SPDG/SSIP TA Alignment, Implementation & Evaluation

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "SPDG/SSIP TA Alignment, Implementation & Evaluation"

Malcolm Beasley
6 years ago
Views:

1 SPDG/SSIP TA Alignment, Implementation & Evaluation Pat Mueller & Arlene Russell Evergreen Evaluation & Consulting, Inc. SPDG National Meeting October 5, 2017

2 O B J E C T I V E S O F T H E S E S S I O N Describe the strategies that Vermont has used to align the implementation and evaluation of their Part B SSIP and SPDG. Provide an overview of an Evaluation Package that aligns the Theory of Action, Logic Model, Evaluation & Data Collection Plan, and Implementation Plan. Discuss considerations for alignment of data collection across initiatives (SSIP, SPDG, SWIFT).

3 S T A T E C O N T E X T : A L I G N M E N T O F S P D G S S I P S W I F T SiMR is Improving math proficiency for students with ED in grades 3,4 and 5. SPDG focus is MTSS literacy, math & behavior K-8 Structures for PD delivery at state and local level Consistent application of implementation science for SSIP, SPDG & SWIFT Systems Coaching as Technical Assistance Delivery Model

4 S T A T E I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O N S I D E R A T I O N S Variance in data collection across sites (SPDG, SSIP, SWIFT) Multiple evidence-based practices being implemented at sites SPDG MTSS Implementation Rubrics, Data-to-Action Plan, Math Edcamp, PBIS, Literacy through Vermont Reads SSIP Math Edcamp, CLASS observation, Traumainformed environments SWIFT SWIFT specific tools (e.g., FIT)

EVALUATION ALIGNMENT: SSIP & SPDG SSIP Logic model uses language from MTSS Field Guide (SPDG) VERMONT S STATEIDENTIFIED MEASURABLERESULT(SIMR) To improve profi ciency of math performance for students

5 EVALUATION ALIGNMENT: SSIP & SPDG SSIP Logic model uses language from MTSS Field Guide (SPDG) VERMONT S STATEIDENTIFIED MEASURABLERESULT(SIMR) To improve profi ciency of math performance for students identified as having an emotional disturbance in grades 3, 4, and 5. VERMONTSSIP EVALUATION AND REPORTINGPLAN DRAFT SCHOOL PERSONNEL KNOWLEDGEOUTCOMES Which Logic Model Outcome? School personnel w ho are responsible for providing math instruction are know ledgeable about 8 Math Teaching Practices. [Short-term] School personnel are know ledgeable about evidenced based practices (EBP) and a culture of learning and high expectations for each and every student. [Short-term] Y2: 2017/18 School Year Y3: 2018/2019 School Year Which Performance Measure? (a) 100% school personnel responsible for providing math instruction report increased know ledge in 8 Math Teaching Principles. What Data Source(s)? Who Has? Reporting Timeline? A dmin Interview s/listening Tour EEC/M ath Y2Q1 PL pre/post evaluation survey EEC/A OE Y2Q2/Q4 SSIP School LT Interview s EEC/A OE Y3Q1 (b) 100% of school personnel report increased know ledge of effective implementation of effective PBIS Principles. PBIS Self-A ssessment Survey School based TFI PBIS/A OE Y2Q1 (c) 100% of personnel in schools participating in PL on Trauma Sensitive Environments report increased know ledge. PL pre/post evaluation survey Support completion survey EEC/TSE Consultant TSE Consultant Y2Q2/Q4 1 Pa g e Q1: A ug/sept/oct Q3: Feb/M ar/a pr Q2: N ov/dec/jan Q4: M ay/june/july SSIP Evaluation & Data Collection Plan includes data sources used in SPDG and SWIFT

E V A L U A T I O N P A C K A G E www.eecvt.

6 E V A L U A T I O N P A C K A G E About Us Selected Presentations VT SSIP Evaluation Package

7 D A T A C O L L E C T I O N I N S T R U M E N T S : S T R E A M L I N I N G & C O N S I D E R A T I O N S Common instruments for data collection PD Session Evaluation Survey Items: Pre/Post Knowledge Assessment PBIS Instruments/Resources: Self Assessments, Fidelity Inventory MTSS Resources: Data2Action Plans

8 DATA C O L L E C T I O N : S T R E A M L I N I N G & C O N S I D E R A T I O N S Needs for unique data collection methods Balancing needs with amount of data collection activities Making multiple requests for input from the same stakeholders Potential for describing a total picture of improvement at state level

9 D I S C U S S I O N Q U E S T I O N S Are you aligning your SPDG with other initiatives? If so, which ones? What does the alignment look like? Do you use evaluation information collected to inform other initiatives? If so, how and with what effect?

10 C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N Pat Mueller: pat@eecvt.com Arlene Russell: arlene@eecvt.com PPT and Evaluation Package are located at: About Us: Selected Presentations

323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding

323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office of Special Education Programs US Department of Education Washington, DC