient Identification Form Identification Information Weill Cornell Community Clinic Patient Identification Form Today s Date: / / Name: (last) (first) (middle) DOB (mm/dd/yyyy): / / Current Address: (street) (city) (state) (zip)

More information

Faculty Campus Climate Survey

Faculty Campus Climate Survey Faculty Campus Climate Survey Summary Report June 20, 2017 Dr. Ann McCann Director of Planning & Assessment Faculty Campus Climate Survey The Faculty Campus Climate Survey was conducted in March 2017 to

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

Vanderbilt University Poll December Survey Results

Vanderbilt University Poll December Survey Results Vanderbilt University Poll December 2012 Survey Results Vanderbilt University Poll December 2012 Toplines for REGISTERED VOTERS N = 829; Margin of Error +/- 4.3% SEX. Record Respondent s sex Male 48% Female

More information

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report B-CU Graduate Exit urvey pring 2008- pring Report Table of Contents I. Executive ummary... 2 II. Methodology... 2 III. Objectives... 2 IV. ummary of the urvey... 3 V. Gender of Participants... 5 VI. Response

More information

Heartland Monitor Poll XXI

Heartland Monitor Poll XXI National Sample of 1000 AMERICAN ADULTS AGE 18+ (500 on landline, 500 on cell) (Sample Margin of Error for 1,000 Respondents = ±3.1% in 95 out of 100 cases) Conducted October 22 26, 2014 via Landline and

More information

New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies

New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies New Jersey economic issues poll April 5-14, 2018 Stockton Polling Institute Weighted frequencies Q1. How would you rate the U.S. economy: Frequency Valid Valid Excellent 47 6.6 6.6 6.6 Good 302 42.1 42.1

More information