North Dakota County Migration Flows: to

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "North Dakota County Migration Flows: to"

Transcription

1 North Dakota Migration Flows: to A detailed analysis of the relocation of people and monies into and out of North Dakota Counties Issued December 2002 $200 Million By Richard Rathge Karen Olson Net Out-Flow of Monies From North Dakota Due to Migration: to $150 Million $100 Million $50 Million $0 Million North Dakota State Data Center at North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota

2

3 North Dakota Migration Flows: to A detailed analysis of the relocation of people and monies into and out of North Dakota Counties Issued December 2002 $200 Million Net Out-Flow of Monies From North Dakota Due to Migration: to $150 Million $100 Million $50 Million $0 Million Dr. Richard Rathge, Director Karen Olson, Information Specialist North Dakota State Data Center North Dakota State University IACC Building, Room 424 PO Box 5636 Fargo, ND Phone: (701) Fax: (701) URL: Richard.Rathge@ndsu.nodak.edu

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology. 5 Description.. 5 Limitations.. 5 Profile Presentation.. 5 Overview of North Dakota Migration Flows.. 6 Map A. of Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income Due to Migration for North Dakota by : to Table A. of Tax Returns,, and Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income Due to Migration for North Dakota: to Discussion 7 Table B. Tax Returns, and Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income for Non-Movers in North Dakota: to State and Profiles North Dakota. 8 Adams 9 Barnes.. 10 Benson. 11 Billings. 12 Bottineau.. 13 Bowman 14 Burke.. 15 Burleigh 16 Cass 17 Cavalier 18 Dickey. 19 Divide.. 20 Dunn 21 Eddy 22 Emmons 23 State and Profiles (continued) Foster.. 24 Golden Valley.. 25 Grand Forks 26 Grant 27 Griggs.. 28 Hettinger 29 Kidder.. 30 LaMoure 31 Logan.. 32 McHenry 33 McIntosh 34 McKenzie.. 35 McLean. 36 Mercer. 37 Morton. 38 Mountrail.. 39 Nelson.. 40 Oliver.. 41 Pembina 42 Pierce.. 43 Ramsey. 44 Ransom. 45 Renville 46 Richland 47 Rolette. 48 Sargent. 49 Sheridan 50 Sioux 51 Slope 52 Stark 53 Steele.. 54 Stutsman 55 Towner. 56 Traill 57 Walsh.. 58 Ward 59 Wells.. 60 Williams 61 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

5 METHODOLOGY Description The data contained in this report were obtained from the -to- Migration Flow files provided by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). These files contain statistics derived from individual tax forms filed with the IRS and are based on the year-to-year changes in the addresses reported by tax filers. The IRS monitors the county and state where tax return filers live each year. The IRS migration data include only those returns for which the social security number of the tax filer matched the return filed in both years. The IRS does not release any micro-data on individual tax filers but aggregates the total number of filers who move between each pair of counties in the country. Definitions of terms and concepts found throughout this report are as follows: Migration flows defined for this report include the movement or relocation of individuals filing a tax form with the IRS. includes persons moving between counties within the United States. includes those persons relocating to or from a foreign country, but still U.S. residents filing a Federal individual income tax return. Tax Filer/Tax Return as presented in this report represent individual tax forms filed with the IRS regardless if they are a single or joint filing. These numbers can be used to approximate the number of households. represent the number of dependents claimed on specific tax filings. These numbers can be used to approximate the number of persons. Aggregate adjusted income is the sum total of the taxable income from all sources, less the adjustments to income, such as IRS deduction, self employment tax and health insurance, alimony paid, etc. Median adjusted income is a derived measure of the midpoint of taxable income distributions. Non-movers are tax filers who do not move or move within the same county. Non-movers are not included in the profiles, however state totals are presented in Table B on page 7. Limitations Migration flows of less than 10 filings between a particular pair of counties are not reported by the IRS and are reflected as throughout this document. New immigrants to the country who were not residents needing to file IRS tax returns previously are not included in the IRS migration statistics. The IRS migration data also do not capture all domestic migration in the U.S., as not everyone files a tax return. Individuals that are not well represented include the elderly, persons who have recently lost a spouse, or others with low income. In addition, there is potential error in misreporting those who file their tax return outof-state. Since an assessment of migration is based on change of mailing address, there is the potential of incorrectly classifying a tax filer as a mover because the mailing address on their tax form is not the same as their permanent residence address. For example, a change in mailing address without a change in residence address will cause an actual non-mover to be classified as a mover. Conversely, a change in residence address without a change in mailing address will lead a true mover to be classified as a non-mover. Although the proportion of misallocation is unknown, current analysis suggests it is small. Profile Presentation Table 1 of each county profile contains the number of Federal individual income tax returns filed by individuals entering or leaving that county for , , and The table indicates the origin of movement into a county and the destination of movement out of a county. Thus the movement into a county may be from a different county in the same state, a different state, or a foreign country. Movement out of a county may be to a different county in the same state, a different state, or a foreign country. In addition to the movement into and out of the county in question, the table also provides the overall net movement due to relocation. Table 1 also includes the number of exemptions reported by tax filers who moved to and from counties in North Dakota. Table 2 of each county profile provides the aggregate adjusted taxable income reported on Federal individual income tax returns filed by individuals entering or leaving that county for , , and These numbers are reported in thousands of dollars. As with Table 1, Table 2 indicates the movement of monies to or from a county in a different state, a different county within North Dakota, or a foreign country. In addition to the movement into and out of the county in question, the table also provides the overall net movement of monies due to relocation. Table 2 also includes a median adjusted taxable income for filers who relocated to or from counties in North Dakota. These numbers are presented in whole dollars. Only year-specific data for this indicator are presented in this report as sums of this indicator are not applicable. The net difference between the median income of tax filers moving into a county and the median income of tax filers leaving a county is also provided in Table 2. North Dakota Migration Flows: to

6 OVERVIEW OF NORTH DAKOTA MIGRATION FLOWS When North Dakota s resident wage earners move to other states, they take their families and incomes with them, resulting in lower consumer spending and tax revenue for North Dakota. Similarly, when residents move from county to county within the state, local economies and tax bases are affected as the population relocates. This report highlights the most recent available U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data, covering Federal individual income tax returns filed between through , relating to the migration of tax filers to and from counties in North Dakota. Analysis using North Dakota tax records between and reveals that more wage earners moved out-of-state than moved in, resulting in a loss of income. There is continuing evidence of income drain from rural as well as urban counties throughout North Dakota. Within North Dakota, tax records show that 52 of the 53 counties in the state suffered net losses in the number of filed tax returns. In addition, 51 of 53 counties experienced net losses in taxable income as a result of migration (Map A). Map A. of Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income Due to Migration for North Dakota by : to The IRS data allow policymakers to assess the magnitude of loss or gain to the economy through the migration of individuals filing tax returns. Between and , 62,976 tax return filers with aggregate taxable income of $1.9 billion left North Dakota. A total of 52,799 tax filers with aggregate taxable income of $1.5 billion entered North Dakota. The net loss in taxable income to the state due to migration was $384.5 million (Table A). Table A. of Tax Returns,, and Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income Due to Migration for North Dakota: to Aggregate Adjusted Year Tax Returns Taxable Income ($) ,207-6, ,383, ,221-6, ,634, ,749-7, ,560,000 TOTAL ,177-20, ,577,000 North Dakota gained net taxable income from incoming Mississippians and Alaskans, but lost net taxable income to 33 other states between and IRS data show that Minnesota gained the most from movement out of North Dakota. Between and , 7,967 tax filers left North Dakota for Minnesota and 5,711 left Minnesota for North Dakota, with a net taxable income of $102 million flowing to Minnesota. Clay and Hennepin counties were the most frequent destinations of North Dakota tax filers relocating to Minnesota. Grand Forks and Ward counties suffered the highest losses in North Dakota, losing $94.3 million and $59.2 million respectively, in net taxable income between and Cass was the only county to show an increase in net returns, however, it suffered a loss in net income due to out-migrants having higher incomes than in-migrants. Only two counties in North Dakota had increases in net income due to the relocation of tax filers, Ramsey ($8.4 million) and Bottineau ($3.6 million). North Dakota Migration Flows: to

7 DISCUSSION Only a small proportion of North Dakota s population actually relocates from year to year. According to the IRS tax data, 223,870 tax filers did not move between 2000 and These filers reported 500,134 exemptions and $9.6 billion in net taxable income (Table B). Table B. Tax Returns,, and Aggregate Adjusted Taxable Income for Non-Movers in North Dakota: to Aggregate Adjusted Year Tax Returns Taxable Income ($) , ,222 8,573,491, , ,896 9,085,902, , ,134 9,583,046,000 However, the economic consequence of migration for the state of North Dakota is both clear and compelling. Evidence from IRS tax records demonstrates that the net exchange of movers to and from North Dakota has resulted in a consistent and increasing loss of revenue to the state. The total net loss of taxable income to North Dakota, as a result of the net exchange of movers between 1993 and 1994, was slightly more than $37 million dollars. This was the first year that IRS records were made available for county flow analysis. By the year 2001, the annual net loss of revenue for North Dakota had ballooned to over $163 million. A comparison of the median taxable income between tax filers moving into the state and those leaving the state also is very revealing. Residents leaving the state s rural counties, on average, have lower incomes than those moving into rural North Dakota. In 72 percent of the state s rural counties (28 of 39), the median income of the newly arriving tax filers was higher than those leaving between 2000 and Low wages in rural counties most likely accounts for this trend. Unfortunately, the magnitude of those leaving rural North Dakota greatly outpaces those arriving to the extent that the net exchange in income is negative, even though the in-movers have higher incomes. The economic calamity this creates can be illustrated by Bowman, North Dakota. The latest Census indicates that Bowman had fewer than 3,300 residents in the year Between 2000 and 2001, the county lost 114 tax filers and gained only 59 for a net loss of 55 tax filers. The median income of the tax filers coming to Bowman during that time period was $19,062 compared to a median income of $16,527 for those who left. Even though the median income of the new arrivals was 13 percent higher than those who left, the county lost nearly $1.6 million in taxable income during that year solely due to the net income exchange of movers. However, the trend of in-migrants having higher incomes than those leaving is not statewide. In 9 of 14 urban counties throughout North Dakota, the situation is reversed; tax filers leaving had higher incomes than those arriving between 2000 and Since the urban counties account for a much greater proportion of the state s population, the loss of higher income urban tax filers exacerbates the situation. This is best illustrated by the net exchange in Cass, the most populated county in North Dakota. Over the three-year period from to , Cass had a net growth of slightly fewer than 1,100 tax filers. However, even though the county gained tax filers it lost nearly $26 million in taxable income during that period solely due to the net exchange of movers. Although the IRS county-to-county tax flow data have important limitations, they do reveal a serious consequence that needs to be addressed. The loss of revenue is pervasive with all but two counties losing taxable income as a result of migration. The rural counties of the state can least afford the persistent drain on their taxable revenues, not to mention the loss of human capital. Yet they are the ones relatively hardest hit by migration losses. Policy makers need to be more aggressive in their search for solutions and bold in their actions. History suggests that new approaches to economic development need to be considered. The consistent upward trend in lost taxable income suggests that old strategies are not effective. This report demonstrates that greater priority needs to be given to addressing population loss. The economic advantages of doing so are compelling. North Dakota Migration Flows: to

8 North Dakota Table 1. and for Movers, , and : North Dakota Origin for Movement Into State and State Movement Movement Into State 17,092 16,611 19,096 52,799 20,299 Movement Out of State 19,832 22,845 62,976-3,207-3,221-3,749-10,177 16,576 16,096 18,537 51,209 19,766 19,312 22,358 61,436-3,190-3,216-3,821-10,227 8,264 8,182 9,358 25,804 8,264 8,182 9,358 25, ,312 7,914 9,179 25,405 11,502 11,130 13,000 35,632-3,190-3,216-3,821-10, , , Movement 31,612 30,566 14,846 30,300 29,289 14,619 35,035 33,972 16,913 96,947 93,827 46,378 38,444 37,284 14,846 36,664 35,709 14,619 42,497 41,597 16, , ,590 46,378-6,832-6, ,364-6, ,462-7, ,658-20, ,720 14,670 17,059 47,449 22,438 21,090 24,684 68,212-6,718-6,420-7,625-20,763 1,046 1,011 1,063 3,120 1, , Origin for Movement Into State and State Movement Movement Movement Into State 465, , , , , , , , , , , ,559 8,851 8,344 10,026 16,586 16,629 16,269 17,028 16,818 16,935 16,285 17,687 17,837 17,915 17,053 18,779 15,252 12,226 14,285 1,470,293 1,443, , ,746 27, , , , , , , , ,596 11,773 11,055 18,376 18,244 18,384 18,299 16,269 16,285 20,132 19,859 18,109 16, , , , ,476 11,668 19,393 19,390 17,053 21,487 19,538 North Dakota Movement Out of State 1,854,870 1,820, ,326 1,151,049 34, , , ,560-97, , , , , ,917-2,922-2,711-1,642-1,790-1, ,104-1,426-1, ,172-1,556-1, ,708-2,857-4,431-5, , , ,303-7,275 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

9 Adams Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Adams Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,014 1, ,688 1, ,171 15,713 15,713 12,499 20,832 14,687 14,687 16,249 13,749 19,772 19,772 18,999 21,249 3,472 3,472 1,181 2,291 1,410 2,520 1,410 2, , ,188 14,166 16,428 14,166 16,428 17,082 14,249 12,726 21,249 2,135 2,135 1, ,317 19,317 14,999 23,749 Adams 6,065 6,065 3,098 2, , , ,547 1,547-4,583 8,106-1,741-1,741 2,000-7, ,000-2,500-2,593-2,593-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

10 Barnes Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Barnes Origin for and Movement Movement ,293 1, ,713 1,713 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 5,594 5,594 3,382 2,212 6,142 6,142 3,705 2,437 5,951 5,951 3,990 1,961 15,794 15,794 14,906 17,499 18,888 18,888 17,499 22,044 15,390 15,390 16,199 14,027 17,687 17,687 11,077 6,610 6,775 9,101 6,775 9,101 4,258 5,187 2,517 3,914 16,345 16,635 16,345 16,635 16,582 16,451 16,022 16,874 10,118 10,118 6,080 4,037 16,153 16,153 16,690 15,138 Barnes 25,994 25,994 15,525 10,468-1,181-2,959-4,167-1,181-2,959-4, ,482-2, ,477-2, ,676 1,477 2,253 2,253 1,048 5, ,111-8,307-8,307-4,448-3,858 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

11 Benson Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Benson Origin for and Movement Movement ,008 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 1,772 1,772 1, ,903 1,903 1, ,215 3,215 2, ,499 13,499 13,249 13,999 10,440 10,440 9,820 14,166 13,749 13,749 12,793 18,749 6,890 6,890 4,702 2,188 3,039 3,488 3,039 3,488 2,478 2, ,124 16,476 13,124 16,476 14,249 15,440 10,312 19,999 4,665 4,665 3,057 1,609 13,962 13,962 12,802 17,499 Benson 11,192 11,192 8,139 3,055-1,267-1,585-1,450-1,267-1,585-1,450-1,421-1, ,000 3,687-6,036-6,036-5,620-5, ,250-4,302-4,302-3, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

12 Billings Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Billings Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,856 12, ,999 14,999 Billings ,143-2,143 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

13 Bottineau Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Bottineau Origin for and Movement Movement ,033 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 3,519 3,519 1,938 1,582 11,497 11,497 10,475 1,022 4,542 4,542 2,995 1,547 18,863 18,863 19,499 17,499 18,087 18,087 18,124 17,999 21,666 21,666 19,999 24,166 19,558 19,558 15,408 4,151 4,791 5,446 4,791 5,446 3,377 2,948 1,415 2,498 17,199 17,425 17,199 17,425 15,937 17,173 19,443 17,954 5,731 5,731 3,474 2,257 17,173 17,173 15,468 20,937 Bottineau 15,968 15,968 9,799 6,170-1,272 6,051-1,189-1,272 6,051-1,189-1,439 7, , ,664 1,664 3,562-1, ,493 4,493 4,531 3,229 3,590 3,590 5,609-2,019 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

14 Bowman Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Bowman Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,544 1, ,703 1, ,036 1,469 1, ,499 17,499 22,499 14,687 19,721 19,721 19,374 19,999 19,062 19,062 22,499 16,874 4,716 4,716 2,367 2,350 1,890 2,437 1,890 2, , ,357 15,146 17,058 15,146 17,058 14,999 15,937 15,416 18,055 3,052 3,052 1,824 1,228 16,527 16,527 17,499 15,555 Bowman 7,379 7,379 3,896 3, , , ,353 2,353 7, ,663 2,663 3,437 1,944 2,535 2,535 5,000 1,319-2,663-2,663-1,529-1,133 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

15 Burke Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Burke Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,496 1, ,430 1, ,142 22,142 21,428 29,999 23,749 23,749 27,499 22,916 19,999 19,999 14,499 26,666 3,868 3,868 2,233 1,635 1,401 1,280 1,401 1, , ,832 18,249 15,832 18,249 16,785 18,213 14,582 18,332 1,709 1,709 1, ,082 17,082 17,187 16,874 Burke 4,390 4,390 3,104 1, ,310 6,310 4,643 15,417 5,500 5,500 9,286 4,584 2,917 2,917-2,688 9, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

16 Burleigh Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Burleigh Origin for and Movement 1,959 1,963 2,274 6,196 2,015 2,007 2,245 6, ,949 1,952 2,261 6,162 2,001 1,995 2,235 6, ,293 1,308 1,544 4, ,110 3, , ,017 1,002 1,011 1,125 3, , Movement 3,592 3,579 2,251 3,558 3,542 2,253 4,166 4,148 2,751 11,316 11,269 7,255 3,590 3,567 1,790 3,556 3,539 1,718 4,003 3,985 1,965 11,149 11,091 5, ,782 1,328 1,289 1,397 4,014 1,777 1,821 2,020 5, , Origin for and Movement Movement 55,279 55,111 32,908 22,204 58,111 57,744 35,207 22,537 73,212 72,905 45,601 27, ,536 17,563 16,980 19,589 17,480 17,509 16,831 19,383 18,531 18,555 17,617 21,537 11,249 13,749 8, , , ,716 72, ,014 60,912 61,729 60,473 25,877 26,094 35,852 34, ,703 18,056 17,742 18,100 16,910 17,299 18,651 18,977 13,332 11,874 70,494 70,253 29,759 40, ,672 18,688 17,153 20,438 13,999 Burleigh 193, ,455 81, , ,735-2,801 2,718-6,618-2,729 2,652 7,031 9,113 15,842-13,648-11,842-13, ,099-2,083 1,875-5,250-6,818-6,695 31,986-38, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

17 Cass Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Cass Origin for and Movement 4,386 4,226 4,821 13,433 3,889 3,902 4,550 12, ,092 4,285 4,120 4,691 13,096 3,860 3,874 4,504 12, ,690 1,742 1,896 5, , ,016 1,024 2,961 2,595 2,378 2,795 7,768 3,091 3,148 3,632 9, , Movement 7,103 6,990 2,613 6,657 6,527 2,677 7,778 7,617 2,961 21,538 21,134 8,251 6,919 6,871 1,332 6,788 6,749 1,244 7,953 7,879 1,536 21,660 21,499 4, , , , ,139 4,377 3,850 4,656 12,883 5,539 5,505 6,343 17,387-1,162-1,655-1,687-4, Origin for and Movement Movement 122, ,192 43,903 78, , ,978 44,219 73, , ,680 51,849 92, ,073 16,943 17,189 16,094 17,905 16,408 16,736 15,928 17,449 17,352 17,676 16,257 18,623 3,277 3,060 3, , , , ,878 2, , , , ,417 19,575 18, , , ,008 20,698 21,100 20,759 18,210 17,020 21,998 21,657 11,874 15, , ,024 24, ,920 1,022 22,087 22,166 18,177 23,160 15,832 Cass 413, ,097 61, ,248 2,164-1,183-8,453-16,293-1,464-8,439-16,344 24,328 26,049 27,745-25,793-34,488-44, ,065-3,911-2,116-4,093-4,290-4,023-1,092-4,208-4,735-4,490-1,920-4,537-8,597-12,356-12,239-25,929-26,247 78, , North Dakota Migration Flows: to

18 Cavalier Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Cavalier Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,665 1, ,769 1,769 1, ,530 2,530 1,447 1,083 19,642 19,642 23,749 15,624 18,749 18,749 18,332 18,999 23,076 23,076 21,428 24,999 5,964 5,964 3,414 2,551 4,232 3,375 4,232 3,375 1,981 2,163 2,251 1,212 19,062 18,166 19,062 18,166 15,749 17,044 24,582 21,249 4,724 4,724 3,135 1,590 17,314 17,314 17,124 17,856 Cavalier 12,331 12,331 7,279 5,053-2,567-1,606-2,194-2,567-1,606-2,194-1,018-1,159-1,688-1, ,000-8, ,288-2,250 5,762 5,762 4,304 7,143-6,367-6,367-3,865-2,502 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

19 Dickey Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Dickey Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 2,140 2, ,629 2,884 2,884 1,407 1,477 3,511 3,511 1,222 2,290 13,305 13,305 13,280 13,332 16,303 16,303 18,332 15,587 19,062 19,062 21,249 16,943 8,535 8,535 3,140 5,396 4,374 3,533 4,374 3,533 2,088 1,197 2,286 2,336 15,480 15,647 15,480 15,647 17,916 13,593 14,249 17,352 4,892 4,892 2,224 2,668 16,973 16,973 19,999 14,880 Dickey 12,799 12,799 5,509 7,290-2, ,381-2, ,381-1, , ,175-2,175-4, ,739-1,765 2,089 2,089 1,250 2,063-4,264-4,264-2,369-1,894 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

20 Divide Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Divide Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,264 1, ,332 18,332 19,999 14,999 12,499 12,499 11,499 14,999 20,624 20,624 18,749 22,499 2,555 2,555 1,047 1,509 1, , ,999 12,707 14,999 12,707 14,166 8,999 15,624 14,721 1,901 1,901 1, ,499 19,499 17,082 24,166 Divide 4,291 4,291 2,262 2, ,333 3,333 5, , ,125 1,125 1,667-1,667-1,736-1,736-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

21 Dunn Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Dunn Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,210 1, ,673 1,673 1, ,560 2,560 1,357 1,203 16,249 16,249 15,555 18,332 17,749 17,749 17,499 18,332 23,249 23,249 21,070 28,332 5,443 5,443 3,564 1,879 2,305 1,736 2,305 1,736 1,502 1, ,624 15,178 15,624 15,178 14,463 17,082 18,749 11,785 2,491 2,491 1, ,499 17,499 16,457 20,416 Dunn 6,532 6,532 4,425 2,106-1, , , ,571 2, ,547 5,750 5,750 4,613 7,916-1,089-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

22 Eddy Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Eddy Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,077 1, ,247 1, ,550 1,550 1, ,392 13,392 12,726 15,624 19,166 19,166 20,499 14,166 21,999 21,999 20,832 31,249 3,874 3,874 2,846 1,029 2,121 1,443 2,121 1,443 1,216 1, ,916 13,213 17,916 13,213 16,388 15,384 22,499 10,713 2,335 2,335 1, ,044 17,044 16,110 20,499 Eddy 5,899 5,899 3,975 1,924-1, , ,524-4,524-3,662-6,875 5,953 5,953 5,115 3,453 4,955 4,955 4,722 10,750-2,025-2,025-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

23 Emmons Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Emmons Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,752 1,752 1, ,492 1,492 1, ,863 1,863 1, ,582 19,582 19,374 19,999 19,062 19,062 18,928 19,999 21,249 21,249 21,249 21,249 5,107 5,107 3,378 1,730 2,419 2,257 2,419 2,257 1,590 1, ,166 16,249 16,166 16,249 14,860 15,624 18,999 17,499 2,970 2,970 1, ,852 19,852 17,954 23,332 Emmons 7,646 7,646 5,068 2, , , ,416 3,416 4,514 1,000 2,813 2,813 3,304 2,500 1,397 1,397 3,295-2,083-2,539-2,539-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

24 Foster Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Foster Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 2,823 2,823 2, ,210 2,210 1, ,441 2,441 1, ,999 18,999 18,499 22,499 24,642 24,642 24,999 23,749 23,499 23,499 23,570 23,332 7,474 7,474 5,673 1,803 2,528 2,626 2,528 2,626 1,533 1, ,167 15,416 19,749 15,416 19,749 14,285 17,499 21,499 24,166 4,516 4,516 3,144 1,372 20,249 20,249 18,957 25,624 Foster 9,670 9,670 6,137 3, , , , ,583 3,583 4,214 1,000 4,893 4,893 7, ,250 3,250 4,613-2,292-2,196-2, ,731 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

25 Golden Valley Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Golden Valley Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,999 14,999 13,124 17,499 17,999 17,999 17,499 18,124 17,499 17,499 22,499 16,785 2,621 2,621 1,024 1,599 1,698 1,321 1,698 1, ,666 16,943 16,666 16,943 12,999 16,874 18,332 16,999 1,953 1,953 1, ,082 17,082 19,374 14,374 Golden Valley 4,972 4,972 2,474 2,498-1, , ,667-1, ,056 1, , ,125 2,411-2,351-2,351-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

26 Grand Forks Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Grand Forks Origin for and Movement 2,431 2,310 2,557 7,298 3,328 2,787 3,237 9, ,054 2,283 2,145 2,397 6,825 3,104 2,632 3,099 8, , , , ,509 1,434 1,621 4,564 2,515 2,024 2,394 6,933-1, , Movement 4,397 4,072 1,294 4,060 3,711 1,147 4,649 4,334 1,332 13,106 12,117 3,773 6,978 6,428 1,089 5,495 5,172 1,120 6,353 6,074 1,232 18,826 17,674 3,441-2,581-2, ,435-1, ,704-1, ,720-5, ,778 2,564 3,002 8,344 5,339 4,052 4,842 14,233-2,561-1,488-1,840-5, , Origin for and Movement Movement 60,879 57,968 17,069 40,899 58,288 55,236 16,000 39,236 70,301 67,343 18,791 48,552 2,912 3,053 2,958 14,930 14,802 13,570 15,662 15,082 15,031 13,368 16,308 16,589 16,575 13,934 18,113 17,314 15,971 16, , ,547 51, ,687 8,923 95,266 84,352 90,158 80,861 15,510 15,695 74,648 65,166 5,107 3,491 20,613 19,911 20,668 20,073 17,526 17,443 21,600 21,100 20,124 18, , ,632 18,261 82,371 3,487 20,983 20,987 17,411 22,170 20,908 Grand Forks 283, ,651 49, ,185 12,085-34,387-26,064-33,819-32,190-25,625-33,289 1, ,749-25,930-33,819-2, ,683-5,866-3,956-5,938-4,829-5,042-4,075-4,792-4,394-4,412-3,477-4,057-2,810-2,337-4,091-94,270-91,104 2,394-93,498-3,162 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

27 Grant Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Grant Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,245 1, ,339 1, ,374 19,374 20,624 20,624 21,249 19,999 17,884 17,884 16,428 19,582 3,328 3,328 1,312 1,274 1,312 1, ,749 13,749 14,749 13,749 14,999 13,541 13,749 14,166 1,909 1,909 1, ,713 15,713 13,749 19,999 Grant 4,495 4,495 3,017 1, ,625 4,625 6,875 6,875 7,708 5,833 2,171 2,171 2, ,167-1,167 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

28 Griggs Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Griggs Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,329 1, ,550 1, ,562 16,562 16,999 15,832 20,499 20,499 22,499 14,166 24,999 24,999 24,499 27,499 3,788 3,788 2,343 1,445 2,215 2,121 2,215 2,121 1,202 1,555 1, ,916 14,910 17,916 14,910 16,785 14,499 19,499 16,874 2,090 2,090 1, ,468 15,468 15,832 14,999 Griggs 6,426 6,426 4,114 2,312-1, , ,354-1, ,667 5,589 5,589 8,000-2,708 9,531 9,531 8,667 12,500-2,638-2,638-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

29 Hettinger Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Hettinger Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,140 1, ,749 23,749 23,332 24,999 17,749 17,749 17,082 18,749 19,166 19,166 19,999 14,999 2,892 2,892 1,719 1,172 1,392 1,927 1,392 1, , ,999 14,285 14,999 14,285 14,749 14,999 15,832 13,124 1,927 1,927 1, ,576 15,576 16,249 14,285 Hettinger 5,246 5,246 3,790 1, ,750 8,750 8,583 9,167 3,464 3,464 2,083 5,625 3,590 3,590 3, ,354-2,354-2, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

30 Kidder Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Kidder Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,828 1, ,499 17,499 14,642 22,499 16,499 16,499 17,916 14,642 18,332 18,332 16,666 22,499 3,634 3,634 2,146 1,487 1,797 1,613 1,797 1,613 1,301 1, ,768 14,614 15,768 14,614 15,937 13,928 15,499 15,832 2,054 2,054 1, ,874 16,874 16,874 14,999 Kidder 5,464 5,464 4,053 1, ,731 1,731-1,295 7,000 1,885 1,885 3,988-1,190 1,458 1, ,500-1,830-1,830-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

31 LaMoure Table 1. and for Movers, , and : LaMoure Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,901 1,901 1, ,710 1,710 1, ,373 2,373 1,269 1,104 19,422 19,422 19,721 18,749 17,499 17,499 16,428 27,499 20,832 20,832 18,928 24,374 5,984 5,984 3,504 2,481 2,981 2,909 2,981 2,909 1,945 2,201 1, ,124 20,832 16,124 20,832 14,999 21,153 17,812 19,999 3,219 3,219 1,887 1,331 18,471 18,471 16,666 23,213 LaMoure 9,109 9,109 6,033 3,075-1,080-1, ,080-1, , ,298 3,298 4, ,333-3,333-4,725 7,500 2,361 2,361 2,262 1,161-3,125-3,125-2, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

32 Logan Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Logan Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,499 17,499 13,749 24,999 21,249 21,249 16,874 16,874 2,346 2,346 1,332 1,330 1,332 1,330 1, ,187 14,687 17,187 14,687 18,437 11,666 1,459 1,459 15,499 15,499 Logan 4,121 4, ,688 13,333 6,562 6,562 1,375 1,375-1,775-1,775 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

33 McHenry Table 1. and for Movers, , and : McHenry Origin for and Movement Movement ,027 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 2,716 2,716 2, ,840 2,840 1,672 1,168 2,904 2,904 2, ,888 18,888 20,226 16,785 22,638 22,638 22,691 22,499 19,820 19,820 19,772 19,999 8,460 8,460 6,093 2,367 4,182 4,030 4,182 4,030 2,919 3,085 1, ,808 16,047 15,808 16,047 14,299 16,153 18,213 15,499 6,244 6,244 3,931 2,313 19,017 19,017 18,420 20,624 McHenry 14,456 14,456 9,935 4,521-1,466-1,190-3,340-1,466-1,190-3, ,413-1, ,795 3,080 3,080 5,927-1,428 6,591 6,591 6,538 7, , ,996-5,996-3,842-2,154 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

34 McIntosh Table 1. and for Movers, , and : McIntosh Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,233 1, ,537 1, ,999 14,999 18,749 18,749 18,124 19,374 24,999 24,999 23,749 25,832 3,680 3,680 1,869 1,412 1,869 1,412 1, ,874 15,908 16,874 15,908 17,221 15,312 15,832 17,499 2,327 2,327 1,286 1,041 15,499 15,499 18,124 13,749 McIntosh 5,608 5,608 3,283 2, ,875-1,875 2,841 2,841 2,812 1,875 9,500 9,500 5,625 12,083-1,928-1,928 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

35 McKenzie Table 1. and for Movers, , and : McKenzie Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 3,673 3, ,839 2,157 2, ,225 3,400 3,400 1,423 1,977 14,582 14,582 9,807 23,332 15,535 15,535 13,124 18,213 19,374 19,374 17,812 20,937 9,230 9,230 3,189 6,041 2,900 3,494 2,900 3,494 1,514 1,823 1,386 1,671 14,037 15,999 14,037 15,999 12,999 14,820 15,999 18,213 3,810 3,810 1,813 1,998 14,654 14,654 12,221 22,499 McKenzie 10,204 10,204 5,150 5, , , , ,192 7, , ,720 4,720 5,591-1, , North Dakota Migration Flows: to

36 McLean Table 1. and for Movers, , and : McLean Origin for and Movement Movement ,198 1, ,471 1,471 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 5,527 5,527 3,658 1,869 4,981 4,981 3,544 1,437 7,230 7,230 4,925 2,305 18,823 18,823 19,999 16,666 20,340 20,340 19,166 22,499 22,954 22,954 22,767 23,999 17,738 17,738 12,127 5,611 6,734 7,490 6,734 7,490 4,406 5,103 2,327 2,387 17,371 18,273 17,371 18,273 16,299 17,758 19,285 19,422 9,219 9,219 6,270 2,949 17,552 17,552 17,070 18,957 McLean 23,443 23,443 15,779 7,663-1,207-2,509-1,989-1,207-2,509-1, ,559-1, ,452 1,452 3,700-2,619 2,067 2,067 1,408 3,077 5,402 5,402 5,697 5,042-5,705-5,705-3,652-2,052 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

37 Mercer Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Mercer Origin for and Movement Movement ,383 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 4,144 4,144 2,633 1,511 4,284 4,284 2,619 1,665 6,616 6,616 3,900 2,717 18,087 18,087 20,356 14,999 23,749 23,749 23,570 23,999 23,749 23,749 21,874 31,499 15,044 15,044 9,152 5,893 8,134 7,494 8,134 7,494 4,700 3,337 3,434 4,158 14,917 16,281 14,917 16,281 13,928 14,599 18,332 19,285 8,994 8,994 5,118 3,877 16,452 16,452 14,856 19,820 Mercer 24,622 24,622 13,155 11,469-3,990-3,210-2,378-3,990-3,210-2,378-2, ,218-1,923-2,493-1,160 3,170 3,170 6,428-3,333 7,468 7,468 8,971 4,714 7,297 7,297 7,018 11,679-9,578-9,578-4,003-5,576 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

38 Morton Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Morton Origin for and Movement , ,017 2, , ,017 2, , , Movement 1,420 1,420 1,099 1,459 1,459 1,105 1,566 1,566 1,153 4,445 4,445 3,357 1,506 1, ,484 1, ,823 1,823 1,241 4,813 4,798 3, , , Origin for and Movement Movement 18,927 18,927 14,417 4,510 21,294 21,294 16,004 5,290 23,928 23,928 17,303 6,624 17,736 17,736 18,242 15,951 19,042 19,042 18,617 20,999 18,424 18,424 18,396 18,499 64,149 64,149 47,724 16,424 20,982 22,360 20,982 22,190 13,641 14,956 7,341 7, ,963 17,231 16,963 17,356 16,641 17,659 17,828 16,738 12,082 30,669 30,669 17,664 13,005 17,425 17,425 16,782 19,129 Morton 74,011 73,841 46,261 27,580-2,055-1,066-6,741-2, , , ,831-1,944-6, ,601-1,877 1,811 1, , , ,862-9,692 1,463-11,156 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

39 Mountrail Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Mountrail Origin for and Movement Movement ,034 1, Origin for and Movement Movement 2,895 2,895 1,692 1,204 3,168 3,168 1,893 1,275 3,669 3,669 2,143 1,526 15,832 15,832 14,422 19,374 16,606 16,606 18,499 13,610 14,999 14,999 14,090 16,110 9,732 9,732 5,728 4,005 3,711 3,635 3,711 3,635 2,377 2,424 1,334 1,211 14,014 13,635 14,014 13,635 13,157 13,999 15,356 12,499 4,504 4,504 2,898 1,606 16,514 16,514 14,852 19,772 Mountrail 11,850 11,850 7,699 4, ,818 1,818 1,265 4,018 2,971 2,971 4,500 1,111-1,515-1, ,662-2,118-2,118-1, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

40 Nelson Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Nelson Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement 1,873 1,873 1, ,232 2,232 1,112 1,119 1,901 1,901 1, ,463 19,463 19,062 19,999 20,499 20,499 16,999 24,499 16,457 16,457 14,999 19,374 6,006 6,006 3,393 2,611 2,811 3,064 2,811 3,064 1,637 1,973 1,174 1,091 14,999 19,999 14,999 19,999 14,431 21,874 18,124 17,856 2,863 2,863 1, ,999 19,999 18,928 25,416 Nelson 8,738 8,738 5,557 3, ,464 4,464 4,631 1, ,875 6,643-3,542-3,542-3,929-6,042-2,732-2,732-2, North Dakota Migration Flows: to

41 Oliver Table 1. and for Movers, , and : Oliver Origin for and Movement Movement Origin for and Movement Movement ,160 1,160 1,091 1, ,499 17,499 18,213 15,832 20,832 20,832 15,713 15,713 15,624 15,832 2,997 2,997 1,282 1,608 1,282 1, ,888 15,937 13,888 15,937 12,999 14,117 14,999 22,499 3,066 3,066 2, ,874 21,874 23,332 18,749 Oliver 5,956 5,956 4,523 1, , , , ,611 3,611 5, ,895 4,895-6,161-6,161-7,708-2,917-2,959-2,959 North Dakota Migration Flows: to

AGRICULTURAL POLICY BRIEF

AGRICULTURAL POLICY BRIEF Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies North Dakota State University AGRICULTURAL POLICY BRIEF No. 27 May 13 Potential Changes in Federal Crop Insurance Premiums in North Dakota Under a Whole

More information

Input Costs for 2011

Input Costs for 2011 Input Costs for 2011 Andrew Swenson Extension Farm Management Specialist Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics North Dakota State University Historic Enterprise Analysis from North Dakota Farm

More information

Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (COST) Plan 26. Summary of Benefits January 1, December 31, 2018

Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (COST) Plan 26. Summary of Benefits January 1, December 31, 2018 Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (COST) Plan 26 Summary of Benefits January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 This booklet gives you a summary of what we cover and what you pay. It doesn t list every service

More information

ANALYSIS OF TAXES PAID BY NORTH DAKOTA FARM AND RANCH OPERATORS

ANALYSIS OF TAXES PAID BY NORTH DAKOTA FARM AND RANCH OPERATORS Agricultural Economics Report No. 195 February 1985 ANALYSIS OF TAXES PAID BY NORTH DAKOTA FARM AND RANCH OPERATORS Glenn D. Pederson Roger G. Johnson Mir B. Ali Randal C. Coon Department of Agricultural

More information

Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (Cost) Plan 6. Summary of Benefits January 1, December 31, 2019

Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (Cost) Plan 6. Summary of Benefits January 1, December 31, 2019 Medica Group Prime Solution SM w/rx (Cost) Plan 6 Summary of Benefits January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 This booklet gives you a summary of what we cover and what you pay. It doesn t list every service

More information

Williston Basin 2016: Employment, Population, and Housing Projections

Williston Basin 2016: Employment, Population, and Housing Projections Williston Basin 2016: Employment, Population, and Housing Projections Vision West Consortium Meeting December 8, 2016 Dickinson, ND Dean A. Bangsund Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics Nancy

More information

North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics. Kimberly Vachal Charlie Cooper. UGPTI Department Publication No.

North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics. Kimberly Vachal Charlie Cooper. UGPTI Department Publication No. 378.784 U664 138 1999-2 North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics Kimberly Vachal Charlie Cooper UGPTI Department Publication No. 138 September 2 UPPER GREAT PLAINS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE

More information

Williston Basin 2012: Projections of Future Employment and Population North Dakota Summary

Williston Basin 2012: Projections of Future Employment and Population North Dakota Summary Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report 704 January 2013 Williston Basin 2012: Projections of Future Employment and Population North Dakota Summary Dean A. Bangsund Nancy M. Hodur North Dakota State

More information

2014 Medica Clear Solution (PPO)

2014 Medica Clear Solution (PPO) 2014 Medica Clear Solution (PPO) Essential Medicare plans made simple. Y0088_3436a CMS Accepted Medicare facts you need to know Not everyone realizes that Medicare does not cover all healthcare expenses

More information

water - the foundation for life

water - the foundation for life water - the foundation for life 2004 Garrison Diversion Annual Report our mission To provide a reliable, high quality and affordable water supply for the benefit of North Dakota Richard Fugleberg Chairman

More information

OPERATION PRAIRIE DOG

OPERATION PRAIRIE DOG OPERATION PRAIRIE DOG Building North Dakota Infrastructure PART I. Formula Adjustment of the Oil and Gas Gross Production Tax to Oil and Gas Producing Subdivisions. A. Move the following from the One Percent

More information

Welcome to the ND Uniform County Permit System

Welcome to the ND Uniform County Permit System Welcome to the ND Uniform County Permit System The ND Uniform County Permit System is a program that is governed by the Executive Board and Truck Permit Committee of the ND Association of Oil & Gas Producing

More information

SUBSIDY RECAPTURE TAX DISCLOSURE NOTICE HOMEOWNERSHIP DIVISION SFN (05/18)

SUBSIDY RECAPTURE TAX DISCLOSURE NOTICE HOMEOWNERSHIP DIVISION SFN (05/18) SUBSIDY RECAPTURE TAX DISCLOSURE NOTICE HOMEOWNERSHIP DIVISION (05/8) NOTICE OF POTENTIAL RECAPTURE TAX ON SALE OF HOME Because you are receiving a mortgage loan from the proceeds on a tax-exempt bond,

More information

North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics, Jolene Dalebout Tiffany Erickson "Kimberly Vacha!

North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics, Jolene Dalebout Tiffany Erickson Kimberly Vacha! 378.784 U664 118 u THE UPPER GREAT PLANS TRANSPORTATON NSTTUTE North Dakota Grain and Oilseed Transportation Statistics, 1996-97 Jolene Dalebout Tiffany Erickson "Kimberly Vacha! UGPT Publication No. 118

More information

Planning for the Future

Planning for the Future Planning for the Future 2006 Garrison Diversion Annual Report Garrison Diversion is committed to securing a stronger future for all of North Dakota by providing a reliable, high quality and affordable

More information

for Cost Sharing in a Research Project Involving Water Management Practices on Shallow Tilled Soils,

for Cost Sharing in a Research Project Involving Water Management Practices on Shallow Tilled Soils, I N D E X Amenia Drop Structure - Consideration of Request from Rush River Water Management District for Cost Sharing in P r o j e c t, A p p r o v e d $ 7, 0 0 0 - Antelope Creek Flood Hazard Analysis

More information

Demographic and Economic Profile. North Dakota. Updated June 2006

Demographic and Economic Profile. North Dakota. Updated June 2006 Demographic and Economic Profile North Dakota Updated June 2006 Metro and Nonmetro Counties in North Dakota Based on the most recent listing of core based statistical areas by the Office of Management

More information

Genworth 2015 Cost of Care Survey North Dakota

Genworth 2015 Cost of Care Survey North Dakota Cost of Care Survey 2015 Genworth 2015 Cost of Care Survey North Dakota State-Specific Data 118928ND 04/01/15 North Dakota Homemaker Services Hourly Rates USA $8 $20 $40 $44,616 2% North Dakota Whole State

More information

Regional Economic Impact of Cass County, ND and Clay County, MN

Regional Economic Impact of Cass County, ND and Clay County, MN 51 Broadway Suite 500 Fargo, ND 58102 701.364.1900 Fax 701.293.7819 Regional Economic Impact of Cass County, ND and Clay County, MN GFMEDC Mission The mission of the Greater Fargo Moorhead Economic Development

More information

Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 708 S February 2013

Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 708 S February 2013 Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 708 S February 2013 Estimates of Projections: Ray, Stanley, Watford City, Williston and Dickinson Nancy M. Hodur, Dean A. Bangsund, Richard Rathge, Karen Olson

More information

Policy lessons from Illinois exodus of people and money By J. Scott Moody and Wendy P. Warcholik Illinois Policy Institute Senior Fellows

Policy lessons from Illinois exodus of people and money By J. Scott Moody and Wendy P. Warcholik Illinois Policy Institute Senior Fellows ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE SPECIAL REPORT JULY 2014 Policy lessons from Illinois exodus of people and money By J. Scott Moody and Wendy P. Warcholik Illinois Policy Institute Senior Fellows Executive summary

More information

LDC Gas Forum Midcontinent Alliance Pipeline:

LDC Gas Forum Midcontinent Alliance Pipeline: LDC Gas Forum Midcontinent Alliance Pipeline: Delivering Today / Focused on Tomorrow September 13, 2010 Tony Straquadine Government Affairs Manager Forward looking statements and information Certain information

More information

Office of Human Resources NEW EMPLOYEES GUIDE FOR UPLAN BENEFITS ENROLLMENT

Office of Human Resources NEW EMPLOYEES GUIDE FOR UPLAN BENEFITS ENROLLMENT Office of Human Resources NEW EMPLOYEES GUIDE FOR UPLAN BENEFITS ENROLLMENT Enroll in UPlan Benefits for 2018 Table of Contents NEW EMPLOYEE - BENEFITS ENROLLMENT Are You Eligible for UPlan Benefits...Page

More information

Comparing Relative Banking Performance in the Bakken with Banking in Other Shale Energy Areas

Comparing Relative Banking Performance in the Bakken with Banking in Other Shale Energy Areas Comparing Relative Banking Performance in the with Banking in Other Shale Energy Areas By RON FELDMAN Executive Vice President STACY JOLLY Financial Analyst Maps of shale energy deposits in the United

More information

GARRISON DIVERSION CONSERVANCY DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Garrison Diversion Conservancy District Carrington, North Dakota October 12 and 13, 2017

GARRISON DIVERSION CONSERVANCY DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Garrison Diversion Conservancy District Carrington, North Dakota October 12 and 13, 2017 17-113 GARRISON DIVERSION CONSERVANCY DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Garrison Diversion Conservancy District Carrington, North Dakota October 12 and 13, 2017 A meeting of the Board of Directors of the Garrison

More information

The Economic Contribution of North Dakota Cooperatives to the North Dakota State Economy

The Economic Contribution of North Dakota Cooperatives to the North Dakota State Economy Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report No. 687 October 2011 The Economic Contribution of North Dakota Cooperatives to the North Dakota State Economy Gregory McKee Department of Agribusiness & Applied

More information

Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota

Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota Residential s in Minnesota Spring 2013 Planning, Research, and Evaluation Residential s in Minnesota Introduction Minnesota s foreclosure crisis has destabilized the housing market in many parts of the

More information

2019 Crop Insurance Update Devils Lake, ND January 9, 2019

2019 Crop Insurance Update Devils Lake, ND January 9, 2019 2019 Crop Insurance Update Devils Lake, ND January 9, 2019 Revenue Projected Price Estimates Crop 2019 Est. Proj. Price 2018 Proj. Price Barley $3.28 Canola, Spring $0.184 Corn Dec corn at $4.03 on 1-8-19

More information

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004 CASS RURAL WATER USERS DISTRICT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004 CASS RURAL WATER USERS DISTRICT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND 2004 CASS RURAL WATER USERS DISTRICT CASS RURAL WATER USERS DISTRICT Table of Contents INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION

More information

Six Cities Impacts Forecasting

Six Cities Impacts Forecasting Six Cities Impacts Forecasting Annual Meeting Progress Update October 26, 2016 STUDY SCOPE Impacts Forecasts for Six Participating Cities Williston Watford City Dickinson Tioga Stanley Killdeer Study Funded

More information

FARMOWNERS AND FARM FIRE

FARMOWNERS AND FARM FIRE ITEM FARMOWNERS AND FARM FIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS NSFO PAGE Actual Cash Value Loss Settlement - Windstorm or Hail Losses to Roofs... 21 Actual Cash Value or Replacement Cost... 7 Added Animal Perils - Sheep...

More information

Projections for Western North Dakota Bottineau County

Projections for Western North Dakota Bottineau County Projections for Western North Dakota Bottineau County Acknowledgments Analysts Dean Bangsund, NDSU Dr. Nancy Hodur, NDSU Funders North Dakota Association of Oil and Gas Producing Counties North Dakota

More information

Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota

Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota Winter 2011 Research and Evaluation Unit Residential Foreclosures in Minnesota Introduction Minnesota s foreclosure crisis has destabilized the housing market in

More information

2016 Census of Canada

2016 Census of Canada 216 Census of Canada Incomes Results from the latest Census release show that Alberta had the highest median income among the provinces. Alberta s strong economic expansion in recent years, particularly

More information

A region in need of housing

A region in need of housing ND011 Stutsman County Housing Authority ND028 Foster County Housing Authority ND052 Dickey Sargent Housing Authority FY 2014 Annual Report A region in need of housing page 1 page 2 Table of contents Executive

More information

Six Cities Impacts Forecasting

Six Cities Impacts Forecasting Six Cities Impacts Forecasting Executive Summary January 9, 2017 STUDY SCOPE Study Funded 50/50 by WDEA and Participating Cities Impacts Forecasts for Six Participating Cities Williston Watford City Dickinson

More information

MAGELLAN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC

MAGELLAN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC F.E.R.C. No. 4 (Cancels F.E.R.C. No. 12*) *(Williams Pipe Line Company, LLC Series) MAGELLAN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH PARTICIPATING CARRIERS SHOWN HEREIN PROPORTIONAL PIPELINE TARIFF CONTAINING

More information

Chickpeas in the U.S. Northern Plains

Chickpeas in the U.S. Northern Plains B R I E F I N G Briefing No. 78 August 2005 Chickpea Production and Price Risk Management in the Northern Plains Gary W. Brester and David Buschena Agricultural Marketing Policy Center Linfield Hall P.O.

More information

COUNTY PROJECTIONS MINNESOTA COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS MINNESOTA PLANN I NG STATE DEMOGRAPHIC CENTER

COUNTY PROJECTIONS MINNESOTA COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS MINNESOTA PLANN I NG STATE DEMOGRAPHIC CENTER COUNTY PROJECTIONS Faces of the Future MINNESOTA COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS 1995 2025 MINNESOTA PLANN I NG STATE DEMOGRAPHIC CENTER Faces of the Future 1 1 2 2 5 7 9 10 Looking ahead 30 years Economic

More information

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1 University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1 Public Informational Meeting October 15, 2015 6:00 P.M. Overview Flood Risk FEMA

More information

Healthy Kids and Strong Working Families. Improving Economic Security for North Dakota Families with Children

Healthy Kids and Strong Working Families. Improving Economic Security for North Dakota Families with Children B R I E F Healthy Kids and Strong Working Families Improving Economic Security for North Dakota Families with Children Jennifer Shaffer April 2011 The National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP) is

More information

for higher-income residents to become regular users of transit. In other words, the carsharing connection would provide them with mobility insurance.

for higher-income residents to become regular users of transit. In other words, the carsharing connection would provide them with mobility insurance. Time-Banking Transit and Carsharing: Can it bring additional users to carsharing originations and increased mobility and access to low-income populations? Introduction and Overview Carsharing has been

More information

Study of the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program

Study of the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program Study of the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program Prepared for: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE February 13, 2012 (revised) Prepared by: 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, Maryland 20816

More information

State of Rural Minnesota Report 2017

State of Rural Minnesota Report 2017 State of Rural Minnesota Report 2017 Introduction In 1997, a group of rural Minnesota advocates came together to create a rural policy think tank that would provide policy makers, rural advocates and concerned

More information

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F M I N N E A P O L I S. fedgazette. Regional Business & Economics Newspaper

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F M I N N E A P O L I S. fedgazette. Regional Business & Economics Newspaper F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F M I N N E A P O L I S J U L Y 2 1 V O L. 22 N O. 3 Regional Business & Economics Newspaper minneapolisfed.org More on the Recession T H E L I T T L E E C O N O M

More information

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report, Second Quarter 2014

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report, Second Quarter 2014 St. Cloud State University therepository at St. Cloud State Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Minnesota Regional Economic and Business Conditions Report 10- Twin Cities Minnesota

More information

Business in Nebraska

Business in Nebraska Business in Nebraska VOLUME 61 NO. 684 PRESENTED BY THE UNL BUREAU OF BUSINESS RESEARCH (BBR) OCTOBER 2006 Labor Force Implications of Population Decline in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska By Dr. Randy Cantrell,

More information

Health Insurance Coverage in 2013: Gains in Public Coverage Continue to Offset Loss of Private Insurance

Health Insurance Coverage in 2013: Gains in Public Coverage Continue to Offset Loss of Private Insurance Health Insurance Coverage in 2013: Gains in Public Coverage Continue to Offset Loss of Private Insurance Laura Skopec, John Holahan, and Megan McGrath Since the Great Recession peaked in 2010, the economic

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2017 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter This issue is part of a series for the six planning areas of Minnesota: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and

More information

Stutsman County Housing Authority

Stutsman County Housing Authority Stutsman County Housing Authority Foster County Housing Authority Meeting Agenda December 18, 2014 9:00 AM ~ County Commissioner s room Approval of the minutes of past meetings (March, April, November)

More information

The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring the Relationship Between Racial Segregation and Subprime Lending

The High Cost of Segregation: Exploring the Relationship Between Racial Segregation and Subprime Lending F u r m a n C e n t e r f o r r e a l e s t a t e & u r b a n p o l i c y N e w Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y s c h o o l o f l aw wa g n e r s c h o o l o f p u b l i c s e r v i c e n o v e m b e r 2 0

More information

Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Minnesota Long-Term Care Industry:

Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Minnesota Long-Term Care Industry: Minnesota Department of Health Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Minnesota Long-Term Care Industry: Status of Coverage and Policy Options Report to the Minnesota Legislature January, 2002 Health

More information

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. December 6, 2004 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BANK OF EUFAULA RSSD#

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. December 6, 2004 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BANK OF EUFAULA RSSD# PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BANK OF EUFAULA RSSD# 343051 P.O. BOX 607 EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA 74432-0607 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 925 Grand Boulevard Kansas

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Interest in employer-sponsored retiree health plans remains very high as coverage under the new Medicare prescription drug benefit begins. Employers, retirees and their families,

More information

Demographic and Economic Profile. Florida. Updated May 2006

Demographic and Economic Profile. Florida. Updated May 2006 Demographic and Economic Profile Florida Updated May 2006 Metro and Nonmetro Counties in Florida Based on the most recent listing of core based statistical areas by the Office of Management and Budget

More information

Obama s Tax Hikes on High-Income Earners Will Hurt the Poor and Everyone Else

Obama s Tax Hikes on High-Income Earners Will Hurt the Poor and Everyone Else Obama s Tax Hikes on High-Income Earners Will Hurt the Poor and Everyone Else Guinevere Nell and Karen A. Campbell, Ph.D. Abstract: Those who think they are safe from the looming Obama tax hikes because

More information

Region IV Economic, Social, & Demographic Statistics

Region IV Economic, Social, & Demographic Statistics Region IV Economic, Social, & Demographic Statistics David T. Flynn, Ph.D. Bureau of Business & Economic Research & Department of Economics College of Business & Public Administration University of North

More information

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Third Quarter 2016

Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Third Quarter 2016 St. Cloud State University therepository at St. Cloud State Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Minnesota Regional Economic and Business Conditions Report 12-20- Twin Cities Minnesota

More information

Template Version Date: May 2011

Template Version Date: May 2011 This document describes the Housing Finance Agency (HFA) Hardest-Hit Fund (HHF) data that state HFAs are required to provide to Bank of New York Mellon. It includes quarterly borrower characteristic data

More information

Economic and Fiscal Impact of In-Migrating Retirees on Arkansas Economy 1998

Economic and Fiscal Impact of In-Migrating Retirees on Arkansas Economy 1998 UJA-- DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System Community & Economic Development FSCDM4 Economic and Fiscal Impact of In-Migrating Retirees on Arkansas Economy 1998 Wayne

More information

Illinois HFA Performance Data Reporting- Borrower Characteristics

Illinois HFA Performance Data Reporting- Borrower Characteristics This document describes the Housing Finance Agency (HFA) Hardest-Hit Fund (HHF) data that state HFAs are required to provide to Bank of New York Mellon. It includes quarterly borrower characteristic data

More information

Northwest Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2014

Northwest Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2014 Northwest Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Northwest Minnesota Leading Economic Indicators Index...2 Northwest Minnesota Business

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2018

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter 2018 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Second Quarter This issue is part of a series for the six planning areas of Minnesota: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and

More information

Demographic and Economic Trends in Rural America

Demographic and Economic Trends in Rural America Demographic and Economic Trends in Rural America John Cromartie Geographer, ERS-USDA Tom Hertz Economist, ERS-USDA Lorin Kusmin Economist, ERS-USDA Presentation for HUD Rural Gateway Peer-to-Peer Call

More information

Foreclosures in Greater Minnesota: A Report Based on County Sheriff s Sale Data

Foreclosures in Greater Minnesota: A Report Based on County Sheriff s Sale Data Foreclosures in Greater Minnesota: A Report Based on County Sale Data Supplement 1: October 31, 2007 332 Minnesota Street Suite 1310-East Saint Paul, MN 55101 Telephone: 651-221-1997 Facsimile: 651-221-1904

More information

EstimatingFederalIncomeTaxBurdens. (PSID)FamiliesUsingtheNationalBureau of EconomicResearchTAXSIMModel

EstimatingFederalIncomeTaxBurdens. (PSID)FamiliesUsingtheNationalBureau of EconomicResearchTAXSIMModel ISSN1084-1695 Aging Studies Program Paper No. 12 EstimatingFederalIncomeTaxBurdens forpanelstudyofincomedynamics (PSID)FamiliesUsingtheNationalBureau of EconomicResearchTAXSIMModel Barbara A. Butrica and

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2018

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2018 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter This issue is part of a series for the six planning areas of Minnesota: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Twin

More information

Minnesota County Program Aid (CPA)

Minnesota County Program Aid (CPA) Minnesota Department of Revenue Minnesota County Program Aid (CPA) Nick Greene Conrad Segal Eric Willette Principles of Good Tax System Efficiency Simplicity Equity Stability Competitiveness Responsiveness

More information

Expanding Medicaid in Ohio

Expanding Medicaid in Ohio Expanding in Ohio County-level analysis March 2013 Introduction The Ohio Expansion Study ( Study ) was conducted with financial support from the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, the Mt. Sinai Health

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter 2017 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report First Quarter This issue is part of a series for the six planning areas of Minnesota: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Twin

More information

Socioeconomic Impacts of the Langdon Wind Energy Center

Socioeconomic Impacts of the Langdon Wind Energy Center Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 627 May 28 Socioeconomic Impacts of the Langdon Wind Energy Center F. Larry Leistritz Randal C. Coon Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics Agricultural

More information

Historical and Projected Population Totals in Maryland,

Historical and Projected Population Totals in Maryland, Growth and Land Use Trends Population Trends From 2000-2030 Maryland will grow by nearly 1.4 million people. Specifically, this growth will mean the difference between 5.3 million people in 2000 to 6.7

More information

The Impact of Tax Free Zones on Economic Development Minnesota Public Finance Note #

The Impact of Tax Free Zones on Economic Development Minnesota Public Finance Note # Laura Kalambokidis Extension Economist Department of Applied Economics Phone: (612) 625-1995 E-mail: lkalambo@apec.umn.edu The Impact of Tax Free Zones on Economic Development Minnesota Public Finance

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2017 St. Cloud State University therepository at St. Cloud State Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Minnesota Regional Economic and Business Conditions Report 4-2018 Twin Cities Area

More information

October 2016 Dashboard for St. Croix Valley Released

October 2016 Dashboard for St. Croix Valley Released October 2016 Dashboard for St. Croix Valley Released The October 2016 edition of the St. Croix Valley Economic Dashboard has been released by the Center for Economic Research (CER) at UWRiver Falls, in

More information

Agricultural Act of 2014

Agricultural Act of 2014 Farm Bill Cash Flow 2017 Outlook Conference for Agricultural Lenders Grand Forks Oct. 16 Fargo Oct. 31 Andrew Swenson Extension Farm Management Specialist Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics

More information

Hardest Hit Fund Homeowner Emergency Loan Program (HHF)

Hardest Hit Fund Homeowner Emergency Loan Program (HHF) Hardest Hit Fund Homeowner Emergency Loan Program (HHF) To finance the creation and the preservation of affordable housing throughout the State to increase the supply of decent and safe places for people

More information

Expanding Medicaid in Ohio

Expanding Medicaid in Ohio Expanding in Ohio County-level analysis March 2013 Introduction The Ohio Expansion Study ( Study ) was conducted with financial support from the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, the Mt. Sinai Health

More information

A new program to connect private investment to low-income communities nationwide

A new program to connect private investment to low-income communities nationwide Opportunity Zones A new program to connect private investment to low-income communities nationwide Overview The Opportunity Zones program was established by Congress in the Tax Cut and Jobs Act as an innovative

More information

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND BASELINE PROJECTIONS FOR THE TOMORROW PLAN SASAKI. From

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND BASELINE PROJECTIONS FOR THE TOMORROW PLAN SASAKI. From EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND BASELINE PROJECTIONS FOR THE TOMORROW PLAN To SASAKI From GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES Urban Economists, Market Strategists & Land Use/Public Policy Analysts November 2011

More information

Acknowledgements First Nations Development Institute and Center for Responsible Lending.

Acknowledgements First Nations Development Institute and Center for Responsible Lending. Borrowed Time: Use of Refund Anticipation Loans Among EITC Filers in Native American Communities Native Assets Research Center Research Report 2009-1 Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Annie

More information

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois MSAs. Third Quarter, 2016

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois MSAs. Third Quarter, 2016 Housing Price Forecasts Illinois MSAs Third Quarter, 2016 Presented To Illinois REALTORS From R E A L Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, Institute of Government and Public Affairs University of

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2014

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter 2014 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Fourth Quarter TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1 Twin Cities Leading Economic Indicators Index...2 Twin Cities Business Filings...4 Twin Cities

More information

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly www.taxpolicycenter.org The Distribution of Federal Taxes, 2008 11 Jeffrey Rohaly Overall, the federal tax system is highly progressive. On average, households with higher incomes pay taxes that are a

More information

A House Divided. How Race Colors the Path to Homeownership. Executive Summary. With a foreword by:

A House Divided. How Race Colors the Path to Homeownership. Executive Summary. With a foreword by: A House Divided How Race Colors the Path to Homeownership Executive Summary With a foreword by: January 2014 Contributors Skylar Olsen Economist Katie Curnutte Director of Communications Svenja Gudell

More information

Abstract. Acknowledgments

Abstract. Acknowledgments Abstract Acknowledgments Contents ii / Retiree-Attraction Policies for Rural Development Economic Research Service/USDA Summary Economic Research Service/USDA Retiree-Attraction Policies for Rural Development

More information

Individual Income Tax Gap

Individual Income Tax Gap Individual Income Tax Gap Tax Year 1999 WARNING: While attempting to update this study, we discovered that its methodology was flawed. We no longer believe that the portions of the tax gap estimate derived

More information

ASSEMBLY, No. 15 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE

ASSEMBLY, No. 15 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR ASSEMBLY, No. 15 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE DATED: JUNE 1, 2016 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Agencies Affected: Raises minimum

More information

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2017

Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2017 St. Cloud State University therepository at St. Cloud State Central Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Minnesota Regional Economic and Business Conditions Report 10- Central Minnesota Economic

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2015

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report - Second Quarter 2015 St. Cloud State University therepository at St. Cloud State Twin Cities Minnesota Economic and Business Conditions Report Minnesota Regional Economic and Business Conditions Report 9- Twin Cities Area

More information

Rural Development Plan

Rural Development Plan Overview Polar Communications Polar Telcom Polar Cablevision Wolverton Telephone Co. PO Box 270 Park River, ND 58270 Rural Development Plan Polar Communications Mutual Aid Corporation s plan for the future

More information

Economic Impact of Restricting Housing Growth to No More Than 1% In Colorado

Economic Impact of Restricting Housing Growth to No More Than 1% In Colorado Economic Impact of Restricting Housing Growth to No More Than 1% In Colorado A Closer Look at the Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Initiative 66 and Why Housing Matters For the State s Economic Future. AUTHORS

More information

Mayor Proposed SALARY PLAN FY 2019

Mayor Proposed SALARY PLAN FY 2019 Mayor Proposed SALARY PLAN FY 2019 May 21, 2018 Table of Contents 2019 Salary Plan Executive Summary... 3 Annual Salary Plan Information... 4 Salary Survey Information... 5 2019 Salary Budget Request...

More information

J. D. Kennedy, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. C. A. Tyrrell, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Associate

J. D. Kennedy, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. C. A. Tyrrell, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Associate MARSHALL MACKLIN MONAGHAN LIMITED 80 COMMERCE VALLEY DR. EAST THORNHILL, ONTARIO L3T 7N4 TEL: (905) 882-1100 FAX: (905) 882-0055 EMAIL: mmm@mmm.ca WEB SITE: www.mmm.ca January 6, 2004 File No. 14.02138.01.P01

More information

Appendix B: Survey Methodology

Appendix B: Survey Methodology Appendix B: Survey Methodology A s part of evaluating Minnesota s research tax credit, we wanted a better understanding of businesses perspectives on the tax credit. To collect this information, we surveyed

More information

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review tl-i^ol. n Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review Fall 1977 Looking for Evidence of Noncompetitive Behavior in Minnesota's Banking Industry (p.v> ffi? District Conditions (p. 8) Federal Reserve

More information

TAX CREDITS FOR GROWING BUSINESSES ACT 2011 REPORT

TAX CREDITS FOR GROWING BUSINESSES ACT 2011 REPORT TAX CREDITS FOR GROWING BUSINESSES ACT 2011 REPORT June 1, 2011 * State of North Carolina Department of Commerce Secretary J. Keith Crisco * Distribution of Article 3J Tax Credits by Industry section was

More information

Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data

Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data December 18, 2013 No. 408 Fiscal Fact Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data By Kyle Pomerleau Introduction The Internal Revenue Service has released new data on individual income taxes, reporting on

More information

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2017

Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter 2017 Twin Cities Area Economic and Business Conditions Report Third Quarter This issue is part of a series for the six planning areas of Minnesota: Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Twin

More information

Subprime Originations and Foreclosures in New York State: A Case Study of Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties.

Subprime Originations and Foreclosures in New York State: A Case Study of Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties. Subprime Originations and Foreclosures in New York State: A Case Study of Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Washington, DC Chicago, IL Cairo,

More information