WP7. EIP and Leveraging policies externally

Transcription

1 WP7. EIP and Leveraging policies externally I3U Project Steering Meeting and Stakeholders Meeting, Zagreb, September 2016 This project is co-funded by the European Union

2 WP7: EIP and Leveraging policies externally: review of the Workpackage activities (WP Leader: WERI-SGH) Evaluation of direct and dynamic effects of the EU policy actions that promote stronger cooperation in innovation activities internal cooperation: pooling internal EU resources and efforts external cooperation (with third countries) Commitment 29. European Innovation Partnerships (WIIW) Commitment 30. Retaining and Attracting International Talent (TIK) Commitment 31. Scientific Cooperation with Third Countries (EIZ) Commitment 32. Roll-out global research infrastructures (WERI-SGH)- related to Com. 5 (WP2) Construct the priority European research infrastructures (WERI-SGH)

3 Work in progress Task 7.2 Review of actions that have been undertaken in order to implement the Innovation Union commitments # assessment of the state of implementation of the commitments # will be conducted collection of data that will allow to measure the results of individual commitments. Task 7.3 Analysis of the direct impact of commitment implementation on innovation in EU. Direct impact assessment for the commitments #29 to #32 (individually).

4 Commitment 5 Construct the priority European research infrastructures Arkadiusz Michał Kowalski (WERI-SGH) "By 2015, Member States together with the Commission should have completed or launched the construction of 60% of the priority European research infrastructures currently identified by the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). The potential for innovation of these (and ICT and other) infrastructures should be increased. The Member States are invited to review their Operational Programmes to facilitate the use of cohesion policy money for this purpose. Three main issues in Commitment 5: 1) completion or launching the construction of 60% of 44 priority ESFRI Roadmap 2008 research infrastructures; 2) increasing the potential of all research infrastructures in Europe, mostly by encouraging common investments, and pooling resources; 3) contributing to European innovativeness.

5 Commitment 5 Construct the priority European research infrastructures The state of Commitment 5 implementation 44 ESFRI research infrastructures identified in ESFRI Roadmap 2008 (mentioned in the Commitment 5 of the Innovation Union) current state of implementation FIELD Operational Under construction Not inititiated Social Sciences and Humanities Environmental Sciences Energy Biological and Medical Sciences Materials and Analytical Facilities Physical Sciences and Engineering e-infrastructures Total Total Total (%) 75% 25% 100%

6 Pooling the resources across Europe common investments in research infrastructures Years Financing from EU part INFRA (EUR) Project total budget (EUR) Leverage FP7 Ad Hoc Overall FP H2020 Ad Hoc INFRAIA Overall H2020 (until ) Source: own elaboration based on financial data from CP UE in Poland. Financial data on allocation of funds to projects implemented by RI in the framework of FP7 (part INFRA) and Horizon 2020 for are used to calculate leverage effect, which shows how many EUR spending from other sources were generated by 1 EUR spending from EU framework programs.

7 Average budget per participant Figure 1. Distribution of FP7 budget, part INFRA, UE, EFTA countries Switzerland France UK Cyprus Luksemburg Estonia Croatia Irlandia Finland Austria CzR Denmark Norway Hungary Portugal Latvia Bulgaria Lithuania Romania Malta 0 Poland Belgium Sweden Greece Iceland Slovenia Slovakia Netherlands Spain Italy Germany Number of financed participants Source: own elaboration based on financial data from CP UE in Poland.

8 Average budget per participant Figure 2. Distribution of H2020 budget, part INFRA, UE, EFTA, data till Slovenia Romania Estonia Malta Latvia Cyprus Croatia Lithuania Denmark CzR Austria Ireland Bulgaria Hungary Sweden Finland Belgium Portugal Slovakia Luksemburg Greece Norway Switzerland Poland Netherlands Spain Italy France UK Germany Number of financed participants Source: own elaboration based on financial data from CP UE in Poland.

9 Commitment 32 Towards global research infrastrutures (Małgorzata Stefania Lewandowska (WERI-SGH) Commitment 32. The European Union should step up its cooperation on the roll-out of the global research infrastructures. By 2012, agreement should be reached with international partners on the development of research infrastructures, which owing to cost, complexity and/or interoperability requirements can only be developed on a global scale. European Commission recommendation regarding the choice of Global Research Infrastructures:... In this respect the recommendations of the Carnegie Group of Senior Officials* on Global Research Infrastructures had to be taken into account COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 17633/12, Competitiveness Council of 11 December 2012, Proposal for a Council decision establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ( ), p. 5 *The Carnegie Group is composed of the science ministers and senior officials from the G8 nations and some others including the European Commission

10 Table 2. Twelve Global Research Infrastructures chosen based on GSO recommendation (for full names of global infrastructures see: Appendix) Feature Social Science Envir. Science Biological and Medical Science Materials and Analytical Facilities Physical Science and Engineering Abbr. IPERION EPOS ELIXIR EMBL IMPC ESS PETRA III ESO ISIS LNGS SKA SPIRIAL 2 Recomm. by GSO GSO; ESFRI GRI Type Distribu Distribu ted ted GSO; ESFRI Distribu ted GSO Distribu ted GSO; ESFRI Distribu ted GSO; ESFRI Distribu ted GSO Single sited GSO; ESFRI Distribu ted GSO GSO GSO; ESFRI Single Single Distribu sited sited ted GSO; ESFRI Single sited Location 12 EUs IT UK; DE, UK, IT SE DE DE UK IT UK FR countries DE FR, IT Life cycle Constr. Constr. Oper. Oper. Oper. Constr. Oper. Oper. Oper. Oper. Constr. Oper. FP7 INFRA NO YES YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO YES YES H2020 YES YES YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO YES NO INFRA No of EU No of non EU %Internatio nalisation Source: own elaboration. 8% 16% 16% 22% 54% 13% 48% 18% 53% 47% 68% 44% GSO Group of Senior Officials set up at G8 in 2008; ESFRI European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures set up in 2002.

11 Commitment 32 Towards global research infrastructures The state of Commitment 32 implementation 1. The financial framework analysis financial data from FP7 and H2020 till Number of financed Average financing per Total financing Size of the projects Financing to GRI participants* participant Financing to GRI from FP7 (5 GRI out of 12) Relation to FP7 0.09% 80.21% 0.05% 0.16% Relation to FP7 part INFRA 2% 93% 2% 3% Financing to GRI from H2020 (5/12) Relation to H2020 till % % 0.42% 0.96% Relation to H2020 part INFRA 8% 216% 12% 20% 2. The legal framework analysis documents and organisational / institutional initiatives introduced by EC and GSO Documents related to GRI 6 prepared by EC 5 prepared by GSO Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Research Infrastructure; Group of Senior Organisational / institutional initiatives related Officials on Global Research Infrastructures (GSO); Expert Group on Cost Control and to GRI Management; European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) 3. The participation framework analysis state of internationalisation Total number of participants* in 12 GRI in (2010) 253 (2015) Number of international participants (countries outside EU) in 12 GRI State and rate of internationalisation 61 (2010) (33%) 91 (2010) (36%) Source: own elaboration based on financial data from CP UE in Poland, documents and web sites. *Participant in case of financing means organisation; **Participant in case of internationalisation means country

12 Financing from FP7 and H2020 Figure 3. Budgets of related projects to ESFRI Roadmap 2008 research infrastructures and financing from FP7 and H2020 (till ) PRACE ELIXIR ESS EPOS SPIRAL EMBRC SHARE SKA KM3NeT EuroBioImaging ECRIN LIFEWATCH CLARIN BBMRI Number of financed participants Source: own elaboration

13 Financing from EU Figure 4. Budgets of projects related to Global Research Infrastructures cofinanced by FP7 and H2020 (till ), changes among two sources Brightn ESS, H ELIXIR-EXCELERATE, H PREPSKA, GOSKA, ISKAF2010; FP EPOS IP, H IPERION CH, H IN-SKA, H NEUTRONSOURCEESS, FP EPOS, FP SPIRAL2PP, FP ELIXIR, FP Source: own elaboration Number of financed participants

14 Conclusions Conclusions related to Commitment 5: Conclusions related to Commitment 32: Innovation Union Commitment 5 was fulfilled in terms of the number of RIs completed or launched, exceeding even agreed target of 60% of RIs from ESFRI Roadmap 2008 (actually 75% were at least initiated). Total financing from H2020 related to selected GRIs already tripled in relations to FP7. Number of financed participants is already higher, the average financing per participant is higher than in FP7. Projects realized by RIs under EU framework programs involved huge investments of funds from other sources (pooling resources): - 1 EUR spending from FP7 (part INFRA) involved on average 37.7 EUR total spending on co-financed projects, - 1 EUR spending on RI from H2020 (until May 2016) was connected with EUR of total spending on realized projects. There is a strong discrepancy in EU framework programs (part INFRA) funds allocation between Western European and CEE countries, which may increase the gap in innovation ability between EU member states. The legal framework (11 documents) as well as organisational / institutional initiatives sets the stage for further international cooperation of GRIs. The internationalisation level for 12 GRIs is moderate (36%) but there are GRIs like SKA; ISIS and EMBL where it exceeds 50% (data for 2015). The internationalisation paste is moderate: the involvement of international partners changed from 61 (33%) in 2010 to 91 (36%) in 2015.

15 Research Plan for Commitment 5 and Commitment 32 Direct impact assessment I. DESK RESEARCH - 12 Global Research Infrastructures profiles (Establishment; Enlargement; Legal relationship with European Union; The scope of financing; Geographical partnership) related to Com32 II. FIELD RESEARCH - Quantitative analysis - based on structured questionnaires related to Com 5 and 32 Tool Respondents Sample Method applied Structured questionnaire Representatives of research infrastructures premises RI from MERIL database on research infrastructures (RIs) in Europe of more than national relevance: CAWI/ CATI Structured questionnaire Representatives of research infrastructures users (universities; enterprises; public bodies; research organisations) N=594 Organisations financed from FP7 or/and H2020 part INFRA: N=6 898 CAWI QUESTIONNAIRES READY; DATA BASES THE FIRST ALMOST READY; THE SECOND READY; START OF THE FIELD RESEARCH: OCTOBER 2016 Direct impact assessment - the relationship between the activity of RI and GRI in achieving the stated policy targets (the short-term, direct impacts and medium to longer-term indirect impacts) in terms of [(1) innovation; (2) European and national competitiveness; (3) creation of employment, (4) science, (5) society, (6) to tackle global challenges].

16 Thank you

17 Appendix Full names of 12 GRI: IPERION - Integrated Platform for the European Research Infrastructure on Cultural Heritage; EPOS - European Plate Observing System; ELIXIR - European Life-Science Infrastructure For Biological Information; EMBL - European Molecular Biology Laboratory; IMPC - International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium; ESS - International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium; PETRA III - PETRA III at DESY (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron); ESO - European Southern Observatory; ISIS - a world-leading centre for research in the physical and life sciences at the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory near Oxford; LNGS - Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso; SKA - The Square Kilometre Array; SPIRAL 2 - Système de Production d Ions Radioactifs et Ligne de 2éme generation.