FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Transcription

1 FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central Iowa region s transportation system. July 2016

2 The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) prepared this report with partial funding from the United States Department of Transportation s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, and in part through local matching funds provided by the CIRTPA member governments. These contents are the responsibility of the CIRTPA. The United States Government and its agencies assume no liability for the contents of this report or for the use of its contents. The CIRTPA approved this report on July 21, Please call (515) to obtain permission for use Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance

3 Glossary of Acronyms ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CMAQ DEMO DART DMAMPO DISC ESP ER FM FL FHWA FTA FFY HIRTA HRRR HSIP ICAAP Iowa DOT IM Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Demonstration Award Des Moines Area Metropolitan Transit Authority Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Discretionary Federal Funds Economic Stimulus Package Emergency Relief Program Farm-to-Market Funds Federal Lands Highway Program Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Federal Fiscal Year Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority High Risk Rural Roads Highway Safety Improvement Program Iowa s Clean Air Attainment Program Iowa Department of Transportation Interstate Maintenance ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 MAP-21 MPO NHS NEPA NHPP PL PRF RTP RPA RISE SAFETEA-LU SRTS STIP Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Metropolitan Planning Organization National Highway System National Environmental Policy Act National Highway Performance Program Planning Funds Primary Road Funds Recreational Trails Program Regional Planning Affiliation Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy Program Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Safe Routes to School State Transportation Improvement Program

4 STP STP-HBP TAP TEA-21 TIP TTC Surface Transportation Program Surface Transportation Program Highway Bridge Program Transportation Alternative Program Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century Transportation Improvement Program MPO Transportation Technical Committee

5 Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE Introduction....1 General Overview of the TIP 3 The TIP and Federal Guidance 3 Federal Transportation Planning Process...4 Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance Transportation Improvement Program 8 Revising the TIP...9 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures...12 Surface Transportation Program Project Selection Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection Highway Bridge Program Project Selection 14 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs...15 Surface Transportation Program...15 Transportation Alternatives Program 15 Federal Funding Programs. 18 State Funding Programs..19 Transit Funding Programs.20 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports. 22 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects Program Format...28 FFY FHWA Project List... 29

6 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administration Projects Program Format FFY Transit Project List.44 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan.. 47 Federal Highway Administration Projects...47 Federal Transit Administration Projects...57 CHAPTER EIGHT Public Participation...58 Figures and Tables Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership. 6 Table 4.1: City of Boone Table 4.2: Boone County Table 4.3: Dallas County Table 4.4: Iowa Department of Transportation.. 23 Table 4.5: City of Huxley Table 4.6: City of Granger..24 Table 4.7: Iowa DNR Table 4.8: Jasper County Table 4.9: City of Knoxville Table 4.10: Madison County Table 4.11: Marion County Table 4.12: City of Mingo Table 4.13: City of Newton Table 4.14: City of Pella.. 26 Table 4.15: City of Perry Table 4.16: Polk County. 26 Table 4.17: Story County Table 4.18: Warren County Table 4.19: Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority Table 7.1: CIRPTA Federal-Aid Funding Sources...48 Table 7.2: Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint...48 Table 7.3: Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint 48 Table 7.4: 2014 City Street O+M Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes 49 Table 7.5: Forecasted Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes. 50 Table 7.6: Forecasted Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes...51 Table 7.7: County Road O+M Costs on Federal-Aid Routes..52 Table 7.8: Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Fed-Aid Routes..52

7 Table 7.9: Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes...53 Table 7.10: 2012 City Street Fund Receipts...54 Table 7.11: Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue. 54 Table 7.12: State Fiscal Year 2013 Farm-to-Market Receipts.55 Table 7.13: Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue Table 7.14: Fiscal Year 2013 Secondary Road Fund Receipts 56 Table 7.15: Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue 56 Table 7.16: HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Table 7.17: HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY

8 CIRTPA Transportation Policy Committee Chet Hollingshead, Chair Boone County Board of Supervisors Representing Name Title City of Adel Anthony Brown City Administrator City of Boone Luke Nelson City Administrator City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Chuck Burgin Director of Community Development City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Chet Hollingshead County Supervisor Dallas County Brad Golightly County Supervisor Jasper County Dennis Carpenter County Supervisor Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Jim Kingery County Supervisor Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Wayne E. Clinton County Supervisor Warren County Dean Yordi County Supervisor Ames Area MPO* Damion Pregitzer Traffic Engineer DART* Elizabeth Presutti General Manager Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Policy Committee Officers Representing Name Title Boone County Chet Hollingshead Chair City of Pella Denny Buyert Vice-Chair Dallas County Brad Golightly Secretary/Treasurer

9 CIRTPA Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) Scott Kruse, Chair Boone County, Engineer Representing Name Title City of Adel Anthony Brown City Administrator City of Boone Luke Nelson City Administrator City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Chuck Burgin Director of Community Development City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Keith Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Robert Kieffer County Engineer Dallas County Jim George County Engineer Jasper County Russell Stutt County Engineer Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Tyler Christian County Engineer Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Darren Moon County Engineer Warren County Matt Thomas County Engineer Ames Area MPO* Damion Pregitzer Traffic Engineer DART* Jim Tishim Planning Director Iowa DOT* Mike Clayton District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Technical Committee Officers Representing Name Title Boone County Scott Kruse Chair Madison County Todd Hagan Vice-Chair

10 C H A P T E R O N E Introduction The FFY TIP contains seven chapters covering the CIRTPA s guidelines for choosing and funding projects, status reports of the previous FFY projects, a listing of projects in the Federal highway and Federal transit element, a financial plan for all Federal-aid projects, required resolutions and certifications, and a summary of public comments. Chapter One: General Overview of the TIP The Introduction explains Federal transportation planning guidelines and provides background information on the CIRTPA s responsibilities, representatives, and committees. The chapter also includes information about the CIRTPA s public participation process procedures and provides an overview of the TIP, including its purpose, requirements, and the methodology to adopt, implement, amend, or modify the plan. Chapter Two: Project Selection Procedures This chapter provides background into the CIRTPA s project selection procedure, including eligibility requirements, basis of funding projects, and project scoring process. Chapter Three: Funding Programs This chapter provides a summary of the various funding programs available for project within the CIRTPA planning area including Federal, State, and local funding sources. The chapter also discusses the intent of each of these programs. Chapter Four: Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Status Reports The Federal Fiscal Year 2016 Status Reports chapter is a status listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize Federal funding in FFY Chapter Five: Federal Highway Administration Projects The Federal Highway Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). Chapter Six: Federal Transit Administration Projects The Federal Transit Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FTA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). 1

11 Chapter Seven: Financial Plan The Financial Plan chapter summarizes the financial availability of the CIRTPA to implement surface transportation improvements. The chapter includes the fiscal constraint of the STBG and TAP funds, listing the forecasted operations and maintenance expenditures, and forecasted non Federal-aid revenues. The chapter also includes a section discussing the transit funding Federal-aid by year. Chapter Eight: Public Comment The public comment chapter includes a summary on the disposition of comments made as part of the public review of the TIP on June 21, 2016, and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 15, Appendices Resolutions and Certifications The resolutions and certifications chapter includes the TIP s resolution of adoption by the CIRTPA, a self-certification of the planning process, and a certification of the financial capacity analysis. 2

12 G e n e r a l O v e r v i e w o f t h e T I P The transportation system in a regional planning area is vital for the movement of people and goods to, though, from, and within the area. A transportation system takes on two primary roles: the movement of people and the movement of goods. The transportation improvement program (TIP) is a regionally agreed upon list of surface transportation improvements that received Federal funding to move goods and people in a defined area s transportation system. The TIP and Federal Guidance Congress passed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962, requiring regional agencies to conduct a "continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated" (3-C) transportation planning process. Congress took additional steps in drafting the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 by establishing Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urbanized areas over 50,000 persons in population, and by dedicating to MPOs a small portion of each state's funding from the Highway Trust Fund. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) empowered and provided for flexibility in the use of funding, improved state-regional cooperation, and enhanced public participation. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) legislation of 1998 expanded the role and responsibilities of metropolitan areas exceeding 200,000 persons in population with the designation of Transportation Management Areas (TMA). In 2005, Congress passed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA-LU guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation through Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009 (September 30, 2009). Then the United States Senate passed continuing resolutions to extend SAFETEA-LU and to provide appropriations for transit programs through 2012 at funding levels consistent with authorized 2009 levels. SAFETEA-LU addressed the many challenges facing transportation systems including improving safety, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency in freight movement, increasing intermodal connectivity, and protecting the environment. SAFETEA-LU promoted more efficient and effective Federal surface transportation programs by focusing on transportation issues of national significance, while giving state and local transportation decision makers more flexibility to solve transportation problems in 3

13 their communities. 1 On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) was signed into law replacing SAFETEA-LU. MAP-21 provides essential funds for transportation projects ranging from passenger rail, freight transportation, highway and bridge projects, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. MAP-21 took effect on October 1, 2012, and funds surface transportation projects through September 30, The bill provides $105 billion in funding per year for Federal Fiscal Year s (FFY) 2013 and An extension was signed in 2014, which authorizes surface transportation funding through May 31, Continuing resolutions were signed that then extended funding until December of MAP-21 includes a number of major changes including the elimination of the Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancements Program, expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (TIFIA), and streamlining of the environmental review process. Federal transit program also chance slightly with Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom funds being consolidated into the Urbanized Area Formula Grants. 2 On December 4, 2015 the Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST) was signed into law replacing MAP-21. The FAST Act authorized $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs. MAP-21 included provisions to make the Federal surface transportation more streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal, and to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. The FAST Act builds on the changes made by MAP-21. The FAST ACT establishes and funds new programs to support critical transportation projects to ease congestion and facilitate movement. It also builds on the reforms of MAP-21 by incorporating changes aimed at ensuring the timely delivery of transportation projects. Federal Transportation Planning Process Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450, Subpart C, states that MPOs are to carry out a: continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive multimodal transportation planning

14 process, including the development of a metropolitan transportation plan and a transportation improvement program (TIP), that encourages and promotes the safe and efficient development, management, and operation of surface transportation systems to serve the mobility needs of people and freight (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) and foster economic growth and development, while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. Section identifies eight planning factors to identify the scope of the metropolitan transportation planning process. These include: 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 4. Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight; 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic patterns; 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; 7. Promote efficient system management and operation; and, 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) serves as the formal transportation planning body for the greater central Iowa regional area, carrying out the intent of Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Section 450. The CIRTPA works to carry out a 3-C multimodal transportation planning process for the greater central Iowa regional area, excluding the areas within the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Ames Area MPO. Responsibilities The CIRTPA provides a regional forum to assure local, state, and Federal agencies and the public 5

15 coordinate transportation planning issues, and to prepare transportation plans and programs. The CIRTPA develops both long and short-range multimodal transportation plans, selects, and approves projects for Federal funding based on regional priorities, and develops methods to reduce traffic congestion. The CIRTPA is responsible for these transportation planning activities within the geographic area identified as the Regional Planning Area (RPA). The CIRTPA approved its current RPA on January 10, The RPA includes all portions of Boone, Dallas, Jasper, Madison, Marion, Polk, Story, and Warren Counties except for the planning area of the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Membership Full voting membership to the CIRTPA is open to any county or city government located, wholly or partially, in the designated RPA containing a minimum population of 3,000 persons that adopts the CIRTPA's 28E Agreement (agreement entered into under Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, establishing the CIRTPA and its responsibilities). Currently, CIRTPA membership includes the following cities and counties: Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership Cities Counties Adel Pella Boone County Boone Perry Dallas County Huxley Story City Jasper County Indianola Winterset Madison County Knoxville Marion County Nevada Polk County Newton Story County Warren County 6

16 The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority (DART), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) serve as advisory non-voting, representatives to the CIRTPA. Organization Two designated committees form the structure of the CIRTPA: the Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). The CIRTPA member governments and agencies boards and councils appoint their own representatives to the TTC and to the TPC. The CIRTPA TTC is comprised primarily of representatives of member governments and agencies technical staffs, including planners, engineers, and city administrators. The CIRTPA TPC is primarily comprised of elected officials that include mayors, city council members, city managers, and county supervisors. The CIRTPA staff supports the TTC and the TPC. The TTC offers technical guidance and recommendations to the TPC. The TPC takes formal actions on transportation topics after reviewing and considering the TTC s recommendations. Additionally, the CIRTPA supports, as needed, other subcommittees, roundtables, working groups, and advisory committees of the Des Moines Area MPO on various transportation-related topics relevant to the CIRTPA's responsibilities. Representation Each member government is entitled to one representative each on the CIRTPA TPC and on the CIRTPA TTC. As previously noted, the Iowa DOT, DART, FHWA, FTA, and the AAMPO serve as advisory representatives to the CIRTPA and each have one representative. 7

17 Transportation Improvement Program The CIRTPA s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program (FFY TIP) serves as a list of Federal-aid eligible surface transportation improvements for the CIRTPA s MPA. The TIP covers a period of no less than four years and is updated annually for compatibility with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program development and approval process. State Transit Assistance (STA) and Statewide Transportation Alternatives Program (Statewide TAP) funds are the only source of state funding shown in the TIP. The TIP identifies all Federal funds programmed during the four-year period (FFY ). Additionally, the TIP identifies all projects by Federal funding program and by FFY. TIP Requirements Title 23 of the CFR, Section , indicates the TIP must cover a period of no less than four years, be updated at least every four years, and be approved by the CIRTPA and the Governor (or in the case of the State of Iowa, the TIP will be approved by the Iowa DOT). Additionally, Section states the TIP shall include: Capital and non-capital surface transportation projects within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area proposed for funding; Contain all regionally significant projects requiring an action by the FHWA or the FTA whether or not the projects are to be funded; All regionally significant projects proposed to be funded with Federal funds other than those administered by FHWA or the FTA, as well as all regionally significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds; A financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommends any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs; A project, or a phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of the project; and, Sufficient descriptive material, estimated total project cost, amount of Federal funds proposed to be obligated during each program year, and identification of the agencies responsible for each project or phase. 8

18 Plan Consistency Each project or project phase included in the TIP must be consistent with other CIRTPA plans, including the Horizon Year 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (HY 2035 MTP). In addition, the CIRTPA requires consistency among the TIP and member governments and agencies capital improvement plans. In particular, the CIRTPA requires consistency among proposed short- and longrange projects, strategies, plans, and programs. TIP Adoption Adoption of the CIRPTA s FFY TIP is subject to the CIRPTA s review and approval. The review process consists of a public comment period that offers opportunities for review and comment of the draft FFY TIP. At the conclusion of the public review period, CIRTPA staff reviews and summarizes all submitted comments and presents the findings to the CIRTPA committees for consideration into the final FFY TIP. The CIRTPA submits the final (approved) FFY TIP, with a copy of the formal resolution, to the Iowa DOT. The Iowa DOT then reviews the plan to ensure compliance with Federal regulations. Revising the TIP Under Federal law, the CIRTPA may revise the TIP at any time under procedures agreed to by the cooperating parties consistent with the procedures established. Revisions are changes that occur between annual updates. The Iowa DOT identifies two types of revisions to the TIP: major revisions (amendments) and minor revisions (administrative modifications). The Iowa DOT considers the following criteria when determining the type of TIP revision. Amendments An amendment is a major change to a project in the TIP, including the addition or deletion of a project, a major change in project cost or project phase initiation dates, or a major change in the design concept or scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through lanes). The Iowa DOT considers amendments to the FFY TIP any proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: 9

19 Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP; Funding sources Receiving additional Federal funding sources to a project; and, Scope changes Changing the project termini, project alignment, the amount of through traffic lanes, the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction, or the change to include widening of the roadway. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an amendment, the CIRTPA must approve the requested change and must follow the public participation process identified in the CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan (PPP). The PPP states the CIRTPA would schedule a public meeting to receive public comments at the Policy Committee meeting prior to the Policy Committee taking action on the proposed amendment. If the Policy Committee approves the amendment, the CIRTPA would notify the Iowa DOT, the FHWA, and the FTA. Administrative Modifications An administrative modification is a minor change to a project in the TIP, including minor changes to project phase costs, funding sources or previously included projects, and project or project phase initiation dates. The Iowa DOT considers as administrative modification to the FFY TIP proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs do not increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or do not increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first four years of the TIP; Funding sources Changes to funding from one source to another; and, Scope changes All changes to the projects scope are amendments. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an administrative modification, the CIRTPA would conduct a thorough review of the proposed administrative modification and would process the revision administratively by notifying the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA. 10

20 Redemonstration of Fiscal Constraint The Iowa DOT is required to ensure that the STIP is fiscally constrained not only at the time of approval but also throughout the fiscal year. As part of the draft STIP process the DOT adjusts its federal aid participation to utilize all remaining federal funds after local project sponsors have programmed their federal aid projects. Based on this approach, at the time of approval by FHWA and FTA, no additional federal aid funds are available to be added to the STIP and maintain fiscal constraint of the document. In order to maintain fiscal constraint of the STIP document any revision to the STIP that adds a new federal aid project or increases a project s STIP limit will require that a corresponding change be made to another programming entry to ensure that the STIP remains fiscally constrained. The federal aid funds moved to make way for the additional programmed federal aid need to be of the same federal aid program type. This requirement pertains to both administrative modifications and amendments to the STIP and therefore also applies when moving projects up from the out years of the STIP. To facilitate the STIP approval process a programming note should be added to both TPMS entries noting the TPMS number of the other project. The requirement to ensure fiscal constraint does not apply to accomplishment year projects that have been already programmed at their full federal aid participation rate (typically 80 percent) and whose programming entry is being adjusted based on an updated cost estimate. 11

21 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures The CIRTPA, when considering project requests for STBG funds, should place primary emphasis upon region-wide transportation system improvement needs as identified in the CIRTPA s Long-Range Transportation Plan (Plan), with how those needs impact the movement of people and goods throughout the regional area, and how the requested project will have potential benefits and potential impacts on all communities in central Iowa. The CIRTPA should consider funding regionally significant transportation projects in the Plan. All projects applying for CIRTPA STBG or TAP funding must be sponsored by one or more of the twenty CIRTPA member governments, the Iowa DOT, DART or HIRTA. Other entities are eligible only with co-sponsorship by one of the organizations listed above. When applying for STBG or TAP funds a sponsor must submit a resolution from that sponsor s council, board of supervisors, or similar governing body, guaranteeing the local funds for the STBG match and authorizing the project. Surface Transportation Program Project Selection The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The method for the distribution of the CIRTPA s STBG funding occurs through a sub-allocation process to all CIRTPA member governments with populations over 5,000. The calculations used in the CIRTPA s STBG sub-allocation process reflect the formulas used by the Iowa DOT in distributing STBG funds to Iowa s regional planning affiliations. Each CIRTPA member government eligible to receive STBG funds makes individual decisions on where to expend those resources within their respective jurisdictions. Many CIRTPA members save their STBG allocation for several years in order to build more substantial projects. 12

22 Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection The CIRTPA follows the FHWA s Guidance for Transportation Enhancement Activities in the administration of the TAP project selection, which may be publicly accessed at Any project applying for CIRTPA TAP funding must be sponsored by one or more of the twelve CIRTPA member cities and eight CIRTPA member counties governments. The CIRTPA only awards TAP funds for the coming Federal Fiscal Year. The following are the CIRTPA guidelines for the TAP Program. These guidelines are considered by the CIRTPA when allocating monies to TAP projects. 1. The CIRTPA TTC s TAP Subcommittee evaluates TAP projects in five categories: 1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities; 2. Historical Preservation Facilities; 3. Streetscape; 4. Environmental; and, 5. Safe Routes to School. The CIRTPA TTC and the CIRTPA TPC will be provided with the TAP Subcommittee representative scores, an average score, and the percentage points received for each project submitted. The CIRTPA TTC will develop a TAP recommendation to the CIRTPA TPC that identifies projects that the CIRTPA TTC recommends for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP. The final projects selected for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP will be determined by the CIRTPA TPC. 2. The CIRTPA and its staff will continue to work with the Iowa DOT and other MPOs and RPAs in the state to refine the TAP application and implementation process. 3. Representation on the TAP Subcommittee will be updated annually prior to the solicitation of the TAP applications. The TAP Subcommittee will be an eightmember subcommittee, with one representative from each county. Each representative on the subcommittee will represent one county and all the cities 13

23 within that county. Each of the eight member counties, and the member cities within those counties, will appoint one representative to the TAP Subcommittee. 4. TAP funds must have a relationship to surface transportation. Proximity to a roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear and credible description of this relationship in their project s proposal. The focus is on a clear and credible description of how the proposed TA project relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked: In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through present or past use as a transportation resource? Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in the development of surface transportation? What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation? What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s), when did the relationship(s) start and end, or do the relationship(s) continue? Is the relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of transportation funds? The scoring criterion for TAP projects is located in Appendix C. Highway Bridge Program Project Selection The primary factor in Highway Bridge Program project selection is condition. Counties annually review the results from the bridge inspections and make funding decisions based on these reports. Other factors that are considered include traffic counts, freight movement, and detour lengths. For example, a bridge posted for weight limits that is on an important freight and farm goods route might be replaced before other bridge that are in worse condition but don t have a significant impact on traffic movements. 14

24 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs The following chapter summarized the various funding program available for projects in the CIRPTA s planning area. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The CIRTPA is allocated approximately $5 million per year in STBG funding. Transportation Alternatives Program Setaside (TAP) The purpose of the TAP is to provide funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. The CIRTPA groups these eligible activities into categories as follows: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Provision of on-street and off-street facilities for pedestrians and bicycles and the conversion and use of abandoned railway corridors. New Construction subcategory is for projects creating a new facility, whereas the Major Reconstruction subcategory is for projects that result in a major rehabilitation of an existing facility. 15

25 Historic Preservation: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities. Streetscape: Improvements to pedestrian facilities along a transportation corridor; sidewalks, lighting, safety-related infrastructure, signalization, and, traffic calming. Environmental: Control and removal of outdoor advertising; address storm water management, control, and water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehiclecaused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control. Safe Routes to Schools: Infrastructure related projects.-planning, design, and construction of infrastructure-related projects in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school. Noninfrastructure related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school. The list of qualifying activities is intended to be exclusive, not illustrative. Only those activities listed are eligible TAP activities. Measures in the activities listed, which go beyond what is customarily provided as environmental mitigation, are considered as Transportation Alternatives Programs. TAP projects are non-motorized transportation-related activities. Transportation Alternative Program projects must have a relationship to surface transportation. Proximity to a roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear and credible description of this relationship in their project s proposal. The focus is on a clear and credible description of how the proposed TAP project relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked: 1. In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through present or past use as a transportation resource? 2. Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in the development of surface transportation? 16

26 3. What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation? 4. What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s)? 5. When did the relationship(s) start and end or does the relationship(s) continue? 6. Is a relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of transportation funds? The TAP guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship. The following application types generally have been considered ineligible by the FHWA, in cooperation with the Iowa DOT: 1. Surfacing or resurfacing of existing roads or construction of new roads; 2. Construction or surfacing of parking lots (unless trailhead parking lot); 3. Construction of low water crossings on roads; 4. Picnic shelters, picnic tables, grills (unless directly related to a trailhead); 5. Construction of new buildings (unless they are rest rooms or trailhead shelters in conjunction with trails that will accommodate bikes or pedestrians); 6. Mitigation or National Environmental Policy Act Section 106 documentation of a bridge replacement; 7. Applications without a public sponsor (city, State, or county agency); 8. Historic applications where the facility or structure is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (please review with the State Historic Preservation Office); 9. Historic preservation activities that do not demonstrate some significant historic connection with transportation system; and, 10. Normal environmental mitigation work. The Iowa DOT divides TAP funds into two categories. Fifty percent of the TAP funds are divided between the MPO s and Regional Planning Affiliations (RPA). The DOT retains $1 million of the remaining TAP funds for Statewide TAP projects and the rest is targeted to MPO s and RPA s as TAP flex funds. 17

27 Federal Funding Programs Some FHWA funds are distributed by statutory formulas, while other funds are discretionary (congressionally earmarked). The primary sources of FHWA formula funding to Iowa include: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): CMAQ provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs tasked with helping to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These projects can include those that reduce congestion and improve air quality. National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): This program consolidates the National Highway System and the Interstate Maintenance Program into one program. NHPP expands the number of eligible roadway miles and funds may be used to construct or improve NHS roadways, including some state highways, U.S. highways, and Interstates. STBG Highway Bridge Program (STBG-HBP): While the Highway Bridge Program was eliminated in MAP-21, a portion of Iowa s STBG will continue to be targeted directly to counties and dedicated specifically to county bridge projects. A portion of these funds are required to be obligated for off-system bridges. The remaining funds can be used on either on-system or off-system bridges. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This is a core Federal-aid program that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. Portions of these funds are set aside for use on highrisk rural roads and railway highway crossings. Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) and Tribal Transportation Program (TTP): The FLAP Program provides funding for projects that improve access within, and to, federal lands. The FLAP funding will be distributed through a grant process where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit, rank, and select projects to receive funding. The TTP provides safe and adequate transportation and public road access to and within Indian reservations and Indian lands. Funds are distributed based on a statutory formula based on tribal population, road mileage, and average tribal shares of the former Tribal Transportation Allocation Methodology. Demonstration Funding (DEMO): Demonstration funding is a combination of different programs and sources. The FHWA administers discretionary programs through various offices representing special funding categories. An appropriation bill 18

28 provides money to a discretionary program, through special congressionally directed appropriations or through legislative acts, such as the American recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). State Planning and Research (SPR): SPR funds are available to fund statewide planning and research activities. A portion of SPR funds are provided to RPAs to support transportation planning efforts. National Highway Freight Program (NHFP): NHFP funds are distributed to states via a formula process and are targeted towards transportation projects that benefit freight movements. State Funding Programs In addition to the distribution of Federal-aid formula funds, the Iowa Department of Transportation administers several grant programs through application processes that need to be documented in the TIP. They include the following: Statewide Transportation Alternatives Programs: Transportation Alternatives Program projects are intended to go beyond the normal mitigation of a transportation improvement project. Statewide Enhancement funds are made available through an application process for projects of statewide significance. Statewide Enhancement projects are categorized by Trail and Bicycle Facility, Historic and Archeological, and Scenic and Environmental projects. Project formerly eligible under Safe Routes to School are now eligible for TAP funding. Recreational Trail Program: This program provides federal funding for both motorized and nonmotorized trail projects and is funded through a takedown from Iowa s TAP funding. The decision to participate in this program is made annually by the Iowa Transportation Commission. Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP): The ICAAP funds projects that are intended to maximize emission reductions through traffic flow improvements, reduced vehicle-miles of travel, and reduced single-occupancy vehicle trips. This program utilizes $4 million of Iowa s CMAQ apportionment. City Bridge Program: A portion of STBG funding dedicated to local bridge projects is set aside for the funding of bridge projects within cities. Eligible projects need to be classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Projects are rated and 19

29 prioritized by the Office of Local Systems with awards based upon criteria identified in the application process. Projects awarded grant funding are subject to a federal-aid obligation limitation of $1 million. Highway Safety Improvement Program Secondary (HSIP-Secondary): This program is being funded using a portion of Iowa s Highway Safety Improvement Program and funds safety projects on rural roadways. Transit Funding Programs Similar to the FHWA programs, the transit funding authorized by the FAST Act is managed in several ways. The largest amount is distributed to the states or to large metropolitan areas by formula. Other program funds are discretionary, and some are earmarked for specific projects. Program funds include the following: Statewide Transportation Planning Program (Section 5304 and 5305): These funds come to the state based on population and are used to support transportation planning projects in non-urbanized areas. Capital Investment Program (Section 5309): The transit discretionary program provides Federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program. In recent years, Congress has earmarked all of these funds for specific projects or geographic regions. Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310): Funding is provided through this program to increase the mobility for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Part of the funding is administered along with the Non-Urbanized funding with the remaining funds allocated among urbanized transit systems in areas with a population of less than 200,000. Urbanized areas with more than 200,000 in population receive a direct allocation. Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311): This program provides capital and operating assistance for rural and small urban transit systems. Fifteen percent of these funds are allocated to Intercity Bus projects. A portion of the funding is also allocated to support rural transit planning. The remaining funds are combined with the rural portion (30 percent) of Section 5310 funds and allocated among regional and small urban transit systems based on their relative performance in the prior years. 20

30 Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP - Section 5311(b)(3)): This funding is also used for statewide training events and to support transit funding fellowships for regional and small urban transit staff or planners. Bus and Bus Facilities Program (5339): This formula program provides federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program. TAP Flexible Funds: Certain Title 23 funds may be used for transit purposes. Transit capital assistance is an eligible use of STBG funds. Transit capital and start-up operating assistance is an eligible use of ICAAP funds. When ICAAP and STBG funds are programmed for transit projects, they are transferred to the FTA. The ICAAP funds are applied for and administered by the Office of Public Transit. State Transit Assistance (STA): All public transit systems are eligible for funding. These funds can be used by the public transit system for operating, capital, or planning expenses related to the provision of open-to-the-public passenger transportation. FHWA Funding Transferred to FTA STBG funds designated for transit investments are required to be transferred from FHWA to FTA for administration. These projects must be programmed in the highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA) section of the TIP in the FFY they are to be transferred. The process is initiated with a letter from the RPA/MPO to the Iowa DOT s Office of Program Management and to the Office of Public Transit requesting the transfer of funds. The Office of Program Management will then review the request and submit it to FHWA for processing. STBG funds used for planning efforts require projects to be included in the CIRTPA s Unified Planning Work Program and TIP. Funds will be transferred to a Consolidated Planning Grant by request of the Office of Systems Planning. Finally, transit projects receiving awards through the ICAAP also require a transfer of funds. The process for these types of transfers is the same as transferring STBG funds for transit investments, except that no letter from the RPA/MPO requesting the transfer is required. 21

31 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2016 Status Reports The following are status reports of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA or FTA funds in FFY The status of projects may include a notice of receiving Federal authorization, letting, canceling, rolling over, or scheduled letting before October 1, TABLE 4.1 City of Boone Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-U-0750(632) In the city of Boone, On Benton Street, from Mamie Eisenhower Ave to 8 th St Roll to FFY 2017 TABLE 4.2 Boone County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status DEMO HDP-C008()--6B th St.: From Des Moines River to Sec Roll to FFY 2017 STBG STBG-S-C008(36) 5E-08 E-18: From Greene County to Hwy Let TABLE 4.3 Dallas County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status RTP NRT-C025(95)--9G-25 Hiawatha Trail: Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail Connection Let RTP NRT-C025(99) 9G-25 RRVT to High Trestle Trail Connector Phase 1 Acquisition/Construction (Perry to Bouton) Roll to FFY 2017 TAP TAP-R-C025(098) 8T-25 RRVT Paved Crossing Project, Phase Letting June 2016 STBG STBG-S-C025(102) 5E-25 On F-31, from Minburn to R-22 & intersection 7139 Let 22

32 STBG-HBP BROS-C025(101) 5F-25 On R30, Over Little Beaver Ck., along SLINE S3 T81 R Let May 2016 TABLE 4.4 Iowa Department of Transportation Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status HSIP HSIP 092() 2H61 IA92: Winterset to I Let HSIP IHSIPX-035-5(105) On I35, from Co Rd E15 (Story City) to IA175 (Ellsworth) Let NHPP IM 035() I-35: South Skunk River 2.6 Mi S of US 30 (NB & SB) Let NHPP NHSX 169() 3H-25 US169: In De Soto, From South City Limit to North of Ash St NHPP IM 035() I-35: CO RD G76 (New Virginia) Interchange Let Roll to FFY 2017 PRF BRFN 080() I-80: E 5 th St over I Mi E of IA 14 in Newton Let PRF BRFN 141() IA141: North Raccoon River, 1.5 MI W of IA Let PRF STBGN 92() 2J-91 IA 92: W of CO Rd R57 to E of S N STIN Indianola (State Share) Let PRF BRFN 80() I-80: Co Rd F48 Over I Let PRF BRFN 90() US69: Keigley Branch, 1.1 Mi S of Cord E Let PRF BRFN 030() US30: West Branch Indian Creek, 0.7Mi E of Co Rd S14 (EB) Let PRF IMN 080() 0E-50 I-80: Polk Co to Iowa Co Let PRF NHSN 065() 2R-91 US65: S of 17 th Ave from 3 rd Ave ININ Indianola Let STBG-HBP BRF 065() US65: Middle River, 0.4 Mi S of Co Rd G24 (NB) Let STBG-HBP BRF 65() US65: South River, 2.0 Mi S of IA Let TABLE 4.5 City of Huxley Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status TAP TAP-U-3630(91)--8I-85 Heart of Iowa Nature Trail, From Highway 69 to Trailridge Park Let Dec

33 TABLE 4.6 City of Granger Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BRM-3042(603) 8N-25 In the City of Granger on State St, 70 ft east of Main St Let TABLE 4.7 Iowa DNR Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status MISC FLAP-0625(603) 7L-63 On Dubuque drive and surrounding area: from Lake Red Rock to approx ft east Letting Oct 2016 TABLE 4.8 Jasper County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status RTP NRT-C050(108) 9G-50 Mitchellville to Prairie City Rails to Trails Corridor Acquisition Roll to FFY 2017 TAP TAP-R-C050(110) 8T-50 On the Chichaqua Valley Trail from just east of Ira to the Indian Creek Bridge Let April 2016 STBG-HBP BROS-C050(112) 5F-50 Hwy T-12: Over North Skunk River Letting July 2016 STBG-HBP BRS-C050() On County Road F17, Over the North Skunk River approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, along NLINE S21 T81 R Roll to FFY 2017 STBG-HBP BRS-C050() On County Road F48, Over Squaw Creek, just of W 116 th St S, on NLINE S11 T79 R Let STBG-HBP BROS-3987(601) 8J-50 On Indigo Ave, Over Coon Creek, from State Hwy 224 east 500 Feet, along NLINE S25 T80 R Roll to FFY 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C050() 5F-50 On S 64 th Ave E, Over Sugar Creek, in S25 T79 R Let 24

34 TABLE 4.9 City of Knoxville Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-U-4040() On Jackson Street and Long Lane, from Highway 14 to Grant Street (Long Lane) and Grant Street to Roche Street (Jackson Street) Canceled STBG STBG-U-4040(608) In the city of Knoxville, Pavement rehabilitation on Robinson, Jackson, and Main streets Roll to FFY 2017 TABLE 4.10 Madison County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-C061(99) 8J-61 Larkspur Ave.: Over S Fork Clanton Creek Let STBG-HBP BROS-C061(102) 8J-61 All: From Various to Various Let STBG-HBP BROS-C061(105) 8J-61 On Heritage Ave, over N Branch North River, S17 T77 R Roll to FFY 2017 TABLE 4.11 Marion County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-C063(119) 5F-63 On Coolidge St., Over BNSF RR, from IA 316 to Swan, on NLINE S19 T77N R21W Let May 2016 TABLE 4.12 City of Mingo Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-5110(601) 8J-50 West Railroad Street, just west of Lincoln St, Over Stream Letting August 2016 TABLE 4.13 City of Newton Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-U-5482(620) In the City of Newton, On N 4 th Avenue W, from W 8 th Street through the 1400 Block Letting June 2016 TAP STBG-E-5482(618) 8V-50 North Newton Hike and Bike Trail: Approx miles of 8 ft trail from Woodland Park to E 12 St N Let May

35 TABLE 4.14 City of Pella Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-U-5947(615) On OSKALOOSA ST, from Prairie Street to SE 16 th St Let TABLE 4.15 City of Perry Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BRM-5970(615) 8N-25 In the city of Perry, Willis Avenue Bridge over Frog Creek (Bridge # ) Let April 2016 STBG STBG-U-5970(616) NORTH ST: From 16 th St to 18 th St Letting August 2016 TABLE 4.16 Polk County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-S-C077(211) 5E-77 On NE Yoder Dr/NE 134 Ave, from NE 72 St to NE 112 St Let TABLE 4.17 Story County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status FM STBG FM-C085(133) STBG-S-C085(135) 5E-85 On E63, from R38 east aprpox. 3.5 Miles to N. 5 th Ave. in Huxley On E63, from approx. 870 feet NE of the Cambridge City Limits east approx Miles to S Authorized Authorized STBG-HBP BROS-C085(127) 8J-85 On 660 th Ave., Over Rock Creek, at SE S 22 T82 R Authorized TABLE 4.18 Warren County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STBG-S-C091(107) 5E-91 G76, from US Hwy 65 east approx Miles past G72 approx. 500 feet Let May

36 Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-C091(100) 5F-91 On G62/Roosevelt St. at 230 th Ave., over Flank Creek, at, W 0.1, at SW S2 T74 R Let April 2016 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(63) 8J-91 On Hoover St, Over Cavitt Creek, at ne1/4 S14 T76 R Authorized STBG-HBP BROS-C091(102) 5F th Ave: About 0.1 MI north of Polk St Authorized STBG-HBP BRS-C091(101) On G76, Over Otter Creek, at NE S30 T74 R Letting September 2016 TABLE 4.19 Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority Fund Category Project Description Transit # Status STA, 5310, 5311 Administration/Operation/Maintenance 3038 On-going 5339 Light Duty Bus (158 wb) 2382 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (158 wb) 3238 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 1573 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3501 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3564 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 1574 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 2386 Not-Complete 5339 Light Duty Bus (176 wb) 3232 Not-Complete 5317 Rural Mobility Management 3566 Not Complete 27

37 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects The first FFY in the FFY TIP is referred to as the Annual Element. Projects for the entire four years (FFY ) are listed together by funding program and in order of FFY. The CIRTPA s program for FFY contains 108 projects with a total cost of approximately $161,799,000. Of the 108 projects in the CIRTPA s program, 106 projects totaling $208,512,000 are roadway transportation improvements. Two projects totaling $832,000 are bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts in $1,000s by year, and Transportation Program Management System (TPMS) identification number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The TPMS identification number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s TIP. Projects are listed in alphabetical order by county, then by city. Project funding amounts are listed by year and are listed in $1,000s. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal Aid refers to the amount of Federal-aid the project has received. Regional FA (Federal-aid) refers to the amount of Federal-aid received from the CIRTPA (i.e., STBG and TAP funds). 28

38 Generated on 07/08/2016 Draft TIP (2017) (filtered) 29

39 RPA Transportation Improvement Program TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# STBG - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Boone STP-U-0750(632) DOT Letting: 01/18/ Project Total 1, ,180 Boone In the city of Boone, On Benton Street, from Mamie -- Federal Aid Eisenhower Ave to 8th St Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Outside Services Engineering -- Regional FA PA NOTE: $32,000 for design and engineering programmed for FFY STP-S-C008(69)--5E-08 DOT Letting: 01/18/ MI Project Total Boone CRD E-57: X Ave E 1 MI to Y Ave -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pave 25/36:83:25 Regional FA PA NOTE: This projects is using $150,000 in re-purposed appropriations money STP-S-C008(70)--5E-08 DOT Letting: 01/18/ MI Project Total Boone CRD R-27: E-52 N 2.7 MI to Hwy Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pave 2,11,14:83:26 Regional FA PA NOTE: This project is using $574,911 in re-purposed appropriations money STP-S-C008(67)--5E MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,450 Boone CRD On Lower Ledges Rd and E-52, from Lower Ledges -- Federal Aid Easterly approx. 4.2 Miles to Hwy , ,160 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , STP-S-C008(71)--5E MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,550 Boone CRD On E57, from P-54 in Berkley east approx. 4.5 Miles to -- Federal Aid 0 0 1, ,240 Hwy. 169, along NLINE S4,3,2,1,6 T82 R28 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 4,3,2,1,6:82:28 Regional FA 0 0 1, , Dallas STP-S-C025(106)--5E-25 DOT Letting: 01/16/ MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,600 Dallas CRD On F25, from Guthrie Co. to P46 -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Jasper STP-S-C050()--5E MI Project Total 2, ,750 Jasper CRD On County Road F36, from County road S52 east -- Federal Aid approx. 5.5 Miles to Cherry Creek Bridge 2, ,200 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 2, , STP-U-5482(621) DOT Letting: 03/21/ Project Total 1, ,131 Newton On 1st Ave (Hwy 6) from approx. 300' west of E 14th -- Federal Aid St to Iowa Speedway Dr Draft TIP Approved Pavement Markings -- Regional FA

40 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) STP-U-5482() Project Total 0 1, ,500 Newton Iowa Speedway Drive, from approx. 1,200 feet south -- Federal Aid of 1st Avenue E to approx. 1,900 feet north of Interstate 0 1, , Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1, , STP-U-5482() Project Total 0 1, ,500 Newton Union Drive Reconstruction, from N 4th Avenue W to -- Federal Aid 0 1, ,200 N 19th Avenue W Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1, , Madison STP-S-C061(103)--5E-61 DOT Letting: 12/20/ Project Total 4, ,000 Madison CRD On G4R, from US169 EAST AND NORTH approx Federal Aid Miles to TIMBER RIDGE AVE, S18 T76 R27 2, ,000 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 18:76:27 Regional FA 2, , STP-U-8497() Project Total Winterset On Summitt Avenue, from 1st Street to 16th Avenue -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA Marion STP-U-4040(608) DOT Letting: 12/20/ Project Total 1, ,072 Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, Pavement rehabilitation on -- Federal Aid Robinson, Jackson, and Main streets Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab,Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA STP-S-C063(125)--5E-63 DOT Letting: 02/21/ MI Project Total 2, ,300 Marion CRD On T17, from IA 92 to Pella Co. Line -- Federal Aid 1, ,840 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen,Shoulder Grading -- Regional FA 1, , STP-S-C063(S45 OL)--5E MI Project Total 0 1, ,500 Marion CRD S45: From Melcher-Dallas to Hwy5 -- Federal Aid 0 1, ,000 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 15:75:21 Regional FA 0 1, , STP-U-4040() Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Larson Street from -- Federal Aid Highway 14 to Grant Street and Brobst Street to Roche Street Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA STP-U-4040() Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, Rock Island from Hwy 14 to -- Federal Aid st st and on 2nd st from Reno st to Rock Island Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA

41 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Marion - 63 (continued) STP-U-4040() Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Roche St from Robinson St -- Federal Aid to Main St Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA STP-U-4040() Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Park Lane from Pleasant -- Federal Aid Street to Madison Street Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Polk STP-S-C077(Mad-CL)--5E-77 6 MI Project Total 0 1, ,078 Polk CRD On NW Madrid Dr, from BR 132 to Hwy Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 17:81:25 Regional FA Story STP-S-C085(142)--5E-85 DOT Letting: 01/18/ MI Project Total Story CRD On R77, from approx. 335 feet north of E. Walnut St. in -- Federal Aid Roland North approx Miles to Hamilton Co. Line Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA STP-S-C085(141)--5E-85 DOT Letting: 01/18/ MI Project Total Story CRD On E18, from a point approx. 1370' east of Hwy 65 east -- Federal Aid approx Miles to Marshall Co. line Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA STP-U-5405() Project Total 0 0 1, ,500 Nevada In the city of Nevada, On US Highway 30 Interchange -- Federal Aid 0 0 1, ,200 with W 18th Street and 610th Avenue Draft TIP Approved Miscellaneous -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , Warren STP-S-C091(112)--5E-91 DOT Letting: 12/20/ MI Project Total 2, ,000 Warren CRD On G76, from G72 east approx. 4.7 Miles to 10th -- Federal Aid Avenue (county line) 1, ,600 Draft TIP Approved Pave,Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 1, , STP-U-3680(614) DOT Letting: 01/21/ MI Project Total Indianola In the city of Indianola, On S J & K ST, from approx. -- Federal Aid 600' N OF IA 92 to approx 500' S OF IA Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signals,Right of Way -- Regional FA STP-S-C091(R63n)--5E-91 2 MI Project Total 0 1, ,040 Warren CRD R-63: From North River to DM CITY LIMIT -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 16:77:24 Regional FA

42 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) STP-S-C091(G58)--5E MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,260 TA Warren CRD G58, from Hwy 65 to S23 -- Federal Aid 0 0 1, ,008 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 23:75:23 Regional FA 0 0 1, , STBG-HBP - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program - Bridge Program Boone [NBIS: 78150] BROS-C008(71)--5F-08 DOT Letting: 08/15/ MI Project Total Boone CRD On 110TH ST, Over TRIB.OF SQUAW CREEK, on Federal Aid NLINE S10 T85 R Draft TIP Approved Culvert Replacement 10:85:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C008(63)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 11/15/ MI Project Total Boone CRD On Montana Road, from approx. 1 mile S. of 224th Federal Aid Lane to approx miles S. of 224th Lane Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 7:83:26 Regional FA [NBIS: 78220] BROS-C008(70)--8J-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On U AVE, Over MONTGOMERY CREEK, along Federal Aid WLINE S33 T85 R25 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 33:85:25 Regional FA [NBIS: 78050] BROS-C008(33)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/ MI Project Total Boone CRD 200th Street: approx mi. east of C Ave Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 28:84:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 77940] BROS-C008(41)--8J-8 DOT Letting: 06/18/ MI Project Total Boone CRD 180th Street: Hwy Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:84:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 77500] BROS-C008(72)--8J-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On 240TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S16 T83 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:83:28 Regional FA [NBIS: 77470] BROS-C008(73)--8J-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On 230TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S9 T83 R28 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 9:83:28 Regional FA Dallas [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(C-39)--5F MI Project Total Dallas CRD On Pioneer Av., Over Slough Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T81 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27:81:27 Regional FA

43 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Dallas - 25 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(M-79)--5F-25 0 Project Total Dallas CRD On 358th Pl., Over Bear Creek, in S25 T78 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:78:29 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C025(C-41)--5F MI Project Total Dallas CRD On R30/O Ave., Over Beaver Creek, along ELINE S Federal Aid T81 R27 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 9:81:27 Regional FA Jasper [NBIS: ] BROS-C050( )--8J-50 0 MI Project Total Jasper CRD E 84th St S: Over Elk Creek Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:79:18 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk Federal Aid River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, along NLINE S21 T81 R19 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 21:81:19 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-3897(601)--8J-50 DOT Letting: 01/18/ MI Project Total Jasper CRD On Indigo Ave, Over Coon Creek, from State Hwy Federal Aid east approx. 500 Feet, along NLINE S25 T80 R18 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:80:18 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050()--8J-50 0 Project Total Jasper CRD On G13, Over M BR BUCKLEY CREEK, along Federal Aid NLINE S4 T77 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 4:77:17 Regional FA [NBIS: 30430] BRS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD F-48: Over Prairie Creek Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:80:20 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BHS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD On F-24, Over Clear Creek, along NLINE S2 T80 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 2:80:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Cherry Creek, from W 36th Federal Aid St east approx. 300 Feet, in S32 T80 R19 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 32:80:19 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050()--5F MI Project Total Jasper CRD On S 64th Ave E, Over Sugar Creek, in S25 T79 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:79:17 Regional FA

44 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Squaw Creek, just of W Federal Aid 116th St S, on NLINE S11 T79 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation 11:79:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C050( )--8J MI Project Total Jasper CRD On N 91st Ave W, Over Wolf Creek, at NLINE S Federal Aid T81 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:81:21 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C050() MI Project Total Jasper CRD On County Road F24, Over Indian Creek, along NLINE Federal Aid S3 T80 R21 approximately 500 east of State Hwy Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:80:21 Regional FA Madison [NBIS: ] BROS-C061(104)--8J-61 DOT Letting: 09/19/ MI Project Total 1, ,200 Madison CRD On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH Federal Aid RIVER, at SE S5 T77 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5:77:29 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C061(105)--8J-61 DOT Letting: 04/18/ MI Project Total 1, ,200 Madison CRD On HERITAGE AVE, Over N BRANCH NORTH Federal Aid RIVER, S17 T77 R28 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:77:28 Regional FA BROS-C061()--8J-61 0 MI Project Total Madison CRD ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Outside Services Bridge Inspection -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C061() MI Project Total Madison CRD On G61: Over Waterway approx. 1.3 miles east of P Federal Aid in NE S17 T74 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:74:28 Regional FA Marion [NBIS: ] BROS-C063(239100)--8J MI Project Total Marion CRD On Story Dr. Remove Bridge , Grading of 90th Federal Aid Pl. between G76 and Story Dr Draft TIP Approved Bridge Removal,Grading 16:74:20 Regional FA Polk [NBIS: ] BRS-C077(214) DOT Letting: 12/20/ Project Total Polk CRD On NE Santiago DR., Over a Branch of Skunk River, E Federal Aid of NE Hubbell Road Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA

45 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Polk - 77 (continued) [NBIS: ] BRS-C077(212) DOT Letting: 12/20/ Project Total Polk CRD On NE 96 St, Over an unamed tributary of INDIAN Federal Aid CREEK South of NE 166 Ave Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C077(BR4264)--5F-77 0 MI Project Total Polk CRD On NE 94 Ave E of NE 112 St Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C077(115) DOT Letting: 11/17/ MI Project Total ,020 1,020 Polk CRD NE 82 Ave: From W of to NE 109 St Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 26:80:22 Regional FA Story [NBIS: ] BRF--35() MI Project Total 2, ,446 DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: CO RD E57 OVER I MI S OF US Federal Aid 2, ,201 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C085(G20)--8J MI Project Total Story CRD On Sand Hill Trail, Over Unnamed Stream, in S20 T Federal Aid R23 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 20:83:23 Regional FA BRF--35() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: US 30 INTERCHANGE IN AMES -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge New,Culvert Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C085(U17)--8J MI Project Total Story CRD On 570th Ave., Over Ballard Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T82 R23 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:82:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C085(W19) MI Project Total Story CRD On E18, Over Drainage Ditch, on NLINE S19 T85 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 19:85:22 Regional FA Warren [NBIS: ] BRF--35() Project Total 3, ,853 DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: MIDDLE RIVER 0.4 MI S OF IA 92 (SB) Federal Aid 3, ,468 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRF--35() Project Total 6, ,964 DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CO RD G76 (NEW VIRGINIA) INTERCHANGE Federal Aid 6, ,268 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Lighting,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA

46 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(109)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 02/21/ MI Project Total 1, ,200 Warren CRD 115th Ave.: G24 Hwy S approx MI Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 35:77:24 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(103)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 10/18/ Project Total Warren CRD On 190TH AVE, Over NORTH WOLF CREEK, from Federal Aid 190TH ST & TYLER ST NORTH approx. 1.1 Miles, S7 T74 R22 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(111)--5F-91 DOT Letting: 11/15/ MI Project Total Warren CRD On 180TH AVE, From Illinois ST N approx. 0.1 MI Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 13:76:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C091(N0302) Project Total 0 1, ,000 Warren CRD On R45, Over BROADHORN CREEK, from Roosevelt Federal Aid St. north approx. 0.4 Miles Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRS-C091(N1033) Project Total 0 1, ,000 Warren CRD On R45, Over S RIVER, from Roosevelt St. south Federal Aid approx. 0.3 Miles, S10 T74 R25 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:74:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(S0330)--8J-91 0 MI Project Total Warren CRD On QUEBEC ST, E approx. 0.3, at NW S3 T74 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:74:22 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(R3073)--8J MI Project Total Warren CRD R73: G76 Hwy S 0.3 MI Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 30:74:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(E2354)--8J MI Project Total Warren CRD 55TH AVE: Illinois St S 0.4 MI Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 23:76:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(E3325)--5F MI Project Total Warren CRD On KIRKWOOD ST NEAR 33RD AVE, Over Federal Aid UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO MIDDLE RIVER, from RD AVE WEST approx. 0.1 Miles, S33 T76 R25 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 33:76:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(F0253)--5F MI Project Total Warren CRD On 115TH AVE, Over CAVITT CREEK, from 115TH Federal Aid AVE & FULTON ST SOUTH approx Miles, S T76 R24 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 2:76:24 Regional FA

47 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(B3474)--5F MI Project Total Warren CRD On 168TH AVE, Over BUTCHER CREEK, from Federal Aid 168TH AVE & FULTON ST NORTH approx Miles, S34 T77 R23 Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:77:23 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(10TH)--5F-91 0 Project Total Warren CRD On R35 (10TH AVE), Over BRANCH BADGER Federal Aid CREEK, S31 T77 R Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 31:77:25 Regional FA [NBIS: ] BROS-C091(M-2109)--8J-91 0 Project Total Warren CRD On 30TH AVE, Over PAINTER CREEK, S21 T75 R Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 21:75:25 Regional FA NHPP - National Highway Performance Program Jasper [NBIS: ] IM--80() MI Project Total ,244 6,514 14,058 DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: NORTH SKUNK RIVER 2.1 MI E OF IA Federal Aid 0 0 6,520 5,863 12,383 Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Pave,Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA Polk IM--35() Project Total 4, ,807 DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: 1.6 MI N OF CO RD F22 TO 3.5 MI N OF IA -- Federal Aid 210 (NB &SB) 4, ,327 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA Story [NBIS: ] IM--35() Project Total 5,591 12, ,642 DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.6 MI S OF US Federal Aid (NB & SB) 5,032 11, ,483 Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA Warren IM--35() MI Project Total 12, ,156 DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) -- Federal Aid 10, ,941 Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA STBG - STP funded TAP projects - Pop. under 5,000 Story TAP-R-8612(601)--8T-85 DOT Letting: 12/20/ Project Total Story CCB Praeri Rail Trail Extension Project to Dakins Lake -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave,Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA

48 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# TAP - Transportation Alternatives Warren STP-E-3680(615)--8V-91 DOT Letting: 10/17/ Project Total Indianola Jerry Kelley Trail, from Memorial Park along Iowa Ave, -- Federal Aid Kenwood Blvd, and Euclid Ave to N W St Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Project tied to STP-E-3680(613)--8V-91 which was deobligated. $26,600 spent on PE the remaining, $282,920 was transferred to (615)and rolled to FFY RTP - Recreational Trails Program Dallas NRT-C025(95)--9G-25 Local Letting: 12/21/ Project Total Dallas CCB Hiawatha Trail: Raccoon River Valley Trail to High -- Federal Aid Trestle Trail Connection Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Total Fed Rec Trail Grant: $139, NRT-C025()--9G-25 0 Project Total Dallas CCB On Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail -- Federal Aid Connector - City of Bouton to Quinlan Avenue Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Total Fed Rec Trail Grant: $170, NRT-C025(99)--9G-25 Local Letting: 07/21/ Project Total Dallas CCB Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail -- Federal Aid Connector Phase 1 Acquisition/Construction (Perry to Bouton) Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike ROW,Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA PA NOTE: Approximately $40,000 authorized in FFY 2016; Total Fed Rec Trail Grant: $119,575 Jasper NRT-C050(108)--9G-50 Local Letting: 01/21/ Project Total 6, ,971 Jasper CCB Mitchellville to Prairie City Rails to Trails Corridor -- Federal Aid Acquisition Draft TIP Approved Ped/Bike ROW -- Regional FA PRF - Primary Road Funds Dallas [NBIS: ] BRFN--80() MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,100 DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: SOUTH RACCOON RIVER 1.5 MI E OF US Federal Aid (EB) Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--80() MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,390 DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: NORTH RACCOON RIVER 2.3 MI E OF US Federal Aid (EB) Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA BRFN--80() MI Project Total ,100 1,100 DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: SOUTH RACCOON RIVER 1.5 MI E OF US -- Federal Aid (WB) Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA

49 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Dallas - 25 (continued) BRFN--80() MI Project Total ,390 1,390 DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: NORTH RACCOON RIVER 2.3 MI E OF US -- Federal Aid 169 (WB) Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA Jasper NHSN-65()--2R Project Total 9,644 5, ,991 DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: IA 330 AND IA 117 INTERCHANGE -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge New -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--14() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: STREAM 0.2 MI S OF IA Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] NHSN--14()--2R-50 0 MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: STREAM 0.2 MI N OF IA Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Culvert Replacement -- Regional FA STPN--224()--2J MI Project Total 2, ,202 DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 224: I-80 TO US 6 -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave -- Regional FA IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total ,400 DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: POLK CO TO IOWA CO -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Patching -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--6() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 US 6: IAIS RR 1.5 MI E OF IA Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--14() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: BUCK CREEK 1.6 MI N OF CO RD F Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--14() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 14: CHERRY CREEK 4.3 MI S OF I Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA [NBIS: ] BRFN--80() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: IAIS RR 0.4 MI W OF IA 14 (EB) Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA BRFN--163() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 163: WALNUT CREEK 2.4 MI W OF IA 17 (EB) -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA

50 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total STIP# Madison BRFN--169() MI Project Total DOT-D04-RPA11 US 169: NORTH BRANCH NORTH RIVER 5.2 MI S -- Federal Aid OF CO RD F Draft TIP Approved Bridge Rail Retrofit -- Regional FA Marion BRFN--5() MI Project Total DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 5: WHITE BREAST CREEK 2.7 MI W OF IA Federal Aid (SB) Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA Story [NBIS: ] BRFN--210() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 210: OVER I Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA BRFN--65() MI Project Total DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: CO RD E MI N OF US Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA Warren NHSN--92()--2R MI Project Total 1, ,996 DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: IA 28 INTERSECTION IN MARTENSDALE -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Grade and Pave -- Regional FA BRFN--92() MI Project Total DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: SOUTH RIVER 0.4 MI E OF E JCT CO RD S23 -- Federal Aid Draft TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program Warren IHSIPX-92() Project Total 1, ,606 DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: I-35 TO CO RD R57 -- Federal Aid 1, ,445 Draft TIP Approved Pavement Widening -- Regional FA

51 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administrations Projects A portion of Federal fuel tax revenue is placed in the Mass Transit Account of the Federal Highway Trust Fund. These funds, along with General Fund appropriations, are reserved for transit purposes and are administered by the FTA. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts by year, and Transit Number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The Transit Number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s Transit Program. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal-Aid refers to the amount of Federal-Aid (FA) the project has received. State-Aid (SA) refers to the amount of funding the transit provider has received from the State. 42

52 Draft 2017 Transit Program (Filtered) 43

53 RPA-11 (36 Projects) Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY17 FY18 FY19 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 1563 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 1139 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 1565 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 1136 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2381 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 2225 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2383 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 3325 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2388 Minivan Total 52,500 Capital VSS FA 44,625 Replacement Unit #: 2227 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2390 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 85,000 Capital VSS FA 72,250 Replacement Unit #: 5517 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2874 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 1141 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2875 Minivan Total 52,500 Capital VSS FA 44,625 Replacement Unit #: 1143 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2876 Minivan Total 52,500 Capital VSS FA 44,625 Replacement Unit #: 5519 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2879 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 87,000 Capital VSS FA 73,950 Replacement Unit #: 8722 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3233 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 1140 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3236 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 8723 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3241 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 Capital VSS FA 78,200 Replacement Unit #: 7642 SA STA, 5311 Region 11 / HIRTA 4006 Administative Total 1,489,581 Operations FA 869,999 Other SA 619, Region 11 / HIRTA 4201 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 85,000 79,000 Capital VSS FA 72,250 67,150 Replacement Unit #: 6523 SA 44

54 RPA-11 (36 Projects) Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY17 FY18 FY19 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 4202 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 95,220 Capital VSS FA 78,200 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 6524 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4205 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 95,220 Capital VSS FA 78,200 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 8727 SA 5317 Region 11 / HIRTA 4206 Mobility Coordinator Total 50,000 Operations FA 40,000 Misc SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4198 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 92,000 95,220 Capital VSS FA 78,200 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 7641 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3244 Minivan Total 54,336 Capital VSS FA 46,186 Replacement Unit #: 6526 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4207 Conversion Van Total 54,500 Capital VSS FA 46,325 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4208 Conversion Van Total 54,500 Capital VSS FA 46,325 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3240 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 7640 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3234 Minivan Total 54,336 Capital VSS FA 46,186 Replacement Unit #: 1145 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2389 Minivan Total 50,500 Capital VSS FA 42,925 Replacement Unit #: 4419 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2391 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 1142 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2387 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 3327 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2880 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 7644 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3242 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 2228 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3243 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 4420 SA 45

55 RPA-11 (36 Projects) Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY17 FY18 FY19 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 4196 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 7639 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4197 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 3323 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4203 Minivan Total 55,000 Capital VSS FA 44,000 Replacement Unit #: 7638 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4204 Minivan Total 52,500 Operations VSS FA 44,625 Other Unit #: 8724 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4199 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 79,000 Capital FA 67,150 Replacement Unit #: 5515 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4200 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 95,220 Capital VSS FA 80,937 Replacement Unit #: 6525 SA 46

56 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan The FAST Act states that the TIP shall include a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, identification of public and private resources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommend any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs. Federal Highway Administration Projects For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain systemlevel estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). In addition, revenue and cost estimates for the TIP must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect year of expenditure dollars, based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the CIRTPA, State(s), and public transportation operator(s). The CIRTPA staff utilized an inflation rate of 4% to determine year of expenditure dollars. The FFY TIP is fiscally constrained by funding sources. Funding sources include Federal, State, and local financial resources. The CIRTPA recognizes that in the event of Federal, State, and local funding changes, amendments, or revisions, it will need to reflect the change in project funds within the FFY TIP. CIRTPA Federal-aid Funding Sources The total Federal share of projects included in the first year (annual element) of the TIP shall not exceed levels of funding committed to the CIRTPA. Additionally, the total Federal share of projects included in the second, third, fourth, and/or subsequent years of the TIP may not exceed levels of funding committed, or reasonably expected to be available, to the CIRTPA. Table 7.1 displays a listing of all Federal-Aid funding sources and total project costs in the TIP and the amount of Federal funds committed by source for FFYs Table 7.2 and 7.3 display the 47

57 financial constraint of the STBG and TAP funding sources for FFYs , breaking down all revenues, expenditures, programmed funds, adjustments, and returns. TABLE 7.1 CIRTPA Federal-Aid Funding Sources Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid HSIP $1,606,000 $1,445,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NHPP $22,554,000 $20,300,000 $13,023,000 $11,451,000 $7,572,000 $6,520,000 $6,514,000 $5,863,000 PRF $16,226,000 $0 $7,884,000 $0 $3,868,000 $0 $4,594,000 $0 RTP $7,625,000 $881,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG $17,508,000 $12,264,000 $7,383,000 $5,720,000 $7,762,000 $5,730,000 $533,000 $426,000 STBG-HBP $21,753,000 $18,452,000 $5,875,000 $4,699,000 $4,912,000 $3,678,000 $3,775,000 $3,018,000 TAP $390,000 $225,000 $442,000 $283,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $87,662,000 $53,567,000 $34,607,000 $22,153,000 $24,114,000 $15,928,000 $15,416,000 $9,307,000 TABLE 7.2 CIRTPA Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $7,792,117 $1,573,003 $1,172,905 $763,523 STBG Target $5,097,118 $5,097,118 $5,097,118 $5,097,118 TAP Flex Funds $222,784 $222,784 $222,784 $222,784 Subtotal $13,112,019 $6,892,905 $6,492,807 $6,083,425 Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0 Programmed STBG Funds $11,539,016 $5,720,000 $5,729,284 $426,241 Balance $1,573,003 $1,172,905 $763,523 $5,657,184 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation s Fiscal Year rd Quarter Status Report. TABLE 7.3 CIRTPA Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $795,565 $859,707 $865,929 $1,155,071 TAP Target $289,142 $289,142 $289,142 $289,142 Subtotal $1,084,707 $1,148,849 $1,155,071 $1,444,213 Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0 Programmed TAP Funds $225,000 $282,920 $0 $0 Balance $859,707 $865,929 $1,155,071 $1,444,213 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation s Fiscal Year rd Quarter Status Report. 48

58 Operations and Maintenance Costs and Projections The following tables demonstrate the costs of operations and maintenance to the Federal-aid System. Table 7.4 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.5 and 7.6 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table 7.4. TABLE CIRTPA City Street Operations and Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name On- System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Roadway Maintenance Total Operations Operations on Federal- Aid Routes Maintenance on Federal- Aid Routes Boone County $323,872 $88,878 $12,098 $8,552 Boone $933,188 $541,334 $264,372 $153,360 Dallas County $1,909,026 $237,935 $212,931 $44,490 Adel $407,991 $111,627 $47,572 $13,016 Perry $737,338 $376,101 $191,487 $97,673 Jasper County $491,945 $357,429 $44,476 $33,700 Newton $838,755 $482,601 $228,057 $131,219 Madison County $157,299 $52,049 $29,987 $7,835 Winterset $484,894 $25,205 $88,105 $4,580 Marion County $416,283 $98,096 $70,156 $25,329 Knoxville $474,003 $167,515 $121,582 $42,968 Pella $890,431 $154,221 $227,950 $39,481 Polk County $167,661 $21,718 $0 $0 Story County $929,366 $448,712 $129,610 $46,680 Nevada $929,840 $494,364 $309,358 $164,475 Story City $273,647 $86,394 $38,502 $12,156 Warren County $281,987 $93,338 $19,127 $13,420 Indianola $1,037,111 $238,381 $226,298 $52,015 Totals $11,684,634 $4,075,895 $2,261,668 $890,945 Source: 2015 City Street Finance Reports 49

59 TABLE 7.5 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $8,552 $8,894 $9,250 $9,620 $10,005 $10,405 Boone $153,360 $159,494 $165,874 $172,509 $179,410 $186,586 Dallas County $44,490 $46,270 $48,120 $50,045 $52,047 $54,129 Adel $13,016 $13,537 $14,078 $14,641 $15,227 $15,836 Perry $97,673 $101,580 $105,643 $109,869 $114,264 $118,834 Jasper County $33,700 $35,048 $36,450 $37,908 $39,424 $41,001 Newton $131,219 $136,468 $141,926 $147,604 $153,508 $159,648 Madison County $7,835 $8,148 $8,474 $8,813 $9,166 $9,532 Winterset $4,580 $4,763 $4,954 $5,152 $5,358 $5,572 Marion County $25,329 $26,342 $27,396 $28,492 $29,631 $30,817 Knoxville $42,968 $44,687 $46,474 $48,333 $50,266 $52,277 Pella $39,481 $41,060 $42,703 $44,411 $46,187 $48,035 Polk County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Story County $46,680 $48,547 $50,489 $52,509 $54,609 $56,793 Nevada $164,475 $171,054 $177,896 $185,012 $192,412 $200,109 Story City $12,156 $12,642 $13,148 $13,674 $14,221 $14,790 Warren County $13,420 $13,957 $14,515 $15,096 $15,700 $16,327 Indianola $52,015 $54,096 $56,259 $58,510 $60,850 $63,284 Totals $890,945 $926,583 $963,646 $1,002,192 $1,042,280 $1,083,971 Source: 2015 City Street Finance Reports 50

60 TABLE 7.6 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $12,098 $12,582 $13,085 $13,609 $14,153 $14,719 Boone $264,372 $274,947 $285,945 $297,383 $309,278 $321,649 Dallas County $212,931 $221,448 $230,306 $239,518 $249,099 $259,063 Adel $47,572 $49,475 $51,454 $53,512 $55,653 $57,879 Perry $191,487 $199,146 $207,112 $215,397 $224,013 $232,973 Jasper County $44,476 $46,255 $48,105 $50,029 $52,031 $54,112 Newton $228,057 $237,179 $246,666 $256,533 $266,794 $277,466 Madison County $29,987 $31,186 $32,434 $33,731 $35,081 $36,484 Winterset $88,105 $91,629 $95,294 $99,106 $103,070 $107,193 Marion County $70,156 $72,962 $75,881 $78,916 $82,073 $85,356 Knoxville $121,582 $126,445 $131,503 $136,763 $142,234 $147,923 Pella $227,950 $237,068 $246,551 $256,413 $266,669 $277,336 Polk County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Story County $129,610 $134,794 $140,186 $145,794 $151,625 $157,690 Nevada $309,358 $321,732 $334,602 $347,986 $361,905 $376,381 Story City $38,502 $40,042 $41,644 $43,310 $45,042 $46,844 Warren County $19,127 $19,892 $20,688 $21,515 $22,376 $23,271 Indianola $226,298 $235,350 $244,764 $254,554 $264,737 $275,326 Totals $2,261,668 $2,352,135 $2,446,220 $2,544,069 $2,645,832 $2,751,665 Source: 2015 City Street Finance Reports Table 7.7 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.8 and 7.9 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

61 TABLE CIRTPA County Road Operations and Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name On-System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Operations Cost Total Maintenance Cost Operations Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Maintenance Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Boone County $1,881,801 $2,990,289 $582,641 $925,849 Dallas County $2,239,983 $3,992,339 $732,322 $1,305,223 Jasper County $2,291,094 $4,009,129 $766,503 $1,341,285 Madison County $1,536,905 $3,092,162 $570,596 $1,148,006 Marion County $1,511,813 $3,464,056 $559,583 $1,282,187 Polk County $2,356,977 $4,507,689 $1,050,032 $2,008,173 Story County $1,809,760 $3,434,083 $711,877 $1,350,812 Warren County $2,143,172 $3,415,317 $795,356 $1,267,464 Totals $15,771,506 $28,905,064 $5,768,911 $10,629,000 Source: 2015 County Engineers Annual Report TABLE 7.8 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $582,641 $605,947 $630,185 $655,392 $681,608 $708,872 Dallas County $732,322 $761,615 $792,079 $823,763 $856,713 $890,982 Jasper County $766,503 $797,163 $829,050 $862,212 $896,700 $932,568 Madison County $570,596 $593,420 $617,157 $641,843 $667,517 $694,217 Marion County $559,583 $581,966 $605,245 $629,455 $654,633 $680,818 Polk County $1,050,032 $1,092,033 $1,135,715 $1,181,143 $1,228,389 $1,277,524 Story County $711,877 $740,352 $769,966 $800,765 $832,795 $866,107 Warren County $795,356 $827,170 $860,257 $894,667 $930,454 $967,672 Totals $5,768,911 $5,999,667 $6,239,654 $6,489,240 $6,748,810 $7,018,762 Source: 2015 County Engineers Annual Report 52

62 TABLE 7.9 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $925,849 $962,883 $1,001,398 $1,041,454 $1,083,112 $1,126,437 Dallas County $1,305,223 $1,357,432 $1,411,729 $1,468,198 $1,526,926 $1,588,003 Jasper County $1,341,285 $1,394,936 $1,450,734 $1,508,763 $1,569,114 $1,631,878 Madison County $1,148,006 $1,193,926 $1,241,683 $1,291,351 $1,343,005 $1,396,725 Marion County $1,282,187 $1,333,474 $1,386,813 $1,442,286 $1,499,977 $1,559,977 Polk County $2,008,173 $2,088,500 $2,172,040 $2,258,922 $2,349,278 $2,443,250 Story County $1,350,812 $1,404,844 $1,461,038 $1,519,480 $1,580,259 $1,643,469 Warren County $1,267,464 $1,318,163 $1,370,889 $1,425,725 $1,482,754 $1,542,064 Totals $10,629,000 $11,054,160 $11,496,326 $11,956,179 $12,434,427 $12,931,804 Source: 2015 County Engineers Annual Report Non-Federal-aid Revenue Sources and Projections In addition to operations and maintenance costs are non Federal-aid revenue sources. Non Federalaid revenue sources and projections are included to demonstrate the revenue sources and amounts available for operation and maintenance of the system in the CIRTPA planning area. Table 7.10 contains the receipts for the Road Use Tax Fund and other road monies on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA. Table 7.11 contains the projected revenues on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table Table 7.12 contains the receipts for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.13 contains the projected revenues for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table Table 7.14 contains the receipts for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.15 contains the projected revenues for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

63 TABLE CIRTPA City Street Fund Receipts City/County Name Road Use Tax Fund Federal-Aid Receipts Miscellaneous Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $526,716 $128,474 $343,325 $998,515 Boone $1,316,522 $447,767 $511,501 $2,275,790 Dallas County $871,591 $3,797,409 $321,686 $4,990,659 Adel $382,864 $19,746 $594,938 $997,548 Perry $800,873 $1,043,851 $469,591 $2,314,315 Jasper County $942,023 $313,458 $322,627 $1,1578,108 Newton $1,586,149 $3,950 $0 $1,590,099 Madison County $281,105 $147,440 $666,256 $1,094,801 Winterset $539,669 $1,950,145 $2,220,112 $4,709,926 Marion County $387,280 $77,615 $537,607 $1,002,502 Knoxville $760,424 $859,027 $215,308 $1,834,759 Pella $1,076,427 $84,960 $0 $1,161,387 Polk County $135,276 $94,431 $25,904 $255,611 Story County $1,169,309 $2,132,172 $406,734 $1,983,451 Nevada $706,873 $136,910 $2,613,142 $3,456,925 Story City $356,764 $72,290 $296,421 $724,062 Warren County $324,441 $209,303 $9,827 $543,571 Indianola $1,537,069 $3,906,370 $3,206,277 $8,649,716 Totals $13,701,375 $15,425,291 $12,649,530 $41,776,196 Source: 2015 City Street Finance Reports TABLE 7.11 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue City/County Name Boone County $998,515 $1,038,456 $1,079,994 $1,123,194 $1,168,121 $1,214,846 Boone $2,275,790 $2,366,822 $2,461,494 $2,559,954 $2,662,352 $2,768,847 Dallas County $4,990,659 $5,190,285 $5,397,897 $5,613,813 $5,838,365 $6,071,900 Adel $997,548 $1,037,450 $1,078,948 $1,122,106 $1,166,990 $1,213,670 Perry $2,314,315 $2,406,888 $2,503,163 $2,603,290 $2,707,421 $2,815,718 Jasper County $11,578,108 $12,041,232 $12,522,882 $13,023,797 $13,544,749 $14,086,539 Newton $1,590,099 $1,653,703 $1,719,851 $1,788,645 $1,860,191 $1,934,599 Madison County $1,094,801 $1,138,593 $1,184,137 $1,231,502 $1,280,762 $1,331,993 Winterset $4,709,926 $4,898,323 $5,094,256 $5,298,026 $5,509,947 $5,730,345 Marion County $1,002,502 $1,042,602 $1,084,306 $1,127,678 $1,172,786 $1,219,697 Knoxville $1,834,759 $1,908,149 $1,984,475 $2,063,854 $2,146,409 $2,232,265 Pella $1,161,387 $1,207,842 $1,256,156 $1,306,402 $1,358,659 $1,413,005 Polk County $255,611 $265,835 $276,469 $287,528 $299,029 $310,990 Story County $1,983,451 $2,062,789 $2,145,301 $2,231,113 $2,320,357 $2,413,171 Nevada $3,456,925 $3,595,202 $3,739,010 $3,888,570 $4,044,113 $4,205,878 54

64 City/County Name Story City $724,062 $753,024 $783,145 $814,471 $847,050 $880,932 Warren County $543,571 $565,314 $587,926 $611,443 $635,901 $661,337 Indianola $8,649,716 $8,995,705 $9,355,533 $9,729,754 $10,118,944 $10,523,702 Totals $41,776,196 $43,447,244 $45,185,134 $46,992,539 $48,872,240 $50,827,130 Source: 2015 City Street Finance Reports TABLE 7.12 State Fiscal Year 2014 CIRTPA Farm-to-Market Receipts County Name 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Boone County $209,780 $273,449 $269,498 $178,603 $931,330 Dallas County $226,814 $295,653 $291,381 $193,106 $1,006,953 Jasper County $281,638 $367,116 $361,812 $239,782 $1,250,348 Madison County $197,919 $257,988 $254,260 $168,505 $878,672 Marion County $237,120 $309,086 $304,620 $201,880 $1,052,706 Polk County $378,135 $492,900 $485,778 $321,937 $1,678,750 Story County $234,515 $305,691 $301,274 $199,662 $1,041,141 Warren County $254,468 $331,700 $326,907 $216,650 $1,129,725 Totals $2,020,390 $2,633,582 $2,595,531 $1,720,124 $8,969,627 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.13 CIRTPA Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue County Name Boone County $892,000 $968,583 $1,007,327 $1,047,620 $1,089,524 $1,133,105 Dallas County $958,328 $1,047,231 $1,089,120 $1,132,685 $1,177,993 $1,225,112 Jasper County $1,198,021 $1,300,362 $1,352,376 $1,406,471 $1,462,730 $1,521,240 Madison County $841,624 $913,819 $950,372 $988,387 $1,027,922 $1,069,039 Marion County $1,008,366 $1,094,814 $1,138,607 $1,184,151 $1,231,517 $1,280,778 Polk County $1,594,444 $1,745,900 $1,815,736 $1,888,365 $1,963,900 $2,042,456 Story County $997,616 $1,082,787 $1,126,098 $1,171,142 $1,217,988 $1,266,707 Warren County $1,082,451 $1,174,914 $1,221,911 $1,270,787 $1,321,618 $1,374,483 Totals $8,572,848 $9,328,412 $9,701,549 $10,089,611 $10,493,195 $10,912,923 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 55

65 TABLE 7.14 Fiscal Year 2015 CIRTPA Secondary Road Fund Receipts County Name Property Tax L.O.S.T. Road Use Tax Fund Farm-to- Market Extension Revenue Time-21 RISE Bridge Funds Transfer Credits Misc Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $2,070,138 $92,658 $2,956,933 $21,987 $337,702 $285,000 $233,701 $0 $456,379 $6,454,498 Dallas County $3,454,189 $0 $3,108,938 $29,832 $355,396 $0 $0 $0 $52,779 $7,001,134 Jasper County $2,409,087 $0 $4,028,838 $25,653 $459,652 $0 $613,965 $0 $170,511 $7,707,706 Madison County $1,558,463 $0 $2,833,311 $32,629 $325,253 $0 $11,913 $0 $49,319 $4,810,888 Marion County $1,963,388 $0 $3,203,483 $18,979 $365,269 $0 $83,830 $620 $215,797 $5,851,366 Polk County $7,467,353 $0 $4,887,298 $60,865 $560,512 $0 $31,538 $0 $6,906 $13,014,472 Story County $2,400,000 $0 $3,194,381 $28,865 $365,593 $0 $0 $0 $455,968 $6,444,807 Warren County $2,180,439 $0 $3,419,853 $0 $388,292 $147,467 $393,353 $0 $208,255 $6,737,659 Totals $23,503,057 $92,658 $27,633,035 $218,810 $3,157,669 $432,467 $1,368,300 $620 $1,615,914 $58,022,530 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.15 CIRTPA Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue County Name Boone County $6,454,498 $6,712,678 $6,981,185 $7,260,432 $7,550,850 $7,852,884 Dallas County $7,001,134 $7,281,179 $7,572,427 $7,875,324 $8,190,337 $8,517,950 Jasper County $7,707,706 $8,016,014 $8,336,655 $8,670,121 $9,016,926 $9,377,603 Madison County $4,810,888 $5,003,324 $5,203,456 $5,411,595 $5,628,059 $5,853,181 Marion County $5,851,366 $6,085,421 $6,328,837 $6,581,991 $6,845,271 $7,119,081 Polk County $13,014,472 $13,535,051 $14,076,453 $14,639,511 $15,225,091 $15,834,095 Story County $6,444,807 $6,702,599 $6,970,703 $7,249,531 $7,539,513 $7,841,093 Warren County $6,737,659 $7,007,165 $7,287,452 $7,578,950 $7,882,108 $8,197,392 Totals $58,022,530 $60,343,431 $62,757,168 $65,267,455 $67,878,153 $70,593,280 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 56

66 Federal Transit Administration Projects As with highway projects, legislation requires that all Federal and State transit projects be included in a fiscally constrained TIP. As the 5307 annual apportionment is the only guaranteed source of grant funds, CIRTPA actively seeks discretionary funding from a variety of sources, including the state Public Transit Equipment and Facilities Management System (PTMS) process and earmarks (State and Federal). Because these funds are the hardest to obtain, there is always uncertainty whether the projects will be implemented in the current year. Therefore, the TIP will periodically be revised if project funding is reduced or delayed. Table 7.17 lists all federal funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Table 7.18 lists all state funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Funding Sources Federal and State funding account for the majority of all capital purchases and as a result, is critical to success. The following section outlines the general funding sources available to HIRTA for FFY TABLE 7.16 HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid 5317 $50,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $1,426,500 $1,212,525 $363,392 $308,884 $476,100 $404,685 $1,212,525 $708, $1,489,581 $869,999 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $2,966,081 $2,122,524 $363,392 $308,884 $476,100 $404,685 $1,212,525 $708,547 TABLE 7.17 HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY State-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid STA $1,489,581 $619,582 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $1,489,581 $619,582 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 57

67 C H A P T E R E I G H T Public Participation The CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan outlines the CIRTPA s public outreach requirements and efforts through three primary components: public meetings, publications, and maintenance of the CIRTPA s website, The CIRTPA holds a standard of a minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days and a minimum 4-week advance public notice before an initial, amended, or revised TIP is adopted by the CIRTPA. This standard also applies when holding public meetings for any TIP amendments. The CIRTPA will approve the TIP, and/or amendments to the TIP, following the completion of the public comment period. The CIRTPA works to hold public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times. If a person is not able to attend a public meeting, information regarding the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP is available on the CIRTPA s website. In addition, all meetings of the CIRTPA committees are open to the public. Members of the public may request time on the CIRTPA s agendas to comment on specific subjects of interest to the representatives. Legal notices and meeting announcements regarding the adoption of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP are published in The Des Moines Register and sent to the various news agencies within central Iowa a week before the scheduled public meeting. The CIRTPA website contains CIRTPA news and information about upcoming events, CIRTPA members, staff, the organization of the CIRTPA, and employment opportunities. Meeting agendas and minutes are available, as is a listing of committee representatives. The website features a library containing documents, maps, newsletters, and press releases. Additionally, educational opportunities related to CIRTPA activities are listed on the website. CIRTPA staff regularly updates the website in order to engage citizens. The CIRTPA accepts input and comments from the public through a variety of means. Members of the public may express their views, share their opinions, and ask questions regarding proposed amendments in three ways: 1) orally at a meeting; 2) in writing via forms available at a meeting; or, 3) by submitting 58

68 written comments to the CIRTPA prior to the close of the given comment period. The CIRTPA will make a summary, analysis, or report on the disposition of comments made as part of the review of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP and will notify the CIRTPA TTC and TPC representatives of all TIP comments as part of the approved TIP. Immediately following is a summary of the comments made June 21, 2016 and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 16, Public Comment Summary The CIRTPA staff held a public meeting on June 21, 2016, to receive comments and questions on the TIP draft. If there would have been participants, they would have been given a copy of the TIP (also, available on the CIRTPA website) and staff would have guided the participants through the document, chapter by chapter, explaining in detail each chapter s significance within the TIP. Once staff would have finished explaining the information in the TIP, the meeting would have been open for discussion. There were no participants and there were no comments about the TIP draft or any particular surface transportation improvements listed. 59

69 Appendix A Federal regulations require documentation in addition to the project list prior to approval of the Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. All regional planning affiliation transportation improvement programs must be accompanied by: 1. A resolution of adoption by the planning organization. This resolution can be found on the following page. 60

70 RESOLUTION PLACEHOLDER 61

71 Appendix B 62

72 63