5-Year Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "5-Year Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023"

Transcription

1 5-Year Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

2 City Council Steve Miller, Mayor Jeannie Bruins, Vice Mayor Bret Daniels, Council Member Albert J. Fox, Council Member Jeff Slowey, Council Member City Manager Christopher W. Boyd City Attorney Ruthann Ziegler Department Directors Ron Lawrence, Chief of Police Ronda Rivera, Assistant City Manager Rhonda Sherman, Community Services Director CIP Development Staff Leslie Blomquist, Senior Civil/Traffic Engineer Regina Cave, Operations Manager Katherine Cooley, Assistant to the City Manager Stephanie Cotter, Development Specialist Stuart Hodgkins, City Engineer Chris Myers, Facilities & Grounds Manager Mary Poole, Operations Manager Devon Rodriguez, Economic Development Manager Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

3 I. Message from the City Manager II. Summaries: Capital Improvement Program 5 Year Estimated Funding... 1 Current Year (FY 2018/2019) Project Funding by Source... 2 III. Transportation Capital Projects Summary of Transportation Capital Projects... 4 Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)... 5 Annual Accessibility Program (ADA, Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter and Drain Inlets)... 6 Auburn Boulevard Enhancements... 8 Citrus Heights Electric Greenway Mariposa Avenue Safe Routes to School Old Auburn Complete Streets Plan Pavement Restoration Sunrise Blvd Rehabilitation and Complete Streets Traffic Control, Neighborhood Safety, Accessibility & Walkability Various Signalized Intersection Safety Improvements IV. Transportation Maintenance Projects Summary of Transportation Maintenance Projects City Landscape Enhancements Citywide Landscape Maintenance Services Street Lighting Energy Efficient Conversion Program Street Lighting Maintenance and Replacement Program Street Sweeping Traffic Signal Maintenance Transportation Maintenance (Contracts) Tree Arborist, Maintenance and Preservation Services Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

4 V. Storm Water Capital Projects Summary of Drainage Capital Projects Neighborhood Areas Drainage Master Plan Neighborhood Areas 8, 9, & 10 Master Plan Implementation Neighborhood Creek Bank Restoration Program Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program VI. Storm Water Maintenance Projects Summary of Drainage Maintenance Projects Open Space, Creek and Channel Maintenance Storm Water Maintenance Services VII. General Purpose Projects Summary of General Purpose Projects Activate Auburn Program Economic Development Incentive Initiative First Time Homebuyers Program Housing Rehabilitation Program Neighborhood Improvement Program Sayonara Redevelopment Project Stock Ranch VIII. Descriptions of Major Funding Sources Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

5 MESSAGE FROM THE CITY MANAGER Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

6 CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS 6360 Fountain Square Drive Citrus Heights, CA (916) Fax (916) TTY/TDD: California Relay Service The City of Citrus Heights is committed to providing high quality, economical, responsive city services to our community. April 20, 2018 RE: Overview of 2018/ /23 Citrus Heights Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: The City of Citrus Heights Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FYs 2018/ /2023 allocates existing funds and anticipated revenues to rehabilitate, restore, improve and add to the City's infrastructure. Projects in the CIP cover a wide range of capital improvements, including: Transportation, Stormwater, and General Purpose. The CIP covers a five-year planning horizon, and is updated each year to reflect on-going changes. The document, prepared by City staff based on submissions from City departments, is approved by the Planning Commission, and then submitted to the City Council for final adoption, along with the City's annual budget. The Five-Year Plan does not appropriate funds, but rather functions as a budgeting and planning tool, supporting the actual appropriations made through adoption of the budget. With regard to the CIP s annual development, criteria used in prioritizing and including capital and maintenance projects and programs include: Consistency with the City s General Plan; Programs and services directly benefitting residents; Direct benefit to neighborhoods; Support of economic development; Increases the City's capacity to provide services to residents; Program and project funding that is leveraged by external funding sources; and Consistency with the City's financial policies and condition. The 2018/ /2023 CIP is organized around several project categories. The categories and noteworthy projects include: Transportation Capital Projects, including continuing design and right of way acquisitions for the next phase of Auburn Boulevard Rusch Park to the North City Limits; completing construction of Sunrise Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 2(A) Project; constructing Mariposa Safe Routes to School Phase III; initiating preliminary engineering Steve Miller, Mayor Jeannie Bruins, Vice Mayor Bret Daniels, Council Member Albert J. Fox, Council Member Jeff Slowey, Council Member Christopher W. Boyd, City Manager Ruthann Ziegler, City Attorney

7 Overview of 2018/ /23 Citrus Heights Capital Improvement Program (CIP) April 2018 Page 2 and environmental for Mariposa Safe Routes to School Phase IV; and initiating design and environmental for the Electric Greenway Project. Transportation Maintenance, including continued efforts on citywide Tree Maintenance and Preservation and the Street Lighting Energy Efficiency Program, which will continue to replacement city-owned street lights with LED technology utilizing the California Energy Conservation loan program. Storm Water Capital Projects including continued implementation of Neighborhood Drainage Master Plans; and Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation. Storm Water Maintenance, including the Open Space, Creek and Channel Maintenance. General Purpose Projects, including the Activate Auburn Program, and the Economic Development Incentive Initiative. This year s CIP update represents the City of Citrus Heights ongoing commitment to seek grant funding opportunities by leveraging local dollars in an effort to deliver much needed infrastructure investments for our community. I look forward to the continued work with City Council, staff and the community in implementing the projects and programs designated for the upcoming year, and working to promote economic development in Citrus Heights. Respectfully Submitted, Christopher W. Boyd City Manager

8 SUMMARIES OF CAPITAL & MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

9 ESTIMATED FUNDING FOR ALL PROJECTS CATEGORY 2018/ / / / /2023 TOTALS Transportation Capital $7,880,553 $1,958,940 $8,991,000 $5,680,000 $8,180,000 $32,690,493 Transportation Maintenance $2,128,797 $1,082,717 $1,085,185 $1,067,727 $1,070,344 $6,434,770 Drainage Capital $1,961,000 $1,900,000 $1,590,000 $1,854,000 $1,115,000 $8,420,000 Drainage Maintenance $865,311 $813,173 $763,173 $763,173 $763,173 $3,968,003 General Purpose $1,777,570 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $2,369,570 TOTAL: $14,613,231 $5,902,830 $12,577,358 $9,512,900 $11,276,517 1 P a g e

10 PROJECT FUNDING BY SOURCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL Activ e Transportation Highway Safety Imp. Measure A Capital Measure A Capital Measure A Park Impact Road Maint. Roadway SACOG Bike/Ped SACOG Local / Regional Sustainable Storm Water Communities Transit Impact TDA Bike and Project Program Grant CDBG Gas Tax Grants (Bike/Ped) (Traffic) Maintenance Fees RedFlex Funds Rehab (SB1) Impact Funds Grant Grant Utility Fund Grant Fees Ped Adv anced Traffic Management System $13,000 Annual Accessibility Program $360,000 $50,000 $100,000 Auburn Boulev ard Complete Streets - Phase II $65,000 $1,500,000 $107,050 Citrus Heights Electric Greenway $350,000 $25,000 $40,000 Old Auburn Complete Streets Plan $155,000 $5,850 Pav ement Restoration $100,000 $100,000 $144,942,000 Mariposa Safe Routes to School Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Phase 3 - Northridge to Eastgate $129,558 $129,559 $60,000 $870,049 $372,192 $194,079 Phase 4 - Skyrcrest Elementary to Madison $109,000 $26,000 Sunrise Blv d Rehabilitation Complete Streets Phase 2A - Locher to Sayonara $150,000 $82,940 $31,500 $105,000 $225,900 $92,156 $30,000 $159,778 Traffic Control, Neighborhood Safety, Accessibility and Walkability $40,000 $30,000 $122,000 $5,000 Various Signalized Intersection Safety Improv ements $40,000 $486,000 $71,000 $459,000 $360,000 $290,000 $568,940 $187,058 $370,599 $375,900 $40,000 $30,000 $144,942,000 $65,000 $870,049 $1,500,000 $671,398 $277,000 $30,000 $364,707 TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE California General Energy Capital Tree Mitigation Commission Citrus Heights Improv ement Measure A Storm Water Impact Fee Project Loan Lighting District Gas Tax Funds LMAD's Maintenance Solid Waste Utility Fund Fund Citywide Landscape Enhancements - - $25,000 $25, Citywide Landscape Maintenance Serv ices Street Lighting Energy Efficiency Program Street Lighting Maintenance & Replacement Program - - $175,000 - $64, $250,000 - $25, $351, $75, Street Sweeping $152,000 $56,500 $56,500 - Traffic Signal Maintenance - - $250, Transportation Contracts - - $140, $350, Tree Arborist, Maintenance and Preserv ation Serv ices - - $45, $45,000 - $30,000 $10,000 $250,000 $351,977 $660,000 $25,000 $64,788 $622,000 $56,500 $86,500 $10,000 2 P age

11 PROJECT FUNDING BY SOURCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 DRAINAGE CAPITAL DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE Project Storm Water Utility Fees Project LMAD's Storm Water Utility Fund Neighborhood Areas Drainage Master Plans $100,000 Open Space, Creek and Channel Maintenance $15,311 $450,000 Neighborhood Areas 8, 9, & 10 Drainage Master Plan Implementation $1,611,000 Storm Water Maintenance Serv ices $400,000 $15,311 $850,000 Neighborhood Creekbank Restoration Program $100,000 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program $150,000 $1,961,000 GENERAL PURPOSE State Cal Low Income SACOG HOME Mobile Federal CDBG Federal General General Housing Roadway Community Home Repair Project Funds HOME Funds Capital Funds Funds Impact Fee Impact Fees Design Grant Grant Activ ate Auburn Program $38,000 Economic Dev elopment I ncentiv e I nitiativ e $432,329 First Time Homebuyer Program $148,000 Housing Rehabilitation Program $200,000 $650,000 Neighborhood Improvement Program $15,000 Sayonara Redev elopment Project $109,573 Stock Ranch (development agreement) $184,668 $200,000 $148,000 $432,329 $15,000 $109,573 $184,668 $38,000 $650,000 3 Page

12 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

13 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY FY S 2018/ /2023 Estimated Secured Funding for FY 2018/2019 and Unsecured for FY s 2019/ /2023 Project Name 2018/ / / / /2023 Advanced Traffic Management System $13,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Annual Accessibility Program (ADA, Walkability & Sidewalk/Curb Repairs) $438,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Auburn Boulevard Complete Streets Phase II $1,672,050 $222,940 $500,000 $5,000,000 $8,000,000 Citrus Heights Electric Greeway $390,000 $316,000 $5,639,000 $0 $0 Mariposa Safe Routes to School Mariposa III Safe Routes $1,755,437 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mariposa IV Safe Routes $135,000 $422,000 $2,021,000 $0 $0 Old Auburn Complete Streets Plan $160,850 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 Pavement Restoration $1,644,942 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sunrise Blvd Complete Streets Rehabilitation Phase 2A Locher Drive to Sayonara Drive $877,274 $0 $0 $0 $0 Phase 2B Greenback to Oak Avenue $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $0 Traffic Control, Neighborhood Safety, Accessibility and Walkability Various Signalized Intersection Safety Improvements $197,000 $283,000 $151,000 $0 $0 $597,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL: $7,880,553 $1,958,940 $8,991,000 $5,680,000 $8,180,000 4 P a g e

14 ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS) Locations: City Wide Project Background The Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) was placed into operation in 2009 with overall transportation improvement for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles on the Greenback & Sunrise corridors. This system allows for operations not available from the 25 year old system that was replaced. The next phase is the addition of the Auburn corridor from Van Maren to Old Auburn/Sylvan. This addition allows monitoring and coordination of existing traffic signals. Project Objectives Upgrade operations of traffic signals to include updated hardware (controllers, cabinets, fiber equipment) capable of operating on ATMS. This will provide traffic signal synchronization capabilities and increased safety for automobiles, pedestrians and bicycles as well as improved public transportation within the City. Continue expansion of the management system to improve operations, safety, air quality and multi-modal transportation capacity. Existing Situations Upgraded signals and signal modifications are required to meet Federal and State functional guidelines; the existing traffic signal control equipment does not provide operations that meet these guidelines. Project Justification Trouble calls are on the rise, with repeat failures due to aging electronics. New intersections cannot operate within Federal and State requirements with the old controller system. Fiscal Implications Funding is provided by Measure A Capital Traffic Control and Safety - Funds. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Expenditures Measure A Capital (Traffic Safety) Program or Project Miscellaneous ATMS Upgrades $13,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $13,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 5 P a g e

15 ANNUAL ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAM (ADA, SIDEWALK/CURB/GUTTER & DRAIN INLETS) Locations: City Wide Project Background Federal and State regulations, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title 24, establish a mandate that all facilities open to the public are equally accessible. Many sidewalks, bus stops, intersections and other facilities used for access to residences and businesses throughout the City were constructed prior to implementation of ADA and Title 24 requirements. In addition to addressing specific ADA related requests, the City actively makes investments that will improve overall walkability in neighborhoods throughout the City. Under the ADA, the City is required to conduct a Self-Assessment of all City programs and services and develop a Transition Plan to eliminate barriers accessing city buildings and pedestrian rights-ofway. The Transition Plan was adopted by City Council in July While many access improvements are installed in conjunction with other capital projects, each year the City receives requests for improved access along City sidewalks, intersections and bus stops. The requests are prioritized based upon available funding and overall benefit to the community and scheduled Annual Accessibility Improvements Project. A city-wide Walkability Survey has also been conducted. This survey enlisted participation of residents in each of the neighborhood areas in the City. To address these issues the City has programmed funds for sidewalk infill and sidewalk repair projects. Project Objectives Improve pedestrian access for all users of the City s public rights of way and repair deteriorated sections of sidewalk, curb and gutter. Existing Situations Lack of adequate pedestrian facilities including, but not limited to, sidewalk, curb access ramps pedestrian pushbuttons and audible pedestrian signal heads can make access along City rights of way difficult. Project Justification It is a goal of the City to be responsive to all requests for improved access; State and Federal regulations require the City to provide reasonable accommodation. Maintaining an active and robust access improvement and sidewalk repair program is in-line with City values of providing equal access to City services and full participation in local government affairs. 6 P a g e

16 Fiscal Implications The funding sources for this project include Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), and Measure A funding. In many instances, construction of new ADA ramps necessitates relocation and/or reconstruction of drainage inlets. As a result, additional funding for this work comes from the Storm Water Utility Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue CDBG* $360, Measure A Maintenance Storm Water Utility Fund $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Program or Project Expenditures Misc. Accessibility Improvements / ADA Sidewalk Infill, Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repairs $438,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 *CDBG funds are allocated on an annual basis by Council approval of an expenditure plan. 7 P a g e

17 AUBURN BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREETS PHASE II Locations: Auburn Blvd An important commercial corridor requiring priority attention from the City is the two mile-long Auburn Boulevard Corridor located in the north-central portion of the City. The Corridor is home to more than 130 businesses, and serves as a vital business services and retail node, responsible for generating approximately 15% of all city sales. The City has developed a comprehensive blueprint to revitalize the Auburn Boulevard Corridor. This blueprint encompasses a multi-faceted approach to revitalization with a Redevelopment and Land Use Component (including an infrastructure improvement element), a Business Retention Component and a Business Attraction Component. City staff is anticipating these overall project components will be implemented concurrently. The scope of the Auburn Boulevard-related projects in the City s Capital Improvement Program include capital reinvestment of ADA, pedestrian and transportation infrastructure, streetscape beautification and under-grounding overhead utility lines. To date, the project has been divided into 2 Phases with 3 segments within Phase 1: Phase 1- Segment 1 Sylvan Corners (completed in 2005); Segment 2 - utility undergrounding (Sylvan Corners to Rusch Park) and street improvements between Sycamore and Rusch Park (completion in late 2013); Segment 3 street improvements between Sycamore and Rusch Park (construction Fall 2013 through summer 2014); and Phase 2 Rusch Park to the northern City limit (design, row, utility undergrounding and enhancements) Rusch Park to North City Limit Project Background This project maintains two through-lanes in each direction and adds medians and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Planned improvements include a Class II bike lane and a separated wider sidewalk with street trees. This project will have the added benefit of creating a uniform look to the corridor. Project Objectives Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety Provide landscaping and trees along the street frontage to encourage pedestrian traffic Minimize right of way impacts to property owners Existing Condition The existing roadway currently provides for bicycle traffic with a slightly wider outside vehicle lane. The existing sidewalks are 3-feet to 4-feet wide with utility poles placed within that width at the back of curb. With the increasing traffic volume and speed along this corridor, improved facilities are needed. Project Justification This project is needed to provide better pedestrian and bicycle safety along Auburn Boulevard to the northern city limits. This project will also carry north the improvements started in Phase I- Sylvan Intersection to Rusch Park. 8 P a g e

18 Fiscal Implications Total project cost for Phase II is estimated at $24,000,000, including design, right of way, undergrounding and pedestrian and roadway improvements. Full funding sources for this portion of the project have not yet been identified. Revenue 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 SACOG Grant Flexible Funding $1,500,000 $200, Program 1 Roadway Impact Funds Stormwater Utility Fund $65, $107, TBD - $22,940 $500,000 $5,000,000 $8,000,000 Program or Project Design/Right of Way Final Design *Utility UG *Utility UG *Construction Expenditures Auburn Blvd Rusch Park to North City Limits $1,672,050 $222,940 $500,000 $5,000,000 $8,000, SACOG Grant Blend of Regional Local and Community Design. Specifics of funding types (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Funds, Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, etc.) 9 P a g e

19 CITRUS HEIGHTS ELECTRIC GREENWAY Locations: Neighborhoods 8, 9 and 10 Project Background In 2014, the Council adopted the Creek Corridor Trail Project and directed Staff to update the General Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, and Bikeway Master Plan to incorporate the Priority 1 (Highest Priority) projects into these documents. In 2016, staff applied for and received Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding for the Preliminary Design and Environmental Documentation of the project and in 2017 applied for and received ATP SB1 Augmentation funding for the Final Design and Construction of the project. The Electric Greenway is a 2.9 mile multi-use trail between Sunrise and Wachtel following an existing SMUD corridor, connecting seven parks, several schools, and the Sunrise Marketplace. Project Objectives Encourage use of active modes of transportation by increasing the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking, increase safety and mobility for non-motorized users, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance public health Existing Condition The project is located on publically owned property consisting of Parks and bike/pedestrian easements along the SMUD Corridor. The conditions range from manicured park to informal trails along the SMUD Corridor. Project Justification The project was identified in the General Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, and Bikeway Master Plan as the highest priority trail project. The project aides the City in reaching its walkability, greenhouse gas reduction, and quality of life goals. 10 P a g e

20 Fiscal Implications In addition to the amounts below, the City will be contributing approximately $670,000 in staff time for this project. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 ATP (Regional) $350, ATP (State SB1Augmentation) - $311,000 $5,555, Revenue Park Impact Fees $40,000 $5, Orangevale Recreation and Park District - - $20, Measure A Capital (Bike/Ped) - - $64, Program or Project Expenditures Electric Greenway Design and Environmental $390,000 $316,000 $5,639, P a g e

21 MARIPOSA AVENUE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL Locations: Mariposa Avenue between Greenback Lane and Madison Avenue Project Background Capital improvement projects are planned to enhance pedestrian/bicycle safety and accessibility, particularly focused on provision of safe routes to and from San Juan High School and Skycrest Elementary School. Improvements include infill sidewalk construction, installation of bicycle facility improvements and lighting improvements. Project Objectives Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety by improving the continuity and walking surfaces of City sidewalks. Provision of safe routes to and from school for pedestrian and bicyclists and promotion of walking/biking to and from school. The City strives to provide accessible sidewalks and pathways. Specific projects and budgets are listed below. Project Mariposa Ave. Safe Route to School Phase III Mariposa Ave. Safe Route to School Phase IV Description Curb, gutter and sidewalk; drainage improvements; access ramps and bike lane upgrades on east side of Mariposa Avenue between Northridge and Eastgate Avenue. Curb, gutter and sidewalk; drainage improvements; access ramps and bike lane upgrades on east and west side of Mariposa Avenue between Skycrest Elementary and Madison Avenue FY Budget $1,755,437 $135,000 Existing Condition In many locations throughout the City, sidewalks and/or bike lanes don t exist, lack continuity, or need improvements and thus limit access and use. This project seeks to improve safety on Mariposa Avenue which is a direct route connecting several schools. Project Justification This project will allow implementation of pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements and a range of mobility improvements and facilities to meet the needs of the City. Fiscal Implications: The final two phases of the Mariposa Avenue Safe Routes to School project are underway. The first two phases of this project constructed sidewalk, bicycle facilities and accessibility improvements between Greenback and Northridge. Storm Water Utility Funds will be utilized for drainage related improvements constructed as part of the Safe Routes projects. 12 P a g e

22 Mariposa Avenue Phase III 5-Year Funding Allocated 2018/ / / / /2023 Measure A Capital (Bike/Ped Safety) $129, Measure A Capital (Traffic Safety) $129, Revenue Roadway Impact Funds SACOG Bike/Ped Grant Storm Water Utility Funds $60, $870, $372, TDA Bike and Ped $ 194, Program or Project Construction Expenditures Mariposa III Safe Routes Project $1,755, Mariposa Avenue Phase IV 5-Year Funding Allocated 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Expenditures Measure A Capital (Ped Safety) Active Transportation Program Grant Program or Project Mariposa IV Safe Routes Project $26,000 $82,000 $395, $109,000 $340,000 $1,651, Prelim Eng / Environmental Prelim Eng / Environmental / Right of Way Construction $135,000 $422,000 $2,021, P a g e

23 OLD AUBURN COMPLETE STREETS PLAN Location: Old Auburn Road between Sylvan Road/Auburn Boulevard and Fair Oaks Boulevard Project Background The Old Auburn Road Complete Streets Plan will address challenging transportation conditions including excessive speeds, skewed intersections, inadequate bicycle, pedestrian and transit infrastructure, and a history of collisions along nearly 2-miles of Old Auburn Road. The Plan community engagement plan to define community based solutions to transform Old Auburn Road into a Complete Street. The Plan will evaluate existing conditions, identify collision trends and deficiencies and develop Complete Streets solutions to address the concerns and increase safety, convenience and efficiency for all users. Project Objectives Develop a conceptual plan to improve safety, reduce collisions and improve accessibility for all users of the corridor. Existing Conditions Old Auburn Road is an incomplete street. The corridor sees high vehicular volumes and speeds and is lacking bicycle, pedestrian and transit infrastructure along much of the corridor. Old Auburn Road provides direct access to two schools and numerous commercial centers generating a significant amount of bicyclists and pedestrians. The City received a Sustainable Communities Grant in the amount of $190,000 for this project. The grant includes community engagement, existing conditions analysis, and development of a final conceptual level plan. The concept plan will be used to seek grant funding for design and construction. Project Justification This project will improve safety and accessibility and encourage increased multi-modal travel (walking and cycling). This project promotes a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, increased mobility, and encourages economic investment. 14 P a g e

24 Fiscal Implications: A Sustainable Communities Grant will fund the project. An 11.47% local match is required which will partially be met with City staff time. In addition to the amounts below, the City will be contributing approximately $37,428 in staff time for this project. Revenue 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Sustainable Communities Grant $155,000 $35, TDA Bike/Ped Funds $5, Program or Project Plan Development Plan Development Expenditures Old Auburn Complete Streets Plan $160,850 $35, P a g e

25 PAVEMENT RESTORATION Locations: Various locations throughout the City Project Background Under the City s Pavement Management System (PMS), streets are resurfaced to improve ride quality and avoid more costly future reconstruction. The systematic approach takes the results of visual field evaluations of each street and, using specialized computer software, rates and categorizes the streets by an overall condition index. Use of the structured PMS approach in conjunction with staff inspection, permits the City to schedule resurfacing projects and ultimately extend the service life of a street s pavement. There are older streets in the City with deteriorated section of curbing, gutter and sidewalk. Many of the streets also have substandard accessibility at curb returns. In conjunction with the City s resurfacing projects, locations requiring repair of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk and installation of compliant curb access ramps are identified. Project Objectives Perform needed repairs to pavement to extend the pavement service life Use the PMS and staff inspection to schedule street resurfacing (i.e. overlays, cape seals and slurry seals) Minimize the need for more costly repairs and provide safe and desirable roadways for vehicles Repair curbs, gutters and sidewalk and install curb access ramps in conjunction with resurfacing Providing safe routes for all pedestrians Continue City s objective for improving public routes for physically limited persons Existing Condition Prior to incorporation, many streets throughout the City did not receive preventive maintenance and/or resurfacing. Progress had been made in recent years; however, the majority of City streets still require preventive maintenance or resurfacing. Signs of cracking, pot holes and base failures can be seen in residential, collector and arterial streets. Project Justification The PMS was set up to manage the maintenance of streets by using cost effective methods and timing strategies. By deferring preventive maintenance or resurfacing, the cost to repair streets increases dramatically compared to the annual cost of maintaining streets. Providing these improvements will minimize unsafe conditions at curb returns, improve access for pedestrians and disabled/ada persons and promote the City s objectives in improving handicapped accessibility in public right of way. 16 P a g e

26 Fiscal Implications The City will continue to seek grant funding such as Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) for resurfacing projects along our arterials; however, residential resurfacing will be budgeted for on an annual basis using local funds, such as Measure A Maintenance, Gas Tax and the Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account Fund (enhanced gas tax). 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Gas Tax $100, Revenue Measure A Maintenance Road Maintenance Rehab Account* $100, $1,444, Program or Project Expenditures Residential Resurfacing Program $1,444, Arterial Program $200, *Anticipated revenues from SB-1 Transportation Bill. Planned expenditures for subsequent fiscal years will be included in future CIP s following approval by state oversight. This amount is contingent upon RMRA not being repealed. 17 P a g e

27 SUNRISE BOULEVARD REHABILITATION AND COMPLETE STREETS Location: Sunrise Blvd between Locher Drive and Sayonara Drive west side (Phase 2A) Sunrise Blvd between Greenback Lane and Oak Avenue (Phase 2B) Project Background The Sunrise Boulevard Complete Streets Improvements (SBCS) is a comprehensive and realistic Complete Streets project consisting of multiple phases that will rehabilitate and reconstruct a regionally significant arterial, adding much needed Complete Streets elements throughout the project area. The Sunrise Boulevard corridor is a major north-south arterial trunk running between HWYs 50 and 80. Over 40,000 vehicles use this roadway daily. It also serves as a primary connection between major employment centers (Placer County and its cities and Rancho Cordova) and health care destinations (Sutter and Kaiser hospitals and numerous health care providers). This is particularly significant as the local aging population requires increased levels of safe and convenient access to health care. Project Objectives Design and construct a continuous Complete Street for Sunrise Boulevard, to provide safe, accessible and convenient transportation options for all users of the corridor. Existing Condition Sunrise Boulevard between the north City limits and Sayonara Drive is a four lane major arterial with inadequate, incomplete and non-compliant (ADA) pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. The arterial experiences high crash rates and is a challenging and disconnected environment for nonvehicular forms of transportation. Project Justification The Projects will enhance safety and accessibility and encourage increased multi-modal travel (walking, cycling and transit). Additionally, improvements along this busy corridor will reduce congestion, promote reduced Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per household, encourage economic investment, and repair/replace deteriorating infrastructure. Fiscal Implications Three phases of Sunrise Blvd are identified in the Countywide Transportation Expenditure Plan (CTEP) to receive Measure A Capital Funds. Phase 1 (Antelope Road to Oak Avenue) was completed in the spring of 2013 and Phase 3A (west side frontage improvements only) from the north city limit to Antelope Road was completed in A Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant received in late 2013 will fund design and construction of a portion Phase 2A (west side frontage improvements only) from Sayonara to Locher ahead of the original 2019 schedule identified by the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA). 18 P a g e

28 Phase 2A 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Gas Tax $150, Revenue Highway Safety Improvement Program Measure A Capital (Bike/Ped Safety) Measure A Capital (Traffic Safety) Storm Water Utility Fund $82, $31, $105, $92, Transit Impact Fees $30, TDA Bike/Ped $159, Measure A Maintenance $225, Program or Project Construction Construction Expenditures SBCS Phase 2A Locher Drive to Sayonara West Side $877, Phase 2B 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Measure A Capital CTEP Funds* - $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 - Program or Project Expenditures SBCS Phase 2B Greenback Lane to Oak Avenue - $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 - *These numbers represent potential programmed funds, not necessarily the schedule of design/right of way/construction. 19 P a g e

29 TRAFFIC CONTROL, NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY, ACCESSIBILITY AND WALKABILITY Location: Various locations and neighborhoods throughout the City Project Background Minor capital improvement projects to enhance corridor and neighborhood traffic safety, accessibility and walkability. This project is intended to address all users of the transportation system, not just vehicles. Improvements will include corridor safety studies, as well as corridor, roadway and traffic safety improvements. Caltrans planning grant applications were submitted for A Safe Schools Corridor Plan to be developed for Carriage Drive, which is a neighborhood collected connecting three schools as well as development of a multi-modal transportation safety program. Striping, channelization, roadway geometrics, median installations and enhancements, and access management are all part of this program. Community education, engagement and traffic enforcement are incorporated in all aspects of this program. Project Objectives Improve safety and enhance accessibility for all users of the local streets and roads. Focus is on corridor safety and comprehensive traffic calming and walkability applications. Existing Conditions High traffic volumes, speeds and diverse users of the transportation system, including pedestrian, bicycle and personal motorized vehicles, impact corridor and neighborhood safety throughout the City. An aging and limited inventory of signage and median treatments throughout the City impacts the safety and efficiency of the entire system. Installation of new and or upgraded striping, traffic calming and channelization devices, and traffic operations system improvements improve efficiency of traffic operations. Project Justification This project will allow implementation of street safety and traffic control improvements, create corridor safety plans, develop a program to evaluate, prioritize and implement neighborhood traffic safety countermeasures. This project utilizes traffic data, engineering analysis, and partnerships with Neighborhood Associations and the City s Neighborhood Traffic Management Team to identify issues, concerns and opportunities. 20 P a g e

30 Fiscal Implications: This is an ongoing program with annual commitment of local each fiscal year. 5-Year Funding Allocated 2018/ / / / /2023 Measure A (Traffic Safety) $40,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Gas Tax - $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Revenue Redflex Funds $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 TDA Bike and Ped Sustainable Communities Grant $5,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $122,000 $193,000 $61, Program or Project Misc. Traffic Safety and Accessibility Upgrades $75,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 Expenditures Multi-Modal Transportation Safety Improvement Program $53,500 $94,000 $32, Carriage Drive Safe Schools Corridor Plan $68,500 $99,000 $28, P a g e

31 VARIOUS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Location: Various locations throughout the City; Greenback Lane and Auburn Blvd intersection median approaches Project Background The City operates and maintains 61 signalized intersections, most of which were installed many years ago. Since taking over the operations and maintenance of the signal system, we have been actively upgrades the signals to include count-down pedestrian indications and larger size vehicle indications as various capital improvement and maintenance projects permit. This project will upgrade all remaining locations. This project will also install pedestrian median fencing, within the existing raised medians, along three legs of the intersection of Greenback & Auburn, forcing pedestrians to utilizing the signalized crossings. Curb ramps and push button upgrades are also included at two intersections along Sunrise. Project Objectives Improve safety, reduce collisions and improve accessibility for all users at various signalized intersections throughout the City. Existing Conditions The City received a Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) Grant in the amount of $486,000 for various signalized intersection safety improvements citywide. The grant includes design, outreach and the construction of the signal upgrades. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds will be used to fund the construction of the accessibility improvements. Project Justification This project will enhance safety and accessibility at various signalized intersections throughout the City. Changing Federal & State safety requirements will be addressed through the traffic signal upgrades. 22 P a g e

32 Fiscal Implications: A Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant and a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) will fund the project (a 10% local match for the HSIP Grant is required). 5-Year Funding Allocated 2018/ / / / /2023 Measure A (Traffic Safety) $71, Revenue Gas Tax $40, HSIP Grant $486, Program or Project Design & Construction Expenditures Various Signalized Intersection Upgrades and Pedestrian Fence $597, P a g e

33 TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

34 TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT SUMMARY FY S 2018/ /2023 Estimated Secured Funding for FY 2018/2019 and Unsecured for FY s 2019/ /2023 Project Name 2018/ / / / /2023 City Landscape Enhancements $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Citywide Landscape Maintenance Services $241,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 Street Lighting Energy Efficient Conversion Program Street Lighting Maintenance & Replacement Program $275,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $425,591 $425,591 $425,591 $425,591 $425,591 Street Sweeping $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 Traffic Signal Maintenance Contracts $250,000 $230,740 $233,208 $215,750 $218,367 Transportation Maintenance Contracts $490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Tree Arborist, Maintenance and Preservation $130,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 TOTAL: $2,127,411 $1,081,331 $1,083,799 $1,066,341 $1,068, P a g e

35 CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS Locations: City Wide Project Background The purpose of this project is to identify substandard landscape areas at various City of Citrus Heights landscape locations that are in need of some additional improvements and to implement those improvements for the purpose of bringing all landscape areas in the city up to the same level of success. Project Objectives Identify city maintained landscape areas that are in need of additional enhancement. Plan for and procure plantings and or materials for the identified areas of need. Installation of landscape materials and supplies at the identified areas. Existing Condition The City currently maintains landscaping at multiple locations throughout the City. Many of these areas require some additional plant and landscape materials to meet current City standards. Project Justification The goal of this project is to create a more professional and uniform landscape throughout the City. Fiscal Implications The funding sources for the City Landscaping Enhancements are General Capital Improvement Funds and Gas Tax Funds. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Gas Tax $25, General Capital Improvement Funds $25, Program or Project Expenditures City Landscape Enhancement $50, P a g e

36 CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Locations: City Wide Project Background The City maintains a substantial amount of landscaped areas, both along the medians as well as the entrances to neighborhoods. In 2008 the City entered into two separate contracts with one vender to provide landscape maintenance services. The services include the maintenance of lawn, shrubs, plants and flowers, irrigation systems and minor tree maintenance. Both contracts are in effect through June 30, Project Objectives Provide timely and responsive service on a scheduled and on call basis; Reduce the potential for hazards created by overgrown trees and vegetation blocking the view of traffic control devices; Improve and maintain the City s investment in providing a visually inviting community. Existing Condition Regular maintenance, primarily weekly requirements as well as on-call landscape repairs. Project Justification Maintain the landscape areas throughout the community for the aesthetic purposes as well as safety. Fiscal Implications These services are funded primarily with Gas Tax Funds, along with Landscape Maintenance Assessment District funds contributing where applicable. $241,820 has been budged for the 18/19 FY. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Gas Tax $175, Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Program or Project $66, Expenditures Landscape Maintenance Services $241, TBD Contract expires June 30, 2019; new budgets will be determined with new contracts 26 P a g e

37 STREET LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONVERSION PROGRAM Locations: City Wide Project Background Of the approximate 4,423 City maintained street lights, approximately 950 have been converted to Light Emitting Diode (LED) technology. LED technology continues to evolve and the amount light from the same amount of energy increases with each new generation. The conversions that were accomplished from were financed by Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) funding and other one-time sources. SMUD one-time rebates and incentives also supplement the initial costs. This program is to have an annual budget of $50,000 which can be enhanced by other funding sources for energy savings devices. The California Energy Commission (CEC) offers 1% energy efficiency loans covering the total cost of conversion projects. Loan payback is accomplished utilizing the cost savings from a reduction in the monthly energy bills. Conversion of approximately 475 additional street lights to energy efficient models may be accomplished utilizing this loan and is included in this budget item. Project Objectives Convert as many street lights as possible, utilizing available funding sources, to energy efficient models, resulting in a reduction in energy costs, and reduced maintenance costs. Ensure optimum public health, safety and convenience through the use of the best available lighting fixtures. Existing Condition The existing street light fixtures are failing at a high rate without a cost schedule for replacement; each one that fails is an additional cost to the lighting district. New fixtures will reduce the energy cost per fixture by 40-50%. In addition, as LED fixtures have a lower failure rate, response maintenance costs for outages will also reduce. Project Justification Existing fixtures are not efficient and have a short period between needed maintenance; they are very old and are failing. 27 P a g e

38 Fiscal Implications The City lighting district does not have a funding reserve or the capital to fund this project. The total project cost using existing pricing would be $1,400,000. The cost savings resulting from the conversion due to reduction in energy use would afford a continuous annual budget for the conversion program. SMUD rebates and incentives also supplement this budget and it is anticipated that a 1% loan from the CEC will fund a larger conversion project in FY 18/19. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Gas Tax $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 CEC Loan $250,000 Program or Project Expenditures Energy Efficient Street Light Conversion $275,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50, P a g e

39 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Locations: City Wide Project Background The City of Citrus Heights currently has a contract with Bear Electrical Solutions to provide Street Light Maintenance, including routine service and emergency response. Under this agreement, approximately 4,400 street lights and safety lights are maintained along City streets. Project Objectives To provide cost-effective, responsive maintenance and emergency response for the City s street light system. Existing Condition Approximately 4,400 City owned or requested street lights exist within in the City limits. The street light infrastructure is varied depending upon the area of the City with streetlights existing along all arterials, some collectors and about one-third of residential streets. Underground utilities exist throughout the City. During the last Fiscal Year funding was utilized to convert or install 122 Street and Safety lights with LED lighting technology; the result of this action is shown in the anticipated reduction of expenditures for street light maintenance. Project Justification Street lights provide increased visual capacity at night, allowing for safer driving conditions as well as safety for walkers and bicyclists in dark conditions. In addition, street lighting is associated with crime prevention and deterrence. Fiscal Implications Under this proposal (inclusion of Safety Lighting) these services along with utility costs are funded by Citrus Heights Street Lighting Assessment District (CSA-1) funds, and Measure A Maintenance. The amount budgeted for FY 18/19 is $426, Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue CSA-1 Funds $351,977 $351,977 $351,977 $351,977 $351,977 Measure A Maintenance $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Program or Project Expenditures Street Light Maintenance (contract, utilities, damages) $426,977 $426,977 $426,977 $426,977 $426,977 *Annual CSA-1 revenues are flat at $350,591and do not fully fund maintenance of the city s lighting system; therefore the program is subsidized by Measure A Maintenance funds to balance the budget. 29 P a g e

40 STREET SWEEPING Locations: City Wide Project Background There are 120 curb miles of commercial streets and 347 curb miles of residential streets that are routinely swept by a private contractor. Project Objectives All streets located within the City of Citrus Heights are swept on a monthly basis, with additional sweeping services provided citywide during the 2-3 month leaf drop season and on an emergency call out basis. Existing Condition Street sweeping is necessary to keep streets and storm drains free of debris and dirt and to comply with the City s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit requirements. Project Justification Prevents storm drain inlet blockages and accumulation of debris in gutters; reduces pollution of natural waterways; and enhances neighborhood aesthetics. Fiscal Implications Funded by Measure A Maintenance, Storm Water and Solid Waste funds, the street sweeping contract maintains a fixed cost of $22.96 per curb mile through December Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Measure A Maintenance $152,000 $152,000 $152,000 $152,000 $152,000 Solid Waste $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 Stormwater Utility Fund $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 $56,500 Program or Project Expenditures Street Sweeping $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265,000 $265, P a g e

41 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE Locations: City Wide Project Background There are 62 traffic signal locations maintained by the City of Citrus Heights. 59 are located at intersections solely within the boundaries of Citrus Heights, and two span the City/County. Of the sixtytwo locations, two are dedicated as fire station signals and four as pedestrian signals. There are an additional six locations with a flasher or beacon. The City also operates a Traffic Operations Center (TOC) capable of monitoring and controlling traffic signals formerly connected to the County system. The control server; ATMS.now is an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) encompassing twenty-one remote cameras mounted on signal poles, two permanent changeable message sign (CMS), and thirty-one traffic signals from its location at City Hall. Maintenance items such as traffic signal LED replacement, server upgrades, and replacement of batteries in Battery Backup Systems (BBS), painting signal appurtenances for contrast and visibility are part of planned activities to ensure proper operation and compliance with State mandates. Emergency response to knockdowns is also included in this program. Contracting for traffic signal operations engineering services is part of this budget item. The city is currently working with SACOG to develop a citywide ITS master plan. The city has not had an update to the ITS Master Plan since 2000 and it is necessary to provide a long term plan for growth. The updated ITS Master Plan will help ensure the City is in alignment with SACOG Regional Transportation allotments. Evaluation of existing and development of new traffic signal coordination plans is also included in this budget item. Minor upgrades to the traffic signals to meet current federal and state rules and regulations, such as installation of ADA accessible push buttons, is also part of this budget item. Project Objectives Provide regular scheduled maintenance to traffic signal facilities and perform as-needed emergency maintenance to traffic signal facilities. Ensure efficient and safe operations of all traffic signals and provide needed traffic signal functional evaluations and timing checks. Existing Condition Conditions vary throughout the City. Project Justification Traffic safety and efficient traffic flow depend upon properly timed and functioning traffic signals. Routine monitoring and evaluation of operations is needed as traffic patterns and adjacent uses change and develop. 31 P a g e

42 Fiscal Implications These services are funded with Gas Tax funds for FY 18/19. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Gas Tax $250,000 $230,740 $233,208 $215,750 $218,367 Program or Project Base Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract includes preventative maintenance, emergency response. $109,846 $112,240 $114,708 $117,250 $119,867 Expenditures Operations Engineering/Traffic Data Collection ATMS.now Server Replacement Signal Coordination Evaluation $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $15, $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $30,000 $30,000 LED Re-Lamping $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Battery Replacement 1/3 per yr (life Cycle) Loop Replacement modification $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $26,654 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5, P a g e

43 TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE (CONTRACT SERVICES) Locations: Various locations throughout the City Project Background The City of Citrus Heights has 235 miles of public roads within its boundaries. To keep the City a desirable place to live, work and shop, these roads must be safe, convenient to use and visually pleasing to travel on. The City contracts out most of its transportation maintenance services, including street signs, street striping and markings, graffiti abatement, road maintenance (pothole repair) and hazardous material response. Project Objectives Provide quality and timely maintenance services for streets in the City of Citrus Heights, which makes streets easier to walk, ride and drive on and safer for all users. Existing Condition The City has been operating on an on-call basis for transportation maintenance services since formally separating these services from the County of Sacramento. Daily maintenance including graffiti removal, hazardous material response, pothole filling, replacement of knocked down traffic signs and repair of the palm tree lighting on Sunrise Boulevard (seasonal) are performed on an asneeded basis. Regular replacement of pavement striping, legends and markings and street signs, to ensure optimum visibility and enhance traffic safety, is performed on an annual scheduled basis. Pavement striping, legends and markings deteriorate with time and vehicle traffic and become less visible during when it is dark or in some cases completely obliterated. As a result, striping, legends and markings must be refreshed on a periodic basis. The estimated replacement value of the all striping and marking is approximately $1,025,000. The City s goal is to replace approximately 1/10 th of this inventory each year through the maintenance program as well as with capital projects. Streets signs fade and become less reflective from long exposure to sunlight and in some cases repeated graffiti making them harder to see in both day and night conditions. Additionally, the Federal Highway Administration s Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), adopted by the State of California, mandates that regulatory, street name and warning signs meet minimum retro-reflectivity standards. To ensure optimum visibility, enhance traffic safety and comply with MUTCD regulations the City must replace older signs on a periodic basis. The City s goal is to replace approximately 1/10 th of its sign inventory each year. As additional revenues are identified, the City will plan to increase maintenance of citywide signage and striping. 33 P a g e

44 Fiscal Implications These services are funded by Gas Tax and Measure A Maintenance. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Gas Tax $140, Measure A Maintenance $350, Program or Project Electrical Maintenance $10, Graffiti Abatement $20, Expenditures Hazardous Material Response Street Maintenance (road repair) Street Sign Maintenance $10, $325, $80, Street Striping Maintenance $45, P a g e

45 TREE ARBORIST, MAINTENANCE and PRESERVATION SERVICES (city owned trees) Locations: City wide Project Background The City of Citrus Heights maintains emergency on-call arborists services and tree maintenance services for the purpose of maintaining a healthy tree canopy citywide. Currently, these services are provided by two separate contracts, These services include on-call arborists services, annual and bi annual reports on City owned trees and as well as on-call tree removal, maintenance and preservation services. The arborist services provide for evaluations to confirm the health of the trees for safety and liability purposes, as well as help to establish pruning schedules. The services also include emergency on-call services, particularly exercised during the storm season in events where trees, both from public and private property have fallen into the right-of-way and require immediate attention. Project Objectives Provide effective and efficient on call arborists services as needed. Perform annual and bi annual reports on City owned Right of Way trees. Provide specialized recommendations and preventative maintenance to improve and maintain community safety. Provide effective and efficient tree maintenance services as needed. Preservation of Heritage Oak Trees. Maintain the health of the City s tree canopy. Removal of trees obstructing our creek and drainage systems. Existing Condition As needed basis. Project Justification In order to maintain a healthy tree canopy, preserve Heritage Oaks and maintain the safety of those using our streets, certain standards must be met in terms of evaluating the health and over all condition of existing City-owned trees, maintain a proactive maintenance schedule, and remove obstructions and hazards so as not to impede visibility or compromise safety in the public right of way. 35 P a g e

46 Fiscal Implications These services are funded by Gas Tax, Storm Water funds, Measure A Maintenance and Tree Mitigation funds with a total budget of $130,000 for FY 18/19. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Gas Tax $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 Revenue Measure A Maintenance $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 Storm Water $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Tree Mitigation Funds* $10, Program or Project Expenditures Tree Arborist Services $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Tree Removal, Maintenance and Preservation Services $120,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 *Tree Mitigation funds will be programmed annually as revenues become available. 36 P a g e

47 STORM WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

48 STORM WATER CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY FY S 2018/ /2023 Estimated Secured Funding for FY 2018/2019 and Unsecured for FY s 2019/ /2023 Project Name 2018/ / / / /2023 Neighborhood Areas Drainage Master Plans $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $150,000 $0 Neighborhood Areas 8, 9, & 10 Drainage Master Plan Implementation $1,611,000 $1,500,000 $1,240,000 $1,454,000 $865,000 Neighborhood Creekbank Restoration Program $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 TOTAL: $1,961,000 $1,900,000 $1,590,000 $1,854,000 $1,115, P a g e

49 NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS DRAINAGE MASTER PLANS Locations: Neighborhood Areas 1 thru 5 and 11 Project Background The fundamental goal of the Neighborhood Areas Drainage Master Plans is to address current and future drainage needs within the City s 11 neighborhood areas and develop a capital improvement program to address the findings. The final product of the study will not only guide the City in effectively addressing drainage issues but also provide guidance on addressing stormwater quality and water retention (hydro-modification). All neighborhood areas will be studied and prioritized based on the lack of infrastructure and reoccurring drainage issues. These issues include City and County drainage complaints over the past ten years, high maintenance costs based on open ditches, and cross-property drainage ditches that require staff to coordinate rights of entry, and property owner complaints regarding neighbors drainage through their property. Project Objectives Develop a capital improvement program to help guide the City in implementing future capital improvement projects and eliminate recurring local flooding. The master plan for Areas 4, 5 and 11 will be completed in fiscal year 2019/2020 and the master plan for Areas 1, 2 and 3 will be completed in fiscal year 2020/2021. Existing Condition Throughout the City a multitude of drainage issues exist, the majority of the drainage infrastructure was developed prior to the City incorporating and requires improvements. Project Justification Improve overall drainage conveyance, and reduce the risk of flooding and damage to property due to an inadequate or the lack of drainage system. Fiscal Implications The City proposes to budget $500,000 from fiscal year 2018/2019 through fiscal year 2020/2021. This program is financed with the Stormwater Utility Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Stormwater Utility Fund $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $150,000 - Program or Project Expenditures Neighborhood Areas 4, 5, and 11 Neighborhood Areas 1, 2, and 3 $100,000 $150, $100,000 $150, P a g e

50 NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS 8, 9, & 10 DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Locations: Neighborhood Areas 8, 9, & 10 Project Background The fundamental goal of the Areas 8, 9, and 10 Master Plan Implementation is to complete projects included in the Capital Improvement Program list in the Drainage Master Plan. The projects effectively address drainage issues and improve stormwater quality and conveyance in the area. In addition, the projects will eliminate deficiencies, known flooding problems, and roadside ditches where possible. The projects will be prioritized and consideration will be given to whether improvements would eliminate existing flooding or would prevent potential future flooding due to facility failure, the severity of potential flooding, whether the flooding would affect structures, major roads, or minor roads, and whether the improvements would provide stormwater quality benefits. Cost effectiveness will also be an important consideration and projects that provide multiple benefits such as flood control and water quality benefits will have higher priority. Project Objectives Improve drainage, eliminate deficiencies; and implement the capital improvement program developed by the Master Plan. Existing Conditions and Project Justifications Areas 8, 9, and 10 have a combination of developed drainage systems which include sidewalk, curb, and gutter as well as subsurface storm drains; as well rural areas with informal drainage systems. Throughout the City a multitude of drainage issues exist, with a majority of the drainage infrastructure having been developed prior to the City s incorporation. These improvement projects will help correct overall drainage conveyance deficiencies, and help to reduce risk of flooding and property damage. 39 P a g e

51 Fiscal Implications The City proposes to budget approximately $6,670,000 from fiscal year 18/19 fiscal year 22/23 to implement the projects in the Area 8, 9, and 10 Master Plan. The following projects will be financed with the Stormwater Utility Fee Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Stormwater Utility Fund $1,611,000 $1,500,000 $1,240,000 $1,454,000 $865,000 Program or Project Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Highland Ave/Rinconada Upsize Pipe on Dana Butte Way Wonder Street Drainage Upgrades Upsize Outfall on Chula Vista Pipe Improvements on Bonita/Old Auburn Amsell Pipe Upgrade and Detention Basin Mariposa Glen Acre to Arcade Creek Denton Way to Sunhill Overland Release Minnesota, Anderson, Canady Drainage Improvements $1,135, $112,000 - $386, $865,000 - $1,100, $740, $400, $90, $500,000 $1,342, P a g e

52 NEIGHBORHOOD CREEK BANK RESTORATION PROGRAM Locations: City Wide Project Background There are approximately 26 miles of creek corridors in Citrus Heights. Throughout the City, there are areas with eroded banks, an overpopulation of invasive species, and endangered wildlife habitats. Because each creek area has unique challenges, this program focuses on collaboration with surrounding residents to sustainably manage the riparian habitat based on neighborhood priorities. Project Objectives One objective of the Neighborhood Creek Bank Restoration Program is to work with neighborhood residents to identify areas along creek corridors with potential erosion, a large number of invasive species, and threatened wildlife habitats. Stormwater Program staff will collaborate with community members to establish a shared vision to sustainably manage erosion, invasive species, and threatened wildlife along the creek corridors in their neighborhood areas. Volunteer activity will be utilized to restore banks, clear invasive species, and re-establish wildlife habitats. This program may eventually include large projects as additional grant funds are secured. Existing Condition Currently, there are areas along the City s 26 miles of creek with eroding banks, a large amount of invasive plants, and endangered riparian habitats. The degradation of creek areas is a result of various factors such as the introduction of non-native species; illegal dumping in and along creeks; development of manmade structure; and blockages caused by wildlife such as beaver dams. Together, these barriers damage natural habitats, increase bank erosion, and impede the flow of water. Project Justification This pilot program emphasizes neighborhood involvement and stewardship to develop a resident-led plan to restore and maintain creek areas. 41 P a g e

53 Fiscal Implications The City proposes to budget $100,000 for each of the next five fiscal years. This program is financed with the Stormwater Utility Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Stormwater Utility Fund $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Program or Project Expenditures Neighborhood Creek Bank Restoration Program Locations TBD $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100, P a g e

54 STORM DRAIN PIPE REHABILITATION PROGRAM Locations: City Wide The majority of the existing storm drain pipe system was constructed prior to the City s incorporation in The system was constructed utilizing a series of pipe materials including concrete, PVC, and metal. Due to age and corrosivity of the soils, some of the storm drain pipes have corroded or degraded to a point where maintenance is necessary. The purpose of this project is to identify corroded and/or damaged storm drain pipes throughout the City that could potentially fail. The identified storm drain pipes will be rehabilitated in place. Project Objectives Replace all corroded and failing storm drain pipes in the city to improve overall drainage conveyance, and reduce the risk of a failure that would impact public safety and damage to property. Existing Condition A significant amount of storm drain pipes throughout the City are deteriorated and require rehabilitation. Project Justification Improve overall drainage conveyance, and reduce the risk of flooding and damage to property due to a drainage pipe collapse or failure. Fiscal Implications The City proposes to budget a minimum of $750,000 over the next five fiscal years. This project is financed with the Stormwater Utility Fees Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Stormwater Utility Fund $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Program or Project Expenditures Storm Drain Pipe Rehabilitation Program $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150, P a g e

55 STORM WATER MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

56 STORM WATER MAINTENANCE PROJECT SUMMARY FY S 2018/ /2023 Estimated Secured Funding for FY 2018/2019 and Unsecured for FY s 2019/ /2023 Project Name 2018/ / / / /2023 Open Space, Creek and Channel Maintenance $465,311 $413,173 $363,173 $363,173 $363,173 Storm Water Maintenance Services $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 TOTAL: $865,311 $813,173 $763,173 $763,173 $763, P a g e

57 OPEN SPACE, CREEK AND CHANNEL MAINTENANCE Locations: City Wide Project Background This program has traditionally been highly visible to the public and is one of the most common services residents assess to determine satisfaction with the Stormwater Utility Program. Over the past two years, these services have been provided under contract to maintain the City s open spaces, creeks and channels. Such services include weed abatement, vegetation removal, and clearing of debris in creeks to ensure unobstructed flow of our storm water. Project Objectives Removal of vegetation, trees, silt, deposits, illegal dumps, and debris in the creeks and channels, overbanks, trash racks, inlets and outlets in order to improve flows and water quality. Existing Condition The creeks and channels are regularly inspected and maintained to ensure water flow and improve water quality. Project Justification Reduces property damage and liability from flooding, enhances public safety and water quality. Fiscal Implications The City proposes a budget of $465,311 for FY 18/19. The funding source for this project is the Stormwater Utility Fees Fund and is augmented by Landscape Maintenance Assessment District funds for work specific to the district areas. Revenue 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Stormwater Utility Fund Landscape Maintenance Assessment District Funds $450,000 $397,862 $347,862 $347,862 $347,862 $15,311 $15,311 $15,311 $15,311 $15,311 Program or Project Expenditures Manual Creek and Channel Maintenance $465,311 $413,173 $363,173 $363,173 $363, P a g e

58 STORM WATER MAINTENANCE SERVICES Locations: City Wide Project Background The City s General Services Department is responsible for storm drain maintenance. The City has retained Coastline Water Resources to serve as a partner to the City in order to expand the capability of the City s staff to provide a comprehensive maintenance program which includes preventative maintenance, on-call maintenance and emergency response services. Project Objectives Clean and maintain approximately 250,000 LF of drainage pipe per year and the respective drain inlets and manholes to ensure proper storm water flow and improve water quality. Removed excess sediment from bridge locations that impede water flow during storm events. Assess the City s drainage system by evaluating the cleanliness, and physical condition. Collect input, suggestions and solutions for issues related to the storm water system. Complete maintenance projects (not to exceed $25,000) to repair failed or inadequate drainage facilities. Existing Condition Since 2010, the City s General Services Department has been responsible for maintaining the storm water system. During the time the City s General Services Department has had responsibility for storm water maintenance, it has cleaned or modified well over 400 drainage inlets and manholes, nearly 20,000 LF of drainage laterals, cleaned more than 23,000 LF of storm drain lines and cleaned all concrete channels within the City. Project Justification Reduces property damage from flooding, enhances public safety and water quality. Fiscal Implications The City proposes a budget of $400,000 for each fiscal year. The funding source for this project is the Storm Water Utility Fees Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Stormwater Utility Fund $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 Program or Project Expenditures Storm Water Maintenance Services $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400, P a g e

59 GENERAL PURPOSE PROJECTS Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

60 GENERAL PURPOSE PROJECT SUMMARY FY S 2018/ /2023 Estimated Secured Funding for FY 2018/2019 and Unsecured for FY s 2019/ /2023 Project Name 2018/ / / / /2023 Activate Auburn Program $38,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Economic Development Incentive Initiative $432,329 $0 $0 $0 $0 First Time Homebuyer Program $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 Housing Rehabilitation Program Neighborhood Improvement Program Sayonara Redevelopment Project $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,573 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stock Ranch $184,668 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL: $1,777,570 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148, P a g e

61 ACTIVATE AUBURN PROGRAM Locations: Auburn Boulevard Project Background With the loss of Redevelopment, the City applied for and received a $100,000 grant from SACOG to promote the revitalization of commercial corridors. The City directed this grant toward the Activate Auburn Program. Project Objectives The primary purpose of the Activate Auburn SACOG grant is to provide a financial incentive in the form of economic development grants to property owners along commercial corridors and in particular the Auburn Boulevard Specific Plan area. The grants are used for technical assistance (façade, retail activation). Project Justification The City received a $100,000 Community Design Program grant from SACOG in The program supports the City s Activate Auburn portion of the City s Economic Development Incentive Program. The program provides technical assistance for properties along commercial corridors between December 2016 and December Fiscal Implications The $100,000 SACOG grant requires a 10% match ($10,000) which is paid for from the Economic Development Program. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue SACOG Community Design Grant $38, Program or Project Expenditures Activate Auburn Program $38, P a g e

62 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE INITIATIVE Locations: City Wide Project Background The Development Fund is one part of the Citrus Heights Economic Development Incentive Initiative. Fund Allocation: The Development Fund has three categories. Each category has its own set of eligible applicants, use of funds and program criteria. Detailed guidelines are available on file with the Community and Economic Development Department. Application Process: Interested businesses are encouraged to speak with the Economic Development Division. Citrus Heights and recipient agree to an Incentive Proposal that outlines the terms and ED staff reviews the terms. Satisfactory applications are presented to the City Council for consideration. Project Objectives The primary purpose of the Development Fund is to provide a financial incentive in the form of economic development loans, grants or a match to help do the following: Improve the perception of Citrus Heights as business friendly Grow sustainable and livable wage jobs (retention and creation) Increase the Citrus Heights tax base Increase business-to-business activity Diversify the local economy Project Justification The City Council approved a new three year goal Improve Economic Development in May The Development Fund is part of the overall Citrus Heights Economic Development Incentive Initiative. Fiscal Implications The Development Fund was funded with a one-time allocation of $643,280. The remaining balance is carried over to the next fiscal year. In fiscal year , an additional allocation of $301,172 was added to the Development Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue General Capital Funds $432, Program or Project Expenditures Economic Development Program $432, P a g e

63 FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS PROGRAM Locations: City Wide Project Background The City s General Plan outlines the need to increase the number and percentage of homeowners in the community. This project provides low-interest loans to first-time homebuyers. The loans are used for down payment assistance. Eligible households are those earning up to 80% of the area median income. In the event funds are repaid, additional loans can be issued. Project Objectives To create a revolving fund to assist first-time homebuyers. To assist approximately four households purchase a home each year. Existing Condition Not applicable. Project Justification Funds will be used to assist families that cannot otherwise afford to buy a home in Citrus Heights. Fiscal Implications Federal HOME funds must be used to provide housing assistance to low- and moderate-income persons. These funds will be structured as 30-year deferred payment loans. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Federal HOME Funds $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 Program or Project Expenditures First Time Homebuyer Program $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148,000 $148, P a g e

64 HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM Locations: City Wide Project Background The City currently offers low-interest 30-year deferred payment loans for homeowners to make health and safety repairs to their homes. This project also provides the City the opportunity to reinvest in its aging housing stock. Eligible households are those earning up to 80% of the area median income. The City is also completing mobile home repair loans funded with a $1,000,000 CalHome grant obtained from the CA Department of Housing and Community Development in Project Objectives To create a revolving fund to assist housing rehabilitation program participants To assist approximately four households to make health and safety repairs to their homes in FY 18/19 with approximately $50,000 in home repair loans awarded to each borrower. In the event previous loans are repaid, additional funds will be available to issue new loans. Existing Condition Not applicable Project Justification Funds will be used to assist families that cannot otherwise afford to make needed repairs to their homes in Citrus Heights. Fiscal Implications These are Federal CDBG and State CalHome funds. The funds must be used to provide housing assistance to low- and moderate-income persons. CalHome funding will be used specifically for mobile home repairs. Revenue 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 State CalHome Mobile Home Repair Grant Federal CDBG Funds $650, $200, Program or Project Expenditures Housing Rehabilitation Program $850, P a g e

65 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Locations: Throughout all ten neighborhood areas Project Background The City of Citrus Heights is committed to increasing community involvement and improving the quality of life in the City. Consistent with early Council leadership, which was instrumental in the formation of the neighborhood areas, the City continues to support community improvement efforts of the active areas. The associations provide their members with opportunities to be involved by helping to determine neighborhood priorities and resolving neighborhood concerns. Starting in FY 17/18 neighborhood association project funding is now awarded on a competitive basis with associated matching requirements for the groups. Funding awards to individual associations will be made upon an assessment of project viability and available funding. For the purposes of this CIP item, it is estimated total awards will not exceed $15,000. Project Objectives Create programs or events that bring neighbors together and improve the quality of life and connectedness in the community. Focus budgetary and staffing resources within neighborhoods by providing several projects or programs during the fiscal year Promote a sense of community by focusing on civic capital improvement projects within neighborhoods that emphasize safety and aesthetic enhancements. Existing Condition Continuance of the Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP) has resulted in community-building partnerships between neighborhood groups, Sunrise Recreation and Park District, local schools and businesses, as well as between neighborhood associations. Funding is now awarded in a competitive grant program rather than automatic annual allocations. Project Justification Neighborhood level investments promote community-building relationships within Citrus Heights and regionally, as well as improve safety and quality of life within neighborhoods. 52 P a g e

66 Fiscal Implications & Project Cost Total cost of the proposed program will vary based upon applications received and grants awarded, but it is estimated awards will not exceed $15,000 for fiscal year 2018/2019. The funding source is the General Capital Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue General Capital Improvement Fund Not to exceed $15, Program or Project Expenditures Neighborhood Improvement Projects Not to exceed $15, P a g e

67 SAYONARA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Locations: Sayonara Drive Project Background The City relocated ten families and demolished 15 structures (14 four-plexes and 1 eight-plex) on Sayonara Drive in FY 09/10. The City used Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds (federal stimulus dollars) for the tenant relocation and demolition. Approximately $3.4 million in Redevelopment funds were used to purchase the residential properties. In FY12/13, two of the vacant parcels were developed into a community center and neighborhood park with a combination of Community Development Block Grant and Park In-Lieu funds. Because Redevelopment funds were used to purchase the properties, the City has a statutory requirement to replace the low- and moderateincome housing units demolished as part of the Sayonara Redevelopment Project before September 5, Project Objectives Fulfill replacement housing statutory requirements; Improve quality of life on street; Reduce calls for service; Introduce ownership housing; and Promote private investment. Existing Condition The City has completed many public improvements including the installation of streetlights, repaving, traffic-calming devices, all-way stops, crosswalks and limited landscaping. In addition to making public improvements, the City has purchased 15 properties and has demolished these properties to make way for future redevelopment. Two of these properties were developed with a neighborhood park and community center in Fiscal Year 12/13. Project Justification The project will provide affordable replacement housing on Sayonara Drive, which will help revitalize the neighborhood. Additionally, it will fulfill the City s statutory housing replacement requirement. 54 P a g e

68 Fiscal Implications The balance of the Low-Income Housing Impact Fee will be used to begin the project of developing these housing units. In is anticipated these funds will assist in procuring consultant services and other costs associated with accomplishing this effort. Regarding major project funding, staff is looking for appropriate funding sources to redevelop Sayonara Drive. With the elimination of Redevelopment funding it is anticipated the funding for this project will come from multiple sources including private investment. At this point, the exact amount of funding needed to facilitate the construction of Sayonara Drive affordable housing is unknown. The redevelopment of the new housing will have no impact on the City s General Fund. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / /2022 Revenue Low Income Housing Impact Fee $109, Program or Project Expenditures Sayonara Redevelopment Project $109, P a g e

69 STOCK RANCH Locations: Stock Ranch and surrounding area (Auburn Boulevard near Sylvan Corners and Van Maren Lane) Project Background Stock Ranch is a 129-acre parcel of land located in the center of Citrus Heights. The Stock Ranch Guide for Development requires that certain public improvements are designed, constructed and installed on and/or near the Stock Ranch parcel as the property develops. The City entered into the Stock Ranch Reimbursement of Costs Agreement on March 12, 2003, which details the reimbursement of $554,000 in Roadway Impact fees for specific public improvements. To date, $369,336 has been reimbursed. The remaining balance ($184,668) is due when building permits totaling 375,000 square feet have been issued. The goal is that this will occur in 2019/2020. Project Objectives Construction of public improvements on and/or near the Stock Ranch parcel as the property develops. Existing Condition The two large format stores have been constructed and are open for business. Phases I and II improvements are completed, and have been formally accepted by the City. In 17/18, additional site improvements were made. Construction of additional retail pads are expected to be under construction in FY 18/19. Project Justification The City s reimbursement of some capital costs was granted in consideration of the long-term fiscal benefits that the Stock Ranch project will generate for the City, and as an incentive for the property owner to develop the Auburn Commerce District of Stock Ranch. Fiscal Implications The total fiscal impact is $554,000. It is anticipated that C & S Properties, Inc. will request the remaining $184,668 in FY 2018/2019, should Pad C be developed. 5-Year Funding Allocated Funding 2018/ / / / /2023 Revenue Roadway Impact Fees $184, Program or Project Expenditures 1 Construction Reimbursement Per Agreement $184, Funding is outlined in Stock Ranch Reimbursement Agreement approved on March 12, 2003, Resolution , and the First Amendment to Agreement for Reimbursement of Costs approved on April 27, 2005, Resolution P a g e

70 DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

71 Description of Major Funding Sources Active Transportation Program (ATP) Regional and State Augmented Created in 2013, the ATP consolidated pre-existing federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), and State Safe Routes to School (SR2S), into a single program with a focus to make California a national leader in active transportation. The ATP is administered by the Division of Local Assistance, Office of Active Transportation and Special Programs. Capital Replacement Fund General Capital funds are funds expended on various capital improvement and replacement projects, including information technology and vehicle replacement. Citrus Heights Street Lighting Assessment District (CSA-1) Beginning FY , the City assumed operations and maintenance responsibilities for its street lights and safety lights. Previously, the County of Sacramento administered the City s lights, and funds were collected to support operations through a County-wide assessment district, called Community Services Area One (or CSA-1). As part of the City s assumption of maintenance and operations of its street lights, during FY , the City formed a City-wide assessment district under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 to collect the direct levy in Citrus Heights that was previously collected by the County through CSA-1 to support light maintenance operations. Community Design Funding Program (SACOG) The Community Design Funding Program is intended to provide financial assistance to local government agencies that seek to implement physical development that is consistent with SACOG's Blueprint Principles. Approximately every two years, SACOG accepts applications for projects from cities, counties, transit districts and air districts from Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties. Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) These federal funds are distributed to the City on an annual basis. The City receives approximately $670,000 per year. The funds are used to support capital projects such as park improvements and sidewalks. Other projects the City has used the funds for include: loans to modest income families for rehabilitation, Habitat for Humanity projects and public services such as senior nutrition. Development Impact Fees Development Impact Fees, including Roadway, Transit and Park Facilities, Drainage, Low Income Housing, Fire Capital, and Tree Preservation Fees, are fees paid by a developer/development project to pay for the cost of providing the facilities necessary to accommodate growth. The cost of projects needed to support growth is financed with impact fees based on a measurement of a development s impact on future needs. The purpose of these fees is to fund the cost of roadway, transit and park facilities required due to the type(s) of development designated in the General Plan. 57 P a g e

72 Description of Major Funding Sources (cont.) Federal Home Funds HOME provides formula grants to states and localities that communities use often in partnership with local, nonprofit groups to fund a wide range of activities that build, buy, and/or rehabilitate affordable housing for rent or homeownership or provide direct rental assistance to low-income people. The City of Citrus Heights receives a share of the County HOME funds that are disbursed through the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA). Gas Tax Administered by the State Board of Equalization, this is an 18 cent per gallon tax on fuel used to propel a motor vehicle or aircraft. Use of the revenue is for research, planning, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways or public mass transit. General Fund Unrestricted fund used to support city operations, including City Council, City Attorney, General Management, Administrative Services, Finance, Community Development, General Services, Police, non-departmental and capital projects. General Fund revenue sources include: property tax; sales and use tax; utility users' tax; franchise fees; business license; planning, permits and fees; motor vehicle in-lieu; and interest earnings. General Capital Improvement Funds are funds set aside from the City s General Fund for the acquisition and/or construction of capital facilities and special projects. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), which was signed into law on August 10, 2005, established the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as a core Federal-aid program. The overall purpose of this program is to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads through the implementation of infrastructure-related highway safety improvements. The specific provisions pertaining to the HSIP are defined in Section 1401 of SAFETEA-LU which amended Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 USC 148) to incorporate these provisions. These provisions are still in effect due to Continuing Resolutions passed by Congress during Federal Fiscal Year 2009/10. Local Regional Funding (SACOG) Every two years, SACOG conducts a programming round to allocate funds to projects based on apportionments of regional Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), and State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds. These funds are programmed through the Air Quality, Bicycle & Pedestrian, Community Design, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Regional/Local funding programs. Low Income Housing Impact Fee This fee is assessed on new commercial development or additional commercial footage to assist in the provision of affordable housing. 58 P a g e

73 Description of Major Funding Sources (cont.) Measure A Capital & Maintenance Funds This funding source was approved by Sacramento County voters in the form of a ½ cent sales tax in 1988, and again in November 2004, to fund specific transportation projects. When the City incorporated, Measure A funds programs for County transportation projects within Citrus Heights became available to the City as a funding source for those projects previously under the County s jurisdiction. In this document, Measure A Capital Funds identified as old and new. The old funds are from the original Measure, which expires April The Traffic Safety and Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety funds are from the renewed Measure, which went into effect April 2009 and is in place for 30 years. The CTEP is the Countywide Transportation Expenditure Plan, produced by the Sacramento Transportation Authority; the Administrator of Measure A Funds. The CTEP outlines all project identified in the Bond Measure detail. Orangevale Recreation & Parks District Orangevale Recreation & Park District is an independent Special District Governed by an Elected Board of Directors in the community of Orangevale within the unincorporated area of the County of Sacramento. Park Facility Impact Fees As part of the City s Development Impact Fee structure, Park Impact Fees are collected on new commercial and residential structures over 5,000 sf. The purpose of this fee is to mitigate impacts caused by new development activity and to provide new park and recreational facilities. These funds are collected by the City, however, use of funds are approved by the Sunrise Recreation and Park District, and must for acquisition and/or improvement construction costs for park and recreational facilities. Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account Funds (SB-1) Funds derived from the 2017 Gas Tax increase that will be collected and distributed to agencies in conjunction with the SB-1 Transportation Bill. These funds are flexible and can be used for maintenance, capital or a combination of both and can also be leveraged to secure additional federal and/or state grants. Roadway Impact Fee Fund Impact Funds imposed on new or proposed development projects to pay for portions of costs of providing public services to the new development. SACOG Bicycle/Pedestrian Program (SACOG Bike/Ped Grant) The Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program focuses on projects that support active transportation efforts in the region. This program is intended to support the efforts of local agencies to construct infrastructure with walking, bicycling, and transit use as primary transportation considerations, and to provide facilities for walking and biking within and between the communities of the Sacramento region. For 2018, bike/ped funding and regional/local funding are being combined into one funding program - Merged Regional Program. Call for apps in May, apps due in July. Recommended funding selection will be in November. 59 P a g e

74 Description of Major Funding Sources (cont.) State CalHome Manufactured Housing Funds The CalHome Program is funded by the State through Proposition 1C, the Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of This program is administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. These CalHome funds are part of a set-aside for manufactured housing repair and replacement. Storm Water Utility Funds Funds collected by Sacramento County through an assessment district that covers the City of Citrus Heights. The funds collected provide for maintenance and capital improvements on the City s drainage and storm water system including creeks, streams and roadside ditches. Sustainable Communities Grant This grant program is funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA, Section 5304) and also the State Highway Account. Distribution of these funds by Caltrans has been authorized by the FTA. The Sustainable Communities Grants fund transportation planning projects that achieve the Caltrans Mission and Grant Program Overarching Objectives, identify and address mobility deficiencies in the multimodal transportation system, encourage stakeholder collaboration, involve active public engagement and ultimately result in programmed system improvements. TBD Funding source to be determined. Transit Enhancements (5307) This funding source is provided by the Federal Transit Administration and is administered to the City through Sac RT is an Urbanized Area Formula Funding Program that makes federal resources available to urbanized areas for transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas as well as for transportation planning. The City submits capital projects containing transit elements, including but not limited to transit infrastructure, including pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks and bus shelters, to SacRT for consideration. If SACRT approves and funding is available, the City receives up to 50% project reimbursement of eligible project components. Transportation Development Act (TDA) TDA is one of the major funding sources for public transit in California. The TDA provides two funding sources, the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance Fund (STA). The LTF is derived from a ¼ cent of the general statewide sales tax. This ¼ cent sales tax is returned to every county in the State from where the tax was collected. The STA is derived from sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. Fifty percent of the STA funds are allocated according to population, while the other fifty- percent is allocated according to the ratio of the total public transit revenues that were generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. TDA funds may be used for street and road projects provided all reasonable transit needs have been met. 60 P a g e

75 Last revised: 5/17/ Year Capital Improvement Program 2018/ /2023

Capital Improvement Projects

Capital Improvement Projects Capital Improvement Projects This section highlights the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for FY 2017-2018. Capital projects are designed to enhance the City s infrastructure, extend

More information

Public Works and Development Services

Public Works and Development Services City of Commerce Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Policy Public Works and Development Services SOP 101 Version No. 1.0 Effective 05/19/15 Purpose The City of Commerce s (City) Capital Improvement

More information

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP The Capital Investment Program (CIP) is a multi-year program aimed at upgrading and expanding City facilities, buildings, grounds, streets, parks and roads. The

More information

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R C H A P T E R 11 IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION This chapter addresses implementation of the General Plan. The Plan s seven elements include 206 individual actions. 1 Many are already underway or are on-going.

More information

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL Sue Frost, Mayor Jeannie Bruins, Vice Mayor Steve Miller, Council Member Jeff Slowey, Council Member Mel Turner, Council Member CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting of Thursday, August 27,

More information

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year 20172018 AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Agency Name: City of Fremont Date: 12/21/2018 Primary Point of Contact Name: Tish Saini

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...

More information

PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING

PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 4 DIVISIONS: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SEWER & STORM DRAIN ENGINEERING 18 FTE s, 2 Hourly s In FY 14/15 Expended approximately

More information

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Chapter 6: Financial Resources Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation

More information

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation

More information

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting Monte Sereno City Council Chambers 18041 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road, Monte Sereno, CA 95030 MEETING CALLED TO

More information

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CALIFORNIA April 27, 2012 CITY HALL 5 th FLOOR 915 I STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-2684 PH 916-808-5704 FAX 916-808-7618 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sacramento, California

More information

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year 20172018 AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Agency Name: City of Alameda Date: 11/29/2018 Primary Point of Contact Name: Scott Wikstrom

More information

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM The transportation capital program for fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2020 consists of a variety of transportation construction and maintenance capital projects primarily

More information

CIP. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Timm Borden, Director

CIP. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Timm Borden, Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Timm Borden, Director CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE ~ CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3266 (408) 777-3354 ~ FAX (408) 777-3333 CIP 2015-2016 Budget report of the Capital Improvement Program

More information

EXHIBIT A. The Road Maintenance & Traffic Relief Act of 2016 Sacramento County Measure B Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan ( )

EXHIBIT A. The Road Maintenance & Traffic Relief Act of 2016 Sacramento County Measure B Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan ( ) EXHIBIT A The Road Maintenance & Traffic Relief Act of 2016 Sacramento County Measure B Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan (2017-2047) I. Implementation Guidelines A. Revenue Estimates and Distribution.

More information

TABLE 1 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM Measure B Revenues and Expenditures

TABLE 1 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM Measure B Revenues and Expenditures Alameda CTC Programs Annual Compliance Report 00 Reporting Year TABLE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM Measure B Revenues and DATE : Revised /0/ Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column

More information

This page intentionally left blank

This page intentionally left blank 197 This page intentionally left blank 198 Capital Improvement Program PROCEDURE Each year the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is prepared from project requests submitted by the various departments.

More information

TRANSPORTATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TRANSPORTATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sacramento County Department of Transportation (SACDOT) is responsible for improving, operating and maintaining the transportation infrastructure of the Unincorporated Area of the

More information

Draft West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan

Draft West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan Draft West Los Angeles Transportation Improvement and Mitigation Specific Plan City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. Effective Specific Plan Procedures Amended by Ordinance No. Specific Plan Amendment Amended

More information

Funding Source: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant - $315,100; Measure I - $60,500

Funding Source: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant - $315,100; Measure I - $60,500 FY 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program Detail STREETS Raised Median on Pipeline Avenue S14009 Program Year Initiated: FY 2013-14 Construction Year: FY 2016-17 Project Description: Install raised median

More information

City of Clovis Date completed or revised: September 26, 2014

City of Clovis Date completed or revised: September 26, 2014 Date completed or revised: September 26, 2014 Completed by: (print) Renee Mathis The anticipated Fiscal Year 2014-15 revenue allocation for Street Maintenance sub-program: $912,013 X Street Maintenance

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1 Fund # begins with a Fund Type Fund Type Description/Restrictions 1 General The City's principal operating fund, which is supported by taxes and fees and which, generally, has no restrictions on its use.

More information

SACRAMENTO COUNTY MEASURE B TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX EXPENDITURE PLAN ( )

SACRAMENTO COUNTY MEASURE B TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX EXPENDITURE PLAN ( ) THE ROAD MAINTENANCE & TRAFFIC RELIEF ACT OF 2016 NATOMAS ELVERTA ANTELOPE RIO LINDA NORTH HIGHLANDS SACRAMENTO COUNTY MEASURE B TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX EXPENDITURE PLAN (2017-2047) CITRUS HEIGHTS ORANGEVALE

More information

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET CITY OF PLACERVILLE ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2014/2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY Each year the City faces the challenge of meeting infrastructure and equipment needs with limited

More information

Implementation Project Development and Review 255

Implementation Project Development and Review 255 Introduction 248 Implementation Principles 249 Public Agency Fiduciary Responsibilities 250 Project Development and Review Process 252 Project Development and Review 255 Maintenance 23 Implementation Implementation

More information

RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR THE PUBLIC

RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR THE PUBLIC J-17 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017 TO: City Council FROM: Russ Thompson, Public Works Director PRESENTER: Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED

More information

City of Pacifica General Fund Budget

City of Pacifica General Fund Budget City of Pacifica 2017-18 General Fund Budget General Government Lorenzo Hines Jr. City Manager s Office May 2, 2017 City of Pacifica 1 General Government 2017-18 DRAFT Budget Mission We strive to manage

More information

DRAFT C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6

DRAFT C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board April 10, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transportation

More information

An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin

An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin To: Mayor Steve Adler From: Mike Hebert and Linda Bailey Cc: City Council Members April 22, 2016 Summary An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin Recently, the City Council

More information

Memo. To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance. From: Scott Tourville. Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC:

Memo. To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance. From: Scott Tourville. Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC: To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance Memo From: Scott Tourville Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC: C. Schornack S. Spencer File Date: November 21, 2014 RE: Updated 2015 CIP Plan

More information

Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan

Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan 2016 2020 CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA City of Rancho Cordova Council: Mayor:. Robert J. McGarvey Vice Mayor: David Sander Council Member:.. Linda Budge Council Member:.. Dan

More information

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: June 22, 2009 Subiect: ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 09-53, APPROVING THE CITY'S REVISED PROPOSITION

More information

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS Public Works is comprised of several Departments/Divisions that develop, improve, and maintain the County s basic infrastructure needs related to transportation, storm

More information

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works RFP# 10-07 City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works MARKET STREET BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH BETWEEN MICHAEL SUCCI DRIVE AND THE NH PORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sealed

More information

Public Works Maintenance STORMWATER AND

Public Works Maintenance STORMWATER AND Public Works Maintenance STORMWATER AND TRANSPORTATION Mission Statement T H E P U B L I C W O R K S M A I N T E N A N C E D I V I S I O N I S T H E M A I N C U S T O D I A N A N D P R I N C I P A L C

More information

City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program

City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program Current Year Plan (FY 2014) and Five-Year Plan (FY 2015-2019) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I BACKGROUND

More information

Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer. PRESENTER: Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer

Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer. PRESENTER: Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 10, 2018 TO: FROM: City Council Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer PRESENTER: Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer 922

More information

CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET TAB 5

CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET TAB 5 CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET TAB 5 This page intentionally left blank. 2016-2018 CAPITAL BUDGET 5-1 This page intentionally left blank. City of Walnut Creek 2016-2018 Capital Budget Table of Contents Introduction

More information

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting of Tuesday, April 18, 2017 Citrus Heights Community Center 6300 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, CA MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1 Fund # begins with a Fund Type Fund Type Description/Restrictions 1 General The City's principal operating fund, which is supported by taxes and fees and which, generally, has no restrictions on its use.

More information

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards;

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards; DIVISION 4.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SECTION 4.201 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to tie the capital improvement needs identified in the other elements to

More information

Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study. Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study

Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study. Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Background Study Objective Summary of Results Next Steps and Policy Questions Background: Currently, funding availability drives infrastructure investment decisions.

More information

CITY OF ORINDA. Road and Drainage Repairs Plan. (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016

CITY OF ORINDA. Road and Drainage Repairs Plan. (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016 CITY OF ORINDA Road and Drainage Repairs Plan (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016 (ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 17, 2012 AND UPDATED APRIL 22, 2014) CITY OF ORINDA 22 Orinda Way Orinda,

More information

CITY OF ORINDA. Road and Drainage Repairs Plan. (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016

CITY OF ORINDA. Road and Drainage Repairs Plan. (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016 CITY OF ORINDA Road and Drainage Repairs Plan (As Updated in 2016) March 15, 2016 (ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 17, 2012 AND UPDATED APRIL 22, 2014) CITY OF ORINDA 22 Orinda Way Orinda,

More information

City of Des Moines. Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program. November 29, 2016

City of Des Moines. Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program. November 29, 2016 City of Des Moines Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program November 29, 2016 Goals of Citizen Engagement Goal Focus on service levels Department definitions of adequate service and opportunities

More information

City of SANTA ANA. Proposed Budget Summary FY

City of SANTA ANA. Proposed Budget Summary FY City of SANTA ANA Proposed Budget Summary FY 2015-2016 June 2, 2015 City Manager s Budget Message will be made available on May 29 th, 2015. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Total Annual Budget FY 2015-2016

More information

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates.

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates. , Segments 2-4 Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates Table of Contents 6.1 Details of Facilities... 17 6.2 Pre-Development and Facility Feasibility... 1 6.2.1 Planning... 1 6.2.2 Environmental Mitigation...

More information

Infrastructure Asset Management. Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007

Infrastructure Asset Management. Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007 Infrastructure Asset Management Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007 Chula Vista s Municipal Infrastructure Pavement* Traffic Signals Alleys Streetlights Parking Lots Street Signs Sidewalks*

More information

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway

More information

Region 5 Upcoming Projects for Summer/Fall 2018

Region 5 Upcoming Projects for Summer/Fall 2018 Region 5 Upcoming Projects for Summer/Fall 2018 The budget amount provided does not reflect the construction costs for projects. The amounts may include ROW, engineering, design, and utility costs. The

More information

STREETS DEPARTMENT FISCAL YEAR 2018 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 26, 2017

STREETS DEPARTMENT FISCAL YEAR 2018 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 26, 2017 INTRODUCTION STREETS DEPARTMENT FISCAL YEAR 2018 BUDGET TESTIMONY APRIL 26, 2017 Good morning, President Clarke and Members of City Council. I am Carlton Williams, Commissioner of the Streets Department.

More information

TOWN OF JUPITER Community Redevelopment Agency

TOWN OF JUPITER Community Redevelopment Agency TOWN OF JUPITER Community Redevelopment Agency DATE: September 14, 2012 TO: THRU: FROM: Honorable Chair and Commissioners of the Community Redevelopment Agency Andrew D. Lukasik, Executive Director Brenda

More information

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally

More information

FISCAL YEAR RECOMMENDED BUDGET

FISCAL YEAR RECOMMENDED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 RECOMMENDED BUDGET JUNE 6, 2017 AGENDA City Manager s Budget Status FY 2017-18 General Fund Recommended Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended Non-General Fund Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended

More information

Capital Improvement Program Fund

Capital Improvement Program Fund Capital Improvement Program Fund The Capital Improvement Program Fund provides funding for streets, public buildings (both governmental and school facilities), land, and other capital assets. Capital Improvement

More information

CITY OF POMONA. Financial Update Community Meetings

CITY OF POMONA. Financial Update Community Meetings CITY OF POMONA Financial Update Community Meetings TONIGHTS PRESENTATION 1 Historical Outlook 2 2019 Operating Budget 3 UFI Recommendations 4 CIP Budget Millions POMONA S HISTORICAL OUTLOOK $110 General

More information

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability FY 2018-19 Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability City Council Briefing August 15, 2018 Majed Al-Ghafry, Assistant City Manager Overview FY 2018-19 Budget by Strategic Priority

More information

Attachment 3, Page 1

Attachment 3, Page 1 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROGRAM (Estimated Direct Costs) BUDGET OUTLOOK FOR SOSLA REPORT (As of February 2014) Planning Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year

More information

Capital Improvement Program. Fiscal Years

Capital Improvement Program. Fiscal Years Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2014-2021 1 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2014-2021 Agenda Background Significant Accomplishments (2012-2014) Proposed Work Plan (2014-2016) and 7- Year

More information

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION PROJECT PACKAGES

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION PROJECT PACKAGES INTRODUCTION The Implementation Plan is intended to provide the City of Berkeley a framework to define the future steps for the West Berkeley Circulation Master Plan (WBCMP). Since the objective of the

More information

Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW

Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW MEMORANDUM v TO: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer o FROM: Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 9522271100 Fax

More information

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled BOARD POLICY NO. 031 TransNet ORDINANCE AND EXPENDITURE PLAN RULES The following rules have been adopted and amended by the SANDAG Board of Directors in its role as the San Diego County Regional Transportation

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1 Fund # begins with a Fund Type Fund Type Description/Restrictions 1 General The City's principal operating fund that is supported by taxes and fees and which, generally, has no restrictions on its use.

More information

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year 217218 AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Agency Name: City of San Leandro Date: 12/14/218 Primary Point of Contact Name: Norite

More information

PUBLIC WORKS CIP Quarterly Update Year 17~Volume II

PUBLIC WORKS CIP Quarterly Update Year 17~Volume II Capital Improvement Program Quarterly Report July 2017 2 0 1 7 Department of Public Works PUBLIC WORKS CIP Quarterly Update Year 17~Volume II 1 Introduction The Public Works Department s mission is improvement

More information

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the

More information

MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT

MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT E-78 City of Mercer Island 2007-2008 Budget Department: Maintenance The Maintenance Department consists of the following functions: 1) administration, 2) capital projects engineering,

More information

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade. Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding

More information

Appendix B Example Project Designs and Engineers Opinion of Costs

Appendix B Example Project Designs and Engineers Opinion of Costs Appendix B Example Project Designs and Engineers Opinion of Costs 32 nd Street from E. 2 nd to Main Avenue CR 251 and CR 250 9 th Street Sidewalk Improvements 15 th Street Improvements Intermodal Facility

More information

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services Department of Environmental Services Mission: To implement a comprehensive stormwater management program that balances the following goals: 1) to reduce the potential for stormwater threats to public health,

More information

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16 Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority Final Budget Fiscal Year 2015/16 Introduction Message to the Governing Board The Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA)

More information

S h e l b y v i l l e, K Y E A S T E N D S T U D Y L A N I M P L E M E N TAT I O N

S h e l b y v i l l e, K Y E A S T E N D S T U D Y L A N I M P L E M E N TAT I O N S h e l b y v i l l e, K Y 8 P L A N I M P L E M E N TAT I O N Sh e l b y v i l l e, K Y 8 P l a n I m p l e m e n t a t i o n I n t r o d u c t i o n In order to realize the vision and goals established

More information

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018 FY19 Budget - Discussion April 2018 FY19 Proposed Budget: $6.6 Billion General Planning & Programs 3% Identify regional mobility needs and solutions Debt Service 6% Obligations from current and past projects

More information

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY In late October, the Governor signed into law SB 83 (Hancock), which authorizes congestion management agencies (CMAs) to impose an annual vehicle registration fee increase of

More information

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

More information

PUBLIC WORKS CIP SUPPORT

PUBLIC WORKS CIP SUPPORT PUBLIC WORKS Public Works is comprised of several Departments/Divisions that develop, improve, and maintain the County s basic infrastructure needs related to transportation, storm water management, and

More information

City of San Juan Capistrano Age eport

City of San Juan Capistrano Age eport 6/19/2014 C1 City of San Juan Capistrano Age eport TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Karen P. Brust, City a Cindy Russell, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasure~~ Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Assistant Finance

More information

CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CAPITAL PROGRAMS FUND CITY OF GOLDEN CAPITAL PROGRAMS FUND 11/2/2017 TEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 20172026 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL 2014 ACTUAL 2015

More information

Our Mission: To provide critical transportation infrastructure to enhance the community s long-term economic and environmental sustainability.

Our Mission: To provide critical transportation infrastructure to enhance the community s long-term economic and environmental sustainability. Department of Environmental Services Our Mission: To provide critical transportation infrastructure to enhance the community s long-term economic and environmental sustainability. Transportation Capital

More information

MORVA COUNTY SERVICE AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW FINAL

MORVA COUNTY SERVICE AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW FINAL MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW FINAL November 29, 2012 Prepared for the Local Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County by Baracco and Associates, Policy Consulting Associates, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 TABLE

More information

OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: May 14, 2018 To: The Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From:

More information

Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper

Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper Pierce County Public Works- Office of the County Engineer Division Introduction This paper will document the process used by the

More information

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year 2016-2017 AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Agency Name: City of Albany Date: 12/18/2017 Primary Point of Contact Name: Aleida Andrino-Chavez

More information

Residential Street Improvement Plan

Residential Street Improvement Plan Residential Street Improvement Plan Introduction Aging infrastructure, including streets, is a nationwide problem and it is one of the biggest challenges facing many cities and counties throughout the

More information

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY 11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program

More information

Transportation Funding

Transportation Funding Transportation Funding TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Background... 3 Current Transportation Funding... 4 Funding Sources... 4 Expenditures... 5 Case Studies... 6 Washington, D.C... 6 Chicago... 8

More information

CITY OF BRENTWOOD DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM 2015

CITY OF BRENTWOOD DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM 2015 CITY OF BRENTWOOD DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction. 1 Program Overview. 1 Fee Summary 2 Land Use Categories and Growth Projections. 3 Administration 5 Community Facilities

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES... 3 B. SUMMARY... 17 LIST OF TABLES Table IX 1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14-2017/18... 11 Table

More information

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET CITY OF PLACERVILLE ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2012/2013 1 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY Each year the City faces the challenge of meeting infrastructure and equipment needs with

More information

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent. Sec. 11-700 Transportation management special use permits. 11-701 Purpose and intent. There are certain uses of land which, by their location, nature, size and/or density, or by the accessory uses permitted

More information

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND

TIGER IV. Benefit Cost Analysis. Minot International Airport Access Road. Minot, ND Appendix A TIGER IV Benefit Cost Analysis Minot International Airport Access Road Minot, ND Table of Contents Summary and Findings... 3 Net Economic Impacts to North Dakota... 4 Project Matrix... Error!

More information

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee Memorandum Date: 03.16.10 RE: Plans and Programs Committee March 23, 2010 To: From: Through: Subject: Plans and Programs Committee: Commissioners Campos (Chair), Chu (Vice Chair), Chiu, Avalos, Dufty and

More information

Report Accompanying the Diamond Lake Urban Renewal Plan

Report Accompanying the Diamond Lake Urban Renewal Plan Report Accompanying the Diamond Lake Urban Renewal Plan Adopted by the City of Roseburg July 9, 2018 Ordinance No. 3502 Diamond Lake Urban Renewal Area Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Elaine

More information

Capital Improvement Project Profile Fiscal Year

Capital Improvement Project Profile Fiscal Year Capital Improvement Projects Transportation Fund Funding Sources: Measure I TDA Federal-State-County Grants Transportation DIF Transportation Fund 237 Pine Avenue Connection Project ST061 - G7016 - C7011-8745

More information

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1 Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation

More information

Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission. Street Repair Policy Update and Permeable Paver Trial Project

Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission. Street Repair Policy Update and Permeable Paver Trial Project Public Works Commission ACTION CALENDAR July 14, 2009 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Public Works Commission Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission

More information

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N Alameda CTC Programs Annual Compliance Report 20112012 Reporting Year Table 1: Measure B Revenues and BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN AGENCY NAME : City of Albany 12/19/2012 Column A Column B Column C Column D

More information

CITY OFANAHEIM. Community Services Department. FY 2017/18Proposed Budget. June 6, Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program

CITY OFANAHEIM. Community Services Department. FY 2017/18Proposed Budget. June 6, Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program CITY OFANAHEIM FY 2017/18Proposed Budget Community Services Department June 6, 2017 Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program Overview Core Services Proposed Budget Summary Personnel Notable Changes

More information

DRAFT PROPOSED BUDGET THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (Part 2) City of Chico May 2, 2017

DRAFT PROPOSED BUDGET THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (Part 2) City of Chico May 2, 2017 DRAFT PROPOSED BUDGET 2017 18 THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (Part 2) City of Chico May 2, 2017 DRAFT PROPOSED BUDGET 2017 18 SCHEDULE May 2 nd Round #2 Community Development Public Works May 16 th Questions

More information