OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY
|
|
- Darren Terry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW.. 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 TA BUDGET SUMMARY MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY... 7 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 PROGRAM SUMMARY... 8 TOTAL SUMMARY OHIO STATEWIDE URBAN CMAQ COMMITTEE AMATS EASTGATE.. 12 MORPC MVRPC NOACA OKI SCATS TMACOG BEL-O-MAR BHJ CCSTCC ERPC KYOVA LACRPC LCATS RCRPC FINDLAY LANCASTER MARION WOOSTER ZANESVILLE DEFINITIONS. 33 2
3 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Ohio Department of Transportation () annually allocates Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) transportation capital improvement budgets to Ohio s 17 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and to five large cities located outside of MPO areas. MPOs are transportation planning entities in urbanized areas exceeding 50,000 population comprised principally of local elected officials that conduct federally required transportation planning processes for their regions. defines large cities as municipalities, outside MPO areas, with populations between 25,000 and 50,000. The transportation budgets include three separate FHWA fund types: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) Transportation Alternatives Program (TA) MPO and Large City Boundaries These budget allocations provide an important source of federal funding to assist Ohio s urbanized areas and large cities in maintaining, operating, and improving their multimodal transportation networks. The MPOs and large cities manage the budgets by selecting and monitoring the implementation of fiscally balanced, multi-year programs of local government sponsored multimodal transportation system improvement projects within their respective geographies. Projects are to address identified system needs and result in measurable improvements to local transportation network conditions. By policy, encourages the MPOs and large cities to maximize annual transportation improvement project awards and minimize annual budget carry forward balances. In order to meet these policy criteria, the MPOs and large cities must closely collaborate with local government project sponsors, project development consultants, and project managers to assure projects are developed and awarded on schedule, on scope, and within budget. 3
4 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO and large city receives an annual STP budget. STP budgets are comprised of federally required allocations and discretionary allocations. For SFY 2015, $189m of budget was available for the MPO and Large Cities Program. Of the original SFY 2015 budget, approximately 80% was a required allocation with the remaining 20% being discretionary. allocations are proportionate to the respective MPO s/large cities populations. STP funding is eligible for financing a wide range of multimodal preservation, operating, and capital transportation system improvement projects. Eligible project types include: Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for federal aid highways and bridges on any public road Capital costs for transit projects Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities SFY 2015 MPO and Large City STP Capital $15M $174M 4
5 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY MPOs in US EPA designated air quality areas are eligible to use CMAQ Program funding, with 15 of Ohio s 17 MPOs meeting this criteria. For Ohio s eight large MPOs (>200,000 population urbanized area in Ohio) is grouped into one statewide program with one statewide budget. The remaining seven small MPOs (<200,000 population urbanized area in Ohio) receive individual allocations. The eight large MPOs collectiviely establish, prioritize, and manage annual programs of CMAQ projects. Managing the eight large MPOs CMAQ programs as one unified statewide budget positions the program to maximize expenditures and finance projects with the greatest air quality improvement returns to Ohio. CMAQ budgets are an discretionary allocation. For SFY 2015, $91.8m in budget was available for the MPO Program. CMAQ Program funding is eligible for financing projects that will result in reductions in mobile source pollutant emissions. Eligible project types include: Traffic flow congestion mitigation projects such as turn lanes, roundabouts, traffic signal, and intersection improvements Diesel engine retrofits and advanced truck technologies Freight and intermodal projects Transit capital and new service operations Travel Demand Management Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Carpooling and vanpooling Alternative fuels and vehicles SFY 2015 MPO and Large City CMAQ Capital $16M $75M 5
6 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 TA BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO receives an annual TA program budget. TA program budgets are ten percent of the respective MPO s STP budget and are comprised of federally required allocations and discretionary allocations. For SFY 2015, $20.6m of budget was available for the MPO Program. Of the orignial SFY 2015 budget, approximately 65% was a required allocation with the remaining 35% being discretionary. The TA program provides a funding source for projects that will advance modal transportation options and integrate transportation infrastructure within social (community) and natural environments. Eligible project types include: On- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities Community improvement activities Environmental mitigation Recreational trail program projects Safe routes to school projects Planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways The Bel-O-Mar, LARPC, LCATS, and WWW MPOs return their annual budget allocations to participate in s statewide TA program. SFY 2015 MPO and Large City TA Capital $3M $17M 6
7 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY Original Available Original Available Original Available AMATS $9,481,921 $15,775,165 $948,192 $1,006,654 Eastgate $5,123,356 $6,535,121 $512,336 $565,679 MORPC $20,044,209 $35,879,610 $2,004,421 $8,020,989 MVRPC $10,835,414 $17,198,569 Ohio Statewide Urban $1,083,541 $884,795 NOACA $27,575,220 $49,730,963 CMAQ Committee $2,757,521 $3,858,388 OKI $20,617,864 $22,538,388 $2,061,786 $3,275,821 SCATS $4,670,515 $12,498,802 $467,052 $869,084 TMACOG $7,509,135 $9,112,742 $750,914 $1,314,810 Bel-O-Mar $403,679 $1,493,629 $499,140 $2,293,669 BHJ $622,247 $1,246,229 $494,241 $1,296,175 $62,225 $15,325 CCSTCC $1,547,246 $4,263,030 $980,790 $1,989,867 $154,725 $327,006 ERPC $898,239 $4,243,287 $89,824 $364,827 KYOVA $494,721 $363,919 $421,223 $49,472 $80,000 LACRPC $1,122,919 $2,062,112 $753,893 $201,106 LCATS $1,154,783 $2,166,351 $952,692 $3,474,906 RCRPC $1,257,801 $277,065 $125,780 $27,434 WWW $318,267 $625,041 $304,454 $276,150 Findlay $602,491 $926,101 Lancaster $567,075 $1,706,713 Marion $538,663 $220,003 Wooster $381,935 $591,085 Zanesville $372,693 $600,163 Statewide CMAQ $56,569,557 $81,878,063 Total $116,140,393 $189,690,169 $60,918,686 $91,831,160 $11,067,789 $20,610,814 7
8 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 PROGRAM SUMMARY The MPO and Large City program provides a significant source of federal funds to assist Ohio s urban area local governments in preserving, operating, and improving their multimodal transportation systems. The MPOs and large cities collaborate with their member local governments to establish fiscally balanced, multi-year programs of transportation system improvement projects for their regions. Prioritization involves a challenging process of allocating finite fiscal resources to develop an optimal regional transportation investment program that balances preservation, operational, capacity, and modal transportation priorities. In SFY 2015 the MPO and Large City Program awarded 150 construction projects and financed 9 public transit projects totaling $287 million. Tables 1 and 2 below identify the diverse mix of transportation improvement project types financed during SFY An ongoing focus of the MPO and Large City Program is to maximize annual project awards and minimize annual budget carry forward amounts. For a number of years, prior to SFY 2014, the Program had experienced annual carry forward budget amounts in the $150m range. Beginning with SFY 2014, and the MPOs agreed to institute a policy to limit the amount of budget MPOs and large cities could carry forward into the subsequent SFY. This policy has been a success. In SFY 14 the Program carry forward balance was $106m. In SFY 2015 the MPO and Large City carry forward budget balance was reduced to $35m. Current program estimates point toward additional reductions in SFY 2016 to a total of $21m. The remainder of this report shows the detailed SFY 2015 budgets, expenditures, and carry forward balances for each Ohio MPO and the five large cities. Bike 13 Public Transit System Investments Bridge Capacity Addition Enhancement Intersection Construction Contracts Awarded ADA Paratransit Service Alternative Fuel Purchase 1 1 Public Transit System Investments Pavement 53 New Service Start-Up 1 Rehab/ Reconstruction 18 RR Grade Separation Sidewalk Signals Vehicle Purchase/ Replacement *A total of 38 buses purchased Other Capital Costs 1 5 Other CMAQ Table 1: FY 2015 Construction Contracts Awarded Table 2: FY 2015 s by Project Type 8
9 MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM TOTAL SFY 2015 Original 15 Let CE 15 STP $116,140,393 $189,690,169 $160,014,067 $1,873,056 $5,685,000 $4,090,376 $15,474, % 13.32% CMAQ $60,918,686 $91,831,160 $55,350,737 $1,314,158 $15,537,222 $61,192 $16,766, % 27.52% TA $11,067,789 $20,610,814 $16,896,071 $274,037 $3,440, % 31.09% STP Planning - $2,553, $1 CMAQ Planning - $2,801, $1 Totals $188,126,868 $302,132,143 $237,615,718 $3,461,251 $21,222,222 $4,151,568 $35,681,386 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $266,450,759 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 88.19% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 150 $200 $180 $250 $160 $140 $200 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $150 $100 $50 Original SFY 11 SFY 12 SFY 13 SFY 14 SFY 15 5 Year - Trend 9
10 OHIO STATEWIDE URBAN CMAQ COMMITTEE Original STP CMAQ $56,569,557 $81,878,063 $51,445,919 $1,291,956 $15,537,222 $10,932, % 19.33% TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning - $2,670, Totals $56,569,557 $81,878,063 $54,116,685 $1,291,956 $15,537,222 $10,932,201 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $70,945,863 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 86.65% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: - ** Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee construction contracts awarded are shown on the respective MPO Program Management Summary pages. $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 AMATS Eastgate MORPC MVRPC NOACA OKI SCATS TMACOG 5 Participating Year - MPOs in Trend the Statewide CMAQ Program 10
11 AMATS (AKRON) Original STP $9,481,921 $15,775,165 $14,588,505 $406,623 $780, % 8.23% CMAQ** TA $948,192 $1,006,654 $901,222 $105, % 11.12% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $10,430,113 $16,781,819 $15,489,727 $406,623 $885,469 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $15,896,350 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 94.72% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 14 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 Original $4 $5 $2 5 Year - Trend 11
12 EASTGATE (YOUNGSTOWN) Original STP $5,123,356 $6,535,121 $6,129,470 $154,254 $151, % 2.96% CMAQ** TA $512,336 $565,679 $388,754 $7,811 $169, % 33.01% STP Planning - $100, CMAQ Planning Totals $5,635,692 $7,100,800 $6,618,224 $162,066 $320,511 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $6,780,289 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 95.49% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 17 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 Original 5 Year - Trend 12
13 MORPC (COLUMBUS) Original STP $20,044,209 $35,879,610 $29,442,002 $79,842 $2,093,716 $3,750, % 18.71% CMAQ** TA $2,004,421 $8,020,989 $7,832,041 $188, % 0.00% STP Planning - $514, CMAQ Planning Totals $22,048,630 $43,900,600 $37,788,043 $268,790 $2,093,716 $3,750,051 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $40,150,549 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 91.46% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 8 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $40 $35 $30 $40 $35 $30 Original $25 $20 $15 $25 $20 $15 $10 $10 $5 $5 5 Year - Trend 13
14 MVRPC (DAYTON) Original STP $10,835,414 $17,198,569 $14,007,206 $363,997 $2,445, % 22.57% CMAQ** TA $1,083,541 $884,795 $843,592 $21,331 $19, % 1.83% STP Planning - $381, CMAQ Planning Totals $11,918,955 $18,083,363 $15,232,501 $385,328 $2,465,535 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $15,617,829 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 86.37% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 18 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $20 $18 $25 $16 $14 $20 $12 $10 $8 $6 $15 $10 Original $4 $2 $5 5 Year - Trend 14
15 NOACA (CLEVELAND) Original STP $27,575,220 $49,730,963 $42,283,189 $742,988 $2,500,000 $3,258, % 11.82% CMAQ** TA $2,757,521 $3,858,388 $2,189,991 $33,856 $1,634, % 59.28% STP Planning - $946, CMAQ Planning Totals $30,332,741 $53,589,352 $45,419,180 $776,844 $2,500,000 $4,893,328 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $48,696,024 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 90.87% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 32 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $60 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $50 $40 $30 $20 Original $10 $10 5 Year - Trend 15
16 OKI (CINCINNATI) Original STP $20,617,864 $22,538,388 $18,991,515 $3,185, % 0.00% CMAQ** TA $2,061,786 $3,275,821 $3,066,609 $4,461 $204, % 9.93% STP Planning - $361, CMAQ Planning Totals $22,679,650 $25,814,209 $22,419,997 $4,461 $3,185,000 $204,751 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $25,609,459 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 99.21% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 13 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. Millions $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 Original $5 5 Year - Trend 16
17 SCATS (CANTON) Original STP $4,670,515 $12,498,802 $10,579,741 $1,409,877 $509, % 10.90% CMAQ** TA $467,052 $869,084 $809,014 $60, % 12.86% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $5,137,567 $13,367,886 $11,388,755 $1,409,877 $569,254 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $12,798,632 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 95.74% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 5 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 Original 5 Year - Trend 17
18 TMACOG (TOLEDO) Original STP $7,509,135 $9,112,742 $7,755,449 $452,811 $824, % 10.98% CMAQ** TA $750,914 $1,314,810 $533,156 $17,629 $764, % % STP Planning - $80, CMAQ Planning Totals $8,260,049 $10,427,552 $8,368,605 $17,629 $452,811 $1,588,508 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $8,839,044 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : % 84.77% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 13 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $10 $9 $8 $7 $14 $12 $10 $6 $5 $4 $8 $6 Original $3 $2 $1 $4 $2 5 Year - Trend 18
19 BEL-O-MAR (BRIDGEPORT) Original STP $403,679 $1,493,629 $1,319,309 $14,768 $159, % 39.52% CMAQ $499,140 $2,293,669 $763,600 $22,202 $1,507, % % TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $902,819 $3,787,298 $2,082,909 $36,970 $1,667,419 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,119,879 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 55.97% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 6 $2.5 $2.0 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Original $1.5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 5 Year - Trend 19
20 BHJ (STEUBENVILLE) Original STP $622,247 $1,246,229 $1,059,981 $186, % 29.93% CMAQ $494,241 $1,296,175 $1,109,145 $97, % 19.63% TA $62,225 $15,325 $15, % 0.00% STP Planning CMAQ Planning - $90, Totals $1,178,713 $2,557,728 $2,274,450 $283,278 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,274,450 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 88.92% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 2 $1.4 $1.2 $2.5 $2.0 Original.8.6 $ Year - Trend 20
21 CCSTCC (SPRINGFIELD) Original STP $1,547,246 $4,263,030 $3,529,033 $733, % 47.44% CMAQ $980,790 $1,989,867 $1,428,191 $521, % 53.14% TA $154,725 $327,006 $29,361 $297, % % STP Planning CMAQ Planning - $40, Totals $2,682,761 $6,579,903 $5,027,085 $1,552,818 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $5,027,085 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 76.40% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 6 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 21
22 ERPC (SANDUSKY) Original STP $898,239 $4,243,287 $4,029,117 $214, % 23.84% CMAQ - - TA $89,824 $364,827 $246,109 $118, % % STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $988,063 $4,608,114 $4,275,226 $332,888 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $4,275,226 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 92.78% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 5 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 22
23 KYOVA (IRONTON) Original STP $494, % 0.00% CMAQ $363,919 $421,223 $61,192 $360, % 98.93% TA $49,472 $80,000 $40,000 $40, % 80.85% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $908,112 $501,223 $40,000 $61,192 $400,032 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $101,192 as % of Original 2015 : 11.14% as % of Available 2015 : 20.19% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: $1.6 $1.4 $ Original Year - Trend 23
24 LACRPC (LIMA) Original STP $1,122,919 $2,062,112 $1,167,505 $744, % 66.31% CMAQ $753,893 $201,106 $198,644 $2, % 0.33% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - $150, CMAQ Planning Totals $1,876,812 $2,263,218 $1,516,149 $747,069 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $1,516,149 as % of Original 2015 : 80.78% as % of Available 2015 : 66.99% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1 $2.5 $2.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 24
25 LCATS (NEWARK) Original STP $1,154,783 $2,166,351 $1,573,489 $60,396 $532, % 46.11% CMAQ $952,692 $3,474,906 $379,440 $3,095, % % TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $2,107,475 $5,641,257 $1,952,929 $60,396 $3,627,932 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,013,326 as % of Original 2015 : 95.53% as % of Available 2015 : 35.69% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 2 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 Original 5 Year - Trend 25
26 RCRPC (MANSFIELD) Original STP $1,257,801 $277,065 $197,582 $79, % 6.32% CMAQ - - TA $125,780 $27,434 $899 $26, % 21.10% STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $1,383,581 $304,499 $198,482 $106,018 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $198,482 as % of Original 2015 : 14.35% as % of Available 2015 : 65.18% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original.1 5 Year - Trend 26
27 WWW (BELPRE-MARIETTA) Original STP $318,267 $625,041 $435,392 $18,156 $151, % 47.60% CMAQ $304,454 $276,150 $25,798 $250, % 82.23% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - $20, CMAQ Planning Totals $622,721 $901,191 $481,191 $18,156 $401,844 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $499,346 as % of Original 2015 : 80.19% as % of Available 2015 : 55.41% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: Original 5 Year - Trend 27
28 FINDLAY Original STP $602,491 $926,101 $926, % 0.00% CMAQ TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $602,491 $926,101 $926,101 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $926,101 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : % Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: Original Year - Trend 28
29 LANCASTER Original STP $567,075 $1,706,713 $1,328,043 $32,033 $133,972 $212, % 37.50% CMAQ TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $567,075 $1,706,713 $1,328,043 $32,033 $133,972 $212,666 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $1,494,047 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 87.54% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1 $1.8 $1.6 $1.4 $ $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original Year - Trend 29
30 MARION Original STP $538,663 $220,003 $185,650 $34, % 6.38% CMAQ TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $538,663 $220,003 $185,650 $34,353 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $185,650 as % of Original 2015 : 34.46% as % of Available 2015 : 84.39% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1.3 $ $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original.1 5 Year - Trend 30
31 WOOSTER Original STP $381,935 $591,085 $448,260 $142, % 37.40% CMAQ TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $381,935 $591,085 $448,260 $142,825 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $448,260 as % of Original 2015 : % as % of Available 2015 : 75.84% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: Original SFY 12 SFY 13 SFY 14 SFY 15 5 Year - Trend 31
32 ZANESVILLE Original STP $372,693 $600,163 $37,528 $562, % % CMAQ TA STP Planning CMAQ Planning Totals $372,693 $600,163 $37,528 $562,635 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $37,528 as % of Original 2015 : 10.07% as % of Available 2015 : 6.25% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: $1.8 $1.6 $1.4 $ Original 5 Year - Trend 32
33 DEFINITIONS ORIGINAL BUDGET ALLOCATION: The total new budget allocated by to Ohio s MPOs and large cities in SFY AVAILABLE 2015 BUDGET: The available SFY 2015 budget is a component of the original budget allocation and accumulated carry forward budgets from previous years. Available budget also reflects program budget trades, which are transfers of budget between programs or between MPOs, to be repaid in a later fiscal year. ENCUMBERED: totals are those that have been recorded in s accounting system in SFY UNENCUMBERED EXPENDITURES: that are not recorded as encumbrances in s accounting system due to the nature of the expenditure. There are three types of unencumbered expenditures: LET CE: expenditures for staff construction engineering labor costs on let projects. PAYMENT: expenditures made to pay back previously secured loans. TRANSFER: FHWA funding that is transferred to for financing of Regional Transit Authority projects. 15 CARRY FORWARD: Accumulated carry forward budgets that will roll into SFY The carry forward totals are the difference between the available SFY 2015 budgets, and the encumbrances and unencumbered expenditures that took place in SFY % ORIGINAL ALLOCATION EXPENDED: ( + Unencumbered ) Original SFY 2015 % ORIGINAL ALLOCATION CARRIED FORWARD: SFY 2015 Original SFY
OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY
OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY Revised 9/19/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 STBG BUDGET SUMMARY... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY
More informationTechnical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group
Technical Memorandum Finance Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group April 25, 2013 i Table of Contents 1. Ohio Finance... 1 1.1 Baseline Projection -- Highways...
More information2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION TEMPO Meeting July 21, 2016 Current Initiatives On-going efforts to address performance-based planning and programming processes as required
More information2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION HGAC Transportation Policy Council Meeting Current Initiatives On-going efforts to address performance-based planning and programming processes
More informationTransportation Trust Fund Overview
Transportation Trust Fund Overview Created pursuant to New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority Act of 1984 Established to finance the cost of planning, acquisition, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
More informationFinancial Snapshot October 2014
Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding MoDOT s finances. This document provides
More informationINVESTING STRATEGICALLY
11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program
More informationFinancial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri
Financial Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri November 2017 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART...
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION. 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART... FINANCIAL SECTION Statement of Revenues and Expenditures... 3 Balance Sheet... 3 LOAN/BOND SECTION Montgomery County Transportation Improvement
More informationPioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017
2017-2021 Pioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017 HIGHWAY AMENDMENTS FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2017 Part 1A: Federal Aid Target Projects Increase cost of (604033)
More informationWASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER
WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
More information2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Financial Summary FINANCIAL OUTLOOK Establishing MPO Transportation Plan fiscal forecasts for a twenty year planning horizon in today s transportation environment is
More informationCHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally
More informationChapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions
Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the
More informationINVESTMENT STRATEGIES
3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This
More informationSKATS FY 2018-FY 2023
SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Determination PUBLIC REVIEW Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study Cover Photos Top left: 45th Avenue NE
More informationALL Counties. ALL Districts
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation
More informationQUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY
QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017
Fiscal Year 2018 VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2018 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationContents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205
Contents Introduction 1 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Tel 210.227.8651 Fax 210.227.9321 825 S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 www.alamoareampo.org aampo@alamoareampo.org Pg.
More informationChapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan
Chapter 15 Transportation Improvements Financing Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments 2030 Regional Transportation Plan CHAPTER 15 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS FINANCING INTRODUCTION As
More informationChapter 6: Financial Resources
Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation
More informationTransportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning
Capital District November 9, 2004 Transportation Committee Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning CDTC has been successful in funding 36 Linkage Program planning studies since
More informationFEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES
Financial Plan FINANCIAL PLAN INTRODUCTION This plan s financial analysis was developed in response to the requirements for a fiscally constrained plan that was introduced in the Intermodal Surface Transportation
More informationA Moment of Truth: Ohio s Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It. Better Transportation for Working and Living
A Moment of Truth: Ohio s Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It. Better Transportation for Working and Living FEBRUARY 2019 Fix Our Roads Ohio Case Statement As Ohio addresses the economic
More informationHouse Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.
House Bill 20 Implementation Tuesday,, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.020 INTRODUCTION In response to House Bill 20 (HB 20), 84 th Legislature, Regular Session, 2015, and as part of the implementation
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY
NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 Amendment Conformity Report for August 20, 2008 Amendments (Amendment # 2008-028 thru 2008-030) On August 20, 2008 the Executive Board
More informationTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FY 2013-2016 2016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HOUSTON DISTRICT AUGUST 2014 Quarterly Revision HIGHWAY August 2014 . HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL
More informationFY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2019 2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and Comment: April 16, 2018 Approved by the Policy Board: May 21, 2018 Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure...
More informationConcord Township Cincinnati, City of Macedonia, City of... 9 Middleport, Village of Dayton, City of... 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART... 2 FINANCIAL SECTION Statement of Revenues and Expenditures... 3 Balance Sheet... 3 LOAN/BOND SECTION Montgomery County... 4 Montgomery County...
More informationTechnical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs
Technical Report No. 4 Revenue and Costs Technical Report No. 4 REVENUE AND COSTS PASCO COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 8731 Citizens Drive New Port Richey, FL 34654 Ph (727) 847-8140, fax (727)
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway
More informationRecommendations for On the Move Plan Elements -- DRAFT MAY 23 Funding Goal Group June 22, 2006 Page 1
Funding Goal Group June 22, 2006 Page 1 Goal: Be successful in obtaining adequate funding for transportation facilities. Background: An efficient and well maintained transportation system is essential
More informationFEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2016 2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines
More informationFEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines
More informationRedbook. Department of Transportation
LBO Analysis of Executive Transportation Budget Proposal Part I Tom Middleton, Senior Budget Analyst February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Quick look...... 4 Overview... 5 Appropriation summary... 5 H.B. 62
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number:
NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Adjustment Number: 2009019 TIP Number: 200852034 FROM: TIP# 200852034 Jurisdiction: Hendersonville Project:
More informationCHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis
CHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis COMPASS commissioned a financial analysis, finalized in 2012, to support the CIM 2040 update. The analysis, Financial Forecast for the Funding of Transportation
More informationGLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.
Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018
Fiscal Year 2019 VDOT Annual Budget June 2018 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2019 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview. 5 Revenues. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationRIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning
RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning Land & Water Conservation Summit March 10, 2012 Statewide Planning Framework Department of Administration Statewide Planning Program State Planning
More informationPotential Changes to the 2015 to 2018 TIP Highway List. Proposed Administrative Adjustment #3
Potential Changes to the 2015 to 2018 TIP Highway List Proposed Administrative Adjustment # PROJECT #60644, WORCESTER CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Move the FY 2015 Statewide Transportation
More informationSummary Narrative of Amendment 3 to the FFY Transportation Improvement Program for the Northern Middlesex Region
Summary Narrative of Amendment 3 to the FFY 2017 2021 Transportation Improvement Program for the Northern Middlesex Region The following summarizes a proposed amendment to Fiscal Year 2017 of the FFY 2017
More informationIn addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,
Strategic Initiatives for 2008-2009 ODOT Action to Answer the Challenges of Today In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities, the Strategic Initiatives set forth by
More informationAppendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Exhibit G-1 2014 RTP REVENUE FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS LOCAL REVENUES Measure K Sales Tax Renewal Program: Description:
More informationFunding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.
Funding Update House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.012 Transportation Funding Sources for the FY 2016-2017 Biennium
More information2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION Texas Transportation Commission Workshop 06/29/16 Commission Workshop Outline Introduction of performance-based planning and programming processes.
More informationChapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance
Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance This chapter examines the sources of funding for transportation investments in the coming years. It describes recent legislative actions that have changed the
More information7.0 Financially Feasible Plan
Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 7-1 7.0 Financially Feasible Plan The Memphis MPO used a performance-based approach to rank projects for Livability 2040 and incorporated state and local priorities
More informationCapital Improvement Projects
Capital Improvement Projects This section highlights the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for FY 2017-2018. Capital projects are designed to enhance the City s infrastructure, extend
More informationAPPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Background Starting with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act of 1991, it has been a consistent requirement of federal law and regulation that the projects included
More informationN A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A
2009 NATIONAL SCAN: RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS 2009 National Scan Results: Rural Transportation Planning Organizations Since the passage of ISTEA, an increasing number of states have turned
More informationFinancial Capacity Analysis
FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Federal transportation planning rules require that metropolitan area transportation plans include a financial capacity analysis to demonstrate that the plan is
More informationTechnical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast
Technical Appendix FDOT 040 Revenue Forecast This page was left blank intentionally. APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE PLAN 040 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan
More informationROCHESTER - OLMSTED COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEMORANDUM
ROCHESTER - OLMSTED COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: District 6 ATP Mitzi Baker, ROCOG Executive Director DATE: March 6, 2017 RE: Year 2021 ROCOG-ATP Projects BACKGROUND In late 2013, the D-6
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011
Fiscal Year 2011-2012 VDOT Annual Budget June 2011 For Further Information Contact: Virginia Department of Transportation Financial Planning Division 1221 E. Broad Street, 4th Floor Richmond, VA 23219
More information2012 Boston MPO Transportation Improvement Program
Non- Indicates a change in project cost Indicates removed from TIP (cost not reflected in total) Indicates a project moved in from another TIP element Indicates a project moved out to another TIP element
More informationCorridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017
Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017 Project Purpose To develop and implement a scoring and project
More informationFiscal Year Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014
Fiscal Year 2015 Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014 Revised Annual Budget 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance and Operating Fund
More informationUNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
2002 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Blank Page SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES CATEGORIES NUMBER, NAME AND YEAR ESTABLISHED PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY FUNDING BANK BALANCE (Yes/) RESPONSIBLE ENTITY RANKING INDEX OR ALLOCATION
More informationPrioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016
Prioritization and Programming Process NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016 Today s Roadmap 1. Planning and Programming Division Overview 2. Strategic Investments (STI) Law 3. Prioritization
More informationFY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction
FY 2009-2018 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy.. asset management, performance-based strategic direction March 31, 2008 Governor Jon S. Corzine Commissioner Kris Kolluri Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE
More informationSafety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017
Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017 Recommendation: It was the recommendation of the committee that OTO support the statewide safety targets. Discussion: Natasha Longpine presented background information
More informationPROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING
Program Financing PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING The funding of highway improvements depends on the availability of funds and on criteria established by state and federal law for the use of those funds. Highway
More informationFY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2017 2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and Comment: April 18, 2016 Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure... 3 Mission Statement... 3 Vision Statement...
More informationBINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016
BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016 The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study Policy Committee is designated by the Governor of New York as the Metropolitan
More informationTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S T A T E W I D E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I M P R O V E M E N T P R O G R A M S T I P 2 015201 8 BRYAN DISTRICT 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 T I P H I G H W AY I n i t i a l 2015
More informationPrepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013
FY 2013 Annual Performance and Expenditure Report for the Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS) Area October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 Prepared by the South East Texas Regional
More informationAnnual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013 Nashua Regional Planning Commission 9 Executive Park Drive Suite 201 Merrimack, NH 03054 (603) 424-2240 www.nashuarpc.org A N N U A L L I S
More informationAPPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans
APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans Overview This appendix documents the current Florida Department
More informationAmendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN February, 2011 Prepared by the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Acknowledgments Title Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 Regional Transportation
More informationP.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)
- C.:B-. Title. Chapter B. (Rename) Infrastructure Trust.,-0 - C.:B-0. to :B-0. - C.:B-. - - C.:B-. & :B-. - Repealer - Note P.L., CHAPTER, approved October, Assembly, No. 0 (Fourth Reprint) 0 0 AN ACT
More informationState Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report
State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report The Ohio Department of Transportation is pleased to present the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2006 State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Annual Financial Report.
More informationFY February Quarterly Revision. Bryan DISTRICT
FY 20132016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM February Quarterly Revision Bryan DISTRICT TRANSIT Administrative Amendment February 2013 BCSMPO, Final FY 20132016 TIP, FY 2013 2016 Transportation
More informationCity Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013
City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013 Highway User Tax Distribution (HUTD) Fund Gas Tax Registration Tax Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) Trunk Highway Fund County State
More informationAPPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS
APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS The 2018 StanCOG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) financial forecasts provide revenue projections for StanCOG member
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT 2018-2027 DRAFT AUGUST 2017 1 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF 10-YEAR CAPITAL HIGHWAY INVESTMENT PLAN... 1 This page intentionally left blank. SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT
More informationEstimated Financial Summary for the Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule
Estimated Financial Summary for the 2017-2021 Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule Overview Section 5 of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program explains the sources and projected levels of
More informationDanny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Grant County Democrats Monday, April 11, 2016 Facts and Figures AHTD Quick Facts 3rd Largest State Agency
More informationAnalysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission
Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation
More informationState Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report
State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report The Ohio Department of Transportation is pleased to present the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2007 State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) Annual Financial Report.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
November 20, 2015 Revised December 18, 2015 to reflect FAST Act PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE This is a collaborative product jointly developed by the Pennsylvania Planning
More informationFinancial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007
Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Prepared for: By: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 REVIEW OF FRED AND VRE EXISTING FUNDING SOURCES... 1 Federal Funding...
More informationTraffic. Municipal Manager. Traffic Administration. Transportation Planning. Traffic Engineering. Communications. Data. Paint and Signs.
Municipal Manager Administration Transportation Planning Engineering Communications Data Paint and Signs Signals Safety and Signals Signal Operations / General Government Operating Budget Lance R. Wilber,
More informationSFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report
SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report Thurston Regional Planning Council UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Annual Report for second year of TRPC s UPWP State Fiscal Years 2017-2018 (July 1,
More informationCongestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.
Congestion Management Process Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc. August 26, 2015 Congestion Management Process (as adopted by R2CTPO Board) August 26, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The River to Sea Transportation
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE Presentation for Texas Transportation Commission March 28, 2018 Purposes of the Workshop The Texas Transportation
More informationJoint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation
Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation Funding Overview February 21, 2013 H. Tasaico, PE 1 NCDOT Funding Overview - Agenda State Transportation Comparative Data Transportation Funding Sources
More informationNorthern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda
Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda Northern Virginia s economic growth and global competitiveness are directly tied to the region s transit network. Transit
More informationProposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Presentation before the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee California Department of Transportation Proposition 1B Just one component of the Strategic
More informationCRTPO Project Selection Direct Attributable & Bonus Allocation Funds
CRTPO Project Selection Direct Attributable & Bonus Allocation Funds January 21, 2015 Strategic Transportation Investments is State Driven STI process drives NC s TIP Data element tempered by local preference
More informationRegional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council
Regional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Analysis Framework... 1-1 1.1 The Project Selection Advisory
More informationHB2 and HB1887 Update
HB2 and HB1887 Update Nick Donohue Deputy Secretary of Transportation April 20, 2015 HB2 Legislation Requires Commonwealth Transportation Board to adopt statewide prioritization process to evaluate projects
More informationTransportation Funding
Transportation Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Background... 3 Current Transportation Funding... 4 Funding Sources... 4 Expenditures... 5 Case Studies... 6 Washington, D.C... 6 Chicago... 8
More informationTerre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County SFY 2018 2021 Metropolitan Planning Organization West Central Indiana Economic
More informationFAIRBANKS METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES & PROCEDURES
FAIRBANKS METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES & PROCEDURES REVISED & APPROVED OCTOBER 21, 2015 P a g e 2 P a g e 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS FMATS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES... 4 No.1 Background Information...
More informationGeorgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division
Special Examination Report No. 16-17 December 2016 Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division Greg S. Griffin, State Auditor Leslie McGuire, Director Why we did this review This
More informationWednesday, June 6, 2018
Wednesday, June 6, 2018 Excellence in Program Administration Award 2018 AASHTO Civil Rights Training Symposium Excellence in Program Administration Award Joanna McFadden EEO/DBE Section Head APRIL 2017-2018
More information2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017
2040 Plan Update Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017 What is the TPP? Long-range transportation plan for the Twin Cities region Part of the federal 3C planning process cooperative, continuous, comprehensive
More informationVERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2016 Budget. Sue Minter, Secretary of Transportation House Transportation Committee
VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION FY2016 Budget Sue Minter, Secretary of Transportation House Transportation Committee February 19, 2015 FY2016 Budget 1 Five Year Budget History $ millions $658.1 $653.1
More information