SanDiego CountyWater Authority

Transcription

1 SanDiego CountyWater Authority

2 ANNUAL BUDGET REPORT ON THE FISCAL YEAR / OCTOBER

3 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Capital Improvement Program Background Introduction Overview of CIP Executive Summary Major Accomplishments 2.2 Significant Issues During Fiscal Year / 2.3 Summary of Total CIP 2.4 Discussion and Profile of Causes for Under- 2.5 Performance Indicators 2.6 CIP Milestone Attainment 2.7 Status of Major Professional Service Agreements and Construction Contracts 2.8 Status of Reimbursements for Reimbursable Projects 2.9 Detailed Project Information Appendix A Project Locations Appendix B Project Detail Information A-i B-i Table 1 CIP Project Budget Status 8 2 CIP Profile of Under Schedule Milestones for CIP Projects with Annual Greater than $1 Million 17 4 Planning and Design Contract Status 19 5 Construction Contract Status 20 6 Construction Management Contract Status 21 7 Status of Reimbursements for Reimbursable Projects 23 Figure 1 CIP Planned vs. Actual Fiscal Year / 11 A-1 CIP Location Map A-1 i

4 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP San Diego County Water Authority Annual Budget Report on the Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year / 1.0 Capital Improvement Program Background 1.1 Introduction This is the first in a series of Annual Budget reports on the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The predecessors to this report were the fourth quarter reports which dwelt only on the last quarter of the fiscal year. The intention of the new report is to provide a balance between program level perspectives and project detail on the preceding year to explain how well staff was able to execute the budget plan, what it was able to accomplish, and discuss the significant issues that prevented a fuller execution of the budget plan as set forth in the annual CIP budget document. Staff will continue to provide quarterly reports to the Board on the status of the program, its component projects and significant issues of the quarter and how they will affect the future. The quarterly reports will continue to provide the complement of tables and summaries that have been refined over the last several years. Additionally, information will be provided on evolving issues that will affect the budget to include trends, forecasts, and staff strategies to keep the program on target. The new annual report on the budget provides: Summarized information on accomplishments Discussion of significant issues Summary of total CIP expenditures Discussion and profile of causes for under-expenditure Information on performance measures and milestone attainment Contract status profiles Status of reimbursable projects Individual project reports 1.2 Overview of the CIP The approved CIP for FY / contained 78 projects and had a total value of $1.58 billion; the appropriation for the year was $99.4 million. Appendix A shows the location of major projects throughout the County. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 1

5 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.0 Executive Summary The annual budget report on the CIP for FY / covers the period of time from July 1, through June 30,. During that period of time, $50.5 million was spent and 18 projects were completed with a budgeted value of $483.5 million. During this period of time, excellent progress was made on a number of significant planning projects which included the Regional Water Facilities Master Plan and the Binational Water Facilities; a minute treaty was completed between the United States and Mexico on the latter project to begin design and geotechnical work. Significant work was completed on the ESP Optimization Study permitting a number of key projects to move forward. Agreements were awarded for the design of three projects, design was completed on eight other projects, and the 60 percent review on the design of the Olivenhain Dam was completed by the Board of Senior Consultants and the California Division of Safety of Dams. Three construction management agreements were awarded on large projects, construction began on three new projects, and construction was completed on eight other projects. More than 25 miles of pipeline was inspected as part of the Aqueduct Protection Program; a Project Labor Agreement and an Owner Controlled Insurance Program for the Emergency Storage Project (ESP) were executed with the potential to save nearly $10 million over the life of the ESP projects; and approximately 30,000 Ultra-low Flush Toilets were provided to users. Ten significant issues impacted the CIP during the fiscal year. First, a half dozen project budgets were modified adding $827,000 to the cost of the CIP. Second, as the year progressed, it became increasingly evident that there would need to be cost revisions to the ESP projects. A detailed analysis of these issues was performed during the last quarter of the fiscal year and will be presented to the Board in the first quarter of FY /. Finally, there were eight categories of issues that delayed the full execution of the planned CIP program. Staffing shortages and diversion of key staff to non-cip tasks were prominent as were dependence upon others (agencies, contractors, studies, staff, and the Board), and environmental issues. A full expenditure of the FY / appropriation was not achieved. While the last eight significant issues for the year all impacted the under-expenditure, the most significant causes were delays attributed to dependence on other agencies (44 percent) and delays caused by internal staff/board actions (17 percent). A more detailed discussion of all the issues contained in this summary follow in the balance of this Report. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 2

6 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.1 Major Accomplishments Major accomplishments for FY / included: Completed probabilistic supply and M&I and agricultural forecasts, evaluated strategies and opportunities for a regional recycled water storage and transmission system, identified potential regional projects, and developed hydraulic and probabilistic models for the Regional Water Facilities Master Plan. Signed and ratified a minute treaty between the United States and Mexico, established scope and division of work responsibilities between each country, awarded conceptual design agreement for south-of-border alignments for the Binational Water Facilities Study. Completed emergency water demand forecasts, the system hydraulic model, surge analyses, and conceptual designs of the Olivenhain Pump Station as a part of the ESP Optimization Study. Awarded agreements for design of the Escondido Maintenance Warehouse, Olivenhain Pump Station, and Olivenhain 8 Flow Control Facility (FCF). Completed design for relining of Pipeline 3 in Rancho Penasquitos; connections to Pipeline 4 for Olivenhain 2, San Dieguito/Santa Fe 3, and Vallecitos 7 FCFs; Olivenhain Pipelines, Phases I and II; San Diego 18/21 FCF and Inlet Pipeline; and the Olivenhain Dam foundation excavation. Completed reviews of the 60 percent Olivenhain Dam design by the Board of Senior Consultants and the California Division of Safety of Dams. Awarded the construction management agreement for the Olivenhain Dam and Reservoir; awarded the contract and began construction of the Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline Diversion Structure; and began construction of the Valley Center Pump Station. Began construction of the San Diego 18/21 FCF and Olivenhain Pipelines, Phase I and awarded the construction contract for Olivenhain Pipelines, Phase II. Completed construction of the Via Ambiente access road and bridge; the right dam abutment access road and mass grading for the Olivenhain Pump Station and Olivenhain Municipal Water District s Treatment Plant; the Olivenhain Dam aggregate test quarry and roller compacted concrete test fill; the Relocation of Pipeline 3 at State Route 125/94 Interchange; San Diego 7 FCF; the connections to Pipeline 4 for Carlsbad l, Olivenhain 1, and San Dieguito 4 and 5 FCFs; the connection of the Pipelines 3 and 4 vents at Black Mountain; and Pipeline 5 Interim Operation project. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 3

7 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP Inspected over 25 miles of existing pipeline as part of the Aqueduct Protection Program. Executed a Project Labor Agreement and Owner Controlled Insurance Program for the ESP. Provided nearly 30,000 Ultra-low Flush Toilets (ULFTs) to San Diego County residents through the three ULFT incentive programs. 2.2 Significant Issues During FY / Ten significant issues had substantial effects on the execution of the CIP in FY /; they were: Engineering Department Staffing. This issue has two dimensions: full staffing of regular employee positions and staff augmentation by contract consultant and temporary Authority employees. For the last two to three years, the tight civil engineer labor market in California has made it difficult for the Authority to be fully staffed in its regular positions with an average vacancy rate of 15 percent; a substantial portion of these vacancies have been in senior positions. This has continued to be an issue through the end of the fiscal year. The second dimension of the issue, the recruitment of contract consultant and Authority temporary employees, has also continued to be a problem through the end of the fiscal year. Our ability to fill those positions was delayed by staff decisions to take a broader look at the whole staffing picture using the mechanism of the FY / budget process to facilitate a comprehensive examination. As the result of that process, two regular positions were requested and approved by the Board to be added to the Engineering Department (Manager of Engineering Administration and Controls and a Financial Analyst), and the earlier plan to add contract and temporary Authority staff was affirmed. It is anticipated that the majority of these positions will be filled during the first quarter of FY /. Work Unrelated to CIP Management. Because of unique skill sets and experiences associated with key staff members, they were used during FY / to perform substantial work that is unrelated to CIP management. The most notable of these has been time spent by key senior members of the staff in the Revenue and Rate Study project. For the majority of the first half of the fiscal year, an average of three key Engineering Department staff were devoted to the Rate Study. This study continued to consume the majority of the time of one of the Department s executives and periodically others during the second half of the fiscal year. Changes to the CIP Budget During FY /. During this fiscal year, the Board took actions to adjust six CIP budgets. The budget for the Regional Water Facilities Master Plan was increased by $450,000 to fund developing the Master Plan using a reliability-based approach. A new I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 4

8 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP project, Vallecitos 10 FCF was added at a cost of $377,000. This action was taken in response to a request from the Vallecitos Water District to upgrade an existing FCF from 15 to 60 cubic feet per second. The Board transferred $1,800,000 from the Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline Diversion Structure to the Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline project to allow its completion. Finally, the Board transferred $160,000 from the Relocation of Pipeline 3 at State Route 125/94 to the South Bay Freeway Crossing project. This change was brought about by a change in scope of the South Bay Freeway Crossing project attributable to erroneous record drawings. Delays in the Acquisition of Real Estate. Delays in the acquisition of several key pieces of real estate had substantial impacts on the CIP during this fiscal year. The larger of the two issues was the needed mitigation property associated with the ESP project. The Board directed collaboration with other public agencies to acquire the needed property. This has delayed the purchase by more than a year. A second significant delay was associated with the Additional Right of Way Width project. It was established to acquire additional right of way in areas where there was insufficient room for the Authority to access its facilities. The terrain in the Black Mountain Ranch area had unusual topography causing the needed right of way to vary substantially from one point to the next. Because this would have a significant impact on several developers of residential communities along the right of way, staff took the extra time to seek alternatives. These actions have pushed the purchase of the additional right of way into the next fiscal year. Impacts of Environmental Issues. Environmental issues have delayed key aspects of three projects. The most noteworthy has been the initiation of the needed geotechnical studies associated with the San Vicente Pipeline project. These studies have been delayed pending the completion of environmental surveys for the newly listed Quino Checkerspot butterfly. The Olivenhain Pipelines and Interconnect project was primarily delayed by dependence upon work managed by another agency, but several key months were also lost waiting for the gnatcatcher breeding season to end. Concerns over the discovery of Brodiaea Filifolia plant life near the site for the Vallecitos 9 FCF have also played a role in the delay of that project. Delays Caused by Dependence Upon Work Managed by Another Agency. The largest single project appropriation for the fiscal year was Olivenhain Pipelines and Interconnect ($22 million). This appropriation plan was based on the Olivenhain Water Treatment Plant site being available in January. Due to delays caused by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District s (OMWD) contractor in completing the mass grading work on the site, our contractor was not able to begin work until May 1,. The impact of this delay was nearly $19 million unspent this fiscal year. In a similar way OMWD s mass grading contractor will not be finished until the first quarter of FY /. This delay will have a domino effect on the Dam project, I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 5

9 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP moving the award of the construction contract for the main dam from November to March of. Contractor Delays. The majority of a project s budget is expended during construction. During FY /, the Authority experienced contractor induced delays on four projects. The issue with both the Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline and the ESP Diversion Structure Modifications was associated with the contractor s inability to meet the Authority s specifications for concrete design mix. This resulted in protracted delays because each new mix had to be tested after a minimum of 21 days of curing. Modifications to the Valley Center Pump Station and the construction of the Valley Center Pump Station are both being done by the same contractor. Contractor induced delays slowed the issuing of the Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed. Once awarded, the contractor was initially less aggressive than anticipated. Optimization Study Impacts. Progress on at least three projects was linked to issues undergoing analysis in the ESP Optimization Study. The purpose of the Optimization Study is to refine the operating criteria and size of all ESP facilities, as well as the location of all pipelines and pumping stations. It is part of the overall value engineering effort for the ESP and requires a systematic approach to maximize cost-saving opportunities while maintaining the operational flexibility of the entire system. Planned work on the Olivenhain Pump Station and the Olivenhain 8 FCF has been postponed as has the design work on the San Vicente Pipeline and Interconnect project to permit a full analysis. Larger than Anticipated Repairs to the Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipelines. Inspections early in the fiscal year revealed the need to install an extensive steel sleeve nearly 2,000 feet long in the Rancho Penasquitos area. Additional inspections revealed the need to extend this work an additional 300 feet. The substantial scope of this work coupled with decisions made earlier in the fiscal year to defer work on this project to free-up resources to work on the Rate Study resulted in significant under-spending on this project. ESP Cost Revisions. During the first half of the fiscal year, it became increasingly clear from various design and project management studies that budget adjustments for the ESP would likely need to be made. The data indicated that while considerable cost savings could be achieved through optimization efforts, there would also be other areas where costs appeared to have a likelihood of increasing particularly if certain worst case contingencies were realized. In late May, a team consisting of engineering staff and selected consultants was formed to systematically study this issue. The team employed a bottoms up cost building approach using several different cost estimating methodologies and relied on various benchmarks to validate costs. The results of that study will be provided to the Board during the first quarter of FY /. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 6

10 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.3 Summary of Total CIP This section is included in the report to provide the status of project budgets for the CIP. The information presented in Table 1 shows total project and program budgets, life to date expenditures, and FY / expenditures. Figure 1 profiles actual expenditures versus the budgeted appropriation amount for FY / inclusive of all CIP projects. The FY / CIP budgeted appropriation was $99.4 million. for the first three quarters of the fiscal year were $27.4 million; expenditures in the last quarter of the year were $23.1 million. Total FY / CIP expenditures were $50.5 million. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 7

11 TABLE 1 Capital Improvement Program June 30, Life-To-Date Total Actual Life-To-Date Project Total Percent Project Name Budget Thru 6/30/99 FY 99/00 Thru 6/30/00 Budget Abandonment of Pipeline 4 at Alvarado 39,000 4,528 7,792 12,320 26,680 68% Additional Aqueduct Right of Way Width 1,300,000 37,247 69, ,840 1,193,160 92% Aqueduct Alignment Corrections 355, ,914 10, , ,164 48% Aqueduct Control System 4,570,000 4,406, ,853 4,584,275-14,275 0% Aqueduct Protection Program 8,000,000 3,535,080 1,028,531 4,563,611 3,436,389 43% Aqueduct Security Improvement Project 180,000 7, , ,023 96% Binational Water Facilities Study 3,000,000 28, , ,609 2,362,391 79% Bradley Park Relocation Pipelines 3 & 4 7,620,000 3,090 16,681 19,771 7,600, % Escondido Facility Soils Remediation 200,000 68,841 56, ,119 74,881 37% Escondido Maintenance Building 400, ,383 1, , % Emergency Storage Project PROJECT BUDGET STATUS ESP - Diversion Structure Modification (Phase I) 3,500, ,499, % ESP - ESP, Planning & Support Serv. (Phase I,II,III & IV) 56,700,000 22,273,882 5,718,239 27,992,121 28,707,879 51% ESP - Lake Hodges Inlet/Outlet (Phase III) 7,283, ,283, % ESP - Lake Hodges to Olivenhain Pipeline (Phase III) 24,729, ,729, % ESP - Lake Hodges Pump Station (Phase III) 35,681, , ,508 35,541, % ESP - Mods. to Valley Center Pump Stations (Phase I) 2,000, , ,191 1,604,809 80% ESP - Olivenhain Dam and Reservoir (Phase I) 148,050,000 10,327,892 13,772,621 24,100, ,949,487 84% ESP - Olivenhain Pipelines & Interconnect (Phase I) 29,500, ,606 3,206,201 4,201,807 25,298,193 86% ESP - Olivenhain Pump Station (Phase I) 37,450,000 1, , ,975 37,248,025 99% ESP - Operations Center Upgrade (Phase II) 2,500, ,500, % ESP - Pipeline 5 Pump Station (Phase II) 28,000, ,740 41,740 27,958, % ESP - Pump Station at Pipeline 3 & Interconnect (Phase III) 7,768, ,768, % ESP - Pump Station at Pipeline 4 (Phase III) 4,666, ,666, % ESP - San Vicente Dam Raise (Phase IV) 107,079, ,079, % ESP - San Vicente Pipeline & Aqueduct Interconnect (Phase II 168,543, , , ,406, % ESP - San Vicente Pump Station (Phase II) 44,000, , ,796 43,582,204 99% ESP - San Vicente Recreation Facility (Phase IV) 22,047, ,047, % ESP - San Vicente to First Aqueduct Pipeline (Phase I) 6,500, , ,328 6,276,672 97% ESP SUBTOTAL 736,000,000 33,599,259 24,252,074 57,851, ,148,666 92% 8

12 TABLE 1 Capital Improvement Program June 30, PROJECT BUDGET STATUS Life-To-Date Total Actual Life-To-Date Project Total Percent Project Name Budget Thru 6/30/99 FY 99/00 Thru 6/30/00 Budget Fallbrook 3/Rainbow 1 FCF Upgrade 1,370,000 95,594 81, ,088 1,192,912 87% Fallbrook 6/DeLuz 1FCF Throttling Valve Structure 1,045,000 13,287 48,835 62, ,878 94% Geographic Information Systems 6,200,000 1,299, ,305 1,601,139 4,598,862 74% Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project 2,640, , , ,836 1,996,164 76% Integrated Finance System 2,450,000 2,376,313 66,040 2,442,353 7,647 0% Levy Water Treatment Plant Expansion 16,846,765 16,287,467 15,073 16,302, ,225 3% Line Structure Sealing Project 495, ,536 2, , ,944 71% Miramar Pump Station Rehabilitation 1,720,000 25,626 63,374 89,000 1,631,000 95% Miramar Pump Station Valve & Meter Vaults 585, , , , ,091 29% Mission Trails P/L & Flow Regulatory Structure 30,753,000 30,699,515 19,365 30,718,880 34,120 0% Mitigation Program 4,000,000 3,390,326 34,819 3,425, ,855 14% Moreno Lakeside Pipeline - Flow Control Facility 2,420,000 5, , ,557 2,282,443 94% Moreno Lakeside Pipeline 20,880,995 1,175,573 1,513,817 2,689,390 18,191,605 87% New Office Facility 16,000,000 3,760,984 2,698,017 6,459,001 9,540,999 60% Olivenhain 6 and 7 Flow Control Facility 850,000 13,383 3,954 17, ,663 98% Olivenhain 8 FCF 2,500,000 5,694 1,016 6,710 2,493, % Pipelines 3 Operation & Pipeline 4 Conversion 1,986,000 1,877,284 9,573 1,886,857 99,143 5% P/L's 3 & 4 Conv -Diversion Structure to Miramar 2,263, , ,482 1,390, ,377 39% Pipeline 3 Transfer to City of San Diego 265, ,162 4, ,951 98% Pipeline 6 122,300,000 2,996,099 28,516 3,024, ,275,385 98% Pipeline Drainage Program 100,000 1, ,241 98,759 99% Ramona Reservoir Bypass 400,000 53, , ,380 87% Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline 71,310,000 70,718, ,285 70,984, ,226 0% Rancho Penasquitos P/L - Diversion Structure 18,720,000 5,963,016 5,961,957 11,924,973 6,795,027 36% Rancho Penasquitos P/L - Pressure Control Facility 5,400,000 15, , ,899 5,275,101 98% Regional Water Facilities Master Plan 1,800, , ,449 1,203, ,649 33% Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR125/94 Interchange 8,290, ,934 6,045,970 6,672,905 1,617,095 20% Replacement/Relining of Existing PCCP 78,770,000 1,376,392 1,961,687 3,338,079 75,431,921 96% Right of Way Access Improvements 650,000 47,979 15,551 63, ,470 90% San Diego 17 Flow Control/Pumping Facility 5,000,000 4,472 1,273 5,745 4,994, % 9

13 TABLE 1 Capital Improvement Program June 30, PROJECT BUDGET STATUS Life-To-Date Total Actual Life-To-Date Project Total Percent Project Name Budget Thru 6/30/99 FY 99/00 Thru 6/30/00 Budget San Diego 18/21 Flow Control Facility 2,400, ,193 1,016,406 1,414, ,401 41% Sonic Flow Meter Replacement Project 665, ,354 17, ,694 43,306 7% South Bay Freeway Crossing 400, , , ,354 1,646 0% SR 125 Second Aqueduct Relocation 200,000 10, , ,891 94% System Modifications 10,260,000 5,463, ,073 5,682,980 4,577,020 45% Terminal Structure Modifications 1,050,000 14,447 36,467 50, ,086 95% ULFT Incentive Program 6,300,000 3,100, ,156 3,744,969 2,555,031 41% Vallecitos 9 Flow Control Facility 2,000, ,975 81, ,560 1,778,441 89% Vallecitos 10 Flow Control Facility 377, ,616 15, ,384 96% Valley Center 8 Flow Control Facility 380, ,227 82, , ,799 50% Valley Center Pump Station 2,795, ,705 1,103,293 1,646,997 1,148,003 41% Valve/Actuator Procurement 900, ,130 12, , ,181 24% Subtotals 1,217,400, ,321,111 50,466, ,787, ,613,532 80% Substantially Completed Projects Helix 1 FCF Metering Improvements 52,240 52, , % La Mesa/Lemon Grove Pipeline and FCFs 122,500, ,408,489 4, ,413,242 86,758 0% Lower Otay Pipeline and Flow Control Facilities 39,550,000 39,447,425 25,490 39,472,915 77,085 0% National City/Southbay 4 Flow Control Facility 1,116,000 1,115, ,115, % North County Distribution Pipeline 26,482,000 26,343,061 3,548 26,346, ,391 1% San Marcos Pipeline 89,108,000 88,841,674 15,394 88,857, ,932 0% Scripps Ranch Pipeline 58,950,000 58,806,123 4,775 58,810, ,102 0% Valley Center Pipeline 24,334,000 24,248,744 9,599 24,258,343 75,657 0% Subtotals 362,092, ,263,480 63, ,327, ,201 0% CIP Budget Total 1,579,493, ,584,590 50,529, ,114, ,378,733 61% 10

14 Planned vs. Actual July 1, through June 30, FIGURE Actual Planned ENDINGMONTHOF 11

15 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.4 Discussion and Profile of Causes for Under- Under-expenditures of the FY / appropriation were $48.9 million. Table 2 profiles the principal reasons ($47.7 million) for the significant under-expenditures, which fall into seven categories. The categories are: Staffing Shortages. Nine projects were deferred because of staffing shortages created primarily as a result of staff involvement in the Revenue and Rate Study. In the aggregate, this resulted in $6.2 million of deferred work. Other Agency Delays. Three projects were delayed due to the dependence on other agencies. The largest of the projects is the Olivenhain Pipelines and our dependence upon the OMWD s contractor to have the Olivenhain Water Treatment Plant site ready in January ; it was not available until May of. The second project is the Ground Water Storage and Recovery Study. A number of significant issues relative to a Phase II study focused on the San Diego Formation and is the basis of an ongoing dialogue between the Authority, the City of San Diego, and the Sweetwater Authority. Pending resolution of these issues, the Phase II study has been delayed. The cumulative value of these delays is $21.0 million and accounts for 44 percent of the under-expenditures for this fiscal year. Finally, the Binational Water Facilities Study was delayed due to the Mexican Agencies delay in beginning their portion of the Study. Contractor Delays. Contractor delays played a part in the delay of four projects this year: the Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline Diversion Structure, ESP Diversion Structure Modifications, Modifications to Valley Center Pump Station, and the Valley Center Pump Station. Impacts on the first two projects were significant resulting in under-expenditures of $5.3 million. The central issue on these projects was conformance to the concrete design mix. Staff and Board Delays. Three projects have been impacted by actions of staff and/or the Board causing delays. The delays in acquiring additional right of way in the Black Mountain Ranch area have already been discussed; this delay resulted in under-expenditures of $730,000. The Board directed collaboration with other public agencies to obtain needed ESP mitigation property has resulted in a delay of a year and the under-expenditure in this fiscal year of $3.6 million. Finally, the planning and design issues associated with the interior of the New Office Facility took longer than was anticipated delaying the expenditures of the entire appropriation this fiscal year; $3.5 million was unspent at the close of the year. In the aggregate, these delays resulted in $7.9 million in under-expenditures. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 12

16 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP Optimization Study. Planned work on the Olivenhain Pump Station and the Olivenhain 8 FCF has been postponed pending resolution of issues regarding the hydraulic interaction of the pumping stations that take water from each of the three reservoirs during an emergency. Design work had been delayed on the San Vicente Pipeline and Aqueduct Interconnect pending resolution of whether or not a direct connection to the Miramar Reservoir would be cost effective and provide the greatest utility to the system. While resolution was reached on these issues before the end of the fiscal year, these projects under-spent $4.3 million because of these delays. Projects Completed Under Budget. The property acquisition associated with the Lake Hodges Pump Station cost $600,000 less than was forecast and Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR 125/94 Interchange was completed $1.6 million less than budget. Environmental Delays. Work on the Vallecitos 9 FCF has been delayed pending resolution of concerns raised regarding the endangered Brodiaea Filifolia plants in the vernal pools near the proposed construction site. These delays resulted in an under-expenditure of $438,000 on this project. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 13

17 Table 2 Capital Improvement Program Profile of Under- for Key Projects ($000) June 30, REASONS FOR UNDER-EXPENDITURES Other Staff/ FY/ Unspent Staffing Agency Contractor Board Optimization Under Environmental Project Name Appropriation Appropriation Shortages Delays Delays Delays Study Budget Additional Aqueduct Right of Way Width Binational Water Facilities Study 1, Bradley Park Relocation Pipelines 3 & ESP - Diversion Structure Modification (Phase I) 1,030 1,029 1,029 ESP - ESP, Planning & Support Serv. (Phase I,II,III & IV) 9,360 3,644 3,644 ESP - Lake Hodges Pump Station (Phase III) 1, ESP - Olivenhain Pipelines & Interconnect (Phase I) 22,014 18,808 18,808 ESP - Olivenhain Pump Station (Phase I) 1, ESP - San Vicente Pipeline & Aqueduct Interconnect (Ph 2,060 1,923 1,923 Fallbrook 3/Rainbow 1 FCF Upgrade Fallbrook 6/DeLuz 1 Space FCF Throttling Valve Structur Geographic Information Systems Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project 1,683 1,518 1,518 Levy Water Treatment Plant Expansion New Office Facility 6,203 3,505 3,505 Olivenhain 6 and Olivenhain 8 FCF 1,393 1,392 1,392 P/L's 3 & 4 Conv -Diversion Structure to Miramar 1, Rancho Penasquitos P/L - Diversion Structure 10,215 4,253 4,253 Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR125/94 Interchange 7,680 1,634 1,634 Replacement/Relining of Existing PCCP 5,079 3,117 3,117 Terminal Structure Modifications Vallecitos 9 Flow Control Facility Totals 75,615 47,703 6,216 21,010 5,283 7,880 4,283 2, Percentage of Under- 13% 44% 11% 17% 9% 5% 1% 14

18 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.5 Performance Indicators The following performance indicators for / have been established as a means of measuring staff s efficiency and effectiveness at meeting the goals and objectives of the CIP: Activity/Criteria FY / Goal FY / Results CIP Project expenditures as percent of FY appropriation Complete milestones for projects with budgets greater than $5 million Complete milestones for projects with budgets between $2 million and $5 million* Complete milestones for projects with budgets less than $2 million 100% 51% 90% 77% 75% 65% 50% 58% Other costs of major pipeline projects, excluding construction contracts will not exceed 20% of total project cost CIP project cash flow estimates to the Finance Department Less than 20% of total costs Submit % Continuously for invoices > $100,000 Perform aqueduct shutdown for inspection and preventative maintenance Complete emergency aqueduct repairs within ten days 4 times 4 100% 100% I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 15

19 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.6 CIP Milestone Attainment Table 3 shows the level of milestone attainment for CIP projects with FY / appropriations greater than $1 million. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 16

20 Table 3 Capital Improvement Program Schedule Milestones for CIP Projects with Annual Greater than $1 Million June 30, Project Milestone Identified in / CIP Est. Date Actual or Comment in 99/00 Current CIP Date Binational Water Prepare scope of work for Mexico 5/00 4/00 Facilities Study alignments Complete cost refinement for US 6/00 10/00 Delayed due to geologic alignments drilling access challenges ESP-Planning & Support Award OCIP Contract 7/99 10/99 Services Complete Optimization Study 6/00 10/00 Delayed due to revised demand forecast and Rate Study Acquire ESP Mitigation lands 6/00 12/00 Delayed because of Board Guidance ESP-Lake Hodges Acquire property from City of San Diego 4/00 6/00 Optimization Study delays Pump Station Complete conceptual design 10/99 1/00 Optimization Study delays ESP-Olivenhain Dam & Complete final design 6/00 8/00 Delayed due to OMWD Reservoir Award construction contract for 12/99 8/00 construction that prevented foundation excavation test embankment work Complete design & construction of 9/99 9/00 Delayed because of OMWD RCC test fill and quarry contractor Finish construction right abutment 1/00 9/00 Delayed because of OMWD access road contractor ESP-Olivenhain Award Phase I construction contract 9/99 9/99 Spec 500 Phase I awarded to Pipelines and Negotiate and award contract for 10/99 10/99 Valley Engineers. Interconnect Phase I construction management services Award Phase II construction contract 12/99 6/00 Delay caused by OMWD Contractor ESP-Olivenhain Pump Award design contract 12/99 7/00 Design award delayed pending Station Complete preliminary design 4/00 1/01 ESP Optimization Study ESP-San Vicente Select route 11/99 11/00 Delayed due to Optimization Pipeline & Aqueduct Complete transient analysis 4/00 1/01 Study; field work delayed due to Interconnect endangered species issues Award design contract 6/00 4/01 Groundwater Storage & Complete I.D. and screening of 8/99 2/00 Delayed in response to concerns Recovery Project potential groundwater storage and expressed by member agencies recovery projects regarding in San Diego Begin field test and confirm 12/99 6/00 Formation characteristics of aquifer systems Moreno-Lakeside Complete design and construction 6/00 10/00 Design delayed due to Pipeline documents pipeline alignment issues Develop agreement with Helix Water 5/00 9/00 and addressing of community District concerns Develop agreement with City of 3/00 12/00 Required additional City review San Diego for interim use of San Vicente by-pass pipeline New Office Facility Award construction contract 9/99 2/00 Construction contract awarded Reach 60% complete on 6/00 8/00 and work 50% complete on construction 6/30/00 Olivenhain 8 - Flow Award design contract 5/99 7/00 Design work consolidated with Control Facility Complete final design 2/00 9/01 Olivenhain Pump Station project Pipeline 3 and 4 Complete final design 9/99 7/00 Delayed due to staff vacancies Conversion, Miramar Complete construction of San Dieguito- 4/00 1/00 and Project Manager involved Santa Fe 4 and 5 Flow Control Facility in Rate Study Rancho Penasquitos Begin construction 7/99 7/99 Project was delayed pending Pipeline Diversion Notice of Completion 5/01 8/01 Contractor's ability to create Structure correct concrete design mix Relocation of Pipeline 3 Complete construction 6/00 4/00 Project completed ahead of at State Route 125/94 schedule and below budget Interchange 17

21 Table 3 Capital Improvement Program Schedule Milestones for CIP Projects with Annual Greater than $1 Million June 30, Project Milestone Identified in / CIP Est. Date Actual or Comment in 99/00 Current CIP Date Replacement/Relining Advertise for construction 5/99 5/99 of Existing PCCP relocation of Pipeline 3 at Chevy Chase apartments Complete Pipeline 3 condition 6/00 6/00 Began design for relining assessment between Black 2,300 feet and Replacement of Mountain Vent and Miramar Hill 100 feet of PCCP. Construction Vent Scheduled for 7/00 to 1/01 San Diego 18/21 Flow Complete construction SD 18/21 12/99 5/01 Schedule adjusted by the Control Facility Flow Control Facility Inlet Pipeline City of San Diego to Begin construction SD 18/21 Flow 10/99 12/99 accommodate other city Control Facility projects Valley Center Pump Begin construction 7/99 11/99 Contractor issues caused delay in Station issuing Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed 2.7 Status of Major Professional Service Agreements and Construction Contracts Tables 4, 5, and 6 summarize the status of major consultant agreements and construction contracts in support of the CIP. The status is presented as of June 30,. 18

22 TABLE 4 Capital Improvement Program June 30, PLANNING AND DESIGN CONTRACT STATUS Project Number Consultant Original Contract Amount Amendments Total Amount Invoiced to Date Percent $ Invoiced Start Date Finish Date B0101 Brown & Caldwell 383, , , ,688 95% 7/96 10/00 97% C0401 Boyle Engineering 733,816 69, , , % 10/98 6/00 100% E0201 Black & Veatch 467,500 2,595,815 3,063,315 2,701,990 88% 6/92 4/01 92% F0101 Black & Veatch 4,950,000-4,950, ,049 17% 2/95 6/04 57% G0200 Black & Veatch 10,000-10,000 10, % 11/99 5/00 100% G0200 CIC Research, Inc. 5,400-5,400 5, % 11/99 1/00 100% G0200 ECI, Water Resource Division of Frederic R. Harris, Inc. 10,000-10,000 10, % 12/99 6/00 100% G0200 GEI Consultants, Inc. 500,000 5,920,100 6,420,100 3,224,998 50% 3/98 3/03 47% G0200 Henwood Energy Services 49,900-49,900 47,883 96% 11/99 6/00 100% G0200 Johnson Management Group 944, ,000 70,000 7% 3/00 12/03 9% G0200 Katz & Associates 340, ,849 89,576 26% 5/99 6/02 38% G0200 KEA Environmental 4,300,000-4,300,000 1,153,544 27% 10/98 10/03 35% G0200 Parsons Infrastructure 3,779,800 1,720,000 5,499, ,384 17% 7/99 4/04 21% G0300 BOSC Contracts 145,000 20, , ,427 86% 12/98 12/00 79% G0300 Parsons-Harza 6,950, ,000 7,840,000 5,630,575 72% 8/98 4/03 41% G0700 Brierley Associates 658, ,775 20,855 3% 1/00 5/03 15% G0400 Camp, Dresser, and McKee 960,000 96,000 1,056, ,813 94% 9/98 8/01 60% H0101 Montgomery Watson 595, , , ,455 42% 12/97 5/01 74% H0201 Merkel & Associates 100,000 40, , ,063 72% 2/96 2/02 68% H0201 Hinshaw & Associates 49,000-49,000 6,895 14% 5/97 5/02 57% H0201 SDG&E/J. Whalen 49,000-49,000 19,358 40% 11/98 Open - I0201 Montgomery Watson 429, , ,933 26% 9/99 12/01 36% I0201 Black & Veatch 150, ,000 69,299 46% 8/99 12/00 65% M0111 Corrao Group 252,500 39, , ,845 37% 7/97 11/02 55% M0161 AKM Consulting Engineers 98,000-98,000 98, % 9/97 3/00 100% M0171 John Powell & Associates 266, , ,477 84% 4/97 9/00 95% M0201 Richard Brady & Associates 268, ,000 50,692 19% 4/00 8/02 19% M0221 Daniel Boyle Engineering 302, ,500 21,912 7% 10/99 2/03 20% N0034 Parsons-Engineering Science 2,881,570-2,881,570 1,534,700 53% 10/97 9/02 55% N0034 Dudek & Associates 240,000 50, , ,315 99% 12/97 2/01 79% N0301 Agra Earth & Environmental 20,000 4,812 24,812 13,050 53% 8/99 9/00 77% R0101 M.J. Schiff 250, ,000-0% 1/00 1/03 6% R0101 Raz Konyalian 757, , ,793 93% 3/98 10/00 90% R0101 Pressure Pipe Inspection Co. 270, , , % 2/00 5/00 100% R0101 Russell Corrosion Consultants 100, ,000 29,569 30% 2/00 2/03 14% Total 32,267,051 11,867,309 44,134,360 21,181,069 48% Time Elapsed Percent 19

23 TABLE 5 Capital Improvement Program June 30, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT STATUS Change Project Number Spec No. Contractor Scope Contract Amount Order Amount Total Amount Invoiced to Date Percent $ Invoiced Start Date Finish Date Time Elapsed Percent B J. W. Contracting Valley Center Pump Station 2,269,000-2,269, ,140 19% 9/99 4/01 53% C0401/ R Mitchell Pacific Relocation of SR 125/94 4,818,334 1,025,800 5,844,134 5,844, % 7/99 4/00 100% D Cass Construction Modifications to SD 7 FCF 340,000 14, , , % 1/98 1/00 100% D Pascal & Ludwig SD/SF 4 & 5 FCF 743,900 9, , , % 11/98 1/00 100% E C.E. Wylie Rancho Penasquitos Diversion Structure 10,640,000 58,421 10,698,421 4,165,185 39% 7/99 8/01 48% G Kiewit Pacific Olivenhain Dam - Package 2: Test Quarry & RCC Test Fill 1,257,758 45,068 1,302,826 1,251,412 96% 12/99 9/00 77% G Valley Engineers Olivenhain Pipelines, Phase I 2,110,800 60,672 2,171,472 1,983,129 91% 9/99 8/00 83% M AES Construction Group SD 18/21 FCF 1,340,790 10,448 1,351, ,825 62% 12/99 9/00 77% R LH Woods PL 3 Relining in RP 1,679,999-1,679,999-0% 6/00 1/01 0% Total 25,200,581 1,224,697 26,425,278 15,608,013 59% 20

24 TABLE 6 Capital Improvement Program June 30, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTRACT STATUS Project Number Consultant Scope Contract Amount Amendments Total Amount Invoiced to Date Percent Invoiced Start Date Finish Date Time Elapsed Percent B0104 Pacific 17 P2A Pump Station CM Services 249, , ,383 55% 11/99 10/00 73% C0401/ R0202 Haley & Aldrich Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR 125/94 Interchange 930, , , % 6/99 6/00 100% D0201 D0401 Corrao Group CM Inspection for Four Projects 190, , ,691 72% 3/98 5/01 72% McDonald/Stephens Diversion Structure CM E0202 Engineers Services 650, , ,946 39% 7/99 3/01 57% E0202 Klienfelder Diversion Structure Geotechnical Services 260, ,000 32,693 13% 7/99 3/01 57% E0202 RW Hunt Pipe Fabrication Inspection 200, , ,431 67% 9/98 9/00 96% Olivenhain Dam CM G0300 Raytheon Infrastructu Services 11,900,000-11,900, ,994 8% 2/00 6/02 18% Olivenhain Pipelines CM G0400 Dudek & Associates Services 2,500,000-2,500,000-0% 6/00 8/01 0% M0171 Southland Geotechnical Consultants San Diego 18/21 FCF Geotech/Material Testing Services 10,000-10,000 6,987 70% 4/00 9/00 59% Total 16,889,055-16,889,055 2,524,125 15% 21

25 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.8 Status of Reimbursements for Reimbursable Projects Table 7 provides the status of reimbursable projects as of June 30,. Separate data is provided for this fiscal year and life to date (LTD) for the projects. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 22

26 Table 7 Capital Improvement Program June 30, Budgeted Amount Reimbursements Reimbursements Project Reimbursable Authority Eligible to be Invoiced Invoiced Received Received Project Name Budget Budget Cost 6/30/00 Note Invoiced FY99/00 LTD FY99/00 To Date Abandonment of Pipeline 4 at Alvarado $39,000 $39,000 - $12, Binational Water Facilities Study $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $500,000 $637,609 $637, Olivenhain Dam Packages 2,3,&4 $148,050,000 $22,500,000 $125,550,000 $22,688,337 $2,171,695 $1,302,370 $1,302,370 $1,302,370 $1,302,370 Olivenhain Pipelines & Interconnect $29,500,000 $6,000,000 $23,500,000 $3,730,845 $873, , , , ,904 Moreno-Lakeside Flow Control Facility $2,420,000 $1,040,600 $1,379,400 $137,557 $137, Olivenhain 6 and 7 Flow Control Facilit $850,000 $145,000 $705,000 $17, Olivenhain 8 Flow Control Facility $2,500,000 $2,500,000 - $6, Pipeline 3 transfer to City of SD $265,000 $265,000 - $4, Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR 125/94 $8,290,000 $8,290,000 - $6,672,905 $6,672,905 $3,932,768 $4,292,715 $3,932,768 $4,292,715 San Diego 17 FCF/Pumping Facility $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $5, San Diego 18/21 Flow Control Facility $2,400,000 $2,400,000 - $1,414, South Bay Freeway Crossing $400,000 $400,000 - $398,354 1, 4 $260, SR 125 Second Aqueduct Relocation $200,000 $200,000 - $11, Valley Center 8 Flow Control Facility $380,000 $380,000 - $190,201 3, 4 $190, Helix 1 FCF Metering Improvements $52,240 $52,240 - $52,240 $52,240 - $52,240 - $52,240 Lower Otay Pipeline & Flow Control Fa $39,550,000 $450,000 $39,100,000 $39,472,915 3, 4 $450, National City/Southbay 4 FCF $1,116,000 $1,116,000 - $1,115,723 $1,114,538 - $1,114,538 - $1,114,538 Totals $244,012,240 $51,277,840 $192,734,400 $76,568,555 $12,559,954 $5,672,043 $7,198,767 $5,672,043 $7,198, Reimbursement occurs at the end of the project. 2. through 6/30/00 not subject to reimbursement. STATUS OF REIMBURSEMENTS FOR REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS 3. Deposits previously reported as reimbursables have been removed. These amounts remain as deposits until project ends, at which time they become reimbursements. 4. Project closed end of FY /. Will invoice in FY /. 23

27 FY / Annual Budget Report on the CIP 2.9 Detailed Project Information Appendix B contains detailed information on each CIP project. New with this report is an individual synopsis of events and significant issues for each project. I:\CIP\CIPBudgt\9900\Annual Budget Report\Narrative.doc 24

28 APPENDIX A

29 APPENDIX A Project Categories/Locations Table of Contents List of Figures Figure A-1 Capital Improvement Program Location Map A-1 A-i

30 0miles 5 10 RIVERSIDECOUNTY SANDIEGOCOUNTY LEGEND PLANNING/EIR DESIGNSTAGE UNDERCONSTRUCTION Ramona Pipeline L Lake Henshaw Sutherland ElCapitan SanVicente Reservoir Lake Hodges Lake Poway Miramar Reservoir LakeJennings Lake Murray Sweetwater Upper Otay Lower Otay L L PROJECTS: Pipeline6 ValleyCenterPumpStation TwinOaksValleyDiversionStructure ESPDiversionStructureModifications BradleyParkRelocationPipelines3&4 OlivenhainEmergencyStorageProjects LakeHodgesPumpStation- EmergencyStorage NewOfficeFacility Pipeline3&4Conversion-Diversion StructuretoMiramar LevyWaterTreatmentPlantExpansion Moreno-LakesidePipeline&FCF GroundwaterStorage&RecoveryProject SanVicenteEmergencyStorageProjects A B C D E F H I K L O O P J H G PROJECTS NOTSHOWN: TerminalStructureModifications SanVicenteto2ndAqueductPipeline Pipeline5PumpStation Pipeline4PumpStation Pipeline3PumpStation N N N Q Q Q L A B C D E F H I K L O O P J H G M N N N Q R P S Q R S N A B C D E F H I K L J N H G M NP P N Figure A-1 A-1

31 APPENDIX B

32 APPENDIX B Project Detail Information Table of Contents Project Name: Project No: Page Abandonment of Pipeline 4 at Alvarado D1101 B-1 Additional Aqueduct Right of Way Width N0341 B-3 Aqueduct Alignment Corrections N0281 B-5 Aqueduct Control System N0011 B-7 Aqueduct Protection Program R0101 B-9 Aqueduct Security Improvement Project P0301 B-11 Binational Water Facilities Study I0201 B-13 Bradley Park Relocation Pipelines 3 & 4 D0701 B-15 Escondido Facility Soils Remediation N0311 B-17 Escondido Maintenance Building N0271 B-19 ESP - Diversion Structure Modifications G1500 B-21 ESP - Emerg. Storage Project, Planning & Support Services G0200 B-23 ESP - Lake Hodges Inlet/Outlet G1100 B-25 ESP - Lake Hodges to Olivenhain Pipeline G1200 B-27 ESP - Lake Hodges Pump Station G1300 B-29 ESP - Modifications to Valley Center Pump Station G1600 B-31 ESP - Olivenhain Dam and Reservoir G0300 B-33 ESP - Olivenhain Pipeline and Interconnect G0400 B-35 ESP - Olivenhain Pump Station G0500 B-37 ESP - Operations Center Upgrade G1900 B-39 ESP - Pipeline 5 Pump Station G0900 B-41 ESP - Pump Station at Pipeline 3 and Interconnect G1700 B-43 ESP - Pump Station at Pipeline 4 G1800 B-45 ESP - San Vicente Dam Raise G1400 B-47 ESP - San Vicente Pipeline and Aqueduct Interconnect G0700 B-49 ESP - San Vicente Pump Station G0600 B-51 ESP - San Vicente Recreation Facility G0800 B-53 ESP - San Vicente to First Aqueduct Pipeline G1000 B-55 Fallbrook 3/Rainbow 1 FCF Upgrade M0201 B-57 Fallbrook 6/DeLuz 1 FCF Throttling Valve Structure M0221 B-59 Geographic Information Systems H0301 B-61 Groundwater Storage and Recovery Project T0102 B-63 Integrated Finance System N0243 B-65 Levy Water Treatment Plant Expansion N0031 B-67 Line Structure Sealing Project P0401 B-69 Miramar Pump Station Rehabilitation N0331 B-71 Miramar Pump Station Valve and Meter Vaults M0191 B-73 Mission Trails Pipeline and Flow Regulatory Structure D0301 B-75 B-i

33 Project Name: Project No: Page Mitigation Program (Crestridge Property) H0201 B-77 Moreno-Lakeside Pipeline - FCF N0032 B-79 Moreno-Lakeside Pipeline N0034 B-81 New Office Facility H0402 B-83 Olivenhain 6 & 7 FCF M0241 B-85 Olivenhain 8 FCF M0251 B-87 Pipeline 3 Operation and Pipeline 4 Conversion D0801 B-89 Pipelines 3 & 4 Conversion - Diversion Structure to Miramar D1001 B-91 Pipeline 3 Transfer to City of San Diego C0301 B-93 Pipeline 6 F0101 B-95 Pipeline Drainage Program N0231 B-97 Ramona Reservoir Bypass N0121 B-99 Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline E0201 B-101 Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline - Diversion Structure E0202 B-103 Rancho Penasquitos Pipeline Pressure Control Facility E0203 B-105 Regional Water Facilities Master Plan H0101 B-107 Relocation of Pipeline 3 at SR 125/94 Interchange C0401 B-109 Replacement/Relining of Existing PCCP R0201 B-111 Right of Way Access Improvements P0201 B-113 San Diego 17 Flow Control/Pumping Facility M0181 B-115 San Diego 18/21 FCF M0171 B-117 Sonic Flow Meter Replacement Project P0501 B-119 South Bay Freeway Crossing D0901 B-121 SR 125 Second Aqueduct Relocation N0171 B-123 System Modifications L0000 B-125 Terminal Structure Modifications N0301 B-127 ULFT Incentive Program W0101 B-129 Vallecitos 9 FCF M0111 B-131 Vallecitos 10 FCF M0261 B-133 Valley Center 8 FCF M0161 B-135 Valley Center Pump Station B0104 B-137 Valve/Actuator Procurement M0231 B-139 Substantially Completed Helix I FCF Metering Improvements N0033 B-141 La Mesa/Lemon Grove Pipeline and FCFs D0201 B-143 Lower Otay Pipeline and FCFs D0401 B-145 National City/Southbay 4 FCF D0402 B-147 North County Distribution Pipeline D0601 B-149 San Marcos Pipeline E0101 B-151 Scripps Ranch Pipeline D0101 B-153 Valley Center Pipeline B0101 B-155 B-ii