Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council"

Transcription

1 Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council Version 1 UNCLASSIFIED

2 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road, Bristol BS1 5AH enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency 2011 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: or our National Customer Contact Centre: T: enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk.

3 Foreword Flood risk is one of the issues that you will need to consider when you are planning a new development, whether you are proposing a home extension or something bigger, or even a potential change of use. The local planning authority will make a decision on whether a proposed development will be suitable or not. The Environment Agency is often consulted as part of this process to provide expert advice. This can take the form of bespoke advice on a case by case basis, or where proposals are deemed lower risk we often issue our advice via a series of standard comments known as 'standing advice'. Standing Advice forms an important part of the Government's reform of the planning system, by delivering faster and more consistent decisions while continuing to give full consideration to possible environmental effects. The purpose of this pre-application document is to allow developers access to this standing advice, so that they can incorporate the appropriate flood risk mitigation into the design of their proposals, prior to submitting a formal planning application to East Lindsey District Council. Further information on the principles of Standing Advice can be found on our website. The current link to this information is

4 Guidance Notes 1.0 Introduction The Environment Agency has produced local standing advice, in the form of a matrix, to enable East Lindsey District Council to make decisions on low risk planning applications where flood risk is an issue. The advice also sets out the level of mitigation that we would look for in higher risk proposals. This was formally adopted in May This standing advice removes the need to directly consult us for an individual response on lower risk applications, whilst also identifying those higher risk development situations where case by case consultation with the Environment Agency should continue. Our standing advice provides guidance on the minimum levels of flood risk mitigation that would be expected for various types of development, dependent on the level of flood risk and other constraints. In order to make full use of this guidance you may need to acquire additional information on the flood risk to your proposed development site. 2.0 Which geographical areas does this standing advice apply to? This standing advice applies to sites within the boundaries of East Lindsey District Council. It is most relevant to sites with an identified flood risk, or those sites within the coastal floodplain that are covered by the Environment Agency s Coastal Hazard Mapping. 3.0 Identifying the flood risk constraints to a proposed site The flood risk to a proposed site can be identified using mapping made available by the Environment Agency. Does the proposed development site fall within one or more of the following designations: the flood zone (i.e. zone 3 high probability or zone 2 medium probability ); a flood hazard area 1 (i.e. danger to all, danger to most, danger to some); outside of the flood zone (i.e. zone 1 low probability ). byelaw distance of a Main River of sea defence; The answer to this question will determine where on the horizontal axis of the matrix the development will fall, i.e. into which flood risk column. Information on the three principal flood risk constraints (i.e. Main Rivers or sea defences, the hazard zones and the flood zones) can be obtained from the Environment Agency by requesting the relevant data, known as a Product. Further information on the types of Product that are available can be found at In addition to the normal collection of products that we offer, the Environment Agency s Coastal Hazard Mapping has been produced, which covers the Coastal Floodplain of East Lindsey District Council. This mapping will determine whether or not a proposed site falls within a flood hazard area. Our Hazard Mapping shows the consequences should a breach or overtopping of our existing sea defences occur. The results show the likely flood depths, velocities and overall hazard to a proposed site. This mapping can be obtained by requesting a Product 8 from our Customers and Engagement team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data 1 See Appendix 1 for further information on Flood Hazards to people

5 commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and accompanying licence. 4.0 Identifying the development type from the categories set out in the matrix The vertical axis of the matrix, or row, sets out the different development types. The development type is easily determined in most cases by referring to the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (please see Table 2: Flood risk vulnerability classification). This should be read in conjunction with the National Planning Policy Framework. Please note that if a proposed building is to incorporate a mixture of uses then the whole building should be assigned the highest of the relevant flood risk vulnerability classifications. Where proposals incorporate different uses across a range of buildings or a larger site, the development may fall within several classifications of flood risk vulnerability. Please note that the matrix further differentiates between major and non-major development proposals. Major development is defined as either applications for 10 houses or more, nonresidential development where the new floorspace to be provided is 1,000 square metres or more, or where the site area is 1 hectare or more in total. 5.0 Identifying which cell(s) of the matrix the proposal falls into. Having applied steps 3 and 4 above, this should indicate which cell should be selected from the standing advice matrix, for any given proposal. Please note that more than one section of the matrix may be relevant. For example, developments that will contain a mixture of flood risk vulnerability classifications or developments where proposed works have the potential to require additional consents from the Environment Agency. 6.0 Interpreting the information within the applicable cell(s) of the matrix Having identified the correct cell(s) within the matrix, this will provide a link to your pre-application flood risk guidance. In addition to flood risk considerations, the correct cell will also indicate scenarios where additional flood risk related consent(s) may be needed from the Environment Agency. 7.0 Requesting the Environment Agency s free planning advice The Environment Agency offers a free pre-application advice service in the form of a preliminary opinion. Each developer will be entitled to one free preliminary opinion, for each proposed development. If you decide to request our free planning advice on your proposed development, in addition to the flood risk advice contained within this matix, we will: Identify all other environmental constraints from our constraint maps Check for site specific local environmental issues that concern us Provide a statement of any environmental issues you should consider further Let you know about environmental permits, licences and consents that your proposed development will need from us Based on the information you have given us we will give you our 'preliminary opinion' that: The proposed development raises no environmental issues for us, or The proposed development raises some environmental issues that concern us and you will need to undertake further work to show how to ensure no adverse environmental impacts, or On environmental grounds we would object in principle to the proposed development If your development raises environmental issues or you require additional guidance, you can receive further advice from us subject to charges. This further advice could take the form of feedback on technical reports including Flood Risk Assessments, or attending meetings or site visits.

6 Addressing planning issues at the pre-application stage has long been recognised as good practice. It enables consideration of both minor and complex issues, outside the constraints of the statutory planning timeframe. 8.0 Requesting further planning advice through the Environment Agency s charged service Following its introduction on 03 February 2014, our charged service will help you to improve your application and to meet conditions placed on permissions already granted. We may offer advice on, for example, mitigating the environmental impacts that concern us or highlighting opportunities for environmental enhancements. We will provide a project manager to oversee our advice, agreeing tasks and timetables with you. This is so that we can make specialists available when you need advice from them. We can provide advice on documents and plans you provide (such as Flood Risk Assessments), advice on aligning planning and permitting requirements, or other specific tasks that we agree. Furthermore, we may carry out desk based analysis, arrange meetings or even make site visits as set out in our agreement with you. Should you request further advice your local Area Office will contact you to discuss the advice you require and prepare an agreement that is made up of an offer letter, a programme, and our standard terms and conditions. The programme will specify the tasks we will carry out, giving the approximate timetable and an order of cost for our advice. We can vary a programme only when we agree with you in writing the changes you want to make. We use a national hourly rate, currently 84 per person per hour, for our planning advice agreements. This charge is to recover our costs as we are not currently funded to provide pre-application advice. Our agreement with you would not prejudice our statutory planning advice to a planning authority once you have formally submitted your planning application, and we do not guarantee that your development will be approved. Furthermore, our agreement with you would not affect decisions we make about Environmental Permits, or other consents and licences we issue. Please contact us to find out how our charged service can help you. 9.0 Contacting us To enquire about, or request, our planning advice (or other documents we have referred to, such as our Surface Water Guidance Notes) you may: Call our national customer contact centre on who will put you through to the relevant team (Monday - Friday, 8am to 6pm), or your local Area Office at plannl.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk or Post your request to: Sustainable Places Team, Waterside House, Waterside North, Lincoln, LN2 5HA

7 East Lindsey District Council Standing Advice Matrix A B C D E F G Please refer to NPPF Technical Guidance (Table 3) for advice on when the Sequential and Exception Tests are applicable Environment Agency 9m Byelaw, or including culverting or control of flow of any river Danger to ALL (Hazard Rating >2) Danger to MOST (Hazard Rating ) Danger to SOME (Hazard Rating ) Low Hazard (Hazard Rating ) Flood Zone 3 Flood Zone 2 1 Minor domestic/commercial/industrial extensions (for extensions to form new dwellings - see A7) Consult EA FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A FFL no lower than existing property + appropriate mitigation ST & ET N/A 2 Water Compatible (Excluding development that includes essential ancillary sleeping or residential accommodation) Consult EA Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation UNCLASSIFIED

8 A B C D E F G Please refer to NPPF Technical Guidance (Table 3) for advice on when the Sequential and Exception Tests are applicable Environment Agency 9m Byelaw, or including culverting or control of flow of any river or stream Danger to ALL (Hazard Rating >2) Danger to MOST (Hazard Rating ) Danger to SOME (Hazard Rating ) Low Hazard (Hazard Rating ) Flood Zone 3 Flood Zone New short-let Camping and Caravan Sites (incl. log cabins & chalets) - subject to flood warning and evacuation plan Non-major* 'Less Vulnerable' uses, e.g. commercial/industrial development (less than 1ha site area or 1,000m2 floor space) Non-major* 'More Vulnerable' uses, including residential development & residential holiday accom. (less than 10 dwellings/units or less than 0.5ha in size), except short-let caravan sites - see A5 above Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Mitigation Consult EA Consult EA Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation 300mm FFL Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation 300mm FFL Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation 300mm FFL

9 A B C D E F G Please refer to NPPF Technical Guidance (Table 3) for advice on when the Sequential and Exception Tests are applicable Environment Agency 9m Byelaw, or including culverting or control of flow of any river or stream Danger to ALL (Hazard Rating >2) Danger to MOST (Hazard Rating ) Danger to SOME (Hazard Rating ) Low Hazard (Hazard Rating ) Flood Zone 3 Flood Zone 2 6 Flood risk sensitive changes of use - not including change of use of land to caravan/camping sites (see A5 above) Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA mitigation - No self contained GF residential units mitigation mitigation mitigation Essential Infrastructure Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Mitigation 7 8 Major* 'Less Vulnerable' uses e.g. commercial/industrial development - greater than 1,000m2 floor space or greater than 1ha site area Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA

10 A B C D E F G Please refer to NPPF Technical Guidance (Table 3) for advice on when the Sequential and Exception Tests are applicable Environment Agency 9m Byelaw, or including culverting or control of flow of any river or stream Danger to ALL (Hazard Rating >2) Danger to MOST (Hazard Rating ) Danger to SOME (Hazard Rating ) Low Hazard (Hazard Rating ) Flood Zone 3 Flood Zone Major* 'More Vulnerable' uses including residential development & residential holiday accom (not including camping/caravan sites) - greater than 10 dwellings/units or 0.5ha in size Highly Vulnerable' uses, e.g. caravans, mobile homes and park homes intended for permanent residential use - With the Exception of buildings and infrastructure explicitly for use in emergencies (which should be referred to the EA for bespoke advice) Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Consult EA Object - Contrary to NPPF Object - Contrary to NPPF Object - Contrary to NPPF Object - Contrary to NPPF Object - Contrary to NPPF Consult EA

11 Works within 9m of a Main River or Sea Defence Guidance Notes A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6,A7,A8,A9,A10 Under the terms of the Water Resources Act 1991 and the Land Drainage Byelaws the prior written consent of the Environment Agency is required for any proposed works or structures in, under, over or within 9 metres measured horizontally from the foot of any bank of the landward side, or where there is no bank, within 9 metres measured horizontally from the top edge of the batter enclosing a main river or tidal defence structure. The applicant is requested to contact the Environment Agency's Flood and Coastal Risk Management team on for further information. Please note that Environment Agency formal consent is required irrespective of any Town and Country Planning Act approvals/permissions. The Environment Agency may also request the removal of Permitted Development rights in this location.

12 Minor Development (All Hazard Categories including Flood Zones 3 and 2) Guidance Notes B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1 It is unlikely that East Lindsey District Council will consult the Environment Agency on this type of application, as we have provided them with advice on the minimum outcomes from any planning application. Our recommendation is that planning authorities need to check the planning application and ensure that one or other of the mitigation measures proposed below has been incorporated into the development: Floor levels within the proposed development will be set no lower than existing levels AND, flood proofing of the proposed development has been incorporated where appropriate. Details of any flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included in accordance with Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007) Or; Floor levels within the extension will be set 300mm above the known or modelled 1% (1 in 100 chance each year) river flood level or 0.5% (1 in 200 chance each year) tidal & coastal flood level. (This must be demonstrated by a plan that shows finished floor levels relative to the known or modelled flood level). All levels should be stated in relation to Ordnance Datum. We would recommend that future occupiers of the development sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at NB Sequential and Exception Tests are not required for minor development.

13 Water Compatible (Hazard Categories Danger to All and Danger to Most) Guidance Notes B2 and C2 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms the proposal will operate under flood conditions i.e. essential electrical equipment, and that appropriate mitigation measures/flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development in response to the expected hazard onsite. authority will need to be satisfied that the proposed development is also in accordance with all The site is affected by the Environment Agency s Hazard Mapping following a breach of the flood defences. Our Hazard Mapping shows the consequences should a breach or overtopping of our existing defences occur. The results show the likely flood depths, velocities and overall hazard to the proposed site. We strongly recommend that the applicant obtains this information by requesting a Product 8 from our Customers and Engagement team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk. This information is chargeable. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The Environment Agency objects to proposals, which include ground floor ancillary sleeping accommodation as an adequate standard of safety will not be achievable within the predicted flood depths as shown in the Hazard Mapping outputs. We recommend that future occupiers of the development sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

14 Water Compatible (Hazard Danger to Some) Guidance Note D2 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms the proposal will operate under flood conditions i.e. essential electrical equipment, and that appropriate mitigation measures/flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development in response to the expected hazard onsite. The site is affected by the Environment Agency s Hazard Mapping following a breach of the flood defences. Our Hazard Mapping shows the consequences should a breach or overtopping of our existing defences occur. The results show the likely flood depths, velocities and overall hazard to the proposed site. We strongly recommend that the applicant obtains this information by requesting a Product 8 from our Customers and Engagement team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk. This information is chargeable. Finished floor levels should be informed by the predicted flood depths, over the lifetime of the development. The flood depths for the % tidal / 1% fluvial scenario can inform multi storey applications. The flood depths for the % scenario would inform any proposal that included ground floor sleeping, further guidance on the minimum mitigation allowable is provided below: For depths of m Finished floor levels to be set 500mm above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. For depths of m Finished floor levels to be set 300mm above ground level. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). We recommend that future occupiers of the development sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

15 Water Compatible (Low Hazard and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Notes E2 & F2 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms the proposal will operate under flood conditions i.e. essential electrical equipment, and that appropriate mitigation measures/flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Finished floor levels should be set 300mm above ground level (single storey proposals must consider the % scenario). Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We recommend that future occupiers of the development sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

16 Water Compatible (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G2 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms the proposal will operate under flood conditions i.e. essential electrical equipment, and that appropriate mitigation measures/flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). We recommend that future occupiers of the development sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

17 New Short-let camping and caravan sites including log cabins, chalets etc (All hazard categories and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Notes B3, C3, D3, E3 & F3 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The site lies within an area of identified flood risk, therefore the Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains a Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan, undertaken and agreed in consultation with the local planning authority's emergency planning officer. Our Hazard Mapping, which contains depth, velocity and resultant hazard to a site, will be fundamental in the development of any Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan in areas where hazard mapping is available. Requests for this data can be made to our Customers and Engagement team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. All static caravans will need to be secured to the ground using an adequate mechanism such as chains and ground anchors and the finished floor level set at a minimum 300mm above ground level. The Environment Agency also request the imposition of the following condition in coastal areas: CONDITION: No caravans/chalets/log cabins and similar structures/tents on the site shall be occupied between 1st November (or the following Sunday, if half terms extends into November) in any one year and 14th March in the succeeding year. REASON: To reduce the impact of flooding. If the application is for occupancy outside of these dates, the local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, together with the Flood Risk Assessment which must include additional robust evidence on the consequences of flooding to the site and its future users, for tailored assessment of the risks and bespoke advice.

18 New Short-let camping and caravan sites including log cabins, chalets etc (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G3 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The site lies within an area of identified flood risk, therefore the Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains a Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan, undertaken and agreed in consultation with the local planning authority's emergency planning officer. All static caravans will need to be secured to the ground using an adequate mechanism such as chains and ground anchors and the finished floor level set at a minimum 300mm above ground level.

19 Non-Major Less Vulnerable (Danger to All, Danger to Most and Danger to Some) Guidance Notes B4, C4, D4 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The proposal should be informed by a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which contains evidence to justify the chosen finished floor level. This should be raised as high as practicable, or a minimum 300mm above the existing ground level. The Flood Risk Assessment should also include confirmation that appropriate mitigation measures/flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Single storey buildings should be built above the flood level, obtained in our Hazard Mapping. If this is not practical then either an area of safe refuge or an appropriate evacuation strategy will need to be submitted. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. Where a Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan is provided to demonstrate the safety of future users, the local planning authority must be satisfied. The Environment Agency does not normally comment on or approve the adequacy of flood emergency response procedures accompanying development proposals, as we do not carry out these roles during a flood. Our involvement with this development during an emergency will be limited to delivering flood warnings to occupants/users covered by our flood warning network. The Technical Guide to the National Planning Policy Framework (paragraph 9) states that those proposing developments should take advice from the emergency services when producing an evacuation plan for the development as part of the flood risk assessment. In all circumstances where warning and emergency response is fundamental to managing flood risk, we advise local planning authorities to formally consider the emergency planning and rescue implications of new development in making their decisions.

20 Cont d We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

21 Non-major Less Vulnerable development (Low Hazard including Flood Zones 3 and 2) Guidance Notes E4, F4 & G4 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which includes confirmation that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The finished floor level should be set 300mm above the existing ground level. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

22 Non-major more vulnerable development (Hazards Danger to All and Danger to Most) Guidance Notes B5 & C5 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding, where the expected flood conditions are hazardous. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Single storey development should be informed by the flood depths arising from the % scenario, and proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the flood depths for the % tidal scenario. Finished floor levels (FFL) should be informed by the predicted flood depth and set as required below: For depths of >1.6m - It is unlikely that mitigation measures would prevent flood water from entering the building at ground floor level. Therefore, proposals must be a minimum 2 storey with no ground floor habitable accommodation. The first floor living accommodation shall be above the highest predicted flood depth. Single storey safe developments will not be achievable in these depths. We are likely to secure the requirement of non-habitable uses at ground floor through a suitably worded planning condition. For depths of 1m - 1.6m - Proposals must be a minimum 2 storey, with FFL set a minimum of 1m above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level, demountable defences to 600mm above FFL. Single storey safe developments will not be achievable in these depths. For depths 0.5m - 1m - FFL to be set 1m above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level, (single storey proposals must consider the % scenario for setting FFL).

23 Cont d For depths of 0.25m - 0.5m - FFL to be set 500mm above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. For depths m - FFL to be set 300mm above ground level. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

24 Non-major more vulnerable development (Hazard Danger to Some) Guidance Notes D5 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding, where the expected flood conditions are hazardous to some groups of people. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Single storey development should be informed by the flood depths arising from the % scenario, and proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the flood depths for the % tidal scenario. Finished floor levels (FFL) should be informed by the predicted flood depth and set as required below: For depths of 0.25m - 0.5m FFL to be set 500mm above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. For depths FFL to be set 300mm above ground level. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

25

26 Non-major more vulnerable development (Low Hazard and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Note E5 & F5 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Single storey developments are informed by the depths arising from the % scenario. Proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the greater flood depths of either the % tidal extents or the % fluvial extents. Finished floor levels (FFL) should be set a minimum of 300mm above ground level. However single storey developments should use the flood depths from the % scenario, to set a resistant FFL. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

27 Non-major more vulnerable development (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G5 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Generally finished floor levels (FFL) should be set 300mm above ground level. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

28 Flood risk sensitive change of use (Hazards Danger to All and Danger to Most) Guidance Notes B6 & C6 The site lies within an area of flood hazard that is considered dangerous to all or dangerous to most groups of people. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, which should be accompanied by a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which demonstrates that the increased sensitivity of development and its future users will be safe for its lifetime. The Environment Agency will only support like-for-like vulnerability classification uses and may not support proposals which include ground floor habitable accommodation. The Environment Agency objects to proposals, which include self contained ground floor residential accommodation as an adequate standard of safety will not be achievable within the predicted flood depths as shown in the Hazard Mapping. Information on the flood risk vulnerability classifications can be found in Table 2 of the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework. East Lindsey District Council, as decision maker, can confirm the classification of any proposed development. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

29 Flood risk sensitive change of use (Hazard Danger to Some) Guidance Note D6 The site lies within an area of flood hazard that is considered dangerous to some groups of people. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, which should be accompanied by a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which demonstrates that the increased sensitivity of development and its future users will be safe for its lifetime. The Environment Agency objects to proposals, which include self contained ground floor residential accommodation as an adequate standard of safety will not be achievable within the predicted flood depths as shown in the Hazard Mapping. Information on the flood risk vulnerability classifications can be found in Table 2 of the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework. East Lindsey District Council, as decision maker, can confirm the classification of any proposed development. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

30 Flood risk sensitive change of use (Low Hazard) Guidance Note E6 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development up to the predicted flood level. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Additional information to inform the expected tidal flood depths or fluvial risks, which ever if the greater consequence can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

31 Flood risk sensitive change of use (Flood Zones 3 and 2) Guidance Note F6 & G6 The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience construction techniques have been incorporated into the development up to a minimum of 300mm above ground level, when in the tidal floodplain. Bespoke advice may be necessary where fluvial consequences on the proposed development need to be appraised. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

32 Essential Infrastructure (All Hazard categories and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Note B7, C7, D7, E7 & F7 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The application should be referred to the Environment Agency together with a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which demonstrates that with appropriate mitigation the proposal will be safe for its lifetime. The flood depths arising from the % scenario should be used to inform mitigation. All critical equipment must be raised above the expected flood depths from the % scenario. We would advise that the lifetime of the development is agreed with East Lindsey District Council, as we recognise this is usually substantially less than the year We would recommend that an area of safe refuge is provided in the development, where appropriate, that is above the expected future flood depth. Where no area of safe refuge is provided, it must be agreed with East Lindsey District Council that they are content to manage the risks to the future users of the site through a robust Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan. The Environment Agency does not normally comment on or approve the adequacy of flood emergency response procedures accompanying development proposals, as we do not carry out these roles during a flood. Our involvement with this development during an emergency will be limited to delivering flood warnings to occupants/users covered by our flood warning network. The Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (paragraph 9) states that those proposing developments should take advice from the emergency services when producing an evacuation plan for the development as part of the Flood Risk Assessment. In all circumstances where warning and emergency response is fundamental to managing flood risk, we advise local planning authorities to formally consider the emergency planning and rescue implications of new development in making their decisions. Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition.

33 Cont d Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

34 Essential Infrastructure (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G7 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which confirms that it will remain operational during the % scenario and that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience construction techniques have been incorporated into the development up to a minimum of 300mm above ground level. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

35 Major less vulnerable development (All Hazard categories and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Notes B8, C8, D8, E8 & F8 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, together with a supporting Flood Risk Assessment. It is recommended that this happens at the pre application stage of the process. Please refer to the guidance notes for further information on our charged pre-application service. The Flood Risk Assessment should contain evidence to justify the chosen finished floor level. This should be raised as high as practicable, but to a minimum of 300mm above the existing ground level. The Flood Risk Assessment should also include confirmation that appropriate mitigation measures and flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development and that the proposal will be safe for its lifetime. Single storey buildings should be built above the flood depth considering the % scenario. If this is not practicable an area of safe refuge or an appropriate evacuation strategy will need to be submitted. We would recommend that an area of safe refuge is provided in the development that is above the expected future flood depth. Where no area of safe refuge is provided, it must be agreed with East Lindsey District Council that they are content to manage the risks to the future users of the site through a robust Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan. The Environment Agency does not normally comment on or approve the adequacy of flood emergency response procedures accompanying development proposals, as we do not carry out these roles during a flood. Our involvement with this development during an emergency will be limited to delivering flood warnings to occupants/users covered by our flood warning network. The Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (paragraph 9) states that those proposing developments should take advice from the emergency services when producing an evacuation plan for the development as part of the Flood Risk Assessment.

36 Cont d In all circumstances where warning and emergency response is fundamental to managing flood risk, we advise local planning authorities to formally consider the emergency planning and rescue implications of new development in making their decisions. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

37 Major less vulnerable development (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G8 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, together with a supporting Flood Risk Assessment which demonstrates that with appropriate mitigation the proposal will be safe for its lifetime. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The finished floor level should be set 300mm above the existing ground level. Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

38 Major more vulnerable development (Hazards Danger to All and Danger to Most) Guidance Notes B9 & C9 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding, where the expected flood conditions are hazardous. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The Lincolnshire Coastal Study recommends that housing should be limited to only that development required to maintain the existing population. Single storey developments are informed by the flood depths arising from the % scenario and proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the depths from the % scenario. Minimum finished floor levels (FFL) should be informed using the predicted flood depth and set as required below: For depths of >1.6m - It is unlikely that mitigation measures would prevent flood water from entering the building at ground floor level. Therefore, proposals must be a minimum 2 storey with no ground floor habitable accommodation. The first floor living accommodation shall be above the highest predicted flood depth. We will recommend the use of a suitability worded planning condition to secure the non-habitable uses at ground floor. For depths of 1m - 1.6m - Proposals must be a minimum 2 storey, with FFL set a minimum of 1m above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level, demountable defences to 600mm above FFL. For depths of 0.5m - 1m - FFL to be set 1m above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. Cont d

39 For depths of 0.25m - 0.5m - FFL to be set 500mm above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. For depths of m - FFL to be set 300mm above ground level. Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

40 Major more vulnerable development (Hazard Danger to Some) Guidance Note D9 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding, where the expected flood conditions are hazardous to some groups of people. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). The Lincolnshire Coastal Study recommends that housing should be limited to only that development required to maintain the existing population. Single storey developments are informed by the flood depths arising from the % scenario and proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the depths from the % scenario. Minimum finished floor levels (FFL) should be informed by the predicted flood depth and set as required below: For depths of 0.25m - 0.5m FFL to be set 500mm above ground level, flood resilient construction shall be used to a height 300mm above the predicted flood level. Depths m FFL to be set 300mm above ground level. Additional information to inform the expected flood depths can be obtained by requesting data from our Customers and Engagement Team at custanno.lincoln2.an@environment-agency.gov.uk To use this data commercially, such as in a Flood Risk Assessment, there will be a charge for the information and an accompanying licence.

41 Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

42 Major more vulnerable development (Low Hazard and Flood Zone 3) Guidance Notes E9 & F9 with Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. This site lies within an area identified at risk of flooding. The Environment Agency recommends that the proposal is accompanied by a Flood Risk Assessment which contains evidence that appropriate mitigation measures including flood resilience techniques have been incorporated into the development. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Single storey developments are informed by the flood depths arising from the % scenario. Proposals that do not include ground floor sleeping can be informed by the greater flood depths from either the % tidal scenario or % fluvial scenario. Finished floor levels (FFL) should be set 300mm above ground level for multi storey developments. Flood depths from the % scenario should be used to inform resistant FFL on single storey proposals. Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition. We would support the recommendation of a Flood Risk Assessment advising future occupiers of the development will sign up to the free Floodline Warnings Direct Service. More information can be found at

43 Major more vulnerable development (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G9 including Surface Water Guidance Notes The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, together with a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which demonstrates that with appropriate mitigation the proposal will be safe for its lifetime. Finished floor levels should be elevated to 300mm above ground level. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007). Where the size of the site exceeds 1 ha, then the Flood Risk Assessment must also include details of surface water drainage arrangements and demonstrate that the proposal will not increase flood risk elsewhere. We have produced a suite of Surface Water Guidance Notes which set out the principles of sustainable surface water management, the level of detail required for us to be satisfied to recommend a planning condition and the level of detail required to discharge a planning condition.

44 Highly vulnerable development (All Hazard categories including Flood Zone 3) Guidance Note B10, C10, D10, E10, F10 In accordance with Table 3 of the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework, highly vulnerable uses are not appropriate in Flood Zone 3. However, due to the extent of the Flood Zone along the coast, exceptions may be made for essential installations such are Police, Ambulance and Fire stations etc. Such proposals should be referred to the Environment Agency for bespoke advice at pre-application stage.

45 Highly vulnerable development (Flood Zone 2) Guidance Note G10 The local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the development passes the Flood Risk Sequential Test. We recommend that this requirement is discussed with them at an early opportunity. The aim of the Sequential Test, in summary, is to steer new development to areas at the lowest probability of flooding (see paragraph 101 of the National Planning Policy Framework) and therefore in the first instance the local planning authority should be satisfied that the Sequential Test has been applied to justify development in this location, and to allow the Exception Test to be considered. Please note a copy of this evidence should be forwarded to the Environment Agency. The local planning authority will need to refer the application to the Environment Agency, together with a supporting Flood Risk Assessment, which demonstrates that with appropriate mitigation the proposal will be safe for its lifetime. Please refer to the following document for information on flood resilience and resistance techniques to be included: Improving Flood Performance of New Buildings - Flood Resilient Construction (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2007).

46 Appendix 1 Flood Hazards Flood Hazard to people is based on research undertaken by Defra and the Environment Agency, which is translated in Flood Risk Assessment Guidance for New Development Phase 2, R&D Technical Report FD2320/TR2. Table 13.1 below uses the composite conditions of depth and velocity, including a debris factor, and shows how these factors combine to result in the various flood hazards. Table 13.1: Defra/Environment Agency Flood Risk Assessment Guidance for New Development, Phase 2, R&D Technical Report FD2320/TR2. Danger to all An area of extreme danger with deep and/or fast flowing water. This is an area that only Emergency Services can assess safety for their entry. Danger to most An area that is dangerous for most people, with deep and/or fast flowing water. Danger to some An area with deep or fast flowing water that would be dangerous for children, elderly or those with limited mobility. Low hazard An area of fast flowing shallow water, or deeper standing water. Caution should be exercised. More information on risks to people can be found in Defra /Environment Agency Flood Risks to People Phase 2, R&D Technical Report FD2321/TR2

FLOODING INFORMATION SHEET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED

FLOODING INFORMATION SHEET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED The information in this document has been written in partnership by the Association of British Insurers and the Environment Agency 1. Flood risk and insurance Q1. How can I find out the flood risk affecting

More information

National Flood Risk Assessment Key facts. Environment Agency 1 NaFRA 2005 Key Facts

National Flood Risk Assessment Key facts. Environment Agency 1 NaFRA 2005 Key Facts National Flood Risk Assessment 2005 Key facts 1 NaFRA 2005 Key Facts We are The. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment

More information

Protocol for the maintenance of flood and coastal risk management assets (England only) Version 4, 27/01/2014 UNCLASSIFIED

Protocol for the maintenance of flood and coastal risk management assets (England only) Version 4, 27/01/2014 UNCLASSIFIED Protocol for the maintenance of flood and coastal risk management assets (England only) Version 4, 27/01/2014 UNCLASSIFIED We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make

More information

Development and Flood Risk - the Environment Agency s approach to PPS25. scrutinised before planning decisions are made

Development and Flood Risk - the Environment Agency s approach to PPS25. scrutinised before planning decisions are made Development and Flood Risk - the Environment Agency s approach to PPS25 Steve Cook Flood Risk Policy Advisor Stephen.cook@environment-agency.gov.uk Our role in PPS25 h Providing advice and information

More information

Good Practice Guide. GPG 101 Document Owner: Steve Cook. Page 1 of 7.

Good Practice Guide. GPG 101 Document Owner: Steve Cook. Page 1 of 7. Good Practice Guide Producing flood risk hydraulic models and flood consequence assessments for development planning purposes Date Published: September 2015 GPG 101 Document Owner: Steve Cook Page 1 of

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Draft Claremorris Local Area Plan 2012 2018 Prepared by Forward Planning Section Mayo County Council 1 Table of Contents Section 1: Overview of the Guidelines... 4 1.1 Introduction...

More information

Review of preliminary flood risk assessments (Flood Risk Regulations 2009): guidance for lead local flood authorities in England

Review of preliminary flood risk assessments (Flood Risk Regulations 2009): guidance for lead local flood authorities in England Review of preliminary flood risk assessments (Flood Risk Regulations 2009): guidance for lead local flood authorities in England 25 January 2017 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the

More information

Flood Risk and Land Use Vulnerability Guidance

Flood Risk and Land Use Vulnerability Guidance Flood Risk and Land Use Vulnerability Guidance UPS-BP-GU2a v.2 UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT WHEN PRINTED Pag SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY Identifier: LUPS-GU24 Land Use Planning System SEPA Guidance

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Ireland West Airport Knock Local Area Plan 2012 2018 Prepared by Forward Planning Section Mayo County Council 0 1 Table of Contents Section 1: Overview of the Guidelines...

More information

FLOOD SOLUTIONS Residence

FLOOD SOLUTIONS Residence FLOOD SOLUTIONS Residence Report prepared on 22 Knighton Road, Liverpool, L4 9RD Report reference AEL028FLR022381 National grid reference 337815, 394462 Report prepared for Specimen Client Client reference

More information

Sequential Flood Risk Test for Mid Sussex Neighbourhood Plans

Sequential Flood Risk Test for Mid Sussex Neighbourhood Plans Sequential Flood Risk Test for Mid Sussex Neighbourhood Plans Introduction This Sequential Test has been prepared to assess the flood risk of sites within the parish that have been identified as suitable,

More information

Flood Risk Assessment for Planning

Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Report on: Sample Property, Sample Town, Sample Postcode Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report Date: Sample AEL-XXXX-FRA-XXXX 28 th October 2016 Client Reference:

More information

Provision of Flood Risk Information for sites on Duchess Street, Grimsby and Doughty Road, Grimsby.

Provision of Flood Risk Information for sites on Duchess Street, Grimsby and Doughty Road, Grimsby. Hassan Choudhry hassan.choudhry@arcadis.com Our ref: CCN/217/66343 & 66345 Date: 2 November 217 Dear Hassan Provision of Flood Risk Information for sites on Duchess Street, Grimsby and Doughty Road, Grimsby.

More information

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding 4 NATURAL HAZARDS ISSUE 1 River Flooding A large part of the plains within the Timaru District is subject to some degree of flooding risk. At least part of all of the main settlements in the District and

More information

Guildford Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Summary Report. January 2016

Guildford Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Summary Report. January 2016 Guildford Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Summary Report January 2016 What is this document? This document provides a summary of Guildford Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA,

More information

STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT

STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED VARIATION NO. 1 (CORE STRATEGY) TO THE LONGFORD TOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2009-2015 for: Longford Local Authorities Great Water Street, Longford, Co. Longford by:

More information

Solway Local Plan District 1 Flood risk management in Scotland 1.1 What is a Flood Risk Management Strategy? Flood Risk Management Strategies have bee

Solway Local Plan District 1 Flood risk management in Scotland 1.1 What is a Flood Risk Management Strategy? Flood Risk Management Strategies have bee Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District Section 1: Flood Risk Management in Scotland 1.1 What is a Flood Risk Management Strategy?... 1 1.2 How to read this Strategy... 1 1.3 Managing

More information

Product 4 (Detailed Flood Risk) for Our Ref: OX_0748_01. Mill Lane, Somerford Keynes

Product 4 (Detailed Flood Risk) for Our Ref: OX_0748_01. Mill Lane, Somerford Keynes Product 4 (Detailed Flood Risk) for Our Ref: OX_0748_01 Mill Lane, Somerford Keynes Product 4 is designed for developers where Flood Risk Standing Advice FRA (Flood Risk Assessment) Guidance Note 3 Applies.

More information

Resilience to Flooding of Grid and Primary Substations

Resilience to Flooding of Grid and Primary Substations PRODUCED BY THE OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE OF ENERGY NETWORKS ASSOCIATION Engineering Technical Report 138 Resilience to Flooding of Grid and Primary Substations www.energynetworks.org PUBLISHING AND COPYRIGHT

More information

LOW. Overall Flood risk. Flood considerations. Specimen Address, Specimen Town. Rivers and the Sea Low page 4. Historic Flood.

LOW. Overall Flood risk. Flood considerations. Specimen Address, Specimen Town. Rivers and the Sea Low page 4. Historic Flood. Specimen Address, Specimen Town Overall Flood risk LOW Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207 Groundsure Floodview complies with relevant Law Society practice notes

More information

Flood Risk Management Planning in Scotland: Arrangements for February 2012

Flood Risk Management Planning in Scotland: Arrangements for February 2012 Flood Risk Management Planning in Scotland: Arrangements for 2012 2016 February 2012 Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009 1 Contents Forewords 1. Introduction to this document... 5 2. Sustainable

More information

ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE

ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE MAIDENHEAD DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PANEL 26 October 2016 Item: 1 Application 16/01449/FULL No.: Location: Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham

More information

Flood Risk Sequential Test

Flood Risk Sequential Test Flood Risk Sequential Test Assessment of Proposed Development Sites Stroud District Council Evidence Base (December 2013) Development and Flood Risk Sequential Test 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document considers

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment PLANNING DEPARTMENT, KILKENNY COUNTY COUNCIL Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Proposed Amendment No. 2 of Callan Local Area Plan 2009-2020 Forward Planning January 2016 This Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

More information

Planning and Flood Risk

Planning and Flood Risk Planning and Flood Risk Patricia Calleary BE MEngSc MSc CEng MIEI After the Beast from the East Patricia Calleary Flood Risk and Planning Flooding in Ireland» Floods are a natural and inevitable part of

More information

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction This survey is intended to help the interagency planning committee to receive public feedback on specific flood risk reduction techniques,

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Management

Strategic Flood Risk Management Strategic Management Duncan McLuckie (NSW Department of Infrastructure and Natural Resources) Introduction This paper discusses what is meant by strategic flood risk management, who is responsible in New

More information

Consider the risks to your own business as well as to your operations

Consider the risks to your own business as well as to your operations Hayley Bowman Flood and Coastal Risk Management Mapping, Modelling and Data 07919 544 551 Hayley.bowman@environment-agency.gov.uk DataInfo@environment-agency.gov.uk EA covers England only. Wales covered

More information

Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea

Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea Risk of Flooding from Rivers and Sea Product Description April 2015 RISK OF FLOODING FROM RIVERS AND SEA PRODUCT DESCRIPTION An assessment of flood risk for England produced using local data and expertise.

More information

LLDC Flood Risk Review Summary Report. Issue 2 13 January 2017

LLDC Flood Risk Review Summary Report. Issue 2 13 January 2017 Issue 2 13 January 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility

More information

Flood Risk Management Strategy. Shetland

Flood Risk Management Strategy. Shetland Flood Risk Management Strategy Shetland Publication date: 14 December 2015 Terms and conditions Ownership: All intellectual property rights for Flood Risk Management Strategies are owned by SEPA or its

More information

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian The year 212 was the UK s second wettest since recordkeeping began only 6.6 mm shy of the record set in 2. In 27, the UK experienced its wettest summer, which

More information

IRISH FLOOD PREVENTION PROGRAMME Example of integrating climate change adaptation into projects

IRISH FLOOD PREVENTION PROGRAMME Example of integrating climate change adaptation into projects IRISH FLOOD PREVENTION PROGRAMME Example of integrating climate change adaptation into projects JASPERS Networking Platform Event Climate Change Adaptation: Vulnerability and Risk Assessment and the Resilience

More information

2018 PREPARING FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE AND MANAGING THE RISING FLOOD RISK

2018 PREPARING FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE AND MANAGING THE RISING FLOOD RISK Ireland Water 2018 PREPARING FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE AND MANAGING THE RISING FLOOD RISK Mark Adamson Office of Public Works 25 th April, 2018 FLOOD RISK IN IRELAND NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT, OEP 2012 & 2017

More information

Engineers Ireland Annual Conference

Engineers Ireland Annual Conference Engineers Ireland Annual Conference MANAGING FLOOD RISK AND BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES Mark Adamson Office of Public Works 15 th May, 2015 FLOOD RISK IN IRELAND RECENT FLOODS November 2009: >1,600

More information

investing for the future

investing for the future investing for the future Flood and coastal risk management in England A long-term investment strategy We are the Environment Agency. It s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place

More information

TOWN OF KENT, CT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

TOWN OF KENT, CT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TOWN OF KENT, CT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS Whereas, Congress has determined that a National Flood Insurance Program would alleviate personal hardships and economic

More information

A guide to how we fund and deliver Flood Risk Management Schemes

A guide to how we fund and deliver Flood Risk Management Schemes A guide to how we fund and deliver Flood Risk Management s We are currently in the appraisal stages of many projects investigating whether schemes to manage flood risk can be provided throughout Cumbria.

More information

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011 Hazard Mitigation Grants Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011 Outline Purpose of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Projects Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Programs Using

More information

INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY A MECHANISM FOR CONSISTENT INDUSTRY & GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION PROPERTY EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE PROGRAM

INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY A MECHANISM FOR CONSISTENT INDUSTRY & GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION PROPERTY EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE PROGRAM INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY A MECHANISM FOR CONSISTENT INDUSTRY & GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION PROPERTY EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE PROGRAM Davies T 1, Bray S 1, Sullivan, K 2 1 Edge Environment 2 Insurance Council

More information

Analysis of costs & benefits of risk reduction strategies

Analysis of costs & benefits of risk reduction strategies Analysis of costs & benefits of risk reduction strategies adapted by Emile Dopheide from RiskCity Exercise 7b, by Cees van Westen and Nanette Kingma ITC January 2010 1. Introduction The municipality of

More information

SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY

SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY Appeal by Mrs. S Biddle against the decision by South Northamptonshire Council to refuse planning permission for

More information

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA McLuckie D. For the National Flood Risk Advisory Group duncan.mcluckie@environment.nsw.gov.au Introduction Flooding is a natural phenomenon

More information

The 2004 Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum September 21-22, 2004 FLOOD STANDARDS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES

The 2004 Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum September 21-22, 2004 FLOOD STANDARDS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES The 2004 Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum September 21-22, 2004 FLOOD STANDARDS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES Firas Makarem, Dewberry, International Committee Chair, Association of State Floodplain

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: A Local Authority Perspective. Karyn Punchard, Weymouth & Portland Borough Council

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: A Local Authority Perspective. Karyn Punchard, Weymouth & Portland Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: A Local Authority Perspective Karyn Punchard, Weymouth & Portland Borough Council Workshop Flooding issues in Weymouth & Portland SFRA Level 1 2005/6 SFRA Level 2 2008/9

More information

THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL COASTAL HAZARDS POLICY

THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL COASTAL HAZARDS POLICY THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL COASTAL HAZARDS POLICY 1. OBJECTIVES a) To sustainably manage the effects of coastal hazards on the District s coastal foreshore land by ensuring risk to life and property

More information

Strategic flood risk management

Strategic flood risk management Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Environment Agency Strategic flood risk management HC 780 SESSION 2014-15 5 NOVEMBER 2014 4 Key facts

More information

Kirkwall (Potentially Vulnerable Area 03/05) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Orkney Orkney Islands Council Orkney coastal Backgroun

Kirkwall (Potentially Vulnerable Area 03/05) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Orkney Orkney Islands Council Orkney coastal Backgroun Kirkwall (Potentially Vulnerable Area 03/05) Local Plan District Orkney Local authority Orkney Islands Council Main catchment Orkney coastal Summary of flooding impacts 490 residential properties 460 non-residential

More information

Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town

Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town Telephone: 2 7261 191 Email: SitecheckFlood@rpsgroup.com Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town Prepared for: L And1 Landmark1 Account Landmark(Test Account) 6-7 Abbey Court, Sowton Ind Estate Exeter

More information

Flood Risk Management: Modelling blockage and breach scenarios February 2015

Flood Risk Management: Modelling blockage and breach scenarios February 2015 Flood Risk Management: Modelling blockage and breach scenarios February 2015 OGN100 Document Owner: Mark Pugh Page 1 of 6 Version History: Document Date Summary of Changes Version Published 1.0 DEC-2014

More information

FLOOD SOLUTIONS Commercial

FLOOD SOLUTIONS Commercial FLOOD SOLUTIONS Commercial Overall Opinion PASSED Argyll's Overview The Site is not considered to be at a significant risk of flooding. This is as a result of flood defences in proximity to the Site which

More information

LOCAL FLOOD RISK STRATEGY EMYR WILLIAMS PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

LOCAL FLOOD RISK STRATEGY EMYR WILLIAMS PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL FLOOD RISK STRATEGY EMYR WILLIAMS PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Flood Risk Management We can only manage flood risk. It is not possible to prevent all flooding even if we had the money. There will

More information

Flooding in Brisbane. Challenges and implications. Kerry Doss Manager City Planning & Economic Development

Flooding in Brisbane. Challenges and implications. Kerry Doss Manager City Planning & Economic Development Flooding in Brisbane Challenges and implications Kerry Doss Manager City Planning & Economic Development Brisbane, the River City In January 2011, the River City was reminded just what that meant Over

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. SFRA Report

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. SFRA Report Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SFRA Report on Strandhill Mini-Plan Variation No.1 of the Sligo County Development Plan 2011-2017 Prepared by Contents 1. The context for the Flood Risk Assessment 1 2.

More information

Appendix L Methodology for risk assessment

Appendix L Methodology for risk assessment Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement 347 Appendix L Methodology for risk assessment Compliance with Appendix L means: (a) (b) Use of Steps 1 to 6 below (the default methodology); or Use of a recognised

More information

HRPP 358. Adapting flood risk management for an uncertain future: Flood management planning on the thames estuary. D. Ramsbottom & T.

HRPP 358. Adapting flood risk management for an uncertain future: Flood management planning on the thames estuary. D. Ramsbottom & T. HRPP 358 Adapting flood risk management for an uncertain future: Flood management planning on the thames estuary D. Ramsbottom & T. Reeder Reproduced from a paper presented at: The 43rd Defra Flood and

More information

September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan

September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Basic Conditions Statement Published by Pagham Parish Council for Consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. 1 Pagham Neighbourhood

More information

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN IRELAND

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN IRELAND National Flood Management Conference 2018 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN IRELAND Mark Adamson Office of Public Works 15 th March, 2018 FLOOD RISK IN IRELAND NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT, OEP 2012 Flooding: Joint

More information

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan Detailed Report on Flood Risk in the Baldonnell Area 8 th May 2015 rpsgroup.com/ireland Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan

More information

Mapping flood risk its role in improving flood resilience in England

Mapping flood risk its role in improving flood resilience in England Mapping flood risk its role in improving flood resilience in England Catherine Wright Director of Digital and Skills Flood and Coastal Risk Management Environment Agency 6 October 2017 The Environment

More information

The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities

The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities Technical Appendices November 2009 Contents PAGE A. Identification and Assessment of Flood Risk 1 B. Addressing Flood Risk Management in Design of Development 35 A Appendix A: Identification and Assessment

More information

DEFINING BEST PRACTICE IN FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

DEFINING BEST PRACTICE IN FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT DEFINING BEST PRACTICE IN FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT M Babister 1 M Retallick 1 1 WMAwater, Level 2,160 Clarence Street Sydney Abstract With the upcoming release of the national best practice manual, Managing

More information

Evidence for Environmental Audit Committee Enquiry on Sustainable Housing Submission by Association of British Insurers, May 2004

Evidence for Environmental Audit Committee Enquiry on Sustainable Housing Submission by Association of British Insurers, May 2004 Evidence for Environmental Audit Committee Enquiry on Sustainable Housing Submission by Association of British Insurers, May 2004 The Government s plans to tackle the country s profound housing shortage

More information

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs) The Department of Homeland Security s Federal Emergency Management Agency is committed to helping communities that were impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita rebuild safer and stronger. Following catastrophic

More information

Flood Risk Assessment. Approved by RECOMMENDATIONS. Professional Opinion

Flood Risk Assessment. Approved by RECOMMENDATIONS. Professional Opinion Flood Report Flood Risk Assessment Professional Opinion RECOMMENDATIONS 1. A prudent purchaser may wish to consider further assessment of the property to identify appropriate flood protection measures.

More information

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LOCATION OF NEW FACILITIES FUNDED BY ALBERTA INFRASTRUCTURE

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LOCATION OF NEW FACILITIES FUNDED BY ALBERTA INFRASTRUCTURE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LOCATION OF NEW FACILITIES FUNDED BY ALBERTA INFRASTRUCTURE June 2017 Flood Risk Management GUIDELINES for Location of New Facilities Funded by Alberta Infrastructure

More information

Britannia Village Flood Control Project

Britannia Village Flood Control Project Britannia Village Flood Control Project Summary of Background Information February 2011 Contents 1) Flood Risks in the Village 2) Alternative Flood Risk Management Approaches Status Quo The Proposed Remedial

More information

Floodplain Management Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017

Floodplain Management Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017 Floodplain Management 2017 Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017 Floodplain Mapping and Flood Zones Zone Deisgnations: Zone A: No base flood elevations have been determined it is an approximated

More information

Article 23-6 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT

Article 23-6 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PITTSFIELD CHAPTER 23, ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION I That the Code of the City of Pittsfield, Chapter 23, Article 23-6 Floodplain District, shall be replaced with the following:

More information

Barry Island and Docks (2)

Barry Island and Docks (2) Barry Island and Docks (2) Draft Recommendations: Long Term Plan It has been assumed that the structures associated with Barry Docks will be maintained and upgraded in the long term, but this is subject

More information

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Appeal Decision Site visit made on 19 December 2016 by Geoff Underwood BA(Hons) PGDip(Urb Cons) MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision

More information

Queensborough Flood Construction Level (FCL) Review PHASE 1 REPORT. Submitted By:

Queensborough Flood Construction Level (FCL) Review PHASE 1 REPORT. Submitted By: Queensborough Flood Construction Level (FCL) Review PHASE 1 REPORT Submitted By: EB3774 - January 2013 1. SUMMARY... 1 2. INTRODUCTION... 2 3. STUDY AREA... 3 4. FLOOD PROBABILITY... 8 5. FLOOD CONSEQUENCE...

More information

Flood Risk. How do we manage flood risks? Built Form. Components of Flood Risk. Consequence of a flood. Chance of a flood

Flood Risk. How do we manage flood risks? Built Form. Components of Flood Risk. Consequence of a flood. Chance of a flood Built Form Managing flood risk can be delivered through both planning scheme and non-planning scheme measures. During Summer 2010/2011 we witnessed just how well our built form performed. It was evident

More information

Huntington Beach LCPA 1-16 (Sunset Beach Specific Plan) DRAFT Hazard Analysis Sug Mod Working Document/Not for general circulation.

Huntington Beach LCPA 1-16 (Sunset Beach Specific Plan) DRAFT Hazard Analysis Sug Mod Working Document/Not for general circulation. LCPA 1-16 (Sunset Beach Specific Plan) DRAFT Hazard Analysis Sug Mod Working Document/Not for general circulation. 3.3 Regulations (page 34) 3.3.9 (page 60) Add new Section 3.3.9 below after Flood Plain

More information

Derry City & Strabane District Council 17th July 2015, 3pm.

Derry City & Strabane District Council 17th July 2015, 3pm. Derry City & Strabane District Council 17th July 2015, 3pm Malcolm Calvert, (Principal Engineer, Mapping & Modelling Unit) Sean O Neill, (Regional Engineer - Western) Flood Hazard & Risk Mapping www.riversagencyni.gov.uk

More information

Flood Risk Management in Ireland. The National CFRAM Programme & overview of the Capital Works Programme. Click to add text

Flood Risk Management in Ireland. The National CFRAM Programme & overview of the Capital Works Programme. Click to add text Flood Risk Management in Ireland The National CFRAM Programme & overview of the Capital Works Programme Click to add text Dr. John Martin Office of Public Works Engineers Ireland's Local Government Seminar

More information

TRANSPORT OF WORKS ACT ORDER 1992 THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (EAST WEST RAIL BICESTER TO BEDFORD IMPROVEMENTS) ORDER

TRANSPORT OF WORKS ACT ORDER 1992 THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (EAST WEST RAIL BICESTER TO BEDFORD IMPROVEMENTS) ORDER TRANSPORT OF WORKS ACT ORDER 1992 THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (EAST WEST RAIL BICESTER TO BEDFORD Proof of Evidence in relation to Flood Risk Amy Hensler 156/3/1 BEng (Hons), MSc, C.WEM, MCIWEM, CEnv On

More information

Appeal by Lloyds Bank PLC

Appeal by Lloyds Bank PLC Appeal by Lloyds Bank PLC Network Rail (Werrington Grade Separation) Order Transport and Works Act 19982 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Land and buildings at Stirling Way, Peterborough Summary Proof

More information

Oban (Potentially Vulnerable Area 01/31) Local authority Main catchment Argyll and Bute Council Knapdale coastal Background This Potentially Vulnerabl

Oban (Potentially Vulnerable Area 01/31) Local authority Main catchment Argyll and Bute Council Knapdale coastal Background This Potentially Vulnerabl Oban (Potentially Vulnerable Area 01/31) Local authority Argyll and Bute Council Main catchment Knapdale coastal Summary of flooding impacts 320 residential properties 310 non-residential properties 1.8

More information

Low. Yes. Low. Surface water. Other*

Low. Yes. Low. Surface water. Other* Overall Opinion Passed The site is not considered to be at significant risk of flooding. No further action is considered necessary. However, it would be prudent to consider the measures outlined in the

More information

Appendix B. A Comparison of the Minimum NFIP Requirements and the CRS

Appendix B. A Comparison of the Minimum NFIP Requirements and the CRS A Comparison of the Minimum s and the CRS The Community Rating System provides credits for exceeding the minimum requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Many local officials are not

More information

Lowestoft Flood Risk Management Project

Lowestoft Flood Risk Management Project Volume 1, Issue 1 Winter 2017 Lowestoft Flood Risk Management Project I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E : Welcome 1 Background to the project 2 What are we considering 2 and how has the project progressed?

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality WHAT IS A FLOOD? The National Flood Insurance Program defines a flood as a general and temporary condition of partial

More information

National Flood Risk Management Plan. CFRAM Programme

National Flood Risk Management Plan. CFRAM Programme National Flood Risk Management Plan AND THE CFRAM Programme Gerard O Connell, Engineer-in-Charge, Regional Projects & Flood Advisory Office Environmental SPC, 27 th June, 2018 HISTORIC & POLICY CONTEXT

More information

Homecheck Professional. Flood Risk Assessment PASSED. Overall Flood Risk: LOW RISK IDENTIFIED. Insurability: YES. Flood Report. Professional Opinion

Homecheck Professional. Flood Risk Assessment PASSED. Overall Flood Risk: LOW RISK IDENTIFIED. Insurability: YES. Flood Report. Professional Opinion Homecheck Professional Flood Report Flood Risk Assessment PASSED Professional Opinion The overall flood risk rating for the property is assessed to be 'Low'. No further action is considered necessary however

More information

Assessing future flood risk across the UK

Assessing future flood risk across the UK Climate Change Risk Assessment: 2017 Assessing future flood risk across the UK (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) Presentation to the FoRUM Workshop Paul Sayers and Matt Horritt 17 March 2015

More information

FloodSolutions Consult Residential

FloodSolutions Consult Residential FloodSolutions Consult Residential Sample, Road, Sample Town Report Prepared for: Sample client Client Reference: Not Supplied Report Reference: AEL-0000-FSCRsample National Grid Reference: 00000, 00000

More information

FloodSolutions Commercial

FloodSolutions Commercial FloodSolutions Commercial Overall Opinion PASSED Argyll's Overview The Site is not considered to be at a significant risk of flooding and buildings and contents insurance should be available and affordable.

More information

BLESSINGTON LOCAL AREA PLAN FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT

BLESSINGTON LOCAL AREA PLAN FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT BLESSINGTON LOCAL AREA PLAN 2013-2019 FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Page Number 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Definition of Flooding 2 1.2 Policy Framework 2 1.3 Flood Risk Identification 3 1.4 Mapping

More information

Implementation of Water Framework and Flood Directive in Finland. Markku Maunula Finnish Environment Institute

Implementation of Water Framework and Flood Directive in Finland. Markku Maunula Finnish Environment Institute Implementation of Water Framework and Flood Directive in Finland Markku Maunula Finnish Environment Institute Finland is rich in freshwater About 11 % of surface is covered by water The number of lakes

More information

Role of the Flood & Water Management Committee & LCC as Lead Local Flood Authority

Role of the Flood & Water Management Committee & LCC as Lead Local Flood Authority Role of the Flood & Water Management Committee & LCC as Lead Local Flood Authority Page 1 Agenda Item 5 Page 2 21F of Local Government Act 2000 - Overview and scrutiny committees: flood risk management

More information

Pre-Development Floodplain Application

Pre-Development Floodplain Application Pre-Development Floodplain Application The Department of Planning, at the recommendation of FEMA, is now requiring completion of a Pre- Development Floodplain Application for all properties in the regulated

More information

The AIR Coastal Flood Model for Great Britain

The AIR Coastal Flood Model for Great Britain The AIR Coastal Flood Model for Great Britain The North Sea Flood of 1953 inundated more than 100,000 hectares in eastern England. More than 24,000 properties were damaged, and 307 people lost their lives.

More information

Comhairle Baile Cheanntair~ Nás na Ríogh

Comhairle Baile Cheanntair~ Nás na Ríogh Comhairle Baile Cheanntair~ Nás na Ríogh DRAFT STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT NAAS TOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2011 ~ 2017 Kildare County Council Water Services Department Aras Chill Dara Devoy Park Naas County

More information

Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers

Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals Appeal Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers

More information

FOR TO THE GAELTACHT LOCAL AREA PLAN MARCH 2013

FOR TO THE GAELTACHT LOCAL AREA PLAN MARCH 2013 APPENDIX II TO THE SEA ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT STAGE 2 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE GAELTACHT LOCAL AREA PLAN 2008-2014 for: Galway County Council County Buildings Prospect

More information

CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION ACT TITLE 35

CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION ACT TITLE 35 CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND ENVIROMENTAL PROTECTION ACT TITLE 35 CHAPTER SECTION 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Establishment 101 Required Reporting

More information

California Building Code and the NFIP. John Ingargiola, Senior Engineer FEMA Building Science Branch

California Building Code and the NFIP. John Ingargiola, Senior Engineer FEMA Building Science Branch California Building Code and the NFIP John Ingargiola, Senior Engineer FEMA Building Science Branch CA Major Disaster Declarations and Federal Assistance $21 $21 $76 $78 7 declarations, 2004-2016, total

More information

Government Decree on Flood Risk Management 659/2010

Government Decree on Flood Risk Management 659/2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland NB: Unofficial translation; legally binding texts are those in Finnish and Swedish. Government Decree on Flood Risk Management 659/2010 Section 1 Preliminary

More information

Chelmsford City Council. Level 1 and Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Final Report

Chelmsford City Council. Level 1 and Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. Final Report Chelmsford City Council Level 1 and Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report October 2017 This page has been left intentionally blank 2015s3715 Chelmsford SFRA L1 and L2 Final Report v1.0.docx

More information