BANTAY LANSANGAN: ROAD SECTOR REPORT CARD (09 Nov 06)

Transcription

1 BANTAY LANSANGAN: ROAD SECTOR REPORT CARD (09 Nov 06) CLUSTER / INDICATOR A. SYSTEM/NETWORK DESCRIPTION 1. Overall Philippine Road Network (For information): National Roads 28,805 km Provincial Roads 27,076 km City Roads 7,052 km Municipal Roads 15,804 km Barangay Roads 121,989 km Total 200,726 km DATA SOURCE 1. DPWH (Planning Service or PS) and LGUs Toll Expressways 165 km 2. Existing National Roads (a) Roads by Surface Type: Paved Roads 70.1%: 20,179 km Concrete 44.5%: 12,795 km Asphalt 25.6%: 7,384 km Unpaved Roads 29.9%: 8,626 km Gravel 29.5%: 8,516 km Earth 0.4%: 110 km Total 100.0%: 28,805 km (b) Roads by Condition (using Visual Road Condition or or ROCOND Rating): Paved Roads 100.0%: 20,179 km Good 27.4% Fair 25.0% Poor 25.7% Bad 21.9% Unpaved Roads 100.0%: 8,626 km Good 32.8% Fair 50.6% Poor 14.4% Bad 2.2% Total 100.0%: 28,805 km Good 29.1% Fair 32.9% Poor 22.2% Bad 15.8% (c) Bridges by Structure Type: Permanent 93%: 246,160 lm Temporary 7%: 17,280 lm 2 (a). DPWH (PS using Road and Bridge Application or RBIA database) 2 (b). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA and ROCOND), with BL validation of sample. 2 (c). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA). 1

2 Total 100%: 263,440 lm 3. (a) Increase in length, in km and percentage, of paved National Roads (this report vs. last report) (b) Reduction in road user costs: vehicle (fixed and running) operating costs, and time costs due to 3 (a). 4. (a) Increase in length (km) and percent of paved national roads which achieve a ROCOND Rating of Good. OR with an International Roughness Index (IRI) of at least 3 for asphalt roads and 4 for concrete roads. (b) Reduction in road user costs: vehicle (fixed and running) operating costs and time costs due to 4 (a). 5. Increase in length (lm) and percent of national bridges built of permanent (concrete/steel) and strong structures (per American Association of State and Highway Officials or AASHTO standards). 6. Reduction in incidence of vehicle overloading on national roads. 3 (a). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA). 3 (b). DPWH (PS w/ PMS/ HDM 4), independently validated by BL with road users. 4 (a). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA, ROCOND, IRI), verified by BL on sample roads. 4 (b). DPWH (PS w/ PMS/ HDM 4), validated by BL with road users. 5. DPWH (PS w/ RBIA) 6. BL, with info from DPWH (PS with data from 22 weighbridge stations & 84 axle load survey stns). B. GOVERNANCE 1. Jurisdiction / responsibility for the planning, design, construction, maintenance, funding of roads, by road classification (For information): 1. DPWH (PS), Road Board, LGUs, TRB National Roads DPWH, except for the following: Road Board for management of MVUC maintenance fund LGUs for operation and maintenance of lights. Provincial Roads Provincial Governments City Roads City Governments Municipal Roads Municipal Governments Barangay Roads Barangay Governments Toll Expressways DPWH for planning, procurement, design & construction supervision 2

3 Toll Regulatory Board (TRB) for toll rate approval, supv n of operation Concessionaire for funding, construction, operation, maintenance 2. Number and length of Local (Provincial/City/Municipal) Roads converted to National Roads but not complying with DPWH criteria. 3. Cost and percent (in terms of value) of Local Road construction projects funded in DPWH budget 4. National road sections with gaps or overlaps in jurisdiction (e.g., non operation by LGUs of lights) 2. BL consultant with DPWH (PS). 3. BL consultant with DPWH (PS, Comptrollership & Financial Mgt. Service or CFMS). 4. BL consultant with DPWH (PS). C. RESOURCE ALLOCATION 1. Projection of needs and sector trends for national roads 2. Current investment needs vs. allocations for national roads: construction and maintenance 3. National budget norms 4. Private sector participation in roads (tollway concessions) 1. BL consultant with info from DPWH (PS), NEDA 2. DPWH (PS & Bureau of Maintenance or BOM, w/ MYPS, PMS/HDM 4) 3. BL consultant with info from DPWH (PS, CFMS) and DBM 4. BL consultant with info from DPWH (PS), TRB, NEDA D. ASSET MANAGEMENT 1. Planning and Budgeting (a) Planning of Construction Projects: (1) Compliance with Prerequisites: Number, value and percent of national road construction projects funded by DPWH which meet the following prerequisites: 1 (a). DPWH (PS & Bureau of Design or BOD w/ MYPS), with BL (i) Included in the approved DPWH medium term infrastructure program based on the priorities 3

4 generated by the Multi Year Planning and Scheduling (MYPS) system using objective criteria within the budget ceiling. (ii) Undergone (i) detailed engineering with an accuracy of +/ 10%, (ii) quality assurance check for design and estimates, and (iii) value engineering if project cost is Php100 M or more, all according to DPWH standards. (iii) Approved by the NEDA Investment Coordination Committee, if the cost exceeds Php 500M. (iv) Endorsed by the Regional Development Council. (2) Efficiency in Construction Fund Allocation: Amount and percentage of variance between (i) actual allocation of construction funds under the General Appropriations Act (GAA) (by district and project), and (ii) planned allocation and priorities generated by MYPS within the budget ceiling. (b) Planning of Maintenance Projects (1) Compliance with Prerequisites: Number and percent of funded national road maintenance projects which meet the following: 1 (b). DPWH (PS & BOM w/ PMS/HDM 4 and RMMS) and Road Board, with BL (i) (ii) Included in the DPWH annual work program approved by the Road Board, program based on the priorities generated by the Pavement Management System / Highway Development and Management Version 4 (PMS/HDM 4) and Routine Maintenance Management System (RMMS) using objective planning criteria within the budget ceiling. Exclude works or activities not related to road maintenance (2) Efficiency in Maintenance Fund Allocation: Amount and percent of variance between (i) actual allocation of maintenance funds under MVUC and GAA (by district and project), and (ii) needs and planned allocation and priorities based on the program generated by the PMS/HDM 4 and 4

5 RMMS using objective planning criteria within the budget ceiling. (c) Transparency in Funding: Extent (in number, value and percentage) of posting in the websites of DPWH and the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (Philgeps) of the actual vs. planned allocations under 1 (a)(2) and 1 (b)(2) above, plus actual releases, disbursements, and physical accomplishments. 2. Procurement (a) Compliance with Procurement Plan: Number, value and percent of construction/maintenance contracts procured which are included in the approved DPWH Annual Procurement Plan (Satisfactory threshold 100% of the total no. of contracts). (b) Complete Bidding Documents: Number, value and percent of procured contracts supported by complete Bidding Documents in accordance with the approved DPWH Procurement Manual (Satisfactory threshold 100% of the total no. of contracts). (c) Public Bidding as General Mode: Number, value and percent of contracts procured through modes other than public bidding, e.g., negotiated contract (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of contracts procured through all modes). (d) Advertisement and Posting for Transparency : Number, value and percent of contracts bid out which were advertised in the newspapers and posted in the websites of Philgeps and DPWH, per R.A and its Implementing Rules and Regulations Part A (IRR A) (Satisfactory threshold 100% of the total no. of contracts procured). (e) Eligibility/Prequalification: Average number of contractors declared eligible/ prequalified vs. applicants for eligibility/prequalification for the contract. (f) Participation of Bidders: Average number of submitted bids per contract vs. (i) average number declared eligible/prequalified and (ii) benchmark of at least 5 bids. (g) Level of Competition: Number, value and percent of 1 (c). DPWH (Mgt Info System or MIS, w/ PS and CFMS), DBM (Philgeps), with BL 2 (a). DPWH (Bids and Awards Committee or BAC Secretariat, 2 (b). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (c). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (d). DPWH (MIS w/ BAC Sec) and DBM (Philgeps), with BL 2 (e). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (f). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (g). DPWH (BAC Sec), 5

6 publicly bid contracts with at least five submitted bids (Satisfactory threshold at least 75% of the total no. of such contracts). (h) Reasonableness of ABC: Number, value and percent of contracts where the Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) or components thereof do not exceed the accepted benchmark range of costs (e.g., cost per km of road, cubic meter of earthwork, square meter of rightof way, etc.). (Satisfactory threshold 100%). (i) Effectiveness of CES: Number, value and percent of foreign assisted contracts where the winning bid does not exceed the Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) prepared using the DPWH Cost Estimation System (CES) (Satisfactory threshold at least 90% of the total no. of such contracts). (j) Posting of Contract Awards for Transparency: Number and percent of contract awards posted in Philgeps and DPWH websites (Satisfactory threshold 100% of all awards made). (k) Time for Bidding (Efficiency): Number and percent of publicly bid contracts where the period between bid invitation and bid opening is not more than 3 months (Satisfactory threshold at least 75% of the total no. of such contracts). (l) Time for Bid Evaluation (Efficiency): Number and percent of publicly bid contracts where the period between bid opening and contract award is not more than 15 days (Satisfactory threshold at least 75% of the total no. of such contracts). (m) Protests and Adverse Reports on Procurement: Number and percent of biddings where (i) protests were filed and/or (ii) NGO Observers in the BACs submitted Observation Reports on irregularities noted in the procurement (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of biddings weighted by value). 3. Construction (a) Quality: Number, value and percent of construction projects with major defects costing more than 10% of the contract cost vs. approved plans and specifications (Satisfactory threshold 0). 2 (h). DPWH (BAC Sec, BOD, Bureau of Construction or BOC), 2 (i). DPWH (BAC Sec, BOD, BOC, w/ CES), 2 (j). DPWH (MIS w/ BAC Sec), DBM (Philgeps), 2 (k). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (l). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (m)(i). DPWH (BAC Sec), 2 (m)(ii). BL thru NGO Observers in BACs. 3 (a). DPWH (MIS) w/ Bureau of Research & Standards Quality Assurance Units (BRS QAU) & BOC), 6

7 with BL verification (b) Quantity/Scope: Number, value and percent of construction projects with variation orders whose cumulative value exceeds 10% of the original contract cost vs. approved plans, specifications, and bill of quantities (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of projects). (c) Cost: Number, value and percent of construction projects with cost overruns exceeding the ABC and benchmark unit costs (Satisfactory threshold 0). (d) Timeliness: Number, value and percent of construction projects with slippage or delay exceeding 15% of the approved construction schedule for the project/contract (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of contracts). (e) Disbursements: Number, value and percent of construction projects where actual disbursements disproportionately exceed, by more than 20%, the value of the physical works done, based on verified Statements of Works Accomplished (SWA) (Satisfactory threshold 0). (f) Payments: Number, value and percent of construction contracts with payments to contractors made more than 45 days from date of billing (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of projects). (g) Completion: Number, value and percent of construction projects reported to be completed and accepted by DPWH but found to be incomplete or with uncorrected defects per BL checklist (Satisfactory threshold 100% of the total no. of projects). 3 (b). DPWH (MIS w/ BOC), with BL verification 3 (c). DPWH (MIS w/ BOC and CES), with BL verification 3 (d). DPWH (MIS w/ BOC), with BL verification 3 (e). DPWH (MIS w/ CFMS, BOC), with BL 3 (b). DPWH (MIS w/ CFMS, BOC), with BL verification 3 (g). BL shall determine this, with info from DPWH. 4. Maintenance (a) Quality: (1) Number, value and percent of maintenance projects with major defects costing more than 10% of the project/contract cost vs. approved plans and specifications (Satisfactory threshold 0). (2) Length (km) and percentage of national roads 4 (a)(1). DPWH (MIS w/ BOM, BRS QAU), 4 (a)(2). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA, ROCOND), 7

8 maintained to Visual Road Condition (ROCOND) Rating of Good. (b) Quantity/Scope: Number, value and percent of maintenance projects with variation orders whose cumulative value exceeds 10% of the original contract cost vs. approved plans, specifications, and bill of quantities (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of projects). (c) Cost: Number, value and percent of maintenance projects with cost overruns exceeding the ABC and benchmark unit costs (Satisfactory threshold 0). (d) Timeliness: (1) Number, value and percent of maintenance projects with slippage or delay exceeding 15% of the approved construction schedule for the project/contract (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of contracts). (2) Number and percentage of cases where the actual DPWH response time to repair/correct reported defects exceeds the allowable time per prescribed standards, e.g., 24 hours for potholes, 3 days for pavement damage, etc. (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of cases). (e) Disbursements: Number, value and percent of maintenance projects where actual disbursements disproportionately exceed, by more than 20%, the value of the performed work, net of contract penalties (e.g., for failure to repair defects within the prescribed time) based on verified Statements of Works Accomplished (SWA) (Satisfactory threshold 0). (f) Payments: Number, value and percent of maintenance contracts with payments to contractors made more than 45 days from date of billing (Satisfactory threshold not more than 10% of the total no. of projects). (g) Completion: Number, value and percent of maintenance projects reported to be completed and accepted by DPWH but found to be incomplete or with uncorrected with BL sample 4 (b). DPWH (MIS w/ BOM), with BL 4 (c). DPWH (MIS w/ BOM), with BL 4 (d)(1). DPWH (MIS w/ BOM), with BL 4 (d)(2). BL, with road users assessing compliance by making own reports & monitoring response times. DPWH (MIS w/ BOM) reports are for reference. 4 (e). DPWH (MIS w/ CFMS & BOM), with BL verification 4 (f). DPWH (MIS w/ BOM), with BL verification 4 (g). BL shall determine this, with info from DPWH. 8

9 defects per checklist (Satisfactory threshold 100% of the total no. of projects). E. AGENCY PERFORMANCE 1. DPWH Staff Efficiency: Reduction in number of staff per km of national roads. 2. Complaints: Number of complaints acted upon vs. number of complaints received on national road services and transactions. 3. Investigations and Sanctions: Number of prosecutions/ sanctions vs. number of investigations made on national road services and transactions. 4. Blacklisted Contractors : Number of contractors suspended/blacklisted vs. number of irregularities reported. 5. DPWH Personnel Sanctioned/Recognized : Number of DPWH Project Managers/Engineers/personnel given (a) sanctions/penalties for poor performance or irregularities and (b) incentives for outstanding/good performance. 1. DPWH (Admn & Manpo Mgt Service or AMMS) 2. DPWH (Internal Affairs Office or IAO), with BL 3. DPWH (IAO and Legal Service or LS), with BL 4. DPWH (BAC Sec), with BL 5. DPWH (AMMS and LS,) 6. Internal Audit Findings : Reduction (or increase) in the number, percentage and value of non compliance with internal controls and systems found by the DPWH Internal Audit Service. 7. COA Findings: Reduction (or increase) in the number, percentage and value of disallowances and irregularities shown in Commission on Audit (COA) reports. 8. Perception Surveys on Corruption: Improved (or worse) perception of corruption in the DPWH: 6. DPWH (Internal Audit Service or IAS), with BL 7. COA and DPWH (CFMS, IAS), 8. BL (a) Social Weather Stations (SWS) annual survey. (b) Separate TAN/BL survey 9. Road Users /Community Satisfaction Feedback Surveys: (a) Quality and effectiveness of national road services. 9. BL thru survey of sample of road users/communities (b) Extent and effectiveness of DPWH communications 9

10 with the public, including website, annual reports, billboards, advisories, etc. 10. Transparency (a) Number and percent of requests for information on national road services and transactions granted/ denied by DPWH/ Road Board. 10. BL, with info from DPWH. (b) Existence of DPWH public disclosure policy and its implementation F. ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASPECTS 1. Air Quality and Noise (a) Extent of vehicle emissions and noise arising from road congestion and other road defects. (b) Reduction in length and percentage of congested national road sections with traffic volume to capacity (V/C) ratio of more than 1. (c) Increase in vehicle speeds (kph) due to 1 (b). 1 (a). BL, with info from DPWH (Environmental and Social Services Office or ESSO), MMDA, DENR 1 (b). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA), 1 (c). DPWH (PS), with BL 2. Road Safety (a) Number, location, and priority of accident black spots. (b) Reduction in number of accident black spots due to DPWH road safety measures. 2 (a). DPWH (PS using Traffic Accident Recording and Analysis System or TARAS, with accident data from PNP). 2 (b). DPWH (PS TARAS), (c) Decrease in number and severity of accidents related to road defects due to DPWH road safety measures. 2 (c). DPWH (PS TARAS), 3. Encroachment 10

11 (a) Location and length/area of encroachment/occupancy of road right of way by informal settlers, billboards, structures, debris, etc. (b) Reduction in the length/area of national road sections with encroachments (squatters, billboards, structures, etc.) on the right of way. 3 (a). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA), with LGUs, verified by BL. 3 (b). DPWH (PS w/ RBIA), 11