Multi-Hazard Risk Management Project The Smithsonian Institution (SI)
|
|
- Margery Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Multi-Hazard Risk Management Project The Smithsonian Institution (SI) Over 700 facilities worldwide dedicated to research, exhibit, and outreach 18 museums and galleries in Washington DC and NYC wide variety of other facilities 1 new museum in planning stage Quasi-federal agency 1,000 staff and volunteers 1
2 SI Facilities 3 SI Facilities Museums Research Zoo Office Buildings Warehouse/Storage Telescopes Owned and Leased
3 Office of Protection Services Over 800 security guards and police officers and 100 management, technical, investigation staff in DC, NYC, and Panama dedicated to: Security guards (proprietary and contract) Police (National Zoo) Investigations Physical Security (Design and Construction) Personnel Security (Identity Management) Disaster and Emergency Management Risk Management Responsibilities Cultural Property Protection Anti-terrorism Disaster Management Program Hosts the National Conference of Cultural Property Protection SI Role in National Mitigation and Planning Department of Homeland Security Key Assets (Resources) National Infrastructure and Protection Plan (NIPP) National Monument and Icon Sector Federal Facilities Sector Commercial Facilities Sector Interagency Security Committee Membership Communication with other agencies Department of Justice Mall security agencies Cultural Property Community 6 3
4 Overview Why are we doing this? Government says we should It is smart It is our responsibility to staff, visitors, and the National Collection SI Disaster Management Program Preparedness, including Risk Management Risk Assessment (every 3 years) Risk Mitigation Response Recovery Risk Mitigation is generally the most efficient and cost effective form of disaster management Why Multi-Hazard? 7 The Methodology FEMA 6 and Written by DHS/FEMA for use by state and local agencies Government / commercial sector-specific plan (NIPP) Provides framework and methods that can be adjusted Free, non-proprietary Method Database Training For SI, methodology was modified to address all hazards First time this was done Modified method was template for other All-Hazard Risk Assessments Modified method is being incorporated into Version of the publications in October 007 8
5 What Level of Assessment? Tier 1 Screening staff spending 1 to days on site Conceptual level protective measures and ROM cost estimates Tier Detailed to 7 staff spending 1 to weeks on site Detailed protective measures and cost estimates 9 FEMA 6/ Methodology Risk = (Asset Value) x (Threat Value) x (Vulnerability Value) 10
6 Step 1: Threat/Hazard Identification & Rating Disaster Level Threat Manmade Explosive Blast due to vehicle bomb Chemical / Biological / Radiological (CBR) release Technological accident Armed attack Civil Disruption Cyber Attack Kidnapping / Hostage Limited Data to Produce Probability! Access to Agent Knowledge or Expertise History of Threats Asset Visibility/Symbolism Asset Accessibility Site Population Collateral Damage Disaster Level Threat Natural Hazard Wind (hurricane or tornado) Severe Storm / Lightning Earthquake Wildfire (not building fire) Flooding (surface water, not broken pipes) Landslide / Sinkhole Lava flow Significant Data to Produce Probability! 11 Creating a Threat Value Threat / Hazard Rating Very High 10 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is imminent. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is credible. High 8 9 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is expected. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is credible. Medium High 7 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is probable. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is credible. Medium 6 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is probable. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is known, but is not likely. Medium Low The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is probable. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is known, but is not likely. Low 3 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is possible. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat exists, but is not likely. Very Low 1 The likelihood of a threat, weapon, and tactic being used against the site or building is very negligible. Internal decision-makers and/or external law enforcement and intelligence agencies determine the threat is non-existent or extremely unlikely. 1 6
7 Step : Asset Identification and Assessment Two part process: Define and understand a building s core functions and processes Approx 3 0 functions Identify site and building infrastructure and systems 10 infrastructure elements 13 People and Asset Value Asset Value: The degree of debilitating impact that would be caused by the incapacity or destruction of an asset Determined by staff at each site Normalized by the assessment team 1 7
8 Creating an Asset Value Very High High Medium High Medium Medium Low Low Very Low Asset Value Loss or damage of the building s assets would have exceptionally grave consequences such as extensive loss of life, widespread severe injuries, or total loss of primary services, core processes, and functions. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have grave consequences such as loss of life, severe injuries or impairment of core processes, and functions. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have serious consequences, such as serious injuries or impairment of core processes and functions. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have moderate to serious consequences, such as injuries or impairment of core functions and processes. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have moderate consequences, such as minor injuries or minor impairment of core functions and processes. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have minor consequences, such as a slight impact on core functions and processes for a short period of time. Loss or damage of the building s assets would have negligible consequences or impact. 1 Step 3: Vulnerability Assessment Survey performed with a survey checklist containing 0+ questions Flooding Flooding Screening analysis Detailed Engineering Existing Operational Plans Other data collected Air Intakes Entrance Features Facility Condition Assessment Reports Master Plans Disaster Management Plans Wildfire Telecom Service Wind 16 8
9 Creating a Vulnerability Value Very High 10 High 8 9 Medium High 7 Medium 6 Medium Low Low 3 Vulnerability Rating One or more major weaknesses have been identified that make the asset extremely susceptible to an aggressor or hazard. The building lacks redundancies / physical protection and the entire building would only be functional again after a very long period of time after the attack. One or more major weaknesses have been identified that make the asset highly susceptible to an aggressor or hazard. The building has poor redundancies / physical protection and most parts of the building would only be functional again after a long period of time after the attack. An important weakness has been identified that make the asset very susceptible to an aggressor or hazard. The building has inadequate redundancies / physical protection and most critical functions would only be operational again after a long period of time after the attack. A weakness has been identified that make the asset fairly susceptible to an aggressor or hazard. The building has insufficient redundancies / physical protection and most parts of the building would only be functional again after a considerable period of time after the attack. A weakness has been identified that make the asset somewhat susceptible to an aggressor or hazard. The building has incorporated a fair level of redundancies / physical protection and most critical functions would only be operational again after a considerable period of time after the attack. A minor weakness has been identified that slightly increases the susceptibility to an aggressor or hazard. The building has incorporated a good level of redundancies / physical protection and most critical functions and the building would be operational within a short period of time after the attack. Very Low 1 No weaknesses exist. The building has incorporated excellent redundancies / physical protection and the building would be operational immediately after an attack. 17 Mapping Functional Areas Determine location of functional areas Are high asset value functions near areas of high vulnerability? 18 9
10 Example Unit Plan Results Natural Hazards Manmade Threats Function (i.e., People) Earthquake Wind Flood Explosive Blast Armed Attack Administration/Executive/Divisional Offices Asset Value Threat Rating 1 Vulnerability Rating 8 Armories/Break Areas/Locker Rooms Asset Value Threat Rating 1 Vulnerability Rating 8 Data Center Asset Value Threat Rating 1 Vulnerability Rating 8 Red: Should be addressed Yellow: Consider incorporating into other projects/plans Risk = Asset Value x Threat Rating x Vulnerability Rating Green: Least Risk often no action is recommended 19 Lessons Learned Site Briefs On-Site Operational and Management Staff were much more cooperative when we explained what we were doing and why Asset Value is a difficult concept to convey isn t everything important? Low Cost / No Cost Involve key site staff during the inspection many low cost / no cost items were found, conveyed verbally, and were corrected shortly after the inspection. Many projects could be implemented with annual maintenance, and not capital funds Applicable to many Medium risk issues 0 10
11 Lessons Learned Difficulties with Screening Level Accounting for building age, type, use, and various renovations: many facilities could have been considered multiple facilities Structural system differences Mechanical / electrical system differences Very difficult finding building plans and important data on older buildings 1 Lessons Learned Cyberterrorism SI has a robust program to handle this threat Difficult to assess during a screening level assessment due to specialized expertise Building Fire SI has a robust fire program, therefore this hazard is already being mitigated 11
12 Lessons Learned Large number of buildings, lots of walking Asset value meetings needed improvement Comparing natural to man-made risk scores was challenging and exciting 3 Example Unit Plan Results 1
13 Risk Scores Institution-Wide Risk Scores across all sites Total Scores 31,16 Red (High Risk) Scores 3,79 (11.9 %) Yellow (Medium Risk) Scores,39 (1.93 %) Green (Low Risks) Scores 3,138 (7.1%) Screening level analysis (more detailed analysis will be required for certain mitigation) Highest Scores (60 810) covered many different risks/locations Some trends Some stand-alone scores Highest individual scores are misleading when it comes time to mitigation Anomalies / Mistakes High Risk Scores Analysis Institution-Wide High Risk Scores across all sites by threat / hazard Manmade 7.9% Drought/ Extreme Heat 1.0% Severe Storm/ Lightning 8.9% Landslide/ Sinkhole 0.3% Tsunami 0.7% Fire 0.8% Flood 3.% Earthquake 3.0% Lava Flow 0.% Wind.% 6 13
14 Analyzing Risk American History Case Study Of the all the high risk scores for National Museum of American History, the top 6 were due to flooding These were some of the highest risk scores for all of SI Natural hazards only represented % of the high risk scores Be careful how you interpret risk scores! 7 GIS 100 Year Flood 8 1
15 Major Findings Several commonalities between buildings / sites: Risks associated with geography Risks associated with changes in policies and procedures Utility backup standards Safe haven procedures Shelter-in-place procedures exist, but need additional review 9 Events During Risk Mitigation Process Wildfire near Whipple Observatory, AZ Summer 00 Hurricane Jeanne, Ft. Pierce, FL September 00 Earthquake in Kona, HI (near Mauna Kea) November 006 Flooding on Washington, DC July 006 Evacuating the National Mall July (006 and 007) 30 1
16 Damage to Ft. Pierce Research building was constructed in 1999 to code with an importance factor for wind Hurricane Jeanne was below a code event! Yet: Damage to facility and systems Associated costs from damage Lost time affected research schedules / projects 31 Risk Management: Taking the Next Step We took this to a higher level with SI: Translated them into the Smithsonian s Capital Plan. We worked with the people who are directly responsible for major project integration for each building. Three Options: Do nothing and accept the risk. Perform a risk assessment and manage the risk by installing reasonable mitigation measures. Protect the building against all threats to achieve the least amount of risk. 3 16
17 Integration of Proposed Measures Assessment Team and OPS staff met with project mangers for each site Described the results of the risk assessment including recommendations and cost estimates Decisions were made on whether / when / how to integrate findings (both major and minor) Identified source of funding (Capital, Operational, Maintenance) Nearly all findings were approved and will be integrated (many not for more than years) The Capital Plan was revised with mitigation projects integrated into existing projects or new stand-alone projects 33 Prioritization: Factors Used Let risk scores guide initial project prioritization Highest scores = highest risk Reduction in significant number of scores Focus on consequences of doing nothing Life safety Cost to replace infrastructure Importance to the overall Smithsonian mission Benefit / Cost 3 17
18 Findings: Utility Performance Standard Create a performance standard for different classes of buildings for redundant utilities and backup power. These critical utilities may include water, steam, gas, electric, HVAC (for certain collections and research) and communications systems. After the standards are completed, conduct a needs assessment for the different classes of buildings. 3 Findings: Detailed CBR Assessment Conduct a detailed vulnerability assessment of CBR vulnerabilities/threats for all urban facilities (direct, collateral damage issues) and determine likely protective measures
19 Findings: Sheltering-in-Place Operational recommendation: Expand the Disaster Management Plans to include scenarios, eventbased decision trees, performance standards, and policies for Sheltering-in-Place for specific threats and hazards. The assessment should also include: The areas within buildings to locate people A plan for sheltering staff and visitors for various types of threats/hazards A detailed vulnerability assessment of HVAC equipment, air flow, and space requirements 37 Integration of Proposed Measures Results were integrated into major master planning for National Museum of American History Changing use of building due to flood risk 38 19
20 Lessons Learned Comparison of building value is difficult which building is most important? The methodology does not support this. The subjective aspects of the threat and asset value numbers can over (and under) emphasize risks. How to Define Value? Building $ value Value of assets within building Staff and visitor lives Psychosocial impact Society Government Economy x x = 1 Risk = Asset Value x Threat Rating x Vulnerability Rating 6 x 6 x = Lessons Learned Collateral Damage (blast, CBR, etc.) should be it s own threat. Context is important. FEMA The comparison of natural threats and man made threats (when ranking) was not perfect probability versus target attractiveness. Earlier assessments (man made) were verified, but some natural disasters risks were ranked higher new data. 0 0
21 Results Approximately 0 new planning / design / construction projects added to the SI -year Capital Program Several new emergency / disaster planning projects included into future budget requests Difficult to draw the line at a disaster many small risks and mitigation measures were recommended (approximately maintenance projects identified) Translating theory to reality is difficult Everyone has pet projects and nobody is wrong arguments about priority New SI Performance Metric for tracking risk was developed 1 1
A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool
Mila Kennett Architect/Manager Risk Management Series Risk Reduction Branch FEMA/Department of Homeland Security MCEER Conference, September 18, 2007, New York City A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety:
More informationSTATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide
STATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide the hazard mitigation planning process Hazard mitigation planning is the process of determining how to reduce or eliminate the loss of life and property
More informationSection 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS
Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS 2.1 Introduction The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), signed into law by the President of the United States on October 30, 2000 (P.L. 106-390),
More informationPrerequisites for EOP Creation: Hazard Identification and Assessment
Prerequisites for EOP Creation: Hazard Identification and Assessment Presentation to: Advanced Healthcare Emergency Management Course Objectives Upon lesson completion, you should be able to: Understand
More informationThe Mississippi State Department of Health EOPs and HVAs Presented By: Lillie Bailey
The Mississippi State Department of Health EOPs and HVAs Presented By: Lillie Bailey Introductions Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Hazard Vulnerability Assessment (HVA) Exercising and Implementation Do
More informationSouthwest Florida Healthcare Coalition
Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition Hazards Vulnerability Assessment 2018 1 Table of Contents Summary 3 EmPower Maps and Data 5 Social Vulnerability Index Maps 19 Suncoast Disaster Healthcare Coalition
More informationFACILITY NAME. CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool
FACILITY NAME CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool 1) Change "Facility Name" at the top of this Instruction Tab
More informationEvaluate every potential event in each of the three categories of probability, risk, and preparedness. Add additional events as necessary.
HAZARD VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS The Joint Commission defines hazard vulnerability analysis as the identification of hazards and the direct and indirect effect these hazards may have on the hospital. Hazard
More informationREPUBLIC OF BULGARIA
REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY INTRUDUCTION Republic of Bulgaria often has been affected by natural or man-made disasters, whose social and economic consequences cause significant
More informationSection II: Vulnerability Assessment and Mitigation
Section II: Vulnerability Assessment and Mitigation 1. Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (facility name) should conduct a thorough Hazard Vulnerability Analysis to help determine what events or incidents may
More informationMulti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For School Districts and Educational Institutions
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Data Collection Questionnaire For School Districts and Educational Institutions County: School District / Educational Institution Name: Return by: Please complete
More informationIntroduction to Disaster Management
Introduction to Disaster Management Definitions Adopted By Few Important Agencies WHO; A disaster is an occurrence disrupting the normal conditions of existence and causing a level of suffering that exceeds
More informationA Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks
A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks John Bowman, MBCI Enterprise Business Continuity Management Share one approach to assess the current level of business continuity risk in your organization.
More informationCOMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON
COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON This document provides a summary of the hazard mitigation planning information for the City of Lisbon that will
More informationAssessing Risk: Shifting Focus from Hazards to Capabilities. Jane Coolidge Kara Walker CMRHCC April 2017
Assessing Risk: Shifting Focus from Hazards to Capabilities Jane Coolidge Kara Walker CMRHCC April 2017 Hazards Vulnerability Analysis (HVA): Overview To identify jurisdictional hazards To assess hazard
More informationSOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012
SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012 AGENDA FOR TODAY Purpose of Meeting Engage All Advisory Committee Members Distribute Project
More informationMemorandum of Understanding Between Atchison County, Kansas And Atchison County Community Schools USD 377
Memorandum of Understanding Between Atchison County, Kansas And Atchison County Community Schools USD 377 I. Purpose The purpose of this memorandum of Understanding is to confirm a spirit of cooperation
More informationCOMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY
COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY This document provides a summary of the hazard mitigation planning information for the City of Central City
More informationin coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department
Prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure Hazard Mitigation and Emergency Management Program in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department The purpose of hazard
More informationPHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Prioritize Hazards PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND After you have developed a full list of potential hazards affecting your campus, prioritize them based on their likelihood of occurrence. This step
More informationHazard Mitigation Planning
Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation In order to develop an effective mitigation plan for your facility, residents and staff, one must understand several factors. The first factor is geography. Is your
More informationCatastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions
Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions Catastrophes, whether natural or man-made, can damage structures, disrupt process flows and supply chains, devastate a workforce, and financially cripple a company
More informationBY Sri D. K. Goswami OIL INDIA LIMITED
BY Sri D. K. Goswami OIL INDIA LIMITED Safety comes in CANS, I can, You can, We can EMERGENCY PREPARDNESS An Overview EMERGENCY Emergency means a situation or scenario which has the potential to cause
More informationExecutive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope
Executive Summary Introduction and Purpose This is the first edition of the Los Angeles Unified School District All-Hazard Mitigation Plan, and through completion of this plan the District continues many
More informationNatural Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-Year Update Progress Report Chippewa County Taskforce Committee January 29, 2013
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-Year Update Progress Report Chippewa County Taskforce Committee January 29, 2013 Allegan County, June, 2010 Photo courtesy Peter Olson Chapter Updates Chapter 1 Introduction»
More informationRegional Healthcare Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
Regional Healthcare Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Prepared by: The Northwest Healthcare Response Network June 5, 2017 2017 Northwest Healthcare Response Network. Regional Healthcare Hazard Vulnerability
More informationHillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy and the Community Rating System
Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy and the Community Rating System Presented By Hillsborough County s Hazard Mitigation Section Eugene Henry, Manager Hazard Mitigation Contributing Team Members:
More informationEmergency Preparedness
Emergency Preparedness For Design Firms DPLE 244 November 21, 2018 1 RLI Design Professionals is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned
More informationQualitative versus Quantitative Analysis. two types of assessments Qualitative and Quantitative.
USING THE CRITICAL ASSET AND INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ANALYSIS (CAIRA) METHODOLOGY The All-Hazards Approach to Conducting Security Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Analysis By Doug Haines In order to accomplish
More informationAPPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map
APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE Hazard Rankings Status of Mitigation Actions Building Permit Data Future Land Use Map Critical Facilities Map Zone Maps Hazard Rankings (From Qualitative Assessment and Local
More informationAPPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX D PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION This appendix includes the following: 1. Meeting Agendas 2. Meeting Minutes 3. Meeting Sign-In Sheets 4. Public Survey Summary Results 1) Introductions AGENDA
More informationCommunity Disaster Preparedness Index
CENTER FR URBAN RURAL INTERFACE STUDIES Community Disaster Preparedness Index A Tool Designed to Measure Your Community s Disaster Preparedness Developed by: Center for Urban Rural Interface Studies Mississippi
More informationGarfield County NHMP:
Garfield County NHMP: Introduction and Summary Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment DRAFT AUG2010 Risk assessments provide information about the geographic areas where the hazards may occur, the value
More informationNatural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training
Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky KAMM Regional Training Floodplain 101 Kentucky has approximately 92,000 linear miles of streams and rivers Approximately 31,000 linear miles have mapped flood hazards
More informationPriority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago
Multi-Hazard Plan, 2017 Table G - 11. Actions Identified for by the () (From Master Action Chart) Action /City Comments on 1 All-Hazards Education & Awareness Programs Work to ensure that all residents
More informationITEM 9 STAFF REPORT. TO: Mayor and City Council. FROM: Tom Welch, Interim Fire Chief. SUBJECT: City ofmill Valley All-Hazard Mitigation Plan
STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Welch, Interim Fire Chief SUBJECT: City ofmill Valley DATE: March 2,2015 Approved for Forwarding: ~c.~~_ a es C. McCann, City Manager 1 Issue: Consideration
More informationHazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities Dave Seebart WHEPP Reg. 3, Project Manager April 23, 25, & 26, 2013 1 Hazard Vulnerability Assessment (HVA) for Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF)
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Energy. Oil, Gas and Petrochemical. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Energy Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Start Partnering to Reduce Risk AIG s Client Risk Solutions (CRS) partners with organizations to build
More informationPresentation to the National Hurricane Conference
Presentation to the National Hurricane Conference Thursday, April 21, 2011 Atlanta, Georgia Dangers of Complacency: Dealing with Insurance Amnesia After Storm-Free Years Strategic Insurance Education Using
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) The Conceptual Framework
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) The Conceptual Framework ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) ERM Definition The Conceptual Frameworks: CAS and COSO Risk Categories Implementing ERM Why ERM? ERM Maturity
More informationPriority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago
Multi-Hazard Plan, 2017 Table G - 1. Actions Identified by the () (From Master Action Chart) Action 1 All-Hazards 6 All-Hazards Education & Awareness Programs / Preparedness and Response Support Work to
More informationDeSoto Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting. February 16, 2016 Grand Cane, LA
DeSoto Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting February 16, 2016 Grand Cane, LA Introductions Officials Mitigation Steering Committee members SDMI team members GOHSEP hazard mitigation team
More informationCHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy
CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy Chapter 3 Section All Sections Updates to Section Revised Natural Hazards Introduction and all Sections to change Natural Hazards Subcommittee to Committee.
More informationContents. Copyright The City of Calgary. All rights reserved. Reprinted with Permission.
Contents 1 What is business continuity? 3 Why should my business have a plan? 3 How to develop a business continuity plan 4 STEP ONE: Analyze your business 5 STEP TWO: Assess the risks 6 STEP THREE: Develop
More informationEvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #11 Hazard Assessment
1. INTRODUCTION The risk and vulnerability assessment process detailed here identifies the hazards the Evict Campus faces and assesses the level of vulnerability to these potential events. Conducting a
More informationChapter 10 Mitigation
44.213 Emergency Management Fall 2015 Chapter 10 Mitigation School of Criminology and Justice Studies University of Massachusetts Lowell Understand the general concepts and purposes behind mitigation Know
More informationBusiness Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale. Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 1 Caveat Opinions expressed are those of the author and not
More informationNorthern Kentucky University 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Public Kick-Off Meeting March 20, 2018
Northern Kentucky University 2018 Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Kick-Off Meeting March 20, 2018 Agenda Welcome Hazard Mitigation Planning 101 Hazard Identification Exercises Next Steps Jeff Baker, NKU
More informationPriority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago
Table G - 8. Actions Identified for by the () (From Master Action Chart) Action 1 All-Hazards 6 All-Hazards Education & Awareness Programs & Regulations / Preparedness and Response Work to ensure that
More informationDisasters and Localities. Dr. Tonya T. Neaves Director Centers on the Public Service Schar School of Policy and Government
Disasters and Localities Dr. Tonya T. Neaves Director Centers on the Public Service Schar School of Policy and Government INTRODUCTION Risk to disasters is increasing Population growth will inherently
More informationEmergency Preparedness and Protection of Field Equipment. DPLE 280 September 7, 2016
Emergency Preparedness and Protection of Field Equipment DPLE 280 September 7, 2016 RLI Design Professionals is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems.
More informationG318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0
G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop Module 2: Risk Assessment Visual 2.0 Unit 1 Risk Assessment Visual 2.1 Risk Assessment Process that collects information and assigns values to risks to: Identify
More informationHazard Mitigation FAQ
Hazard Mitigation FAQ What is Hazard Mitigation? Actions taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to people, property, or the environment from hazards and their effects. Examples: Hazardous Area
More information2015 Mobile County, Alabama Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Appendices
2015 Mobile County, Alabama Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A - Federal Requirements for local Mitigation Plans B - Community Mitigation Capabilities C - 2009 Plan Implementation Status D - Hazard Ratings
More informationAFTERMATH OUTBREAK. Contingency Planning to Sustain Critical Operations During Large Scale Disasters and Catastrophic Events
AFTERMATH OUTBREAK Contingency Planning to Sustain Critical Operations During Large Scale Disasters and Catastrophic Events By: Thomas Kerss, Law Enforcement Consultant Texas Association of Counties Learning
More informationManaging Olympic Risks. Dr Will Jennings University of Southampton
Managing Olympic Risks Dr Will Jennings University of Southampton Outline 1. Risk and mega-events: complexity and decision-making under uncertainty 2. A brief history of risk management and the Olympics
More information4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks
Information Security Standard 4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks Version: 1.0 Status Revised: 03/01/2013 Contact: Chief Information Security Officer PURPOSE To identify, quantify,
More informationGUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES
GUIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES Sponsored by a Public-Partnership with the Federal
More informationEmergency Preparedness. Emergency Preparedness & the Senior Housing Provider. The Speakers LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
Emergency Preparedness & the Senior Housing Provider LEADINGAGE MINNESOTA 2015 SENIOR LIVING NOW! CONFEREN CE SESSIONS #107 AND #207 The Speakers Andrew Tepfer All-Hazard Planner Homeland Security & Emergency
More informationUsing Risk Modeling, Analysis, and Assessment to Inform Homeland Security Policy and Strategy
Using Risk Modeling, Analysis, and Assessment to Inform Homeland Security Policy and Strategy Alan D. Cohn Assistant Secretary for Strategy, Planning, Analysis & Risk United States Department of Homeland
More informationCounty of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan, 2015 Update
Executive Summary: County of Kaua'i Multi-Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Plan Introduction to the Mitigation and Resilience Plan In this third plan, the longer term needs for sustaining mitigation efforts
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Retail. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Retail Start Partnering to Reduce Risk Retail companies compete vigorously to deliver superior service to customers with diverse and everchanging
More informationVULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
SOUTHSIDE HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION The Vulnerability Assessment section builds upon the information provided in the Hazard Identification and Analysis
More informationVULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
SOUTHSIDE HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 2011 UPDATE Each of the hazards in this section was reviewed and updated to reflect the revised information obtained for the updated
More informationDISASTER MANAGEMENT. The Complete Package
DISASTER MANAGEMENT The Complete Package Introduction Vince Yeager Darden Restaurants FM 30yr US Naval Officer Participated and led numerous disaster response and recovery operations around the world.
More informationMulti-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Data Collection Questionnaire County: For Local Governments Jurisdiction: Return to: Marcus Norden, Regional Planner BRP&EC Please complete this data collection
More informationHazard Mitigation Plan Planning Perspective
7. A. Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Perspective B. Public Meeting Notice A. Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Perspective York County Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Mitigation Plan Planning Perspective
More informationNational Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials National Policy Institute on Emergency Planning and Preparedness August 19-20, 2016 Sheraton Hotel, Boston, MA Jeanne M. Salvatore, Senior
More informationSchool District Mitigation Planning 101 April 28 th 30 th 2014
School District Mitigation Planning 101 April 28 th 30 th 2014 Kenneth A. Goettel Goettel & Associates Inc. 1732 Arena Drive Davis, CA 95618 (530) 750-0440 KenGoettel@aol.com What is Hazard Mitigation?
More informationIVANS 2008 XCHANGE CONFERENCE Key Communications Issues Facing the Property/Casualty Insurance Industry in 2008
IVANS 2008 XCHANGE CONFERENCE Key Communications Issues Facing the Property/Casualty Insurance Industry in 2008 Tampa, Florida February 7, 2008 Jeanne. M. Salvatore Senior Vice President, Public Affairs
More informationWhether you blame it on global
Management & Careers Working with FEMA An Extension of What We Do By Michael Genito The role of the government finance officer in dealing with disasters requires preparation before the event, support and
More informationUnderstanding Enterprise Risk Management: An Overview
Understanding Enterprise Risk Management: An Overview 05/2016 What is Risk? An uncertain event It exists in the future Has a cause and effect Impacts objectives Its effect may be positive and/or negative
More informationDade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Introduction to Mitigation Definition of Mitigation Mitigation is defined by FEMA as "...sustained action that reduces or eliminates longterm risk to people and property from natural hazards and their
More informationQ1 Do you...(check all that apply).
Q1 Do you...(check all that apply). Live in the City of... Work in the City of... Visit the City of Hesperia... Live in the City of Hesperia Work in the City of Hesperia Visit the City of Hesperia but
More informationDetailed Identification and Classification of Hazards and Disasters for Effective Hazard. Vulnerability Assessments. Abstract
1 Detailed Identification and Classification of Hazards and Disasters for Effective Hazard Vulnerability Assessments. Abstract The identification and classification of the terms hazard, incident, and disaster
More informationTangipahoa Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Steering Committee Kick-off Meeting. September 9, 2014 Hammond, LA
Tangipahoa Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Steering Committee Kick-off Meeting September 9, 2014 Hammond, LA Introductions Officials Mitigation Steering Committee members SDMI team members
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Real Estate. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Real Estate Start Partnering to Reduce Risk Real estate owners, operators, managers and developers act vigorously to maintain profitability
More informationTerrorism Risk Insurance in Australia
Terrorism Risk Insurance in Australia Dr Christopher Wallace, Michael Pennell and Norris Robertson Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute
More informationRisk Management Framework
Risk Management Framework Anglican Church, Diocese of Perth November 2015 Final ( Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Risk Management Policy... 2 Purpose... 2 Policy... 2 Definitions (from AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009)...
More informationSussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary
Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Executive Summary March 2010 SUSSEX COUNTY ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY March 2010 For questions and to make comments on this document, contact: Joseph
More informationVillage of Blue Mounds Annex
Village of Blue Mounds Annex Community Profile The Village of Blue Mounds is located in the southwest quadrant of the County, north of the town of Perry, west of the town of Springdale, and south of the
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Energy. Chemical. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Energy Chemical Start Partnering to Reduce Risk AIG s Client Risk Solutions (CRS) partners with organizations to build long-term relationships
More informationBusiness Continuity Plan. The 12 Steps Model. Business Continuity Plan. Emergency Contingency Crisis Castastrophe Disaster.
1 Origin (Manufactur er / Supplier) Dispatching Port Business Continuity Plan. Unloading Port The 12 Steps Model Destination Fundamentals 2 Emergency Contingency Crisis Castastrophe Disaster 1 Emergencies
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Construction. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Construction Start Partnering to Reduce Risk AIG s Client Risk Solutions (CRS) team builds long-term relationships with organizations to
More informationPlanning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.
Section 3 Capability Identification Requirements Planning Process---Requirement 201.6(b): An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan. Documentation of the Planning
More informationThe Role of the Earthquake Hazard Leader in South Australia
The Role of the Earthquake Hazard Leader in South Australia J. M. Carr 1 & S.G.Turner 2 1. Executive Director, Building Management Division, Department for Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, GPO Box
More informationStevens County, Washington Request for Proposal For A Countywide Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan (Update)
Stevens County, Washington Request for Proposal For A Countywide Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan (Update) Project background A Multi-Jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan is a representation
More informationBest Practices in ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT. [ Managing Risks Holistically ]
Best Practices in ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT [ Managing Risks Holistically ] INTRODUCTIONS MODERATOR: Bob Lipps, JD, CPA PANELISTS: Ron Wilcox Abel Pomar Karen Gordon, Esq. THE EVOLUTION OF RISK Traditional
More informationClient Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for Financial Institutions. Start
Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance Risk solutions for Financial Institutions Start Partnering to Reduce Risk Financial Institutions compete vigorously to maintain profitability and deliver superior
More informationEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (Industrial Emergency Preparedness)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (Industrial Emergency Preparedness) Dr.D.P.Tripathy, Professor & Head, Dept. of Mining Engg., NIT, Rourkela-769008. Emergency management Emergency management
More informationIBTTA Facilities Management and Maintenance Workshop October 23-25, 2011 Nashville, TN Ray Szczucki ACE USA Inland Marine ACE USA
Business Continuity Planning. Recovering From Disasters IBTTA Facilities Management and Maintenance Workshop October 23-25, 2011 Nashville, TN Ray Szczucki Inland Marine Any opinions or positions expressed
More informationLloyd s City Risk Index
Lloyd s City Risk Index 2015-2025 lloyds.com/cityriskindex Executive Summary About Lloyd s Lloyd s is the world s only specialist insurance and reinsurance market that offers a unique concentration of
More informationT-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards
T-318 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Requirements Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards Raymond Mejia, Lead Hazard Mitigation Planner Samantha Aburto, Hazard Mitigation Planner
More informationANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER
ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER B.1 Community Profile Figure B.1 shows a map of the Town of Blue River and its location within Summit County. Figure B.1. Map of Blue River Summit County (Blue River) Annex
More informationDisaster Recovery Planning: Preparation is Key to Survival
Adjusters International Disaster Recovery Consulting EDITOR S NOTE Making sure the right insurance program is in place to protect your organization after a disaster may not be enough to survive in today
More informationHandout 1.1 Essential Records
Essential Records Session 1 Handout 1.1 Handout 1.1 Essential Records PRIORITY FOR ACCESS* Priority 1: First 1 12 hours Could be either Priority 1 or Priority 2 Priority 2: First 12 72 hours Priority 2
More informationModeling Extreme Event Risk
Modeling Extreme Event Risk Both natural catastrophes earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods and man-made disasters, including terrorism and extreme casualty events, can jeopardize the financial
More informationHAZUS th Annual Conference
HAZUS 2014 7 th Annual Conference Welcome 2 Nicky Hastings, Natural Resources Canada REFLECTING ON AN EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS FOR A MID-SIZED URBAN COMMUNITY IN WESTERN CANADA Opportunity or Liability? Resilience
More informationEssential Records Webinar
Participant Guide Final, July 2010 Course Number: AWR-210-2 FirstResponderTraining.gov Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction... 2-1 Welcome and Overview...2-1 Take-Home Activity Debrief...2-3
More informationC APABILITY A SSESSMENT
PURPOSE The Rappahannock Rapidan region's capability assessment was conducted to determine the ability of participating localities to develop and implement a comprehensive hazard mitigation strategy and
More information