Maximize the Sharpe Ratio and Minimize a VaR 1
|
|
- Brittany Fisher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Maximize the Share Ratio and Minimize a VaR 1 Robert B. Durand 2 Hedieh Jafarour 3,4 Claudia Klüelberg 5 Ross Maller 6 Aril 28, 2008 Abstract In addition to its role as the otimal ex ante combination of risky assets for a risk-averse investor, ossessing the highest otential return-for-risk tradeoff, the tangency or Maximum Share Ratio ortfolio in the Markowitz (1952, 1991) rocedure lays an imortant role in asset management, as it minimizes the robability that a future ortfolio return falls below the risk-free or reference rate. his is a kind of Value at Risk (VaR) roerty of the ortfolio. In this aer we demonstrate the way this VaR, and related quantities, vary along the efficient frontier, emhasizing the secial role layed by the tangency ortfolio. he results are illustrated with an analysis of the market crash of October 1987, as an eisode of extreme negative market movements, where the tangency ortfolio erforms best (loses least!) among a variety of ortfolios. 1 his work is artially suorted by ARC Grant DP University of Western Australia, M250, Nedlands WA 6009, Australia: Robert.Durand@uwa.edu.au. 3 Centre for Financial Mathematics, MSI, and School of Finance & Alied Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra AC 0200, Australia, and Islamic Azad University of Shiraz: Hedieh.Jafarour@anu.edu.au. 4 Corresonding author. 5 Center for Mathematical Sciences, Munich University of echnology, D Garching, Germany: cklu@ma.tum.de, htt:// 6 Centre for Financial Mathematics, MSI, and School of Finance & Alied Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra AC 0200, Australia: Ross.Maller@anu.edu.au. 1
2 1. Introduction: the Maximum Share Ratio and "angency" Portfolios Given a universe of d 2 risky assets having raw return vector µ and excess mean return vector µ = µ ri (relative to a reference rate r ), and returns covariance matrix Σ, form a ortfolio by taking an allocation, that is, a linear combination with coefficients given by a vector, x, say, of the assets. 1 he "reference rate" could be the revailing risk-free rate, if there is one, or some other benchmark rate, such as the exected market return for the eriod, etc. Let R be the ex ost excess return achieved from this ortfolio, after the ortfolio has been in lace for a secified, fixed, time eriod. Suose R has exectation µ and variance 2 σ. hus 2 E( R ) = µ =xµ and Var( R) = σ =x Σx. (1.1) Assume that, for all such ortfolios, the standardized ex ost excess returns R µ σ are identically distributed, having the same distribution as a random variable Z, say, where E( Z ) = 0 and Var( Z ) = 1. Define the oulation Maximum Share Ratio as SR : = max ix = 1 x µ x Σx. (1.2) his quantity has long been used in ortfolio theory and ractice (Share 1963), either in an ex ante fashion, where it can be used to decide on an otimal allocation giving an otimal returnrisk tradeoff, or ex ost, as a ortfolio erformance evaluation tool. It lays a significant role in 1 Here i denotes a d-vector, each of whose elements is one, and a rime will denote a vector or matrix transose. 2
3 both discrete and continuous time finance, and is an object of interest in research right u to the resent day (see, e.g., Christensen and Platen 2007). he maximization in (1.2) is over all ortfolios satisfying the total allocation constraint ix =1, that a unit amount of resources is invested. here is no requirement that the comonents of the vector x be nonnegative, so short selling of assets is allowed. he ratio in (1.2) is maximized taking its sign into account, as advocated, e.g. by Share (1994); we are interested in maximizing the actual (risk-adjusted) return that is, a measure sensitive to losses, as well as to gains. 2 In this aer, we consider (in Section 2) an otimality roerty of the Maximum Share Ratio ortfolio, that is, the ortfolio achieving the maximum value in Eq. (1.2), which it ossesses with regard to Value at Risk. he ideas are illustrated with a textbook examle in Section 3. We then go on in the fourth section to develo some ideas regarding realized returns on efficient ortfolios, which are illustrated with the same textbook data, and in the fifth section, we examine the erformance of a sectrum of ortfolios calculated from monthly data on US stocks rior to the October 1987 stock market crash, showing how the tangent ortfolio, and various other selected ortfolios, erformed rior to, and on, the day of the crash. o conclude this section we mention some further facts we will need, concerning the connection between the maximum Share ratio and what we will call the "tangency" ortfolio. he quantity SR in Eq. (1.2) is the maximum Share ratio achievable from the d assets. In textbooks, and in alications, the corresonding ortfolio is often found or illustrated by drawing a tangent line in the ( σ, µ lane from the oint (0, r) (where r is the risk-free or ) 2 In some studies, the quantity in Eq. (1.2) is squared before the maximization is done. While this simlifies the algebra, it unrealistically ignores ossible exected losses on the ortfolio. 3
4 reference rate) to the efficient frontier constructed from µ and Σ. he coordinates of this oint, ( σ, µ ), say, give the location of the maximum Share ratio ortfolio in the ( σ, µ ) lane, and the sloe of the tangent line gives the maximum Share ratio available for any ortfolio constructed from this universe of assets. he corresonding allocation vector calculated from Equation (41) in Merton (1972). x can be Merton (1972) showed further, however, that this rocedure can be misleading or in error, since a tangency oint roducing a maximum Share ratio need not in fact exist. He gave a necessary and sufficient condition for this to be the case (heorem II in Merton (1972)). Of course a maximum value of the Share ratio still exists (and is finite), but it has to be found by other means; see, e.g., the method outlined in Maller & urkington (2002). he robability calculation in (2.1) below uses only the existence of the maximum Share ratio ortfolio, however calculated; it does not require the existence of a tangent oint to the efficient frontier. Nevertheless, we shall continue to refer to the ortfolio with maximum Share ratio as the tangent ortfolio whether or not such exists. For all the data considered in this aer, it turns out that the tangent ortfolio does in fact exist, so no confusion should result from this. 2. A Value at Risk Proerty of the Maximum Share Ratio Portfolio Let x be the allocation vector corresonding to the ortfolio obtained as a result of the maximization in Eq. (1.2). As discussed in the revious section, we will refer to this as the tangency ortfolio. Recall that the excess mean return vector µ equals µ = µ ri, where µ is the mean raw return vector, and r is the reference rate. We can write r SR µ = = µ σ σ, 4
5 where µ = x µ, µ = x µ and σ = x Σx. he maximum Share Ratio ortfolio ossesses a certain otimality roerty with resect to VaR, as the following simle calculation shows. For an arbitrary ortfolio with allocation, we have x SR xµ = x Σx µ σ. Letting R be the excess return on the tangency ortfolio, we can calculate R µ µ P( R 0) = P σ σ µ = P Z σ P ( Z SR) R µ µ = P σ σ = P 0. ( R ) (2.1) It follows that ( R ) ( R ) min P 0 P 0 x and the minimum is achieved for the tangency ortfolio. hus, an allocation of assets according to the tangency ortfolio has the lowest robability of the investor receiving a return below the reference rate; in other words, it has the smallest VaR relative to this rate. As ortfolios move away from the maximum Share Ratio allocation, this robability increases. We can illustrate the magnitude of this increase by lotting the robability for ortfolios on the efficient frontier, that is, those having exected return and standard deviation ( µ, σ ), against σ, thus obtaining a reresentation of the way this VaR changes along the efficient frontier. We have to assume a distribution for Z, the standardized return, and for this, 5
6 we will consider a standard normal, as well as a t-distribution with 4 degrees of freedom. hese reresent extreme distributions between which returns distributions are likely to lie. While the normal distribution is often assumed for returns, esecially over longer eriods, it has been long recognized that returns distributions in reality are more heavy tailed and letokurtic than the normal distribution (Fama, 1965; Embrechts et al. 1997; Platen and Sidorowicz 2007); therefore, we utilize a t-distribution with small degrees of freedom to simulate this feature of the data. We illustrate the concets using some data from Ruert s text book (2004,.150). here are d = 3 assets for which the (raw) mean vector and covariance matrix are µ 0.08 = and Σ = he efficient frontier for this examle is shown on.155 of that book. In Figure 2.1 we lot the function P( R 0) = P( Z µ / σ ) for ortfolios on the efficient frontier, as a function of the ortfolio risk, σ. As exected, the curves have a minimum at the tangent oint, and the curve for the t-distribution is higher than for the normal; the robability of a return below the risk-free rate is much higher for the heavier-tailed t-distribution. A Value at Risk is usually thought of as a quantile below which a return falls with a secified (low) robability; thus, we should also consider P( R q), for values of q not equal to zero. It is not the case in general that this quantity is minimized for the Maximum Share Ratio allocation, but by observation this seems to remain aroximately true for q not too far from zero (recall that we are otimizing excess returns, relative to a benchmark). In Figure 2.2, the robabilities of efficient ortfolio returns lower than q are shown for various values of q. For examle, from the lowest curve in Figure 2.2 (left lot) can be read that the robability of a 6
7 future excess return less than for the tangent oint ortfolio is aroximately hus the tangency ortfolio is exected to return more than 0.02 below the reference rate at most 44.1% of the time. For the t 4 distribution in the right lot, on the other hand, such a loss haens aroximately with robability Although it is not necessarily the case that the minima of the curves in Figure 2.2 should occur at the tangent oint (exected for the cases q = 0 ), in fact this haens for this data (and also for the data analyzed in Section 4). Figure 2.1: Ruert Data, Normally and t 4 Distributed Returns he robability of receiving a negative return, as a function of the standard deviation of the efficient ortfolio. he curve labeled N deicts normally distributed returns and the curve labeled deicts t 4 distributed returns. he curves start at the standard deviation of the minimum variance ortfolio on the left, and show the osition of the tangent oint ortfolio (indicated by dot oints). 7
8 Figure 2.2: Ruert Data, Values at Risk for Normally and t 4 Distributed Returns he robability of receiving an excess return lower than q, where q is secified by the numbers at the right hand ends of the curves, as a function of the standard deviation of the efficient ortfolio. he left hand diagram deicts normally distributed returns; the right hand diagram t 4 distributed returns. he curves start at the standard deviation of the minimum variance ortfolio on the left, and show the osition of the tangent oint ortfolio (indicated by dot oints). 3. Efficient Portfolio Returns o investigate the erformances of ortfolios on the efficient frontier, we need some facts concerning them. hese are derived from Merton (1972). In our notation, the quantities on.1853 of his aer are: A 1 = i Σ µ, B, 1 = µ Σ µ C 1 = i Σ i, D BC A 0 2 = >. (Recall that µ denotes the raw returns and µ = µ ri are the excess returns on the d assets.) We assume that a tangent oint exists, so the quantity 1 PC = i Σ µ = A rc is ositive (Merton (1972),. 1863). he coordinates in the ( σ, µ ) lane of the minimum variance and tangent oint ortfolios are given by and 2 1 A σ m =, µ m =, C C 8
9 1 2 µ Σ µ σ = 1 2 ( i Σ µ ), µ = r +. 1 µ Σ µ 1 i Σ µ he corresonding ortfolio allocations are 1 m = Σ i x and C x 1 Σ µ = 1 i Σ µ. (Note: we have µ, not µ, in σ, µ and x.) he equation of the efficient frontier in ( σ, µ ) sace is 2 ( σ 1) A+ D C F( σ ) =. (3.1) C (We use the F notation for frontier, rather than Merton's E notation, which we reserve for exectation.) he ortfolio allocation corresonding to a ortfolio with coordinates ( σ, µ ) on the efficient frontier is given by the vector x = ( Σ ) F( σ ) C µ AΣ i + BΣ i AΣ µ D (3.2) (Merton (1972),.1856 and.1845). It is easily checked by differentiation that the curve F( σ ) r σ (3.3) in ( σ, µ ) sace has a maximum at the oint σ which satisfies σ 2 = 2 B 2rA + r C ( A rc) 2 ; (3.4) this of course is the variance of the tangent oint ortfolio. (Note that the denominator in (3.4) 2 is ( PC ) > 0.) he function in (3.3) increases for σ < σ and decreases for σ > σ. Figure 3.1 shows the curve for the Ruert data, taking r = 0.02 as on.155 of Ruert (2004). 9
10 Figure 3.1: Share Ratios for Efficient Portfolios from the Ruert Data Plot of the Share ratio (Eq. (3.3)) for ortfolios on the efficient frontier, against their standard deviation, Ruert textbook data. he tangent oint ortfolio is indicated by a dot. Now suose we have a new observation vector, R, on the returns of the d assets. We can think in terms of the efficient ortfolio with mean F( σ ) and standard deviation σ being ut in lace at a certain time, then evaluated using the future return some algebra, we can write R. Using (3.2), and after ( 1 1 )( ( ) ( ) + ) Rx r F( σ ) r C A B A = + R µ Σ µ Σ i σ σ σd. (3.5) Here Rx reresents the return on the efficient ortfolio corresonding to the returns R on the d assets, and the quantity on the left of (3.5) is the standardized excess return, i.e., the ex ost Share ratio for the ortfolio. On the right of (3.5) is the oulation Share ratio for the ortfolio lus a random term corresonding to the new return, R. If R is drawn from the same oulation as that from which the efficient ortfolio was constructed, so that E( R ) = µ and 10
11 Var( R ) = Σ, it is clear that the exectation of the random term in (3.5) is zero, and its variance is one (as can also be checked after some algebra). Figure 3.2 shows a lot of Eq. (3.5) for 13 returns generated randomly as observations on N( µ, Σ), using Ruert's values of µ and Σ. (Ruert does not suly the original returns for which his µ and Σ were calculated, so we simulated the observations.) We took 13 returns so as to corresond with the 1987 crash data in the next section. It is clear from Figure 3.2 that Eq. (3.5), as a function of σ, need not resemble Eq. (3.3), as shown lotted in Figure 3.1. For this data, the random comonent in Eq. (3.5), which has a standard deviation of one, overwhelms its exectation, which for this data eaks at about 0.13 (cf. Figure 3.1). Figure 3.2: Standardized Returns on Efficient Portfolios for Ruert Data Ex ost Share ratios for returns on ortfolios on the efficient frontier, corresonding to a new return, against their standard deviations, Ruert textbook data. he tangent oint ortfolio is indicated by a dot. 11
12 While the simulated future return curves sometimes eak close to the tangency oint, at other times the maximum occurs for much higher risk ortfolios, and sometimes the curves are even convex. For such data (and the data in the next section has similar features), unfortunately, investing in the tangency ortfolio roduces very little benefit for individual future returns. Only when averaged over a relatively large number of returns will curves calculated from Eq. (3.5) begin to resemble those from Eq. (3.3). 4. Fama-French Data In this section we analyze a more realistic examle. For oulation µ and Σ, we take values estimated from monthly data on US stocks for twenty-five value-weighted size and book-to-market ortfolios (Fama and French, 1993) downloaded from Ken French s website ( htt://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/ages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html). his classic set of data has been used in many definitive studies of ortfolio and other analyses; see for examle Jagannathan and Ma (2003). We refer to these ortfolios as the Fama-French ortfolios. Choosing an aroriate selection of assets from the real world to demonstrate the VaR minimizing roerties of the Share ratio is roblematic given the large number of assets from which an investor may choose. he Fama-French ortfolios are reresentative of asset classes that cature factors that aear to be imortant to investors; it is reasonable that an investor might use these as reresentative asset classes from which to derive an otimal return to risk trade-off. Figure 4.1 shows the efficient frontier calculated from this data set. 12
13 Figure 4.1: Efficient Frontier constructed from 25 Fama-French ortfolios. he efficient frontier estimated from monthly returns on the 25 Fama-French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember 1987, with the tangent line, and the maximum Share ratio oint lotted as a dot. Figure 4.2 shows the robability of a negative excess return (return less than the riskfree rate, r = ) for the normal and t4-distributions. he minimum robability at the tangent oint is clearly aarent, but the minimum is not so well defined as it was for the textbook data (in Figure 2.1). his is a reflection of the fact that the tangent oint is not well defined in Figure 4.1; although PC > 0 for this data, PC is close to zero, and the efficient frontier is ractically a straight line to the right of the tangent oint. Consequently, the Share ratio is ractically the same for all ortfolios with higher risk than the tangent oint ortfolio. he robability of a negative return is of course much higher for the more extreme t4-distributed returns. 13
14 Figure 4.2: Fama-French Monthly Data, t 4 and Normally Distributed Returns he robability of receiving a negative return, as a function of the standard deviation of the efficient ortfolio. he curve labeled N deicts normally distributed returns and the curve labeled deicts t 4 distributed returns. Parameters estimated from 60 monthly returns on 25 Fama-French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember he curves start at the standard deviation of the minimum variance ortfolio on the left, and show the osition of the tangent oint ortfolio (indicated by dot oints). Figure 4.3 shows the family of curves obtained by lotting P( R q) against σ, again for ortfolios on the efficient frontier, for various values of q. he same values of µ and Σ are taken as for Figure 4.1, and Z is N(0,1). For examle, from the lowest curve in Figure 4.3 can be read that the robability of a future excess return less than for the tangent oint ortfolio is aroximately hus the tangency ortfolio is exected to return less than at most 5.5% of the time, for this data, if returns are normally distributed. In other words, the minimum VaR in this data, corresonding to a 5.5% quantile, if a normal distribution is as- 14
15 sumed for returns, is a return below Since the Fama-French data is in ercentage terms, this means a otential loss of 0.15%, on a monthly basis, or about 1.8%.a. Figure 4.3: Fama-French Monthly Data, Normally Distributed Returns he robability of receiving an excess return lower than q, where q is secified by the numbers at the right hand ends of the curves, as a function of the standard deviation of the efficient ortfolio, assuming normally distributed returns. Parameters are estimated from 60 monthly returns on 25 Fama-French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember he curves start at the standard deviation of the minimum variance ortfolio on the left, and show the osition of the tangent oint ortfolio (indicated by dot oints). Figure 4.4 shows similar information as Figure 4.3, but with Z having a t-distribution with 4 degrees of freedom, rather than a normal distribution. he same values of µ and Σ are taken as for Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3. With this more extreme distribution for returns, robabilities of large negative returns are much higher than for the normal distribution, and values at risk are corresondingly much higher too. he VaR corresonding to a 5% quantile is about -0.70, thus, a loss of 0.70%, on a monthly basis, or about 8.4%.a., substantially higher then 15
16 for a normal distribution, but still woefully inadequate for describing the losses on efficient ortfolios on Black Monday, October , as we shall see in the next section. Note that the curves in Figure 4.3 and Figure 4.4 are much shallower than in Figure 2.2, again reflecting the difficulty in locating the tangent oint accurately in this data. Figure 4.4: Fama-French Monthly Data, t 4 Distributed Returns he robability of receiving a return lower than q, where q is secified by the numbers at the right hand ends of the curves, as a function of the standard deviation of the efficient ortfolio, assuming t 4 distributed returns. Parameters estimated from 60 monthly returns on 25 Fama- French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember he curves start at the standard deviation of the minimum variance ortfolio on the left, and show the osition of the tangent oint ortfolio (indicated by dot oints) Crash Performance In this section we make some evaluations of the erformance of a sectrum of ortfolios using real data sets for illustration. Minimizing VaR matters most when rices are falling; 16
17 therefore, we examine the erformance of tangent ortfolios on Black Monday, October 19, 1987, when the S&P 500 index fell by 20.5%. An advantage of using the Black Monday crash is that this is erhas the only case where the reality of an observed event is more extreme than something that might reasonably have been simulated! As in Section 4, we take monthly data on the Fama-French ortfolios over a eriod of 60 months rior to the 1987 crash, and use it to set u a sectrum of ortfolios, each of whose erformance (excess return, risk-adjusted) is then evaluated a day after the crash. he sectrum of ortfolios consists of those on the efficient frontier, including the minimum variance and tangency ortfolios, together with selected ortfolios such as the equally weighted ortfolio. o evaluate the erformances of the ortfolios, we consider the case of an investor whose strategy involves utting in lace one of the above-mentioned ortfolios; for examle she may maximize the ex ante Share ratio of her ortfolio. Of course with the benefit of hindsight, our investor would have shorted the entire market, but to kee the analysis realistic we assume she reviews and rebalances her ortfolio regularly, without foresight, and that rebalancing takes some nonzero time. Introducing such a friction is not unreasonable, though it may mean that we are erring on the side of conservativism. 3 hus, to summarize, the investor makes her allocations at the beginning of October 1987, using a ortfolio constructed from the Fama-French ortfolios, and the information on their returns over the receding 60 months (that is, using the monthly data from October We also confine the illustration to the direct use of the historic data, again, erring on the side of conservativism; for examle, using a adjustment, such as that analyzed in Jorion (1996) or Ledoit and Wolf (2004), might result in better estimates to the otimization and, consequentially, imroved outcomes for the tangent ortfolio 17
18 to Setember, 1987 used in the analysis in the receding section). As benchmark reference rate for the calculation of the tangency ortfolio we take the exected risk-free rate at the end of October, he crash takes lace on October 19, 1987, and we evaluate the return on each ortfolio at the close of business on that day. able 5.1 shows the absolute returns on some selected ortfolios (not all of which are efficient), on that day. Portfolio Return on Black Monday angent Minimum variance Equal weighted ortfolio of the 25 Fama-French ortfolios S&P 500 index (equal-weighted) S&P 500 index able 5.1: Black Monday Returns Returns (in ercentages) on Black Monday for selected ortfolios constructed from 60 monthly returns on 25 Fama-French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember he returns in able 5.1 are far below anything that could be exected from Figure 4.3 and Figure 4.4. Even under a t-distribution with four degrees of freedom, the robability of receiving a return below is only Nonetheless, our investor would undoubtedly have been very leased with the relatively large return (smaller loss) she achieved! 4 he risk-free rate at the end of October 1987 was also downloaded from Kenneth French's data library. Using the end-of-october risk-free rate assumes that our analyst had erfect exectations about this asect of the return calculation. 18
19 Figure 5.1 shows a lot of the exected Share ratio, that is, the function in Eq. (3.3), for this data. he maximum occurs at the tangent oint, as it should, and is reasonably well defined. Figure 5.1: Share Ratios for Efficient Portfolios from the Fama-French Data A lot of the Share ratio for ortfolios on the efficient frontier, against their standard deviations. he tangent oint ortfolio is indicated by a dot. Figure 5.2 shows the risk-adjusted excess returns from efficient ortfolios calculated from the Fama-French data, lotted against the standard deviations of the ortfolios, for the first 14 trading days in October Forewarned by Figure 3.2 and the analysis of the Ruert data, we exect high variation around the oulation Share ratio of he curves in the to art of Figure 5.2 cover the first 13 trading days in October. In this eriod some of the curves tend to show a maximum near the tangent oint ortfolio, but the curvature is very slight and the maxima are not at all well-defined. his feature disaears as October goes on, and the curves become monotone increasing. he lowest curve is for October 19. he return on 19
20 the tangent ortfolio is not the highest on this day. here is a monotonic increase in riskadjusted excess returns as we increase the risk of the ortfolio along the efficient frontier, from the minimum ossible risk, on. he least losses would have been given by taking ositions at extreme risks. Of course the crash eriod reresents an extreme situation whereas our theory assumes that returns have a constant distribution. his was almost certainly not the case on October 19, We discuss the imlications further in the next section. Figure 5.2: Returns for efficient ortfolios from 25 Fama-French ortfolios, first 14 trading days in October he risk-adjusted returns on efficient ortfolios calculated from monthly returns on the 25 Fama-French ortfolios over the eriod October 1982-Setember 1987, evaluated on the first 14 trading days in October 1987, lotted against the standard deviation of the ortfolios. he number at the right hand end of a curve indicates the date on which the ortfolio was evaluated. he lowest curve corresonds to Black Monday, October 19, he minimum variance ortfolio is at the left end of each curve and the tangent ortfolio is indicated by a dot oint. Excess returns are adjusted for risk by dividing by the standard deviation of the original ortfolio. 20
21 6. Discussion and Conclusion Maximizing the return to risk trade-off through investing in the tangency ortfolio is very well-known and understood by educated investors. Rational investors, esecially investors whose trustees focus only on returns, will want to guard at all cost against the ossibility that their ortfolio will earn less than the risk-free, or reference, rate. Our work demonstrates the way that maximizing the exected Share ratio through selecting the tangency ortfolio minimizes the chances, not only of a return lower than the reference rate, but of even lower returns as well, across the range of efficient ortfolios. hese VaR minimizing roerties of the tangency ortfolio have not, to our knowledge, been imlemented in a ractical situation, and, as a result, the very desirable consequences of imlementing a simle black-box aroach to ortfolio selection have not been thoroughly exlored. he ex ante allocation of assets to a ortfolio is always based on imerfect foresight. In using the crash of 1987 to illustrate the VaR minimizing roerties of the tangency ortfolio, we have chosen a articularly extreme examle where investors cared deserately about the downside risk of their ortfolios. By constructing a ortfolio based on five-years of monthly data before the crash, we have ut ourselves in the situation of an investor following a reasonably realistic tangency-ortfolio strategy. he in-samle estimates of exected loss resented in Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3 demonstrate that, should the distributions have remained stable, our investor's exected losses would have been minimized by holding the tangency ortfolio. However, in the extreme circumstances of October 1987, the assumtion that ast returns distributions would remain the same was almost certainly violated. But after the damage had been done, it turns out that the tangency ortfolio erformed best (lost least!) out of the range of benchmarks resented in able 5.1. Perhas this kind of damage control is the most we can 21
22 hoe for with this kind of event. If any bonuses were awarded at the end of 1987, our tangentortfolio investor would have deserved hers. Acknowledgements We are grateful to John Gould for some technical assistance. References Christensen, M.M., and Platen, E., (2007) Share Ratio Maximization and Exected Utility when Asset Prices Have Jums", Int. J. heoret. Al. Finance, 10, , Embrechts, P., Klüelberg, C., and Mikosch,. Modelling Extremal Events. For Insurance and Finance. Sringer-Verlag, Berlin, Fama, E.F., (1965), he Behavior of Stock-Market Prices, Journal of Business 38, Fama, E., and K. French, (1993), Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, Jagannathan, R. and Ma,. (2003) Risk reduction in large ortfolios: why imosing the wrong constraints hels. J. Finance 58, Jorion, P., (1986) Bayes-Stein estimation for ortfolio analysis, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M. (2004) Honey, I Shrunk the Samle Covariance Matrix, Journal of Porfolio Management 30(4), Maller, R.A. and urkington, D.A. (2002) New light on the ortfolio allocation roblem, Math. Meth. Oer. Res., 56, Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio Selection, J. Finance, 7, Markowitz, H. (1991) Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment, Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass. 22
23 Merton, R.C. (1972) An analytic derivation of the efficient ortfolio frontier, J. Fin. Quant. Anal., 7, Platen, E. and Sidorowicz, R. (2007) Emirical evidence on Student-t log-returns of diversified world indices. J. Statist. heory and Practice, 2, Ruert, D. (2006) Statistics and Finance. An Introduction. Sringer, New York. Share, W.F. (1963) A simlified model for ortfolio analysis, Management Science, Share, W.F. (1994) he Share Ratio, J. Portfolio Management (Fall),
Effects of Size and Allocation Method on Stock Portfolio Performance: A Simulation Study
2011 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering IPEDR vol.12 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singaore Effects of Size and Allocation Method on Stock Portfolio Performance: A Simulation
More informationA Multi-Objective Approach to Portfolio Optimization
RoseHulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal Volume 8 Issue Article 2 A MultiObjective Aroach to Portfolio Otimization Yaoyao Clare Duan Boston College, sweetclare@gmail.com Follow this and additional
More informationRisk and Return. Calculating Return - Single period. Calculating Return - Multi periods. Uncertainty of Investment.
Chater 10, 11 Risk and Return Chater 13 Cost of Caital Konan Chan, 018 Risk and Return Return measures Exected return and risk? Portfolio risk and diversification CPM (Caital sset Pricing Model) eta Calculating
More informationLecture 2. Main Topics: (Part II) Chapter 2 (2-7), Chapter 3. Bayes Theorem: Let A, B be two events, then. The probabilities P ( B), probability of B.
STT315, Section 701, Summer 006 Lecture (Part II) Main Toics: Chater (-7), Chater 3. Bayes Theorem: Let A, B be two events, then B A) = A B) B) A B) B) + A B) B) The robabilities P ( B), B) are called
More informationA random variable X is a function that assigns (real) numbers to the elements of the sample space S of a random experiment.
RANDOM VARIABLES and PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS A random variable X is a function that assigns (real) numbers to the elements of the samle sace S of a random exeriment. The value sace V of a random variable
More informationLECTURE NOTES ON MICROECONOMICS
LECTURE NOTES ON MCROECONOMCS ANALYZNG MARKETS WTH BASC CALCULUS William M. Boal Part : Consumers and demand Chater 5: Demand Section 5.: ndividual demand functions Determinants of choice. As noted in
More informationSupplemental Material: Buyer-Optimal Learning and Monopoly Pricing
Sulemental Material: Buyer-Otimal Learning and Monooly Pricing Anne-Katrin Roesler and Balázs Szentes February 3, 207 The goal of this note is to characterize buyer-otimal outcomes with minimal learning
More informationA COMPARISON AMONG PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN PORTFOLIO THEORY
A COMPARISON AMONG PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN PORFOLIO HEORY Sergio Ortobelli * Almira Biglova ** Stoyan Stoyanov *** Svetlozar Rachev **** Frank Fabozzi * University of Bergamo Italy ** University of Karlsruhe
More information( ) ( ) β. max. subject to. ( ) β. x S
Intermediate Microeconomic Theory: ECON 5: Alication of Consumer Theory Constrained Maimization In the last set of notes, and based on our earlier discussion, we said that we can characterize individual
More informationConfidence Intervals for a Proportion Using Inverse Sampling when the Data is Subject to False-positive Misclassification
Journal of Data Science 13(015), 63-636 Confidence Intervals for a Proortion Using Inverse Samling when the Data is Subject to False-ositive Misclassification Kent Riggs 1 1 Deartment of Mathematics and
More informationINDEX NUMBERS. Introduction
INDEX NUMBERS Introduction Index numbers are the indicators which reflect changes over a secified eriod of time in rices of different commodities industrial roduction (iii) sales (iv) imorts and exorts
More information***SECTION 7.1*** Discrete and Continuous Random Variables
***SECTION 7.*** Discrete and Continuous Random Variables Samle saces need not consist of numbers; tossing coins yields H s and T s. However, in statistics we are most often interested in numerical outcomes
More informationA Comparative Study of Various Loss Functions in the Economic Tolerance Design
A Comarative Study of Various Loss Functions in the Economic Tolerance Design Jeh-Nan Pan Deartment of Statistics National Chen-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 700, ROC Jianbiao Pan Deartment of Industrial
More informationC (1,1) (1,2) (2,1) (2,2)
TWO COIN MORRA This game is layed by two layers, R and C. Each layer hides either one or two silver dollars in his/her hand. Simultaneously, each layer guesses how many coins the other layer is holding.
More informationSINGLE SAMPLING PLAN FOR VARIABLES UNDER MEASUREMENT ERROR FOR NON-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
ISSN -58 (Paer) ISSN 5-5 (Online) Vol., No.9, SINGLE SAMPLING PLAN FOR VARIABLES UNDER MEASUREMENT ERROR FOR NON-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION Dr. ketki kulkarni Jayee University of Engineering and Technology Guna
More informationCapital Budgeting: The Valuation of Unusual, Irregular, or Extraordinary Cash Flows
Caital Budgeting: The Valuation of Unusual, Irregular, or Extraordinary Cash Flows ichael C. Ehrhardt Philli R. Daves Finance Deartment, SC 424 University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-0540 423-974-1717
More informationManagement Accounting of Production Overheads by Groups of Equipment
Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 11; 2015 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Management Accounting of Production verheads by Grous of Equiment Sokolov
More information1 < = α σ +σ < 0. Using the parameters and h = 1/365 this is N ( ) = If we use h = 1/252, the value would be N ( ) =
Chater 6 Value at Risk Question 6.1 Since the rice of stock A in h years (S h ) is lognormal, 1 < = α σ +σ < 0 ( ) P Sh S0 P h hz σ α σ α = P Z < h = N h. σ σ (1) () Using the arameters and h = 1/365 this
More informationSummary of the Chief Features of Alternative Asset Pricing Theories
Summary o the Chie Features o Alternative Asset Pricing Theories CAP and its extensions The undamental equation o CAP ertains to the exected rate o return time eriod into the uture o any security r r β
More informationSampling Procedure for Performance-Based Road Maintenance Evaluations
Samling Procedure for Performance-Based Road Maintenance Evaluations Jesus M. de la Garza, Juan C. Piñero, and Mehmet E. Ozbek Maintaining the road infrastructure at a high level of condition with generally
More informationInformation and uncertainty in a queueing system
Information and uncertainty in a queueing system Refael Hassin December 7, 7 Abstract This aer deals with the effect of information and uncertainty on rofits in an unobservable single server queueing system.
More informationRevisiting the risk-return relation in the South African stock market
Revisiting the risk-return relation in the South African stock market Author F. Darrat, Ali, Li, Bin, Wu, Leqin Published 0 Journal Title African Journal of Business Management Coyright Statement 0 Academic
More informationRisk and Return and Portfolio Theory
Risk and Return and Portfolio Theory Intro: Last week we learned how to calculate cash flows, now we want to learn how to discount these cash flows. This will take the next several weeks. We know discount
More informationStatistics and Probability Letters. Variance stabilizing transformations of Poisson, binomial and negative binomial distributions
Statistics and Probability Letters 79 (9) 6 69 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Statistics and Probability Letters journal homeage: www.elsevier.com/locate/staro Variance stabilizing transformations
More informationOnline Robustness Appendix to Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms: Evidence from the Self Employed
Online Robustness Aendix to Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms: Evidence from the Self Emloyed October 01 Erik Hurst University of Chicago Geng Li Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Benjamin
More informationQuantitative Aggregate Effects of Asymmetric Information
Quantitative Aggregate Effects of Asymmetric Information Pablo Kurlat February 2012 In this note I roose a calibration of the model in Kurlat (forthcoming) to try to assess the otential magnitude of the
More informationModeling and Estimating a Higher Systematic Co-Moment Asset Pricing Model in the Brazilian Stock Market. Autoria: Andre Luiz Carvalhal da Silva
Modeling and Estimating a Higher Systematic Co-Moment Asset Pricing Model in the Brazilian Stock Market Autoria: Andre Luiz Carvalhal da Silva Abstract Many asset ricing models assume that only the second-order
More informationVI Introduction to Trade under Imperfect Competition
VI Introduction to Trade under Imerfect Cometition n In the 1970 s "new trade theory" is introduced to comlement HOS and Ricardo. n Imerfect cometition models cature strategic interaction and roduct differentiation:
More informationTESTING THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL AFTER CURRENCY REFORM: THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE STOCK EXCHANGE
TESTING THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL AFTER CURRENCY REFORM: THE CASE OF ZIMBABWE STOCK EXCHANGE Batsirai Winmore Mazviona 1 ABSTRACT The Caital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) endeavors to exlain the relationshi
More informationVolumetric Hedging in Electricity Procurement
Volumetric Hedging in Electricity Procurement Yumi Oum Deartment of Industrial Engineering and Oerations Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 9472-777 Email: yumioum@berkeley.edu Shmuel Oren
More informationAnalysis on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Game Theory of Petroleum Group Corporation
DOI: 10.14355/ijams.2014.0301.03 Analysis on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Game Theory of Petroleum Grou Cororation Minchang Xin 1, Yanbin Sun 2 1,2 Economic and Management Institute, Northeast Petroleum
More information: now we have a family of utility functions for wealth increments z indexed by initial wealth w.
Lotteries with Money Payoffs, continued Fix u, let w denote wealth, and set u ( z) u( z w) : now we have a family of utility functions for wealth increments z indexed by initial wealth w. (a) Recall from
More informationMidterm Exam: Tuesday 28 March in class Sample exam problems ( Homework 5 ) available tomorrow at the latest
Plan Martingales 1. Basic Definitions 2. Examles 3. Overview of Results Reading: G&S Section 12.1-12.4 Next Time: More Martingales Midterm Exam: Tuesday 28 March in class Samle exam roblems ( Homework
More informationMean Variance Analysis and CAPM
Mean Variance Analysis and CAPM Yan Zeng Version 1.0.2, last revised on 2012-05-30. Abstract A summary of mean variance analysis in portfolio management and capital asset pricing model. 1. Mean-Variance
More informationAnnex 4 - Poverty Predictors: Estimation and Algorithm for Computing Predicted Welfare Function
Annex 4 - Poverty Predictors: Estimation and Algorithm for Comuting Predicted Welfare Function The Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire (CWIQ) is an off-the-shelf survey ackage develoed by the World Bank
More informationON JARQUE-BERA TESTS FOR ASSESSING MULTIVARIATE NORMALITY
Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Alications Volume, umber, 009, Pages 07-0 O JARQUE-BERA TESTS FOR ASSESSIG MULTIVARIATE ORMALITY KAZUYUKI KOIZUMI, AOYA OKAMOTO and TAKASHI SEO Deartment of
More informationLecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance
Lecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance analysis Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Second Term 2018 Outline and objectives Mean-variance and efficient frontiers: logical meaning o Guidolin-Pedio,
More informationEquation Chapter 1 Section 1 A Primer on Quantitative Risk Measures
Equation Chapter 1 Section 1 A rimer on Quantitative Risk Measures aul D. Kaplan, h.d., CFA Quantitative Research Director Morningstar Europe, Ltd. London, UK 25 April 2011 Ever since Harry Markowitz s
More informationObjectives. 3.3 Toward statistical inference
Objectives 3.3 Toward statistical inference Poulation versus samle (CIS, Chater 6) Toward statistical inference Samling variability Further reading: htt://onlinestatbook.com/2/estimation/characteristics.html
More informationEfficient Portfolio and Introduction to Capital Market Line Benninga Chapter 9
Efficient Portfolio and Introduction to Capital Market Line Benninga Chapter 9 Optimal Investment with Risky Assets There are N risky assets, named 1, 2,, N, but no risk-free asset. With fixed total dollar
More informationTHEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THREE-ASSET PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THREE-ASSET PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Michal ŠOLTÉS ABSTRACT: The aer deals with three-asset ortfolio It focuses on ordinary investor for whom the Marowitz s theory of selection of otimal
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Tuesday October 6 Portfolio Allocation Mean-Variance Approach
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Tuesday October 6 ortfolio Allocation Mean-Variance Approach Validity of the Mean-Variance Approach Constant absolute risk aversion (CARA): u(w ) = exp(
More informationQuantitative Risk Management
Quantitative Risk Management Asset Allocation and Risk Management Martin B. Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Outline Review of Mean-Variance Analysis
More informationFirst the Basic Background Knowledge especially for SUS students. But going farther:
asic ackground Knowledge: Review of Economics for Economics students. Consumers Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources/ Economics of Sustainability K Foster, CCNY, Sring 0 First the asic ackground
More informationEconomics Lecture Sebastiano Vitali
Economics Lecture 3 06-7 Sebastiano Vitali Course Outline Consumer theory and its alications. Preferences and utility. Utility maimization and uncomensated demand.3 Eenditure minimization and comensated
More informationAppendix Large Homogeneous Portfolio Approximation
Aendix Large Homogeneous Portfolio Aroximation A.1 The Gaussian One-Factor Model and the LHP Aroximation In the Gaussian one-factor model, an obligor is assumed to default if the value of its creditworthiness
More informationAsymmetric Information
Asymmetric Information Econ 235, Sring 2013 1 Wilson [1980] What haens when you have adverse selection? What is an equilibrium? What are we assuming when we define equilibrium in one of the ossible ways?
More informationEconomics 424/Applied Mathematics 540. Final Exam Solutions
University of Washington Summer 01 Department of Economics Eric Zivot Economics 44/Applied Mathematics 540 Final Exam Solutions I. Matrix Algebra and Portfolio Math (30 points, 5 points each) Let R i denote
More informationNon-Inferiority Tests for the Ratio of Two Correlated Proportions
Chater 161 Non-Inferiority Tests for the Ratio of Two Correlated Proortions Introduction This module comutes ower and samle size for non-inferiority tests of the ratio in which two dichotomous resonses
More informationCustomers. State Regulated. FERC Regulated. Competitive PSERC ISO LSE
PSERC Shmuel Oren oren@ieor.berkeley.edu IEOR Det., University of California at Berkeley and Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSerc) (Based on joint work with Yumi Oum and Shijie Deng) Centre
More informationA NOTE ON SKEW-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION APPROXIMATION TO THE NEGATIVE BINOMAL DISTRIBUTION
A NOTE ON SKEW-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION APPROXIMATION TO THE NEGATIVE BINOMAL DISTRIBUTION JYH-JIUAN LIN 1, CHING-HUI CHANG * AND ROSEMARY JOU 1 Deartment of Statistics Tamkang University 151 Ying-Chuan Road,
More informationLecture IV Portfolio management: Efficient portfolios. Introduction to Finance Mathematics Fall Financial mathematics
Lecture IV Portfolio management: Efficient portfolios. Introduction to Finance Mathematics Fall 2014 Reduce the risk, one asset Let us warm up by doing an exercise. We consider an investment with σ 1 =
More informationMatching Markets and Social Networks
Matching Markets and Social Networks Tilman Klum Emory University Mary Schroeder University of Iowa Setember 0 Abstract We consider a satial two-sided matching market with a network friction, where exchange
More informationGottfried Haberler s Principle of Comparative Advantage
Gottfried Haberler s rincile of Comarative dvantage Murray C. Kem a* and Masayuki Okawa b a Macquarie University b Ritsumeiken University bstract Like the Torrens-Ricardo rincile of Comarative dvantage,
More informationModeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Optimization II: Model-Based Portfolio Management
Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Optimization II: Model-Based Portfolio Management C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park Math 420: Mathematical Modeling January 26, 2012
More information2/20/2013. of Manchester. The University COMP Building a yes / no classifier
COMP4 Lecture 6 Building a yes / no classifier Buildinga feature-basedclassifier Whatis a classifier? What is an information feature? Building a classifier from one feature Probability densities and the
More informationBuyer-Optimal Learning and Monopoly Pricing
Buyer-Otimal Learning and Monooly Pricing Anne-Katrin Roesler and Balázs Szentes January 2, 217 Abstract This aer analyzes a bilateral trade model where the buyer s valuation for the object is uncertain
More informationIndividual Comparative Advantage and Human Capital Investment under Uncertainty
Individual Comarative Advantage and Human Caital Investment under Uncertainty Toshihiro Ichida Waseda University July 3, 0 Abstract Secialization and the division of labor are the sources of high roductivity
More informationObjectives. 5.2, 8.1 Inference for a single proportion. Categorical data from a simple random sample. Binomial distribution
Objectives 5.2, 8.1 Inference for a single roortion Categorical data from a simle random samle Binomial distribution Samling distribution of the samle roortion Significance test for a single roortion Large-samle
More informationQuality Regulation without Regulating Quality
1 Quality Regulation without Regulating Quality Claudia Kriehn, ifo Institute for Economic Research, Germany March 2004 Abstract Against the background that a combination of rice-ca and minimum uality
More informationMarkowitz portfolio theory
Markowitz portfolio theory Farhad Amu, Marcus Millegård February 9, 2009 1 Introduction Optimizing a portfolio is a major area in nance. The objective is to maximize the yield and simultaneously minimize
More informationMS-E2114 Investment Science Lecture 5: Mean-variance portfolio theory
MS-E2114 Investment Science Lecture 5: Mean-variance portfolio theory A. Salo, T. Seeve Systems Analysis Laboratory Department of System Analysis and Mathematics Aalto University, School of Science Overview
More informationand their probabilities p
AP Statistics Ch. 6 Notes Random Variables A variable is any characteristic of an individual (remember that individuals are the objects described by a data set and may be eole, animals, or things). Variables
More informationQuantitative Portfolio Theory & Performance Analysis
550.447 Quantitative ortfolio Theory & erformance Analysis Week February 18, 2013 Basic Elements of Modern ortfolio Theory Assignment For Week of February 18 th (This Week) Read: A&L, Chapter 3 (Basic
More informationFinancial Mathematics III Theory summary
Financial Mathematics III Theory summary Table of Contents Lecture 1... 7 1. State the objective of modern portfolio theory... 7 2. Define the return of an asset... 7 3. How is expected return defined?...
More informationPolicyholder Outcome Death Disability Neither Payout, x 10,000 5, ,000
Two tyes of Random Variables: ) Discrete random variable has a finite number of distinct outcomes Examle: Number of books this term. ) Continuous random variable can take on any numerical value within
More informationECON 1100 Global Economics (Fall 2013) Government Failure
ECON 11 Global Economics (Fall 213) Government Failure Relevant Readings from the Required extbooks: Economics Chater 11, Government Failure Definitions and Concets: government failure a situation in which
More informationOptimal Portfolio Inputs: Various Methods
Optimal Portfolio Inputs: Various Methods Prepared by Kevin Pei for The Fund @ Sprott Abstract: In this document, I will model and back test our portfolio with various proposed models. It goes without
More informationQR43, Introduction to Investments Class Notes, Fall 2003 IV. Portfolio Choice
QR43, Introduction to Investments Class Notes, Fall 2003 IV. Portfolio Choice A. Mean-Variance Analysis 1. Thevarianceofaportfolio. Consider the choice between two risky assets with returns R 1 and R 2.
More informationYale ICF Working Paper No First Draft: February 21, 1992 This Draft: June 29, Safety First Portfolio Insurance
Yale ICF Working Paper No. 08 11 First Draft: February 21, 1992 This Draft: June 29, 1992 Safety First Portfolio Insurance William N. Goetzmann, International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management,
More informationBA 351 CORPORATE FINANCE LECTURE 7 UNCERTAINTY, THE CAPM AND CAPITAL BUDGETING. John R. Graham Adapted from S. Viswanathan
BA 351 CORPORATE FINANCE LECTURE 7 UNCERTAINTY, THE CAPM AND CAPITAL BUDGETING John R. Graham Adated from S. Viswanathan FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS DUKE UNIVERSITY 1 In this lecture, we examine roject valuation
More informationChapter 1: Stochastic Processes
Chater 1: Stochastic Processes 4 What are Stochastic Processes, and how do they fit in? STATS 210 Foundations of Statistics and Probability Tools for understanding randomness (random variables, distributions)
More informationSharpe Ratios and Alphas in Continuous Time
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS VOL. 39, NO. 1, MARCH 2004 COPYRIGHT 2004, SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WA 98195 Share Ratios and Alhas in Continuous
More informationMathematics in Finance
Mathematics in Finance Steven E. Shreve Department of Mathematical Sciences Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA shreve@andrew.cmu.edu A Talk in the Series Probability in Science and Industry
More informationFeasibilitystudyofconstruction investmentprojectsassessment withregardtoriskandprobability
Feasibilitystudyofconstruction investmentrojectsassessment withregardtoriskandrobability ofnpvreaching Andrzej Minasowicz Warsaw University of Technology, Civil Engineering Faculty, Warsaw, PL a.minasowicz@il.w.edu.l
More informationChapter 8. Markowitz Portfolio Theory. 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance The main question in portfolio theory is the following: Given an initial capital V (0), and opportunities (buy or sell) in N securities
More informationTwin Deficits and Inflation Dynamics in a Mundell-Fleming-Tobin Framework
Twin Deficits and Inflation Dynamics in a Mundell-Fleming-Tobin Framework Peter Flaschel, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany Gang Gong, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Christian R. Proaño, IMK
More informationLecture 10-12: CAPM.
Lecture 10-12: CAPM. I. Reading II. Market Portfolio. III. CAPM World: Assumptions. IV. Portfolio Choice in a CAPM World. V. Minimum Variance Mathematics. VI. Individual Assets in a CAPM World. VII. Intuition
More informationWe connect the mix-flexibility and dual-sourcing literatures by studying unreliable supply chains that produce
MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Vol. 7, No. 1, Winter 25,. 37 57 issn 1523-4614 eissn 1526-5498 5 71 37 informs doi 1.1287/msom.14.63 25 INFORMS On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing
More informationThe Inter-Firm Value Effect in the Qatar Stock Market:
International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 11, No. 1; 2016 ISSN 1833-3850 E-ISSN 1833-8119 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Inter-Firm Value Effect in the Qatar Stock
More informationThe mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations
The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2014 Outline and objectives The backward, three-step solution
More informationFinal Exam Suggested Solutions
University of Washington Fall 003 Department of Economics Eric Zivot Economics 483 Final Exam Suggested Solutions This is a closed book and closed note exam. However, you are allowed one page of handwritten
More informationPhysical and Financial Virtual Power Plants
Physical and Financial Virtual Power Plants by Bert WILLEMS Public Economics Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paer Series (DPS) 05.1 htt://www.econ.kuleuven.be/ces/discussionaers/default.htm Aril
More informationHow Large Are the Welfare Costs of Tax Competition?
How Large Are the Welfare Costs of Tax Cometition? June 2001 Discussion Paer 01 28 Resources for the Future 1616 P Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Telehone: 202 328 5000 Fax: 202 939 3460 Internet: htt://www.rff.org
More informationMidterm Exam 1. Tuesday, September hour and 15 minutes. Name: Answer Key
Macroeconomics ECON 302 San Francisco State niversit Michael Bar Fall 2011 Midterm Eam 1 Tuesda Setember 27 1 hour and 15 minutes Name: Answer Ke Instructions 1. This is closed book closed notes eam. 2.
More informationGames with more than 1 round
Games with more than round Reeated risoner s dilemma Suose this game is to be layed 0 times. What should you do? Player High Price Low Price Player High Price 00, 00-0, 00 Low Price 00, -0 0,0 What if
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 11, November ISSN
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 11, November-2013 1063 The Causality Direction Between Financial Develoment and Economic Growth. Case of Albania Msc. Ergita
More informationIEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management
IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management Basic Concepts and Techniques of Risk Management Martin Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Email: martin.b.haugh@gmail.com
More informationTHE DELIVERY OPTION IN MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITY VALUATION SIMULATIONS. Scott Gregory Chastain Jian Chen
Proceedings of the 25 Winter Simulation Conference. E. Kuhl,.. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, eds. THE DELIVERY OPTIO I ORTGAGE BACKED SECURITY VALUATIO SIULATIOS Scott Gregory Chastain Jian
More informationProfessor Huihua NIE, PhD School of Economics, Renmin University of China HOLD-UP, PROPERTY RIGHTS AND REPUTATION
Professor uihua NIE, PhD School of Economics, Renmin University of China E-mail: niehuihua@gmail.com OD-UP, PROPERTY RIGTS AND REPUTATION Abstract: By introducing asymmetric information of investors abilities
More informationValue-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector
Value-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector Ran SHI, Jin ZHONG Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China ABSTRACT In the deregulated
More informationEfficient Frontier and Asset Allocation
Topic 4 Efficient Frontier and Asset Allocation LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this topic, you should be able to: 1. Explain the concept of efficient frontier and Markowitz portfolio theory; 2. Discuss
More informationWeek 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals
Week 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals Christopher Ting http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/christophert/ Christopher Ting : christopherting@smu.edu.sg :
More informationSDMR Finance (2) Olivier Brandouy. University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, IAE (Sorbonne Graduate Business School)
SDMR Finance (2) Olivier Brandouy University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, IAE (Sorbonne Graduate Business School) Outline 1 Formal Approach to QAM : concepts and notations 2 3 Portfolio risk and return
More informationParameter Estimation Techniques, Optimization Frequency, and Equity Portfolio Return Enhancement*
Parameter Estimation Techniques, Optimization Frequency, and Equity Portfolio Return Enhancement* By Glen A. Larsen, Jr. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA, Glarsen@iupui.edu
More informationPublication Efficiency at DSI FEM CULS An Application of the Data Envelopment Analysis
Publication Efficiency at DSI FEM CULS An Alication of the Data Enveloment Analysis Martin Flégl, Helena Brožová 1 Abstract. The education and research efficiency at universities has always been very imortant
More informationEcon 424/CFRM 462 Portfolio Risk Budgeting
Econ 424/CFRM 462 Portfolio Risk Budgeting Eric Zivot August 14, 2014 Portfolio Risk Budgeting Idea: Additively decompose a measure of portfolio risk into contributions from the individual assets in the
More informationForward Vertical Integration: The Fixed-Proportion Case Revisited. Abstract
Forward Vertical Integration: The Fixed-roortion Case Revisited Olivier Bonroy GAEL, INRA-ierre Mendès France University Bruno Larue CRÉA, Laval University Abstract Assuming a fixed-roortion downstream
More informationPortfolio Risk Management and Linear Factor Models
Chapter 9 Portfolio Risk Management and Linear Factor Models 9.1 Portfolio Risk Measures There are many quantities introduced over the years to measure the level of risk that a portfolio carries, and each
More informationModeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Return I: Introduction
Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Return I: Introduction C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park Math 420: Mathematical Modeling January 26, 2012 version c 2011 Charles
More information