NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR EDUCATION & TRAINING QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIA. Accreditation Scheme for EIA Consultant Organizations

Transcription

1 NTIONL CCREDITTION ORD FOR EDUCTION & TRINING QULITY COUNCIL OF INDI QCI Office, 2 nd Floor, Institution of Engineers uilding, SZ Marg, New Delhi ccreditation Scheme EI Consultant Organizations Minutes of ccreditation Committee Meeting (XXII) held on January 19, 2011 from 1400 to 1700 Hrs Present 1. Dr. Prodipto Ghosh Chairman 2. Mr. K. P. Nyati Member 3. Prof. C. K. Varshney Member 4. Prof... Dhar Member 5. Dr. S. Devotta Member 6. Dr.. Sengupta Member Leave of absence was granted to Mr. Chandra hushan & Mr. K. R. Ranganathan. NET was represented by: Mr.. K. Ghose Principal dvisor, Mr. Vipin Sahni Director, Mr. bhay Sharma Executive, Ms. Jyoti Dahiya The following were discussed/ decided: i. The minutes of the ccreditation Committee Meeting (XXI) held on Jan 11, 2011 were considered and. ii. iii. Representations received from already accredited EI Consultant Organizations expansion of scope were discussed. It was decided that, all applications expansion of scope shall be considered as new applications and would be taken up in the queue. Some pplicant Organizations (O) was allowed 3 months time by the C to propose and get experts s not cleared or not covered. Experts proposed by accredited consultant organizations to fulfill such requirements will also undergo the usual process of document assessment and interaction with NET ssessors. QCI would organize such interviews in line with the submissions received from applicant organizations. Cases put up consideration of the Committee i. Grass Roots Research & Creations India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi ii. Envomin Consultants, hubaneshwar Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 1

2 iv. Cases considered i) Grass Roots Research & Creations India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi pplied 1, 4, 8, 29, 31, 34, 37, 38, 39 = 9 pproved 1 (Open Cast ), 4, 8, 31 ( ), 34, 37, 38, 39 = 8 EI Coordinators 1 K D Choudhary 1, 8, 37, 38, 39 2 nusua Nag 31, 34, 38, 39 1 (OC) Rachna Sharma 1, 4, 37, 38, K. Das 1 5 Navin Handa 4, 38, 39 Empanelled Experts 6 L ggarwal 4, 31, 37, 38, V Deshpande 29, 38, S. Sharma 4 9 Yatin Choudhary 38 sector 1 overall EI He is full time chair professor of ISM, Dhanbad. No agreement between GRC and ISM was submitted stating that ISM do not have any objection to Dr ggarwal working as an empanelled expert GRC. Can be considered only on submission of above agreement. any sector overall EI sector 34 overall Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 2

3 10 miya Sahu Kumar K. Sinha 1 12 Denishwar Dayal Moyukh Ghosh M. S. Waghmare 1 15 Tapan Mazumdar 1 16 P. R. Chaudhari 1, 4, 38, 39 1 (OC) S. K. Sharma 1 sector 34 overall EI sector 1 overall EI sector 1 overall EI sector 39 sector 1 overall EI Functional reas pplied LU, P, Q, WP, E, NV, SE, HG, GS, RH, SHW = 11 reas pproved LU ( ), P, Q, WP, E, NV, SE ( ), HG, GS, SHW = 10 reas Functional rea Experts 1 Shivraj Sahai reas applied P, Q, WP, E reas 2 Rachna Sharma NV, SHW hence not 3 nusua Nag E, SHW E, SHW 4 K. D. Choudhary P, NV P, NV 5 K. N. Dutta SE SE 6 Mudita Tomar P, Q, WP, SW 7 T Venkata Krishna Reddy 8 nupama Singh LU, Q, WP, NV P, WP, HG, SHW hence not hence not 9 Rajesh P, WP, HG, Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 3

4 reas applied reas SHW hence not 10 Saurabh Gupta P, WP, HG 11 rpan Pal SHW, RH hence not 12 Girish Choudhary RH, SHW hence not 13 P, Manoj Kumar P, WP, GS Soil only WP & Geology due to Dwivedi inadequate 14 bira Dutta LU hence not 15 mbarish P, Q, WP hence not Karunanithi 16 Vijay P, WP hence not Venkateswarlu 17 Pritika Gupta WP hence not 18 rvind Rajput P, WP Not meeting qualification requirements P & WP. Not 19 Sadre alam E Decision Clarification to be sought Pending specific in E 20 any nnesha LU, SE area Chakaraborty 21 Santosh M D RH hence not 22 Pankaj Dutt Dev P, WP hence not 23 J Mahapatra LU LU 24 bhijit Sarkar Q, NV hence not 25 Raju Kawade WP, RH hence not 26 Sushma Sharma WP, NV hence not 27 Shibham Mitra P, WP any area due to not being fully relevant to the 28 K Das LU, HG, GS EI Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 4

5 reas applied reas 29 Sougata Sarkar NV, RH 30 Laxmi Singh E 31 njana Sinha LU, E, SHW 32 Mervyn Gilbert SHW 33 Suman Q 34 Sekhar Upadhyay LU, E, SE LU, SE 35 S Sinha P, Q, WP P, Q 36 Surendra Kumar Sharma RH 37 nju Jain WP 38 Navin Handa Empanelled Experts P, Q, WP, NV P Q WP Noise 39 nju ggarwal E 40 L Ramanathan HG, GS 41 Tapan Mazumdar HG, GS HG, Geology 42 Manzu Rawat WP, SHW 43 miya Kumar Sahu P, SHW Solid Waste hence not hence not hence not hence not hence not Q EI Not accepted E due to inadequate WP EI hence not EI hence not Vibration Not since details not provided any area. He is a faculty member in JNU. greement b/w Uni. & GRC him to be considered. Soil any area & s P & Hazardous waste due to inadequate 44 K C Sahu HG, GS Good Knowledge of Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 5

6 reas applied reas 45 S R Maley GS, SHW Soil 46 P Radhakrishna Moorthy LU, HG, GS LU, HG 47 hagwan Singh P, WP 48 Pravin ansal P, WP, RH 49 Kulashekharan WP 50 Sharad Kumar Sharma WP, NV, RH, SHW Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 6 s. Not any area EI related Not For Geology, due to inadequate EI For SHW on qual. grounds GS EI any area any area EI EI hence not 51 J P Vaidya HG HG 52 T K Dutta GS, RH EI hence not 53 R K Sharma SE SE 54 M R aig WP, HG any area the 55 T S Krishan SE Not meeting qualification requirements. 56 K P Juyal WP, GS EI hence not 57 EI shok Kumar NV hence not Rathi 58 V N Srivasankara Pillai P, WP P 59 Tayyab Saify WP, E WP EI hence not 60 S Singh HG HG 61 P K Sahu SE EI hence not 62 R S Topal WP

7 reas applied reas 63 Virendra Khatana SE 64 Jagdamba Prasad E 65 R Yadav GS 66 V Mohanan NV 67 C Sri Satya RH 68 P K Jha HG, GS 69 J P N Rai E 70 Suraj Kumar Sharma LU, HG, NV 71 V Deshpande NV 72 Moyukh Ghosh SHW 73 L ggarwal P, Q, WP Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 7 74 P R Choudhary E, WP E, WP 75 rvind Purohit P, Q, WP, SHW 76 Hemant Singh RH 77 Shakil hmed RH 78 mar Singh HG 79 Janamjyoti Das RH 80 jay Kumar Gautam SHW hence not EI hence not Not accepted GS due to inadequate EI hence not Not meeting qualification requirements. He is with Pant Nagar Univ. Need to have agreement with GRC being considered LU & HG EI NV on qual. grounds EI hence not P, Q & SHW due to inadequate comprehension of s Not accepted WP due to inadequate Not accepted RH due to inadequate

8 81 mit Ranjan Chakaraborty reas applied reas SHW SHW 82 K N Jayan SE 83 bhijit Choudhary E 84 mit Kumar P 85 run Kumar P, Q, NV E To meet the requirements of the scheme, the applicant may be asked to arrange inhouse/empanelled expert/s RH within three months and approach NET approval. Final accreditation is subject to the fulfillment of the above requirements. ii) Envomin Consultants, hubaneshwar pplied 1, 7, 8, 37, 38 = 5 EI Coordinators pproved 1 (Open Cast), 8 (Not ISP ), 7 (Not pelletisation ) = 3 1 Debasish Gouda 1, 7, 8 Empanelled Experts 1 (OC) 7 (Not Pelletisation) 8 (Not ISP) 2 G N Pathak 37, 38 any sector EI pplied LU, P, Q, WP, E, NV, SE, HG, GS, RH, SHW = 11 reas Functional reas pproved LU, P ( ), Q ( ), E, SE, Geology, Solid Waste ( ) = 5 reas Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 8

9 Functional rea Experts reas applied reas 1 iswajit Mishra P, WP P Not accepted WP, as not fully relevant 2 P Keshi SHW Solid waste Hazardous waste due to inadequate 3 D Mishra E E 4 N Samal RH Candidature withdrawn 5 R N Subudhi HG Candidature withdrawn 6 R K Mishra SE SE Soil 7 P K Sahoo GS Geology 8 P N Nepak HG HG Empanelled Experts 9 W K Mohanty NV 10 R Gouda E 11 P M Dash Q Q 12 Mishra LU LU 13 S K Guru RH To meet the requirements of the scheme, the applicant may be asked to arrange inhouse experts WP & Hazardous Waste, and also inhouse/empanelled expert/s Soil, NV, HG, RH within three months and approach NET approval. Final accreditation is subject to the fulfillment of the above requirements. Cases of Partial ssessment The cases of Ecomen Laboratories & Enkay Enviro Services were assessed on Dec. 4, 2010 & Jan 8, 2011 respectively based on representations received from the applicant organizations. 1. Ecomen Laboratories, Lucknow Experts proposed in the original application were not during Office ssessment conducted earlier. ccreditation Committee in the Meeting dated Sep. 28, 2010 decided that the decision of Ecomen Laboratories, Lucknow is pending, subject to interview of remaining 5 experts. Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 9

10 Following experts proposed were assessed: reas reas 1 Nupur Srivastava WP WP E 2 Ritu Pandey P, E, SE P SE on qual grounds Empanelled Experts 3 R S Shukla LU, E LU, E To meet the requirements of the scheme, the applicant may be asked to arrange inhouse experts WP, SHW and preferably inhouse expert SE, E and also inhouse/empanelled expert/s RH, GS, HG & NV within three months and approach NET approval. Final accreditation is subject to the fulfillment of the above requirements. n inhouse expert in E should be available with the organization at the time of first surveillance assessment. In case the pplicant Organization arranges an empanelled expert SE, subsequently inhouse expert in this area has to be with the organization at the time of first surveillance assessment meeting the requirements of Scheme. 2. Enkay Enviro Services, Jaipur included in the original application were redistributed as a response of Desktop ssessment, but were not accepted during Stage III. C meeting dated Sep. 21, 2010 cleared that such experts may be considered the original sector/s applied. EI Coordinators to be 1. Sunita Mantri 2. KNS Rao 3. UN Seth 4. lok Kumar Pandey FEs to be ( covering remaining areas) 1. Umesh Datt Sharma 2. Pawan Kumar Singh 3. Yati Kachhawa 4. H K Kalarikal Ravindranathan Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 10

11 EI Coordinators Inhouse Expert 1 Sunita Mantri 22, K N S Rao 26 3 U N Seth 9, 16, 21, 27 4 lok Kumar Pandey 37 Cat. sector 26 EI any sector EI sector 37 EI Functional rea Experts reas reas 1 Umesh Datt Sharma NV 2 Pawan Kumar Singh E, SHW 3 Yati Kachhawa E 4 H K Kalarikal Ravindranathan NV Decision Pending Cat. NV any area EI Not accepted E due to inadequate Clarifications to be sought specific on NV The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair. Vipin Sahni Director NET Minutes of C Meeting XXII: January 19, 2011 Page 11