Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences"

Transcription

1 Frequency Distributions August 2010

2 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical first-year student or senior they have taught during the current academic year. This option is valuable for institutions that desire to have faculty estimate first-year or senior levels of engagement across all their courses, rather than one particular course. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all faculty respondents at your institution who reported that they teach mostly first-year or senior students. who reported teaching mostly other types of students or who did not report the class level of students taught are not included in this report. Survey Items The items from the FSSE typical-student survey option appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Class Level Frequency distributions are reported separately for faculty who teach mostly first-year students and those who teach mostly seniors. Variable Names The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your data file and the FSSE-NSSE Combined Report. FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions NSSEville State University Count The 'Count' column represents the actual number of faculty who selected a particular response for each item. Response Categories Column Percentage (%) Response options are This column represents listed just as they the percentage of faculty appear on the responding to the instrument. particular option for each item.

3 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 27 4% 20 4% 47 4% clinical assignment Somewhat important % 69 15% % Important % % % Very important % % % % % % b. Community service or volunteer work FVOLUNTR Not important 75 11% 48 10% % Somewhat important % % % Important % % % Very important % % % % % % c. Participation in a learning community or some other formal FLERNCOM Not important % % % program where groups of students take two or more classes Somewhat important % % % together Important % % % Very important 98 14% 76 17% % % % % d. Work on a research project with a faculty FIMPR05 Not important 66 9% 45 10% % member outside of course or program requirements Somewhat important % % % Important % % % Very important % % % % % % e. Foreign language coursework FFORLANG Not important 33 5% 21 5% 54 5% Somewhat important % % % Important % % % Very important % % % % % % f. Study abroad FSTUDYAB Not important 54 8% 40 9% 94 8% Somewhat important % % % Important % % % Very important % % % % % % 1

4 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? (continued) g. Independent study or self-designed major FINDST06 Not important % % % Somewhat important % % % Important % % % Very important 66 10% 48 10% % % % % h. Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project FSENIOR Not important 19 3% 13 3% 32 3% or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Somewhat important 65 9% 44 9% 109 9% Important % % % Very important % % % % % % Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. Student relationships with other students FENVSTU Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of Alienation 1 0% 1 0% 2 0% 2 2 0% 2 0% 4 0% % 7 2% 23 2% % 31 7% 94 8% % % % % % % Friendly, Supportive, Sense of Belonging % % % % % % 2

5 Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. (continued) Student relationships with faculty members Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices FENVFAC FENVADM Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic 2 0% 2 0% 4 0% 2 5 1% 1 0% 6 1% % 7 2% 25 2% % 29 6% 70 6% % % % % % % Available, Helpful, Sympathetic % % % Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid % % % 11 2% 15 3% 26 2% % 14 3% 40 3% % 43 9% % % % % % % % % % % Helpful, Considerate, Flexible 65 9% 45 10% % % % % To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? a. Requiring students to spend significant amounts FENVSCHO Very little 31 4% 20 4% 51 4% of time studying and on academic work Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % 3

6 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued) b. Providing students the support they need to help FENVSUPR Very little 13 2% 10 2% 23 2% them succeed academically Some % 61 13% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, FENVDIVR Very little 85 12% 54 12% % social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much % 78 17% % % % % d. Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities FENVNACA Very little 73 11% 45 10% % (work, family, etc.) Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 94 14% 55 12% % % % % e. Providing students the support they need FENVSOCA Very little 53 8% 33 7% 86 8% to thrive socially Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 88 13% 53 12% % % % % f. Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities FENVACT Very little 24 3% 15 3% 39 3% (organizations, campus publications, student government, Some % 81 17% % fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % g. Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities FENVEVEN Very little 38 5% 21 5% 59 5% (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % 4

7 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued) h. Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work FENVCOMP Very little 12 2% 6 1% 18 2% Some 89 13% 51 11% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? a. Teaching undergraduate students in class UGTEACH 0 3 0% 0 0% 3 0% % 49 11% 97 8% % 97 21% % % % % % 81 17% % % 27 6% 68 6% % 11 2% 24 2% More than % 2 0% 7 1% % % % b. Grading papers and exams GRADEPAP % 9 2% 30 3% % % % % % % % % % % 43 9% 99 9% % 12 3% 48 4% % 8 2% 16 1% More than % 3 1% 6 1% % % % 5

8 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) c. Giving other forms of written and oral feedback GRADEBCK 0 8 1% 0 0% 8 1% to students % % % % % % % 67 14% % % 31 7% 64 6% % 8 2% 27 2% % 8 2% 12 1% More than % 2 0% 7 1% % % % d. Preparing for class CLASSPRP 0 4 1% 0 0% 4 0% % 61 13% % % % % % % % % 78 17% % % 36 8% 87 7% % 22 5% 44 4% More than % 5 1% 19 2% % % % e. Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching REFLECT % 3 1% 13 1% % % % % 96 21% % % 36 8% 67 6% % 13 3% 27 2% % 8 2% 14 1% % 3 1% 9 1% More than % 9 2% 18 2% % % % 6

9 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) f. Research and scholarly activities SCHOLAR % 41 9% 88 8% % % % % % % % 66 14% % % 23 5% 64 6% % 15 3% 40 3% % 8 2% 18 2% More than % 11 2% 23 2% % % % g. Working with undergraduates on research FRESEARC % % % % % % % 97 21% % % 29 6% 50 4% % 8 2% 21 2% % 5 1% 9 1% % 1 0% 1 0% More than % 1 0% 2 0% % % % h. Advising undergraduate students ADVISE % 39 8% % % % % % % % % 36 8% 78 7% % 13 3% 28 2% % 11 2% 13 1% % 2 0% 7 1% More than % 4 1% 5 0% % % % 7

10 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) i. Supervising internships or other field experiences FIELDEXP % % % % % % % 34 7% 61 5% % 15 3% 27 2% % 6 1% 10 1% % 2 0% 2 0% % 0 0% 1 0% More than % 1 0% 2 0% % % % j. Working with students on activities other than coursework FFACOTHR % % % (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) % % % % 35 8% 77 7% % 12 3% 23 2% % 4 1% 10 1% % 1 0% 3 0% % 3 1% 5 0% More than % 3 1% 9 1% % % % k. Other interactions with students outside of the classroom FINTERAC % 33 7% 90 8% % % % % 82 18% % % 27 6% 59 5% % 11 2% 20 2% % 4 1% 8 1% % 3 1% 5 0% More than % 6 1% 14 1% % % % 8

11 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) l. Conducting service activities SERVICE % % % % % % % 69 15% % % 20 4% 43 4% % 9 2% 17 1% % 4 1% 11 1% % 2 0% 2 0% More than % 0 0% 3 0% % % % In what format do you most often teach? TTEACFOR Classroom, on-campus % % % Classroom, auxiliary location 3 0% 3 1% 6 1% Distance education 1 0% 1 0% 2 0% % % % Please respond to the following two questions based on one particular undergraduate course section you are teaching or have taught during this academic year. What is the general area of your selected course? TCSDISCL Arts and Humanities % % % Biological science 55 8% 29 7% 84 8% Business 15 2% 32 7% 47 4% Education 25 4% 34 8% 59 5% Engineering 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% Physical science % 36 8% % Professional 7 1% 20 5% 27 2% Social science 99 15% 76 17% % Other 42 6% 49 11% 91 8% % % % 9

12 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? a. Lecture LECTURE 0% 27 4% 14 3% 41 4% 1-9% % 59 13% % 10-19% % 69 15% % 20-29% 81 12% 79 17% % 30-39% 79 11% 67 14% % 40-49% 88 13% 76 16% % 50-74% % 72 16% % 75% or more 59 9% 27 6% 86 7% % % % b. Teacher-led discussion TEACHLED 0% 25 4% 3 1% 28 2% 1-9% % 69 15% % 10-19% % % % 20-29% % % % 30-39% 91 13% 83 18% % 40-49% 53 8% 41 9% 94 8% 50-74% 61 9% 36 8% 97 8% 75% or more 26 4% 18 4% 44 4% % % % c. Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, TEACHSTU 0% % 51 11% % etc.) 1-9% % 93 20% % 10-19% % % % 20-29% 98 14% 92 20% % 30-39% 55 8% 58 13% % 40-49% 44 6% 23 5% 67 6% 50-74% 32 5% 25 5% 57 5% 75% or more 32 5% 18 4% 50 4% % % % 10

13 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) d. Student computer use COMPMED 0% % % % 1-9% % % % 10-19% 70 10% 45 10% % 20-29% 29 4% 21 5% 50 4% 30-39% 13 2% 11 2% 24 2% 40-49% 11 2% 8 2% 19 2% 50-74% 8 1% 5 1% 13 1% 75% or more 12 2% 9 2% 21 2% % % % e. Small group activities GROUPSML 0% 91 13% 70 15% % 1-9% % % % 10-19% % % % 20-29% 90 13% 81 18% % 30-39% 62 9% 35 8% 97 8% 40-49% 30 4% 11 2% 41 4% 50-74% 25 4% 10 2% 35 3% 75% or more 18 3% 6 1% 24 2% % % % f. Student presentations STUPRES 0% % 66 14% % 1-9% % % % 10-19% % % % 20-29% 76 11% 66 14% % 30-39% 18 3% 28 6% 46 4% 40-49% 15 2% 8 2% 23 2% 50-74% 14 2% 8 2% 22 2% 75% or more 14 2% 11 2% 25 2% % % % 11

14 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) g. In-class writing CLSWRITE 0% % % % 1-9% % % % 10-19% % 51 11% % 20-29% 36 5% 19 4% 55 5% 30-39% 13 2% 7 2% 20 2% 40-49% 8 1% 3 1% 11 1% 50-74% 3 0% 2 0% 5 0% 75% or more 2 0% 2 0% 4 0% % % % h. Testing and evaluation TESTEVAL 0% 60 9% 50 11% % 1-9% % % % 10-19% % % % 20-29% 51 7% 34 7% 85 7% 30-39% 30 4% 19 4% 49 4% 40-49% 9 1% 4 1% 13 1% 50-74% 3 0% 6 1% 9 1% 75% or more 11 2% 5 1% 16 1% % % % i. Performances in applied and fine arts PERFORM 0% % % % (e.g., dance, drama, music) 1-9% 53 8% 16 4% 69 6% 10-19% 18 3% 15 3% 33 3% 20-29% 10 1% 12 3% 22 2% 30-39% 9 1% 7 2% 16 1% 40-49% 6 1% 6 1% 12 1% 50-74% 9 1% 9 2% 18 2% 75% or more 36 5% 25 6% 61 5% % % % 12

15 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) j. Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.) EXPERIEN 0% % % % Estimate the total number of students you have taught during this current academic year. 1-9% % 76 17% % 10-19% 70 10% 51 11% % 20-29% 57 8% 35 8% 92 8% 30-39% 33 5% 38 8% 71 6% 40-49% 34 5% 25 6% 59 5% 50-74% 27 4% 23 5% 50 4% 75% or more 21 3% 13 3% 34 3% % % % TTSTDCOL 9 or less 32 5% 72 16% 104 9% % % % % % % % % % % 47 10% % 100 or more 72 10% 10 2% 82 7% % % % 13

16 Please respond to the following questions based on the typical students you have taught during this academic year. About how often has the typical student done each of the following? a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions TCLQUEST Never 5 1% 0 0% 5 0% Sometimes % 70 15% % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % b. Made a class presentation TCLPRSNT Never % 41 9% % Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 90 13% % % % % % c. Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before TREWROPA Never % % % turning it in Sometimes % % % Often % 91 20% % Very Often % 75 17% % % % % d. Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or TINTEGRA Never 99 15% 27 6% % information from various sources Sometimes % 70 15% % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % e. Included diverse perspectives (different races, religions, TDIVCLAS Never % 74 16% % genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class discussions or writing Sometimes % % % assignments Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % 14

17 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) f. Come to class without completing readings or assignments TCLUNPRE Never 28 4% 50 11% 78 7% Sometimes % % % Often % 75 16% % Very Often 80 12% 29 6% % % % % g. Worked with other students on projects during class TCLASSGR Never 91 13% 64 14% % Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % h. Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class TOCCGRP Never 71 10% 49 11% % assignments Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % i. Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when TINTIDEA Never % 22 5% % completing assignments or during class discussions Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 31 5% % % % % % j. Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) TTUTOR Never % 96 22% % Sometimes % % % Often 36 5% 70 16% % Very Often 9 1% 25 6% 34 3% % % % k. Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service TCOMMPRO Never % % % learning) as part of a regular course Sometimes % % % Often 57 9% 63 15% % Very Often 27 4% 43 10% 70 6% % % % 15

18 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) l. Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, TITICADE Never % 80 18% % instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % m. Used to communicate with an instructor T Never 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% Sometimes % 46 10% % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % n. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor TGRADE Never 10 1% 6 1% 16 1% Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % o. Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor TPLANS Never 61 9% 8 2% 69 6% Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 84 12% % % % % % p. Discussed ideas from his or her readings or classes with TIDEAS Never 89 13% 23 5% % faculty members outside of class Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 45 7% 70 16% % % % % q. Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on his TFEED Never 4 1% 0 0% 4 0% or her academic performance Sometimes 60 9% 35 8% 95 8% Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % 16

19 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) r. Worked harder than usual to meet an instructor's standards or TWORKHRD Never 14 2% 2 0% 16 1% expectations Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 72 11% 83 19% % % % % s. Worked with faculty members on activities other than TFACOTHR Never % 63 14% % coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, Sometimes % % % etc.) Often 74 11% % % Very Often 21 3% 31 7% 52 5% % % % t. Discussed ideas from his or her readings or classes with others TOOCID05 Never 53 8% 25 6% 78 7% outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, Sometimes % % % etc.) Often % % % Very Often 36 6% 54 13% 90 9% % % % u. Had serious conversations with students of a different race or TDIVRSTU Never 95 15% 50 12% % ethnicity than his or her own Sometimes % % % Often 98 16% 89 21% % Very Often 35 6% 52 12% 87 8% % % % v. Had serious conversations with students who are very different TDIFFSTU Never 85 14% 44 10% % from him or her in terms of their religious beliefs, political Sometimes % % % opinions, or personal values Often % % % Very Often 35 6% 47 11% 82 8% % % % w. Examined the strengths and weaknesses of his or her views on TOWNVIEW Never 62 10% 28 6% 90 8% a topic or issue Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 65 10% 61 14% % % % % 17

20 About how often has the typical student done each of the following? (continued) x. Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining TOTHRVW Never 61 10% 30 7% 91 9% how an issue looks from that person's perspective Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often 58 9% 66 15% % % % % y. Learned something that changed the way he or she understood TCHNGVW Never 12 2% 11 2% 23 2% an issue or concept Sometimes % % % Often % % % Very Often % % % % % % During the current school year, about how much reading and writing do you estimate the typical student has done? a. Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of TREADASG None 10 2% 10 2% 20 2% course readings Between 1 and % % % Between 5 and % % % Between 11 and % % % More than % 31 7% 63 6% % % % b. Number of books read on his or her own (not assigned) for TREADOWN None % 64 16% % personal enjoyment or academic enrichment Between 1 and % % % Between 5 and % 54 13% % Between 11 and % 9 2% 13 1% More than % 2 0% 2 0% % % % c. Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more TWRTMR05 None % 89 20% % Between 1 and % % % Between 5 and % 39 9% 61 6% Between 11 and % 6 1% 10 1% More than % 5 1% 8 1% % % % 18

21 During the current school year, about how much reading and writing do you estimate the typical student has done? (continued) d. Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages TWRTMD05 None 67 10% 28 6% 95 9% Between 1 and % % % Between 5 and % % % Between 11 and % 54 12% % More than % 9 2% 16 1% % % % e. Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages TWRITSML None 35 5% 26 6% 61 6% Between 1 and % % % Between 5 and % % % Between 11 and % 95 22% % More than % 39 9% 88 8% % % % In a typical week, how many homework problem sets does the typical student complete? a. Number of problem sets that take the typical student more TPROBSTA None 69 12% 79 20% % than one hour to complete % % % % % % % 33 8% 78 8% More than % 32 8% 88 9% % % % b. Number of problem sets that take the typical student less than TPROBSTB None 91 16% 86 21% % one hour to complete % % % % 97 24% % % 38 9% % More than % 36 9% % % % % 19

22 About how many hours do you think the typical student should spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing TEXPREP 0 2 0% 0 0% 2 0% homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other % 23 5% 77 7% academic activities) % 64 15% % % 68 15% % % % % % 82 19% % % 56 13% % More than % 48 11% % % % % b. Working for pay on campus TEXWRKON % 31 7% 75 7% % 88 20% % % % % % 66 15% % % 32 7% 65 6% % 5 1% 7 1% % 1 0% 2 0% More than % 1 0% 3 0% % % % c. Working for pay off campus TEXWRKOF % % % % 95 22% % % % % % 40 9% 89 8% % 36 8% 62 6% % 2 0% 5 0% % 5 1% 7 1% More than % 2 0% 4 0% % % % 20

23 About how many hours do you think the typical student should spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions d. Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus TEXCOCUR 0 6 1% 4 1% 10 1% publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, % % % intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) % % % % 73 17% % % 14 3% 35 3% % 1 0% 6 1% % 0 0% 2 0% More than % 1 0% 2 0% % % % e. Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) TEXSOCIA 0 4 1% 4 1% 8 1% % 91 21% % % % % % % % % 27 6% 81 8% % 9 2% 24 2% % 2 0% 8 1% More than % 2 0% 11 1% % % % f. Providing care for dependents living with him or her (parents, TEXCARED % % % children, spouse, etc.) % % % % 54 13% % % 19 5% 46 5% % 10 2% 22 2% % 7 2% 13 1% % 3 1% 4 0% More than % 2 0% 5 0% % % % 21

24 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions g. Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) TEXCOMMU % 72 17% % % % % % 29 7% 63 6% % 4 1% 9 1% % 1 0% 2 0% % 0 0% 1 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % a. Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing TACTPREP 0 3 0% 1 0% 4 0% homework or lab work, analyzing data, rehearsing, and other % 78 18% % academic activities) % % % % % % % 48 11% % % 25 6% 50 5% % 12 3% 28 3% More than % 12 3% 22 2% % % % b. Working for pay on campus TACTWKON % 21 5% 45 4% % 87 21% % % % % % 75 18% % % 37 9% 78 7% % 8 2% 11 1% % 2 0% 4 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % 22

25 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions c. Working for pay off campus TACTWKOF % 75 18% % % 67 16% % % 92 22% % % 73 18% % % 71 17% % % 17 4% 33 3% % 14 3% 22 2% More than % 6 1% 10 1% % % % d. Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus TACTCOCU % 8 2% 19 2% publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, % 98 23% % intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) % % % % 98 23% % % 72 17% % % 27 6% 59 6% % 2 0% 12 1% More than % 3 1% 9 1% % % % e. Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) TACTSOCI 0 1 0% 2 0% 3 0% % 15 4% 44 4% % 87 21% % % % % % % % % 39 9% % % 20 5% 62 6% More than % 25 6% 73 7% % % % 23

26 About how many hours do you think the typical student actually spends in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions f. Providing care for dependents living with him or her (parents, TACTCARE % % % children, spouse, etc.) % % % % 36 9% 75 7% % 20 5% 35 3% % 9 2% 16 2% % 1 0% 5 0% % 3 1% 7 1% More than % 3 1% 4 0% % % % g. Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.) TACTCOMM % 69 17% % Select the response that represents the extent to which the typical student's examinations have challenged that student to do his or her best work % % % % 49 12% 91 9% % 7 2% 19 2% % 6 1% 6 1% % 0 0% 2 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % TEXAMS Very Little 6 1% 8 2% 14 1% % 6 1% 20 2% % 22 5% 59 5% % 74 17% % % % % % % % Very much 52 8% 46 11% 98 9% % % % 24

27 During the current school year, how much do you believe the typical student's coursework has emphasized the following mental activities? a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from his or her courses TMEMORIZ Very little 38 6% 58 14% 96 9% and readings so he or she can repeat them pretty much in the Some % % % same form Quite a bit % % % Very much 95 15% 43 10% % % % % b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, TANALYZE Very little 11 2% 5 1% 16 1% such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and Some % 48 11% % considering its components Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, TSYNTHES Very little 40 6% 8 2% 48 5% or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and Some % 59 14% % relationships Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % d. Making judgments about the value of information, TEVALUAT Very little 52 8% 9 2% 61 6% arguments, or methods such as examining how others gathered Some % 73 17% % and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their Quite a bit % % % conclusions Very much % % % % % % e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new TAPPLYIN Very little 53 8% 9 2% 62 6% situations Some % 70 16% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % 25

28 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? a. Writing clearly and effectively TGNWRITE Very little 30 5% 5 1% 35 3% Some % 78 18% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % b. Speaking clearly and effectively TGNSPEAK Very little 41 6% 7 2% 48 5% Some % 69 16% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % c. Thinking critically and analytically TGNANALY Very little 23 4% 5 1% 28 3% Some % 62 15% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % d. Analyzing quantitative problems TGNQUANT Very little 59 10% 30 7% 89 9% Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 60 10% 83 20% % % % % e. Using computing and information technology TGNCMPTS Very little 34 5% 13 3% 47 4% Some % 94 22% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % f. Working effectively with others TGNOTHER Very little 24 4% 5 1% 29 3% Some % 52 12% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % 26

29 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (cont.) g. Learning effectively on his or her own TGNINQ Very little 39 6% 9 2% 48 5% Some % 86 20% % Quite a bit % % % Very much 94 15% % % % % % h. Understanding himself or herself TGNSELF Very little 37 6% 12 3% 49 5% Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 89 14% % % % % % i. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds TGNDIVER Very little 97 16% 48 11% % Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 62 10% 58 14% % % % % j. Solving complex real-world problems TGNPROBS Very little % 28 7% % Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 36 6% 46 11% 82 8% % % % k. Developing a personal code of values and ethics TGNETHIC Very little 58 9% 28 7% 86 8% Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 64 10% 69 17% % % % % l. Developing a deepened sense of spirituality TGNSPIRI Very little % % % Some % % % Quite a bit 96 16% 74 18% % Very much 32 5% 36 9% 68 7% % % % 27

30 To what extent has the typical student's experience at this institution contributed to his or her knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (cont.) m. Acquiring a broad general education TGNGENLE Very little 21 3% 9 2% 30 3% Some % 59 14% % Quite a bit % % % Very much % % % % % % n. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills TGNWORK Very little 71 11% 17 4% 88 8% Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 55 9% 81 19% % % % % o. Voting in local, state, or national elections TGNCITZN Very little % 89 22% % Some % % % Quite a bit 75 12% % % Very much 21 3% 29 7% 50 5% % % % p. Contributing to the welfare of his or her community TGNCOMMU Very little % 40 10% % Some % % % Quite a bit % % % Very much 29 5% 51 12% 80 8% % % % 28

31 FSSE 2010 Frequency Distributions What is the general discipline of your academic appointment? (Please specify an academic discipline) APDISCOL Arts and humanities % % % Biological science 46 8% 25 6% 71 7% Business 15 3% 29 7% 44 4% Education 23 4% 34 9% 57 6% Engineering 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% Physical science 95 16% 32 8% % Professional 7 1% 16 4% 23 2% Social science 86 15% 69 17% % Other 40 7% 44 11% 84 9% % % % IPEDS:

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school. Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community,

June 27, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, Dear Members of The Joseph Sears School Community, June 27, 2017 The 2017 School Climate Survey was issued to parents in May as a means of monitoring school climate and systematically collecting parent

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 1 Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 2 Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics at Youngstown State University 150 undergraduate mathematics/mathematics

More information

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement.

Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Student Goals - For further information, please refer to the South Seattle Community College Mission Statement. Day Evening Day Evening Day Evening Day/Evening Student 66% 34% 71% 29% 63% 37% Yes No Yes

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16 Course Syllabus BUSI 1307 Personal Finace Revision Date: 10/17/16 Catalog Description: Personal and family accounts, budgets and budgetary control, bank accounts, charge accounts, borrowing, investing,

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSM Type of study Full Time

More information

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications.

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Management Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACMA Type of study Full

More information

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Senior Scheduling Today, we are going to discuss your senior course selections. Some reminders when you get your verification card. Not all classes in the course

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages: PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSC Type of study Full Time

More information

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes

SAMPLE. FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3. Course Description and Outcomes FIN350: Principles of Finance for the Public Sector Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 8 weeks.

More information

Actuarial Control Cycle A1

Actuarial Control Cycle A1 ACST4031 Actuarial Control Cycle A1 The aim of the Actuarial Control Cycle is to provide students with an understanding of underlying actuarial principles that may be applied to a range of problems and

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE SYLLABUS: AGEC 600 -- AGRICULTURAL FINANCE Professor: Timothy G. Baker, 590 Krannert -- Office: 494-4237 Cell: 714-0426 E-mail: baker@purdue.edu Secretary: Linda Klotz. Krannert 565. E-mail: lrklotz@purdue.edu

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Fall 2016 COURSE: FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 383 Investment

More information

University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science

University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Minor In Actuarial Science Prepared primarily by Kathy Zhong February, 2011 A. Summary Actuarial

More information

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am

ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am ACT3230 A01 Actuarial Models 2 Winter 2019 Drake Centre 115, TR 10:00 am 11:15 am CONTENTS INSTRUCTOR... 1 COURSE DESCRIPTION... 1 COURSE OBJECTIVES... 1 COURSE MATERIALS... 2 COURSE FORMAT... Error! Bookmark

More information

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year Award BSc (Hons) School Cass Business School Department or equivalent UG Programme (Cass

More information

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 9 criteria evaluated: Students Program educational objectives Program

More information

Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum

Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum Master of Science in Finance (MSF) Curriculum Courses By Semester Foundations Course Work During August (assigned as needed; these are in addition to required credits) FIN 510 Introduction to Finance (2)

More information

COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN

COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN WACO, TEXAS COURSE SYLLABUS AND INSTRUCTOR PLAN Principle of Managerial Accounting ANNETTE BIGHAM SPRING 2011 Course Description: Emphasizes managerial use of and decision making with accounting data.

More information

Southern Utah University

Southern Utah University Selected Comparison Groups August 2009 Reviewing Your Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In

More information

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW)

ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW) ANNUAL PROGRAM PLANNING WORKSHEET (APPW) Program: Recreation Administration Planning Year: 2015-2016 Last Year CPPR Completed: 2015 Unit: Kinesiology, Health Science, and Athletics Cluster: Math, Sciences,

More information