FY STIP ODESSA DISTRICT HIGHWAY

Transcription

1 FY STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ODESSA DISTRIT HIGHWAY AUGUST 2012

2 FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and omment: April 16, 2012 Approved by the Policy Board: May 17, 2012

3 Table of ontents ontents Table of ontents... 2 Motor Members and Structure... 3 Mission Statement of the Midland Odessa Transportation (MOTOR)... 3 Transportation Improvement Program... 4 Year of Expenditure Trends... 4 Total Project osts (TP)... 5 Methodology... 5 Operations and Maintenance... 5 Record of Public Involvement... 8 Purpose of Public Meetings... 8 Public Involvement Policy... 9 How Projects are selected Air Quality Issues ontact Information Funding ategories & Project Development Authority Statewide SJs (ontrol Section Job) Highway onstruction Project Listing FY FY Highway Financial Summary Year of Expenditure onstruction osts Transit Project Listing FY JAR Project Listing Transit Financial Summary, MOTOR MPO MOTOR MPO Self ertification Midland Odessa urban Area Boundary Appendix A MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

4 Motor Members and Structure The Midland Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization, formally known as the Midland Odessa Transportation Organization (MOTOR), is a federally mandated organization developed to coordinate the highway, transit, and land use planning processes in order to receive federal funds for highway and transit improvements. MOTOR is the organization that sets the transportation priorities by bringing together government entities within the MOTOR Urbanized Area Boundary (UAB) to make continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation decisions. The government entities include the ities of Odessa and Midland; and ounties of Ector and Midland; and the Texas Department of Transportation Odessa District Office. The MOTOR Policy Board sets the priorities for the transportation projects in the MOTOR Urban Area Boundary. The MOTOR Policy Board also provides direction to the MOTOR Executive Director and is the policy making entity for MOTOR. This ommittee is comprised of representatives from the ity of Midland, the ity of Odessa, Midland ounty, Ector ounty, and TxDOT Odessa District. The Policy Board meets at the MOTOR Offices (located at 9601 Wright Drive, Midland, Texas) every third Monday of the month at 5:00 pm. The MOTOR Technical Advisory ommittee (TA) provides technical assistance, knowledge and provides technical recommendations to the Policy Board and MOTOR Staff; the MOTOR Executive Director chairs the TA. The TA includes representatives from the ity of Midland, the ity of Odessa, Midland ounty, Ector ounty, and the TxDOT Odessa District office. The MOTOR Technical Advisory ommittee meets at the MOTOR Offices the first Thursday of every month at 8:30 am. Mission Statement of the Midland Odessa Transportation (MOTOR) Provide stewardship of a cooperative transportation planning process that ensures state and local officials cooperatively develop a fiscally constrained transportation program that ensures the region s future transportation and transit demands are timely and efficiently satisfied. 3 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

5 Transportation Improvement Program MOTOR, working cooperatively with TxDOT, develops a work program of transportation projects known as the Transportation Improvement Program, or the TIP. The TIP lists projects developed through a cooperative, comprehensive, and continuing transportation planning process. The projects identified in the TIP are derived from the current Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). The TIP provides a short range planning document that will coordinate the transportation projects of the two ities, two ounties, and the Odessa District of TxDOT with urban area needs. The purposes of the TIP include: Identification of improvements recommended for advancement during the 4 year program; Identification of transportation improvement priorities; Realistic estimates of total costs and revenues for the program period; and Facilitating a cooperative, comprehensive, and continuing transportation planning process. Funding for transportation improvements come from the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, TxDOT and local entities. Most off state highway system projects require a local match (usually 20%) from the entity in which the project resides. Additionally, the participating entity is usually required to provide the necessary right of way and utility adjustments for off state highway system projects. Year of Expenditure Trends SAFETEA LU requires that the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) have financial plans that reflect year of expenditure dollars for revenue and project cost estimates for any STIP, MTP or TIP adopted, approved, or amended after December 11, To fully comply with all SAFETEA LU requirements, the MOTOR Policy Board at their regularly scheduled meeting on Thursday, December 20, 2007 officially adopted the following annual inflation rates for highway projects, transit projects, and rate of revenue growth for the FY TIP: Highway Projects Transit Projects Rate of Revenue Growth 8.8% 8% 0% NOTE: The MOTOR MPO and TxDOT Odessa District worked together to determine a reasonable rate of growth based upon timing and scheduling of projects. However, further information from the Design and onstruction Information System (DIS) assumes the TxDOT rate of inflation of 4%. 4 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

6 Total Project osts (TP) To determine the TP, the MPO utilized project programming information obtained from the TxDOT Design and onstruction Information System (DIS) database. onstruction Engineering (E), ontingency and Indirect osts are anticipated to be 20%, 25%, or 30%, depending upon the roadway classification and type of work. Right of way costs are assumed to increase at a rate of 5% annually. Methodology For project costs to be forecasted and appropriately programmed, construction estimates will be prepared utilizing available current unit bid prices and inflated to a future construction cost utilizing the anticipated trends outlined in YOE Trends above. Once the anticipated future year construction cost is determined, the TP will be established by increasing the YOE construction cost by 20%, 25%, or 30% for E, ontingency and Indirect osts plus the anticipated ROW cost. This approach will provide a consistent methodology to develop both construction costs, and total project costs. Operations and Maintenance SAFTEA LU regulations require the TIP demonstrate appropriate system level estimates of funds to adequately operate and maintain Federal aid highways, The majority of funds used to pay operating and maintenance costs of these highways within the MOTOR boundary are State and ity funds. The table below demonstrates approximate annual funding levels TxDOT and each ity allocate to the preservation of roadways eligible for Federal aid funding. Based on historical practices, each entity has ensured O&M needs were met with sufficient funding to maintain the system in a desirable condition. As operating costs escalate, each entity pledges to ensure revenue allocations are sufficient to maintain the system in a desirable condition as defined by the TxDOT Maintenance Division. 5 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

7 REVENUE ALLOATIONS FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANE (Based on current year agency s budget) Midland ounty Ector ounty TxDOT $2,247,778 $1,808,514 ity of Odessa $ 6,350,000 ity of Midland $ 1,815,000 Subtotals $ 4, $8,158,514 Total $ 12,221,292 The TIP was developed in accordance with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA), Transportation Equity Act for the 21st entury (TEA 21), Federal Transit Act, and in accordance with the metropolitan planning requirements set forth in the Statewide and Metropolitan Planning Final Rule (23 FR Part 450, 49 FR Part 613) promulgated in the February 14, 2007 Federal Register. The TIP reflects changes in the planning process brought about by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA LU) which was passed by ongress and signed into law on August 10, SAFETEA LU addresses the many challenges that the transportation system faces today, such as improving safety, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency in freight movement, increasing intermodal connectivity, and protecting the environment. SAFETEA LU increases investment in highway, transit, and safety programs while retaining the basic goals and structure of the earlier Transportation Equity Act for the 21st entury (TEA 21). The major changes include: a change from a three year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to a four year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), expanded consideration of environmental issues in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and expansion of public participation. In compliance with SAFETEA LU requirements, the MOTOR MPO has considered and applied strategies that will serve to advance the eight transportation planning factors identified under SAFETEA LU (23 FR, Part Scope of Metropolitan Planning Process) as follows: Support the economic vitality of the urban area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; 6 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

8 Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; Promote efficient system management and operation; and Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. 7 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

9 Record of Public Involvement The Public Involvement process included: In a regularly scheduled meeting of the MOTOR MPO Policy Board (Monday, April 16, 2012 at the MOTOR MPO onference Room), the Draft Transportation Improvement Program ( TIP) was approved for general release and public involvement. itizens are given the opportunity to review and comment on agenda items at each Policy Board Meeting. The MOTOR MPO conducted a public meeting (at the MOTOR MPO onference Room on Monday, April 16, 2010) for the public to review and comment on the detailed information contained in the draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Notice of the public meeting was placed in the Midland Reporter Telegram and the Odessa American newspapers. Public notices of the meeting were posted at ity Halls of the ities of Midland and Odessa. The public was given a minimum of thirty (30) days to submit comments on the projects for consideration prior to the adoption of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). A draft TIP was made available during regular business hours at the MOTOR MPO Office; TxDOT Odessa District Office; the Midland and Ector ounty Libraries; the ity Secretary Offices of the ities of Midland and Odessa; and on the MOTOR MPO website ( prior to the adoption of the TIP. In a regularly scheduled meeting of the MOTOR MPO Policy Board (Monday, May 17, 2010), the final Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was approved for submission in the TxDOT STIP. itizens were once again given the opportunity to review and comment on the TIP prior to the final approval by the Policy Board. opies of the approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) remained on file during regular business hours at the MOTOR MPO Offices for public access and review, and on the MOTOR MPO website ( until it was submitted to TxDOT Transportation Planning and Programming in Austin, Texas on May 23, The approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) will remain on the website for ongoing reference by the public. Purpose of Public Meetings Public involvement is an essential phase of project planning and selection. The process gives the public an opportunity to vocalize the needs of the planning area to the representatives of the MOTOR. The public involvement process assures the public is kept informed and has an opportunity to voice their concerns, interests, and priorities on transportation needs. 8 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

10 Public meetings provide an opportunity to ask questions and to make formal comments on the proposed TIP. These meetings are also designed: To inform the public of the status of the planning and programming of transportation projects. To describe the recommended project locations and designs, to allow the public to determine how they will potentially affect you and your property. To provide an opportunity to present information and to share the public s views before decisions are finalized. To develop a record of public views and participation to present with recommendations to the Policy Board prior to finalization of the TIP. Public Involvement Policy The Midland Odessa Regional Transportation Study (MORTS) MPO adopted a formal Public Involvement Policy in February, 1994 (Revised in February, 1999). When the MPO was designated in 2005 as the Midland Odessa Transportation Organization (MOTOR), this policy remained in effect and met the standard requirements for public participation in the planning process as established with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st entury (TEA 21). In order to comply with all SAFETEA LU directives passed into law in 2005, the MOTOR MPO worked with consultants, and adopted a new Public Participation Plan on September 20, 2007 that provides a public participation process that: Requires a minimum public comment period of 45 days before the process is adopted or revised; Provides timely information on regional transportation issues; Provides additional public access to technical and policy information; Requires adequate public notice of public activities and time for public review at key decision points, including but not limited to approval of MOTOR s long range transportation plan (MTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); Demonstrates consideration and response to public input received during the planning and program development processes; ommits to incorporate Environmental Justice elements and Title VI considerations by seeking out and considering the needs of the historically underserved populations, including, but not limited to low income and minority households; Includes public comments as part of the adoption and amendment of MOTOR MPO documents, including the Long Range Plan (MTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); Makes available to the public revisions to the MTP and the TIP; Allows for periodic review of the Public Participation Plan to assure compliance with Federal requirements; Allows for Federal Highway and Federal Transit Administrations to review the 9 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

11 Public Participation Plan; oordinates MOTOR MPO s initiative with the Statewide Planning Involvement Process; Seeks out and considers comments from the public and from stakeholders (i.e. local and state emergency response agencies regarding safety programs; Identifies and coordinates with federal, state, and tribal, wildlife, land management, economic development and regulatory agencies; Provides for consultation with all interested parties defined as citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation and users of public Transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled and interested parties; Provides for visualization techniques to the maximum extent practicable; Provides for an electronically accessible format. Progress to Update the Public Involvement Policy Progress to update the Public Involvement Policy (PIP) in order to comply with all SAFETEA LU initiatives includes: The MPO has contracted professional service providers to assist in developing a website and to propose a new PIP. A new PIP was adopted on September 20, 2007; Five (5) public meetings were conducted (March 15, 2007; March 26, 2007; April 19, 2007; July 26, 2007 and September 20, 2007) to obtain citizen input into the new participation plan; The final draft of the Public Participation Plan was released for public review on July 26, 2007, and adopted by the Policy Board on September 20, The MOTOR MPO website became active on Friday, March 2, o Improvements were made to the website that became active on September 20, The MPO has implemented the Midessa Management Study to identify and understand emergency & incident response issues within the MPO boundaries; MOTOR Staff routinely provides draft documents to both the Odessa District of TxDOT and the TxDOT Planning Division for review and comment to synchronize planning activities; Members of the MOTOR Staff and TA participated in the 2007 ategory 3 onsensus Meeting conducted March 2007 in Austin. Public Involvement Strategy Distribution of Information using the following: MOTOR MPO website (which will be 10 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

12 updated on a regular basis and will at a minimum have posting of: Policy Board meetings, upcoming public meetings, Technical Advisory ommittee meetings, workshops, and other notices that may be of interest to the public); newsletters, public service announcements, direct mailings, e mails, press releases, newspaper ads, public meetings, open houses, community meetings/workshops; and ollection of Information to include surveys, comment cards at meetings, comment forms on website and other communication from citizens. How Projects are selected In July of 2008, a list of four high priority projects was voted upon by the Technical Advisory ommittee (TA) as well as the Policy Board. These projects were added to Appendix A of the TIP. These projects are to be the first projects funded as money becomes available. Subsequent projects for the TIP were chosen directly from the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). In creating the MTP, MOTOR went through an extensive public involvement process to determine the Vision Plan for the region. This community visioning process resulted in a plan for the growth of the region over the next 25 years, and a list of the transportation investments needed to make the Vision Plan a reality. Key investments in the Vision Plan include the following initiatives: Improve regional mobility and accessibility around the region with investments such as: Upgrading major roadways to freeway design standards Adding inter city and expanded transit service Building a regional bicycle/pedestrian system to connect both cities Improve interstate mobility and accessibility by making investments such as: Widening IH 20 Upgrading interchanges on IH 20 onverting IH 20 frontage roads to one way operation Adding a north south freight line and intermodal inland port Distribute traffic in ways that reduce the impacts of growth on primary corridors through initiatives such as: Limiting access points to a few well designed intersections onstructing strategic connections to promote economic development Expand transit and ridesharing choices by making improvements such as: onstructing downtown transit centers and park and ride lots 11 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

13 Expanding existing transit services Enhance regional gateways from IH 20 into downtown areas Improve overall system efficiency by developing a regional transportation management and operations center With the guidance of the Technical Advisory ommittee (TA) and the MOTOR Policy Board, a set of evaluation guidelines for ranking these projects was developed. An evaluation based on these guidelines was done for each project. Projects were discussed at length with the TA and priorities were set and approved by the Policy Board. Additionally, MOTOR will invest in all types of projects equally throughout the region. More detailed information on this Vision Plan can be found in hapter 7 of the MTP. NOTE: All project listings are financially constrained to available resources. After adoption by the Policy Board, the approved TIP will be utilized for programming projects within the urban area. Any projects listed in the first year of the approved TIP shall be considered in the first priority and may be implemented as soon as construction plans are completed and funds are appropriated. Should any project not able to be implemented from the first priority, then projects should be selected from the second year and shall be considered the second priority, and those projects may be implemented as plans are completed and funds are appropriated. If funds and plans are available, projects from the third year, which shall be considered the third priority, may be moved into the first or second year and may be implemented as soon as plans and funds are available. Air Quality Issues The lean Air Act of 1990 places several requirements on communities to maintain and improve urban air quality. In response to the Act, the U. S. Department of Transportation has identified those communities in the nation with poor air quality as non attainment areas and those with good air quality are classified as attainment areas. Although the Midland Odessa Metropolitan area has been identified as an attainment area, consideration is still given in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to the maintenance of good air quality through the appropriate mix of land uses with their resulting travel patterns. 12 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

14 ontact Information Tim Dolan, AIP, Executive Director, MOTOR MPO Phone: (432) Ext Physical Address 9601 Wright Drive, Suite 1 Midland, TX Mailing Address P.O. Box Midland, TX MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

15 Funding ategories & Project Development Authority Restructured UTP ategories ategory Description Development Authority 1 onsolidated Rehabilitation onstruct Only 2 Metropolitan Area (TMA) orridor Projects Plan, Develop & onstruct 3 Urban Area (Non TMA) orridor Projects Plan, Develop & onstruct 4 Statewide onnectivity orridor Projects Plan, Develop & onstruct 5 ongestion Mitigation Air Quality Develop & onstruct 6 onsolidated Structures Rehabilitation Plan, Develop & onstruct 7 STP Metropolitan Mobility/Rehabilitation Develop & onstruct 8 STP Safety onstruct Only 9 STP Enhancements onstruct Only 10 Miscellaneous onstruct Only 11 District Discretionary Develop & onstruct 12 Strategic Priority Plan, Develop & onstruct Notes: Plan Authority: determination. Projects authorized for environmental studies and route/right of way Develop Authority: Projects authorized for P. S. & E. preparation, ROW acquisition and utility adjustments; but not authorized for construction. onstruct Authority: Projects authorized for P.S. & E. preparation, ROW acquisition, utility adjustments and construction. 14 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

16 Statewide SJs (ontrol Section Job) The categories identified in the table below are statewide SJs which TxDOT has selected to let construction projects under to ensure that no more projects are let than funds exist to support. The use of statewide SJs for these categories will provide a more efficient method of programming and letting projects, and decreases of necessity for STIP revisions. Statewide Project ontrol Section Job (SJ) Numbers ategory Statewide SJ Type of Work PE Preliminary Engineering ROW Right of Way Preventative Maintenance and Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Railroad Grade Separations Safety Landscaping Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment Program (ITS) Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Rest Areas (SRA) and Truck Weigh Stations Transit Improvements 15 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

17 Highway onstruction Project Listing FY MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

18 FY MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

19 MOTOR Metropolitan Planning Organization FY Transportation Improvement Program Highway Financial Summary Year of Expenditure onstruction osts Funding by ategory ategory Description Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Programmed Authorized Preventive Maintenance and 1 Rehabilitation Urban Area (Non- TMA) 2M or 2U orridor Projects Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation 3 Project Statewide onnectivity 4 orridor Projects 5 MAQ FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total FY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,486,959 $7,486,959 $0 $0 $7,486,959 $7,486,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6 Structures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 7 Metro Mobility & Rehab $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8 Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 9 Transportation Enhancements $1,840,454 $1,840,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,840,454 $1,840, Supplemental Transportation Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 11 District Discretionary $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 Strategic Priority $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 Strategic Priority REON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 12S Strategic Priority REON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SBPE Strategy Budget PE Strategy Budget PE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SB 102 Strategy 102 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $1,840,454 $1,840,454 $0 $0 $7,486,959 $7,486,959 $0 $0 $9,327,413 $9,327, MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

20 Funding Participation Source Source FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Total Federal $1,472,363 $0 $5,989,567 $0 $7,461,930 State $0 $0 $1,497,392 $0 $1,497,392 Local Match $368,091 $0 $0 $0 $368,091 AT 3 - Local ontributions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Prop 12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Prop 14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 at 3- Prop 14 SB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Texas Mobility Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Pass Thru Toll Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Regional Toll Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Match to Regional Toll Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AT 3 - Unique Federal Program - Tiger II $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other - Section 5306 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other - Strategy PE Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other - Stragegy 102 Budget $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $1,840,454 $0 $7,486,959 $0 $9,327,413 NOTE #1: Allocation of construction funds; as well as programming of projects in this funding category will be identified in the Statewide TIP in the Statewide SJ portion of the document. NOTE #2: Midland Odessa Transportation Organization (MOTOR) is not eligible for funds in these categories. NOTE #3: Districtwide Projects identified for Prev. Maintenance & Rehab. Activities or landscape development, and are funded form AT 10 or AT 11 Work ategories will be identified in the region s Rural TIP. 19 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

21 Transit Project Listing The attached spreadsheets outline the proposed transit projects for the FY TIP. Notes: 1. Allocation Source: Metropolitan Transportation Plan. 2. The Federal Transit Act has been codified in the U.S. ode. Federal agencies have adopted a new series of numbers to describe transit programs. The following table displays this information. ONVERSION TABLE 49 U. S.. Section Description 5309 Discretionary 5307 Urbanized Program 5310 Elderly/Disabled Program 5311 Rural/Non urbanized Program 5313 State Planning 5316 JAR Job Access Reverse ommute 5317 New Freedom 20 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

22 21 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

23 22 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

24 23 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

25 24 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

26 25 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

27 26 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

28 27 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

29 28 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

30 FY JAR Project Listing The projects listed here is for the intercity bus service, which is started from October This JAR program is expected to continue throughout this TIP update cycle. The listing here is for information purpose and these funding number are not included in the transit summary sheet. 29 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

31 30 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

32 31 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

33 32 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

34 33 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

35 Transit Financial Summary, MOTOR MPO All Figures are in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars FY Transportation Improvement Program FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Transit Program Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec Urbanized Formula >200K 6,529,752 1,765,600 8,295,352 3,940,000 1,709,500 5,649,500 4,060,000 1,719,500 5,779,500 2 Sec Urbanized Formula <200K Sec Discretionary Sec Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities Sec Nonurbanized Formula Sec JAR >200K Sec JAR <200K Sec JAR Nonurbanized Sec New Freedom >200K Sec New Freedom <200K Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized Other FTA Regionally Significant or Other Total Funds $6,529,752 $1,765,600 $8,295,352 $3,940,000 $1,709,500 $5,649,500 $4,060,000 $1,719,500 $5,779,500 Transportation Development redits Requested $515,838 $360,000 $380,000 Awarded $0 $0 $0 34 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

36 FY 2016 Total Transit Program Federal State/Other Total Federal State/Other Total 1 Sec Urbanized Formula >200K 2,540,000 1,699,500 4,239,500 17,069,752 6,894,100 23,963,852 2 Sec Urbanized Formula <200K Sec Discretionary Sec Elderly &Individuals w/disabilities Sec Nonurbanized Formula Sec JAR >200K Sec JAR <200K Sec JAR Nonurbanized Sec New Freedom >200K Sec New Freedom <200K Sec New Freedom Nonurbanized Other FTA Regionally Significant or Other Total Funds $2,540,000 $1,699,500 $4,239,500 $17,069,752 $6,894,100 $23,963,852 Transportation Development redits Requested $0 $1,255,838 Awarded $0 $0 35 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

37 MOTOR MPO Self ertification In accordance with 23 FR Part and of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, the Texas Department of Transportation, and the Midland Odessa Transportation Organization, Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Midland Odessa urbanized area, hereby certify that the transportation planning process is addressing the major issues in the metropolitan planning area and is being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements of: (1) 23 U.S.. 134, 49 U.S , and this subpart; (2) Title VI of the ivil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S d 1) and 49 FR part 21; (3) 49 U.S , prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity; (4) Section 1101(b) of the SAFETEA LU (Pub. L ) and 49 FR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects; (5) 23 FR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal aid highway construction contracts; (6) The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S et seq.) and 49 FR parts 27, 37, and 38; (7) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S ), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (8) Section 324 of title 23 U.S.. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and (9) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.. 794) and 49 FR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MIDLAND ODESSA METROPOLITION ODESSA DISTRIT PLANNING ORGANIZATION Mike McAnally, District Engineer Judge Susan Redford, hairperson The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. ode. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation 36 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

38 Midland Odessa urban Area Boundary 37 MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

39 Appendix A The purpose of Appendix A is to identify projects that are undergoing preliminary engineering and environmental analysis (PE/EA) consistent with early project development. The Federal Highway Administration allows these projects to be referenced in the current Transportation Improvement Program in order to facilitate the feasibility and PE/EA phases. This Appendix contains projects that are scheduled for implementation beyond the four years of the TIP time frame, and it in no way implies that these projects are programmed in the TIP. ost estimates are preliminary and do not represent any commitment of construction funding. onsistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan will be verified as alternatives are examined in studies or environmental clearance efforts. Projects listed in Appendix A will include, at a minimum, SJ Number, MPO ID number, county, TxDOT district, sponsoring entity, street name, project limits, project description, estimated let date and preliminary project cost. SJ TBD TBD TBD TBD MPO Project No. R 02a R 02b Name Limits Description JBS Parkway JBS Parkway R 03 Loop 250 R 04 Interstate 20 RE 02 FM 1882 Near FM 3503 Interstate 20 to FM 3503 Fairgrounds Rd to Todd Rd At Midkiff Rd From US 385 North to Yukon Rd East R 66 SL0250 At SH 191 R 48 R 1130 IH0020 to FM0307 R 51 Fairgroun ds Rd SL0250 to Bus. 158 onstruct new roadway (0.5 miles) Widen existing roadway to five lanes (2 miles) onstruct mainlanes w/ interchange at Fairgrounds Rd Reconstruct and upgrade interchange Improve Intersections/Safety (0.5 mile) Add direct connectors at SH0191 (NW movement) Widen from 2 to 5 lanes with curb and gutter Widen from 2 to 4 lanes w/ bike lanes Estimated ost Estimated Letting Date $2.1m 2015 $4.4m 2025 $24.6m 2025 $15.5m 2025 $2.0m 2016 $11.9m 2025 $4.3m 2025 $9.1m MOTOR Transportation Improvement Program FY

40 FY STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ODESSA DISTRIT RURAL GROUPED S HIGHWAY AUGUST 2012

41

42 Grouping of Projects 23 FR part (f) Projects that are not considered to be of appropriate scale for individual identification in a given program year may be grouped by function, work type, and/or geographic area using the applicable classifications under 23 FR (c) and (d) and/or 40 FR part 93. In nonattainment and maintenance areas, project classifications must be consistent with the exempt project classifications contained in the EPA transportation conformity regulation (40 FR part 93). In addition, projects proposed for funding under title 23 U.S.. hapter 2 that are not regionally significant may be grouped in one line item or identified individually in the TIP.

43 Grouped Project SJs Definition of Grouped Projects for Use in the STIP Revised May 18, 2005 PROPOSED SJ GROUPED ATEGORY PE Preliminary Engineering Right of Way Acquisition Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Railroad Grade Separations Safety (safe routes to school) Landscaping DEFINITION Preliminary Engineering for any project that is not added capacity in a non-attainment area. Includes activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction such as planning and technical studies, grants for training and research programs. Right of Way acquisition for any project that is not added capacity in a non-attainment area. Includes relocation assistance, hardship acquisition and protective buying. Projects to include pavement repair to preserve existing pavement so that it may achieve its designed loading. Includes seal coats, overlays, resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation done with existing ROW. Also includes modernization of a highway by reconstruction, adding shoulders or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking, weaving, turning, climbing, nonadded capacity). Projects to replace and/or rehabilitate functionally obsolete or structurally deficient bridges. Projects to construct or replace existing highwayrailroad grade crossings and to rehabilitate and/or replace deficient railroad underpasses, resulting in no added capacity. Projects to include the construction or replacement/rehabilitation of guard rails, median barriers, crash cushions, pavement markings, skid treatments, medians, lighting improvements, curb ramps, railroad/highway crossing warning devices, fencing, intersection improvements (e.g., turn lanes), signalization projects and interchange modifications. Also includes projects funded via the Federal Hazard Elimination Program and the Federal Railroad Signal Safety Program. Project consisting of typical right-of-way landscape development, establishment and aesthetic improvements to include any associated erosion control and environmental mitigation activities.

44 Grouped Project SJs Definition of Grouped Projects for Use in the STIP Revised May 18, 2005 PROPOSED SJ GROUPED ATEGORY Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment DEFINITION Highway traffic operation improvement projects including the installation of ramp metering control devices, variable message signs, traffic monitoring equipment and projects in the Federal ITS/IVHS programs Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Rest Areas and Truck Weigh Stations Transit Improvements onstruction or rehabilitation of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths and facilities. onstruction and improvement of rest areas and truck weigh stations. Projects include the construction and improvement of small passenger shelters and information kiosks. Also includes the construction and improvement of rail storage/maintenance facilities bus transfer facilities where minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.

45 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 1 OF ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM IH 20 LIMITS TO: 4.0 MILES EAST OF IH 20 ROADWAY REHABILITATION SH 158 FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 6,098,371 $ 298,820 $ 6,098,371 $ 298,820 $ 3,049 $ 752,539 $ 6,098, DIST DIS: $ 4,321,124 $ 1,080,281 $ 5,401,405 $ 557,573 $ 139,393 $ 696,966* $ 4,878,697 $ 1,219,674 $ 6,098,371 $ 7,727, ODESSA RANE FM 1053 LIMITS FROM ETOR OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: SH 329 SEAL OAT SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 578,672 $ 28,355 $ 578,672 $ 14,698 $ 3,241 $ 71,408 $ 578,672 $ 462,938 $ 115,734 $ 578,672* $ 462,938 $ 115,734 $ 578,672 $ 706, ODESSA RANE LIMITS FROM SH 329 LIMITS TO: PEOS OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT FM 1053 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 168,463 $ 8,255 $ 168,463 $ 4,279 $ 943 $ 20,788 $ 168,463 $ 134,770 $ 33,693 $ 168,463* $ 134,770 $ 33,693 $ 168,463 $ 205,626 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

46 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 2 OF ODESSA MARTIN LIMITS FROM SH 349 LIMITS TO: HOWARD OUNTY LINE SEAL SH 176 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 816,960 $ 40,031 $ 816,960 $ 20,751 $ 4,575 $ 100,813 $ 816,960 $ 653,568 $ 163,392 $ 816,960* $ 653,568 $ 163,392 $ 816,960 $ 997, ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM BS 349 LIMITS TO: 0.5 MI NORTH OF IH 20 NFR SEAL OAT SH 140 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 191,556 $ 9,386 $ 191,556 $ 4,866 $ 1,073 $ 23,638 $ 191,556 $ 153,245 $ 38,311 $ 191,556* $ 153,245 $ 38,311 $ 191,556 $ 233, ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM 0.5 MI NORTH OF IH 20 LIMITS TO: SH 137 SEAL OAT FM 307 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 782,650 $ 38,350 $ 782,650 $ 19,879 $ 4,383 $ 96,579 $ 782,650 $ 626,120 $ 156,530 $ 782,650* $ 626,120 $ 156,530 $ 782,650 $ 955,303 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

47 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 3 OF ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM BREWSTER OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: TERRELL OUNTY LINE SEAL PROGRAM US 90 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 310,728 $ 15,226 $ 310,728 $ 7,892 $ 1,740 $ 38,344 $ 310,728 $ 248,582 $ 62,146 $ 310,728* $ 248,582 $ 62,146 $ 310,728 $ 379, ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM 0.3 MI SOUTH OF FM 1776 LIMITS TO: 0.8 MI NORTH OF IH 10 SEAL OAT US 285 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 291,938 $ 14,305 $ 291,938 $ 7,415 $ 1,635 $ 36,025 $ 291,938 $ 233,550 $ 58,388 $ 291,938* $ 233,550 $ 58,388 $ 291,938 $ 356, ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM 0.8 MI NORTH OF IH 10 LIMITS TO: IH 10 SEAL OAT US 285 FUNDING AT(S): 1 SEAL OAT $ 115,056 $ 5,638 $ 115,056 $ 2,922 $ 644 $ 14,198 $ 115,056 $ 92,045 $ 23,011 $ 115,056* $ 92,045 $ 23,011 $ 115,056 $ 140,438 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

48 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 4 OF ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM IH 10 SFR LIMITS TO: PEOS RIVER SEAL OAT SH 290 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 280,469 $ 13,743 $ 280,469 $ 7,124 $ 1,571 $ 34,610 $ 280,469 $ 224,375 $ 56,094 $ 280,469* $ 224,375 $ 56,094 $ 280,469 $ 342, ODESSA PEOS US 385 LIMITS FROM 0.3 MI EAST OF US 285 SOUTH LIMITS TO: IH 10 EAST SEAL OAT SEALOAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 71,285 $ 3,493 $ 71,285 $ 1,811 $ 399 $ 8,797 $ 71,285 $ 57,028 $ 14,257 $ 71,285* $ 57,028 $ 14,257 $ 71,285 $ 87, ODESSA PEOS SH 18 LIMITS FROM PEOS RIVER LIMITS TO: 13.6 MI SOUTH OF PEOS RIVER SEAL OAT SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 389,413 $ 19,081 $ 389,413 $ 9,891 $ 2,181 $ 48,054 $ 389,413 $ 311,530 $ 77,883 $ 389,413* $ 311,530 $ 77,883 $ 389,413 $ 475,318 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

49 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 5 OF ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM 4.1 MI NORTH OF IH 10 LIMITS TO: IH 10 NFR SEAL OAT SH 18 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 512,292 $ 25,102 $ 512,292 $ 13,012 $ 2,869 $ 63,217 $ 512,292 $ 409,834 $ 102,458 $ 512,292* $ 409,834 $ 102,458 $ 512,292 $ 625, ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM IH 10 NFR LIMITS TO: BI 10-G SEAL OAT SH 18 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 61,693 $ 3,023 $ 61,693 $ 1,567 $ 345 $ 7,613 $ 61,693 $ 49,354 $ 12,339 $ 61,693* $ 49,354 $ 12,339 $ 61,693 $ 75, ODESSA PEOS US 190 LIMITS FROM INTERSETION OF US 190/SH 349(WEST) LIMITS TO: INTERSETION OF US 190/SH 349(EAST) SEAL OAT SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 171,818 $ 8,419 $ 171,818 $ 4,364 $ 962 $ 21,202 $ 171,818 $ 137,454 $ 34,364 $ 171,818* $ 137,454 $ 34,364 $ 171,818 $ 209,722 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

50 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 6 OF ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM RANE OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: FM 11 SEAL OAT FM 1053 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 106,341 $ 5,211 $ 106,341 $ 2,701 $ 596 $ 13,122 $ 106,341 $ 85,073 $ 21,268 $ 106,341* $ 85,073 $ 21,268 $ 106,341 $ 129, ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM FM 11 LIMITS TO: 2.6 MI SOUTH OF FM 1450 SEAL OAT FM 1053 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 283,839 $ 13,908 $ 283,839 $ 7,210 $ 1,590 $ 35,026 $ 283,839 $ 227,071 $ 56,768 $ 283,839* $ 227,071 $ 56,768 $ 283,839 $ 346, ODESSA PEOS US 190 LIMITS FROM HILL STREET IN ITY OF IRAAN LIMITS TO: PEOS RIVER SEAL OAT SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 51,059 $ 2,502 $ 51,059 $ 1,297 $ 286 $ 6,301 $ 51,059 $ 40,847 $ 10,212 $ 51,059* $ 40,847 $ 10,212 $ 51,059 $ 62,322 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

51 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 7 OF ODESSA REEVES BI 20-B LIMITS FROM IH SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD LIMITS TO: WARD OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 262,406 $ 12,858 $ 262,406 $ 6,665 $ 1,469 $ 32,381 $ 262,406 $ 209,925 $ 52,481 $ 262,406* $ 209,925 $ 52,481 $ 262,406 $ 320, ODESSA REEVES SH 17 LIMITS FROM BI 20-B LIMITS TO: 0.6 MI SOUTH OF IH 20 OVERPASS SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 113,880 $ 5,580 $ 113,880 $ 2,893 $ 638 $ 14,053 $ 113,880 $ 91,104 $ 22,776 $ 113,880* $ 91,104 $ 22,776 $ 113,880 $ 139, ODESSA REEVES SH 17 LIMITS FROM 0.6 MI SOUTH OF IH 20 OVERPASS LIMITS TO: 0.7 MI NORTH OF FM 1934 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 103,249 $ 5,059 $ 103,249 $ 2,623 $ 578 $ 12,741 $ 103,249 $ 82,599 $ 20,650 $ 103,249* $ 82,599 $ 20,650 $ 103,249 $ 126,026 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

52 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 8 OF ODESSA REEVES LIMITS FROM US 285 LIMITS TO: 3 MI EAST OF US 285 SEAL OAT FM 1450 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 108,840 $ 5,333 $ 108,840 $ 2,765 $ 610 $ 13,431 $ 108,840 $ 87,072 $ 21,768 $ 108,840* $ 87,072 $ 21,768 $ 108,840 $ 132, ODESSA TERRELL SH 349 LIMITS FROM SEAL OAT PROGRAM (FY-2013) LIMITS TO: SEAL OAT 15.8 MILES SOUTH OF FM 2400 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 730,160 $ 35,778 $ 730,160 $ 18,546 $ 4,089 $ 90,102 $ 730,160 $ 584,128 $ 146,032 $ 730,160* $ 584,128 $ 146,032 $ 730,160 $ 891, ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM REAGAN OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: RANKIN WEST ITY LIMITS SEAL OAT US 67 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 348,657 $ 17,084 $ 348,657 $ 8,856 $ 1,952 $ 43,024 $ 348,657 $ 278,926 $ 69,731 $ 348,657* $ 278,926 $ 69,731 $ 348,657 $ 425,571 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

53 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 9 OF ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM IH 20 WEST OF MONAHANS LIMITS TO: IH 20 EAST OF MONAHANS SEAL OAT BI 20-D SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 753,398 $ 36,916 $ 753,398 $ 19,136 $ 4,219 $ 92,969 $ 753,398 $ 602,718 $ 150,680 $ 753,398* $ 602,718 $ 150,680 $ 753,398 $ 919, ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM SH 329 LIMITS TO: PEOS RIVER SEAL OAT SH 18 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 101,149 $ 4,956 $ 101,149 $ 2,569 $ 566 $ 12,482 $ 101,149 $ 80,919 $ 20,230 $ 101,149* $ 80,919 $ 20,230 $ 101,149 $ 123, ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM SPUR 57 LIMITS TO: 3.4 MI SOUTH OF IH 20 SEAL OAT FM 1219 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 111,425 $ 5,460 $ 111,425 $ 2,830 $ 624 $ 13,750 $ 111,425 $ 89,140 $ 22,285 $ 111,425* $ 89,140 $ 22,285 $ 111,425 $ 136,005 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

54 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 10 OF ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM 3.4 MI SOUTH OF IH 20 LIMITS TO: 7.4 MI SOUTH OF IH 20 SEAL OAT FM 1219 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 115,856 $ 5,677 $ 115,856 $ 2,943 $ 649 $ 14,297 $ 115,856 $ 92,685 $ 23,171 $ 115,856* $ 92,685 $ 23,171 $ 115,856 $ 141, ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. SIGN REPLAEMENTS VA SIGN REPLAEMENTS FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 276,000 $ 13,524 $ 276,000 $ 165,600 $ 3,560 $ 34,058 $ 276, DIST DIS: $ 220,800 $ 55,200 $ 276,000* $ 220,800 $ 55,200 $ 276,000 $ 508, ODESSA MIDLAND FM 868,E MIDLAND LIMITS FROM LOOP 250 LIMITS TO: WADLEY ROADWAY REHABILITION ROADWAY REHABILITION FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 2,196,000 $ 98,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 98,000 $ 1,000 $ 246,800 $ 2,196, DIST DIS: $ 1,453,842 $ 363,461 $ 1,817,303 $ 302,958 $ 75,739 $ 378,697* $ 1,756,800 $ 439,200 $ 2,196,000 $ 2,534,200 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

55 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 11 OF ODESSA PEOS IH 10 LIMITS FROM 2.0 MILES WEST OF FM 11 LIMITS TO: 0.4 MILES WEST OF RM 2886 ROADWAY REHABILITION ROADWAY REHABILITION FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 3,400,000 $ 166,600 $ 3,400,000 $ 203,660 $ 88,400 $ 419,560 $ 3,400,000 $ 3,060,000 $ 340,000 $ 3,400,000* $ 3,060,000 $ 340,000 $ 3,400,000 $ 4,414, ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM GARFIELD_STREET LIMITS TO: SH 349- ROADWAY REHABILITATION LP 250 MIDLAND ROADWAY REHABILITION FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 1,500,000 $ 73,500 $ 1,500,000 $ 73,500 $ 750 $ 185,100 $ 1,500, DIST DIS: $ 996,662 $ 249,166 $ 1,245,828 $ 203,338 $ 50,834 $ 254,172* $ 1,200,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,900, ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. PAVEMENT MAKKINGS VA PAVEMENT MAKKINGS FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 442,286 $ 21,672 $ 442,286 $ 28,218 $ 5,705 $ 54,578 $ 442, DIST DIS: $ 353,829 $ 88,457 $ 442,286* $ 353,829 $ 88,457 $ 442,286 $ 578,024 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

56 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2013 PAGE: 12 OF ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM SH 191 LIMITS TO: 0.2 MILES SOUTH TRAFFI SIGNALS SP 588 ODESSA TRAFFI SIGNALS FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 278,000 $ 13,622 $ 278,000 $ 43,424 $ 5,755 $ 34,305 $ 278, DIST DIS: $ 222,400 $ 55,600 $ 278,000* $ 222,400 $ 55,600 $ 278,000 $ 393,815 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

57 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 13 OF ODESSA ANDREWS FM 1788 LIMITS FROM 1.9 MI SOUTH OF GAINES OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: SH 176 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 542,598 $ 26,587 $ 542,598 $ 13,782 $ 3,039 $ 66,957 $ 542,598 $ 434,078 $ 108,520 $ 542,598* $ 434,078 $ 108,520 $ 542,598 $ 662, ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM US 385 LIMITS TO: RANE OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT US 67 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 529,958 $ 25,968 $ 529,958 $ 13,461 $ 2,968 $ 65,397 $ 529,958 $ 423,966 $ 105,992 $ 529,958* $ 423,966 $ 105,992 $ 529,958 $ 646, ODESSA UPTON US 67 LIMITS FROM 0.1 MI WEST OF WEST SH 349 LIMITS TO: US 385 SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 788,523 $ 38,638 $ 788,523 $ 20,028 $ 4,416 $ 97,304 $ 788,523 $ 630,818 $ 157,705 $ 788,523* $ 630,818 $ 157,705 $ 788,523 $ 962,471 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

58 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 14 OF ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM MIDLAND OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: 6.56 MI SOUTH OF FM 2401 SEAL OAT SH 349 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 662,064 $ 32,441 $ 662,064 $ 16,816 $ 3,708 $ 81,699 $ 662,064 $ 529,651 $ 132,413 $ 662,064* $ 529,651 $ 132,413 $ 662,064 $ 808, ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM 6.56 MI SOUTH OF FM 2401 LIMITS TO: US 67 SEAL OAT SH 349 X FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 661,968 $ 32,436 $ 661,968 $ 16,814 $ 3,707 $ 81,687 $ 661,968 $ 529,574 $ 132,394 $ 661,968* $ 529,574 $ 132,394 $ 661,968 $ 807, ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM US 67 LIMITS TO: ROKETT OUNTY LINE SEAL OAGT SH 349 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 292,726 $ 14,344 $ 292,726 $ 7,435 $ 1,639 $ 36,122 $ 292,726 $ 234,181 $ 58,545 $ 292,726* $ 234,181 $ 58,545 $ 292,726 $ 357,302 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

59 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 15 OF ODESSA UPTON LIMITS FROM SH 349 LIMITS TO: REAGAN OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT RM 1555 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 362,529 $ 17,764 $ 362,529 $ 9,208 $ 2,030 $ 44,736 $ 362,529 $ 290,023 $ 72,506 $ 362,529* $ 290,023 $ 72,506 $ 362,529 $ 442, ODESSA UPTON FM 1901 LIMITS FROM 2.4 MI NORHT OF ROKETT NTY LINE LIMITS TO: ROKETT OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 87,759 $ 4,300 $ 87,759 $ 2,229 $ 491 $ 10,829 $ 87,759 $ 70,207 $ 17,552 $ 87,759* $ 70,207 $ 17,552 $ 87,759 $ 107, ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM 0.5 M SOUTH OF IH 20 LIMITS TO: FM 1776 SEAL OAT SH 18 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 562,752 $ 27,575 $ 562,752 $ 14,294 $ 3,151 $ 69,444 $ 562,752 $ 450,202 $ 112,550 $ 562,752* $ 450,202 $ 112,550 $ 562,752 $ 686,895 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

60 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 16 OF ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM SH 18 NORTH LIMITS TO: SH 18 SOUTH SEAL OAT LP 464 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 314,050 $ 15,388 $ 314,050 $ 7,977 $ 1,759 $ 38,754 $ 314,050 $ 251,240 $ 62,810 $ 314,050* $ 251,240 $ 62,810 $ 314,050 $ 383, ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM WINKLER OUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: SPUR 57 SEAL OAT SH 115 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 337,161 $ 16,521 $ 337,161 $ 8,564 $ 1,888 $ 41,606 $ 337,161 $ 269,729 $ 67,432 $ 337,161* $ 269,729 $ 67,432 $ 337,161 $ 411, ODESSA WARD LIMITS FROM SH 18S LIMITS TO: RANE OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT SH 329 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 208,725 $ 10,228 $ 208,725 $ 5,302 $ 1,169 $ 25,757 $ 208,725 $ 166,980 $ 41,745 $ 208,725* $ 166,980 $ 41,745 $ 208,725 $ 254,770 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

61 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 17 OF ODESSA WINKLER LIMITS FROM VAN STREET IN KERMIT LIMITS TO: WARD OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT SH 18 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 609,681 $ 29,874 $ 609,681 $ 15,486 $ 3,414 $ 75,235 $ 609,681 $ 487,745 $ 121,936 $ 609,681* $ 487,745 $ 121,936 $ 609,681 $ 744, ODESSA WINKLER LIMITS FROM SH 18 NORTH LIMITS TO: WARD OUNTY LINE SEAL OAT SH 115 FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 621,020 $ 30,430 $ 621,020 $ 15,774 $ 3,478 $ 76,634 $ 621,020 $ 496,816 $ 124,204 $ 621,020* $ 496,816 $ 124,204 $ 621,020 $ 758, ODESSA MIDLAND IH 20 LIMITS FROM 5.9 MILES EAST OF SH 349 LIMITS TO: 0.4 MILES EAST OF SH 349 REONSTRUT DRIVING LANES FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 6,709,899 $ 328,785 $ 6,709,899 $ 401,923 $ 174,457 $ 828,002 $ 6,709,899 $ 6,038,909 $ 670,990 $ 6,709,899* $ 6,038,909 $ 670,990 $ 6,709,899 $ 8,711,462 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

62 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 18 OF ODESSA ANDREWS US 385 LIMITS FROM AT PROPOSED ANDREWS BYPASS ROAD LIMITS TO:. INTERSETION IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 1,600,000 $ 78,400 $ 1,600,000 $ 102,080 $ 20,640 $ 197,440 $ 1,600, DIST DIS: $ 1,440,000 $ 160,000 $ 1,600,000* $ 1,440,000 $ 160,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,091, ODESSA ETOR VA,E LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. TRAFFI SIGNALS (PLAEHOLDER SJ) FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 361,560 $ 14,700 $ 300,000 $ 46,860 $ 6,210 $ 37,020 $ 361, DIST DIS: $ 289,248 $ 72,312 $ 361,560* $ 289,248 $ 72,312 $ 361,560 $ 424, ODESSA MIDLAND SH 349,E MIDLAND LIMITS FROM IH 20 LIMITS TO: R 140 ROADWAY REHABILITATION ROADWAY REHABILITION FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 2,650,342 $ 118,276 $ 2,413,790 $ 118,276 $ 1,207 $ 297,862 $ 2,650, DIST DIS: $ 1,691,033 $ 422,758 $ 2,113,791 $ 429,241 $ 107,310 $ 536,551* $ 2,120,274 $ 530,068 $ 2,650,342 $ 3,058,514 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

63 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2014 PAGE: 19 OF ODESSA REEVES IH 10 LIMITS FROM SH 17 LIMITS TO: 8.4 MILES EAST OF SH 17 UPGRADE TO STANDARDS FREEWAY,E FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 7,015,245 $ 309,989 $ 6,326,310 $ 378,946 $ 164,484 $ 780,667 $ 7,015,245 $ 6,313,721 $ 701,525 $ 7,015,245* $ 6,313,721 $ 701,525 $ 7,015,245 $ 8,213, ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. PAVEMENT MARKINGS VA PAVEMENT MARKINGS FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 300,000 $ 14,700 $ 300,000 $ 19,140 $ 3,870 $ 37,020 $ 300, DIST DIS: $ 240,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000* $ 240,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 $ 392,070 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

64 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2015 PAGE: 20 OF ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM AT MONAHANS DRAW LIMITS TO:. REPLAE BRIDGE BI 20-E FUNDING AT(S): 6 $ 500,000 $ 24,500 $ 500,000 $ 37,250 $ 61,700 $ 500,000 6-STRUT RHB: $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000* $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 635, ODESSA PEOS SP 194 LIMITS FROM AT DRAW 0.4 MILES SOUTH OF US 385 LIMITS TO:. REPLAE BRIDGE FUNDING AT(S): 6 $ 300,000 $ 14,700 $ 300,000 $ 22,350 $ 37,020 $ 300,000 6-STRUT RHB: $ 240,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000* $ 240,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 $ 381, ODESSA PEOS R,E LIMITS FROM AT ANAL NO. 2 LIMITS TO:. REPLAE BRIDGE FUNDING AT(S): 6 $ 572,985 $ 24,990 $ 510,000 $ 37,995 $ 62,934 $ 572,985 6-STRUT RHB: $ 458,388 $ 114,597 $ 572,985* $ 458,388 $ 114,597 $ 572,985 $ 648,108 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

65 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2015 PAGE: 21 OF ODESSA REEVES LIMITS FROM 0.3 MILES E OF SH17 LIMITS TO:. REPLAE BRIDGE R,E REPLAE BRIDGE FUNDING AT(S): 6 $ 365,138 $ 15,925 $ 325,000 $ 24,213 $ 40,105 $ 365,138 6-STRUT RHB: $ 292,110 $ 36,514 $ 36,514 $ 365,138* $ 292,110 $ 36,514 $ 36,514 $ 365,138 $ 413, ODESSA ETOR VA,E LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. SEAL OAT (PLAEHOLDER SJ) FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 8,229,904 $ 375,340 $ 7,660,000 $ 194,564 $ 42,896 $ 945,244 $ 8,229,904 $ 6,583,923 $ 1,645,981 $ 8,229,904* $ 6,583,923 $ 1,645,981 $ 8,229,904 $ 9,349, ODESSA ETOR VA LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. TRAFFI SIGNALS (PLAEHOLDER SJ),E FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 301,300 $ 12,250 $ 250,000 $ 39,050 $ 5,175 $ 30,850 $ 301, DIST DIS: $ 241,040 $ 60,260 $ 301,300* $ 241,040 $ 60,260 $ 301,300 $ 354,150 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

66 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2015 PAGE: 22 OF ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM IH 20 PLAEHOLDER (2015) LIMITS TO:. ROADWAY REHABILITATION VA FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 4,434,807 $ 217,306 $ 4,434,807 $ 217,306 $ 2,217 $ 547,255 $ 4,434,807 $ 3,991,326 $ 443,481 $ 4,434,807* $ 3,991,326 $ 443,481 $ 4,434,807 $ 5,619, ODESSA REEVES IH 10 LIMITS FROM 0.6 MI WEST OF FM 3078 LIMITS TO: 2.8 MI WEST OF FM 2903 UPGRADE TO STANDARDS FREEWAY FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 9,645,194 $ 472,614 $ 9,645,194 $ 577,747 $ 250,775 $ 1,190,217 $ 9,645, DIST DIS: $ 8,218,167 $ 913,130 $ 9,131,297 $ 462,507 $ 51,390 $ 513,897* $ 8,680,675 $ 964,519 $ 9,645,194 $ 12,522, ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE LIMITS TO:. PAVEMENT MARKINGS VA FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 500,000 $ 24,500 $ 500,000 $ 31,900 $ 6,450 $ 61,700 $ 500, DIST DIS: $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000* $ 400,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 653,450 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

67 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2015 PAGE: 23 OF ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM 4 MILES SE OF IH 20 LIMITS TO: GLASSOK OUNTY LINE PAVEMENT OVERLAY SH 158 PAVEMENT OVERLAY FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 3,500,000 $ 171,500 $ 3,500,000 $ 156,800 $ 431,900 $ 3,500, DIST DIS: $ 1,811,117 $ 452,779 $ 2,263,896 $ 988,883 $ 247,221 $ 1,236,104* $ 2,800,000 $ 700,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,399,500 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

68 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2016 PAGE: 24 OF ODESSA ROKETT LIMITS FROM AT PEOS RIVER LIMITS TO:. REPLAE BRIDGE US 67,E FUNDING AT(S): 6 $ 1,874,491 $ 81,753 $ 1,668,439 $ 124,299 $ 205,885 $ 1,874,491 6-STRUT RHB: $ 1,499,593 $ 374,898 $ 1,874,491* $ 1,499,593 $ 374,898 $ 1,874,491 $ 2,120, ODESSA ETOR VA,E LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE PLAEHOLDER LIMITS TO:. SEAL OAT FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 8,229,900 $ 375,340 $ 7,659,996 $ 194,564 $ 42,896 $ 945,244 $ 8,229,900 $ 6,583,920 $ 1,645,980 $ 8,229,900* $ 6,583,920 $ 1,645,980 $ 8,229,900 $ 9,349, ODESSA MIDLAND LIMITS FROM FM 1213 LIMITS TO: 5.1 MI SOUTH ROADWAY REHABILITATION SH 349 FUNDING AT(S): 1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION $ 4,399,998 $ 215,600 $ 4,399,998 $ 220,000 $ 286,000 $ 542,960 $ 4,399,998 $ 3,519,998 $ 880,000 $ 4,399,998* $ 3,519,998 $ 880,000 $ 4,399,998 $ 5,664,557 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

69 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2016 PAGE: 25 OF ODESSA ETOR LIMITS FROM IH 10 PLAEHOLDER LIMITS TO:. ROADWAY REHABILITATION VA FUNDING AT(S): 1,11 $ 9,288,673 $ 455,145 $ 9,288,673 $ 455,145 $ 4,644 $ 1,146,222 $ 9,288, DIST DIS: $ 5,571,000 $ 619,000 $ 6,190,000 $ 2,788,806 $ 309,867 $ 3,098,673* $ 8,359,806 $ 928,867 $ 9,288,673 $ 11,769, ODESSA ETOR VA LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE PLAEHOLDER LIMITS TO:. TRAFFI SIGNALS,E FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 301,300 $ 12,250 $ 250,000 $ 39,050 $ 5,175 $ 30,850 $ 301, DIST DIS: $ 241,040 $ 60,260 $ 301,300* $ 241,040 $ 60,260 $ 301,300 $ 354, ODESSA MIDLAND BS 349 LIMITS FROM LP 250 LIMITS TO: WADLEY IN MIDLAND ROADWAY REHABILITATION FUNDING AT(S): 1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION $ 2,400,000 $ 117,600 $ 2,400,000 $ 117,600 $ 1,200 $ 296,160 $ 2,400,000 $ 1,920,000 $ 480,000 $ 2,400,000* $ 1,920,000 $ 480,000 $ 2,400,000 $ 3,041,040 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

70 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2016 PAGE: 26 OF ODESSA PEOS LIMITS FROM FM 1450 LIMITS TO: 9.55 MILES ROADWAY RESTORATION SH 18 ROADWAY RESTORATION FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 1,999,999 $ 98,000 $ 1,999,999 $ 100,000 $ 130,000 $ 246,800 $ 1,999,999 $ 1,599,999 $ 400,000 $ 1,999,999* $ 1,599,999 $ 400,000 $ 1,999,999 $ 2,574, ODESSA PEOS SH 18 LIMITS FROM 9.55 MILES SOUTH OF FM 1450 LIMITS TO: 5 MILES NORTH OF IH 10 ROADWAY RESTORATION ROADWAY RESTORATION FUNDING AT(S): 1 $ 1,999,999 $ 98,000 $ 1,999,999 $ 100,000 $ 130,000 $ 246,800 $ 1,999,999 $ 1,599,999 $ 400,000 $ 1,999,999* $ 1,599,999 $ 400,000 $ 1,999,999 $ 2,574, ODESSA WINKLER LIMITS FROM NORTH WINK ITY LIMITS LIMITS TO: SOUTH WINK ITY LIMITS ROADWAY REHABILITATION SH 115 FUNDING AT(S): 1 ROADWAY REHABILITATION $ 2,040,732 $ 99,996 $ 2,040,732 $ 153,055 $ 142,851 $ 251,826 $ 2,040,732 $ 1,632,586 $ 408,146 $ 2,040,732* $ 1,632,586 $ 408,146 $ 2,040,732 $ 2,688,460 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

71 TUESDAY, APRIL 10, :56:29 PM STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TIP FY GROUPED S TXDOT ODESSA DISTRIT FY 2016 PAGE: 27 OF ODESSA ETOR VA LIMITS FROM DISTRITWIDE PLAEHOLDER LIMITS TO:. PAVEMENT MARKINGS,E FUNDING AT(S): 11 $ 556,400 $ 24,500 $ 500,000 $ 31,900 $ 6,450 $ 61,700 $ 556, DIST DIS: $ 445,120 $ 111,280 $ 556,400* $ 445,120 $ 111,280 $ 556,400 $ 653,450 PHASE: = ONSTRUTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER * FUNDING NOT FIXED

72 Rural onsultation and Public Involvement Process TxDOT ODA On April 11, 2012, ODA held a public meeting to present the draft Rural TIP. The presentation was held at the OG (Permian Basin Regional Planning ommission) meeting room just before their monthly meeting. A notice was placed in newspapers across the district (see attached examples). To add consistency to the rural development process, the recently-formed Rural Planning Organization (made up of many of the OG members) opened their meeting up for this TIP presentation. The RPO follows the boundary for the OG (Permian Basin Regional Planning ommission) and includes a county that fall in four TxDOT Districts: Odessa, Lubbock, Abilene, and San Angelo. ontact information was provided for RPO members and public that had interest outside the boundaries of the Odessa District. For two weeks following the meeting, a copy of the Draft Rural TIP was made available at the Odessa District Office. No members of the public reviewed the document or provided comments.

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83