ADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION

Transcription

1

2

3

4 ADVICE LETTER (AL) SUSPENSION NOTICE ENERGY DIVISION Utility Name: SCE Utility Number/Type: U338-E Advice Letter Number(s) 3214-E Date AL(s) Filed) 5/1/15 Utility Contact Person: Darrah Morgan Utility Phone No.: (626) Date Utility Notified: 5/19/15[ X] ed to: ED Staff Contact: Whitney Richardson ED Staff ED Staff Phone No.: (415) [X] INITIAL SUSPENSION (up to 120 DAYS from the expiration of the initial review period) This is to notify that the above-indicated AL is suspended for up to 120 days beginning May 19, 2015 for the following reason(s) below. If the AL requires a Commission resolution and the Commission s deliberation on the resolution prepared by Energy Division extends beyond the expiration of the initial suspension period, the advice letter will be automatically suspended for up to 180 days beyond the initial suspension period. [ ] A Commission Resolution is Required to Dispose of the Advice Letter [ ] Advice Letter Requests a Commission Order [X] Advice Letter Requires Staff Review The expected duration of initial suspension period is 120 days [ ] FURTHER SUSPENSION (up to 180 DAYS beyond initial suspension period) The AL requires a Commission resolution and the Commission s deliberation on the resolution prepared by Energy Division has extended beyond the expiration of the initial suspension period. The advice letter is suspended for up to 180 days beyond the initial suspension period. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Whitney Richardson at whitney.richardson@cpuc.ca.gov cc: EDTariffUnit * Note: reference Decision D , dated February 21, 2002, and Rule 7.5 in appendix A of D.O

5 Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations May 1, 2015 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION SUBJECT: Modification of the California Alternate Rates for Energy and Medical Baseline Exemption to Elements of the Cost Responsibility Surcharge Southern California Edison Company (SCE) hereby submits for filing the following change to its tariffs. The revised tariff sheets are listed on Attachment A and are attached hereto. PURPOSE As liabilities associated with the wholesale market disruption are no longer reflected in SCE rates, SCE has already removed all Energy Crisis-related exemptions from bundled California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and Medical Baseline (MB) customer rates. As such, SCE is revising Schedule DA-CRS, Direct Access Cost Responsibility Surcharge and Schedule CCA-CRS, Community Choice Aggregation Cost Responsibility Surcharge to treat Direct Access (DA), Community Aggregation (CA), and Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), or collectively known as Departing Load, CARE and MB customers in an analogous manner. Because Energy Crisisrelated surcharges have already been similarly removed from Departing Load CARE and MB rates, SCE is requesting the authority to remove the Energy Crisis-related exemptions from Departing Load CARE and MB customer rates. BACKGROUND The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission or CPUC) has historically maintained the principle that analogous bundled service and Departing Load customers should be treated consistently and symmetrically in order to prevent a cost-shift from Departing Load customers to remaining bundled service customers, and to ensure equal treatment of CARE customers regardless of service provider. In Resolution E-3813 (Resolution), the Commission established certain exemptions for Departing Load CARE and MB customers from the Departing Load Cost Responsibility Surcharge P.O. Box Rush Street Rosemead, California (626) Fax (626)

6 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 (CRS) to shield the CARE and MB customers from Energy Crisis-related liabilities protection that the Commission had already granted to their bundled service customer counterparts. As SCE explains herein, the exemption is no longer necessary or relevant. Furthermore, the continued application of the exemption will result in inequitable treatment between bundled service CARE and MB customers and Departing Load CARE and MB customers, and will directly contradict the intent of the Resolution that established the exemption in the first place. A. Symmetric Treatment for Bundled CARE and MB Customers and Departing CARE and MB Customers with Respect to Procurement Obligations Incurred on Their Behalf 1) Energy Crisis-Related Procurement Obligations In response to the wholesale market manipulation that resulted in a significant revenue shortfall, SCE filed an Emergency Rate Stabilization Plan (A ) to request authorization to increase rates. The Commission subsequently adopted a 1 cent/kwh Emergency Procurement Surcharge 1 and a 3 cents/kwh Procurement Energy Surcharge 2 to be collected through generation rates, collectively known as Procurement Related Obligations Account (PROACT) surcharges, 3 to be recovered from customers for SCE s past procurement cost undercollections (Energy Crisis liabilities). In June 2001, the same time period in which the PROACT surcharges were implemented into rates, SCE modified its generation credit billing mechanism for Departing Load customers. Instead of crediting Departing Load customers with the avoided cost of procuring energy, SCE began crediting Departing Load customers with the generation rate of their otherwise applicable tariff (OAT). This approach resulted in Departing Load customers avoiding the PROACT surcharges adopted by the Commission. Because SCE believed that Departing Load customers had also contributed to the Energy Crisis liabilities, SCE proposed to establish a Historical Procurement Charge (HPC) to collect such costs from Departing Load customers. The Commission adopted SCE s proposal and specified the amount to be collected from Departing Load customers, 4 but noted that the overarching issue of Departing Load cost responsibility would be addressed in Rulemaking In D issued 1 Decision (D.) D PROACT was established as a part of SCE s October 2001 Settlement Agreement with the CPUC. The Settlement Agreement found that SCE should be allowed to recover approximately $3,278 million in Energy Crisis liabilities, and established the PROACT to consolidate the accounting of revenues from the Emergency Procurement Surcharge, Procurement Energy Surcharge, and the PROACT balance. The Settlement Agreement was approved in Resolution E D approved SCE s proposal and SCE established the HPC in Advice 1640-E-B.

7 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 later that year, the Commission established the CRS to recover from Departing Load customers their share of the Department of Water Resources Bond Charge (DWRBC), HPC, DWR Power Contracts (DWR Power Charge), above-market costs of Utility Retained Generation (URG) resources and Competition Transition Charge (CTC). In the Decisions that approved the PROACT surcharges, the Commission established that CARE 5 and MB 6 customers should not be held responsible for the Energy Crisis liabilities. As such, the groups were exempted from the Emergency Procurement Surcharge, the Procurement Energy Surcharge, and the DWRBC. Although both D and D were silent on the issue of CRS applicability to Departing Load CARE and MB customers, SCE believed that Departing Load CARE and MB customers should be treated symmetrically with remaining bundled service CARE and MB customers, and as such, explicitly exempted them from DWRBC and HPC in the proposed tariffs included in Advice 1674-E. In Resolution 3813-E approving and adopting the utilities advice letters implementing the CRS pursuant to D , the Energy Division made clear its policy of analogous treatment for bundled service and Departing Load CARE and MB customers by identifying the wholesale market related charges from which all CARE and MB customers were to be exempt. Specifically, the Resolution determined that in addition to the exemption from HPC and DWRBC that SCE proposed, the utilities should exempt Departing Load CARE and MB customers from the DWR power charge as well, because analogous bundled customers are exempt from the 3-cent surcharge. 7 In other words, because the DWR power charge, included in the DA-CRS, corresponded directly with the 3-cent Procurement Energy Surcharge that authorized the utilities to recover Energy Crisis-related liabilities from bundled service customers, Departing Load CARE customers should similarly be exempt from that particular component. The Resolution goes on to say: Our expressed policy is to protect the interests of CARE and medical baseline customers so that they are exempt from rate increases arising from the wholesale market price disruptions. We exempted bundled CARE and medical baseline usage from the 3-cent surcharge in D Thus we clarify our intent to exempt CARE and Medical baseline DA customers from all components of the DA CRS, except for the CTC charges to be determined in the DA CRS Cap Proceeding, R This exemption will be effective on a going forward basis. 8 This language reveals that the intent of the exemption was to treat bundled service CARE and MB customers and Departing Load CARE and MB customers in a 5 D at page 24; D at page D at page Resolution E-3813 at Page Resolution E-3813 at P. 20, emphasis added.

8 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 comparable way by excluding all CARE and MB customers, regardless of service provider, from paying for Energy Crisis-related liabilities, and to specifically exempt Departing Load CARE and MB customers from paying the HPC, DWR Power Charge, and DWRBC components of the CRS accordingly. The intent of the Resolution, however, was not to generally exempt departing CARE customers from all stranded costs associated with their departure, as exhibited by the continued requirement for Departing load customers to pay CTC. Based on this Resolution, the utilities maintained this treatment for DA -- and later CA and CCA -- CARE and MB customers by exempting them from the DA-CRS Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) rate component, the successor to the DWR Power Charge, when it was instituted pursuant to D However, it is imperative to note that although the nomenclature has remained the same since the establishment of the DA-CRS in D , the composition of the contracts within the SCE portfolio has changed dramatically. In 2003, SCE s portfolio consisted almost exclusively of DWR contracts related to the energy crisis. As such, Departing Load CARE and MB customers were appropriately exempted from paying the HPC, DWRBC, and DWR Power Charge components of the DA-CRS. They were not, however, exempt from paying the CTC which recovers the above-market costs of utility contracts signed prior to deregulation. Today s portfolio, on the other hand, consists almost exclusively of utility-owned generation and post-energy Crisis purchased power procurement contracts, as will be described in the next section. SCE believes the current treatment of Departing Load customers is no longer appropriate because the Departing Load CARE and MB exemption to the DWR Power Charge, and later the PCIA, essentially represents an explicit exemption from Energy Crisis-related liabilities that have not been a part of the SCE portfolio since ) Non-Energy-Crisis-Related Procurement Obligations The full costs of SCE s utility-owned generation and purchased power contracts are recovered from bundled service customers through their generation rate component, irrespective of whether the generation assets are considered below-market or abovemarket relative to a market price benchmark. Pursuant to D , any abovemarket costs 10 related to generation procured on behalf of Departing Load customers before their departure are collected from those customers through the CRS. As will be explained in further detail in Section B, the Non-CARE generation rate used to calculate the appropriate CARE discount for bundled service CARE customers includes the costs of all generation assets, including the above-market pieces of any assets that are deemed to be uneconomic in the CRS calculation. Although bundled service CARE customers are granted a certain amount of relief from uneconomic 9 SCE s DWR contracts expired in Above-market costs as defined by Resolution E-4475.

9 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 generation, specifically, the same 32.5 percent relief they receive from all SCE costs, they are not exempt from the above-market generation costs completely. Bundled service MB customers today receive an additional baseline allocation of 16.5 kwh per day, and are billed in accordance with the terms and conditions of their OAT, except that they are exempt from DWRBC. As such, the cost of all generation assets, regardless of whether they would be considered below-market or above-market based on the CRS calculation criteria, are included in their generation rate. Exempting Departing Load CARE and MB customers from the PCIA charge entirely would effectively be absolving them of responsibility for all above-market costs incurred by SCE on their behalf, a result that is asymmetric with the rate treatment afforded their bundled service CARE and MB customer counterparts. In other words, exempting Departing Load CARE and MB customers from the PCIA charge entirely inappropriately shifts costs to remaining bundled service customers including remaining CARE and MB bundled service customers which is inconsistent with the Commission precedent and policy discussed above. B. Symmetric Treatment for Bundled Service CARE Customers and Departing CARE Customers with Respect to Ratemaking and the Effective CARE Discount In order to ensure that CARE customers, regardless of service provider, receive the state mandated percent 11 discount on their total electricity bill, SCE has implemented the following methodology to set CARE rates. 12 Total rates for Domestic CARE Tiers 1 and 2 are set at a discount of 35 percent to the total Energy Rates, i.e. inclusive of delivery charges and generation charges, for non-care Tiers 1 and 2, respectively. The CARE Tier 3 Energy Rate is set residually, such that the average effective CARE discount equals 32.5 percent. 13 The difference in each Tier between the total non-care Energy Rates and CARE Energy Rates is defined as the CARE Discount. The CARE Discount is then subtracted from the non-care distribution rate component to set the CARE distribution rate component. In other words, the full CARE discount is applied in the distribution rate component, and all other delivery rate components are the same for CARE and non-care customers alike. 11 California Assembly Bill Approved by the Commission in D To calculate the Tier 3 rate, SCE calculates the total amount of revenue that would be collected from the domestic class as a whole if there were no CARE program (i.e., total system sales are multiplied by the delivery non-care domestic rate, and total bundled service sales are multiplied by the generation non-care domestic rate), and reduces that revenue by 32.5 percent to determine an estimated CARE revenue (i.e., the amount that would be collected if all domestic customers were CARE customers). SCE then uses the defined CARE Tiers 1 and 2 rates and multiplies that by the domestic billing determinants to calculate the revenue to be collected from CARE Tiers 1 and 2, and determines the Tier 3 rate necessary to collect the remainder of the estimated CARE revenue.

10 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 This distinctive rate design methodology provides bundled service and Departing Load CARE customers with the appropriate discount. In fact, the Commission contemplated this treatment when it addressed CCA issues 14 as a whole in D Specifically, the Commission directed the utilities to set CCA CARE rates in the following manner: The discount [will] apply to all elements of a customer s bill, including the [departing load] portion, but the discount [will] be applied only to the distribution rate. The utilities [will] calculate the generation portion of their CARE discount using their own generation rates. 15 The Decision further states that the discount should not be reflected in the CRS. 16 In other words, Departing Load customers already receive CARE discounts equivalent to the ones they would have received had they remained bundled service customers. Granting Departing Load CARE customers a discount on top of the one they already receive in their CARE distribution rates by exempting them entirely from the PCIA would thus result in an effective CARE discount that is greater than the discount that bundled service CARE customers receive. PROPOSED TARIFF CHANGES SCE proposes to modify the Special Conditions of Schedules DA-CRS and CCA-CRS to specify that CARE and Medical Baseline customers are exempt from the DWRBC, but are not exempt from the PCIA. 17 TIER DESIGNATION Pursuant to General Order (GO) 96-B, Energy Industry Rule 5.2, this advice letter is submitted with a Tier 2 designation. 14 SCE notes that the continued application of the exemption would also result in disparate treatment across CCAs, as well. Any potential CCA with a high percentage of CARE customers would have more flexibility in their pricing than a potential CCA with a low percentage of CARE customers. 15 D at page D at page Please note, both bundled and Departing Load CARE and MB customers will continue to be exempt from the DWRBC, California Solar Incentive Surcharge and CARE Surcharge.

11 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 EFFECTIVE DATE This advice filing will become effective on May 31, 2015, the 30 th calendar day after the date filed. Parties have recently filed a motion in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company s (PG&E) 2015 Energy Resource Recovery Account (ERRA) Proceeding Phase 2 in an attempt to address the inconsistent application of PCIA among the IOUs. 18 As SCE has stated in its Responses, SCE believes that this issue is not within the scope of an ERRA proceeding, and has sought to remedy this inconsistency through the Advice Letter process. In addition, Lancaster Choice Energy will be phasing in the majority of their Residential customers in October In order to ensure that potential CCA customers are well informed of the applicable charges prior to the date of their scheduled cut-over, SCE urges the Energy Division to consider this request and act expeditiously. NOTICE Anyone wishing to protest this advice filing may do so by letter via U.S. Mail, facsimile, or electronically, any of which must be received no later than 20 days after the date of this advice filing. Protests should be submitted to: CPUC, Energy Division Attention: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California EDTariffUnit@cpuc.ca.gov Copies should also be mailed to the attention of the Director, Energy Division, Room 4004 (same address above). In addition, protests and all other correspondence regarding this advice letter should also be sent by letter and transmitted via facsimile or electronically to the attention of: Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company 8631 Rush Street Rosemead, California Facsimile: (626) AdviceTariffManager@sce.com 18 Marin Clean Energy and Communities for a Better Environment Joint Motion to Amend scope

12 ADVICE 3214-E (U 338-E) May 1, 2015 Michael R. Hoover Director, State Regulatory Affairs c/o Karyn Gansecki Southern California Edison Company 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2030 San Francisco, California Facsimile: (415) Karyn.Gansecki@sce.com There are no restrictions on who may file a protest, but the protest must set forth specifically the grounds upon which it is based and must be received by the deadline shown above. In accordance with General Rule 4 of GO 96-B, SCE is serving copies of this advice filing to the interested parties shown on the attached GO 96-B, A et al and A et al service lists. Address change requests to the GO 96-B service list should be directed by electronic mail to AdviceTariffManager@sce.com or at (626) For changes to all other service lists, please contact the Commission s Process Office at (415) or by electronic mail at Process_Office@cpuc.ca.gov. Further, in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 491, notice to the public is hereby given by filing and keeping the advice filing at SCE s corporate headquarters. To view other SCE advice letters filed with the Commission, log on to SCE s web site at For questions, please contact Desiree Wong at (626) or by electronic mail at Desiree.Wong@sce.com or Robert Thomas at (626) or by electronic mail at Robert.Thomas@sce.com. Southern California Edison Company /s/ Russell G. Worden Russell G. Worden RGW:dw/rt:jm Enclosures

13 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ADVICE LETTER FILING SUMMARY ENERGY UTILITY MUST BE COMPLETED BY UTILITY (Attach additional pages as needed) Company name/cpuc Utility No.: Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) Utility type: Contact Person: Darrah Morgan ELC GAS Phone #: (626) PLC HEAT WATER Disposition Notice to: EXPLANATION OF UTILITY TYPE ELC = Electric GAS = Gas PLC = Pipeline HEAT = Heat WATER = Water (Date Filed/ Received Stamp by CPUC) Advice Letter (AL) #: 3214-E Tier Designation: 2 Subject of AL: Modification of the California Alternate Rates for Energy and Medical Baseline Exemption to Elements of the Cost Responsibility Surcharge Keywords (choose from CPUC listing): CARE AL filing type: Monthly Quarterly Annual One-Time Other If AL filed in compliance with a Commission order, indicate relevant Decision/Resolution #: Does AL replace a withdrawn or rejected AL? If so, identify the prior AL: Summarize differences between the AL and the prior withdrawn or rejected AL: Confidential treatment requested? Yes No If yes, specification of confidential information: Confidential information will be made available to appropriate parties who execute a nondisclosure agreement. Name and contact information to request nondisclosure agreement/access to confidential information: Resolution Required? Yes No Requested effective date: 5/31/15 No. of tariff sheets: -4- Estimated system annual revenue effect: (%): Estimated system average rate effect (%): When rates are affected by AL, include attachment in AL showing average rate effects on customer classes (residential, small commercial, large C/I, agricultural, lighting). Tariff schedules affected: Service affected and changes proposed 1 : Pending advice letters that revise the same tariff sheets: Schedule CCA-CRS, Schedule DA-CRS and Table of Contents None 1 Discuss in AL if more space is needed.

14 Protests and all other correspondence regarding this AL are due no later than 20 days after the date of this filing, unless otherwise authorized by the Commission, and shall be sent to: CPUC, Energy Division Attention: Tariff Unit 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, California Russell G. Worden Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company 8631 Rush Street Rosemead, California Facsimile: (626) Michael R. Hoover Director, State Regulatory Affairs c/o Karyn Gansecki Southern California Edison Company 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2030 San Francisco, California Facsimile: (415)

15 Public Utilities Commission 3214-E Attachment A Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. Title of Sheet Cancelling Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. Revised E Schedule CCA-CRS Revised E Revised E Schedule DA-CRS Revised E Revised E Table of Contents Revised E Revised E Table of Contents Revised E 1

16 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E RATES (Continued) Schedule CCA-CRS Sheet 11 COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION COST RESPONSIBILITY SURCHARGE (Continued) The components of Schedule CCA-CRS are as follows: 1. DWRBC is the Department of Water Resources Bond Charge to recover the interest and principal of DWR bonds. 2. CTC is the Ongoing Competition Transition Charge which recovers the above market costs of utility generation. 3. Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA): Either a charge or credit, designed to maintain bundled customer indifference associated with other customers departing bundled utility service. The PCIA is determined residually by subtracting the authorized CTC revenue component of the DA-CRS revenues from the Indifference Amount developed in accordance with the D , as modified by D The Indifference Amount reflects the extent to which the average cost of the SCE total generation portfolio, differs from a Market Price Benchmark developed by the Commission. The Indifference Amount is negative when the departure of a customer for DA service results in lower resource costs for the remaining bundled service customers. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and medical baseline eligible CCA customers are treated in a similar manner to Direct Access customers with respect to CRS. Thus, CARE and medical baseline eligible CCA Service Customers are exempt from the DWRBC. (D) 2. Continuous DA customers who opt-in to CCA shall retain their continuous DA status and remain exempt from the DWRBC, and the PCIA components contained in this Schedule. 3. The DA-CRS undercollection (DA-CRS-UC) provisions of schedule DA-CRS are applicable to Bundle Service and CCA Service customers, including Transitional Bundled Service (TBS) customers served concurrently under Schedule PC-TBS, who as past Direct Access Customers are responsible for payment of the DA-CRS-UC. 4. Pursuant to Section 8.b of the Amended and Restated Agreement to Implement Assembly Bill 80, until such time that the aggregate annual load of customers served by the City of Cerritos Community Aggregator reaches or exceeds 110,000 megawatt-hours, all such customers are assigned 2004 vintage for purposes of CRS applicability. Any customer account subsequently initiating service with the City of Cerritos Community Aggregator will be assigned a CCA-CRS vintage based on the criteria set forth in the RATES section. (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3214-E R. O. Nichols Date Filed May 1, 2015 Decision Senior Vice President Effective Oct 6, R8 Resolution

17 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Schedule DA-CRS Sheet 20 DIRECT ACCESS COST RESPONSIBILITY SURCHARGE RATES (Continued) (Continued) A. Direct Access Cost Responsibility Surcharge (DA-CRS): (Continued) Pursuant to D , for 2001 vintage customers that were not continuously DA from February 1, 2001 to September 20, 2001, the DA-CRS was established at an interim level of 2.7 cents/kwh. The DA-CRS is determined by multiplying the customer s total kwh for the billing period by the sum of the applicable CRS components from the DA CRS component table for the applicable vintage. California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and medical baseline eligible DA customers are exempt from the DWR Bond Charge. (D) DA-eligible customers, both continuous and non-continuous, who provide notice of their intent to switch to DA service pursuant to Rule 22.1, Switching Exemption Guidelines are assigned a vintaged CRS as described below. Except as explained below for the Open Enrollment Window approved in D DA-eligible customers currently receiving bundled service are required to submit the Six-Month Notice to Transfer to Direct Access Service Form prior to transferring to DA service. Resolution E-4226 resolved the basis of CRS vintaging. The submittal date of the Six-Month Advance Notice establishes the CRS vintage, provided the notice is accepted by SCE. Customers with submittal dates for accepted notices in the first six months of the calendar year are assigned the CRS vintage for the prior year. If the submittal occurs on July 1 or later, the customer is assigned the CRS vintage of the current year beginning with the 2009 vintage. Any customer taking service or submitting their Six-Month Notice prior to July 1, 2009 is assigned the 2001 vintage. Any customer requesting DA service from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010 is assigned the 2009 vintage, and so on with 2010 and beyond. There are two CRS schedules for each vintage year: Continuous, and Non-Continuous. The 2001 Vintage Continuous DA Customers pay only the Ongoing CTC. The 2001 Vintage Non- Continuous DA Customers and successive vintages pay some combination of the DWR Bond Charge, the Power Cost Indifference Adjustment for DWR resources, and the DA Undercollection Charge (UC). (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3214-E R. O. Nichols Date Filed May 1, 2015 Decision Senior Vice President Effective Oct 6, R8 Resolution

18 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E TABLE OF CONTENTS Sheet 1 Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. TITLE PAGE E TABLE OF CONTENTS - RATE SCHEDULES E E TABLE OF CONTENTS - LIST OF CONTRACTS AND DEVIATIONS E TABLE OF CONTENTS - RULES E TABLE OF CONTENTS - INDEX OF COMMUNITIES, MAPS, BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS... (T) (T) E TABLE OF CONTENTS - SAMPLE FORMS E E PRELIMINARY STATEMENT: A. Territory Served E B. Description of Service E C. Procedure to Obtain Service E D. Establishment of Credit and Deposits E E. General E F. Symbols E G. Gross Revenue Sharing Mechanism E E H. Baseline Service E I. Not In Use... -E J. Not In Use... -E K. Nuclear Decommissioning Adjustment Mechanism E L. Purchase Agreement Administrative Costs Balancing Account E M. Income Tax Component of Contributions E N. Memorandum Accounts E E E E E E E E O. California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) Adjustment Clause E E P. Optional Pricing Adjustment Clause (OPAC) E (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3214-E R. O. Nichols Date Filed May 1, 2015 Decision Senior Vice President Effective Oct 6, R8 Resolution

19 Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E TABLE OF CONTENTS Sheet 8 (Continued) RATE SCHEDULES (Continued) Schedule Cal. P.U.C. No. Title of Sheet Sheet No. OTHER BG-NEM Experimental Biogas Net Energy Metering E E BSC-IMO Bundled Service Customer-Interval Meter Ownership E CBP Capacity Bidding Program E E CCA-CRS Community Choice Aggregation Cost Responsibility Surcharge E E CCA-INFO Community Choice Aggregation-Information Fees E CCA-SF Community Choice Aggregation Service Fees E E CC-DSF Customer Choice - Discretionary Service Fees E E CGDL-CRS Customer Generation Departing Load Cost Responsibility Surcharge E E CHP Combined Heat and Power Excess Energy Purchase E E CPP Critical Peak Pricing E CREST California Renewable Energy Small Tariff E DA-CRS Direct Access Cost Responsibility Surcharge E E E DAEBSC-CRS Direct Access Eligible Bundled Service Customers-Cost Responsibility Surcharge E DA-LRATC Direct Access Local Resource Adequacy Transfer Credit E DA-RCSC Direct Access Revenue Cycle Services Credits E E DBP Demand Bidding Program E DL-NBC Departing Load - Nonbypassable Charges E EITE Emissions-Intensive and Trade-Exposed Customer Greenhouse Gas Allowance Revenue Provisions E ESP-DSF Energy Service Provider - Discretionary Service Fees E E ESP-NDSF Energy Service Provider - Non Discretionary Service Fees E FC-NEM Fuel Cell Electrical Generating Facility Net Energy Metering & E Interconnection Agreement E GMS Generation Municipal Surcharge E (T) (T) (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3214-E R. O. Nichols Date Filed May 1, 2015 Decision Senior Vice President Effective Oct 6, R8 Resolution