S p a c e U t i l i z a t i o n A n a l y s i s a n d P l a n n i n g 0 4 / 0 9 / 1 3

Transcription

1 4 / 9 / 1 3

2 Space Utilization Analysis General Purpose Statement Classrooms and Lab spaces designed to meet the teaching and learning needs of a broad range of academic programs and to support the entire UND university community. PROJECT NO.: Space Code Types - General Classroom - Lecture Room - Technology Enhanced Classroom - Class Laboratory Space Utilization Analysis and Planning Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 43

3 U N D C o r e H o u r s a n d O t h e r H o u r s Core Hours - Core Academic Delivery Hours - Monday - Friday, 8am to 4pm - 8 Hours/Day, 4 Hours/Week Other Hours - Hours outside of Core Hours that Room/Seats are plausibly used - Monday - Friday, 6am to 8am - Monday - Friday, 4pm to 1pm - Saturday, 8am to 8pm Peak Hours - Hours inside of Core Hours that Room/Seats are Maximized - - Monday - Thursday, 9am to 2pm PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 44

4 Ta r g e t S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n University of North Dakota 65% University of Minnesota 65% University of Tennessee-Chatanooga 6% University of Vermont 59% Ta r g e t R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n C o m p a r i s o n PROJECT NO.: University of North Dakota 8% University of Minnesota 71% MnSCU 68% University of Tennessee-Chatanooga 67% University of Vermont 6% Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 45

5 U N D A c t u a l C o m b i n e d S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n v s. T a r g e t U t i l i z a t i o n University of North Dakota - Target 65% University of North Dakota - Actual 5% U N D A c t u a l C o m b i n e d R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n v s. Ta r g e t U t i l i z a t i o n University of North Dakota - Target 8% University of North Dakota - Actual 71% PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 46

6 U N D A c t u a l S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n v s. Ta r g e t U t i l i z a t i o n University of North Dakota - Target 65% 111 Codes - Actual 52% 112 Codes - Actual 38% 13 Codes - Actual 66% 212 Codes - Actual 87% U N D A c t u a l R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n v s. Ta r g e t U t i l i z a t i o n University of North Dakota - Target 8% 111 Codes - Actual 73% 112 Codes - Actual 82% 13 Codes - Actual 85% 212 Codes - Actual 46% PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 47

7 U N D A c t u a l R o o m & S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n S u m m a r y SPACE UTILIZATION BY BUILDING & ROOM University of North Dakota Space Utilization Analysis and Planning Space Core Hrs Core Hrs Core Hrs Otr Hrs Otr Hrs Otr Hrs Weekly Use Student Student Student % Code Avail/Wk Used/Wk Use % Avail/Wk Used/Wk Use % % of 4 Hrs Enrollment Capacity of Capacity UND TOTAL 111 4,16 3,2 73% 4, % 86% 68,2 131,166 52% UND TOTAL % % 97% 2,472 53,547 38% UND TOTAL % % 89% 1,4 15,125 66% UND TOTAL % % 63% 5,167 5,912 87% UND GRAND TOTAL 111,112,13,212 6,32 4,472 71% 6, % 84% 13,699 25,75 5% PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 48

8 UND has high utilization PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 49

9 C o m b i n e d R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s - 4 % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h 2, 12% 18, 16, 14, % 215 8% 1% 8% OVERCROWDED Room Utilization >85% Optimal Room Utilization 8% Enrollment 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 6% 4% 2% Utilization AVERAGE Room Utilization 5%-85% LOW Room Utilization <5% 2, ,953 % PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 5

10 C o m b i n e d S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s - 4 % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h Enrollment 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 213 5% % 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% OVERCROWDED Seat Utilization >7% Optimal Seat Utilization 65% Utilization AVERAGE Seat Utilization 45%-7% LOW Seat Utilization <45% 2, 1% ,953 % PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 51

11 C o m b i n e d R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h 2, 18, 16, 14, % 22 8% 12% 1% 8% OVERCROWDED Room Utilization >85% Optimal Room Utilization 8% Enrollment 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 6% 4% 2% Utilization AVERAGE Room Utilization 5%-85% LOW Room Utilization <5% 2, ,953 % PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 52

12 C o m b i n e d S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h Enrollment 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 213 5% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% OVERCROWDED Seat Utilization >7% Optimal Seat Utilization 65% Utilization AVERAGE Seat Utilization 45%-7% LOW Seat Utilization <45% 23 65% 2, 1% % 2 11,953 PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 53

13 C o m b i n e d R o o m U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s -. 5 % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h 2, 12% 18, 16, 14, % 1% 8% OVERCROWDED Room Utilization >85% Optimal Room Utilization 8% 237 8% Enrollment 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 6% 4% 2% Utilization AVERAGE Room Utilization 5%-85% LOW Room Utilization <5% 2, ,953 % PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 54

14 C o m b i n e d S e a t U t i l i z a t i o n P r o j e c t i o n s -. 5 % E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h Enrollment 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 213 5% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% OVERCROWDED Seat Utilization >7% Optimal Seat Utilization 65% Utilization AVERAGE Seat Utilization 45%-7% LOW Seat Utilization <45% 25 65% 2, 1% % 11,953 PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 55

15 T i m e f r a m e R e l a t e d t o G r o w t h a n d U t i l i z a t i o n 2, 18, 16, 14, % 22 8% 12% 1% 8% OVERCROWDED Room Utilization >85% Optimal Room Utilization 8% Enrollment 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 6% 4% 2% Utilization AVERAGE Room Utilization 5%-85% LOW Room Utilization <5% 2, ,953 P l a n n i n g D e s i g n C o n s t. % PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 56

16 P l a n n i n g f o r G r o w t h Funding - Design - Build - Occupy -?? Years 1-2 Years 1-2 Years 1-3 Months From Intent to Occupation can take 2-6 years, or more. PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 57

17 UND needs more classrooms and labs NOW! PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 58

18 D e t a i l e d P l a n n i n g M u s t C o m e F i r s t Size - Type - Location - Costs PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 59

19 D e t a i l e d P l a n n i n g M u s t C o m e F i r s t Size - Type - Location - Costs PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 6

20 D e t a i l e d P l a n n i n g M u s t C o m e F i r s t Size - Type - Location - Costs PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 61

21 D e t a i l e d P l a n n i n g M u s t C o m e F i r s t Size - Type - Location - Costs PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 62

22 Gateway Drive Stanford Road No. Columbia Road Classroom & Lab Building Locations Hamline St. Princeton St. Stanford Road State Street No. 42nd St. University Ave. University Ave Dem ers PROJECT NO.: Ave. 64 Columbia Road Overpass Interstate 29 Sixth Ave. North No. BuildingSpace Code Type OKelly 12 Gillettte 2 Babcock 1 Gamble 9 Merrifield 24 Harrington Education 1 Hyslop Abbott 3 Witmer 6 Montgomery 1 Streibel 3 Odegard 8 Robertson-Sayre Corwin-Larimore 2 Starcher Clifford 1 Leonard 6 Hughes 3 Upson II 3 Nursing 7 Ryan Hall Total # of Spaces 152 Within 1/4 Mile Radius 136 9% Total # of Buildings 22 Within 1/4 Mile Radius 18 8% Total/Space Code Building Location 1/4 Mile Radius (1 minute walk) Space Utilization Analysis and Planning Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. SK. 63 2

23 Interstate 29 No. 42nd St. State Street Stanford Road 69 Stanford Road Gateway Drive B u i l d i n g s f o r F u t u r e C o n s i d e r a t i o n No. Columbia Road No. Building Space Code Type Square Footage Babcock 1 22,36 6 Chandler 37, Womens Center 2,99 69 Dakota Hall 37, Era Bell Thomp 2, Ctr. Comm. Eng. 2, Cambridge 13,82 23 Strinden Center 11,551 Total Square Footage 129,963 Total/Space Code Sixth Ave. North University Ave Princeton St Demers Ave. Hamline St. University Ave. Columbia Road Overpass Building Location 1/4 Mile Radius (1 minute walk) PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 64

24 F a c t o r s i n D e t e r m i n i n g S i z e Current Needs - Baseline for determining future needs Demand for new pedagogy and/or room types i.e. Active Learning vs. Traditional Classroom needs Future Needs - Pace of growth, new program introductions, existing building demo/re-purposing, classroom types Type of Uses - Academic, Administrative, Student Support etc. - Lab, Classroom, Commons, Housing etc. - Traditional, Scale Up, Research, Hybrid etc. Location - Site access and constraints - Relationship to other buildings/programs Need for Swing Space - Space for accommodating functions displaced by renovation, demolition or re-purposing PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 65

25 C l a s s r o o m / L a b S p a c e N e e d s R e l a t e d t o E n r o l l m e n t G r o w t h 212 Enrollment Seat Utilization Room Utilization 11,953 5% 71% Future Enrollment +-14,8 >65% >8% +- 3, Additional Students x 3sf/Student = +- 9,sf of additional classroom/lab space = +- 18,sf of additional building space PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 66

26 Discussion PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 67

27 S p a c e M a n a g e m e n t P o l i c y R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s Centralize Scheduling of General Purpose Classrooms and Labs - Develop Common Pool of General Purpose Classrooms and Labs for cross-department/department use Identify Classrooms and Labs for Departmental Use and Scheduling - More specialized and proprietary spaces should come under the control of individual Departments Establish Standardized Inventory of Room Types, Size and Configuration - General Classroom, Seminar Room, Lecture Hall, Auditorium, Active Learning Centralize Planning and Establish Standardized Inventory of Room Characteristics - Furniture - type, size, mobility; Technology; Equipment Establish Inventory of Collaboration and Learner Support Spaces - Ancillary, Prep, Storage, Study, Teaming, War Rooms /Project Rooms Develop Swing Space - Space for accommodating functions displaced by renovation, demolition or re-purposing Establish Room Use Protocols - Expectations of Faculty, Facilities Staff, Students for Room Set Up, Technology, Equipment, Security, Maintenance PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 68

28 Discussion PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 69

29 P r o j e c t S c h e d u l e January February March April May June July kick-off Data Collection & Discovery on-going Discovery & Data Collection Analysis on-going Analysis/findings confirmation March 5th March 7th Exploration April 9th on-going Exploration & standards Refinement May 14th Packaging June 11th final graphics Final document delivery April 16th TBD? June 18th TBD? Proposed Meetings/Conference Calls with Steering Committee (SC) Proposed Meetings/Workshops with Steering Committee (SC) Proposed Meetings/Workshops/Reviews with Advisory Committee (AC) Proposed Reviews with Executive Council (EC) P r e l i m i n a r y P r o j e c t S c h e d u l e PROJECT NO.: Grand Forks, North Dakota SK. 7