General Plan Amendment GENERAL PLAN CLEAN UP Draft Plan Changes Applicable to the Lakeside Planning Area

Transcription

1 eneral Plan mendment P UP raft Plan hanges pplicable to the akeside Planning rea

2 IUI P Purpose s part of the ugust 3, 2011 adoption of the eneral Plan Update, the Board of upervisors directed staff to bring forward a eneral Plan cleanup every two years in the form of a eneral Plan mendment (P). he lean-up P (12-007) is intended to provide a regular mechanism for making changes to the eneral Plan to allow for corrections discovered during the Plan s implementation or to reflect changing circumstances. his is the first lean-up processed since the adoption of the eneral Plan Update. he types of changes in the lean-up fall under the following categories: land use map, policy documents, mobility element network, and community/ subregional plans. and Use ap he lean-up P proposes changes to land use designations of specific properties to ensure consistency with the goals and policies of the eneral Plan and to correct mapping errors. he following types of revisions are included: apping rrors orrections missed during the eneral Plan Update process wnership hanges hanges in ownership from public to private or vice versa inor P equests inor community planning group requested revisions are included when the required review can be accommodated with an I ddendum or lesser environmental review larifications efining additional terms in the lossary or providing additional detail in a table; text changes to the and Use lement Internal onsistency evisions to make the onservation and pen pace lement consistent with roads identified in community plans egacy ommunities analysis of disadvantaged communities in the unincorporated ounty, in accordance with enate Bill 244 obility lement etwork ppendix Proposed revisions to the obility lement include: orrections evisions to fix typographical errors, incorrect classifications and segment boundaries, or mapping inconsistencies inor P equests evisions to road improvement classifications to comply with the initial intentions of a community planning group not clearly conveyed Policy ocuments hanges are proposed to the eneral Plan Introduction, and Use, onservation and pen pace, and afety lements, and lossary. hese changes fall under the following categories. rrors and missions orrections to policy text and numbering 2013 eneral Plan lean Up

3 Page 2 ommunity/ubregional Plans inor clarifications, revisions, and edits are proposed to community and subregional plans, such as the following: Board irection t the June 27, 2012 Board of upervisor s hearing, the Board directed staff to add language to the orth ountain ubregional Plan Internal onsistency evisions to policies to address legal inconsistencies with state law or local regulations Property pecific equests (P ) s a result of Board direction, four of the very low complexity eneral Plan property specific requests will follow the lean-up process, but are not considered eneral Plan lean-up items. hey are included in this package for information and analysis. I ddendum he lean-up process is only meant to be used for minor changes or additions to the eneral Plan that do not result in additional environmental impacts. herefore, qualifying changes should only require an ddendum to the previously certified eneral Plan Update nvironmental Impact eport (I). n ddendum may be prepared when significant environmental impacts were previously analyzed, and only minor changes or additions to the previously certified I are needed (Q uidelines sections / 15164). Public utreach Introduction to the lean-up hanges to an adopted eneral Plan must follow the process specified by state law, even when they are corrections for a clean-up. he following is a summary of the primary outreach efforts for the eneral Plan lean-up. eb Page web page has been established to provide project updates nnuallnup.html mail istribution Planning and evelopment ervices, dvance Planning ivision publishes updates to provide project specific information. Property owners affected by this project and other interested parties are being encouraged to sign up for this distribution list. Property wner otification arly in the project planning process, property owners of affected parcels were mailed a notification of proposed property changes. his notification not only informed them of the proposed change, but encouraged them to sign up to receive the dvance Planning . ommunity Planning roup (P) Input oncurrence with the proposed changes is being requested ribal onsultation ll tribal governments within the an iego region are being consulted about the changes proposed in the lean-up in accordance with enate Bill 18 Public and gency eview he raft Plan is being circulated for public review Planning ommission and Board of upervisors earings he raft Plan is being presented at Planning ommission and Board of upervisors hearings, providing property owners and members of the public with two additional opportunities to provide comments taff ontact: Kevin Johnston (858) kevin.johnston@sdcounty.ca.gov 2013 eneral Plan lean Up

4 2013 eneral Plan lean Up Unit ield nalysis I ommunity Parcels creage eneral Plan esignation 1 # welling Units 2 xisting Proposed urrent Proposed ategory of hange UP: Z B I U 101 lpine I 1 4 Ind omm inor P equest 101 rest ehesa wnership hange 101 entral ountain / wnership hange J101 Jamul ulzura 1 8 P/P wnership hange J101 Julian / apping rror 101 akeside P/P wnership hange 102 akeside 2 1 P/P wnership hange 103 akeside wnership hange 104 akeside wnership hange 105 akeside 1 14 P/P 0 0 wnership hange 101 ountain mpire P 40/ wnership hange 103 ountain mpire P/P 4 0 wnership hange 104 ountain mpire / apping rror B4 ainbow omm apping rror B101 ainbow 1 86 P 0 / wnership hange B102 ainbow wnership hange 101 amona wnership hange 101 an ieguito 1 3 P/P 0 0 apping rror 104 an ieguito P/P 2 0 apping rror 105 an ieguito 1 3 P/P wnership hange V101 pring Valley V omm apping rror V101 Valle e ro apping rror V102 Valle e ro 2 4 P/P I 1 0 Ind wnership hange V103 Valle e ro V apping rror V104 Valle e ro 1 7 P/P I 1 0 Ind wnership hange V101 Valley enter omm inor P equest V102 Valley enter / wnership hange ubtotal PP PIFI QU 16 orth ountain / Board irection 15 amona Board irection 2 an ieguito Board irection V17 pring Valley /V 2.9 V 4.3/V Board irection ubtotal ee next page for descriptions of eneral Plan esignations 2 xisting and proposed dwelling units are just estimates based on the allowed density and available slope data (for slope dependent designations). ther planning and environmental factors/constraints could affect the actual unit yield eneral Plan lean Up

5 and Use esignation egend V 30 Village esidential 30 (30 units per gross acre) V 24 Village esidential 24 (24 units per gross acre) V 20 Village esidential 20 (20 units per gross acre) V 15 Village esidential 15 (15 units per gross acre) V 10.9 Village esidential 10.9 (10.9 units per gross acre) V 7.3 Village esidential 7.3 (7.3 units per gross acre) V 4.3 Village esidential 4.3 (4.3 units per gross acre) V 2.9 Village esidential 2.9 (2.9 units per gross acre) V 2 Village esidential 2 (2 units per gross acre) 0.5 emi ural 0.5 (1 unit per 0.5, 1, or 2 gross acres) 1 emi ural 1 (1 unit per 1, 2, or 4 gross acres) 2 emi ural 2 (1 unit per 2, 4, or 8 gross acres) 4 emi ural 4 (1 unit per 4, 8, or 16 gross acres) 10 emi ural 10 (1 unit per 10 or 20 gross acres) 20 ural ands 20 (1 unit per 20 gross acres) 40 ural ands 40 (1 unit per 40 gross acres) 80 ural ands 80 (1 unit per 80 gross acres) 1 eneral ommercial 2 ffice Professional 3 eighborhood ommercial 4 ural ommercial 5 Village ore ixed Use I 1 imited Impact Industrial I 2 edium Impact Industrial I 3 igh Impact Industrial ribal ands P Public gency ands P pecific Plan rea P/P Public/emi Public Facilities pen pace onservation pen pace ecreation inks to Zoning Information Zoning Use egulations (including descriptions, allowed uses, and uses subject to discretionary approval) Zoning evelopment esignators (including density, lot area, building type, maximum floor area, floor area ratio, height, coverage, setback, and usable open space) nimal egulation esignators eneral Plan lean Up

6 I 32 57'0" B Village esidential (V-20), 20 du/ac Village esidential (V-24), 24 du/ac Village esidential (V-30), 30 du/ac K F B F P and Use esignation eneral Plan lean-up eneral Plan Property pecific equests egend xisting eneral Plan esignations 32 57'0" Barona eservation an Vicente eservoir F akeside K P 104 F V U F I P -UP KI '0" K U B '0" Fernbrook P '0" 117 0'0" Iron '0" ountain Village esidential (V-15), 15 du/ac B U I P P U U P I B B V I I B I K V P I I P I V I I K U I I I oo rdi nates : 8 3 Feet K I ource: ounty of an iego, ani, File reference: P:\gp2020\cleanup\X\cleanup_etter.mxd '0" I I '0" op yr ight ani ll i ghts eser ve d. Fu ll text o f th is le gal n oti ce can b e fo und at: h ttp:// ww w.sangi s.or g/egal_ oti ce.htm his i s a d raft map and sh ould be des troyed upo n s ubmi ttal of sub sequ ent ver sio ns. I P/ I PV I I U F K I, I XP IPI, I UI B U I I, IP I I F B II FI F PIU PUP. o te: h is pro duct may contai n infor matio n fr om t he e gion al Info rmatio n ys tem w hi ch cann ot b e r eprod uced wi tho ut t he wri tten per mis sio n of. hi s p rod uct may co ntain i nformati on rep rodu ce d w it h p ermi ss ion gran ted by & P to ani. hi s map is copyri ghted by & P. It i s unl awfu l to cop y or rep rodu ce al l or any par t th ereo f, whe ther for pers onal u se or res ale, w ith out the pr ior, w ritte n p ermi ss ion of & P. I J K I I I B B P I K I V egional ocation a p ap Pre pare d By: P I V VI I K Z I QU I I I I U 80 I B I 32 54'0" P I K J K VI I I I I I I U B V U U K K I pen pace (onservation) pen pace (ecreation) B I ribal ands V I B I Public gency ands P I I Public/emi-Public ands - olid aste Facility K P P P V I V I V Public/emi-Public Facilities Village ore ixed Use I len aks IB I V F BU U I V U I U P Z P V I I 101 V I I K I I U B B I igh Impact Industrial I edium Impact Industrial imited Impact Industrial P Z I V eneral ommercial ural ommercial VI V 32 54'0" ffice Professional K K V pecific Plan rea eighborhood ommercial K I VU B B 32 51'0" K V U I ural ands (-80), 1 du/80 ac l ajon '0" F ural ands (-40), 1 du/40 ac F B V ural ands (-20), 1 du/20 ac I U U V K 8 0 I P I V V I I emi-ural esidential (-4), 1 du/4,8,16 ac B U V F I V F I K I P B I V V Z I Q QU I I U Blossom Valley I I K P P IF K I P K B I I U emi-ural esidential (-1), 1 du/1,2,4 ac emi-ural esidential (-2), 1 du/2,4,8 ac Village esidential (V-2), 2 du/ac J B P P P I ie g K I U K K V I K V K V I I V ake Jennings 117 0'0" r ive o I P I U P F V J U I U P I I U B V I K P P P B V P I K V J n a I K F B I l apitan emi-ural esidential (-10), 1 du/10,20 ac eservoir P I V U K I K K I I V I U I I V V U V VI I I P I V I U I P V I emi-ural esidential (-0.5), 1 du/0.5 ac 105 I P IV F akeside 102 I V I IV I V K I I V I antee P VI U V V 101 I VI U P I I K K I V I V Z J U I U P 103 I Village esidential (V-2.9), 2.9 du/ac V I 32 51'0" Village esidential (V-4.3), 4.3 du/ac Village esidential (V-7.3), 7.3 du/ac Village esidential (V-10.9), 10.9 du/ac I I '0" iles 2

7 and Use esignation hanges P UP KI 101 urrent Proposed eneral Plan esignation Zoning Use egulation ummary of Zoning hanges no changes are proposed to the zoning use regulation or the zoning development designators eneral Plan lean Up

8 and Use esignation hanges P UP KI 102 urrent Proposed eneral Plan esignation Zoning Use egulation ummary of Zoning hanges no changes are proposed to the zoning use regulation or the zoning development designators eneral Plan lean Up

9 and Use esignation hanges P UP KI 103 urrent Proposed eneral Plan esignation Zoning Use egulation urrent 70 (imited gricultural) Use egulation ummary of Zoning hanges Proposed no changes are proposed for the zoning development designators 80 (pen pace) eneral Plan lean Up

10 and Use esignation hanges P UP KI 104 urrent Proposed eneral Plan esignation Zoning Use egulation urrent 70 (imited gricultural) Use egulation ummary of Zoning hanges Proposed no changes are proposed for the zoning development designators 80 (pen pace) eneral Plan lean Up

11 and Use esignation hanges P UP KI 105 urrent Proposed eneral Plan esignation Zoning Use egulation ummary of Zoning hanges urrent 70 (imited gricultural) Use egulation Proposed 80 (pen pace) no changes are proposed for the zoning development designators eneral Plan lean Up

12 U P PI U Page ection evision ationale hapter 3: and Use lement 3-10 and Use esignations (First paragraph on page) 3-11 able U-1 Footnote d. evelopment within esidential, ommercial, Industrial, pecific Plan reas, and Public/emi-Public eneral Plan land use designations is regulated through either a maximum residential density or building intensity. esidential ensity is expressed as a maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre (exclusive of public roads and rightsof-way). d. his denotes the upper range for each component, but there is no expectation that this would be achieved when each component is applied in the same area. he maximum F in the Village ore ixed Use esignation is 0.7 unless offsite parking or underground parking is provided in conjunction with the proposed development. In that case, the maximum F could be up to Policy U-6.12 ocument and annually review areas within floodways and 100- and 200-year floodplains to ensure areas subject to flooding are accurately mapped in accordance with B 162 (enacted January 1, 2008). (ee also Policy ) 3-20 egacy ommunities [he proposed text for the and Use lement amendment is provided at the end of Policy ocument changes in this section on page 4-4.] 3-30 Policy U-9.6 own enter Uses. ocate commercial, office, civic, and higher-density residential land uses in the own enters of Villages or ural Villages at transportation nodes. xceptions to this pattern may be allowed for established industrial districts and secondary commercial districts or corridors. In this reference, a transportation node is intended to be the intersection of two high traffic volume obility lement roadways, along with a transit stop. hapter 5: onservation and pen pace lement 5-24 Policy Provide Zoning overlays for Z-2 designated lands and a 1,500 1,300-foot wide buffer area adjacent to such lands. ithin these overlay zones, the potential effects of proposed land use actions on potential future extraction of mineral resources shall be considered by the decision-makers. Proposed clarification to emphasize that private roads are not excluded from the gross acreage calculations, similar to the Zoning rdinance definition. Proposed clarification to add an incentive for underground parking when offsite parking is not feasible. Proposed revision to note the correct reference policy on floodplain maps. In ctober 2011, enate Bill (B) 244, and Use, eneral Plans, and isadvantaged ommunities was enacted requiring cities and counties to review and update the and Use lement to identify disadvantaged unincorporated communities. larification to add the meaning of transportation node, as it relates to this policy. he buffer distance was incorrectly noted eneral Plan lean Up

13 U P Page ection evision ationale 5-26 to 5-27 able amino el ey west to ilac oad - ceanside city limits east to Vista ay tate oute 76 to its terminus at ld ighway ld iver oad tate oute 76 to amino del ey hanges proposed for consistency with the scenic highways identified in the Bonsall ommunity Plan Figure -5 evise map based on above changes to able -1 (adding map references #21 and #52). hapter 7: afety lement 7-10 able -1 5 minute travel time (1 st bullet): Village (V-2 to V-30) and limited emi-ural esidential areas (-0.5 and -1) dded emi-ural designation omitted from table eneral Plan lean Up

14 U P Page ection evision ationale hapter 10: cronyms and lossary lossary revised definition lossary new term ransit odes subcategory of the Village classification includes sites within walking distance approximately ¼ ½ mile of future rapid transit stations. erved by either express bus or rail service, ransit ode areas are planned as diverse, mixed-use areas with a range of residential, retail, and where appropriate, employment-generating land uses (e.g., office/professional or light industrial) as well as parks and civic spaces. Urban imit ine - growth boundary that defines the maximum extent of urban and sub-urban development. n Urban imit ine may be the basis for containment of growth inducing urban infrastructure or for community-specific goals and policies. orrection for consistency with the description in the egional ategories section of the and Use lement. he ½ mile distance is more appropriate for unincorporated ounty. dded for clarification since this term is referred to in the eneral Plan, but no definition is provided eneral Plan lean Up

15 BII K PPIX IX I oad egment esignation/improvement #.#X = [# of lanes].[roadway classification][improvement] obility lement etwork akeside ommunity Planning rea 16 2 l onte oad ( 1920) egment: ake Jennings Park oad to ountain mpire ubregion lpine community boundary 2.3 inor ollector one pecial ircumstances 2013 eneral Plan lean Up