Fire Department Deployment Analysis and Performance Audit Assessment

Transcription

1 Fire Department Deployment Analysis and Performance Audit Assessment Santa Barbara County Fire Department Presented on February 14, 2012 Citygate Associates, LLC

2 Project Deliverables Comprehensive review of the deployment system Review of headquarters programs necessary to support the field functions Costs of current or modified operations 2

3 Policy Choices Framework No mandatory federal or state minimum fire service levels If fire services are provided, they have to be delivered safely, following standards 3

4 Policy Choices Framework Communities have the level of fire services that they need and can afford The challenge is matching need with fiscal capacity 4

5 Deployment Review Components Existing deployment Risks and expectations Measure fire unit travel times Response statistics Gap analysis 5

6 Incident Types In FY the Department responded to: 11,467 incidents Averaging 31 incidents per day 65% of incident responses were to EMS 3.88% to fires of all types 46 building fires or 3.8/month 6

7

8 Response Time Countywide Department-wide Measure Crew Dispatch to Arrival 90% Minute Goal or Actual <= 06:00 Measure Source SBCFD Policy of 5 minutes + 1- minute dispatch Actual Performance 63.4% Crew Dispatch to Arrival <= 07:00 Citygate Suburban Recommendation 77.2% Actual Dispatch to Arrival 09:51 SBCFD Countywide Compliance 90.0% 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 Deployment Recommendations Stations well located in population clusters Adopt response time measures tied to population densities As funds permit, increase staffing per unit 12

13 Headquarters Services Current staffing is down FTEs However, supervision, training and safety oversight is critical in fire services Some of the reductions are not sustainable for much longer At least 3 positions in Safety & Standards, Info Technology and Finance need to be funded 13

14 Cost of Fire Services The Fire District has a structural deficit that will grow as costs increase The pre-proposition 13 tax rates will not support the current or desired level of fire services 14

15 Cost of Fire Services (cont.) The needs over time are: Immediate: $1.8 million in FY , increasing to an average of $4 million per year over the next three years just to maintain current services Near Term: $12.1 million per year to implement the operational and support recommendations Longer Term: $6 million per year in cumulative annual debt to implement the CIP program 15

16 Revenue Options An Oil Production Tax would generate $1.8 to $3.0 million annually Increasing the property tax allocation to the Fire District, providing an additional $2.5 million per year for each 1 percent of increase above the present percent 16

17 Revenue Options (cont.) A dedicated fire parcel tax might generate between $1.5 and $2.5 million, dependent upon the tax rate used No one revenue measure can meet all the needs Priority choices regarding revenue sources and fire service levels have to be made 17

18 Next Steps & Report Choices Receive the policy recommendations and adopt revised Fire Department performance measures Provide the funds necessary to retain the current level of service or make reductions to eliminate the structural deficit Identify funding to add back critical command, training, and safety headquarters positions Determine how to provide funding to restore and enhance services to the most populated areas 18

19 Discussion and Questions 19

20 Field Deployment Strategy Deployment is about the speed and weight of the attack Speed is delivered with neighborhood based units Weight is the massing of multiple units quickly enough to provide enough firefighters to stop the escalation of the emergency 20

21 Multiple-Unit Response Multiple units are needed to deliver enough firefighters in a reasonable time to serious emergencies to simultaneously and effectively perform the tasks needed for the outcome 15 firefighters minimum are needed within an 11-minute total response time for positive urban outcome expectations This is known as concentration of companies 21