Back to Table of Contents Total Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %
|
|
|
- Bennett Holland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Language Survey Version Stakeholder Group Back to Table of Contents Spanish Sample Size ,322 1, % % 0 0% 1,302 98% 1, % 0 0% Spanish 40 13% 0 0% % 20 2% 0 0% % Sample Size ,322 1, Community 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% - Spanish 40 13% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1,302 98% 1, % 0 0% - Spanish 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 20 2% 0 0% % Sample Size ,322 1, Community 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % % % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1, % 1, % % How many children do you currently have in Modesto City Schools? Sample Size child % % 9 23% children 98 31% 80 29% 18 46% children 38 12% 26 9% 12 31% children 6 2% 6 2% 0 0% or more children 5 2% 5 2% 0 0% Are you currently a student in Modesto City Schools? Sample Size ,320 1, Yes , % 1, % % No % 0 0% 0 0% What is your child's current school ( school year)? Sample Size ,322 1, Elihu Beard Elementary 4 1% 4 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Bret Harte Elementary 5 2% 2 1% 3 8% % % 0 0% Burbank Elementary 32 10% 4 1% 28 70% % % 11 55% El Vista Elementary 3 1% 2 1% 1 3% 14 1% 12 1% 2 10% Enslen Elementary 13 4% 13 5% 0 0% 2 0% 2 0% 0 0% Catherine Everett Elementary 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Fairview Elementary 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 4 0% 3 0% 1 5% Franklin Elementary 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% John Fremont Elementary 30 9% 30 11% 0 0% 4 0% 4 0% 0 0% William Garrison Elementary 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% Harriett Kirschen Elementary 1 0% 0 0% 1 3% 1 0% 0 0% 1 5% Lakewood Elementary 7 2% 7 3% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% James Marshall Elementary 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 0% 2 0% 1 5% Alberta Martone Elementary 6 2% 6 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% John Muir Elementary 4 1% 4 1% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% Page 1 of 13
2 Spanish Robertson Road Elementary 2 1% 1 0% 1 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Rose Avenue Elementary 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Shackelford Elementary 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sonoma Elementary 12 4% 11 4% 1 3% 2 0% 2 0% 0 0% Tuolumne Elementary 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Wilson Elementary 5 2% 4 1% 1 3% 119 9% 118 9% 1 5% Orville Wright Elementary 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Evelyn Hanshaw Junior High 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% La Loma Junior High 11 3% 9 3% 2 5% 2 0% 2 0% 0 0% Mark Twain Junior High 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Roosevelt Junior High 10 3% 10 4% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% Fred C. Beyer High 32 10% 32 12% 0 0% 8 1% 7 1% 1 5% Grace M. Davis High 13 4% 13 5% 0 0% 18 1% 18 1% 0 0% Thomas Downey High 24 8% 24 9% 0 0% 5 0% 5 0% 0 0% James C. Enochs High 41 13% 41 15% 0 0% 33 2% 33 3% 0 0% Joseph A. Gregori High 33 10% 32 12% 1 3% 18 1% 18 1% 0 0% Peter Johansen High 7 2% 6 2% 1 3% 11 1% 9 1% 2 10% Modesto High 12 4% 12 4% 0 0% 12 1% 12 1% 0 0% Robert Elliott Alternative Ed Center 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 0% 3 0% 0 0% Pearson Education Center 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% G % 0 0% 0 0% 2 0% 2 0% 0 0% What is your child's current grade level ( school year)? Sample Size ,322 1, Transitional Kindergarten 3 1% 1 0% 2 5% 3 0% 2 0% 1 5% Kindergarten 23 7% 17 6% 6 15% 2 0% 1 0% 1 5% Grade % 11 4% 5 13% 28 2% 27 2% 1 5% Grade % 12 4% 5 13% 53 4% 51 4% 2 10% Grade % 15 5% 6 15% % % 0 0% Grade % 14 5% 5 13% % % 1 5% Grade % 17 6% 5 13% % % 5 25% Grade % 10 4% 2 5% % % 6 30% Grade % 10 4% 1 3% 5 0% 5 0% 0 0% Grade % 10 4% 1 3% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% Grade % 54 20% 0 0% 27 2% 27 2% 0 0% Grade % 43 16% 0 0% 24 2% 23 2% 1 5% Grade % 41 15% 1 3% 40 3% 38 3% 2 10% Grade % 21 8% 1 3% 19 1% 19 1% 0 0% Does your child fall into any of the following categories/participate in any of the following services this school year? Please select all that apply. Page 2 of 13 Sample Size Learner (EL) 38 12% 9 3% 29 73% Foster Youth 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% Restorative Justice 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Special Education 25 8% 22 8% 3 8%
3 Spanish Free and Reduced Price Lunch 78 25% 55 20% 23 58% Counseling Services 14 5% 14 5% 0 0% None of the above % % 4 10% I am motivated to learn I like going to school I come to class prepared Sample Size ,137 1, Top % % 29 85% % % 12 86% Strongly Agree % % 22 65% % % 8 57% Agree 90 30% 83 31% 7 21% % % 4 29% Neither Agree nor Disagree 22 7% 21 8% 1 3% % % 2 14% Disagree 18 6% 17 6% 1 3% 56 5% 56 5% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 13 4% 10 4% 3 9% 46 4% 46 4% 0 0% Sample Size ,127 1, Top % % 32 86% % % 9 56% Strongly Agree % % 21 57% % % 3 19% Agree % 97 36% 11 30% % % 6 38% Neither Agree nor Disagree 32 10% 32 12% 0 0% % % 4 25% Disagree 29 9% 28 10% 1 3% 91 8% 89 8% 2 13% Strongly Disagree 14 5% 10 4% 4 11% 85 8% 84 8% 1 6% Sample Size ,140 1, Top % % 28 88% % % % Strongly Agree % % 17 53% % % 7 54% Agree % 91 34% 11 34% % % 6 46% Neither Agree nor Disagree 12 4% 12 4% 0 0% % % 0 0% Disagree 10 3% 8 3% 2 6% 53 5% 53 5% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 10 3% 8 3% 2 6% 46 4% 46 4% 0 0% I understand what types of academic support are available to me Sample Size Top % % 5 63% Strongly Agree % % 2 25% Agree % % 3 38% Neither Agree nor Disagree % % 1 13% Disagree % 61 7% 1 13% Strongly Disagree % 59 7% 1 13% I understand what types of non-academic support are available to me Sample Size Top % % 7 78% Strongly Agree % % 3 33% Agree % % 4 44% Neither Agree nor Disagree % % 0 0% Page 3 of 13
4 Spanish Disagree % % 2 22% Strongly Disagree % 62 8% 0 0% How prepared do you feel for... high school? Sample Size Top % 17 89% 2 100% 1 100% 1 100% - - Completely Prepared 4 19% 3 16% 1 50% 1 100% 1 100% - - Somewhat Prepared 15 71% 14 74% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% - - Neither Prepared nor Unprepared 1 5% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% - - Somewhat Unprepared 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% - - Completely Unprepared 1 5% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% - - college? Sample Size Top % % 1 33% 66 66% 64 65% 2 100% Completely Prepared 33 19% 33 19% 0 0% 15 15% 14 14% 1 50% Somewhat Prepared 86 49% 85 49% 1 33% 51 51% 50 51% 1 50% Neither Prepared nor Unprepared 17 10% 17 10% 0 0% 12 12% 12 12% 0 0% Somewhat Unprepared 25 14% 24 14% 1 33% 13 13% 13 13% 0 0% Completely Unprepared 14 8% 13 8% 1 33% 9 9% 9 9% 0 0% career/workforce? Sample Size Top % 93 54% 2 67% 56 57% 55 57% 1 50% Completely Prepared 19 11% 19 11% 0 0% 17 17% 16 16% 1 50% Somewhat Prepared 76 43% 74 43% 2 67% 39 39% 39 40% 0 0% Neither Prepared nor Unprepared 32 18% 32 19% 0 0% 15 15% 15 15% 0 0% Somewhat Unprepared 31 18% 30 17% 1 33% 14 14% 14 14% 0 0% Completely Unprepared 17 10% 17 10% 0 0% 14 14% 13 13% 1 50% My child's school encourages parental involvement Sample Size Top % % 32 94% Strongly Agree 94 33% 76 30% 18 53% Agree % % 14 41% Neither Agree nor Disagree 38 13% 36 14% 2 6% Disagree 23 8% 23 9% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 14 5% 14 6% 0 0% My child's school encourages involvement from community organizations Sample Size Top % % 28 97% Strongly Agree 45 18% 35 16% 10 34% Agree % 91 41% 18 62% Neither Agree nor Disagree 57 23% 57 25% 0 0% Disagree 25 10% 25 11% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 17 7% 16 7% 1 3% Page 4 of 13
5 Spanish I have an opportunity in the decision-making process at my child's school Sample Size Top % % 28 85% Strongly Agree 35 13% 20 8% 15 45% Agree % 88 37% 13 39% Neither Agree nor Disagree 73 27% 69 29% 4 12% Disagree 45 16% 44 18% 1 3% Strongly Disagree 19 7% 19 8% 0 0% I have an opportunity in the decision-making process at the district Sample Size Top % 63 27% 29 94% Strongly Agree 22 8% 9 4% 13 42% Agree 70 26% 54 23% 16 52% Neither Agree nor Disagree 78 29% 78 33% 0 0% Disagree 60 23% 58 25% 2 6% Strongly Disagree 36 14% 36 15% 0 0% Please indicate how much you disagree or agree with the following statement: Modesto City Schools provides ample opportunities for parents to be involved Sample Size Strongly Agree 38 14% 28 11% 10 29% Agree % % 15 44% Neither Agree nor Disagree 57 20% 56 23% 1 3% Disagree 33 12% 30 12% 3 9% Strongly Disagree 28 10% 23 9% 5 15% Which parent or community activity(ies) have you participated in this year? Please select all that apply. Sample Size Family or community forums 38 13% 26 10% 12 34% Back to School Night % % 24 69% School Site Council Meetings (SSC) 22 8% 19 7% 3 9% Teacher Association (PTA) 58 20% 52 20% 6 17% Learner Advisory Committee/ Learner Partnership 10 3% 2 1% 8 23% District Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) 8 3% 1 0% 7 20% Booster Club 42 14% 42 16% 0 0% District Advisory Committee (e.g., LCAP meeting) 13 4% 10 4% 3 9% Community Advisory Committee 2 1% 0 0% 2 6% volunteer at community events (e.g., Kids Night & Health Fair, Science Fair) 68 23% 59 23% 9 26% volunteer at school % 97 38% 5 14% Open House % % 18 51% Other 36 12% 32 12% 4 11% None of the above 40 14% 35 14% 5 14% Page 5 of 13
6 Spanish I feel that the school and/or district valued my participation or input in... Family or community forums Sample Size Top % 12 48% % Strongly Agree 10 28% 3 12% 7 64% Agree 13 36% 9 36% 4 36% Neither Agree nor Disagree 7 19% 7 28% 0 0% Disagree 2 6% 2 8% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 4 11% 4 16% 0 0% Back to School Night Sample Size Top % 89 59% 20 87% Strongly Agree 40 23% 30 20% 10 43% Agree 69 39% 59 39% 10 43% Neither Agree nor Disagree 40 23% 40 26% 0 0% Disagree 18 10% 15 10% 3 13% Strongly Disagree 8 5% 8 5% 0 0% School Site Council Meetings (SSC) Sample Size Top % 13 72% 2 100% Strongly Agree 8 40% 7 39% 1 50% Agree 7 35% 6 33% 1 50% Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 20% 4 22% 0 0% Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 1 5% 1 6% 0 0% Teacher Association (PTA) Sample Size Top % 39 78% 6 100% Strongly Agree 21 38% 16 32% 5 83% Agree 24 43% 23 46% 1 17% Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 7% 4 8% 0 0% Disagree 3 5% 3 6% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 4 7% 4 8% 0 0% Learner Advisory Committee/ Learner Partnership Sample Size Top % 1 100% 6 86% Strongly Agree 3 38% 0 0% 3 43% Agree 4 50% 1 100% 3 43% Neither Agree nor Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Disagree 1 13% 0 0% 1 14% Strongly Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Booster Club Page 6 of 13
7 Spanish Sample Size Top % 33 79% Strongly Agree 10 24% 10 24% Agree 23 55% 23 55% Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 7% 3 7% Disagree 5 12% 5 12% Strongly Disagree 1 2% 1 2% District Advisory Committee (e.g., LCAP meeting) Sample Size Top % 6 60% 3 100% Strongly Agree 6 46% 3 30% 3 100% Agree 3 23% 3 30% 0 0% Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 23% 3 30% 0 0% Disagree 1 8% 1 10% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Other Sample Size Top % 23 72% 2 67% Strongly Agree 15 43% 13 41% 2 67% Agree 10 29% 10 31% 0 0% Neither Agree nor Disagree 5 14% 5 16% 0 0% Disagree 3 9% 2 6% 1 33% Strongly Disagree 2 6% 2 6% 0 0% District Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) Sample Size Top % 0 0% 7 100% Strongly Agree 4 50% 0 0% 4 57% Agree 3 38% 0 0% 3 43% Neither Agree nor Disagree 1 13% 1 100% 0 0% Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Community Advisory Committee Sample Size Top % % Strongly Agree 2 100% % Agree 0 0% % Neither Agree nor Disagree 0 0% % Disagree 0 0% % Strongly Disagree 0 0% % volunteer at community events (e.g., Kids Night & Health Fair, Science Fair) Sample Size Top % 44 79% 6 75% Strongly Agree 20 31% 17 30% 3 38% Agree 30 47% 27 48% 3 38% Neither Agree nor Disagree 12 19% 10 18% 2 25% Page 7 of 13
8 Spanish Disagree 1 2% 1 2% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 1 2% 1 2% 0 0% volunteer at school Sample Size Top % 80 85% 4 80% Strongly Agree 41 41% 38 40% 3 60% Agree 43 43% 42 45% 1 20% Neither Agree nor Disagree 10 10% 9 10% 1 20% Disagree 2 2% 2 2% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 3 3% 3 3% 0 0% Open House Sample Size Top % 68 56% % Strongly Agree 32 23% 23 19% 9 50% Agree 54 39% 45 37% 9 50% Neither Agree nor Disagree 32 23% 32 26% 0 0% Disagree 15 11% 15 12% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 7 5% 7 6% 0 0% What has prevented you from participating in parent activities so far this year? Sample Size Scheduling conflicts 23 58% 22 63% 1 20% Not sure how I can participate 13 33% 12 34% 1 20% Not interested 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% I didn't feel welcome 1 3% 1 3% 0 0% Other 6 15% 5 14% 1 20% Nothing - I am satisfied with the school 4 10% 2 6% 2 40% What would help parents become more involved in Modesto City Schools? Please select all that apply. Sample Size More communication between the school and parents % % 16 50% More information on involvement opportunities % % 11 34% More information on how to support students at home % 91 36% 20 63% More convenient times for participation % % 12 38% More participation opportunities at the district level 61 21% 54 21% 7 22% More participation opportunities at the school level 86 30% 78 31% 8 25% More convenient locations for participation 48 17% 43 17% 5 16% Other 28 10% 25 10% 3 9% None of the above 30 11% 27 11% 3 9% Are you able to communicate with teachers and staff when you need to? Sample Size Yes % % 33 97% No 27 9% 27 11% 0 0% Not applicable/i don t need to communicate with teachers/school administrators 7 2% 6 2% 1 3% Page 8 of 13
9 Spanish Confidence Level = 95% Why are you unable to communicate with teachers and staff when necessary? Please Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % select all that apply. Sample Size Language barrier 2 8% 2 8% Waiting for translators and/or liaisons 1 4% 1 4% Teachers/school administrators are unresponsive 18 69% 18 69% Teachers/school administrators are unavailable when I am available 12 46% 12 46% Staff are unresponsive 0 0% 0 0% Not sure how to communicate with teachers and staff 0 0% 0 0% Other 6 23% 6 23% None of the above 0 0% 0 0% How would you prefer the school to communicate with you? Please select up to three options. Sample Size Phone calls % % 22 71% In-person meetings 91 32% 77 31% 14 45% % % 6 19% Mail/letter 66 23% 56 22% 10 32% Newsletters 72 26% 59 24% 13 42% Website 55 20% 55 22% 0 0% Other 14 5% 14 6% 0 0% Modesto City Schools... wants students to succeed Sample Size ,088 1, Top % % 30 94% % % 9 75% Strongly Agree 80 28% 59 24% 21 66% % % 6 50% Agree % % 9 28% % % 3 25% Neither Agree nor Disagree 40 14% 40 16% 0 0% 99 9% 99 9% 0 0% Disagree 18 6% 16 6% 2 6% 40 4% 39 4% 1 8% Strongly Disagree 10 4% 10 4% 0 0% 40 4% 38 4% 2 17% focuses on students' character Sample Size ,022 1, Top % % 24 86% % % 5 42% Strongly Agree 36 13% 26 11% 10 36% % % 1 8% Agree 98 37% 84 35% 14 50% % % 4 33% Neither Agree nor Disagree 67 25% 66 28% 1 4% % % 4 33% Disagree 48 18% 45 19% 3 11% 80 8% 80 8% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 18 7% 18 8% 0 0% 54 5% 51 5% 3 25% provides a well-rounded curriculum Sample Size Top % % 23 85% % % 10 77% Strongly Agree 38 14% 27 11% 11 41% % % 4 31% Agree % % 12 44% % % 6 46% Neither Agree nor Disagree 40 15% 38 16% 2 7% % % 1 8% Page 9 of 13
10 Spanish Disagree 44 16% 43 18% 1 4% 94 10% 93 10% 1 8% Strongly Disagree 21 8% 20 8% 1 4% 54 6% 53 6% 1 8% sets high expectations for student achievement Sample Size ,031 1, Top % % 27 93% % % 10 77% Strongly Agree 53 19% 40 16% 13 45% % % 2 15% Agree % % 14 48% % % 8 62% Neither Agree nor Disagree 53 19% 53 21% 0 0% % % 1 8% Disagree 37 13% 35 14% 2 7% 54 5% 54 5% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 11 4% 11 4% 0 0% 43 4% 41 4% 2 15% provides sufficient opportunities for students to explore their career interest Sample Size , Top % 85 37% 21 72% % % 7 58% Strongly Agree 24 9% 14 6% 10 34% % % 4 33% Agree 82 32% 71 31% 11 38% % % 3 25% Neither Agree nor Disagree 69 27% 66 29% 3 10% % % 1 8% Disagree 61 23% 56 24% 5 17% % % 1 8% Strongly Disagree 24 9% 24 10% 0 0% 70 7% 67 7% 3 25% I trust teachers and the school staff I am respected by other students at school School rules are fair My teachers listen to me ,035 1, Top % % 26 84% % % 5 45% Strongly Agree 80 29% 70 28% 10 32% % % 2 18% Agree % % 16 52% % % 3 27% Neither Agree nor Disagree 34 12% 31 13% 3 10% % % 3 27% Disagree 28 10% 26 11% 2 6% 63 6% 62 6% 1 9% Strongly Disagree 16 6% 16 7% 0 0% 69 7% 67 7% 2 18% Sample Size ,048 1, Top % % 18 62% % % 6 50% Strongly Agree 50 19% 44 18% 6 21% % % 2 17% Agree % % 12 41% % % 4 33% Neither Agree nor Disagree 49 18% 43 18% 6 21% % % 2 17% Disagree 17 6% 13 5% 4 14% % % 3 25% Strongly Disagree 10 4% 9 4% 1 3% 93 9% 92 9% 1 8% Sample Size ,041 1, Top % % 25 86% % % 5 45% Strongly Agree 54 20% 44 18% 10 34% % % 2 18% Agree % % 15 52% % % 3 27% Neither Agree nor Disagree 37 14% 33 14% 4 14% % % 5 45% Disagree 21 8% 21 9% 0 0% % % 0 0% Strongly Disagree 14 5% 14 6% 0 0% % % 1 9% Page 10 of 13
11 Spanish Sample Size ,027 1, Top % % 24 86% % % 5 45% Strongly Agree 56 21% 47 20% 9 32% % % 0 0% Agree % 96 40% 15 54% % % 5 45% Neither Agree nor Disagree 54 20% 52 22% 2 7% % % 3 27% Disagree 33 12% 31 13% 2 7% 80 8% 80 8% 0 0% Strongly Disagree 14 5% 14 6% 0 0% 77 7% 74 7% 3 27% Bullying is not a problem at my school Sample Size , Top % 60 28% 9 36% % % 5 56% Strongly Agree 15 6% 10 5% 5 20% % % 3 33% Agree 54 22% 50 23% 4 16% % % 2 22% Neither Agree nor Disagree 61 25% 50 23% 11 44% % % 0 0% Disagree 71 29% 69 32% 2 8% % % 2 22% Strongly Disagree 42 17% 39 18% 3 12% % % 2 22% I feel safe at school My school is clean My school is well-maintained Sample Size ,025 1, Top % % 25 78% % % 8 67% Strongly Agree 66 24% 53 21% 13 41% % % 1 8% Agree % % 12 38% % % 7 58% Neither Agree nor Disagree 36 13% 32 13% 4 13% % % 1 8% Disagree 17 6% 14 6% 3 9% 93 9% 91 9% 2 17% Strongly Disagree 10 4% 10 4% 0 0% % % 1 8% Sample Size ,033 1, Top % % 24 80% % % 6 60% Strongly Agree 86 31% 72 29% 14 47% % % 3 30% Agree % % 10 33% % % 3 30% Neither Agree nor Disagree 31 11% 27 11% 4 13% % % 2 20% Disagree 19 7% 17 7% 2 7% % % 1 10% Strongly Disagree 3 1% 3 1% 0 0% % % 1 10% Sample Size Top % % 21 68% % % 6 60% Strongly Agree 80 29% 70 29% 10 32% % % 3 30% Agree % % 11 35% % % 3 30% Neither Agree nor Disagree 32 12% 24 10% 8 26% % % 1 10% Disagree 21 8% 19 8% 2 6% % % 1 10% Strongly Disagree 4 1% 4 2% 0 0% % % 2 20% In what area(s) would you like to see more support available to your child at Modesto City Schools? Please select up to five options. Page 11 of 13 Sample Size ,094 1,086 8
12 Spanish Academic enrichment % 97 39% 14 47% % % 4 50% Academic support (e.g., tutoring) 82 29% 72 29% 10 33% % % 3 38% Character education 65 23% 56 23% 9 30% % % 1 13% Life skills development % % 12 40% % % 4 50% Health services 31 11% 25 10% 6 20% % % 3 38% Special education services 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Academic counseling 81 29% 70 28% 11 37% % % 2 25% Technology literacy 75 27% 72 29% 3 10% % % 0 0% Socio-emotional counseling 61 22% 54 22% 7 23% % % 2 25% Extra-curricular opportunities (e.g., sports, community service) 93 33% 85 34% 8 27% % % 4 50% Preparation for the next school level (e.g., elementary students moving to junior high; junior high students moving to high school) 70 25% 58 23% 12 40% % % 2 25% College preparation 98 35% 87 35% 11 37% % % 2 25% Career preparation % 95 38% 5 17% % % 2 25% Other 20 7% 20 8% 0 0% % % 1 13% None of the above - I am satisfied with the current support available 17 6% 16 6% 1 3% 40 4% 40 4% 0 0% What subjects would you like additional courses offered at your school? Please select up to five options. Sample Size Career and Technical Education % 28 33% 1 100% College-Preparatory Elective % 28 33% 0 0% Dance % 13 15% 1 100% Language Arts % 3 4% 0 0% as a Second Language (ESL) % 5 6% 0 0% Family and Consumer Science (e.g., cooking, welding) % 19 22% 0 0% Health and Physical Education % 12 14% 0 0% Mathematics % 12 14% 0 0% Music % 18 21% 0 0% Science % 19 22% 0 0% Social Science/History % 9 11% 0 0% Special Education % 6 7% 0 0% Technology & Engineering % 24 28% 0 0% Theater % 12 14% 0 0% Visual Arts % 20 24% 0 0% Foreign Languages % 39 46% 0 0% Other % 8 9% 1 100% None of the above - I am satisfied with the current course offerings % 10 12% 0 0% Please select your race/ethnicity: Sample Size American Indian or Alaska Native 5 2% 5 2% 0 0% 32 3% 32 3% 0 0% Asian 5 2% 5 2% 0 0% 48 5% 48 5% 0 0% Black or African American 4 1% 4 2% 0 0% 31 3% 31 3% 0 0% Hispanic 80 29% 53 22% 27 93% % % 3 60% Page 12 of 13
13 Spanish Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 3 1% 2 1% 1 3% 10 1% 10 1% 0 0% White % % 0 0% 77 8% 77 8% 0 0% Two or more races 20 7% 20 8% 0 0% % % 0 0% Prefer not to respond 31 11% 30 12% 1 3% % % 2 40% Which language(s) do you speak at home? Please select all that apply. Sample Size Assyrian 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 13 1% 13 1% 0 0% Arabic 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 20 2% 20 2% 0 0% Cantonese 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 9 1% 9 1% 0 0% % % 10 36% % % 5 83% Farsi 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 9 1% 9 1% 0 0% French 3 1% 3 1% 0 0% 28 3% 28 3% 0 0% German 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 17 2% 17 2% 0 0% Hindi 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 14 1% 14 1% 0 0% Hmong 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 9 1% 9 1% 0 0% Italian 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 20 2% 20 2% 0 0% Korean 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 14 1% 14 1% 0 0% Khmer/Cambodian 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 26 3% 26 3% 0 0% Lao 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 1% 10 1% 0 0% Mandarin 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 7 1% 7 1% 0 0% Portuguese 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 11 1% 11 1% 0 0% Russian 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 15 2% 15 2% 0 0% Spanish 61 23% 35 14% 26 93% % % 6 100% Tagalog 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 9 1% 9 1% 0 0% Vietnamese 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 1% 10 1% 0 0% Other 8 3% 6 2% 2 7% 66 7% 65 7% 1 17% Which of the following best identifies the highest level of education attained by any adult member of your household? Sample Size Some high school 10 4% 3 1% 7 25% High school diploma/ged 19 7% 13 5% 6 21% Some college or postsecondary technical training 57 21% 52 21% 5 18% year degree 18 7% 18 7% 0 0% year degree 63 23% 63 26% 0 0% Some graduate school 22 8% 22 9% 0 0% Graduate degree 68 25% 68 28% 0 0% Prefer not to respond 16 6% 6 2% 10 36% Page 13 of 13
Total Community Parent Student Confidence Level = 95% Count Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %
Language Survey Version Stakeholder Group Back to Table of Contents How many children do you currently have in Modesto City Schools? Are you currently a student in Modesto City Schools? Which of the following
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues January 2015 South Carolina Offshore Drilling Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: January 13-15, 2015 Respondents: 604 Registered Voters Method: Telephone
Subsidized after school slots requires participant to attend the after school program 5 days/week and stay until 5:30PM
Sunnyside Elementary After School Program Registration 2016-2017 School Year SECTION A: PROGRAM SITE AND SCHEDULE School: Sunnyside Elementary After School Program Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Presented by: Harris Poll
What America Is Thinking About Energy Issues February 2016 Virginia Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: January 22 February 1, 2016 Respondents: 630 Registered Voters Method: Telephone Weighting: Results
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016
What America Is Thinking On Energy Issues February 2016 South Carolina Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: January 22-31, 2016 Respondents: 600 Registered Voters Method: Telephone Weighting: Results
National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics
National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics In spring 2015, nine community colleges from across the state were provided a small stipend to participate in the Civic Engagement Survey
California Department of Education, May 2016 School Year 2016-2017 Sunrise Middle School Application for Free and Reduced-Price Meals: State Meal Program Complete one application per household. Read the
What America Is Thinking Access Virginia Fall 2013
What America Is Thinking Access Virginia Fall 2013 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Harris Interactive Interviewing: September 24 29, 2013 Respondents: 616 Virginia Registered Voters
School District of Slinger Community Survey Report
School District of Slinger Community Survey Report Prepared by: School Perceptions October 2011 Overview The survey was conducted for the School District of Slinger during the fall of 2011 by School Perceptions.
SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017
SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and
TABLE 1. PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Waterloo city, Iowa TABLE 1. PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound Total population 66,659 64,093 69,225 SEX AND AGE Male 32,096 30,415 33,777 Female 34,563 33,025
What America is Thinking on Energy Issues Election Night Poll 2014 November 5, 2014
What America is Thinking on Energy Issues Election Night Poll 2014 November 5, 2014 Presented to: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: November 4, 2014 Respondents: 827
Production & Offshore Drilling July 2014
Production & Offshore Drilling July 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: July 10 July 13, 2014 Respondents: 1012 Registered Voters Method: Telephone Sample:
Random digital dial Results are weighted to be representative of registered voters Sampling Error: +/-4% at the 95% confidence level
South Carolina Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Harris Poll Interviewing: November 18 22, 2015 Respondents: 607 Registered Voters in South Carolina Method: Telephone Sample: Random
Policy for Tuition & Preschool Student Assignment
MILTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MILTON, MASSACHUSETTS Policy for Tuition & Preschool Student Assignment TUITION FOR PRESCHOOL 1. Families will pay tuition for preschool based on the sliding fee scale approved by
Heartland Monitor Poll XXI
National Sample of 1000 AMERICAN ADULTS AGE 18+ (500 on landline, 500 on cell) (Sample Margin of Error for 1,000 Respondents = ±3.1% in 95 out of 100 cases) Conducted October 22 26, 2014 via Landline and
Policy for Tuition & Preschool Student Assignment
TUITION FOR PRESCHOOL MILTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MILTON, MASSACHUSETTS Policy for Tuition & Preschool Student Assignment 1. Families will pay tuition for preschool based on the sliding fee scale approved by
Standards for Success HOPWA Data Elements
This shortcut assists HOPWA Grantees to identify: Relevant data elements to collect; Questions for gathering information for the data element; and Possible response options. Participant Description 1 Person
Weighting: Results are weighted to be representative of 2012 election voters across the United States
API Election Night Survey Interview Schedule November 7, 2012 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Harris Interactive Interviewing: November 6, 2012 Respondents: 827 Voters Method: Telephone
Total Enrollment by Division, Department, Degree Track and Year of Study as of 10/15/17
Enrollment by Division, Department, Degree Track and Year of Study as of 1/1/1 G1 G G G G DCE G1 G G G + Architecture 1 1 Art and Archaeology 1 1 1 Classics Comparative Literature 1 1 East Asian Studies
Access and Infrastructure National April 2014
Access and Infrastructure National April 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: April 3-9, 2014 Respondents: 1,003 Registered Voters Method: Telephone Sample:
Monthly School Board Standing Committee Meetings
Monthly School Board Standing Committee Meetings October 10, 2017 5:30 P.M. Audit/Budget/Finance 5:40 P.M. Joint Audit/Budget/Finance & Personnel/Policy 5:55 P.M. Personnel/Policy Please Note: Committee
Community Outreach Network Interest Form & Agreement
Community Outreach Network Interest Form & Agreement For Covered California Staff Use Only CON MOU#: Click here to enter text. New Partnership: Yes No Form Date Received: Click here to enter text. Processed
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page
Northwest Census Data Aggregation
Northwest Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table
Riverview Census Data Aggregation
Riverview Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table
JOHN C. FREMONT SENIOR HIGH
JOHN C. FREMONT SENIOR HIGH UPDATED - 03/28/16 Public school 2143 students CDS code: 19647331933118 SD: 88% AA: 8% FI: LAUSD-S EL: 38% AI/AN :0% PI: 7676 South San Pedro Street SWD: 13% AS: 0% WH: 1% Los
Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation
Zipe Code 66101 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)
Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation
Zipe Code 66103 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5)
American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument
2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.
2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class
ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT LUNCH AND BREAKFAST PAYMENT OPTIONS Payments for meals can be made to your school lunch manager, or at the Food Service Office, 490 North State, Lindon, Utah 84042 Payments may also
CUYAHOGA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 431 Stow Ave, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio APPLICATION
Dear Parent/Guardian: CUYAHOGA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 431 Stow Ave, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44222-0396 2012-2013 APPLICATION Children need healthy meals to learn. Cuyahoga Falls
Tyler Area Economic Overview
Tyler Area Economic Overview Demographic Profile. 2 Unemployment Rate. 4 Wage Trends. 4 Cost of Living Index...... 5 Industry Clusters. 5 Occupation Snapshot. 6 Education Levels 7 Gross Domestic Product
THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOKLINE BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS PHONE FAX Memorandum
THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOKLINE BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS 02445 PHONE 617-730-2425 FAX 617-730-2108 WILLIAM H. LUPINI, Ed.D. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Memorandum PETER C. ROWE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR
Recommended Budget and Local Control & Accountability Plan Committee of the Whole BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 20 TH, 2017
2017-18 Recommended Budget and Local Control & Accountability Plan Committee of the Whole BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 20 TH, 2017 1 OBJECTIVES Share Multi Year Projections (MYPs) for 2017-18
Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO)
Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO) *note: participants can refuse to answer any or all questions in this survey* Screening Questions 1. Have you worked for pay or profit at any
University Hgts. Elem. School School Report Card Bowling Lane Jonesboro, AR
University Hgts. Elem. School School Report Card 2015 2016 300 Bowling Lane Jonesboro, AR 72401 870 910 7823 SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS Principal Superintendent STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS Kelli Murray James Dunivan
City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011
Godbe Research City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011 The City of San Rafael commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a telephone survey of voters to assess overall perceptions
Proposed Budget
ELMIRA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 28-29 Proposed Budget Public Vote Tuesday, May 5, 28 Ernie Davis Academy and Elmira High School 7 a.m.-8 p.m. Elmira City School District Mission "The Elmira City School District
Keystone XL Pipeline & Energy Infrastructure December Results are weighted to be representative of registered voters in the United States
Keystone XL Pipeline & Energy Infrastructure December 2013 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Harris Interactive Interviewing: December 5 8, 2013 Respondents: 1,025 Registered Voters
ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES 2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found
Findings from Focus Groups: Select Populations in Dane County
W ISCONSIN STATE PLANNING GRANT Briefing Paper 3, September 2001 Findings from Focus Groups: Select Populations in Dane County Wisconsin is one of 20 states that received a grant in 2000-01 from the Health
FINAL NARRATIVE REPORT
FINAL NARRATIVE REPORT Grants Administration Division To navigate through the pages of this invoice, please use the "Next" and "Back" buttons at the bottom of each page. Avoid using your web browser's
Illinois State University
You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%
ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year s Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the
Random digit dial Results are weighted to be representative of Maryland registered voters.
Access and Infrastructure Maryland April 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: April 9 16, 2014 Respondents: 602 registered voters Method: Telephone Sample:
Application Adult & Dislocated Worker Programs
Application Adult & Dislocated Worker Programs Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) FORM WIOA I-B 1.1 For Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs If you are age 18 or older and need help in obtaining
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 602894 Central Cities (CC) 227,818 Outside Central Cities 375,076 Percent of Entire MSA 37.79% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1187941 Central Cities (CC) 511,843 Outside Central Cities 676,098 Percent of Entire MSA 43.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 661645 Central Cities (CC) 247,057 Outside Central Cities 414,588 Percent of Entire MSA 37.34% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 583845 Central Cities (CC) 316,649 Outside Central Cities 267,196 Percent of Entire MSA 54.24% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1251509 Central Cities (CC) 540,423 Outside Central Cities 711,086 Percent of Entire MSA 43.18% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1135614 Central Cities (CC) 677,766 Outside Central Cities 457,848 Percent of Entire MSA 59.68% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 591932 Central Cities (CC) 260,970 Outside Central Cities 330,962 Percent of Entire MSA 44.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1100491 Central Cities (CC) 735,617 Outside Central Cities 364,874 Percent of Entire MSA 66.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 540258 Central Cities (CC) 198,915 Outside Central Cities 341,343 Percent of Entire MSA 36.82% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1249763 Central Cities (CC) 691,295 Outside Central Cities 558,468 Percent of Entire MSA 55.31% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1088514 Central Cities (CC) 272,953 Outside Central Cities 815,561 Percent of Entire MSA 25.08% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 922516 Central Cities (CC) 470,859 Outside Central Cities 451,657 Percent of Entire MSA 51.04% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 687249 Central Cities (CC) 198,500 Outside Central Cities 488,749 Percent of Entire MSA 28.88% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 542149 Central Cities (CC) 181870 Outside Central Cities 360279 Percent of Entire MSA 33.55% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1025598 Central Cities (CC) 293,834 Outside Central Cities 731,764 Percent of Entire MSA 28.65% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 875583 Central Cities (CC) 232,835 Outside Central Cities 642,748 Percent of Entire MSA 26.59% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 716998 Central Cities (CC) 448,275 Outside Central Cities 268,723 Percent of Entire MSA 62.52% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1333914 Central Cities (CC) 284,943 Outside Central Cities 1,048,971 Percent of Entire MSA 21.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 712738 Central Cities (CC) 448,607 Outside Central Cities 264,131 Percent of Entire MSA 62.94% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1169641 Central Cities (CC) 0 Outside Central Cities 1,169,641 Percent of Entire MSA 0% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999 to
B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report
B-CU Graduate Exit urvey pring 2008- pring Report Table of Contents I. Executive ummary... 2 II. Methodology... 2 III. Objectives... 2 IV. ummary of the urvey... 3 V. Gender of Participants... 5 VI. Response
Wheatland-Chili Central Schools Budget Development
Wheatland-Chili Central Schools 2015-2016 Budget Development BUDGET HEARING May 11, 2015 Board of Education Meeting 1 2015-2016 Budget Development Timeline Date January 12 January 26 February 9 February
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 3251876 Central Cities (CC) 2,078,750 Outside Central Cities 1,173,126 Percent of Entire MSA 63.92% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1592383 Central Cities (CC) 1,181,140 Outside Central Cities 411,243 Percent of Entire MSA 74.17% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1776062 Central Cities (CC) 716,793 Outside Central Cities 1,059,269 Percent of Entire MSA 40.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4112198 Central Cities (CC) 416,474 Outside Central Cities 3,695,724 Percent of Entire MSA 10.13% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 9519338 Central Cities (CC) 4408996 Outside Central Cities 5110342 Percent of Entire MSA 46.32% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1623018 Central Cities (CC) 152397 Outside Central Cities 1470621 Percent of Entire MSA 9.39% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1731183 Central Cities (CC) 776733 Outside Central Cities 954450 Percent of Entire MSA 44.87% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2968806 Central Cities (CC) 669,769 Outside Central Cities 2,299,037 Percent of Entire MSA 22.56% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2846289 Central Cities (CC) 809063 Outside Central Cities 2037226 Percent of Entire MSA 28.43% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4441551 Central Cities (CC) 1147720 Outside Central Cities 3293831 Percent of Entire MSA 25.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1500741 Central Cities (CC) 661799 Outside Central Cities 838942 Percent of Entire MSA 44.1% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2552994 Central Cities (CC) 686992 Outside Central Cities 1866002 Percent of Entire MSA 26.91% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
OFC OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL. 3rd Level Subagency Report
Department of the Treasury Response Summary Surveys Completed Department of the Treasury 51,038 Departmental Offices 1,002 UNDER SEC (TERROR&FIN INTELL) 208 88 This 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
Patient Demographic Information
Maurice Jové, M.D. Nathan Jové, M.D. Jeff Traub, M.D. Brian Vanderhoof, D.O Farhan Malik, M.D. Patient Demographic Information First Name Last Name M.I. Address City State ZIP Code E-Mail Address Home
Please complete all forms in their entirety. All documents submitted become the property of Drew and cannot be returned.
I N S T R U C T I O N S F O R C O M P L E T I N G T H E M. A.T. A P P L I C AT I O N Office of Graduate Admission The Caspersen School Drew University Madison, New Jersey 07940 973.408.3110 fax: 973.408.3040
Occidental College Factbook
Occidental College Factbook As of Fall 2015 Headcount Enrollment 2,178 Total Enrollment 2,180 2,170 2,160 2,150 2,140 2,132 2,128 2,130 2,120 2,117 2,114 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Women Men Ethnicity/Race
CITY OF CALISTOGA DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION
DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION Date Applicant s Name Phone Residence Address Home City, State, Zip Code Phone Mailing Address (If different) FAMILY INFORMATION Applicant or Co-Applicant
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2414616 Central Cities (CC) 764431 Outside Central Cities 1650185 Percent of Entire MSA 31.66% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
Data Description Values Code Required? Point 1 Branch ID Unique code to identify main
Exhibit C: Client Level Data Requirements The following data points will be collected for each client. If, upon implementation of the Project Reinvest: Financial Capability program, it is realized that
MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS (MODESTO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT) (MODESTO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT) ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2017
(MODESTO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT) (MODESTO HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT) ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 5 Basic Financial
Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students
Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage
Budget Draft Dated: 2/25/16 February 25, William Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs. Agenda for Presentation
2016-2017 Budget Draft Dated: 2/25/16 February 25, 2016 William Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs 1 Agenda for Presentation Budget Calendar Goal of the Budget Process Opportunities for
Dear Parent/Guardian:
13 Church Street, Kingston New Hampshire 03848 (P) 603-642-8400 (F) 603-642-8404 seacoastcharterschool.org Dear Parent/Guardian: Children need healthy meals to learn. Seacoast Charter School offers healthy
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Agenda Item
3.B. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education Agenda Item Meeting Date August 14, 2018 Agenda Item Title Recommend Approval of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education FY2018-2019 Operating Budget
THE AP-GfK POLL. Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media
GfK Custom Research North America THE AP-GfK POLL Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media Interview dates: September 27-30, 2008 Interviews: 1,160 adults; 808 likely voters Margin of error: +/- 2.9
***IMPORTANT*** FREE & REDUCED PRICE MEALS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
***IMPORTANT*** FREE & REDUCED PRICE MEALS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS 2018-2019 There is no need for you to complete this application if you have already received a letter from us stating that your child(ren)
Random digit dial Results are weighted to be representative of registered voters.
Keystone XL Pipeline National April 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: April 16 20, 2014 Respondents: 1000 registered voters Method: Telephone Sample: Random
HOW TO APPLY FOR FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE MEALS
HOW TO APPLY FOR FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE MEALS California Department of Education, May 2016 Please use these instructions to help you complete the Application for Free and Reduced-Price Meals. You only
Joliet Junior College Fall 10th Day Census Enrollment Report (Credit Only) 2015 Fall 2016 Fall Fall
2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Fall 2018 Fall 1-Yr % Change Headcount FTEs Headcount FTEs Headcount FTEs Headcount FTEs Headcount FTEs Admit Status Year HC % Change New to JJC 2,090 14% 1,351 16% 2,254 15% 1,461
SURVEY-IN-BRIEF 2012 SURVEY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RESIDENTS AGE 50 AND OLDER ABOUT UTILITIES
2012 SURVEY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RESIDENTS AGE 50 AND OLDER ABOUT UTILITIES AARP s District of Columbia State Office in response to its commitment to ensure affordable electric rates and consumer protections