LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY. Bill No Authorize 2008 Bond Reallocation

Transcription

1

2 City of Santa Fe, Ne II e I 0 LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY Bill No Authorize 2008 Bond Reallocation SPONSOR(S): Councilor Ives SUMMARY: The proposed bijl authorizes an amendment to the 2008 General Obligation (GO) Bond to reallocate 803,000 currently designated for various city park improvements to complete certain incomplete projects at city parks and recreation facilities and to replace three failing bridges at Fort Marcy Park. PREPARED BY: Rebecca Seligman, Legislative Liaison Assistant FISCALIMPACT: No DATE: April19, 2016 ATTACHMENTS: Bill FIR 2

3 1 2 3 CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO BILL NO INTRODUCED BY: 4 5 Councilor Peter N. Ives AN ORDINANCE 10 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2008 GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND 11 TO REALLOCATE 803,000 CURRENTLY DESIGNATED FOR VARIOUS CITY PARK 12 IMPROVEMENTS TO COMPLETE CERTAIN INCOMPLETE PROJECTS AT 13 CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND TO REPLACE THREE FAILING 14 BRIDGES AT FORT MARCY PARK BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE: 17 Section 1. Authority 18 A. Section (E) SFCC 1987 requires that any reallocation of proceeds from a 19 voter-approved general obligation bond that deviates materially from the information provided to 2 0 the electorate by the city of Santa Fe shall be voted upon by the governing body through the 21 adoption of an ordinance. 2 2 B. The governing body, through the adoption of this ordinance, authorizes the 2 3 reallocation of funds from the 2008 parks bond as specified in Section 3 of this ordinance. 24 Section 2. Legislative Findings 25 A. The 200L.Genera1 obligation bond was approved by voters in the amount of 1 3

4 1 30,300,000 on March 4, B. Many of the projects that were to be funded by the bond have been completed, 3 while others are in progress or waiting to be started pending reallocation of unspent funds. 4 C. A reallocation of bond funds is requested to address certain safety concerns and 5 to reflect changes in priorities for city parks. 6 Section 3. Reallocation 7 A. The parks and recreation department is recommending the closing/completion of 8 the following projects from the current funding list: 9 Cathedral Park 1 0 Cross of the Martyrs 11 Mager's Field 12 Monica Roybal Pocket Park 13 Peralta Park 14 Sunnyslope Meadows 15 Thomas Macaione Park 16 Torreon Park 1 7 Amelia \Vhite Park 18 Atalaya Park 1 9 Cornell Park 2 0 Don Diego Park 2 1 Galisteo Tennis Courts 2 2 Orlando Fernandez Park 2 3 Patrick Smith 2 4 Salvador Perez Pool 2 5 Salvador Perez Park 2 4

5 1 Ashbough Park 2 Cielo Vista Park 3 Gregory Lopez Park 4 Larrogoite Park 5 Los Acquias Park 6 Los Milagros Park 7 Maclovia Park 8 Rancho del Sol Park 9 Candelero Park 10 Genoveva Chavez Park 11 Martin Luther King (Villa Serena) 12 Las Estancias Park 13 Nava Ade Park 14 Pueblos del Sol Trails 15 MRC Sports Fields 16 Santa Fe River Parkway 17 Franklin Miles Park 18 Archuleta River Property 19 Genoveva Chavez Communit y Center 20 Ragle Park 21 B. The funds remainin g from the 2008 general obligation bond shall be reallocated 2 2 or added to existing funding for improvements and additions as follows: 23 (1) Bicentennial Pool 20, Replace elephant fixture 25 (2) Fort Marcy Complex 8,

6 1 Install handicapped doors 2 (3) Fort Marcy Complex 600,000 3 Replace three pedestrian bridges 4 (3) Frenchy's Field 14,500 5 Purchase and install solar lighting 6 (4) John Griego Park 46,000 7 Replace basketball court 8 (5) Calle Lorca Park 7,100 9 Purchase and install security lighting near 10 the playground 11 (6) East De Vargas Park 5, Purchase and install water fountain 13 (7) Young Park 72, Install sidewalks; replace basketball Comi 15 (8) Herb Martinez Park 7, Resurface tennis courts 17 (9) Mark Brandt Park 12, Landscaping improvet ents to mclude 19 drainage extensions and planting oftrees 20 (10) Monica Lucero Park 6, Landscaping improvements to include 22 installation of post and cable, and planting of trees 23 (11) Villa Caballero Park 5, Purchase and install shade structure 25 Total 803,

7 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: KELLEY. BRENNAN, CITY ATTORNEY M/Legislation/Bills 2016/Authorize 2008 Bond Reallocation 5 7

8 City of Santa Fe Fiscal Impact Report (FIR) FIR No. {)fjd(p This Fiscal Impact Report (FIR) shall be completed for each proposed bill or resolution as to its direct impact upon the City's operating budget and is intended for use by any of the standing committees of and the Governing Body of the City of Santa Fe. Bills or resolutions with no fiscal impact still require a completed FIR. Bills or resolutions with a fiscal impact must be reviewed by the Finance Committee. Bills or resolutions without a fiscal impact generally do not require review by the Finance Committee unless the subject of the bill or resolution is financial in nature. Section A. General Information (Check) Bill: X Resolution: --- (A single FIR may be used for related bills and/or resolutions) Short Title(s): AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2008 GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND TO REALLOCATE 803,000 CURRENTLY DESIGNATED FOR VARIOUS CITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO COMPLETE CERTAIN INCOMPLETE PROJECTS AT CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES AND TO REPLACE THREE FAILING BRIDGES AT FORT MARCY PARK. Sponsor(s): Councilor Ives Reviewing Department(s): Parks and Recreation Department Persons Completing FIR: Phone:...,x=2-=--14.:...:2=--- ======== = == =========== == ========= =========== ======= ================== Section B. Summary Briefly explain the purpose and major provisions of the bill/resolution: This bill would authorize the reallocation of funds from the 2008 Parks Bond from current designations to other improvements throughout the city, including the replacement of bridges at Fort Marcy Complex. This legislation is pursuant to Ordinance that requires the adoption of an ordinance in order to authorize reallocation of bond funds. =============== ====== ======================== == ================= ======== Section C. Fiscal Impact Note: Financial information on this FIR does not directly translate into a City of Santa Fe budget increase. For a budget increase, the following are required: a. The item must be on the agenda at the Finance Committee and City Council as a "Request for Approval of a City of Santa Fe Budget Increase" with a definitive funding source (could be same item and same time as bill/resolution) b. Detailed budget information must be attached as to fund, business units, and line item, amounts, and explanations (similar to annual requests for budget) c. Detailed personnel forms must be attached as to range, salary, and benefit allocation and signed by Human Resource Department for each new position(s) requested (prorated for period to be employed by fiscal year)* 1. Projected Expenditures: a. Indicate Fiscal Year(s) affected- usually current fiscal year and following fiscal year (i.e., FY 03/04 and FY 04/05) b. Indicate: c. Indicate: ''A" if current budget and level of staffing will absorb the costs "N" if new, additional, or increased budget or staffing will be required "R" - if recurring annual costs "NR" if one-time, non-recurring costs, such as start-up, contract or equipment costs d. Attach additional projection schedules if two years does not adequately project revenue and cost patterns e. Costs may be netted orshown as an offset if some cost savings are projected (explain in Section 3 Narrative) Finance Director: 8

9 X Check here if no fiscal impact Column# Expenditure Classification FY FY "A'' Costs "R)' Costs- Fund --- Required recurring Personnel* Fringe** Capital Outlay Land/ Building Professional Services All Other Operating Costs Total: * Any indication that additional staffmg would be required must be reviewed and approved in advance by the City Manager by attached memo before release of FIR to committees. **For fringe benefits contact the Finance Dept. 2. Revenue Sources: a. To indicate new revenues and/or b. Required for costs for which new ex p enditure budget is proposed above in item 1. Column# Type of FY --- "R" Costs FY --- Revenue Recurring or"nr" "A" Costs "R" Costs Absorbed Recurring or"n'' or"nr" New Non- Budget recurring Required Absorbed Recurring Affected or"n" New or"nr" Budget Non- Nonrecurring 5 6 "R" Costs Fund Recurring or Affected "NR"Nonrecurring Total: Form adopted: 01/12!05; revised 8/24(05; revised 4/17/08 2 9

10 3. Expenditure/Revenue Narrative: Explain revenue source(s). Include revenue calculations, grant(s) available anticipated date of receipt of revenues/grants, etc. Explain expenditures, grant match(s), justify personnel increase(s), detail capital and operating uses, etc. (Attach supplemental page, if necessary.) As a reallocation, no additional funding is required from the City. === ================ ============= ====== ================================ = == Section D. General Narrative 1. Conflicts: Does this proposed bill/resolution duplicate/conflict with/companion to/relate to any City code, approved ordinance or resolution, other adopted policies or proposed legislation? Include details of city adopted laws/ordinance/resolutions and dates. Summarize the relationships, conflicts or overlaps. This bill is pursuant to Ordinance that requires the adoption of an ordinance by the Governing Body to authorize the reallocation of bond funds approved by the voters. 2. Consequences of Not Enacting This Bin/Resolution: Are there consequences of not enacting this bill/resolution? If so, describe. Funding for unneeded or unwanted park improvements will remain, while those improvements deemed more important will not have the required funding to complete. 3. Technical Issues: Are there incorrect citations of law, drafting errors or other problems? Are there any amendments that should be considered? Are there any other alternatives which should be considered? If so, describe. None identified. 4. Community Impact: Briefly describe the major positive or negative effects the Bill/Resolution might have on the community including, but not limited to, businesses, neighborhoods, families, children and youth, social service providers and other institutions such as schools, churches, etc. By adopting this bill, th.e public will have assurances that the funds they approved through the 2008 GO Bond will be spent in the way they approved. Funding wm be moved from proiects that neighborhoods do not need or want, to those that are needed for public safety reasons, or have greater tangible value to the public. Form adopted: 01/12/05; revised 8/24/05; revised 4/17/