FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Transcription

1 FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater central Iowa region s transportation system. July 2018

2 The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) prepared this report with partial funding from the United States Department of Transportation s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, and in part through local matching funds provided by the CIRTPA member governments. These contents are the responsibility of the CIRTPA. The United States Government and its agencies assume no liability for the contents of this report or for the use of its contents. The CIRTPA approved this report on July 19, Please call (515) to obtain permission for use Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance

3 Glossary of Acronyms ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CMAQ DEMO DART DMAMPO DISC ESP ER FM FL FHWA FTA FFY HIRTA HRRR HSIP ICAAP Iowa DOT IM Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Demonstration Award Des Moines Area Metropolitan Transit Authority Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Discretionary Federal Funds Economic Stimulus Package Emergency Relief Program Farm-to-Market Funds Federal Lands Highway Program Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Federal Fiscal Year Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority High Risk Rural Roads Highway Safety Improvement Program Iowa s Clean Air Attainment Program Iowa Department of Transportation Interstate Maintenance ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 MAP-21 MPO NHS NEPA NHPP PL PRF RTP RPA RISE SAFETEA-LU SRTS STIP Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Metropolitan Planning Organization National Highway System National Environmental Policy Act National Highway Performance Program Planning Funds Primary Road Funds Recreational Trails Program Regional Planning Affiliation Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy Program Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Safe Routes to School State Transportation Improvement Program

4 STBG STP-HBP SWAP TAP TEA-21 TIP TTC Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Surface Transportation Program Highway Bridge Program Iowa DOT Swapped Funding Transportation Alternative Program Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century Transportation Improvement Program MPO Transportation Technical Committee

5 Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE Introduction....1 General Overview of the TIP 3 The TIP and Federal Guidance 3 Federal Transportation Planning Process...4 Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance Transportation Improvement Program 8 Revising the TIP...9 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures...13 Surface Transportation Program Project Selection Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection STBG-SWAP Project Selection..15 Highway Bridge Program Project Selection 15 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs...16 Surface Transportation Program...16 Transportation Alternatives Program 16 Federal Funding Programs. 20 State Funding Programs..22 Transit Funding Programs.23 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2018 Status Reports. 25 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects Program Format...32 FFY FHWA Project List... 33

6 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administration Projects Program Format FFY Transit Project List.53 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan.. 57 Federal Highway Administration Projects...57 Federal Transit Administration Projects...69 CHAPTER EIGHT Public Participation...70 Figures and Tables Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership. 6 Table 4.1: City of Boone Table 4.2: Boone County Table 4.3: Dallas County Table 4.4: Iowa Department of Transportation.. 26 Table 4.5: Iowa DNR Table 4.6: City of Indianola..28 Table 4.7: Jasper County Table 4.8: City of Knoxville Table 4.9: Madison County Table 4.10: Marion County Table 4.11: City of Nevada...29 Table 4.12: City of Newton Table 4.13: Polk County. 29 Table 4.14 RPA Table 4.15: Story County Table 4.16: Warren County Table 4.17: City of Winterset Table 4.18: Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Authority Table 7.1: CIRPTA Federal-Aid Funding Sources...58 Table 7.2: CIRTPA SWAP Funding Sources 58 Table 7.3: Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint...59 Table 7.4: CIRTPA Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint.59 Table 7.5: 2017 City Street O+M Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes 60 Table 7.6: Forecasted Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes. 61 Table 7.7: Forecasted Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes...62 Table 7.8: County Road O+M Costs on Federal-Aid Routes..63 Table 7.9: Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Fed-Aid Routes..63

7 Table 7.10: Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes...63 Table 7.11: 2017 City Street Fund Receipts Table 7.12: Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue. 66 Table 7.13: State Fiscal Year 2017 Farm-to-Market Receipts.67 Table 7.14: Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue Table 7.15: Fiscal Year 2017 Secondary Road Fund Receipts 68 Table 7.16: Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue 68 Table 7.17: HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Table 7.18: HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY

8 CIRTPA Transportation Policy Committee Brad Golightly, Chair Dallas County, County Supervisor Representing Name Title City of Adel Anthony Brown City Administrator City of Boone John Rouse Parks/Public Works Director City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Ryan Waller City Manager City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Brian Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Bill Zinnel County Supervisor Dallas County Brad Golightly County Supervisor Jasper County Dennis Carpenter County Supervisor Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Steve McCombs County Supervisor Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Lauris Olson County Supervisor Warren County Dean Yordi County Supervisor Ames Area MPO* Tony Filippini Transportation Planner FHWA* Darla Hugaboom Transportation Planner DART* Luis Montoya Transit Planner Iowa DOT* Andy Loonan District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Policy Committee Officers Representing Name Title Dallas County Brad Golightly Chair City of Huxley John Haldeman Vice-Chair Polk County Bret BandeLune Secretary/Treasurer

9 CIRTPA Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) Todd Hagan, Chair Madison County, Engineer Representing Name Title City of Adel Kip Overton Public Works Director City of Boone Daniel Scott City Engineer City of Huxley John Haldeman City Administrator City of Indianola Ryan Waller City Manager City of Knoxville Aaron Adams City Manager City of Nevada Larry Stevens City Engineer City of Newton Brian Laube Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Pella Denny Buyert Public Works Director City of Perry Josh Wuebker Assistant Public Works Director City of Story City Mark Jackson City Administrator City of Winterset Mark Nitchals City Administrator HIRTA Julia Castillo Executive Director Boone County Scott Kruse County Engineer Dallas County Alan Miller County Engineer Jasper County Russell Stutt County Engineer Madison County Todd Hagan County Engineer Marion County Tyler Christian County Engineer Polk County Bret VandeLune Land Use Planning Manager Story County Darren Moon County Engineer Warren County David Carroll County Engineer Ames Area MPO* Tony Filippini Transportation Planner FHWA* Darla Hugaboom Transportation Planner DART* Luis Montoya Transit Planner Iowa DOT* Andy Loonan District 1 Planner *Advisory, Non-Voting Member Transportation Technical Committee Officers Representing Name Title Madison County Todd Hagan Chair Warren County David Carroll Vice-Chair

10 C H A P T E R O N E Introduction The FFY TIP contains seven chapters covering the CIRTPA s guidelines for choosing and funding projects, status reports of the previous FFY projects, a listing of projects in the Federal highway and Federal transit element, a financial plan for all Federal-aid projects, required resolutions and certifications, and a summary of public comments. Chapter One: General Overview of the TIP The Introduction explains Federal transportation planning guidelines and provides background information on the CIRTPA s responsibilities, representatives, and committees. The chapter also includes information about the CIRTPA s public participation process procedures and provides an overview of the TIP, including its purpose, requirements, and the methodology to adopt, implement, amend, or modify the plan. Chapter Two: Project Selection Procedures This chapter provides background into the CIRTPA s project selection procedure, including eligibility requirements, basis of funding projects, and project scoring process. Chapter Three: Funding Programs This chapter provides a summary of the various funding programs available for project within the CIRTPA planning area including Federal, State, and local funding sources. The chapter also discusses the intent of each of these programs. Chapter Four: Federal Fiscal Year 2018 Status Reports The Federal Fiscal Year 2018 Status Reports chapter is a status listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize Federal funding in FFY Chapter Five: Federal Highway Administration Projects The Federal Highway Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid and State SWAP projects programmed to utilize FHWA and Iowa DOT funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). 1

11 Chapter Six: Federal Transit Administration Projects The Federal Transit Administration Projects chapter provides a listing of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FTA funds during the next four FFYs (FFY ). Chapter Seven: Financial Plan The Financial Plan chapter summarizes the financial availability of the CIRTPA to implement surface transportation improvements. The chapter includes the fiscal constraint of the STBG and TAP funds, listing the forecasted operations and maintenance expenditures, and forecasted non Federal-aid revenues. The chapter also includes a section discussing the transit funding Federal-aid by year. Chapter Eight: Public Comment The public comment chapter includes a summary on the disposition of comments made as part of the public review of the TIP on June 19, 2018, and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 19, Appendices Resolutions and Certifications The resolutions and certifications chapter includes the TIP s resolution of adoption by the CIRTPA, a self-certification of the planning process, and a certification of the financial capacity analysis. 2

12 G e n e r a l O v e r v i e w o f t h e T I P The transportation system in a regional planning area is vital for the movement of people and goods to, though, from, and within the area. A transportation system takes on two primary roles: the movement of people and the movement of goods. The transportation improvement program (TIP) is a regionally agreed upon list of surface transportation improvements that received Federal funding to move goods and people in a defined area s transportation system. The TIP and Federal Guidance Congress passed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1962, requiring regional agencies to conduct a "continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated" (3-C) transportation planning process. Congress took additional steps in drafting the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 by establishing Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urbanized areas over 50,000 persons in population, and by dedicating to MPOs a small portion of each state's funding from the Highway Trust Fund. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) empowered and provided for flexibility in the use of funding, improved state-regional cooperation, and enhanced public participation. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) legislation of 1998 expanded the role and responsibilities of metropolitan areas exceeding 200,000 persons in population with the designation of Transportation Management Areas (TMA). In 2005, Congress passed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). SAFETEA-LU guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation through Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2009 (September 30, 2009). Then the United States Senate passed continuing resolutions to extend SAFETEA-LU and to provide appropriations for transit programs through 2012 at funding levels consistent with authorized 2009 levels. SAFETEA-LU addressed the many challenges facing transportation systems including improving safety, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency in freight movement, increasing intermodal connectivity, and protecting the environment. SAFETEA-LU promoted more efficient and effective Federal surface transportation programs by focusing on transportation issues of national significance, while giving state and local transportation decision makers more flexibility to solve transportation problems in 3

13 their communities. 1 On July 6, 2012, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) was signed into law replacing SAFETEA-LU. MAP-21 provides essential funds for transportation projects ranging from passenger rail, freight transportation, highway and bridge projects, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. MAP-21 took effect on October 1, 2012, and funds surface transportation projects through September 30, The bill provides $105 billion in funding per year for Federal Fiscal Year s (FFY) 2013 and An extension was signed in 2014, which authorizes surface transportation funding through May 31, Continuing resolutions were signed that then extended funding until December of MAP-21 includes a number of major changes including the elimination of the Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancements Program, expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (TIFIA), and streamlining of the environmental review process. Federal transit program also chance slightly with Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom funds being consolidated into the Urbanized Area Formula Grants. 2 On December 4, 2015 the Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST) was signed into law replacing MAP-21. The FAST Act authorized $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs. MAP-21 included provisions to make the Federal surface transportation more streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal, and to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. The FAST Act builds on the changes made by MAP-21. The FAST ACT establishes and funds new programs to support critical transportation projects to ease congestion and facilitate movement. It also builds on the reforms of MAP-21 by incorporating changes aimed at ensuring the timely delivery of transportation projects. Federal Transportation Planning Process Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450, Subpart C, states that MPOs are to carry out a: continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive multimodal transportation planning

14 process, including the development of a metropolitan transportation plan and a transportation improvement program (TIP), that encourages and promotes the safe and efficient development, management, and operation of surface transportation systems to serve the mobility needs of people and freight (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) and foster economic growth and development, while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution. Section identifies ten planning factors to identify the scope of the metropolitan transportation planning process. These include: 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; 4. Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight; 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic patterns; 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; 7. Promote efficient system management and operation; 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system; 9. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and 10. Enhance travel and tourism. Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance The Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA) serves as the formal transportation planning body for the greater central Iowa regional area, carrying out the intent of Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations, Section 450. The CIRTPA works to carry out a 3-C multimodal transportation planning process for the greater central Iowa regional area, excluding the areas within the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Ames Area MPO. 5

15 Responsibilities The CIRTPA provides a regional forum to assure local, state, and Federal agencies and the public coordinate transportation planning issues, and to prepare transportation plans and programs. The CIRTPA develops both long and short-range multimodal transportation plans, selects, and approves projects for Federal funding based on regional priorities, and develops methods to reduce traffic congestion. The CIRTPA is responsible for these transportation planning activities within the geographic area identified as the Regional Planning Area (RPA). The CIRTPA approved its current RPA on January 10, The RPA includes all portions of Boone, Dallas, Jasper, Madison, Marion, Polk, Story, and Warren Counties except for the planning area of the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Membership Full voting membership to the CIRTPA is open to any county or city government located, wholly or partially, in the designated RPA containing a minimum population of 3,000 persons that adopts the CIRTPA's 28E Agreement (agreement entered into under Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, establishing the CIRTPA and its responsibilities). Currently, CIRTPA membership includes the following cities and counties: Figure 1.1: CIRTPA Membership Cities Counties Adel Pella Boone County Boone Perry Dallas County Huxley Story City Jasper County Indianola Winterset Madison County Knoxville Marion County Nevada Polk County Newton Story County Warren County 6

16 The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority (DART), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) serve as advisory non-voting, representatives to the CIRTPA. Organization Two designated committees form the structure of the CIRTPA: The Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). The CIRTPA member governments and agencies boards and councils appoint their own representatives to the TTC and to the TPC. The CIRTPA TTC is comprised primarily of representatives of member governments and agencies technical staffs, including planners, engineers, and city administrators. The CIRTPA TPC is primarily comprised of elected officials that include mayors, city council members, city managers, and county supervisors. The CIRTPA staff supports the TTC and the TPC. The TTC offers technical guidance and recommendations to the TPC. The TPC takes formal actions on transportation topics after reviewing and considering the TTC s recommendations. Additionally, the CIRTPA supports, as needed, other subcommittees, roundtables, working groups, and advisory committees of the Des Moines Area MPO on various transportation-related topics relevant to the CIRTPA's responsibilities. Representation Each member government is entitled to one representative each on the CIRTPA TPC and on the CIRTPA TTC. As previously noted, the Iowa DOT, DART, FHWA, FTA, and the AAMPO serve as advisory representatives to the CIRTPA and each have one representative. 7

17 Transportation Improvement Program The CIRTPA s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program (FFY TIP) serves as a list of Federal-aid eligible surface transportation improvements for the CIRTPA s MPA. The TIP covers a period of no less than four years and is updated annually for compatibility with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program development and approval process. The TIP identifies all Federal funds programmed during the four-year period (FFY ). Additionally, the TIP identifies all projects by Federal funding program and by FFY. TIP Requirements Title 23 of the CFR, Section , indicates the TIP must cover a period of no less than four years, be updated at least every four years, and be approved by the CIRTPA (or in the case of the State of Iowa, the TIP will be approved by the Iowa DOT). Additionally, Section states the TIP shall include: Capital and non-capital surface transportation projects within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning area proposed for funding; Contain all regionally significant projects requiring an action by the FHWA or the FTA whether or not the projects are to be funded; All regionally significant projects proposed to be funded with Federal funds other than those administered by FHWA or the FTA, as well as all regionally significant projects to be funded with non-federal funds; A financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommends any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs; A project, or a phase of a project, only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be available for the project within the time period contemplated for completion of the project; and, Sufficient descriptive material, estimated total project cost, amount of Federal funds proposed to be obligated during each program year, and identification of the agencies responsible for each project or phase. 8

18 Plan Consistency Each project or project phase included in the TIP must be consistent with other CIRTPA plans, including the Horizon Year 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (HY 2035 MTP). In addition, the CIRTPA requires consistency among the TIP and member governments and agencies capital improvement plans. In particular, the CIRTPA requires consistency among proposed short- and longrange projects, strategies, plans, and programs. TIP Adoption Adoption of the CIRPTA s FFY TIP is subject to the CIRPTA s review and approval. The review process consists of a public comment period that offers opportunities for review and comment of the draft FFY TIP. At the conclusion of the public review period, CIRTPA staff reviews and summarizes all submitted comments and presents the findings to the CIRTPA committees for consideration into the final FFY TIP. The CIRTPA submits the final (approved) FFY TIP, with a copy of the formal resolution, to the Iowa DOT. The Iowa DOT then reviews the plan to ensure compliance with Federal regulations. Revising the TIP Under Federal law, the CIRTPA may revise the TIP at any time under procedures agreed to by the cooperating parties consistent with the procedures established. Revisions are changes that occur between annual updates. The Iowa DOT identifies two types of revisions to the TIP: major revisions (amendments) and minor revisions (administrative modifications). The Iowa DOT considers the following criteria when determining the type of TIP revision. RPA Project Approval Process It is important to note that changes to programming entries outside the annual TIP process are also subject to CIRTPA s project selection criteria. Specific examples where this is applicable include: All new projects added must be selected using the approved planning agency criteria Sponsors, at their own discretion, cannot move STBG/STBG Swap and Iowa s TAP funding 9

19 from one project to another If project funding is deobligated those funds must be programmed through the project selection process. They are not to be programmed at the discretion of the project sponsor to whose project was originally provided funding. Amendments An amendment is a major change to a project in the TIP, including the addition or deletion of a project, a major change in project cost or project phase initiation dates, or a major change in the design concept or scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through lanes). The Iowa DOT considers amendments to the FFY TIP any proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Projects which are added or deleted from the TIP; Funding sources Adding an additional federal funding source; and, Scope changes Changing the project termini, project alignment, the amount of through traffic lanes, the type of work from an overlay to reconstruction, or the change to include widening of the roadway. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an amendment, the CIRTPA Policy Committee must approve the requested change and must follow the public participation process identified in the CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan (PPP). The PPP states the CIRTPA would schedule a public meeting to receive public comments at the Policy Committee meeting prior to the Policy Committee taking action on the proposed amendment. If the Policy Committee approves the amendment, the CIRTPA would notify the Iowa DOT, the FHWA, and the FTA. Administrative Modifications An administrative modification is a minor change to a project in the TIP, including minor changes to project phase costs, funding sources or previously included projects, and project or project phase initiation dates. The Iowa DOT considers as administrative modification to the FFY TIP proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria: 10

20 Project cost Projects in which the recalculated project costs do not increase Federal aid by more than 30 percent or do not increase total Federal aid by more than $2,000,000 from the original amount; Schedule changes Changes in schedules to projects which are included in the first four years of the TIP; Funding sources Changes to funding from one source to another; and, Scope changes All changes to the projects scope are amendments. If the Iowa DOT considers a change to the TIP to be an administrative modification, the CIRTPA would conduct a thorough review of the proposed administrative modification and would process the revision administratively by notifying the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA. SWAP Project Revision Process The Iowa DOT will make no distinction between amendments and administrative modifications for projects using swapped Primary Road Funds. Swap projects are subject to CIRTPA s project revision processes and all applicable state public meeting requirements. Redemonstration of Fiscal Constraint The Iowa DOT is required to ensure that the STIP is fiscally constrained not only at the time of approval but also throughout the fiscal year. As part of the draft STIP process the DOT adjusts its federal aid participation to utilize all remaining federal funds after local project sponsors have programmed their federal aid projects. Based on this approach, at the time of approval by FHWA and FTA, no additional federal aid funds are available to be added to the STIP and maintain fiscal constraint of the document. To maintain fiscal constraint of the STIP document any revision to the STIP that adds a new federal aid project or increases a project s STIP limit will require that a corresponding change be made to another programming entry to ensure that the STIP remains fiscally constrained. The federal aid funds moved to make way for the additional programmed federal aid need to be of the same federal aid program type. This requirement pertains to both administrative modifications and amendments to the STIP and therefore also applies when moving projects up from the out years of the STIP. To facilitate the STIP approval process a programming note should be added to both TPMS entries noting the TPMS number of the other project. 11

21 The requirement to ensure fiscal constraint does not apply to accomplishment year projects that have been already programmed at their full federal aid participation rate (typically 80 percent) and whose programming entry is being adjusted based on an updated cost estimate. 12

22 CHAPTER TWO Project Selection Procedures The CIRTPA, when considering project requests for STBG funds, should place primary emphasis upon region-wide transportation system improvement needs as identified in the CIRTPA s Long-Range Transportation Plan (Plan), with how those needs impact the movement of people and goods throughout the regional area, and how the requested project will have potential benefits and potential impacts on all communities in central Iowa. The CIRTPA should consider funding regionally significant transportation projects in the Plan. Only members of CIRTPA are eligible to receive STBG funding directly from CIRTPA. Surface Transportation Program Project Selection The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The method for the distribution of the CIRTPA s STBG funding occurs through a sub-allocation process to all CIRTPA member governments with populations over 5,000. The calculations used in the CIRTPA s STBG sub-allocation process reflect the formulas used by the Iowa DOT in distributing STBG funds to Iowa s regional planning affiliations. Each CIRTPA member government eligible to receive STBG funds makes individual decisions on where to expend those resources within their respective jurisdictions. Many CIRTPA members save their STBG allocation for several years in order to build more substantial projects. Additionally, a portion of CIRTPA s STBG funding is made available to non-sub-allocation entities. Communities and the Iowa DOT. Approximately 4.4% of STBG funding is made available in the accomplishment year for the upcoming TIP. Only road and bridge projects eligible to receive STBG may apply for funding. The CIRTPA Funding Subcommittee will make a recommendation to the CIRTPA Policy Committee for a final decision. 13

23 Transportation Alternatives Program Project Selection The CIRTPA follows the FHWA s Guidance for Transportation Enhancement Activities in the administration of the TAP project selection, which may be publicly accessed at Starting in FFY 2018, the Iowa DOT will be responsible for awarding TAP funding within the CIRTPA planning area. CIRTPA will still be responsible for collecting and scoring projects using the state approved scoring process. CIRTPA will also make recommendations to the state as to which projects should be funded. CIRTPA will continue to use the established scoring process to collect, score, and recommend projects to the Iowa DOT. The scoring process is outlined below: 1. The CIRTPA TTC s TAP Subcommittee evaluates TAP projects using the Iowa DOT s scoring process: The CIRTPA TTC and the CIRTPA TPC will be provided with the TAP Subcommittee representative scores, an average score, and the percentage points received for each project submitted. The CIRTPA TTC will develop a TAP recommendation to the CIRTPA TPC that identifies projects that the CIRTPA TTC recommends for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP. The final projects selected for inclusion in the draft CIRTPA TIP will be determined by the CIRTPA TPC. 2. The CIRTPA and its staff will continue to work with the Iowa DOT and other MPOs and RPAs in the state to refine the TAP application and implementation process. 3. Representation on the TAP Subcommittee will be updated annually prior to the solicitation of the TAP applications. The TAP Subcommittee will be an eightmember subcommittee, with one representative from each county. Each representative on the subcommittee will represent one county and all the cities within that county. Each of the eight member counties, and the member cities within those counties, will appoint one representative to the TAP Subcommittee. The scoring criterion for TAP projects is located in Appendix C. 14

24 STBG-SWAP Project Selection STBG Swap funding has expended eligibilities over STBG funding and can be awarded on roads with a federal functional classification of Minor Collector or higher in rural areas, all Farm to Market routes, and Collector or higher in urban areas. Highway Bridge Program Project Selection The primary factor in Highway Bridge Program project selection is condition. Counties annually review the results from the bridge inspections and make funding decisions based on these reports. Other factors that are considered include traffic counts, freight movement, and detour lengths. For example, a bridge posted for weight limits that is on an important freight and farm goods route might be replaced before other bridge that are in worse condition but don t have a significant impact on traffic movements. 15

25 CHAPTER THREE Funding Programs The following chapter summarized the various funding program available for projects in the CIRPTA s planning area. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) The purpose of the STBG is to provide flexible funding that may be used by localities for improvements on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, and intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities. The STBG is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities. The CIRTPA is allocated approximately $5 million per year in STBG funding. Transportation Alternatives Program Setaside (TAP) Legislative History Iowa s Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a new iteration of the program that was included in, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), a transportation authorization act which was in effect from 2013 to The MAP-21 program redefined the former Transportation Enhancements (TE) activities and consolidated these eligibilities with the former Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, Recreational Trails Program (RTP) and some types of projects that were previously funded through the discretionary National Scenic Byways (NSB) program which were all originally authorized under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and continued through two successive laws, TEA-21 and SAFETEA-LU. The most recent transportation authorization act, Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, was enacted in This act placed further restrictions on the selection of projects for funding under the federal TAP program structure which has led Iowa to implement a modified version of the federal program. Iowa Implementation On September 13, 2016, the Iowa Transportation Commission endorsed continuing to allow Iowa s Transportation Management Areas (TMAs), which include the Iowa portions of the metropolitan 16

26 planning areas surrounding Davenport, Des Moines, and Council Bluffs; Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs); and Regional Planning Affiliations (RPAs) to select the vast majority of projects eligible for this program through a regionally administered selection process. Under previous transportation authorization acts and in support of the state s history of encouraging regional planning through these organizations, a majority of funding is distributed to the TMAs, MPOs, and RPAs to directly select projects locally. With the goal of distributing funding as equitably as possible across the state, the Iowa DOT retains $1 million annually to administer a Statewide TAP program, geared toward statewide or multi-regional projects, while targeting the remaining funding to the TMAs, MPOs, and RPAs through the Local Projects TAP program. While consistent with the long-standing regional project selection process in Iowa, this method of project selection is no longer allowed under the competitive project selection requirements of the FAST Act for the federal Transportation Alternatives Set-aside program. The goal of the Local Projects TAP program is the selection of regional projects based on regional priorities. This is consistent with the state s 2017 long range transportation plan, Iowa in Motion In the past, the statewide bicycle/pedestrian planning framework was set within a network of statewide priority corridors with inconsistent local demand or support; however, experience has shown that most successful bicycle/pedestrian projects seize on opportunities and depend on local organization, commitment, and momentum to see a project through to completion. Each TMA, MPO, and RPA has an adopted long-range transportation plan that outlines goals and priorities for the transportation system in the region. Many of these organizations have also undertaken a variety of TAP-related bicycle/pedestrian planning activities which can help further define regional priorities for bicycle/pedestrian funding. Relying on the TMA, MPO, and RPA regional planning processes will result in a better overall Local Projects TAP program by selecting the local projects most 3 likely to be successful. To allow for the continued selection of projects by the TMAs, MPOs, and RPAs, Iowa DOT will administer the Iowa s TAP program with Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds rather than the funding apportioned to the state for the federal Transportation Alternatives Set-aside program. The use of STBG funds will allow the state the flexibility to continue to administer a TAP program that supports regional decision-making. TMAs, MPOs, and RPAs will solicit Local Projects TAP program project applications and select projects for award. Iowa DOT will annually calculate STBG-TAP funding targets for each MPO and 17

27 RPA on a per capita basis and TMA s will receive an STBG-TAP target which represents the Transportation Alternatives Set-aside funds sub-allocated to them via federal statute. The funds targeted to MPOs and RPAs must be awarded and programmed for projects eligible under the Iowa s TAP program guidance. The funding programs administered by the TMAs will continue to be bound by the federal Transportation Alternatives Set-aside guidance published by the Federal Highway Administration ( Iowa DOT will also make additional STBG funds, referred to as STBG-TAP-Flex funds, available to all TMAs, MPOs, and RPAs on a per capita basis. Each TMA, MPO, or RPA will decide how much, if any, of these STBG-TAP-Flex funds are rolled into the Local Projects TAP program administered by the agency. The CIRTPA groups activities into categories as follows: Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Provision of on-street and off-street facilities for pedestrians and bicycles and the conversion and use of abandoned railway corridors. New Construction subcategory is for projects creating a new facility, whereas the Major Reconstruction subcategory is for projects that result in a major rehabilitation of an existing facility. Historic Preservation: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities. Streetscape: Improvements to pedestrian facilities along a transportation corridor; sidewalks, lighting, safety-related infrastructure, signalization, and, traffic calming. Environmental: Control and removal of outdoor advertising; address storm water management, control, and water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehiclecaused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control. Safe Routes to Schools: Infrastructure related projects.-planning, design, and construction of infrastructure-related projects in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school. Non- 18

28 infrastructure related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school. The list of activities is intended to be illustrative, not exclusive. Measures in the activities listed, which go beyond what is customarily provided as environmental mitigation, are considered as Transportation Alternatives Programs. TAP projects are non-motorized transportation-related activities. Transportation Alternative Program projects must have a relationship to surface transportation. Proximity to a roadway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to surface transportation. Project sponsors should provide a clear and credible description of this relationship in their project s proposal. The focus is on a clear and credible description of how the proposed TAP project relates to the surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked: 1. In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through present or past use as a transportation resource? 2. Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in the development of surface transportation? 3. What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation? 4. What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s)? 5. When did the relationship(s) start and end or does the relationship(s) continue? 6. Is a relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of transportation funds? The TAP guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship. The following application types generally have been considered ineligible by the FHWA, in cooperation with the Iowa DOT: 1. Surfacing or resurfacing of existing roads or construction of new roads; 2. Construction or surfacing of parking lots (unless trailhead parking lot); 3. Construction of low water crossings on roads; 4. Picnic shelters, picnic tables, grills (unless directly related to a trailhead); 19

29 5. Construction of new buildings (unless they are rest rooms or trailhead shelters in conjunction with trails that will accommodate bikes or pedestrians); 6. Mitigation or National Environmental Policy Act Section 106 documentation of a bridge replacement; 7. Applications without a public sponsor (city, State, or county agency); 8. Historic applications where the facility or structure is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (please review with the State Historic Preservation Office); 9. Historic preservation activities that do not demonstrate some significant historic connection with transportation system; and, 10. Normal environmental mitigation work. Federal Funding Programs Some FHWA funds are distributed by statutory formulas, while other funds are discretionary (congressionally earmarked). The primary sources of FHWA formula funding to Iowa include: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): CMAQ provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs tasked with helping to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These projects can include those that reduce congestion and improve air quality. Demonstration Funding (DEMO): Demonstration funding is a combination of different programs and sources. The FHWA administers discretionary programs through various offices representing special funding categories. An appropriation bill provides money to a discretionary program, through special congressionally directed appropriations or through legislative acts, such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): This is a core federal aid program that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. A portion of this funding is targeted for use on local high risk rural roads and railway highway crossings. Metropolitan Planning Program (PL): FHWA provides funding for this program to the State of Iowa based on urbanized area population. The funds are dedicated to support transportation planning projects in urbanized areas with more than 50,000 persons. 20

30 National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): NHPP funds are available to be used on projects that improve the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), including some state and U.S. highways and interstates. State Planning and Research (SPR): SPR funds are available to funds statewide planning and research activities. A portion of SPR funds are provided to RPAs to support transportation planning efforts. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG): This program is designed to address specific issues identified by Congress and provides flexible funding for projects to preserve or improve the condition/performance of transportation facilities, including any federal aid highway or public road bridge. STBG funding may be utilized on: Roadway projects on federal aid routes Bridge projects on any public road Transit capital improvements TAP eligible activities Planning activities Iowa targets STBG funding to each of its 27 MPOs and RPAs on an annual basis for programming based on regional priorities. Iowa has implemented a Swap program that allows MPOs and RPAs, at their discretion, to swap targeted federal STBG funding for state Primary Road Fund dollars. Iowa also targets a portion of its STBG funding directly to counties for use on county bridge projects. Iowa s swap program allows counties, at their discretion, to swap federal STBG funding for state Primary Road Fund dollars. These funds can be used on either on system or off system bridges however off system bridge investments must be continued to maintain the ability to transfer the federal STBG set aside for off system bridges. Transportation Alternatives Setaside Program (TAP): This program is a setaside from the STBG program. The TAP program provides funding to expand travel choices and improve the transportation experience. Transportation Alternatives Program projects improve the cultural, historic, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of transportation infrastructure. Projects can include creation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and the restoration of historic transportation facilities, among others. It is important to note that some types of projects eligible under the SAFETEA LU program Transportation Enhancements are no longer eligible, or have modified eligibility, under 21

31 the TAP. All projects programmed with TAP funds should be verified to ensure compatibility with TAP eligibility. Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) and Tribal Transportation Program (TTP): The FLAP Program provides funding for projects that improve access within, and to, federal lands. The FLAP funding will be distributed through a grant process where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit, rank, and select projects to receive funding. The TTP provides safe and adequate transportation and public road access to and within Indian reservations and Indian lands. Funds are distributed based on a statutory formula based on tribal population, road mileage, and average tribal shares of the former Tribal Transportation Allocation Methodology. National Highway Freight Program (NHFP): NHFP funds are distributed to states via a formula process and are targeted towards transportation projects that benefit freight movements. Ten percent of NHFP funds will be targeted towards non DOT sponsored State Funding Programs In addition to the distribution of Federal-aid formula funds, the Iowa Department of Transportation administers several grant programs through application processes that need to be documented in the TIP. They include the following: City Bridge Program: portion of STBG funding dedicated to local bridge projects is set aside for the funding of bridge projects within cities. Eligible projects need to be classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Projects are rated and prioritized by the Office of Local Systems with awards based upon criteria identified in the application process. Projects awarded grant funding are subject to a federal aid obligation limitation of $1 million. Iowa has implemented a Swap program that allows cities, at their discretion, to swap federal STBG funding for state Primary Road fund dollars. Highway Safety Improvement Program Secondary (HSIP-Secondary): This program is funded using a portion of Iowa s Highway Safety Improvement Program apportionment and funds safety projects on rural roadways. Funding targeted towards these local projects is eligible to be swapped for Primary Road Fund dollars. 22

32 Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP): The ICAAP funds projects that are intended to maximize emission reductions through traffic flow improvements, reduced vehicle miles of travel, and reduced single occupancy vehicle trips. This program utilizes $4 million of Iowa s CMAQ apportionment. Funding targeted towards these local projects is eligible to be swapped for Primary Road Fund dollars. Recreational Trail Program: This program provides federal funding for both motorized and nonmotorized trail projects and is funded through a takedown from Iowa s TAP funding. The decision to participate in this program is made annually by the Iowa Transportation Commission. Iowa s Transportation Alternatives Program: This program targets STBG funding to MPOs and RPAs to award to locally sponsored projects that expand travel choices and improve the motorized and nonmotized transportation experience. Transit Funding Programs Similar to the FHWA programs, the transit funding authorized by the FAST Act is managed in several ways. The largest amount is distributed to the states or to large metropolitan areas by formula. Other program funds are discretionary, and some are earmarked for specific projects. Program funds include the following: Metropolitan Transportation Planning program (Section 5303 and 5305): FTA provides funding for this program to the state based on its urbanized area populations. The funds are dedicated to support transportation planning projects in urbanized areas with more than 50,000 persons. Statewide Transportation Planning Program (Section 5304 and 5305): These funds come to the state based on population and are used to support transportation planning projects in non-urbanized areas. They are combined with the Section 5311 funds and allocated among Iowa s RPAs. Urbanized Area Formula Grants program (Section 5307): FTA provides transit operating, planning, and capital assistance funds directly to local recipients in urbanized areas with populations between 50,000 and 200,000. Assistance amounts are based on 23

33 population and density figures and transit performance factors for larger areas. Local recipients must apply directly to the FTA. Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310): Funding is provided through this program to increase the mobility for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Part of the funding is administered along with the Non-Urbanized funding with the remaining funds allocated among urbanized transit systems in areas with a population of less than 200,000. Urbanized areas with more than 200,000 in population receive a direct allocation. Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311): This program provides capital and operating assistance for rural and small urban transit systems. Fifteen percent of these funds are allocated to Intercity Bus projects. A portion of the funding is also allocated to support rural transit planning. The remaining funds are combined with the rural portion (30 percent) of Section 5310 funds and allocated among regional and small urban transit systems based on their relative performance in the prior years. Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP - Section 5311(b)(3)): This funding is also used for statewide training events and to support transit funding fellowships for regional and small urban transit staff or planners. Bus and Bus Facilities Program (5339): This formula program provides federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program. TAP Flexible Funds: Certain Title 23 funds may be used for transit purposes. Transit capital assistance is an eligible use of STBG funds. Transit capital and start-up operating assistance is an eligible use of ICAAP funds. When ICAAP and STBG funds are programmed for transit projects, they are transferred to the FTA. The ICAAP funds are applied for and administered by the Office of Public Transit. STBG funds for small urban and regional transit systems are also administered by the Office of Public Transit. State Transit Assistance (STA): All public transit systems are eligible for funding. These funds can be used by the public transit system for operating, capital, or planning expenses related to the provision of open-to-the-public passenger transportation. The majority of the funds received in a fiscal year are distributed to individual transit systems are the basis of a formula using performance statistics from the most recent available year. o STA Special Projects: Each year up to $300,000 of the total STA funds are set aside to fund special projects. These can include grants to individual systems 24

34 to support transit services that are developed in conjunction with human services agencies. Grants can also be awarded to statewide projects that improve public transit in Iowa through such means as technical training for transit system or planning agency personnel, statewide marketing campaigns, etc. This funding is also used to mirror the RTAP to support individual transit training fellowships for large urban transit staff or planners. STA Coordination Special Projects: Funds provide assistance with startup of new services that have been identified as needs by health, employment, or human services agencies participating in the passenger transportation planning process. Public Transit Infrastructure Grant Fund: This is a state program that can fund transit facility projects that involve new construction, reconstruction, or remodeling. To qualify, projects must include a vertical component. FHWA Funding Transferred to FTA STBG funds designated for transit investments are required to be transferred from FHWA to FTA for administration. These projects must be programmed in the highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA) section of the TIP in the FFY they are to be transferred. The process is initiated with a letter from the RPA/MPO to the Iowa DOT s Office of Program Management and to the Office of Public Transit requesting the transfer of funds. The Office of Program Management will then review the request and submit it to FHWA for processing. STBG funds used for planning efforts require projects to be included in the CIRTPA s Unified Planning Work Program and TIP. Funds will be transferred to a Consolidated Planning Grant by request of the Office of Systems Planning. Finally, transit projects receiving awards through the ICAAP also require a transfer of funds. The process for these types of transfers is the same as transferring STBG funds for transit investments, except that no letter from the RPA/MPO requesting the transfer is required. 25

35 CHAPTER FOUR Federal Fiscal Year 2018 Status Reports The following are status reports of all Federal-aid projects programmed to utilize FHWA or FTA funds in FFY The status of projects may include a notice of receiving Federal authorization, letting, canceling, rolling over, or scheduled letting before October 1, TABLE 4.1 City of Boone Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-0750(634) Industrial Park Road Improvements: approx. 350 feet west of Argo street to Corporate Limits Let March 2018 TABLE 4.2 Boone County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-C008(71) 5F-08 On 110 th Street, Over TRIB. OF SQUAW CREEK, on NLINE S10 T85 R Let April 2018 TABLE 4.3 Dallas County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status RTP NRT-C025(103) 9G-25 On Raccoon River Valley Trail to High Trestle Trail Connector City of Bouton to Quinlan Avenue Authorization FFY 2018 STBG-HBP BROS-C025(C-39)--5F-25 On Pioneer Av., Over Slough Creek, along WLINE S27 T81 R Rolled to FFY 2022 STBG STP-S-C025(106)--5E-25 On F25, from Guthrie Co. to P Let January 2018 TABLE 4.4 Iowa Department of Transportation Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status HSIP HSIP-144()--2H-25 IA 144: NCL OF PERRY TO SCL OF RIPPEY Let February

36 Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status HSIP HSIPX--14()--3L-50 IA 14: 1.6 MI W OF IA 224 TO 2.2 MI N OF LAUREL NHPP IM-NHS--35() I-35: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.6 MI S OF US 30 (NB & SB) NHPP HSIPX--14()--3L-50 IA 14: 1.6 MI W OF IA 224 TO 2.2 MI N OF LAUREL NHPP IMX--80() On I-80, from IA 224 east approx 2.1 mi to N Skunk River PRF NHSN--65()--2R-50 US 65: IA 330 AND IA 117 INTERSECTION PRF IMN--80()--0E-50 I-80: POLK CO TO IOWA CO PRF NHSN--30()--2R-8 US 30: W OF CO RD R18 TO E OF IA FHWA Approved Let January 2018 Let May 2018 Letting September 2018 Let December 2016 Let May 2017 Let November 2017 PRF STPN--117()--2J-50 IA 117: BYERS BRANCH 1.5 MI NW OF MINGO Let July 2017 PRF STPN--224()--2J-50 IA 224: 0.1 MI N OF MAIN ST IN KELLOGG Let July 2017 PRF IMN--80()--0E-77 I-80: FOUR MILE CREEK 1.4 MI E OF E JCT I Let July 2017 PRF IMN--35()--0E-85 I-35: US 30 INTERCHANGE IN AMES PRF STPN-17()--2J-08 On IA17, from S of UP RR to S Jct IA PRF BRFN--169() US 169: NORTH BRANCH NORTH RIVER 5.2 MI S OF CO RD F PRF BRFN--6() US 6: IAIS RR 1.5 MI E OF IA PRF IMN--235()--0E-77 I-235: W I-35/80 INTERCHANGE TO E I-35/80 INTERCHANGE PRF IMN--35()--0E-77 I-35: W JCT I-80 TO WRIGHT CO PRF IMN--80()--0E-77 I-80: E JCT I-35 TO JASPER CO PRF BRFN--14() IA 14: BUCK CREEK 2.7 MI S OF CO RD F PRF BRFN--14() IA 14: CHERRY CREEK 4.3 MI S OF I PRF IMN--35()--0E-91 I-35: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) Letting December 2018 Let October 2017 Let November 2017 Let February 2018 Let May 2017 Let May 2017 Let May 2017 Let November 2017 Let November 2017 Let November

37 Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status PRF STPN--69()--2J-91 US 69: 1 MI N OF CLARKE CO TO INDIANOLA PRF NHSN--92()--2R-91 IA 92: 1 MI W OF SANDYVILLE AND 5 MI W OF IA PRF STPN--210()--2J-8 IA 210: IA 17 IN MADRID TO WCL OF SLATER Let March 2018 Let March 2018 Let December 2017 TABLE 4.5 Iowa DNR Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status MISC FLAP-0625(603) 7L-63 On Dubuque drive and surrounding area: from Lake Red Rock to approx ft east Letting September 2018 TABLE 4.6 City of Indianola Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status TAP STP-E-3680(615)--8V-91 Jerry Kelley Trail, from Memorial Park along Iowa Ave, Kenwood Blvd, and Euclid Ave to N W St Roll to FFY 2019 TABLE 4.7 Jasper County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BRS-SWAP-C050(121)--FF-50 On County Road F48, Over Cherry Creek, from W 36th St east 300 Feet, in S32 T80 R Roll to FFY 2019 STBG-HBP BROS-C050(117)--8J-50 E 84th St S: Over Elk Creek Let November 2017 STBG-HBP BRS-C050(115) On County Road F17, Over The North Skunk River, approximately 500 feet west of State Hwy 14, along NLINE S21 T81 R Let May 2018 TABLE 4.8 City of Knoxville Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-4040(608) In the city of Knoxville, Pavement rehabilitation on Robinson, Jackson, and Main streets Let June

38 TABLE 4.9 Madison County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG-HBP BROS-C061(109)--8J-61 ALL: From VARIOUS to VARIOUS STBG-HBP STBG-HBP BRS-C061(108) BROS-C061(104)--8J-61 On G61: Over Waterway approx. 1.3 miles east of P61 in NE S17 T74 R28 On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH RIVER, at SE S5 T77 R FHWA Authorized Letting October 2018 Letting September 2018 TABLE 4.10 Marion County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C063(127)--5E-63 On S45 from IA Hwy 5 to G76 & G76 from S45 E 2 Miles Let February 2018 TABLE 4.11 City of Nevada Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status In the city of Nevada, Lincoln Hwy from approx. Let May STBG STP-U-5405(611) /4 mi w of w 18th st to approx. 1/4 mi e of w 18th st TABLE 4.12 City of Newton Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status Iowa Speedway Drive, from approx. 1,200 feet Letting July STBG STP-U-5482(613) south of 1st Avenue E to approx. 1,900 feet north of Interstate 80 TABLE 4.13 Polk County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C077(220)--5E-77 On NW Madrid Dr, from BR 132 to Hwy Let January

39 TABLE 4.14 RPA-11 Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG RGPL-PA11()--ST-00 HIRTA: Vehicle Purchase FHWA Authorized TABLE 4.15 Story County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status TAP TAP-R-8612(601)--8T-85 Praeri Rail Trail Extension Project Roll to FFY 2019 STBG-HBP BROS-C085(144)--8J-85 On Sand Hill Trail, Over Unnamed Stream, in S20 T83 R Let April 2018 TABLE 4.16 Warren County Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-S-C091(119)--5E-91 R-63: From North River to DM CITY LIMIT Let November 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(115)--8J-91 On R73/138TH AVE 0.3 MILES SOUTH OF G76, Over UNNAMED STREAM, NE S30 T74 R Let November 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(116)--8J-91 On 55TH AVE, SOUTH OF ILLINOIS ST 0.4 MILES, over UNNAMED STREAM, at Ctr S23 T76 R Let November 2017 STBG-HBP BRS-C091(114) On R45, Over BROADHORN CREEK, 0.4 miles north of Roosevelt St Let December 2017 STBG-HBP BRS-C091(113) On R45, Over S RIVER, 0.3 miles south of Roosevelt St Let December 2017 STBG-HBP BROS-C091(120)--8J-91 On 220TH AVE, Over BRANCH FLANK CREEK, S3 T74 R Let January

40 TABLE 4.17 City of Winterset Fund Category Project Number Location/Description TPMS Status STBG STP-U-8497() In the city of Winterset, 10th Street Reconstruction, from Iowa 92 and Benton Street Rolled to FFY 2020 TABLE 4.18 HIRTA Fund Category Transit Location/Description Status STA, Admin Completed June Light Duty Bus (158" wb) VSS Unit #: 3323 Moved to FFY Light Duty Bus (158" wb) VSS Unit #: 8722 Moved to FFY Light Duty Bus (158" wb) VSS Unit #: 8723 Moved to FFY Light Duty Bus (176" wb) VSS Unit #: 1140 Moved to FFY Light Duty Bus (176" wb) VSS Unit #: 1141 Moved to FFY Light Duty Bus (176" wb) VSS Unit #: 1139 Moved to FFY STP 4247 STP 4207 STP 4731 STP 4740 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) VSS Unit #: 7641 Minivan VSS Unit #: 4419 Minivan VSS Unit #: 6627 Mobility Coordinator Conversion Van VSS Conversion Van VSS Minivan VSS Moved to FFY2019 Moved to FFY2019 Moved to FFY2019 Completed June 2018 Moved to FFY2019 Moved to FFY2019 Moved to FFY

41 CHAPTER FIVE Federal Highway Administration Projects The first FFY in the FFY TIP is referred to as the Annual Element. Projects for the entire four years (FFY ) are listed together by funding program and in order of FFY. The CIRTPA s program for FFY contains 105 projects with a total cost of approximately $171,085,000. Of the 105 projects in the CIRTPA s program, 99 projects totaling $166,157,000 are roadway transportation improvements. Six projects totaling $4,928,000 are bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts in $1,000s by year, and Transportation Program Management System (TPMS) identification number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The TPMS identification number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s TIP. Projects are listed in alphabetical order by county, then by city. Project funding amounts are listed by year and are listed in $1,000s. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal Aid refers to the amount of Federal-aid the project has received. Regional FA (Federal-aid) refers to the amount of Federal-aid received from the CIRTPA (i.e., STBG and TAP funds). SWAP refers to the amount of swapped Federal-aid funding received by project. 32

42 Generated on 07/19/2018 Draft TIP (2019) (filtered) 33

43 RPA Transportation Improvement Program TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# SWAP-STBG - SWAP - STBG equivalent Region Wide STBG-SWAP-6125(602)--SG-00 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 01/16/2019 2, ,254 Pleasantville In the city of Pleasantville, Jasper Street Reconstruction -- Federal Aid from West Street to Hobson Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen,Ped/Bike Paving -- Regional FA SWAP PA NOTE: STIP limit is $254,486 Boone STBG-SWAP-C008(71)--FG MI Project Total 1, ,550 Boone CRD On E57, from P-54 in Berkley east 4.5 Miles to Hwy. -- Federal Aid 169, along NLINE S4,3,2,1,6 T82 R28 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 4,3,2,1,6:82:28 Regional FA 1, , SWAP 1, , STBG-SWAP-C008(67)--FG MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,479 Boone CRD On Lower Ledges Rd and E-52, from Lower Ledges -- Federal Aid Easterly 4.2 Miles to Hwy 17 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, , STBG-SWAP-C008(76)--FG Project Total 0 0 2, ,000 Boone CRD On R18 from E-57 South 3.9 miles to 310th Street. -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, ,600 Dallas STBG-SWAP-C025(H-43)--FG-25 5 MI Project Total ,250 4,250 Dallas CRD On R22, from Highway 44 North 5.0 Miles to F31, -- Federal Aid S31/32, 29/30, 19/20, 17/18, 8/7 T80 R26, Grant Township Final TIP Approved 31/32, 29/30, Regional FA Pavement Rehab 19/20, 17/18, 8/7:80: SWAP Jasper STBG-SWAP-5482(621)--SG-50 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 01/16/ Newton In the city of Newton, On 1st Ave (Hwy 6) from approx. -- Federal Aid 300' west of E 14th St to Iowa Speedway Dr. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP

44 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) STBG-SWAP-5482()--SG-50 0 Project Total 0 0 2, ,500 Newton In the city of Newton, Union Drive Reconstruction, -- Federal Aid from N 4th Avenue W to N 19th Avenue W Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 2, , SWAP 0 0 2, ,000 Madison STBG-SWAP-C061()--FG-61 6 MI Project Total 0 2, ,000 Madison CRD On G61 (MACKSBURG RD), from -- Federal Aid ADAIR/MADISON COUNTY LINE EAST 6 Miles to FIELDSTONE AVE. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 2, , SWAP 0 2, , STBG-SWAP-8497()--SG-61 0 Project Total 0 1, ,300 Winterset In the city of Winterset, 10th Street Reconstruction, -- Federal Aid from Iowa 92 and Benton Street. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1, , SWAP 0 1, ,300 Marion STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Larson Street from -- Federal Aid Highway 14 to Grant Street and Brobst Street to Roche Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, Rock Island from Hwy 14 to -- Federal Aid 1st st and on 2nd st from Reno st to Rock Island Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Roche St from Robinson St -- Federal Aid to Main St Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Park Lane from Pleasant -- Federal Aid Street to Madison Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP

45 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Marion - 63 (continued) STBG-SWAP-C063(T14 Shldrs)--FG Project Total Marion CRD T14, from Pella Corp. Limit to Jasper Co. Line -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Widening,Shoulder Grading 15:77:18 Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-C063(CS)--FG-63 0 Project Total Marion CRD On Various, from Countywide to Countywide -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-5947()--SG-63 0 Project Total 0 0 1, ,650 Pella In the city of Pella, Oskaloosa St, from SE 16 to 240 St -- Federal Aid (Eagle Lane) including the intersection approx. 300 ft Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, , STBG-SWAP-C063(CS2)--FG-63 0 Project Total Marion CRD On Various, from Countywide to Countywide -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP Polk STBG-SWAP-C077(HMA )--FG Project Total 0 1, ,148 Polk CRD On NW 58 St, from CL of Polk City to NW 166 Ave -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP Story STBG-SWAP-C085(R38)--FG-85 8 MI Project Total ,280 2,280 Story CRD On R38, from Slater City Limits north 8.0 Miles -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA ,280 2, SWAP ,280 2, STBG-SWAP-C085(S27)--FG MI Project Total ,100 1,100 Story CRD On S27, from 295th St. North 5.5 Miles to Hwy Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA ,100 1, SWAP ,100 1,100 Warren STBG-SWAP-C091(121)--FG-91 DOT Letting: 3.9 MI Project Total TA 1, ,700 11/20/2018 Warren CRD G58, from 118th ST to Hwy 65/69 and Hwy 65 to Milo -- Federal Aid city limits Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 24:75:23 Regional FA 1, , SWAP 1, ,700 36

46 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# STBG - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Region Wide RGPL-PA11()--ST-00 0 Project Total TA RPA-11 HIRTA: Vehicle Purchase -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Transit Investments -- Regional FA SWAP PA NOTE: Federal Aid 2019: $116,806, 2020: $115,025, 2021: $114,535, and 2022: $115,820 Warren STP-U-3680(614) DOT Letting: 01/21/ MI Project Total TA Indianola In the city of Indianola, On S J & K ST, from approx. -- Federal Aid 600' N OF IA 92 to approx 500' S OF IA Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signals,Right of Way -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-HBP - Surface Transportation Block Grant Program - Bridge Program Jasper [NBIS: ] BRS-C050(116) DOT Letting: 11/19/ MI Project Total 0 1, ,500 TA Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Squaw Creek, just of W Federal Aid 116th St S, on NLINE S11 T79 R21 0 1, ,200 Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation 11:79:21 Regional FA -- SWAP Madison [NBIS: ] BROS-C061(104)--8J-61 DOT Letting: 10/16/ MI Project Total 1, ,200 TA Madison CRD On COTTONWOOD AVE, Over N BR NORTH Federal Aid RIVER, at SE S5 T77 R Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5:77:29 Regional FA -- SWAP SWAP-HBP - SWAP-HBP equivalent Boone [NBIS: 77940] BROS-SWAP-C008(41)--SE-08 DOT Letting: 0 MI Project Total 06/18/ Boone CRD 180th Street: Hwy Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:84:28 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C008(74)--SE-08 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 11/20/ Boone CRD On U AVE, Over MONTGOMERY CREEK, along Federal Aid WLINE S33 T85 R25 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 33:85:25 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: 77500] BROS-SWAP-C008(72)--SE-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On 240TH ST, Over BEAVER CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S16 T83 R28 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 16:83:28 Regional FA -- SWAP

47 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Boone - 08 (continued) [NBIS: 78270] BROS-SWAP-C008(77)--FE-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On 150TH ST, Over TRIB. OF SQUAW CREEK, along Federal Aid NLINE S36 T85 R25 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 36:85:25 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: 77860] BROS-SWAP-C008(xx)--FE-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On J AVE, OVER UP RR, S27 T84 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27:84:27 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: 77100] BROS-SWAP-C008(xx)--SE-08 0 Project Total Boone CRD On QW LN, Over BIKE TRAIL, S35 T82 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 35:82:26 Regional FA -- SWAP Dallas [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C025(E-44)--SE-25 0 MI Project Total Dallas CRD On B Avenue, Over Mosquito Creek, S5/6 T80 R29, Federal Aid Lincoln Township Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 5/6:80:29 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C025(J-39)--SE MI Project Total Dallas CRD On 270TH ST, Over Panther Creek, S15/22 T79 R28, Federal Aid Colfax Township Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 15/22:79:28 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C025(C-39)--FE MI Project Total Dallas CRD On Pioneer Avenue, Over Slough Creek, S27/28 T Federal Aid R27, Beaver Township Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27/28:81:27 Regional FA -- SWAP Jasper [NBIS: 30430] BRS-SWAP-C050(120)--FF-50 DOT Letting: 0 MI Project Total 11/20/ Jasper CRD F-48: Over Prairie Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 34:80:20 Regional FA -- SWAP

48 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C050(121)--FF-50 DOT Letting: 0.1 MI Project Total 11/20/2018 1, ,300 Jasper CRD On County Road F48, Over Cherry Creek, from W 36th Federal Aid St east 300 Feet, in S32 T80 R19 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 32:80:19 Regional FA -- SWAP 1, , [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C050()--FE MI Project Total Jasper CRD On S 64th Ave E, Over Sugar Creek, in S25 T79 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:79:17 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C050()--SE-50 0 Project Total Jasper CRD On G13, Over M BR BUCKLEY CREEK, along Federal Aid NLINE S4 T77 R17 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 4:77:17 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C050( )--SE MI Project Total Jasper CRD N 75th Ave W: Over Clear Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 35:81:21 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C050()--FF MI Project Total 0 1, ,700 Jasper CRD On County Road F24, Over Indian Creek, along NLINE Federal Aid S3 T80 R21 approximately 500 east of State Hwy 117 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:80:21 Regional FA -- SWAP 0 1, , [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C050()--FF MI Project Total Jasper CRD On F-24, Over Clear Creek, along NLINE S2 T80 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 2:80:21 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C050()--SE-50 0 Project Total Jasper CRD On INDIGO AVE, Over BEAR CREEK, along NLINE Federal Aid S25 T80 R18 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 25:80:18 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C050()--FF-50 0 Project Total Jasper CRD On T38, Over SUGAR CREEK, on WLINE S13 T Federal Aid R17 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 13:80:17 Regional FA -- SWAP

49 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Madison [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C061(108)--FF-61 DOT Letting: 0 MI Project Total 12/18/2018 1, ,250 Madison CRD On G61: Over Waterway approx. 1.3 miles east of P Federal Aid in NE S17 T74 R28 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:74:28 Regional FA -- SWAP 1, , [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C061()--SE-61 DOT Letting: 01/16/ Project Total 1, ,000 Madison CRD On VALLEYVIEW AVE., Over DRAINAGE, S10 T Federal Aid R26 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:75:26 Regional FA -- SWAP 1, , [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C061(114)--FE-61 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 11/20/ Madison CRD On G46, Over DRAINAGE, S12 T75 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:75:26 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: 4410] BRS-SWAP-C061()--FF-61 0 Project Total 1, ,800 Madison CRD On R21 (PERU RD), Over CLANTON CREEK, at NW 4410 Federal Aid S12 T74 R27 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:74:27 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C061(115)--FF-61 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 12/18/2018 2, ,000 Madison CRD On R35 (BEV. PARK RD.), Over CLANTON CREEK, Federal Aid at NW S12 T75 R26 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:75:26 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C061()--FE-61 0 Project Total Madison CRD On R21, Over BRANCH TO CLANTON CREEK, at Federal Aid S1 T74 R27 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 1:74:27 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C061()--FF-61 0 MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,200 Madison CRD On P53, Over NORTH RIVER, S10 T76 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 10:76:29 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: 34730] BRS-SWAP-C061()--FF-61 0 MI Project Total ,250 1,250 Madison CRD Clark Tower Rd.: Over Clanton Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 12:74:28 Regional FA -- SWAP ,000 1,000 40

50 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Marion [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C063( )--FE-63 0 Project Total Marion CRD On KENNEDY ST, Over COMPETINE CREEK, from Federal Aid S71 W 0.25 Miles Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA -- SWAP Polk [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C077(215)--FE-77 DOT Letting: 0 MI Project Total 11/20/ Polk CRD On NE 94 Ave E of NE 112 St Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C077(BR-1844)--SE-77 0 Project Total 0 0 1, ,000 Polk CRD On NE 162ND AVE, Over INDIAN CREEK, E Of NE Federal Aid 104TH ST Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA -- SWAP 0 0 1, ,000 Story [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C085(145)--SE-85 DOT Letting: 0.1 MI Project Total 02/19/ Story CRD 300TH ST: Over Unnamed Creek Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 13:82:24 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C085(148)--SE-85 DOT Letting: 0.1 MI Project Total 01/22/ Story CRD On 570th Ave., Over Ballard Creek, along WLINE S Federal Aid T82 R23 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:82:23 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C085(W19)--FF MI Project Total Story CRD On E18, Over Drainage Ditch, on NLINE S19 T85 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 19:85:22 Regional FA -- SWAP Warren [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C091(117)--SE-91 DOT Letting: 0 MI Project Total 11/20/ Warren CRD On QUEBEC ST, Over FLANK CREEK, from 220th Federal Aid Ave. East 0.3 Miles, at S3 T74 R22 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 3:74:22 Regional FA -- SWAP

51 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C091(B1709)--SE MI Project Total Warren CRD 140TH AVE: Scotch Ridge Rd S 0.4 MI Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 17:77:23 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C091(M2109)--SE MI Project Total Warren CRD On 30TH AVE, Over PAINTER CREEK, S21 T75 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 21:75:25 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BRS-SWAP-C091(S-2703)--FF MI Project Total Warren CRD On S23, Over COTTON CREEK, S27 T74 R Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 27:74:22 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C091(B0857)--SE MI Project Total Warren CRD On BUCHANAN ST, 0.25 miles east of 143rd Ave, Federal Aid Over BRANCH NORTH RIVER, S8 T77 R23 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 8:77:23 Regional FA -- SWAP [NBIS: ] BROS-SWAP-C091(C2820)--SE MI Project Total Warren CRD On DUBUQUE ST, 0.5 MILE WEST OF R63, Over Federal Aid UNNAMED STREAM, S28 T77 R24 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement 28:77:24 Regional FA -- SWAP SWAP-STBG - SWAP - STBG equivalent Region Wide STBG-SWAP-6125(602)--SG-00 DOT Letting: 01/16/ Project Total 2, ,254 Pleasantville In the city of Pleasantville, Jasper Street Reconstruction -- Federal Aid from West Street to Hobson Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen,Ped/Bike Paving -- Regional FA SWAP PA NOTE: STIP limit is $254,486 Boone STBG-SWAP-C008(71)--FG MI Project Total 1, ,550 Boone CRD On E57, from P-54 in Berkley east 4.5 Miles to Hwy. -- Federal Aid 169, along NLINE S4,3,2,1,6 T82 R28 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 4,3,2,1,6:82:28 Regional FA 1, , SWAP 1, ,240 42

52 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Boone - 08 (continued) STBG-SWAP-C008(67)--FG MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,479 Boone CRD On Lower Ledges Rd and E-52, from Lower Ledges -- Federal Aid Easterly 4.2 Miles to Hwy 17 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, , STBG-SWAP-C008(76)--FG Project Total 0 0 2, ,000 Boone CRD On R18 from E-57 South 3.9 miles to 310th Street. -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pave -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, ,600 Dallas STBG-SWAP-C025(H-43)--FG-25 5 MI Project Total ,250 4,250 Dallas CRD On R22, from Highway 44 North 5.0 Miles to F31, -- Federal Aid S31/32, 29/30, 19/20, 17/18, 8/7 T80 R26, Grant Township Final TIP Approved 31/32, 29/30, Regional FA Pavement Rehab 19/20, 17/18, 8/7:80: SWAP Jasper STBG-SWAP-5482(621)--SG-50 DOT Letting: 0 Project Total 01/16/ Newton In the city of Newton, On 1st Ave (Hwy 6) from -- Federal Aid approx. 300' west of E 14th St to Iowa Speedway Dr. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-5482()--SG-50 0 Project Total 0 0 2, ,500 Newton In the city of Newton, Union Drive Reconstruction, -- Federal Aid from N 4th Avenue W to N 19th Avenue W Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 2, , SWAP 0 0 2, ,000 Madison STBG-SWAP-C061()--FG-61 6 MI Project Total 0 2, ,000 Madison CRD On G61 (MACKSBURG RD), from -- Federal Aid ADAIR/MADISON COUNTY LINE EAST 6 Miles to FIELDSTONE AVE. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 2, , SWAP 0 2, , STBG-SWAP-8497()--SG-61 0 Project Total 0 1, ,300 Winterset In the city of Winterset, 10th Street Reconstruction, -- Federal Aid from Iowa 92 and Benton Street. Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 1, , SWAP 0 1, ,

53 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Marion STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Larson Street from -- Federal Aid Highway 14 to Grant Street and Brobst Street to Roche Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, Rock Island from Hwy 14 to -- Federal Aid 1st st and on 2nd st from Reno st to Rock Island Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Roche St from Robinson St -- Federal Aid to Main St Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-4040()--SG-63 0 Project Total Knoxville In the city of Knoxville, On Park Lane from Pleasant -- Federal Aid Street to Madison Street Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-C063(T14 Shldrs)--FG Project Total Marion CRD T14, from Pella Corp. Limit to Jasper Co. Line -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Widening,Shoulder Grading 15:77:18 Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-C063(CS)--FG-63 0 Project Total Marion CRD On Various, from Countywide to Countywide -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP STBG-SWAP-5947()--SG-63 0 Project Total 0 0 1, ,650 Pella In the city of Pella, Oskaloosa St, from SE 16 to 240 St -- Federal Aid (Eagle Lane) including the intersection approx. 300 ft Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA 0 0 1, , SWAP 0 0 1, ,650 44

54 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Marion STBG-SWAP-C063(CS2)--FG-63 0 Project Total Marion CRD On Various, from Countywide to Countywide -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP Polk STBG-SWAP-C077(HMA )--FG Project Total 0 1, ,148 Polk CRD On NW 58 St, from CL of Polk City to NW 166 Ave -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA SWAP Story STBG-SWAP-C085(R38)--FG-85 8 MI Project Total ,280 2,280 Story CRD On R38, from Slater City Limits north 8.0 Miles -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA ,280 2, SWAP ,280 2, STBG-SWAP-C085(S27)--FG MI Project Total ,100 1,100 Story CRD On S27, from 295th St. North 5.5 Miles to Hwy Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA ,100 1, SWAP ,100 1,100 Warren STBG-SWAP-C091(121)--FG-91 DOT Letting: 3.9 MI Project Total TA 1, ,700 11/20/2018 Warren CRD G58, from 118th ST to Hwy 65/69 and Hwy 65 to Milo -- Federal Aid city limits Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab 24:75:23 Regional FA 1, , SWAP 1, ,700 NHPP - National Highway Performance Program Dallas IM--80() MI Project Total ,642 6,273 21,915 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 I-80: US 6/169 IN DE SOTO TO CO RD R16 -- Federal Aid ,078 5,646 19,724 Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement,Grading -- Regional FA -- SWAP Jasper IM-NHS--80() MI Project Total 6,262 6,241 11, ,918 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: N SKUNK RIVER 2.1 MI E OF IA Federal Aid 5,636 5,617 10, ,527 Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Pave,Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA -- SWAP NHSX--92()--3H-61 0 MI Project Total 2, ,465 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 IA 92: E JCT US 169 TO I Federal Aid 1, ,972 Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA -- SWAP 45

55 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Story NHSX--30()--3H-85 0 MI Project Total ,400 6,400 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 30: 0.5 MI E OF I-35 TO E OF 590TH AVE -- Federal Aid ,120 5,120 Final TIP Approved Bridge New,Grading,Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP Warren IM-NHS--35() MI Project Total , ,711 TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: N OF NORTH RIVER TO S OF BADGER -- Federal Aid CREEK (SB) , ,040 Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Bridge Replacement,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA -- SWAP LIFETIME FUNDING NOTE: Sum of funding from this program plus any spending prior to 2019 plus any anticipated future amounts after 2022: $255,163,000 STBG-TAP - Transportation Alternatives Dallas TAP-U-C025()--8I-25 0 Project Total TA Dallas CCB Raccoon River Valley Trail Bridges Rehabilitation -- Federal Aid Project Phase I Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA SWAP Story TAP-R-3630(092)--8T-85 DOT Letting: 04/16/ Project Total TA Huxley In the city of Huxley, On Heart of Iowa Nature Trail -- Federal Aid Paving from Hwy 69 to 320th Street Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grading,Ped/Bike Paving -- Regional FA SWAP TAP-U-C085(601)--8I-85 DOT Letting: 11/20/ Project Total TA Story CCB Praeri Rail Trail Extension Project to Dakins Lake -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave,Ped/Bike Miscellaneous -- Regional FA SWAP DOT NOTE: Project eligible for FHWA TAP funding TAP-U-C085(151)--8I-85 DOT Letting: 02/19/ Project Total TA Story CCB On Heart of Iowa Nature Trail: Slater to Huxley Hard -- Federal Aid Surfacing and Trail Improvements Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA SWAP 46

56 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Warren TAP-U-3680(615)--8I-91 DOT Letting: 12/18/ Project Total TA Indianola In the city of Indianola, On Jerry Kelley Trail, Along -- Federal Aid Euclid Ave, Kenwood Blvd, and Iowa Ave to Memorial Park Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- Regional FA SWAP PA NOTE: Project tied to STP-E-3680(613)--8V-91 which was deobligated. $26,600 spent on PE the remaining, $282,920 was transferred to (615)and rolled to FFY TAP funding limit: $282,920 DOT NOTE: Project eligible for FHWA TAP funding RTP - Recreational Trails Program Jasper NRT-C050()--9G Project Total 1, ,837 TA Jasper CCB From NSNWR entrance road to S 80th Avenue W and -- Federal Aid from Red Rock Park in Monroe to Jasper Street and IA interchange Final TIP Approved Ped/Bike Grading -- Regional FA SWAP PA NOTE: Total NRT STIP limit of $263,712. $89,737 in FFY 2018 and $173,975 in FFY SWAP-CMAQ - SWAP - Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Warren ICAAP-SWAP-3680()--SH-91 0 Project Total Indianola In the city of Indianola, Traffic Signal System Timings -- Federal Aid Update Final TIP Approved Traffic Signals -- Regional FA -- SWAP PA NOTE: ICAAP Award of $121,600 MISC - Federal Lands Access Program - TAP type project Marion FLAP-0625(603)--7L-63 DOT Letting: 11/20/ Project Total TA IADNR-D04-RPA11 On Dubuque drive and surrounding area: from Lake -- Federal Aid Red Rock to approx ft east Final TIP Approved Miscellaneous -- Regional FA -- SWAP 47

57 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# PRF - Primary Road Funds Boone STPN--17()--2J-8 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 17: S OF UP RR TO S JCT IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Culvert Replacement,Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP STPN--210()--2J-8 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 210: IA 17 IN MADRID TO WCL OF SLATER -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP NHSN--30()--2R-8 0 MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,697 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 30: CO RD R18 INTERSECTION -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP STPN--17()--2J-8 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 17: 0.5 MI N OF US 30 TO 3 MI N (STATE -- Federal Aid SHARE) Final TIP Approved Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--210() MI Project Total ,440 3,440 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 210: DES MOINES RIVER 0.3 MI E OF CO RD -- Federal Aid E62 Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation -- Regional FA -- SWAP Dallas NHSN--6()--2R-25 0 MI Project Total 1, ,000 TA DOT-D04-RPA11 US 6: S OF 302ND PL TO GREENWOOD HILLS DR -- Federal Aid IN ADEL (STATE SHARE) Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab/Widen -- Regional FA -- SWAP Jasper NHSN--65()--2R-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: IA 330 AND IA 117 INTERSECTION -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Erosion Control -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: 0.8 MI E OF CO RD T38 TO IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Slope Improvement -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: IAIS RR 0.4 MI W OF IA 14 (EB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP 48

58 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Jasper - 50 (continued) BRFN--163() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 163: WALNUT CREEK 2.4 MI W OF IA 117 (EB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP STPN--117()--2J-50 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 117: 0.2 MI S OF I Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Slope Improvement -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 3, ,772 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: 2.5 MI E OF IA 224 TO 1.0 MI W OF IA Federal Aid (EB & WB) Final TIP Approved Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--80()--0E-50 0 MI Project Total 0 0 1, ,920 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-80: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.5 MI W OF IA Federal Aid (EB & WB) Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--117() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 117: STREAM 0.5 MI S OF CO RD F24 -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--117() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 IA 117: SQUAW CREEK 1.7 MI N OF CO RD S6G -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--6() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 6: DITCH 0.2 MI E OF CO RD T12 -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Replacement -- Regional FA -- SWAP Madison BRFN--169() MI Project Total TA DOT-D04-RPA11 US 169: NORTH RIVER 3.5 MI N OF N JCT IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--5() MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 5: WHITE BREAST CREEK 2.7 MI N OF IA Federal Aid (SB) Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP 49

59 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Polk STPN--35()--2J-77 0 MI Project Total 2, ,346 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: REST AREAS 3.0 MI S OF IA 210 (NB & SB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--65() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: SKUNK RIVER 7.6 MI N OF I-80 (NB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP Story STPN--35()--2J-85 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: US 30 INTERCHANGE IN AMES -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Erosion Control,Traffic Signs -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--35()--0E-85 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 I-35: SOUTH SKUNK RIVER 2.6 MI S OF US Federal Aid (NB & SB) Final TIP Approved Erosion Control -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--65() MI Project Total TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 65: CO RD E MI N OF US Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Rehabilitation,Right of Way -- Regional FA -- SWAP NHSN--30()--2R-85 0 MI Project Total 0 6, ,292 TA DOT-D01-RPA11 US 30: E OF W 18TH ST TO E OF CO RD S27 IN -- Federal Aid NEVADA (EB & WB) Final TIP Approved Grade and Pave -- Regional FA -- SWAP Warren IMN--35()--0E-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CLANTON CREEK TO N OF IA 92 (SB) -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Erosion Control -- Regional FA -- SWAP BRFN--92() MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: SOUTH RIVER 0.4 MI E OF E JCT CO RD -- Federal Aid S23 Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP 50

60 TPMS Project # Length Pgm'd Amounts in 1000's Sponsor Location FHWA# Appr. Status Funding Program S:T:R FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total STIP# Warren - 91 (continued) IMN--35()--0E-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CO RD G64 INTERCHANGE -- Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP IMN--35()--0E-91 0 MI Project Total TA DOT-D05-RPA11 I-35: CO RD G50 INTERCHANGE 4.7 MI S OF IA Federal Aid Final TIP Approved Bridge Deck Overlay -- Regional FA -- SWAP HSIP - Highway Safety Improvement Program Warren HSIP-92()--3L-91 0 Project Total 7, ,427 TA DOT-D05-RPA11 IA 92: N ST IN INDIANOLA TO W JCT IA 5 -- Federal Aid (STATE SHARE) 6, ,182 Final TIP Approved Pavement Widening,Pavement Rehab -- Regional FA -- SWAP DOT NOTE: Joint HSIP and 3R Project 51

61 CHAPTER SIX Federal Transit Administrations Projects A portion of Federal fuel tax revenue is placed in the Mass Transit Account of the Federal Highway Trust Fund. These funds, along with General Fund appropriations, are reserved for transit purposes and are administered by the FTA. Program Format The project listing is organized by TIP funding program. The sponsor name, project number, project location, project description, project funding, programmed amounts by year, and Transit Number are shown for each project within the different TIP funding categories. The Transit Number is a unique number given to each project included in the CIRTPA s Transit Program. Project Total refers to the total cost of the project. Federal-Aid refers to the amount of Federal-Aid (FA) the project has received. State-Aid (SA) refers to the amount of funding the transit provider has received from the State. 52

62 Draft 2019 Transit Program (Filtered) 53

63 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (44 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY19 FY20 FY21 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 2387 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 3327 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2391 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1142 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 2880 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 8725 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3234 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Replacement Unit #: 1143 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3243 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1146 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4201 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 6525 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4208 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4433 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 2225 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4435 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Replacement Unit #: 1145 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4447 Minivan Total 55,000 Capital VSS FA 46,750 Replacement Unit #: 6526 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4451 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1142 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4455 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 5517 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4456 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Replacement Unit #: 5519 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4741 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Expansion SA STA, 5311 Region 11 / HIRTA 4913 Day to Day Operations/Admin Total 1,326,399 Operations FA 773,811 Other SA 552,588 54

64 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (44 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4960 Non-ADA Standard Minivan Total 33,000 Capital VSS FA 19,736 Expansion SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 5155 Conversion Van Total 57,000 Capital VSS FA 33,000 Expansion SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4733 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 7642 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4458 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 6527 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4459 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 7642 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4460 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 7645 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4461 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 7646 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4462 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 7647 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4452 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 3326 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4453 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 4421 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4449 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 2230 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4204 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS FA 48,535 Replacement Unit #: 8724 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4205 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 8725 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4199 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 5515 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4200 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 6525 SA 55

65 Fund Sponsor Transit # Expense Class Project Type RPA-11 (44 Projects) Desc / Add Ons / Addnl Info FY19 FY20 FY21 FY Region 11 / HIRTA 4443 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1147 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4444 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1148 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4445 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1149 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4446 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 1150 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4454 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 5516 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4463 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 8727 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 4736 Conversion Van Total 57,100 Capital VSS, Low Floor FA 48,535 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4457 Minivan Total 55,000 Capital VSS FA 46,750 Replacement Unit #: 5520 SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 5156 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 66,000 Expansion SA STP Region 11 / HIRTA 5157 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 144,775 Capital VSS, Low Floor FA 115,820 Expansion SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4450 Light Duty Bus (158" wb) Total 91,100 Capital VSS FA 77,435 Replacement Unit #: 2231 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4448 Light Duty Bus (138" wb) Total 89,000 Capital VSS FA 75,650 Replacement Unit #: 2229 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 4442 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,560 Capital VSS FA 82,085 Replacement Unit #: 1146 SA 5339 Region 11 / HIRTA 3242 Light Duty Bus (176" wb) Total 96,500 Capital VSS FA 82,025 Replacement Unit #: 2228 SA 56

66 CHAPTER SEVEN Financial Plan The FAST Act states that the TIP shall include a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, identification of public and private resources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP, and recommend any additional financing strategies for needed projects and programs. Federal Highway Administration Projects For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain systemlevel estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). In addition, revenue and cost estimates for the TIP must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect year of expenditure dollars, based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the CIRTPA, State(s), and public transportation operator(s). The CIRTPA staff utilized an inflation rate of 4% to determine year of expenditure dollars. The FFY TIP is fiscally constrained by funding sources. Funding sources include Federal, State, and local financial resources. The CIRTPA recognizes that in the event of Federal, State, and local funding changes, amendments, or revisions, it will need to reflect the change in project funds within the FFY TIP. CIRTPA Federal-aid Funding Sources The total Federal share of projects included in the first year (annual element) of the TIP shall not exceed levels of funding committed to the CIRTPA. Additionally, the total Federal share of projects included in the second, third, fourth, and/or subsequent years of the TIP may not exceed levels of funding committed, or reasonably expected to be available, to the CIRTPA. Table 7.1 displays a listing of all Federal-Aid funding sources in the TIP and the amount of Federal funds committed by source and the total project cost of all projects utilizing Federal fund by funding 57

67 source for FFYs Table 7.2 displays a listing of all SWAP funding sources in the TIP and the amount of SWAP funds committed by source and the total project cost of all projects utilizing SWAP fund by funding source for FFYs Tables 7.3 and 7.4 displays the financial constraint of the STBG and TAP funding sources for Federal Fiscal Years , breaking down all revenues, expenditures, programmed funds, adjustments, and returns. TABLE 7.1 CIRTPA Federal-Aid Funding Sources Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid HSIP $7,427,000 $6,182,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MISC $87,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NHPP $8,727,000 $7,608,000 $6,241,000 $5,617,000 $43,768,000 $39,392,000 $12,673,000 $10,766,000 PRF $5,687,000 $0 $8,540,000 $0 $7,579,000 $0 $6,825,000 $0 RTP $1,837,000 $414,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG $150,000 $117,000 $1,099,000 $880,000 $144,000 $115,000 $145,000 $116,000 STBG-HBP $1,200,000 $960,000 $1,500,000 1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG-TAP $3,091,000 $1,427,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $28,206,000 $16,778,000 $17,380,000 $7,697,000 $51,491,000 $39,507,000 $19,643,000 $10,882,000 TABLE 7.2 CIRTPA SWAP Funding Sources Federal-Aid Funding Sources SWAP- CMAQ Total Cost SWAP Total Cost SWAP Total Cost SWAP Total Cost SWAP $142,000 $122,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SWAP-HBP $11,945,000 $8,625,000 $4,945,000 $4,645,000 $4,320,000 $3,890,000 $4,920,000 $4,365,000 SWAP-STBG $6,426,000 $3,647,000 $6,283,000 $5,275,000 $7,704,000 $6,509,000 $7,680,000 $4,230,000 Totals $18,513,000 $12,394,000 $11,228,000 $9,920,000 $12,024,000 $10,399,000 $12,600,000 $8,595,000 58

68 TABLE 7.3 CIRTPA Surface Transportation Program Financial Constraint Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $2,256,695 $4,276,182 $3,401,029 $2,244,858 STBG Target $5,563,523 $5,371,000 $5,499,000 $5,499,000 Flex Funds $222,250 $222,000 $220,000 $220,000 Subtotal $8,040,468 $9,867,182 $9,120,029 $7,963,858 Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0 Programmed STBG Funds $3,764,286 $6,401,029 $6,875,171 $4,597,456 Balance $4,276,182 $3,401,029 $2,244,858 $3,366,402 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation s Fiscal Year rd Quarter Status Report. TABLE 7.4 CIRTPA Transportation Alternatives Program Financial Constraint Unobligated Balance (Carryover) $1,525,923 $145,610 $432,610 $719,610 TAP Target $286,607 $287,000 $287,000 $287,000 Subtotal $1,812,530 $432,610 $719,610 $1,006,610 Transfer Out $0 $0 $0 $0 Programmed STBG Funds $1,666,920 $0 $0 $0 Balance $145,610 $432,610 $719,610 $1,006,610 Based on Iowa Department of Transportation s Fiscal Year rd Quarter Status Report. Operations and Maintenance Costs and Projections The following tables demonstrate the costs of operations and maintenance to the Federal-aid System. Table 7.5 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.6 and 7.7 contain the projected operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid city streets within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

69 TABLE CIRTPA City Street Operations and Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name On- System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Roadway Maintenance Total Operations Maintenance on Federal- Aid Routes Operations on Federal- Aid Routes Boone County $704,564 $126,034 $29,646 $11,310 Boone $1,138,180 $580,364 $324,179 $165,300 Dallas County $877,918 $294,242 $115,121 $43,997 Adel $357,416 $151,240 $41,509 $17,564 Perry $618,144 $260,537 $160,617 $67,697 Jasper County $789,058 $388,151 $64,853 $35,339 Newton $1,284,781 $419,407 $351,579 $114,770 Madison County $245,757 $52,808 $43,050 $7,286 Winterset $781,449 $29,761 $141,947 $5,406 Marion County $326,994 $101,946 $58,540 $25,427 Knoxville $384,551 $467,865 $98,226 $119,507 Pella $898,017 $118,431 $233,769 $30,830 Polk County $155,468 $29,757 $22 $830 Story County $846,702 $179,628 $123,335 $30,373 Huxley $93,544 $221,849 $10,420 $24,712 Nevada $614,300 $116,141 $204,203 $38,607 Story City $369,173 $96,895 $51,874 $13,615 Warren County $306,067 $121,744 $47,507 $15,139 Indianola $1,172,720 $317,241 $256,148 $69,292 Totals $11,964,803 $4,074,041 $2,356,545 $837,001 Source: 2017 City Street Finance Reports 60

70 TABLE 7.6 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Maintenance Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $29,646 $30,832 $32,065 $33,348 $34,682 $36,069 Boone $324,179 $337,146 $350,632 $364,657 $379,244 $394,413 Dallas County $115,121 $119,726 $124,515 $129,495 $134,675 $140,062 Adel $41,509 $43,169 $44,896 $46,692 $48,560 $50,502 Perry $160,617 $167,042 $173,723 $180,672 $187,899 $195,415 Jasper County $64,853 $67,447 $70,145 $72,951 $75,869 $78,904 Newton $351,579 $365,642 $380,268 $395,479 $411,298 $427,750 Madison County $43,050 $44,772 $46,563 $48,425 $50,362 $52,377 Winterset $141,947 $147,625 $153,530 $159,671 $166,058 $172,700 Marion County $58,540 $60,882 $63,317 $65,850 $68,484 $71,223 Knoxville $98,226 $102,155 $106,241 $110,491 $114,911 $119,507 Pella $233,769 $243,120 $252,845 $262,958 $273,477 $284,416 Polk County $22 $23 $24 $25 $26 $27 Story County $123,335 $128,268 $133,399 $138,735 $144,285 $150,056 Huxley $10,420 $10,837 $11,270 $11,721 $12,190 $12,678 Nevada $204,203 $212,371 $220,866 $229,701 $238,889 $248,444 Story City $51,874 $53,949 $56,107 $58,351 $60,685 $63,113 Warren County $47,507 $49,407 $51,384 $53,439 $55,576 $57,800 Indianola $256,148 $266,394 $277,050 $288,132 $299,657 $311,643 Totals $2,356,545 $2,450,807 $2,548,839 $2,650,793 $2,756,824 $2,867,097 Source: 2017 City Street Finance Reports 61

71 TABLE 7.7 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Operation Expenditures on Federal-Aid Routes City/County Name Boone County $11,310 $11,762 $12,233 $12,722 $13,231 $13,760 Boone $165,300 $171,912 $178,788 $185,940 $193,378 $201,113 Dallas County $43,997 $45,757 $47,587 $49,491 $51,470 $53,529 Adel $17,564 $18,267 $18,997 $19,757 $20,547 $21,369 Perry $67,697 $70,405 $73,221 $76,150 $79,196 $82,364 Jasper County $35,339 $36,753 $38,223 $39,752 $41,342 $42,995 Newton $114,770 $119,361 $124,135 $129,101 $134,265 $139,635 Madison County $7,286 $7,577 $7,881 $8,196 $8,524 $8,865 Winterset $5,406 $5,622 $5,847 $6,081 $6,324 $6,577 Marion County $25,427 $26,444 $27,502 $28,602 $29,746 $30,936 Knoxville $119,507 $124,287 $129,259 $134,429 $139,806 $145,399 Pella $30,830 $32,063 $33,346 $34,680 $36,067 $37,509 Polk County $830 $863 $898 $934 $971 $1,010 Story County $30,373 $31,588 $32,851 $34,165 $35,532 $36,953 Huxley $24,712 $25,700 $26,728 $27,798 $28,910 $30,066 Nevada $38,607 $40,151 $41,757 $43,428 $45,165 $46,971 Story City $13,615 $14,160 $14,726 $15,315 $15,928 $16,565 Warren County $15,139 $15,745 $16,374 $17,029 $17,710 $18,419 Indianola $69,292 $72,064 $74,946 $77,944 $81,062 $84,304 Totals $837,001 $870,481 $905,300 $941,512 $979,173 $1,018,340 Source: 2017 City Street Finance Reports Table 7.8 contains the operation and maintenance costs on Federal-aid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA. Tables 7.9 and 7.10 contain the projected maintenance and operation costs on Federalaid county roads within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

72 TABLE CIRTPA County Road Operations and Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name On-System Miles Total Miles Percentage Federal-Aid Routes Total Maintenance Cost Total Operations Cost Maintenance Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Operations Cost on Federal-Aid Routes Boone County $4,012,623 $1,749,695 $1,242,418 $541,753 Dallas County $4,560,519 $2,401,386 $1,513,835 $797,125 Jasper County $4,987,223 $2,175,107 $1,668,771 $727,811 Madison County $4,104,866 $1,615,152 $1,508,532 $593,566 Marion County $4,368,214 $1,544,427 $1,618,834 $572,355 Polk County $5,480,615 $2,341,970 $2,480,168 $1,059,823 Story County $3,663,775 $1,741,391 $1,439,482 $684,185 Warren County $3,620,653 $2,640,946 $1,350,951 $985,399 Totals $34,798,487 $16,210,074 $12,822,990 $5,962,017 Source: 2017 County Engineers Annual Report TABLE 7.9 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Maintenance Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $1,247,068 $1,296,951 $1,348,829 $1,402,782 $1,458,893 $1,517,249 Dallas County $1,404,223 $1,460,392 $1,518,808 $1,579,560 $1,642,742 $1,708,452 Jasper County $1,800,652 $1,872,678 $1,947,585 $2,025,489 $2,106,508 $2,190,768 Madison County $1,265,599 $1,316,223 $1,368,872 $1,423,627 $1,480,572 $1,539,795 Marion County $1,356,052 $1,410,294 $1,466,706 $1,525,374 $1,586,389 $1,649,845 Polk County $2,224,730 $2,313,719 $2,406,268 $2,502,519 $2,602,619 $2,706,724 Story County $1,403,718 $1,459,867 $1,518,261 $1,578,992 $1,642,152 $1,707,838 Warren County $1,616,180 $1,680,827 $1,748,060 $1,817,983 $1,890,702 $1,966,330 Totals $12,318,222 $12,810,951 $13,323,389 $13,856,324 $14,410,577 $14,987,001 Source: 2017 County Engineers Annual Report TABLE 7.10 CIRTPA Forecasted County Road Operations Costs on Federal-Aid Routes County Name Boone County $1,242,418 $1,292,114 $1,343,799 $1,397,551 $1,453,453 $1,511,591 Dallas County $1,513,835 $1,574,388 $1,637,364 $1,702,858 $1,770,972 $1,841,811 Jasper County $1,668,771 $1,735,522 $1,804,943 $1,877,141 $1,952,226 $2,030,315 Madison County $1,508,532 $1,568,874 $1,631,628 $1,696,894 $1,764,769 $1,835,360 Marion County $1,618,834 $1,683,587 $1,750,931 $1,820,968 $1,893,807 $1,969,559 Polk County $2,480,168 $2,579,375 $2,682,550 $2,789,852 $2,901,446 $3,017,504 Story County $1,439,482 $1,497,061 $1,556,944 $1,619,221 $1,683,990 $1,751,350 Warren County $1,350,951 $1,404,989 $1,461,188 $1,519,636 $1,580,421 $1,643,638 Totals $12,822,990 $13,335,910 $13,869,346 $14,424,120 $15,001,085 $15,601,128 Source: 2017 County Engineers Annual Report 63

73 Non-Federal-aid Revenue Sources and Projections In addition to operations and maintenance costs are Non Federal-aid revenue sources. Non Federalaid revenue sources and projections are included to demonstrate the revenue sources and amounts available for operation and maintenance of the system in the CIRTPA planning area. Table 7.11 contains the receipts for the Road Use Tax Fund and other road monies on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA. Table 7.12 contains the projected revenues on Federal-aid routes within each city in the CIRTPA based on data in Table Table 7.13 contains the receipts for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.14 contains the projected revenues for Farm-to-Market Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table Table 7.15 contains the receipts for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA. Table 7.16 contains the projected revenues for the Secondary Road Fund Federal-aid routes within each county in the CIRTPA based on data in Table

74 TABLE CIRTPA City Street Fund Receipts City/County Name Road Use Tax Fund Federal-Aid Receipts Miscellaneous Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $628,841 $329,924 $336,685 $1,295,450 Boone $1,571,783 $616,769 $203,660 $2,392,212 Dallas County $1,040,585 $1,200,189 $381,179 $2,621,953 Adel $457,097 $82,366 $4,538,472 $5,077,935 Perry $956,155 $55,476 $828,704 $1,840,335 Jasper County $1,124,672 $154,870 $902,534 $2,182,076 Newton $1,893,688 $0 $0 $1,893,688 Madison County $335,610 $50,527 $199,425 $585,562 Winterset $644,306 $383,384 $861,927 $1,889,617 Marion County $462,369 $168,743 $168,248 $799,360 Knoxville $907,863 $968,003 $38,375 $1,914,241 Pella $1,285,135 $1,953,546 $0 $3,238,681 Polk County $161,504 $78,782 $0 $240,286 Story County $984,241 $505,330 $43,170 $1,532,741 Huxley $411,785 $27,810 $0 $439,595 Nevada $843,929 $175,059 $5,232,666 $6,251,654 Story City $425,937 $17,392 $2,759,904 $3,203,233 Warren County $387,346 $338,472 $10,134 $735,952 Indianola $1,835,092 $38,571 $713,313 $2,586,976 Totals $16,357,938 $7,145,213 $17,218,396 $40,721,547 Source: 2017 City Street Finance Reports 65

75 TABLE 7.12 CIRTPA Forecasted City Street Fund Revenue City/County Name Boone County $1,295,450 $1,347,268 $1,401,159 $1,457,205 $1,515,493 $1,576,113 Boone $2,392,212 $2,487,900 $2,587,416 $2,690,913 $2,798,550 $2,910,492 Dallas County $2,621,953 $2,726,831 $2,835,904 $2,949,341 $3,067,314 $3,190,007 Adel $5,077,935 $5,281,052 $5,492,294 $5,711,986 $5,940,466 $6,178,084 Perry $1,840,335 $1,913,948 $1,990,506 $2,070,127 $2,152,932 $2,239,049 Jasper County $2,182,076 $2,269,359 $2,360,133 $2,454,539 $2,552,720 $2,654,829 Newton $1,893,688 $1,969,436 $2,048,213 $2,130,141 $2,215,347 $2,303,961 Madison County $585,562 $608,984 $633,344 $658,678 $685,025 $712,426 Winterset $1,889,617 $1,965,202 $2,043,810 $2,125,562 $2,210,585 $2,299,008 Marion County $799,360 $831,334 $864,588 $899,171 $935,138 $972,544 Knoxville $1,914,241 $1,990,811 $2,070,443 $2,153,261 $2,239,391 $2,328,967 Pella $3,238,681 $3,368,228 $3,502,957 $3,643,076 $3,788,799 $3,940,351 Polk County $240,286 $249,897 $259,893 $270,289 $281,101 $292,345 Story County $1,532,741 $1,594,051 $1,657,813 $1,724,125 $1,793,090 $1,864,814 Huxley $439,595 $457,179 $475,466 $494,485 $514,264 $534,835 Nevada $6,251,654 $6,501,720 $6,761,789 $7,032,261 $7,313,551 $7,606,093 Story City $3,203,233 $3,331,362 $3,464,617 $3,603,201 $3,747,330 $3,897,223 Warren County $735,952 $765,390 $796,006 $827,846 $860,960 $895,398 Indianola $2,586,976 $2,690,455 $2,798,073 $2,909,996 $3,026,396 $3,147,452 Totals $40,721,547 $42,350,409 $44,044,425 $45,806,202 $47,638,450 $49,543,988 Source: 2016 City Street Finance Reports 66

76 TABLE 7.13 State Fiscal Year 2017 CIRTPA Farm-to-Market Receipts County Name 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Boone County $290,315 $306,598 $333,165 $208,594 $1,138,671 Dallas County $313,427 $331,006 $359,688 $225,201 $1,229,322 Jasper County $390,296 $412,186 $447,903 $280,432 $1,530,817 Madison County $274,503 $289,899 $315,018 $197,233 $1,076,653 Marion County $329,075 $347,532 $377,646 $236,444 $1,290,698 Polk County $521,211 $550,444 $598,140 $374,495 $2,044,290 Story County $329,116 $347,575 $377,692 $236,473 $1,290,855 Warren County $352,791 $372,578 $404,862 $253,484 $1,383,716 Totals $2,800,733 $2,957,818 $3,214,114 $2,012,356 $10,985,022 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.14 CIRTPA Forecasted Farm-to-Market Revenue County Name Boone County $1,138,671 $1,184,218 $1,231,587 $1,280,850 $1,332,084 $1,385,368 Dallas County $1,229,322 $1,278,495 $1,329,635 $1,382,820 $1,438,133 $1,495,658 Jasper County $1,530,817 $1,592,050 $1,655,732 $1,721,961 $1,790,839 $1,862,473 Madison County $1,076,653 $1,119,719 $1,164,508 $1,211,088 $1,259,531 $1,309,913 Marion County $1,290,698 $1,342,326 $1,396,019 $1,451,859 $1,509,934 $1,570,331 Polk County $2,044,290 $2,126,061 $2,211,104 $2,299,548 $2,391,530 $2,487,191 Story County $1,290,855 $1,342,489 $1,396,189 $1,452,037 $1,510,118 $1,570,523 Warren County $1,383,716 $1,439,065 $1,496,627 $1,556,492 $1,618,752 $1,683,502 Totals $10,985,022 $11,424,423 $11,881,400 $12,356,656 $12,850,922 $13,364,959 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 67

77 TABLE 7.15 Fiscal Year 2017 CIRTPA Secondary Road Fund Receipts County Name Property Tax L.O.S.T. Road Use Tax Fund Farm-to- Market Extension Revenue Time-21 Bridge Funds Transfer Credits Misc Receipts Total Receipts Boone County $2,030,433 $311,528 $3,666,126 $26,250 $358,430 $478,456 $0 $45,727 $6,916,950 Dallas County $3,893,244 $0 $3,848,416 $35,617 $377,203 $0 $0 $244,142 $8,398,621 Jasper County $2,733,103 $0 $4,972,865 $35,079 $486,649 $76,565 $9,816 $139,984 $8,454,060 Madison County $1,527,039 $107,742 $3,514,565 $38,955 $344,727 $733,013 $0 $52,385 $6,318,426 Marion County $2,030,880 $0 $3,970,270 $22,659 $387,186 $0 $7,619 $87,754 $6,506,368 Polk County $6,871,382 $0 $6,120,258 $0 $596,115 $377,414 $0 $889,950 $14,855,119 Story County $2,540,500 $0 $4,019,115 $34,462 $388,062 $476,732 $0 $186,197 $7,645,068 Warren County $2,664,292 $0 $4,244,919 $0 $412,351 $27,518 $0 $227,695 $7,576,776 Totals $24,290,873 $419,270 $34,356,533 $193,022 $3,350,722 $2,169,698 $17,434 $1,873,836 $66,671,389 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation TABLE 7.16 CIRTPA Forecasted Secondary Road Fund Revenue County Name Boone County $6,916,950 $7,193,628 $7,481,373 $7,780,628 $8,091,853 $8,415,527 Dallas County $8,398,621 $8,734,566 $9,083,949 $9,447,307 $9,825,199 $10,218,207 Jasper County $8,454,060 $8,792,223 $9,143,912 $9,509,668 $9,890,055 $10,285,657 Madison County $6,318,426 $6,571,163 $6,834,010 $7,107,370 $7,391,665 $7,687,332 Marion County $6,506,368 $6,766,623 $7,037,288 $7,318,779 $7,611,530 $7,915,991 Polk County $14,855,119 $15,449,324 $16,067,297 $16,709,989 $17,378,388 $18,073,524 Story County $7,645,068 $7,950,871 $8,268,905 $8,599,662 $8,943,648 $9,301,394 Warren County $7,576,776 $7,879,847 $8,195,041 $8,522,843 $8,863,756 $9,218,307 Totals $66,671,389 $69,338,245 $72,111,775 $74,996,246 $77,996,096 $81,115,939 Source: Iowa Department of Transportation 68

78 Federal Transit Administration Projects As with highway projects, legislation requires that all Federal and State transit projects be included in a fiscally constrained TIP. As the 5307 annual apportionment is the only guaranteed source of grant funds, CIRTPA actively seeks discretionary funding from a variety of sources, including the state Public Transit Equipment and Facilities Management System (PTMS) process and earmarks (State and Federal). Because these funds are the hardest to obtain, there is always uncertainty whether the projects will be implemented in the current year. Therefore, the TIP will periodically be revised if project funding is reduced or delayed. Table 7.15 lists all federal funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Table 7.16 lists all state funding sources for HIRTA projects by FFY Funding Sources Federal and State funding account for the majority of all capital purchases and as a result, is critical to success. The following section outlines the general funding sources available to HIRTA for FFY TABLE 7.17 HIRTA s Federal Funding Sources for FY Federal-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid 5339 $2,464,399 $1,732,797 $1,249,600 $1,046,710 $780,100 $653,435 $517,935 $552,588 STP $147,200 $116,806 $153,500 $115,025 $146,100 $114,535 $144,775 $115,820 Totals $2,611,599 $1,849,603 $1,403,100 $1,161,735 $926,200 $767,970 $662,710 $668,408 TABLE 7.18 HIRTA s State Funding Sources for FY State-Aid Funding Sources Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid Total Cost State Aid STA/5311 Totals $1,326,399 $1,326,399 $773,811 ($552,588 Federal Aid) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $773,811 ($522,588) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 69

79 C H A P T E R E I G H T Public Participation The CIRTPA s Public Participation Plan outlines the CIRTPA s public outreach requirements and efforts through three primary components: public meetings, publications, and maintenance of the CIRTPA s website, The CIRTPA holds a standard of a minimum public comment period of 45 calendar days and a minimum 4-week advance public notice before an initial, amended, or revised TIP is adopted by the CIRTPA. This standard also applies when holding public meetings for any TIP amendments. The CIRTPA will approve the TIP, and/or amendments to the TIP, following the completion of the public comment period. The CIRTPA works to hold public meetings at convenient and accessible locations and times. If a person is not able to attend a public meeting, information regarding the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP is available on the CIRTPA s website. In addition, all meetings of the CIRTPA committees are open to the public. Members of the public may request time on the CIRTPA s agendas to comment on specific subjects of interest to the representatives. Legal notices and meeting announcements regarding the adoption of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP are published in The Des Moines Register and sent to the various news agencies within central Iowa a week before the scheduled public meeting. The CIRTPA website contains CIRTPA news and information about upcoming events, CIRTPA members, staff, the organization of the CIRTPA, and employment opportunities. Meeting agendas and minutes are available, as is a listing of committee representatives. The website features a library containing documents, maps, newsletters, and press releases. Additionally, educational opportunities related to CIRTPA activities are listed on the website. CIRTPA staff regularly updates the website in order to engage citizens. The CIRTPA accepts input and comments from the public through a variety of means. Members of the public may express their views, share their opinions, and ask questions regarding proposed amendments in three ways: 1) orally at a meeting; 2) in writing via forms available at a meeting; or, 3) by submitting 70

80 written comments to the CIRTPA prior to the close of the given comment period. The CIRTPA will make a summary, analysis, or report on the disposition of comments made as part of the review of the TIP and/or amendments to the TIP and will notify the CIRTPA TTC and TPC representatives of all TIP comments as part of the approved TIP. Immediately following is a summary of the comments made June 19, 2018 and any subsequent written comments submitted to the CIRTPA before July 19, Public Comment Summary The CIRTPA staff held a public meeting on June 19, 2017, to receive comments and questions on the TIP draft. If there would have been participants, they would have been given a copy of the TIP (also, available on the CIRTPA website) and staff would have guided the participants through the document, chapter by chapter, explaining in detail each chapter s significance within the TIP. Once staff would have finished explaining the information in the TIP, the meeting would have been open for discussion. The participants did not have any comments about the TIP draft or any particular surface transportation improvements listed. 71

81 Appendix A Federal regulations require documentation in addition to the project list prior to approval of the Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance s Federal Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. All regional planning affiliation transportation improvement programs must be accompanied by: 1. A resolution of adoption by the planning organization. This resolution can be found on the following page.

82

83 Appendix B

84