Proposed Budget

Transcription

1 ELMIRA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Proposed Budget Public Vote Tuesday, May 5, 28 Ernie Davis Academy and Elmira High School 7 a.m.-8 p.m. Elmira City School District Mission "The Elmira City School District is a dynamic and innovative learning organization dedicated to developing learners of character who value their educational experience and can compete globally and contribute locally by collaborating with students, families, and community partners to provide meaningful opportunities in a safe and engaging environment for all." ELMIRA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 95 Hoffman Street, Elmira, NY 495

2 28-29 PROPOSED BUDGET Table of Contents Revenues Expenditures Propositions for Voter Approval... Property Tax Report Card School District Report Card Salary Disclosure Exemption Report for Taxing Jurisdictions This copy is for your review only, if you would like an additional copy of this booklet they are located at the District Office at 95 Hoffman St., Elmira, NY or you can contact Kathy McDarby at

3 REVENUES School Districts receive money from several sources. These sources are:. STATE AID The budget is based on the State s 28-9 budget. State aid for the 28-9 budget year is expected to be $322,838 more when compared to the 27-8 budget. 2. OTHER INCOME Any income received by the School District other than State Aid, Fund Balance or Tax Levy is included under this heading. Examples of other income would be; BOCES revenue, interest earnings, payments in lieu of taxes, refunds of prior year s expenses, gifts, rentals, fees, tax penalties, Medicaid reimbursements, and athletic event gate receipts. 3. RESERVES The District maintains Reserve Funds established in accordance with guidelines established by the Comptroller of the State of New York. 4. FUND BALANCE Funds which are budgeted but unexpended at the end of a budget year, and revenues which are realized in excess of those budgeted for the year, are available at the end of one fiscal year to be carried forward as fund balance. 5. TAX LEVY This is the amount to be raised through local property taxes. The Board of Education desires to keep any increase in the levy as low as possible. For the 28-9 school year, there will be a.5 % increase to the tax levy set by the Board of Education in September 28 for the 28-9 school year.

4 PROPOSED BUDGET SUMMARY Anticipated Revenues: Category State Aid $ 9,789,6 $ 9,,944 Property Taxes $ 33,,58 $ 33,496,85 Other $ 3,4,38 $ 3,276,48 TOTAL $ 27,2,994 $ 27,885,274 Proposed Expenditures: Category Administration $ 5,532,85 $ 5,78,766 Instruction $ 52,58,424 $ 53,93,64 Physical Plant $,565,532 $ 2,5,96 Transportation $ 5,224,349 $ 5,2,66 Charter School $ 3,2, $ 3,8, Benefits $ 34,685,2 $ 33,2,62 Debt Service $ 3,337,588 $ 2,996,5 Miscellaneous $,48,284 $,2,576 TOTAL $ 27,2,994 $ 27,885,274 2

5 SUMMARY 28-9 GENERAL FUND REVENUES The two main sources of revenue are the local tax levy and aid from the State of New York. For a number of years, the State has provided about 7 percent of the total district revenues. This year the estimated amount of aid totals $9,,944. This means that the local taxpayer will be paying approximately 26 percent of the district expense, while the State s contribution is 7 percent. Other local projected revenues of $3,276,48 will also be committed to fund the new budget. This other revenue and fund balance represents 3. percent of the budget. Other 3% In summary: Revenue Property Taxes 26% State Aid 7% 3

6 SUMMARY 28-9 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES TENTATIVE 27-8 BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET COMPARED WITH 27-8 AREA 28-9 TENT. BUDGET 28-9 $ 8,338,938 ADMINISTRATION $ 8,425,9 $ 86,7 $ 27,88,92 CAPITAL $ 26,549,745 $ (539,57) $ 8,774,54 PROGRAM $ 82,9,52 $,36,366 $ 27,2,994 $ 27,885,274 $ 683,28 The New York State Uniform System of Accounts proscribes that a school district general fund budget be divided into three categories. The total of those three categories is the Budget presented by the Board of Education to the voters for approval. Expenditures Debt Service, % Miscellaneous, % Adminstration, 5% Benefits, 26% Instruction, 42% Transportation, 4% Physical Plant, 9% Charter School, 3% 4

7 28-9 TENTATIVE BUDGET ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET 27-8 FUNCTION TENTATIVE BUDGET 28-9 BUDGET 7-8 COMPARED WITH TENT. BUDGET 8-9 $ 46,3 Salary of District Clerk, Clerk and Board Supplies; Board Election and Budget Vote Costs; Legal Fees; Memberships in County, State and National School Board Associations. $ 268,326 Salaries of Superintendent and Secretary; Supplies, Travel and Conference Expenses; Consultants, Services and Equipment. $,46,597 Salaries of Management Services Office Staff; BOCES Central Business Office and Tax Collector; Audit Expenses, Business Office Supplies and District Equipment. $,3,33 Salaries of Personnel Administrator, Personnel Office Staff, and Public Information Officer; Legal Services: Supplies, Equipment and Contractual Expenses for Personnel Office and Records Management. $ 3,672,89 BOCES Print Shop and Data Processing Services; Supplies, Equipment and Contractual Expenses for Printing. $ 2,84,64 District Insurance and certain BOCES Administration and Rental Costs. $ 46,9 $ 6 $ 277,333 $ 9,7 $,368,883 $ (92,74) $,82,833 $ 69,53 $ 3,753,733 $ 8,644 $ 2,235,32 $ 5,48 5

8 28-9 TENTATIVE BUDGET ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET 27-8 FUNCTION TENTATIVE BUDGET 28-9 BUDGET 7-8 COMPARED WITH TENT. BUDGET 8-9 $ 5,93,649 Administrative Salaries for District wide Instructional Supervision, Building Administration, Curriculum Development, including Related Support Staff and Records Management; Professional Development Staff; Related Office Supplies, BOCES and Contractual Expenses, Attendance and Pupil Personnel Services, and Learning Technology. $ 5,265,584 $ 7,935 $ 469,259 Administrative Salaries for Programs for Students with Special Needs. $ 4,29,8 Retirement, Social Security, Medical Insurance, Dental Insurance, Life Insurance, Workers' Compensation and Unemployment Insurance for Administrative Staff. $ 375,9 $ (93,358) $ 4,8,8 $ (,99) $ 8,338,938 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE $ 8,425,9 $ 86,7 6

9 28-9 TENTATIVE BUDGET CAPITAL BUDGET FUNCTION TENTATIVE BUDGET 28-9 BUDGET 7-8 COMPARED WITH TENT. BUDGET 8-9 $ 8,467,378 Salaries of Custodians and Maintenance Staff: Supplies, Environmental Testing, Equipment and Contractual Costs for Buildings and Grounds, BOCES Construction. $ 8,947,97 $ 479,79 $ - Judgments, Assessments, Refund of Taxes. $, $, $ 52,82 Central Storeroom, Drug Testing and Fingerprinting. $ 3,269,426 Retirement, Social Security, Medical Insurance, Dental Insurance, Life Insurance, Workers' Compensation and Unemployment Insurance for Custodial and Maintenance; Central Storeroom Staffs. $ 54,256 $,454 $ 3,62,342 $ (7,84) $ 3,838,296 Annual Bond Redemption, Interest Costs and Interfund Transfers to Other Funds, authorized by Voters or Comptroller's Regulations. $,46, Bus Purchases $ 3,226,5 $,5, $ (62,246) $ (3,) $ 27,88,92 TOTAL CAPITAL $ 26,549,745 $ (539,57) 7

10 28-9 TENTATIVE BUDGET PROGRAM BUDGET 27-8 FUNCTION TENTATIVE BUDGET 28-9 BUDGET7-8 COMPARED WITH TENT. BUDGET8-9 $ 6,24 Salaries, Supplies, BOCES and Conference Expenses for In-service Training. $ 4, $ (2,24) $33,25,57 Salaries for all regular Classroom Teachers, Assistants, Aides, Substitutes and Occupational Education; Classroom Textbooks, Supplies, Equipment and Contractual Expenses; Legal Services, BOCES and Drug Testing/Fingerprinting. $,223,623 Salaries for Teachers, Assistants and Aides for Pupils with Special Educational Needs; Supplies, BOCES, Equipment and Contractual Expenses for those programs. $ 527,576 Salaries, Supplies, Textbooks, Equipment for Night School and Summer School Instruction & BOCES. $,26,96 Salaries of School Librarians and Assistants; Equipment, Supplies and Contractual Costs for Libraries, including Computer Assisted Instruction; State Computer Software and Hardware, both locally funded and State Aided; and BOCES. $ 4,326,95 Salaries for School Counselors and their Clerical Staff, Health Office Staff, School Psychologists, Social & Family Workers, Attendance Office and Related Support Staff, Youth Programs, Community School, Co-Curricular and Interscholastic Athletics; Supplies, Equipment and Contractual Costs (e.g. School Resource Officers) $ 33,84,45 $ 635,575 $ 2,368,54 $,44,89 $ 652,576 $ 25, $,275,65 $ 5,69 $ 4,62,55 $ 275,635 8

11 28-9 TENTATIVE BUDGET PROGRAM BUDGET 7-8 TENTATIVE COMPARED BUDGET BUDGET WITH TENT FUNCTION 28-9 BUDGET 8-9 $ 3,763,35 Salaries of Bus Drivers, Monitors and other $ 3,97,66 $ 27,3 Bus Garage Personnel; Contract Transportation and Public Carriers; Transportation Supplies, and other Miscellaneous Equipment and Contractual Expenses. $ 27,5,784 Retirement, Social Security, Medical $ 25,759,9 $ (,255,874) Insurance, Dental Insurance, Life Insurance, Workers' Compensation and Unemployment Insurance for all Instructional Employees and Bus Drivers. $ 39, Interfund Transfers to Special Aid Fund, $ 4, $, Including District's Share of Summer School Program for Students with Special Needs. $ 8,774,54 TOTAL PROGRAM $ 82,9,52 $,36,366 $ 27,2,994 TOTAL BUDGET $27,885,274 $ 683,28 9

12 Proposition #: APPROVAL OF BUDGET Shall the following resolution be adopted? RESOLVED, that the proposed $27,885,274 General Fund Budget of the Elmira City School District, Chemung County, New York for 28-9 be approved in accordance with Section 222 of the Education Law and that the balance of said budget, after applying public monies thereto, be raised by a tax upon the taxable property of said district.

13 28-9 Property Tax Report Card Elmira City School District Contact Person: Melissa Mendolera Telephone Number: Budgeted 27-8 (A) Proposed Budget 28-9 (B) Total Budgeted Amount, not Including Separate Propositions 27,2,994 27,885,274 A. Proposed Tax Levy to Support the Total Budgeted Amount 33,,58 33,496,85 B. Tax Levy to Support Library Debt, if Applicable C. Tax Levy for Non-Excludable Propositions, if Applicable 2 D. Total Tax Cap Reserve Amount Used to Reduce Current Year Levy, if Applicable E. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy (A + B + C - D) 33,,58 33,496,85 F. Permissible Exclusions to the School Tax Levy Limit 776,746 9,837 G. School Tax Levy Limit, Excluding Levy for Permissible Exclusions 3 32,224,762 32,864,85 H. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Excluding Levy to Support Library Debt and/or Permissible Exclusions (E - B - F + D) 32,224,762 32,586,3 I. Difference: (G - H); (negative value requires 6.% voter approval) 2 278,837 Public School Enrollment 6,963 7,39 Consumer Price Index 2.3% ' Include any prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest. 2 Tax levy associated with educational or transportation services propositions are not eligible for exclusion under the School Tax Levy Limit and may affect voter approval requirements. 3 For 28-9, includes any carryover from 27-8 and excludes any tax levy for library debt or prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest. Adjusted Restricted Fund Balance Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance as a Percent of the Total Budget Actual Estimated (D) (E) 8,63,97 2,, 666,42 5, 5,55,2 5,54,56 4.% 4.% 3/3/8 Actual Reserve Name Reserve Description * Balance Capital Reserve To pay the cost of any object or purpose for which bonds may be issued. $ 6,75,688 Workers' Compensation To pay for Workers Compensation and Reserve benefits. $,244,476 6/3/8 Estimated Ending Balance $ 6,77, Will be used for next capital project $,8, Intended Use of the Reserve in the School Year Pay for benefits, medical/hospital expenses and administrative costs of our self insured Workers' Compensation Plan - 2 claims for $258,94 in 7-8 Unemployment' To pay the cost of reimbursement to the Insurance Reserve State Unemployment Insurance Fund. $ 66,6 $ 68, Not intended for Reserve for Tax For the gradual use of the proceeds of the Reduction sale of school district real property. $ 427,83 $ 429, Not intended for Insurance Reserve To pay liability, casualty, and other types of uninsured losses. $,74,323 $,76, Pay for property damaged but not insured. i.e., Bus Liability Reserve To establish and maintain a program of reserves to cover liability claims incurred. $ 5, Reserve was established in 7-8 Tax Certiorari Reserve To establish a reserve fund for tax certiorari settlements $ 35,488 $ 353, For the payment of accrued employee Reserve for Employee benefits due to employees upon Benefit Accrued Liability termination of service. $ 73,37 $ 9, To fund employer retirement contributions to Retirement Contribution the State and Local Employees Retirement $ 7,7,799 Reserve System $ 7,9, Not intended for Pay judgement claims arising out of tax certiorari proceedings - claim for $3,622 in 7-8 Employee reimbursement upon retirement for unused sick, vacation and personal leave

14 FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (26-7) INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (25-6) (Data are lagged a year.) Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below. The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES $57,29,84 $8,57,487 PUPILS PUPILS 6,7 98 EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL $9,284 $2,6 SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP HIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY URBAN OR SUBURBAN GENERAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES $2,44,985,374 $,5,335,896 PUPILS PUPILS 23,256 34,37 EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL $,446 $3,859 2 of 4

15 ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS GENERAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES SPECIAL EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES $33,423,69,457 $4,485,942,729 PUPILS PUPILS 2,649,59 46,996 EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL $2,65 $3,423 Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-2 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included. The pupil count for General Education is K-2 average daily membership plus K-2 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education program. Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-2 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of buildinglevel administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included. The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-2 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included. Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities. TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP NY STATE $9,84 $2,264 $23,36 Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures. 3 2 of 4

16 INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (26-7) Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below. STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULAR CLASSROOM) THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT 8% OR MORE SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP HIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY URBAN OR SUBURBAN 8% OR MORE NY STATE 8% OR MORE % 47.6% 58.4% 4% - 79% 4% - 79% 4% - 79% % 8.3%.9% LESS THAN 4% LESS THAN 4% LESS THAN 4% % 24.% 9.6% SEPARATE SETTINGS SEPARATE SETTINGS SEPARATE SETTINGS 3.4% 7.2% 5.9% OTHER SETTINGS OTHER SETTINGS OTHER SETTINGS % 2.9% 4.5% The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-2) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from %. SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP NY STATE 3.4% 2.9% 4.9% This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-2) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE) responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic Education Data System (BEDS). Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page. COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 24, 28, 4:26 PM EST 4 3 of 4

17 ELMIRA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [26-7] ELMIRA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (26-7) K-2 ENROLLMENT 5,75 ENROLLMENT BY GENDER MALE FEMALE 2,978 52% 2,773 48% ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY GROUP TOTAL PERCENT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN HISPANIC OR LATI ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER WHITE MULTIRACIAL , % 4% 2% % 73% % OTHER GROUPS ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 6 % 835 5% 3,93 68% ENROLLMENT BY GRADE GROUP TOTAL PERCENT PRE -K (HALF DAY) PRE -K (FULL DAY) K (FULL DAY) ST GRADE 2ND GRADE 3RD GRADE 4TH GRADE 5TH GRADE 6TH GRADE UNGRADED ELEMENTARY 7TH GRADE 8TH GRADE 9TH GRADE TH GRADE TH GRADE 2TH GRADE UNGRADED SECONDARY % 5% 8% 7% 8% 7% 7% 7% 8% % 7% 7% 7% 8% 7% 7% % 5 of 3

18 GROUP AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (26-7) CLASS SIZE COMMON BRANCH GRADE 8 ENGLISH GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS GRADE 8 SCIENCE GRADE 8 SOCIAL STUDIES GRADE ENGLISH GRADE MATHEMATICS GRADE SCIENCE GRADE SOCIAL STUDIES FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (26-7) ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH 3,577 62% 7 % ATTENDANCE (25-6) ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE 92% STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (25-6) 556 9% TEACHER TURVER RATE (25-6 TO 26-7) TURVER RATE OF TEACHERS WITH FEWER THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TURVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS 2% 8% GROUP STAFF COUNTS (26-7) STAFF PRINCIPALS ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF PARAPROFESSIONALS TOTAL TEACHERS PERCENT WITH VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (26-7) 422 % % PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 3 HOURS OR DOCTORATE TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 6% %,289 % 6 2 of 3

19 HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (26-7) GROUP COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS) GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS) REGENTS DIPLOMA ALL STUDENTS % GENERAL EDUCATION % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % GROUP REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT LOCAL DIPLOMAS COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS ALL STUDENTS 9 33% 89 27% 36 % 3 % GENERAL EDUCATION 8 36% 86 29% 4 5% % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 3% 3 % 22 76% 3 9% HIGH SCHOOL N-COMPLETERS (26-7) GROUP DROPPED OUT ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION TOTAL NCOMPLETERS PROGRAM ALL STUDENTS 6% 6 % 6 7% GENERAL EDUCATION 7 5% 4 % 85 6% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 29 2% 2 % 3 3% POST-GRADUATION PLANS OF COMPLETERS (26-7) GROUP TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY TO THE MILITARY ALL STUDENTS 94 28% 6 48% % 3 4% GENERAL EDUCATION 9 3% 42 47% % 3 4% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 3 9% 8 56% % % GROUP TO EMPLOYMENT TO ADULT SERVICES TO OTHER KWN PLANS PLANS UNKWN ALL STUDENTS 6 8% % 3 % % GENERAL EDUCATION 5 7% % 3 % % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 3% % % 3% GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 6 - District: % 43% Statewide: 3 36% 33% 27 28% 29% 5 7% 7% 9% 2% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 29 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 443 9% 23 48% 47 33% 74 7% 9 2% GENERAL EDUCATION 39 2% 73 44% 37 35% 72 8% 8 2% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 53 6% 4 75% 9% 2 4% 2% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 45 6% 23 5% 5 33% 7 6% % HISPANIC OR LATI % WHITE 323 8% 55 48% 34% 54 7% 4 % MULTIRACIAL 64 9% 3 47% 22 34% 6% 2 3% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 55% 5 45% % 3 27% 3 27% FEMALE % 99 45% 72 32% 44 2% 7 3% 3 of 3

20 MALE 22 4% 4 52% 75 34% 3 4% 2 % N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 442 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 342 5% 86 54% 3 3% 47 4% 6 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 3% 27 27% 44 44% 27 27% 3 3% T MIGRANT 443 9% 23 48% 47 33% 74 7% 9 2% GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - 5. District: % 4% 27 38% 35% Statewide: 24% 25% %. 5% 6% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 287 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 8% ALL STUDENTS 434 8% 9 44% 65 38% 58 3% 2 5% GENERAL EDUCATION 376 2% 4 37% 58 42% 57 5% 2 6% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 58 2% 5 86% 7 2% 2% % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 52 6% 25 48% 24 46% 3 6% % HISPANIC OR LATI 4 % WHITE 298 2% 23 4% 2 38% 48 6% 5 5% MULTIRACIAL 69 6% 35 5% 23 33% 5 7% 6 9% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 5 3% 7 47% 6 4% 2 3% % FEMALE 99 22% 8 4% 75 38% 29 5% 4 7% MALE 235 5% 9 46% 9 38% 29 2% 7 3% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 434 8% 9 44% 65 38% 58 3% 2 5% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 37 3% 63 5% 3 36% 34 % 7 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 7 32% 27 23% 52 44% 24 2% 4 2% T MIGRANT 434 8% 9 44% 65 38% 58 3% 2 5% GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS % 3 33% 32% 29% 8% 22% 5 5% 3% 3% Percentage Scoring at Levels - District: 27 Statewide: 35% 27 MEAN SCORE: 278 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 43 3% 25 58% 27 29% 34 8% 2 5% GENERAL EDUCATION 36 5% 84 5% 23 34% 34 9% 9 5% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 % 66 93% 4 6% % % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 49 % 32 65% 2 24% % 5 % HISPANIC OR LATI 8 % WHITE 3 4% 75 56% 93 3% 3 % 3 4% 8 4 of 3

21 MULTIRACIAL 59 5% 38 64% 8 3% 3 5% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 2 25% 5 42% 4 33% 8% 2 7% FEMALE 2 6% 6 55% 6 29% 22 % 5% MALE 22 % 34 6% 66 3% 2 5% 9 4% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 428 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 3 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 299 8% 88 63% 87 29% 6 5% 8 3% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 32 23% 62 47% 4 3% 8 4% 2 9% MIGRANT % T MIGRANT 43 % GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - 5. District: % 37% 39% % 22% 2.5 6% 6% 3% 8% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 287 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 32% 27 Statewide: 27 ALL STUDENTS 48 22% 73 4% 55 37% 56 3% 34 8% GENERAL EDUCATION % 8 33% 46 4% 56 6% 34 % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 64 % 55 86% 9 4% % % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 65 5% 37 57% 8 28% 8 2% 2 3% HISPANIC OR LATI 3 % WHITE 39 23% 5 37% 22 39% 44 4% 28 9% MULTIRACIAL 29 4% 5 52% 34% 2 7% 2 7% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 5 27% 6 4% 5 33% 2 3% 2 3% FEMALE 29 26% 73 35% 82 39% 32 5% 22 % MALE 29 7% 48% 73 35% 24 % 2 6% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 48 22% 73 4% 55 37% 56 3% 34 8% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 28 5% 45 52% 94 34% 26 9% 5 5% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 38 36% 28 2% 6 44% 3 22% 9 4% MIGRANT % T MIGRANT 47 % GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - 5. District: % 42% 27 38% 36% Statewide: % 27 22% 22% 2.5 7% 5% 3% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 29 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 45 22% 64 4% 53 38% 69 7% 9 5% GENERAL EDUCATION % 29 35% 5 4% 68 9% 9 5% 9 5 of 3

22 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 39 3% 35 9% 3 8% 3% % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 63 % 3 49% 26 4% 6 % % HISPANIC OR LATI % WHITE 33 25% 5 38% 37% 59 9% 8 6% MULTIRACIAL 25 8% 4 56% 9 36% 4% 4% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 4 2% 4 29% 7 5% 3 2% % FEMALE 8 27% 69 38% 64 35% 38 2% 6% MALE 224 8% 95 42% 89 4% 3 4% 9 4% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 44 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 277 4% 35 49% 3 37% 34 2% 5 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 28 38% 29 23% 5 39% 35 27% 4 % T MIGRANT 45 22% 64 4% 53 38% 69 7% 9 5% GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - 6 District: % 45% Statewide: 3 35% 33% 3% % 8% 3% 5% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 285 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 2% ALL STUDENTS 33 2% 38 44% 9 35% 57 8% 9 3% GENERAL EDUCATION % 94 36% 39% 56 22% 9 3% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 54 2% 44 8% 9 7% 2% % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 38 3% 26 68% 7 8% 5 3% % HISPANIC OR LATI 7 % WHITE % 3 4% 92 37% 48 9% 9 4% MULTIRACIAL 5 3% 5 33% 8 53% 2 3% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 25% 4 5% 2 25% 2 25% % FEMALE 55 26% 49 32% 65 42% 34 22% 7 5% MALE 58 6% 89 56% 44 28% 23 5% 2 % N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 3 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 95 3% 4 53% 66 34% 22 % 3 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 8 35% 34 29% 43 36% 35 3% 6 5% T MIGRANT 33 2% 38 44% 9 35% 57 8% 9 3% GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS - 6 District: 45 48% 27 43% Statewide: % 25% 27% 29% 25% 23% 5 6% 3% Percentage Scoring at Levels 2 MEAN SCORE: of 3

23 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS % 85 43% 23 28% 7 6% 55 3% GENERAL EDUCATION % 45 38% 3 3% 67 8% 54 4% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 54 7% 4 74% 9% 3 6% 2% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 44 2% 2 48% 4 32% 5 % 4 9% HISPANIC OR LATI % WHITE 36 3% 32 42% 85 27% 57 8% 42 3% MULTIRACIAL 62 9% 27 44% 23 37% 7 % 5 8% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 45% 5 45% 9% 9% 4 36% FEMALE 2 3% 83 39% 65 3% 32 5% 3 5% MALE % 2 46% 58 26% 38 7% 24 % N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 432 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 67 5% 88 27% 4 2% 36 % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 48% 8 8% 35 35% 29 29% 9 9% T MIGRANT % 85 43% 23 28% 7 6% 55 3% GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS % 27% 3% 2 3% 5% 22% 3 Percentage Scoring at Levels 6% 4 2% 2% % - District: 27 Statewide: 27 MEAN SCORE: 28 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 43 2% 22 49% 29 3% 64 5% 26 6% GENERAL EDUCATION % 59 43% 23 33% 64 7% 26 7% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 59 % 53 9% 6 % % % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 53 9% 32 6% 6 3% 2 4% 3 6% HISPANIC OR LATI 4 % WHITE % 28 44% 94 32% 5 7% 22 7% MULTIRACIAL 69 6% 42 6% 6 23% 4% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 5 3% 67% 3 2% 2 3% % FEMALE 97 8% 8 55% 54 27% 26 3% 9 5% MALE % 4 44% 75 32% 38 6% 7 7% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 43 2% 22 49% 29 3% 64 5% 26 6% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 35 5% 8 57% 88 28% 39 2% 8 3% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 6 37% 32 28% 4 35% 25 22% 8 6% T MIGRANT 43 2% 22 49% 29 3% 64 5% 26 6% GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS 2 7 of 3

24 6 District: 58% MEAN SCORE: % Statewide: 3 32% 27 25% 27% 5 GROUP TOTAL TESTED 22% PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2% 3 LEVEL 4 6% 4% 6% ALL STUDENTS 422 2% Percentage Scoring 246 at Levels 58% 93 22% 66 6% 7 4% GENERAL EDUCATION % 79 5% 89 26% 64 8% 7 5% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 73 3% 67 92% 4 5% 2 3% % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 49 4% 35 7% 7 4% 7 4% % HISPANIC OR LATI 8 % WHITE 35 22% 65 54% 72 24% 52 7% 6 5% MULTIRACIAL 56 9% 4 7% 2% 5 9% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 2 25% 6 5% 3 25% 2 7% 8% FEMALE 2 9% 9 59% 44 22% 3 5% 7 3% MALE 22 2% 27 57% 49 22% 35 6% 5% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 49 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 3 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 289 3% 94 67% 56 9% 3 % 8 3% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 33 33% 52 39% 37 28% 35 26% 9 7% T MIGRANT 422 2% % 93 22% 66 6% 7 4% GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS - 5. District: % 25. 3% 3% % 4% 2% Percentage Scoring at Levels 9% MEAN SCORE: 284 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 6% 2% 7% 27 Statewide: 27 ALL STUDENTS 46 7% 77 44% 58 39% 47 2% 24 6% GENERAL EDUCATION 346 2% 32 38% 45 42% 45 3% 24 7% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 6 3% 45 75% 3 22% 2 3% % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 65 2% 4 63% 6 25% 6 9% 2 3% HISPANIC OR LATI % WHITE 3 2% 7 39% 24 4% 38 3% 2 7% MULTIRACIAL 28 4% 5 54% 2 43% % 4% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 3 23% 4 3% 6 46% 3 23% % FEMALE 97 7% 85 43% 78 4% 23 2% 6% MALE 29 8% 92 44% 8 38% 24 % 3 6% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 46 7% 77 44% 58 39% 47 2% 24 6% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 269 3% 45 54% 9 33% 22 8% 2 4% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 37 27% 32 23% 68 5% 25 8% 2 9% T MIGRANT 46 7% 77 44% 58 39% 47 2% 24 6% 22 GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 25 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 24 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP. 8 of 3

25 - Statewide: 6 District: 45 47% 27 38% 3 33% 35% 27 29% 24% 5 3% 8% 5% 4% & above 3 & above Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 29 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 42 8% 88 47% 4 35% 6 5% 3 3% GENERAL EDUCATION 364 2% 54 42% 37 38% 6 6% 3 4% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 38 % 34 89% 4 % % % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 66 3% 43 65% 2 32% 2 3% % HISPANIC OR LATI 9% 6 55% 4 36% 9% % WHITE % 25 42% 5 35% 53 8% 3 4% MULTIRACIAL 24 3% 3 54% 8 33% 3 3% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 5 2% 2% 3 6% 2% % FEMALE 79 7% 87 49% 62 35% 25 4% 5 3% MALE 223 9% 45% 79 35% 35 6% 8 4% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 4 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 276 % 52 55% 93 34% 27 % 4 % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 26 33% 36 29% 48 38% 33 26% 9 7% T MIGRANT 42 8% 88 47% 4 35% 6 5% 3 3% GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 25 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 24 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP. - 6 District: % 43% Statewide: 3 36% 3% 27 27% 27% 5 7% 6% 6% 9% & above 3 & above Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 277 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 249 6% 32 53% 4% 6 6% % GENERAL EDUCATION 24 8% 94 46% 94 46% 6 8% % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 45 % 38 84% 7 6% % % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 3 % 2 68% 32% % % HISPANIC OR LATI 4 % WHITE 97 8% 98 5% 83 42% 6 8% % MULTIRACIAL 6 % 69% 5 3% % % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 5 % 2 4% 3 6% % % FEMALE 25 8% 54 43% 6 49% 8% % MALE 24 5% 78 63% 4 32% 6 5% % 23 9 of 3

26 N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 247 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 6 3% 93 58% 63 39% 5 3% % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 88 3% 39 44% 38 43% 3% % T MIGRANT 249 6% 32 53% 4% 6 6% % GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics. GROUP TOTAL TESTED LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 4 & ABOVE 3 & ABOVE ALL STUDENTS 3 % % 4 3% 26 87% 3 % 24 of 3

27 GRADE 4 SCIENCE - District: 75 86% 27 68% Statewide: 5 53% 27 42% 25 % % 33% 4% 2% 26% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 7 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS % 47 % 9 2% 85 42% 5 26% GENERAL EDUCATION % 3 8% 69 8% 68 44% 29% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 6 35% 7 28% 22 37% 7 28% 4 7% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 53 47% 9% 8 34% 7 32% 8 5% HISPANIC OR LATI 2 % WHITE 3 74% 26 9% 53 8% 26 42% 95 32% MULTIRACIAL 72 65% 4% 5 2% 36 5% 5% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 3 54% 8% 5 38% 6 46% 8% FEMALE 23 66% 9 9% 5 25% 89 44% 44 22% MALE 235 7% 28 2% 4 7% 96 4% 7 3% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % 47 % 9 2% 85 42% 5 26% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 39 62% 42 3% 78 24% 4 44% 59 8% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 9 85% 5 4% 3 % 45 38% 56 47% T MIGRANT % 47 % 9 2% 85 42% 5 26% 25 of 3

28 GRADE 8 SCIENCE Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test. - 8 District: 6 68% 27 Statewide: 4 47% 27 36% 39% % 3% 29% 2 2% 2% 2% Percentage Scoring at Levels MEAN SCORE: 53 GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 29 27% 62 3% 9 44% 5 24% 5 2% GENERAL EDUCATION 66 3% 37 22% 8 48% 45 27% 4 2% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 43 6% 25 58% 26% 6 4% 2% BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 29 7% 5 52% 2 4% 2 7% % HISPANIC OR LATI 6 % 5 83% 7% % % WHITE 6 32% 36 23% 73 46% 46 29% 5 3% MULTIRACIAL 4 2% 6 43% 5 36% 3 2% % FEMALE 86 2% 23 27% 45 52% 5 7% 3 3% MALE 23 3% 39 32% 46 37% 36 29% 2 2% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 28 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 52 26% 49 32% 63 4% 37 24% 3 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 57 28% 3 23% 28 49% 4 25% 2 4% T MIGRANT 29 27% 62 3% 9 44% 5 24% 5 2% GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS SCIENCE TEST Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test. GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 86 98% % % 55 64% 29 34% 26 2 of 3

29 TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION - District: 75 85% % Cohort 65% 52% Statewide: 25 3% 3% 4% 3% 23 8% 2% Cohort Percentage Scoring at Levels GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 473 7% 4 3% 2 4% 85 8% % GENERAL EDUCATION 42 77% 3 % 2% 74 8% % STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 3% 5% 5% 5% 4% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 5 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 99 62% 4 4% % 2 2% 4 4% HISPANIC OR LATI 45% % 9% % 5 45% WHITE % 3% 3% 57 6% 95 56% MULTIRACIAL 8 63% % % 4 5% 3% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 88% % % 3 38% 4 5% FEMALE 24 77% 3 % 4 2% 46 9% 39 58% MALE % 5% 7 7% 39 7% 6 45% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 47 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 8 3% 4% 6 22% 6 42% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 97 78% 6 3% 5% 25 3% 29 65% T MIGRANT 473 7% 4 3% 2 4% 85 8% % TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION - District: % 25 7% 3% % 7% 7% 85% 23 Cohort 55% Statewide: 23 3% Cohort 4% Percentage Scoring at Levels GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 473 7% 32 7% 52 % % 67 4% GENERAL EDUCATION 42 78% 2 5% 34 8% 245 6% 67 7% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 34% 2 7% 8 25% 24 34% % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 5 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 99 68% 8 8% 6 6% 6 6% 7 7% HISPANIC OR LATI 45% 9% 2 8% 5 45% % WHITE % 23 7% 32 9% 96 56% 58 7% MULTIRACIAL 8 5% % 3% 4 5% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 75% % 3% 4 5% 2 25% FEMALE 24 78% 2 5% 8 8% 44 6% 43 8% MALE % 2 9% 34 5% 25 54% 24 % 27 3 of 3

30 N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 47 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 22 8% 36 3% 55 56% 27 % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 97 78% 5% 6 8% 4 58% 4 2% T MIGRANT 473 7% 32 7% 52 % % 67 4% TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION - District: 75 78% 23 Cohort 5 6% Statewide: 25 % 46% 43% 23 9% 34% 5% 6% Cohort 4% Percentage Scoring at Levels GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 473 6% 54 % 43 9% 27 46% 66 4% GENERAL EDUCATION 42 67% 34 8% 33 8% 25 5% 65 6% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 8% 2 28% 4% 2 7% % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 5 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 99 52% 7 7% 3 3% 45 45% 6 6% HISPANIC OR LATI 55% % % 4 36% 2 8% WHITE % 36 % 3 9% 59 46% 57 6% MULTIRACIAL 8 38% 3% % 3 38% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 88% % % 6 75% 3% FEMALE 24 63% 26 % 23 % 9 5% 32 3% MALE % 28 2% 2 9% 98 42% 34 5% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 47 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 36 3% 29 % 9 43% 26 9% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 97 7% 8 9% 4 7% 98 5% 4 2% T MIGRANT 473 6% 54 % 43 9% 27 46% 66 4% TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION - District: % 69% Cohort 5 Statewide: 48% 4% % 3% 6% 4% 28% 32% Cohort Percentage Scoring at Levels GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS % 2% 3 6% 34 28% 92 4% GENERAL EDUCATION 42 77% 2 % 6 4% 2 3% 87 47% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 25% 8 % 4 2% 3 8% 5 7% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 5 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 99 66% 3 3% 9 9% 3 3% 34 34% HISPANIC OR LATI 45% % 9% 3 27% 2 8% 28 4 of 3

31 WHITE 347 7% 7 2% 2 6% 9 26% 53 44% MULTIRACIAL 8 63% % % 5 63% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 88% % % 4 5% 3 38% FEMALE 24 73% 3 % 9 8% 7 3% 5 44% MALE % 7 3% 5% 63 27% 87 37% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 47 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 6 2% 5 5% 84 3% 9 33% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 97 77% 4 2% 5 8% 5 25% 5% T MIGRANT % 2% 3 6% 34 28% 92 4% TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION - District: 75 84% 23 7% Cohort 5 25 Statewide: 44% 45% 38% 23 4% 3% 5% 5% 27% Cohort Percentage Scoring at Levels GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 ALL STUDENTS 473 7% 2 4% 26 5% 29 44% 28 27% GENERAL EDUCATION 42 78% 8 2% 6 4% 89 47% 26 3% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 7 3% 2 7% 4% 2 28% 2 3% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 % ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 5 % BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 99 7% 7 7% 7 7% 53 54% 6 6% HISPANIC OR LATI 55% % % 4 36% 2 8% WHITE % 3 4% 8 5% 44 4% 8 3% MULTIRACIAL 8 38% % 3% 3 38% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 88% % % 5 63% 2 25% FEMALE 24 78% 4% 4% 2 5% 65 27% MALE % 4% 6 7% 88 38% 63 27% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 47 % ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 % ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 4% 9 7% 24 45% 57 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 97 79% 5% 7 4% 85 43% 7 36% T MIGRANT 473 7% 2 4% 26 5% 29 44% 28 27% Regents Examination Results (26-7) ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE) ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE) GROUP TOTAL TESTED LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 ALL STUDENTS % 22 6% 77 2% 63 6% 76 46% GENERAL EDUCATION % 3 4% 62 9% 6 9% 7 52% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 9 6% 5 26% 2 4% 5 9% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 6 7% 22 27% 5 8% 23 28% 29 5 of 3

32 HISPANIC OR LATI 4 WHITE % 6 6% 5 7% 44 5% 49 52% MULTIRACIAL 7 4% % 2 29% 4% 3 43% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 7 % % 3 43% 3 43% 4% FEMALE 2 6 8% 8 4% 33 6% 35 7% 9 54% MALE % 4 8% 44 24% 28 5% 67 37% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 383 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 3 7% 48 26% 33 8% 66 35% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 9 5% 29 5% 3 5% 56% T MIGRANT % 22 6% 77 2% 63 6% 76 46% ALGEBRA 2/TRIGOMETRY REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGOMETRY GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS 4 GENERAL EDUCATION 4 WHITE 4 SMALL GROUP TOTAL 4 FEMALE MALE 3 N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 4 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 3 T MIGRANT of 3

33 ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE) ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE) GROUP TOTAL TESTED LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 ALL STUDENTS 5 6 2% 9 8% % 67 3% 5 3% GENERAL EDUCATION % 66 5% % 64 5% 5 4% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 24 33% 23 32% 3 4% % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 6 ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 37 3% 54 46% 3 3% % HISPANIC OR LATI % 2 25% 4 5% % % WHITE % 49 4% 92 56% 59 7% 4 4% MULTIRACIAL 9 3 6% % 3 68% 3 6% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 2 2% 2 2% 4 4% 2 2% % FEMALE % 46 9% 3 54% 34 4% 6 2% MALE % 44 7% 36 53% 33 3% 9 4% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 498 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 65 22% 53 53% 25 9% 4 % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 25 2% 4 55% 42 2% 5% T MIGRANT 5 6 2% 9 8% % 67 3% 5 3% COMMON CORE GEOMETRY REGENTS COMMON CORE GEOMETRY GROUP TOTAL TESTED LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 ALL STUDENTS % 38 8% 2 54% 24 2% 5 7% GENERAL EDUCATION 25 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 3 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 3 5 7% 6 2% 6 53% 2 7% 3% HISPANIC OR LATI 6 WHITE 6 7% 23 4% 9 57% 2 3% 4 9% MULTIRACIAL 7 % 5 7% 2 29% % % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 9 % 4 44% 3 33% % % FEMALE 2 9 9% 2 2% 57 56% 2 2% 3 3% MALE 4 8 8% 7 6% 55 53% 2 2% 2 2% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % 38 8% 2 54% 24 2% 5 7% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 8 9 % 6 2% 4 5% 4% 4 5% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 22 7% 72 57% 3 % 9% T MIGRANT % 38 8% 2 54% 24 2% 5 7% 3 7 of 3

34 ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE) ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE) GROUP TOTAL TESTED LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 ALL STUDENTS 23 % 4 3% 47 38% 53 43% 9 5% GENERAL EDUCATION 22 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 3 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 9 % % 6 67% % % HISPANIC OR LATI WHITE 8 % 3 3% 39 36% 49 45% 7 6% MULTIRACIAL SMALL GROUP TOTAL 6 % % 2 33% 3 5% 7% FEMALE 74 % 4 5% 3 42% 3 42% 8 % MALE 49 % % 6 33% 22 45% 22% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 22 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 35 % % 5 43% 5 43% 5 4% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 88 % 4 5% 32 36% 38 43% 4 6% T MIGRANT 23 % 4 3% 47 38% 53 43% 9 5% GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % % 75 5% GENERAL EDUCATION % % 73 7% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 3 8% 2 3% ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC % 5 83% 2 33% BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 43 36% 4 3% HISPANIC OR LATI % 2 22% % WHITE % 26 58% 67 9% MULTIRACIAL % 65% 2 2% FEMALE % 2 5% 3 3% MALE % 47 55% 44 6% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 56 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 7 42% 23 8% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 5 66% 52 23% T MIGRANT % % 75 5% 32 8 of 3

35 U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % % 89 47% GENERAL EDUCATION % 33 88% 8 5% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 2 42% 9 9% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 66 69% 32 34% HISPANIC OR LATI 4 WHITE % % 52 52% MULTIRACIAL 9 9% 9 9% 3 3% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 6 6 % 6 % 2 33% FEMALE % 89 87% 46% MALE % 44 77% 88 47% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % % 89 47% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 59 8% 73 37% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 74 84% 6 56% T MIGRANT % % 89 47% LIVING ENVIRONMENT REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % % 6 5% GENERAL EDUCATION % 27 78% 59 7% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 3 27% 2 4% ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 34 5% 5 7% HISPANIC OR LATI 7 WHITE % % 5 7% MULTIRACIAL % 2 63% 4 2% SMALL GROUP TOTAL 8 73% 5 45% 9% FEMALE % 43 7% 27 3% MALE % 4 73% 34 8% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 392 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 2 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 34 64% 27 3% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 49 8% 34 8% T MIGRANT % % 6 5% 33 9 of 3

36 PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % 82 53% 6 8% GENERAL EDUCATION % 7 56% 59 2% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES % 2 29% 2% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 2 ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 9 27% % HISPANIC OR LATI 7 WHITE % 52 6% 58 23% MULTIRACIAL 7 7% 5 5% % SMALL GROUP TOTAL 7 64% 6 55% 9% FEMALE % 76 5% 2 4% MALE % 6 56% 39 2% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 34 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 83 47% 22 2% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 99 6% 38 23% T MIGRANT % 82 53% 6 8% PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % 82% 24 8% GENERAL EDUCATION % 82% 24 8% ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 8 8 % 8 % 2 25% HISPANIC OR LATI WHITE % 96 8% 2 8% MULTIRACIAL 4 SMALL GROUP TOTAL 9 9 % 7 78% % FEMALE % 63 78% 2 5% MALE % 48 87% 2 22% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 35 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 32 84% 9 24% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 79 8% 5 5% T MIGRANT % 82% 24 8% 34 2 of 3

37 PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS GROUP TOTAL TESTED ALL STUDENTS % 63 9% 29 42% GENERAL EDUCATION 67 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN % 7 88% 2 25% WHITE 6 6 % 56 92% 27 44% FEMALE 3 3 % 28 93% 37% MALE % 35 9% 8 46% N-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS % 63 9% 29 42% ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 4 4 % 3 93% 4 29% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED % 5 9% 25 45% T MIGRANT % 63 9% 29 42% NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (26-7) GROUP TOTAL TESTED PROFICIENT LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 GRADE 3 ELA 2 % GRADE 3 MATH 2 % GRADE 4 ELA 5 % 5 GRADE 4 MATH 5 6% 3 GRADE 4 SCIENCE 4 % GRADE 5 ELA 3 % GRADE 5 MATH 3 % GRADE 6 ELA 3 % GRADE 6 MATH 3 % GRADE 7 ELA 4 % GRADE 7 MATH 4 % GRADE 8 ELA 5 6% 2 3 GRADE 8 MATH 5 % 5 GRADE 8 SCIENCE 5 % 5 SECONDARY -LEVEL SCIENCE % SECONDARY -LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES % NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (26-7) KINDERGARTEN GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 2 GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES GRADE 2 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 3 GENERAL EDUCATION of 3

38 GRADE 3 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES GRADE 5 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 3 GENERAL EDUCATION 3 GRADE 7 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS GENERAL EDUCATION GRADE 8 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 2 GENERAL EDUCATION 2 GRADE 9 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS GENERAL EDUCATION GRADE GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 2 GENERAL EDUCATION 2 GRADE 2 GROUP TOTAL TESTED ENTERING EMERGING TRANSITIONING EXPANDING COMMANDING ALL STUDENTS 2 GENERAL EDUCATION 2 ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: GROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING PERCENT OF ENROLLED PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR -TARGET of 3

39 THE TEST STUDENTS WITH ADMINISTRATION VALID TEST SCORES PERIOD DAY ALL STUDENTS 5,425* 9%* 2, AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 2 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 743* 87%* HISPANIC OR LATI 43* 85%* YES ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 WHITE 3,976* 9%*, MULTIRACIAL 53* 92%* STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 79* 89%* LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT 7 6 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 3,78* 9%*, RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE T USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADMINISTRATION PERIOD PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VALID TEST SCORES TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY PI T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 5,42* 9%* 2, T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 4,682* 9%* 2,79 77 T HISPANIC OR LATI 5,282* 9%* 2,39 75 T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC 5,397* 9%* 2, T WHITE,449* 89%* T MULTIRACIAL 4,895* 9%* 2,25 76 GENERAL EDUCATION 4,635* 9%* 2,38 83 ENGLISH PROFICIENT 5,4* 9%* 2, T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED,77* 9%* 73 6 MALE 2,836* 9%*, FEMALE 2,589* 9%*,45 84 MIGRANT 2 2 T MIGRANT 5,423* 9%* 2, There were fewer than 4 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 3 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 3. ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: GROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADMINISTRATION PERIOD PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VALID TEST SCORES PI >= EAMO OR SAFE TESTED STUDENTS HARBOR TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR TARGET ALL STUDENTS 5,48* 87%* 2, AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 74* 85%* HISPANIC OR LATI 42* 8%* ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 2 WHITE 3,97* 87%*, MULTIRACIAL 53* 9%* STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES * 86%* of 3

40 LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT 7 6 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 3,697* 87%*, RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE T USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADMINISTRATION PERIOD PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VALID TEST SCORES TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY PI T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 5,42* 87%* 2,34 75 T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 4,677* 87%* 2, 78 T HISPANIC OR LATI 5,276* 87%* 2,25 75 T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC 5,39* 87%* 2, T WHITE,447* 87%* T MULTIRACIAL 4,888* 86%* 2,56 77 GENERAL EDUCATION 4,633* 87%*, ENGLISH PROFICIENT 5,43* 87%* 2,3 75 T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED,72* 87%* 79 9 MALE 2,834* 88%*,25 75 FEMALE 2,584* 86%*,9 74 MIGRANT T MIGRANT 5,48* 87%* 2,36 75 There were fewer than 4 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 3 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 3. ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: GROUP MADE AYP TESTED 8% STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADMINISTRATION PERIOD PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VALID TEST SCORES PI >= EAMO OR TESTED STUDENTS PROGRESS TARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY PI EAMO PROGRESS TARGET ALL STUDENTS YES 88 84% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN YES 237* 83%* HISPANIC OR LATI 27 7 ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 3 2 WHITE YES 64 84% MULTIRACIAL YES 98 93% STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES 37 83% LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT 2 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES 6 83% RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE T USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST ADMINISTRATION PERIOD PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH VALID TEST SCORES TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY PI of 3

41 T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 88 84% T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 77 85% 63 5 T HISPANIC OR LATI % T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC % T WHITE 24 84% T MULTIRACIAL % GENERAL EDUCATION % ENGLISH PROFICIENT % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 28 86% MALE % FEMALE 42 84% MIGRANT T MIGRANT 88 84% There were fewer than 4 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 3 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 8 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 3. SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: GROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% 2TH GRADERS PERCENT OF 2TH PI >= EAMO OR SAFE 23 GRADERS WITH VALID TEST SCORES HARBOR TARGET ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR TARGET ALL STUDENTS YES YES % YES AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 3 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN YES 57* 95%* HISPANIC OR LATI 8 8 ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 4 WHITE YES YES % YES MULTIRACIAL 7 4 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES 49 96% LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT 2 2 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 46* 94%* YES RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE T USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP 2TH GRADERS PERCENT OF 2TH GRADERS WITH VALID TEST SCORES 23 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS PI T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 39 96% T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 39 97% T HISPANIC OR LATI % T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC % T WHITE 95* 95%* 4 2 T MULTIRACIAL % GENERAL EDUCATION % ENGLISH PROFICIENT 39 96% T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 8 99% 74 6 MALE 98 95% FEMALE % of 3

42 MIGRANT T MIGRANT % There were fewer than 4 2th graders, so the Percent of 2th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 3 students in the 23 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. * The percentage of 2th graders tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of 2th graders in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 3. SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: GROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% 2TH GRADERS PERCENT OF 2TH PI >= EAMO OR SAFE 23 GRADERS WITH VALID TEST SCORES HARBOR TARGET ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR TARGET ALL STUDENTS YES % AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 3 3 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN YES 84 99% HISPANIC OR LATI 8 8 ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 4 WHITE YES % MULTIRACIAL 7 4 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES 49 98% LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT 2 2 ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES 22 99% RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE T USED TO DETERMINE AYP. GROUP 2TH GRADERS PERCENT OF 2TH GRADERS WITH VALID TEST SCORES 23 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS PI T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 39 99% 38 3 T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 39 99% T HISPANIC OR LATI % T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC % T WHITE 6 98% 4 97 T MULTIRACIAL % GENERAL EDUCATION % ENGLISH PROFICIENT 39 99% 38 3 T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 8 99% MALE 98 99% 89 FEMALE 95 99% MIGRANT T MIGRANT % There were fewer than 4 2th graders, so the Percent of 2th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 3 students in the 23 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 3. UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS GROUP ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI 4 26 of 3

43 ALL STUDENTS AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN HISPANIC OR LATI ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC WHITE MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index. OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES GROUP MADE AYP ALL STUDENTS AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN HISPANIC OR LATI ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER WHITE MULTIRACIAL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES YES YES YES YES There were not enough students to make an AYP determination of 3

44 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION: 22 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT GRADUATION RATE STATE STANDARD PROGRESS TARGET ALL STUDENTS YES % 8% 64% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN YES 87 6% 8% 59% HISPANIC OR LATI ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 4 WHITE YES 35 69% 8% 67% MULTIRACIAL 4 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES 77 39% 8% 36% LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES 25 54% 8% 53% YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. There were fewer than 3 students in the cohort. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than of 3

45 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION: 2 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT GRADUATION RATE STATE STANDARD PROGRESS TARGET ALL STUDENTS % 8% 69% AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 2 BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN YES 82 6% 8% 54% HISPANIC OR LATI ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC 2 WHITE 342 7% 8% 73% MULTIRACIAL 6 STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 84 38% 8% 42% LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 9 54% 8% 66% YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. There were fewer than 3 students in the cohort. Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than of 3

46 GRADUATION RATES FOR N-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT 22 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT GRADUATION RATE 2 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT GRADUATION RATE T AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE % % T BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 37 68% % T HISPANIC OR LATI % % T ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC % % T WHITE 7 58% 2 57% T MULTIRACIAL % % GENERAL EDUCATION % % ENGLISH PROFICIENT % % T ECOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED 28 8% % MALE 243 6% 23 62% FEMALE 25 72% 23 74% MIGRANT T MIGRANT % % There were fewer than 3 students in the cohort of 3

47 Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability Percentage of 22 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 3, 26 with: REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 2% REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 3% PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) % REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5% PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 24, 28, 9:3 AM EST 45 3 of 3

48 New York State Education Department State Aid Management System (SAMS) Page of5 Salary: Administrative Compensation Information Page 76 - ELMIRA CITY SD Official - as of 4/2428 D:49 PM Form Due May 7, Salary Threshold= $35, In response to legislative efforts to encourage greater cost sharing in service provision and local government administration, we now provide a section for districts that share administrative staff to highlight these efforts for the upcoming school year. Each sharing district should identify in the form the other district(s) with which they will be sharing administrative staff for school year Ifyou will be sharing a Superintendent, list the otherdistrict (or districts) in the text box. If you will be sharing other administrative staff required to be reported, please send an to EMSCMGTS@nysed.gov indicating the title ofthe staffpersons(s) as well as the other district(s) involved in the cost-sharing. The salaries, benefits and othercompensation reported in the form should reflect only the financial support orcommitment that ~ district will be making. Thay should notref/act the total amountsbudgeted to be paidbyallparticipating districts over the school year. Report Estimated Salaries in the Budget for the School Year Sections 68 and 76 of the Education Law (Please read the instructions and definitions before completing this form.) Title Salary Employee Other Benefits Remuneration. Superintendent of Schools 94, , ,2., Please list the district or districts with which you will be sharing a superintendent (if applicable): Associate, Assistant and Deputy Superintendents (Example Titles: Associate Superintendent for Instruction, Deputy Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent for Business, etc.) 2. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 39,648 46,27 3,2 3. SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ,35 4. ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL ,97 3,75 5. SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 52,524 37,25 3, , /24/28

49 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:6 School District Summary Total Assessed Value,949,93,93 Equalized Total Assessed Value 2,253,724,88 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions of Exemptions Exempted SPEC DIST USED FOR PURPOSE EST RPTL , NYS - GENERALLY RPTL 44() 45 9,268, CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 52 26,967, CITY - GENERALLY RPTL 46() ,923, CITY - CEMETERY LAND RPTL , TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 77 5,337, TOWN - CEMETERY LAND RPTL , VG - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 8 4,38, SCHOOL DISTRICT RPTL ,57, USA - GENERALLY RPTL 4() 4 4,297, MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEV AGENC RPTL 42-a 4 2,26, UDC OWNED N-HOUSING PROJECT MC K UCON L ,7, RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN RPTL ,543, NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 43 5,758, NPROF CORP - EDUCL(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 48,758, NPROF CORP - CHAR (CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 7 8,37, NPROF CORP - HOSPITAL RPTL 42-a 25 7,68, NPROF CORP - MORAL/MENTAL IM RPTL 42-a 55 6,78, NPROF CORP - SPECIFIED USES RPTL 42-b 8 379, VETERANS ORGANIZATION RPTL 452 4,3, HISTORICAL SOCIETY RPTL ,566, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 9 2,26, PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND RPTL , T-FOR-PROFIT HOUSING COMPANY RPTL ,79, T-FOR-PROFIT HOUS CO - HOSTE RPTL , T-FOR-PROFIT HOUS CO-SR CITS RPTL 422 6,75, PERFORMING ARTS BUILDING RPTL 427 9,. 332 TAX SALE - COUNTY OWNED RPTL 46(5) 36, ALT VET EX-WAR PERIOD-COMBAT RPTL 458-a. 43 PARAPLEGIC VETS RPTL 458(3) 3 432, CLERGY RPTL , AGRICULTURAL BUILDING RPTL 483 2,49, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L ,36, Page of 2

50 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:6 School District Summary Total Assessed Value,949,93,93 Equalized Total Assessed Value 2,253,724,88 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions of Exemptions Exempted 473 AGRIC LAND-INDIV T IN AG DIS AG MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL 467 6,825, PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL 425 2,732 62,79, BASIC STAR RPTL 425 6,552 96,77, SILOS, MANURE STORAGE TANKS, RPTL 483-a 6 245, TEMPORARY GREENHOUSES RPTL 483-c 3 94, FOREST LAND CERTD AFTER 8/74 RPTL 48-a 782, BUSINESS INVESTMENT PROPERTY P RPTL 485-b 7,82,567.8 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions:, ,653, Total System Exemptions:. Totals:, ,653, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 48 Page 2 of 2

51 NYS - Real Property System County of Chemung City of Elmira SWIS Code - 74 Assessor's Report Prior Year File S495 Exemption Impact Report School Detail Report Equalized Total Assessed Value,76,524,38 RPS22/V4/L Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Total Assessed Value 893,55,76 Uniform Percentage 83. School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Code Exemption Name Statutory Authority Number of Exemptions Total Equalized Value of Exemptions Percent of Value Exempted 2 NYS - GENERALLY 3 CO - GENERALLY 335 CITY - GENERALLY 337 CITY - CEMETERY LAND 38 SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 USA - GENERALLY 82 MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEV AGENC 88 UDC OWNED N-HOUSING PROJECT 26 RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN 252 NPROF CORP - EDUCL(CONST PRO 253 NPROF CORP - CHAR (CONST PRO 252 NPROF CORP - HOSPITAL 2523 NPROF CORP - MORAL/MENTAL IM 26 VETERANS ORGANIZATION 2625 HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2735 PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND 28 T-FOR-PROFIT HOUSING COMPANY 332 TAX SALE - COUNTY OWNED 43 ALT VET EX-WAR PERIOD-COMBAT 43 PARAPLEGIC VETS 44 CLERGY 48 PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER 484 PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER 4834 ENHANCED STAR 4854 BASIC STAR TEMPORARY GREENHOUSES RPTL 44() 27 RPTL 46() 26 RPTL 46() 226 RPTL RPTL RPTL 4() 4 RPTL 42-a 4 MC K UCON L 6272 RPTL RPTL 42-a 94 RPTL 42-a 5 RPTL 42-a 2 RPTL 42-a 47 RPTL RPTL RPTL RPTL RPTL 46(5) RPTL 458-a RPTL 458(3) RPTL 46 5 RPTL RPTL RPTL 425,23 RPTL 425 3,25 RPTL 483-c 79,48, ,33, ,88, , ,284, ,297,59.4 2,26, ,7, ,467, ,797, ,35, ,53, ,595,83.36,3, ,566, , ,39, , ,83. 9,35. 34,94. 9, ,23, ,395, , Page of 2

52 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 City of Elmira School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 893,55,76 SWIS Code - 74 Uniform Percentage 83. Equalized Total Assessed Value,76,524,38 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 476 BUSINESS INVESTMENT PROPERTY P RPTL 485-b,423,77.3 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 4, ,96, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 4, ,96, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 5 Page 2 of 2

53 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Ashland - 72 School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 367,86 Village of Wellsburg SWIS Code - 72 Uniform Percentage.53 Equalized Total Assessed Value 23,992,549 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 35 TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 5 63, TOWN - CEMETERY LAND RPTL , VG - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 6 3,64, RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN RPTL , NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 3 562, NPROF CORP - SPECIFIED USES RPTL 42-b 3, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 65, ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,235, BASIC STAR RPTL ,25, Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 26 9,634, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 26 9,634, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 5 Page 3 of 2

54 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Ashland School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 77,84 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage.53 Equalized Total Assessed Value 5,397,647 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 2 NYS - GENERALLY RPTL 44() 4 267, CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 5 36, TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 4 398, VG - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 2 667, PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND RPTL 446 3, CLERGY RPTL 46 98, AGRICULTURAL BUILDING RPTL , AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,975, BASIC STAR RPTL ,82, SILOS, MANURE STORAGE TANKS, RPTL 483-a 38,562.8 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 236,365, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 236,365, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 52 Page 4 of 2

55 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Baldwin School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 622,254 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage.65 Equalized Total Assessed Value 37,72,364 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 3 CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 4, TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 5 33, NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 2 45, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 33, PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND RPTL , AGRICULTURAL BUILDING RPTL 483 3, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL 467 2, PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,694, BASIC STAR RPTL ,984, FOREST LAND CERTD AFTER 8/74 RPTL 48-a 6 264,.7 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 27 9,66, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 27 9,66, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 53 Page 5 of 2

56 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Big Flats School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 44,49,222 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage. Equalized Total Assessed Value 44,49,222 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 3 CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 6 436, NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 8 3,659, NPROF CORP - SPECIFIED USES RPTL 42-b 7 248, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 65, PARAPLEGIC VETS RPTL 458(3) 29, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,345, BASIC STAR RPTL ,3, 9.29 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 235 3,88, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 235 3,88, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 54 Page 6 of 2

57 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Chemung School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 9,75,782 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage. Equalized Total Assessed Value 9,75,782 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 2 NYS - GENERALLY RPTL 44() NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 8, NPROF CORP - MORAL/MENTAL IM RPTL 42-a 24, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL 467 9, ENHANCED STAR RPTL , BASIC STAR RPTL , FOREST LAND CERTD AFTER 8/74 RPTL 48-a 78,.96 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 52 2,2, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 52 2,2, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 55 Page 7 of 2

58 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Elmira School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 358,58,93 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage 97. Equalized Total Assessed Value 369,67,27 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted SPEC DIST USED FOR PURPOSE EST RPTL , NYS - GENERALLY RPTL 44() 3 69, CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 2 258, TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 4,36, SCHOOL DISTRICT RPTL ,56, RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN RPTL , NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 7,39, NPROF CORP - EDUCL(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 5 966, NPROF CORP - HOSPITAL RPTL 42-a 2 53, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 3, PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND RPTL 446 6, CLERGY RPTL , AGRICULTURAL BUILDING RPTL 483 8, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , AGRIC LAND-INDIV T IN AG DIS AG MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,993, BASIC STAR RPTL 425,228 36,46, SILOS, MANURE STORAGE TANKS, RPTL 483-a 3 2,.5 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions:,765 8,79, Total System Exemptions:. Totals:,765 8,79, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 56 Page 8 of 2

59 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Erin School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 252,375 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage 74.5 Equalized Total Assessed Value 338,758 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 4854 BASIC STAR RPTL 425 3, Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 3, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 3, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 57 Page 9 of 2

60 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Horseheads School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 5,4 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage 9. Equalized Total Assessed Value 56,484 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions:. Total System Exemptions:. Totals:. Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 58 Page of 2

61 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Southport School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 64,529,639 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage. Equalized Total Assessed Value 64,529,639 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 2 NYS - GENERALLY RPTL 44(),34, CO - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 7 397, CITY - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 2 5,.2 35 TOWN - GENERALLY RPTL 46() 7 2,79, SCHOOL DISTRICT RPTL ,76, RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN RPTL , NPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 9 3,865, NPROF CORP - EDUCL(CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 2,995, NPROF CORP - CHAR (CONST PRO RPTL 42-a 2 28, NPROF CORP - HOSPITAL RPTL 42-a 2,998, NPROF CORP - MORAL/MENTAL IM RPTL 42-a 7,34, INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT RPTL 464(2) 5,9, PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND RPTL ,.4 28 T-FOR-PROFIT HOUSING COMPANY RPTL 422,4, T-FOR-PROFIT HOUS CO - HOSTE RPTL , T-FOR-PROFIT HOUS CO-SR CITS RPTL 422 6,75, PERFORMING ARTS BUILDING RPTL 427 9,. 43 PARAPLEGIC VETS RPTL 458(3) 85,. 44 CLERGY RPTL ,5. 47 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING RPTL , AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L 35 27,236, AGRIC LAND-INDIV T IN AG DIS AG MKTS L 36, PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL , ENHANCED STAR RPTL ,663, BASIC STAR RPTL 425,86 54,5, SILOS, MANURE STORAGE TANKS, RPTL 483-a 2 6, TEMPORARY GREENHOUSES RPTL 483-c 2 4, FOREST LAND CERTD AFTER 8/74 RPTL 48-a 4 34, Page of 2

62 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year File RPS22/V4/L County of Chemung S495 Exemption Impact Report Date/Time - 4/24/28 4:42:2 Town of Southport School Detail Report Total Assessed Value 64,529,639 SWIS Code Uniform Percentage. Equalized Total Assessed Value 64,529,639 School District - 74 Elmira Csd Exemption Exemption Statutory Number of Total Equalized Value of Percent of Value Code Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 476 BUSINESS INVESTMENT PROPERTY P RPTL 485-b 6 389,39.6 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 2,962 3,225, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 2,962 3,225, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments for municipal services. Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes: 6 Page 2 of 2

63 NYS - Real Property System Assessor's Report Prior Year FIie RPS22V4IL County ofsteuben S495 Exemption Impact Report Oatemme-2228 :53:6 Sc:hool DistrictSummary Total Assessed Value,33,959 Equalized Total Assessed Value,33,959 School District Exemption Exemption Statutory Numberof Total Equalized VallHt Pen:entofValue Code Name Authority Exempllons of Exemptions Exempled 472 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L , PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTL467 5, ENHANCED STAR RPTL , BASIC STAR RPTL , 3.BO Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 3 359, Total System Exemptions:. Totals: 3 359, Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do nottake Into consideration, payments Inlleu of taxes orotherpayments for munlclpalservlc~ Amount, Ifany, attributable to payments In lleu oftaxn: 6 Page of

64 NVS - Real Property System Assessor's Report - 27 PrforYear FIie RPS22N4/L County of Sleuben S495 Exemption Impact Report Datemme - 2/2/28 :53:6 School Detail Report Town ofcaton Total Assessed Value,33,959 SWIS Code Unlfonn Percentage. Equalized Total Assesaed Value,33,959 School Distnct 74 Elmira CSD Exemption Exemption Statutory Numberof Total Equalized Value of Percent ofvalue Coda Name Authority Exemptions Exemptions Exempted 472 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AG-MKTS L ,92 B PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER RPTl467 5,67.2 4B34 ENHANCED STAR RPTL , BASIC STAR RPTL , 3.8 Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions: 3 359, Tolal System Exempllom: Totals: o.oo 3 369, Values have been equalized using the Unlfonn Percentage ofvalue. The Exemptamounts do nottake Intoconsideration, payments In Heu oftues orotherpayments for municipal services. Amount, Ifany, attributable to payments In lieu of laxes: 62 Page of