Culinary and Pressure Irrigation Water System. Capital Facilities Plan

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Culinary and Pressure Irrigation Water System. Capital Facilities Plan"

Transcription

1 Culinary and Pressure Irrigation Water System Capital Facilities Plan September 2009 Prepared By: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 240 West Center St., Ste. 200 Orem, Utah (801)

2 SANTAQUIN CITY CULINARY AND PRESSURE IRRIGATION WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND ASSOCIATED IMPACT FEES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF REPORT FORMAT OF REPORT LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING WATER SYSTEM EXISTING WATER SOURCES EXISTING WATER STORAGE EXISTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS WATER SOURCE IMPROVEMENTS WATER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SUMMARY REVENUE SOURCES Figures 1-9 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A - FIGURE V-5 ALLOCATION OF WATER SOURCES (Revised Sept 2007) CALCULATION OF CULINARY STORAGE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE APPENDIX B PROJECT CALCULATIONS

3 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE OF REPORT A capital facilities plan is an essential element in the development of any community experiencing significant growth. With a capital facilities plan, a community has a tool to guide infrastructure improvements. This water system capital facilities plan provides direction for future growth, and provides a plan for the construction of water improvements to serve the residents of Santaquin City. The goals of the capital improvement plan are listed below: Model the current water system infrastructure to serve the current connections. Model the future water system required to service the projected buildout connections based on the currently adopted General Plan. Determine the improvements needed current and future, to meet city growth projections. Estimate the cost of improvements required to serve future development. These costs can then be used to calculate the impact fees which will be assessed by the city. By establishing impact fees to pay for the capital facilities projects in this report it will provide a means for Santaquin to meet the demands of future growth. 1.2 FORMAT OF REPORT The report is sequenced as follows: 1. Determination of the current level of service (Section 2.0). 2. Description of the existing facilities and any existing excess capacity (Section 3.0). 3. Description of the improvements required to address current deficiencies and accommodate growth, including both the cost and the timeframe for construction (Sections 4.0 and 5.0). 4. Discussion of available funding sources (Section 6.0). 2.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE The accepted levels of service in Santaquin are based on the state standards for water delivery systems as set forth in the State of Utah drinking water rules Section R The accepted levels of service are as follows: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 1

4 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan Table 2.1: Culinary Use Accepted Level of Service Type Quantity Unit Source (Peak Day Demand) 800 gpd (gallons per day) per ERU Storage 400 gallons per ERU Fire Storage 120,000 gallons (minimum per isolated system, may be more where required by fire code) Emergency Storage 25% of total required storage Table 2.2: Outdoor Use Accepted Level of Service Type Quantity Unit Source 3.96 gpm (gallons per minute) per irrigated acre Storage 2848 gallons per irrigable acre The accepted levels of service for pressures in the culinary system is the state standard, which requires a minimum of 20 psi during fire flow, 30 psi during peak instantaneous demand, and 40 psi during peak day demand. The accepted level of service for pressure in the secondary system is a minimum of 35 psi during the peak day demand. No state standard exists for minimum pressure in a secondary system which does not provide fire suppression, so this minimum pressure has been determined by Santaquin City. 3.0 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM Santaquin has two separate water supply systems. The culinary water system primarily serves indoor demands, while the pressure irrigation system (or secondary system) serves outdoor demands. The culinary system only serves the outdoor demand in limited locations and circumstances. The existing facilities are discussed below organized into the type of facility: source, storage, or distribution. 3.1 EXISTING WATER SOURCES A listing of the capacities of existing water sources is provided in Table and below. Separate tables are provided for the culinary and secondary systems: Table 3.1.1: Existing Culinary Water Supply Sources Source Quantity (mgd) Springs 1.27 Cemetery Well 1.01 Center Street Well.81 East Side Well.46 Summit Ridge Well 1.66 Total Culinary Sources 5.20 J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 2

5 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan Table 3.1.2: Existing Secondary Water Supply Sources Source Quantity (mgd) Summit Creek Irrigation Shares (500 Shares) 1.35 Secondary Total 1.35 The water supplied by the Summit Creek Irrigation Company is diverted from the irrigation company s pipeline in Summit Creek Canyon, and from two wells owned by the Summit Creek Irrigation Company. The table below compares the existing source capacity to the current required capacity, based on the current number of connections (currently 2014 ERU). The table also identifies any excess capacity in the system. The current demand is based on the current number of connections, and assumes ¼ acre of irrigated land per connection. Table 3.1.3: Existing Demands on Water Sources Vs. Capacity Type Capacity (mgd) Current Demand Difference (mgd) (mgd) Culinary Sources Secondary Sources Total Excess 2.07 Water from the culinary sources currently supplements the secondary system, making up for what looks like a deficiency in the table above. As more irrigation water rights are obtained, and when the CUP (Central Utah Project) is completed, which will provide another source of water, this supplementation will discontinue. Overall, the city currently has excess water source capacity. 3.2 EXISTING WATER STORAGE A listing of the current water storage tanks and reservoirs can be found below in Tables and Separate tables are provided for the culinary and secondary systems. Table shows the existing capacity, the current demand, and the corresponding surplus or deficiency for each culinary tank. The totals are then added together to find the overall system s excess capacity. The current culinary storage demand was determined using the existing number of connections in the zone, and the established level of service described previously. The quantity of required culinary storage includes fire demands and an additional 25% for emergency storage. The current irrigation storage requirements on the culinary tanks were determined using the existing quantity of irrigable acres in the zone, unless they are currently served by the secondary system. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 3

6 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan Table shows separate calculations for storage demands on the culinary tanks, either with or without the irrigation demands in the zone. This is because as soon as booster pumps are installed on the secondary system to bring secondary water to Upper Zone and Eastside Zone, the irrigation demands on these tanks will be eliminated, leaving only the culinary demands. Under normal conditions, each culinary tank supplies one or more zones, with each tank operating independent of the other existing tanks. During an emergency situation, the Eastside Zone Tank and Upper Zone Tank can supplement the Main Zone Tank, as needed. Because of this possible supplementation, the totals for existing storage and required storage for these individual tanks can be added together to find the system-wide surplus capacity, as is done in Table below. Due to development agreements, the Summit Ridge Upper Tank can only supply water to the Summit Ridge Development and is therefore broken out separately in Table There is currently only one storage reservoir for the secondary system, as shown below in Table The Summit Ridge Development is not considered separately in the secondary system as it is in the culinary system. The storage requirements for the secondary system were determined using the existing number of connections (2014 ERU), assuming a ¼ acre of land per connection, and the established level of service described previously. Table 3.2.1: Existing Culinary Water Storage System Tank Capacity (gal) Culinary Required (gal) Irrigation Required (gal) Surplus without Irrigation (gal) Surplus with Irrigation (gal) Main City Eastside Zone 1,000, , , , ,612 System Tank Upper Zone Tank 1,000, , , , ,313 Main Zone Tank 500, , , ,000 Main City System Totals: 2,500,000 1,560,000 1,323, , ,701 Summit Ridge System Summit Ridge Upper Tank 1,200, , , , ,896 Summit Ridge System Totals: 1,200, , , , ,896 Table 3.2.2: Existing Secondary Water Storage Reservoir Capacity (gal) Required (gal) Difference (gal) Ahlin Pond 13,034,000 5,735,872 7,298,128 Totals: 5,735,872 7,298,128 As can be seen above, when including the current irrigation demands on the culinary tanks in the Main City System, the overall system is deficient, but if J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 4

7 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan the irrigation demands are not included, the overall system has adequate storage. When booster pumps are installed on the secondary system the irrigation demands on the culinary tanks will be eliminated, resulting in a culinary system which has surplus capacity. The Summit Ridge culinary system has adequate storage to meet current demands in the Summit Ridge Development in either situation. The secondary system has excess capacity since the Ahlin Pond was designed to serve the future needs of the city. 3.3 EXISTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The existing distribution systems were modeled and evaluated to determine whether or not the existing systems met the established levels of service for pressure when in full operation. In the culinary system some low pressures were identified along 4 th south which will be corrected as part of one of the projects listed in Section 5.0 of this report (Project 2a). There also exists some inefficiencies in the system which result in higher operating costs which must be addressed. These inefficiencies are discussed further in section 4.1. In the secondary system, there are no existing deficiencies, but several pipelines have been oversized to feed future development. Impact fees will be used to pay back these oversized lines. Figures 1 and 2 show the extents of the existing distribution systems. 4.0 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS In order to meet the demands of future growth, the capacity of the system must be enhanced. The growth projections for Santaquin used in this study are 6% growth per year until 2013, then a 4% growth per year until 2029 and then a 3% growth per year. Growth projections predict that Santaquin will reach build-out in The yearly increase in irrigable acres was created by the addition of 1/4 acre of irrigable land with each new connection. Growth projections can be seen in Figure V-5 in Appendix A. A summary of growth in terms of Acres and Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) is shown below: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 5

8 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan Table 4.0.1: Growth Projections Summary Land Use Total Acres Build-out ERU"s Current ERU's Agriculture Business park Commercial Low Density Housing Medium Density Housing Medium-High Density Housing Open Space Public Facilities Ranchettes Transit Oriented Development Total The existing systems cannot support the increase in connections as shown above at the accepted level of service. Enhancements will need to be made to water sources, storage, and the distribution systems in order to provide for the demands of the expanding population. A more detailed description is given below for each portion of the system: water sources, water storage, and the distribution systems. 4.1 WATER SOURCE IMPROVEMENTS Water source capacity must be increased to meet the growing need of the culinary and pressure irrigation systems. A summary of the needs is provided below in Table For more detailed information on the timing of allocation of water sources see Figure V-5 in Appendix A. Table 4.1.1: Increase in Water Source Demand Type Current Capacity (mgd) Build-out ERU Build-out Demand (mgd) Required Increase (mgd) Culinary , Secondary , As growth occurs, land developers will be required to provide water sufficient for their developments, both culinary and irrigation. The Central Utah Project (CUP), when completed, will provide a new resource for pressure irrigation water. The quantity of water sources must be kept well above the demands so if a pump failure occurs there will still be sufficient water to supply the city s needs. As soon as possible a new well will need to be drilled, to provide a standby supply for when the Summit Creek Well is out of service. The existing Summit Ridge pumping facility should be upgraded to increase its capacity to the capacity of the well, probably about 3,000 gpm. A new well should also be drilled in the same area of similar capacity. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 6

9 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan System Pumps in the lower pressure zones currently pump all of the water to higher pressure zones, only to have a large portion of the water released back into the lower zones through pressure reducing valves. This is very inefficient. Considerable savings will be realized if water is pumped only as high as the system needs. To correct this it will be necessary to reconfigure the pumps and piping to allow the pumps to pump into their own zone. Booster pumps should then be installed to pump to the upper zones only when necessary, and the pressure reducing stations from the upper zones to the lower zones will not be used, except in emergency. These improvement projects are listed in more detail in Section WATER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS New tanks and reservoirs must be installed to accommodate the increased storage requirements from growth. A summary of the needs is provided below in Table Table 4.2.1: Increase in Water Storage Demand Current Capacity (gal) Build-out Demand (gal) Fire Demand (gal) Emergency Demand (25%) (gal) Total Demand (gal) Required Increase (gal) Culinary 3,700,000 9,206,672 3,060,000 2,301,668 14,568,340 10,868,340 Secondary 13,034,000 20,608,128 20,608,128 7,574,128 *Culinary Demand values come from the table Calculation of Culinary Storage Capacity Requirements by Zone in Appendix A. New storage facilities will be located to provide for adequate pressure and flow throughout the city. The exact locations of the storage tanks will be determined through the computer model and the layout of the land. See Calculation of Culinary Storage Capacity Requirements by Zone in Appendix A, for a storage demand summary. Also, booster pumps will need to be installed to supply secondary water to the Upper Zone and Eastside Zone since the secondary systems in these areas are currently being fed by the culinary tanks (see Projects 6h and 6k in Section 5.0). These tanks currently have insufficient capacity to serve both the culinary and secondary systems (see Table 3.2.1), but will have sufficient capacity once the irrigation demands are eliminated. The improvement projects are listed in more detail in Section WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS The culinary and secondary distribution systems were analyzed using the computer models in order to identify locations where the demands required by new growth would require upsizing of pipes. Developers are expected to install J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 7

10 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan up to 8 pipe for the culinary system, or 6 pipe on the secondary system as part of their development. If a pipe must exceed these sizes in order to serve future development, the additional cost beyond that of installing the 8 or 6 pipe will be covered by the city using funds generated from impact fees. The pipes which must be upsized are listed in Section 5.0, and shown in Figures 7 and 9. A pressure irrigation pipeline and a culinary pipeline must be constructed between the Main Zone and the West Zone to tie these two systems together. This will provide water from the primary source of supply to the entire system, and provide more reliable service to the users. More detail on these projects is given in Section 5.0, and they can be seen in Figures 6 and IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUMMARY The improvement projects necessary to accommodate future growth, and to resolve existing deficiencies and inefficiencies are listed in the tables in this section. Each project listing contains commentary on why the project must be constructed, a description of the project, probable cost, the timeline for construction, and what the funding source will be. Particular attention is given to those projects which have already been constructed, or will be within the next 10 years, since the cost of these projects can be used to determine impact fees. Maps of the projects can be seen in Figures 6 through 9. The numbering on these maps match the numbering below. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBABLE COST 1 PROJECT: IMPROVE THE CULINARY WATER SUPPLY TO THE EAST SIDE ZONE See Figure 6 Commentary: The existing East Side Well does not have capacity to provide the increasing demand in the Upper East Side Zone. Recommendations: When Within 10 Cost Years? a Construct a Booster Pump Station to deliver water Now Yes $ 228,350 as needed from the Upper Zone to the East Side Zone. This will supplement the water provided by the East Side Well. Total Probable Cost: $ 228,350 Funding: Impact Fees 2 PROJECT: RE-ALIGN PRESSURE ZONE BOUNDARIES See Figure 6 Commentary: There is a section of the City in the area South of 400 South and Center to 300 West where the pressure in the Culinary System is too low. Recommendations: When Within Ten Years? Cost a Construct the pipeline interconnections and extensions that will bring the low pressure area out of the main pressure zone and into the upper pressure zone. Already Constructed NA $ 182, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 8

11 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan Total Probable Cost: $ 182, Funding: Impact Fees, Other City Funds 3 PROJECT: IMPROVE THE OVERALL CITY WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM See Figure 6 Commentary: The rapid recent growth of the City and the unprecedented pending population increases mandate that steps be taken now to improve the City water supply. a water demands will exceed the capacity of all existing City water sources, including the City owned Summit Creek Irrigation Co. shares. There is no standby supply in case a well is out of service. b. Much of the water used in the Santaquin system is pumped from the wells to upper pressure zones and released back to the lower zones through pressure reducing valves. Considerable savings will be realized, especially as the City grows, if water is pumped only as high in the system as is needed. Recommendations: The solutions are interrelated. All of the following improvements need to be accomplished concurrently. a Upgrade and reconfigure the SR Well for increased capacity and delivery to the Main Zone. b Construct a new deep Well on the West Side, including a Pumping Facility and building c Construct a 5 mg Culinary Water Storage tank on the West Side to serve the Main Zone. d Construct a culinary Booster Pump Facility from the Main Zone to the SR Upper Zone. e Construct a 16-inch Culinary Water Pipeline from the SR Wells to the main City. When Within 10 Years? Already Constructed Cost NA $ 256, As soon as money is available No $ 1,130,000 Now Yes $ 2,950,100 Now Yes $ 620,000 Already Constructed NA $ 667, Total Probable Cost: $ 5,623, Funding: Impact Fees/$200,000 CDBG Grant for Project 3a 4 PROJECT: PROVIDE PRESSURE IRRIGATION FACILITIES FOR GROWTH ON THE WEST SIDE- See Figure 8 Commentary: The following irrigation facilities are required to provide separation of the pressure irrigation water from the culinary water in the service areas west of the main city. These facilities should be constructed as soon as funding can be made available, but must be in place before the new developments can be served (including Ekins) and before CUP Aqueduct water can be used. Recommendation: When Within 10 Cost Years? a Construct a 40 acre foot Pond at the same elevation as the Ahlin Pond on the west side As Development Occurs Yes $ 1,468,000 b Construct a Booster Pump Facility to deliver water from the Main Zone to the SR Upper Zone. As Development Occurs No $ 333,000 J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 9

12 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan c Construct a 1 mg PI Tank at Summit Ridge to serve the SR Upper (large) Zone d Construct a 24-inch PI Pipeline to deliver water between the East and West areas of the City and to connect the Ahlin Pond and the new West Side PI Pond. As Development Occurs As development occurs No $ 1,170,000 Yes $ 3,300,000 Total Probable Cost: $ 6,271,000 Funding: Impact Fees 5 PROJECT: CONNECT TO THE CUP AQUEDUCT AT TWO LOCATIONS See Figure 8 Commentary: One connection to the CUP Aqueduct will be made where the Pressure Irrigation transmission line intersects the location of the aqueduct near the Summit Ridge Well. Water from this turnout will be delivered to the two Pressure Irrigation Ponds that serve the Main Pressure Zone. A second connection will be made at a location to be determined in the Northern part of the City to deliver water to the North Pressure Zones. Recommendation: When Within 10 Cost Years? a Construct a connection to the CUP Aqueduct to serve the Main Zone. b Construct a connection to the CUP Aqueduct to serve the North Zone. When CUP aqueduct is completed When CUP aqueduct is completed No $ 315,200 No $ 298,600 Total Probable Cost: $ 613,800 Funding: Impact Fees 6 PROJECT: NEW WATER IMPROVEMENTS- See Figure 8 Commentary: The following water improvements will be required within the timeframes listed below. Recommendation: When Within 10 Years? a Construct a new 3 mg Culinary Water Tank at the same location and elevation as the existing Culinary Main Zone Tank. b Construct a 0.5 mg culinary water tank to serve culinary and pressure irrigation demands for the Upper East Side Zone. Separate Pressure Irrigation service will not be provided in this zone. c Construct a Booster Pump Facility from the East Side Zone to the Upper East Side Zone. d Construct a Booster Pump Facility from the Main Zone to the Upper Zone. e Upgrade and reconfigure the Cemetery Well to deliver water directly into the Main Zone. f Construct a pressure irrigation pipeline from Summit Creek Irrigation main line to Hanson Pond. g Construct a pressure irrigation tank to serve the East Side Zone As required by growth As required by growth As required by growth As required by growth As required by growth As required by growth As required by growth Cost No $ 2,984,000 No $ 771,000 Yes $ 581,600 Yes $ 432,500 Yes $ 181,600 No $ 651,000 Yes $ 600,000 J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 10

13 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan h Construct a Pressure Irrigation Booster Pump Facility from the Upper Zone to the East Side Zone i Construct Pressure Reducing Valve Stations (PRV) for Culinary System (Eleven Total) & Pressure Irrigation Systems (Eleven Total) j Construct Pressure Irrigation Pond to serve Upper Zone (Hanson Property) k Construct Booster Pump Pressure Irrigation Main Zone to Upper Zone As soon as money is available As required by growth Yes $ 476,100 No $ 907,500 As required by growth Yes $ 834,100 As soon as Yes $ 388,400 money is available Total Probable Cost: $ 8,807,800 Funding: Impact Fees, Other City Funds 7 PROJECT: CULINARY WATER PIPELINE UP-SIZING See Figure 7 Commentary: When the following pipelines are constructed as part of future city growth and development the estimated cost for City participation with impact fee funding is shown in the column headed "Impact Fee Amount". Recommendation: Pipeline sizes should be required by the City as indicated below when these pipelines are constructed. Item Pipe Built Within Pipe Length Dia 10 Years? Impact Fee Amount Total Cost 7A Yes $ 6, $ 23, B Yes $ 24, $ 67, C 10 7,621 No $ 302, $ 653, D 10 13,095 No $ 210, $ 814, E 10 3,032 Yes $ 54, $ 193, F 10 4,262 Yes $ 34, $ 230, G No $ 15, $ 60, H 10 1,931 Yes $ 31, $ 120, Total Probable Cost: $ 678, $ 2,163, When: To be constructed by Developers. Funding; Impact Fees J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 11

14 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan 8 PROJECT: PRESSURE IRRIGATION PIPELINE UP-SIZING See Figure 9 Commentary: When the following pipelines are constructed as part of future city growth and development the estimated cost for City participation with impact fee funding is shown in the column headed "Impact Fee Amount". Recommendation: Pipeline sizes should be required by the City as indicated below when these pipelines are constructed. Item Pipe Dia Pipe Length Built Within 10 Years? Impact Fee Amount Total Cost 8a 16 13,310 No $ 521, $ 849, aa Yes $ 3, $ 21, ab Yes $ 8, $ 22, ac 8 3,231 No $ 17, $ 96, b 10 2,048 No $ 31, $ 81, c 10 7,263 No $110, $ 290, d 10 8,995 No $137, $ 359, e 10 6,230 No $ 95, $ 248, f Yes $ 14, $ 44, ,954 Yes $ 57, $ 221, g Yes $ 18, $ 47, ,727 Yes $ 27, $ 95, Yes $ 3, $ 32, h 10 1,191 Yes $ 12, $ 59, i 12 2,300 Yes $ 49, $ 127, j 10 1,508 Yes $ 24, $ 74, k 10 4,647 Yes $ 74, $ 231, Yes $ 12, $ 32, l 10 1,121 Yes $ 17, $ 44, m 16 3,834 Yes $150, $ 244, n 10 1,801 Yes $ 28, $ 89, o 12 6,120 Yes $ 125, $ 276, p 10 1,217 Yes $ 18, $ 48, q 16 10,422 Yes $430, $ 781, r 8 2,554 Yes $ 14, $ 100, ,321 Yes $ 21, $ 65, ,392 Yes $ 140, $ 254, ,039 Yes $ 79, $ 302, ,384 Yes $ 410, $ 558, Yes $ 32, $ 52, Yes $ 43, $ 77, s No $ 15, $ 33, t Yes $ 34, $ 56, u 8 2,092 Yes $ 11, $ 62, v 8 2,449 Yes $ 12, $ 73, w 8 3,584 Yes $ 20, $ 140, x Yes $ 3, $ 25, y 8 2,125 No $ 11, $ 63, z 8 1,551 Yes $ 8, $ 46, Total Probable Cost: $ 2,851, $ 6,337, When: To be constructed by Developers. Funding; Impact Fees J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 12

15 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan 9 PROJECT: PRESSURE IRRIGATION FACILITIES UP SIZED FOR GROWTH Commentary: The following facilities were sized for build out condition. The percent paid by impact fees was calculated by the number of build out connections each facility served divided by the number of existing connections served. Recommendation: Collect impact fees to pay back for construction due to growth. Pressure Irrigation Facilities built by the project to be partly reimbursed by impact fees Percent to be paid by Impact fees Item Description Full Amount Impact fee amount Main Zone Irrigation Pond 9a (Ahlin Pond) $1,220,468 85% $ 1,037,398 9b Summit Creek Well Booster Station $ 401,903 85% $ 341,618 Total Probable cost: $2,956,567 $ 1,379, PROJECT: Summit Ridge Development Impact Fee Reimbursement Commentary: The following facilities were sized to serve the Summit Ridge Development Recommendation: Collect impact fees to pay back for construction due to growth. Item Description Eligible Impact fee amount Up-Sized Pipeline, Well, 1 Million Gallon Tank $ 2,830, Revenue Sources Section 201 (3) of the Act requires the City to generally consider all revenue sources, including impact fees, available to finance the anticipated impact to the water system. By doing so, the City ensures fair and equitable treatment among users and concludes whether impact fees are the most appropriate method to fund the growth. The following revenue sources are available to the City to pay for new infrastructure: User Charges The City collects user fees for water services. User fees pay for water the City purchases from various sources, as well as the value of water created by the City s own water sources. User fees also pay for the maintenance and operation expenses of the City s water system. Grants and donations The City obtained a $5M grant for water conservation from the Central Utah Project for construction of the existing pressure irrigation system. It is probable that they may get additional grants for future projects. Special Improvement Districts and Special Assessment Bonds This method of financing growth is acceptable and allocates the cost of the new development to the new development. However, special improvement districts can be expensive to establish and complicated to administer, especially if a large development J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 13

16 Santaquin City Water Capital Facilities Plan is being considered. Moreover, the special assessments may not accurately reflect the true cost of the facilities. General Obligation Bonds, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, and Electric Revenue Bonds The City may elect to issue bonds to maintain a steady flow of funds to pay for needed facilities. The City has issued bonds in the past, and may determine that bonds are a suitable mechanism for funding future water system facilities. The City may use the revenues from impact fees to pay debt service on bonds. In addition, the City may use impact fees to pay for costs of issuance on future bond issues. Bonds may be issued in addition to collecting impact fees. Impact Fees This source is a common method for funding new infrastructure because it is imposed upon new growth. The detailed analysis required to impose impact fees accurately allocates the true impact of a system or facility to those creating the impact. Those creating the most impact, therefore, pay more. The speculative nature of these revenues, and their elasticity, however, make cash flows from impact fees unpredictable. The City may, on a case by case basis, work directly with a developer to adjust the standard impact fee to respond to unusual circumstances and ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. The City may also, on a case by case basis, adjust the amount of the fee based upon studies and data submitted by a developer. Impact Fee Credit The Act allows a credit against impact fees for any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new construction of, any system improvements provided by the developer if the facilities are identified in the 2008 Plan and required contractually or otherwise by the City as a condition of development approval. The improvements do not need to be made in the proposed development. This impact fee analysis does not contemplate a credit owed and any credits given in the future would be agreed to between the developer and the City on a case by case basis as they arise. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Page 14

17 Legend Study Area Parcels Future Tank Existing Tank Future Pumps Future Well Existing Well Future PRV Station Future Pipelines Existing Pipelines Figure 1 Santaquin City Water System Culinary Water System

18 Legend Study Area Parcels Future Pipelines Existing Pipelines Future Pump Existing Pump Existing Well Future Pond Existing Pond Future Tank Figure 2 Santaquin City Water System Pressure Irrigation Water System

19 Natural Open Space Ranchettes Ranchettes Farm land Commercial Commercial Business Park/College Campus Natural Open Space Farm landmedium Density Housing Low Density Housing Open Space Ranchettes Farm land Medium Density Housing Commercial Business Park Public Facility Public Facility CBD Legend Open Space Natural Open Space Medium Density Housing Open Space Medium Density Housing Study Area Parcels Commercial - Agricutlure Farm land Medium Density Housing Natural Open Space city boundary Public FacilityOpen Space Freeway Low Density Housing Low Density Housing Regional Commercial Low Density Housing Natural Open Space TOD Commercial Natural Open Space Figure 3 Santaquin City Water System Land Use Areas

20 North Zone 3 North Zone 2 North Zone 1 East Zone North Zone 1 East Zone West Zone 2 West Zone 1 Main Zone West Zone 1 Main Zone East Zone Main Zone East Zone Upper Zone Upper East Zone 1 Legend Uppper East Zone 2 Study Area Higher Summit Ridge Zone Summit Ridge Zone Upper East Zone 3 Parcels Figure 4 Santaquin City Water System Culinary Pressure Zones

21 North Zone 3 North Zone 1 & 2 Upper Zone East Zone North Zone 1 & 2 Upper Zone West Zone 2 West Zone 1 West Zone 1 Main Zone Main Zone Upper East Zone 1 Legend Study Area Main Zone Parcels Summit Ridge Zone Upper Zone East Zone Upper East Zone 1 Uppper East Zone 2 Upper East Zone 3 Higher Summit Ridge Zone Summit Ridge Zone East Zone Figure 5 Santaquin City Water System Pressure Irrigation Pressure Zones

22 Legend Study Area 1a Study Area Parcels 3a 3e 2a Pipelines Project # 2a 3d 3c 3b Tank 3e 3c Pump 1a 3d Well 3a 3b Figure 6 Santaquin City Water System Culinary Water Improvements

23 7f Legend 7e Study Area Parcels Pipelines Project # Diameter 7a 12 inch 7h 7b 12 inch Summitt Ridge 7a 7c Summitt Ridge 7b 7f 7c 16 inch 7d 12 inch 7e 10 inch 7f 10 inch 7g 12 inch 7h 12 inch Summitt Ridge 10 inch Summitt Ridge 12 inch 7g Summitt Ridge 16 inch 7d Figure 7 Santaquin City Water System Culinary Water Pipelines Up-Sized From 8 inch

24 5b 6i Legend Study Area Parcels 6i Pipelines Pressure Irrigation Project # Diameter 6i 4d, 24 6f, 12 6i Tanks Culinary Water Project # 6i 6i 6i 6i 6a 6b 5a 6c 6e 4c 4d 6g 4a 6a 6k 6d 6j 6g 6h 6i 6i 6j Booster or Aqueduct Turn Out PI Project # 4b 5a 5b 6h 6f 4c Project # 4a 6i 4b Pond Pressure Irrigation 6k Booster Pump or Well Culinary Water 6b Project # 6c 6d 6e PRV Culinary & PI 6i Figure 8 Santaquin City Water System Future Water Improvements

25 8m 8d 8h 8z Legend Study Area Parcels Pipelines Pressure Irrigation REP_NUM, DIAMETER 8a, 16 8aa, 8 8ab, 10 8ac, 8 8b, 10 8w 8x 8aa 8q 8y 8c, 10 8d, 10 8e, 10 8f, 16 8g 8g, 12 8b 8h, 10 8q 8i, 12 8j 8i 8f 8k 8z 8j, 10 8k, 10 8k, 12 8l, 10 8ab 8a 8r 8r 8r 8l 8s 8n 8o 8m, 16 8n, 10 8o, 12 8r 8p, 10 8c 8e 8v 8u 8q, 16 8r, 10 8r, 16 8r 8t 8p 8o 8r, 24 8r, 8 8s, 12 8t, 24 8u, 8 8v, 8 8w, 8 8x, 8 8ac 8y, 8 8z, 8 Figure 9 Santaquin City Water System Pressure Irrigation Up-Sized From Model to Serve Existing Connections

26 Appendix A Figure V-5 Allocation of Water Sources

27 CALCULATION OF CULINARY STORAGE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS BY ZONE STORAGE REQUIRED AT BUILDOUT STORAGE TANK Users Irrig Acres Culinary Outdoor Fire Emerg Total Req Tank Cap Pressure Zone (conn) (acres) (gal) (gal) (gal) (gal) (gal) (gal) % UPPER EAST TANK (Proposed) 1,750,000 Upper East Zone , ,344 Upper East Zone ,000 - Upper East Zone ,200 - TOTALS , , , ,736 1,298,680 1,750,000 EAST ZONE TANK (Existing) 1,000,000 East Zone ,800 - UPPER ZONE TANK (Existing) 1,140, ,200 2,441,000 1,000,000 Upper Zone ,000 - TOTALS 2,602-1,040,800-1,140, ,200 2,441,000 2,000,000 COMBINE UPPER EAST TANK FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY 1,380, ,936 3,739,680 3,750,000 SR UPPER WEST TANK (Proposed) 600,000 Summit Ridge Upper West Zone , ,328 SR UPPER TANK (Existing) 1,200,000 Summit Ridge Upper Zone , , ,332 1,791,660 West Zone ,400 - West Zone ,600 - TOTALS 2, , , , ,332 1,791,660 1,800,000 MAIN ZONE TANK (Existing) 500,000 MAIN ZONE TANK (Proposed) 3,100,000 SR MAIN ZONE TANK (Proposed) 5,000,000 Main Zone ,954,400 - NORTH TANK (Proposed) 500,000 North Zone ,000 - North Zone ,600 - North Zone ,350,800 - (blank) , , ,736 1,298,680 1,440,000 1,519,400 9,037,000 TOTALS 15,194-6,077,600-1,440,000 1,519,400 9,037,000 9,100,000 GRAND TOTALS 20, ,170,000 1,036,672 3,060,000 2,301,668 14,568,340 14,650,000 JUB Engineers F:\Projects\JUB\Santaquin\ \text\Appendix\Demand Calculations.xls

28 SANTAQUIN CITY WATER SYSTEM - CULINARY AND PRESSURE IRRIGATION Figure V-5 ALLOCATION OF WATER SOURCES (Revised Sept 2007) Year Conn Indoor Water (Culinary) Outdoor Water (Pressure Irrigation) Acres Required (mgd) Sources (mgd) Required (mgd) Sources (mgd) 1/4 a/conn 800 Wells 3.96 Summit Creek Irrig Cem CUP Total Springs Total Springs 0.25 (gal/conn/day) Cem Center East SR New (gpm/acre) City Shares mgd Well Developers bring 800 gpd/connection indoor quality water Developers bring 3.96 gpm/acre irrigation water , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,116 1, , ,280 1, , ,451 1, , ,630 1, , ,815 1, , ,007 1, , ,208 1, , ,416 1, , ,578 1, , ,746 1, , ,918 1, , ,096 1, , ,279 1, , NOTES: Water quantities are in million gallons per day (mgd). (1 mgd = 694 gallons per minute (gpm) = 1.55 cubic feet per second (cfs) = 3.07 acre feet per 180 day season The yearly increase in the number of connections matches the growth in the financial projections table - 6%, 4%, 3%. The yearly increase in acres reflects the addition of 1/4 acre of irrigable land with each new connection. The State indoor demand is based on 800 gpd/connection. The State outdoor demand is based on 3.96 gpm/irrigable acre. There are 2103 Shares of SC Irrig water. Other than SC JUB Engineers

29 Appendix B Project Calculations

30 1a. Booster Pump from the Upper Zone to the East Side Zone 8 Tapping Sleeve and Valve 1 each $ 3, $ 3, fitting and valve in pump house 1 LS $ 10, $ 10, Tapping Sleeve and Valve 1 each $ 4, $ 4, Inch Main Line 150 LF $ $ 8, Inch Main Line 150 LF $ $ 10, Booster Pump 2 each $ 24, $ 48, Electrical 1 each $ 70, $ 70, Emergency Generator 1 each $ 28, $ 28, Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 45, Total $ 228,338 2a. New Waterline to Correct Pressure Problems As per Bid 1 LS $ 209, $ 209,369 Other Fees Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 52,342 Total $ 261,711 3a. Reconfigure Summit Ridge Well to Pump into Main Zone 16 Inch Main Line 138 LF $ $ 13, Inch End Cap 1 each $ $ Connect to Existing 16" 1 LF $ $ Inch Bend 2 LF $ 1, $ 2, Reconfigure Well 1 each $ 144, $ 144,120 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 40,147 Total $ 285,737 3b. Construct a New Well on the West Side Drill New Well 1 each $ 500, $ 500,000 Pump and Motor 1 each $ 98, $ 98,000 Building 1 each $ 120, $ 120,000 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Install Controls 1 each $ 40, $ 40,000 Misc Piping and Valves 1 each $ 60, ,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 225,750 Total $ 1,128,750 3c Construct a Reservoir to Serve the Main Zone 16 Inch Main Line 1,400 LF $ ,036 Earthwork (Cut) C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 68, Earthwork (Fill) 9500 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 57, Pipe Works 1 each $ 10, $ 10, Valve Vault 1 each $ 50, $ 50, Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20, Million Gallon Tank 1 each $ 2,034, $ 2,034,600 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 590,009 Total $ 2,950,045

31 3d. Construct Booster Pump from the Main Zone to the SR Upper Zone 16 Inch Main Line 830 LF $ $ 80, Inch Bend 3 each $ 1, $ 3, Connect to Existing 16" 1 each $ $ Inch End Cap 1 each $ $ Booster Pump 2 each $ 35, $ 70,600 Building 1 each $ 120, $ 120,000 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Emergency Generator 1 each $ 54, $ 54,500 Install Controls 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Misc Piping and Valves 1 each $ 60, $ 60,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 123,690 Total $ 618,451 3e. Construct a Main Pipeline to Summit Ridge As per Final Payment 1 LS $639, $ 639,180 Other Fees Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 159,795 Total $ 798,975 4a Construct a Pressure Irrigation Reservoir on the west side (Main Zone) 24 Inch Main Line 200 LF $ $ 20,261 Earthwork (Cut) C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 314,148 Earthwork (Fill) C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 261,790 Clay Liner 6200 C.Y. $ $ 68,200 Rip Rap 3000 C.Y. $ $ 180,000 Inlet/Outlet Structure 1 each $ 150, $ 150,000 Emergency Outlet 1 each $ 40, $ 40,000 Overflow Structure 1 each $ 120, $ 120,000 Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 293,600 Total $ 1,468,000 4b. Booster Pump from Main Pressure Irrigation Zone to the Summit Ridge Upper Zone 12 Inch Main Line 800 LF $ $ 36, Booster Pump 1 each $ 35, $ 35,300 Building 1 each $ 80, $ 80,000 Electrical 1 each $ 45, $ 45,000 Misc Piping and Valving 1 each $ 60, $ 60,000 Install Controls 1 each $ 10, $ 10,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 66,601 Total $ 333,005 4c. Construct an Irrigation Reservoir at Summit Ridge Upper Zone Earthwork (Cut) 6547 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 39, Earthwork (Fill) 5456 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 32, Pipe Works 1 each $ 4, $ 4, Valve Vault 1 each $ 40, $ 40, Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 1 Million Gallon Tank 1 each $ 800, $ 800,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 234,005 Total $ 1,170,024

32 Construct Irrigation Main from Santaquin to Summit Ridge 4d. 24 Inch Main Line 20,720 LF $ $ 2,639,728 24" Cross - LF $ 2, $ - 24" Tee - LF $ 2, $ - Reducers - each 1300 $ - Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 659,932 Total $ 3,299,660 5a. Construct a Connection to the CUP Aqueduct to serve the Main Zone Vault 1 each $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Pipe inside Vault 1 ls $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Electrical 1 ls $ 42,000 $ 42,000 Valves 1 ls $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Meter 1 each $ 10,150 $ 10,150 Controls 1 ls $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 63,038 $ 315,188 5b. Construct a Connection to the CUP Aqueduct to serve the North Zone Vault 1 each $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Pipe inside Vault 1 ls $ 45,000 $ 45,000 Electrical 1 ls $ 42,000 $ 42,000 Valves 1 ls $ 41,700 $ 41,700 Meter 1 each $ 10,150 $ 10,150 Controls 1 ls $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 59,713 $ 298,563 6a. Construct a Culinary Tank Adjacent to the Existing Main Zone tank Earthwork (Fill) 8500 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 51, Pipe Works 1 each $ 16, $ 16, Valve Vault 1 each $ 50, $ 50, Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 3 Million Gallon Tank 1 each $ 2,250, $ 2,250,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 596,750 Total $ 2,983,750 6b. Construct a Culinary Tank to Serve the Upper East Zone Earthwork (Cut) 4800 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 28, Earthwork (Fill) 4000 C.Y. $ 6.00 $ 24, Pipe Works 1 each $ 4, $ 4, Valve Vault 1 each $ 40, $ 40, Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20, ,000 Gallon Tank 1 each $ 500, $ 500,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 154,200 Total $ 771,000

33 6c. Construct a Culinary Booster Pump from East Side Zone to the Upper East Zone 12 Inch Main Line 100 LF $ $ 6, Misc Piping and Valving 1 each $ 50, $ 50, Booster Pump 2 each $ 82, $ 164,200 Building 1 each $ 80, $ 80,000 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Emergency Generator 1 each $ 59, $ 59,800 Install Controls 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 116,304 Total $ 581,521 6d. Construct a Culinary Booster Pump from the Main Zone to the Upper Zone 16 Inch Main Line 100 LF $ $ 8, Misc Piping and Valving 1 each $ 6, $ 6, Booster Pump 2 each $ 41, $ 82,800 Building 1 each $ 80, $ 80,000 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Emergency Generator 1 each $ 63, $ 63,600 Install Controls 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 86,494 Total $ 432,468 6e 6f 6g Reconfigure Cemetery Well to Pump into the Main Zone 10 Inch Main Line 120 LF $ $ 7, Inch Main Line 100 LF $ $ 7, Inch Tee 1 each $ $ Inch Bend 2 each $ $ 1, x 8 Inch Reducer 1 each $ $ Inch Tee 2 each $ $ 1, Inch Bend 3 each $ $ 2, Inch End Cap 1 each $ $ Connect to Existing 10" 1 each $ $ x 10 Inch Reducer 2 each $ $ 1, Inch Tee 1 each $ $ Inch End Cap 1 each $ $ Reconfigure Well 1 each $ 120, $ 120,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 36,321 Total $ 181,603 Construct a Pressure Irrigation Main line from Summit Creek Irrigation Line to Upper Pond 20 Inch Main Line 4,550 LF $ $ 520,065 Meter 1 each $ 900 $ 900 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 130,016 Total $ 650,981 Construct a Pressure Irrigation Tank to serve the East Side Zone Pipe Works 1 each $ 10, $ 10, Float and Telemetrics 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 1 Million Gallon Tank 1 each $ 450, $ 450,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 120,000 Total $ 600,000

34 6h 6i 6j 6k Construct a pressure Irrigation Booster Pump from Upper Zone to East Side Zone 10 Inch Main Line 1,300 LF $ $ 64, Misc Piping and Valving 1 each $ 55, $ 55, Booster Pump 2 each $ 32, $ 64,200 Vault 1 each $ 31, $ 31,000 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Emergency Generator 1 each $ 61, $ 61,000 Install Controls 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 95,209 Total $ 476,045 Construct Pressure Reducing Stations for Culinary & Pressure Irrigation Systems PRV 22 each $ 5, $ 110, Misc Piping and Valving 22 ls $ 20, $ 440, Vault 22 each $ 8, $ 176,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 181,500 Total $ 907,500 Construct Pressure Irrigation Pond to serve Upper zone (Hansen Property) Item Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount Cut Haul Off Excess 26,833 YD 3 $ 3.75 $ 100, Fill 0 YD 3 $ 9.00 $ - Pond Protection (12") 26,167 YD 3 $ 4.00 $ 104, Filter/Bedding Layer (6") 4,100 TON $ $ 49, Clay Liner (18") 2,050 TON $ $ 51, Rip Rap (18") 4,000 YD 3 $ $ 48, Structures 3,600 TON $ $ 82, Pipe 3 EA $ 40, $ 120, Trail/Access 500 LF $ $ 75, Fencing 15,600 SF $ 0.50 $ 7, Misc (Metering, Stilling Well, Etc.) 2,000 LF $ $ 30, EA $ 20, $ 20, Engineer and Fees 1 EA $ 68, $ 68, Subtotal $ 758, Contingency $ 75, Total $ 834, Booster Pump Pressure Irriagation Main Zone to Upper Zone Misc Piping and Valving 1 each $ 55, $ 55, Booster Pump 2 each $ 32, $ 64,200 Buiilding 1 each $ 86, $ 86,487 Electrical 1 each $ 85, $ 85,000 Install Controls 1 each $ 20, $ 20,000 Other Fees contingence, Engineering, Legal, Finance, Administrative 25% $ 77,672 Total $ 388,359

SPRINGVILLE CITY CULINARY WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014

SPRINGVILLE CITY CULINARY WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014 SPRINGVILLE CITY CULINARY WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014 Adopted May 20, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPACT FEE CERTIFICATION... 3 SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 PROPOSED CULINARY WATER IMPACT

More information

SPRINGVILLE CITY PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014

SPRINGVILLE CITY PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014 SPRINGVILLE CITY PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014 Adopted May 20, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPACT FEE CERTIFICATION... 3 SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 PROPOSED PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION

More information

Oakland Storage 1, May 2. for the. Condition. Maximum Day. system conditions. Treatment. (gpm) (MGD) 1,026. Existing.

Oakland Storage 1, May 2. for the. Condition. Maximum Day. system conditions. Treatment. (gpm) (MGD) 1,026. Existing. Oakland Township Oakland Hunt & Southeast Water System Storage & Treatment May 2 Introduction This memorandum provides the cost opinions for design and construction of the interconnection of the two water

More information

Diablo Water District 2018 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

Diablo Water District 2018 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update June 15, 2018 Diablo Water District 2018 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update This technical memorandum describes the 2018 update of the existing funding mechanisms used by Diablo Water District (DWD)

More information

Diablo Water District PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

Diablo Water District PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update June 1, 2016 Diablo Water District PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update This technical memorandum describes the 2016 update of the existing funding mechanisms used by Diablo Water

More information

33 Ditch Bottom Inlet (DBI) -Type E $ 2, EA - 0 $ - 35 Ditch Bottom Inlet (DBI) -Type H (Modified) $ 5, EA $ 5,600.

33 Ditch Bottom Inlet (DBI) -Type E $ 2, EA - 0 $ - 35 Ditch Bottom Inlet (DBI) -Type H (Modified) $ 5, EA $ 5,600. CITY OF PLANT CITY WHEELER STREET RE-ALIGNMENT Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (Final Plans) Rev 7/22/2010 Rev 8/2/2010 Rev 8/27/20012 Bid Cost per Estimated Extended Item Item Unit Units Wheeler

More information

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM City and County of Broomfield, Colorado CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM To: From: Prepared by: Mayor and City Council Charles Ozaki, City and County Manager David Allen, Deputy Director of Public

More information

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL 2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL Receive a presentation from Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham regarding the 2017 Utility Rate Study The purpose of the Council

More information

City of Riverbank. Water Rate Study FINAL 6/18/2015

City of Riverbank. Water Rate Study FINAL 6/18/2015 Water Rate Study FINAL 6/18/2015 Bartle Wells Associates Independent Public Finance Consultants 1889 Alcatraz Avenue Berkeley, California 94703 www.bartlewells.com Tel: 510-653-3399 June 18, 2015 6707

More information

ZIONS BANK PUBLIC FINANCE

ZIONS BANK PUBLIC FINANCE Tremonton, Utah WATER Impact Fee Analysis Noticing DRAFT Prepared By January 21, 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Growth and ERU Projections... 3 Level of Service Definitions...

More information

Stormwater Utility & Water Utility Charges & Rates. October 20, 2015

Stormwater Utility & Water Utility Charges & Rates. October 20, 2015 Stormwater Utility & Water Utility Charges & Rates October 20, 2015 1 Agenda Fiscal Policies/Goals System Development Charge Stormwater Utility Charges & Rates Water Utility Charges & Rates 2 Fiscal Policies/Goals

More information

SPECIAL ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MEETING May 27, :00 p.m. PPHCSD Office 4176 Warbler Road, Phelan, CA AGENDA

SPECIAL ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MEETING May 27, :00 p.m. PPHCSD Office 4176 Warbler Road, Phelan, CA AGENDA 4176 Warbler Road P. O. Box 294049 Phelan, CA 92329-4049 (760) 868-1212 Fax (760) 868-2323 1. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda SPECIAL ENGINEERING COMMITTEE MEETING

More information

Rates and Fees for New Connections (Developer Fees)

Rates and Fees for New Connections (Developer Fees) Rates and Fees for New Connections (Developer Fees) Table V: New Connection (Developer) Rates and Fees Effective Date 1/1/2019 1/1/2020 1/1/2021 A. Plan Review Fees Per Linear Foot (LF) - Water $0.65 $0.65

More information

CITY OF ELKO BID TABULATION * RE-BID* FOR Sports Complex April 4, 2018

CITY OF ELKO BID TABULATION * RE-BID* FOR Sports Complex April 4, 2018 CITY OF ELKO BID TABULATION * RE-BID* FOR Sports Complex 2017-2018 April 4, 2018 Great Basin Engineering CLEARING EARTHWORK 1 337.01200 Mobilization @ Per Lump Sum 1 LS $445,350.00 $ 445,350.00 $481,768.00

More information

Request for Proposals: Bond Underwriter

Request for Proposals: Bond Underwriter Request for Proposals: Bond Underwriter RFP Contact Inquiries regarding this RFP should be directed in writing to: Brittney Bateman Executive Envoy & Programs Manager Weber Basin Water Conservancy District

More information

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA UTILITY SPECIAL DISTRICT S SYSTEMS AND OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010.

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA UTILITY SPECIAL DISTRICT S SYSTEMS AND OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. UTILITY SPECIAL DISTRICT S SYSTEMS AND OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 Overview The service area of the Utility District s Water System includes the entire City of Riviera Beach (approximately

More information

VILLAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 940 LAKESHORE DRIVE, SUITE 200 THE VILLAGES, FLORIDA PHONE: (352) * FAX:

VILLAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 940 LAKESHORE DRIVE, SUITE 200 THE VILLAGES, FLORIDA PHONE: (352) * FAX: VILLAGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 940 LAKESHORE DRIVE, SUITE 200 THE VILLAGES, FLORIDA 32162 PHONE: (352) 751-6700 * FAX: (352) 751-6715 E-mail: melissa.schaar@districtgov.org

More information

RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN EXCESS CAP A CITY CREDIT POLICY FOR WATER AND SEWERFACILTIIES

RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN EXCESS CAP A CITY CREDIT POLICY FOR WATER AND SEWERFACILTIIES RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN EXCESS CAP A CITY CREDIT POLICY FOR WATER AND SEWERFACILTIIES WHEREAS, it is desirable to institute a policy to provide a credit (payment) to individuals who extend the Orange Water

More information

LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Policy and Procedures Manual

LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Policy and Procedures Manual EXHIBIT A LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Policy and Procedures Manual POLICY TITLE: Reserve Policy POLICY NUMBER: (to be established) ADOPTED: July 18, 2016 AMENDED: This statement is intended

More information

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank. References American Water Works Association. Buried No Longer: Confronting America s Water Infrastructure Challenge. 2012. Brown and Caldwell et al. City of Davis Water Distribution System Optimization

More information

RATE INFORMATION. A. The rates adopted by the Authority will be in accordance with of the Code of Virginia, as amended.

RATE INFORMATION. A. The rates adopted by the Authority will be in accordance with of the Code of Virginia, as amended. Page 1 of 8 Section 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy to explain how the Bedford Regional Water Authority ( Authority ) implements the adopted Rates policy and to provide explanation for each of the

More information

Capital Improvements Program FY FY2020

Capital Improvements Program FY FY2020 FY2016 - FY2020 CITY OF MANVEL, TEXAS April 25, 2016 prepared for: City of Manvel Mayor and Council 20025 Morris Avenue Manvel, Texas 77578 prepared by: 19701 Morris Avenue, Manvel, Texas 77578 TBPE F-9827

More information

CHAPTER 7 CHARGES, FEES, OR DEPOSITS

CHAPTER 7 CHARGES, FEES, OR DEPOSITS Chapter 7 Charges, Fees and Deposits 33 CHAPTER 7 CHARGES, FEES, OR DEPOSITS Charges and fees are collected to support the District s obligation to carry out its statutory duties, including maintenance

More information

WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016

WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016 WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016 The Financial Link Executive Summary - Water In May 2015, the City of Whitefish (City) retained AE2S to complete a Water and

More information

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER 2017 City of San Clemente Contents CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Study Goals and Drivers... 1 Water Rate Analysis & Adoption... 2 Recycled Water Rate Analysis &

More information

CHAPTER XI. WATER & SEWER ARTICLE A. WATER CONNECTION FEES. New Water Connection Fees. Inside City Limits

CHAPTER XI. WATER & SEWER ARTICLE A. WATER CONNECTION FEES. New Water Connection Fees. Inside City Limits CHAPTER XI. WATER & SEWER ARTICLE A. WATER CONNECTION FEES Section 1. New Water Connection Fees Limits Service Complete Service Connection Installation (Potable or Irrigation) Meter Only Installation for

More information

Executive Summary. Consolidation Feasibility Study CITY OF OTHELLO. and. Adams County Water District No.1. Basin View Water Association

Executive Summary. Consolidation Feasibility Study CITY OF OTHELLO. and. Adams County Water District No.1. Basin View Water Association CITY OF OTHELLO and Adams County Water District No.1 Basin View Water Association Bird Dog Family LTD Partnership II Highland Estates Water System Meadow Lane Water Association Othello Manor Water System

More information

WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER RATE STUDY Public Meeting to Review Study Results. January 5, 2016

WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER RATE STUDY Public Meeting to Review Study Results. January 5, 2016 WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER RATE STUDY Public Meeting to Review Study Results January 5, 2016. Public Resources Management Group, Inc. Utility, Rate, Financial and Management Consultants Utility

More information

Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2

Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2 Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2 Presented by Shana E. Epstein Director of Public Works, City of Beverly Hills Background Phase 1-Effective January 18, 2018 5-year revenue requirement 3% annual increase

More information

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT UTILITY NO. 3140 Class AB WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT OF LITTLE CHUTE MUNICIPAL WATER DEPT 108 W MAIN ST LITTLE CHUTE, WI 54140-1750 For the Year Ended: DECEMBER 31, 2016 TO PUBLIC

More information

Sonoma County Service Area #41(CSA #41) Water Rate Study

Sonoma County Service Area #41(CSA #41) Water Rate Study Sonoma County Service Area #41(CSA #41) Water Rate Study September 13, 2016 Prepared by Greg Clumpner, Director, NBS Carmen Narayanan, Consultant, NBS 1 CSA #41 Zones of Benefit 2 Overview of Presentation

More information

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+%

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+% 1 CHART EXAMPLES OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES OF MWD MEMBER AGENCIES AND THEIR SUBAGENCIES MWD Member Agencies shown: MWDOC, SDCWA, Calleguas, Las Virgenes, West Basin, LADWP, Eastern and Foothill Member

More information

Chapter CONCURRENCY

Chapter CONCURRENCY Chapter 14.28 CONCURRENCY Sections: 14.28.010 Purpose. 14.28.020 Development exempt from project concurrency review. 14.28.030 Concurrency facilities and services. 14.28.040 Project concurrency review.

More information

Rock Chalk Park - Infrastructure Report. July 2013

Rock Chalk Park - Infrastructure Report. July 2013 Rock Chalk Park Infrastructure Report July 2013 The following report is the first monthly report for the construction of infrastructure at Rock Chalk Park. The format follows the sections outlined in the

More information

Water and Wastewater System Schedules of Rates and Charges and Fees As of July 1, 2015

Water and Wastewater System Schedules of Rates and Charges and Fees As of July 1, 2015 Water and Wastewater System Schedules of Rates and Charges and Fees As of July 1, 2015 East Bay Municipal Utility District Oakland, California Photos on cover: EBMUD crew replacing 16-inch diameter pipeline

More information

The 2009 Farm and Ranch Water Infrastructure Program Regulations

The 2009 Farm and Ranch Water Infrastructure Program Regulations Consolidated to March 29, 2011 1 INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM F-8.001 REG 38 The 2009 Farm and Ranch Water Infrastructure Program Regulations being Chapter F-8.001 Reg 38 (effective April 30, 2009) as amended

More information

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT February 2, 218 This page was intentionally left blank. City of Calistoga Water Rate Study Report Page 2 February 2, 218 Dylan Feik City Manager City of

More information

WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVANSTON AND THE VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE AND THE VILLAGE OF NILES

WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVANSTON AND THE VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE AND THE VILLAGE OF NILES WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVANSTON AND THE VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE AND THE VILLAGE OF NILES Background... 6 1. Parties... 6 1.01 Parties... 6 2. Initial Term of Agreement; Extended Term;

More information

CLASS "C" WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES. (Gross Revenue of Less Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT. Exact Legal Name of Respondent

CLASS C WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES. (Gross Revenue of Less Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT. Exact Legal Name of Respondent CLASS "C" WATER AND/OR WASTEWATER UTILITIES (Gross Revenue of Less Than $200,000 Each) ANNUAL REPORT OF Exact Legal Name of Respondent Certificate Number(s) Submitted To The Charlotte County Budget Office

More information

CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS

CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Storm Drainage Fund... 121-124 Off Street Parking Fund... 125-126 Airport Fund... 127-131 Water Service Fund... 132-145 STORM DRAINAGE FUND CURRENT OPERATIONS This fund

More information

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT UTILITY NO. 5370 Class AB WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT OF SHEBOYGAN WATER UTILITY 72 PARK AVE SHEBOYGAN, WI 53081-2958 For the Year Ended: DECEMBER 31, 2017 TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

More information

2015 Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees

2015 Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees 2015 Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees Prepared for the City of Georgetown Prepared by: Georgetown Utility Services and Chisholm Trail Special Utility District Capital Improvements Advisory Committees

More information

ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE. November 27, :30 PM Greenspot Road, Highland CA AGENDA

ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE. November 27, :30 PM Greenspot Road, Highland CA AGENDA ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE November 27, 2017-2:30 PM 31111 Greenspot Road, Highland CA 92346 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENTS NEW BUSINESS AGENDA 1. Approve the September 25,

More information

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VAIL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF TUCSON RELATING TO THE DELIVERY OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT WATER

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VAIL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF TUCSON RELATING TO THE DELIVERY OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VAIL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF TUCSON RELATING TO THE DELIVERY OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT WATER WHEREAS, This Agreement is entered into this _ day of, 2013, by and between the

More information

City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study. Jessica Cook 9/25/17

City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study. Jessica Cook 9/25/17 City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study Jessica Cook 9/25/17 1 Utility Funds They are Enterprise Funds 1. Should pay for Capital Outlays Operations Replacement Reserves Debt 2. Should be flush with

More information

Squaw Valley PSD. Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study. Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc.

Squaw Valley PSD. Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study. Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc. Squaw Valley PSD Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study February 15, 2017 Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc. Purpose of the District s Study Provide sufficient

More information

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library. For additional information about this document and the document conversion process, please contact

More information

Reserve Study Transmittal Letter

Reserve Study Transmittal Letter Reserve Study Transmittal Letter Date: February 1, 215 To: Sonja Bachus, Management Alternative, The From: Browning Reserve Group (BRG) Re: ; Update w/o Site Visit Review Attached, please find the reserve

More information

City of La Verne. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District #1. Infrastructure Financing Plan

City of La Verne. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District #1. Infrastructure Financing Plan City of La Verne Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District #1 Introduction Infrastructure Financing Plan Senate Bill No. 628 was first introduced in February 2013 by Senators Beall and Wolk. This bill,

More information

Plan of Water Management

Plan of Water Management Plan of Water Management Special Improvement District No. 2 of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District Effective Date: November 1, 2018 10/04/2017 10/04/2017 Table of Contents 1.0 DEFINITIONS... 1 2.0

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan I. Project Background The City of Troutdale is in need of the services of a qualified Professional Engineer, licensed

More information

Capital Region Water. Water and Wastewater Rate Study Report. November 22, Capital Region Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study

Capital Region Water. Water and Wastewater Rate Study Report. November 22, Capital Region Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study Capital Region Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study Report November 22, 2017 Capital Region Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 RATE STUDY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES...1

More information

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017 City Council Public Hearing February 13, 2017 Public Hearing on Proposed Water Rates PRESENTED BY Kelly J. Salt Partner 2016 Best Best & Krieger LLP Article X, section 2 (1928) The general welfare requires

More information

City of Arroyo Grande Department of Public Works REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY UPDATE

City of Arroyo Grande Department of Public Works REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY UPDATE I. INTRODUCTION City of Arroyo Grande Department of Public Works REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY UPDATE The City of Arroyo Grande, California (the City ) was incorporated as a general

More information

Maurice Kaufman, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Bartle Wells Associates DATE: September 7, 2016 MEMORANDUM

Maurice Kaufman, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Bartle Wells Associates DATE: September 7, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Maurice Kaufman, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Bartle Wells Associates DATE: September 7, 2016 SUBJECT: - MEMORANDUM Introduction The (City) provides sewer sanitary collection services

More information

Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis

Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis + Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis Final Report September 2016 Firm Headquarters Redmond Town Center 7525 166 th Ave. NE Suite D-215 Redmond, WA 98052 T: (425) 867-1802 F: (425) 867-1937 www.fcsgroup.com

More information

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY FINAL WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY B&V PROJECT NO. 179322.0100 PREPARED FOR City of Lynwood, CA JANUARY 11, 2017 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2011. All rights reserved. City of Lynwood, CA WATER AND SEWER

More information

2017 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF AZLE, TEXAS

2017 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF AZLE, TEXAS 2017 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF AZLE, TEXAS JULY 2017 Prepared by: Weatherford Office Address: 1508 Santa Fe Drive, Suite 203 Weatherford, Texas 76086 (817) 594-9880 www.jacobmartin.com

More information

City of Newport News Virginia. Waterworks Ratings Presentation. April 27, 2017

City of Newport News Virginia. Waterworks Ratings Presentation. April 27, 2017 City of Newport News Virginia Waterworks Ratings Presentation April 27, 2017 I. Overview Newport News Waterworks Mission Statement: To provide high quality drinking water and support public health, safety,

More information

Stormwater System Development Charges

Stormwater System Development Charges Methodology Report Stormwater System Development Charges Prepared For City of Springfield April 20, 2009 GALARDI CONSULTING, LLC PAGE 1 OF 9 SECTION 1 Introduction Oregon legislation establishes guidelines

More information

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202

227 West Trade Street Phone Suite 1400 Fax Charlotte, NC 28202 227 West Trade Street Phone 704 373 1199 www.raftelis.com Suite 1400 Fax 704 373 1113 Charlotte, NC 28202 April 19, 2018 Mr. Jerry Hatton City Engineer City of Belmont P.O. Box 431 Belmont, NC 28012 Subject:

More information

MUNICIPALITY OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE CHESLEY DRINKING WATER SYSTEM FINANCIAL PLAN

MUNICIPALITY OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE CHESLEY DRINKING WATER SYSTEM FINANCIAL PLAN MUNICIPALITY OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE CHESLEY DRINKING WATER SYSTEM FINANCIAL PLAN 15-013 GSS Engineering Consultants Ltd. Unit 104D 1010 9 th Avenue West Owen Sound ON N4K 5R7 519.372.4828 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Electric and Water 2018 Capital True Up and Budget Amendment Board Action Approval of Resolution No. 1814, 2018 Capital True Up Budget Amendment

Electric and Water 2018 Capital True Up and Budget Amendment Board Action Approval of Resolution No. 1814, 2018 Capital True Up Budget Amendment M E M O R A N D U M EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD TO: FROM: DATE: May 1, 2018 SUBJECT: OBJECTIVE: Commissioners Brown, Carlson, Mital, Simpson and Helgeson Rod Price, Chief Electric Engineering & Operations

More information

DOMESTIC SERVICE CHARGE:

DOMESTIC SERVICE CHARGE: PART 5 CHARGES 51 SERVICE CHARGE: 51.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS: 51.1.1 DOMESTIC For all metered service connections located within or outside the boundaries of the District, a bimonthly charge for domestic

More information

HACKBERRY HIDDEN COVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN (UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS)

HACKBERRY HIDDEN COVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN (UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS) HACKBERRY HIDDEN COVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN (UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS) SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 HACKBERRY HIDDEN COVE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT

More information

2015 Financial Assurance 8/6/2015 Estimate Form (with pre-plat construction)

2015 Financial Assurance 8/6/2015 Estimate Form (with pre-plat construction) 2015 Financial Assurance 8/6/2015 Estimate Form (with pre-plat construction) Project Information The Glen at Widefield Filing No. 9 PDD File: SF-185 9/25/2018 Project Name Section 1 - Grading and Erosion

More information

Agenda Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District Planning Committee

Agenda Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District Planning Committee Agenda Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District Planning Committee Sacramento Metro Fire Dept. Friday, February 5, 2015 6609 Rio Linda Blvd. 2:00 pm Rio Linda, CA 95673 Public documents relating to

More information

WHEREAS, the rates of the Proposed Ordinance take into account the cost of service study recently completed by LADWP; and

WHEREAS, the rates of the Proposed Ordinance take into account the cost of service study recently completed by LADWP; and RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles (City) is at a crossroads with regard to its water future in light of what may be the new normal of prolonged drought and due to its rapidly aging water

More information

2019 Approved Budget 12/5/2018

2019 Approved Budget 12/5/2018 2019 Approved 12/5/2018 GENERAL FUND Actual 12/31/2017 Property Taxes 9,328,803 10,250,578 11,515,613 Property Taxes for SG Redevelopment 273,985 290,424 In Lieu of Fees 602,050 1,012,614 1,073,371 Prior

More information

BOPU RESOLUTION NO

BOPU RESOLUTION NO BOPU RESOLUTION NO. 2009 - ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED TAP FEES, WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES, PUMP STATION AND RELATED FEES SET BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES." WHEREAS, the

More information

Department of Public Works Engineering

Department of Public Works Engineering Department of Public Works Engineering DATE: January 27, 2016 TO: Honorable Chairman and Public Utility Authority Members FROM: Cynthia M. Herrera, MMC, Interim Executive Director/ City Clerk BY: Nathan

More information

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President Impact Fee Basics: Methodology and Fee Design Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President Basic Options for One-Time Infrastructure Charges Funding from broad-based revenues (general taxes) Growth

More information

2012 WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, PACKAGE IV SAWS WATER JOB. NO /SAWS SEWER JOB NO SOLICITATION #B DD BID PROPOSAL

2012 WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, PACKAGE IV SAWS WATER JOB. NO /SAWS SEWER JOB NO SOLICITATION #B DD BID PROPOSAL BID PROPOSAL PROPOSAL OF, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of, a Partnership consisting of, an Individual doing business as. Enclosed with this bid are (1) Bid Bond, and

More information

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT

WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT UTILITY NO. 5370 Class AB WATER, ELECTRIC, OR JOINT UTILITY ANNUAL REPORT OF SHEBOYGAN WATER UTILITY 72 PARK AVE SHEBOYGAN, WI 53081-2958 For the Year Ended: DECEMBER 31, 2016 TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

More information

CAPITAL RECOVERY POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAPITAL RECOVERY POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1.01 General Policy Statement... 1 Section 1.02 Authority... 1 Section 1.03 Definitions... 1 Section 1.04 Capital Recovery Fees as Conditions of Development

More information

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs Recorded Estimated Budget Forecast Description FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 Well Production (OCWD, A-F, a)

More information

WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY REPORT January 2017 WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY PREPARED BY: ECONOMICS STRATEGY STAKEHOLDERS SUSTAINABILITY www.newgenstrategies.net 3420

More information

Consolidation of the Warm Beach Water System

Consolidation of the Warm Beach Water System Consolidation of the Warm Beach Water System Public Hearing July 24, 2018 Last Discussed: July 10, 2018 Warm Beach Water Association (WBWA) - Location and Size WBWA WBWA water system has ~600 water service

More information

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT Water Financial Planning and Rate Study Report March 16, 2018 District of Thousand Oaks Water and Wastewater Financial Plan Study Report March 16, 2018 Board of Directors

More information

Cave Creek and Desert Hills Master Plan. Master Plan Cost Estimate. Cave Creek and Desert Hills, AZ BASIS OF ESTIMATE

Cave Creek and Desert Hills Master Plan. Master Plan Cost Estimate. Cave Creek and Desert Hills, AZ BASIS OF ESTIMATE Cave Creek and Desert Hills Water Company Master Plan Cost Estimate Cave Creek and Desert Hills, AZ Estimate ID: 2008.0041 Project Name: Cave Creek and Desert Hills Master Plan Class Estimate: Class 4

More information

Draft Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District Groundwater Well Assistance Program (GWAP)

Draft Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District Groundwater Well Assistance Program (GWAP) Draft Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District Groundwater Well Assistance Program (GWAP) Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District 310 East Avenue C Milano, TX 76556 512.455.9900

More information

3.1. Construction Meter Additional Charges for Temporary Meters OTHER FEES, CHARGES, AND DEPOSITS CAPACITY FEES...

3.1. Construction Meter Additional Charges for Temporary Meters OTHER FEES, CHARGES, AND DEPOSITS CAPACITY FEES... Table of Contents 1. CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICE... 3 1.1. Metered Service:... 3 1.2. Water Commodity Charge:... 3 1.3. SDCWA and Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Charges:... 4 1.4. Separate Private Fire

More information

WATER RATE STUDY CITY OF SALIDA. Revised March West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO

WATER RATE STUDY CITY OF SALIDA. Revised March West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO WATER RATE STUDY CITY OF SALIDA Revised March 2011 Prepared by Tyler Harpel, PE In Conjunction with City Staff 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 970.945.5948 fax

More information

UERWA 2018 Rates. Outdoor Usage

UERWA 2018 Rates. Outdoor Usage UERWA 2018 Rates Water Service Base Charge/SFE Base Rate $ 17.29 Tier 1 (0-10) $ 3.62 Debt Service 2010 Bonds $ 3.05 Tier 2 (11-20) $ 5.43 Debt Service 2013 Bonds $ 2.54 Tier 3 (21-30) $ 8.14 Capital Replacement

More information

Costs for Pond Production of Yellow Perch in the North Central Region,

Costs for Pond Production of Yellow Perch in the North Central Region, North Central Regional Aquaculture Center In cooperation with USDA s Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service Costs for Pond Production of Yellow Perch in the North Central Region, 1994

More information

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made between GLEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, hereinafter called the "Subdivider," and El Paso County by and through the Board of County Commissioners of El

More information

EVANSTON. FY 2017 Proposed Budget Presentation. Martin Lyons, Assistant City Manger / CFO Lara Biggs, City Engineer.

EVANSTON. FY 2017 Proposed Budget Presentation. Martin Lyons, Assistant City Manger / CFO Lara Biggs, City Engineer. EVANSTON FY 2017 Proposed Budget Presentation Martin Lyons, Assistant City Manger / CFO Lara Biggs, City Engineer October 24, 2016 Administrative Services 1 FY 2017 BUDGET PRESENTATION-- October 17, 2016

More information

Town of Rocky Mountain House: Offsite Levy Review

Town of Rocky Mountain House: Offsite Levy Review Town of Rocky Mountain House: Offsite Levy Review Version 6 October 25 th, 2016 Presented to: Todd Becker, CAO Town of Rocky Mountain House PO Box 1509 Rocky Mountain House AB T4T 1B2 (403) 845-2866 tbecker@rockymtnhouse.com

More information

WATER MARKETING POLICY OF THE COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S COLORADO RIVER WATER PROJECTS ENTERPRISE FOR THE YAMPA RIVER BASIN

WATER MARKETING POLICY OF THE COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S COLORADO RIVER WATER PROJECTS ENTERPRISE FOR THE YAMPA RIVER BASIN WATER MARKETING POLICY OF THE COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S COLORADO RIVER WATER PROJECTS ENTERPRISE FOR THE YAMPA RIVER BASIN All Prior Versions Superseded YAMPA RIVER WATER MARKETING POLICY

More information

LETTER OF INTENT FOR: HERITAGE HILLS COMMUNITY

LETTER OF INTENT FOR: HERITAGE HILLS COMMUNITY LETTER OF INTENT FOR: HERITAGE HILLS COMMUNITY January 5, 205 2 Partially Completed Single Family Lots (65' x 5' typical) 46 Completed Townhome Pads (22' x 50' typical) Sale. This letter of intent outlines

More information

Toronto Water Budget BU Recommended Operating Budget Recommended Capital Plan 2017 Recommended Water Rate

Toronto Water Budget BU Recommended Operating Budget Recommended Capital Plan 2017 Recommended Water Rate 2017 BU25.1 Toronto Water Budget 2017 Recommended Operating Budget 2017 2026 Recommended Capital Plan 2017 Recommended Water Rate Lou Di Gironimo, General Manager, Toronto Water Budget Committee, November

More information

REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO

REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO December 11, 2003 REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO Prepared for CITY OF SAN

More information

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009 TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The functions and duties of the Oro Valley Water Utility Commission include reviewing and developing

More information

PUBLIC WORKS. AdrrWo Aal- P W. Tectl. (8) Const.lnsp.l Eng. Tech. Conv. Sile AtlendllnI (31) I. Y. SIte Supv,. Hvy. Eq Mech r-- HYy Eq Oper.

PUBLIC WORKS. AdrrWo Aal- P W. Tectl. (8) Const.lnsp.l Eng. Tech. Conv. Sile AtlendllnI (31) I. Y. SIte Supv,. Hvy. Eq Mech r-- HYy Eq Oper. PUBLIC WORKS ) UIiII\y Cps. s.. v.ww_. WW... C'"'_ Tectl. (8) AdrrWo Aal- P W....... "'""" ~... '" ".WWfP WW _. -(2) - WNTP Sf. WTP Operator (2) H I H WNTP WTP Operator labasst. (8) Const.lnsp.l Eng. Tech.

More information

COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 766 MAIN STREET HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Monday, January 26, 2009 2:00 p.m. AGENDA The Coastside County Water District (CCWD) does

More information

Lookout Mountain Water District: Genesis and Evolution

Lookout Mountain Water District: Genesis and Evolution Lookout Mountain Water District: Presented by: Genesis and Evolution John Roscoe, President of the Board and Panel: Board of Directors and Contractors September 30, 2010 1 Introduction Purpose: Update

More information

TOWN OF CENTREVILLE, MARYLAND. Financial Statements Together with Report of Independent Public Accountants

TOWN OF CENTREVILLE, MARYLAND. Financial Statements Together with Report of Independent Public Accountants Financial Statements Together with Report of Independent Public Accountants For the Year Ended JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Report of Independent Public Accountants 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis

More information

presents: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE INFORMATIONAL OVERVIEW DETAILS PROVIDED BY:

presents: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE INFORMATIONAL OVERVIEW   DETAILS PROVIDED BY: presents: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE INFORMATIONAL OVERVIEW www.springcreekud.org DETAILS PROVIDED BY: SPRING CREEK UTILITY DISTRICT Development & Infrastructure About Spring Creek Utility District Spring

More information

Engineering Overview and Analysis of the Herron Island Water System

Engineering Overview and Analysis of the Herron Island Water System Engineering Overview and Analysis of the Herron Island Water System System Description The Herron Island Water System serves the properties of Herron Island west of Key Peninsula in Pierce County, Washington.

More information

Hurricane Valley Fire Special Service District, Utah

Hurricane Valley Fire Special Service District, Utah Hurricane Valley Fire Special Service District, Utah NOTICING DR A FT Fire protection Impact Fee Analysis PRovided By ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE, Inc. September 19, 2016 CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 Impact

More information