Report to Committee of the Whole September 23, 2013

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Report to Committee of the Whole September 23, 2013"

Transcription

1 Report to Committee of the Whole September 23, 2013 SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: EQAO 2013 Primary and Junior Divisions Assessment Results This report was prepared by Mary Lou Mackie, Executive Superintendent of Education and Mark Harper, Superintendent of Learning Services, in consultation with Executive Committee. PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to share the results of the Primary and Junior Divisions Provincial Assessments conducted in May/June BACKGROUND: The Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) is an arm s-length agency of the Ministry of Education. The EQAO mandate is to conduct large-scale assessments, to report findings in an objective way and to recommend strategies at the provincial level that can lead to improved student achievement. During May/June 2013, there were over participants in Grades 3 and 6 across the province during the EQAO assessments of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. In our Board, there were 4203 Grade 3 students and 4225 Grade 6 students. Individual Student Reports (ISRs) are being made available to schools during the week of September 23, 2013 and will be sent home with students. These reports show the student s achievement in relation to the provincial standard, as identified in the Ontario Curriculum. The reports for students in Grade 6 also show their achievement results on the primary division assessment (Grade 3), if they wrote it in Individual student reports also include summaries of the school, board and provincial results. Provincial test questions change each year. To allow for historical comparisons, EQAO applies statistical measures to each year s Grade 3 and Grade 6 assessment results, prior to their release STATUS: EQAO publicly released provincial, board, and school-level results on September 18, Student Participation The following chart identifies the participation rates for the Primary (Grade 3) and Junior (Grade 6) assessments. Participation rates are the percentage of students who took part in the assessment. Our Board has maintained the increases in participation rates over the last five years, most notably for students with Special Education needs (where average increases in participation rates across five years are 5 to 6 percent in Reading, 5 to 6 percent in Writing, and 5 to 7 percent in Mathematics), and English Language Learners (with average five-year increases of 3 to 6 percent in Reading, 2 to 7 percent in Writing, and 6 to 7 percent in Mathematics). Participation Rates Primary (Grade 3) Junior (Grade 6) Reading Writing Mathematics Reading Writing Mathematics WRDSB 95% 95% 95% 96% 96% 96% Province 97% 97% 97% 98% 98% 97% - 1 -

2 Participation Rates Over Time Percentage of Grade 3 Students Who Participated in the Assessment: Comparing Student Participation from 2009 to % 94% 94% 94% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 94% 95% 94% 95% 95% 75% 50% 25% 0% Reading Writing Math WRDSB 2009 WRDSB 2010 WRDSB 2011 WRDSB 2012 WRDSB 2013 Percentage of Grade 6 Students Who Participated in the Assessment: Comparing Student Participation from % 94% 95% 95% 95% 96% 95% 95% 95% 96% 96% 94% 95% 95% 95% 96% 75% 50% 25% 0% Reading Writing Math WRDSB 2009 WRDSB 2010 WRDSB 2011 WRDSB 2012 WRDSB 2013 Student Achievement The Waterloo Region District School Board has maintained the previous increases in both Primary and Junior Reading and Writing, within one percentage point increase or decrease in these areas as compared to last year s results. Consistent with provincial results, gains were not seen in Mathematics achievement. Students in both Grade 3 and Grade 6 experienced a decline of 3 and 2 percentage points respectively in the 2013 assessments. The chart below summarizes the meaning of the levels used to describe student achievement. Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 The student has demonstrated all or almost all of the required knowledge and skills, and the student s achievement exceeds the provincial standard. The student has demonstrated most of the required knowledge and skills, and the student s achievement meets the provincial standard. The student has demonstrated some of the required knowledge and skills, and the student s achievement approaches the provincial standard. The student has demonstrated some of the required knowledge and skills in limited ways, and the student s achievement falls much below the provincial standard

3 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage of Grade 3 Students Achieving at Levels 3, 4: Comparing Student Performance from 2009 to % 61% 61% 57% 58% 66% 68% 69% 68% 65% 64% 66% 65% 62% 59% Reading Writing Math WRDSB 2009 WRDSB 2010 WRDSB 2011 WRDSB 2012 WRDSB % 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage of Grade 6 Students Achieving at Levels 3, 4: Comparing Student Performance from 2009 to % 74% 75% 69% 71% 72% 73% 72% 66% 67% 63% 59% 58% 55% 53% Reading Writing Math WRDSB 2009 WRDSB 2010 WRDSB 2011 WRDSB 2012 WRDSB % 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage of Grade 3 Students Achieving at Level 3 or 4 77% 68% 68% 67% 61% 59% Reading Writing Math Province WRDSB 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage of Grade 6 Students Achieving at Level 3 or 4 77% 75% 76% 72% 57% 53% Reading Writing Math Province WRDSB Contextual information used in interpreting the Board s achievement results over time is included in Appendix A. Each school has received a copy of its overall results. Administrators and teaching staff are interpreting these school results and will share the results with their communities. A summary of individual school data is provided in

4 EQAO Assessment Data for Specified Groups Results from EQAO Primary and Junior assessments for 2013 indicate gains in the achievement of our specified groups (boys, English Language Learners (ELLs) and students with Special Education needs) across five years in Reading and Writing. Results over the past five years show improvements in boys achievement in Reading and Writing. In the area of Writing, which has been an area of focus for the Board, we see a five-year increase of 8 percentage points in Grade 6 boys achievement and a 4 percentage point increase in Grade 3 boys achievement. Compared to , there was a one percentage point increase in boys achievement in Grade 3 Reading and Writing, and in Grade 6 Reading. Achievement of ELLs indicate increased results, as well. Of particular note are the results for ELLs in Grade 3 Reading, where there has been a 13 percentage point increase in results from Results for students with Special Education needs in Grade 3 and Grade 6 Reading and Writing over the past five years show improvement: 6 percentage points in Primary Reading and 7% in Primary Writing; 16 percentage points in both Junior Reading and Junior Writing. Action Plans EQAO has provided data that will assist educators at all levels to take actions to improve student achievement in Reading, Writing and Mathematics. Ongoing analysis and interpretation of achievement results will serve to further inform the continual development of supports for learning. Actions undertaken will focus on supporting the goal identified in system memo ES-001: (Working in Collaboration to Optimize Learning and Achievement for All Students) that specified groups of students will improve their ability to communicate their thinking. Listed below are the actions staff will take to support the learning of all students. These actions align with, and are included under, the following Board s strategic directions: Engaging students, families, staff and communities, pursuing student achievement and success for all, embracing diversity and inclusion, and promoting forward thinking. These actions are primarily focused on interventions for students, capacity building (educator knowledge and skills to improve learning, instruction and leadership) and supporting conditions (e.g., supports for parents and families) to improve learning and instruction. Engaging Students, Families, Staff and Communities A Ministry initiative, Collaborative Inquiry in Mathematics (CIL-M) will continue to be implemented. Sixty schools participated in Additional schools will have the opportunity to participate in Specific groups of educators will participate in centrally-facilitated Learning Cycles (e.g. Mathematics, Full Day Kindergarten teams, teachers of ELL, Special Education, French Immersion, etc.) to improve learning and instruction particularly for specified groups of students who struggle (e.g., students receiving Special Education support, boys, ELLs and students in Grade 9 applied and essential math). Learning Series will be provided to support all teachers and administrators new to Grades 3 and 6 in understanding the format and requirements of the EQAO Primary and Junior Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics. Learning Services consultants will provide support to administrators and School Improvement planning teams in interpreting and using information presented in the EQAO reports, to inform instruction and to refine School Improvement Plans. Learning Services staff will support the implementation of networked and site-based Learning Cycles, intended to improve learning and instruction in areas of greatest need, specific to each site, in all schools in the Waterloo Region District School Board. Communication with parents regarding on how parents can support their students as they complete the EQAO Assessments, via newsletters, parent nights and at School Council meetings, will increase. For example, an EQAO Parent Resources link has been placed on each school s website ( This link will connect with a document designed to assist parents in navigating the EQAO site. Parent support sessions, specifically focused on offering assistance to help students with Mathematics, will be expanded. The Parent Leadership Project, for racialized communities to increase parents understanding and engagement in support of their children s learning, will continue. Ministry of Education Parent Resources supporting Mathematics and Literacy will be made available to all schools

5 Fostering Wellness and Well-Being A board-wide mental health strategy is being developed and specific interventions to promote mental health and enable students to be better prepared to learn and achieve are being considered for implementation. Safe, caring and inclusive school training is continuing with the goal of providing interventions and creating conditions to help students feel safe, comfortable and able to learn. The vision of the educator as caring and responsive, as reflected in the Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement (BIPSA), and an emphasis in schools on explicitly creating conditions that optimize learning by ensuring safe, welcoming environments, is an area of effort in Learning Series will be offered to assist teachers in developing effective strategies and plans for at-risk and formally identified (IEP) students, particularly those who may have additional health-related barriers, transitioning between schools. Pursuing Student Achievement and Success For All The use of differentiated instruction, universal design, a problem-solving approach and the promotion of more student choice to respond to student interests/readiness (i.e., student voice), particularly in Mathematics, will continue as an area of emphasis to help staff intervene with students and help them improve their confidence, understanding and application of Mathematics concepts and strategies. Learning Support Teachers (LSTs) will collaborate with classroom teachers to intervene to address the learning needs of students. Four LSTs will be focused on supporting schools with FDK. Five LSTs will be focused on supporting the use of Assessment for Learning in various contexts (e.g., Math/Language). A broader understanding and demonstration of the Board Improvement Plan goal, that specified groups of students will improve their ability to communicate their thinking, will be promoted across the system. This includes a more intentional focus on creative and critical thinking and various ways in which students communicate their thinking, including oral and other forms of communication, across all curriculum areas, with an emphasis on Mathematics. School Improvement Plans include a focus on assessment for learning which is an area of emphasis in the Board Improvement Plan. Data from a variety of classroom assessments is used inform and guide instruction and support the choice of effective instructional tools that have a positive impact on increasing student engagement and learning. Given the areas of need relating to Mathematics, it is anticipated that more schools will renew their efforts on using assessment for learning principles to improve learning and instruction related to Mathematics. Professional Learning sessions on instructional leadership to improve Mathematics learning and instruction will be available for administrators. More school administrators are actively participating in improving learning and instruction in projects focused on Mathematics, such as CIL-Math. Embracing Diversity and Inclusion Several math intervention resources have been purchased for all schools to support students who are struggling with the acquisition of Mathematical concept in elementary schools (e.g. Leaps and Bounds, and Do the Math ). The implementation of a web-based Math intervention called DreamBox, an online program with educational games that are individualized for students learning K-3 Math, will expand. Each elementary school is provided with 10 licenses to support closing the gap in Number Sense and Numeration for struggling students. A summer intervention program, focused on the primary and junior division with a Numeracy/Mathematics focus, has been implemented to support elementary students. Early Literacy Intervention (ELI) support will continue in 89 schools. Ongoing professional learning opportunities will continue for Special Education Resource Teachers (SERTs) delivering ELI. A Corrective Reading Program will be implemented in 70 to 80 elementary and secondary schools to intervene with struggling readers in Grades 4 and up and the Empower Reading Program will be used to intervene with students identified with needs in an Individual Education Plan (IEP). Learning Series will continue to be offered focused on the integration of curriculum expectations and issues related to marginalized groups in supporting barrier-free learning environments and critical thinking skills (e.g., First Nations Metis Inuit, LGBTQ). Ongoing training for SERTs, classroom teachers and administrators will continue to support the needs of students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and in particular the use of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) strategies. Special Education, self-contained (congregated) classes and classroom teachers will continue to participate in Learning Series that focus on using Assessment for Learning principles, writing/interpreting IEPs and alternative reporting practices to accommodate students and modify curriculum expectations to assist students with special needs communicate their thinking. ESL teachers are receiving training to support the development of academic language in the content areas for English Language Learners (ELL)

6 Promoting Forward Thinking The Ontario Education Resource Bank, an online digital resource for use by teachers to help differentiate instruction, share resources and provide more engaging learning activities, is increasingly being utilized to intervene to improve learning and instruction with challenging subject content for some students, such as Mathematics. Research is underway on various tools to intervene with students and improve learning and instruction relating to Mathematics (e.g., full-school implementation of interventions such as Dreambox, Prodigy, Contexts for Learning Mathematics Mini-Lessons for Number Sense and Numeration). Students are increasingly being engaged and their voice, perspectives and opinions are being considered as teachers intervene to improve instructional approaches for students, particularly in Mathematics. A number of promising practices (e.g., Mathematics book study in the Student Work Study Initiative) in all divisions (primary, junior, intermediate and secondary) are being used to refine and improve professional learning approaches and instruction, particularly in reference to Mathematics. A review of formative elementary assessment tools, including those developed to assess Mathematics, is underway. These are used to help identify student strengths and needs and assist teachers in reflecting on and improving learning and instruction. Promotion of web-based resources for teachers to support instruction such as EduGAINS ( and e-workshop ( will continue. A greater emphasis on the cross-curricular applications of Mathematics, to make it more relevant, engaging and visible for more students across all subject areas, will be an area of focus in COMMUNICATIONS: Each school has received a copy of its overall results. Administrators and teaching staff are interpreting these school results and are sharing the results with their communities. Results are being shared with Executive Superintendents, Superintendents and Learning Services staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: All activities related to this initiative can be applied to the existing budgets of Learning Services. STRATEGIC PLAN: The six strategic directions that are used to guide the work of the Board are: Engaging students, families, staff and communities Fostering wellness and well-being Pursuing student achievement and success for all Embracing diversity and inclusion Championing quality public education Promoting forward-thinking. This report addresses several strategic directions within the Strategic Plan. Overall, the report focuses on the strategic direction described as pursuing student achievement and success for all. In addition, the report describes several actions staff will take to support the learning of all students. These actions address the following Board s strategic directions: engaging students, families, staff and communities, embracing diversity and inclusion and promoting forward-thinking. As well, the report serves as another source of evidence highlighting student achievement and success and helps to address the strategic direction described as championing quality public education. RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation. For information only

7 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, Primary and Junior Divisions, Contextual Information: Grade 3* This information provides a context for interpreting the board s results. Demographic Information Board Province Enrolment Number of Grade 3 students Number of classes with Grade 3 students Number of schools with Grade 3 classes Gender Number Percent Number Percent Female % % Male % % Gender not specified 0 0% 0 0% Student Status English language learners** Students with special education needs (excluding gifted)** % 16% % 17% Place of Birth Born in Canada % % Born outside Canada 392 9% % In Canada less than one year 15 <1% 786 1% In Canada one year or more but less than three years 73 2% % In Canada three years or more 266 6% % Language First language learned at home was other than English % % Year Student Entered Current School Year of the assessment % % Year prior to the assessment % % 2 years prior to the assessment % % 3 or more years prior to the assessment % % Data not available 1 <1% 78 <1% Year Student Entered Current Board Year of the assessment 205 5% % Year prior to the assessment 197 5% % 2 years prior to the assessment 298 7% % 3 or more years prior to the assessment % % Data not available 7 <1% % * Contextual data pertaining to gender, student status, place of birth, language learned at home and year entered school and board are provided by schools and/or boards through the Student Data Collection process. Some data may be missing because they were not provided by the school or the board. ** See the Explanation of Terms.

8 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, Primary and Junior Divisions, Contextual Information: Grade 3 (continued) Participation in the Assessment Board Province Number of Grade 3 students* Reading Writing Mathematics Number Percent Number Percent Students who participated (excludes no data and exempt )** Reading % % Writing % % Mathematics % % Students who did not complete any part of the assessment ( no data )** Reading 41 1% 755 1% Writing 42 1% 764 1% Mathematics 44 1% 830 1% Students who were exempted** All three subjects 136 3% % Reading 177 4% % Writing 148 4% % Mathematics 150 4% % Participating English language learners who received a special provision** Reading 25 1% % Writing 26 1% % Mathematics 27 1% % Participating students who received one or more accommodations ** Reading % % Writing % % Mathematics % % * Some French Immersion students do not write all components of the assessment in Grade 3; the numbers shown reflect those students who were expected to write each component as determined by the French Immersion participation option selected by boards. ** See the Explanation of Terms. Includes students with an Individual Education Plan, students designated as English language learners and students receiving special permission.

9 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, Primary and Junior Divisions, Contextual Information: Grade 6* This information provides a context for interpreting the board s results. Demographic Information Board Province Enrolment Number of Grade 6 students Number of classes with Grade 6 students Number of schools with Grade 6 classes Gender Number Percent Number Percent Female % % Male % % Gender not specified 1 <1% 9 <1% Student Status English language learners** Students with special education needs (excluding gifted)** % 22% % 20% Place of Birth Born in Canada % % Born outside Canada % % In Canada less than one year 4 <1% 680 1% In Canada one year or more but less than three years 69 2% % In Canada three years or more 371 9% % Language First language learned at home was other than English % % Year Student Entered Current School Year of the assessment % % Year prior to the assessment % % 2 years prior to the assessment 380 9% % 3 or more years prior to the assessment % % Data not available 2 <1% 93 <1% Year Student Entered Current Board Year of the assessment 184 4% % Year prior to the assessment 208 5% % 2 years prior to the assessment 163 4% % 3 or more years prior to the assessment % % Data not available 5 <1% % * Contextual data pertaining to gender, student status, place of birth, language learned at home and year entered school and board are provided by schools and/or boards through the Student Data Collection process. Some data may be missing because they were not provided by the school or the board. ** See the Explanation of Terms.

10 Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, Primary and Junior Divisions, Contextual Information: Grade 6 (continued) Participation in the Assessment Board Province Number of Grade 6 students Reading Writing Mathematics Number Percent Number Percent Students who participated (excludes no data and exempt )* Reading % % Writing % % Mathematics % % Students who did not complete any part of the assessment ( no data )* Reading 44 1% 630 <1% Writing 44 1% 642 <1% Mathematics 43 1% 702 1% Students who were exempted* All three subjects 126 3% % Reading 146 3% % Writing 139 3% % Mathematics 144 3% % Participating English language learners who received a special provision* Reading 15 <1% % Writing 16 <1% % Mathematics 16 <1% % Participating students who received one or more accommodations * Reading % % Writing % % Mathematics % % * See the Explanation of Terms. Includes students with an Individual Education Plan, students designated as English language learners and students receiving special permission.

11 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 3 READING: Overall Results Province % 2% 5% 23% 55% 12% WRDSB % 3% 6% 25% 53% 9% A R Kaufman PS 36 8% 11% 14% 31% 31% 6% Abraham Erb PS 46 9% 2% 4% 20% 54% 11% Alpine PS 38 5% 0% 13% 24% 45% 13% Avenue Road PS 28 14% 0% 14% 39% 32% 0% Ayr PS 25 4% 0% 0% 36% 56% 4% Baden Public School 56 0% 2% 7% 25% 66% 0% Blair Road PS 28 4% 0% 14% 36% 39% 7% Breslau PS 64 3% 2% 2% 45% 47% 2% Bridgeport PS 55 0% 5% 4% 31% 58% 2% Brigadoon PS 73 3% 1% 3% 19% 63% 11% Cedar Creek PS 36 3% 0% 3% 28% 56% 11% Cedarbrae PS 18 0% 0% 11% 11% 78% 0% Centennial PS 35 11% 6% 3% 40% 37% 3% Central PS 37 3% 3% 5% 41% 49% 0% Chalmers Street PS 43 9% 9% 9% 33% 40% 0% Clemens Mill PS 75 8% 3% 3% 25% 53% 8% Conestogo PS 37 8% 3% 3% 11% 57% 19% Coronation PS 58 2% 2% 7% 31% 50% 9% Country Hills PS 73 5% 5% 5% 25% 53% 5% Crestview PS 51 6% 4% 10% 35% 39% 6% Dickson PS 17 0% 6% 6% 41% 35% 12% Driftwood Park PS 47 9% 2% 9% 26% 51% 4% Edna Staebler PS 122 2% 5% 5% 18% 56% 12% Elgin Street PS 58 0% 7% 7% 31% 48% 7% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 45 9% 2% 13% 13% 47% 16% Empire PS 74 5% 5% 3% 11% 58% 18% Floradale PS 36 6% 3% 11% 36% 44% 0% Forest Glen PS 43 2% 2% 7% 21% 58% 9% Forest Hill PS 73 5% 0% 11% 36% 40% 8% Franklin PS 80 5% 0% 8% 29% 54% 5% Glencairn PS 44 7% 0% 5% 25% 59% 5% Grand View PS 29 0% 3% 17% 31% 38% 10% Grandview PS 24 0% 0% 12% 0% 75% 12% Hespeler PS 63 2% 0% 5% 32% 52% 10% Highland PS 78 1% 1% 3% 17% 68% 10% Hillcrest PS 58 0% 0% 3% 24% 64% 9% Howard Robertson PS 48 10% 2% 19% 31% 38% 0% J F Carmichael PS 55 5% 5% 7% 38% 31% 13% John Darling PS 32 12% 0% 9% 19% 47% 12% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

12 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 3 READING: Overall Results Province % 2% 5% 23% 55% 12% WRDSB % 3% 6% 25% 53% 9% John Mahood Jr PS 56 0% 0% 5% 18% 70% 7% JW Gerth PS 69 0% 0% 6% 16% 70% 9% Keatsway PS 49 4% 0% 8% 20% 47% 20% King Edward PS 29 7% 3% 0% 41% 38% 10% Lackner Woods PS 55 0% 2% 2% 25% 55% 16% Laurelwood P.S. 59 7% 0% 2% 10% 53% 29% Lester B Pearson Public School 75 3% 1% 7% 17% 57% 15% Lexington PS 30 0% 0% 0% 13% 73% 13% Lincoln Heights PS 22 0% 0% 9% 23% 55% 14% Linwood PS 45 2% 0% 16% 31% 44% 7% MacKenzie King PS 17 18% 0% 6% 24% 53% 0% Manchester PS 31 0% 0% 13% 39% 45% 3% Mary Johnston PS 63 8% 5% 6% 11% 54% 16% Meadowlane PS 30 0% 3% 3% 17% 67% 10% Millen Woods PS 47 0% 0% 0% 26% 47% 28% Moffat Creek PS 40 2% 0% 8% 30% 52% 8% N A MacEachern PS 39 18% 3% 0% 15% 49% 15% New Dundee PS 32 3% 6% 6% 31% 44% 9% Northlake Woods PS 48 0% 2% 6% 10% 65% 17% Parkway PS 19 N/D 11% 16% 37% 37% 0% Pioneer Park PS 35 0% 6% 17% 17% 60% 0% Preston PS 39 0% 5% 8% 18% 62% 8% Prueter PS 20 0% 5% 20% 25% 35% 0% Queen Elizabeth PS 27 15% 11% 7% 30% 41% 0% Riverside PS 34 11% 3% 3% 35% 41% 15% Rockway PS 23 3% 0% 9% 35% 22% 13% Ryerson PS 48 22% 2% 10% 35% 42% 10% Saginaw PS 65 0% 0% 5% 22% 55% 14% Sandhills Elementary Public School 117 5% 2% 1% 22% 63% 10% Sandowne PS 52 2% 0% 4% 31% 63% 2% Sheppard PS 67 0% 6% 7% 18% 52% 9% Silverheights PS 70 7% 6% 3% 34% 56% 1% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 39 0% 3% 0% 31% 49% 13% Smithson PS 22 5% 0% 0% 18% 41% 9% Southridge PS 49 32% 4% 0% 12% 63% 12% St Jacobs PS 31 8% 3% 0% 29% 55% 13% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 N/D 2% 13% 37% 44% 2% Suddaby PS 53 0% 6% 11% 30% 43% 2% Tait Street PS 25 2% 8% 4% 24% 60% 4% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

13 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 3 READING: Overall Results Province % 2% 5% 23% 55% 12% WRDSB % 3% 6% 25% 53% 9% Trillium PS 32 8% 3% 19% 25% 47% 6% Wellesley PS 77 0% 3% 6% 26% 60% 4% Westmount PS 42 27% 0% 2% 19% 57% 17% Westvale PS 40 0% 0% 5% 20% 60% 10% Williamsburg PS 107 1% 1% 6% 26% 60% 7% Wilson Avenue PS 58 5% 2% 9% 28% 41% 9% Winston Churchill PS 33 5% 3% 12% 24% 45% 0% Woodland Park PS 54 0% 2% 0% 33% 52% 13% WT Townshend PS 86 12% 1% 6% 34% 49% 10% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

14 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 19% 70% 7% WRDSB % <2% 1% 26% 64% 4% A R Kaufman PS 36 8% 0% 6% 47% 36% 3% Abraham Erb PS 46 9% 2% 0% 17% 63% 9% Alpine PS 38 5% 0% 0% 32% 55% 8% Avenue Road PS 28 11% 0% 0% 14% 75% 0% Ayr PS 25 4% 0% 0% 24% 68% 4% Baden Public School 56 0% 2% 0% 29% 64% 5% Blair Road PS 28 4% 0% 4% 32% 46% 14% Breslau PS 64 2% 0% 2% 34% 62% 0% Bridgeport PS 55 0% 0% 2% 29% 69% 0% Brigadoon PS 73 1% 1% 0% 10% 78% 10% Cedar Creek PS 36 3% 0% 0% 17% 75% 6% Cedarbrae PS 18 0% 0% 0% 28% 67% 6% Centennial PS 35 11% 3% 3% 31% 51% 0% Central PS 37 3% 0% 0% 41% 57% 0% Chalmers Street PS 43 9% 2% 7% 37% 42% 2% Clemens Mill PS 75 4% 3% 0% 21% 65% 7% Conestogo PS 37 8% 0% 0% 24% 59% 8% Coronation PS 58 2% 0% 0% 21% 74% 3% Country Hills PS 73 4% 1% 1% 29% 62% 3% Crestview PS 51 6% 2% 6% 31% 53% 2% Dickson PS 17 0% 12% 6% 41% 41% 0% Driftwood Park PS 47 2% 2% 0% 30% 66% 0% Edna Staebler PS 122 2% 2% 0% 28% 63% 3% Elgin Street PS 58 0% 4% 7% 34% 52% 3% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 45 7% 2% 7% 22% 58% 4% Empire PS 74 5% 5% 1% 12% 64% 12% Floradale PS 36 3% 0% 0% 36% 61% 0% Forest Glen PS 43 5% 2% 0% 14% 77% 2% Forest Hill PS 73 3% 0% 0% 33% 63% 1% Franklin PS 80 5% 0% 0% 19% 75% 1% Glencairn PS 44 7% 0% 0% 32% 61% 0% Grand View PS 29 0% 3% 0% 31% 66% 0% Grandview PS 24 0% 0% 0% 12% 83% 4% Hespeler PS 63 2% 0% 0% 38% 57% 3% Highland PS 78 1% 1% 0% 17% 78% 3% Hillcrest PS 58 0% 0% 0% 24% 72% 3% Howard Robertson PS 48 6% 0% 0% 50% 44% 0% J F Carmichael PS 55 5% 2% 4% 38% 45% 5% John Darling PS 32 9% 0% 0% 25% 62% 3% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

15 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 19% 70% 7% WRDSB % <2% 1% 26% 64% 4% John Mahood Jr PS 56 0% 0% 2% 18% 80% 0% JW Gerth PS 69 0% 0% 1% 20% 77% 1% Keatsway PS 49 2% 0% 4% 14% 69% 10% King Edward PS 29 7% 0% 0% 31% 62% 0% Lackner Woods PS 55 0% 2% 0% 7% 84% 7% Laurelwood P.S. 59 7% 0% 0% 8% 71% 14% Lester B Pearson Public School 75 1% 0% 0% 19% 71% 9% Lexington PS 30 0% 0% 0% 10% 87% 3% Lincoln Heights PS 22 0% 0% 0% 36% 59% 5% Linwood PS 45 2% 0% 0% 18% 78% 2% MacKenzie King PS 17 12% 0% 0% 24% 65% 0% Manchester PS 31 0% 0% 3% 32% 65% 0% Mary Johnston PS 63 8% 5% 0% 19% 59% 10% Meadowlane PS 30 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% 0% Millen Woods PS 47 0% 0% 0% 28% 62% 11% Moffat Creek PS 40 2% 0% 0% 30% 62% 5% N A MacEachern PS 39 8% 6% 3% 21% 64% 0% New Dundee PS 32 0% 3% 0% 38% 59% 0% Northlake Woods PS 48 0% 2% 0% 15% 81% 2% Parkway PS 19 0% 0% 11% 37% 53% 0% Pioneer Park PS 35 0% 0% 3% 23% 66% 9% Preston PS 39 0% 3% 3% 21% 72% 3% Prueter PS 20 15% 0% 0% 30% 50% 5% Queen Elizabeth PS 27 11% 0% 0% 56% 33% 0% Riverside PS 34 3% 3% 0% 41% 44% 9% Rockway PS 23 13% 0% 0% 39% 48% 0% Ryerson PS 48 0% 2% 2% 33% 62% 0% Saginaw PS 65 5% 0% 0% 17% 68% 11% Sandhills Elementary Public School 117 1% 1% 2% 17% 74% 5% Sandowne PS 52 0% 0% 0% 37% 62% 2% Sheppard PS 67 7% 1% 4% 28% 54% 4% Silverheights PS 70 0% 3% 0% 34% 63% 0% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 39 5% 3% 0% 5% 79% 8% Smithson PS 22 32% 0% 0% 14% 55% 0% Southridge PS 49 6% 4% 0% 12% 71% 6% St Jacobs PS 31 0% 3% 0% 16% 77% 3% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 2% 0% 0% 37% 61% 0% Suddaby PS 53 8% 6% 2% 42% 43% 0% Tait Street PS 25 0% 4% 0% 20% 68% 8% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

16 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 19% 70% 7% WRDSB % <2% 1% 26% 64% 4% Trillium PS 32 0% 0% 6% 44% 44% 6% Wellesley PS 77 1% 0% 1% 35% 60% 3% Westmount PS 42 5% 0% 0% 36% 60% 0% Westvale PS 40 5% 0% 0% 12% 75% 8% Williamsburg PS 107 0% 0% 0% 30% 67% 3% Wilson Avenue PS 58 12% 0% 0% 31% 52% 5% Winston Churchill PS 33 15% 3% 0% 30% 45% 6% Woodland Park PS 54 0% 2% 0% 13% 80% 6% WT Townshend PS 86 0% 1% 0% 29% 67% 2% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

17 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <2% 3% 27% 55% 12% WRDSB % <2% 4% 33% 51% 7% A R Kaufman PS 36 8% 0% 14% 47% 28% 3% Abraham Erb PS 46 9% 0% 7% 24% 54% 7% Alpine PS 38 0% 0% 3% 53% 39% 5% Avenue Road PS 28 11% 0% 11% 50% 29% 0% Ayr PS 25 4% 0% 4% 28% 56% 8% Baden Public School 56 0% 2% 2% 30% 64% 2% Blair Road PS 28 4% 0% 7% 43% 43% 4% Breslau PS 64 2% 0% 3% 42% 48% 5% Bridgeport PS 55 0% 2% 4% 40% 53% 2% Brigadoon PS 73 1% 1% 3% 18% 67% 10% Cedar Creek PS 36 6% 0% 3% 31% 50% 11% Cedarbrae PS 18 0% 0% 6% 33% 61% 0% Centennial PS 35 11% 3% 6% 31% 49% 0% Central PS 37 3% 3% 14% 57% 24% 0% Chalmers Street PS 43 7% 2% 16% 47% 28% 0% Clemens Mill PS 75 4% 3% 1% 41% 47% 4% Conestogo PS 37 8% 0% 3% 19% 59% 11% Coronation PS 58 2% 0% 16% 28% 50% 5% Country Hills PS 73 3% 1% 3% 23% 64% 5% Crestview PS 51 6% 4% 18% 35% 37% 0% Dickson PS 17 0% 12% 0% 47% 41% 0% Driftwood Park PS 47 4% 0% 6% 45% 43% 2% Edna Staebler PS 122 2% 2% 2% 18% 62% 13% Elgin Street PS 58 0% 4% 5% 40% 48% 3% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 45 7% 2% 11% 31% 40% 9% Empire PS 74 5% 5% 3% 16% 51% 19% Floradale PS 36 0% 0% 0% 33% 61% 6% Forest Glen PS 43 5% 2% 2% 33% 47% 12% Forest Hill PS 73 7% 0% 7% 38% 42% 5% Franklin PS 80 4% 0% 2% 36% 51% 6% Glencairn PS 44 7% 0% 5% 48% 39% 2% Grand View PS 29 0% 3% 10% 31% 52% 3% Grandview PS 24 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% Hespeler PS 63 2% 0% 2% 40% 56% 2% Highland PS 78 1% 1% 0% 21% 65% 12% Hillcrest PS 58 0% 0% 0% 26% 59% 16% Howard Robertson PS 48 6% 2% 8% 50% 31% 2% J F Carmichael PS 55 5% 0% 13% 47% 29% 5% John Darling PS 32 12% 0% 0% 31% 47% 9% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

18 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <2% 3% 27% 55% 12% WRDSB % <2% 4% 33% 51% 7% John Mahood Jr PS 56 0% 0% 4% 38% 59% 0% JW Gerth PS 69 0% 0% 0% 39% 54% 7% Keatsway PS 49 0% 0% 6% 35% 53% 6% King Edward PS 29 10% 3% 7% 21% 55% 3% Lackner Woods PS 55 0% 0% 0% 15% 64% 22% Laurelwood P.S. 59 7% 0% 2% 12% 59% 20% Lester B Pearson Public School 75 1% 0% 0% 23% 63% 13% Lexington PS 30 0% 0% 0% 17% 73% 10% Lincoln Heights PS 22 0% 0% 5% 36% 55% 5% Linwood PS 45 2% 0% 0% 40% 51% 7% MacKenzie King PS 17 6% 0% 6% 29% 53% 6% Manchester PS 31 0% 0% 3% 45% 48% 3% Mary Johnston PS 63 8% 5% 3% 21% 44% 19% Meadowlane PS 30 0% 0% 7% 33% 57% 3% Millen Woods PS 47 0% 0% 0% 30% 60% 11% Moffat Creek PS 40 0% 0% 5% 38% 50% 8% N A MacEachern PS 39 5% 3% 5% 28% 56% 3% New Dundee PS 32 0% 3% 0% 38% 50% 9% Northlake Woods PS 48 0% 2% 4% 21% 62% 10% Parkway PS 19 0% 0% 0% 63% 37% 0% Pioneer Park PS 35 0% 3% 9% 23% 57% 9% Preston PS 39 0% 5% 3% 23% 67% 3% Prueter PS 20 15% 0% 5% 45% 35% 0% Queen Elizabeth PS 27 11% 0% 4% 67% 15% 4% Riverside PS 34 3% 3% 6% 26% 41% 21% Rockway PS 23 30% 0% 0% 30% 39% 0% Ryerson PS 48 0% 2% 2% 33% 54% 8% Saginaw PS 65 5% 0% 0% 22% 54% 20% Sandhills Elementary Public School 117 2% 1% 0% 38% 49% 10% Sandowne PS 52 0% 0% 4% 33% 56% 8% Sheppard PS 67 7% 1% 6% 30% 51% 4% Silverheights PS 70 0% 3% 1% 41% 49% 6% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 39 8% 3% 0% 18% 62% 10% Smithson PS 22 32% 0% 5% 18% 41% 5% Southridge PS 49 6% 4% 2% 27% 45% 16% St Jacobs PS 31 0% 0% 0% 19% 68% 13% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 2% 2% 9% 44% 37% 6% Suddaby PS 53 6% 6% 4% 60% 23% 2% Tait Street PS 25 0% 4% 0% 20% 64% 12% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

19 Grade 3 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 3 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <2% 3% 27% 55% 12% WRDSB % <2% 4% 33% 51% 7% Trillium PS 32 0% 0% 0% 59% 34% 6% Wellesley PS 77 1% 0% 3% 35% 60% 1% Westmount PS 42 5% 0% 0% 29% 60% 7% Westvale PS 40 5% 0% 5% 18% 62% 10% Williamsburg PS 107 0% 0% 11% 28% 58% 3% Wilson Avenue PS 58 12% 0% 3% 38% 36% 10% Winston Churchill PS 33 15% 3% 0% 27% 42% 12% Woodland Park PS 54 0% 2% 2% 24% 63% 9% WT Townshend PS 86 0% 1% 3% 36% 56% 3% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 3 cannot be released.

20 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 READING: Overall Results Province % <2% 2% 18% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 2% 19% 65% 10% A R Kaufman PS 36 6% 3% 6% 25% 61% 0% Abraham Erb PS 43 2% 0% 0% 12% 67% 19% Alpine PS 32 6% 0% 0% 19% 66% 9% Avenue Road PS 38 3% 3% 0% 34% 58% 3% Ayr PS 26 4% 0% 0% 31% 65% 0% Baden Public School 36 8% 3% 0% 22% 61% 6% Blair Road PS 29 0% 0% 0% 31% 62% 7% Breslau PS 54 0% 2% 2% 28% 61% 7% Bridgeport PS 60 10% 0% 0% 15% 68% 7% Brigadoon PS 67 0% 1% 1% 3% 78% 16% Cedar Creek PS 47 4% 0% 0% 19% 62% 15% Cedarbrae PS 29 0% 3% 3% 28% 48% 17% Centennial PS 42 17% 0% 0% 14% 67% 2% Central PS 22 0% 0% 9% 41% 50% 0% Chalmers Street PS 35 0% 3% 0% 23% 74% 0% Clemens Mill PS 80 0% 1% 0% 22% 69% 8% Conestogo PS 32 6% 3% 0% 25% 66% 0% Coronation PS 58 3% 2% 7% 38% 47% 3% Country Hills PS 64 2% 0% 5% 36% 56% 2% Crestview PS 59 0% 0% 2% 20% 75% 3% Driftwood Park PS 76 4% 0% 0% 16% 78% 3% Edna Staebler PS 57 2% 0% 2% 12% 70% 14% Elgin Street PS 45 2% 0% 13% 31% 49% 4% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 60 15% 0% 0% 3% 52% 30% Empire PS 59 2% 0% 0% 5% 78% 15% Floradale PS 31 3% 0% 0% 19% 65% 13% Forest Glen PS 64 9% 0% 0% 19% 66% 6% Forest Hill PS 59 2% 2% 7% 34% 49% 7% Franklin PS 94 7% 1% 2% 12% 70% 7% Glencairn PS 57 5% 0% 0% 12% 72% 11% Grand View PS 37 3% 0% 3% 30% 65% 0% Grandview PS 30 0% 0% 3% 27% 63% 7% Hespeler PS 68 0% 1% 4% 15% 71% 9% Hillcrest PS 47 2% 0% 0% 26% 66% 6% Howard Robertson PS 41 5% 2% 2% 39% 49% 2% J F Carmichael PS 41 5% 2% 2% 17% 68% 5% John Darling PS 43 5% 0% 0% 23% 67% 5% JW Gerth PS 60 3% 0% 2% 18% 67% 10% Keatsway PS 51 0% 0% 0% 12% 76% 12% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

21 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 READING: Overall Results Province % <2% 2% 18% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 2% 19% 65% 10% King Edward PS 29 3% 7% 0% 21% 66% 3% Lackner Woods PS 72 0% 6% 0% 10% 54% 31% Laurelwood P.S. 66 0% 2% 2% 8% 67% 23% Lester B Pearson Public School 61 2% 0% 2% 7% 72% 18% Lexington PS 37 0% 0% 0% 11% 68% 22% Lincoln Heights PS 29 0% 0% 10% 28% 55% 7% Linwood PS 45 4% 0% 2% 33% 56% 4% MacKenzie King PS 21 0% 0% 0% 24% 67% 10% Manchester PS 30 3% 3% 0% 20% 73% 0% Mary Johnston PS 64 2% 0% 0% 8% 73% 17% Meadowlane PS 35 0% 0% 0% 17% 80% 3% Millen Woods PS 44 0% 0% 0% 18% 52% 30% Moffat Creek PS 38 5% 0% 0% 37% 55% 3% N A MacEachern PS 40 5% 0% 0% 12% 68% 15% New Dundee PS 36 0% 0% 0% 22% 64% 14% Northlake Woods PS 49 4% 0% 0% 2% 71% 22% Park Manor Sr PS 87 1% 2% 0% 3% 72% 21% Parkway PS 29 7% 0% 0% 10% 72% 10% Pioneer Park PS 50 0% 2% 2% 34% 52% 10% Preston PS 30 7% 7% 0% 20% 60% 7% Prueter PS 37 24% 0% 0% 19% 51% 5% Queen Elizabeth PS 19 5% 11% 0% 21% 53% 11% Rockway PS 19 11% 5% 5% 47% 32% 0% Ryerson PS 64 5% 0% 0% 12% 67% 16% Saginaw PS 61 2% 0% 0% 8% 79% 11% Sandhills Elementary Public School 88 1% 1% 5% 8% 66% 19% Sandowne PS 54 0% 0% 6% 22% 63% 9% Sheppard PS 47 0% 0% 4% 36% 55% 4% Silverheights PS 85 0% 6% 4% 12% 56% 22% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 51 0% 2% 2% 37% 57% 2% Smithson PS 34 29% 3% 0% 0% 59% 9% Southridge PS 67 10% 4% 4% 27% 48% 6% St Andrews Sr PS 90 2% 0% 3% 24% 62% 8% St Jacobs PS 38 0% 0% 3% 8% 71% 18% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 0% 0% 4% 31% 59% 6% Suddaby PS 50 0% 6% 2% 16% 66% 10% Tait Street PS 48 0% 0% 2% 19% 67% 12% Trillium PS 29 0% 0% 0% 21% 72% 7% Wellesley PS 69 0% 1% 4% 9% 67% 19% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

22 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 READING: Overall Results Province % <2% 2% 18% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 2% 19% 65% 10% Westmount PS 39 23% 0% 0% 8% 67% 3% Westvale PS 62 2% 2% 0% 11% 71% 15% Williamsburg PS 82 1% 2% 4% 17% 67% 9% Wilson Avenue PS 54 4% 0% 0% 30% 59% 7% Winston Churchill PS 26 12% 8% 0% 15% 50% 15% Woodland Park PS 52 2% 0% 0% 15% 79% 4% WT Townshend PS 96 1% 2% 0% 17% 71% 9% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

23 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 20% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 1% 22% 62% 10% A R Kaufman PS 36 6% 0% 3% 33% 47% 11% Abraham Erb PS 43 2% 0% 0% 16% 72% 9% Alpine PS 32 6% 0% 0% 31% 59% 3% Avenue Road PS 38 0% 3% 0% 53% 39% 5% Ayr PS 26 4% 0% 0% 23% 69% 4% Baden Public School 36 8% 3% 0% 36% 47% 6% Blair Road PS 29 0% 0% 3% 28% 62% 7% Breslau PS 54 0% 2% 4% 37% 48% 9% Bridgeport PS 60 10% 0% 2% 12% 70% 7% Brigadoon PS 67 0% 1% 0% 10% 70% 18% Cedar Creek PS 47 4% 0% 0% 21% 68% 6% Cedarbrae PS 29 0% 3% 0% 21% 59% 17% Centennial PS 42 17% 0% 0% 26% 52% 5% Central PS 22 0% 0% 9% 50% 41% 0% Chalmers Street PS 35 0% 3% 0% 29% 63% 6% Clemens Mill PS 80 0% 1% 2% 20% 69% 8% Conestogo PS 32 6% 3% 3% 16% 56% 16% Coronation PS 58 3% 0% 0% 52% 43% 2% Country Hills PS 64 2% 2% 0% 38% 52% 8% Crestview PS 59 0% 0% 0% 36% 59% 5% Driftwood Park PS 76 1% 0% 1% 9% 82% 7% Edna Staebler PS 57 2% 0% 2% 19% 74% 4% Elgin Street PS 45 2% 0% 4% 47% 47% 0% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 60 15% 0% 0% 7% 48% 30% Empire PS 59 2% 0% 0% 12% 68% 19% Floradale PS 31 3% 0% 0% 19% 71% 6% Forest Glen PS 64 9% 0% 0% 22% 56% 12% Forest Hill PS 59 0% 2% 3% 41% 41% 14% Franklin PS 94 7% 1% 0% 24% 56% 11% Glencairn PS 57 5% 0% 0% 16% 68% 11% Grand View PS 37 3% 0% 0% 30% 68% 0% Grandview PS 30 0% 0% 0% 13% 80% 7% Hespeler PS 68 0% 1% 3% 31% 50% 15% Hillcrest PS 47 2% 0% 2% 23% 66% 6% Howard Robertson PS 41 5% 2% 2% 32% 49% 10% J F Carmichael PS 41 5% 2% 0% 54% 39% 0% John Darling PS 43 5% 0% 0% 28% 58% 9% JW Gerth PS 60 3% 0% 2% 13% 80% 2% Keatsway PS 51 2% 0% 0% 18% 73% 8% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

24 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 20% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 1% 22% 62% 10% King Edward PS 29 3% 7% 0% 45% 45% 0% Lackner Woods PS 72 0% 6% 0% 8% 65% 21% Laurelwood P.S. 66 0% 2% 2% 5% 64% 29% Lester B Pearson Public School 61 2% 0% 0% 7% 75% 16% Lexington PS 37 0% 0% 0% 11% 70% 19% Lincoln Heights PS 29 0% 3% 0% 31% 62% 3% Linwood PS 45 4% 0% 0% 20% 69% 7% MacKenzie King PS 21 0% 0% 0% 10% 86% 5% Manchester PS 30 3% 0% 0% 17% 77% 3% Mary Johnston PS 64 2% 0% 0% 17% 70% 11% Meadowlane PS 35 0% 0% 0% 11% 77% 11% Millen Woods PS 44 0% 0% 0% 20% 59% 20% Moffat Creek PS 38 5% 0% 3% 37% 50% 5% N A MacEachern PS 40 5% 0% 0% 15% 52% 28% New Dundee PS 36 0% 0% 0% 25% 69% 6% Northlake Woods PS 49 4% 0% 0% 16% 67% 12% Park Manor Sr PS 87 1% 2% 0% 9% 68% 20% Parkway PS 29 3% 0% 0% 28% 66% 3% Pioneer Park PS 50 0% 2% 0% 24% 64% 10% Preston PS 30 7% 7% 0% 17% 70% 0% Prueter PS 37 24% 0% 5% 19% 46% 5% Queen Elizabeth PS 19 5% 11% 0% 5% 74% 5% Rockway PS 19 5% 5% 0% 58% 26% 5% Ryerson PS 64 5% 0% 0% 8% 61% 27% Saginaw PS 61 2% 0% 0% 15% 72% 11% Sandhills Elementary Public School 88 1% 1% 1% 8% 76% 12% Sandowne PS 54 0% 0% 2% 20% 74% 4% Sheppard PS 47 0% 2% 2% 32% 55% 9% Silverheights PS 85 0% 6% 0% 21% 58% 15% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 51 0% 2% 0% 29% 67% 2% Smithson PS 34 29% 3% 0% 12% 47% 9% Southridge PS 67 10% 4% 1% 36% 42% 6% St Andrews Sr PS 90 2% 0% 2% 36% 52% 8% St Jacobs PS 38 0% 3% 3% 3% 84% 8% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 0% 0% 0% 44% 50% 6% Suddaby PS 50 0% 8% 2% 20% 60% 10% Tait Street PS 48 0% 0% 0% 12% 71% 17% Trillium PS 29 0% 0% 0% 38% 52% 10% Wellesley PS 69 0% 1% 0% 17% 71% 10% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

25 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May June 2013 Grade 6 WRITING: Overall Results Province % <2% 1% 20% 64% 13% WRDSB % <2% 1% 22% 62% 10% Westmount PS 39 23% 0% 0% 18% 56% 3% Westvale PS 62 2% 2% 0% 15% 65% 18% Williamsburg PS 82 1% 2% 0% 15% 72% 10% Wilson Avenue PS 54 4% 0% 0% 17% 76% 4% Winston Churchill PS 26 12% 8% 0% 12% 54% 15% Woodland Park PS 52 2% 0% 0% 29% 67% 2% WT Townshend PS 96 1% 2% 1% 17% 67% 12% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

26 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 6 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <1% 11% 30% 43% 13% WRDSB % <2% 9% 33% 43% 10% A R Kaufman PS 36 6% 3% 19% 47% 22% 3% Abraham Erb PS 43 2% 0% 7% 30% 42% 19% Alpine PS 32 6% 0% 12% 53% 22% 6% Avenue Road PS 38 3% 3% 24% 45% 26% 0% Ayr PS 26 4% 0% 8% 27% 62% 0% Baden Public School 36 6% 3% 0% 53% 36% 3% Blair Road PS 29 0% 0% 24% 38% 38% 0% Breslau PS 54 6% 0% 4% 41% 46% 4% Bridgeport PS 60 10% 0% 7% 33% 48% 2% Brigadoon PS 67 0% 1% 0% 16% 58% 24% Cedar Creek PS 47 4% 0% 4% 32% 55% 4% Cedarbrae PS 29 3% 3% 17% 28% 41% 7% Centennial PS 42 17% 0% 12% 33% 33% 5% Central PS 22 0% 0% 41% 36% 23% 0% Chalmers Street PS 35 0% 6% 6% 37% 43% 9% Clemens Mill PS 80 0% 1% 9% 39% 44% 8% Conestogo PS 32 6% 3% 3% 22% 50% 16% Coronation PS 58 3% 0% 28% 52% 17% 0% Country Hills PS 64 2% 0% 5% 48% 41% 5% Crestview PS 59 0% 2% 8% 54% 34% 2% Driftwood Park PS 76 3% 0% 4% 36% 49% 9% Edna Staebler PS 57 2% 2% 7% 32% 51% 7% Elgin Street PS 45 2% 0% 31% 36% 27% 4% Elizabeth Ziegler PS 60 15% 0% 2% 20% 45% 18% Empire PS 59 2% 0% 3% 17% 61% 17% Floradale PS 31 3% 0% 10% 23% 58% 6% Forest Glen PS 64 9% 0% 14% 33% 41% 3% Forest Hill PS 59 0% 2% 20% 47% 24% 7% Franklin PS 94 7% 1% 11% 35% 37% 9% Glencairn PS 57 7% 0% 0% 28% 54% 11% Grand View PS 37 3% 0% 8% 49% 38% 3% Grandview PS 30 0% 0% 7% 30% 60% 3% Hespeler PS 68 0% 1% 10% 38% 41% 9% Hillcrest PS 47 2% 2% 4% 57% 34% 0% Howard Robertson PS 41 2% 2% 22% 54% 17% 2% J F Carmichael PS 41 5% 0% 34% 41% 17% 2% John Darling PS 43 5% 2% 14% 30% 42% 7% JW Gerth PS 60 3% 0% 7% 25% 57% 8% Keatsway PS 51 0% 0% 2% 29% 45% 24% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

27 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 6 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <1% 11% 30% 43% 13% WRDSB % <2% 9% 33% 43% 10% King Edward PS 29 3% 7% 28% 48% 14% 0% Lackner Woods PS 72 0% 6% 1% 14% 43% 36% Laurelwood P.S. 66 0% 2% 2% 11% 47% 39% Lester B Pearson Public School 61 0% 0% 5% 30% 51% 15% Lexington PS 37 0% 0% 3% 30% 49% 19% Lincoln Heights PS 29 0% 0% 17% 34% 48% 0% Linwood PS 45 4% 0% 7% 56% 31% 2% MacKenzie King PS 21 0% 0% 0% 24% 71% 5% Manchester PS 30 3% 0% 10% 53% 30% 3% Mary Johnston PS 64 2% 0% 5% 28% 50% 16% Meadowlane PS 35 0% 0% 9% 23% 60% 9% Millen Woods PS 44 0% 0% 9% 20% 48% 23% Moffat Creek PS 38 5% 0% 16% 50% 26% 3% N A MacEachern PS 40 5% 0% 0% 28% 52% 15% New Dundee PS 36 0% 0% 0% 39% 58% 3% Northlake Woods PS 49 4% 0% 0% 16% 57% 22% Park Manor Sr PS 87 1% 2% 5% 18% 61% 13% Parkway PS 29 3% 0% 10% 31% 52% 3% Pioneer Park PS 50 0% 2% 24% 48% 24% 2% Preston PS 30 7% 7% 3% 33% 47% 3% Prueter PS 37 24% 0% 8% 22% 38% 8% Queen Elizabeth PS 19 5% 11% 16% 16% 53% 0% Rockway PS 19 11% 5% 37% 26% 21% 0% Ryerson PS 64 5% 0% 8% 20% 42% 25% Saginaw PS 61 2% 0% 2% 20% 67% 10% Sandhills Elementary Public School 88 5% 0% 7% 24% 48% 17% Sandowne PS 54 0% 0% 19% 43% 35% 4% Sheppard PS 47 0% 0% 13% 43% 43% 2% Silverheights PS 85 0% 6% 7% 29% 40% 18% Sir Adam Beck P.S. 51 2% 2% 8% 39% 49% 0% Smithson PS 34 24% 3% 0% 26% 35% 12% Southridge PS 67 10% 4% 25% 34% 21% 4% St Andrews Sr PS 90 3% 0% 13% 41% 39% 3% St Jacobs PS 38 0% 0% 11% 5% 61% 24% Stewart Avenue Sr PS 54 0% 0% 17% 44% 37% 2% Suddaby PS 50 0% 6% 12% 34% 44% 4% Tait Street PS 48 0% 0% 2% 23% 56% 19% Trillium PS 29 0% 0% 14% 55% 31% 0% Wellesley PS 69 0% 2% 9% 26% 55% 7% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

28 Grade 6 Test Results for All Students: May - June 2013 Grade 6 MATHEMATICS: Overall Results Province % <1% 11% 30% 43% 13% WRDSB % <2% 9% 33% 43% 10% Westmount PS 39 18% 0% 3% 31% 44% 5% Westvale PS 62 3% 2% 2% 27% 52% 15% Williamsburg PS 82 1% 2% 10% 33% 41% 12% Wilson Avenue PS 54 4% 0% 7% 61% 26% 2% Winston Churchill PS 26 8% 12% 8% 19% 35% 19% Woodland Park PS 52 2% 0% 4% 42% 44% 8% WT Townshend PS 96 1% 2% 8% 27% 51% 10% Results from schools with fewer than 15 participating students in Grade 6 cannot be released.

Nutrition for Learning Inc. Financial Statements August 31, 2015

Nutrition for Learning Inc. Financial Statements August 31, 2015 Financial Statements August 31, 2015 Independent Auditors' Report To the Members of Nutrition for Learning Inc.: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Nutrition for Learning Inc. which

More information

SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT

SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2018 TO AUGUST 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPOSED RESOLUTION... 1 BOARD PRIORITIES... 2 GOVERNANCE... 3 SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS ACTION PLAN 2018-2019...

More information

APPENDIX A WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. Analysis of Provincial Grant Allocations and Other Revenues

APPENDIX A WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. Analysis of Provincial Grant Allocations and Other Revenues APPENDIX A WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Analysis of Provincial Grant Allocations and Other Revenues June 17, 2013 7 Waterloo Region District School Board 2013/14 Budget Grants for Student Needs

More information

WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA

WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA JUNE 5, 2017 WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA A Special Committee of the Whole Budget Meeting of the Waterloo Region District School Board will be held in the Education Centre Board

More information

District Operating BUDGET

District Operating BUDGET District Operating BUDGET 2018 19 CHRIST has no body but yours, no hands, no feet on earth but YOURS. ~ St. Teresa of Ávila The following documents are integral in the development of our District Operating

More information

Recommendation Report

Recommendation Report Recommendation Report DATE: April 24, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE STAFF: REFERENCE: Board of Trustees Darrel Robertson, Superintendent of Schools 2018-2019 Distribution of Funds Todd Burnstad,

More information

Lethbridge School District No Operating Budget Executive Summary

Lethbridge School District No Operating Budget Executive Summary Lethbridge School District No. 51 2017-2018 Operating Budget Executive Summary Lethbridge School District No. 51 has a total budget of $128.6 million and provides public education services to the citizens

More information

BUSINESS AND FINANCE

BUSINESS AND FINANCE Page 8 BUSINESS AND FINANCE Report to the Governance Committee Meeting: Presented for: In Camera Open Information Approval Meeting Date: June 20, 2016 Presented by: Subject: Isabel Grace, Superintendent

More information

Lethbridge School District No. 51

Lethbridge School District No. 51 Lethbridge School District No. 51 Year End Report August 31st 2017 This document is Management s Discussion and Analysis of the Audited Financial Statements for the year ended August 31, 2017. This report

More information

District Operating. Budget

District Operating. Budget District Operating Budget 2017-18 Be it known to all who enter here that Christ is the reason for this school. He is the unseen but ever present teacher in its classes. He is the model of its staff and

More information

Report to Committee of the Whole May 14, 2012

Report to Committee of the Whole May 14, 2012 Report to Committee of the Whole May 14, 2012 SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: 2012-2013 This report was prepared by Marilyn Allen Marklevitz, Executive Superintendent of Business and Financial Services, Ian Gaudet,

More information

DECEMBER 18, 2017 WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING

DECEMBER 18, 2017 WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING DECEMBER 18, 2017 WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE OF MEETING The regular monthly Board Meeting of the Waterloo Region District School Board will be held in the Board Room, Floor 1, Building

More information

Total Community Parent Student Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

Total Community Parent Student Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Language Survey Version Stakeholder Group Back to Table of Contents How many children do you currently have in Modesto City Schools? Are you currently a student in Modesto City Schools? Which of the following

More information

Prairie South School Division No Annual Report

Prairie South School Division No Annual Report Prairie South School Division No. 210 2017-2018 Annual Report Table of Contents School Division Contact Information... 1 Letter of Transmittal... 2 Introduction... 3 Governance... 4 School Division Profile...

More information

WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET HEARING

WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET HEARING + WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET HEARING School Committee Recommended FY13 Operating Budget March 12, 2012 + AGENDA Proposed Goals and Priorities FY13 Operating Budget Budget Process Enrollment & Staffing

More information

Public Hearing FY13 Operating Budget. School Committee Meeting January 17, 2012

Public Hearing FY13 Operating Budget. School Committee Meeting January 17, 2012 Needham Public Schools Scholarship Public Hearing FY13 Operating Budget School Committee Meeting January 17, 2012 FY13 Budget Request Based on District Values and Goals Goal One: Advance Standards Based

More information

Centennial School District Budget Message April 19, CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017

Centennial School District Budget Message April 19, CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017 CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017 Dr. Paul Coakley Superintendent Rick Larson Budget Officer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It was the best of times, it was the worst of times so begins

More information

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care At a Glance Our Mission To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care MESSAGE FROM OUR SUPERINTENDENT High Performance in Cherry Creek Schools Harry Bull, Jr., Ed.D. The Cherry Creek

More information

Board of Education Meeting

Board of Education Meeting Board of Education Meeting 2015-16 Budget Draft 2 nd Part Instructional Technology Staffing 2015-16 Budget Draft 3 nd Part Transportation Bus purchase Benefits, Debt Service Transfers Budget Savings 2015-2016

More information

Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, June 21, The following information regarding the Board s budget process was previously provided to Trustees:

Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, June 21, The following information regarding the Board s budget process was previously provided to Trustees: Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, June 21, 2016 ACTION REPORT ITEM 8.5 2016-17 BUDGET ESTIMATES (FINAL) PURPOSE: To provide the Board with the final 2016-17 Budget Estimates for approval. BACKGROUND: The

More information

Recommendation Report

Recommendation Report Recommendation Report DATE: November 28, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE STAFF: REFERENCE: Board of Trustees Darrel Robertson, Superintendent of Schools Fall Update to the Revised 2017-2018

More information

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school. Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time

More information

Recommendation Report

Recommendation Report Recommendation Report DATE: November 29, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE STAFF: REFERENCE: Board of Trustees Darrel Robertson, Superintendent of Schools Fall Update to the Revised 2016-2017

More information

WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS

WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS + WAYLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS Budget Hearing Presentation FY16 Operating and Capital Budgets March 9, 2015 + AGENDA 2 System-Wide Vision & Goals School Committee Recommended Operating Budget Goal of Momentum

More information

BUDGET ESTIMATES

BUDGET ESTIMATES PUBLIC REPORT TO REGULAR BOARD 2017-18 BUDGET ESTIMATES A generous man will himself be blessed, for he shares his food with the poor. Proverbs 22:9 Created, Draft First Tabling Review May 9, 2017 May 18,

More information

ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. Previously Eligible Students Spring 2014

ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. Previously Eligible Students Spring 2014 ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Students Spring 2014 The attached list presents the results for each school in the Toronto District School Board

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. FY 2017 Approved

M E M O R A N D U M. FY 2017 Approved Dorothy H. Galo, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools Item 7.3 HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS 220 Central Street Hingham, Massachusetts 02043 781-741-1500 VOICE 781-749-7457 FAX dgalo@hinghamschools.org www.hinghamschools.com

More information

operating budget for and beyond

operating budget for and beyond cbe.ab.ca operating budget for 2012-13 and beyond 9-44 Table of Contents Budgeting for Success 1 Our Ultimate Goal 1 Operating Budget Highlights 2 Budget-at-a-Glance 2012-13 3 How New Schools are Funded

More information

ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. First-time Eligible Students Spring 2013

ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD. First-time Eligible Students Spring 2013 ONTARIO SECONDARY SCHOOL LITERACY TEST RESULTS: SCHOOLS IN THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD First-time Students Spring 2013 The attached list presents the results for each school in the Toronto District

More information

FY15 Wellesley Public School Budget

FY15 Wellesley Public School Budget FY15 Wellesley Public School Budget Annual Town Meeting 2014 WPS Strategic Plan 2 1. Focus on Every Child, in Every Classroom, Every Day 2. Invest in Educators 3. Provide Broad-Based Learning Opportunities

More information

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development Wheatland-Chili Central Schools 2016-2017 Budget Development Instruction: BOCES, Special Education, and Pupil Personnel Services February 8, 2016 Board of Education Meeting 1 District Objectives Build

More information

Recap: The Saskatchewan Plan for Growth. Saskatchewan Chamber Recommendation

Recap: The Saskatchewan Plan for Growth. Saskatchewan Chamber Recommendation Issue in Focus December 2012 Recap: The Saskatchewan Core Issue In October 2012 the Saskatchewan Party Government released the "Saskatchewan ". This plan sets out core activities for the government to

More information

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care

Our Mission. To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care At a Glance Our Mission To inspire every student to think, to learn, to achieve, to care MESSAGE FROM OUR SUPERINTENDENT Our Culture of Learning Welcome to the Cherry Creek Schools Culture of Learning.

More information

Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVO) November 1, 2017

Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVO) November 1, 2017 Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVO) Introduction TVO has an ambitious mission: to ignite the potential that lies within all Ontarians through the power of learning. TVO s complex role as

More information

2018/2019 Budget Presentation

2018/2019 Budget Presentation 2018/2019 Budget Presentation Budget Certainty Presented to the Board of Education April 10, 2018 School District No. 43 (Coquitlam) 2018/2019 Budget Presentation Slide 1 Presentation Agenda 1. Background

More information

Introduction. An Action Plan for Halifax

Introduction. An Action Plan for Halifax Introduction The Halifax Chamber of Commerce is a best practice business advocacy organization that represents over 1,700 members and strives to make Halifax an even better place to live, work and play.

More information

FY14 BUDGET PROPOSAL Public Hearing February 25, 2013

FY14 BUDGET PROPOSAL Public Hearing February 25, 2013 FY14 BUDGET PROPOSAL Public Hearing February 25, 2013 Fiscal Year 14 Budget Schedule 2 November 01, 2013 Manager of Financial Operations distributes FY14 budget information to meet with Budget Leaders

More information

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM Administration Building June 8, 2016 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Budget Information Presentation Budget Forum Next Steps Budget Planning Calendar October 28

More information

BUDGET UPDATE PART II. Board of Education Meeting March 26, 2018

BUDGET UPDATE PART II. Board of Education Meeting March 26, 2018 2018 2019 BUDGET UPDATE PART II Board of Education Meeting March 26, 2018 BUILDING A RESPONSIBLE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET What Guides Budget Development? Respect Hard Work Integrity Diversity Communication

More information

2016/2017 Budget Presentation A stable and incremental budget

2016/2017 Budget Presentation A stable and incremental budget School District No. 43 (Coquitlam) 2016/2017 Budget Presentation A stable and incremental budget April 12, 2016 School District 43 (Coquitlam) 2016/2017 Budget Presentation Slide 1 Presentation Agenda

More information

BUSINESS AND FINANCE

BUSINESS AND FINANCE BUSINESS AND FINANCE Report to the Governance Committee Meeting: Presented for: In Camera Open Information Approval Meeting Date: June 12, 2017 Presented by: Subject: Isabel Grace, Superintendent of Business/Finance

More information

STAFF REPORT ITEM 9.2

STAFF REPORT ITEM 9.2 Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, February 2, 2016 STAFF REPORT ITEM 9.2 PURPOSE: 2016-17 BUDGET ESTIMATES SCHEDULE, OBJECTIVES AND UPDATES To provide the Board of Trustees with the 2016-17 Budget Estimates

More information

2013 / 2014 Operating Budget

2013 / 2014 Operating Budget 2013 / 2014 Operating Budget Holy Spirit Roman Catholic Separate Regional Division No. 4 May 29, 2013 Prepared by: Lisa Palmarin, CGA, CSBO Secretary Treasurer Holy Spirit Catholic Schools 620 12 Street

More information

Shrewsbury Public Schools. Fiscal Year 2019 Superintendent s Budget Recommendation January 31, 2018

Shrewsbury Public Schools. Fiscal Year 2019 Superintendent s Budget Recommendation January 31, 2018 Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2019 Superintendent s Budget Recommendation January 31, 2018 Major Topics About This Budget & Key Questions Level Services Budget Recap & Sources of Funds Financial

More information

School Excursions. The Director of Education holds the principal responsible to ensure that:

School Excursions. The Director of Education holds the principal responsible to ensure that: Administrative Procedure 260 Background School Renfrew County District School Board recognizes the value of offering inclusive and equitable excursions which align with educational programming. Student

More information

Recommendation Report

Recommendation Report Recommendation Report DATE: November 27, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE STAFF: REFERENCE: Board of Trustees Darrel Robertson, Superintendent of Schools Fall Update to the Revised 2018-2019

More information

2002/03 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMS

2002/03 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMS 2002/03 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FORMS The financial statements forms are provided under EFIS and boards are required to submit their financial statements to the ministry under EFIS. An updated EFIS users

More information

CENTRAL OKANAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION

CENTRAL OKANAGAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION 2018-2019 ANNUAL BUDGET PRESENTATION Eileen Sadlowski, CPA, CA Secretary Treasurer/CFO February 5, 2018 STAFFING (HEAD COUNT) & SCHOOLS 1,454 TEACHERS 999 CUPE 548 CAS/CUPE RELIEF 94 PRINCIPALS/VICE PRINCIPALS

More information

Financial Plan

Financial Plan Financial Plan 2018-2019 Budget for Fiscal Year July 1, 2018 June 30, 2019 AT A GLANCE CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5 4700 South Yosemite Street Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Arapahoe County, Colorado

More information

Back to Table of Contents Total Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

Back to Table of Contents Total Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Language Survey Version Stakeholder Group Back to Table of Contents Spanish Sample Size 316 276 40 1,322 1,302 20 276 87% 276 100% 0 0% 1,302 98% 1,302 100% 0 0% Spanish 40 13% 0 0% 40 100% 20 2% 0 0%

More information

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet 1 Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet Use this worksheet to list proposed expenditures of FY 2016 Achievement and Integration revenue. Address general questions on budget submission

More information

2017/2018 Annual Budget Presentation. April 5, 2017

2017/2018 Annual Budget Presentation. April 5, 2017 2017/2018 Annual Budget Presentation April 5, 2017 Operating, Special Purpose and Capital Funds School districts manage financial resources in three funds: Operating Fund Where the main operating expenditures

More information

Clover Garden Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective

Clover Garden Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective Local AIG Plan, 2016-2019 Page 1 of 35 Clover Garden Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective 2016-2019 Approved by local Board of Education on: 11-OCT-16 LEA Superintendent's Name:

More information

Tuckahoe Union Free School District Initial Budget Overview

Tuckahoe Union Free School District Initial Budget Overview Board of Education Meeting March 16, 2017 Preparing Every Student for Excellence Budget Goals Aligned w/strategic Plan Implement a new teacher leadership model to support the implementation and sustainability

More information

HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE

HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE HALTON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD CAPITAL STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE DECEMBER 5, 2002 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (i) 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. CAPITAL STRATEGIC PLAN (CSP) UPDATE 2.1 Background 2-1 2.2 Residential

More information

Revised Budget Estimates including Sept 1 to Nov 30 Actuals Page 1 of 8

Revised Budget Estimates including Sept 1 to Nov 30 Actuals Page 1 of 8 2017-2018 Revised Budget Estimates including Sept 1 to Nov 30 Actuals Page 1 of 8 1. 2017-2018 Revised Budget Estimates including Sept 1 to Nov 30 Actuals Page 2 of 8 1 2 Description 6.83 FTE Elementary

More information

Summary Public School Indicators for the Provinces and Territories, to

Summary Public School Indicators for the Provinces and Territories, to Catalogue no. 81-9-MIE No. 44 ISSN: 1711-831X ISBN: -662-43681-4 Research Paper Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics Summary Public School Indicators for the Provinces and Territories,

More information

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Table of Contents Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT... 1-2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Financial Position... 3 Statements of Activities... 4-5

More information

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011 Budget Development for 2011-2012 Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011 as of May 23, 2011 Agenda Welcome and introductions Meeting format Budget presentation Input Context for Budget Development Unprecedented

More information

PRELIMINARY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2018

PRELIMINARY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2018 PRELIMINARY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2018 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 286 BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Suite 286 Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Ph: (763) 450-3386 www.brooklyncenterschools.org

More information

Superintendent s Proposed Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS

Superintendent s Proposed Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS Revised 11-16-09 Superintendent s Proposed Budget 2010-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Superintendent s Message Page 1 2009-12 Three Year Strategic Improvement Plan Overview Page 4 Major Object Code

More information

Budget Overview Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19,

Budget Overview Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19, Budget Overview 2019-2020 Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19, 2019 1 Our Mission The mission of the Rochester City School District is

More information

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Agenda Item

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Agenda Item 3.B. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Agenda Item Meeting Date August 14, 2018 Agenda Item Title Recommend Approval of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education FY2018-2019 Operating Budget

More information

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development. Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2017

Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development. Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2017 Wheatland-Chili Central Schools 2017-2018 Budget Development Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2017 1 The Wheatland-Chili Central School community is committed to academic excellence which empowers

More information

The School District of Clayton s Budget Planning Guide. Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview. Helpful Definitions

The School District of Clayton s Budget Planning Guide. Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview. Helpful Definitions The s Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview Transition to Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB) is a major outcome within the Resource Management theme of the District s strategic plan. It is not a budget reduction process.

More information

Click to edit Master title style

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master title style School Board FY 2018 Budget Retreat January 14, 2017 Click FY 2018 to edit Budget Master Retreat title Agenda style Overview of State requirements Overview of budget development

More information

% of Total Population

% of Total Population 6SHFLDO (GXFDWLRQ Department: Student Services Director: Jennifer Truslow Asst. Director: Anne Zernicke Ages: 3 through 22 Address: 89 Wellesley Street Weston MA 02493 PH: 781-786-5240 Fax: 781-786-5249

More information

Elementary School Boundary Review

Elementary School Boundary Review Elementary School Boundary Review South West Brantford May 23, 2017 Agenda Welcome and Introductions The Boundary Review Process Grand Erie s Demographics and Long Term Accommodation Forecasts for the

More information

EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT

EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017-2018 BUDGET PRESENTATION May 4, 2017 Making the world a better place, one student at a time WELCOME BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, GOALS, & HISTORY John Scavelli, Jr.,

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Requested Annual Budget ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Family, Community & Business Engagement Arts Integration Curriculum

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Family, Community & Business Engagement Arts Integration Curriculum & Instruction Academic Programs Career Academy Programs College & Career Ready ESOL Early

More information

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007

PENCIL FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007 Table of Contents Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT... 1-2 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Financial Position... 3 Statements

More information

Preliminary Recommended Budget for School Year. School Board Meeting June 22, 2011

Preliminary Recommended Budget for School Year. School Board Meeting June 22, 2011 Preliminary Recommended Budget for 2011-2012 School Year School Board Meeting June 22, 2011 as of June 22, 2011 Agenda Context for recommended 2011-12 general fund budget Review budget challenge and estimated

More information

ADOPTED BUDGET

ADOPTED BUDGET 2012- ADOPTED BUDGET Recommendation Budget by Budget Unit Budget Unit Descriptions Prepared by the District 191 Business Office 100 River Ridge Court Burnsville MN 55337 (952) 707-2051 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL

More information

The Board of Education of the Saskatoon Public S.D. #13 of Saskatchewan. (Saskatoon Public Schools) Annual Report

The Board of Education of the Saskatoon Public S.D. #13 of Saskatchewan. (Saskatoon Public Schools) Annual Report The Board of Education of the Saskatoon Public S.D. #13 of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon Public Schools) 2014-15 Annual Report Contents Letter of Transmittal... 1 Introduction... 2 School Division Profile...

More information

WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA

WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA JUNE 11, 2018 WATERLOO REGION DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE AND AGENDA A Committee of the Whole meeting of the Waterloo Region District School Board will be held in the Board Room, Building 2, 1 st Floor,

More information

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2020

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2020 Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2020 Prince William County School Board Meeting February 6, 2019 John M. Wallingford Associate Superintendent for Finance & Risk Management Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Highlights

More information

Amended Budget. Durango School District 9-R

Amended Budget. Durango School District 9-R Amended Budget Durango School District 9-R FYE 06/30/2013 GENERAL FUND BUDGET Pupil Count - Assessed Valuation - Mill Levies Page 1 1. Pupil Enrollment Actual Budget Increase Actual Estimated October Count

More information

Summary Report of the Vancouver School Board Budget 2017 Consultation Survey

Summary Report of the Vancouver School Board Budget 2017 Consultation Survey Summary Report of the Vancouver School Board Budget 2017 Consultation Survey INTRODUCTION: The Vancouver School Board (VSB) consulted stakeholders on the 2017 Budget. Over the last several years, the Vancouver

More information

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2017 Budget Workbook

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2017 Budget Workbook Remember, one of the most important steps is having a district's program and fiscal staff collaborate on this budget. As always, proposed expenditures that align with budget requirements will be approved

More information

BOARD OF EDUCATION 2017 / Governance Framework and Annual Work Plan

BOARD OF EDUCATION 2017 / Governance Framework and Annual Work Plan BOARD OF EDUCATION 2017 / 2018 Governance Framework and Annual Work Plan 2 Annual Work Plan and Governance Framework 2017-2018 The Importance of a Governance Framework Effective Boards of Education have

More information

Capacity Development Strategies and Priorities Supporting Research, Developing Minds

Capacity Development Strategies and Priorities Supporting Research, Developing Minds Capacity Development Strategies and Priorities 2013 2018 Supporting Research, Developing Minds Introduction A key part of the Sheikh Saud Bin Saqr Al Qasimi Foundation s mission is to develop and deliver

More information

Solana Beach School District

Solana Beach School District B U D G E T W O R K S H O P Solana Beach School District 2017-18 Proposed Budget June 8, 2017 Our Mission is to provide a child-centered education of the highest quality, using the unique vision and resources

More information

FY16 BUDGET BASICS. Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office Community Presentation

FY16 BUDGET BASICS. Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office Community Presentation FY16 BUDGET BASICS Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office Community Presentation Timeline for FY 15-16 Budget February Davis Center Redesign work completed March 6 Allocations sent out March 6 April

More information

Milton Public Schools Budget FY Warrant Committee Presentation December 17, 2015

Milton Public Schools Budget FY Warrant Committee Presentation December 17, 2015 Milton Public Schools Budget FY2016-2017 Warrant Committee Presentation December 17, 2015 1 Vision of Milton Public Schools The Vision of the Milton Public School system is to build and strengthen a dynamic

More information

Canadian School Board Structure and Trustee Profile

Canadian School Board Structure and Trustee Profile Cross Country Overview: Canadian School Board Structure and Trustee Profile Canadian School Boards Association April 2018 The national voice of school boards Introduction Introduction In 2015, the Canadian

More information

Salt Lake City School District

Salt Lake City School District Salt Lake City School District Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2017-18 Salt Lake City School District 440 East 100 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 www.slcschools.org Prepared by the Office of the Business Administrator

More information

NEW LONDON PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Superintendent s Recommended Budget. Fiscal Year

NEW LONDON PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Superintendent s Recommended Budget. Fiscal Year NEW LONDON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Superintendent s Recommended Budget Fiscal Year 2017-18 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Table of Contents Introduction PAGES SUPERINTENDENT'S TRANSMITTAL LETTER 5 Executive

More information

Our Vision We honour student voice and choice through engaging, purposeful and experiential learning in a safe and respectful community.

Our Vision We honour student voice and choice through engaging, purposeful and experiential learning in a safe and respectful community. The discussion and analysis of School District 62 s financial performance provides an overall narrative review of the School District s financial activities for the year ended June 30, 2017. The intent

More information

Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year

Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year 2013-2014 Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Mary Beth Jackson, Superintendent Rita R. Scallan, Chief

More information

The Quantile Framework. for Mathematics. Linking Assessment with Mathematics Instruction

The Quantile Framework. for Mathematics. Linking Assessment with Mathematics Instruction The Quantile Framework for Mathematics Linking Assessment with Mathematics Instruction The Quantile Framework for Mathematics Linking Assessment with Mathematics Instruction 1.1 The Quantile Framework

More information

Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance. Revised

Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance. Revised 2018-2019 Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance Revised Agenda Budget Calendar Stakeholder Expectations District Vision, Mission, and Goals Budget Priorities

More information

Superintendent s Proposed BUDGET Fiscal Year Public Hearing April 8, 2015

Superintendent s Proposed BUDGET Fiscal Year Public Hearing April 8, 2015 Superintendent s Proposed BUDGET Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Public Hearing April 8, 2015 1 Budget Development Teachers & Administrators were asked to make requests that would enhance student learning Administrators

More information

2020 Vision: Budget Process Budget Strategies

2020 Vision: Budget Process Budget Strategies 2020 Vision: Budget Process Budget Strategies Superintendent/CEO John Blain 395 Wakesiah Avenue, Nanaimo, BC V9R 3K6 2018-19 / Nanaimo Ladysmith Public Schools www.sd68.bc.ca All district decisions are

More information

Preliminary Budget

Preliminary Budget Learners are innovative thinkers who are successful, confident, respectful, and caring Prepared by the Division of Business Affairs 433, 15 th Street South Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 2Z4 Presentation:

More information

ROCKWOOD R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT

ROCKWOOD R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT ROCKWOOD R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT St. Louis County, Missouri 2013/14 Budget Dr. Terry Adams, Interim Superintendent of Schools Mr. Tim Rooney, CPA, Chief Financial and Legislative Officer Mr. Dan Steinbruegge,

More information

Leading Collaboration to Increase Cumulative Impact: Evidence from Ontario s Poverty Reduction Strategy

Leading Collaboration to Increase Cumulative Impact: Evidence from Ontario s Poverty Reduction Strategy Leading Collaboration to Increase Cumulative Impact: Evidence from Ontario s Poverty Reduction Strategy 4.5 million Canadians live in poverty. Over 1.5 million are in Ontario. The estimated yearly cost

More information

Prince Edward Island

Prince Edward Island Prince Edward Island Budget Highlights 2000-2001 A Balanced Agenda: Investing in our Health Care, Education, Jobs and Communities for the New Millennium Presented by The Honourable Patricia J. Mella Provincial

More information

BOUND BROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET Planning For Our Success

BOUND BROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET Planning For Our Success BOUND BROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET 2017-2018 Planning For Our Success Overall Budget Goals Keep Instructional Programs Keep or reduce classes sizes Continue Instructional Improvement Continue Curriculum

More information

Deputy Minister. DATE: June 28, 2006

Deputy Minister. DATE: June 28, 2006 Ministry of Education Deputy Minister MinistPre de l Éducation Sous-ministre Mowat Block Édifice Mowat Queen s Park Queen s Park Toronto ON M7A 1L2 Toronto ON M7A 1L2 Telephone (416) 325-2600 Téléphone

More information