The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 1 of 8

Transcription

1 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 1 of 8 VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING August 20, 2013 M I N UT E S Village President James Patterson called the meeting of the Board of Trustees to order at 7:30 PM 1. ROLL CALL Present: President Patterson, Trustees Britton, Hinkamp, Jenny, Karton, White Absent: Trustee Detlefs Also Present: Village Manager Hileman, Deputy Village Manager Owen, Village Attorney Patt, Director of Planning/Economic Development Bak, Director of Planning Brady, Recorder Joanne McDonagh 2. FLAG CEREMONY President Patterson led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 6, 2013 Regular Board of Trustees Meeting Page 9, add Trustee Jenny s vote of aye to the roll call vote under 11f Trustee Britton made a motion to approve as amended seconded by Trustee Jenny. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. 4. REPORT OF THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT Residents must contact the Public Works Department by August 30 with their tree variety preference to replace the parkway tree adjacent to their property if it was removed or they were informed it would be. Tickets for the August 26, 2013 Fall Fashion Film and Fun event are available at the Regal Glen Movie Theatre in The Glen Town Center. Proceeds from this Glenview Giving Foundation event will benefit several Glenview social service agencies. Twenty-five area restaurants will provide food samplings. Literacy classes sponsored by the Glenview Public Library in partnership with Oakton Community College are available for non-english speakers to improve reading and writing skills. Registration for the fall session is Thursday, August 22, 2013 from 9:15 am to 12:15 pm at the library. Some Gallery Park pathways are being resurfaced. Pedestrians can walk alongside them during the work. a. Consideration of a Resolution authorizing execution of a liquor license request for a Class A Liquor License for Fish on Fire, 1615 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 130 & 135. Approved Resolution No Director Bak reported on the request for a Class A liquor license for the Fish on Fire hibachi restaurant. The applicant passed the background check and the restaurant is expected to open in September. As Village Liquor Commissioner, President Patterson asked for the advice and consent of the Board to approve a Class A liquor license for the Fish on Fire restaurant. The Board voted unanimously in favor of approval. Mr. B.J. Sung, one of the partners, said Fish on Five is essentially a steak and seafood Japanese hibachi style restaurant which will include a sports bar, lounge and light music. b. Coffee shop liquor license update Director Bak reported that the Village received a request several months ago from one of the Starbucks in Glenview asking for permission to apply for a Class B liquor license (wine and beer where food is available). Requests have not been received from any other coffee shop entity. At former President Cummings direction, Director Bak researched how the Starbucks national program to move into the evening restaurant market would impact Glenview s Class B license. The program involves a modified Starbucks menu with light evening meal choices and the service of beer and wine where permitted by local municipalities. Schaumburg and Burr Ridge approved liquor licenses for Starbucks. In Glenview, the operator of Starbucks and anyone on duty when liquor is served would go through a background check. Starbucks does not permit alcohol to be served before 4:00 p.m. All Village requirements associated with a liquor license would apply and all servers of alcohol must take a BASSET training course to be certified by the Illinois Liquor Control Commission. The Glenview coffee shops that qualify to apply for liquor licenses include Starbucks, the new Glenview Grind, Einstein s and Dunkin' Donuts, but Einstein s would need to modify its business model since it is only open until the afternoon. All liquor license classifications require that food be available. Restaurants are defined as a place where meals are served and alcohol could be part of that experience. The Starbucks in Schaumburg

2 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 2 of 8 upgraded its kitchen in order to support the Starbucks menu. In Glenview, the Inspectional Services Department s health sanitarians would address the kitchen issue directly with Starbucks. Director Bak addressed general questions related to restaurants, coffee shops and the types of establishments that would qualify to apply for a Class B liquor license. An establishment like Subway would qualify to apply for a Class B liquor license since food is available. Starbucks has started advertising light evening meal choices in order to capture some of this market. Trustee Hinkamp doesn t see Starbucks as a restaurant and felt that Glenview was attempting to shoehorn establishments. The request from Starbucks wasn t a concern but it could start the Village on a slippery slope. Trustee Karton noted that McDonald s, Einstein s and similar facilities already qualify to apply for a liquor license since they serve food. She didn t understand why coffee shops were being considered separately. When traveling she has seen people visit Starbucks mainly to work and have coffee. She is not comfortable with the proposed coffee shop liquor license. Director Bak confirmed for Trustee Karton that food at Starbucks would be prepared on site in a kitchen that accommodates such preparation. President Patterson said some Starbucks facilities where alcohol is served choose to utilize outside providers for food preparation so it is delivered fresh daily, which is easier than preparing the food on site. The term for this is called immediate consumption. Attorney Patt confirmed that the liquor license would only allow liquor to be consumed on the premises. Trustee White is comfortable with the proposed coffee shop liquor license. He referred to the Dominick s grocery store in The Glen and asked if the Starbucks Signature Café within the store could apply for a Class B liquor license through the concept under discussion. Director Bak noted that there is a liquor license specific to grocery stores which was established in December to accommodate Heinen s Finer Foods business model of serving beer and wine. She would have to consider how to address the Starbucks Signature Café within Dominick s. Trustee Jenny did not object to the coffee shop liquor license. In response to his question about Starbucks hours of operation, Director Bak said the language for the coffee shop liquor license could be modified to indicate that alcohol would not be served prior to 4:00 p.m. Trustee Britton felt the proposed language did not cleanly apply to Starbucks. He supports approval if staff is given direction to clean up the language and refrain from shoehorning establishments. 5. REPORT OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER: None 6. REPORT OF THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY Attorney Eric Patt asked for a brief executive session at the end of this meeting to discuss the purchase, sale or lease of real property by the Village and to discuss pending or imminent litigation. Trustee Jenny made a motion to approve seconded by Trustee Hinkamp. AYES: Trustees Hinkamp, Jenny, Karton, White, Britton 7. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC: None 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 9. CONSENT AGENDA Deputy Village Manager Owen read the consent agenda. a. Old Business i. Second consideration of temporary traffic Ordinance amending Chapter 90 of the Glenview Municipal Code for control of road closure for the Glenview Firefighters Local 4186 s Firehouse 5K, Sunday, September 22, Approved Ordinance No ii. Second consideration of temporary traffic Ordinance amending Chapter 90 of the Glenview Municipal Code for control of road closure for the Glenview House Oktoberfest, September 21, Approved Ordinance No. 5699

3 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 3 of 8 b. New Business i. Resolutions and recommendations authorizing: (1) A budget amendment for private plan review and inspectional services in the combined amount of $290,000. Approved Resolution No (2) A plan review and inspection services contract amendment with SAFEbuilt of Windsor, Colorad o in the amount not to exceed $175,000; Approved Resolution No (3) A plan review and inspection services contract amendment with Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, Illinois in the amount of $115,000; Approved Resolution No ii. Resolution authorizing release of certain Executive Session minutes and erasure of certain Executive Session audiotapes. Continued iii. Consideration of the approval of the voucher list for August 20, Approved Trustee White made a motion to approve as amended seconded by Trustee Britton. AYES: Trustees Jenny, Karton, White, Britton, Hinkamp 10. OLD BUSINESS: None 11. NEW BUSINESS a. First Consideration of an Ordinance granting a zoning variation at North Lake Terrace Falcon Boxing Gym. Approved Director Bak reported that the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 15, 2013 on a 4-0 vote recommended approval of a zoning variation to allow a multi-tenant ground sign within an easement instead of at a 10-foot setback as required by ordinance. Northlake Terrace is a private road and part of the area north of West Lake Avenue that was annexed several years ago. It is not a public right-of-way. Since North Lake Terrace is an easement, a zoning variance is required. This past spring, Falcon Boxing Gym was granted conditional use and site plan approval. The Appearance Commission approved the multitenant sign on July 17, The Zoning Board supported the variance request based on the need for the sign to be visible to motorists. The Zoning Board reviewed two signs. The nonconforming sign will be brought into compliance upon remodeling. Trustee Karton made a motion to approve seconded by Trustee Jenny. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Due to the unanimous vote, this matter will be placed on the consent agenda at the next meeting. b. First consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 6 expanding the Class F Liquor License classification. Approved as amended Director Bak addressed the proposed ordinance to amend the Class F liquor license classification. The current Class F license covers catering and cooking schools. The proposal is to segregate them as Class F1 and Class F2, with consideration for a Class F3 license related to an art studio or similar entertainment businesses. If the Board approves the proposed ordinance, the total number of Class F licenses would need to increase. Pinot s Palette is an actively growing national franchise and part of the paint and sip industry. The patrons take art classes with a trained instructor, and food and alcohol are provided. Alcohol can only be consumed on site. Two Pinot s Palette facilities were approved in the Chicago area but they are not yet open. Recently Naperville approved a liquor license for Pinot s Palette by amending its existing entertainment license to allow an art studio or similar business to be eligible as an entertainment facility. Naperville requires that 60% of revenue must come from something other than the service of alcohol. After reviewing the Naperville ordinance, Director Bak said Glenview chose not to allow liquor licenses at all of its entertainment facilities. The proposed ordinance is limited to art studios, arts and crafts studios or businesses within that range of activity. Tipsy Paint is a paint and sip facility that operates a BYOB studio in Glenview as a conditional use (located in an industrial district). Other studios are interested in coming to Glenview. Pinot s Palette wants to open in The Glen Town Center in an existing tenant space provided that a liquor license is granted. The studio offers programs for individuals, families and children. Children s programs are held in a private room. Children are not allowed on the premises without an adult unless they are participating

4 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 4 of 8 in one of the children s activities. Director Bak noted that the representative for Pinot s Palette was not available to attend tonight s meeting but could be available when the item is considered on a second reading. Since Pinot s Palette in Naperville hasn t opened yet, Glenview staff doesn t know the actual activity, enforcement of the liquor license, etc. The proposed ordinance allows food to be prepared off site by a licensed caterer or restaurant that meets Glenview s health code requirements. If the license is approved, Pinot s Palette would establish a relationship with a restaurant in The Glen Town Center or perhaps offer catered or boxed food. The Board discussed increasing the maximum number of Class F licenses to accommodate additional paint and sip type studios, and the requirement pertaining to revenue generated from sales other than alcohol. Since Pinot s Palette expects 25% to 30% of its revenue to come from alcohol they didn t object to the proposed 75% requirement. The ordinance states that at the time of the annual license renewal, the Village would be given a certified statement of revenue for auditing purposes. If requirements are not met, the Village could deny any request for renewal. Trustee White suggested reducing the percentage to 65% to give the applicant more leeway since there is no material difference. Trustee Karton agreed and she was assured that anyone serving alcohol would be BASSET trained and certified and required to comply with all Village requirements. In response to Trustee Hinkamp, Director Bak reviewed the Village s requirements related to the timeframe that alcohol could be served and said the hours could be modified specifically for Class F licenses if desired. Polling the Trustees resulted in full support for amending the ordinance to reflect a change from 75% to 65%. The Village currently permits and has issued one Class F license. The proposal would increase that total to four permitted licenses and in turn would increase the total number of all liquor licenses in all classes from 95 to 98. This action would allow similar businesses that would qualify to apply for a liquor license, that is, Tipsy Paint, Pinot s Palette and Color Me Mine. There appears to be a growing trend for these types of facilities. Director Bak said the total number of available liquor licenses is confirmed by staff closer to the end of the year when it is clear which businesses plan to renew and a recommendation to increase or decrease the maximum number of licenses is made at that time. Trustee Jenny made a motion to approve as amended seconded by Trustee White. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Due to the unanimous vote of approval, this item will be placed on the consent agenda at the next meeting. Note - President Patterson referred back to agenda item 4a related to the coffee shop liquor license update discussion presented by Director Bak. He asked Trustee Britton to consider helping staff articulate the language needed for the proposed license. Trustee Britton agreed to do so. c. First consideration of an Ordinance for Conditional Use, Final Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Subdivision Approval for 1020 Waukegan Road Heinen s Fine Foods and Final Site Plan Review Approval for Glenview Road Shoppers Row. Approved on first reading Ordinance No d. First Consideration of an Ordinance for commercial zoning variations at 1020 Waukegan Road Heinen s Fine Foods. Approved on first reading Ordinance No Agenda items 11c and 11d were reviewed together. Director Brady stated that the applicant had requested Board consideration to waive administrative rules to adopt on first reading regarding 11c and 11d. Director Brady reviewed a map of the former Dominick s site and the proposed Heinen s development. The property owned by the Village will be occupied by Heinen s Fine Foods as part of a lease agreement. Another map was shown indicating the Plan Commission s recommendation for site plan improvements related to the easement agreement and lease agreement that were approved in December As part of these agreements, the Village is required to be the applicant for approvals to allow access in and out of the Shoppers Row site and access out to Waukegan Road. The Plan Commission recommended approval of a conditional use, final site plan and preliminary site plan for Heinen s Fine Foods and the final site plan review for the Shoppers Row improvements on a 4-0 vote on July 23, As part of the approvals for the Heinen s development, the Zoning Board recommended approval on August 5, 2013 on a 5-0 vote of 17 commercial variations related to Heinen s Fine Foods. As part of the approvals for the Heinen s site, the developer and architect addressed the Appearance Commission twice. Preliminary appearance approval was received for the building, landscaping, lighting and signage on August 7, Heinen s will return to the Appearance Commission for final appearance approval once final construction documents for the building permit are

5 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 5 of 8 submitted. Appearance Commission approval for lighting improvements along the new parking lot layout is required for Shoppers Row. Director Brady addressed some of the items for the Heinen s proposal and how they comply with the downtown development code and revitalization plan that the code is based upon. He reviewed the alternate concept that was indicated in the revitalization plan and enhancements to the river embankment and a path along the river. These items were compiled as part of the proposal for the Heinen s development. The downtown development code requires the building to be located at the street with parking in the rear. Acceptable materials will be used to wrap around the majority of the façade, the parking complies with the Village s requirements and detention will be provided. With respect to the Waukegan Road Corridor Plan, the applicant will be closing some curb cuts. The cross connection between the grocery store site and Shoppers Row has been enhanced and there is shared parking via the easement approved in December, Two full curb cuts on the existing site will change to one full curb cut in the general location of the existing curb cut on the northern side. The southern curb cut has been eliminated and replaced with a right in only curb cut for the benefit of Shoppers Row patrons. The site plan has had numerous changes as part of the process. Director Brady reviewed highlights of what was discussed by the Plan Commission and how key topics of concern were addressed. There was support for a man door or another type of pedestrian access along Waukegan Road. Since it is difficult to have a man door off of Waukegan Road for pedestrian access due to the store layout and grade level of the store and Waukegan Road, the applicant reconfigured the interior surface parking lot to add an additional row of trees. This created an access point for a walking path to and from the grocery store through the parking lot and to the riverbank. The Plan Commission and Appearance Commission also chose to increase the architectural detail on the north side and along the Waukegan Road frontage. He reviewed in detail the Shopper Row site plan and the Heinen s site plan, various improvements and how issues were addressed for each site. The information is outlined in the meeting material. The Appearance Commission and Zoning Board discussed the Heinen s roof top parking deck (for employees only) and how to screen the vehicles from the street. The Zoning Board had concerns but these were satisfied by the refinement that the vehicles would be screened by a five foot parapet wall which was considered adequate. The Appearance Commission said seeing a vehicle here and there might be a point of interest since rooftop parking is unusual and could be considered an architectural detail. The commercial variations reviewed by the Plan Commission and heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals primarily related to bulk regulations, parking lot design, lighting and design requirements in compliance with the downtown code. Variations are necessary to comply with the Downtown Revitalization Plan which requires buildings to be at the lot lines. Through the process, several variance requests were dropped or lessened in intensity. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended Board approval of all 17 variations requested based on the unique shape of the Heinen s site and the terms of the lease agreement related to parking and easement requirements for Shoppers Row, the grade changes from Waukegan Road to the river, the unique situations created by the adjacencies of the Shoppers Row development, and the fact that the downtown code was intended for mixed use developments rather than the proposed large scale single use development. The Heinen s building architecture was debated by the Plan Commission. The Zoning Board had some comments. The Appearance Commission weighted in on the architectural details and granted preliminary approval. He reviewed what has been modified through the review process. Details discussed at the Appearance Commission include the addition of windows to the Waukegan Road elevation, metal trellises to create shadow interests, patterns on brick insets and other architectural details as indicated in the exhibits presented. To address an Appearance Commission concern related to the design of the southeast corner of the building, the applicant added additional signage and increased the height of the parapet wall. Representing Heinen s and the architectural firm, Mr. Bill Wells and Mr. Greg Ernst were available to address Board questions. Trustee Karton shared her appreciation that the process resulted in having a brand new grocery store built to the lot line to closely match the concept in the downtown plan. Trustee Jenny made an omnibus motion to waive administrative rules for 11c and 11d, seconded by Trustee Britton. AYES: Trustees Karton, White, Britton, Hinkamp, Jenny

6 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 6 of 8 Trustee Karton made an omnibus motion to approve on first reading 11c and 11d, seconded by Trustee Britton. AYES: Trustees White, Britton, Hinkamp, Jenny, Karton e. Riverbank stabilization and path adjacent to Heinen s update and request for direction Director Brady said staff is seeking Board direction for the proposed stabilization and path by the riverbank. As part of the lease agreement, the Village is responsible for the riverbank and has already removed the brush and trees along the river. The next step relates to landscaping adjacent to Shoppers Row and the Heinen s site which is on a different project track but parallel timing with the Heinen s development. The Board considered the proposed options A through E. The Our Lady of Perpetual Help improvements on the west edge of the riverbank, Shoppers Row and Heinen s site improvements on the east edge and the riverbank improvements would all be done and completed in conjunction with each other. Conceptual plans for riverbank restoration and landscape were drafted. Both plans were reviewed in January, 2013 by the Natural Resources Commission. They were supportive of the riverbank stabilization, introduction of environmental features in terms of river improvements, natural landscaping and a pathway in conjunction with the Downtown Revitalization Plan concept. During review of the Heinen s development, the Plan Commission, Appearance Commission and Zoning Board expressed support for a pedestrian pathway connection along the river. The Plan Commission wanted the river path for pedestrians on Glenview Road to walk through a row of landscaping in the Heinen s parking lot to access Heinen s store the same way the front door would be accessed by patrons coming from the main parking field. A main objective of the Downtown Revitalization Plan is to add green space along the river and enhance the edge of both sides and toward River Drive. The alternate Downtown Plan concept for the site included an enhanced river edge and a river walk. After review by the Natural Resources Commission, the plan has been refined to include riverbank stabilization and prevention of erosion at the water level using natural landscape materials. Additional trees would be planted that wouldn t encroach into power lines. Director Brady described the river environmental improvements of a ripple pool and a cross vane. There was discussion about two proposed versions of the path. The first version includes a three-foot wide crushed stone path, retaining wall, and a railing to prevent pedestrians from falling into the river. Since the path is in the floodway, any fencing would be placed parallel with the river at a north/south configuration. The second version is a four-foot wide concrete path with a retaining wall and railing. Riverbank stabilization is necessary in order to make the pathway possible and stairs leading up to the Glenview Road section would be needed. Director Brady comprehensively reviewed options A thorough E related to the riverbank improvements. If a federal EPA grant is awarded to Glenview for the project in April, 2014, $111,000 of Village money would be obligated. If the grant is not awarded, the obligation for all improvements in A through E would total $236,000 of Village money. Based on tonight s Board s direction, consultants will prepare final designs for review by the Natural Resources Commission for final comments. The design drawings would then be reviewed by the Appearance Commission for approval followed by the Village Board s consideration of a contract award. Director Brady confirmed that the riverbank improvement options A through E could be done out of order. Trustee White suggested burying the power lines. Director Brady described the work involved and said such a project would likely be cost prohibitive since the flood plain runs along the back side of the property. In terms of burying the lines only on the Heinen s site, he explained it would be costly to relocate the lines through the Heinen s site along an indirect path and it would also need to be coordinated with the Heinen s development. Trustee Britton asked how likely it was for Glenview to be awarded the grant for the proposed riverbank improvements and path. Director Brady explained that although the projects are strong, there may be an issue from an equity standpoint. The EPA is focused on other drainage areas within other water sheds. He said Heinen s had not been asked directly to help fund the improvements for the west side of the riverbank.

7 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 7 of 8 Manager Hileman said the cost for burying power lines was not considered during the Heinen s site preparation discussions. He could obtain cost details if directed by the Board, but noted Heinen s is currently finalizing bids and working toward moving their project forward. Also, he understands that Heinen s budget is very tight. Trustee Karton suggested permeable concrete for the path to allow water to penetrate since it would be in the flood plain. She asked where the area north of the middle of the Heinen s parking lot leads to. Director Brady said at the lot lines of the residential properties to the north there is a steep drop to the riverbank with no available land to have a path at grade. It is not feasible to connect Grove Street from Glenview Road via the river walk without significant cantilevering or other support structures because the two northern residential developments have patios at the lot line adjacent to the river. Manager Hileman indicated that the Board was asked to consider the various options now in order to avoid doing the work after the Heinen s parking lot was constructed. Also, he doesn t expect option E to be fully funded since Glenview has received grant funding many times over the last ten years and may have received its fair share at this point. Mr. Bill Wells, director of store planning for Heinen s, anticipates the store would open on April 2, They are working aggressively to meet that date. He understands the path would essentially connect Heinen s with the Village so he will ask Mr. Heinen to consider participating financially in the project. Trustee Karton asked to continue this discussion to have time to receive feedback from Mr. Heinen and get visuals of the improvements outlined in A through E. She wanted this information before approving anything. President Patterson asked the Trustees to rank the five options in order to prioritize the projects. Trustee Britton supported options A through E up to $111,000. If the grant wasn t awarded and Heinen s chose not to financially participate, he would support spending $136,000 of Glenview money on the project. Trustee Hinkamp was in favor of A B and E using Glenview money. Trustee Jenny concurred with Trustee Hinkamp. It would promote a walkable downtown environment and the pedestrian path would link the Heinen s development to residential developments to the west and other stores. Trustee White was in favor of option A at $60,000, incremental B at $50,000 and incremental E at $26,000. He supports the linkage between Heinen s and other downtown developments. He also wants to improve the quality of the river. In response to Trustee White s question about doing river improvements (incremental option D) without stabilization on the west side (incremental option C), Director Brady said he would forward the question to the consultants and present the findings to the Board. Trustee Karton also wants to improve the quality of the river and the runoff from the Heinen s parking lot to the river such as through native landscaping. In January the Natural Resources Commission recommended that the Heinen s parking lot run-off go to the river through a bio-swale with native landscaping to filter it, but Heinen s has since proposed full detention, so all water from the site will be contained in a detention system. Director Brady explained that native landscaping would restore and beautify the natural riverbank condition. Trustee Karton was supportive of permeable concrete for the path, riverbank stabilization on the east side, native landscaping and the ripple pool. Director Brady suggested that permeable pavers may present maintenance issues due to the voids in the concrete which would fill with debris when the river rose above the path during flood events. He added that there are ways to deal with snow plowing on gravel. Trustee White felt a concrete path was best. It could be plowed in the winter so the path would be usable year round to access the Heinen s store. Manager Hileman said a cost benefit analysis would be prepared which would include maintenance of a concrete path and a crushed stone path. Permeable pavers may not be practical from a maintenance perspective. In response to Trustee Karton, he will add stamped concrete to the analysis. President Patterson concluded from the Board discussion and Trustee Britton s suggestion that staff direction could be to spend up to $136,000 of Village dollars for options A, B and E, with any additional monies from the potential EPA grant and/or Heinen s Fine Foods to be used to expand upon the project. There was no need to wait to see if the grant was awarded. The Trustees were in favor of the proposed direction to staff. 12. PUBLIC COMMENT: None 13. ADJOURNMENT

8 The Village of Glenview, Regular Board of Trustees Meeting, August 20, Page 8 of 8 Trustee Jenny made a motion to adjourn to executive session at 9:11 PM, seconded by Trustee White. AYES: Trustees Karton, White, Britton, Hinkamp, Jenny Respectfully submitted, Joanne McDonagh, Recording Secretary ATTEST