FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM"

Transcription

1 FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central Iowa region s transportation system. July 2017

2 The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) prepared this report with partial funding from the United States Department of Transportation s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, and in part through local matching funds provided by the CIRTPA member governments. These contents are the responsibility of the CIRTPA. The United States Government and its agencies assume no liability for the contents of this report or for the use of its contents. The CIRTPA approved this report on July 20, Please call (515) to obtain permission for use Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance

3 Glossary of Acronyms ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CMAQ DEMO DART DMAMPO DISC ESP ER FM FL FHWA FTA FFY HIRTA HRRR HSIP ICAAP Iowa DOT IM Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Demonstration Award Des Moines Area Metropolitan Transit Authority Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Discretionary Federal Funds Economic Stimulus Package Emergency Relief Program Farm-to-Market Funds Federal Lands Highway Program Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Federal Fiscal Year Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority High Risk Rural Roads Highway Safety Improvement Program Iowa s Clean Air Attainment Program Iowa Department of Transportation Interstate Maintenance ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 MAP-21 MPO NHS NEPA NHPP PL PRF RTP RPA RISE SAFETEA-LU SRTS STIP Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Metropolitan Planning Organization National Highway System National Environmental Policy Act National Highway Performance Program Planning Funds Primary Road Funds Recreational Trails Program Regional Planning Affiliation Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy Program Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Safe Routes to School State Transportation Improvement Program

4 STBG STP-HBP TAP TEA-21 TIP TTC Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Surface Transportation Program Highway Bridge Program Transportation Alternative Program Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century Transportation Improvement Program MPO Transportation Technical Committee

5 Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE Introduction....1 General Overview of the TIP 3 The TIP and Federal Guidance 3 Federal Transportation Planning Process...4 Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance Transportation Improvement Program 8 Revising the TIP...9 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures...12 Surface Transportation Program Project Selection Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection Highway Bridge Program Project Selection 13 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs...14 Surface Transportation Program...14 Transportation Alternatives Program 14 Federal Funding Programs. 16 State Funding Programs..18 Transit Funding Programs.19 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Status Reports. 22 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects Program Format...28 FFY FHWA Project List... 29

6 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administration Projects Program Format FFY Transit Project List.44 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan.. 49 Federal Highway Administration Projects...49 Federal Transit Administration Projects...60 CHAPTER EIGHT Public Participation...61 Figures and Tables Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership. 6 Table 4.1: City of Boone Table 4.2: Boone County Table 4.3: Dallas County Table 4.4: Iowa Department of Transportation.. 23 Table 4.5: Iowa DNR Table 4.6: Jasper County Table 4.7: City of Knoxville Table 4.8: Madison County Table 4.9: Marion County Table 4.10: City of Newton Table 4.11: City of Pella.. 25 Table 4.12: City of Perry Table 4.13: Polk County. 26 Table 4.14: Story County Table 4.15: Warren County Table 4.16: City of Winterset Table 4.17: Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority Table 7.1: CIRPTA Federal-Aid Funding Sources...50 Table 7.2: Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint...50 Table 7.3: 2016 City Street O+M Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes 51 Table 7.4: Forecasted Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes. 52 Table 7.5: Forecasted Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes...53 Table 7.6: County Road O+M Costs on Federal-Aid Routes..54 Table 7.7: Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Fed-Aid Routes..54 Table 7.8: Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes...55 Table 7.9: 2016 City Street Fund Receipts Table 7.10: Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue. 57

7 Table 7.11: State Fiscal Year 2016 Farm-to-Market Receipts.58 Table 7.12: Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue Table 7.13: Fiscal Year 2016 Secondary Road Fund Receipts 59 Table 7.14: Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue 59 Table 7.15: HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Table 7.16: HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY

8 CIRTPA Transportation Policy Committee Denny Buyert, Chair City of Pella, Public Works Director Representing Name Title City of Adel Anthony Brown City Administrator City of Boone Wayne Schwartz City Engineer City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Ryan Waller City Manager City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Bill Zinnel County Supervisor Dallas County Brad Golightly County Supervisor Jasper County Dennis Carpenter County Supervisor Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Steve McCombs County Supervisor Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Darren Moon County Engineer Warren County Dean Yordi County Supervisor Ames Area MPO* Tony Filippini Transportation Planner DART* Carl Saxon Transit Planner Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Policy Committee Officers Representing Name Title City of Pella Denny Buyert Chair Dallas County Brad Golightly Vice-Chair City of Huxley John Haldeman Secretary/Treasurer

9 CIRTPA Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) Todd Hagan, Chair Madison County, Engineer Representing Name Title City of Adel Anthony Brown City Administrator City of Boone Wayne Schwartz City Engineer City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Chuck Burgin Director of Community Development City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Scott Kruse County Engineer Dallas County Alan Miller County Engineer Jasper County Russell Stutt County Engineer Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Tyler Christian County Engineer Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Darren Moon County Engineer Warren County David Carroll County Engineer Ames Area MPO* Tony Filippini Transportation Planner DART* Carl Saxon Transit Planner Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Technical Committee Officers Representing Name Title Madison County Todd Hagan Chair City of Boone Wayne Schwartz Vice-Chair

10 C H A P T E R O N E Introduction The FFY TIP contains seven chapters covering the CIRTPA s guidelines for choosing and funding projects, status reports of the previous FFY projects, a listing of projects in the Federal highway and Federal transit element, a financial plan for all Federal-aid projects, required resolutions and certifications, and a summary of public comments. Chapter One: General Overview of the TIP The Introduction explains Federal transportation planning guidelines and provides background information on the CIRTPA s responsibilities, representatives, and committees. The chapter also includes information about the CIRTPA s public participation process procedures and provides an overview of the TIP, including its purpose, requirements, and the methodology to adopt, implement, amend, or modify the plan. Chapter Two: Project Selection Procedures This chapter provides background into the CIRTPA s project selection procedure, including eligibility requirements, basis of funding projects, and project scoring process. Chapter Three: Funding Programs This chapter provides a summary of the various funding programs available for project within the CIRTPA planning area including Federal, State, and local funding sources. The chapter also discusses the intent of each of these programs. Chapter Four: Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Status Reports The Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Status Reports chapter is a status listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize Federal funding in FFY Chapter Five: Federal Highway Administration Projects The Federal Highway Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). Chapter Six: Federal Transit Administration Projects The Federal Transit Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FTA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). 1

11 Chapter Seven: Financial Plan The Financial Plan chapter summarizes the financial availability of the CIRTPA to implement surface transportation improvements. The chapter includes the fiscal constraint of the STBG and TAP funds, listing the forecasted operations and maintenance expenditures, and forecasted non Federal-aid revenues. The chapter also includes a section discussing the transit funding Federal-aid by year. Chapter Eight: Public Comment The public comment chapter includes a summary on the disposition of comments made as part of the public review of the TIP on June 20, 2017, and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 20, Appendices Resolutions and Certifications The resolutions and certifications chapter includes the TIP s resolution of adoption by the CIRTPA and a map of planned projects. 2

12 G e n e r a l O v e r v i e w o f t h e T I P The transportation system in a regional planning area is vital for the movement of people and goods to, though, from, and within the area. A transportation system takes on two primary roles: the movement of people and the movement of goods. The transportation improvement program (TIP) is a regionally agreed upon list of surface transportation improvements that received Federal funding to move goods and people in a defined area s transportation system. The TIP and Federal Guidance Congress passed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962, requiring regional agencies to conduct a "continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated" (3-C) transportation planning process. Congress took additional steps in drafting the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 by establishing Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urbanized areas over 50,000 persons in population, and by dedicating to MPOs a small portion of each state's funding from the Highway Trust Fund. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) empowered and provided for flexibility in the use of funding, improved state-regional cooperation, and enhanced public participation. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) legislation of 1998 expanded the role and responsibilities of metropolitan areas exceeding 200,000 persons in population with the designation of Transportation Management Areas (TMA). In 2005, Congress passed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA-LU guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation through Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009 (September 30, 2009). Then the United States Senate passed continuing resolutions to extend SAFETEA-LU and to provide appropriations for transit programs through 2012 at funding levels consistent with authorized 2009 levels. SAFETEA-LU addressed the many challenges facing transportation systems including improving safety, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency in freight movement, increasing intermodal connectivity, and protecting the environment. SAFETEA-LU promoted more efficient and effective Federal surface transportation programs by focusing on transportation issues of national significance, while giving state and local transportation decision makers more flexibility to solve transportation problems in 3

13 their communities. 1 On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) was signed into law replacing SAFETEA-LU. MAP-21 provides essential funds for transportation projects ranging from passenger rail, freight transportation, highway and bridge projects, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. MAP-21 took effect on October 1, 2012, and funds surface transportation projects through September 30, The bill provides $105 billion in funding per year for Federal Fiscal Year s (FFY) 2013 and An extension was signed in 2014, which authorizes surface transportation funding through May 31, Continuing resolutions were signed that then extended funding until December of MAP-21 includes a number of major changes including the elimination of the Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancements Program, expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (TIFIA), and streamlining of the environmental review process. Federal transit program also chance slightly with Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom funds being consolidated into the Urbanized Area Formula Grants. 2 On December 4, 2015 the Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST) was signed into law replacing MAP-21. The FAST Act authorized $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs. MAP-21 included provisions to make the Federal surface transportation more streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal, and to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. The FAST Act builds on the changes made by MAP-21. The FAST ACT establishes and funds new programs to support critical transportation projects to ease congestion and facilitate movement. It also builds on the reforms of MAP-21 by incorporating changes aimed at ensuring the timely delivery of transportation projects. Federal Transportation Planning Process Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450, Subpart C, states that MPOs are to carry out a: continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive multimodal transportation planning

14 process, including the development of a metropolitan transportation plan and a transportation improvement program (TIP), that encourages and promotes the safe and efficient development, management, and operation of surface transportation systems to serve the mobility needs of people and freight (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) and foster economic growth and development, while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. Section identifies eight planning factors to identify the scope of the metropolitan transportation planning process. These include: 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 4. Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight; 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic patterns; 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; 7. Promote efficient system management and operation; and, 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) serves as the formal transportation planning body for the greater central Iowa regional area, carrying out the intent of Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Section 450. The CIRTPA works to carry out a 3-C multimodal transportation planning process for the greater central Iowa regional area, excluding the areas within the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Ames Area MPO. Responsibilities The CIRTPA provides a regional forum to assure local, state, and Federal agencies and the public 5

15 coordinate transportation planning issues, and to prepare transportation plans and programs. The CIRTPA develops both long and short-range multimodal transportation plans, selects, and approves projects for Federal funding based on regional priorities, and develops methods to reduce traffic congestion. The CIRTPA is responsible for these transportation planning activities within the geographic area identified as the Regional Planning Area (RPA). The CIRTPA approved its current RPA on January 10, The RPA includes all portions of Boone, Dallas, Jasper, Madison, Marion, Polk, Story, and Warren Counties except for the planning area of the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Membership Full voting membership to the CIRTPA is open to any county or city government located, wholly or partially, in the designated RPA containing a minimum population of 3,000 persons that adopts the CIRTPA's 28E Agreement (agreement entered into under Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, establishing the CIRTPA and its responsibilities). Currently, CIRTPA membership includes the following cities and counties: Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership Cities Counties Other Adel Pella Boone County HIRTA Boone Perry Dallas County Huxley Story City Jasper County Indianola Winterset Madison County Knoxville Marion County Nevada Polk County Newton Story County Warren County 6

16 The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority (DART), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) serve as advisory non-voting, representatives to the CIRTPA. Organization Two designated committees form the structure of the CIRTPA: the Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). The CIRTPA member governments and agencies boards and councils appoint their own representatives to the TTC and to the TPC. The CIRTPA TTC is comprised primarily of representatives of member governments and agencies technical staffs, including planners, engineers, and city administrators. The CIRTPA TPC is primarily comprised of elected officials that include mayors, city council members, city managers, and county supervisors. The CIRTPA staff supports the TTC and the TPC. The TTC offers technical guidance and recommendations to the TPC. The TPC takes formal actions on transportation topics after reviewing and considering the TTC s recommendations. Additionally, the CIRTPA supports, as needed, other subcommittees, roundtables, working groups, and advisory committees of the Des Moines Area MPO on various transportation-related topics relevant to the CIRTPA's responsibilities. Representation Each member government is entitled to one representative each on the CIRTPA TPC and on the CIRTPA TTC. As previously noted, the Iowa DOT, DART, FHWA, FTA, and the AAMPO serve as advisory representatives to the CIRTPA and each have one representative. 7

17 Transportation Improvement Program The CIRTPA s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program (FFY TIP) serves as a list of Federal-aid eligible surface transportation improvements for the CIRTPA s MPA. The TIP covers a period of no less than four years and is updated annually for compatibility with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program development and approval process. The TIP identifies all Federal funds programmed during the four-year period (FFY ). Additionally, the TIP identifies all projects by Federal funding program and by FFY. TIP Requirements Title 23 of the CFR, Section , indicates the TIP must cover a period of no less than four years, be updated at least every four years, and be approved by the CIRTPA (or in the case of the State of Iowa, the TIP will be approved by the Iowa DOT). Additionally, Section states the TIP shall include: Capital and non-capital surface transportation projects within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area proposed for funding; Contain all regionally significant projects requiring an action by the FHWA or the FTA whether or not the projects are to be funded; All regionally significant projects proposed to be funded with Federal funds other than those administered by FHWA or the FTA, as well as all regionally significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds; A financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommends any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs; A project, or a phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of the project; and, Sufficient descriptive material, estimated total project cost, amount of Federal funds proposed to be obligated during each program year, and identification of the agencies responsible for each project or phase. Plan Consistency Each project or project phase included in the TIP must be consistent with other CIRTPA plans, 8

18 including the Horizon Year 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (HY 2035 MTP). In addition, the CIRTPA requires consistency among the TIP and member governments and agencies capital improvement plans. In particular, the CIRTPA requires consistency among proposed short- and longrange projects, strategies, plans, and programs. TIP Format The Iowa DOT has adopted a standard format for submittal of program data to FHWA and FTA. The standard format includes project location, route identification, project termini/location, work description, project sponsor, FHWA structure numbers, total project costs by year, and expected federal aid funds by year. CIRTPA utilizes TPMS to generate all lists of programming information as TPMS utilizes the standard format. When programming local bridge projects a minimum amount of descriptive language is required so that the project location can be identified on a map. Along with the route the crossing is on, local bridge project descriptions include the proper name of the waterway being crossed, a distance from an identifiable location such as intersection, or the section township range. The FHWA structure number must also be included. TIP Adoption Adoption of the CIRPTA s FFY TIP is subject to the CIRPTA s review and approval. The review process consists of a public comment period that offers opportunities for review and comment of the draft FFY TIP. At the conclusion of the public review period, CIRTPA staff reviews and summarizes all submitted comments and presents the findings to the CIRTPA committees for consideration into the final FFY TIP. The CIRTPA submits the final (approved) FFY TIP, with a copy of the formal resolution, to the Iowa DOT. The Iowa DOT then reviews the plan to ensure compliance with Federal regulations. Revising the TIP Under Federal law, the CIRTPA may revise the TIP at any time under procedures agreed to by the cooperating parties consistent with the procedures established. Revisions are changes that occur between annual updates. 9

19 The Iowa DOT identifies two types of revisions to the TIP: major revisions (amendments) and minor revisions (administrative modifications). The Iowa DOT considers the following criteria when determining the type of TIP revision. Amendments An amendment is a major change to a project in the TIP, including the addition or deletion of a project, a major change in project cost or project phase initiation dates, or a major change in the design concept or scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through lanes). The Iowa DOT considers amendments to the FFY TIP any proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP; Funding sources Adding an additional federal funding source; and, Scope changes Changing the project termini, project alignment, the amount of through traffic lanes, the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction, or the change to include widening of the roadway. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an amendment, the CIRTPA Policy Committee must approve the requested change and must follow the public participation process identified in the CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan (PPP). The PPP states the CIRTPA would schedule a public meeting to receive public comments at the Policy Committee meeting prior to the Policy Committee taking action on the proposed amendment. If the Policy Committee approves the amendment, the CIRTPA would notify the Iowa DOT, the FHWA, and the FTA. Administrative Modifications An administrative modification is a minor change to a project in the TIP, including minor changes to project phase costs, funding sources or previously included projects, and project or project phase initiation dates. The Iowa DOT considers as administrative modification to the FFY TIP proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: 10

20 Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs do not increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or do not increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first four years of the TIP; Funding sources Changes to funding from one source to another; and, Scope changes All changes to the projects scope are amendments. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an administrative modification, the CIRTPA would conduct a thorough review of the proposed administrative modification and would process the revision administratively by notifying the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA. Redemonstration of Fiscal Constraint The Iowa DOT is required to ensure that the STIP is fiscally constrained not only at the time of approval but also throughout the fiscal year. As part of the draft STIP process the DOT adjusts its federal aid participation to utilize all remaining federal funds after local project sponsors have programmed their federal aid projects. Based on this approach, at the time of approval by FHWA and FTA, no additional federal aid funds are available to be added to the STIP and maintain fiscal constraint of the document. To maintain fiscal constraint of the STIP document any revision to the STIP that adds a new federal aid project or increases a project s STIP limit will require that a corresponding change be made to another programming entry to ensure that the STIP remains fiscally constrained. The federal aid funds moved to make way for the additional programmed federal aid need to be of the same federal aid program type. This requirement pertains to both administrative modifications and amendments to the STIP and therefore also applies when moving projects up from the out years of the STIP. To facilitate the STIP approval process a programming note should be added to both TPMS entries noting the TPMS number of the other project. The requirement to ensure fiscal constraint does not apply to accomplishment year projects that have been already programmed at their full federal aid participation rate (typically 80 percent) and whose programming entry is being adjusted based on an updated cost estimate. 11

21 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures The CIRTPA, when considering project requests for STBG funds, should place primary emphasis upon region-wide transportation system improvement needs as identified in the CIRTPA s Long-Range Transportation Plan (Plan), with how those needs impact the movement of people and goods throughout the regional area, and how the requested project will have potential benefits and potential impacts on all communities in central Iowa. The CIRTPA should consider funding regionally significant transportation projects in the Plan. Only members of CIRTPA are eligible to receive STBG funding directly from CIRTPA. Surface Transportation Program Project Selection The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The method for the distribution of the CIRTPA s STBG funding occurs through a sub-allocation process to all CIRTPA member governments with populations over 5,000. The calculations used in the CIRTPA s STBG sub-allocation process reflect the formulas used by the Iowa DOT in distributing STBG funds to Iowa s regional planning affiliations. Each CIRTPA member government eligible to receive STBG funds makes individual decisions on where to expend those resources within their respective jurisdictions. Many CIRTPA members save their STBG allocation for several years in order to build more substantial projects. Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection The CIRTPA follows the FHWA s Guidance for Transportation Enhancement Activities in the administration of the TAP project selection, which may be publicly accessed at 12

22 Starting in FFY 2018, the Iowa DOT will be responsible for awarding TAP funding within the CIRTPA planning area. As of the completion of this TIP, the Iowa DOT has not finalized a TAP selection and scoring process. When one is approved, it will be included in this document. Highway Bridge Program Project Selection The primary factor in Highway Bridge Program project selection is condition. Counties annually review the results from the bridge inspections and make funding decisions based on these reports. Other factors that are considered include traffic counts, freight movement, and detour lengths. For example, a bridge posted for weight limits that is on an important freight and farm goods route might be replaced before other bridge that are in worse condition but don t have a significant impact on traffic movements. 13

23 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs The following chapter summarized the various funding program available for projects in the CIRPTA s planning area. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The CIRTPA is allocated approximately $5 million per year in STBG funding. Transportation Alternatives Program Setaside (TAP) The purpose of the TAP is to provide funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. The CIRTPA groups activities into categories as follows: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Provision of on-street and off-street facilities for pedestrians and bicycles and the conversion and use of abandoned railway corridors. New Construction subcategory is for projects creating a new facility, whereas the Major Reconstruction subcategory is for projects that result in a major rehabilitation of an existing facility. 14

24 Historic Preservation: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities. Streetscape: Improvements to pedestrian facilities along a transportation corridor; sidewalks, lighting, safety-related infrastructure, signalization, and, traffic calming. Environmental: Control and removal of outdoor advertising; address storm water management, control, and water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehiclecaused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control. Safe Routes to Schools: Infrastructure related projects.-planning, design, and construction of infrastructure-related projects in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school. Noninfrastructure related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school. The list of activities is intended to be illustrative, not exclusive. Measures in the activities listed, which go beyond what is customarily provided as environmental mitigation, are considered as Transportation Alternatives Programs. TAP projects are non-motorized transportation-related activities. Transportation Alternative Program projects must have a relationship to surface transportation. Proximity to a roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear and credible description of this relationship in their project s proposal. The focus is on a clear and credible description of how the proposed TAP project relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked: 1. In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through present or past use as a transportation resource? 2. Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in the development of surface transportation? 15

25 3. What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation? 4. What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s)? 5. When did the relationship(s) start and end or does the relationship(s) continue? 6. Is a relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of transportation funds? The TAP guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship. The following application types generally have been considered ineligible by the FHWA, in cooperation with the Iowa DOT: 1. Surfacing or resurfacing of existing roads or construction of new roads; 2. Construction or surfacing of parking lots (unless trailhead parking lot); 3. Construction of low water crossings on roads; 4. Picnic shelters, picnic tables, grills (unless directly related to a trailhead); 5. Construction of new buildings (unless they are rest rooms or trailhead shelters in conjunction with trails that will accommodate bikes or pedestrians); 6. Mitigation or National Environmental Policy Act Section 106 documentation of a bridge replacement; 7. Applications without a public sponsor (city, State, or county agency); 8. Historic applications where the facility or structure is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (please review with the State Historic Preservation Office); 9. Historic preservation activities that do not demonstrate some significant historic connection with transportation system; and, 10. Normal environmental mitigation work. Federal Funding Programs Some FHWA funds are distributed by statutory formulas, while other funds are discretionary (congressionally earmarked). The primary sources of FHWA formula funding to Iowa include: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): CMAQ provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs tasked with helping to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These projects can include those that reduce congestion and improve air quality. 16

26 National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): This program consolidates the National Highway System and the Interstate Maintenance Program into one program. NHPP expands the number of eligible roadway miles and funds may be used to construct or improve NHS roadways, including some state highways, U.S. highways, and Interstates. STBG Highway Bridge Program (STBG-HBP): While the Highway Bridge Program was eliminated in MAP-21, a portion of Iowa s STBG will continue to be targeted directly to counties and dedicated specifically to county bridge projects. A portion of these funds are required to be obligated for off-system bridges. The remaining funds can be used on either on-system or off-system bridges. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This is a core Federal-aid program that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. Portions of these funds are set aside for use on highrisk rural roads and railway highway crossings. Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) and Tribal Transportation Program (TTP): The FLAP Program provides funding for projects that improve access within, and to, federal lands. The FLAP funding will be distributed through a grant process where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit, rank, and select projects to receive funding. The TTP provides safe and adequate transportation and public road access to and within Indian reservations and Indian lands. Funds are distributed based on a statutory formula based on tribal population, road mileage, and average tribal shares of the former Tribal Transportation Allocation Methodology. Demonstration Funding (DEMO): Demonstration funding is a combination of different programs and sources. The FHWA administers discretionary programs through various offices representing special funding categories. An appropriation bill provides money to a discretionary program, through special congressionally directed appropriations or through legislative acts, such as the American recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). State Planning and Research (SPR): SPR funds are available to fund statewide planning and research activities. A portion of SPR funds are provided to RPAs to support transportation planning efforts. 17

27 National Highway Freight Program (NHFP): NHFP funds are distributed to states via a formula process and are targeted towards transportation projects that benefit freight movements. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG): This program is designed to address specific issues identified by Congress and provides flexible funding for projects to preserve or improve the condition/performance of transportation facilities, including any federal aid highway or public road bridge. STBG funding may be utilized on: Roadway projects on federal aid routes Bridge projects on any public road Transit capital improvements TAP eligible activities Planning activities Transportation Alternatives Setaside Program (TAP): This program is a setaside from the STBG program. The TAP program provides funding to expand travel choices and improve the transportation experience. Transportation Alternatives Program projects improve the cultural, historic, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of transportation infrastructure. Projects can include creation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and the restoration of historic transportation facilities, among others. It is important to note that some types of projects eligible under the SAFETEA LU program Transportation Enhancements are no longer eligible, or have modified eligibility, under the TAP. All projects programmed with TAP funds should be verified to ensure compatibility with TAP eligibility. State Funding Programs In addition to the distribution of Federal-aid formula funds, the Iowa Department of Transportation administers several grant programs through application processes that need to be documented in the TIP. They include the following: Statewide Transportation Alternatives Programs: Transportation Alternatives Program projects are intended to go beyond the normal mitigation of a transportation improvement project. Statewide Enhancement funds are made available through an application process for projects of statewide significance. Statewide Enhancement projects are categorized by Trail and Bicycle Facility, Historic and Archeological, and 18

28 Scenic and Environmental projects. Project formerly eligible under Safe Routes to School are now eligible for TAP funding. Recreational Trail Program: This program provides federal funding for both motorized and nonmotorized trail projects and is funded through a takedown from Iowa s TAP funding. The decision to participate in this program is made annually by the Iowa Transportation Commission. Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP): The ICAAP funds projects that are intended to maximize emission reductions through traffic flow improvements, reduced vehicle-miles of travel, and reduced single-occupancy vehicle trips. This program utilizes $4 million of Iowa s CMAQ apportionment. City Bridge Program: A portion of STBG funding dedicated to local bridge projects is set aside for the funding of bridge projects within cities. Eligible projects need to be classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Projects are rated and prioritized by the Office of Local Systems with awards based upon criteria identified in the application process. Projects awarded grant funding are subject to a federal-aid obligation limitation of $1 million. Highway Safety Improvement Program Secondary (HSIP-Secondary): This program is being funded using a portion of Iowa s Highway Safety Improvement Program and funds safety projects on rural roadways. Transit Funding Programs Similar to the FHWA programs, the transit funding authorized by the FAST Act is managed in several ways. The largest amount is distributed to the states or to large metropolitan areas by formula. Other program funds are discretionary, and some are earmarked for specific projects. Program funds include the following: Statewide Transportation Planning Program (Section 5304 and 5305): These funds come to the state based on population and are used to support transportation planning projects in non-urbanized areas. They are combined with the Section 5311 funds and allocated among Iowa s RPAs. 19

29 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310): Funding is provided through this program to increase the mobility for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Part of the funding is administered along with the Non-Urbanized funding with the remaining funds allocated among urbanized transit systems in areas with a population of less than 200,000. Urbanized areas with more than 200,000 in population receive a direct allocation. Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311): This program provides capital and operating assistance for rural and small urban transit systems. Fifteen percent of these funds are allocated to Intercity Bus projects. A portion of the funding is also allocated to support rural transit planning. The remaining funds are combined with the rural portion (30 percent) of Section 5310 funds and allocated among regional and small urban transit systems based on their relative performance in the prior years. Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP - Section 5311(b)(3)): This funding is also used for statewide training events and to support transit funding fellowships for regional and small urban transit staff or planners. Bus and Bus Facilities Program (5339): This formula program provides federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program. TAP Flexible Funds: Certain Title 23 funds may be used for transit purposes. Transit capital assistance is an eligible use of STBG funds. Transit capital and start-up operating assistance is an eligible use of ICAAP funds. When ICAAP and STBG funds are programmed for transit projects, they are transferred to the FTA. The ICAAP funds are applied for and administered by the Office of Public Transit. STBG funds for small urban and regional transit systems are also administered by the Office of Public Transit. State Transit Assistance (STA): All public transit systems are eligible for funding. These funds can be used by the public transit system for operating, capital, or planning expenses related to the provision of open-to-the-public passenger transportation. The majority of the funds received in a fiscal year are distributed to individual transit systems are the basis of a formula using performance statistics from the most recent available year. o STA Special Projects: Each year up to $300,000 of the total STA funds are set aside to fund special projects. These can include grants to individual systems to support transit services that are developed in conjunction with human services agencies. Grants can also be awarded to statewide projects that improve public transit in Iowa through such means as technical training for transit 20

30 system or planning agency personnel, statewide marketing campaigns, etc. This funding is also used to mirror the RTAP to support individual transit training fellowships for large urban transit staff or planners. STA Coordination Special Projects: Funds provide assistance with startup of new services that have been identified as needs by health, employment, or human services agencies participating in the passenger transportation planning process. Public Transit Infrastructure Grant Fund: This is a state program that can fund transit facility projects that involve new construction, reconstruction, or remodeling. To qualify, projects must include a vertical component. FHWA Funding Transferred to FTA STBG funds designated for transit investments are required to be transferred from FHWA to FTA for administration. These projects must be programmed in the highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA) section of the TIP in the FFY they are to be transferred. The process is initiated with a letter from the RPA/MPO to the Iowa DOT s Office of Program Management and to the Office of Public Transit requesting the transfer of funds. The Office of Program Management will then review the request and submit it to FHWA for processing. STBG funds used for planning efforts require projects to be included in the CIRTPA s Unified Planning Work Program and TIP. Funds will be transferred to a Consolidated Planning Grant by request of the Office of Systems Planning. Finally, transit projects receiving awards through the ICAAP also require a transfer of funds. The process for these types of transfers is the same as transferring STBG funds for transit investments, except that no letter from the RPA/MPO requesting the transfer is required. 21

31 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Status Reports The following are status reports of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA or FTA funds in FFY The status of projects may include a notice of receiving Federal authorization, letting, canceling, rolling over, or scheduled letting before October 1, TABLE 4.1 City of Boone Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-U-0750(632) In the city of Boone, On Benton Street, from Mamie Eisenhower Ave to 8 th St Let February 2017 TABLE 4.2 Boone County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG/DEMO STP-S-C008(69) 5E-08 E-57: X Ave E 1 MI to Y Ave Let January 2017 STBG/DEMO STP-S-C008(70) 5E-08 R-27: E-52 N 2.7 MI to Hwy Let January 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C008(63) 8J-08 On Montana Road, from approx. 1 miles S. of 224 th Let Lane to approx miles S. of 224 th January Lane 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C008(71) 5F-08 On 110 th Street, Over TRIB. OF SQUAW CREEK, on NLINE S10 T85 R Roll to FFY 2018 TABLE 4.3 Dallas County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status RTP NRT-C025(95)--9G-25 Hiawatha Trail: Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail Connection Letting FFY 2017 RTP NRT-C025(99) 9G-25 RRVT to High Trestle Trail Connector Phase 1 Acquisition/Construction (Perry to Bouton) Letting FFY

32 RTP NRT-C025(103) 9G-25 On Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail Connector City of Bouton to Quinlan Avenue Letting FFY 2017 TAP TAP-R-C025(098) 8T-25 RRVT Paved Crossing Project, Phase Let HSIP HSIP-S-C025(104) 5E-25 On F-31, from Kimble Pl. to Chestnut St. (Minburn) Let HSIP HSIP-S-C025(107) 6C-25 On F90, from West approach of the Bulgar Creek Bridge east approx Miles to IA 169, on NLINE S36 T78 R Let April 2017 TABLE 4.4 Iowa Department of Transportation Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status HSIP IHSIPX-32() IA 92: I-35 TO CO RD R HSIP HSIPX-014-4(66) 3L-50 On IA14, from 1.6 mi W of IA224 to 2.2 mi N of Laurel Let May 2017 Letting July 2017 NHPP IM 35() I-35: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) Let Dec 2016 NHPP IM 35() I-35: 1.6MI N OF CO RD F22 TO 3.5 MI N OF IA 210 (NB & SB) Let Feb 2017 NHPP IM-NHS 35() I-35: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.6 MI S OF US 30 (NB & SB) Let Jan 2017 NHPP IM-35() I-35: CO RD E57 OVER I MI S OF US Let Jan 2017 PRF NHSN 65() 2R-50 US 65: IA 330 AND IA 117 INTERCHANGE Let Dec 2016 PRF BRFN 14() IA 14: STREAM 0.2 MI S OF IA Let Dec 2016 PRF NHSN 14() 2R-50 IA 14: STREAM 0.2 MI N OF IA Let Dec 2016 PRF BRFN 210() IA 210: OVER I PRF NHSN 92() 2R-91 IA 92: IA 28 INTERSECTION IN MARTENSDALE PRF IMN 80() 0E-50 I-80: POLK CO TO IOWA CO Let Nov 2016 Let May 2017 Let May 2017 PRF STPN 224() 2J-50 IA 224: I-80 TO US Let Oct 2016 STBG-HBP BRF 35() I-35: CO RD G76 (NEW VIRGINIA) INTERCHANGE Let Dec

33 STBG-HBP BRF 35() I-35: MIDDLE RIVER 0.4 MI S OF IA 92 (SB) Let Dec 2016 TABLE 4.5 Iowa DNR Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status MISC FLAP-0625(603) 7L-63 On Dubuque drive and surrounding area: from Lake Red Rock to approx ft east Rolled to FFY 2018 TABLE 4.6 Jasper County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C050(114) 5E-50 On County Road F36, from County road S52 east approx. 5.5 Miles to Cherry Creek Bridge Let April 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C050(117) 8J-50 E 84TH ST S: Over Elk Creek Roll to FFY 2018 STBG-HBP BRS-C050(115) On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, along NLINE S21 T81 R Roll to FFY 2018 STBG-HBP BROS-3987(601) 8J-50 In the City of Kellogg, On Indigo Ave, Over Coon Creek, in Sec 25 T80-N, R-18W Let April 2017 TABLE 4.7 City of Knoxville Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-4040(608) In the city of Knoxville, Pavement rehabilitation on Robinson, Jackson, and Main streets Letting June 2017 TABLE 4.8 Madison County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C061(103) 5E-61 ON G4R, from US169 EAST AND NORTH 12 Miles to TIMBER RIDGE AVE, S18 T76 R Let December 2016 STBG-HBP BROS-C061(107) 8J-61 ALL: FROM VARIOUS TO VARIOUS Authorized 24

34 STBG-HBP BROS-C061(104) 8J-61 On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH RIVER, at S5 T77 R Removed/Roll to FFY 2018 STBG-HBP BROS-C061(105) 8J-61 On HERITAGE AVE, Over N BRANCH NORTH RIVER, S17 T77 R Roll to FFY 2018 TABLE 4.9 Marion County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C063(125) 5E-63 On T17, from IA 92 to Pella Co. Line Let February 2017 STBG BROS-C063(239100) 8J-63 Story Dr.: From G 76 to 94 th 8331 Removed TABLE 4.10 City of Newton Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-5482(620) In the city of Newton, On N 4 th Avenue W, from W 8 th Street through the 1400 Block Let June 2016 STBG STP-U-5482(621) On 1st Ave (Hwy 6) from approx. 300 west of E 14 th St to Iowa Speedway Dr Roll to FFY 2018 TABLE 4.11 City of Pella Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status DEMO HDP-5947() In the city of Pella, On OSKALOOSA ST, from Prairie Street to SE 16 th St Let January 2016 TABLE 4.12 City of Perry Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BRM-5970(615) 8N-25 In the city of Perry, Willis Avenue Bridge over Frog Creek (Bridge # ) Letting August

35 TABLE 4.13 Polk County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BRS-C077(212) On NE 96 St, Over an unnamed tributary of INDIAN CREEK South of NE 166 Ave Let January 2017 STBG-HBP BRS-C077(214) On NE Santiago DR., Over a Branch of Skunk River, E. of NE Hubbell Road Let January 2017 TABLE 4.14 Story County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status TAP TAP-R-8612(601) 8T-85 Praeri Rail Trail Extension Project to Dakins Lake Letting September 2017 STBG STP-S-C085(142) 5E-85 On R 77, from approx. 335 feet north of E Walnut St. in Roland North approx Miles to Hamilton Co. Line Let January 2017 STBG STP-S-C085(141) 5E-85 On E18, from a point approx east of Hwy 65 east approx Miles to Marshall Co. Line Let January 2017 TABLE 4.15 Warren County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C091(112) 5E-91 On G76, from G72 east approx. 4.7 Miles to 10th Avenue (county line) Let December 2016 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(109) 5F th Ave.: G24 Hwy S approx MI Let March 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(103) 5F-91 On 190TH AVE, Over NORTH WOLF CREEK, from 190TH ST & TYLER ST NORTH approx. 1.1 Miles, S7 T74 R Let November 2016 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(111) 5F-91 On 180TH AVE, from Illinois ST N approx. 0.1 MI Let March

36 TABLE 4.16 City of Winterset Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-8497() On Summitt Avenue, from 1 st Street to 16 th Avenue Removed TABLE 4.17 Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority Fund Category Project Description Transit # Status STA, 5311 Administrative Will be complete /30/ Employment Transportation Initiative 4334 In process of using funds 5339 Light Duty Bus (138 wb) Funded for Replaced / 4236 Ordered 5339 Light Duty Bus (138 wb) 4201 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (138 wb) 2390 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (158 wb) 2879 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 2874 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3233 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3236 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 1563 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) Funded for Replaced / 1565 Ordered 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 2381 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 2383 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) Funded for Replaced / 4202 Ordered 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3241 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 4198 Not funded 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) Funded for Replaced / 4233 Ordered 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) Funded for Replaced / 4234 Ordered 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 4205 Not funded 5339 Minivan 2388 Not funded 5339 Minivan 2875 Not funded 5339 Minivan 2876 Not funded 5317 Connect Your Care 4335 In process of using funds 5317 Mobility Coordinator 4336 In process of using funds 27

37 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects The first FFY in the FFY TIP is referred to as the Annual Element. Projects for the entire four years (FFY ) are listed together by funding program and in order of FFY. The CIRTPA s program for FFY contains 111 projects with a total cost of approximately $172,202,000. Of the 111 projects in the CIRTPA s program, 109 projects totaling $171,370,000 are roadway transportation improvements. Two projects totaling $832,000 are bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts in $1,000s by year, and Transportation Program Management System (TPMS) identification number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The TPMS identification number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s TIP. Projects are listed in alphabetical order by county, then by city. Project funding amounts are listed by year and are listed in $1,000s. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal Aid refers to the amount of Federal-aid the project has received. Regional FA (Federal-aid) refers to the amount of Federal-aid received from the CIRTPA (i.e., STBG and TAP funds). 28

38 Generated on 07/20/2017 Draft TIP (2018) (filtered) 29

39 RPA Transportation Improvement Program TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# STBG - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Region Wide RGPL-PA11()--ST-00 0 Project Total TA RPA-11 HIRTA: Vehicle Purchase -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Trans Planning -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Federal Aid 2018: $108,800, 2019: $116,800, 2020: $120,576, and 2021: $124,256 Boone STP-U-0750() Project Total TA Boone Industrial Park Road Improvements: approx. 350 feet -- Federal Aid west of Argo street to Corporate Limits Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Patching -- Regional FA STP-S-C008(67)--5E MI Project Total 0 1, ,479 TA Boone CRD On Lower Ledges Rd and E-52, from Lower Ledges -- Federal Aid 0 1, ,184 Easterly 4.2 Miles to Hwy 17 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1, , STP-S-C008(71)--5E MI Project Total 0 1, ,550 TA Boone CRD On E57, from P-54 in Berkley east 4.5 Miles to Hwy. -- Federal Aid 0 1, , , along NLINE S4,3,2,1,6 T82 R28 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 4,3,2,1,6:82:28 Regional FA 0 1, , STP-S-C008(76)--5E Project Total ,967 3,967 TA Boone CRD On R18 from E-57 South 3.9 miles to 310th Street. -- Federal Aid ,100 3,100 Final TIP Approved Pave -- Regional FA ,100 3, Dallas STP-S-C025(106)--5E-25 DOT Letting: 01/17/ MI Project Total 2, ,900 TA Dallas CRD On F25, from Guthrie Co. to P46 -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 5:80:29 Regional FA Jasper STP-U-5482(613) DOT Letting: 01/17/ Project Total 1, ,500 TA Newton Iowa Speedway Drive, from approx. 1,200 feet south -- Federal Aid of 1st Avenue E to approx. 1,900 feet north of Interstate 1, , Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 1, , STP-U-5482(621) DOT Letting: 01/16/ Project Total TA Newton On 1st Ave (Hwy 6) from approx. 300' west of E 14th -- Federal Aid St to Iowa Speedway Dr. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA PA NOTE: STBG funding limit: $362,200 30

40 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) STP-S-C050()--5E Project Total 0 0 3, ,500 TA Jasper CRD On F62, from State Highway 163 East Miles to -- Federal Aid State Highway , ,800 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA 0 0 2, , STP-U-5482() Project Total ,500 2,500 TA Newton In the city of Newton, W 8th Street N, Union Drive and -- Federal Aid W 4th Street N from N 4th Avenue W to N 19th ,000 2,000 Avenue W Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA ,000 2, Madison STP-U-8497() Project Total 1, ,200 TA Winterset In the city of Winterset, 10th Street Reconstruction, -- Federal Aid from Iowa 92 and Benton Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Marion STP-S-C063(127)--5E-63 DOT Letting: 02/20/ MI Project Total 2, ,000 TA Marion CRD On S45 from IA Hwy 5 to G76 & G76 from S45 E 2 -- Federal Aid Miles 1, ,400 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 1, , STP-U-4040() Project Total TA Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Larson Street from -- Federal Aid Highway 14 to Grant Street and Brobst Street to Roche Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA PA NOTE: STBG funding limit: $113, STP-U-4040() Project Total TA Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, Rock Island from Hwy 14 to -- Federal Aid 1st st and on 2nd st from Reno st to Rock Island Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA PA NOTE: STBG funding limit: $179, STP-U-4040() Project Total TA Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Roche St from Robinson St -- Federal Aid to Main St Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA PA NOTE: STBG funding limit: $27,734 31

41 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Marion - 63 (continued) STP-U-4040() Project Total TA Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Park Lane from Pleasant -- Federal Aid Street to Madison Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA PA NOTE: STBG funding limit: $426, STP-U-5947() Project Total ,650 1,650 TA Pella In the city of Pella, Oskaloosa St, from SE 16 to 240 St -- Federal Aid (Eagle Lane) including the intersection approx. 300 ft Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Polk STP-S-C077(220)--5E-77 DOT Letting: 01/17/ MI Project Total 1, ,110 TA Polk CRD On NW Madrid Dr, from BR 132 to Hwy Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 17:81:25 Regional FA STP-S-C077(HMA )--5E Project Total 0 0 1, ,148 TA Polk CRD On NW 58 St, from CL of Polk City to NW 166 Ave -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Story STP-U-5405(611) DOT Letting: 01/17/ Project Total 1, ,400 TA Nevada Approx. 1,100 ft west, approx. 1,700 ft east, and -- Federal Aid approx. 150 ft south of Lincoln Way and W 18th St 1, ,120 Final TIP Approved Pavement Widening,Pavement Markings -- Regional FA 1, , Warren STP-U-3680(614) DOT Letting: 01/21/ MI Project Total TA Indianola In the city of Indianola, On S J & K ST, from approx. -- Federal Aid 600' N OF IA 92 to approx 500' S OF IA Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signals,Right of Way -- Regional FA STP-S-C091(119)--5E-91 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total 1, ,040 TA Warren CRD R-63: From North River to DM CITY LIMIT -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 16:77:24 Regional FA STP-S-C091(121)--5E-91 DOT Letting: 11/20/ MI Project Total 0 1, ,700 TA Warren CRD G58, from 118th ST to Hwy 65/69 and Hwy 65 to Milo -- Federal Aid city limits 0 1, ,360 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 23:75:23 Regional FA 0 1, ,

42 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) STP-S-C091(G16SR)--5E Project Total ,400 2,400 TA Warren CRD G16, from HWY 65/69 to CARLISLE -- Federal Aid ,920 1,920 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA ,920 1, PA NOTE: Joint project with City of Carlisle, TPMS project number STBG-HBP - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program - Bridge Program Boone [NBIS: 78150] BROS-C008(71)--5F-08 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total TA Boone CRD On 110TH ST, Over TRIB.OF SQUAW CREEK, on Federal Aid NLINE S10 T85 R Final TIP Approved Culvert Replacement 10:85:25 Regional FA [NBIS: 78050] BROS-C008(33)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/ MI Project Total TA Boone CRD 200th Street: 1/4 mi. east of C Ave Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 28:84:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 77940] BROS-C008(41)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/ MI Project Total TA Boone CRD 180th Street: Hwy Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:84:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 78220] BROS-C008(74)--8J-08 DOT Letting: 11/20/ Project Total TA Boone CRD On U AVE, Over MONTGOMERY CREEK, along Federal Aid WLINE S33 T85 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 33:85:25 Regional FA [NBIS: 77500] BROS-C008(72)--8J-08 0 Project Total TA Boone CRD On 240TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S16 T83 R28 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:83:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 77470] BROS-C008(73)--8J-08 0 Project Total TA Boone CRD On 230TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S9 T83 R28 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 9:83:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 78270] BROS-C008(77)--5F-08 0 Project Total TA Boone CRD On 150TH ST, Over TRIB. OF SQUAW CREEK, Federal Aid along NLINE S36 T85 R25 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 36:85:25 Regional FA [NBIS: 77880] BROS-C008(78)--8J-08 0 Project Total TA Boone CRD On 160TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, at NE S5 T Federal Aid R28 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5:84:28 Regional FA

43 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Dallas [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(C-39)--5F MI Project Total TA Dallas CRD On Pioneer Av., Over Slough Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T81 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27:81:27 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(E-44)--8J-25 0 MI Project Total TA Dallas CRD On B Avenue, Over Mosquito Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T80 R29 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5:80:29 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(M-79)--5F-25 0 Project Total TA Dallas CRD On 358th Pl., Over Bear Creek, in S25 T78 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:78:29 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(C-41)--5F MI Project Total TA Dallas CRD On R30/O Ave., Over Beaver Creek, along ELINE S Federal Aid T81 R27 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 9:81:27 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(J-39)--8J MI Project Total TA Dallas CRD On 270TH ST, Over Panther Creek, S15/22 T79 R28, Federal Aid Colfax Township Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 15/22:79:28 Regional FA Jasper [NBIS: ] BROS-C050( )--8J MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD On N 91st Ave W, Over Wolf Creek, at NLINE S Federal Aid T81 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:81:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050(117)--8J-50 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD E 84th St S: Over Elk Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:79:18 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050(115) DOT Letting: 01/17/ MI Project Total 1, ,500 TA Jasper CRD On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk Federal Aid River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, 1, ,200 along NLINE S21 T81 R19 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 21:81:19 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Cherry Creek, from W 36th Federal Aid St east 300 Feet, in S32 T80 R19 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 32:80:19 Regional FA

44 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C050()--5F MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD On S 64th Ave E, Over Sugar Creek, in S25 T79 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:79:17 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050()--8J-50 0 Project Total TA Jasper CRD On G13, Over M BR BUCKLEY CREEK, along Federal Aid NLINE S4 T77 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 4:77:17 Regional FA PA NOTE: Mahaska County TPMS Project number [NBIS: ] BRS-C050(116) DOT Letting: 11/20/ MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Squaw Creek, just of W Federal Aid 116th St S, on NLINE S11 T79 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation 11:79:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total 0 1, ,250 TA Jasper CRD On County Road F24, Over Indian Creek, along NLINE Federal Aid S3 T80 R21 approximately 500 east of State Hwy , ,000 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:80:21 Regional FA [NBIS: 30430] BRS-C050() MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD F-48: Over Prairie Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:80:20 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BHS-C050() MI Project Total TA Jasper CRD On F-24, Over Clear Creek, along NLINE S2 T80 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 2:80:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050()--8J-50 0 Project Total TA Jasper CRD On INDIGO AVE, Over BEAR CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S25 T80 R18 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:80:18 Regional FA Madison BROS-C061(109)--8J-61 Local Letting: 01/21/ MI Project Total TA Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C061(108) DOT Letting: 12/19/ MI Project Total 1, ,250 TA Madison CRD On G61: Over Waterway approx. 1.3 miles east of P Federal Aid in NE S17 T74 R28 1, ,000 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:74:28 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C061(104)--8J-61 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total 1, ,200 TA Madison CRD On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH Federal Aid RIVER, at SE S5 T77 R29 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5:77:29 Regional FA

45 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Madison - 61 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C061()--8J-61 0 Project Total 0 1, ,000 TA Madison CRD On VALLEYVIEW AVE., Over DRAINAGE, S10 T Federal Aid R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:75:26 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C061()--5F-61 0 Project Total TA Madison CRD On G46, Over DRAINAGE, S12 T75 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:75:26 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C061()--5F-61 0 Project Total TA Madison CRD On R21, Over BRANCH TO CLANTON CREEK, at Federal Aid S1 T74 R27 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 1:74:27 Regional FA [NBIS: 34730] BRS-C061() MI Project Total ,250 1,250 TA Madison CRD Clark Tower Rd.: Over Clanton Creek Federal Aid ,000 1,000 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:74:28 Regional FA Polk [NBIS: ] BROS-C077(215)--5F-77 DOT Letting: 01/16/ MI Project Total TA Polk CRD On NE 94 Ave E of NE 112 St Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA Story [NBIS: ] BROS-C085(144)--8J-85 DOT Letting: 02/20/ MI Project Total TA Story CRD On Sand Hill Trail, Over Unnamed Stream, in S20 T Federal Aid R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:83:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C085(145)--8J-85 DOT Letting: 12/18/ MI Project Total TA Story CRD 300TH ST: Over Unnamed Creek in Sec. 13 Palestine Federal Aid Twp., approx. 450' west of the intersection of 560 Ave and 300 St. Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 13:82:24 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C085(W19) MI Project Total TA Story CRD On E18, Over Drainage Ditch, on NLINE S19 T85 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 19:85:22 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C085(U17)--8J MI Project Total TA Story CRD On 570th Ave., Over Ballard Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T82 R23 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:82:23 Regional FA Warren [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(120)--8J-91 DOT Letting: 12/19/ Project Total TA Warren CRD On 220TH AVE, Over BRANCH FLANK CREEK, S Federal Aid T74 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:74:22 Regional FA

46 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(115)--8J-91 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total TA Warren CRD On R73/138TH AVE 0.3 MILES SOUTH OF G76, Federal Aid Over UNNAMED STREAM, NE S30 T74 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 30:74:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(116)--8J-91 DOT Letting: 11/21/ MI Project Total TA Warren CRD On 55TH AVE, SOUTH OF ILLINOIS ST 0.4 MILES, Federal Aid over UNNAMED STREAM, at Ctr S23 T76 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 23:76:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C091(114) DOT Letting: 11/21/ Project Total TA Warren CRD On R45, Over BROADHORN CREEK, 0.4 miles north Federal Aid of Roosevelt St Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C091(113) DOT Letting: 11/21/ Project Total 1, ,100 TA Warren CRD On R45, Over S RIVER, 0.3 miles south of Roosevelt Federal Aid St Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:74:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(117)--8J-91 DOT Letting: 11/20/ MI Project Total TA Warren CRD On QUEBEC ST, 0.3 MILES EAST OF 220TH AVE, Federal Aid Over FLANK CREEK, at NW S3 T74 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:74:22 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(E1577)--8J MI Project Total TA Warren CRD IDAHO ST: 50th Ave W 0.3 MI Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 15:76:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(B1709)--8J MI Project Total TA Warren CRD 140TH AVE: Scotch Ridge Rd S 0.4 MI Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:77:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(M2109)--8J-91 0 Project Total TA Warren CRD On 30TH AVE, Over PAINTER CREEK, S21 T75 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 21:75:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C091(S-2703) Project Total TA Warren CRD On S23, Over COTTON CREEK, S27 T74 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27:74:22 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(M-2009)--8J-91 0 Project Total TA Warren CRD On 20TH AVE, Over PAINTER CREEK, S20 T75 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:75:25 Regional FA

47 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# NHPP - National Highway Performance Program Dallas NHSX-169()--3H-25 0 Project Total 9, ,000 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 On US169, from IA141 to US30 -- Federal Aid 7, ,200 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA IM--80() MI Project Total , ,671 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: US 6/169 IN DE SOTO TO CO RD R16 -- Federal Aid 0 0 9, ,559 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Right of Way -- Regional FA Jasper [NBIS: ] IMX--80() MI Project Total 361 7,521 5,777 8,806 22,465 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: NORTH SKUNK RIVER 2.1 MI E OF IA Federal Aid 0 6,769 5,200 7,926 19,895 Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Pave,Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA Story [NBIS: ] IM-NHS--35() Project Total 10, ,620 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.6 MI S OF US Federal Aid (NB & SB) 9, ,464 Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement,Culvert Replacement -- Regional FA Warren IM-NHS--35() MI Project Total ,205 20,205 TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: N OF NORTH RIVER TO S OF BADGER -- Federal Aid CREEK (SB) ,185 18,185 Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA TAP - Transportation Alternatives Story TAP-R-8612(601)--8T-85 DOT Letting: 01/17/ Project Total TA Story CCB Praeri Rail Trail Extension Project to Dakins Lake -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave,Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA Warren STP-E-3680(615)--8V-91 DOT Letting: 02/20/ Project Total TA Indianola Jerry Kelley Trail, from Memorial Park along Iowa Ave, -- Federal Aid Kenwood Blvd, and Euclid Ave to N W St Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Project tied to STP-E-3680(613)--8V-91 which was deobligated. $26,600 spent on PE the remaining, $282,920 was transferred to (615)and rolled to FFY TAP funding limit: $282,920 RTP - Recreational Trails Program Dallas NRT-C025(103)--9G-25 Local Letting: 01/21/ Project Total TA Dallas CCB On Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail -- Federal Aid Connector - City of Bouton to Quinlan Avenue Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike ROW,Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA

48 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# MISC - Federal Lands Access Program - TAP type project Marion FLAP-0625(603)--7L-63 DOT Letting: 11/21/ Project Total TA IADNR-D04-RPA11 On Dubuque drive and surrounding area: from Lake -- Federal Aid Red Rock to approx ft east Final TIP Approved Miscellaneous -- Regional FA PRF - Primary Road Funds Boone NHSN--30()--2R-8 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 30: W OF CO RD R18 TO E OF IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA STPN-17()--2J-08 0 Project Total 5, ,556 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 On IA17, from S of UP RR to S Jct IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA STPN--210()--2J-8 0 MI Project Total 2, ,600 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 210: IA 17 IN MADRID TO WCL OF SLATER -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA NHSN--30()--2R-8 0 MI Project Total 0 1, ,197 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 30: CO RD R18 INTERSECTION -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Right of Way -- Regional FA Jasper NHSN--65()--2R-50 0 Project Total 6, ,395 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: IA 330 AND IA 117 INTERSECTION -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Erosion Control,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--14() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: BUCK CREEK 2.7 MI S OF CO RD F Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--14() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: CHERRY CREEK 4.3 MI S OF I Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--6() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 6: IAIS RR 1.5 MI E OF IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total ,400 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: POLK CO TO IOWA CO -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA STPN--117()--2J-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 117: BYERS BRANCH 1.5 MI NW OF MINGO -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Revetment -- Regional FA

49 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) STPN--224()--2J-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 224: 0.1 MI N OF MAIN ST IN KELLOGG -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Right of Way,Revetment -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: IAIS RR 0.4 MI W OF IA 14 (EB) Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA BRFN--163() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 163: WALNUT CREEK 2.4 MI W OF IA 117 (EB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total ,920 1,920 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.5 MI W OF IA Federal Aid (EB & WB) Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA BRFN--117() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 117: STREAM 0.5 MI S OF CO RD F24 -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA Madison BRFN--169() MI Project Total TA DOT-D04-RPA11 US 169: NORTH BRANCH NORTH RIVER 5.2 MI S -- Federal Aid OF CO RD F Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation -- Regional FA Marion BRFN--5() MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 5: WHITE BREAST CREEK 2.7 MI N OF IA Federal Aid (SB) Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA Polk IMN--235()--0E-77 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-MPO26 I-235: W I-35/80 INTERCHANGE TO E I-35/80 -- Federal Aid INTERCHANGE Final TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA IMN--35()--0E-77 0 Project Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 TA DOT-D01-MPO26 I-35: W JCT I-80 TO WRIGHT CO -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA IMN--80()--0E-77 0 MI Project Total ,600 TA DOT-D01-MPO26 I-80: E JCT I-35 TO JASPER CO -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA

50 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# Polk - 77 (continued) IMN--80()--0E-77 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: FOUR MILE CREEK 1.4 MI E OF E JCT I Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Right of Way,Revetment -- Regional FA Story IMN--35()--0E-85 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: US 30 INTERCHANGE IN AMES -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Erosion Control,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA BRFN--65() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: CO RD E MI N OF US Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation -- Regional FA Warren IMN--35()--0E-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Erosion Control -- Regional FA STPN--69()--2J-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 US 69: 1 MI N OF CLARKE CO TO INDIANOLA -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Slope Improvement,Right of Way -- Regional FA NHSN--92()--2R-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: 1 MI W OF SANDYVILLE AND 5 MI W OF -- Federal Aid IA 14 Final TIP Approved Slope Improvement,Right of Way -- Regional FA BRFN--92() MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: SOUTH RIVER 0.4 MI E OF E JCT CO RD S23 -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program Dallas HSIP-144()--2H-25 0 Project Total 3, ,200 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 IA 144: NCL OF PERRY TO SCL OF RIPPEY -- Federal Aid 2, ,560 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA DOT NOTE: Project includes 3R and HSIP funding. Jasper HSIPX--14()--3L-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: 1.6 MI W OF IA 224 TO 2.2 MI N OF LAUREL -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA

51 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total STIP# FM - Farm-to-Market Funds Warren [NBIS: ] FM-C091(E3325) MI Project Total TA Warren CRD On KIRKWOOD ST NEAR 33RD AVE, Over Federal Aid UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO MIDDLE RIVER, from RD AVE WEST 0.1 Miles, S33 T76 R25 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 33:76:25 Regional FA

52 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administrations Projects A portion of Federal fuel tax revenue is placed in the Mass Transit Account of the Federal Highway Trust Fund. These funds, along with General Fund appropriations, are reserved for transit purposes and are administered by the FTA. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts by year, and Transit Number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The Transit Number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s Transit Program. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal-Aid refers to the amount of Federal-Aid (FA) the project has received. State-Aid (SA) refers to the amount of funding the transit provider has received from the State. 43

53 Draft 2018 Transit Program (Filtered) 44

54 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (56 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY18 FY19 FY20 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 2389 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 4419 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4197 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 88,600 Capital VSS FA 75,310 Replacement Unit #: 3323 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4198 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 7641 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4207 Conversion Van Total 55,500 Capital VSS FA 47,175 Expansion SA 5317 Region 11 / HIRTA 4247 Mobility Coordinator Total 50,000 Operations FA 40,000 Misc SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4436 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1139 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4437 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 88,600 Capital VSS FA 75,310 Replacement Unit #: 8722 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4438 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 88,600 Capital VSS FA 75,310 Replacement Unit #: 8723 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4439 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1140 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4440 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1141 SA STA, 5311 Region 11 / HIRTA 4465 Admin Total 1,409,722 Operations FA 825,669 Other SA 584, Region 11 / HIRTA 4467 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 6627 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4731 Conversion Van Total 55,500 Capital VSS FA 47,175 Expansion SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4740 Minivan Total 45,475 Capital VSS FA 14,450 Expansion SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4741 Conversion Van Total 73,000 Capital VSS FA 58,400 Expansion SA 45

55 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (56 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY18 FY19 FY20 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 4456 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 5519 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4447 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 2227 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4451 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 3325 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4433 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 2225 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4435 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 1145 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4208 Conversion Van Total 73,000 Capital VSS FA 58,400 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2387 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 3327 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3243 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 4420 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4201 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 86,500 Capital VSS FA 73,525 Replacement Unit #: 6523 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2391 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 1142 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2880 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 7644 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3234 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 1143 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3242 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 2228 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4199 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 79,000 Capital FA 67,150 Replacement Unit #: 5515 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4200 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 6525 SA 46

56 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (56 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY18 FY19 FY20 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 4204 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 8724 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4205 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 8725 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4452 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 3326 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4453 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 80,500 Capital FA 68,425 Replacement Unit #: 4421 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4449 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 2230 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4450 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 88,600 Capital VSS FA 75,310 Replacement Unit #: 2231 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4455 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 86,500 Capital VSS FA 73,525 Replacement Unit #: 5517 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4733 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,395 Capital VSS FA 73,916 Replacement Unit #: 7642 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4734 Minivan Total 59,086 Capital VSS FA 46,660 Replacement Unit #: 8724 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4458 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 80,500 Capital FA 68,425 Replacement Unit #: 6527 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4459 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 7642 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4460 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 7645 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4461 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 7646 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4462 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 7647 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4463 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 86,500 Capital VSS FA 73,525 Replacement Unit #: 8727 SA 47

57 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (56 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4735 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,395 Capital Diesel, UFRC, VSS FA 73,916 Replacement Unit #: 8727 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4736 Conversion Van Total 62,940 Capital VSS, Low Floor FA 50,340 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4457 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 5520 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4448 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 86,500 Capital VSS FA 73,525 Replacement Unit #: 2229 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4454 Non-ADA LD bus (138" wb) Total 73,300 Capital VSS FA 58,640 Replacement Unit #: 5516 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4441 Minivan Total 53,500 Capital VSS FA 45,475 Replacement Unit #: 1145 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4442 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1146 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4443 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1147 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4444 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1148 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4445 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1149 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4446 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 93,700 Capital VSS FA 79,645 Replacement Unit #: 1150 SA 48

58 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan The FAST Act states that the TIP shall include a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, identification of public and private resources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommend any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs. Federal Highway Administration Projects For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain systemlevel estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). In addition, revenue and cost estimates for the TIP must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect year of expenditure dollars, based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the CIRTPA, State(s), and public transportation operator(s). The CIRTPA staff utilized an inflation rate of 4% to determine year of expenditure dollars. The FFY TIP is fiscally constrained by funding sources. Funding sources include Federal, State, and local financial resources. The CIRTPA recognizes that in the event of Federal, State, and local funding changes, amendments, or revisions, it will need to reflect the change in project funds within the FFY TIP. CIRTPA Federal-aid Funding Sources The total Federal share of projects included in the first year (annual element) of the TIP shall not exceed levels of funding committed to the CIRTPA. Additionally, the total Federal share of projects included in the second, third, fourth, and/or subsequent years of the TIP may not exceed levels of funding committed, or reasonably expected to be available, to the CIRTPA. Table 7.1 displays a listing of all Federal-Aid funding sources and total project costs in the TIP and the amount of Federal funds committed by source for FFYs Table 7.2 displays the 49

59 financial constraint of the STBG funding source for FFYs , breaking down all revenues, expenditures, programmed funds, adjustments, and returns. TABLE 7.1 CIRTPA Federal-Aid Funding Sources Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid FM $0 $0 $380,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 HSIP $3,232,000 $2,589,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MISC $87,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NHPP $19,876,000 $16,664,000 $7,676,000 $6,769,000 $16,398,000 $14,759,000 $2,9011,000 $2,611,000 PRF $20,508,000 $0 $4,276,000 $0 $4,152,000 $0 $4,550,000 $0 RTP $214,000 $171,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG $12,592,000 $8,209,000 $6,108,000 $4,585,000 $5,332,000 $3,987,000 $10,672,000 $7,969,000 STBG-HBP $9,631,000 $7,680,000 $8,595,000 $6,873,000 $3,805,000 $3,026,000 $3,975,000 $3,179,000 TAP $832,000 $508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $66,972,000 $35,891,000 $27,035,000 $18,227,000 $29,687,000 $21,772,000 $48,508,000 $13,759,000 TABLE 7.2 CIRTPA Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $3,510,062 $565,390 $1,398,106 $2,931,289 STBG Target $5,049,677 $5,197,000 $5,300,000 $5,428,000 Flex Funds $214,451 $222,000 $220,000 $220,000 Subtotal $8,774,190 $5,982,390 $6,918,105 $8,579,289 Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0 Programmed STBG Funds $8,208,800 $4,584,284 $3,986,817 $7,969,256 Balance $565,390 $1,398,106 $2,931,289 $610,033 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation s Fiscal Year rd Quarter Status Report. Operations and Maintenance Costs and Projections The following tables demonstrate the costs of operations and maintenance to the Federal-aid System. Table 7.3 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.4 and 7.5 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

60 TABLE CIRTPA City Street Operations and Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name On- System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Roadway Maintenance Total Operations Operations on Federal- Aid Routes Maintenance on Federal- Aid Routes Boone County $536,660 $111,172 $9,481 $22,296 Boone $1,390,530 $320,732 $93,269 $404,366 Dallas County $730,954 $223,048 $130,546 $44,490 Adel $363,567 $217,156 $25,320 $42,392 Perry $647,563 $250,085 $64,972 $168,237 Jasper County $606,364 $387,633 $55,613 $35,817 Newton $1,096,347 $561,146 $152,576 $298,097 Madison County $285,110 $62,774 $29,987 $47,211 Winterset $677,339 $37,139 $9,696 $123,072 Marion County $288,997 $109,877 $27,467 $48,745 Knoxville $790,662 $244,509 $62,717 $202,805 Pella $796,598 $55,212 $14,543 $209,824 Polk County $205,840 $32,100 $1,963 $34,760 Story County $937,992 $294,518 $128,412 $46,680 Huxley $69,639 $200,275 $22,391 $7,786 Nevada $763,591 $41,472 $13,798 $254,047 Story City $255,815 $102,937 $14,483 $35,993 Warren County $368,020 $105,399 $9,908 $49,625 Indianola $1,271,426 $323,851 $70,664 $277,425 Totals $12,083,014 $3,681,035 $937,806 $2,353,668 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports 51

61 TABLE 7.4 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $22,296 $23,188 $24,115 $25,080 $26,083 $27,126 Boone $404,366 $420,541 $437,362 $454,857 $473,051 $491,973 Dallas County $44,490 $46,270 $48,120 $50,045 $52,047 $54,129 Adel $42,392 $44,088 $45,851 $47,685 $49,593 $51,576 Perry $168,237 $174,966 $181,965 $189,244 $196,813 $204,686 Jasper County $35,817 $37,250 $38,740 $40,289 $41,901 $43,577 Newton $298,097 $310,021 $322,422 $335,319 $348,731 $362,681 Madison County $47,211 $49,099 $51,063 $53,106 $55,230 $57,439 Winterset $123,072 $127,995 $133,115 $138,439 $143,977 $149,736 Marion County $48,745 $50,695 $52,723 $54,831 $57,025 $59,306 Knoxville $202,805 $210,917 $219,354 $228,128 $237,253 $246,743 Pella $209,824 $218,217 $226,946 $236,023 $245,464 $255,283 Polk County $34,760 $36,150 $37,596 $39,100 $40,664 $42,291 Story County $46,680 $48,547 $50,489 $52,509 $54,609 $56,793 Huxley $7,786 $8,097 $8,421 $8,758 $9,109 $9,473 Nevada $254,047 $264,209 $274,777 $285,768 $297,199 $309,087 Story City $35,993 $37,433 $38,930 $40,487 $42,107 $43,791 Warren County $49,625 $51,610 $53,674 $55,821 $58,054 $60,376 Indianola $277,425 $288,522 $300,063 $312,065 $324,548 $337,530 Totals $2,353,668 $2,447,815 $2,545,727 $2,647,556 $2,753,459 $2,863,597 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports 52

62 TABLE 7.5 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $9,481 $9,860 $10,255 $10,665 $11,091 $11,535 Boone $93,269 $97,000 $100,880 $104,915 $109,112 $113,476 Dallas County $130,546 $135,768 $141,199 $146,846 $152,720 $158,829 Adel $25,320 $26,333 $27,386 $28,482 $29,621 $30,806 Perry $64,972 $67,571 $70,274 $73,085 $76,008 $79,048 Jasper County $55,613 $57,838 $60,151 $62,557 $65,059 $67,662 Newton $152,576 $158,679 $165,026 $171,627 $178,492 $185,632 Madison County $29,987 $31,186 $32,434 $33,731 $35,081 $36,484 Winterset $9,696 $10,084 $10,487 $10,907 $11,343 $11,797 Marion County $27,467 $28,566 $29,708 $30,897 $32,133 $33,418 Knoxville $62,717 $65,226 $67,835 $70,548 $73,370 $76,305 Pella $14,543 $15,125 $15,730 $16,359 $17,013 $17,694 Polk County $1,963 $2,042 $2,123 $2,208 $2,296 $2,388 Story County $128,412 $133,548 $138,890 $144,446 $150,224 $156,233 Nevada $22,391 $23,287 $24,218 $25,187 $26,194 $27,242 Story City $13,798 $14,350 $14,924 $15,521 $16,142 $16,787 Warren County $14,483 $15,062 $15,665 $16,291 $16,943 $17,621 Indianola $9,908 $10,304 $10,716 $11,145 $11,591 $12,055 Totals $70,664 $73,491 $76,430 $79,487 $82,667 $85,974 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports Table 7.6 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.7 and 7.8 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

63 TABLE CIRTPA County Road Operations and Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name On-System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Operations Cost Total Maintenance Cost Operations Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Maintenance Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Boone County $1,869,581 $4,025,935 $579,119 $1,247,068 Dallas County $2,297,589 $4,222,515 $764,077 $1,404,223 Jasper County $2,035,121 $5,381,966 $680,893 $1,800,652 Madison County $1,755,059 $3,441,397 $645,436 $1,265,599 Marion County $1,533,095 $3,654,345 $568,900 $1,356,052 Polk County $2,242,214 $4,925,334 $1,012,788 $2,224,730 Story County $1,688,408 $3,566,374 $664,554 $1,403,718 Warren County $2,218,355 $4,336,673 $826,731 $1,616,180 Totals $15,639,422 $33,554,539 $5,742,498 $12,318,222 Source: 2016 County Engineers Annual Report TABLE 7.7 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $579,119 $602,284 $626,375 $651,430 $677,487 $704,587 Dallas County $764,077 $794,640 $826,426 $859,483 $893,862 $929,616 Jasper County $680,893 $708,129 $736,454 $765,912 $796,549 $828,410 Madison County $645,436 $671,253 $698,104 $726,028 $755,069 $785,272 Marion County $568,900 $591,656 $615,322 $639,935 $665,533 $692,154 Polk County $1,012,788 $1,053,300 $1,095,432 $1,139,249 $1,184,819 $1,232,211 Story County $664,554 $691,136 $718,782 $747,533 $777,434 $808,532 Warren County $826,731 $859,800 $894,192 $929,960 $967,158 $1,005,845 Totals $5,742,498 $5,972,198 $6,211,086 $6,459,529 $6,717,910 $6,986,627 Source: 2016 County Engineers Annual Report 54

64 TABLE 7.8 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $1,247,068 $1,296,951 $1,348,829 $1,402,782 $1,458,893 $1,517,249 Dallas County $1,404,223 $1,460,392 $1,518,808 $1,579,560 $1,642,742 $1,708,452 Jasper County $1,800,652 $1,872,678 $1,947,585 $2,025,489 $2,106,508 $2,190,768 Madison County $1,265,599 $1,316,223 $1,368,872 $1,423,627 $1,480,572 $1,539,795 Marion County $1,356,052 $1,410,294 $1,466,706 $1,525,374 $1,586,389 $1,649,845 Polk County $2,224,730 $2,313,719 $2,406,268 $2,502,519 $2,602,619 $2,706,724 Story County $1,403,718 $1,459,867 $1,518,261 $1,578,992 $1,642,152 $1,707,838 Warren County $1,616,180 $1,680,827 $1,748,060 $1,817,983 $1,890,702 $1,966,330 Totals $12,318,222 $12,810,951 $13,323,389 $13,856,324 $14,410,577 $14,987,001 Source: 2015 County Engineers Annual Report Non-Federal-aid Revenue Sources and Projections In addition to operations and maintenance costs are Non Federal-aid revenue sources. Non Federalaid revenue sources and projections are included to demonstrate the revenue sources and amounts available for operation and maintenance of the system in the CIRTPA planning area. Table 7.9 contains the receipts for the Road Use Tax Fund and other road monies on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA. Table 7.10 contains the projected revenues on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.9. Table 7.11 contains the receipts for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.12 contains the projected revenues for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table Table 7.13 contains the receipts for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.14 contains the projected revenues for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

65 TABLE CIRTPA City Street Fund Receipts City/County Name Road Use Tax Fund Federal-Aid Receipts Miscellaneous Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $625,983 $174,393 $340,425 $1,140,801 Boone $1,564,637 $3,135,275 $507,523 $5,207,435 Dallas County $1,035,855 $329,909 $395,553 $1,761,317 Adel $455,019 $13,287 $604,888 $1,073,194 Perry $951,807 $116,458 $2,222,780 $1,073,194 Jasper County $1,119,558 $295,405 $71,176 $1,486,139 Newton $1,885,078 $13,993 $0 $1,899,071 Madison County $334,082 $70,559 $201,404 $1,874,995 Winterset $641,376 $329,253 $904,366 $1,874,995 Marion County $460,267 $105,819 $165,243 $731,329 Knoxville $903,735 $875,021 $662,065 $2,440,821 Pella $1,279,292 $1,981,703 $0 $3,260,995 Polk County $160,770 $100,275 $11,100 $272,145 Story County $979,766 $745,241 $90,022 $1,815,029 Huxley $409,912 $2,338,171 $4,691,088 $7,439,171 Nevada $840,092 $152,826 $723,919 $1,716,837 Story City $424,000 $26,823 $1,169,265 $1,620,088 Warren County $385,585 $159,830 $16,193 $561,608 Indianola $1,826,749 $187,645 $588,953 $2,603,347 Totals $16,283,563 $11,151,886 $13,365,963 $410,801,412 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports 56

66 TABLE 7.10 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue City/County Name Boone County $1,140,801 $1,186,433 $1,233,890 $1,283,246 $1,334,576 $1,387,959 Boone $5,207,435 $5,415,732 $5,632,362 $5,857,656 $6,091,962 $6,335,641 Dallas County $1,761,317 $1,831,770 $1,905,040 $1,981,242 $2,060,492 $2,142,911 Adel $1,073,194 $1,116,122 $1,160,767 $1,207,197 $1,255,485 $1,305,705 Perry $1,073,194 $1,116,122 $1,160,767 $1,207,197 $1,255,485 $1,305,705 Jasper County $1,486,139 $1,545,585 $1,607,408 $1,671,704 $1,738,572 $1,808,115 Newton $1,899,071 $1,975,034 $2,054,035 $2,136,197 $2,221,644 $2,310,510 Madison County $1,874,995 $1,949,995 $2,027,995 $2,109,114 $2,193,479 $2,281,218 Winterset $1,874,995 $1,949,995 $2,027,995 $2,109,114 $2,193,479 $2,281,218 Marion County $731,329 $760,582 $791,005 $822,646 $855,551 $889,774 Knoxville $2,440,821 $2,538,454 $2,639,992 $2,745,592 $2,855,415 $2,969,632 Pella $3,260,995 $3,391,435 $3,527,092 $3,668,176 $3,814,903 $3,967,499 Polk County $272,145 $283,031 $294,352 $306,126 $318,371 $331,106 Story County $1,815,029 $1,887,630 $1,963,135 $2,041,661 $2,123,327 $2,208,260 Huxley $7,439,171 $7,736,738 $8,046,207 $8,368,056 $8,702,778 $9,050,889 Nevada $1,716,837 $1,785,510 $1,856,931 $1,931,208 $2,008,456 $2,088,795 Story City $1,620,088 $1,684,892 $1,752,287 $1,822,379 $1,895,274 $1,971,085 Warren County $561,608 $584,072 $607,435 $631,733 $657,002 $683,282 Indianola $2,603,347 $2,707,481 $2,815,780 $2,928,411 $3,045,548 $3,167,370 Totals $410,801,412 $427,233,468 $444,322,807 $462,095,720 $480,579,548 $499,802,730 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports 57

67 TABLE 7.11 State Fiscal Year 2016 CIRTPA Farm-to-Market Receipts County Name 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Boone County $296,153 $310,415 $303,374 $203,064 $1,113,006 Dallas County $319,656 $335,050 $327,450 $219,180 $1,201,336 Jasper County $397,788 $416,945 $407,487 $272,753 $1,494,973 Madison County $279,336 $292,789 $286,147 $191,534 $1,049,806 Marion County $334,847 $350,972 $343,011 $229,596 $1,258,426 Polk County $533,408 $559,097 $546,414 $365,744 $2,004,663 Story County $331,524 $347,490 $339,607 $227,317 $1,245,939 Warren County $359,253 $376,554 $368,012 $246,330 $1,350,150 Totals $2,851,965 $2,989,312 $2,921,503 $1,955,519 $10,718,299 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.12 CIRTPA Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue County Name Boone County $1,113,006 $1,157,527 $1,203,828 $1,251,981 $1,302,060 $1,354,142 Dallas County $1,201,336 $1,249,390 $1,299,365 $1,351,340 $1,405,394 $1,461,609 Jasper County $1,494,973 $1,554,772 $1,616,963 $1,681,641 $1,748,907 $1,818,863 Madison County $1,049,806 $1,091,798 $1,135,470 $1,180,889 $1,228,125 $1,277,250 Marion County $1,258,426 $1,308,763 $1,361,113 $1,415,558 $1,472,180 $1,531,067 Polk County $2,004,663 $2,084,849 $2,168,243 $2,254,973 $2,345,172 $2,438,979 Story County $1,245,939 $1,295,776 $1,347,607 $1,401,511 $1,457,572 $1,515,875 Warren County $1,350,150 $1,404,156 $1,460,322 $1,518,735 $1,579,485 $1,642,664 Totals $10,718,299 $11,147,031 $11,592,912 $12,056,629 $12,538,894 $13,040,450 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 58

68 TABLE 7.13 Fiscal Year 2016 CIRTPA Secondary Road Fund Receipts County Name Property Tax L.O.S.T. Road Use Tax Fund Farm-to- Market Extension Revenue Time-21 RISE Bridge Funds Transfer Credits Misc Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $2,012,021 $237,773 $3,575,640 $26,131 $389,001 $0 $76,310 $0 $37,524 $6,354,400 Dallas County $2,988,634 $0 $3,753,108 $35,455 $409,736 $0 $0 $0 $288,946 $7,475,879 Jasper County $2,257,291 $0 $4,860,142 $30,626 $528,773 $0 $656,006 $0 $193,563 $8,526,401 Madison County $1,489,598 $0 $3,421,863 $38,778 $374,365 $0 $169,503 $0 $948,184 $6,442,291 Marion County $1,904,370 $0 $3,869,806 $22,556 $420,419 $0 $0 $2,255 $281,334 $6,500,740 Polk County $4,975,614 $0 $5,982,619 $0 $646,978 $0 $0 $0 $28,725 $11,633,936 Story County $1,945,000 $0 $3,863,620 $34,305 $421,116 $0 $828,232 $30,418 $19,354 $7,142,045 Warren County $2,318,190 $0 $4,137,829 $0 $447,353 $28,005 $323,031 $0 $257,799 $7,512,207 Totals $19,890,718 $237,773 $33,464,627 $187,851 $3,637,741 $28,005 $2,053,082 $32,673 $2,055,429 $61,587,899 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.14 CIRTPA Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue County Name Boone County $6,354,400 $6,608,576 $6,872,919 $7,147,836 $7,433,749 $7,731,099 Dallas County $7,475,879 $7,774,914 $8,085,911 $8,409,347 $8,745,721 $9,095,550 Jasper County $8,526,401 $8,867,457 $9,222,155 $9,591,042 $9,974,683 $10,373,671 Madison County $6,442,291 $6,699,983 $6,967,982 $7,246,701 $7,536,569 $7,838,032 Marion County $6,500,740 $6,760,770 $7,031,200 $7,312,448 $7,604,946 $7,909,144 Polk County $11,633,936 $12,099,293 $12,583,265 $13,086,596 $13,610,060 $14,154,462 Story County $7,142,045 $7,427,727 $7,724,836 $8,033,829 $8,355,182 $8,689,390 Warren County $7,512,207 $7,812,695 $8,125,203 $8,450,211 $8,788,220 $9,139,748 Totals $61,587,899 $64,051,415 $66,613,472 $69,278,010 $72,049,131 $74,931,096 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 59

69 Federal Transit Administration Projects As with highway projects, legislation requires that all Federal and State transit projects be included in a fiscally constrained TIP. As the 5307 annual apportionment is the only guaranteed source of grant funds, CIRTPA actively seeks discretionary funding from a variety of sources, including the state Public Transit Equipment and Facilities Management System (PTMS) process and earmarks (State and Federal). Because these funds are the hardest to obtain, there is always uncertainty whether the projects will be implemented in the current year. Therefore, the TIP will periodically be revised if project funding is reduced or delayed. Table 7.15 lists all federal funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Table 7.16 lists all state funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Funding Sources Federal and State funding account for the majority of all capital purchases and as a result, is critical to success. The following section outlines the general funding sources available to HIRTA for FFY TABLE 7.15 HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid 5317 $50,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $747,600 $635,460 $868,780 $738,463 $1,316,460 $1,118,991 $821,800 $694, $1,409,722 $825,669 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG $156,475 $108,800 $146,000 $116,800 $151,481 $120,576 $155,335 $124,256 Totals $2,363,797 $1,609,929 $1,014,780 $855,263 $1,467,941 $1,239,941 $977,135 $819,121 TABLE 7.16 HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY State-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid STA $1,409,722 $584,053 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $1,409,722 $584,053 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 60

70 C H A P T E R E I G H T Public Participation The CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan outlines the CIRTPA s public outreach requirements and efforts through three primary components: public meetings, publications, and maintenance of the CIRTPA s website, The CIRTPA holds a standard of a minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days and a minimum 4-week advance public notice before an initial, amended, or revised TIP is adopted by the CIRTPA. This standard also applies when holding public meetings for any TIP amendments. The CIRTPA will approve the TIP, and/or amendments to the TIP, following the completion of the public comment period. The CIRTPA works to hold public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times. If a person is not able to attend a public meeting, information regarding the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP is available on the CIRTPA s website. In addition, all meetings of the CIRTPA committees are open to the public. Members of the public may request time on the CIRTPA s agendas to comment on specific subjects of interest to the representatives. Legal notices and meeting announcements regarding the adoption of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP are published in The Des Moines Register and sent to the various news agencies within central Iowa a week before the scheduled public meeting. The CIRTPA website contains CIRTPA news and information about upcoming events, CIRTPA members, staff, the organization of the CIRTPA, and employment opportunities. Meeting agendas and minutes are available, as is a listing of committee representatives. The website features a library containing documents, maps, newsletters, and press releases. Additionally, educational opportunities related to CIRTPA activities are listed on the website. CIRTPA staff regularly updates the website in order to engage citizens. The CIRTPA accepts input and comments from the public through a variety of means. Members of the public may express their views, share their opinions, and ask questions regarding proposed amendments in three ways: 1) orally at a meeting; 2) in writing via forms available at a meeting; or, 3) by submitting 61

71 written comments to the CIRTPA prior to the close of the given comment period. The CIRTPA will make a summary, analysis, or report on the disposition of comments made as part of the review of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP and will notify the CIRTPA TTC and TPC representatives of all TIP comments as part of the approved TIP. Immediately following is a summary of the comments made June 20, 2017 and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 20, Public Comment Summary The CIRTPA staff held a public meeting on June 20, 2017, to receive comments and questions on the TIP draft. If there would have been participants, they would have been given a copy of the TIP (also, available on the CIRTPA website) and staff would have guided the participants through the document, chapter by chapter, explaining in detail each chapter s significance within the TIP. Once staff would have finished explaining the information in the TIP, the meeting would have been open for discussion. The participants did not have any comments about the TIP draft or any particular surface transportation improvements listed. 62

72 Appendix A Federal regulations require documentation in addition to the project list prior to approval of the Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. All regional planning affiliation transportation improvement programs must be accompanied by: 1. A resolution of adoption by the planning organization. This resolution can be found on the following page. 63

73 64

74 Appendix B 65

75 66

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2017-2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2018-2021 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2016 2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2016-2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central

More information

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This

More information

NOTICE OF JOINT MEETING

NOTICE OF JOINT MEETING THE CIRTPA CENTRAL IOWA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ALLIANCE 420 Watson Powell, Suite 200 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Phone: (515) 334-0075 - Fax: (515) 334-0098 Dean C. Yordi, Warren County Russell Stutt,

More information

Unified Planning Work Program & Budget Fiscal Year 2019 (July 2018 June 2019)

Unified Planning Work Program & Budget Fiscal Year 2019 (July 2018 June 2019) Unified Planning Work Program & Budget Fiscal Year 2019 (July 2018 June 2019) June 1, 2018 FINAL 2 Page The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) has prepared this report with

More information

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

More information

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally

More information

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY 11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program

More information

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding MoDOT s finances. This document provides

More information

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE November 20, 2015 Revised December 18, 2015 to reflect FAST Act PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE This is a collaborative product jointly developed by the Pennsylvania Planning

More information

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri Financial Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri November 2017 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently

More information

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group Technical Memorandum Finance Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group April 25, 2013 i Table of Contents 1. Ohio Finance... 1 1.1 Baseline Projection -- Highways...

More information

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 Amendment Conformity Report for August 20, 2008 Amendments (Amendment # 2008-028 thru 2008-030) On August 20, 2008 the Executive Board

More information

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Contents Introduction 1 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Tel 210.227.8651 Fax 210.227.9321 825 S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 www.alamoareampo.org aampo@alamoareampo.org Pg.

More information

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Background Starting with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act of 1991, it has been a consistent requirement of federal law and regulation that the projects included

More information

Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County

Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County SFY 2018 2021 Metropolitan Planning Organization West Central Indiana Economic

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION 19 F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S Expedited Administrative Modifications

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION 19 F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S Expedited Administrative Modifications TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 REVISION 19 Expedited Administrative Modifications TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018

More information

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Five Year Planning Calendar 3 Budget Summary 4 Unified

More information

Analysis of Regional Transportation Spending

Analysis of Regional Transportation Spending Analysis of Regional Transportation Spending An overview of transportation revenues and expenses of Greater Des Moines June 2016 Contents Executive Summary Purpose Key Findings Regional Goals Federal Funding

More information

OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW.. 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY......... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015

More information

2045 Long Range Transportation

2045 Long Range Transportation The Jackson Area Comprehensive Transportation Study 2045 Long Range Transportation June 2018 Jackson Area Comprehensive Transportation Study 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Jackson County, Michigan

More information

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

ALL Counties. ALL Districts TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation

More information

APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) ( )

APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) ( ) APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) (2017-2020) (replaces previous Transportation Improvement Program) ACCESS2040 APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM The High Priority Investment

More information

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Appendix G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Exhibit G-1 2014 RTP REVENUE FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS LOCAL REVENUES Measure K Sales Tax Renewal Program: Description:

More information

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report Thurston Regional Planning Council UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Annual Report for second year of TRPC s UPWP State Fiscal Years 2017-2018 (July 1,

More information

Capital Improvement Projects

Capital Improvement Projects Capital Improvement Projects This section highlights the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for FY 2017-2018. Capital projects are designed to enhance the City s infrastructure, extend

More information

NASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number:

NASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number: NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Adjustment Number: 2009019 TIP Number: 200852034 FROM: TIP# 200852034 Jurisdiction: Hendersonville Project:

More information

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023 SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Determination PUBLIC REVIEW Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study Cover Photos Top left: 45th Avenue NE

More information

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2019 2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and Comment: April 16, 2018 Approved by the Policy Board: May 21, 2018 Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure...

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. REVISION #12 Amendment 6/3/16 DRAFT. July 2016

FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. REVISION #12 Amendment 6/3/16 DRAFT. July 2016 FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 215-218 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION #12 Amendment July 216 Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization 77 Richards Street, Suite 2 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-4623 (88) 587-215

More information

Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Conformity Check List The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and all amendments must include a conformity report. The conformity report must address

More information

7.0 Financially Feasible Plan

7.0 Financially Feasible Plan Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 7-1 7.0 Financially Feasible Plan The Memphis MPO used a performance-based approach to rank projects for Livability 2040 and incorporated state and local priorities

More information

OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY

OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY Revised 9/19/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 STBG BUDGET SUMMARY... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY

More information

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2017 2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and Comment: April 18, 2016 Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure... 3 Mission Statement... 3 Vision Statement...

More information

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade. Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding

More information

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation Funding Overview February 21, 2013 H. Tasaico, PE 1 NCDOT Funding Overview - Agenda State Transportation Comparative Data Transportation Funding Sources

More information

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS The 2018 StanCOG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) financial forecasts provide revenue projections for StanCOG member

More information

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning Capital District November 9, 2004 Transportation Committee Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning CDTC has been successful in funding 36 Linkage Program planning studies since

More information

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans Overview This appendix documents the current Florida Department

More information

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the

More information

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING Program Financing PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING The funding of highway improvements depends on the availability of funds and on criteria established by state and federal law for the use of those funds. Highway

More information

Financial Capacity Analysis

Financial Capacity Analysis FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Federal transportation planning rules require that metropolitan area transportation plans include a financial capacity analysis to demonstrate that the plan is

More information

Metroplan White Paper

Metroplan White Paper Background White Paper 30 Crossing Plan and TIP Amendments The 30 Crossing Project is a major design-build-finance reconstruction and expansion project on I-40 from the US 67/167 interchange to the north

More information

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction FY 2009-2018 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy.. asset management, performance-based strategic direction March 31, 2008 Governor Jon S. Corzine Commissioner Kris Kolluri Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE

More information

City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013

City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013 City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013 Highway User Tax Distribution (HUTD) Fund Gas Tax Registration Tax Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) Trunk Highway Fund County State

More information

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina Chris Lukasina NCAMPO February 1, 2016 Items to Discuss What is an MPO/RPO? Why were they established? How are they structured? What areas do they

More information

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Prepared for: By: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 REVIEW OF FRED AND VRE EXISTING FUNDING SOURCES... 1 Federal Funding...

More information

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A 2009 NATIONAL SCAN: RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS 2009 National Scan Results: Rural Transportation Planning Organizations Since the passage of ISTEA, an increasing number of states have turned

More information

Appendix O. Transportation Financial Background

Appendix O. Transportation Financial Background Appendix O Transportation Financial Background Appendix Contents Background Consistency with Other Federal, State, and Local Documents Revenue Constrained Financial Assumptions Revenue Sources: Availability

More information

Chapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

Chapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan Chapter 15 Transportation Improvements Financing Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments 2030 Regional Transportation Plan CHAPTER 15 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING INTRODUCTION As

More information

FY Work Funding Total Fed State Local

FY Work Funding Total Fed State Local NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Adjustment Number: 2010024 TIP Number: 2006201 FROM: TIP# 2006201 Jurisdiction: City of Murfreesboro Project:

More information

Joplin Area Transportation Study Organization

Joplin Area Transportation Study Organization Joplin Area Transportation Study Organization 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program 602 SOUTH MAIN STREET JOPLIN, MISSOURI 64801 (417) 624-0820 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 AVIATION... 9 HIGHWAY...

More information

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013 Nashua Regional Planning Commission 9 Executive Park Drive Suite 201 Merrimack, NH 03054 (603) 424-2240 www.nashuarpc.org A N N U A L L I S

More information

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway

More information

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Chapter 6: Financial Resources Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation

More information

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS Minnesota Transportation Advisory Committee FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management American Association of State

More information

Region XII Planning Affiliation Transportation Improvement Program

Region XII Planning Affiliation Transportation Improvement Program Region XII Planning Affiliation 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Approved July 13, 2017 2018-2021 Transportation Program Executive Summary The Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act or

More information

2008 UTILITIES STP 2,200,000 1,760, , CONST ES 11,200,000 11,200,000. FY Work Funding Total Fed State Local

2008 UTILITIES STP 2,200,000 1,760, , CONST ES 11,200,000 11,200,000. FY Work Funding Total Fed State Local NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Adjustment Number: 2009022 TIP Number: 2004068a FROM: TIP# 2004068a Agency/Jurisdiction: TDOT / Mt. Juliet Project: SR171 / Mt. Juliet Road Termini:

More information

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance This chapter examines the sources of funding for transportation investments in the coming years. It describes recent legislative actions that have changed the

More information

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017 Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017 Recommendation: It was the recommendation of the committee that OTO support the statewide safety targets. Discussion: Natasha Longpine presented background information

More information

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 2002 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Blank Page SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES CATEGORIES NUMBER, NAME AND YEAR ESTABLISHED PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY FUNDING BANK BALANCE (Yes/) RESPONSIBLE ENTITY RANKING INDEX OR ALLOCATION

More information

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY

CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STRATEGIES: PAYING OUR WAY The financial analysis of the recommended transportation improvements in the 2030 San Diego Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future (RTP or the Plan ) focuses on four components: Systems

More information

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda Northern Virginia s economic growth and global competitiveness are directly tied to the region s transit network. Transit

More information

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast Technical Appendix FDOT 040 Revenue Forecast This page was left blank intentionally. APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE PLAN 040 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan

More information

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region The Prospectus Transportation Planning in the Denver Region Draft Version August 2016 Approved December 2004 Revised November 2006 Revised August 2007 Revised March 2009 Revised September 2011 Revised

More information

Financial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT)

Financial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT) Financial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT) Inflation and Long Range Cost Escalation For the FY 2012 2017 TIP period, ARC will use the GDOT recommended 4 percent inflation rate. This conservative

More information

Black Hawk County Metropolitan Area

Black Hawk County Metropolitan Area Transportation Improvement Program Black Hawk County Metropolitan Area Fiscal Years 2019-2022 DRAFT June 14, 2018 FY 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Black Hawk County Metropolitan Area Transportation

More information

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance 4.1 Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance 2040 4.2 CONTENTS Chapter 4: Transportation Finance Overview 4.3 Two Funding Scenarios 4.4 Current Revenue Scenario Assumptions 4.5 State Highway Revenues

More information

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information:

Additionally, the UPWP serves as a source for the following information: Executive Summary ES.1 WHAT IS THE UPWP? The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) produced by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) explains how the Boston region s federal transportation

More information

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2. House Bill 20 Implementation Tuesday,, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.020 INTRODUCTION In response to House Bill 20 (HB 20), 84 th Legislature, Regular Session, 2015, and as part of the implementation

More information

MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY

MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY MADISON ATHENS-CLARKE OCONEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FY - 2018 Final April 12, 2017 Prepared by: Athens-Clarke County Planning Department In Cooperation with: The Georgia

More information

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs Technical Report No. 4 Revenue and Costs Technical Report No. 4 REVENUE AND COSTS PASCO COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 8731 Citizens Drive New Port Richey, FL 34654 Ph (727) 847-8140, fax (727)

More information

FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) FY2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Approved by the Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board May 17, 2017

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...

More information

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Financial Summary FINANCIAL OUTLOOK Establishing MPO Transportation Plan fiscal forecasts for a twenty year planning horizon in today s transportation environment is

More information

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2015 2018 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines

More information

METROPOLITAN TOPEKA PLANNING ORGANIZATION TOPEKA, KANSAS

METROPOLITAN TOPEKA PLANNING ORGANIZATION TOPEKA, KANSAS METROPOLITAN TOPEKA PLANNING ORGANIZATION TOPEKA, KANSAS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2017-2020 The Metropolitan Topeka Planning Organization (MTPO) Staff prepared the Transportation

More information

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc. Congestion Management Process Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc. August 26, 2015 Congestion Management Process (as adopted by R2CTPO Board) August 26, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The River to Sea Transportation

More information

Mankato / North Mankato Area Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY

Mankato / North Mankato Area Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY Mankato / North Mankato Area Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program FY 2017-2020 Prepared by the Mankato / North Mankato Area Planning Organization September 2016 To view this plan online

More information

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 Fiscal Year 2018 VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2018 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance

More information

JULY 17, 2018 FINAL AGENDA SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT (NEXT SCHEDULED REPORT DECEMBER 2018)

JULY 17, 2018 FINAL AGENDA SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT (NEXT SCHEDULED REPORT DECEMBER 2018) NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT MERCER, INC. NJ TRANSIT MORRIS, INC. REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS JULY 17,

More information

FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES

FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES Financial Plan FINANCIAL PLAN INTRODUCTION This plan s financial analysis was developed in response to the requirements for a fiscally constrained plan that was introduced in the Intermodal Surface Transportation

More information

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION 2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION HGAC Transportation Policy Council Meeting Current Initiatives On-going efforts to address performance-based planning and programming processes

More information

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FY 2013-2016 2016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOUSTON DISTRICT AUGUST 2014 Quarterly Revision HIGHWAY August 2014 . HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL

More information

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016 BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016 The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Policy Committee is designated by the Governor of New York as the Metropolitan

More information

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.

More information

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013 FY 2013 Annual Performance and Expenditure Report for the Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS) Area October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 Prepared by the South East Texas Regional

More information

Transportation Budget Trends

Transportation Budget Trends 2018 2019 Transportation Budget Trends Transportation Budget Trends 2018 2019 Wisconsin Department of Transportation The report provides a comprehensive view of transportation budget information presented

More information

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions Purpose MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program Revisions This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Pennsylvania

More information

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2. Funding Update House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.012 Transportation Funding Sources for the FY 2016-2017 Biennium

More information

Twin Cities Area Transportation Study (TwinCATS) Adopted:

Twin Cities Area Transportation Study (TwinCATS) Adopted: Introduction Twin Cities Area Transportation Study (TwinCATS) Transportation Improvement Program Administrative Modification & Amendment Policy Adopted: This document provides guidance that defines the

More information

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Wednesday, June 6, 2018 Wednesday, June 6, 2018 Excellence in Program Administration Award 2018 AASHTO Civil Rights Training Symposium Excellence in Program Administration Award Joanna McFadden EEO/DBE Section Head APRIL 2017-2018

More information

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process

Measure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process Glossary Administrative Committee This committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and provides general policy oversight that spans the multiple program responsibilities of the organization

More information

2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update

2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Broward MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Update Technical Report # 6 Prepared by: In association with: December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Methodology and

More information

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects THE ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transit Routes... 2 Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)... 3 Transit Operators and Recipients of

More information

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects THE ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transit Routes... 2 Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)... 3 Transit Operators and Recipients of

More information