Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report"

Transcription

1 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make up the five Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice are indicated by the following: LAC=Level of Academic Challenge ACL=Active and Collaborative Learning SFI=Student-Faculty Interaction EEE=Enriching Educational Experiences SCE=Supportive Campus Environment Variable Names The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your raw data file and the Mean Comparisons report. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected or census-administered students for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted and locally administered oversamples and other non-randomly selected students are not included. NSSEville Mid East NSSEville Mid East St at e Private Carnegie Class NSSE 2012 St ate Private Carnegie Class NSSE 2012 Variable Resp o nse Op tions Co unt % Count % Co unt % Count % Co unt % Count % Co unt % Count % 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 15 2% 211 2% 1,248 3% 4,922 3% 9 1% 124 1% 901 2% 3,538 2% contributed to class (ACL) Sometimes % 2,905 34% 14,781 35% 57,335 35% % 2,088 22% 12,633 23% 46,587 25% discussions Often % 2,967 35% 15,134 36% 57,083 35% % 3,048 33% 17,608 33% 60,869 32% Very often % 2,079 29% 11,163 26% 44,027 27% % 4,058 44% 23,086 42% 81,914 41% Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 192, % 1b. Made a class presentation CLPRESEN Never 80 9% 775 9% 5,215 13% 21,742 14% 24 2% 277 3% 2,779 5% 10,865 6% (ACL) Sometimes % 4,202 50% 21,727 50% 85,258 51% % 2,761 30% 16,041 30% 62,084 33% Often % 2,406 30% 11,642 28% 42,552 26% % 3,688 39% 20,570 37% 71,247 36% Very often 47 5% % 3,780 9% 13,872 9% % 2,638 28% 15,083 27% 49,267 25% Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1c. Prepared two or more REWROPAP Never % % 4,445 11% 20,566 13% % 1,624 16% 7,821 14% 30,644 16% drafts of Sometimes % 2,658 32% 12,162 29% 49,181 30% % 3,644 38% 19,675 36% 72,374 37% a paper or assignment Often % 2,709 33% 14,262 34% 52,973 33% % 2,451 27% 15,467 29% 52,575 28% before turning it in Very often % 1,803 25% 11,341 27% 40,180 25% % 1,628 18% 11,403 21% 37,522 20% Total % 8, % 42, % 162, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1d. Worked on a paper or INTEGRAT Never 12 1% 133 2% 805 2% 3,275 2% 4 0% 88 1% 584 1% 2,004 1% project that required Sometimes % 1,558 19% 7,790 19% 30,757 19% 79 8% 1,045 12% 5,944 11% 22,154 12% integrating ideas or Often % 3,796 46% 18,693 44% 71,661 43% % 3,565 38% 20,389 38% 71,169 37% information from various Very often % 2,696 33% 15,110 35% 57,856 35% % 4,669 49% 27,625 50% 98,358 50% sources Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % 1e. Included diverse DIVCLASS Never 66 7% 516 6% 2,614 7% 10,590 7% 52 5% 542 6% 3,288 7% 12,973 7% perspectives (different Sometimes % 2,548 30% 12,747 30% 50,123 31% % 2,780 29% 15,326 28% 56,316 29% races, religions, genders, Often % 3,248 39% 16,448 38% 62,783 38% % 3,253 35% 18,995 35% 66,376 34% political beliefs, etc.) in Very often % 1,865 25% 10,544 25% 39,804 24% % 2,780 30% 16,844 30% 57,710 29% class discussions or writing Total % 8, % 42, % 163, % 1, % 9, % 54, % 193, % i t Response Options Response options are listed as they appear on the instrument. NSSEville State University Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institutionreported class ranks are used. Count The Count column represents the actual number of students who responded to the particular option in each question. Counts are unweighted. Column Percentage (%) This column presents the weighted percentage of students responding to the particular option in each question. Weighting Weights adjusting for gender and enrollment status (and by institutional size for comparison groups) are applied to the percentage column (%) of this report. Weights are computed separately for first-year students and seniors. Weighted results present a more accurate representation of your institution and comparison group students. Only the column percents are weighted. The count is the actual number of respondents. Because the counts are unweighted and the column percentages are weighted, one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. Additional details about weighting can be found on the NSSE Web site. nsse.iub.edu/links/institutional_reporting 1

2 Public Carnegie Class 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 18 6% 776 3% 1,011 3% 245 4% 16 3% 615 2% 699 2% 237 2% contributed to class (ACL) Sometimes % 8,093 37% 12,777 33% 2,444 37% % 6,968 24% 10,235 21% 2,613 24% discussions Often 95 33% 7,395 34% 13,610 35% 2,232 35% % 8,953 31% 15,442 31% 3,439 31% Very often 52 18% 5,604 26% 11,396 30% 1,570 25% % 12,312 42% 23,498 47% 4,941 43% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1b. Made a class presentation Never 90 31% 3,488 16% 4,518 13% % 17 3% 2,203 8% 2,721 6% 714 7% Sometimes % 10,903 49% 19,292 49% 3,212 49% % 9,736 34% 14,196 29% 3,342 30% Often 46 16% 5,466 25% 10,969 28% 1,862 28% % 10,042 35% 18,595 37% 4,158 37% Very often 9 2% 1,975 10% 3,939 11% 568 9% % 6,891 23% 14,378 28% 3,021 26% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1c. REWROPAP Never 63 24% 2,792 13% 4,601 12% % % 4,358 15% 7,706 15% 1,797 16% Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in Sometimes 98 34% 6,054 28% 11,346 29% 1,845 29% % 10,018 35% 17,936 35% 4,094 36% Often 82 29% 6,944 32% 12,602 33% 2,130 33% % 8,273 29% 13,554 27% 3,053 27% Very often 42 14% 5,942 28% 10,099 27% 1,718 26% % 6,121 21% 10,593 22% 2,277 20% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1d. INTEGRAT Never 7 3% 558 3% 708 2% 143 2% 6 1% 491 2% 559 1% 167 2% Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources Sometimes 69 25% 3,924 18% 6,791 18% 1,173 18% 46 8% 3,574 13% 5,187 11% 1,320 12% Often % 9,107 42% 16,640 42% 2,863 44% % 10,661 37% 17,872 36% 4,145 37% Very often 81 28% 8,257 37% 14,625 37% 2,308 36% % 14,127 48% 26,306 52% 5,608 49% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1e. DIVCLASS Never 23 7% 1,635 8% 2,549 7% 441 7% 40 7% 2,467 9% 3,041 7% 856 8% Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing assignments Sometimes 74 28% 6,746 31% 12,089 31% 2,079 31% % 7,963 28% 13,572 28% 3,236 29% Often % 7,913 36% 14,378 36% 2,375 37% % 9,523 33% 17,098 34% 3,780 33% Very often 85 29% 5,492 25% 9,680 25% 1,570 25% % 8,866 30% 16,126 32% 3,364 29% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1f. CLUNPREP Never 86 29% 6,088 28% 11,560 30% 1,845 29% 82 13% 7,302 25% 12,530 25% 2,740 24% Come to class without completing readings or assignments CLPRESEN (ACL) Carnegie Class Sometimes % 12,007 55% 20,927 54% 3,541 54% % 16,154 56% 27,898 56% 6,275 56% Often 30 11% 2,560 12% 4,178 11% % 97 16% 3,574 13% 6,259 13% 1,497 14% Very often 19 6% 1,190 5% 2,132 6% 365 6% 71 12% 1,844 6% 3,242 6% 745 7% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % 1g. Never 37 13% 2,666 12% 5,059 13% % 45 8% 3,265 12% 4,788 10% 1,098 10% Worked with other students on projects during class CLASSGRP (ACL) UNF Public Sometimes % 9,079 41% 16,280 41% 2,762 42% % 10,799 37% 18,816 37% 4,090 37% Often 91 33% 7,149 33% 12,472 32% 2,160 33% % 9,056 31% 16,315 33% 3,758 33% Very often 22 8% 2,933 14% 4,951 13% % % 5,766 20% 10,040 20% 2,319 20% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 28, % 49, % 11, % UNF a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 1

3 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 1h. Worked with classmates OCCGRP Never 51 17% 3,359 16% 5,860 17% 1,079 18% 29 5% 2,592 9% 4,023 9% 1,001 9% outside of class to prepare (ACL) Sometimes % 9,073 41% 15,855 40% 2,789 42% % 9,017 31% 16,119 32% 3,603 32% class assignments Often 89 31% 6,438 29% 11,783 29% 1,899 28% % 9,719 34% 17,040 34% 3,829 34% Very often 21 8% 3,027 14% 5,401 14% % % 7,676 27% 12,933 26% 2,856 25% Total % 21, % 38, % 6, % % 29, % 50, % 11, % 1i. INTIDEAS Never 26 10% 1,660 8% 2,496 7% 420 7% 10 2% 1,047 4% 1,529 3% 388 4% Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions Sometimes % 7,921 38% 13,672 37% 2,252 37% % 7,202 26% 11,888 25% 2,700 25% Often 89 36% 7,616 37% 14,229 38% 2,406 39% % 11,348 41% 20,416 42% 4,605 42% Very often 41 15% 3,369 16% 6,412 17% 1,050 17% % 8,316 30% 14,581 30% 3,208 29% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1j. TUTOR Never % 10,811 52% 20,324 55% 3,508 57% % 12,610 45% 22,536 47% 5,159 47% Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) (ACL) Sometimes 87 33% 6,417 31% 11,058 30% 1,795 29% % 9,383 34% 15,632 32% 3,571 33% Often 24 10% 2,274 11% 3,722 10% % 61 10% 3,308 12% 5,629 12% 1,181 11% Very often 6 3% 1,098 5% 1,776 5% 257 4% 54 9% 2,687 10% 4,728 10% 1,006 9% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1k. COMMPROJ Never % 11,952 58% 21,292 60% 3,770 61% % 13,748 50% 22,687 49% 5,287 50% Participated in a communitybased project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course (ACL) Sometimes 77 30% 5,310 25% 9,652 25% 1,511 25% % 8,089 29% 15,072 30% 3,337 30% Often 26 10% 2,178 11% 3,881 10% 553 9% 78 13% 3,647 13% 6,403 13% 1,401 12% Very often 12 4% 1,051 5% 1,810 5% 256 4% 65 10% 2,334 8% 4,118 8% 855 7% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1l. ITACADEM Never 42 15% 2,927 14% 5,503 16% % 49 9% 2,619 9% 4,493 10% 1,060 10% Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment (EEE) Sometimes 82 31% 5,800 28% 10,945 29% 1,874 31% % 6,919 25% 12,314 25% 2,757 25% Often 78 31% 5,693 27% 10,577 28% 1,782 29% % 7,590 27% 13,669 28% 3,111 29% Very often 57 23% 6,183 30% 9,847 27% 1,590 26% % 10,863 38% 18,085 37% 4,015 36% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1m. Never 9 4% 242 1% 323 1% 71 1% 3 1% 119 0% 196 0% 66 1% Used to communicate with an instructor Sometimes 67 27% 3,480 18% 5,937 18% 1,167 21% 52 9% 2,662 10% 4,715 11% 1,184 11% Often 78 29% 6,882 33% 12,833 35% 2,187 35% % 7,596 28% 13,503 29% 3,180 30% Very often % 9,968 47% 17,726 46% 2,701 43% % 17,582 61% 30,049 60% 6,494 58% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1n. FACGRADE Never 25 10% 1,362 7% 2,546 7% 457 7% 27 5% 1,019 4% 1,844 4% 482 5% Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor (SFI) Sometimes % 7,566 37% 13,975 38% 2,461 40% % 8,513 31% 15,586 33% 3,607 34% Often 76 31% 6,653 33% 11,994 32% 1,971 32% % 9,175 33% 16,103 33% 3,610 33% Very often 37 14% 4,989 24% 8,289 23% 1,239 21% % 9,251 33% 14,940 30% 3,217 29% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 2

4 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 1o. Talked about career plans FACPLANS Never 48 18% 4,183 21% 7,935 22% 1,265 22% % 4,544 17% 7,484 16% 1,887 18% with a faculty member or (SFI) Sometimes % 8,920 43% 16,131 43% 2,635 42% % 10,528 38% 18,479 38% 4,254 39% advisor Often 58 23% 4,779 23% 8,345 23% 1,512 25% % 7,237 26% 12,722 26% 2,761 25% Very often 31 11% 2,702 13% 4,411 12% % % 5,647 20% 9,797 20% 2,021 18% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1p. FACIDEAS Never % 8,962 42% 15,304 41% 2,721 43% % 8,194 29% 13,757 29% 3,437 31% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class (SFI) Sometimes 90 35% 7,321 36% 13,391 36% 2,123 34% % 11,383 41% 20,101 41% 4,436 40% Often 27 12% 2,747 14% 5,447 15% % 99 17% 5,033 18% 8,914 18% 1,856 17% Very often 9 3% 1,587 8% 2,756 8% 427 7% 74 13% 3,404 12% 5,804 12% 1,213 11% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 28, % 48, % 10, % 1q. FACFEED Never 14 5% 1,364 7% 2,031 6% 394 7% 44 8% 1,220 5% 1,783 4% 506 5% Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance (SFI) Sometimes 94 39% 6,649 33% 11,497 32% 2,029 34% % 7,669 28% 12,765 27% 3,107 29% Often 96 37% 8,185 40% 15,115 41% 2,426 40% % 11,912 43% 21,455 44% 4,687 43% Very often 50 19% 4,036 20% 7,657 21% 1,167 19% % 6,911 24% 12,140 25% 2,501 22% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1r. WORKHARD Never 19 8% 1,094 6% 1,884 6% 313 5% 35 6% 1,271 5% 2,205 5% 514 5% Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations (LAC) Sometimes 88 36% 6,256 31% 11,458 32% 2,020 33% % 7,863 29% 14,190 30% 3,361 32% Often 90 36% 8,075 40% 14,894 41% 2,445 41% % 10,894 39% 19,239 40% 4,269 39% Very often 55 20% 4,773 23% 8,031 22% 1,224 20% % 7,667 27% 12,423 25% 2,649 24% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1s. FACOTHER Never % 11,292 56% 19,574 55% 3,414 57% % 12,417 45% 21,190 46% 4,969 47% Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) (SFI) Sometimes 69 27% 5,278 26% 10,173 27% 1,543 26% % 8,243 30% 14,365 29% 3,161 29% Often 28 12% 2,349 12% 4,334 12% % 79 13% 4,028 15% 7,348 15% 1,605 15% Very often 8 2% 1,206 6% 2,087 6% 339 6% 62 10% 2,932 10% 5,048 10% 1,027 9% Total % 20, % 36, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 1t. OOCIDEAS Never 15 6% 1,532 8% 2,483 7% 442 8% 24 4% 1,165 4% 1,948 4% 514 5% Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.) (ACL) Sometimes 80 31% 6,994 35% 12,555 35% 2,120 35% % 7,991 29% 14,256 30% 3,216 30% Often 98 40% 6,831 34% 12,477 34% 2,034 34% % 10,136 37% 17,626 37% 3,891 36% Very often 62 24% 4,832 24% 8,732 24% 1,413 24% % 8,389 30% 14,231 29% 3,174 29% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 1u. DIVRSTUD Never 34 13% 3,156 16% 6,086 17% 1,143 19% 53 9% 3,295 12% 6,594 14% 1,793 17% Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own (EEE) Sometimes 89 35% 6,271 31% 11,661 32% 2,090 33% % 8,677 31% 16,045 33% 3,746 34% Often 66 26% 5,451 27% 9,542 26% 1,451 25% % 7,722 28% 13,150 27% 2,772 26% Very often 66 26% 5,368 26% 9,039 25% 1,331 23% % 8,025 28% 12,403 26% 2,508 24% Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 3

5 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 1v. Had serious conversations DIFFSTU2 Never 33 13% 2,802 14% 5,207 15% % 53 9% 3,076 11% 5,615 12% 1,450 14% with students who are very (EEE) Sometimes 90 35% 6,407 32% 11,735 32% 2,028 33% % 8,859 32% 16,049 33% 3,671 33% different from you in terms of Often 66 25% 5,613 28% 10,052 27% 1,598 27% % 7,983 29% 14,041 29% 3,051 28% their religious beliefs, political Very often 65 27% 5,423 27% 9,326 25% 1,465 24% % 7,834 28% 12,457 26% 2,654 25% opinions, or personal values Total % 20, % 36, % 6, % % 27, % 48, % 10, % 2a. MEMORIZE Very little 9 4% 781 4% 1,659 5% 263 5% 37 6% 1,930 7% 3,974 8% 835 8% Coursework emphasizes: Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings Some 57 24% 4,260 21% 8,200 23% 1,234 21% % 7,171 26% 13,468 28% 2,883 27% Quite a bit % 8,072 41% 14,608 41% 2,514 42% % 10,245 37% 17,478 37% 3,987 37% Very much 76 29% 6,925 34% 11,507 31% 1,942 32% % 8,218 30% 12,912 27% 3,046 28% Total % 20, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 2b. ANALYZE Very little 3 1% 431 2% 723 2% 141 2% 7 1% 390 1% 620 1% 166 2% Coursework emphasizes: Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory (LAC) Some 31 14% 3,462 17% 5,878 17% 1,061 18% 81 14% 3,335 12% 5,730 12% 1,446 14% Quite a bit % 8,374 42% 15,230 43% 2,560 43% % 10,932 40% 19,007 40% 4,314 40% Very much % 7,665 38% 13,976 38% 2,166 37% % 12,800 46% 22,323 46% 4,783 44% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 2c. SYNTHESZ Very little 13 5% 925 5% 1,451 4% 259 4% 14 2% 905 4% 1,412 3% 355 4% Coursework emphasizes: Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences (LAC) Some 53 21% 5,079 26% 8,700 25% 1,569 26% % 5,416 20% 8,821 19% 2,170 21% Quite a bit % 7,953 40% 14,815 41% 2,444 41% % 10,649 39% 18,936 40% 4,263 40% Very much 83 33% 5,947 29% 10,802 29% 1,648 28% % 10,463 37% 18,469 38% 3,905 36% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 2d. EVALUATE Very little 7 3% 941 5% 1,569 5% 302 5% 13 2% 1,210 5% 1,795 4% 448 5% Coursework emphasizes: Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods (LAC) Some 68 28% 4,792 24% 8,531 24% 1,456 25% % 5,443 20% 9,326 20% 2,222 21% Quite a bit 97 37% 8,043 40% 14,822 41% 2,458 41% % 10,397 38% 18,487 39% 4,144 38% Very much 81 32% 6,175 31% 10,924 30% 1,726 29% % 10,410 37% 18,079 37% 3,892 36% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 2e. APPLYING Very little 8 4% 747 4% 1,282 4% 246 4% 18 3% 702 3% 1,130 3% 287 3% Coursework emphasizes: Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations (LAC) Some 57 24% 4,116 21% 7,306 21% 1,238 21% 84 15% 3,967 15% 6,768 15% 1,601 16% Quite a bit % 7,350 37% 13,966 39% 2,313 39% % 9,319 34% 16,721 35% 3,857 36% Very much 86 33% 7,778 38% 13,343 36% 2,138 36% % 13,525 49% 23,133 47% 4,969 45% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 3a. READASGN None 2 1% 201 1% 294 1% 40 1% 12 2% 455 2% 686 2% 179 2% Number of assigned textbooks, books, or booklength packs of course readings (LAC) % 5,346 28% 7,906 25% 1,435 27% % 8,766 33% 13,314 29% 3,207 31% % 8,739 44% 14,950 42% 2,622 44% % 10,353 38% 17,862 37% 4,152 39% % 3,799 18% 8,154 21% 1,216 19% % 4,389 16% 9,185 19% 1,899 17% More than % 1,844 9% 4,544 12% % 72 12% 3,457 12% 6,650 14% 1,271 12% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 4

6 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 3b. Number of books read on READOWN None 82 34% 5,520 28% 9,837 28% 1,628 27% % 5,863 21% 10,590 22% 2,377 22% your own (not assigned) for % 10,059 51% 18,506 51% 3,026 52% % 14,164 52% 24,767 52% 5,578 52% personal enjoyment or % 2,704 13% 4,688 13% % 94 16% 4,496 16% 7,499 16% 1,660 15% academic enrichment % 819 4% 1,474 4% 272 5% 23 4% 1,518 6% 2,489 5% 580 5% More than % 807 4% 1,308 4% 251 4% 20 3% 1,406 5% 2,377 5% 530 5% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 3c. Number of written papers or WRITEMOR None % 16,764 83% 29,465 81% 4,948 82% % 15,126 55% 24,363 51% 5,770 54% reports of 20 pages or more (LAC) % 2,125 11% 4,332 13% % % 9,970 37% 19,018 39% 4,080 38% % 584 3% 1,103 4% 183 3% 50 9% 1,476 5% 2,836 6% 562 5% % 230 1% 472 1% 80 2% 8 1% 480 2% 760 2% 172 2% More than % 196 1% 424 1% 50 1% 10 2% 387 1% 724 2% 133 1% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 3d. Number of written papers or WRITEMID None 76 31% 3,793 19% 5,198 16% 1,035 18% 66 12% 3,550 13% 4,373 10% 1,180 11% reports between 5 and 19 (LAC) % 11,092 55% 19,061 53% 3,305 55% % 13,121 48% 20,843 44% 5,036 47% pages % 4,128 21% 8,972 24% 1,268 21% % 7,448 27% 14,763 30% 3,058 28% % 744 4% 2,137 5% 245 4% 52 9% 2,395 9% 5,393 11% 1,046 9% More than % 185 1% 507 1% 70 1% 24 4% 977 4% 2,424 5% 414 4% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 3e. Number of written papers or WRITESML None 2 1% 774 4% 1,016 3% 176 3% 28 5% 2,069 8% 2,592 6% 645 6% reports of fewer than 5 pages (LAC) % 7,698 39% 11,341 34% 2,065 36% % 10,773 39% 16,088 35% 3,707 35% % 6,881 34% 12,300 34% 2,039 33% % 7,220 26% 13,087 27% 2,893 27% % 3,254 16% 7,358 19% 1,110 18% 82 14% 4,325 16% 8,757 18% 1,878 17% More than % 1,381 7% 3,922 10% 551 9% 70 12% 3,144 11% 7,309 15% 1,620 14% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 4a. PROBSETA None 18 7% 2,270 11% 4,122 11% % % 4,421 16% 8,009 16% 1,745 16% Number of problem sets that take you more than an hour to complete % 6,995 36% 12,302 35% 2,169 37% % 8,491 31% 14,724 31% 3,423 32% % 6,357 32% 11,752 32% 1,843 31% % 7,929 29% 13,917 29% 3,124 29% % 2,041 10% 3,805 10% % 49 9% 2,783 10% 5,017 10% 1,100 10% More than % 2,273 11% 3,835 11% % 82 14% 3,792 14% 5,954 13% 1,315 12% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 4b. Number of problem sets that PROBSETB None 19 8% 2,097 11% 4,185 12% % % 6,392 23% 11,228 24% 2,241 21% take you less than an hour to % 7,055 35% 12,615 36% 2,128 36% % 9,919 36% 16,909 36% 3,821 36% complete % 5,254 26% 9,599 26% 1,600 27% % 5,634 21% 10,263 21% 2,441 22% % 2,322 11% 4,239 11% % 40 7% 2,293 8% 4,044 8% 951 9% More than % 3,219 16% 5,176 15% % 67 12% 3,158 12% 5,141 11% 1,232 11% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 5

7 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 5. Select the circle that best EXAMS 1 Very little 1 1% 101 1% 229 1% 37 1% 7 1% 229 1% 561 1% 126 1% represents the extent to which 2 0 0% 192 1% 356 1% 69 1% 8 1% 324 1% 722 2% 168 2% your examinations during the 3 4 2% 615 3% 1,121 3% 184 3% 16 3% 827 3% 1,600 4% 386 4% current school year have % 2,259 11% 4,104 12% % 63 11% 2,622 10% 4,865 10% 1,176 11% challenged you to do your best % 5,898 29% 10,836 30% 1,881 31% % 7,104 26% 12,960 27% 3,070 28% work % 6,251 31% 11,702 31% 1,880 31% % 8,492 31% 14,767 30% 3,212 30% 7 Very much 47 18% 4,643 23% 7,560 21% 1,146 20% % 7,892 28% 12,290 26% 2,586 24% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6a. ATDART07 Never 60 24% 4,984 26% 8,911 27% 1,473 27% % 9,835 36% 16,089 35% 3,882 37% Attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theater, or other performance Sometimes % 9,066 46% 15,849 44% 2,619 44% % 11,552 42% 20,391 43% 4,523 42% Often 53 21% 3,594 18% 6,630 18% 1,092 18% 71 12% 3,633 14% 6,442 13% 1,292 12% Very often 24 9% 2,020 10% 4,094 11% % 40 7% 2,175 8% 4,407 9% 909 8% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6b. EXRCSE05 Never 47 17% 2,459 13% 4,477 14% % 81 14% 4,031 15% 7,092 16% 1,659 16% Exercised or participated in physical fitness activities Sometimes 75 31% 5,457 27% 9,470 27% 1,582 27% % 8,705 31% 14,976 32% 3,450 32% Often 63 25% 5,159 26% 9,006 25% 1,564 26% % 6,519 24% 10,960 23% 2,473 23% Very often 63 27% 6,566 34% 12,433 34% 1,939 32% % 7,925 30% 14,235 30% 3,022 28% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6c. WORSHP05 Never % 7,352 37% 14,674 42% 2,603 45% % 9,260 34% 18,405 40% 4,538 44% Participated in activities to enhance your spirituality (worship, meditation, prayer, etc.) Sometimes 63 23% 5,223 27% 9,508 27% 1,526 26% % 7,148 27% 12,799 27% 2,755 26% Often 30 13% 3,134 16% 5,256 15% % 61 11% 4,409 16% 7,044 15% 1,412 13% Very often 47 20% 3,882 20% 5,907 16% % % 6,286 23% 8,948 19% 1,878 17% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6d. OWNVIEW Never 34 13% 2,105 10% 3,864 11% % 50 9% 2,205 8% 3,856 8% 1,062 10% Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views on a topic or issue Sometimes 89 35% 7,121 36% 12,946 36% 2,246 37% % 8,693 32% 15,570 33% 3,578 33% Often 81 34% 6,431 33% 11,838 34% 1,870 33% % 9,880 37% 16,839 36% 3,601 34% Very often 45 19% 3,897 20% 6,660 19% 1,020 18% % 6,344 23% 10,922 23% 2,344 22% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6e. OTHRVIEW Never 19 8% 1,248 6% 2,124 6% 369 6% 35 6% 1,336 5% 2,216 5% 624 6% Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective Sometimes 71 27% 6,094 31% 10,913 31% 1,888 31% % 7,659 28% 13,196 28% 3,049 28% Often % 7,288 37% 13,522 38% 2,191 38% % 10,561 39% 18,632 39% 4,040 38% Very often 52 21% 5,003 26% 8,835 25% 1,392 24% % 7,620 28% 13,219 28% 2,883 27% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % 6f. CHNGVIEW Never 17 7% 801 4% 1,360 4% 246 5% 20 4% 863 3% 1,355 3% 390 4% Learned something that changed the way you understand an issue or concept Sometimes 78 31% 5,923 30% 10,407 30% 1,764 29% % 7,765 29% 13,162 28% 3,179 30% Often 98 39% 7,488 38% 13,860 39% 2,312 39% % 10,711 39% 19,078 40% 4,163 39% Very often 57 23% 5,458 28% 9,837 28% 1,533 27% % 7,882 29% 13,757 29% 2,884 27% Total % 19, % 35, % 5, % % 27, % 47, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 6

8 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 7a. Practicum, internship, field INTERN04 Have not decided 27 11% 2,441 13% 4,307 14% % 31 5% 2,191 8% 3,802 9% % experience, co-op experience, (EEE) Do not plan to do 9 4% 775 4% 1,412 5% 215 4% % 3,842 14% 6,733 15% 1,422 14% or clinical assignment Plan to do % 14,703 75% 26,637 74% 4,400 75% % 8,020 30% 12,213 27% 3,138 30% Done 16 6% 1,410 7% 2,530 7% 379 6% % 12,823 48% 24,074 49% 5,009 46% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7b. VOLNTR04 Have not decided 24 12% 2,167 12% 4,187 14% % 47 8% 2,415 9% 4,244 10% 1,030 10% Community service or volunteer work (EEE) Do not plan to do 12 6% 1,035 6% 1,839 6% 298 6% 88 17% 3,514 14% 6,222 14% 1,457 15% Plan to do % 8,228 42% 14,800 42% 2,636 44% 89 16% 4,773 18% 7,761 17% 1,859 18% Done % 7,817 40% 13,952 38% 2,017 35% % 16,059 59% 28,396 59% 6,111 57% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7c. LRNCOM04 Have not decided % 5,854 30% 11,269 32% 1,795 31% 99 18% 4,020 15% 6,825 15% 1,550 15% Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together (EEE) Do not plan to do 50 21% 4,749 25% 7,965 24% 1,429 25% % 12,234 46% 21,653 47% 4,967 48% Plan to do 65 27% 5,344 28% 9,376 27% 1,476 27% 37 7% 2,974 11% 4,606 11% 1,039 10% Done 26 10% 3,237 17% 6,067 17% 1,003 18% % 7,469 28% 13,438 28% 2,857 26% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7d. RESRCH04 Have not decided 97 41% 7,057 36% 13,370 38% 2,237 38% 91 16% 4,943 18% 8,299 18% 1,986 19% Work on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements (SFI) Do not plan to do 57 22% 4,573 23% 8,326 24% 1,408 24% % 12,570 46% 23,722 49% 5,250 49% Plan to do 80 33% 6,542 34% 11,372 33% 1,787 32% 74 13% 4,196 16% 6,257 14% 1,529 15% Done 11 4% 1,110 6% 1,723 5% 292 6% 99 17% 5,120 19% 8,451 18% 1,709 17% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7e. Foreign language coursework FORLNG04 Have not decided 70 29% 3,571 19% 6,809 20% 1,174 21% 40 7% 2,450 9% 4,416 10% % (EEE) Do not plan to do 82 35% 5,670 30% 10,116 30% 1,835 31% % 11,665 44% 20,936 45% 4,849 46% Plan to do 69 27% 6,419 33% 11,073 32% 1,841 34% 44 8% 2,469 9% 4,181 10% 875 9% Done 23 9% 3,637 18% 6,817 18% % % 10,279 37% 17,265 35% 3,766 36% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7f. Study abroad STDABR04 Have not decided 78 32% 5,612 29% 9,974 29% 1,737 30% 75 13% 3,799 14% 6,123 14% 1,479 14% (EEE) Do not plan to do 60 27% 5,446 29% 9,603 29% 1,674 31% % 17,125 64% 30,333 65% 6,972 67% Plan to do % 7,570 38% 14,080 38% 2,145 36% 50 8% 2,819 11% 3,855 9% 933 9% Done 4 2% 617 4% 1,069 4% 154 3% 96 17% 2,988 11% 6,274 12% 1,063 10% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 7g. Independent study or selfdesigned INDSTD04 Have not decided 97 40% 5,797 31% 11,157 33% 1,759 32% 80 14% 3,790 14% 6,170 14% 1,479 14% major (EEE) Do not plan to do 99 40% 9,325 47% 16,578 46% 2,864 47% % 16,238 60% 28,573 60% 6,640 63% Plan to do 40 17% 3,178 18% 5,600 17% % 47 10% 2,725 10% 4,307 10% % Done 6 2% 864 5% 1,301 4% 189 4% 79 14% 3,909 15% 7,375 16% 1,348 13% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 7

9 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 7h. Culminating senior SNRX04 Have not decided 97 42% 7,335 38% 13,125 38% 2,241 39% 43 8% 3,360 12% 5,178 12% 1,263 12% experience (capstone course, (EEE) Do not plan to do 28 11% 2,375 13% 3,881 12% % % 6,008 23% 9,895 21% 2,296 22% senior project or thesis, Plan to do % 9,080 47% 17,183 48% 2,674 46% % 9,722 36% 15,940 35% 3,670 36% comprehensive exam, etc.) Done 5 2% 510 3% 657 2% 110 2% % 7,770 29% 15,781 32% 3,245 30% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 8a. Quality of relationships with ENVSTU other students (SCE) 8b. Quality of relationships with ENVFAC faculty members (SCE) 8c. Quality of relationships with ENVADM administrative personnel (SCE) and offices 1 Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of alienation 1 1% 198 1% 376 1% 60 1% 3 0% 223 1% 385 1% 87 1% 2 8 3% 462 2% 852 3% 144 2% 17 3% 461 2% 878 2% 191 2% % 966 5% 1,765 5% 281 5% 22 4% 977 4% 1,707 4% 391 4% % 2,404 12% 4,097 12% % 73 13% 2,738 10% 4,757 10% 1,139 11% % 4,099 22% 7,175 21% 1,209 22% % 5,119 19% 8,865 19% 2,068 20% % 5,499 28% 10,609 30% 1,763 30% % 8,151 31% 14,644 31% 3,338 32% 7 Friendly, Supportive, Sense of belonging 61 25% 5,641 29% 9,936 28% 1,600 28% % 9,121 34% 15,507 33% 3,257 30% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 1 Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic 3 1% 187 1% 273 1% 49 1% 3 1% 289 1% 446 1% 116 1% 2 4 2% 452 3% 690 2% 138 3% 6 1% 569 2% 977 2% 264 3% % 1,192 6% 1,683 5% 328 6% 27 5% 1,156 4% 1,843 4% 498 5% % 3,213 17% 4,985 15% % 74 13% 3,236 12% 4,909 11% 1,194 12% % 5,143 27% 8,829 25% 1,541 26% % 5,982 22% 9,826 21% 2,330 22% % 5,365 28% 10,810 30% 1,685 29% % 8,101 30% 15,045 32% 3,364 32% 7 Available, Helpful, Sympathetic 35 14% 3,721 19% 7,523 22% 1,062 20% % 7,462 27% 13,721 29% 2,708 26% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 1 Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid 6 3% 523 3% 843 3% 182 4% 13 2% 1,184 5% 2,037 5% 506 5% 2 9 3% 1,059 6% 1,710 5% 282 5% 41 8% 1,804 7% 3,092 7% 729 7% % 1,961 10% 3,129 9% 536 9% 54 10% 2,598 10% 4,594 10% 1,133 11% % 4,233 22% 7,181 21% 1,228 21% % 5,201 19% 8,910 19% 2,068 20% % 4,463 23% 8,168 23% 1,355 23% % 5,770 22% 9,882 21% 2,253 21% % 3,911 20% 7,721 22% 1,229 21% % 5,362 20% 9,789 21% 2,131 20% 7 Helpful, Considerate, Flexible 36 16% 3,135 16% 6,068 18% % % 4,914 18% 8,496 18% 1,664 16% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 8

10 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 9a. Preparing for class (studying, ACADPR01 0 hrs/wk 0 0% 52 0% 100 0% 25 1% 4 1% 71 0% 139 0% 36 0% reading, writing, doing (LAC) 1-5 hrs/wk 41 17% 2,898 16% 4,800 15% % % 4,134 16% 6,693 15% 1,621 16% homework or lab work, 6-10 hrs/wk 59 26% 4,850 26% 8,418 25% 1,497 27% % 6,330 24% 11,120 24% 2,548 25% analyzing data, rehearsing, hrs/wk 50 21% 4,276 22% 7,729 22% 1,256 22% % 5,286 20% 9,434 20% 2,050 19% and other academic activities) hrs/wk 48 21% 3,332 17% 6,303 18% % 77 14% 4,421 17% 7,923 17% 1,737 16% hrs/wk 24 9% 1,822 9% 3,640 10% 547 9% 42 8% 2,740 10% 4,739 10% 1,035 10% hrs/wk 10 4% 932 5% 1,869 5% 259 4% 28 5% 1,611 6% 2,970 6% 640 6% 30+ hrs/wk 9 4% 947 5% 1,711 5% 257 5% 43 7% 2,076 8% 3,482 7% 739 7% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 9b. Working for pay on campus WORKON01 0 hrs/wk % 16,575 86% 27,538 82% 4,815 86% % 20,927 79% 34,209 75% 7,943 77% 1-5 hrs/wk 2 1% 378 2% 1,526 4% 148 2% 9 2% 712 3% 1,959 4% 291 3% 6-10 hrs/wk 5 2% 733 4% 2,685 6% 267 4% 22 4% 1,298 5% 3,637 7% 597 5% hrs/wk 3 1% 701 4% 1,571 4% 236 4% 19 3% 1,312 5% 2,784 6% 526 5% hrs/wk 2 1% 483 3% 843 3% 149 3% 27 5% 1,308 5% 2,307 5% 596 6% hrs/wk 2 1% 125 1% 202 1% 34 1% 10 2% 400 2% 674 1% 211 2% hrs/wk 0 0% 36 0% 57 0% 11 0% 7 1% 186 1% 265 1% 87 1% 30+ hrs/wk 1 0% 93 1% 165 1% 31 1% 11 2% 455 2% 586 1% 133 1% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 9c. Working for pay off campus WORKOF01 0 hrs/wk % 12,910 68% 23,422 66% 3,842 65% % 11,410 43% 18,695 39% 4,069 39% 1-5 hrs/wk 14 6% 837 4% 1,599 4% 261 4% 15 2% 1,203 4% 2,405 5% 520 5% 6-10 hrs/wk 10 4% 854 4% 1,659 5% 290 5% 29 5% 1,426 5% 2,901 6% 660 6% hrs/wk 22 9% 924 5% 1,547 4% 230 4% 34 6% 1,660 6% 3,094 6% 764 7% hrs/wk 22 9% 1,126 6% 1,854 5% 343 6% 63 12% 2,285 8% 4,111 9% 974 9% hrs/wk 14 5% 834 4% 1,295 4% 233 4% 55 10% 1,944 7% 3,299 7% 879 8% hrs/wk 11 5% 518 3% 804 3% 163 3% 43 7% 1,406 5% 2,461 5% 604 6% 30+ hrs/wk 2 1% 1,066 6% 2,332 9% 314 7% % 5,294 20% 9,488 22% 1,932 20% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 9d. Participating in co-curricular COCURR01 0 hrs/wk % 8,104 43% 13,965 44% 2,490 46% % 13,489 50% 22,881 51% 5,277 52% activities (organizations, (EEE) 1-5 hrs/wk 70 28% 5,149 26% 10,300 27% 1,651 27% % 6,606 25% 12,044 25% 2,765 26% campus publications, student 6-10 hrs/wk 33 15% 2,609 13% 4,590 13% % 50 9% 2,825 11% 4,857 10% 1,060 10% government, fraternity or hrs/wk 15 6% 1,368 7% 2,403 7% 352 6% 23 4% 1,506 6% 2,613 5% 559 5% sorority, intercollegiate or hrs/wk 11 4% 878 5% 1,608 4% 232 4% 12 2% 944 4% 1,779 4% 328 3% intramural sports, etc.) hrs/wk 4 2% 468 2% 804 2% 90 2% 5 1% 523 2% 930 2% 170 2% hrs/wk 2 1% 172 1% 319 1% 52 1% 3 1% 245 1% 521 1% 93 1% 30+ hrs/wk 4 2% 387 2% 636 2% 100 2% 12 2% 556 2% 920 2% 158 2% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 9

11 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 9e. Relaxing and socializing SOCIAL05 0 hrs/wk 4 2% 246 1% 425 1% 48 1% 8 1% 454 2% 779 2% 159 2% (watching TV, partying, etc.) 1-5 hrs/wk 42 17% 4,820 25% 8,807 26% 1,282 23% % 8,394 31% 14,240 31% 3,106 29% 6-10 hrs/wk 79 32% 5,602 29% 10,165 29% 1,659 29% % 7,981 30% 14,170 30% 3,153 30% hrs/wk 48 21% 3,715 20% 6,763 19% 1,178 20% % 4,686 18% 8,476 18% 1,920 19% hrs/wk 30 12% 2,257 12% 4,046 12% % 46 8% 2,602 10% 4,546 10% 1,066 11% hrs/wk 14 6% 1,072 6% 1,917 6% 336 6% 24 4% 1,108 4% 1,873 4% 436 4% hrs/wk 7 3% 456 2% 796 2% 148 3% 15 3% 485 2% 854 2% 189 2% 30+ hrs/wk 14 7% 902 5% 1,526 5% 282 6% 16 3% 867 4% 1,406 3% 326 3% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 9f. CAREDE01 0 hrs/wk % 13,209 69% 23,695 66% 3,941 65% % 14,219 55% 25,021 52% 5,546 53% Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) 1-5 hrs/wk 39 15% 2,482 13% 4,411 13% % 81 15% 3,306 12% 5,959 13% 1,476 14% 6-10 hrs/wk 10 4% 1,130 6% 2,005 6% 346 7% 38 7% 1,857 7% 3,327 7% 745 8% hrs/wk 2 1% 552 3% 1,017 3% 167 3% 27 5% 1,138 4% 1,984 5% 446 5% hrs/wk 6 3% 336 2% 646 2% 101 2% 15 3% 995 4% 1,611 4% 349 4% hrs/wk 0 0% 176 1% 370 1% 68 2% 5 1% 463 2% 839 2% 177 2% hrs/wk 0 0% 127 1% 242 1% 34 1% 10 2% 416 2% 731 2% 172 2% 30+ hrs/wk 1 0% 1,016 6% 1,995 7% 272 6% 60 11% 4,156 15% 6,843 15% 1,437 14% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 9g. COMMUTE 0 hrs/wk 21 10% 2,335 12% 8,199 21% % 19 4% 2,420 9% 6,210 12% 1,043 10% Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) 1-5 hrs/wk % 11,658 61% 19,190 56% 3,457 58% % 15,806 60% 27,226 58% 6,080 58% 6-10 hrs/wk 42 18% 3,003 16% 4,141 13% % % 5,293 20% 8,343 19% 2,068 20% hrs/wk 7 3% 1,055 6% 1,523 5% 302 6% 43 8% 1,686 6% 2,573 6% 680 7% hrs/wk 5 2% 469 2% 668 2% 129 3% 14 2% 627 2% 966 2% 233 2% hrs/wk 2 1% 210 1% 273 1% 56 1% 4 1% 264 1% 365 1% 95 1% hrs/wk 0 0% 93 0% 114 0% 22 0% 3 0% 132 1% 201 0% 51 0% 30+ hrs/wk 2 1% 275 2% 381 1% 70 1% 2 0% 430 2% 571 1% 140 1% Total % 19, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 10a. ENVSCHOL Very little 6 3% 309 2% 543 2% 101 2% 13 2% 441 2% 900 2% 213 2% Spending significant amounts of time studying and on academic work (LAC) Some 43 19% 2,680 15% 5,120 16% % 97 17% 3,902 15% 7,459 17% 1,786 18% Quite a bit % 8,239 44% 15,518 45% 2,572 45% % 11,254 43% 20,370 44% 4,574 44% Very much 82 32% 7,664 40% 13,010 37% 2,059 37% % 10,804 40% 17,406 37% 3,745 36% Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 10b. ENVSUPRT Very little 8 3% 469 3% 840 3% 158 3% 21 4% 1,128 4% 1,870 5% 479 5% Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically (SCE) Some 40 18% 3,310 18% 5,795 18% 1,047 20% % 5,708 22% 9,712 22% 2,411 24% Quite a bit 93 39% 7,832 42% 14,365 42% 2,457 43% % 11,100 42% 19,335 42% 4,408 43% Very much 99 40% 7,190 37% 13,028 36% 1,927 34% % 8,370 32% 15,018 32% 2,980 29% Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 10

12 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 10c. Encouraging contact among ENVDIVRS Very little 22 9% 2,179 12% 3,838 12% % 89 16% 4,027 16% 7,111 16% 1,675 17% students from different (EEE) Some 76 31% 5,187 28% 9,284 28% 1,590 29% % 7,976 30% 14,085 31% 3,246 31% economic, social, and racial or Quite a bit 81 37% 6,145 33% 11,457 33% 1,914 34% % 8,049 30% 13,921 30% 3,029 29% ethnic backgrounds Very much 61 24% 5,301 27% 9,451 27% 1,453 26% % 6,259 23% 10,814 23% 2,319 22% Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 10d. ENVNACAD Very little 71 31% 4,451 24% 7,565 24% 1,264 24% % 9,234 35% 15,201 34% 3,722 37% Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) (SCE) Some 87 37% 6,641 35% 12,077 35% 2,008 35% % 9,083 34% 16,142 34% 3,594 34% Quite a bit 58 25% 4,717 25% 9,164 26% 1,482 26% % 4,974 19% 9,395 20% 1,985 19% Very much 21 8% 3,035 16% 5,281 15% % 53 10% 3,061 12% 5,296 11% % Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 10e. ENVSOCAL Very little 27 10% 2,696 15% 4,925 16% % % 6,066 23% 10,265 23% 2,423 24% Providing the support you need to thrive socially (SCE) Some 80 35% 6,146 33% 11,216 33% 1,867 33% % 9,320 35% 16,668 36% 3,730 36% Quite a bit 84 37% 6,101 32% 11,323 32% 1,920 34% % 6,972 27% 12,581 27% 2,795 27% Very much 47 18% 3,809 20% 6,465 19% 1,021 18% 78 14% 3,867 15% 6,285 14% 1,306 13% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 10f. ENVEVENT Very little 14 7% 1,467 8% 3,206 11% % 75 14% 3,648 14% 6,779 16% 1,523 15% Attending campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Some 45 20% 4,295 23% 7,806 24% 1,332 25% % 7,296 28% 12,995 29% 3,041 30% Quite a bit 74 31% 6,732 36% 12,525 36% 2,114 36% % 8,983 34% 15,673 33% 3,418 33% Very much % 6,327 33% 10,484 29% 1,665 29% % 6,366 24% 10,438 22% 2,275 22% Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 10g. ENVCOMPT Very little 5 2% 426 2% 934 3% 153 3% 10 2% 543 2% 1,055 2% 214 2% Using computers in academic work Some 33 14% 2,510 13% 4,894 14% % 54 10% 2,588 10% 4,724 11% 1,014 10% Quite a bit 97 41% 6,134 33% 11,786 34% 1,981 34% % 7,408 28% 13,618 29% 3,073 30% Very much % 9,770 51% 16,475 48% 2,669 48% % 15,792 60% 26,633 58% 6,004 58% Total % 18, % 34, % 5, % % 26, % 46, % 10, % 11a. GNGENLED Very little 4 2% 470 3% 853 3% 130 3% 11 2% 774 3% 1,282 3% 313 3% Acquiring a broad general education Some 38 16% 2,809 15% 4,821 15% % 58 11% 3,587 14% 6,250 14% 1,561 16% Quite a bit 99 44% 7,667 42% 14,258 43% 2,415 44% % 9,339 36% 16,508 36% 3,745 37% Very much 93 38% 7,562 40% 13,567 39% 2,145 39% % 12,283 47% 21,466 46% 4,550 45% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 11b. GNWORK Very little 33 15% 1,538 9% 2,717 9% 455 9% 36 7% 1,500 6% 2,452 6% 564 6% Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills Some 79 35% 4,911 26% 8,589 26% 1,488 28% 98 18% 4,689 18% 7,876 18% 1,793 18% Quite a bit 67 28% 6,530 35% 12,090 36% 2,000 37% % 8,504 33% 15,258 33% 3,409 34% Very much 54 22% 5,504 30% 10,055 29% 1,504 27% % 11,320 43% 19,941 43% 4,401 42% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 11

13 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 11c. Writing clearly and GNWRITE Very little 4 2% 778 5% 1,245 4% 231 5% 12 2% 988 4% 1,563 4% 410 4% effectively Some 56 25% 3,639 20% 6,368 20% 1,142 21% % 4,478 18% 7,740 17% 1,944 20% Quite a bit 91 39% 7,212 39% 13,563 40% 2,247 40% % 9,515 37% 16,979 37% 3,880 38% Very much 83 34% 6,877 36% 12,337 36% 1,847 34% % 11,052 42% 19,281 42% 3,961 38% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 11d. GNSPEAK Very little 28 14% 1,273 7% 2,042 7% 313 6% 18 3% 1,391 6% 2,192 5% 538 6% Speaking clearly and effectively Some 75 32% 4,312 23% 7,802 23% 1,269 23% % 5,130 20% 8,798 20% 2,097 21% Quite a bit 72 32% 6,818 37% 12,875 38% 2,172 39% % 9,182 35% 16,679 36% 3,799 37% Very much 59 23% 6,053 32% 10,718 32% 1,702 31% % 10,260 39% 17,776 39% 3,733 36% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 11e. GNANALY Very little 2 1% 382 2% 703 3% 106 2% 12 2% 506 2% 778 2% 186 2% Thinking critically and analytically Some 35 16% 2,564 14% 4,536 14% % 56 11% 2,655 10% 4,690 11% 1,199 12% Quite a bit 94 40% 7,269 40% 13,388 40% 2,252 41% % 8,748 34% 15,643 34% 3,664 36% Very much % 8,239 44% 14,797 43% 2,301 42% % 14,064 54% 24,335 53% 5,109 50% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 11f. GNQUANT Very little 8 3% 787 5% 1,647 5% 276 5% 12 2% 1,144 4% 2,023 5% 473 5% Analyzing quantitative problems Some 42 18% 3,933 21% 7,478 23% 1,255 23% % 4,590 17% 8,826 20% 2,055 20% Quite a bit % 7,262 39% 13,479 40% 2,264 41% % 9,187 36% 16,418 36% 3,748 37% Very much 77 32% 6,439 35% 10,741 32% 1,649 31% % 11,018 43% 18,097 40% 3,862 38% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 11g. GNCMPTS Very little 19 9% 906 5% 1,931 6% 296 6% 20 4% 959 4% 1,817 4% 383 4% Using computing and information technology Some 54 23% 3,552 19% 7,116 21% 1,158 21% 87 16% 3,956 15% 7,780 17% 1,754 17% Quite a bit 92 39% 6,704 36% 12,497 37% 2,105 38% % 8,520 33% 15,560 34% 3,465 34% Very much 68 29% 7,332 39% 11,965 36% 1,912 35% % 12,593 48% 20,366 45% 4,576 45% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 11h. GNOTHERS Very little 7 3% 893 5% 1,507 5% 270 5% 17 4% 944 4% 1,463 4% 361 4% Working effectively with others Some 68 31% 3,928 22% 6,954 22% 1,169 22% 80 15% 4,261 17% 7,111 16% 1,697 17% Quite a bit 82 35% 6,829 37% 12,833 38% 2,127 38% % 8,876 34% 15,941 35% 3,622 36% Very much 76 31% 6,833 36% 12,197 35% 1,900 34% % 11,936 45% 21,038 45% 4,510 43% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 26, % 45, % 10, % 11i. GNCITIZN Very little 67 29% 7,357 41% 15,210 45% 2,223 41% % 10,315 40% 18,985 42% 3,985 40% Voting in local, state, or national elections Some 71 33% 5,271 29% 9,265 28% 1,598 30% % 7,416 29% 13,549 29% 3,086 30% Quite a bit 46 21% 3,271 18% 5,240 16% % 98 18% 4,261 17% 7,235 16% 1,773 18% Very much 38 17% 2,267 13% 3,157 10% % 84 15% 3,668 15% 5,212 12% 1,194 12% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 12

14 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 11j. Learning effectively on your GNINQ Very little 7 3% 887 5% 1,616 6% 247 5% 32 6% 1,390 5% 2,405 6% 580 6% own Some 50 23% 3,803 21% 7,300 22% 1,185 22% 85 16% 4,451 17% 8,235 18% 1,892 19% Quite a bit 99 46% 7,505 41% 14,041 42% 2,326 43% % 9,708 38% 17,672 39% 3,940 39% Very much 67 28% 5,913 32% 9,888 30% 1,585 30% % 10,060 39% 16,584 37% 3,606 36% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11k. Understanding yourself GNSELF Very little 23 11% 1,862 11% 2,942 10% % 55 11% 2,922 12% 4,545 11% 1,108 12% Some 52 22% 4,256 23% 7,846 24% 1,277 23% % 5,989 23% 10,025 23% 2,323 24% Quite a bit 83 39% 6,192 34% 11,961 36% 1,969 37% % 8,212 32% 15,043 33% 3,352 33% Very much 62 27% 5,776 31% 10,005 30% 1,568 29% % 8,424 33% 15,165 33% 3,221 32% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11l. Understanding people of GNDIVERS Very little 21 9% 2,232 13% 3,927 13% % 66 13% 3,328 13% 5,701 13% 1,337 14% other racial and ethnic Some 58 26% 5,218 29% 9,594 29% 1,543 28% % 7,417 29% 13,052 29% 2,998 30% backgrounds Quite a bit 86 39% 6,011 33% 11,328 34% 1,871 34% % 8,087 31% 14,367 31% 3,171 31% Very much 57 25% 4,665 25% 8,017 25% 1,300 25% % 6,807 26% 11,806 26% 2,525 25% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11m GNPROBSV Very little 24 12% 1,775 10% 3,302 11% % 59 11% 2,454 10% 4,059 10% % Solving complex real-world problems Some 75 34% 5,267 29% 9,928 30% 1,604 30% % 6,352 25% 11,532 26% 2,653 27% Quite a bit 68 29% 6,479 35% 12,074 36% 1,968 36% % 8,934 35% 16,062 35% 3,566 35% Very much 55 24% 4,633 25% 7,580 23% 1,213 23% % 7,915 31% 13,272 29% 2,838 28% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11n. GNETHICS Very little 27 13% 2,275 13% 3,719 13% % 72 14% 3,598 14% 5,566 14% 1,449 15% Developing a personal code of values and ethics Some 66 32% 4,653 26% 8,497 26% 1,421 27% % 6,255 24% 10,599 24% 2,532 25% Quite a bit 72 31% 6,054 33% 11,507 34% 1,890 35% % 7,741 30% 14,161 31% 3,137 31% Very much 58 24% 5,134 28% 9,120 27% 1,389 26% % 8,058 31% 14,651 31% 2,923 28% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11o. GNCOMMUN Very little 38 19% 3,240 19% 5,674 19% % 94 18% 4,746 19% 7,739 19% 1,909 20% Contributing to the welfare of your community Some 80 37% 5,911 33% 10,369 32% 1,795 34% % 7,880 31% 13,649 31% 3,207 32% Quite a bit 61 26% 5,354 29% 10,094 30% 1,620 29% % 7,141 28% 12,783 28% 2,768 27% Very much 44 18% 3,630 20% 6,742 19% % % 5,868 23% 10,765 23% 2,140 21% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % 11p. GNSPIRIT Very little 84 38% 6,352 36% 11,143 36% 1,950 36% % 11,667 45% 19,124 44% 4,826 49% Developing a deepened sense of spirituality Some 65 31% 4,779 26% 8,631 26% 1,444 27% % 6,144 24% 11,215 24% 2,453 24% Quite a bit 38 17% 3,746 21% 7,146 21% 1,116 21% 88 16% 3,899 15% 7,391 16% 1,479 14% Very much 35 15% 3,249 18% 5,963 17% % 73 13% 3,966 15% 7,255 15% 1,280 12% Total % 18, % 32, % 5, % % 25, % 44, % 10, % a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 13

15 Public Carnegie Class UNF Public Carnegie Class 12. Overall, how would you ADVISE Poor 10 4% 783 5% 1,418 5% 229 5% 32 6% 2,162 9% 3,820 9% 1,061 11% evaluate the quality of Fair 36 16% 2,774 16% 4,910 15% % % 4,566 18% 8,062 18% 1,945 19% academic advising you have Good 94 39% 8,071 44% 15,068 45% 2,429 45% % 9,992 38% 17,606 38% 3,976 39% received at your institution? Excellent 89 40% 6,739 36% 11,941 35% 1,988 36% % 9,258 35% 16,044 35% 3,200 31% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 13. ENTIREXP Poor 3 2% 269 2% 552 2% 76 2% 7 1% 562 2% 1,024 3% 239 3% How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? Fair 18 9% 1,933 11% 3,500 11% % 53 10% 2,988 12% 5,125 12% 1,194 12% Good % 8,927 49% 16,079 49% 2,721 50% % 11,994 46% 20,775 46% 4,890 48% Excellent 91 40% 7,213 39% 13,149 38% 2,088 38% % 10,412 41% 18,554 40% 3,846 37% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % 14. SAMECOLL Definitely no 5 2% 646 4% 1,309 4% 181 4% 21 4% 1,323 5% 2,379 6% 483 5% If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending? Probably no 37 17% 1,983 11% 3,836 12% % 70 13% 3,140 12% 5,848 13% 1,206 12% Probably yes 79 35% 6,873 38% 13,111 40% 2,085 39% % 9,366 35% 16,999 37% 3,839 38% Definitely yes % 8,881 48% 15,107 44% 2,622 47% % 12,167 47% 20,341 44% 4,658 45% Total % 18, % 33, % 5, % % 25, % 45, % 10, % IPEDS: a Column percentages are weighted by gender and enroll. status (and inst. size for comparisons). Counts are not weighted; one cannot replicate column percentages from counts. 14

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

Southern Utah University

Southern Utah University Selected Comparison Groups August 2009 Reviewing Your Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report

National Survey of Student Engagement Means Summary Report Ntionl Survey of Student Enggement Mens Summry Report Vrile Vr. Nme Clss Men Men Sig Effect Size Men Sig Effect Size COLLEGE ACTIVITIES Acdemic, Intellectul, nd Socil Experiences Asked questions in clss

More information

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District FCLQUEST FCLPRESEN FREWROPAP FINTEGRAT FCLUNPREP FCLASSGRP FOCCGRP selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions selected course section make a class presentation selected

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

Level of Academic Challenge

Level of Academic Challenge N S S E S n a p s h o t November 2009 Inside this issue: Active and Collaborative Learning Student and faculty Interaction Enriching Education Experiences Multi year benchmarks Supporting Campus Environment

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies

NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Analysis of Multiple Years of NSSE Data: Tips and Strategies Fall 2008 Regional NSSE Users Workshop October 2008 Allison BrckaLorenz Overview Introduction Five Multi Year Analysis Tasks 1. Identifying

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 8 weeks.

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Senior Scheduling Today, we are going to discuss your senior course selections. Some reminders when you get your verification card. Not all classes in the course

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSM Type of study Full Time

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 1 Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 2 Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics at Youngstown State University 150 undergraduate mathematics/mathematics

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year?

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Q What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Answered: 2 Skipped: / 35 Q2 How many years of experience do you have working in education? Answered: 2 Skipped: - years

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages: PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSC Type of study Full Time

More information

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics In spring 2015, nine community colleges from across the state were provided a small stipend to participate in the Civic Engagement Survey

More information

BENEFITS PROGRAMS. For New Full-time Academic and Staff Employees

BENEFITS PROGRAMS. For New Full-time Academic and Staff Employees BENEFITS PROGRAMS For New Full-time Academic and Staff Employees Welcome Indiana University s leadership and advances in professional, medical, and technological education and new frontiers in the arts

More information

Engagement Study February 2014

Engagement Study February 2014 Engagement Study February 2014 Our Strategic Plan Identify and understand key constituencies Increase engagement Motivate giving Project Objectives What do they know about us? Understand perceptions of

More information

Please see current textbook prices at

Please see current textbook prices at BUS 203 - INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING II SYLLABUS LECTURE HOURS/CREDITS: 3/3 CATALOG DESCRIPTION Prerequisite: BUS 203 A continuation of BUS 202, this course provides a further development of the principles

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN

COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN WACO, TEXAS COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN Principle of Managerial Accounting ANNETTE BIGHAM SPRING 2011 Course Description: Emphasizes managerial use of and decision making with accounting data.

More information

Commissioned by: A National Survey

Commissioned by: A National Survey Commissioned by: Conducted by: Precision Research Services A National Survey Random (non biased) sample N = 1500 respondents The make up of sample closely resembles the population Multi-stage, stratified

More information

February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904)

February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904) February 24, 2014 Media Contact: Joanna Norris, Associate Director Department of Public Relations (904) 620-2102 University of North Florida Poll Reveals that a Vast Majority of Duval County Residents

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Summer 2018 COURSE: FIN 670, Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 500 and graduate standing

More information