THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS. 1. Introduction:
|
|
- Sophie Williams
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Abstract. We prove values of the starting positions T a F b, T a F b and T a FFF. The last two positions were Erickson s conjectures.. Introduction: The game Toads and Frogs, invented by Richard Guy, is extensively discussed in Winning Ways [], the famous classic by Elwyn Berlekemp, John Conway, and Richard Guy, that is the bible of combinatorial game theory. This game got so much coverage because of the simplicity and elegance of its rules, the beauty of its analysis, and as an example of a combinatorial game whose positions do not always have values that are numbers. Rule The game is played on a n strip with either Toad(T), Frog(F) or on the squares. Left plays T and Right plays F. T may move to the immediate square on its right, if it happens to be empty, and F moves to the next empty square on the left, if it is empty. If T and F are next to each other, they have an option to jump over one another, in their designated directions, provided they land on an empty square. (see [] page 4). In symbols: the following moves are legal for Toad:... T T...,... TF FT..., and the following moves are legal for Frog:... F F...,... TF FT.... Date: March 8, 0.
2 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Two players take turn moving their pieces. The first player who runs out of move loses. Throughout the paper, we will use the notation X n to denote n contiguous copies of the Toads and Frogs position X. For example, (TF) F is shorthand for TFTFF. To be able to understand the present article, reader need a minimum knowledge of combinatorial game theory, that can be found in []. In particular, readers should be familiar with the notions of value of a game and sum games which are the bypass reversible move rule, dominated options rule and inequality of two games. (see [] page, 6-64). The only notations we use are (= {0 0}) and n (= {n n}). We will not use any shorthand notation like,, etc. Background Story Already in [] there is some analysis of Toads and Frogs positions, such as TTFF and a TF b. In 996, Erickson[] analyzed more general positions such as T a F for any a. At the end he made five conjectures about the values of some families of positions. All of them are starting positions (positions where all T are leftmost and all F are rightmost). Erickson s conjectures were: E: T a F b = {{a a b} { b}} for all a > b. E: T a FF = {a a } for all a. E: T a FFF = a 7 for all a 5. E4: T a a F a = or { } for all a. E5: T a b F a is an infinitesimal for all a, b except (a, b) =(,). E6: Toads and Frogs is NP-hard. Jesse Hull proved E6 in 000 (see []). Doron Zeilberger and the author proved E in [4]. The counterexample to conjecture E4 are in [5]. The results of this paper include the proofs of conjectures E and E. Conjecture E5 is still open. Recently, in [4], Doron Zeilberger and the author discussed the new algorithm called the symbolic finite-state method. This method is an automated algorithm to prove the values of all positions in the given class. For example, T a T b F and T a FT b are all the positions in the class F. We first conjecture values of positions in this class. Then we prove these values all at once by using induction. In practice, the following are the classes that we find the values: F, F, F, F, F, FF, FF, FF, FFF, TF. All the results above are in [6].
3 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS Unfortunately, the symbolic finite-state method does not work with the positions where there are variables on both T and F or both and F such as T a F b. However some of these positions have nice values. In [5], the author categorized all positions with one and proved that the value of T a F a is an infinitesimal for a 4. At the end, we made five conjectures related to these types of positions. Current Work The values of the starting positions are of a great interest. Some of them have been investigated in Erickson s paper, []. The starting position with the variables on both T and F interested the author a lot. In this paper, we show the values of the three starting positions namely, (.) T a T b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. (.) T a F b = {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. (.) T a FFF = a 7, a 5. Although these positions have beautiful values, the proofs however seem tedious. The techniques used to prove these positions are similar. The author decides to move the proofs of T a F b and T a FFF to the appendices to make the paper more readable. In Section, we show the value of T a T b, a 4, b 4. These positions are important starting positions which cannot be proved by the symbolic finite-state method. The proof is the shortest amongst the three positions. In the appendix A, we discuss the values of the position T a F b, a > b. The value of this position is the first conjecture of Jeff Erickson in []. The proof is not long but tricky. Regarding to this type of position, the values of T a T b and T a T b are still unknown. In the appendix B, we show the value of T a FFF, a 5. In theory, we can apply the symbolic finite-state method to prove the values of all positions in the class FFF. The result above follows as one of the special case of many positions in this class. But as we mentioned in [4], we could not get the computer to conjecture all the values of all the positions in this class yet. And it would takes days for human to do conjectures by hand. For now we prove the value of T a FFF, a 5, which is Erickson s conjecture,
4 4 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA by hand. The proof is however assisted by computer program the author wrote in Maple. We do not have an automated algorithm for position with variable on both T and F yet. The proofs are assisted by the old program in making conjectures and doing computation. In the future, we hope to have a new method (hopefully along the same line as the symbolic finite-state method) or computer program to make the proofs more automatic or at least shorten them.. Convention and Lemma. In this section, we explain the notation we use in this paper and also mention two lemmas which we will refer to quite often through out this paper... Convention. For G 0, we want to show that Right can win when Left moves first. We show that for each of the possible Left choices, Right has a response that wins the game. Similarly, we show G H by considering G H 0. Therefore we want to show that for all the possible Left moves in the game G or Right moves in the game H, there is a winning reply by Right in the game G or Left in the game H. Below is an example of the notation we use in this paper. Example: To show: T a FT k FTF b, k 0, a 0, b. T a FT k F T F b. Left has three choices to play, moving T on the left hand side or making a move on the right hand side. The arrows above show the possible moves of Left on the left hand side and Right on the right hand side in an order from to. Right could respond to each one of Left s moves as follows: First choice: Right responds by moving in the left option of {0 } on the right hand side. This leads to the position: Case : T a FT k FTF b 0. Second choice: Right responds by moving the left most F. This leads to the position: Case : T a FT k+ FTF b. Third choice: Left picks Right option of {0 } on the right hand side. Right responds by moving the right most F. This leads to the position: Case : T a FT k FTFF b. In conclusion, if Left moves as in i. it suffices to show Case i.
5 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 5.. Two Lemmas. The proof of Lemma. is similar to the proof of DLP [, p.7]. Lemma.. One side Death Leap Principle (One side DLP): If X is a position with no two consecutive empty squares and the only possible move for Left is a jump, then X 0. Proof: In such positions, Left s moves are necessarily jumps and always clear a space for Right to reply. As a result, if Left moves first, Right can always reply. Examples: TTFTTFF 0 and TTTFFTF 0. Lemma.. Blocking Rule (BR): let X and Y be positions. The position XF F Y X + Y. Proof: Right can always imitate Left s move on the opposite side of equation. Hence if Left moves first, Right can always reply... Note. ) There are the known positions in [4] or [6] which we will claim results without proving them again. Those are (.) T a T b F = a, a 0, b. (.) T a F = a, a. (.) T a TF = a, a. (.4) TF b = {0 { b}}, b. ) When we consider the choices of move, we omit the move of an integer. By the number avoidance theorem (page 47 in []), number is an inferior choice than non-number. Amongst the choices of numbers, moving in an integer is the worst one.. T a F b The values of the starting positions are of a great interest. Some of them have been first investigated in Erickson s paper, []. The starting positions with the variables on both Toads and Frogs are even more interesting since they could not be proved by the symbolic finite-state method. In this section we show the value T a T b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. The proof here is not long. However it would be interesting to develop computer program to make the proof more automatic in the future. The outline of proof is shown below.
6 6 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA T a F b = {a b a b}. T a TFF b = {a b a b}. T a TTFFF b = {a b a b}. T a TTTFFFF b = {a b a b}. Figure. T a F b = {a b a b} We prove each of the line above starting from the bottom. The top line is the result we want. Lemma.. T a T F F b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. Proof: By symmetry, we only need to show Case : T a TTF T FFF b T a T F F b {a b a b}. {a b a b}. Case.: T a TTFTFFF b a b. By BR, the left hand side T a TTFT + F b = (a ) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Case.: T a 4 TTTFTFFF b a b. By BR, the left hand side T a 4 TTTFT+F b = (a 4+) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Case.: T a TTF T FFF b a b. to (.). Case..: T a TTFFTFF b a b. The left hand side = T a + TFF b = (a ) (b ) = a b. Refer
7 Case : THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 7 Case..: T a 4 TTTFTFFF b a b. The left hand side is (a 4) (b ) = a b +. T a 4 TTT T FFFF b a b. Case.: T a 4 TTTFTFFF b a b. This is case.. Case.: T a 5 T 5 FFFF b a b. By BR, the left hand side T a 5 T 5 F + F b = (a 5) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Case : T a TTTFFFF b a b. By BR, the left hand side is T a TTTF + F b = (a ) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Lemma.. T a T F F b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. Proof: By symmetry, we only need to show Case : T a TF T FF b {a b a b}. T a T F F b {a b a b}. Case.: T a TFFTF b {a b a b}. Left has to move the left most T, otherwise Right will move the left most F and block the left most position. Therefore we have T a TTFFTF b a b. The left hand side is (a ) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Case.: T a TTFTFFF b {a b a b}. This is Case in Lemma.. Case.: T a TF T FFF b a b. Case..: T a TFFTFF b a b.
8 8 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Left has to move the left most T, otherwise Right will move the left most F and block the left most position. Therefore we have T a TTFFTFF b a b. The left hand side is (a ) (b ) = a b. Refer to (.). Case..: T a TTFTFFF b a b. This is Case. in Lemma.. Case : T a TTTFFFF b {a b a b}, true by Lemma.. Case : T a T T FFFF b a b. Case.: T a TFTFFF b a b. This is Case. above. Case.: a b a b, by Lemma.. Lemma.. T a TFF b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. Proof: By symmetry, we only need to show T a T FF b {a b a b}. Case : T a TFFF b {a b a b}. Case.: T a TFTFF b {a b a b}. This is Case of Lemma.. Case.: T a TFFFF b a b. T a TFTFFF b a b. This is Case. of Lemma.. Case : T a TTFFF b {a b a b}, true by Lemma.. Case : T a T FFF b a b.
9 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 9 Case.: T a TFFFF b a b. This is Case. above. Case.: a b a b, by Lemma.. Theorem.4. T a F b = {a b a b}, a 4, b 4. Proof: By symmetry, we only need to show T a F b {a b a b}. Case : T a TFF b {a b a b}, true by Lemma.. Case : T a FF b a b. a b a b, by Lemma.. 4. Future Work Toads and Frogs is beautiful game with many nice patterns everywhere. The works done so far could have been just the tip of an iceberg. The first breakthrough was the computer programming which compute the values on a specific board that led to discovering patterns and conjectures as in []. The second breakthrough was in [4] which the automated proof was introduced to verify the values of a specific class. Unfortunately, the positions in this paper are too general for that method. The next breakthrough should be another algorithm that are able to handle these general positions. But that is an ultimate goal. In making a progress, it is important to stress the role of computer program. Computer program will help seeing the bigger picture instead of getting lost in details. We have to wait to see whether anyone could find a better algorithm to automated or at least assisted the proof of the new results. The new algorithm might also as well be useful in other games or other brunches of mathematics. Erickson made 5 conjectures in []. Four of them have already been confirmed, three are positive and one is negative. Conjecture 5 is difficult and still open. The author made five new conjectures in [5]. Two of these conjectures are the refine version of conjecture 5 of Erickson. We believe that proving these five new conjectures could lead to a new technique and a better understanding of this game. We end this paper by stating conjecture and open problem similar to the positions we proved in this paper.
10 0 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Conjecture: T a F b = {a b a b}, a 6, b 6. Open Problem: For a fixed number i 5, find the values of T a i F b. APPENDIX Appendix A. T a F b We show T a F b = {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. This position is the smallest nontrivial starting position with variable on both Toads and Frogs. The values of this position are the first conjecture of Erickson in []. We will do the case analysis similar to Section. The proof is not long but tricky. For the case a > b =, the result is already known in [4] and [6]. For the case a > b,we will prove lemmas that will lead to the main theorem. We first show the value of T a TFF b. We then conclude the result by showing that T a F b = T a TFF b. Below is how the tree looks like at the beginning. T a TFF b T a TTFF b T a FTF b T a FTF b T a TFFF b (continue on sub picture) T a TFTF b T a FTF b T a FTF b T a FTFF b Figure. Main tree
11 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS T a TTFF b T a TTTFF b T a TFTF b T a TTFFF b (a b) T a TFTF b T a FTTF b (a ) T a TTFTF b Figure. Sub picture of the main tree Lemma A.,A. and A. will be useful for the subsequence lemmas. Lemma A.. T a T k FTF b = a, k, a 0, b 0. Proof: We show I) T a T k FTF b a, k, a 0, b 0. II) T a T k FTF b a, k, a 0, b 0. I) To show T a T k FTF b a, k, a 0, b 0. Case: T a T k F a. The left hand side is a by (.). Case: T a T k+ FFTF b a. This is true by (.4). II) To show T a T k FTF b a, k, a 0, b 0.
12 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA By BR, the left hand side T a + FTF b = a + 0 = a. Lemma A.. T a T k FTF b a, k, a, b 0. Proof: Left has only choice which leads to: T a T k+ FTF b a. This is II) of Lemma A.. Lemma A.. T a FT i F j TF b {0 0}, i 0, j, a 0, b. Proof: We use induction on a. Base Case: a = 0, T i F j T F b {0 0} Case: T i F j TF b 0, true by one side DLP. Case: T i F j TFF b 0, true by one side DLP. Induction Step: T a FT i F j T F b {0 0}, a. Case: T a FT i F j TF b 0, true by one side DLP. Case: T a FT i+ F j TF b {0 0}, true by induction. Case: T a FT i F j TFF b 0, true by one side DLP. Lemma A.4. T a F Proof: Case: T a F T F k T F b 0, k, a 0, b. T F k+ T F b 0 Case.: T a FTFF k TF b 0, true by one side DLP. Case.: T a FTF k+ TFF b 0, true by one side DLP. Case: T a FTF k TFF b 0, true by one side DLP.
13 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS Lemma A.5. T a F T F k TF b {0 0}, k 0, a 0, b. Proof: Case: T a FTF k+ TF b {0 0}, true by Lemma A.. Case: T a FTF k+ TF b 0, true by Lemma A.4. Lemma A.6 will be used for bypass reversible move rule in figure. Lemma A.6. Proof: T a Case: T a F T a TFTF b T FTF b T a TTF F b, a b. a T a TFTF b, refer to (.). True by Lemma A.. Case: T a TTFTF b T a TFTF b. The left hand side is a by Lemma A.. Then the statement is true by Lemma A.. Case: T a FTTF b a b + T a FTFTF b a b +, true by Lemma A.. Lemma A.7. Proof: T a TT T FF b a, a 0, b. Case : T a TTFTF b a, true by Lemma A.. Case : T a TTTTFFF b a. The left hand side is a b. Lemma A.8 will be used for bypass reversible move rule in figure. Lemma A.8. Proof: T a T FTF b T a F TF b, a, b 0.
14 4 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Case : a T a TFTF b, true by Lemma A.. Case : T a TTFTF b T a TFTF b, the left hand side is a, by Lemma A.. Then the statement is true by Lemma A.. Case : T a TFTF b T a TFTF b. This is trivially true. Lemma A.9. T a FTF b, a, b. Proof: T a FTTF b. T a FTFTF b, true by Lemma A.. Lemma A.0. T a FT k F b = {0 0}, k, a, b. Proof: Need to show I) T a FT k F b {0 0}, k, a 0, b. II) T a FT k F b {0 0}, k, a, b. I) We use induction on a Base Case: a = 0, T k F b {0 0}. Case : T k FTF b {0 0}, true by Lemma A.. Case : T k FF b 0, true by one side DLP. Induction step: T a F T k F b {0 0}, a. Case : T a FT k FTF b {0 0}, true by Lemma A.. Case : T a FT k+ F b {0 0}, true by induction. Case : T a FT k FF b 0, true by one side DLP.
15 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 5 II) To show T a FT k F b {0 0}, k, a, b. Case : T a FT k FTF b {0 0}, true by negative of Lemma A.5. Case : T a F T k+ F b 0. Case.: T a FT k FTF b 0, true by negative of Lemma A.4. Case.: T a FT k TF b 0, true by one side DLP. Lemma A.. Proof: Case : a b. Case : { b} T a T { b} T a FT F F b. F F F b, b, a b +. Case.: T a FFTF b, true by the negative of Lemma A.5. Case.: b TF b. The right hand side is b, by (.). Case.: b T a FTFFF b, true by the negative of Lemma A.. Case : { b} a b. 0 a b, which is true. After applying Lemma A.,A.6,A.7,A.8,A.9,A.0,A. to the tree in figure, like: it looks
16 6 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA T a TFF b T a TTFF b T a FTF b T a FTF b T a TFFF b (Dominated by Lemma A.) a a b (Lemma A.,A.6,A.7 respectively) a b (Lemma A.8) (Lemma A.9) (Lemma A.0)(Negative of Lemma A.8) Figure 4. Tree after applying Lemma A.,A.6,A.7,A.8,A.9,A.0,A. It might be helpful to provide some explanation of the value a after applying Lemma A.8 above. We apply the bypass reversible move by comparing the position T a FTF b and T a TFTF b which is the only right option of T a TFTF b. The left options of T a TFTF b are T a FTTF b and T a TTFTF b in which both have values a by (.) and Lemma A. respectively. After applying these lemmas, we finally conclude that T a TFF b = {{a a b} { b}}. We finally show the main theorem using the result above. Theorem A.. T a F b = {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. Proof: Need to show I) T a F b {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. II) T a F b {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. I) To show T a F b {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. Case : T a TFF b {{a a b} { b}}, true by the tree above. Case : T a FF b { b}.
17 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 7 Case.: { b} { b}, true by the tree above. Case.: T a FFF b b. T a FTFF b b, true by the negative of Lemma A.. II) To show T a F b {{a a b} { b}}, a > b. Case : T a TFF b {{a a b} { b}}, true by the tree above. Case : T a T F b {a a b}. Case.: {a a b} {a a b}, true by the tree above. Case.: T a TTF b a. This is the negative of I) Case.. We show T a FFF = a 7, a 5. Appendix B. T a FFF We are supposed to be able to prove the values of the class FFF by the symbolic finite-state method (see [4],[6]). Then the result above will follow as one of the special case of many positions in the class. However there are too many possible cases to make conjectures. For now we prove the value of T a FFF, a 5 by hand. The proof is quite lengthy but the plan is clear. We need 7 lemmas before we can prove the main theorem. Below is the outline.
18 8 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA T a FFF = a 7 T a TFFF = a 7 T a TTFFF = a 7 T a TFTFF = a 7 T a TTFTFF = a 7 T a FTTFF = a 7 T a TFTTFF = a 7 Figure 5. Main tree We first show Lemma B.. Then we will start to work from the bottom of the main tree (figure 5) and go all the way up to the top. Lemma B.. T a TFTFTF a 7, a 5. Proof: To Show T a T F Case : T a TFFTTF a 4. T FTF 4 a 7. The left hand side is T a TFF = a 4, a 4. This value is the result in [4] (see also [6]). Case : T a FT T FTF a 4.
19 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 9 Case.: T a FTF a 4. The left hand side already is a 4. Case.: T a 4 TFTTFTF a 4, true by one side DLP. Case: T a 4 T T F T FTF a 4. Case.: T a 4 TTFF a 4. The left hand side is {{a 4 a 4} a 4}. Case.: T a 4 TFTTFTF a 4, true by one side DLP. Case.: T a 5 TTTFFTTF a 4. The left hand side is (a 5) +. Case 4: T a F T T FTF a. Case 4.: T a FTF a. The left hand side is {{a a } a }. Case 4.: T a FTF T TF a. Case 4..: T a FFTTTF a. The left hand side is { } which assure the statement for a 7. Case 4..: T a 4 FTTFTTF a. T a FTTF a, The left hand side is. We now have Lemma B.. We are one step closer to the main theorem. We now prove the statement at the bottom of the tree. Lemma B.. T a TFTTFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a TFTTFF a 7. II) T a TFTTFTF a 7.
20 0 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA I) To Show T a T FT T FF 4 a 7. Case: T a TFTFTF a 7, true by Lemma B.. Case : T a FTTTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 4. Case : T a 4 TTF a 7. The left hand side is a 4. Case 4: T a TF a. The left hand side is a. II) To Show T a T F TTF F a 7. Case: T a FTTTFF a 7. The left hand side is + (a ) = a. Case : T a TF a. The left hand side is a. Case : T a T F T F TF a 4. Case.: T a FTTFTF a 4. T a FTTFTF a 4. The left hand side is a, by BR. Case.: T a TFFTTF a 4. The left hand side is a 4. Lemma B.. T a FTTFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a FTTFF a 7. II) T a FTTFF a 7. I) To Show T a FT T FF a 7.
21 Case: T a F THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS T FTF a 7. Case.: T a FF a 4. The left hand side is a 4. Case.: T a TFTFTF a 7, true by Lemma B.. Case.: T a F T FTF a. Case..: T a FF a. The left hand side is a. Case..: T a FTTFTF a. This is case 4 of Lemma B.. Case : T a TFTTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 7 by Lemma B.. Case : T a FTTFF a. The left hand side is a. II) To Show T a F TTF F a 7. Case: T a TFTTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 7 by Lemma B.. Case : T a F a. The left hand side is a. Case : T a T F TTF F a 4. Case.: a 4 a 4, by Lemma B.. Case.: T a TF a 4. The left hand side is a. We have Lemma B. here. Lemma B.4 is similar to Lemma B.. They are also at the same level in the picture. Lemma B.4. T a TTFTFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show
22 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA I) T a TTFTFF a 7. II) T a TTFTFF a 7. I) To Show T a T T F T FF 4 a 7. Case : T a T T FFTF a 7. Case.: T a TFTFTF a 7, true by Lemma B.. Case.: T a 4 TTTFFTF a 7. The left hand side is (a 4). Case.: T a TTFFTF a. The left hand side is (a ). Case : T a TFTTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 7 by Lemma B.. Case : T a 4 TTTFFTF a 7. The left hand side is a 4. Case 4: T a TTFFTF a. The left hand side is a. II) To Show T a TTFT F F a 7. Case : T a TTFFTF a. The left hand side is a. Case : T a TFTTFF a 7. The left hand side is {a a }. Case : T a TFTTFF a 4. This is II) Case of Lemma B.. Lemma B.5. T a TFTFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a TFTFF a 7. II)) T a TFTFF a 7.
23 I) To Show THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS T a T F T FF Case: T a F T TFF a 7. 4 a 7. Case.: T a FTFTF a 7. The left hand side goes to T a FTF = { }. Case.: T a F T F T F a. Case..: T a FTFTF a. The left most position will get block eventually. Case..: T a FTFTF a. The left hand side goes to T a FTF a. The left hand side is {{{a } } 0}. Case : T a FTTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 7 by Lemma B.. Case : T a TTFTFF a 7. The left hand side is a 7 by Lemma B.4. Case 4: T a T F T FF a. Case 4.: T a FTFTF a. T a FTFTF a. T a FTF a., the left hand side is. Case 4.: T a F a., the left hand side is a. Case 4.: a a, true by Lemma B.4.
24 4 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA II) To Show T a T Case : T a FTT F T F F F F a 7. a 7. Case.: T a FTTFF a 7. The left hand side is (a ). Case.: T a TTFF a 4. The left hand side is (a ). Case : T a FFTTFF a 7, true by Lemma B.. Case : T a TTFT F F a 4. a 4 a 4, by Lemma B.4. Lemma B.6. T a TTFFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a TTFFF a 7. II) T a TTFFF a 7. I) To Show T a T T FFF a 7. Case : T a TFTFF a 7, true by Lemma B.5. Case : T a TT T FFF a 7. Case.: T a TTFTFF a 7, true by Lemma B.4. Case.: T a 4 TTTTFFF a 7. The left hand side is (a 4). Case.: T a TTTFFF a. The left hand side is (a ).
25 Case : THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 5 T a T T FFF a. Case.: T a TFTFF a. This is case I)4 of Lemma B.5. Case.: T a TTTFFF a. The left hand side is (a ). II) To Show T a TTF Case : T a T F TF F F F a 7. a 7. Case.: T a TTFTFF a 7, true by Lemma B.4. Case.: T a TFTFF a 7. The left hand side is T a F = a 5. Case.: T a TFTFF a 4. The left hand side is T a F = (a 5 ). Case : T a T F T F F a 4. Case.: a 4 a 4, by Lemma B.5. Case.: T a TFTFF a 4. This is case. above. Lemma B.7. T a TFFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a TFFF a 7. II) T a TFFF a 7. I) To Show T a T FFF a 7.
26 6 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Case : T a TFFF Case.: a 7. T a TF T FF Case..: T a F a 7. T T FF Case...: T a FTFTF a 4. T a FTFTF a 4. a 7. (The left hand side is { }) T a FTF a 4. The left hand side is. Case...: T a FTFTF a 7. T a FTF a 7. The left hand side is 0. Case...: T a FTFTF a. The left hand side is. Case..: T a TTFTFF a 7. The left hand side is (a ) + TF = (a ) Case..: T a F Case.: T T FF a. Case...: T a FTFTF a. This is case... above. Case...: T a FTTFF a. The left hand side is T a FF = {{ } 0}. T a F T FF a.
27 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 7 Case..: T a FF T F a. Case...: T a FF T F a. Case...: T a FFTF a. The left hand side is -. Case...: The left hand side goes to T a FTF a. The left hand side is {{{a } } 0}. Case...: T a F T F T F a. Case...: T a FTFTF a. TTF = { }. Case...: TTF a. The left hand side is. Case..: T a FTTFF a. This is case.. above. Case : T a TTFFF a 7, true by Lemma B.6. Case : T a T FFF a. Case.: T a F T FF a. Case..: T a FF T F a. Case...: T a FFTF a. T a FTF =. Case...: T a F T F T F a.
28 8 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Case...: T a FTFTF a. The statement above is true since the left most part of the position gets block eventually. Case...: T a FTFTF a. The left hand side goes to T a FTF = {{a } } 0} Case..: a a, by Lemma B.5. Case.: a a, by Lemma B.6. II) To Show T a T F F F a 7. Case : T a TTFFF a 7, true by Lemma B.6. Case : T a TT F F F a 7. Case.: T a TFTFF a 7. This is II) case of Lemma B.6. Case.: T a TT F FF a 7. Case..: T a TTFT F F a 7. Case...: T a TTF F TF a 7. Case...: T a TTFFTF a. The left hand side is (a ) + 0 = a. Case...: T a T F TFTF a 4. T a FTTFTF = a 4. The left hand side T a F + FTF = (a 4) + 0 = a 4.
29 THREE RESULTS OF COMBINATORIAL GAME TOADS AND FROGS 9 Case...: T a TTFTFF a 4. The left hand side T a + TFF = (a ) + 0 = a. Case..: T a TTFFF a 4. The left hand side is (a ). Case.: T a TTT F F F a 4. Case..: T a TT F TF F a 4. Case...: a 4 a 4, by Case II. of Lemma B.6. Case...: T a TTFTFF a 4. The left hand side T a TF = a. Case..: T a TTTFFF a 4. The left hand side a. Case : T a TT F F F a 4. Case.: a 4 a 4, by Lemma B.6. Case.: T a TTTFFF a 4, true by the Case. Theorem B.8. T a FFF = a 7, a 5. Proof: Need to show I) T a FFF a 7. II) T a FFF a 7. I) To Show T a FFF a 7. Case : T a TFFF a 7, true by Lemma B.7.
30 0 THOTSAPORN AEK THANATIPANONDA Case : T a FFF a. a a, by Lemma B.7. II) To Show T a F FF a 7. Case : T a TFFFF a 7, true by Lemma B.7. Case : T a T F FF a 4. a 4 a 4, by Lemma B.7. References [] Elwyn Berlekamp, John Conway, and Richard Guy, Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays, Academic Press, New York, 98. [] Jeff Erickson, New Toads and Frogs Results, Game of No Chance, 996. [] Jesse Hull, personal website, jeffe/pubs/toads.html. [4] Thotsaporn Aek Thanatipanonda, Doron Zeilberger, A Symbolic Finite-state approach for Automated Proving of Theorems in Combinatorial Game Theory, J. of Difference Equations and Applications 5(009), -8. [5] Thotsaporn Aek Thanatipanonda, Further Hopping with Toads and Frogs, preprint, [6] Thotsaporn Aek Thanatipanonda, Library values for Toads and Frogs,
Chapter 10: Mixed strategies Nash equilibria, reaction curves and the equality of payoffs theorem
Chapter 10: Mixed strategies Nash equilibria reaction curves and the equality of payoffs theorem Nash equilibrium: The concept of Nash equilibrium can be extended in a natural manner to the mixed strategies
More informationBest-Reply Sets. Jonathan Weinstein Washington University in St. Louis. This version: May 2015
Best-Reply Sets Jonathan Weinstein Washington University in St. Louis This version: May 2015 Introduction The best-reply correspondence of a game the mapping from beliefs over one s opponents actions to
More informationNOTES ON FIBONACCI TREES AND THEIR OPTIMALITY* YASUICHI HORIBE INTRODUCTION 1. FIBONACCI TREES
0#0# NOTES ON FIBONACCI TREES AND THEIR OPTIMALITY* YASUICHI HORIBE Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, 432, Japan (Submitted February 1982) INTRODUCTION Continuing a previous paper [3], some new observations
More informationMath 167: Mathematical Game Theory Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros
Math 167: Mathematical Game Theory Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros Midterm #1, February 3, 2017 Name (use a pen): Student ID (use a pen): Signature (use a pen): Rules: Duration of the exam: 50 minutes. By
More informationMaximum Contiguous Subsequences
Chapter 8 Maximum Contiguous Subsequences In this chapter, we consider a well-know problem and apply the algorithm-design techniques that we have learned thus far to this problem. While applying these
More informationNimbers in partizan games
Games of No Chance 4 MSRI Publications Volume 63, 015 Nimbers in partizan games CARLOS PEREIRA DOS SANTOS AND JORGE NUNO SILVA The chess board is too small for two queens. Victor Korchnoi, challenger for
More informationYao s Minimax Principle
Complexity of algorithms The complexity of an algorithm is usually measured with respect to the size of the input, where size may for example refer to the length of a binary word describing the input,
More informationSingle-Parameter Mechanisms
Algorithmic Game Theory, Summer 25 Single-Parameter Mechanisms Lecture 9 (6 pages) Instructor: Xiaohui Bei In the previous lecture, we learned basic concepts about mechanism design. The goal in this area
More informationOn the Number of Permutations Avoiding a Given Pattern
On the Number of Permutations Avoiding a Given Pattern Noga Alon Ehud Friedgut February 22, 2002 Abstract Let σ S k and τ S n be permutations. We say τ contains σ if there exist 1 x 1 < x 2
More informationCOMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS
COMBINATORICS OF REDUCTIONS BETWEEN EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS DAN HATHAWAY AND SCOTT SCHNEIDER Abstract. We discuss combinatorial conditions for the existence of various types of reductions between equivalence
More informationTWIST UNTANGLE AND RELATED KNOT GAMES
#G04 INTEGERS 14 (2014) TWIST UNTANGLE AND RELATED KNOT GAMES Sandy Ganzell Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, St. Mary s College of Maryland, St. Mary s City, Maryland sganzell@smcm.edu Alex
More informationQuadrant marked mesh patterns in 123-avoiding permutations
Quadrant marked mesh patterns in 23-avoiding permutations Dun Qiu Department of Mathematics University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-02. USA duqiu@math.ucsd.edu Jeffrey Remmel Department
More informationTR : Knowledge-Based Rational Decisions and Nash Paths
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Computer Science Technical Reports Graduate Center 2009 TR-2009015: Knowledge-Based Rational Decisions and Nash Paths Sergei Artemov Follow this and
More informationEssays on Some Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Interval Data
Essays on Some Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Interval Data a thesis submitted to the department of industrial engineering and the institute of engineering and sciences of bilkent university
More informationGEK1544 The Mathematics of Games Suggested Solutions to Tutorial 3
GEK544 The Mathematics of Games Suggested Solutions to Tutorial 3. Consider a Las Vegas roulette wheel with a bet of $5 on black (payoff = : ) and a bet of $ on the specific group of 4 (e.g. 3, 4, 6, 7
More information10.1 Elimination of strictly dominated strategies
Chapter 10 Elimination by Mixed Strategies The notions of dominance apply in particular to mixed extensions of finite strategic games. But we can also consider dominance of a pure strategy by a mixed strategy.
More informationTR : Knowledge-Based Rational Decisions
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Computer Science Technical Reports Graduate Center 2009 TR-2009011: Knowledge-Based Rational Decisions Sergei Artemov Follow this and additional works
More informationTug of War Game. William Gasarch and Nick Sovich and Paul Zimand. October 6, Abstract
Tug of War Game William Gasarch and ick Sovich and Paul Zimand October 6, 2009 To be written later Abstract Introduction Combinatorial games under auction play, introduced by Lazarus, Loeb, Propp, Stromquist,
More informationMaximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy!
Maximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy! Jessica Abramson, Natalie Collina, and William Gasarch August 2017 1 Abstract Alice and Betty are going into the final round of Jeopardy. Alice knows how much money
More informationThe Binomial Theorem and Consequences
The Binomial Theorem and Consequences Juris Steprāns York University November 17, 2011 Fermat s Theorem Pierre de Fermat claimed the following theorem in 1640, but the first published proof (by Leonhard
More information4 Martingales in Discrete-Time
4 Martingales in Discrete-Time Suppose that (Ω, F, P is a probability space. Definition 4.1. A sequence F = {F n, n = 0, 1,...} is called a filtration if each F n is a sub-σ-algebra of F, and F n F n+1
More informationLecture 23: April 10
CS271 Randomness & Computation Spring 2018 Instructor: Alistair Sinclair Lecture 23: April 10 Disclaimer: These notes have not been subjected to the usual scrutiny accorded to formal publications. They
More informationHarvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences CS 152: Programming Languages
Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences CS 152: Programming Languages Lecture 2 Thursday, January 30, 2014 1 Expressing Program Properties Now that we have defined our small-step operational
More informationMAT 4250: Lecture 1 Eric Chung
1 MAT 4250: Lecture 1 Eric Chung 2Chapter 1: Impartial Combinatorial Games 3 Combinatorial games Combinatorial games are two-person games with perfect information and no chance moves, and with a win-or-lose
More informationHarvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences CS 152: Programming Languages
Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences CS 152: Programming Languages Lecture 3 Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1 Inductive sets Induction is an important concept in the theory of programming language.
More informationECE 586GT: Problem Set 1: Problems and Solutions Analysis of static games
University of Illinois Fall 2018 ECE 586GT: Problem Set 1: Problems and Solutions Analysis of static games Due: Tuesday, Sept. 11, at beginning of class Reading: Course notes, Sections 1.1-1.4 1. [A random
More informationMechanism Design and Auctions
Mechanism Design and Auctions Game Theory Algorithmic Game Theory 1 TOC Mechanism Design Basics Myerson s Lemma Revenue-Maximizing Auctions Near-Optimal Auctions Multi-Parameter Mechanism Design and the
More informationForecast Horizons for Production Planning with Stochastic Demand
Forecast Horizons for Production Planning with Stochastic Demand Alfredo Garcia and Robert L. Smith Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering Universityof Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109 December
More informationOn Existence of Equilibria. Bayesian Allocation-Mechanisms
On Existence of Equilibria in Bayesian Allocation Mechanisms Northwestern University April 23, 2014 Bayesian Allocation Mechanisms In allocation mechanisms, agents choose messages. The messages determine
More informationFinding Equilibria in Games of No Chance
Finding Equilibria in Games of No Chance Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Peter Bro Miltersen, and Troels Bjerre Sørensen Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark {arnsfelt,bromille,trold}@daimi.au.dk
More informationNotes on the symmetric group
Notes on the symmetric group 1 Computations in the symmetric group Recall that, given a set X, the set S X of all bijections from X to itself (or, more briefly, permutations of X) is group under function
More informationLecture 4: Divide and Conquer
Lecture 4: Divide and Conquer Divide and Conquer Merge sort is an example of a divide-and-conquer algorithm Recall the three steps (at each level to solve a divideand-conquer problem recursively Divide
More informationMath489/889 Stochastic Processes and Advanced Mathematical Finance Homework 4
Math489/889 Stochastic Processes and Advanced Mathematical Finance Homework 4 Steve Dunbar Due Mon, October 5, 2009 1. (a) For T 0 = 10 and a = 20, draw a graph of the probability of ruin as a function
More informationECON Microeconomics II IRYNA DUDNYK. Auctions.
Auctions. What is an auction? When and whhy do we need auctions? Auction is a mechanism of allocating a particular object at a certain price. Allocating part concerns who will get the object and the price
More informationCS364A: Algorithmic Game Theory Lecture #3: Myerson s Lemma
CS364A: Algorithmic Game Theory Lecture #3: Myerson s Lemma Tim Roughgarden September 3, 23 The Story So Far Last time, we introduced the Vickrey auction and proved that it enjoys three desirable and different
More informationThe Stackelberg Minimum Spanning Tree Game
The Stackelberg Minimum Spanning Tree Game J. Cardinal, E. Demaine, S. Fiorini, G. Joret, S. Langerman, I. Newman, O. Weimann, The Stackelberg Minimum Spanning Tree Game, WADS 07 Stackelberg Game 2 players:
More informationUsing the Maximin Principle
Using the Maximin Principle Under the maximin principle, it is easy to see that Rose should choose a, making her worst-case payoff 0. Colin s similar rationality as a player induces him to play (under
More informationA relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns
Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science DMTCS vol. VOL, 205, 285 302 A relation on 32-avoiding permutation patterns Natalie Aisbett School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney,
More informationsample-bookchapter 2015/7/7 9:44 page 1 #1 THE BINOMIAL MODEL
sample-bookchapter 2015/7/7 9:44 page 1 #1 1 THE BINOMIAL MODEL In this chapter we will study, in some detail, the simplest possible nontrivial model of a financial market the binomial model. This is a
More informationExpectations & Randomization Normal Form Games Dominance Iterated Dominance. Normal Form Games & Dominance
Normal Form Games & Dominance Let s play the quarters game again We each have a quarter. Let s put them down on the desk at the same time. If they show the same side (HH or TT), you take my quarter. If
More informationCATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES
CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES MICHAEL KINYON AND JONATHAN LEECH Abstract. Categorical skew lattices are a variety of skew lattices on which the natural partial order is especially well behaved. While most
More informationIterated Dominance and Nash Equilibrium
Chapter 11 Iterated Dominance and Nash Equilibrium In the previous chapter we examined simultaneous move games in which each player had a dominant strategy; the Prisoner s Dilemma game was one example.
More informationIntroduction Recently the importance of modelling dependent insurance and reinsurance risks has attracted the attention of actuarial practitioners and
Asymptotic dependence of reinsurance aggregate claim amounts Mata, Ana J. KPMG One Canada Square London E4 5AG Tel: +44-207-694 2933 e-mail: ana.mata@kpmg.co.uk January 26, 200 Abstract In this paper we
More informationThe Cascade Auction A Mechanism For Deterring Collusion In Auctions
The Cascade Auction A Mechanism For Deterring Collusion In Auctions Uriel Feige Weizmann Institute Gil Kalai Hebrew University and Microsoft Research Moshe Tennenholtz Technion and Microsoft Research Abstract
More information15-451/651: Design & Analysis of Algorithms October 23, 2018 Lecture #16: Online Algorithms last changed: October 22, 2018
15-451/651: Design & Analysis of Algorithms October 23, 2018 Lecture #16: Online Algorithms last changed: October 22, 2018 Today we ll be looking at finding approximately-optimal solutions for problems
More informationGame Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati.
Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. Module No. # 06 Illustrations of Extensive Games and Nash Equilibrium
More informationHOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM RISKY FOREX SYSTEMS
BestForexBrokers.com Identifying Flaws in Profitable Forex Systems HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM RISKY FOREX SYSTEMS JULY 2017 Disclaimer: BestForexBrokers.com and this report are not associated with myfxbook.com
More informationSequential allocation of indivisible goods
1 / 27 Sequential allocation of indivisible goods Thomas Kalinowski Institut für Mathematik, Universität Rostock Newcastle Tuesday, January 22, 2013 joint work with... 2 / 27 Nina Narodytska Toby Walsh
More informationGame Theory: Normal Form Games
Game Theory: Normal Form Games Michael Levet June 23, 2016 1 Introduction Game Theory is a mathematical field that studies how rational agents make decisions in both competitive and cooperative situations.
More informationMITCHELL S THEOREM REVISITED. Contents
MITCHELL S THEOREM REVISITED THOMAS GILTON AND JOHN KRUEGER Abstract. Mitchell s theorem on the approachability ideal states that it is consistent relative to a greatly Mahlo cardinal that there is no
More informationSolution to Tutorial 1
Solution to Tutorial 1 011/01 Semester I MA464 Game Theory Tutor: Xiang Sun August 4, 011 1 Review Static means one-shot, or simultaneous-move; Complete information means that the payoff functions are
More informationThe Real Numbers. Here we show one way to explicitly construct the real numbers R. First we need a definition.
The Real Numbers Here we show one way to explicitly construct the real numbers R. First we need a definition. Definitions/Notation: A sequence of rational numbers is a funtion f : N Q. Rather than write
More informationSolution to Tutorial /2013 Semester I MA4264 Game Theory
Solution to Tutorial 1 01/013 Semester I MA464 Game Theory Tutor: Xiang Sun August 30, 01 1 Review Static means one-shot, or simultaneous-move; Complete information means that the payoff functions are
More informationOutline Introduction Game Representations Reductions Solution Concepts. Game Theory. Enrico Franchi. May 19, 2010
May 19, 2010 1 Introduction Scope of Agent preferences Utility Functions 2 Game Representations Example: Game-1 Extended Form Strategic Form Equivalences 3 Reductions Best Response Domination 4 Solution
More informationRegret Minimization and Security Strategies
Chapter 5 Regret Minimization and Security Strategies Until now we implicitly adopted a view that a Nash equilibrium is a desirable outcome of a strategic game. In this chapter we consider two alternative
More informationComparison of proof techniques in game-theoretic probability and measure-theoretic probability
Comparison of proof techniques in game-theoretic probability and measure-theoretic probability Akimichi Takemura, Univ. of Tokyo March 31, 2008 1 Outline: A.Takemura 0. Background and our contributions
More informationThe Traveling Salesman Problem. Time Complexity under Nondeterminism. A Nondeterministic Algorithm for tsp (d)
The Traveling Salesman Problem We are given n cities 1, 2,..., n and integer distances d ij between any two cities i and j. Assume d ij = d ji for convenience. The traveling salesman problem (tsp) asks
More informationMartingales. by D. Cox December 2, 2009
Martingales by D. Cox December 2, 2009 1 Stochastic Processes. Definition 1.1 Let T be an arbitrary index set. A stochastic process indexed by T is a family of random variables (X t : t T) defined on a
More informationChristiano 362, Winter 2006 Lecture #3: More on Exchange Rates More on the idea that exchange rates move around a lot.
Christiano 362, Winter 2006 Lecture #3: More on Exchange Rates More on the idea that exchange rates move around a lot. 1.Theexampleattheendoflecture#2discussedalargemovementin the US-Japanese exchange
More informationGame Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India July 2012
Game Theory Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India July 2012 The Revenue Equivalence Theorem Note: This is a only a draft
More informationLecture 2: The Simple Story of 2-SAT
0510-7410: Topics in Algorithms - Random Satisfiability March 04, 2014 Lecture 2: The Simple Story of 2-SAT Lecturer: Benny Applebaum Scribe(s): Mor Baruch 1 Lecture Outline In this talk we will show that
More informationG5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017
G5212: Game Theory Mark Dean Spring 2017 Bargaining We will now apply the concept of SPNE to bargaining A bit of background Bargaining is hugely interesting but complicated to model It turns out that the
More informationANALYSIS OF N-CARD LE HER
ANALYSIS OF N-CARD LE HER ARTHUR T. BENJAMIN AND A.J. GOLDMAN Abstract. We present a complete solution to a card game with historical origins. Our analysis exploits convexity properties in the payoff matrix,
More informationAn Optimal Algorithm for Calculating the Profit in the Coins in a Row Game
An Optimal Algorithm for Calculating the Profit in the Coins in a Row Game Tomasz Idziaszek University of Warsaw idziaszek@mimuw.edu.pl Abstract. On the table there is a row of n coins of various denominations.
More informationIntroduction to Financial Mathematics
Introduction to Financial Mathematics Zsolt Bihary 211, ELTE Outline Financial mathematics in general, and in market modelling Introduction to classical theory Hedging efficiency in incomplete markets
More informationComputing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable
Computing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable Shlomo Hoory and Stefan Szeider Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, shlomoh,szeider@cs.toronto.edu Abstract.
More informationEconometrica Supplementary Material
Econometrica Supplementary Material PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE OFFERS: THE TWO-TYPE CASE TO SUPPLEMENT PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE OFFERS IN THE MARKET FOR LEMONS (Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 1, January 2009, 29 69) BY
More informationAlgorithmic Game Theory and Applications. Lecture 11: Games of Perfect Information
Algorithmic Game Theory and Applications Lecture 11: Games of Perfect Information Kousha Etessami finite games of perfect information Recall, a perfect information (PI) game has only 1 node per information
More informationLattice Laws Forcing Distributivity Under Unique Complementation
Lattice Laws Forcing Distributivity Under Unique Complementation R. Padmanabhan Department of Mathematics University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2 Canada W. McCune Mathematics and Computer Science
More informationSemantics with Applications 2b. Structural Operational Semantics
Semantics with Applications 2b. Structural Operational Semantics Hanne Riis Nielson, Flemming Nielson (thanks to Henrik Pilegaard) [SwA] Hanne Riis Nielson, Flemming Nielson Semantics with Applications:
More informationLaws of probabilities in efficient markets
Laws of probabilities in efficient markets Vladimir Vovk Department of Computer Science Royal Holloway, University of London Fifth Workshop on Game-Theoretic Probability and Related Topics 15 November
More information18.440: Lecture 35 Martingales and the optional stopping theorem
18.440: Lecture 35 Martingales and the optional stopping theorem Scott Sheffield MIT 1 Outline Martingales and stopping times Optional stopping theorem 2 Outline Martingales and stopping times Optional
More informationRISK ANALYSIS OF LIFE INSURANCE PRODUCTS
RISK ANALYSIS OF LIFE INSURANCE PRODUCTS by Christine Zelch B. S. in Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, 2002 B. S. in Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College,
More informationSeparable Preferences Ted Bergstrom, UCSB
Separable Preferences Ted Bergstrom, UCSB When applied economists want to focus their attention on a single commodity or on one commodity group, they often find it convenient to work with a twocommodity
More informationLaurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA
SOME PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL COVERING SPACES Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA Abstract. In this paper we study digital versions of some properties of covering spaces from algebraic topology. We correct and
More informationTug of War Game: An Exposition
Tug of War Game: An Exposition Nick Sovich and Paul Zimand April 21, 2009 Abstract This paper proves that there is a winning strategy for Player L in the tug of war game. 1 Introduction We describe an
More informationMATH 121 GAME THEORY REVIEW
MATH 121 GAME THEORY REVIEW ERIN PEARSE Contents 1. Definitions 2 1.1. Non-cooperative Games 2 1.2. Cooperative 2-person Games 4 1.3. Cooperative n-person Games (in coalitional form) 6 2. Theorems and
More informationEquilibrium payoffs in finite games
Equilibrium payoffs in finite games Ehud Lehrer, Eilon Solan, Yannick Viossat To cite this version: Ehud Lehrer, Eilon Solan, Yannick Viossat. Equilibrium payoffs in finite games. Journal of Mathematical
More informationRecitation 1. Solving Recurrences. 1.1 Announcements. Welcome to 15210!
Recitation 1 Solving Recurrences 1.1 Announcements Welcome to 1510! The course website is http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ 1510/. It contains the syllabus, schedule, library documentation, staff contact information,
More informationTABLEAU-BASED DECISION PROCEDURES FOR HYBRID LOGIC
TABLEAU-BASED DECISION PROCEDURES FOR HYBRID LOGIC THOMAS BOLANDER AND TORBEN BRAÜNER Abstract. Hybrid logics are a principled generalization of both modal logics and description logics. It is well-known
More informationMaximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy!
Maximizing Winnings on Final Jeopardy! Jessica Abramson, Natalie Collina, and William Gasarch August 2017 1 Introduction Consider a final round of Jeopardy! with players Alice and Betty 1. We assume that
More informationLecture 5 Leadership and Reputation
Lecture 5 Leadership and Reputation Reputations arise in situations where there is an element of repetition, and also where coordination between players is possible. One definition of leadership is that
More informationIssues. Senate (Total = 100) Senate Group 1 Y Y N N Y 32 Senate Group 2 Y Y D N D 16 Senate Group 3 N N Y Y Y 30 Senate Group 4 D Y N D Y 22
1. Every year, the United States Congress must approve a budget for the country. In order to be approved, the budget must get a majority of the votes in the Senate, a majority of votes in the House, and
More informationLecture 5. 1 Online Learning. 1.1 Learning Setup (Perspective of Universe) CSCI699: Topics in Learning & Game Theory
CSCI699: Topics in Learning & Game Theory Lecturer: Shaddin Dughmi Lecture 5 Scribes: Umang Gupta & Anastasia Voloshinov In this lecture, we will give a brief introduction to online learning and then go
More informationMath-Stat-491-Fall2014-Notes-V
Math-Stat-491-Fall2014-Notes-V Hariharan Narayanan December 7, 2014 Martingales 1 Introduction Martingales were originally introduced into probability theory as a model for fair betting games. Essentially
More informationOPTIMAL BLUFFING FREQUENCIES
OPTIMAL BLUFFING FREQUENCIES RICHARD YEUNG Abstract. We will be investigating a game similar to poker, modeled after a simple game called La Relance. Our analysis will center around finding a strategic
More informationGame Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India August 2012
Game Theory Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India August 2012 Chapter 6: Mixed Strategies and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium
More informationECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017
ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2017 These notes have been used and commented on before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please
More informationNotes on Natural Logic
Notes on Natural Logic Notes for PHIL370 Eric Pacuit November 16, 2012 1 Preliminaries: Trees A tree is a structure T = (T, E), where T is a nonempty set whose elements are called nodes and E is a relation
More informationPath Auction Games When an Agent Can Own Multiple Edges
Path Auction Games When an Agent Can Own Multiple Edges Ye Du Rahul Sami Yaoyun Shi Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan 2260 Hayward Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2121,
More informationMixed Strategies. In the previous chapters we restricted players to using pure strategies and we
6 Mixed Strategies In the previous chapters we restricted players to using pure strategies and we postponed discussing the option that a player may choose to randomize between several of his pure strategies.
More informationTHE TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM FOR MOVING POINTS ON A LINE
THE TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM FOR MOVING POINTS ON A LINE GÜNTER ROTE Abstract. A salesperson wants to visit each of n objects that move on a line at given constant speeds in the shortest possible time,
More informationA brief introduction to evolutionary game theory
A brief introduction to evolutionary game theory Thomas Brihaye UMONS 27 October 2015 Outline 1 An example, three points of view 2 A brief review of strategic games Nash equilibrium et al Symmetric two-player
More informationThe proof of Twin Primes Conjecture. Author: Ramón Ruiz Barcelona, Spain August 2014
The proof of Twin Primes Conjecture Author: Ramón Ruiz Barcelona, Spain Email: ramonruiz1742@gmail.com August 2014 Abstract. Twin Primes Conjecture statement: There are infinitely many primes p such that
More informationOptimization Prof. A. Goswami Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Lecture - 18 PERT
Optimization Prof. A. Goswami Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture - 18 PERT (Refer Slide Time: 00:56) In the last class we completed the C P M critical path analysis
More informationComplexity of Iterated Dominance and a New Definition of Eliminability
Complexity of Iterated Dominance and a New Definition of Eliminability Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 {conitzer, sandholm}@cs.cmu.edu
More informationAbstract stack machines for LL and LR parsing
Abstract stack machines for LL and LR parsing Hayo Thielecke August 13, 2015 Contents Introduction Background and preliminaries Parsing machines LL machine LL(1) machine LR machine Parsing and (non-)deterministic
More informationPermutation Factorizations and Prime Parking Functions
Permutation Factorizations and Prime Parking Functions Amarpreet Rattan Department of Combinatorics and Optimization University of Waterloo Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 arattan@math.uwaterloo.ca June 10,
More informationLaurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA
THE CLASSIFICATION OF DIGITAL COVERING SPACES Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA Abstract. In this paper we classify digital covering spaces using the conjugacy class corresponding to a digital covering space.
More informationX i = 124 MARTINGALES
124 MARTINGALES 5.4. Optimal Sampling Theorem (OST). First I stated it a little vaguely: Theorem 5.12. Suppose that (1) T is a stopping time (2) M n is a martingale wrt the filtration F n (3) certain other
More information