Safety performance indicators 2011 data

Transcription

1 Safety performance indicators 211 data Report No. 211s May 212 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

2 P ublications Global experience The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines for good practice by individual members. Consistent high quality database and guidelines Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best practice throughout the world. The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consistent databases and records in certain fields. The OGP s members are encouraged to use the guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and regulations which may apply locally. Internationally recognised source of industry information Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies. Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms. Copyright notice The contents of these pages are The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii) the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the OGP. These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

3 OGP safety performance indicators 211 Report No: 211s May 212 Revision history Version Date Amendments 1 May 212 First issued

4 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The safety statistics for 211 were derived from data provided by the following companies: Contributing OGP Members ADDAX ADNOC BG Group BHP BP Cairn Energy Chevron CNOOC ConocoPhillips Dolphin Energy DONG E&P Eni ExxonMobil GDF Suez Hess Corporation INPEX KOSMOS Kuwait Oil Company Maersk Oil Marathon MOL NCOC (North Caspian Operating Co.) Nexen Inc Oil Search OMV Pan n Energy Perenco Petrobras Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd Premier Oil PTTEP Qatar Petroleum Rasgas Repsol RWE Dea AG Shell Companies Statoil Suncor Talisman Energy TNK-BP Total Tullow Oil Wintershall Woodside Yemen LNG ii OGP

5 Safety performance indicators 211 data Contents Executive Summary Preface v vii 1 Summary General Fatalities Total recordable injuries Lost time injuries Overall results Fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) Fatalities by incident category and activity Fatal incident rate (FIR) Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Lost work day cases by category and activity Severity of lost work day cases Severity of restricted work day cases Incident triangles Causal factors analysis OGP Life-Saving Rules Results by region Fatalities Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages Severity of lost work day cases Individual country performance Incident triangles by region Results by function Fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) 3-year rolling average Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 3-year rolling average Severity of lost work day cases Exploration performance Drilling performance Production performance Construction performance Unspecifed function performance Results by company Overall company results Company results by function Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Database dimensions...a Data tables...b Contributing companies... C Countries represented... D Glossary of terms... E OGP iii

6 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers iv OGP

7 Safety performance indicators 211 data Executive Summary Safety Number of fatalities vs fatal accident rate Lost time injury frequency vs total recordable injury rate per million hours worked Number of fatalities Fatalities FAR Fatal accidents per 1 million hours worked TRIR LTIF The 211 OGP safety performance indicators show that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has reduced by 32% compared with 21. The number of fatalities has reduced from 94 in 21 to 65 in 211. This means that, on average, more than one person per week lost their life in Personal injury performance is broadly flat with lost time injury frequency increasing by 2% and total recordable injury rate increasing by 5% in 211 compared with 21 results. There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and high potential events in both 21 and 211. The top 6 causal factors were: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment (1.% of total) Inadequate supervision (7.3% of total) Inadequate work standards/procedures (6.5% of total) Improper decision making or lack of judgment (6.4% of total) Unintentional violation (by individual or group) (5.4% of total) Inadequate training/competence (5.2% of total) Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,, hours worked. OGP v

8 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 211 fatal incidents percent of total 211 incidents No appropriate rule 2% Supplemental rules 54% Core rules 26% In February 212, OGP released a set of life-saving rules (OGP Life-Saving Rules, OGP report 459), intended for use by the oil & gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities. Each OGP Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple and consistent communication regarding risks in the workplace. These Rules were developed by using the fatal incidents and high potential events data provided from the 1991 to 21 Safety performance indicators reports to identify the events and activities that most commonly result in fatal incidents. The Life Saving Rules are split into 8 core rules and 1 supplemental rules. Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions for 211 data has shown that 8% of the fatal incidents reported are covered by the OGP Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption of this system. Health HPI self-assessment returns 211 Average from 17 participating companies Health Reporting Public Health/ Promotion Health Impact Assessment Health Risk Assessment Fitness for Task/Surveillance Industrial Hygiene Management of Ill-Health Medical Emergency Management Level 1 Process under development Level 2 Process in place but not fully implemented and embedded Level 3 Process in place and implemented. System functioning; system procedures documented and results being measured Level 4 Process in place and implemented. System sustained and supported by an on-going improvement process Members of the OGP/IPIECA Health Committee piloted a set of 8 leading indicators of health performance within their companies during September 28, 29 and tools were used: the first indicated the extent of management of the 8 areas across each participating company globally; the second allowed for in-depth analysis at site and corporate level. The tools were enhanced in response to feedback from OGP/IPIECA member companies and final versions of both tools were used during September 211 to gauge health performance across the participating OGP/IPIECA member companies. 17 companies took part and many of these had participated in the 28 pilot. The results are displayed as both radar plots and tables which are colour coded as heat-maps. Individual companies have used earlier years results to identify gaps in their own health management systems so it is pleasing to note that mean values for each health area have improved over the 4 years. The health indicators report illustrates the final versions of both tools, actual anonymous results for 211, trends over time and the potential benefits to health management in the industry. vi OGP

9 Safety performance indicators 211 data Preface The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, OGP, has been collecting safety incident data from member companies globally since The data collected are entered into the OGP safety database, which is the largest database of safety performance in the E&P industry. The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the global safety performance of the contributing OGP member companies, each year. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by OGP membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance. The OGP incident reporting system covers worldwide exploration and production (E&P) operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies and their contractor employees. The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, number of lost work day cases and number of lost work days, lost time injury frequency, number of restricted duty case and restricted duty days, number of medical treatment cases and total recordable injury rate. The report presents contributing OGP members global results for these indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix C). Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. These data are available to OGP members in editable format in the members area of the OGP website. The tables are organised according to the section in the report where the chart appears. In 27 the combined Health Committee of OGP and IPIECA published Health Performance Indicators a guide for the oil and gas industry. Text within this was used to develop two tools to assess health leading performance indicators within individual companies and to compare performance between different parts of a company and between companies and the industry as a whole. Both tools were used in 211 to gauge health performance of IPIECA member companies; the results have been published in the Health report. In 21, safety data collection was initiated to capture causal factors associated with fatal incidents and high potential events. The data reported for 21 and 211 is presented in section 2.11 of this report. The full source data is available to OGP members in editable format in the members area of the OGP web-site. The main changes to the 211 performance indicators are: The metric that combined Restricted Work Day Case + Lost Time Injury frequency is no longer reported Fatal incident and high potential event descriptions previously included in this report as appendixes C and D are now available for download on the OGP Safety Zone website, Inclusion of health leading performance indicator data The addition of a free standing summary These changes reflect the Safety Data Sub-Committee s aim to improve the reliability of the data and its interpretation. OGP vii

10 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers viii OGP

11 Safety performance indicators 211 data 1 Summary The OGP safety performance indicators report summarises the safety performance of contributing OGP member companies for 211. The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark the safety performance of the industry are: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate and lost time injury frequency. Third party fatalities are not included in this report. 1.1 General The safety performance of contributing OGP member companies in 211 is based on the analysis of 3,456 million work hours of data, 1% more than were reported in 21. Submissions were made by 45 of the 59 operating company OGP members (42 reported in 21). All but one reported statistics for their contractors. The data reported cover operations in 98 countries. 78% of the hours reported were associated with onshore activities, 22% with offshore activities. Of the 45 companies, 41 had contributed data in 21. Since these 41 accounted for 99% of the database in 211, comparison of the year 211 results with those of 21 is legitimate and statistically meaningful. 4 of the companies submitting 211 data had also provided data in of the companies contributed 9% of the hours. 6 companies between them covered 5% of the hours, and the largest contributor accounted for 11%. 22% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel and 78% were related to contractors. Hours worked millions [data page B-2] workhours contractor 5 workhours company OGP 1-1

12 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.2 Fatalities Fatality categories, 211 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [data page B-3] Water related, drowning 8% Struck by 18% Other 12% Pressure release 3% Explosion/burn 6% Falls from height 9% Exposure electrical 1% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Fatality activities, 211 % fatalities associated with each activity [data page B-3] Transport - land 23% Transport - water, including marine activity 5% Assault or violent act 8% Caught in, under or between 25% Confined space 8% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 17% Diving, subsea, ROV 3% Against the background of a 1% increase in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has decreased from 94 in 21 to 65 fatalities which occurred in 5 seperate incidents in 211. The resulting Fatal Accident Rate (1.88) is 32% lower than last year s figure. The company and contractor FAR are 1.33 and 2.3 respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 1.94 and 1.67 respectively. The reporting categories are divided into activity and category. The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the OGP member companies is Transport land with 15 fatalities in 11 separate incidents. These included a Pakistan assault or violent act incident involving the ambush of a convoy in which 5 contractor employees and 1 third party lost their lives. There were 11 fatal incidents reported in the activity Construction, Commissioning, Decommissioning which resulted in 11 fatalities. With regard to the incident category, excluding those reported as Other (which included the two air transport incidents), the largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 211 (25%) were categorised as Caught in, under or between (1% in 21). Excluding those categorised as Other, incidents that were the result of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects (18%) were the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics (21% in 21). Similar to last year, 9% of the fatalities were the result of Falls from height (6% in 21) and 8% of the fatalities were categorised as Confined space (1% in 21). Transport - air 11% Seismic/survey operations 6% Production operations 8% Drilling, workover, well services 6% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 4% Maintenance, inspection, testing 17% 1-2 OGP

13 Safety performance indicators 211 data Fatal accident rate per 1 million hours worked [data page B-2] The Fatal Accident Rates for Asia/Australasia (3.3) is high compared with a global average of 1.9. This is mainly due to three single fatal incidents with multiple fatalities in the region (3 incidents resulted in 1 fatalities). 8 6 Overall Contractor Company The FIR is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, the FIR will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and FIR gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost. Overall the fatal incident rate has decreased by 15% compared with last year and is the lowest on record to date. Fatal incident rate company & contractor per 1 million hours worked [data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company OGP 1-3

14 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.3 Total recordable injuries Total recordable injury rate company & contractor per million hours worked [data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.76 injuries per million hours worked (1.68 in 21). This is a 5% increase compared with 21 with 344 more injuries reported than in 21. The region that showed the largest increase in TRIR was South (12.9%); an increase in TRIR was also seen in Asia/Australasia (11.%) and North (9.1%). A reduction in TRIR from 21 to 211 was shown in the Middle East (25.6%), Africa (14.8%), the FSU (1.1%) and Europe (8.5%). The North work hours increased by 36% compared with OGP

15 Safety performance indicators 211 data 1.4 Lost time injuries Lost time injury frequency company & contractor per million hours worked [data page B-3] The overall Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) increased from.42 in 21 to.43 in 211. This represents an increase of 2% compared with 21 and 5 more lost time injuries. This increase is similar in both company and contractor performance. The company and contractor LTIF both show a 2% increase compared with 21. Offshore LTIF has also shown an increase (19%), while onshore the LTIF continues to fall and is the lowest on record to date. There were 1,415 reported injuries resulting in at least one day off work; 1,16 incidents were contractor related and 39 were company related. This equates to an average of 27 such injuries every week of the year. Approximately 272 work-years (assuming 22 working days per year) are estimated to have been lost by reporting companies and their contractors as a result of injuries. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has increased (1,336 in 21), the average time away from work has reduced by 4%. Offshore injuries resulted in a 17% higher number of lost work days than onshore. The severity of lost work day cases is the highest in South compared with the other regions, with 71.6 days lost per LWDC in 211. The average days lost per LWDC for South is 55% greater than the average for the region for the previous 5-year period (46.2) The lost work day case category was provided for all of the Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 1% of the cases were categorised as Other. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (357 cases accounting for 25% of the total; 21 results showed 347 cases accounting for 26% of the total). Caught in, under or between and Slips and Trips (at the same height) accounted for 19% and 17% respectively of the total reported cases. 21 results showed 17% for both categories. Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1,415 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 1% of the cases were reported as Unspecified-other. In 21, 9% were reported as Unspecified-other Lost Work Day Cases by category [data page B-14] Water related, drowning.5% Struck by 25% Other 1% Slips and trips (at same height) 17% Transport - water, including marine activity 5% Transport - land 5% Transport - air 1% Seismic/survey operations 1% Unspecified - other 1% Assault or violent act.4% Lost Work Day Cases by activity [data page B-4] 29 Overall Contractor Company 21 Caught in, under or between 19% Explosion or burns 3% Exposure electrical 2% Exposure noise, pressure, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Falls from height 9% Overexertion, strain 7% Pressure release 1% 211 Confined space.4% Cut, puncture, scrape 3% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9% Diving, subsea, ROV.8% Drilling, workover, well services 22% Production operations 16% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14% OGP 1-5

16 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1-6 OGP

17 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2 Overall results In this section the primary indicators used to measure contributing OGP member companies safety performance are: the number and nature of fatalities, total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incident rate (FIR) and lost time injury frequency (LTIF). Third party incidents are not included in this report. 2.1 Fatalities Fatalities Onshore 211 (21) Offshore 211 (21) Total (21) Company 9 (22) 1 (1) 1 (23) Contractor 43 (44) 12 (27) 55 (71) Total 52 (66) 13 (28) 65 (94) Company/contractor Fatalities 65 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 211. This is 29 fewer than were reported in 21 and 34 fewer than in 29. In 21 there were 21 fatalities as a result of a single air transport incident and 11 fatalities as a result of a single fire & explosion incident. The 65 fatalities occurred in 5 separate incidents. There were five incidents that involved more than two fatalities. These were: êêa Pakistan incident involving the ambush of a convoy, in which 6 people (including one third-party individual) lost their lives. êêa fire & explosion onshore in the UAE in which 4 people lost their lives when their vehicle caught fire after crossing a pool of leaking oil. êêa helicopter crash in Brazil in which 4 people lost their lives after the helicopter crashed into the sea. êêan incident in Indonesia where 3 people died after attempting to save a colleague who had fallen unconcious after entering a tank with a low oxygen content. êêa further helicopter crash in Myanmar in which 3 people drowned when the helicopter crashed into the sea. OGP 2-1

18 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) 211 (21) FAR Relative to 21 FAR Company 1.33 (3.17) 58% lower Contractor 2.3 (2.64) 23% lower Overall 1.88 (2.76) 32% lower Onshore 1.94 (2.62) 26% lower Offshore 1.67 (3.16) 47% lower Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. Fatal accident rate company & contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 8 6 Overall Contractor Company In 211 there were 1 company related fatalities (23 in 21) as a result of 1 separate incidents. In 211 there were 55 contractor related fatalities (71 in 21). êêfive of the contractor fatalities were as a result of a single incident in Pakistan in which their convoy was ambushed by unknown attackers. 4 êêseven of the contractor fatalities were as a result of two separate incidents in Brazil and Myanmar in which the helicopters crashed into the sea. êêfive of the contractor fatalities were as a result of two separate incidents involving fire & explosions in UAE and Russia. 2 êêthree of the contractor fatalities were the result of a single incident in Indonesia after they entered a tank with low oxygen content to rescue an unconscious colleague Fatal accident rate onshore & offshore per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation over the 1 year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable to single transportation incidents involving high numbers of fatalities. 8 Overall Offshore Onshore OGP

19 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity Seven of the 8 fatalities categorised as Other were as a result of 2 air transport incidents. (25% were categorised as Other in 21 and were fatal air transport incidents). Excluding those categorised as Other, the largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 211 were categorised as Caught in, under or between (28%) (13% in 21). êê5 of the 15 fatalities in 211 involved bulldozers, 1 involved a front end loader and 1 involved a road grader. Excluding those categorised as Other, the second greatest proportion of the fatalities reported in 211 were the result of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects (21%) (28% in 21). êêtwo fatalities involved separate tree felling incidents in seismic operations êêtwo fatalities involved separate head-on motor vehicle crashes êêone fatality involved a bulldozer An increase is seen in the number of deaths resulting from land transport incidents (15 fatalities) compared to previous years (8 fatalities in 21, 1 in 29). êê5 fatalities occurred in one assault and violent act incident êê9 fatalities were associated with 9 separate fatal incidents A reduction is seen in the number of deaths resulting from the activity Drilling, Workover, Well Services (4 fatalities) compared to previous years (21 fatalities in 21, 13 in 29). 44 of the fatal incidents involved one fatality. Incidents which involved 2 or more fatalities were reported under the categories: êêother (including air transport) (2 incidents). êêexplosions or burns (2 incidents). êêassault and violent act (1 incident). êêconfined space (2 incidents). There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories: êêcut, Puncture, Scrape. êêexposure Noise, Chemical, Biological, Vibration. êêoverexertion, Strain. êêslips, Trips, Falls (at same height). Fatalities by incident category and activity, 211 Fatalities by activity, 211 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Transport - land 23% Transport - air 11% Fatalities by category, 211 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Water related, drowning 8% Struck by 18% Transport - water, including marine activity 5% Seismic/survey operations 6% Production operations 8% Other 12% Assault or violent act Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 17% Diving, subsea, ROV 3% Drilling, workover, well services 6% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 4% Maintenance, inspection, testing 17% Assault or violent act 8% Caught in, under or between 25% Confined space 8% Pressure release 3% Explosion/burn 6% Falls from height 9% Exposure electrical 1% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Caught in, under or between Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 2 2 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Production operations Seismic/survey operations Transport air 7 7 Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Total Confined space Explosion or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Pressure release Struck by Water related, drowning Other Total OGP 2-3

20 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.4 Fatal incident rate (FIR) 211 (21) FIR Relative to 21 FIR Company.8 (1.1) 27% lower Contractor 1.63 (1.86) 12% lower Overall 1.45 (1.7) 15% lower Onshore 1.57 (1.7) 8% lower Fatal incident rate (FIR) The number of fatal incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours. Offshore 1.3 (1.69) 39% lower Fatal incident rate company & contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company The FIR is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities only, the FIR will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and FIR gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost. Overall the Fatal Incident Rate has decreased by 15% compared with last year and is the lowest on record (5 fatal incidents in 211, 58 fatal incidents in 21). The offshore Fatal Incident Rate reduced by 39% compared with 21 results. This is an actual reduction of 15 fatal incidents from Fatal incident rate onshore & offshore per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Offshore Onshore OGP

21 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Total recordable injury rate company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company 211 (21) TRIR Relative to 21 TRIR Company 1.32 (1.19) 11% higher Contractor 1.88 (1.81) 4% higher Overall 1.76 (1.68) 5% higher Onshore 1.45 (1.41) 3% higher Offshore 2.84 (2.45) 16% higher 3 2 Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,428 million hours, 99% of the database (see Appendix A). An increase can be seen in 211 in all TRIR results Total recordable injury rate onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Offshore Onshore Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. OGP 2-5

22 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 211 (21) LTIF Relative to 21 LTIF Company.42 (.41) 2% higher Contractor.43 (.42) 2% higher Overall.43 (.42) 2% higher Onshore.34 (.35) 3% lower Offshore.74 (.62) 19% higher Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,, hours worked. Lost time injury frequency company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Lost time injury frequency onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Overall Contractor Company Overall Offshore Onshore The overall LTIF increased by 2% from.42 in 21 to.43 in 211. The offshore LTIF increased by 19% compared with 21. The incident categories associated with the increase in offshore LTIF are Caught in, under or between, Falls from height and Overexertion, strain ; the activities associated with the increase are Production operations and Transport water, including marine activity. There were 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 27 injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of the year. Approximately 272 work-years are estimated to have been lost by reporting companies and their contractors (assuming 22 working days per year) as a result of injuries. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has increased (1,366 in 21), the average time away from work has reduced by 4%. See Section 2.8 for further information on Lost Work Day Case severity OGP

23 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.7 Lost work day cases by category and activity Lost Work Day Cases by category Number % Assault or violent act 6.4 Caught in, under or between Confined space 5.4 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 1.7 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning 7.5 Other Total 1,415 Of the 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 1,16 incidents were contractor related and 39 were company related. The Lost Work Day Case category was provided for all of the lost work day cases reported, although 1% of the cases were categorised as Other. The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting categories for 211. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (357 cases accounting for 25% of LWDCs), (21 results showed 347 cases accounting for 26%). Caught in, under or between and Slips and trips (at the same height) accounted for 19% and 17% respectively of the total reported cases. (21 results showed 17% for both categories). In comparison with 21, the 211 results were very similar; no category differed by more than 2%. Lost Work Day Cases by category % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Water related, drowning.5% Struck by 25% Other 1% Slips and trips (at same height) 17% Assault or violent act.4% Caught in, under or between 19% Explosion or burns 3% Exposure electrical 2% Exposure noise, pressure, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Falls from height 9% Overexertion, strain 7% Pressure release 1% Confined space.4% Cut, puncture, scrape 3% Lost Work Day Case (LWDC) A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included. OGP 2-7

24 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost Work Day Cases by activity Number % Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 12.8 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Total 1,415 Lost Work Day Cases by activity % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Transport - water, including marine activity 5% Transport - land 5% Transport - air 1% Seismic/survey operations 1% Production operations 16% Unspecified - other 1% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9% Diving, subsea, ROV.8% Drilling, workover, well services 22% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14% Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1,415 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 1% of the cases were reported as Unspecified-other. In 21, 9% were reported as Unspecified-other. In comparison with 21 data only two activities increased by over 2% of the total: Production operations, increased by 5% from 21 to 211 Lifting, rigging, crane and deck operations increased by 3% from 21 to OGP

25 Safety performance indicators 211 data Lost Work Day Cases by category company & contractor Company Contractor Assault or violent act 3 3 Caught in, under or between Confined space 1 4 Cut, puncture, scrape 9 37 Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 7 18 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 5 24 Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 2 8 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning 7 Other Total 39 1,16 Of the 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 39 were company related and 1,16 incidents were contractor related. Lost Work Day Cases by category Company [Data page B-4] Struck by 2% Other 18% Assault or violent act 1% Caught in, under or between 6% Confined space.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 3% Explosion or burns 4% Exposure electrical 2% Overexertion, strain 8% Pressure release 1% Slips and trips (at same height) 28% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Falls from height 7% Lost Work Day Cases by category Contractor [Data page B-4] Water related, drowning.6% Struck by 27% Other 8% Assault or violent act.3% Caught in, under or between 23% Confined space.4% Cut, puncture, scrape 3% Explosion or burns 3% Exposure electrical 1.6% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 2% Slips and trips Falls from height 1% (at same height) 14% Overexertion, strain 6% Pressure release 1% OGP 2-9

26 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost Work Day Cases by category onshore & offshore Onshore Offshore Assault or violent act 5 1 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4 1 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 2 5 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 7 3 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning 1 6 Other Total Lost Work Day Cases by category Onshore [Data page B-4] Other 13% Assault or violent act 1% Caught in, under or between 16% Of the 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 858 incidents were related to onshore activity and 557 were related to offshore activity. Struck by 27% Slips and trips (at same height) 18% Confined space.5% Cut, puncture, scrape 3% Explosion or burns 4% Exposure electrical 2% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1% Falls from height 9% Overexertion, strain 5% Pressure release 1% Lost Work Day Cases by category Offshore [Data page B-4] Other 6% Assault or violent act.2% Water related, drowning 1% Struck by 23% Caught in, under or between 24% Slips and trips (at same height) 15% Pressure release.5% Overexertion, strain 1% Explosion or burns 2% Exposure electrical 1% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 3% Falls from height 1% Confined space.2% Cut, puncture, scrape 4% 2-1 OGP

27 Safety performance indicators 211 data Lost Work Day Cases by activity company & contractor Company Contractor Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 12 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 3 51 Production operations Seismic/survey operations 3 16 Transport air 4 14 Transport land 17 5 Transport water, including marine activity 4 75 Unspecified other Total 39 1,16 Of the 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 39 were company related and 1,16 incidents were contractor related. Lost Work Day Cases by activity Company [Data page B-4] Transport - water, including marine activity 1% Transport - land 6% Transport - air 1% Seismic/survey operations 1% Unspecified - other 19% Production operations 33% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 2% Drilling, workover, well services 8% Lifting, crane, riggin, deck operations 6% Maintenance, inspection, testing 13% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 1% Lost Work Day Cases by activity Contractor [Data page B-4] Unspecified - other 8% Transport - water, including marine activity 7% Transport - land 4% Transport - air 1% Seismic/survey operations 1% Production operations 11% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 5% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 12% Diving, subsea, ROV 1% Drilling, workover, well services 25% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11% OGP 2-11

28 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost Work Day Cases by activity onshore & offshore Onshore Offshore Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 84 5 Diving, subsea, ROV 12 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 16 3 Transport air 8 1 Transport land 66 1 Transport water, including marine activity 1 69 Unspecified other Total Lost Work Day Cases by activity Onshore [Data page B-4] Transport - water, including marine activity 1% Transport - land 8% Transport - air 1% Seismic/survey operations 2% Unspecified - other 14% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 1% Drilling, workover, well services 24% Of the 1,415 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 858 incidents were onshore related and 557 were offshore related. Production operations 15% Lifting, crane, rigging, Office, warehouse, deck operations 8% accommodation, catering 7% Maintenance, inspection, testing 1% Lost Work Day Cases by activity Offshore [Data page B-4] Unspecified - other 5% Transport - water, including marine activity 12% Transport - land.2% Transport - air 2% Seismic/survey operations 1% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9% Diving, subsea, ROV 2% Drilling, workover, well services 17% Production operations 17% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 4% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 12% Maintenance, inspection, testing 19% 2-12 OGP

29 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.8 Severity of lost work day cases 211 (21) severity Relative to 21 severity Relative to average severity Company 41.6 (35.43) 16% higher 38% higher Contractor (46.2) 7% lower 24% higher Overall (43.9) 4% lower 27% higher Onshore (39.39) 1% higher 28% higher Offshore (52.56) 12% lower 18% higher Severity of LWDC company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4] Overall Contractor Company 3 OGP member companies reported 42,172 days of work lost through injuries. This equates to around 272 workyears of activity. 2 The number of days lost was reported for 79% of the lost work day cases. 1 The difference between company and contractor severity levels is 4%. The offshore LWDC severity is 17% higher than onshore Severity of LWDC onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4] Overall Offshore Onshore Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case. OGP 2-13

30 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Severity of LWDC company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4] Company These figures show the average number of days lost per LWDC in 211 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. An increase is shown in LWDC severity in all areas of activity compared with the previous 5 year period, an increase of 27% overall. Contractor Overall Severity of LWDC onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-4] Onshore 211 Offshore Overall OGP

31 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases 211 (21) severity Relative to 21 severity Relative to severity Company (14.72) 12% lower 12% lower Contractor 1.17 (13.78) 26% lower 18% lower Overall 1.4 (13.88) 25% lower 17% lower Onshore (13.59) 14% lower 2% higher Offshore 8.55 (14.35) 4% lower 42% lower Severity of restricted work day cases company & contractor average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5] Overall Contractor Company A total of 7,996 days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted work day cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed. This compares with 45,835 days lost (LWDC days) on a 34% larger database. The number of days lost overall has fallen by 17% compared with the previous 5-year period and by 25% compared with 21 results. The average number of days lost to restricted work per case decreased compared with the previous 5-year period, most noticeably in offshore operations (42%). The number of days lost among contractor staff has fallen by 18% compared with the previous 5-year period and by 26% compared with the 21 results Severity of restricted work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-5] Overall Offshore Onshore Severity of restricted work day cases The average number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case. Restricted work day case days are not reported by all companies. The database for this analysis is therefore reduced to 2,41 million work hours, 59% of all reported hours. OGP 2-15

32 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Severity of restriced work day cases company & contractor average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5] Company These figures show the average number of days lost per RWDC in 211 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. A reduction is shown in RWDC severity in all areas of activity compared with the previous 5-year period with the exception of onshore activities where it has risen by 2%. The overall average is 42% lower than the average for the previous 5-year period. Contractor 211 Overall Severity of restriced work day cases onshore & offshore average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-5] Onshore 211 Offshore Overall OGP

33 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.1 Incident triangles In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases. Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to lost time injuries :1 4: :1 4: :1 4: :1 4:1 211 incident triangles Overall 1 fatality 22 lost time injuries 93 recordable injuries Companies 1 fatality 31 lost time injuries 97 recordable injuries 21 incident triangles Contractors 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 92 recordable injuries Overall 1 fatality 15 lost time injuries 6 recordable injuries Companies 12 1 fatality 37 recordable injuries Contractors lost time injuries 1 fatality 16 lost time injuries 68 recordable injuries Lost time injuries Lost work day cases and fatalities Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatal incidents (LTI/fatal incidents) Ratio of total recordable injuries to lost time injuries The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatal incidents (recordable injuries/ fatal incidents) Recordable injuries Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set. OGP 2-17

34 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers These data challenge the concept that the ratio between fatalities, lost time injuries and recordable injuries show similar relationships for different incident categories and activities. In some incident categories such as confined space, assault or violent act, water related, drowning, the ratio will be higher. Certain activities and categories of incident also more commonly result in multiple fatalities, such as Transport air, Confined space and Explosion or burns. The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries as a precursor to fatalities. In some incident categories such as confined space, assault or violent act and water related, drowning, the ratio will be higher as shown in the tables below. Category Fatalities LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Ratio, fatalities:ltis Assault or violent act :1 Caught in, under or between :1 Confined space 5 1 2:1 Cut, puncture, scrape 46 n/a Explosion or burns :1 Exposure electrical :1 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1 3 3:1 Falls from height :1 Overexertion, strain 97 n/a Pressure release :1 Slips and trips (at same height) 241 n/a Struck by :1 Water related, drowning :1 Other :1 Activity Fatalities LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Ratio, fatalities:ltis Construction, commissioning, decommissioning :1 Diving, subsea, ROV :1 Drilling, workover, well services :1 Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations :1 Maintenance, inspection, testing :1 Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 81 n/a Production operations :1 Seismic/survey operations :1 Transport air :1 Transport land :1 Transport water, including marine activity :1 Unspecified other 145 n/a 2-18 OGP

35 Safety performance indicators 211 data 2.11 Causal factors analysis The allocation of causal factors to fatal incidents and high potential events was requested for the 211 data reported to OGP. This request was first made in 21, therefore, a comparison of two years of data is possible. A list of causal factors and their descriptions were supplied to those providing data for this document to ensure standardised responses. The causal factors list is divided into two sections: People (acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. Process (conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organisational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. OGP 2-19

36 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fatal Incident Causal Factors 42 of the 5 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors (51 of 58 in 21) 23 causal factors were assigned for the 5 fatal incidents êê81 were People (Aacts) (19 in 21) êê122 were Process (conditions) (133 in 21) Between 1 and 12 causal factors were assigned per incident (1 to 18 in 21) The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 1 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 211 compared to 21; eight of the ten were the same for both years. Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company. Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 15 3 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 11 7 Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence 1 13 Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication 9 12 People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) 9 12 People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) 9 16 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard 8 7 Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures 8 1 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 7 1 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 7 5 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly 6 1 People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/ products 6 9 Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing 6 4 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 6 5 Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change 5 1 Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/products 5 4 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature 5 2 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 5 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured 4 6 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems 4 5 People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) 4 12 Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture 4 9 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 4 2 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems 2 2 People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed 2 People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading 2 8 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices 2 2 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence 1 6 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue 1 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 1 1 Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events 1 3 People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 3 People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation OGP

37 Safety performance indicators 211 data High Potential Event Causal Factors 69 of the 76 high potential incidents were assigned causal factors (97 of 98 in 21) 317 causal factors were assigned for the 76 high potential events (4 in 21) êê131 were People (Acts) (134 in 21) êê186 were Process (Conditions) (266 in 21) Between 1 and 19 causal factors were assigned per event (1 to 11 in 21) The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 1 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 211 compared to 21, seven of the ten were the same for both years. Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown for 21, as two of the causal factors were each assigned 15 times. Additional information on high potential events reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: The information provided includes a narrative description of the event, the corrective actions and recommendations, and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company. Causal Factors assigned for high potential events Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures 2 37 Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/ products 17 9 People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard 13 9 Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/products People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems 12 2 Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading 9 5 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured 9 3 Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture 9 15 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 9 1 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 8 15 People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) 6 9 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 5 6 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue 4 4 People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) 3 9 People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed 3 3 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices 3 1 People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly 3 6 People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation 3 6 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems 3 1 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 3 3 Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events 2 4 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 2 5 Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature 2 People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 1 3 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence 1 Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 1 3 OGP 2-21

38 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The following seven causal factors were common to the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events in 211. Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication 2.12 OGP Life-Saving Rules OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 211 fatal incidents percent of total 211 incidents No appropriate rule 2% Supplemental rules 54% Core rules 26% OGP recently released a set of life-saving rules (OGP Life- Saving Rules, OGP report 459), intended for use by the oil & gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities. Each OGP Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple and consistent communication regarding risks in the workplace. These Rules were developed by using the fatal incidents and high potential events data provided from the 1991 to 21 Safety performance indicators to clearly identify the events and activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear instructions on how to avoid them. These are split into 8 core rules and 1 supplemental rules. Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions for 211 data has shown that 8% of the fatal incidents reported are covered by the OGP Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption of this system OGP

39 Safety performance indicators 211 data 3 Results by region In this section the safety performance of the contributing OGP members is presented for regions and individual countries within those regions. A list of countries from which companies have reported information is provided in Appendix G, which also shows the division of countries into regions. Regions and countries throughout the Safety performance indicators are grouped in the same geographic regions as have been historically used in this report so as to ensure consistency; 3.1 Fatalities Fatalities 211 (21) FAR 211 (21) Fatal incidents 211 (21) FIR 211 (21) Africa 7 (19) 1.25 (3.38) 7 (15) 1.25 (2.67) Asia/Australasia 2 (3) 3.28 (4.14) 12 (1) 1.97 (1.38) Europe 3 (3).87 (.97) 3 (2).87 (.65) FSU 7 (1) 1.59 (2.17) 6 (1) 1.37 (2.17) Middle East 12 (11) 1.74 (1.63) 9 (11) 1.3 (1.63) North 6 (15) 1.5 (5.8) 6 (5) 1.5 (1.69) South 1 (6) 2.42 (1.57) 7 (5) 1.7 (1.31) The table shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities in each of the 7 regions into which the data are partitioned. Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. OGP 3-1

40 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3.2 Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) Fatal Accident Rate per 1 million hours worked Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South Overall Further analysis of the Fatal Accident Rate is presented in Section 3.5 where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. 1 Africa Asia/ Europe Australasia FSU Middle East North South All regions FAR The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. 3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Total recordable injury rate per million hours worked Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South Overall Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3,428 million hours, almost 1% of the database (see Appendix A). Africa Asia/ Europe Australasia FSU Middle East North South Overall Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. 3-2 OGP

41 Safety performance indicators 211 data 3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South Overall Lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data from B-6] Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in Section 3.5 where 5-year rolling averages of LTIF are presented for each of the regions..6.3 Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost workday cases per 1,, hours worked).. Africa Asia/ Europe Australasia FSU Middle East North South Overall OGP 3-3

42 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages The five year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five year rolling average for 211 is calculated by: (Number of injuries in ) (Total work hours in ) The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 212 will calculate from In order to smooth out variability in the annual values of the regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, 5-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends. FAR 5-year rolling average per 1 million hours worked [Data from B-6] 8 Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU TRIR 5-year rolling average per million hours worked [Data from B-6] Middle East North South All regions 211 The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages for each of the seven regions, and includes the all regions curve. The increase in the North FAR in 21 can be in part attributed to the effect of a fire and explosion offshore in the USA in which 11 individuals lost their lives. The increase in the Asia/Australsia FAR in 21 can in part be attributed to the effect of a fatal air-transport incident in Pakistan in which 21 individuals lost their lives. The continued increase in the Asia/Australasia FAR in 211 can in part be attributed to three fatal incidents in the region which resulted in multiple fatalities: Pakistan assault or violent act which resulted in 5 fatalities Myanmar transport air which resulted in 3 fatalities Indonesia confined space which resulted in 2 fatalities The increase in Europe FAR in 29 can in part be atributed to the effect of a fatal air-transport incident in the UK in which 14 contractor employees and 2 air crew lost their lives. LTIF 5-year rolling average per million hours worked [Data from B-7] 8 Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU 6 Middle East North South All regions Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South All regions OGP

43 Safety performance indicators 211 data 3.6 Severity of lost work day cases LWDC severity Relative to average LWDC severity Africa % higher Asia/Australasia % higher Europe % higher FSU % higher Middle East % lower North % lower South % higher Overall % higher Severity of LWDC Average days lost per LWDC [Data from B-7] average 211 average 42.3 The number of days lost was reported for 79% of lost work day cases. The severity of lost work day cases is the highest in the South n region compared with the other regions, with 72 days lost per LWDC in 211. The South n average has risen by 55% compared with a regional average of 46.2 days lost per LWDC for the previous 5-year period Africa Asia/ Australia Europe FSU Middle East North South Lost Work Day Case (LWDC) A Lost Work Day Case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included. Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case. 3.7 Individual country performance The safety performance reported by participating OGP member companies of individual countries is presented in terms of the lost time injury frequency of companies jointly with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies, performance is only published for those countries for which at least 2 companies have reported statistics. Countries with less than 5, reported hours worked are excluded, since results for such small populations of hours would be unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages include data from all countries regardless of work hours or number of contributing companies. Of the 98 countries from which data have been reported, 2 are excluded by these constraints. The chart of relative performance for the remaining 78 countries compares the 211 performance with that of 21 and 29. The majority of countries in Asia/Australasia, FSU and the Middle East achieved an LTIF equal to or lower than the overall average LTIF (.43). The majority of countries in Europe, North and South show an LTIF higher than the global average. For comparison, the 5-year average FAR is shown for each of the regions. There appears to be little if any correlation between these values and the regional average LTIF values. OGP 3-5

44 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost time injury frequency companies with contractors per million hours worked [Data from B-8] 3-6 OGP