Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total"

Transcription

1 Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty Staff Student External Frequencies by I was familiar with Eastern s mission before reading it in the introduction to this survey. Strongly A1.1ALL * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.2% 3.3% 6.8% 4.5% 4.9% Count % within 6.0% 9.1% 23.4% 14.2% 16.8% Count % within 3.2% 6.2% 13.5% 13.5% 10.2% Count % within 43.6% 52.0% 41.7% 38.7% 43.9% Count % within 45.9% 29.3% 14.7% 29.0% 24.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% I am familiar with my department s mission Strongly A1.2 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student Count % within 1.9% 1.5% 4.1% 3.1% Count % within 6.5% 4.8% 19.6% 13.7% Count % within 5.6% 7.5% 13.3% 10.5%

2 Count % within 34.2% 39.0% 41.8% 39.7% Count % within 51.9% 47.3% 21.1% 33.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A1.3 * Crosstabulation My department offers programs and services that support the University s mission. Strongly Faculty Staff Student Count % within.5%.6%.7%.6% Count % within.5%.4% 1.8% 1.2% Count % within 3.5% 7.3% 9.4% 7.7% Count % within 27.5% 34.3% 48.7% 41.1% Count % within 68.1% 57.3% 39.5% 49.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A1.4ALL * Crosstabulation Eastern s processes and activities reflect its commitment to diversity as articulated in the mission statement Strongly Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.4%.8%.8%.6%.9% Count % within 4.9% 3.8% 3.4% 3.2% 3.7% Count % within 12.2% 10.9% 10.0% 7.7% 10.4% Count % within 44.5% 47.7% 54.4% 42.9% 50.5% Count % within 36.9% 36.8% 31.5% 45.5% 34.5% Count

3 % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Students are Eastern s highest priority. Strongly A1.5 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.5%.8% 1.3%.7% 1.0% Count % within 4.2% 4.7% 6.5% 5.3% 5.6% Count % within 10.5% 6.8% 11.5% 9.3% 10.2% Count % within 38.8% 38.5% 40.6% 36.7% 39.6% Count % within 46.0% 49.3% 40.1% 48.0% 43.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern responds to the needs of its surrounding community Strongly A1.6 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.9% 1.5% 1.3% 2.7% 1.5% Count % within 9.0% 7.8% 5.1% 9.4% 6.7% Count % within 18.7% 16.6% 13.0% 11.4% 14.7% Count % within 50.2% 55.1% 53.8% 51.0% 53.2% Count % within 20.1% 19.0% 26.7% 25.5% 23.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A1.7 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External

4 Eastern addresses its role in a multicultural society Strongly Count % within 2.1% 1.5% 1.0%.7% 1.3% Count % within 8.3% 4.1% 5.3% 4.0% 5.5% Count % within 17.5% 13.1% 11.0% 10.1% 12.6% Count % within 48.6% 55.6% 55.2% 57.7% 54.2% Count % within 23.5% 25.8% 27.5% 27.5% 26.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A1.8 * Crosstabulation University-community relations Declined have improved/declined/remained the Remained the Same same during my time at Eastern and/or in Charleston Improved Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 11.0% 11.2% 6.6% 9.6% 8.7% Count % within 57.7% 52.6% 62.8% 52.6% 58.8% Count % within 31.3% 36.2% 30.6% 37.8% 32.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern communicates effectively with its community partners A1.9 * Crosstabulation Strongly External Count 2 2 % within 1.6% 1.6% Count 6 6 % within 4.7% 4.7% Count % within 18.1% 18.1% Count % within 54.3% 54.3% Count 27 27

5 % within 21.3% 21.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Eastern has developed services Strongly or acted in response to the needs of its community partners. A1.10 * Crosstabulation External Count 2 2 % within 1.6% 1.6% Count 8 8 % within 6.3% 6.3% Count % within 17.3% 17.3% Count % within 48.8% 48.8% Count % within 26.0% 26.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% In general, my interaction with Eastern students has been positive/neutral/negative A1.11 * Crosstabulation Negative Positive External Count 3 3 % within 2.1% 2.1% Count % within 16.8% 16.8% Count % within 81.1% 81.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Eastern students provide valuable volunteer services to community partners A1.12 * Crosstabulation Strongly External Count 2 2 % within 1.5% 1.5%

6 community partners Count 9 9 % within 6.7% 6.7% Count 8 8 % within 5.9% 5.9% Count % within 48.1% 48.1% Count % within 37.8% 37.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My major ensures that its Strongly curriculum prepares students to meet the demands of a global society A1.13 * Crosstabulation Student Count 5 5 % within.5%.5% Count % within 2.2% 2.2% Count % within 6.6% 6.6% Count % within 45.7% 45.7% Count % within 45.0% 45.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A2.1 * Crosstabulation Eastern supports freedom of expression. Strongly Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.9%.6%.9% 1.3%.9% Count % within 6.4% 4.9% 4.0% 5.3% 4.7% Count % within 10.6% 10.0% 7.4% 8.0% 8.5% Count

7 % within 48.1% 54.0% 48.7% 48.7% 49.6% Count % within 34.0% 30.5% 39.0% 36.7% 36.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.2 * Crosstabulation Eastern encourages and Strongly enforces academic honesty and integrity Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.4% 1.1%.3%.7%.7% Count % within 3.1% 3.5% 1.2% 2.0% 2.0% Count % within 8.2% 8.0% 4.4% 4.7% 5.8% Count % within 49.6% 49.7% 43.0% 37.2% 45.2% Count % within 37.6% 37.7% 51.1% 55.4% 46.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.3 * Crosstabulation Eastern operates with integrity. Strongly If you answered disagree/strongly disagree, please provide a short explain as to why. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.2% 1.1%.9% 0.0%.9% Count % within 5.7% 5.3% 1.3% 4.0% 3.1% Count % within 11.8% 13.9% 7.2% 4.7% 9.2% Count % within 39.8% 49.0% 51.3% 42.0% 48.2% Count % within 41.5% 30.7% 39.3% 49.3% 38.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

8 A2.4 * Crosstabulation Eastern operates ethically. If youstrongly answered disagree/strongly disagree, please provide a short explain as to why. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.7% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% Count % within 5.5% 6.0% 1.6% 2.8% 3.3% Count % within 10.5% 13.2% 6.8% 10.3% 9.0% Count % within 42.0% 48.0% 50.2% 37.9% 47.5% Count % within 40.4% 31.8% 40.2% 49.0% 39.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.5 * Crosstabulation Eastern provides a safe Strongly environment. If you answered disagree/strongly disagree, please provide a short explain as to why. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.6%.4% 1.9% 1.3% 1.5% Count % within 4.2% 3.8% 4.5% 2.0% 4.1% Count % within 10.3% 10.8% 12.0% 8.7% 11.2% Count % within 48.8% 48.6% 47.8% 42.3% 47.8% Count % within 35.0% 36.4% 33.8% 45.6% 35.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern provides effective i ht t th i t it Strongly A2.6 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count

9 oversight to ensure the integrity of research and scholarly activity. % within.8% 0.0%.1%.8%.3% Count % within 4.0% 1.0%.8% 5.6% 1.7% Count % within 17.7% 21.2% 11.0% 14.4% 14.1% Count % within 51.7% 51.8% 63.0% 45.6% 57.9% Count % within 25.9% 26.1% 25.1% 33.6% 25.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern provides effective support services to ensure the integrity of research and scholarly activity Strongly A2.7 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 2.3% 0.0%.1% 0.0%.5% Count % within 7.3% 0.0%.7% 4.0% 2.0% Count % within 19.4% 15.2% 8.2% 15.9% 11.9% Count % within 47.2% 56.0% 56.8% 48.4% 54.3% Count % within 23.8% 28.8% 34.3% 31.7% 31.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.8 * Crosstabulation I know how to obtain guidance instrongly the ethical use of information resources. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.5%.4%.3%.8%.4% Count % within 1.9% 1.1% 5.7% 1.7% 3.8% Count % within 6.9% 8.0% 10.9% 15.7% 9.8%

10 Count % within 49.5% 56.7% 53.6% 38.0% 52.6% Count % within 41.1% 33.8% 29.4% 43.8% 33.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% I have adequate access to information about policies and procedures that affect me. Strongly A2.9 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 0.0%.4%.2%.8%.2% Count % within 2.8% 3.0% 3.2% 1.6% 3.0% Count % within 5.6% 6.5% 10.1% 10.2% 8.5% Count % within 54.7% 52.3% 56.7% 50.0% 55.0% Count % within 36.9% 37.8% 29.8% 37.5% 33.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.10ALL * Crosstabulation Eastern implements practices that are in agreement with established policies. Strongly Faculty Staff External Count % within.5%.2%.8%.4% Count % within 3.6% 2.6% 3.0% 3.1% Count % within 16.9% 14.1% 9.8% 14.7% Count % within 57.7% 68.3% 58.3% 62.5% Count % within 21.3% 14.6% 28.0% 19.3% Count

11 % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern s recruitment efforts are Strongly effective. A2.11 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count % within 9.6% 9.6% Count % within 29.1% 29.1% Count % within 24.6% 24.6% Count % within 29.9% 29.9% Count % within 6.8% 6.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A2.12ALL * Crosstabulation Eastern s academic programs are clearly presented. Strongly Faculty Student Count % within.5%.4%.4% Count % within 9.7% 2.8% 4.7% Count % within 15.1% 7.8% 9.8% Count % within 53.5% 58.5% 57.1% Count % within 21.3% 30.5% 28.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A2.13ALL * Crosstabulation Faculty Student

12 Eastern s policies ensure the integrity of research. Strongly Count % within.8%.3%.4% Count % within 3.5% 1.2% 1.8% Count % within 20.3% 9.9% 12.7% Count % within 51.7% 59.0% 57.0% Count % within 23.7% 29.6% 28.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Students Only A2.14 I have used to find information about academic programs at EIU (Multiple options can be selected) Answer Percent Number of responses Online academic catalog 82% 1,002 Department web page 75% 909 Printed academic catalog 29% 356 Faculty/academic advisor 80% 978 Other (please specify) 4% 43 N = 1219 Eastern s enrollment information Strongly is clearly presented. A2.16_1 * Crosstabulation Student Count 7 7 % within.7%.7% Count % within 5.1% 5.1% Count % within 13.7% 13.7% Count % within 55.4% 55.4% Count % within 25.1% 25.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

13 Eastern s tuition rates are clearlystrongly presented. A2.16_2 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 1.0% 1.0% Count % within 4.9% 4.9% Count % within 11.2% 11.2% Count % within 54.8% 54.8% Count % within 28.2% 28.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Eastern presents itself accurately to the public. A2.16 * Crosstabulation Strongly External Count 1 1 % within.7%.7% Count % within 8.5% 8.5% Count % within 9.9% 9.9% Count % within 56.7% 56.7% Count % within 24.1% 24.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I believe the BOT acts with the b t i t t f th i tit ti Strongly A2.18 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count

14 best interests of the institution % within.3% 1.2% 1.4% 1.8% 1.1% Count % within 2.8% 1.5% 1.9% 2.7% 2.0% Count % within 25.3% 20.2% 25.3% 15.3% 23.1% Count % within 48.8% 53.1% 49.5% 49.5% 50.3% Count % within 22.8% 24.0% 22.0% 30.6% 23.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% The BOT leaves the faculty to oversee academic matters. Strongly A2.19 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 0.0%.8%.2% 1.0%.3% Count % within 2.1% 2.0%.7% 2.1% 1.4% Count % within 22.2% 34.4% 27.1% 21.9% 27.0% Count % within 50.0% 45.8% 53.2% 47.9% 50.4% Count % within 25.7% 17.0% 18.8% 27.1% 20.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.1 * Crosstabulation Eastern's general education Strongly program prepares students for a life of learning. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.0%.9% 1.4% 2.2% 1.3% Count % within 10.9% 4.4% 5.4% 6.5% 6.3% Count % within 16.3% 14.5% 13.8% 13.8% 14.4%

15 Count % within 49.0% 49.7% 51.0% 44.9% 50.0% Count % within 22.8% 30.6% 28.3% 32.6% 28.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern provides opportunities for professional growth. Strongly A3.2 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 2.6% 2.3%.4% 1.4% 1.2% Count % within 7.7% 8.9% 1.5% 5.6% 4.4% Count % within 11.4% 12.9% 6.1% 7.7% 8.6% Count % within 48.7% 47.4% 46.1% 36.6% 46.3% Count % within 29.6% 28.5% 45.9% 48.6% 39.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern expects excellent teaching. Strongly A3.3 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.9% 1.1% 1.7% 2.0% 1.6% Count % within 4.0% 6.3% 6.6% 6.6% 6.1% Count % within 8.9% 13.8% 13.9% 11.2% 12.8% Count % within 39.2% 51.2% 44.5% 42.1% 44.7% Count % within 46.2% 27.6% 33.2% 38.2% 34.8% Count

16 % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern promotes academic excellence. Strongly A3.4 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 3.3%.6%.6% 1.3% 1.2% Count % within 6.5% 5.4% 2.3% 3.3% 3.8% Count % within 16.3% 14.9% 7.2% 7.3% 10.4% Count % within 41.5% 48.7% 51.2% 43.3% 48.4% Count % within 32.4% 30.4% 38.7% 44.7% 36.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.5 * Crosstabulation Physical facilities have Declined improved, declined, or remained the same during my time at Remained the Same Eastern. Improved Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 16.2% 10.8% 4.0% 8.3% 8.3% Count % within 31.5% 27.2% 58.9% 28.5% 44.0% Count % within 52.3% 62.0% 37.0% 63.2% 47.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% The goals of my department/unit Strongly link to those of the university. A3.7 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count 4 4 % within 1.0% 1.0% Count 2 2 % within.5%.5%

17 Count % within 6.5% 6.5% Count % within 43.6% 43.6% Count % within 48.4% 48.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I understand how planning in mystrongly department/unit links to budgeting. A3.8 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count % within 2.8% 2.8% Count % within 13.1% 13.1% Count % within 12.8% 12.8% Count % within 42.5% 42.5% Count % within 28.9% 28.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_1ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit sets high academic standards. Strongly Faculty Student Count % within 2.2%.4%.9% Count % within 7.4% 3.0% 4.3% Count % within 12.0% 6.5% 8.1% Count % within 34.1% 43.5% 40.8% Count

18 % within 44.4% 46.6% 46.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_2ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit encourages Strongly and enforces academic honesty and integrity Faculty Staff Student Count % within 1.0%.3% 0.0%.3% Count % within 2.1%.5%.8% 1.0% Count % within 6.9% 14.1% 3.0% 6.2% Count % within 37.7% 39.5% 43.1% 41.1% Count % within 52.3% 45.6% 53.1% 51.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_3ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit plans Strongly appropriately to ensure that it is prepared to meet the demands of the future. Faculty Staff Count % within 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% Count % within 9.5% 9.1% 9.3% Count % within 15.3% 18.0% 16.7% Count % within 35.0% 40.9% 37.9% Count % within 38.8% 30.5% 34.7% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_4ALL * Crosstabulation

19 My department/unit periodically reviews its policies and procedures. Strongly Faculty Staff Count % within 1.2% 1.4% 1.3% Count % within 4.2% 4.8% 4.5% Count % within 8.5% 14.7% 11.6% Count % within 42.0% 44.2% 43.1% Count % within 44.0% 34.8% 39.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit offers educational programs that support the university's mission. A3.9_5 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count 1 1 % within.2%.2% Count 2 2 % within.5%.5% Count % within 3.1% 3.1% Count % within 41.3% 41.3% Count % within 54.8% 54.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit is committedstrongly to strengthening the quality of its academic programs. A3.9_6 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count 3 3 % within.7%.7% Count 23 23

20 % within 5.5% 5.5% Count % within 9.8% 9.8% Count % within 30.0% 30.0% Count % within 54.0% 54.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit demonstrates an adequate commitment to student research/creative activity. A3.9_7 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count 1 1 % within.2%.2% Count % within 5.2% 5.2% Count % within 8.4% 8.4% Count % within 36.9% 36.9% Count % within 49.3% 49.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit uses assessment results to improve teaching and learning. A3.9_8 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 2.7% 2.7% Count % within 8.4% 8.4% Count % within 15.1% 15.1% Count % within 35.1% 35.1%

21 Count % within 38.8% 38.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_9ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit has Strongly articulated clear student learning objectives to assess learning outcomes of department/unit sponsored co-curricular opportunities. Faculty Staff Count % within 1.6%.3% 1.0% Count % within 5.2% 4.7% 5.0% Count % within 15.4% 24.2% 19.4% Count % within 36.3% 42.5% 39.1% Count % within 41.5% 28.3% 35.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit demonstrates an adequate commitment to offering integrated and high-impact cocurricular opportunities. A3.24_1 * Crosstabulation Strongly Staff Count 6 6 % within 1.7% 1.7% Count % within 4.9% 4.9% Count % within 23.2% 23.2% Count % within 40.4% 40.4% Count % within 29.8% 29.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

22 My department/unit has Strongly articulated clear student learning objectives to assess learning outcomes. A3.9_10 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count 2 2 % within.5%.5% Count % within 4.9% 4.9% Count % within 12.1% 12.1% Count % within 39.4% 39.4% Count % within 43.1% 43.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My department/unit ensures that Strongly its curriculum prepares students to meet the demands of a diverse workforce. A3.9_11 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count 6 6 % within 1.5% 1.5% Count % within 7.1% 7.1% Count % within 12.3% 12.3% Count % within 36.0% 36.0% Count % within 43.1% 43.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_12ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit offers out of Strongly class activities that prepare students to meet the demands Faculty Staff Count % within 1.0%.8%.9%

23 students to meet the demands of a diverse workforce. Count % within 6.3% 2.9% 4.7% Count % within 11.6% 19.4% 15.4% Count % within 34.4% 46.0% 40.1% Count % within 46.6% 30.9% 38.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.9_13ALL * Crosstabulation My department/unit supports the Strongly quality of learning experiences that occur outside of the classroom. Faculty Staff Count % within 1.0%.8%.9% Count % within 5.5% 2.4% 4.0% Count % within 14.0% 15.3% 14.6% Count % within 32.4% 41.5% 36.8% Count % within 47.1% 39.9% 43.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.10_1ALL * Crosstabulation Adequate support services are available to students who have academic weaknesses. Strongly Faculty Student Count % within 2.0%.6% 1.0% Count % within 11.0% 4.3% 6.1% Count % within 11.5% 9.9% 10.3% Count

24 % within 51.3% 54.2% 53.4% Count % within 24.3% 31.1% 29.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A3.10_2ALL * Crosstabulation Adequate support services are available to students who have learning disabilities. Strongly Faculty Student Count % within 1.8%.6% 1.0% Count % within 10.2% 3.5% 5.4% Count % within 13.3% 12.3% 12.6% Count % within 44.2% 50.9% 49.0% Count % within 30.4% 32.7% 32.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% I feel supported in my professional development in terms of teaching/research/service. A3.11 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 5.3% 5.3% Count % within 10.6% 10.6% Count % within 13.7% 13.7% Count % within 44.6% 44.6% Count % within 25.9% 25.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

25 Overall, I believe existing professional development at Eastern adequately addressed my needs and interests. A3.12 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 5.8% 5.8% Count % within 13.0% 13.0% Count % within 14.5% 14.5% Count % within 44.2% 44.2% Count % within 22.5% 22.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I have the support I need to accomplish my scholarly/creative goals. A3.13 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 5.3% 5.3% Count % within 16.5% 16.5% Count % within 17.5% 17.5% Count % within 44.5% 44.5% Count % within 16.3% 16.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I am aware of outside t iti f f di t A3.14 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count 8 8

26 opportunities for funding to advance my scholarly/creative work. % within 2.1% 2.1% Count % within 8.3% 8.3% Count % within 14.7% 14.7% Count % within 51.2% 51.2% Count % within 23.8% 23.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I have the equipment and facilities I need for my work. A3.15 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 3.4% 3.4% Count % within 10.1% 10.1% Count % within 10.6% 10.6% Count % within 50.0% 50.0% Count % within 26.0% 26.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I am comfortable with my ability Strongly to use the classroom technology appropriate for my course. A3.16 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count 2 2 % within.5%.5% Count % within 2.9% 2.9% Count % within 7.0% 7.0%

27 Count % within 44.2% 44.2% Count % within 45.4% 45.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My work performance is evaluated fairly. A3.17 * Crosstabulation Faculty Count % within 4.8% 4.8% Count % within 7.1% 7.1% Count % within 47.1% 47.1% Count % within 41.0% 41.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Work is fairly distributed. A3.18 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 6.0% 6.0% Count % within 14.1% 14.1% Count % within 14.3% 14.3% Count % within 40.5% 40.5% Count % within 25.1% 25.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

28 I involve students in my scholarly/creative work. A3.19 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count 6 6 % within 1.6% 1.6% Count % within 5.7% 5.7% Count % within 13.4% 13.4% Count % within 46.4% 46.4% Count % within 32.8% 32.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.20 Engaged with students in a structured manner outside of class: (multiple options can be selected) Faculty Answer % Response Mentored undergraduate research outside of a specific course 64% 223 Taken students to a professional conference 56% 196 Lead or participated in a study abroad trip 16% 56 Embedded service in a course 32% 111 Advised a Registered Student Organization 50% 174 TRIO or Honors Student Mentor 16% 55 Faculty Fellows 21% 73 Eastern Reads Facilitator 21% 75 Jumpstart2G.I.V.E. Facilitator 7% 25 Other (fill in) 15% 51 N = 349

29 Staff % Response Taken students to a professional conference 22% 37 RSO advisor. 33% 54 TRIO or Honors Student Mentor. 6% 10 Faculty Fellows. 8% 14 Eastern Reads Facilitator 13% 22 Jumpstart2G.I.V.E. Facilitator. 7% 12 Other (fill in). 58% 95 N = 165 My unit demonstrates an appropriate level of financial commitment to technology. A3.22_1 * Crosstabulation Strongly Staff Count % within 2.2% 2.2% Count % within 10.4% 10.4% Count % within 11.3% 11.3% Count % within 54.1% 54.1% Count % within 22.0% 22.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My unit demonstrates an appropriate level of financial commitment to personnel. A3.22_2 * Crosstabulation Strongly Staff Count % within 4.7% 4.7% Count % within 17.6% 17.6% Count % within 13.2% 13.2%

30 Count % within 46.4% 46.4% Count % within 18.1% 18.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My unit demonstrates an appropriate level of financial commitment to equipment. A3.22_3 * Crosstabulation Strongly Staff Count % within 3.3% 3.3% Count % within 13.1% 13.1% Count % within 14.0% 14.0% Count % within 50.0% 50.0% Count % within 19.6% 19.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% I feel supported by my unit in my Strongly professional development A3.23 * Crosstabulation Staff Count % within 4.4% 4.4% Count % within 8.6% 8.6% Count % within 15.1% 15.1% Count % within 39.7% 39.7% Count % within 32.2% 32.2% Count

31 % within 100.0% 100.0% I have a declared major Yes No Major * Crosstabulation Student External Count % within 94.5% 100.0% 94.5% Count % within 5.5% 0.0% 5.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% The majority of my teachers have been effective. A3.28 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count 3 3 % within.2%.2% Count % within 3.9% 3.9% Count % within 5.1% 5.1% Count % within 51.0% 51.0% Count % within 39.8% 39.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My education at Eastern has provided me the opportunity to participate in curricular and cocurricular activities that promote socially responsible use of knowledge. A3.29 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count 4 4 % within.3%.3% Count % within 2.1% 2.1% Count % within 8.6% 8.6%

32 Count % within 51.5% 51.5% Count % within 37.4% 37.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Labs are staffed adequately Strongly enough to deliver a high level of instruction A3.30 * Crosstabulation Student Count 3 3 % within.3%.3% Count % within 3.9% 3.9% Count % within 13.2% 13.2% Count % within 54.4% 54.4% Count % within 28.1% 28.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Adequate support services are available to students who have physical disabilities. A3.31_3 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count % within 1.0% 1.0% Count % within 3.7% 3.7% Count % within 13.2% 13.2% Count % within 50.0% 50.0% Count % within 32.1% 32.1% Count

33 % within 100.0% 100.0% Adequate support services are Strongly available to students who have emotional/psychological issues. A3.31_4 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 1.2% 1.2% Count % within 5.6% 5.6% Count % within 13.3% 13.3% Count % within 49.3% 49.3% Count % within 30.6% 30.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Individual conferences with instructors Little Some A Lot A3.32_1 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 3.9% 3.9% Count % within 8.9% 8.9% Count % within 35.8% 35.8% Count % within 51.3% 51.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Presentations of research/creative activities A3.32_2 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 4.8% 4.8%

34 research/creative activities Little Some A Lot Count % within 12.0% 12.0% Count % within 40.2% 40.2% Count % within 43.0% 43.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Intenships Little Some A Lot A3.32_3 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 23.4% 23.4% Count % within 8.6% 8.6% Count % within 24.4% 24.4% Count % within 43.6% 43.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Study abroad Little Some A Lot A3.32_4 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 35.5% 35.5% Count % within 7.6% 7.6% Count % within 19.9% 19.9% Count % within 37.0% 37.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

35 Value added to your educational None experience: Practicum Little Some A Lot A3.32_5 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 27.3% 27.3% Count % within 8.7% 8.7% Count % within 23.3% 23.3% Count % within 40.8% 40.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Student teaching Little Some A Lot A3.32_6 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 33.5% 33.5% Count % within 8.4% 8.4% Count % within 23.7% 23.7% Count % within 34.4% 34.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Attendance at conferences Little Some A3.32_7 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 20.4% 20.4% Count % within 11.7% 11.7% Count % within 32.1% 32.1%

36 A Lot Count % within 35.8% 35.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Presenting at conferences Little Some A Lot A3.32_8 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 32.7% 32.7% Count % within 9.2% 9.2% Count % within 24.1% 24.1% Count % within 34.0% 34.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Team/ work for class Little Some A Lot A3.32_9 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 3.9% 3.9% Count % within 15.4% 15.4% Count % within 40.2% 40.2% Count % within 40.4% 40.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None i T /G A3.32_10 * Crosstabulation Student Count 96 96

37 experience: Team/ outside of class Little Some A Lot % within 9.5% 9.5% Count % within 20.7% 20.7% Count % within 35.8% 35.8% Count % within 33.9% 33.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Research/Creative activities conducted outside of Little class A3.32_11 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 6.7% 6.7% Count % within 12.7% 12.7% Count % within 40.1% 40.1% Count % within 40.5% 40.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Collaboration with faculty on research/creative Little activities conducted outside of class Some A3.32_12 * Crosstabulation A Lot Student Count % within 12.1% 12.1% Count % within 10.5% 10.5% Count % within 34.8% 34.8% Count % within 42.6% 42.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0%

38 Value added to your educational None experience: Intellectual conversations with students or Little faculty outside of classroom A3.32_13 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 5.4% 5.4% Count % within 8.7% 8.7% Count % within 36.0% 36.0% Count % within 49.9% 49.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Speakers, presentations, workshops, Little events attended outside of class A3.32_14 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 5.4% 5.4% Count % within 11.3% 11.3% Count % within 36.1% 36.1% Count % within 47.2% 47.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Job shadowing, externships, and internships not Little connected to a class A3.32_16 * Crosstabulation Some Student Count % within 21.6% 21.6% Count % within 8.8% 8.8% Count

39 A Lot % within 24.9% 24.9% Count % within 44.8% 44.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Diversity programs/events attended Little A3.32_17 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 18.3% 18.3% Count % within 12.9% 12.9% Count % within 36.8% 36.8% Count % within 32.1% 32.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Intercollegiate athletics Little A3.32_18 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 25.9% 25.9% Count % within 12.2% 12.2% Count % within 30.3% 30.3% Count % within 31.6% 31.6% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.32_19 * Crosstabulation Student

40 Value added to your educational None experience: Intramural/recreational activities Little Some A Lot Count % within 21.4% 21.4% Count % within 12.9% 12.9% Count % within 31.7% 31.7% Count % within 34.0% 34.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Music Ensembles/s not for class Little credit A3.32_20 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 32.3% 32.3% Count % within 13.9% 13.9% Count % within 25.9% 25.9% Count % within 27.9% 27.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Participation in a Recognized Student Little Organization A3.32_21 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 13.0% 13.0% Count % within 8.3% 8.3% Count % within 27.9% 27.9% Count % within 50.8% 50.8% Count

41 % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Community Service Little A3.32_22 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 9.8% 9.8% Count % within 13.3% 13.3% Count % within 33.6% 33.6% Count % within 43.4% 43.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Participation as a member of University Board or Little Student Government A3.32_23 * Crosstabulation Some A Lot Student Count % within 44.5% 44.5% Count % within 7.4% 7.4% Count % within 21.8% 21.8% Count % within 26.2% 26.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Participation as a member of the DEN, Yearbook, Little or WEastern (radio and TV) A3.32_24 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 50.6% 50.6% Count % within 5.9% 5.9%

42 Some A Lot Count % within 22.5% 22.5% Count % within 21.0% 21.0% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Role as a Residence Assistant, Peer Little Mentor, Peer Leader, Debut/Senior Prowl/Transfer/Prowl Leader, Some NSP Specialist, Peer Learning Assistant, Peer Health Educator A Lot A3.32_25 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 39.5% 39.5% Count % within 6.9% 6.9% Count % within 18.6% 18.6% Count % within 35.1% 35.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Value added to your educational None experience: Service on Inter Fraternity Council, Panhellenic Little Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council, or as a Gamma Chi Some A3.32_26 * Crosstabulation A Lot Student Count % within 46.4% 46.4% Count % within 6.1% 6.1% Count % within 19.2% 19.2% Count % within 28.4% 28.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.32_27 * Crosstabulation

43 Value added to your educational None experience: On-campus job Little Some A Lot Student Count % within 27.6% 27.6% Count % within 5.3% 5.3% Count % within 22.0% 22.0% Count % within 45.1% 45.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Students Only A3.33 Experiences have increased your skills in these specific ways: (multiple options can be selected) Answer % Response Take responsibility for your learning 93% 1,037 Meet expectations and commitments 88% 981 Make appropriate decisions regarding personal behavior 76% 849 Recognize and accept consequences of my actions 76% 841 Appropriately determine when to act alone and when to work or consult with others 65% 721 Demonstrate effective planning, time management, and purposeful behavior 73% 815 Initiate action and effectively engage others to enhance outcomes 54% 605 Maintain sufficient motivation and energy to achieve goals 68% 751

44 Employ talents and skills to contribute to the betterment of society 56% 624 Maintain positive outlook 72% 796 Expect the best from self and others 68% 758 Accurately assess and articulate personal strengths and weaknesses 63% 695 Accept constructive criticism and actively seek selfimprovement 75% 837 Learn and recover from disappointment or bad experience and continue to succeed 68% 752 Recognize advantages of moving outside existing comfort zone 72% 798 Appreciate the importance of diversity and conveys this value to others 58% 647 Understand and respects the values and beliefs of others 73% 814 Seek out others with different backgrounds and/or perspectives to enhance knowledge and personal growth 52% 579 Work effectively with others, despite differences 74% 825 Can respectfully discuss differences with others 68% 759 Seek out others with different backgrounds and/or perspectives to enhance knowledge and personal growth 49% 542

45 Demonstrate ability to help others adapt to new situations 61% 680 Demonstrate intellectual and emotional ability to perform in complicated environments 60% 667 Can function under conditions of uncertainty 64% 716 N = 1112 My major provides an environment in which research/creative activity is encouraged. A3.35_2 * Crosstabulation Student Count % within 2.2% 2.2% Count % within 6.3% 6.3% Count % within 43.7% 43.7% Count % within 47.7% 47.7% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My major prepares me to Strongly engage in independent learning. A3.35_4 * Crosstabulation Student Count 2 2 % within.2%.2% Count % within 1.9% 1.9% Count % within 5.6% 5.6% Count % within 45.1% 45.1% Count % within 47.3% 47.3%

46 Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My major prepares me for further education or employment. A3.35_5 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count 6 6 % within.6%.6% Count % within 1.8% 1.8% Count % within 5.6% 5.6% Count % within 39.7% 39.7% Count % within 52.3% 52.3% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% My major is committed to strengthening the quality of its academic programs. A3.35_6 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count 2 2 % within.2%.2% Count % within 2.2% 2.2% Count % within 6.8% 6.8% Count % within 41.1% 41.1% Count % within 49.8% 49.8% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A3.36_1 * Crosstabulation

47 Faculty in my major care about teaching and student learning. Strongly Student Count 4 4 % within.4%.4% Count % within 1.3% 1.3% Count % within 5.5% 5.5% Count % within 39.9% 39.9% Count % within 52.9% 52.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Faculty in my major care about my experiences outside of the classroom. A3.36_2 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count % within 1.0% 1.0% Count % within 3.0% 3.0% Count % within 11.5% 11.5% Count % within 38.3% 38.3% Count % within 46.2% 46.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Faculty in my major are accessible/available to help students. A3.36_3 * Crosstabulation Strongly Student Count 2 2 % within.2%.2% Count % within 1.4% 1.4%

48 Count % within 5.9% 5.9% Count % within 40.1% 40.1% Count % within 52.5% 52.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% The off-campus constituent Strongly group I represent has processes in place to identify the needs of those it serves. A3.37 * Crosstabulation External Count 1 1 % within.9%.9% Count 4 4 % within 3.7% 3.7% Count % within 13.8% 13.8% Count % within 54.1% 54.1% Count % within 27.5% 27.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Planning in my department/unit addresses academic program quality. A4.1_1 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count 8 8 % within 2.0% 2.0% Count % within 6.5% 6.5% Count % within 10.3% 10.3% Count % within 37.3% 37.3% Count

49 % within 43.9% 43.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Planning in my department/unit addresses enrollment management. A4.1_2 * Crosstabulation Strongly Faculty Count % within 3.4% 3.4% Count % within 9.9% 9.9% Count % within 14.9% 14.9% Count % within 40.3% 40.3% Count % within 31.4% 31.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 4.2 Best Practice for Retention (multiple options can be selected) Staff Answer % Response program/course/activity specifically designed for new students 39% 151 practical work experience 61% 236 academic support/tutoring 35% 134 mandatory, one-on-one advising 27% 103 employs the Early Alert System 26% 100 honors program 18% 70 collaboration with cocurricular activities 41% 156 student employment 85% 325 learning communities 20% 75 peer mentoring 28% 106 faculty mentoring 24% 92

50 N = 384 Faculty Answer % Response program/course/activity specifically designed for new students 49% 193 practical work experience 59% 233 academic support/tutoring 66% 262 mandatory, one-on-one advising 61% 244 employs the Early Alert System 62% 246 honors program 68% 270 collaboration with cocurricular activities 46% 181 student employment 64% 254 learning communities 17% 67 peer mentoring 25% 100 faculty mentoring 62% 247 N = 397 My unit links assessment to continuous improvement. A4.4 * Crosstabulation Strongly Staff Count 5 5 % within 1.2% 1.2% Count % within 8.0% 8.0% Count % within 17.2% 17.2% Count % within 44.3% 44.3% Count % within 29.4% 29.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% A4.5 * Crosstabulation

51 Planning in my unit addresses enrollment management. Strongly Staff Count 5 5 % within 1.4% 1.4% Count % within 6.5% 6.5% Count % within 18.9% 18.9% Count % within 42.2% 42.2% Count % within 31.1% 31.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% Students only 4.7 Factors Influencing Choice to attend EIU (Multiple options can be selected) Answer % Response strength of academic reputation 46% 528 high quality of major program 60% 681 high quality of professors 44% 502 positive relationship with faculty/staff 56% 642 receiving a good education 68% 775 family support/encouragement 53% 599 campus involvement (e.g., Hall Council, Greek Life, intramurals, Christian Campus House/Newman Center) 36% 409 low cost of attendance 65% 743 location 63% 714 social activities/friends 47% 536 learning resources 33% 370

52 academic activities (Emerging Leaders, Ed Scholars, honor societies, major clubs 26% 291 other, please explain 9% 108 N = 1138 A5.1ALL * Crosstabulation Eastern s governance and Strongly administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfil its mission. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 3.8% 2.8% 1.8% 2.6% 2.4% Count % within 11.1% 11.7% 3.1% 6.6% 6.5% Count % within 20.6% 16.5% 11.7% 11.9% 14.3% Count % within 42.1% 46.0% 55.2% 45.7% 50.3% Count % within 22.5% 23.1% 28.2% 33.1% 26.5% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern has policies and procedures to engage its constituents in the institution's governance. Strongly A5.2 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.0%.7%.7% 2.2%.8% Count % within 5.9% 3.8% 1.7% 3.6% 3.0% Count % within 15.1% 15.3% 13.5% 10.1% 14.0% Count % within 44.6% 51.4% 52.9% 48.9% 50.8% Count % within 33.4% 28.8% 31.2% 35.3% 31.4% Count

53 % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern plans for the future. Strongly A5.3 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.2% 2.0%.9% 2.1% 1.1% Count % within 9.1% 6.8% 3.0% 5.6% 5.1% Count % within 15.2% 15.9% 14.2% 11.3% 14.5% Count % within 53.7% 53.5% 56.3% 47.2% 54.6% Count % within 21.8% 21.8% 25.7% 33.8% 24.7% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern engages in systematic and integrated planning. Strongly A5.4 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.3%.7%.7% 2.2%.7% Count % within 7.5% 4.1% 2.8% 3.0% 4.0% Count % within 18.9% 20.1% 15.3% 14.2% 16.9% Count % within 52.1% 54.6% 57.3% 50.7% 55.3% Count % within 21.2% 20.4% 23.9% 29.9% 23.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.5 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External

54 Eastern's planning process encompasses the institution as a whole and considers the perspectives of internal groups and community partners. Strongly Count % within.3% 1.4%.9% 2.2% 1.0% Count % within 10.7% 9.4% 4.5% 5.0% 6.7% Count % within 23.6% 22.8% 16.6% 16.5% 19.1% Count % within 44.5% 48.1% 57.1% 43.2% 52.0% Count % within 20.9% 18.3% 20.9% 33.1% 21.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.6 * Crosstabulation Eastern enables the involvement Strongly of all constituents in setting academic requirements, policy, and processes through collaboration. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.0% 2.0% 1.1% 3.1% 1.4% Count % within 10.4% 6.6% 2.6% 4.7% 5.0% Count % within 21.0% 24.6% 13.1% 18.1% 17.2% Count % within 45.7% 48.9% 58.6% 46.5% 53.4% Count % within 21.8% 18.0% 24.5% 27.6% 22.9% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.7 * Crosstabulation Institutional plans anticipate the Strongly possible impact of fluctuations in the institution s sources of revenue, such as enrollment, the economy, and state support. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 1.9% 2.0% 1.6% 2.2% 1.8% Count % within 10.8% 6.8% 4.6% 5.2% 6.2% Count

55 % within 19.9% 21.3% 15.4% 15.6% 17.5% Count % within 45.7% 49.6% 56.2% 48.1% 52.4% Count % within 21.6% 20.3% 22.2% 28.9% 22.2% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.8 * Crosstabulation Institutional planning anticipates Strongly emerging factors, such as technology, demographic shifts, and globalization. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 2.5% 2.5%.9% 3.1% 1.7% Count % within 11.7% 8.7% 3.2% 3.8% 5.9% Count % within 24.6% 20.4% 14.5% 15.3% 17.6% Count % within 41.0% 50.9% 55.6% 46.6% 51.4% Count % within 20.2% 17.6% 25.7% 31.3% 23.4% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.9 * Crosstabulation Eastern's employees (e.g., Strongly faculty, staff, administrators) are appropriately qualified and trained. Faculty Staff Student External Count % within.8% 1.2%.9% 4.4% 1.1% Count % within 3.5% 8.2% 4.7% 5.9% 5.3% Count % within 10.3% 13.6% 9.9% 8.9% 10.7% Count % within 49.2% 54.9% 49.4% 46.7% 50.3% Count % within 36.1% 22.1% 35.2% 34.1% 32.6%

56 Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern has the financial resources to support its operations. Strongly A5.10 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 8.3% 4.9% 2.3% 4.5% 4.1% Count % within 38.2% 29.6% 11.4% 23.5% 21.0% Count % within 21.7% 22.7% 15.0% 15.9% 17.9% Count % within 28.2% 36.7% 52.6% 47.0% 44.4% Count % within 3.6% 6.1% 18.7% 9.1% 12.7% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Eastern has the human resources to support its operations. Strongly A5.11 * Crosstabulation Faculty Staff Student External Count % within 2.2% 2.0%.3% 2.9% 1.2% Count % within 17.8% 17.0% 3.4% 5.8% 9.0% Count % within 16.5% 15.4% 10.0% 10.9% 12.4% Count % within 48.6% 53.7% 63.0% 61.3% 58.3% Count % within 14.8% 11.8% 23.4% 19.0% 19.1% Count % within 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% A5.12 * Crosstabulation

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Cumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate

Cumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate What is your primary job assignment? Full-time Faculty (classroom) Full-time Faculty (non-classroom) 76 77.55 % 76 77.55 % 22 22.45 % 98 100.00 % Where is your primary job assignment? Oceanside Campus

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Engagement Study February 2014

Engagement Study February 2014 Engagement Study February 2014 Our Strategic Plan Identify and understand key constituencies Increase engagement Motivate giving Project Objectives What do they know about us? Understand perceptions of

More information

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school. Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report

F11 Freshman Check-in Summary Report 2. Do you live in a: Response Rate: 99% (N=190) Question Type: Choose one Tag: Q1 Residence Hall (1) 173 9 House / apartment near campus (2) 6 3% House / apartment far from campus (driving required) (3)

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW)

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW) ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW) Program: Recreation Administration Planning Year: 2015-2016 Last Year CPPR Completed: 2015 Unit: Kinesiology, Health Science, and Athletics Cluster: Math, Sciences,

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

Student Senate. mission

Student Senate. mission Student Senate H o l y o k e C o m m u n i t y C o l l e g e 2014-2015 Student Senate mission To serve as the representative voice of the student body, facilitating communication among and between students

More information

U N I V E R S I T Y H O U S T O N S T R A T E G I C P L A N

U N I V E R S I T Y H O U S T O N S T R A T E G I C P L A N DIRECTION U N I V E R S I T Y O F H O U S T O N L A W C E N T E R S T R A T E G I C P L A N The University of Houston Law Center plays an influential role in the development of law and legal institutions.

More information

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

CATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT INTRODUCTION The College s processes related to Planning Continuous Improvement are very mature. JC s key planning processes are aligned. Clear processes are in place for strategic planning and the College

More information

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year?

Q1 What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Q What is your current position or job title for the most recent academic year? Answered: 2 Skipped: / 35 Q2 How many years of experience do you have working in education? Answered: 2 Skipped: - years

More information

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... Overview...

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... Overview... Table of Contents Executive Summary... Overview... iii 1 Delegation of Authority to the Administration... Summary Revenue and Expense by Program... Summary Revenue and Expense by Account... Operating Resources

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE College of Education Educational Leadership and Policy Studies COURSE OUTLINE

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE College of Education Educational Leadership and Policy Studies COURSE OUTLINE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE College of Education Educational Leadership and Policy Studies COURSE OUTLINE ELPS 664 - BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION MICHAEL D.

More information

Chapter 2: Budgeting for a UTeach Program

Chapter 2: Budgeting for a UTeach Program Chapter 2: Budgeting for a UTeach Program In this chapter: Model Budget Implementing a new UTeach program involves creating a new university unit or department-like entity that operates using a combination

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

Annual Budget Report. Charlie Faas VP Administration & Finance/CFO

Annual Budget Report. Charlie Faas VP Administration & Finance/CFO 2018-19 Annual Budget Report Charlie Faas VP Administration & Finance/CFO Facilities Special Year Student Recreation & Aquatic Center (SRAC) Interdisciplinary Science Building (ISB) Mubadala Silicon Valley

More information

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09 Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09 Table of Contents Purpose... 3 Planning Bodies... 4 Consultation

More information

Planning and Assessment Manual. Institutional Research & Effectiveness

Planning and Assessment Manual. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 1 Planning and Assessment Manual Institutional Research & Effectiveness Revised October 2014 By Dr. Paul Fowler Director of Institutional Effectiveness 2 What is Institutional Effectiveness? Institutional

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

2. Allocation of departmental student activity program budgets shall be held each spring semester.

2. Allocation of departmental student activity program budgets shall be held each spring semester. MINNESOTA STATE STUDENT ASSOCIATION STUDENT ALLOCATIONS COMMITTEE GUIDELINES For Distribution of the Student Activity Fees SECTION 1: ANNUAL DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS 1. All amendments or variations

More information

AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND REPORT

AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND REPORT AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND REPORT December 2013 Prepared by The University of Texas System Office of the Controller Report to the Legislature and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to Available University

More information

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan Please direct inquiries to: Dr. Demond Means, Superintendent (262) 238-8502 dmeans@mtsd.k12.wi.us FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 29, 2012 Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative MEQUON,

More information

Sponsored Student Organization Agreement Instructions

Sponsored Student Organization Agreement Instructions Sponsored Student Organization Agreement Instructions Attached to these instructions is the Sponsored Student Organization (SSO) Agreement. These instructions are being provided for informational purposes

More information

Biennium Open Budget Forum April 2009

Biennium Open Budget Forum April 2009 2009-11 Biennium Open Budget Forum April 2009 Table of Contents Eastern Washington University Open Budget Forum April 2009 Comparison of Governor, House, & Senate Proposals.. A-1 A-4 Biennial Budget Proposals

More information

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees 1. The term "services and activities fees" or S&A fees is defined to mean fees, other than tuition

More information

TOMORROW'S PROMISE THE COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY

TOMORROW'S PROMISE THE COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY F A M U D I V I S I O N O F U N I V E R S I T Y A D V A N C E M E N T TOMORROW'S PROMISE THE COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL CAMPAIGN FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY 1 C O M P R E H E N S I V E C A P I T A L C A M P

More information

College Finance Department Program Review and Strategic Plan

College Finance Department Program Review and Strategic Plan College Finance Department Program Review and Strategic Plan 2017-2022 Lane Community College Table of Contents Department Overview... 1 Guiding Principles and Mission... 2 Staffing and Structure... 3

More information

BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS

BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS 3 November 2017 The State of Illinois recent budget impasse ended in July 2017. Allocations

More information

Welcome to the Spring 2018 Budget Forum! Hosted by the President s Budget Advisory Committee

Welcome to the Spring 2018 Budget Forum! Hosted by the President s Budget Advisory Committee Welcome to the Spring 2018 Budget Forum! Hosted by the President s Budget Advisory Committee Campus Budget Spring 2018 Budget Forum Sonoma State University March 13, 2018 Budget Basics About My Unit Laura

More information

San Jose State University Masters in Public Administration Spring 2018 PADM 218: Public Budgeting 6:00 pm to 8:45 pm Thursday Evenings

San Jose State University Masters in Public Administration Spring 2018 PADM 218: Public Budgeting 6:00 pm to 8:45 pm Thursday Evenings San Jose State University Masters in Public Administration Spring 2018 PADM 218: Public Budgeting 6:00 pm to 8:45 pm Thursday Evenings Instructor: Fred Keeley FrederickKeeley2016@gmail.com 831 227 7906

More information

A M e s s a g e f r o m t h e I n t e r G r e e k C o u n c i l E x e c u t i v e B o a r d

A M e s s a g e f r o m t h e I n t e r G r e e k C o u n c i l E x e c u t i v e B o a r d The Archigos Volume 1, Issue 1 April 2012 The Offical Newsletter of the Columbia University InterGreek Council Office of Fraternity and Sorority Life Lerner 515 Associate Director: Victoria Lopez Herrera

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

OPERATING BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR

OPERATING BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR OPERATING BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 FY 2018 BUDGET DOCUMENTS A. The FY 2018 Education and General Budget Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. General Budget Priorities 1 3. Revenue Assumptions 1 4. Planned

More information

College Dean Budget System Survey Fisher College of Business

College Dean Budget System Survey Fisher College of Business Introduction and Background College Dean Budget System Survey Fisher College of Business This survey is being distributed by the Provost s Budget System Advisory Committee to all college deans to obtain

More information

Introduction. The Assessment consists of: A checklist of best, good and leading practices A rating system to rank your company s current practices.

Introduction. The Assessment consists of: A checklist of best, good and leading practices A rating system to rank your company s current practices. ESG / CSR / Sustainability Governance and Management Assessment By Coro Strandberg President, Strandberg Consulting www.corostrandberg.com September 2017 Introduction This ESG / CSR / Sustainability Governance

More information

VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System

VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System Board Approved: September 19, 2017 Vision 2020 is the School District of Lee County

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

Transition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017

Transition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017 Transition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017 In December 2016, the Commissioner of Higher Education sent a memorandum to the campus and the Board of Regents discussing a transition plan

More information

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees 1. The term "services and activities fees" or S&A fees is defined to mean fees, other than tuition

More information

Report to the Legislature and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to Available University Fund Appropriation SB 1, 85 th Legislature, Regular Session,

Report to the Legislature and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to Available University Fund Appropriation SB 1, 85 th Legislature, Regular Session, AVAILABLE UNIVERSITY FUND REPORT December 2017 Prepared by The University of Texas System Office of the Controller Report to the Legislature and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to Available University

More information

DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Re: Dear Colleagues, The budget planning process for 2019-20 marks a point of inflection for our financial

More information

FY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010)

FY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010) Approved by Chancellor Spakes May 11, 2010 FY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010) INTRODUCTION Taking into account a constrained resource environment, the FY 2011 budget recommendation supports the mission of the

More information

Budget Development Update. December 18, 2018

Budget Development Update. December 18, 2018 Budget Development Update December 18, 2018 The mission of the Burlington School District is to graduate students who: Value different cultures Engage with the community Communicate effectively Think creatively

More information

USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process

USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process University budget strategy, planning and development should be led by the Provost to assure that the budget reflects USF s strategic priorities The President

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus: O

More information

SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION FUND

SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION FUND SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION FUND JUNE 30, 2013 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Independent Auditors Report and Financial Statements Independent Auditors' Report 1-2 Financial Statements:

More information

University Program Resource

University Program Resource University Program Resource A GUIDE FOR UNIVERSITY ACTUARIAL PROGRAMS Access the digital version of this guide at UniversityProgramResourceGuide.SOA.org. Contents 3 Welcome! 4 Who Can Benefit from This

More information

Review (FY13-18) & Projection (FY19-23)

Review (FY13-18) & Projection (FY19-23) KU Lawrence Budget Town Hall: Review (FY13-18) & Projection (FY19-23) Carl W Lejuez Interim Provost 6/6/18 What is Included in our Budget Base funding of $350-$450M - This number is based on revenue we

More information

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM Administration Building June 8, 2016 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Budget Information Presentation Budget Forum Next Steps Budget Planning Calendar October 28

More information

PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND STUDENT LEARNING

PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND STUDENT LEARNING Community College of Allegheny County PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND STUDENT LEARNING Prepared by: Office of Planning & Institutional Research Office of Learning Outcomes & Achieving

More information

Division of Human Resources

Division of Human Resources B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t Division of Human Resources Chief Administrator for Human Resources Employee & Labor Relations ADA Compliance Labor

More information

Virginia Retirement System

Virginia Retirement System Virginia Retirement System Our Vision To be the trusted leader in the delivery of benefits and services to those we serve. Our Core Values Act with Integrity as we perform our role and represent VRS. Display

More information

STRATEGIC PLAN CORE DOCUMENT

STRATEGIC PLAN CORE DOCUMENT ANNEX TWO (Initiatives) TO STRATEGIC PLAN CORE DOCUMENT 2011-2016 2016 New Mexico Military Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview... 3 Proposal/Worksheet... 4 Initiative Assessment Cycle... 11 Record of

More information

Strategic Asset Planning Guide

Strategic Asset Planning Guide Strategic Asset Planning Guide Purpose The purpose of this document is to give the members of the university community tasked with multiyear budgetary planning, implementation, assessment, and/or oversight

More information

Diversity & Inclusion/EEO/Affirmative Action-What s the difference? [shift in orientation] Equal Employment Opportunity focuses on freedom from

Diversity & Inclusion/EEO/Affirmative Action-What s the difference? [shift in orientation] Equal Employment Opportunity focuses on freedom from Diversity & Inclusion/EEO/Affirmative Action-What s the difference? [shift in orientation] Equal Employment Opportunity focuses on freedom from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, religion, national

More information

CITY OF VILLA PARK The Hidden Jewel

CITY OF VILLA PARK The Hidden Jewel CITY OF VILLA PARK The Hidden Jewel 2017 2022 STRATEGIC PLAN December 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 2 Importance of Strategic Planning to the City of Villa Park.... 3 Executive Summary.. 4 Foundation

More information

Five-Year Financial Plan (FY2019 FY 2023) 02/23/18

Five-Year Financial Plan (FY2019 FY 2023) 02/23/18 Five-Year Financial Plan (FY2019 FY 2023) 02/23/18 Renewing Our Vow to the Commonwealth Six years ago, we committed to a bold vision for UK- rebuild our campus, grow funds, support faculty and staff, and

More information

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended March 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Financial Statement Discussion and Analysis 1 Statement of Management Responsibility 8 Independent Auditor's Report

More information

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... Overview...

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... Overview... Table of Contents Executive Summary... Overview... iii 1 Delegation of Authority to the Administration... Summary Revenue and Expense by Program... Summary Revenue and Expense by Account... Operating Resources

More information

Gov s Proposed Budget

Gov s Proposed Budget May 10, 2012 Gov s Proposed 2012-13 Budget Jan 05, 2012 Addressed $9.2b budget deficit Depends on successful November 2012 initiative on temporary tax increases No change to CSU budget if initiative passes

More information

FI 8200: DERIVATIVE MARKETS (Spring 2018)

FI 8200: DERIVATIVE MARKETS (Spring 2018) FI 8200: DERIVATIVE MARKETS (Spring 2018) Class Information: Instructor Information: 5:30-9:45 pm Wednesday; Room 1215 Buckhead Center (January 10 through April 18; every other Wednesday) Professor Gerald

More information

STUDENT UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT LEHIGH UNIVERSITY SANCTIONED PROGRAMS ABROAD

STUDENT UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT LEHIGH UNIVERSITY SANCTIONED PROGRAMS ABROAD STUDENT UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT LEHIGH UNIVERSITY SANCTIONED PROGRAMS ABROAD This Student Understanding and Agreement (the Agreement ) is a legally binding contract between Lehigh University (referred

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel. California State University Channel Islands Katharine Hullinger, ARM Risk Management November 17, 2016

Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel. California State University Channel Islands Katharine Hullinger, ARM Risk Management November 17, 2016 Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel California State University Channel Islands Katharine Hullinger, ARM Risk Management November 17, 2016 1 Executive Orders and Technical Letters Tech. Letter RM 2012-02

More information

What Is Budgeting? Making Decisions that Distribute Resources to Enable Actions. Dr. Richard L. Brown, Jr. Executive Vice Chancellor

What Is Budgeting? Making Decisions that Distribute Resources to Enable Actions. Dr. Richard L. Brown, Jr. Executive Vice Chancellor What Is Budgeting? Making Decisions that Distribute Resources to Enable Actions Dr. Richard L. Brown, Jr. Executive Vice Chancellor The Budget The budget is the device by which an organization: Carries

More information

Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel

Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel Finance 101 Risk Management in Travel California State University Channel Islands Katharine Hullinger, ARM Risk Management November 17, 2015 1 Executive Orders and Technical Letters Tech. Letter RM 2012-02

More information

President: John Miller

President: John Miller President: John Miller Phone: (484) 643-8863 E-Mail: jzm5886@psu.edu Website: www.psuactsci.com Actuarial Science Club Strategic Plan 1 Introduction The Penn State Actuarial Science Program was established

More information

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model Philosophy and guiding principles Why did NKU need a new budget model? Internal and external factors pointed to the need for a more flexible,

More information

OFFICE OF XYZ. Endowment 101

OFFICE OF XYZ. Endowment 101 OFFICE OF XYZ Endowment 101 [An endowment] is purposed to concentrate on obtaining an impregnable financial backing as the surest guaranty, not only for permanency, but for the highest grade of work as

More information

UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result

UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result UIC Postdoc Association Annual Survey 2013 Total submissions: 34 Status: result 1. What is your gender? Male 44% 15 Female 56% 19 2. What is your age? 25-29 18% 6 30-34 47% 16 35-39 18% 6 40 or older 18%

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees 1. The term "services and activities fees" or S&A fees is defined to mean fees, other than tuition

More information

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017 A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2017 Contents Page Independent Auditors Report... 1-3 Management s Discussion And Analysis... 4-19 Financial Statements Statement

More information

In fiscal year (FY) , the general fund base budgets by department were as follows:

In fiscal year (FY) , the general fund base budgets by department were as follows: 1.6 Fiscal Resources. The school shall have financial resources adequate to fulfill its stated mission and goals, and its instructional, research and service objectives. a. Description of the budgetary

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS ASB INTRODUCTION... 2 ARTICLE I PURPOSE... 2 ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 ARTICLE 3 FUND MANAGEMENT...

TABLE OF CONTENTS ASB INTRODUCTION... 2 ARTICLE I PURPOSE... 2 ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 ARTICLE 3 FUND MANAGEMENT... FINANCIAL CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS ASB INTRODUCTION... 2 ARTICLE I PURPOSE... 2 ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 ARTICLE 3 FUND MANAGEMENT... 3 OBJECTIVE...3 USE OF FUNDS*...3 SECTION 3. LIMITATIONS*...4 SECTION

More information

THE KATIE SCHOOL. History of

THE KATIE SCHOOL. History of History of THE KATIE SCHOOL The Katie School of Insurance and Financial Services was established in 1991 as a living memorial to Mary Katherine "Katie", the daughter of an Illinois State University alumnus,

More information

Budget Development Update. January 8, 2019

Budget Development Update. January 8, 2019 Budget Development Update January 8, 2019 The mission of the Burlington School District is to graduate students who: Value different cultures Engage with the community Communicate effectively Think creatively

More information

BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS University Administrators Forum February 6, 2013

BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS University Administrators Forum February 6, 2013 DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS University Administrators Forum February 6, 2013 North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Presentation Outline Budget Overview

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER STATE BIENNIAL BUDGET CYCLE OFM issues budget instructions EVEN YEARS JUN EWU BIENNIAL BUDGET CYCLE ONGOING Agency Strategic Planning Agencies submit budget

More information

2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report

2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report 2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report Office of Institutional Effectiveness College of Coastal Georgia October 2018 A s s e s s m e n t N e e d s S u r v e y & I n

More information

Message from the Chief Financial Officer

Message from the Chief Financial Officer Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2003 Message from the Chief Financial Officer Founded in 1881, the University of Connecticut serves as the state s flagship for higher education, meeting the

More information