Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building. Draft Program. Mission Model Initial Program Development

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building. Draft Program. Mission Model Initial Program Development"

Transcription

1 Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building Draft Program Initial Program Development Issued April 2, 2001

2 Introduction Scope This document is a summary of the Session for the Advanced Computing Technology building. This session was held on March 6, The document builds on the goals and planning parameters established during the Vision Session, and contains the preliminary distribution of space, key organizing principles and concepts, preliminary project schedule, and working project budget. Purpose The purpose of this Initial Program Development is to provide a preliminary program that will be the basis for further discussion and refinement in subsequent sessions. The upcoming detailed programming sessions will yield further detail regarding site, building systems, technology, and cost, and will be incorporated into a Final Program document. During the session, the team addressed the initial allocation and organization of the approximately 120,00 ASF (180, ,000 GSF) identified in the Vision Session with respect to the needs of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the College of Computing, and the Master Plan for the Sector. This document is issued for review and approval. Resources The information presented was gathered from proposed space lists provided by the units, and data supplied from the Pre Planning studies for this project prepared by Georgia Tech. Analyses of peer facilities were performed to stimulate discussion on space qualities and organization. Contents This document contains: Executive Summary 2 Preliminary Space Distribution 3 Institute Master Plan and Key Site Influences 7 Key Organizing Principles and Design Concepts 16 Preliminary Project Schedule 26 Working Project Budget 27 Appendix contains analyses of peer facilities 30. 1

3 Executive Summary At the conclusion of the Vision Session, the following Mission was determined for the ACT building: Above all, this facility s mission is to provide the physical environment that supports the collaborative efforts of the College of Computing and the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Specific functions to be housed include research laboratories, faculty office and office support, classrooms, and informal gathering spaces. It was agreed that a measure of success would be the creation of space that is flexible, high quality, creates a sense of community, and fosters interdisciplinary interaction, enabling the occupants to excel at what they do. The purpose of the workshop was to begin to explore means to achieve the Vision through: - Allocation of space by space type - Site and Master Plan influences - Identification of major principles of building organization and design concepts - Examination of the balance between scope, quality, and budget - Development of an initial project schedule Findings As a result of the workshop, several issues outstanding from the Vision session were resolved or addressed more clearly: Administrative presence in the building will be support functions for each of the units, and not the Dean or Chair The status of the Sector plan was discussed and principles identified which can be incorporated into the design of this project. The Institute identified a need for structured parking for approximately 600 cars, which may be constructed at least partially underground on this site. The Institute identified a need for an auditorium of at least 200 seats. The programmatic focus will be substantially research and graduate student oriented, with some provision for instructional space serving the units and the Institute s undergraduate educational mission. The workshop also revealed several issues which will need to be addressed and resolved in the upcoming sessions: The inclusion of a large auditorium has not been resolved. If one is included, it may displace other program elements, or additional funds may be identified to add the auditorium to the scope. The number and type of classrooms requires further discussion. The total number of faculty, and the ratio of assignable square feet per faculty, should be examined to determine the optimum allocation to support the faculty s Mission.. 2

4 Preliminary Space Distribution Preliminary Space Distribution The space lists presented herein represent the individual requests of ECE and CoC, and an adjusted summary. It represents the first attempt to quantify faculty and student capacity for the units within the allotted space as well as proposed shared and common areas within the building to support the Mission. We understand that further guidance on the allocation of space will be forthcoming from the GT Administration prior to the detialed sessions. The preliminary distribution is based upon a target of approximately 100,000 ASF devoted to space allocated to the units in an equal division ( Departmental Space ). An additional 20,000 ASF of Common areas, allocated for shared and Institute purposes, is also targeted. The initial allocation reflects offices for a total of 106 Faculty, 446 Graduate Students and 40 Post-Docs, approximately 58,000 square feet of laboratory space, a large auditorium, shared/common areas, and general building support. Total gross square footage to accommodate these elements is estimated at approximately 227,000 GSF. Assignable space equals approximately 136,000 ASF at an efficiency ratio of 60% (typical for a building of this type). This allocation yields approximately 1,283 ASF per faculty, which is short of the Institute s stated target of 1,800 ASF per faculty. The preliminary space list resulting from this session identifies issues to be resolved in the upcoming sessions: Initial requests from the units regarding shared spaces, including classroom spaces, when added to general building support and departmental space exceeds what can be constructed under the current working project budget. Types, sizes, and quantity of classroom space to be included in this building require further attention to satisfy the needs and mission of both units. The current space distribution is based upon several factors: current unmet space needs such as a large auditorium, future faculty offices and insufficient research facilities, as well as the more immediate needs generated by impending relocations of functions from existing buildings. In order to achieve a balance between long and short term objectives, further study and / or information regarding the potential for optimization of current and proposed facilities for these units may be useful in making final determinations of space distribution in the ACT building. Certain aspects of the current sector plan, such as a plaza and structured parking, are not included in the space list as programmed space, but are currently reflected in the working project budget.. 3

5 Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building Preliminary Conceptual Space Program Preliminary Space Distribution SUMMARY This list includes common space adjusted during the discussion. COLLEGE OF COMPUTING & ECE Target Departmental & General Support Space Target ASF 100,000 TOTAL COC ECE Target Common / Unassigned Space Target ASF 20,000 TARGET TARGET TARGET Program Requirements/Allowances Quantity Size - ASF Total ASF Departmental Space 800 ASF Research Module * Faculty & Research Staff Office Area Faculty & Senior Research Scientists ,640 Other Academic / Research Staff Research Faculty and Staff ,840 12% 16,201 5,622 10,579 Laboratories Research 57 49,000 Academic Lab 8 8,000 Computer machine room 2 1,200 Research Laboratories 58,200 43% 54,578 28,637 25,941 Graduate Students / Post Docs Post Docs 40 3,200 Graduate Students ,150 ** Faculty and Staff ,350 14% 17,827 11,595 6,232 Department Support Distributed Admin / Staff Support Offices 14 1,400 CNS 11 1,020 Copy rooms Conference 8 4,000 Meeting 6 1,800 Other 1 3,252 Department Support 11,872 9% 11,394 4,146 7,247 78% TOTAL ASF, Departmental Space 106, ,000 50,000 50,000 General Support Building Support for bldg & staff support, supply, storage, etc. 5% Target ASF 5,000 4% 4% TOTAL ASF, General Building / Campus Support 5,000 Common Non-Departmental Building Area Target ASF 20,000 Auditorium each station with data 200 seat ,000 6,000 4% calculate tablet arm & tables Classroom 40 seat , % Classroom 100 seat ,500 7,500 6% ability to partition to 2 50 seat Common Building / Shared Areas Main gathering area 1 2,000 2,000 1% Lounges ,600 3% Other Lobby / Atrium 5% Total Building ASF 6,000 6,000 4% 18% TOTAL ASF, Common Area 25,100 TOTAL BUILDING (DEPARTMENTAL + GENERAL SUPPORT + COMMON ) 136, % NET/GROSS RATIO 0.6 ESTIMATED GROSS SQUARE FEET 227,270 ** Note: an additional 123 graduate students are expected to occupy research labs. 4

6 Preliminary Space Distribution COLLEGE OF COMPUTING Space request Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building Preliminary Conceptual Space Program COLLEGE OF COMPUTING Target Departmental & General Support Space Target AS 50,000 TARGET Target Common / Unassigned Space Target AS 20,000 Program Requirements/Allowances Quantity Size - ASFTotal ASF Departmental Space 800 ASF Research Module * Faculty & Research Staff Office Area Faculty & Senior Research Scientists ,400 Center Directors Research Faculty and Staff 6,400 11% 5,622 Laboratories Research 1 per 1 fac ,000 Academic Lab Computer machine room 1 per 4 lab Research Laboratories 32,600 57% 28,637 Graduate Students / Post Docs Post Docs & Researchers 1 per 1 fac ,200 Graduate Students 5 per 1 fac ,000 Faculty and Staff 13,200 23% 11,595 Department Support Distributed Admin / Staff Support Offices 1 per 6 fac CNS Copy rooms Conference 20 seat ,500 Meeting 10 seat ,800 Other 0 0 Department Support 4,720 8% 4, % TOTAL ASF, Departmental Space 56, % 50,000 Common / Unassigned Building Area Target AS 20,000 Auditorium each station with data 200 seat 1 6,000 6,000 Classroom 40 seat 2 1,000 2,000 Classroom 100 seat ,500 0 Common Building / Shared Areas Main gathering area 1 2,000 2, Lounges ,600 Other Lobby 5% Total Building ASF 6,000 6,000 TOTAL ASF, Unassigned Area 19,600. 5

7 Georgia Institute of Technology Advanced Computing Technology Building Preliminary Conceptual Space Program ECE Preliminary Space Distribution SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING Space request Target Departmental & General Support Space Target AS 50,000 TARGET Target Common / Unassigned Space Target AS 20,000 Program Requirements/Allowances Quantity Size - ASF Total ASF Departmental Space 1,000 ASF Research Module * Faculty & Research Staff Office Area 310 Faculty & Senior Research Scientists , Academic Staff Research Faculty and Staff 10,440 21% 10,579 Laboratories 250 Research Lab 17 1,000 17, Academic Lab 8 1,000 8, Computer machine room 1 per 4 lab Research Laboratories 25,600 52% 25,941 Graduate Students / Post Docs Post Docs Graduate Students 5 per 1 fac ,150 Faculty and Staff 6,150 12% 6,232 ** Department Support Distributed Admin / Staff Support Offices CNS Copy rooms Conference 20 seat ,500 Meeting 10 seat Other (Support) 1 3,252 3,252 Department Support 7,152 14% 7, % TOTAL ASF, Departmental Space 49, % 50,000 Common / Unassigned Building Area Target AS 20,000 Auditorium 250 seat 0 0 Classroom 40 seat ,000 0 Classroom 100 seat ,500 7,500 Common Building / Shared Areas Main gathering area 0 2,000 0 Lounges Other Lobby 0 TOTAL ASF, Unassigned Area 7,500 ** Note: an additional 123 graduate students are expected to occupy research labs. 6

8 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Master Plan and Key Site Influences Important issues related to the future vision of the site were discussed relative to the concept and organization of the ACT building. Institute Facilities staff presented key site constraints and opportunities, both existing and planned, to be considered during the early programming stage. Further site issues will be explored in greater detail during the next sessions. Consultants from WRT explained the current master plan for this sector, outlining a vision for an Information Technology complex with a strong east-west pedestrian connection along the Fifth street axis. Planned improvements to Fifth Street / Ferst Drive are intended to move traffic efficiently to and from the Yamacraw site while avoiding a freeway effect and providing qualitative streetscape enhancements to encourage pedestrian connection between it and the IT complex. The design of the ACT building should accommodate pedestrian flow through to Atlantic Drive, but not try to draw people to and through the building. However, it should not be a walled-off complex. North-south pedestrian access could be accommodated either by a minor route along the Plum Street axis (with care taken to avoid conflicts with service vehicles), or by routing north-south pedestrian flow around the complex. In light of these influences, several Site Opportunities were explored for potential building siting and connectivity. The diagrams are divided into the following sections: Site Influences Master Plan / Sector Plan influences Site Opportunities. 7

9 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Site Influences Site Influences. 8

10 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Site Influences Site Influences. 9

11 Site Influences. 10

12 Master Preliminary Plan and Key Space Site Sector Distribution Influences Plan Master Plan / Sector Plan Master Plan / Sector Plan. 11

13 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Master Plan / Sector Plan Master Plan / Sector Plan. 12

14 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Service Access Site Opportunity Service Access Site Opportunity. 13

15 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Service Access Site Opportunity Service Access Site Opportunity. 14

16 Master Plan and Key Site Influences Service Access Site Opportunity. 15

17 Key Organizing Principles & Design Concepts Key Organizing Principles & Design Concepts In addition to site parameters and Master Plan considerations, analyses of comparable facilities were presented to distill fundamental organizational principles and design concepts which should guide the physical design of the ACT building. The following buildings were analyzed: ACES Building, University of Texas, Austin Newell-Simon Hall, Carnegie Mellon University Soda Hall, Berkeley Stata Center, M.I.T. The facilities were analyzed for the following program and design aspects: relative concentration of space by space type (using Federal room use categories), distribution and arrangements of major space types, net to gross ratios (also known as efficiency ratios), construction and project budgets where available, and key organizing principles and design concepts. The team also toured the existing CoC and ECE facilities to gather information on existing operations and desirable and undesirable aspects of the space. Key organizing principles describe the desired primary arrangement of the spaces in the building both horizontally and vertically. Design concepts presented here are those which would have a major impact on the layout of the building. Other specific design concepts have been collected throughout the process and will be incorporated through the refinement in the detailed program. The contents of this section are the major principles that were gleaned from the discussion and determined to be applicable or desirable for the ACT building. Detailed analysis of the comparable buildings may be found in the Appendix section of this document.. 16

18 Key Organizing Principles Mix Faculty & Students on each floor:. 17

19 Key Organizing Principles. 18

20 Key Organizing Principles. 19

21 Key Organizing Principles. 20

22 Key Organizing Principles on Lower Levels. 21

23 Key Organizing Principles. 22

24 Key Organizing Principles. 23

25 Design Concepts. 24

26 Design Concepts. 25

27 Preliminary Project Schedule The following project schedule was presented as a likely scenario given the parameters to date. The project is currently expected to be delivered in a traditional design-bid-build delivery method consistent with State funded projects. Georgia Tech Administration will be in conversation with the Board of Regents and GSFIC to explore alternative delivery methods to expedite this process. Georgia Institute of Technology - A. C. T. Building SCHEDULE Traditional Delivery Schedule J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D PRE DESIGN Program Select A/E DESIGN Schematics Design Development Construction Documents BID Administrative Review Bid and Award CONSTRUCTION Construction Substantial Completion Final/ Commissioning OTHER Central Utilities Demolish Psychology Demolish Clinic Street R o W Process Key Work Session Key Sessions Target Project Dates: August 2001 December 2002 March 2003 April 2003 April 2005 August 2005 Select A/E Complete Design Documents Bid and Award Begin Construction Substantial Completion Final / Commissioning. 26

28 Working Project Budget Summary The Working Project Budget is the current working model for total project cost. This working model is presented for discussion and follow-up at the upcoming sessions, and will be modified as the program becomes solidified and more information is available. It includes the sum of the space program to date, owner supplied and estimated item costs and funding sources identified. This budget was discussed in preliminary fashion during the workshop, and is presented here to stimulate discussion regarding the balance of scope, quality, and budget. The table represents our understanding of some of the topics discussed, and includes information gathered from the Board of Regents capital request for this project, as well as cost data from our recent experience with BOR projects. Definitions Definitions of key technical terminologies are included to help explain various terms. Total Construction Cost Includes the building cost, the cost for fixed equipment and the costs associated with the site development. For Board of Regents projects, this is referred to as the Stated Cost Limitation (SCL). It includes the following: Building Cost Includes cost for the building structure, foundation, building envelope, and interior finishes. It includes all building systems such as heating and air conditioning, plumbing, fire protection, and electrical. All site work within 5 feet of the building is part of the building cost. Fixed Equipment Includes items which are installed before the completion of the building in accordance with the program parameters and which are part of the general construction contract, such as casework, lockers, fixed seating, chalkboards, etc. Site Development Includes all work required for building construction which lies within the site boundary, i.e. grading and fill, utility connections, roads, sidewalks, parking areas (including parking structures), plazas, landscaping, benches, plants, trees, site lighting, etc.. 27

29 Working Project Budget Definitions, cont. Total Project Cost This is the sum of the construction cost plus the soft cost needed to develop a project. The following is a list of items typically included in the soft cost. Typically, these costs range between 30% and 40% of the construction cost. These items are usually estimated as a percentage of construction cost during the programming phase, as each is directly affected by the total size and complexity of the building construction. This fund is usually managed separately by the client. It is not part of the general construction contract. Resident Engineer Inspector Is the owner s clerk on site during construction. Architectural & Engineering Services Is the cost for preparation of programming, design, and construction documents. It may include the cost of special consultants such as cost management, and FF&E design, as well as surveys and laboratory testing that contribute to the design process. FF&E (Fixtures, Furnishings & Equipment) Includes items not built-in or attached to the building, such as furniture, interior signage, artwork, telephone equipment and sets (but not cabling), etc. It does not include short-term equipment such as computers, copiers, fax machines, or other office equipment. Loose Equipment Includes short term items not built-in or attached to the building such as computers, and loose lab and A/V equipment. Special Costs Includes the cost of land acquisition, bond issuance fees, or other unique items such as environmental analysis, and technology equipment, where applicable. These items are usually estimated as an allowance. These costs are usually divided into items subject to the general contingency (which affect the general construction contract) and those not subject to the contingency. General Contingency Is the reserve account for accommodating development of final building design, vagaries in the bid market, unforeseen conditions found during construction, and minor adjustments in scope by the Owner.. 28

30 Working Project Budget PROJECT BUDGET WORKSHEET - PRELIMINARY University System of Georgia Board of Regents Project: Institution: Location: Advanced Computing Technology Building Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia BOR Capital Request GSF A. CONSTRUCTION 200,000 $ BASE RANGE 1. Construction Cost exclusive of "A" 2 Below $33,390,000 a. Building Cost $31,755,000 b. Fixed Equipment included in Building Cost allowance 3.9M est c. Site Development Grading, Utilities, Landscaping & Site Amenities $1,300,000 allowance 2. Reserve for subsurface conditions based on Para. 6 of Architect's $335,000 allowance Budget Certificate * (1.d.) Structured Parking for 600 cars $0 N/A (1.e.) Plaza $0 3. Total for construction (Stated Cost Limitation) $33,390,000 B. RESIDENT ENGINEER INSPECTOR $3,000 per month 24 $3,000 $72,000 C. ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. Construction Documents (Fixed Fee) 5% $1,669, Construction Administration (Fixed Fee) 2.0% $667, Programming 0.45% $150, Special Consultants (Cost Mgmt, Tech.+Bldg. Commis.) ** of SCL 0.30% $100,170 Special Consultants (ffe) - of ffe budget 0.00% $0 5. Extra Drawings & Specifications (0.1% of "A"3 with a 0.05% $16,695 minimum of $1000 and a max. of $40,000) 6. Engineering Data, Surveys, Laboratory Testing, Etc. 1% $333,900 (2% of "A"3 with a min. of $6,500 and a max. of $400,000) 7. Travel Expenses (minimum of $1,000 and no less than 0 $0 cost of six trips per month during construction) 8. A & E Services Total $2,938,320 D. LOOSE EQUIPMENT Institution's Estimate for standard FFE 10% $3,339, E. SPECIAL COSTS - Subject to Contingency Allowance $1,928,000 Fixed Technology Equipment TBD $0 Environmental $300,000 Demolition* $250,000 Install Chiller Unit North Plant $1,378,000 Auditorium (included in construction) $0 F. GENERAL CONTINGENCY (on Items "A" through "E" ) $2,333,370 Other $0 5% 5.6% $2,333,370 G. SPECIAL COSTS - Not Subject to Contingency $0 H. TOTAL PROJECT COST Total Project Budget $44,001,000 * Owner Supplied Cost ** Original did NOT include cost of Building 2%. 29

Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING

Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING Submitted by: Billy Hamilton, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer The Texas A&M University System Subject: Approval of the Project Scope and Budget,

More information

CAPITAL PROJECT PROCESS

CAPITAL PROJECT PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT PROCESS May 2009 GETTING STARTED What is a project? A project is defined as all work (maintenance & repair or renovation) that requires 5,000 or more in time and materials and/or is sufficiently

More information

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Office of the President 107 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM For the Meeting of January 18, 2005 ENGINEERING UNIT 3, IRVINE CAMPUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Campus: Irvine

More information

UNLV COMBINED MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT AND ONE-TIME PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS (COPP) FY2014 AND UPCOMING 2015 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

UNLV COMBINED MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT AND ONE-TIME PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS (COPP) FY2014 AND UPCOMING 2015 LEGISLATIVE SESSION UNLV COMBINED MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT AND ONE-TIME PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS (COPP) FY2014 AND UPCOMING 2015 LEGISLATIVE SESSION Included in this package are the materials for the FY2014 One-Time Project

More information

Allegan County Courthouse Square

Allegan County Courthouse Square Allegan County Courthouse Square Master Plan Charrette Report Draft Executive Summary Date: August 4, 2014 Prepared By: Index to Report Executive Summary A. Introduction 1. Charrette Goals and Objectives.

More information

Report to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to The University of Texas System Administration HB 1, 84th Legislature,

Report to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor Pursuant to Rider No. 5 to The University of Texas System Administration HB 1, 84th Legislature, CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION December 2016 Prepared by The University of Texas System Office of the Controller Report to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor

More information

27 September 2016 l WORK SESSION Board of Supervisors

27 September 2016 l WORK SESSION Board of Supervisors 27 September 2016 l WORK SESSION Board of Supervisors PRO JECT OPTIONS 1 2 3 OUTLINE THE PROBLEM ADDRESS SOLUTIONS ESTABLISH PLAN TO IMPLEMENT A S S E S S M E N T S T U D Y + L O N G - R A N G E V I S

More information

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM CONSENT

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM CONSENT GB1 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: For Meeting of January 22, 2014 ACTION ITEM CONSENT AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING, LI

More information

Guidelines for Space Needs Studies

Guidelines for Space Needs Studies Guidelines for Space Needs Studies Approved by the Space Use Advisory Committee 1 ; 3/28/19 INTENT Develop a standard process, including standardized documentation, to assess existing space utilization

More information

Virginia Department of Planning and Budget Project Request Justification

Virginia Department of Planning and Budget Project Request Justification DPB Form CNJ June 2005 Virginia Department of Planning and Budget Project Request Justification 2006-2008 Biennium Date: July 22, 2005 A. General Information 1. Agency name: Virginia Tech 2. Agency code:

More information

Town Square Redevelopment. Phase I Contract Discussion

Town Square Redevelopment. Phase I Contract Discussion Town Square Redevelopment Phase I Contract Discussion Date: June 8, 2017 Current Estimated Schedule Draft RFQ Review September 20, 2016 Final RFQ Publication October 10, 2016 Part I Team Shortlist January

More information

RECOMMENDATION. c. Approve a total project cost of $3,300,000

RECOMMENDATION. c. Approve a total project cost of $3,300,000 1. U. T. Arlington - Intramural and Recreation Complex - Phase I: Request for Approval to Amend the FY 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program and the FY 2002-2003 Capital Budget to Include Project; Authorization

More information

UC MERCED CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Issued: February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of Contents...1

UC MERCED CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Issued: February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Table of Contents...1 UC MERCED CAPITAL PLANNING PROCESS CAPITAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Issued: February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents...1 I. Executive Summary...2 II. III. Overview of the UC Merced Capital Planning

More information

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM 102 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR DAVIS HALL NORTH REPLACEMENT BUILDING, BERKELEY

More information

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A Page 1 of 14 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT April 30, 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING The decision to design and construct capital improvement projects begins with the Education and Facilities Master

More information

Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING

Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING Agenda Item No. 3.2 AGENDA ITEM BRIEFING Submitted by: Billy Hamilton, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer The Texas A&M University System Subject: Approval of the Revised Project Scope

More information

Budget Forum. October 18, :30am Noon Hughes Hall Lounge

Budget Forum. October 18, :30am Noon Hughes Hall Lounge Budget Forum October 18, 2017 9:30am Noon Hughes Hall Lounge Agenda Topic Presenter(s) Welcome Nana An FY2017 Luella Russo FY2018-19 Operating Budget Status Luella/Bill Brown Business Intelligence (BI)

More information

FY 2016 Capital Development Plan. Arizona State University

FY 2016 Capital Development Plan. Arizona State University FY 2016 Capital Development Plan Arizona State University EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 3 of 19 Project Name Approval Date Occupancy Date Project Cost Gift Target Current Gifts (Cash/ Pledges) College Avenue

More information

Guidelines for Space Needs Studies

Guidelines for Space Needs Studies Guidelines for Space Needs Studies Approved by the Capital Funding & Priorities Committee; 9/26/11 INTENT Develop a standard process, including standardized documentation, to assess existing space utilization

More information

Allan Hancock Joint Community College District

Allan Hancock Joint Community College District One Stop Studen Allan Hancock Joint Community College District One Stop Student Services Public S Public Safety Com Public Safety Complex Childc Childcare Addit Childcare Addition BOND MEASURE I Progress

More information

ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure S Bond Program September 2017 Monthly Progress Report

ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure S Bond Program September 2017 Monthly Progress Report ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Measure S Bond Program September 2017 Monthly Progress Report PERIOD COVERED: September 1 30, 2017 FISCAL YEAR FY 2017 2018 PROGRESS REPORT NO. PR 03 1718 003 PREPARED BY:

More information

KETCHUM ESSENTIAL SERVICES FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

KETCHUM ESSENTIAL SERVICES FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction Existing Conditions Why New Facilities Locations Why A Central Location is Important Alternate Sites Why Now 2 City Hall Space Needs Purpose, Program,

More information

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT TYPE OF RETAINER AGREEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT TYPE OF RETAINER AGREEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANT TYPE OF RETAINER AGREEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in the City of, State of Illinois, as of the date of the last signature of the parties

More information

BHS Renovation Plan. August 22, 2018

BHS Renovation Plan. August 22, 2018 BHS Renovation Plan August 22, 2018 Deferred Maintenance in Schools is a National Trend Inherent Challenges of Existing Building Needs Identified by Staff and Community Project Design Priorities Accessibility

More information

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS The Board of Education of the Mariemont City School District (the Owner ) is seeking sealed, signed, written qualification statements from qualified Construction Management firms

More information

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8 Children and adults learn and perform best in a safe and comfortable environment. Arlington Public Schools therefore provides safe, comfortable, accessible, efficient and attractive spaces for instructional

More information

Springfield High School

Springfield High School 5.1 Springfield High School Springfield School District Delaware County - Pennsylvania Master Plan Presentation Town Hall Meeting 5 Project Cost Estimates/ Project Financing Strategy / Tax Impact February

More information

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning Budget Reform Update Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning February 2018 Outline Brief budget model overview Communication plan Principles Major components Timeline

More information

University of Colorado Capital Construction Project Status SUMMARY - May 2017 (accounting noted by campus)

University of Colorado Capital Construction Project Status SUMMARY - May 2017 (accounting noted by campus) of Colorado Capital Project Status SUMMARY - May (accounting noted by campus) Legend On-Track Risks Approved - Adjustments Needed Awaiting $ Start-Up Phase In Bidding Phase In Closeout Project Completed

More information

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A Page 1 of 14 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT May 21, 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING The decision to design and construct capital improvement projects begins with the Education and Facilities Master Planning

More information

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM 104 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING

More information

Budgeting and Planning Process as of FY17

Budgeting and Planning Process as of FY17 Budgeting and Planning Process as of FY17 Summary The budget is an important annual planning document for the university and reflects choices, priorities and tactics set forth as the result of intensive

More information

Comprehensive Facilities Assessment School Committee

Comprehensive Facilities Assessment School Committee C A N T O N P U B L I C S C H O O L S Comprehensive Facilities Assessment 3.23.2017 School Committee A g e n d a Introductions Schedule & Process Overview Progress Update Enrollment Targets Facilities

More information

REGISTER OF IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS

REGISTER OF IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS JUNE 7-8, 2017 Contact: John Nash REGISTER OF IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS Actions Requested: Consider recommending to the Board approval of the following actions for

More information

FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT July 21, 2014 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING

FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT July 21, 2014 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING Page 1 of 11 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT July 21, 2014 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING Project Budget: $52,234,000 $8,308,000 $67,358,000 State Match: $36,564,000 ($36,564,000) - Basic Aid Allocation:

More information

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM GB1A Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING,

More information

Scott A. Jordan Executive Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer

Scott A. Jordan Executive Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer April 26, 2017 TO: FROM: Members of the Board of Trustees Scott A. Jordan Executive Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer Jeremy Teitelbaum Interim Provost and Executive Vice President

More information

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $52,234,000 $ 8,308,000 $67,358,000 District Funding Commitment: $15,670,000 $51,688,000 $67,358,000

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $52,234,000 $ 8,308,000 $67,358,000 District Funding Commitment: $15,670,000 $51,688,000 $67,358,000 Page 1 of 20 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT June 27, 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING The decision to design and construct capital improvement projects begins with the Education and Facilities Master Planning

More information

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A

Original Revision Total Project Budget: $14,530,000 $47,700,000 $62,230,000 District Funding Commitment Anticipated State Match: $14,530,000 $N/A Page 1 of 15 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT June 25, 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING The decision to design and construct capital improvement projects begins with the Education and Facilities Master Planning

More information

Allan Hancock Joint Community College District

Allan Hancock Joint Community College District One Stop Studen Allan Hancock Joint Community College District One Stop Student Services Public S Public Safety Com Public Safety Complex Childc Childcare Addit Childcare Addition BOND MEASURE I Progress

More information

PROJECT BUDGET PRESENTATION

PROJECT BUDGET PRESENTATION PROJECT BUDGET PRESENTATION Monomoy Regional High School Building Committee Meeting June 19, 2012 Project Features Serves 700 Students Grades 8-12 8 th Grade Wing located near main entrance 168,000 GSF

More information

AGENDA ITEM 11e BOARD MEMORANDUM. T0: Board of Regents, State of Iowa. Jean Friedrich. DATE: June 1, FY 2006 Budgets Iowa School for the Deaf

AGENDA ITEM 11e BOARD MEMORANDUM. T0: Board of Regents, State of Iowa. Jean Friedrich. DATE: June 1, FY 2006 Budgets Iowa School for the Deaf BOARD MEMORANDUM T0: Board of Regents, State of Iowa FROM: Jean Friedrich DATE: June 1, 2005 SUBJ: FY 2006 s Iowa School for the Deaf Recommended Action: Approve the Iowa School for the Deaf s FY 2006

More information

Progress Update Identified Needs & Capital Plan

Progress Update Identified Needs & Capital Plan Progress Update Identified Needs & Capital Plan May 29, 2012 Buena Park School District Facilities Assessment & Implementation Plan 0 Facilities Planning, Public Finance, Program Administration Summary

More information

Bond Oversight Committee Bond program. January 7, 2016

Bond Oversight Committee Bond program. January 7, 2016 Bond Oversight Committee 2014 Bond program January 7, 2016 Bond Oversight Committee 1 AGENDA Welcome, introductions, reminder of scope/role of BOC Stewart Jacobson, Chair Program Management: Max Cleaver

More information

SPACE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE

SPACE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE Procedure # Related Policy Name & # Approved by: Approval Date: Replaces Procedure Dated: Policy Holder: Admin. Contact(s): Review Date: TBD Space Allocation and Management Policy Rani Dhaliwal TBD n/a

More information

APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE

APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE INTRODUCTION To repair aging classrooms / leaky roofs / old facilities, and provide a safe, quality learning environment for current and future students, shall Grass

More information

SANTA ANA COLLEGE FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2018

SANTA ANA COLLEGE FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2018 SANTA ANA COLLEGE FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2018 1 PROJECTS Dunlap Hall Renovation - Completed Central Plant & Infrastructure - Completed Johnson Student Center & Demolition Science Center

More information

Use of State and District Construction Funds

Use of State and District Construction Funds 8 Use of State and District Construction Funds Through its long-range planning process, the district has met its facilities needs without issuing significant debt. To improve cost efficiency, however,

More information

Western s critical need to stay on track with our overall expansion of access and orderly phased development throughout campus;

Western s critical need to stay on track with our overall expansion of access and orderly phased development throughout campus; Karen W. Morse President An equal opportunity university 56 High Street Bellingham, Washington 985-90 60.650.80 Fax: 60.650.650 October 6, 007 The Honorable Christine Gregoire Governor of the State of

More information

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual SUBJECT: NUMBER: A. PURPOSE To provide guidance on what constitutes maintenance and repair and the process used to document and approve projects. B. DEFINITIONS

More information

Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012

Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012 Thomas County School System Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues 300 Mulberry Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box 1877 Macon, Georgia 31202-1877 Phone: (800) 277-0050 Facsimile: (478) 464-8051 Web:

More information

POLICY STATEMENT NO EFFECTIVE: February 15, 1986 PAGE: 1 of 3. REVISED: August 30, 2004

POLICY STATEMENT NO EFFECTIVE: February 15, 1986 PAGE: 1 of 3. REVISED: August 30, 2004 POLICY STATEMENT NO. 1 08.02 COORDINATED BY: Office of the Chancellor EFFECTIVE: February 15, 1986 PAGE: 1 of 3 REVISED: August 30, 2004 SUBJECT: PLANNING AND EVALUATION I. PURPOSE To define responsibility

More information

Section 05 PRE-PLANNING AND BUILDING PROGRAMMING TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 05 PRE-PLANNING AND BUILDING PROGRAMMING TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 05 PRE-PLANNING AND BUILDING PROGRAMMING TABLE OF CONTENTS 05.01 GENERAL... 2 A. AGREEMENT BASIS... 2 B. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES... 2 C. OWNER RESPONSIBILITIES... 2 05.02 INTRODUCTION...

More information

FACILITIES EVALUATIONS BACKGROUND REPORT

FACILITIES EVALUATIONS BACKGROUND REPORT for DRAFT FACILITIES EVALUATIONS BACKGROUND REPORT March 30, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS PURPOSE. 2 SCOPE of the. 2 CAPACITY / UTILIZATION ANALYSIS UPDATE.. 4 FACILITIES EVALUATIONS :: BACKGROUND DATA REPORTS

More information

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program May 6, 2016 Proposal for Submitted to: Commissioner Dr. Brenda Cassellius Minnesota Department of Education Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program Barnesville Public School District Independent

More information

Following the Money Trail From Austin to College Station

Following the Money Trail From Austin to College Station Following the Money Trail From Austin to College Station Understanding Higher Education Finance and the Role of the Texas Legislature Deborah Wright Assistant Vice President, Budget and Planning Contents

More information

Estimate Considerations. Estimate Considerations

Estimate Considerations. Estimate Considerations Estimate Considerations Estimate Considerations Every estimate, whether it is generated in the conceptual phase of a project or at bidding time, must consider a number of issues Project Size Project Quality

More information

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS. BOARD OF VISITORS SPECIAL MEETING April 11, 2018 Merten Hall, Fairfax Campus 1:30 3:00 p.m.

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS. BOARD OF VISITORS SPECIAL MEETING April 11, 2018 Merten Hall, Fairfax Campus 1:30 3:00 p.m. GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS BOARD OF VISITORS SPECIAL MEETING April 11, 2018 Merten Hall, Fairfax Campus 1:30 3:00 p.m. AGENDA I. Call to Order II. III. IV. Audit Committee Topics A. FY 2017

More information

PRIMER ON RESOURCES PLANNING

PRIMER ON RESOURCES PLANNING PRIMER ON RESOURCES PLANNING TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND RESOURCE PLANNING October 2005 THECB Office of Finance Resource Planning Page 1 10/05 CHAPTER 1 - OVERVIEW

More information

July 2011 Review Lander Schematic. Design. Presentation. Pre-design / Design / Construction

July 2011 Review Lander Schematic. Design. Presentation. Pre-design / Design / Construction F 6 Phase, Reduce Project Budget and Reduce Debt Funding Regents Action and Information Timeline November 2009 HFS Master Plan Phase II & III Update Mercer Site 30W Project Concept March 2011 Mercer Presentation

More information

CH-UH Board of Education Meeting. June 27, 2017

CH-UH Board of Education Meeting. June 27, 2017 CH-UH Board of Education Meeting June 27, 2017 Tonight s Agenda Purpose of this work session Current status of the Master Facilities Plan Phase 1 Factors that led us to this point Current path for middle

More information

Members Present: Gino Gasparini, Vijay Gupta, Nori Jabba, James Ruigomez, Bill Rundberg and Dennis Zheng

Members Present: Gino Gasparini, Vijay Gupta, Nori Jabba, James Ruigomez, Bill Rundberg and Dennis Zheng SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Bond Oversight Committee Minutes of June 1, 2017 Meeting District Office Board Room Members Present: Gino Gasparini, Vijay Gupta, Nori Jabba, James Ruigomez,

More information

SANTA ANA COLLEGE FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING MAY 15, 2018

SANTA ANA COLLEGE FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING MAY 15, 2018 FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING MAY 15, 2018 1 PROJECTS Dunlap Hall Renovation - Completed Central Plant & Infrastructure - Completed Johnson Student Center Johnson Demolition Science Center & Building J

More information

CW/P. F a c i l i t i e s M a s t e r P l a n S e p t e m b e r 8,

CW/P. F a c i l i t i e s M a s t e r P l a n S e p t e m b e r 8, Presentation to Desert Community College District by Cambridge West Partnership, LLC in association with HPI Architecture F a c i l i t i e s M a s t e r P l a n S e p t e m b e r 8, 2 0 1 7 Outreach /

More information

STATE CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANNING

STATE CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANNING STATE CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANNING CCC Chancellor s Office Cheryl Larry Lan Yuan San Mateo CCD Jose Nunez Karen Pinkham CCFC 2016 AGENDA Overview Eligibility Priority Review/Approval Effective Practices 1 Key

More information

FITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY. Susan Navarre Fitchburghistoricalsociety.org

FITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY. Susan Navarre Fitchburghistoricalsociety.org FITCHBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY Susan Navarre director@fitchburghistoricalsociety.com Fitchburghistoricalsociety.org Fitchburg City Hall 1852 Old Town Hall Originally First Parish Classical Greek Temple

More information

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about NKU s New Budget Model Philosophy and guiding principles Why did NKU need a new budget model? Internal and external factors pointed to the need for a more flexible,

More information

PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CHECKLIST

PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CHECKLIST THE FEASIBILITY PROCESS PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT CHECKLIST The Project Feasibility Report is conducted to determine the parameters of time, cost and quality of a proposed capital building project that

More information

I. ACTION ITEM PRESENTATION

I. ACTION ITEM PRESENTATION M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Members of the Administration and Finance Committee Robert M. Tata, Chair Larry R. Hill, Vice Chair Carlton F. Bennett (ex-officio) Lisa B. Smith (ex-officio) Yvonne T. Allmond

More information

Racine Event Center & Hotel. RDA & Committee of the Whole Meeting Tuesday, June 27

Racine Event Center & Hotel. RDA & Committee of the Whole Meeting Tuesday, June 27 Racine Event Center & Hotel RDA & Committee of the Whole Meeting Tuesday, June 27 Agenda o o o o o o Team introductions What the event center and hotel will do for our city? The schedule/process What will

More information

Status: Structural steel installation underway at primary building. Observatory construction underway.

Status: Structural steel installation underway at primary building. Observatory construction underway. Page 1 of 11 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT March 30, 2015 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING Project Budget: $52,234,000 $8,308,000 $67,358,000 State Match: $36,564,000 ($36,564,000) - Basic Aid Allocation:

More information

FY 2017 Capital Development Plan. Arizona State University. Revised November 2016

FY 2017 Capital Development Plan. Arizona State University. Revised November 2016 FY 2017 Capital Development Plan Arizona State University Revised November 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 1 of 17 Item Name: Revised FY 2017 Capital Development Plan (ASU) Action Item Committee Recommendation

More information

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Public Universities AUGUST 2013 CAPITAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MANAGEMENT

More information

Capital Project Delivery Handbook. Facilities Planning & Construction

Capital Project Delivery Handbook. Facilities Planning & Construction Capital Project Delivery Handbook Facilities Planning & Construction 1 FACILITIES PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION 3/8/09 2 FACILITIES PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION 1. WELCOME TO FACILITIES PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION...

More information

Governing Board Bond Update. Measure G Bond Program. for. Solano Community College District

Governing Board Bond Update. Measure G Bond Program. for. Solano Community College District Governing Board Bond Update for Measure G Bond Program prepared by Kitchell for the Solano Community College District Included in Booklet: Board Update Bond Financial Summary Completed Projects Projects

More information

S p a c e U t i l i z a t i o n A n a l y s i s a n d P l a n n i n g 0 4 / 0 9 / 1 3

S p a c e U t i l i z a t i o n A n a l y s i s a n d P l a n n i n g 0 4 / 0 9 / 1 3 4 / 9 / 1 3 Space Utilization Analysis General Purpose Statement Classrooms and Lab spaces designed to meet the teaching and learning needs of a broad range of academic programs and to support the entire

More information

Ballot Measures-T Section

Ballot Measures-T Section T, Westminster School District Classroom Improvement Measure To upgrade aging schools and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide heating, ventilation and

More information

CHAPTER 3: PROJECT PRIORITIES AND SELECTION

CHAPTER 3: PROJECT PRIORITIES AND SELECTION CHAPTER 3: PROJECT PRIORITIES AND SELECTION 3.1 Overview 3.2 Steps in the Capital Outlay Process 3.3 State Funding Configurations 3.4 Priority Criteria for Capital Outlay 3.5 Types of Projects 3.6 Community

More information

Anywhere Community Center

Anywhere Community Center Anywhere Community Center Project Number: #2011-023 Preliminary Program October 17, 2011 prepared for City Of Anywhere prepared by Fortissimo Architects 3616 E 99th Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 74137 P: (918)808-3072

More information

Fourth Report of the Budget Model Development Committee

Fourth Report of the Budget Model Development Committee INTRODUCTION This (BMDC) has resulted from over a year of investigating models of budget development and resource management in higher education. The goal of this study is to propose a new approach to

More information

Chapter 1.28 TACOMA ART COMMISSION Term of office of members Vacancy or removal Creation of Art Commission.

Chapter 1.28 TACOMA ART COMMISSION Term of office of members Vacancy or removal Creation of Art Commission. Chapter 1.28 TACOMA ART COMMISSION Sections: 1.28.010 Creation of Art Commission. 1.28.020 Membership of Commission. 1.28.030 Term of office of members. 1.28.040 Vacancy or removal. 1.28.050 Temporary

More information

Planning and Budgeting for. Assistant Vice President, Budget and Planning

Planning and Budgeting for. Assistant Vice President, Budget and Planning Planning and Budgeting for 2012-2013 2013 Deborah Wright Assistant Vice President, Budget and Planning Contents State of Texas Budgeting Higher Education Funding in Texas Texas A&M University Budget Budget

More information

Creating the WOW Case Study of a Large Tenant Improvement Project What you are in for Project Management Overview Scope Development-What?

Creating the WOW Case Study of a Large Tenant Improvement Project What you are in for Project Management Overview Scope Development-What? Creating the WOW Case Study of a Large Tenant Improvement Project Presented by Anne Merrill, Senior Project Manager, Planning, Design and Construction at Stanford Health Care Cynthia Ruby, CEO & President,

More information

Measure K Board Workshop December 1, 2008 Building on Success: Schools for the Next Generation

Measure K Board Workshop December 1, 2008 Building on Success: Schools for the Next Generation Measure K Board Workshop December 1, 2008 Building on Success: Schools for the Next Generation Workshop Items Citizens Oversight Committee Measure K Next Steps Projects in Planning Milestones Board s Vision

More information

Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) User s Guide to Construction Projects

Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) User s Guide to Construction Projects Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) User s Guide to Construction Projects 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Capital Project Stakeholders...6 Capital Project Approval... 10 Design

More information

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM 106 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPTION OF FINDINGS, AND

More information

Budget Kickoff Fiscal Thursday, March 14, 2019 Scheller College of Business

Budget Kickoff Fiscal Thursday, March 14, 2019 Scheller College of Business Budget Kickoff Fiscal 2020 Thursday, March 14, 2019 Scheller College of Business Meeting Outline 1. FY 19/20 Budget Update/Outlook 2. FY 20 Budget Preparation 3. onebudget 4. Recent Budget Policy Changes

More information

P R E S E N T E D T O : S O L A N O C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E D I S T R I C T G O V E R N I N G B O A R D J U L Y

P R E S E N T E D T O : S O L A N O C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E D I S T R I C T G O V E R N I N G B O A R D J U L Y Measure Q Update P R E S E N T E D T O : S O L A N O C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E D I S T R I C T G O V E R N I N G B O A R D J U L Y 1 5 2 0 1 5 Agenda 1. P R E L I M I N A R Y R E S P O N S E T O

More information

6.0 Support Facilities Element

6.0 Support Facilities Element 6.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this element is to ensure the provision of support facilities to meet University needs during the planning period. (1) DATA REQUIREMENTS. This element shall be based on the following

More information

N A V E S I N K C O U N T R Y C L U B

N A V E S I N K C O U N T R Y C L U B N A V E S I N K C O U N T R Y C L U B M I D D L E T O W N, N E W J E R S E Y B U I L D I N G R E N O V A T I O N P R O G R A M ARTISTIC CONCEPTUAL RENDERING OF PROPOSED MEMBERS GRILLE M A S T E R P L A

More information

Board of Trustees Budget, Finance and Facilities Committee Meeting January 24, 2019

Board of Trustees Budget, Finance and Facilities Committee Meeting January 24, 2019 Board of Trustees Budget, Finance and Facilities Committee Meeting January 24, 2019 PRESENTED BY Finance and Administration Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University 1 ACTION ITEM IV: Approval of

More information

CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSETWORKS, INC. CAPITAL PLANNING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT TRAINING GUIDE STATE CAPITAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT REV MARCH 17 STATE CAPITAL PROJECT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE PROJECT INITIATION... 3 PHASE 1...

More information

The Economic Impact of the University of Maryland, Baltimore s Health Sciences Facility III on The State of Maryland. Prepared By

The Economic Impact of the University of Maryland, Baltimore s Health Sciences Facility III on The State of Maryland. Prepared By The Economic of the University of Maryland, Baltimore s on The State of Maryland Prepared By June 2011 1.0 Introduction and Summary The University of Maryland, Baltimore retained Richard Clinch, the Director

More information

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure...

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure... Contents Ballot Measure... 2 Full Text Ballot Proposition... 3 Tax Rate Statement... 6 Impartial Analysis... 7 Statement in Favor of Measure... 8 Ballot Measure EXHIBIT A HANFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS REPAIR

More information

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON REGENTS PROCEDURES: ACTION ITEM PROPOSED REVISIONS TO REGENTS POLICIES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON REGENTS PROCEDURES: ACTION ITEM PROPOSED REVISIONS TO REGENTS POLICIES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS 3-RP Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON REGENTS PROCEDURES: For the Meeting of ACTION ITEM PROPOSED REVISIONS TO REGENTS POLICIES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS The President recommends

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Fiscal Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Fiscal Note GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Fiscal Note BILL NUMBER: House Bill 620 (First Edition) SHORT TITLE: UNC Capital Projects. SPONSOR(S): Representatives Brawley, Saine, Szoka,

More information

2020 Capital Budget For Architects & Engineers

2020 Capital Budget For Architects & Engineers 2020 Capital Budget For Architects & Engineers What you need to know about the 2020 Capital Budget Process with Minnesota State MINNESOTA STATE May 2018 Greg Ewig, System Director, Capital Development

More information

Approve a project to construct the Sports Performance Center

Approve a project to construct the Sports Performance Center Facilities Committee Michael S. Molina Vice Chancellor - Facilities Planning & Construction December 10-11, 2015 Texas Tech University Item 1 Approve a project to construct the Sports Performance Center

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

Facility Condition Assessment Report. Coast Community College District

Facility Condition Assessment Report. Coast Community College District Facility Condition Assessment Report Coast Community College District February 28, 2003 Introduction To help document the need for funding the necessary replacement and upgrading of facilities within California

More information