BEFORE THE ROOF CAVES IN II: APPA
|
|
- Solomon Hutchinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE ROOF CAVES IN II: APPA PUBLISHED BY: RICK BIEDENWEG AND ROBERT HUTSON This article was originally published by APPA ( and was authored by Rick Biedenweg and Robert Hutson with assistance from Stanford University and the Pacific Partners Consulting Group.
2 Before the Roof Caves in II: A Predictive Model for Physical Plant Renewal 1. Introduction and Context In 1980 a methodology was developed at Stanford University for predicting facilities renewal and replacement requirements based on life- cycles and costs of building sub- systems. The results were published by Rick Biedenweg and Robert Hutson in a paper entitled, Before The Roof Caves In: A Predictive Model for Physical Plant Renewal. Since 1980, Stanford has constructed new buildings, renovated a number of older facilities, responded to new code requirements, adapted to new academic directions, and developed a backlog of deferred maintenance. To assist Stanford University in an assessment of the current annual budget for future facility renewal, the Pacific Partners Consulting Group was retained to review the effectiveness of the original Before- The- Roof- Caves- in (BRCI) Model, incorporate new data, and to extend the predictive model to include the effects of adapting facilities to new program needs. 1.A Definitions The definitions used in this paper are drawn from Financial Planning Guidelines for Facility Renewal and Adaption, SCUP, This paper was a joint project of the Society for College and University Planning (SCUP), the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO), the Association of Physical Plant Administrators of Universities and Colleges (APPA) and Coopers and Lybrand. The project emphasized the need to recognize, plan, and budget for four distinctive aspects or cycles of facilities stewardship: on- going maintenance; renewal; deferred maintenance or catch- up; and adaption. While these four categories are linked (the definitions below discuss some of these links), they are also sufficiently distinct that the paper recommends treating them separately. On- going Maintenance - - routine upkeep such as custodial services, unplugging drains, cleaning gutters, patching holes, fixing light sockets, lubrication of moving parts, and other routine maintenance duties that are required to keep the facilities operating. Failure to attend to these sorts of services results in accelerated deterioration of facilities and an accumulation of maintenance problems. Renewal or Facilities Renewal - - a systematic approach to repairing or replacing building subsystems such as roofs, HVAC, electrical, and plumbing systems, etc. to maintain and extend the life of the facility. Renewal is required to keep the building in good operating condition for its current purpose. This category of projects is sometimes referred to as Planned Maintenance. Page 1
3 Deferred Maintenance - - the accumulation of physical plant components in need of repair brought about by age, use, and damage from natural causes, and for which remedies have been postponed beyond the useful life of the system. Often, these corrections have been postponed due to insufficient funds. A continued underfunding for facilities renewal results in inadequate building renewal and increases the deferred maintenance backlog. Adaption - - alterations in physical plant for changes in use, codes, and standards. These include code changes (such as ADA) and technology advancements (such as high speed networking) in addition to facilities that become obsolete for program reasons. The functions described above are closely related, but frequently planned for and financed through different management processes and budgets. However, decisions about timing and scope of projects in each of these categories may have significant budget implications for the others. For example, a major renovation of a facility to meet new health and safety code requirements might accommodate repairs or replacement of one or more subsystems not yet scheduled in the Renewal budget. While shifting the cost out of the Renewal program should affect that budget, it rarely does - - usually because the Renewal budget is underfunded. 1.B Summary of the 1980 Sub- system or BRCI Approach to Estimating Facilities Renewal Needs The sub- system or Before- the- Roof- Caves- In (BRCI) approach to estimating future renewal and replacement requirements proceeds through the following steps: 1. Each building or facility is analyzed in terms of sub- systems (those major components or systems such as electrical, elevators, roofs etc.) that have a significant impact on facility wear- out and resulting replacement/renewal costs. The characteristics of sub- systems are determined as follows: a. each sub- system has an estimable useful life; b. sub- system cost and life- cycle data are available; c. the sum of the sub- systems in a facility represent all of the components of the facility that could eventually wear out or require replacement. The sub- system categories developed for Stanford facilities in 1980 included the following: Foundations, Major Vertical Floor, and Roof Structures; Roofing; Exterior Cladding; Interior Partitions; Interior Finishes; Elevators; Plumbing; HVAC Moving HVAC - Static; Electrical - Moving; Electrical - Static; Fire Protection; Special Equipment; and Miscellaneous. 2. For each sub- system an estimate of the life- cycle is made. Page 2
4 3. Buildings with similar sub- systems are grouped into categories. These categories include: High- intensity Laboratories; Libraries, Offices, and Classrooms; Low- intensity Laboratories; Athletics; Patient Care; Residential; and Miscellaneous. 4. Average renewal/replacement costs for each sub- system are estimated in dollars per square foot for each category of facilities. 5. Facilities are classified into five- year age cohorts1 by facilities type and by date of construction or most recent major renovation. For each cohort the total square footage of buildings is identified. 6. Projections are then developed for each cohort of facilities as to when specific sub- systems would need replacement and how much it would cost to replace these sub- systems. 7. These projections are then summed across all sub- systems and facility categories to estimate total facility renewal needs per five- year period. 8. Since the projections showed a highly cyclical pattern of expenditures, a smoothing or moving average was used. For more information about this approach see either Financial Planning Guidelines for Facility Renewal and Adaption, SCUP, December 1989, or Before the Roof Caves In: A Predictive Model for Physical Plant Renewal, APPA Newsletter, Association of Physical Plant Administrators, Part 1 (July, 1982), Part 2 (August, 1982). 1 These age cohorts are identified by their midpoint. That is, the 1985 age cohort refers to the period from 1983 through Similarly, the 1960 age cohort refers to 1958 through Page 3
5 2. Benchmarks Using the 1980 BRCI Study To address the question of how well the 1980 study actually predicted facilities renewal needs at Stanford, the published results were compared with actual budgeted expenditures for facilities renewal at Stanford over the past ten years and deferred maintenance cost estimates prepared by an independent contractor. According to the basic theory of the model, the difference between actual expenditures made and facilities renewal needs (over any period of time) should be approximately equal to the increase in deferred maintenance needs over that same period of time. Figure 1, BRCI (1980) Deferred Maintenance Prediction, shows both the BRCI model results and the actual expenditure levels for 1985 through 1994, in 1994 dollars.2 The top line of the graph is the level of needed annual expenditures3 as predicted by the 1980 BRCI study. The line above the darkly shaded region represents the actual expenditures4 on facilities renewal (adjusted to 1994 dollars). The difference between these lines (the lightly shaded region) should represent the increase in deferred maintenance needs from 1984 to Figure 1 2 The index used to calculate 1994 dollars for Figure 1 is the inflation adjuster published in the Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data 1995, page V The predicted level of expenditures was taken from the Before the Roof Caves In paper published in Critical Issues in Facilities Management 4 - Capital Renewal and Deferred Maintenance, APPA, 1989 (page 28). 4 The large increase in 1993 was due to a $4.2 M special allocation for roofs. Page 4
6 A cumulative increase in the expected deferred- maintenance need can be calculated from this figure to be $48.8 million since For the purpose of testing this benchmark, it was assumed that there was very little deferred maintenance in This assumption was based on the substantial incremental funding made available in 1982, 1983, and explicitly for the purpose of eliminating deferred maintenance needs of academic facilities - - and from reports made to the Stanford Board of Trustees that deferred maintenance needs for these facilities had essentially been eliminated by the end of Thus, it was felt the $48.8 million could be used as a reasonable estimate of the expected total deferred maintenance need at the end of This $48.8 million was then compared with the actual deferred maintenance needs as determined by the independent study. To achieve accurate comparisons, however, certain categories needed to be excluded from the independent study. Those categories were foundations, structural systems, and exterior wall systems (BRCI excluded them from the analysis based on their extremely low failure rate) and floor coverings, interior walls, and special equipment (BRCI assumed these were the responsibility of the occupants of the facilities).5 After these exclusions, the figure from the independent survey was $47.9 million. While the similarity of these two figures is indeed remarkable, it is the belief of the authors of this paper that this degree of similarity (only a 2% difference) is probably accidental and that differences of ten to twenty percent are more like what should be expected. However, the similarity does support the reasonableness of the approach and further analysis, by sub- system, was performed. This further analysis suggested a) modifications of certain sub- system categories, b) the addition of new sub- system categories, and c) an acknowledgment that facility obsolescence due to program reasons also needs to be considered. 5 These sub- systems accounted for $22.5 of the $70.1 million dollars of deferred maintenance needs on academic buildings reported by Dober/Lidsky. By sub- systems they are: Foundations - $0.8M; Structural - $1.3M; Exterior Walls - $6.2 M; Floor Covering - $5.9M; Interior Walls - $4.4; and specialties - $3.9M. Page 5
7 3. Updated Model Results Using the new assumptions in the Before- the- Roof- Caves- In model, the expected facility renewal costs per five- year period at Stanford were generated. These are illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2 Overall, the model predicts renewal expenditures of between 0.6% and 2.7% of CRV will be needed on an annual basis, depending on the time period. However, a cyclical pattern and large swings from one five- year period to the next are clearly evident in the figure.6 The large swings over time are due to the cyclical nature of both building construction and sub- system life- cycles. For example, the large 2015 period includes complete electrical and mechanical overhauls for all the facilities built in Since the 1965 cohort has more square feet of construction than any other period (except for major seismic renewal period of 1995) and because the largest components of the costs, by far, are the electrical and mechanical systems, this result is not surprising. Nor is the 2045 peak surprising - - it includes all electrical and mechanical systems for the facilities constructed in 1995 (the largest period of construction/renovation in Stanford s history). 6 These large swings are one reason why it is impractical to use a fixed percentage of the current plant replacement value as a basis for budgeting for facilities renewal. Page 6
8 4. Obsolescence for Program Reasons 4.A Concept As defined in Financial Planning Guidelines for Facility Renewal and Adaption, plant adaption refers to alterations in a physical plant for changes in use, codes, and standards. These include code changes (such as ADA) and technology advancements (such as a need for high speed networking) in addition to facilities that become obsolete for program reasons. This discussion is limited to the latter category (facilities that become obsolete due to program changes) because code changes and technology advancements are extremely difficult to predict over long periods of time. In addition, only the obsolescence of high- intensity laboratories is considered because: a) these facilities are the ones in which obsolescence is most evident; b) high- intensity laboratories become obsolete more quickly than other types of facilities; and c) obsolescence in high- intensity laboratories is more predictable and an obsolescence cycle can be estimated.7 Including adaption in high- intensity laboratories in this update avoids significantly overestimating total facilities renewal requirements. A simple example illustrates this point. Consider a high- intensity laboratory constructed in 1960 with a specific sub- system that needs a $5 million major renovation every 30 years. The BRCI model would predict a $5 million expenditure in 1990, in 2020, in 2050, and every thirty years thereafter. If, however, this facility is a biotechnology building or some other high- technology facility, then industrial experience indicates that sometime around 40 to 50 years after construction (i.e., the year 2000 to 2010) the facility will be obsolete for the program it supports and either the facility will require major renovation or it will be taken down and a new facility constructed in its place. If it is the case that the facility is completely renovated or replaced after 50 years (in the year 2010), then there will be no need for the $5 million sub- system renovation in the year 2020 (the new or renovated facility will be only ten years old at that time, and it requires this sub- system to be renovated only every 30 years). Thus, facilities that become obsolete due to program changes and require renovation or replacement at that time cause the BRCI model to overestimate facility renewal costs on future occasions. 7 It can be argued that classrooms and low- intensity laboratories also become obsolete for program reasons after some period of time. While obsolescence of these types of facilities certainly happens, no evidence was found of this happening on any systematic schedule. These categories of facilities have therefore been excluded from this adaption adjustment. Page 7
9 4.B Facility Renewal Predictions - - Taking Adaption into Account Figure 3 shows the predicted facilities renewal costs both with and without taking into account a predictable obsolescence for program reasons. Note that the anticipated cost, is typically 10% to 15% lower when taking obsolescence for program reasons into account. Figure 3 Page 8
University of Virginia Addressing the University s Deferred Maintenance Backlog
University of Virginia Addressing the University s Deferred Maintenance Backlog Introduction At its December 2004 meeting, the Buildings and Grounds Committee heard a presentation regarding the University
More informationBacklog Reduction Plan
2003-2013 Executive Summary proposes to achieve reductions in our facilities maintenance backlog by documenting and completing backlog projects on a priority basis and by minimizing or eliminating future
More informationUniversity of Virginia Status Report on the Plan to Address Deferred Maintenance
Executive Summary University of Virginia Status Report on the Plan to Address Deferred Maintenance The University of Virginia s facilities portfolio includes 540 buildings and related infrastructure, encompassing
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM
104 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING
More informationUniversity of Virginia Status Report on the Plan to Address Deferred Maintenance
Executive Summary University of Virginia Status Report on the Plan to Address Deferred Maintenance The University of Virginia s facilities portfolio includes 552 buildings and related infrastructure, encompassing
More informationCapital Maintenance. 2. Deferred Maintenance, May 18, 2009 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/deferred_maintenance>
Capital Maintenance Capital Maintenance Capital maintenance has previously been known as deferred maintenance, the act of postponing maintenance in order to save money or avoid costs. 2 At NYU, the term
More informationClassified Staff Adequacy: Facility Maintenance and Operations
Slide 1 Classified Staff Adequacy: Facility Maintenance and Operations Gordon Beck, Director of School Facilities - OSPI Andrea Cobb, Research Analyst - OSPI Tom Kuehn, Regional Coordinator - OSPI Overview
More informationCampus Facilities Deficiencies Report December 2012
Campus Facilities Deficiencies Report December 2012 Deficiencies Deficiencies: Deferred maintenance is defined as maintenance work that has been deferred on a planned or unplanned basis to a future budget
More informationSpringfield High School
5.1 Springfield High School Springfield School District Delaware County - Pennsylvania Master Plan Presentation Town Hall Meeting 5 Project Cost Estimates/ Project Financing Strategy / Tax Impact February
More informationDeferred Maintenance Phase I Report
Ohio University Deferred Maintenance Phase I Report A Case for Addressing Deferred Maintenance Needs at Ohio University Prepared by: University Planning and Implementation and Facilities Management Ohio
More informationThe Real Meaning of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
The Real Meaning of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Presented by David Patnaude Director of Plant and Sustainability Riverdale Country School Lawrence Eighmy Managing Principle 1 The Real Meaning of Total
More informationCapital Planning and Budget. University of Wisconsin System Administration. All Agency Projects Program
University of Wisconsin System Administration All Agency Projects Program OVERVIEW All Agency Projects Program A targeted program addressing the maintenance, repair, renovation, and minor remodeling needs
More informationCAPITAL PROJECT PROCESS
CAPITAL PROJECT PROCESS May 2009 GETTING STARTED What is a project? A project is defined as all work (maintenance & repair or renovation) that requires 5,000 or more in time and materials and/or is sufficiently
More informationDepartment Chair Online Resource Center Facility Maintenance or Facility Improvement? Taking a Responsible Approach
Department Chair Online Resource Center Facility Maintenance or Facility Improvement? Taking a Responsible Approach Richard Bettega, associate vice president for facilities, Lewis and Clark College. Facility
More informationWhere Builders Risk Meets Personal Lines
Where Builders Risk Meets Personal Lines Presenter Introduction Mary Stiglic, CIC, Marketing Manager More than 18 years experience with builders risk Licensed property and casualty agent Holds CIC designation
More informationBUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT. A Comprehensive Approach in Energy and Facility Management
BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT A Comprehensive Approach in Energy and Facility Management Presentation Outline Page Nadine International Company Profile.. 3 FCI -Industry Preferred Formula.... 4 FCI -Other
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 2012 PREPARED BY: JONATHAN C. THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS
More informationAttachment FC 16 SBCC 11/17/2017. STATE BOARD OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES Construction and Property November 17, 2017
A. Approval - New (Non-State and Other State Funds) Name (Other State) (Other State) Non-State Funds/ Undetermined 1 N/A B. Approval - Amended (Non-State and Other State Funds) 1 Coastal Carolina Main
More informationPrepared for: VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION CROZET, VA. Prepared by:
RESERVE FUND STUDY THE VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS CROZET, VA 22932 Prepared for: VILLAGE AT HIGHLANDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION CROZET, VA C/O ASSOCIA COMMUNITY GROUP 1828 PAVILION CIRCLE CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911
More informationPROGRAM REVIEW FACILITIES PLANNING & SERVICES DIVISION
2013-14 PROGRAM REVIEW FACILITIES PLANNING & SERVICES DIVISION I. Division Purpose Plan, construct and maintain a safe, functional, clean and attractive physical environment for the users of El Camino
More informationFY Capital Improvement Program City of New Bedford, Massachusetts
City of New Bedford, Massachusetts Background The Massachusetts Department of Revenue, credit agencies and the Government Accounting Standards Board recommend that localities develop a capital improvement
More informationHurricane Charley - Executive summary. Hurricane Charley. Nature s Force vs. Structural Strength
Hurricane Charley - Executive summary Hurricane Charley Nature s Force vs. Structural Strength Charlotte County, Florida August 13, 2004 Introduction The devastation left behind by Hurricane Andrew when
More informationORIGINAL YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES 2/15/2013 BUILDING SURVEY DATE
0807 3502 SOUTH FIRST STREET CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS SYSTEM CONDITION INDEX.771 PRIMARY BUILDING USE BUILDING SURVEY TEAM BUILDING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT COST $ 347,400 LABORATORY BUILDING GROSS SQUARE FEET 16,986
More information1 Integrated Planning & Public Works
1 Integrated Planning & Public Works STAFF REPORT Building Standards Title: Building Standards 2016 Fees and Charges Report Number: IPPW2015-111 Author: Lynn Balfour Meeting Type: Finance & Strategic Planning
More informationState Historic Homes Rehabilitation Tax Credit CGS
State Historic Homes Rehabilitation Tax Credit CGS 10-416 Historic Homes Rehabilitation Tax Credit Basic Eligibility Requirements Listed on the State or National Register Located in a Program Targeted
More informationOctober 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8
Children and adults learn and perform best in a safe and comfortable environment. Arlington Public Schools therefore provides safe, comfortable, accessible, efficient and attractive spaces for instructional
More informationEstimate Considerations. Estimate Considerations
Estimate Considerations Estimate Considerations Every estimate, whether it is generated in the conceptual phase of a project or at bidding time, must consider a number of issues Project Size Project Quality
More informationSpecial Review. Inflexibility in Contracting and Retainage Practices Could Hurt Construction Industry. Purpose. Current Contracting Environment
Special Review December 2000 Report No. 00-26 Inflexibility in Contracting and Retainage Practices Could Hurt Construction Industry at a glance Retainage is a common construction contracting practice whereby
More informationEducational & Performing Arts Center: Downriver Campus
Educational & Performing Arts Center: Total Estimated Project Construction Cost: $ 18.04 million Groundbreaking: September 2006 Percentage Completed: 100 percent Anticipated Completion Date: Completed
More informationPlease give a detailed description of services offered: (This must be filled out completely)
CONTRACTOR LICENSE APPLICATION City of Douglas-Planning Department P. O. Box 1030/101 N. 4th Street Douglas, Wyoming 82633-1030 (307) 358-2132 or Fax (307) 358-2133 Application for license shall be made
More informationPOLICY NUMBER: POL 131
Chapter: CLAIMS Subject: HOME MODIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL EQUIPMENT Effective Date: April 27, 2006 Last Update: November 22, 2016 PURPOSE STATEMENT: The purpose of this policy is to explain the criteria
More informationReport and Recommendations of the Workgroup on Deferred Maintenance Index FY 2010
Report and Recommendations of the Workgroup on Deferred Maintenance Index FY 2010 July 2010 Division of Planning and Accountability Finance and Resource Planning Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
More informationBallot Measures-T Section
T, Westminster School District Classroom Improvement Measure To upgrade aging schools and improve the quality of education with funding that cannot be taken by the State; provide heating, ventilation and
More informationITEM 7 ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT. YOUR ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT FOR A SHOPPING MALL FOOD COURT LOCATION (Single Unit) Method of Payment
ITEM 7 ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT SHOPPING MALL FOOD COURT LOCATION (Single Unit) Initial Franchise Fee 1 $30,000 Lump Sum At Signing of Franchise Agreement Travel and Living Expenses While Training
More informationCITY OF FORT PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF FORT PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT This is a request for determination by the City s Floodplain Administrator as to whether or not the project
More informationCAPITAL FUNDING SUMMARY
CAPITAL SUMMARY SCC (School Consolidation Capital ) CAPITAL : B19 -December 1, Specifically to address a school board s excess capacity : B11 -May 26, Opportunity to identify most urgent & pressing accommodations
More informationRockville Science Center (P036600)
Rockville Science Center (P036600) (AAGE15) Rockville Date Last Modified 2/26/14 N/A-PS Planning, Design and Supervision 6,492 6,477 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction 56,300 56,272 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,598
More informationLocal Government Use of Preventive Maintenance. This chapter provides additional information on preventive maintenance for
3 Local Government Use of Preventive Maintenance SUMMARY Most school districts, cities, and counties reported that they perform some preventive maintenance on their buildings, but only about 15 percent
More information10 Year OSU Capital Forecast
10 Year OSU Capital Forecast Presentation 2004-17 Define financial boundaries Describe criteria Identify data sources Summarize proposed capital projects Financial boundaries Forecast to align with financial
More informationBackground. MUNICIPALITIES AND DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH CAROLINA: Expanding The Tool Kit
MUNICIPALITIES AND DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH CAROLINA: Expanding The Tool Kit Background Over past 30 years, shift focus from remediation to development Need for commercially vibrant, historically
More informationOne of the core services of most facilities management
The Charge of the Rate Brigade: A Rate Template for In-House Construction Labor by Donald J. Guckert and Jeri Ripley King One of the core services of most facilities management organizations in higher
More informationCapital Projects Fund
The capital projects fund is used to account for the resources used for the acquisition, construction, or improvement of major capital facilities, including those of the enterprise fund. The capital projects
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT TAX CREDITS FOR REHABILITATION
State Historic Preservation Office Oklahoma Historical Society 800 Nazih Zuhdi Drive Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405/521-6249 FAX 405/522-0816 http://www.okhistory.org/shpo/shpom.htm Fact Sheet #14 August
More informationDivision of Finance and Administration Financial Update. Karol Kain Gray Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration September 25, 2013
Division of Finance and Administration Financial Update September 25, 2013 CAFR AWARD o The UNC Finance Division earned the University s 18 th consecutive Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
More informationProgram Performance Review
Program Performance Review Facilities Maintenance Division of the Public Works and Transportation Department July 21, 2006 Report No. 06-18 Office of the County Auditor Evan A. Lukic, CPA County Auditor
More informationThe World Bank FPD Note No. 9 June 1994
Privatesector P U B L I C P O L I C Y F O R T H E The World Bank FPD Note No. 9 June 1994 Reality Checks for Power Forecasts Two Simple Checks Relating Power Sector Demand Forecasts to the Macroeconomy
More informationCentral Michigan University Capital Budget
Central Michigan University Capital Budget 1999-2000 Table of Contents Central Michigan University Capital Budget Table of Contents I. Narrative A. Overview and Process...1 B. Funding Sources...2 C. Capital
More informationStatus: Structural steel installation complete at primary building. Observatory construction underway. Central Plant modifications are complete.
Page 1 of 14 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT August 24, 2015 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING Project Budget: $52,234,000 $8,308,000 $67,358,000 State Match: $36,564,000 ($36,564,000) - Basic Aid
More informationCampus Condition Index Reporting Manual Fall 2012
Campus Condition Index Reporting Manual Fall 2012 September 2012 Division of Planning and Accountability Finance and Resource Planning Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Fred W. Heldenfels IV, Chair
More informationOntario Universities Facilities Condition Assessment Program
Ontario Universities Facilities Condition Assessment Program As of May 2014 Prepared by the Task Force of the Council of Senior Administrative Officers and the Ontario Association of Physical Plant Administrators
More informationUpdate With Site Visit
Update With Site Visit Le Chateau Bellevue, WA 10/28/2011 Report #1002 Phone: 253-241-8151 Fax: 360-872-8073 E-mail: jeremy@reservesolutions.net www.reservesolutions.net Le Chateau Client Info: REPORT
More informationSs. Francis & John Strategic Planning Committee
Ss. Francis & John Strategic Planning Committee Town Hall Meeting April 28, 2015 2 Agenda Update on Debt Reduction Update on One in Faith in Mission Expansion/Facilities Committee Report Questions Saint
More informationFacility Needs Assessment Osage County
Facility Needs Assessment Osage County CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mission Mike Tolson, John Kane, Mike Fisher, Lou Ann Brown, Cathy Ross, Berry Keeler, Jerry Loftis Volunteer committee organized in 2015
More informationGuideline for Low Wealth Applications
Guideline for Low Wealth Applications 160-5-4-.16 (a) 11 Educational Facility Site, Construction, and Reimbursement State Department of Education Facilities Services Unit Effective Date: DRAFT Page 1 of
More informationPhysical Plant. Five-Year Capital Budget Plan. State College Area School District November Page 1 of 15
Physical Plant Five-Year Capital Budget Plan State College Area School District November 2011 Page 1 of 15 Table of Contents Background and 2013 Projects Pages 3-5 Funding Level Pages 6-7 Existing Buildings
More informationFACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE
Marble Falls ISD FACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting 2 April 26, 2018 Love and Inspire WELCOME! Agenda Welcome Co-Chairs School Finance 101 MFISD Financial Overview Aging Facilities Small Group and Large
More informationTracking Expenses in Facilities
Tracking Expenses in Facilities Requirements for Tracking Expenses when maintaining, building or improving a facility Minnesota State Colleges and Universities The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
More informationCONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 3.0 PURPOSE & SCOPE... 3 3.1 PURPOSE... 3 3.2 SCOPE... 3 3.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION... 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION... 5 5.0 OBSERVATIONS... 6 6.0 RESERVE
More informationStatus: Structural steel installation complete at primary building. Observatory construction underway. Central Plant modifications are complete.
Page 1 of 11 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT June 22, 2015 SADDLEBACK COLLEGE 1. SCIENCES BUILDING Project Budget: $52,234,000 $8,308,000 $67,358,000 State Match: $36,564,000 ($36,564,000) - Basic Aid Allocation:
More informationBuilding Codes are BAD for Your Insureds: Why Ordinance or Law Coverage is Necessary!
Main Idea: The application and enforcement of Building Codes can turn a partial loss into a total loss. Section I Gaps in Coverage Create Need for Ordinance of Law Coverage I. Commercial Property Policy
More informationProgram Allocation. Allocation of General Fund. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Director: Bud J. Harris
Director: Bud J. Harris Mission: Facilities Maintenance maintains and repairs equipment and buildings belonging to Kitsap County. Key areas include electrical, plumbing, HVAC, building security systems,
More informationFacility Condition Assessment. Facility Condition Assessment 8/13/2013 AGENDA
AGENDA benefits & limitations Rod Moore, RA, LEED AP, PMP Georgia Tech Benjamin Dutton, FFB, MCIOB, MRICS Faithful+Gould GT Facilities GT Program What is GT FCA Deliverables How GT uses FCA Information
More information$46,400,000 to be funded from gifts ($37,400,000) and external financing ($9,000,000)
501B COMMITTEE ON FINANCE B. AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING FOR C. V. STARR EAST ASIAN LIBRARY, BERKELEY CAMPUS
More informationBallot Measures-N 7. Centralia Elementary School District, Building Strong Neighborhood Schools
Section Ballot Measures-N N Centralia Elementary School District, Building Strong Neighborhood Schools To repair/modernize aging classrooms, science labs/school facilities to keep pace with technology,
More informationCity Exchange, Leeds. Service Charge Forecast 01 April March 2016
City Exchange, Leeds Service Charge Forecast 01 April 2015 31 March 2016 Gross Lettable Area 120,848 square feet Date opened 1977 Last refurbished 2005 Service Charge Booklet Contents: Executive Summary
More informationFacility Maintenance Modeling
Frank Kaleba, PE, Senior Engineer, R&K Solutions, Roanoke/Alexandria VA Van Dobson, PE, Associate VP, Facilities Services and Campus Planning Lehigh University 1 Learning Objectives Describe the challenge
More information2019 Capital Projects Plan
Rev. 03/18 School Name Crawford County Community School Corporation County Name Crawford School No. 1300 2019 Capital Projects Plan The following plan format should be used for your 2019 Capital Projects
More informationDeveloping the Capital Plan is only Half the Battle
Western Connecticut State University Western Oregon University Westfield State University Widener University Williams College Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester State University Xavier University
More informationCHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP PLAN
CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP PLAN FEBRUARY 21, 2017 CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TOTAL COST OWNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1- INTRODUCTION
More informationCAPITAL BUDGET FY 2020 & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY REQUEST
CAPITAL BUDGET FY 22 & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 221-225 REQUEST Board of Education 1/1/218 BOARD OF EDUCATION Bob E. Lord, President Donna M. Sivigny, Vice-President Virginia R. Harrison, Member
More informationResidential Permits R-2, R-3, R-4, and U Occupancies 2018 Building Permit Valuation/Fee Schedule
Residential Permits R-2, R-3, R-4, and U Occupancies 2018 Building Permit Valuation/Fee Schedule The base valuation to determine permit fees for residential buildings and additions are based on a dollar
More informationCAPITAL RESERVE STUDY
CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY FOR THE HIALEAH CONDOMINIUM WILDWOOD CREST, NEW JERSEY Project Number: 12-1066 W:\2012\12-1066\CORR\12-1066v1.doc Date: March 29, 2013 Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary...
More informationThe Reserve Fund Study. Planning and Monitoring Tool Presented by Kevin Dietrich, ACCI DK Condominium Management Inc.
The Reserve Fund Study Planning and Monitoring Tool Presented by Kevin Dietrich, ACCI DK Condominium Management Inc. Background and Overview The Act requires all condominium corporations to maintain a
More informationFY2015 UNIFIED OPERATING BUDGET & STUDENT CHARGES May 2014 REVISED MW114(855) 5/19/14
FY2015 UNIFIED OPERATING BUDGET & STUDENT CHARGES May 2014 REVISED MW114(855) 5/19/14 Table of Contents Budget Overview... 3 Appropriation... 4 Maine Economic Improvement Fund Student Charges 6 Enrollment
More informationMaintenance Matters. Building Envelope Maintenance and Renewals Planning. Building Envelope. Maintenance Bulletin
Maintenance Matters Building Envelope 7 Maintenance Bulletin No. The primary focus of this bulletin is on the importance of being proactive rather than reactive in the maintenance and care of buildings.
More informationAllegan County Courthouse Square
Allegan County Courthouse Square Master Plan Charrette Report Draft Executive Summary Date: August 4, 2014 Prepared By: Index to Report Executive Summary A. Introduction 1. Charrette Goals and Objectives.
More informationPROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY
PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY Licorice Fern II Homeowners Association 16880 SE Licorice Way, Renton, WA 98059 For: Licorice Fern II Homeowners Association c/o Ann Hart, Property Manager Pinnacle 2801 Alaskan
More informationFREEDOM PARK SUMMARY BACKGROUND
FREEDOM PARK SUMMARY Upon hearing the public outcry concerning the Hanford Parks and Recreation Department tearing out the rubberized matting and jack-hammering the concrete under the playground equipment
More informationHurricanes and Beyond. Minimizing Your Disasters. by Kathy Danforth
Images courtesy of www.nnvl.noaa.gov Hurricanes and Beyond Minimizing Your Disasters by Kathy Danforth In large part, wind and water are beyond the control of individuals, associations, and the government.
More informationCode Reference: Section , F.S. Chapter ; FS Section ; Responsible Dept.: Community Development/Building Division
Building Construction Permit Fees 322100 Building Division 341910 Planning Division 341940 Harbor/Code Division 322200/322300 Surcharge Building Permit Fees The governing bodies of local governments may
More information9000 SERIES SCHOOL FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS
9000 SERIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Goals 9000 Acquisition, Use and Disposal of School Property 9100 Contractor License, Surety Bonds and Insurance 9200 Operation and Maintenance of District Facilities 9300
More informationCapital Planning Program CPC Presentation
Capital Planning Program CPC Presentation August 29, 2016 AGENDA 2 I. Overview II. 10-Year Capital Plan Update III. FRRM Data Improvement IV. Key Dates FY16-25 CAPITAL PLAN FUNDING LEVELS As adopted in
More informationPleasantdale Elementary
DeKalb County School District/Elementary Schools Pleasantdale Elementary Final School Assessment Report May 20, 2016 PARSONS School Assessment Report Table of Contents School Executive Summary 5 School
More informationCH-UH Board of Education Meeting. June 27, 2017
CH-UH Board of Education Meeting June 27, 2017 Tonight s Agenda Purpose of this work session Current status of the Master Facilities Plan Phase 1 Factors that led us to this point Current path for middle
More informationBody Corporate ten year maintenance plan example for South Africa
Body Corporate ten year maintenance plan example for South Africa Prepared by: Date: This plan covers the period of ten years from.. Building details & report inputs Supplied information Building name
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual SUBJECT: NUMBER: A. PURPOSE To provide guidance on what constitutes maintenance and repair and the process used to document and approve projects. B. DEFINITIONS
More informationTOWN OF HINESBURG FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS. Prepared By. Michael J. Munson, Ph.D., FAICP
TOWN OF HINESBURG FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Prepared By Michael J. Munson, Ph.D., FAICP September 23, 2009 I. INTRODUCTION: The Town of Hinesburg, Vermont, has recently updated its Town Plan
More informationChapter. Acquisition of Leased Office Space
Chapter Acquisition of Leased Office Space All of the audit work in this chapter was conducted in accordance with the standards for assurance engagements set by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
More informationLos Angeles Unified School District Page 1 of 3
Los Angeles Unified School District 333 South Beaudry Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Board of Education Report File #: Rep-201-16/17, Version: 1 Amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution
More informationAction Item. Sid Albaugh, Assistant Superintendent Business Services. Consideration of Approval of 2018 Measure A - Facilities Project List
Action Item TO: PRESENTED BY: BOARD AGENDA ITEM: Board of Trustees and Superintendent of Schools Sid Albaugh, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Consideration of Approval of 2018 Measure A Facilities
More informationSubject: Capital Reserve Expenditure Guidelines. *incl. former OCHAP/CSHP Peel Access to Housing (PATH)
HIP Housing In Peel Subject: Capital Reserve Expenditure Guidelines Date: August 1, 2012 Applicable To The information contained in this document applies to the following: Municipal & Private Non- Federal
More informationOntario s deteriorating schools. The fix is not in
Ontario s deteriorating schools -- The fix is not in An analysis of the physical condition of Ontario s elementary and secondary schools and the funding and program changes needed to bring them up to standard
More informationRehab Financing The FHA Streamline 203(k) Program
The FHA Streamline 203(k) Program A Guide to Financing Your Home Improvement Project The Program: This is a new 1 st mortgage program sponsored by the FHA and designed to provide homeowners with low-cost
More informationA Comparative Overview of Facilities Management Namibia and South Africa Regarding Building Maintenance
ASOCSA2010-26 A Comparative Overview of Facilities Management Namibia and South Africa Regarding Building Maintenance M. D. Pretorius 1, A.C Hauptfleisch 2 1 martha.pretorius@gmail.com, 2 ach@ecospan.co.za
More informationNotes on PARTNERSHIP UK PROPERTY
SA801(Notes) net CONTENTS Filling in the Partnership UK Property Pages Return period Furnished holiday lettings in the UK or EEA PLN1 PLN1 PLN2 Expenses PLN2 Tax adjustments PLN3 Other property income
More informationUNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SECTION: Facilities Number: 09.04.01 AREA: Facilities Renewal SUBJECT: Capital Facilities Life Cycle Renewal I. PURPOSE The purpose
More informationHow to Use Tax Strategies to Offset Dealership Construction Costs Six-figure offsets are possible if you plan carefully
How to Use Tax Strategies to Offset Dealership Construction Costs Six-figure offsets are possible if you plan carefully With Stephen Bedell, CPA of Crowe Horwath LLP Moderated by Mike Bowers, of DealersEdge
More informationContents Ballot Measure... 2 Full Text Ballot Proposition... 3 Tax Rate Statement... 7 Impartial Analysis... 8 Statement in Favor of Measure...
Contents Ballot Measure... 2 Full Text Ballot Proposition... 3 Tax Rate Statement... 7 Impartial Analysis... 8 Statement in Favor of Measure... 10 Ballot Measure EXHIBIT B MEASURE Y (ABBREVIATED FORM)
More informationSanta Barbara Community College District Measure V Bond Construction Fund Financial Statements and Agreed-Upon Procedures Year Ended June 30, 2013
Measure V Bond Construction Fund Financial Statements and Agreed-Upon Procedures Year Ended June 30, 2013 Measure V Bond Construction Fund Year Ended June 30, 2013 Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors'
More informationDeKalb County School District/Elementary Schools Dunwoody Elementary Final School Assessment Report May 19, 2016
DeKalb County School District/Elementary Schools Dunwoody Elementary Final School Assessment Report May 19, 2016 PARSONS School Assessment Report Table of Contents School Executive Summary 4 School Condition
More information