Feasibility to Closeout, the Corps Planning Process September 27, 2016
|
|
|
- Bertram Bruce
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Feasibility to Closeout, the Corps Planning Process September 27, 2016 Marshall Plumley MVR Chief, Rock Island Plan Formulation Section Mississippi Valley Rock Island District (MVR) Mississippi Valley St. Louis District (MVS) Mississippi Valley St. Paul District (MVP) US Army Corps of Engineers
2 2
3 Overview HREP Planning Process Project Initiation Feasibility Phase Feasibility Report Review and Approval Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Phase (Plans & Specification) Project Implementation and Construction Operations & Maintenance (OMRR&R) Sponsor Input and Decision Points 3
4 HREP Planning Process HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 4
5 HREP Planning Process Project Initiation HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 5
6 Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program (UMRR), USACE A - Team UMRR- CC HPSF* Teams UMRR Program Flow Chart 2015 Long Term Resource Monitoring, USACE Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, USACE USGS-Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center MVP MVR MVS Lake City Field Station, MN DNR La Crosse Field Station, WI DNR Nat l Great Rivers Research & Education Center, INHS Illinois River Biological Station, INHS River Teams; RRF & FWWG River Teams; RRCT, FWIC & IRWG River Teams; RRAT-Exec., IRWG & RRAT-T Bellevue Field Station, IA DNR Open River & Wetlands Field Station, MDC * HPSF Teams = HREP Planning and Sequencing Framework Teams
7 Project Initiation Project Management Plan Agreement by all parties on how to conduct the feasibility study- the scope of work for the study and its review Basis for managing tasks, costs and schedules Should reflect coordination with sponsor, resource agencies, and stakeholders Review Plan 7
8 HREP Planning Process Feasibility Phase HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 8
9 Feasibility Phase Feasibility Study & Report Formulate and evaluate an array of alternative plans and make a recommendation for action or inaction Document analyses and findings Accompanied by a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document Describe the recommended plan Feasibility Level of Detail 35% Environmental outputs Environmental and social impacts Costs Residual risk 9
10 Corps Six-step Planning Process Identify problems and opportunities Inventory and forecast conditions Formulate alternative plans Evaluate alterative plans Compare alternative plans Select a plan 10
11 Keithsburg Division Problems in the area include; limited water management capability, reduced habitat due to sedimentation, limited forest diversity, bluegreen algae blooms, abundance of duckweed, etc. Culvert Eutrophication Stressed bottomland hardwood Abandoned, outdated pump station Landslide at spillway 11
12 Keithsburg Division Feasibility phase underway Plan Formulation Meeting/NEPA Scoping Future Without Project (Period of Analysis) Formulate Goals/Objectives Baseline Monitoring Preliminary Engineering Identify Potential Project Features Evaluate Feasible Project Features Environmental Benefits Analysis Cultural Resources Environmental Impact Cost Estimating Real Estate Requirements CE/ICA Analysis Tentatively Selected Plan Sponsor Support Letter 12
13 Keithsburg Division Feasibility phase underway Risk and Uncertainty Monitoring & Adaptive Management Section 401/404 Evaluation Draft Coordination Act Report Environmental Assessment Value Engineering Final Cost Estimate 13
14 HREP Planning Process Feasibility Report Review and Approval HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 14
15 Feasibility Report Review and Approval Draft Feasibility Report District Quality Control Review Agency Technical Review Alternative Formulation Briefing (MVD) Public Review & Meetings Final Feasibility Report Report Approval by Mississippi Valley Division Signed FONSI 15
16 HREP Planning Process Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 16
17 Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Phase Memorandum of Agreement Project Partnership Agreement Legally binding document (contract) Executed between USACE and Non-Federal Sponsor(s) Establishes terms of funding and construction of the project Establishes terms of Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) of the project 17
18 Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Phase Plans & Specifications Complete the detailed engineering & technical studies and design needed to efficiently deliver the project recommended in the decision document. Preparation of plans and specifications of first significant Federal construction contract. 18
19 Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Phase Baseline Monitoring Draft Plans & Specifications Agency Technical Review BCOE Final Plans & Specifications and Cost Phase Ends With MOA or PPA Execution 19
20 HREP Planning Process Project Implementation and Construction HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement or Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 20
21 Project Implementation and Advertisement Construction Lands, Easements, Rights of Way and Relocations (LERRD) Acquisition Monitoring During Construction Contract Award Notice to Proceed Construction Project Physically Complete/Final Inspection O&M Manual Monitoring & Adaptive Management (Cost share 10-years) Financial Closeout 21 Each Stage
22 HREP Planning Process Operations & Maintenance (OMRR&R) HREP Step 1: Fact Sheet & Project Management Plan HREP Step 7: Select Recommended Plan HREP Step 14: Approval of the Feasibility Report by Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 2: Identify Problems & Opportunities HREP Step 8: Draft Feasibility Report with HREP Step 15: Negotiate and Execute Memorandum of Agreement of Project Partnership Agreement HREP Step 3: Inventory & Forecast Conditions HREP Step 9: District Quality Control Review HREP Step: 16:Conduct Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (Plans & Specifications) HREP Step 4: Formulate Alternative Plans HREP Step 10: Agency Technical Review HREP Step 17: Contract Advertisement and Bid Opening HREP Step 5: Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans HREP Step 11: Alternative Formulation Briefing with Mississippi Valley Division HREP Step 12: Public Review & Meetings HREP Step 18: Construction, Monitoring & Adaptive Management HREP Step 19: Project Closeout HREP Step 6: Compare Alternative Plans HREP Step 13: : Final Feasibility Report with HREP Step 20: Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation (OMRR&R) & Performance Evaluation Reports (PER s) 22
23 Operations & Maintenance OMRR&R Operations & Maintenance ongoing and periodic activities to support project function Repair occasional activities to fix issues associated with wear and tear on project components Replacement & Rehabilitation infrequent activities required when major project components reach the end of their life-cycle Performance Evaluation Reports Provide yearly inspection reports to the Corps 23
24 Discussion 24
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON, D.C AUG 2339
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON, D.C. 20314-1000 8 1 AUG 2339 CECW-PC MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDERS, MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS SUBJECT: Implementation Guidance
Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tim Kuhn Project Manager Portland District 1 February 2016 Introduction Levee Ready Columbia
USACE Planning 101 Planning Basics for Partners
USACE Planning 101 Planning Basics for Partners Bret Walters (901-544-0777) bret.l.walters@usace.army.mil Conservation Partnering Conference Memphis, TN November 2011 US Army Corps of Engineers Topics
APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS
ER-1105-2-100 Appendix F, Revised xx August 2018 APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Page SECTION I - PROGRAM OVERVIEW Purpose and Applicability.. F-1 F-1 References..
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON-CALL PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2018 Submit proposal to: Tony Williams, Principal Civil Engineer Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, DC APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS
ER-1105-2-100 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, DC 20314-1000 Regulation 31 January 2007 ER 1105-2-100 APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS
DAEN SUBJECT: Little Colorado River at Winslow, Arizona, Flood Risk Management Project
per year. In addition to the above, the Navajo County Flood Control District would be fully responsible for performing the investigation, cleanup, and response of hazardous materials on the project sites.
The Need to Address the True Cost of Long-Term Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement (OMRR&R) of the Flood System
The Need to Address the True Cost of Long-Term Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement (OMRR&R) of the Flood System September 8, 2016 Presented by: Christopher Williams, PE Department
ASBPA PARTNERING COMMITTEE S GUIDANCE ON INCORPORATING SURFING CONCERNS INTO PLANNING AND DESIGN OF FEDERAL SHORE PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION PROJECTS
ASBPA PARTNERING COMMITTEE S GUIDANCE ON INCORPORATING SURFING CONCERNS INTO PLANNING AND DESIGN OF FEDERAL SHORE PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION PROJECTS PURPOSE This document is intended to succinctly outline
DAEN SUBJECT: Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study Report, California
1.33 miles of new setback levee along the Delta Front to eliminate the eastern portions of the Fourteenmile Slough levee in North Stockton. 0.59 miles of height improvements between 1.8 and 2.7 feet on
Presentation for 2014 SAME Commander s Brief
Presentation for 2014 SAME Commander s Brief Mr. Gary Meden Deputy for Programs and Project Management Corps of Engineers Rock Island District October 21, 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island District
DAEN SUBJECT: South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, Santa Clara County, California
opportunities would be significant with the restoration of the tidal marsh areas. Recreational features in the recommended plan include two pedestrian bridges, viewing platforms, and benches. The new levees
Dredged Material Management Plans (DMMPs)
Dredged Material Management Plans (DMMPs) Theodore A. Brown, P.E. SES Chief, Planning and Policy Division Headquarters, USACE 12 February 2014 Planning- Construction- Operations & Maintenance Current Guidance
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers PL 84-99 Levee Inspections and Levee Certification Hank DeHaan Rock Island District March 9, 2011 US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Damage Reduction
Norfolk Flood Risk Management Study
Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons May 18, 2016: The Economic Impacts of Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Hampton Roads Intergovernmental Pilot Project: Meetings 5-18-2016 Norfolk Flood Risk Management
Peer Review Plan. Bastrop Interim Feasibility Study. Lower Colorado River Basin, Texas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District Peer Review Plan Bastrop Interim Feasibility Study Lower Colorado River Basin, Texas September 28, 2007 PEER REVIEW PLAN BASTROP INTERIM FEASIBILITY STUDY
Improving Coordinated Flood Preparedness and Response
Improving Coordinated Flood Preparedness and Response Illinois Silver Jackets Hank DeHaan Rock Island and Saint Louis Districts October 2011 US Army Corps of Engineers Illinois Silver Jackets Program Illinois
Final Draft Feasibility Study And Environmental Assessment APPENDIX F MODEL PROJECT COOPERATION AGREEMENT. November 2008
Final Draft Feasibility Study And Environmental Assessment Prepared by: EMH&T, Inc. 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Tel: (614) 775-4500 Fax: (614) 775-4800 Prepared for: Prime Engineering & Architecture,
RESOLUTION - APPROVING FINAL FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
ITEM 12 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Board of Directors Richard M. Johnson, Executive Director (916) 874-7606 RESOLUTION - APPROVING FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BUDGET OVERVIEW:
UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY
UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT [ EIS ] Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee Rob Newman Director, Trinity River Corridor Project, Fort Worth District 28 April 2014
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C
.t DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20314-1000 REPLY TO A TTENTION OF: CECW-PE (l0-1-7a) 1 3 OCT 199B SUBJECT: Tampa Harbor, Big Bend Channel, Florida THE SECRETARY
REVIEW PLAN USING THE NWD MODEL REVIEW PLAN
REVIEW PLAN USING THE NWD MODEL REVIEW PLAN for Continuing Authorities Program Section 103, 205 and projects directed by guidance to use CAP procedures Alki Seawall Erosion Control Project Seattle, WA
Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
CECW-PA Engineer Regulation 1165-2-122 Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Water Resource Policies and Authorities STUDIES OF HARBOR OR INLAND HARBOR PROJECTS
Upper Mississippi River Basin Association
Upper Mississippi River Basin Association ILLINOIS, IOWA, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, WISCONSIN The Honorable Mitchell McConnell The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Harry Reid The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Fighting the Flood: Current Political, Regulatory and Financial Challenges
Fighting the Flood: Current Political, Regulatory and Financial Challenges for Levee Owners Kansas City, Missouri January 23, 2013 Emerging Policy, Programs and Tools for the Management of Levee Systems
DEPARTMENT OF TH E ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC MAY
DEPARTMENT OF TH E ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20314-1000 MAY 11 2018 The Honorable Bill Shuster Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure United States
National Flood Risk Management Program
National Flood Risk Management Program US Army Corps of Engineers Floodplain Managers Association Sacramento, California July 29, 2010 Judy Soutiere Institute for Water Resources A Shared Responsibility
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE. Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy Introduction The principal rivers of the United States and their tributaries have played
SUBJECT: Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed
DEPARTMENi OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF 'rhe CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON. D.C. 20314-1000 REPLY TO AT1'~NTIQN OF: (lo-1-7a) THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 1. I submit for transmission to Congress my report on East
King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program
Attachment A 2015 Work Plan 10-24-14 King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program The District work program is comprised of three categories: district oversight and policy development, operations,
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM REGIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN FOR DECISION DOCUMENTS
South Atlantic Division CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM REGIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN FOR DECISION DOCUMENTS US Army Corps of Engineers April 2015 1. Overview. This document serves as the South Atlantic
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20310-2600 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF CECW-P (1105-2-10a) 0 2 JUN 2003 THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY 1. I submit for transmission to Congress
Governmental Laws, Rules and Policies, Are They Keeping Up With Restoration Objectives? INTERCOL 9 June 6, 2012
Governmental Laws, Rules and Policies, Are They Keeping Up With Restoration Objectives? INTERCOL 9 June 6, 2012 Kenneth G. Ammon, P.E. Senior Vice President WRScompass Presentation Overview Background
Vocabulary of Flood Risk Management Terms
USACE INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Vocabulary of Flood Risk Management Terms Appendix A Leonard Shabman, Paul Scodari, Douglas Woolley, and Carolyn Kousky May 2014 2014-R-02 This is an appendix to: L.
SECTION Watershed Informed Approach to FY 2016 Budget Development
SECTION 2 This section provides information and guidance regarding three new initiatives by the Civil Works Integration within USACE to make the budget formulation more streamlined, our investments more
U.S. Updates: Climate Change, Maintenance and Investigations
U.S. Updates: Climate Change, Monitoring, Assessment, Maintenance and Investigations Edward d J. Hecker Chief, Office of Homeland Security and Provost Marshal, Directorate of Civil Works June 15, 2010
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20314-1000 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: NOV 1 7 2008 CECW-PB MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Clarification Guidance on the Policy
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street, NW CECW-I Washington, D.C
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC 11-2-211 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street, NW CECW-I Washington, D.C. 20314-1000 Circular No. 11-2-211 29 April 2016 EXPIRES 30 SEPTEMBER 2016 Programs Management EXECUTION
Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps
Presentation to USACE 2012 Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Joint Workshop, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain
DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE NATIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN MODEL
DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE NATIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN MODEL For Section 506, Water Resources Development Act of 2000, as Amended Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration (GLFER)
Gov's Planning Estimates Project Title Rank Fund Project Requests for State Funds
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Water and Soil Resources
[Letter to be printed on official Levee Sponsor letterhead]
![[Letter to be printed on official Levee Sponsor letterhead]](/thumbs/84/89135049.jpg "[Letter to be printed on official Levee Sponsor letterhead]")
[Letter to be printed on official Levee Sponsor letterhead] [Date] COL Joel R. Cross, Commander US Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901 RE: [Levee Sponsor
In-Lieu Fee Program Instrument Outline For Proposed In-Lieu Fee Programs in the States of Kansas and Missouri
In-Lieu Fee Program Instrument Outline For Proposed In-Lieu Fee Programs in the States of Kansas and Missouri The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency joint regulation
Offsetting Impacts to Wetlands and Waters in the United States. Palmer Hough U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 2013
Offsetting Impacts to Wetlands and Waters in the United States Palmer Hough U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 2013 1 Problem: Wetlands Loss Approximately 221 million acres in 1700 (lower 48)
WV Streams and Wetlands March 3, 2010
Public Notice U S Army Corps In reply refer to Public Notice No. Issuance Date: of Engineers LRH-2009-WV IRT INITIATIVES February I, 2010 Huntington District Regulatory Branch Stream: Closing Date: WV
WRDA PROVISIONS OF INTEREST H.R.5303 ~ S.2848
WRDA PROVISIONS OF INTEREST ~ GENERALLY 2016 Slim and trim (95+pp) Mostly light on reform Important port funding section Tweaking WRRDA 2014 Committee done; no report Ready for September 2016 Bold and
REVIEW PLAN USING THE NWD MODEL REVIEW PLAN
REVIEW PLAN USING THE NWD MODEL REVIEW PLAN for Continuing Authorities Program Section 14, 107, 111, 204, 206, 208, 1135 and projects directed by guidance to use CAP procedures Clover Island, Kennewick,
FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012
FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD-00002 FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 1 Executive Summary... 2 1 Objective... 4 2 Study Approach...
Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program
Attachment B King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program The King County Flood Control Zone District work program is comprised of two major categories: Programmatic Work Program o Flood Preparedness,
DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL
Great Lakes Fisheries and Ecosystem Restoration (GLFER) Program Section 506, Water Resources Development Act of 2000, as amended DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL COASTAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH ST, SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GEORGIA
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH ST, SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-3490 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: CESAD-PDP : 1 SEP 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander,
Description: This work includes raising the earthen levee from the IHNC to Paris Rd. to the pre-katrina authorized height.
LPV 142 Levee Enlargement Description: This work includes raising the earthen levee from the IHNC to Paris Rd. to the pre-katrina authorized height. Status: The work in the original scope is 82% complete.
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 6 (September 1 November 30, 2017) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation
The Breadth of the Planning Portfolio
The Breadth of the Planning Portfolio Travis Creel, Planner, Regional Planning and Environmental Division South, MVD Eric Halpin, Special Assistant for Dam and Levee Safety, HQUSACE Lisa Kiefel, PCoP,
Moving Policy and Practice from Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to Risk Management
Moving Policy and Practice from Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to Risk Management and other words of encouragement for my friends in the Planning CoP Eric Halpin, PE Special Assistant for Dam
ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS
Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc. 2809 Fish Hatchery Road, Suite 204, Madison, WI 53713 Phone: 608-274-0123 Fax: 608-274-0696 Website: www.floods.org Email: asfpm@floods.org Federal Interagency
Regional Flood Risk Management Program. Mississippi Valley Division 2012 Flood Preparedness Reference Guide 30 March 2012
Mississippi Valley Division 2012 Flood Preparedness Reference Guide 30 March 2012 Purpose of this Document: This document describes the results of the MVD Regional 2012 Flood Season Preparedness effort
2011 MT Floods Damages and Recovery Options
MONTANA 2011 MT Floods Damages and Recovery Options Damage Estimates Public Works: Between $57.5 million Individual: id Housing Assistance $4,442,194 Small Business Assistance $1,634,100 Other Needs
DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL
Great Lakes Fisheries and Ecosystem Restoration (GLFER) Program Section 506, Water Resources Development Act of 2000, as amended DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL Sauk
AMITE RIVER BASIN DRAINAGE AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA. Financial Report As of and for the Year Ended June 30,2018
Financial Report As of and for the Year Ended June 30,2018 Financial Report As of and for the Year Ended June 30,2018 Introductory Section Title Page Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. i ii Financial
King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments
King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments Brian Murray Water and Land Resources Division April 26, 2016 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and
IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN Ohio River Shoreline, Paducah, KY (Paducah, KY LFPP) Reconstruction Project Louisville District MSC Approval Date: 15 January 2013 Last Revision Date: None IMPLEMENTATION
PROJECT REVIEW PLAN INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW AND EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW
PROJECT REVIEW PLAN INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW AND EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW WHITE OAK BAYOU FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTOL DISTRICT/GALVESTON DISTRICT-USACE
Sustaining the Civil Works Program
Sustaining the Civil Works Program Presentation to Planning Community of Practice Meeting Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works 2 June 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers 1 A society grows great
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. Quarterly Report No. 4 (March 1 May 31, 2017)
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 4 (March 1 May 31, 2017) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation 395
1. INTRODUCTION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: JAMES GIOTTONINI, PE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SJAFCA SETH WURZEL, MBA & MARK HENDRIE, CPA CAPITOL PFG SJAFCA SMITH CANAL CLOSURE STRUCTURE DESIGN PROJECT PRELIMINARY
2. We continue to work on the year end close in preparation of the audits commencement.
To: FROM: Board of Supervisors Charles F. Haas, District Treasurer RE: Treasurer s Report for the month of February 2019 CC: Staff Date: February 21, 2019 Routine Business 1. The District received a total
Joint Recommendations on Levee Policy. Association of State Floodplain Managers. National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies
Joint Recommendations on Levee Policy developed by the Association of State Floodplain Managers and the National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies from discussions at the Flood Risk
Risk-Based Project Management Approach for Large- Scale Civil Engineering Projects
Risk-Based Project Management Approach for Large- Scale Civil Engineering Projects Alex Bredikhin, P.E., Risk Manager - Megaprojects, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District 1000 Liberty Ave.,
REVIEW PLAN. Cedar Bayou, Texas Dredged Material Management Plan
REVIEW PLAN Cedar Bayou, Texas Dredged Material Management Plan Galveston District MSC Approval Date: 16 November 2012 Last Revision Date: none REVIEW PLAN Cedar Bayou, Texas Dredged Material Management
Quality Assurance Checklist Review Plans
Quality Assurance Checklist Review Plans Originating District: Project/Study Title: District POC: PCXIN Reviewer: Any evaluation boxes checked 'No' indicate the RP may not comply with ER 11 05-2-41 0 and
Assessment of the risk of failure to reach the environmental objectives of the WFD in the Danube River Basin District
June 2004 Assessment of the risk of failure to reach the environmental objectives of the WFD in the Danube River Basin District Outcome of the Workshop AUTHORS PREPARED BY: IFOK REPORT Assessment of the
Gallinas Watershed Program
C O M M U N I T Y M E E T I N G April 5, 2016 Tonight s Agenda S C H E D U L E O F P R E S E N T A T I O N S Presentation: Gallinas Watershed Program Overview Questions and Answers Presentation: Upper
Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting
Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting May 26, 2010 6:30 8:30 pm Mill Valley City Hall Council s Chambers PG&E Utilities at Bothin Marsh PG&E Utilities
SUMMARY OF RECENT USACE PLANNING POLICY UPDATES: SEPTEMBER MARCH 2019
SUMMARY OF RECENT USACE PLANNING POLICY UPDATES: SEPTEMBER 2018 - MARCH 2019 SUMMARY OF RECENT USACE PLANNING POLICY UPDATES: SEPTEMBER 2018 - MARCH 2019 2 USACE policy and guidance continues to evolve
FOR - ARRA Financial and Operational Review Report Investigations
Program Description 96-3133 Investigations This appropriation funds studies to determine the need, engineering feasibility, and economic and environmental return to the Nation of potential solutions to
Update to the PL Rehabilitation Program
Update to the PL 84-99 Rehabilitation Program Richard J. Varuso, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Program Manager Risk Management Center New Orleans November 2, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers PL 84-99 The USACE Emergency
15 Plan Implementation Requirements
14.4.1 Advance Maintenance The increase in inner harbor shoaling due to the closing of the sediment basin will change operations and maintenance dredging requirements. With the increase in shoaling, dredges
[Bank Name] Mitigation Bank CA BEI template_pdt FINAL Draft dot
![[Bank Name] Mitigation Bank CA BEI template_pdt FINAL Draft dot](/thumbs/90/103876351.jpg "[Bank Name] Mitigation Bank CA BEI template_pdt FINAL Draft dot")
MITIGATION BANK ENABLING INSTRUMENT Table of Contents RECITALS... 1 AGREEMENT...2 Section I: Purpose and Authorities... 2 A. Purpose...2 B. Authorities... 2 Section II: Definitions... 4 Section III: Stipulations...
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Little Manistee River Sea Lamprey Barrier, Manistee County, Michigan Section 506.
DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL for Great Lakes Fisheries and Ecosystem Restoration (GLFER) Program Section 506, Water Resources Development Act of 2000, as Amended DETAILED
Public Notice. Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks. Date: January 24, 2019
Public Notice Number: CESWF-18-MITB Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks Date: January 24, 2019 Purpose The purpose of this Public Notice is to inform you of mitigation banking guidelines being
Hudson Raritan- Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study
Hudson Raritan- Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study Appendix M: COST EFFECTIVENESS AND INCREMENTAL COST ANALYSIS Draft Integrated Feasibility Report & Environmental Assessment February 2017
USACE Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (RIP)
USACE Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (RIP) Lance Helwig, P.E. Chief, Engineering and Construction Division Jason McBain Levee Safety Program Manager Portland District November 14, 2014 US Army Corps
LOWER PASSAIC RIVER COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP
LOWER PASSAIC RIVER COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP 37 37 37 7 7 7 8 9 7 5 74.59 55 55 55 63 63 63 3 3 39 65 53 35 9 56 6 3 56 48 3 Lisa Baron November 6 File Name The views, opinions and findings contained in
Finance Committee Meeting
Finance Committee Meeting FY18 Strategic Business and Operating Plan and Preliminary Budget Review April 04, 2017 1 Finance Committee Meeting FY18 Strategic Business Operating Plan and Preliminary Budget
North Carolina Department of Transportation Wetland and Stream Mitigation
North Carolina Department of Transportation Wetland and Stream Mitigation Why does NCDOT need mitigation? NCDOT Mission Statement Connecting people and places safely and efficiently, with accountability
REVIEW PLAN KEŌPŪ-HIENALOLI STREAMS FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT ISLAND OF HAWAI I, HAWAI I. Feasibility Study
KEŌPŪ-HIENALOLI STREAMS FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT ISLAND OF HAWAI I, HAWAI I Feasibility Study Continuing Authorities Program (CAP) Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 Public Law 80-858 U.S.
TOOKANY CREEK CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SECTION 205, FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
TOOKANY CREEK CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA SECTION 205, FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Philadelphia District North Atlantic Division April 2012 UPDATED: July 26,
REVIEW PLAN Using the MVD Model Review Plan for the Upper Mississippi River Restoration and Referencing the UMRR Programmatic Review Plan
Using the MVD Model Review Plan for the Upper Mississippi River Restoration and Referencing the UMRR Programmatic Review Plan Steamboat Island Scott County, IA Mississippi River Pool 14 Rock Island District
REVIEW PLAN. Panama City Harbor Improvements to Bay Harbor Channel. Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR) with Integrated
REVIEW PLAN Panama City Harbor Improvements to Bay Harbor Channel Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR) with Integrated Environmental Assessment, Panama City, Florida P2: 395107 Mobile District April 2016
SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT
ITEM 2 Agenda of January 19, 2017 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Richard M. Johnson, Executive Director (916) 874-7606 SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement
SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement Quarterly Report No. 9 (June 1, 2018 August 31, 2018) Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation
Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option
Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option October 16, 2012 Q1. Why has the position on a ring-levee changed? The feasibility study recommended buy-outs for areas with staging
INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AGREEMENT ON WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING WITHIN THE REGULATORY BOUNDARIES OF CHICAGO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS January 1997
INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AGREEMENT ON WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING WITHIN THE REGULATORY BOUNDARIES OF CHICAGO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS January 1997 SECTION 1, PURPOSE The Chicago District of the U.S.
MANHATTAN KANSAS LOCAL PROTECTION
PROJECT REVIEW PLAN MANHATTAN KANSAS LOCAL PROTECTION Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study Kansas City District Program Code = 013394 MSC Approval Date: 7 Feb 2013 Last Revision Date: 14 Jan 2013 REVIEW
REVIEW PLAN. Swope Park Industrial Area Flood Damage Reduction Project Kansas City, Missouri
REVIEW PLAN Swope Park Industrial Area Flood Damage Reduction Project Kansas City, Missouri Post Authorization Change Report/ Limited Reevaluation Report Decision Document Kansas City District Northwestern
UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT 255 255 255 237 237 237 0 0 0 217 217 217 163 163 163 200 200 200 131 132 122 239 65 53 80 119 27 FEASIBILITY STUDY 110 135 120 252 174.59 112 92 56
MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY. Project Development Process
MAINE TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Project Development Process A Milestone Guide for the MTA, Consultant, & Partners to Build a MTA Project 10/20/16 1 P a g e INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND AND APPLICABILITY The intent
Finance Committee Meeting
Finance Committee Meeting FY19 Strategic Business and Operating Plan and Preliminary Budget Review April 3, 2018 1 Finance Committee Meeting FY19 Strategic Business Operating Plan and Preliminary Budget
Property, Plant and equipment
Property, Plant and equipment IAS 16 Objective Scope of IAS 16 Definition Recognition Initial measurement Subsequent measurement Derecognition Special topics Spare parts Exchange of assets Changes in decommissioning