Implementation Status & Results Indonesia National Community Empowerment Program In Urban Areas For (P125405)

Transcription

1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Indonesia National Community Empowerment Program In Urban Areas For (P125405) Operation Name: National Community Empowerment Program In Urban Areas Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 1 Status: ARCHIVED Archive : 26-Mar-2013 For (P125405) Country: Indonesia Approval FY: 2013 Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Public Works (DG Human Settlement) Key s Board Approval 20-Nov-2012 Original Closing Planned Mid Term Review 30-Jun-2014 Last Archived ISR Effectiveness Revised Closing Actual Mid Term Review Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The project development objective is to support the Republic of Indonesia to ensure the urban poor in participating kelurahan benefit from improved local governance and living conditions. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Capacity Building for Communities and Local Governments Kelurahan Grants Implementation Support and Technical Assistance Contingency for Disaster Response 0.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Moderate Implementation Status Overview The project has not yet become effective therefore it is too early to report progress. Page 1 of 6

2 Locations Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual Indonesia Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province Indonesia Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Indonesia North Sulawesi Provinsi Sulawesi Utara Indonesia Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Indonesia Central Sulawesi Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah Indonesia South Sulawesi Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Indonesia East Nusa Tenggara Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Indonesia Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Indonesia Provinsi Maluku Provinsi Maluku Indonesia East Kalimantan Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Indonesia Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Indonesia South Kalimantan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Indonesia East Java Provinsi Jawa Timur Indonesia Central Java Provinsi Jawa Tengah Indonesia Provinsi Papua Provinsi Papua Indonesia Bali Provinsi Bali Indonesia Propinsi Gorontalo Propinsi Gorontalo Indonesia Provinsi Maluku Utara Provinsi Maluku Utara Indonesia Provinsi Papua Barat Provinsi Papua Barat Indonesia Provinsi Sulawesi Barat Provinsi Sulawesi Barat Results Project Development Objective Indicators Page 2 of 6

3 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Indicator One: Improved access to Percentage Value infrastructure, social, and/or economic services of the urban poor in participating kelurahan This will be indicated after To be measured once, at Reflects percentage of survey of the related PNPM Urban program completed. completion of project activities kelurahans in which survey repondents indicate that access improved Indicator Two: Satisfaction levels from beneficiaries regarding improved services and local governance Indicator Three: Infrastructure built is at least 20% less expensive than that built by non community based approaches Indicator Four: At least 90% of complaints are resolved Percentage Value To be measured once, at completion of project activities 80% of beneficiaries surveyed are satisfied. Percentage Value % threshold to be met in 80% of participating kalurahan. Percentage Value The baseline refers to the average of 2011 MIS data, which was a significant improvemenet over whereas the average previous 5-year average. Target would maintain the strong programmatic improvements already reflected in the quantitative baseline for 2011 Direct project beneficiaries Number Value Oct-2011 The baseline refers to the average of 2011 MIS data from PNPM Urban AF, which reflects a progressive ramping Target would maintain service levels near 2011 peak, while improving qualitative aspects of program. up of project scope and beneficiaries served over the past 5 years. Female beneficiaries Percentage Sub Type Supplemental Value Intermediate Results Indicators Page 3 of 6

4 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Participation rate of poorest and vulnerable Percentage Value community members in planning and decision making meetings To be reported quarterly by MIS system. Participation rate of women in planning and Percentage Value decision making meetings Percentage of the adult population voting in Percentage Value BKM elections at the neighborhood level Percentage of local governments provide Percentage Value required cost sharing 31-Oct-2011 Reflects actual level achieved Number of each type of infrastructure, economic, and social activities completed per year Percentage of infrastructure works evaluated as of good quality Percentage of kelurahan with revolving loan funds (RLFs) having a portfolio at risk (PAR) ratio 90 days of < 10% Percentage of provincial consultants providing timely & accurate data through MIS Percentage Value To be measured annually, for each year s approved grant program. Target is percentage of participating kelurahan with completed activities each year. Percentage Value Percentage Value Percentage Value Page 4 of 6

5 Percentage of BKMs with completed annual financial audits Data on Financial Performance (as of 07-Feb-2013) Financial Agreement(s) Key s Percentage Value Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Signing Effectiveness Original Closing Revised Closing P IBRD Not Effective 20-Nov Dec-2012 P TF Effective 28-Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec-2014 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P IBRD Not Effective USD P TF Effective USD Disbursement Graph Page 5 of 6

6 Key Decisions Regarding Implementation No decisions to disclose at this time Restructuring History There has been no restructuring to date. Related Projects P National Community Empowerment Program In Urban Areas For Page 6 of 6